Slashdot Mirror


Nerd Vacation to the Earth Simulator

eecue writes "Earlier this year I went on vacation to japan. At the end of my trip I was lucky enough to receive a tour of the Earth Simulator, which is the world's fastest super computer. I took pictures and wrote about it."

131 of 199 comments (clear)

  1. Hmm by protest_boy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if we can slashdot the worlds fastest supercomputer? ;-)

    1. Re:Hmm by ender81b · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well that would, of course, depend on how much bandwith is running to said server now wouldn't it? =)

      Found some nice info (good old google) on said Supercomputer though since the sites linked article didn't have much.

      A Time Article on The Earth Simulator

      Top 500 page on Earth Simulator

      NEC page on the Earth Simulator

      Google Translated Powerpoint presentation on the Earth Simulator

      A snippet(s) of info:
      "Based on the NEC SX architecture, 640 nodes, each node with 8 vector processors (8 Gflop/s peak per processor), 2 ns cycle time, 16GB shared memory. Total of 5120 total processors, 40 TFlop/s peak, and 10 TB memory. "

      "Earth Simulator's processors are one-chip LSIs fabricated with 0.15 micron CMOS process and copper wiring. Highly optimized software and high-speed networks that pump massive amounts of data through 7.8TB/s bandwidth connecting the 640 processing nodes are key to the amazing efficiency of Earth Simulator."

    2. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      world's fastest supercomputer or world's fastest public supercomputer? heh. better ask the LLNL/NSA boys about that one...

    3. Re:Hmm by Dave9876 · · Score: 1

      Even though that 7.8TB/s is the bandwidth within the supercomputer, I'd love to see someone just *try* to slashdot that.

    4. Re:Hmm by jackb_guppy · · Score: 1

      So fast was it going?

      Doing 60 in a school zone?

      We need a new term. "Fast" is a great word to describe a P5 100 vs P5 233 same type of processor and count. "Fast" is meaningless to describe 2048 x P4 2.3G vs 16 x PowerPC4 dual core 1.3G machines.

      Multiple processors DO NOT MAKE any giving thread to run faster. It only makes multiple threads run at the same time.

    5. Re:Hmm by GothicManSlut · · Score: 1

      Or even better, could it simulate the slashdot effect ?

    6. Re:Hmm by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Wow can you imagine a Beowulf cluster of...ah nevermind.

      =)

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    7. Re:Hmm by bob_jordan · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wonder if the simulator was accurate enough for them to know he was coming.

      Bob.

    8. Re:Hmm by jo42 · · Score: 1
      > I took pictures

      1) Learn to use a digital camera.
      2) by turning off the flash,
      3) and holding it steady.

      As a flocktographer, you create vacuum.

  2. Reliability of its predictions by hak+hak · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder how far in advance things like, say, the climate can be predicted, even by such a powerful computer. It's almost impossible to predict the weather for even a small area (I live in the Netherlands) for more than the coming few days to a week, because it's so sensitive to small errors. (That doesn't mean I'm not impressed by the thing, of course.)

    1. Re:Reliability of its predictions by BenjyD · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dutch weather unpredictable? I suppose there is such a huge range; everything from rain to torrential downpour.

    2. Re:Reliability of its predictions by Turbyne · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I don't know if climate prediction was its main task, but anyway:
      1. Read up on the Lorenz equations.
      2. Spend a week or 2 in Boston and see how random weather can really get.
      --
      ~A'Ëq'i4d)^'$ÊSÈòB
    3. Re:Reliability of its predictions by protest_boy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Imagine if the weather was able to be predicted even 10 days in advance with near 100% accuracy. An accurate and reliable forcast would GREATLY effect everything from cargo transport, to disaster preparedness, to "will I have to scrape my windshield in the morning." I can't even begin to fathom how much money would be saved. Too much for my puny brain to comprehend.

    4. Re:Reliability of its predictions by hak+hak · · Score: 1

      Actually, I haven't seen a single cloud in five days! (which indeed surprises me, too)

    5. Re:Reliability of its predictions by protest_boy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Boston?! Heh, try Colorado. Today it was sunny and snowing in Fort Collins. Let's see this supercomputer predict that!

    6. Re:Reliability of its predictions by Rhys · · Score: 1

      Perdicting the weather of a small or large area makes no difference. Weather simulation accuracy improves as the side of the grid you use decreases. It doesn't matter if you're predicting for the entire USA or just one state, if you don't get detailed enough you're off period.

      --
      Slashdot Patriotism: We Support our Dupes!
    7. Re:Reliability of its predictions by Inda · · Score: 2, Funny

      You Yanks no nothing. Trying living on an island with the Atlantic one side, the North Sea the other and France below. You'll understand changable weather then.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    8. Re:Reliability of its predictions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When your super-accurate weather prediction system would predict that next week there would be lots of snow and very difficult traffic, then so many people would decide to go to the mountains and spend next week snowboarding and skiing that this sudden and unpredicted traffic would in turn influence the weather and the prediction :-)

    9. Re:Reliability of its predictions by Buck2 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You Yanks no nothing. ...

      We know something about our language. :)

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
    10. Re:Reliability of its predictions by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

      Isn't there something in chaos theory about snychronicity between dynamical systems - it may be the case that they can get an earth simulator to run in close sync with the real thing with enough real time inputs and then be able to 'fast forward' in time enough to do some useful predictions, altho, of course, without the synchronizing inputs the simulated future and the real one will diverge to varying degrees, depending on the state of the earth modeling art...

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    11. Re:Reliability of its predictions by cap'n+foolsy · · Score: 1

      i thought all you guys got was fog and rain. what gives?

      --
      It might look like I'm standing motionless, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away
    12. Re:Reliability of its predictions by NevermindPhreak · · Score: 1

      youre all a bunch of wussies... try living in the only state surrounded by great-fucking-lakes, the birthplace of the motto "if you dont like the weather in michigan, wait 5 minutes"... id say an island would be worse, but an island doesnt get the crazy effects of winds from your southern part that touches other land...

    13. Re:Reliability of its predictions by Teun · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Huh?

      What about that peninsula between the Atlantic on one and the Pacific on another side plus Canada on its shore and Mexico connecting it to mainland?

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    14. Re:Reliability of its predictions by mlh1996 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      You know, not to knock Michigan weather, 'cause I know those lakes can do some wierd stuff, but I have lived in a lot of places, all over the world, and in every one of them, the locals say, "If you don't like the weather, wait five minutes!" like it's original.

      All right, every place but San Diego.

      --
      Lack of creativity is no excuse for not having a .sig
    15. Re:Reliability of its predictions by lazira · · Score: 1

      I remember a quote along the lines that if you covered the entire earth with a grid of sensors 1m apart and had a computer powerful enough to analyze them, you would only be able to predict the weather about a month or two ahead. The tiny inaccuracies and air currents between those sensors would eventually build up to large variations in weather (the butterfly effect).

      So this supercomputer can't actually predict everything about the weather. What it *can* predict are very isolated problems, such as ocean temperature and currents, which change very little over time.

    16. Re:Reliability of its predictions by oPless · · Score: 1

      It's not your language, ENGLISH is "owned" by the ENGLISH.

      YOUR language is full of misspellings already. :-)

    17. Re:Reliability of its predictions by sketerpot · · Score: 1
      Try southwestern Nebraska in the summer. It stands out as a contrast to livelier places where I would much rather be. If you don't like the weather, wait a few months.

      Try any continental place that is in a big rain shadow, and the weather will be less exciting than great big lakes.

      That said, I seem to remember that the earth simulator is not just another weather prediction computer, but is for other large scale (but more manageable) things.

    18. Re:Reliability of its predictions by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      so you're gonna have to build a bigger computer to figure out what 6 billion people are going to do as a result of knowing what tomorrow's weather is going to be like, and send that to....

      ANOTHER computer that then adjusts for the heat of all those bodies and car engines, etc. send this info to the first computer and repeat. oh, and i guess throw in an output function at some point :)

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    19. Re:Reliability of its predictions by Wobin · · Score: 1

      /me thinks you ought to get out more often.

    20. Re:Reliability of its predictions by NevermindPhreak · · Score: 1

      aww, i thought this was unique to michigan... ah, well... thanks for the heads-up...

    21. Re:Reliability of its predictions by eecue · · Score: 1

      at the tour she said they had predicted the weather for the next 100 years. I asked so when do the polar ice caps melt to which she replied we have not verified to data is accurate yet.

      --
      -- sigs suck --
    22. Re:Reliability of its predictions by andrewski · · Score: 1

      I wonder, do Brits and Aussies and Kiwis have any difficulty understanding Americans' English? Excepting people from The South, Texas, California, and The East, of course, to account for their horrid dialects.

      Seriously, guys, it's cute and everything - but we're trying to have a society here. Come to the Midwest or the Northwest and learn some proper English.

      Yee-haw.

    23. Re:Reliability of its predictions by Turbyne · · Score: 1

      Funny, I used to live there. The thing w/ CO is that there's a regular schedule. It's sunny in the morning, partly cloudy by noon, and rains/snows at night. Maintaining a garden was wickid easy, just plant it and hope the hailstorms don't kill it. In Boston the weather's all over the place, and it shifts constantly, and it's not on a schedule like Ft. Collins, cuz there ain't no foothills (esp ones tatooed w/ a big A) heah!

      --
      ~A'Ëq'i4d)^'$ÊSÈòB
    24. Re:Reliability of its predictions by atomicdragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They say physicists can predict the universe 5 billion years from now better than meteorologists can predict the weather five days from now.

    25. Re:Reliability of its predictions by mlh1996 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I grew up in Ogallala.

      --
      Lack of creativity is no excuse for not having a .sig
  3. How Stupid!!!! by brett720 · · Score: 5, Funny

    If they are going to simulate the earth...then of course as part of the earth, they will have to simulate the EARTH SIMULATOR(1)...which will have to simulate the EARTH SIMULATOR(2) simulating the EARTH SIMULATOR(1) which will have to simulate the EARTH SIMULATOR(3) simulating the EARTH SIMULATOR(2) simulating the EARTH SIMULATOR(1)..etc.etc.etc...and of course that must go on indefinitely! Dont they have better things to spend millions of dollars of processing power on?

    1. Re:How Stupid!!!! by Genrou · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not only that - it is completelly unnecessary. We all know that, at the end of processing, result will be 42.

    2. Re:How Stupid!!!! by ignorant_newbie · · Score: 2, Informative

      blasphemer! have you even read the sacred text which you so blithly profane?

      they already knew the answer before they built the earth. Earth's job was to calculate the question. ofc, since the golgafrinchins (sic?) showed up early in the process, we've completly screwed up the calculation.

    3. Re:How Stupid!!!! by Buck2 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I can only imagine that your comment is serious.

      In defense of the creators of Slashdot, I have to say that I was an Anonymous Coward for about a year before I took a "real" ID. At the time, there were many reasons to be paranoid about signing up for _anything_, let alone some random, marginally interesting website.

      http and related protocols were being hashed out with reverse searches, fingerings of those that were using them, etc. It was not a "clean" transition at the time. (And it's still not. *grumble* *grumble*)

      One of the nicer things about Slashdot is that they have defended some core interests from back when "the web" was new, no matter how ridiculous they might seem with modern tech.

      It's a good thing. Slashdot and all involved have fought hard. So an AC is an imbecile every once in a while. Fuck 'em.

      Everyone who cares will stay. The bad AC(s) will leave. Maybe someone will take their place, maybe not. It's not that important.

      Providing the random expert a chance to contribute is well worth it.

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
    4. Re:How Stupid!!!! by brett720 · · Score: 1

      Point taken, but even as Anonymous Coward, http and related protocols can technically be "hashed" and such. And if one is paranoid about singing up for something like a message board, they should not post in the first place. But I do agree with your comment about the moron ACs that make bad posts leaving.

    5. Re:How Stupid!!!! by Buck2 · · Score: 1

      It is very wonderful to have such a rapid response!

      You are missing the huge, major, large, heavy bit of 'net culture I am trying to impart to you about what it was like when Slashdot was new, though. I think.

      At the time, AC's were encouraged, because _everyone_ was reticent about divulging any information at all.

      But, maybe, I don't understand what you are trying to say ...

      For example, a conversation like this would not have been moderated down (to throw a bone into the fire).

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
    6. Re:How Stupid!!!! by aegilops · · Score: 1

      Sort of. I know the guy was under pressure taking the photos (e.g. no grovelling around in the back of the cabinets, rooting around under the raised server room floors etc) but it didn't look like the server cluster was approximating 1km in size, which after all was the granularity of the model.

      However no doubt these fellas would be pumping out a bit of heat, so that could be factored into that cubic kilometre in the model.

      Aegilops

    7. Re:How Stupid!!!! by Asprin · · Score: 1


      Yeah, but now that they've got the simulator running, there is no need to **actually** **build** the hardware machine. ;)

      --
      "Lawyers are for sucks."
      - Doug McKenzie
    8. Re:How Stupid!!!! by qute · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No. This is a common mistake. The supercomputer in HHGTTG calculates 42. The earth's job was to find the question. Something along the line of:
      "What do you get if you multiply 9 by 6 and"
      (Then they ran of of scrabble pieces :-)

      --
      -- Make software not war
    9. Re:How Stupid!!!! by Jodka · · Score: 1

      Somebody has been reading too much "Godel, Escher, Bach".

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature.
  4. Sounds like they may be overworked.. by Molt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The article mentions that "They were afraid to mention on their website that they offered tours as there were only 3 english speaking employees of the lab". Now this hits Slashdot. Guess they may as well mention it on their site now, since it's already now known in the world of the rabid technophile.

    --
    404 Not Found: No such file or resource as '.sig'
  5. I just rooted it. by Stonent1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now I changed the password to the final 84 digits of pi. See ya suckers!

    1. Re:I just rooted it. by aegilops · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hmmm. "Final" digits of pi, eh? Hey, the comment was a reasonably funny idea, and the flamebait mod is a bit harsh, but have a think about it for a second.

      I read in Q Magazine (music mag from the UK) a column by Blur's bassist in which he wrote that he was doing some thinking about the value of pi, which as we know is an infinite decimal. No, not in the style of "one ninth" which is, also, an infinite decimal (0.1111... recurring), but rather, an infinite, random sequence of digits, that occurs in a precise order.

      Now think about that for a second. He pointed out that if you were to take the number 6 and repeat it a million times, and then string together the phone numbers of everyone in your nation's capital city, then that sequence of digits WILL occur somewhere within pi. In fact, it will occur an infinite number of times, but let's not labour the point.

      Taking his original concept, it occurred to me that you could use a system whereby a sender and receiver both have a whizz-bang algorithm for calculating pi. Now, no doubt the maths graduates in Slashdot will chime in with how this can be done, but let's imagine that both you and I have some method of reliably generating a sequence from pi (e.g. start at the millionth digit within pi's sequence, and then crank out the next 100,000 values).

      So imagine, say, if you were to take some digital media, e.g. the entire source code for Windows, and zip it up into a single archive. The sequence of values that represent the archive would also occur somewhere within the sequence of pi. Now assuming (ah! a big ask) I can FIND that sequence somewhere in there (may take a while...) I can effectively represent ANY binary stream by simply knowing where to start within pi's sequence, and for how many digits (known beforehand by having access to the original file). This way, the binary stream can be "stored" simply by reference to its starting digit, and its length.

      This is a pretty mad concept when you think about it. Data transmissions for previously analysed, static data would become immediate (only two numbers to send) although the burden of using this technique naturally falls on the originator host to find the sequence within pi, and for the recipient to have a method of regenerating those digits. Hopefully, it would be easier to regenerate the sequence for the recipient. So a central computer with access to the media and a staggering quantity of poke (hey! The Earth Simulator!) can scan through the sequence of pi to find the starting point, but once that job is done, the recipients may not have to trawl through all of pi in order to regenerate the sequence (assuming you have an algorith that can start at an arbitrary location within the digit sequence ... although this may not turn out to be the case. I don't know what algorithms people use to calculate pi to these levels of accuracy).

      All digital media could be stored by those two values, irrespective of size. No DRM concerns for accessing digital media (hey, it's just two parameters to the pi algorithm, and I'd be fairly confident on the 'prior art' argument against patents prohibiting this if they tried to patent any restrictions). No media degredation in storage (e.g. CD-Rs not being readable after a few years). Who would need terabytes of storage, when a terabyte could be represented by two numbers? Unless, of couse, the starting point itself is so far into the sequence of pi that it takes MORE space to store the starting point than the size of the binary stream itself.

      Anyway this comment is always going to languish in the -1 off-topic silt at the bottom of the Slashdot pond, but this occurred to me not so long ago and so I fancied sharing.

      We apologise for this break in transmission, normal service will now be resumed.

      Aegilops

    2. Re:I just rooted it. by Spider[DAC] · · Score: 1

      Well, except that theese occurences may well be at an indefinite length into pi, so both finding it, and transmitting it, may well be far -LARGER- a number than the whole representation of the data. in fact its a big chance that it will be. (a limited length contra infinity will always be larger chance towards infinity than towards the limited length)

      --
      I didn't do this, now did I?
    3. Re:I just rooted it. by QuMa · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just because the n-ary representation of pi is infinite does not mean that all sequences will occur in it, and this has in fact not yet been proven.

    4. Re:I just rooted it. by oqti · · Score: 1

      *Which* last 84 digits you mean, my friend?

      Reply here using the secret ninnik speak, and we will rule the world together!

      --

      magic is obscurity
    5. Re:I just rooted it. by Foogle · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, the final 84 digits of Pi use you to root supercomputer.

    6. Re:I just rooted it. by Shade,+The · · Score: 1

      But Pi is irrational, so is not a repeating pattern. Ergo, all possible sequences will occur, since there are an infinite series of digits to Pi, and can't be represented as a finite function. If you think about it, you'll see that it's self-evident.

    7. Re:I just rooted it. by Usquebaugh · · Score: 1

      Nice rebuff :-)

      Sort of like when I decided that every value is made up of two smaller prime values. Do you realise just how common primes are? :-)

    8. Re:I just rooted it. by Shade,+The · · Score: 1

      Point taken. I stand corrected, well, unless some mathematician manages to prove the total randomness of Pi. It seems to be random; considering the statistical analysis here. But I can't find a proof around at the moment.

      Interestingly here's a Pi Search page I've found, so you can try out this guy's method of compression. And how did we get so off-topic again? :)

    9. Re:I just rooted it. by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      Well my point was ... Back in the 90's I remember hearing about Cray saying that they had just made history by finding like the 10 billionth number in pi or something like that. So I figured that if you had root access to the worlds fastest super computer, other then converting your entire music collection to ogg and Divx converting your DVDs what else would you do? Pi!

      Try it, Doctor it's as easy as Pi! -- The Master

      Easy as pie?! Easy as pie?! Oh! Easy as Pi!

      Easy as pi

    10. Re:I just rooted it. by QuMa · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nonsense. Think of a number that's looks like the binary expansion of Pi (ie just 1's and 0's), but in base 10.This'd be non repeating, irrational, not representable as a finite function (for suitable definitions of 'a finite function), and yet I can assure you you won't find the sequence 123456 in it.

    11. Re:I just rooted it. by Phrogz · · Score: 1

      While theoretically correct, your problem is that it's probably going to be REALLY far into Pi before you find the right string.

      Even if you can generate that string instantly, and look it up instantly, you still have to indicate where that position is. I'm not a math major, but TANSTAAFL tells me that it's quite likely that the amount of storage space you would need simply to represent the location in Pi and the offset would end up being larger than the data itself (on average).

      Let's take a stacked example. Say you were looking to convey the data "020873". You need to say "start at location 286178, and then 6 more chars" and (even if you somehow found a way to transmit only as much information as you need, perhaps with some implicit stop char delimiting them) you have now been forced to transmit 7 characters to represent 6.

    12. Re:I just rooted it. by oqti · · Score: 1

      My reply was meant to be a joke :)

      ... but noone moderated it as funny.

      --

      magic is obscurity
    13. Re:I just rooted it. by at_18 · · Score: 1

      Unless, of couse, the starting point itself is so far into the sequence of pi that it takes MORE space to store the starting point than the size of the binary stream itself

      This is exactly the problem: the number of digits required to state the starting point would be on average of the same length as the string of digit you are interested in.

      I once day-dreamed of the "perfect" compression algorithm, based exactly on the same idea. Downloaded from somewhere the first 50 million digits of PI. And, twenty minutes later, my example program was not compressing anything...

    14. Re:I just rooted it. by lingqi · · Score: 1
      This way, the binary stream can be "stored" simply by reference to its starting digit, and its length.

      ahh my boy (or girl) you have grasped one aspect of infinity but not the other.

      Let's even assume that it is indeed possible to find sequences in Pi that will be everything you ever dreamed of.

      Now - you are assuming that your sequence is occuring "early" enough so that your index number will be managable. This may simply not be the case. What if your "starting point," as it turns out, is a number that when represented, actually bigger (make that a LOG BIGGER) than your windows source code? Here what I mean is not that the number is big, but the number is LARGE, as in the storage space which it takes. a trillion is a "big" number but only still takes "128-bits." Now imagine a number that takes a trillion bits / digits / whatever to actually "write out" - and that's what your index will likely look like.

      by the way there is an algorithm where you can calculate the digit(s) of Pi without calculating anything that goes before it. In a black-box version it's "int foo (int index)" where index is the digit you want to calculate, and foo will spit out the index-th digit of Pi without calculating any other digits. I think it may even be linear in respect to index (gasp!).

      --

      My life in the land of the rising sun.

  6. Re:How come we've never heard of this? by protest_boy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Looks like it's been #1 since at least June of last year.

    http://www.top500.org/list/2002/06/

  7. Re:How come we've never heard of this? by Turbyne · · Score: 1

    It's just a name for a really powerful computer to be used by scientists to run models of whatever it is they're studying. These things don't get covered in mainstream news. If you want more information on supercomputers, go to http://www.top500.org/ (No, your G4 didn't make it).
    But as for the name "Earth Simulator", that's exactly what it is, a name. Who knows, in Japanese its name could be The Matrix.

    --
    ~A'Ëq'i4d)^'$ÊSÈòB
  8. no, but we can slashdot the poster .. by spd_rcr · · Score: 2, Funny

    muhahaha ..
    wait, who slashdots themselves ?
    what's a little bandwidth cost in the hopes of looking worldly & possibly attracting the attention of a g33k girl =) mmmmm

    --
    - tensions in our lives that are attacking our minds, unite themselves together to make our consciousness blind - op'ivy
  9. Re:How come we've never heard of this? by Selfbain · · Score: 1

    Yes and obviously you'd know more than the people who can design and build the most powerful computer in the world.

    --
    Well, it has never been successfully tested.
  10. True Nerd Vacantions... by Genrou · · Score: 1
    ...would be in Nerdvana.

    Beware of supermodels, though.

  11. Just think! by FyRE666 · · Score: 3, Funny

    So if you are in Japan and you are as nerdy as me, email me and I will give you her contact address.

    For the majority of people here, this would be the first female entry in their email client's contact list!

    Man is she in for a bad time!

    1. Re:Just think! by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 3, Funny

      > ... , this would be the first female entry in their email client's contact list!

      Probably the second -- you forgot Mom's email address ! ;-)

    2. Re:Just think! by oPless · · Score: 1

      Third, right after YOUR MUMs email address.

    3. Re:Just think! by eecue · · Score: 1

      well so far i've only gotten two emails and they both seemed legit so i emailed them the contact. one of them was from nigeria and mentioned needing some assistance with some money in an account or something like that. ya know the usual.

      --
      -- sigs suck --
  12. Name? by arvindn · · Score: 1

    I understand its called earth simulator because it is used for simulations, but does the name also have something to do with The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy? That would be a cool thing. (In H2G2, the earth, which is the most powerful computer in the universe, is supposed to be a simulation run by mice with humans as the guinea pigs.)

  13. Re:Supersomputers for earth simulation are useless by Selfbain · · Score: 1

    Just a thought but if there is a climate change in the works today then it might be inevitable. If that's the case, then the computer might be able to tell you if it's coming or not by being given all the information about the environment for the last few years. It wouldn't be able to tell you if it was going to snow on Saturday but it might be able to tell you if it was eventually going to snow in the Sahara.

    --
    Well, it has never been successfully tested.
  14. It was STILL worth saying by dragontooth · · Score: 1

    Everyone else does it and gets points.

    --
    "Laugh, and the whole world laughs with you. Cry, and they still think its funny." - Mr. Boffo
    1. Re:It was STILL worth saying by Qender · · Score: 1

      Well, I thought it was funny.

    2. Re:It was STILL worth saying by dragontooth · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I appreciate that. Sometimes I can't help getting reminded of the movie "High Fidelity" when I cruise through Slashdot.

      They walked around thinking they were unappreciated scholars and when you get right down to it, they were nerds with singular interests, and because no one had a grasp of musical works as they did that meant that everyone else was wrong. Not only were they wrong but the people needed to know they were wrong and be ridiculed for their unknowingness

      I am a nerd in so much as I work in a "nerd" business but I like to think I have a sense of humour and I definately have other interests, even *oh my God* SPORTS.

      I feel that people get punished for that here sometimes. Down with elitest snobbery I say. I could have been the hot chick next door that won't go out with you now because you called me a troll when I was juts making a stupid joke =)

      --
      "Laugh, and the whole world laughs with you. Cry, and they still think its funny." - Mr. Boffo
    3. Re:It was STILL worth saying by dragontooth · · Score: 1

      That was very funny. I am so not attracted to men that I can't even believe that women sleep with them. You obviously don't have that hang-up.

      --
      "Laugh, and the whole world laughs with you. Cry, and they still think its funny." - Mr. Boffo
  15. Re:How come we've never heard of this? by BJH · · Score: 1

    In Japanese, it's name is... "Earth Simulator"!

    Wasn't that a surprise?

  16. shhhh keep it out of the publ. domain by JOW · · Score: 3, Funny

    Pls. Don't tell anybody that we geeks travel around the world to look at computers,
    If any none nerds find out ! it just confirms the general believe that we are all a group
    Of sad persons with no life

    --
    I just hate bit SPAM, (www.netnoise.com.kh)
    1. Re:shhhh keep it out of the publ. domain by eecue · · Score: 1

      hahah it was the last leg of my journey... i also went all over japan and even met a wonderful woman named ryoko. and yes i have a life... =P .. oh btw this proves that i'm not a geek. hahah ok i lied!

      --
      -- sigs suck --
  17. The problem is grid size. by MyNameIsFred · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've read in various articles that supercomputer weather prediction systems look at around 200,000 points on the earth surface. With the points being a few km apart. When you think about the size of the earth, this is a very fine grid. However, when you think about a specific person, the spacing is hugh. Hence the problem with weather prediction. A few km can mean the difference between a downpour in a city, or completely missing it.

  18. Re:Did ya get any good Asian pussy? by webmaker · · Score: 1

    Mr admin please ban this fool and his small mind!

  19. world simulator? by matt4077 · · Score: 2, Funny

    most people should start with a visit at the LIFE simulator

  20. Yes yes this is all great and good but... by webmaker · · Score: 1

    its totaly worthless due to the fact Microsoft tech support says windblows just isnt compatable... /sigh

  21. Forgot to mention it was demolished last year by MickLinux · · Score: 1

    when they were putting a bypass through. It seems that the Vogons had their orders, and the orders included putting a bypass through right where the Earth Simulator was.

    Rather than fail to complete their orders, they went ahead and demolished the entire thing. This one is a replacement.

    [BTW... in case anyone wondered, the answer is 42].

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  22. Re:Supersomputers for earth simulation are useless by Buck2 · · Score: 1

    F U

    --

    As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
  23. Re:Superomputers for earth simulation are useless. by tengwar · · Score: 1
    It's well known that the climatic and geostatic system of earth is highly chaotic - just think of Lorenz strange attractors and shallow water disturbanches. All high-level chaos theorists agree that the timespan for stable simulation is just 4 weeks - after that everything goes fucked up. So all this long term climate of continental shift simulation is just a scam.
    However the point of strange attractors is that while short-term behaviour is chaotic (short term here would be for intervals of the order of a year), over the long term the behaviour of the system can be described in terms of families of paths in phase space governed by the strange attractors - for instance I can't tell you the temperature for next Christmas day in New York, but I can give limits on what it will be, and how fast it will be changing.

    Now if you know something about what causes the strange attractors - for instance the Gulf Stream - you may be able to model the effect of moving an attractor, and so get useful work done.

    To give another example - airflow over a wing may be turbulent (i.e. chaotic), but it's still possible to model the aerodynamics to the detail that we need to build an aeroplane.

  24. Flash... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    So, you are a nerd, but you don't have the slightest idea of how light reflects on surfaces like plastic and glass?

    Rule of thumb: if flash light falls at a right angle at a glass surface, it will bounce back and you'll have an _ugly_ _bright_ spot in your picture. Use either a circular polarizer filter, don't use flash at all and use better film.

    About the composition, no, there's not much you can do about that technic-wise. Just look at your pictures and learn from your mistakes for the next time.

    Cheers,

    A. "won't open an account" C.

    1. Re:Flash... by eecue · · Score: 1

      better film hahah it's a digital camera you AC. i'd like to see you fit a polarizing filter on a casio exilim. bright spots happen. i'm not trying to take wonderful pictures.

      --
      -- sigs suck --
  25. Earth simulation, supercomputers and chaos theory by arvindn · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Actually, one of the main motivations for work on building computers in the first half of this century was the promise of weather prediction. Those hopes were shattered by the discovery of chaos theory by Edward Lorenz in 1960. The central point of the theory is that natural systems evolve with time in such a way that even a minute error in measurement at some point in time will make the simulated system diverge rapidly from the real system. You may have heard the catchphrase
    A butterfly's wings in Brazil
    Can trigger a Texan tornado

    This is the fundamental obstacle to simulation of natural phenomena. However, while local parameters remain hard or impossible to predict, global parameters are easier to forecast, and computing power helps. This is where supercomputers come in: for example, they help us study the effect of global warming far out into the future.

  26. Slashdot Effect gets real. by pfafrich · · Score: 1

    > She told me that they were afraid to mention on their website that they
    > offered tours as there were only 3 english speaking
    > employees of the lab.

    Just imaging whats going to happen now.
    Thousands of programmers now know that tours
    are avaliable and 1% are going to want tours.

    Looks like they will be hireing an english speeking tour guide.

    --
    There are four sorts of people in the world: fools, lunatics, idiots and morons. - Umberto Eco, Foucaut's pendulum.
    1. Re:Slashdot Effect gets real. by scrod · · Score: 2, Funny
      Looks like they will be hireing an english speeking tour guide.

      Unfortunately they may have to pass you up.
  27. Re:Supersomputers for earth simulation are useless by BJH · · Score: 1

    In case you missed that part when you were skimming James Gleick's book on chaos theory, the whole point of it is that although it's very difficult to predict anything over the short term/on a fine scale, the overall tendency of a chaotic system may present a regular pattern if the data is interpreted in the right way.

    That's why, when plotting a Lorenz strange attractor, you can't predict where the next point will fall - but you can predict the butterfly shape that those points will form.

  28. Ambiguous title... by Mike1024 · · Score: 1

    Nerd Vacation to the Earth Simulator

    At first, I read the title as:

    Nerd 'Vacation to the Earth' Simulator

    when it's actually

    'Nerd Vacation' to the 'Earth Simulator'

    The distinction is important.

    Michael

    --
    "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
  29. Nerd Vacation to Disneyworld Simulator by ShogZilla · · Score: 1

    Nerds have a tough time taking vacations, apparently, hence the need for vacation simulators?

  30. photo quality by Bender_ · · Score: 1

    Nice one, thank you very much.

    But you really should learn how to control the flash and white balance of your camera. Hey, and does the lady have a face ?

  31. Holes in the grid by hughk · · Score: 5, Insightful
    You are quite right and one of the major issues is the holes in the grid, even at 3Km. Satellite based observation dosn't help much as you only 'see' the tops of any clouds and have no way to measure barometric pressure.

    Many ships record information for the meteorlogical services, but the trouble is that only works where there are ships. In some of the meteorologically interesting places such as the poles are often shrouded in clouds and have few weather stations.

    The truth is that many points must be interpolated. Points closest to civilisation are quite good because there are enough measuring stations. This means that short-term weather forecasts are quite good (except in the UK, where they may be right but delayed or advanced by up to a day) but deteriorates over about three days and over a week or so is extremely difficult.

    Forget the calculations, if you don't have data points, you are just speculating.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  32. The Earth Simulator by FrostedWheat · · Score: 2, Funny

    No-one can be told what the Earth Simulator is. You have to see it for yourself.

  33. Cool but... by yobbo · · Score: 1

    ...does it have USB? Fucking *useless* if I can't plug my camera in!

    1. Re:Cool but... by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1

      No, but they are working on a USB simulator for it.

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
  34. Re:so whats the interface ? by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 4, Informative

    As far as the command set goes it's a vector processor. That means it has an instruction set that is completely unlike any standard scalar (Von Neumann) archictecture processor you may be familiar with. The CRAY series of supercomputers were one of the first vector processors around; do a google search for "CRAY Instruction Set Reference Card" and have a look. That will give you some insight on how a vector processor is programmed. Most instructions support 3 operands - 2 source and a destination argument.

    --
    -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
  35. Striking Similarity by Nintendork · · Score: 1
    Those pictures look a lot like my living room floor right now. The pictures don't do it justice though.

    -Lucas

  36. underwater currents by hitchhacker · · Score: 1


    I've read that underwater currents have a huge effect on the earth's weather.
    Anyone know if the Earth Simulator is taking measurements from these currents?

    -metric

  37. In 30 years... by medscaper · · Score: 3, Insightful
    ...will we look back at this and scoff? Well, not scoff, just admire wistfully what we thought was amazingly fast?

    Just curious. It seems that NASA computers that launched Apollo were amazing at the time - the cream of the crop - yet we have far surpassed that computing power, speed, storage in even laptops 30 or 40 years later.

    I can't wait to see my grandkids' pc!

    --
    Any sufficiently well-organized Government is indistinguishable from bullshit.
    1. Re:In 30 years... by cowtamer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Your grandkids' PC will be made out of room temperature superconductors. The "CPU" will be a single chip containing a lattice of 1048576 10 Ghz processors. It will incorporate a quantum co-processor, qubit level hyperthreading, and 1024 Etabytes extratemporal random access storage.

      However, due to the processing power required by Windows Authorized Edition (AE), JRE 25.0, and the GPU cycles required to render clippie in holographic hi-res, it will still take about a second between a menu-click and anything useful happening... (RMSLinux, however, will still run on old 486 SX machines...)

    2. Re:In 30 years... by ShinmaWa · · Score: 4, Funny

      Your grandkids' PC will be made out of room temperature superconductors. The "CPU" will be a single chip containing a lattice of 1048576 10 Ghz processors. It will incorporate a quantum co-processor, qubit level hyperthreading, and 1024 Etabytes extratemporal random access storage.

      Great! Just in time for Duke Nukem Forever!

      --
      The /. Effect: Thousands of users simultaneously accessing a site to not read its content.
    3. Re:In 30 years... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      It will incorporate a quantum co-processor

      But everyone is missing the best part of quantum components...

      Go ahead on overclock a quantum chip all you want, it won't REALLY be fried until you check to see if it is fried, ala ``Schrodinger's Cat"....
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  38. Re:Supercomputers for earth simulation are useless by popsocial · · Score: 1

    Well it is sort of true that supercomputers are useless. This 4 week time span mentioned above is actually from 1960, when it was possible to forecast weather 2 days in advance but a month was thought possible. In 1974 this expectation was dropped to 10 days, and today, it is agreed (see Tennekes among others) that 7 days is the limit for accurate forecasting even as computing power increases without limit. So really, this big toy should take us a little closer to the 7 day forecast actually being right, but not much further.

    --
    This is a stament about sigs that has no proof
  39. Re:Supercomputers for earth simulation are useless by EvanED · · Score: 2, Informative

    There's a big difference between weather forcasting and climate forcasting.

  40. Re:Supersomputers for earth simulation are useless by red_gnom · · Score: 1

    Actually the supercomputer is not a weather simulator at all. The "weather simulator" came from wrong translation from Japanese by some American reporter. In direct translation from Japanese the computer name is "Tsunami Simulator", and tsunami second meaning in Japanese is atomic bomb. So there we are. It is simply an "A Bomb" simulator.

    Please stop spreading the fad on Slashdot.

    Thank you.

  41. glasses by mr100percent · · Score: 1

    Anybody like his glasses in the pic? Reccomend them?

  42. Re:Supersomputers for earth simulation are useless by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

    Can you cite a source for this? I noticed it shows "precipitation" in one of the pictures from his tour. Unless this is some kind of simulation of nuclear fallout, then I don't think you are correct. From what I remember Japan doesn't do nuclear weapons research or posess nuclear weapons. Given what happened after WWII, they probably wouldn't want to have any nuclear weapons in there country anyway.

  43. Finding data in Pi by Shade,+The · · Score: 1

    The digits of Pi, are, in essense a random stream of numbers. The chance of finding a specific single digit at any part in the stream, assuming a base system of 10, and ignoring all other considerations is 0.1. The chance of finding it after looking twice is 0.1 + (0.1 * 0.9). Three times is 0.1 + (0.1 * 0.9) + (0.1 * 0.9^2).

    Therefore looking for the digit n times is the sum of the series 0.1 * (0.9)^i. Which is a geometric series and equivalent to 0.1(1 - 0.9^n) / (1 - 0.9), which equals (1 - 0.9^n). Thus, the average number of tries to find an single digit is (log 0.5/log 0.9) =~ 6.57881

    What about two digits? A similar solution: (log 0.5/log 0.99) =~ 68.9676. Three digits? 692.801. Four? 6931.13.

    Thus, the amount of data is approximately 70% of the original (a digit with 10 possible solutions found after an average of approximately 7 searches). So this algorithm would compress data down, on average, by 70%. Not bad, but not great either, especially considering the computing power to achieve this. There are much more efficient algorithms around today in terms of computing power vs. compression.

    1. Re:Finding data in Pi by zCyl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If we begin with the assumption that the digits of Pi are completely random, then the following analysis is much simpler and much more correct (or it had better be now that I said it was) than the one presented:

      The probability of finding a particular single digit is 0.1, or of finding a particular sequence of two digits is 0.01 or 0.1^2. The probability of finding a particular sequence of n digits is 0.1^n.

      Therefore, the expectation is that on average you will find a particular sequence of n digits once every 1/(0.1^n) digits, or 10^n digits.

      The question then arises as to the efficiency of indexing this many digits to locate the sequence desired. The amount of storage required for the index is log base 10 (log_10) of the number of digits you need to look. If we assume the desired sequence will always occur in average or less digits, then the amount of storage required for the index is:

      log_10 (10^n) = n (log_10 (10)) = n

      Unfortunately, the assumption I slipped in above that the desired sequence will always occur in average or less digits only holds 50% of the time. Therefore, in order to have a good chance of finding the sequence, we need to include a longer search space, and thus the index needs to be just slightly more digits in length than the sequence being stored.

      In essence, a very effective data expansion algorithm.

      (Proofreading is left as an exercise for the reader.)

  44. Re:odd by Bastian · · Score: 1

    Mathemeticians have been working on numerical approximations of functions (DiffEq, for example), and have been dealing with trying to reduce the error in approximations for centuries, with all the problems involving the approximation getting worse as you leave the starting point and all that.

    Yet it took until the 1960's for someone to figure out that subtle errors at any point in the use of a model of a complex system can cause problems?

    I've always thought that was strange. . .

  45. Assumption by Shade,+The · · Score: 1

    Make that: Assuming the digits of Pi are a stream of random numbers.

  46. Man he missed out by CrazyJim0 · · Score: 1

    He shoulda played world battle on the earth simulator... Now that woulda prolly owned.

  47. Another thought by Shade,+The · · Score: 1

    The above argument doesn't appear to make sense now. If you can compact an arbitary sequence of numbers by 70%, then you can keep passing the same data again and again through the system and reduce any string of data to a much smaller length. By information theory, this should be impossible, shouldn't it? Anyone now where I've screwed up?

    1. Re:Another thought by sankoz · · Score: 1

      Pardon me if I am wrong, but I did not understand how exactly the compression is achieved. Considering you need to store some binary data, the following is what you need: 1. The beginning position of the data in the pi sequence. 2. The number of elements in the data. You are telling that number in step 1 can be found out, on an average, within 70% of all the possible combinations of the data. Very good, but you still need to store this number somewhere for retrieving this info. As someone has already pointed out , this number can be longer than the actual data ! Also, I guess another thing you forgot to do is multiply your probabilities. You say that the chance for 30% compression in the first try is 0.5. Even if I assume that this is true, for the next compression, the chance for the compressed data to be 0.49 the size of the original data becomes 0.5*0.5=0.25. So for n compressions the probability of (1-0.7^n) compression is only 0.5^n

    2. Re:Another thought by Shade,+The · · Score: 1

      Well, assuming my '70%' figure was correct, which I now realise it isn't, then by information theory you've reduced the probability needed to view the information from 100% to 70%, and so reduced the information needed to store the number. But that point's moot, as I screwed up the math anyway :)

      Ah well. It was a nice idea whilst it lasted :)

  48. Bleh by PyroX_Pro · · Score: 1

    What use is a gallery of photos with names like C11054 and no damned descriptions of what we are viewing?

  49. Sim Earth... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember that? Talk about the Earth Simulator always reminds me of that game. Why, why wont the dasies die!?! Even with Nuclear tests!!!

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  50. Climate Prediction is Easy by metamathica · · Score: 1

    There's a big difference between climate and weather. One is a boundary-value problem; the other is an initial-value problem. For those without the terminology, climate refers to average weather over time.

    For example, I can look at the weather for the last few years for wherever you live and tell you very reliably within a few degrees what the average temperatures will be in December and June next year. These are driven mostly by the easily calculable changes in energy flux from the sun.

    You might be tempted to dismiss such basic observations, but anyone who is concerned about possible global warming scenarios--and I'd argue everyone should be--should be curious to know what can be predicted about climate

    .
  51. Re:How come we've never heard of this? by Dahan · · Score: 1

    Hmm, well according to their title graphic, it's "chikyuu shimyure-ta". Which does translate into Earth Simulator.

  52. Re:PI-encoded Messages by kris_lang · · Score: 1

    </PI-encoded-message-begin>
    <start-digit > 09754198093241062140396080639620967866
    <messag e length > 852
    <subencoding> EBCDIC
    </PI-encoded-message-end>

    (spacin g brought to you by the slashdot linebreaker alogorithm and the number e.)

  53. Re:How come we've never heard of this? by BJH · · Score: 1

    Yes, that's what I said...

  54. What is the Earth Simluator? by waterhouse · · Score: 1

    Unforunately, no one can be told what the Earth Simulator is; you have to see it for yourself.

  55. Re:About our language... by gykh · · Score: 1

    Unless you're a Slashdot editor ;)

  56. Re:Earth simulation, supercomputers and chaos theo by Brave+Ulysses · · Score: 1

    " A butterfly's wings in Brazil
    Can trigger a Texan tornado
    "
    Interesting how world events seem to only affect America. Presumably Dubya will us this Texan tornado as a justification for carpet bombing Brazil - this "butterfly wings" undoubtedly a codename for some sort of Weapons of Mass Destruction...
    --

    ---------
    "I can DoS people's cars from my GBA."

  57. That's not really necessary by lingqi · · Score: 1

    NHK just had a documentary about Earth Sim a few days ago, in fact. They showed some results from the computer. One I found especially interesting was a earthquake energy distribution if an earthquake was to occur near atama. Watch some TV and you can save big train-fare bux. =)

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

  58. World's faster computer, but ... by gfreeman · · Score: 1

    I bet it still won't play SimCity4 at a playable speed.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  59. 6 times 9 can be 42 by Dhericean · · Score: 1

    The fact that 6 * 9 is 42 in base 13 implies a very strange number of digits for the ultimate lifeform in Douglas Adams' HHG universe.

    --

    Gamma Testing - Where testing is extended to the full user community (AKA Shipping the Program)