Slashdot Mirror


NASA Gives Up On Pioneer 10

Soft writes "Another Energizer Bunny has finally given out: Pioneer 10's generators have decayed to the point that DSN can no longer detect the probe's signals. It was the first spacecraft to penetrate the asteroid belt (1972) and fly by Jupiter (1973). So long and thanks for all the pic's..."

58 of 607 comments (clear)

  1. The Real Reason: by DasBub · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's tired of hearing about Linux kernel releases every ten minutes.

  2. Sorry slashdot.. by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    But I won't believe Pioneer 10 is dying until Netcraft confirms it..

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  3. So long old friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They just don't make 'em like they used to.

    1. Re:So long old friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      So sad, now it is only good for Klingon target practice. :(

    2. Re:So long old friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Note that the triumphs of NASA date from the era when engineers ran the programs, and not political hacks like now. I feel sorry for the young engineers now who will never experience the greatness which was NASA.

      There were no slackers then. There were dedicated young engineers with buzz cuts and and a slide rule. They didn't listen to "Hip Hop" or "Heavy Metal". They didn't wear baggy pants. They weren't interested in fashion or political correctness. Their uniform was a crisp white dress shirt, a string tie, and a pair of drip-dry Hagar slacks, accessorized with a leather holster--which held an 18 inch slide rule. Bang.

      These men were focused on quality and greatness. They were patriotic, dedicated men who strove each day to make America first with the best engineering the human mind could conceive.

      Today NASA is run by "professional" managers and bureaucrats. They cow-tow not to quality but to politically motivated "quotas" and false "diversity". Slackers abound. "Getting over" takes precedence over "getting it right".

      The saddest thing of all is not the failures of the current space program, as disturbing as they might be. The saddest thing is that we have lost the spirit and the system and methodology which yielded our greatest triumphs.

    3. Re:So long old friend by aliens · · Score: 5, Funny

      Cause we all know you can't accomplish anything unless you don't listen to that satan worshipping hardcore or that terrorist supporting hiphop. These kids now adays are a bunch of unworthy anti-americans.

      Only those people who continue to live in the 50's can possibly bring our great civilization forward. Right?

      The thing that hobbles NASA is the politicians and their demand for big results combined with the huge cuts in budget.

      I can't stand closed minded people. I'm sure you can work dilligently and continuously, you must be a blast to have as a friend.

      --
      -- taking over the world, we are.
    4. Re:So long old friend by orenmnero · · Score: 5, Informative

      Huh? The primary engineers in the early days were Germans, including former Nazis, many of whom built rockets for V-2 missle program. After the war just as many went to Russia as came here. They went to any country that had the resources to pursue a space program.

      And there is no way you are going to tell me the space program was anything but politically motivated. It was a platform for Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon to show up the Russians. Johnson particularly used it to keep the nations mind off Vietnam.

      If anything, the lackluster movement of our space program can be attributed to a LACK of political motivation.

      Failure is part of the process. The success of Pioneer's 3-11 came as a result of the failures of pioneer 0-2. The ones where they didn't "get it right"

      It's also not like those engineers in the good old days never killed anybody. We've had three major disasters exploring space in 67, 86, and 03. All about 15 years apart or so. Not bad considering this is easily the toughest and most dangerous job in the world.

    5. Re:So long old friend by Erbo · · Score: 4, Funny
      So sad, now it is only good for Klingon target practice.

      Shooting space garbage is no test of a warrior's mettle!

      --
      Be who you are...and be it in style!
  4. Rest in peace by andyring · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Pioneer 10, and other satellites of that era, worked far beyond what they were intended, and did a darn good job (and then some) at what they did. Pioneer 10, you did good. May you rest in peace. A job well done.

    1. Re:Rest in peace by Provocateur · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Pioneer isn't dead as long as its moving and carrying that plaque as its one final message from us.

      You know what I've always been looking for in the NASA site but could never get? Animated clips of its voyage (or that of Voyager's) and its fly-bys of the other planets. I always thought they would make really great looking screensavers to match my wallpapers of the shuttle. Anybody know where I can get them?

      Keep on flyin Pioneer

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    2. Re:Rest in peace by km790816 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      One could imagine that we will see Pioneer 10 again. Within a century, I'm sure (or should I say 'I hope') we'll have craft capable of going much faster and further.

      Quite a collector's item, eh? The 22nd Century equivalent of finding the Titanic. (Except that Pioneer 10 is an example of *good* engineering.)

    3. Re:Rest in peace by superyooser · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No, but this page has some fascinating artist renditions (and *huge* publication size images), including Pioneer passing Jupiter, and the Pioneer looking back at the sun from Neptune's orbit!! Amazing! Nobody's ever seen *our* sun appear so small. (It's more dramatic in the medium-size picture.) It gives me goose bumps thinking what it would feel like to be out there, lost in the bleakness of space.

  5. am I the only one by outsider007 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I worry that we're leaving a trial of breadcrumbs for conquering alien races to find us. fight the future.

    --
    If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    1. Re:am I the only one by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 5, Interesting
      If that were a concern, the constant stream of radio, TV and other telecommunications signals we've been pumping into space for most of the 20th century would be a far bigger problem. There's effectively a big sphere of signals expanding around Earth in all directions at the speed of light, and anyone in space who chanced to stumble across any of our physical probes like Pioneer 10 would most likely have already detected us long, long before. Earth really calls a lot of attention to itself with its broadcasts, and our signals just get stronger and more blanketing as time goes by. Not only that, but even if we stopped all broadcasts tomorrow, there'd still be all our old signals moving out through space, and anyone out there with the wherewithal to detect them would be have several of our earth decades of opportunity in which to do so.

      Moreover, many think it's profoundly unlikely any alien races would be interested in conquering us. Even assuming others out there are hostile, the effort and expenditure of resources to get from there to here would probably mean the payoff for attacking us wouldn't be worth the trip.

      It's also been argued that any extraterrestrial civilizations capable of detecting us will almost certainly be much older and more advanced (the thinking being that on the cosmic timescale, we're just starting off, and any civilization even a little younger than ours wouldn't have the tech to detect us, and the odds are high against another civ reaching this stage of development against the exact same time we do, so if they can hear us they've probably been around a while), and that (presumably, anyway) anyone so advanced wouldn't be warlike, so we'd probably have a lot more to gain than to lose from others finding out about us. I'm certainly no expert, but this does strike me as a fairly reasonable line of thought.

    2. Re:am I the only one by phillymjs · · Score: 5, Funny

      Moreover, many think it's profoundly unlikely any alien races would be interested in conquering us.

      I'm more worried about them seeing stuff like "American Idol," "Survivor," and "Joe Millionaire," and deciding we should all be exterminated, not subjugated.

      We can only hope that their positive perception of our race from the 13 years of Simpsons episodes we've pumped out can withstand the damage the later shows will do to it. :-)

      ~Philly

    3. Re:am I the only one by hcdejong · · Score: 4, Funny

      If they can fly at FTL speeds, not missing a single episode is trivial. Just fly to the point to where the broadcast you want has traveled.

  6. Haiku by sconeu · · Score: 4, Insightful


    A little spacecraft
    Far away among the stars
    Rest well, Pioneer

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  7. Pioneer 10 isn't dead.... by Sergeant+Beavis · · Score: 5, Funny
    It was just Slashdotted, that's all.

    Watch, in 5 years, someone will hear from it again.

    --
    There is nothing inherently safe about liberty. That's why so many people died protecting it.
  8. Lifespan? by 1000101 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What is the approximate lifespan of the craft? Will the harsh environment of space eventually destroy it, or will it simply drift along forever? Unless of course it collides with something which I would think would be highly unlikely.

    1. Re:Lifespan? by kfg · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, other than the low temperature the enviroment of space isn't very harsh.

      It's when you start getting near things, like planets and stars, that things get dicey.

      Pioneer is heading the other way, and there isn't any reason that it shouldn't drift on for millions of years, God willing and the crick don't rise none.

      That's why they affixed the infamous plaque to it.

      KFG

  9. Distance. by cybermace5 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's 7.6 billion miles away. Almost 12 hours at the speed of light. And it will take two million years to reach a star considered to be in our close neighborood.

    Incomprehensible space...it's incredibly daunting, yet unbelievably appealing. Pioneer 10 was sent out in the same spirit as the pioneers of early America: the lure of seemingly boundless space and undiscovered wonders.

    This pioneer is blazing a trail we all hope to follow someday. Goodbye Pioneer 10, you have served us well.

    --
    ...
    1. Re:Distance. by digitalsushi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      2 million years eh? Ok, here's a thought to ponder. Think some...thing from Earth will go get it before it gets to the next local star?

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    2. Re:Distance. by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 4, Informative

      >> 2 million years eh? Ok, here's a thought to ponder. Think some...thing from Earth will go get it before it gets to the next local star?

      Very good chance, though i think by pass you mean go farther out. I just can't see one pulling up and going by it in the passing lane. Make for fun video though.

      Anyways. This is the problem with earth ship ideas and such. You build a huge ship and start leaving earth today, then 10 years later another group does. They by then have developed a faster earth ship, and soon pass you by. Thus you wasted years in space you could have been on earth.

      We have much faster probes today. Ion engine powered one could probably catch up to it fast. I remember a TLC episode or similar talking about them and how fast they go. They don't start fast but they just keap accelarating forever (pretty much) so they hit insane speeds. The thing we sent to that astoroid and landed on had an ion engine. It traveled way faster then anything else we ever put out there.

    3. Re:Distance. by snake_dad · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The thing we sent to that astoroid and landed on had an ion engine. It traveled way faster then anything else we ever put out there.

      I think you mean Deep Space 1, which has an ion engine and flew within 1,400 miles of comet Borelly. A little extra duty for that spacecraft, not unlike Pioneer greatly exceeding expectations. The one that landed on an asteroid was NEAR Shoemaker, but it has normal thrusters. Both where extraordinary missions.

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
  10. We should retrieve it someday by jonman_d · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If/when technology permits, we should make it a point to send a ship to retrieve the probe, for both practical and symbolic reasons. It'd be interesting to see the ware and tare on a craft that's been through so much as it has; and, it has a great historical value. As a sign of respect to itself and its builders, Pioneer deserves to be in a measeum of sorts.

    Of course, my other half tells me, for the same reasons, let it alone, in space, quietly, where its home is.

    1. Re:We should retrieve it someday by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The best way to honor it is to let it keap going. Just cause we haven't heard from it or won't doesn't mean it's job is done. It's out there and traveling even if all systems are dead. Some day something will find it. That's another part of it's mission. You wouldn't pull the statue of liberty down and put it in a mueaseum because it's done a good job. It's still doing it's job. Yeah I would like to see it to, but it's busy working right now.

  11. Not too shocking... by mraymer · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The thing has been going longer than it was ever intended to anyway. It's really cold and really far away, so it's not too shocking that it finally quit.

    Has SETI given up on it, too? I know they would do an informal test on their equipment by looking for the Pioneer 10 signal. SETI has been having problems tracking it for a few years at least... here's something Jill Tarter wrote about it.

    If a nuclear war or asteroid or other event destroys all of humanity, probes like this will be our only legacy...

    --

    "To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking

    1. Re:Not too shocking... by mahart · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wish our legacy had better pornography on it

  12. Verizon Commercials by dmuth · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did anyone else read that and think of the Verizon Wireless commercials?

    "Can you hear me NOW?!?"

  13. Amateur time by tqft · · Score: 4, Interesting

    OK Pioneer is dying from whatever I read it appears the problem is the signal to noise ratio is too low.

    Perhaps all you amateurs with radio telescopes out there should ask NASA nicely (through whatever an organisation preferably) for the frequency and lcoation data that is not publicly available and do a big combined search.

    Do you have procedures/software for doing VLBI? It would be a good project to do build it around if you do not already.

    A few hours a day or days a month and you might still get some useful data from it.

    --
    The Singularity is closer than you think
    Quant
    1. Re:Amateur time by ender81b · · Score: 5, Informative

      No offense but if NASA's DSN network, the most advanced tracking and recieving facility in the world, cannot detect it why would you think 1000 amateur astronomers would have any luck? I pulled this from the Voyager home page but presumably Pioneer would be much weaker:

      " The antennas must capture Voyager information from a signal so weak that the power striking the antenna is only 10 exponent -16 watts (1 part in 10 quadrillion). A modern-day electronic digital watch operates at a power level 20 billion times greater than this feeble level. "

      Then again I am no radio expert so maybe what you describe is feasible.

    2. Re:Amateur time by Have+Blue · · Score: 4, Informative

      Very Long Baseline Interferometry increases resolution, not range. It won't help capture a signal too weak for any of the individual dishes to pick up.

  14. Re:Wow! by kfg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When people ask me, "What sign?" I say, "Sputnik."

    If you think you feel old now, wait until you start getting old, my son. :)

    America's oldest man died on Monday. He was actually born in a log cabin and of high school age when the Wright Bros. first flew at Kitty Hawk.

    Think about that one the next time you feel "old." Your world has hardly moved at all compared to his.

    KFG

  15. Am I missing something here? by itallushrt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why don't all you people stop thanking a hunk of metal and start thanking the scientist and engineers that designed, built, and launched Pioneer 10. They are the real reasons this post even exist.

  16. No need to worry by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're only coming to serve man.

    KFG

  17. ObHHGTG by jpetts · · Score: 4, Funny

    2 million years eh?

    Just time for another bath! Pass me the sponge, would you?

    --
    Call me old fashioned, but I like a dump to be as memorable as it is devastating - Bender
  18. Ha! by Quasar1999 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    EchoStar and Bell should have gone with the guys that worked on that satellite... Check out how crappy modern satellites are (Lockheed Martin for example)... hell, they're in low earth orbit and they can't last a whole month before dying(LM's Nimiq 2)... Pioneer went through the asteroid belt... come on... Evolution means going forward, not back... Can't we build reliable satellites of yesteryear?

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    1. Re:Ha! by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Informative

      "EchoStar and Bell should have gone with the guys that worked on that satellite..."

      Apples and oranges. More like apples and rocks. First off, your metaphor breaks down as soon as you describe Pioneer 10 as a "satellite." It is most definately not a satellite.

      Communications satellites are put into earth-orbit with more transponders than you'd care to shake a stick at, its intention being to relay as many communications signals as it can back and forth between ground-based stations. Pioneer was built with one transmitter to beam back periodic signals.

      Communications satellites aren't built to last much longer than a few years to begin with. There is no reason to design one to last more than a dozen years or so when communications technology will outstrip the capabilities of the satellite in that time, requiring a replacement. It took Pioneer over a year just to get anywhere.

      Communications satellites are only 8.5 light-minutes or so from the sun, so there isn't any reason to put a more durable or expensive power supply on them beyond solar panels and batteries for night-time operation. Jupiter alone is more than four times that distance away, and the technology limitations of the time required a (much) more durable atomic solution.

      Geostationary satellites have to deal with those pesky laws of physics that dictate that they will always eventually fall out of orbit. Sure, they don't have to deal with atomspheric drag like LEO objects, but momentum transfer is still an issue. Pioneer isn't a satellite in the remotest sense of the word: It's obviously beyond escape velocity for our solar system, which means it will never come back.

      "Pioneer went through the asteroid belt"

      Lay off the Star Wars. Mass density in that region isn't anywhere near what Hollywood thinks it is. Space debris in earth orbit poses a far greater hazard than passing through the main asteroid belt.

      "Can't we build reliable satellites of yesteryear?"

      The true "satellites of yesteryear" aren't there any more. Try and find three US satellites still in earth orbit that were launched before, say, 1985.

      Now, if you want to talk about space probes, why would we build another Pioneer or even a Voyager when we could build another Magellan or Galileo?

  19. Goddamn by cranos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know you are truly geek when something like this almost brings tears to your eyes. I mean this thing had less computing power than your average calculator and yet it managed to be useful for thirty years?
    See what happens when you actually give your space programme decent funding? You do something like this, something which comes close to making the human race look like something more than six billion savages scrabbling in the dirt.

  20. It's still serving part of its mission. by chaparrl · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the info at Nasa's page on Pioneer 10 "A plaque was mounted on the spacecraft body with drawings depicting a man, a woman, and the location of the sun and the earth in our galaxy."

    1. Re:It's still serving part of its mission. by mahart · · Score: 5, Informative

      pic of it: plaque

  21. Pioneer 10 is dying... by dfenstrate · · Score: 4, Funny

    Netcraft comfirms it.

    (you can shoot me now)

    --
    Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
  22. DON'T MAKE ME RE-LIVE BATTLEFIELD EARTH! by Myriad · · Score: 5, Funny
    I worry that we're leaving a trial of breadcrumbs for conquering alien races to find us. fight the future.

    Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagh! No, make the pain stop! You are causing me a Battlefield Earth flashback! Not only did I watch that evil movie, I've read the damned book years before.

    Don't you know that's exactly how Psychlo's found Earth in the first place?

    Can I believe that I actually know that? Please, shoot me now before the Hubbard cultists get me!

    --
    "They do not preach that their god will rouse them, a little before the Nuts work loose." Kipling, 'The Sons of Martha'
  23. Re:communication via relay? by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 4, Informative

    Possible, kind of, but not really.

    NASA is researching the possibility of setting up a network of satellites around the solar system that can relay information.

    Mars, infact, has 2 relay satellites (MGS and ODY) in orbit that can relay information from rovers/landers/etc from the ground. More will be entering orbit still (ESA's, and another mars orbiter for 2005 or 2007 i think). They will all have the ability to relay information. The beagle lander will rely on this, for example.

    But there is a problem. Those satellites can only relay signals from mars (in orbit, or on the ground). They cannot pick up a signal from Jupiter or Saturn, and retransmit it to earth because they do NOT have a reciever big enough to do that.

    NASA's DSN (look it up) has 100 foot dish antennas to pick up signals from the outter solar system.

    You CANNOT fit a 100 foot dish to a satellite and orbit it around Mars or Jupiter, etc, to pick up signals from further out and relay them to earth. Its simply not possible.

    Because of this, spaceprobes can only relay signals to Earth from signals which are near by. Hence, MGS or ODY relaying from landers on he surface of mars, or Cassini relaying data from the huygens probe.

    Cassini can't pick up signals from a probe around Nepture or Uranus and relay it to earth, because it just cannot possibly have a powerful enough reciever since that requires a huge dish.

    One option, however, is to use laser (optical) instead of radio transmission, which may make this possible.

    That may still have many other problems of its own, however.

    D.

    --
    You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
  24. Re:Radioisotopes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ---..are really cool. Nuclear powered naval vessels don't last a third as long as Pioneer's radioactive batteries have.

    You dont have a clue. A nuclear submarine has 1 battery compartment. This battery is your 50 gallon drum nuclear battery. Those types of batteries have a lifespan (in the submarine) of about 20 years. For that 20 years, it takes care of propulsion, air bladders, CO2 scrubbers, and the 90V AC (I cant remember the freq offhand).

    For disposal, they seal these drums in bigger drums with the bottom of the bigger drum a lead/concrete mesh. They proceed to pour the similar mixture all around the barrel, sealing it totally. Then they lift it 2 miles down a hole in a mountain (Nevada). Once a floor is done, it's sealed by concrete and then a hatch is rivited and then soldered on.

    For what it's worth, ALL the nuclear waste in the US would fit in the dimensions of the football field 6 feet deep. Compare that to COx, NOx, SOx and other organic crap floating from tailpipes. After what I've seen, nuclear is the safest fuel, given non-idiots tending the reactor. You've never heard of a US nuclear powered sub go critical and meltdown. You wonder why? They arent the dumbasses like 3MI. Island.

    From somebody who knows a little too much.

  25. Re:Radioisotopes by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Pioneer 10 & 11 spacecraft used Pu-238 RTGs. The generators initialially provided 155 watts, which diminished to 140 watts by the time the spacecraft encountered Jupiter, 100 watts five years into the mission.

  26. Voyager had a disc. by Goonie · · Score: 4, Informative
    Both the Pioneer probes had the plaque.

    The Voyager probes were sent out with a gold disc which contains, amongst other things, greetings from Kurt Waldheim (former Secretary-General of the UN) amongst ones in a bunch of languages, the "sounds of Earth", including Beethoven and Chuck Berry, the sound of waves against the shore, and various other things, and a bunch of images of Earth life, as well as some instructions as to how to play the disc. It was Carl Sagan's project, IIRC.

    Of course, the odds of the probes ever being detected by extra-terrestrial intelligence is virtually zero, given their slow speed, tiny size, and the fact that they don't emit any signals (or more precisely won't by the time ET is in a position to spot them).

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    1. Re:Voyager had a disc. by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 4, Funny
      Chuck Berry? Man, that's got to be a hell of an honor for ol' Chuck.

      I imagine the first interstellar war will start when an alien civilization "pirates" that copyrighted Chuck Berry recording and the MPAA comes to collect royalties.

  27. Re:82,000 mph !!!!! by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My interpretation of the article is that the probe briefly reached 82,000 mph during its closest approach to Jupiter. It slowed down considerably as it pulled away from Jupiter's gravity well. IIRC, it's currently moving at something more like 20,000 mph.

  28. Icon of the Space Age by PizzaFace · · Score: 5, Informative

    Pioneer 10's mission continues. Let's not forget the plaque that Pioneer 10 carries. It was world famous when the probe was launched, because it was mankind's first attempt to communicate beyond the solar system. Carl Sagan designed the plaque to be universally (in the truest sense) comprehensible, at least to any civilization sufficiently advanced to capture it. Next to the map of the probe's origin relative to our galaxy, with its key in binary notation, was an etching of a generic man and woman, superimposed on an outline of Pioneer to give a sense of scale. The man's arm was raised in a gesture that Sagan hoped would suggest friendship. Especially given the public's then-new awareness of threats to humanity's survival as a species, there was something very poignant about this cosmic message in a bottle that had no chance of being seen by anyone for millions of years.

    I remember a newspaper cartoon from the day. A man in a business suit and a woman in a dress were looking at the plaque on Pioneer, which was half buried in the ground. The man said to the woman, "They seem very similar to us, except that they don't wear clothes."

    1. Re:Icon of the Space Age by PizzaFace · · Score: 4, Informative

      NASA has published a brief history and a depiction of the plaque.

  29. Re:Wow! by kfg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It may well have been possible for you to have had a computer all of your life. Even the internet, nascent as it may have been, may well predate you.

    When he was born he had no *electricity* and no one in his family had ever seen an automobile. Geronimo had only been captured three years previously and was not only still alive, but a comparitively young man.

    The world he was born in to was one someone born 500 years before would have recongnized. The world you were born into is one that that hypothetical person couldn't possibly even have conceived of.

    You are talking differences in quantity. I am talking differences in quality.

    There is no essential difference in type or quality of life today than there was 40 years ago when I first entered school. We live the same way now, with mostly the same things, as we did then. Electricity, phones, central heating, planes, automobiles, movies, TV, hydrogen bombs, etc.

    The cars have become a bit more refined, the planes a bit faster, the phones cordless, the movies, well, they havn't changed much at all really. These are just the things we already had becoming better.

    I'm not saying we don't live in interesting times, or that I'm not glad to be here, but the two cases are *damned* different.

    By the way, the commercial sail record from Sandy Point N.J. at the entrance of NY harbor to Lands End England was only 11 days. It stood for 100 years.

    And I'm *damned* glad the internet hasn't come up with one single reason for me not to go to London. That would suck.

    KFG

  30. So let's go pick it up. by blair1q · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just jump in the hyperdrive and go grab it and download it.

    We do have hyperdrive, right?

    I mean, it's 2003.

    We were supposed to be mining Jupiter's moons by now.

    We can't go get one little probe?

    What have we been doing with the last 30 years?

  31. Re:Never again, anything like it. by anubi · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It saddens me a lot to see the things that so impressed me as a child now fading into oblivion... but yet knowing they are not destroyed.. they are just on a very very very long voyage.

    I only wish I were as elegant in wording as Carl Sagan:

    Reflections on a Mote of Dust

    We succeeded in taking that picture, and, if you look at it, you see a dot. That's here. That's home. That's us. On it, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever lived, lived out their lives. The aggregate of all our joys and sufferings, thousands of confident religions, ideologies and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilizations, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every hopeful child, every mother and father, every inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every superstar, every supreme leader, every saint and sinner in the history of our species, lived there on a mote of dust, suspended in a sunbeam.

    The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors so that in glory and in triumph they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot. Think of the endless cruelties visited by the inhabitants of one corner of the dot on scarcely distinguishable inhabitants of some other corner of the dot. How frequent their misunderstandings, how eager they are to kill one another, how fervent their hatreds. Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the Universe, are challenged by this point of pale light.

    Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity--in all this vastness--there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves. It is up to us.

    It's been said that Astronomy is a humbling, and I might add, a character-building experience. To my mind, there is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world. To me, it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly and compassionately with one another and to preserve and cherish that pale blue dot, the only home we've ever known.

    -- Carl Sagan (1934-1996)

    You can see the image referred to in the article here .

    (In all honesty, I believe this image was from Voyager, but Pioneer had the same view and I felt it only appropriate.)

    Fare well, Pioneer.

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  32. It might have discovered anomolous gravity by ggwood · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am saddened to hear that we lost contact with Pioneer 10 because we don't understand the forces acting on it. One would think that since we know gravity pretty well, and we know the relivant masses involved, we could predict the motion of the Pioneer satelites. Alas no. Exotic things like dark matter and photon pressure were invoked to explain the extra attraction (back) towards our sun, and failed. I heard a great talk about this while at U.C. Riverside department of Physics and had the chance to ask about photon pressure myself (yes, they take that into account - it is a far, far larger effect than this). The BBC has an old story on this effect, which I am sure many slashdotters have already heard of, here.

    By the way, a similar anomoly is seen in Pioneer 11 and another distant satelite (Ulysses perhaps???).

    Also, there is a link at nasa.gov, but at this time it seems broken. I include it for completeness here.

    It seems John Anderson and friends have written several articles on this. One which you might find interesing has been published in Physical Review D: here.

    --
    a war on terrorism? How can we end a war on a method?
  33. Somewhere at NASA... by darnok · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...an old geeky guy picks up his Coke, brushes the pizza crumbs off his gut, brushes spider web out of his waist length greasy hair, pushes his chair back and says "OK, who's gonna beat THIS uptime?"

  34. Release it to the Public Domain by farnsaw · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How about releasing it with all it's communication protocols, passwords, etc to the public domain. Who knows, there might be an enterprising young genius out there with an array of 120 foot (~40 meter) dishes. ;-)

    --
    "Computer Scientists can count to 1024 on their fingers" (non-mutant, non-mutilatated, human computer scientists)
  35. Re:Wow! by Gonarat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We need a new space race. In the 1950s and 1960s the U.S. was in competition with the Soviet Union for the exploration of space. The race began with Sputnik and ended with the Moon landing in 1969. Since then, the Soviets/Russians have concentrated on the space station (Salyuts and Mir) and the U.S. has concentrated on the Space Shuttles. This has lead to the current International Space Station.


    What we need is a new space race to get us (Humankind) off of our duffs. If China gets their space program off the ground the way they want to, we may see one. Then things will really start to move again. Man back on the Moon, missions to Mars, and more (and better) automated spacecraft exploring the solar system. Pioneer 10 was a well built, wonderful space craft. I'd love to see new ones of that calibur made with today's technology. We just need the incentive.

    --
    Beware of Sleestak