Slashdot Mirror


NASA Gives Up On Pioneer 10

Soft writes "Another Energizer Bunny has finally given out: Pioneer 10's generators have decayed to the point that DSN can no longer detect the probe's signals. It was the first spacecraft to penetrate the asteroid belt (1972) and fly by Jupiter (1973). So long and thanks for all the pic's..."

408 of 607 comments (clear)

  1. The Real Reason: by DasBub · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's tired of hearing about Linux kernel releases every ten minutes.

    1. Re:The Real Reason: by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Well, at least telemarketers can't bother it anymore. I am a bit envious.

  2. Wow! by cmburns69 · · Score: 2

    It makes me feel old to know that I was alive when this thing launched!

    An online Starcraft RPG? Only at

    --
    Online Starcraft RPG? At
    Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
    1. Re:Wow! by kfg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When people ask me, "What sign?" I say, "Sputnik."

      If you think you feel old now, wait until you start getting old, my son. :)

      America's oldest man died on Monday. He was actually born in a log cabin and of high school age when the Wright Bros. first flew at Kitty Hawk.

      Think about that one the next time you feel "old." Your world has hardly moved at all compared to his.

      KFG

    2. Re:Wow! by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 1

      >> It makes me feel old to know that I was alive when this thing launched!

      Makes me sad to know i missed it's launch, and moon landings, and everything fun. Only think I got is launch of the POS.... I mean Shuttle. And the mars pathfinder. NASA back in the day built stuff that went above and beyond the call of duty (granted at a huge cost) and now their stuff can't even get through a mission, without crashing into a planet or becoming lost.

    3. Re:Wow! by 3-State+Bit · · Score: 1

      oldest ever or oldest as of Monday? (Has an American died at an older age before?)

    4. Re:Wow! by dirkdidit · · Score: 2

      The man was the oldest man in America at the time.

    5. Re:Wow! by kfg · · Score: 1

      I was wondering how long it would take to make that observation. :)

      It appears there may be someone 7 days older though.

      I'm no spring chicken, but obvioulsy if I was born under Sputnik I'm not exactly ready for the home either, yet I'm old enough to remember the passing of the last known surviving Civil War vet.

      I wonder how many WWI vets are left and if I live a fair life by the time I die there won't be anyone left who remembers WWII.

      On the other hand it's been awile since there was anyone who remembers Agincourt and the world has continuted to spin on.

      All we are is dust in the wind. Dust. Wind. Party on dude.

      KFG

    6. Re:Wow! by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      Your world has hardly moved at all compared to his.

      When he was born, traveling from London to New York might take a month or two. Today we do it in a few hours.

      My first computer had a 6502 CPU, running at 1 MHz or so. I'm typing this on an 800 MHz CPU, which is probably at least 1600x more powerful. It had 64 KB of memory. I now have 256 MB, over 4000x more. I can easily afford quadruple the computing power and memory if I really need it. More importantly, we've eliminated many reasons for having to travel from London to New York.

      It hasn't even been twenty years.

      I think we live in interesting times, but it's up to us to move our world.

    7. Re:Wow! by kfg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It may well have been possible for you to have had a computer all of your life. Even the internet, nascent as it may have been, may well predate you.

      When he was born he had no *electricity* and no one in his family had ever seen an automobile. Geronimo had only been captured three years previously and was not only still alive, but a comparitively young man.

      The world he was born in to was one someone born 500 years before would have recongnized. The world you were born into is one that that hypothetical person couldn't possibly even have conceived of.

      You are talking differences in quantity. I am talking differences in quality.

      There is no essential difference in type or quality of life today than there was 40 years ago when I first entered school. We live the same way now, with mostly the same things, as we did then. Electricity, phones, central heating, planes, automobiles, movies, TV, hydrogen bombs, etc.

      The cars have become a bit more refined, the planes a bit faster, the phones cordless, the movies, well, they havn't changed much at all really. These are just the things we already had becoming better.

      I'm not saying we don't live in interesting times, or that I'm not glad to be here, but the two cases are *damned* different.

      By the way, the commercial sail record from Sandy Point N.J. at the entrance of NY harbor to Lands End England was only 11 days. It stood for 100 years.

      And I'm *damned* glad the internet hasn't come up with one single reason for me not to go to London. That would suck.

      KFG

    8. Re:Wow! by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are not yet grey and know how much your world appears to have changed.

      I am already, shall we say, "distinquished", and know how much that is illusion, even though I remember when they said a 24 hr/day cable news network would never fly. Now I'm old enough not to watch the news much at all because it doesn't effect your life much. Buy a 20 year old NYT. Same shit, different decade. Read it once every year and you'll stay pretty current. You are mistaking a certain "coolness" factor for real change.

      There is no question these are magnificent times, I wouldn't miss them for anything, but the delta of magnificence between 1970 and now is minor compared to the magnificent changes that occured between 1890 and 1960.

      Try this test, take everything out of your house that wouldn't have been there in 1970. Should take you several minutes.

      Now go to a log cabin in Michigan and start shitting in the woods, cutting wood to stay warm and hauling water from the crick as you would have in 1897.

      We stand on the shoulders of giants making crowing sounds every time we grow an inch.

      KFG

    9. Re:Wow! by njchick · · Score: 1
      By the way, the commercial sail record from Sandy Point N.J. at the entrance of NY harbor to Lands End England was only 11 days.
      I think you mean Sandy Hook. Sandy Point is in Maryland.
    10. Re:Wow! by w42w42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This blows me away, and for some reason, I seem to think of it a lot. Perhaps it's my technical nature, in awe at the speed of progress.

      1903 was the first powered flight. 1957 was the first artificial satellite. 1969 was walking on the moon.

      Only 67 years between two bicycle mechanics essentially playing with a kite to walking on the moon! That boggles the mind!

      What most senior citizens in todays world have been witness to, I cannot even begin to grasp the number of times they must have been collectively blown away at some new advancement or achievement.

      I just hope that we all are fortunate enough to be witness to the same progress and achievement.

    11. Re:Wow! by shepd · · Score: 1

      >You are not yet grey and know how much your world appears to have changed.

      This might come as a shock, but I have photos form when I was 14 in which I started turning grey. I'm now pretty close to halfway there. It's not just me -- I've had a _lot_ of people comment on it.

      My doctor is baffled at why... But then again, it really isn't all that important, so she never bothered to put much effort in.

      Just trying to ruin another colloquialism. ;-)

      And no, I don't have any of these problems.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    12. Re:Wow! by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      This has generated a huge, but off-topic debate. Have you considered posting it to the other site?

    13. Re:Wow! by Mxyzptlk · · Score: 1

      Is it just me that is reminded of Monty Python? "Well, of course, we had it tough! We used to have to get up out of the shoebox in the middle of the night, and lick the road clean with our tongues! We had to eat half a handful of freezing cold gravel, work twenty-four hours a day at mill for fourpence every six years, and when we got home, our dad would slice us in two with a breadknife!"

    14. Re:Wow! by Bunji+X · · Score: 1

      Only 67 years between two bicycle mechanics essentially playing with a kite to walking on the moon! That boggles the mind!

      I like to think that once technology is mature, it will not take long until someone find a way of using it in a new brilliant way. (Wonder from whom I stole this philosophy?)

      In the case of going from groking avionics to "walking on the moon", the step is not that big, even for 67 years. It just takes a hell of a lot of resources (intellectual, monetray and material) beeing concentrated in that limited amount of time. The plenty of resources were given by two world wars and a cold one.

      Wonder where we would have been today if it weren't for 2 x WW + cold war?

      --
      ---
      The combined human population is enough to feed every living tiger for app. 28000 years.
    15. Re:Wow! by coastwalker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes I echo your sentiment, I would like to see some more progress

      I still think wow! and enjoy all the wonderfull toys we have to play with these days - but its been a mixed experience since I first started taking notice of the world around me in the mid 70's.

      Sadly since walking on the moon things have fizzled out a bit in the space exploration area. It did cost a lot of money and mars would be even more expensive. It seems to me that things have stood still somewhat since the 60's. I dont see much evidence that anything has changed since then, except for incremental improvements in ideas that had already been thought of.

      Please somebody give me an example of a major breakthrough in ideas, politics, religion or lifestyle that has happened since the 60's

      Even the Internet and the personal computer is only being used as a metaphore for something we already had - library, sheet of paper, telephone, junk mail etc etc. Admittedly it is the greatest library, sheet of paper, telephone ever, I have more access to knowledge information and tools to do things than the most priviledged people in history. But I am not smarter than Julius Caeser, Napoleon whatever and certainly will not achieve a fraction of what they did in their lifetimes - even though I know more than them.

      Pioneer is an aspirational monument to the 20C, our first steps into space

      What is the monument to the 21C going to be? Radically longer lifespan? Environmental meltdown? Bio weapon plagues? The US / China cold war? Clean drinking water for the whole population of Earth? Artificial life software? Money becomes the only motivation? Its all up for grabs, which one is your bet on?

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    16. Re:Wow! by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      This might come as a shock, but I have photos form when I was 14 in which I started turning grey. I'm now pretty close to halfway there. It's not just me -- I've had a _lot_ of people comment on it. My doctor is baffled at why... But then again, it really isn't all that important, so she never bothered to put much effort in.

      Did you encounter any killer alien clowns in the sewer system around your town when you were a kid? They seem to have the effect of either devouring you or turning your hair gray/white. Maybe you repressed the memory.

    17. Re:Wow! by coastwalker · · Score: 1

      I think in this case it would be a bit tough to expect much debate only on how sad / not sad we feel about the demise of Pioneer. It has been posted as a topic before and its death is not unexpected.

      You complain about a branch discussion which is about the wow factor that Pioneer generates. I would say that the wow factor is an important part of what Pioneer means to us and is therefore not off topic. Could you clarify what you think we could be debating on the announcement of Pioneers demise and I would be happy to contribute my thoughts in reply.

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    18. Re:Wow! by Gonarat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We need a new space race. In the 1950s and 1960s the U.S. was in competition with the Soviet Union for the exploration of space. The race began with Sputnik and ended with the Moon landing in 1969. Since then, the Soviets/Russians have concentrated on the space station (Salyuts and Mir) and the U.S. has concentrated on the Space Shuttles. This has lead to the current International Space Station.


      What we need is a new space race to get us (Humankind) off of our duffs. If China gets their space program off the ground the way they want to, we may see one. Then things will really start to move again. Man back on the Moon, missions to Mars, and more (and better) automated spacecraft exploring the solar system. Pioneer 10 was a well built, wonderful space craft. I'd love to see new ones of that calibur made with today's technology. We just need the incentive.

      --
      Beware of Sleestak
    19. Re:Wow! by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      I'm not complaining. I think the discussion is great. I just don't want to see the whole lot slammed with -1 Offtopics when the /. janitors get in. The whole discussion of how the world has changed, and how someone about 100 years old would see changes, is worth an article all to itself.

    20. Re:Wow! by Bambi_72 · · Score: 1

      You had a breadknife?!! Our Dad used to have to cut thru our legs with small bits of gravel thet were left from yesterdays tea, justs e we could all fit in the cigarette box we lived in, all 14 of us!

    21. Re:Wow! by renehollan · · Score: 1
      It may well have been possible for you to have had a computer all of your life. Even the internet, nascent as it may have been, may well predate you.

      Perhaps, but as someone born in 1961, who's first access to a computer was a timesharing system (HP2000, BASIC and all) was in 1973, and who built his own computer around 1980, I can attest that, for a middle-aged person like me, the world certainly changed from being "analog" to "mostly digital".

      The best social example is the Internet. Do you remember scouring the newspapers for job ads? I do. (And they only got printed on Wednesays.) I would argue that the implications of connectivity are no less impressive than electicity: I now shop, bank, communicate, research entirely almost entirely online. As I child I would do research for projects in a physical library. I can't imagine doing that now, and I doubt my two year old son ever will.

      When he was born he had no *electricity* and no one in his family had ever seen an automobile. Geronimo had only been captured three years previously and was not only still alive, but a comparitively young man.

      My father grew up without electicity or automobiles (though they existed). I still maintain that his transition (abandoning horses for transportation in favour of automobiles, and starting to get electrical appliances) is less disruptive than one where you no longer have to go places to get things.

      The world he was born in to was one someone born 500 years before would have recongnized. The world you were born into is one that that hypothetical person couldn't possibly even have conceived of.

      I would argue that this wouldn't be that far a stretch for the world into which I was born in 1961: no CD players, portable phones (we had CB radios, though -- not the same), consumer video players (never mind DVDs), not even calculators. Clocks had hands. Once the "digital revolution" had taken hold, it was easy to imagine these things, yes (O.K. we can digitize audio, video is the next hurdle, etc.), but an analog mindset did not lend itself to that kind of extrapolation: analog video recording existed, of course, but certainly not at consumer prices.

      Remember, this was a world that had yet to see the supposed MPAA-destroying effects of consumer video recorders, and the motion-picture and recording industries were safe in their monopolies based on expensive production equipment.

      You are talking differences in quantity. I am talking differences in quality.

      I'd argue that both exist, and one should not be so quick to discount the relationship between them: better quality of two-way wireless communication has had significant social implications (i.e. anything good or bad w.r.t. cell phones) -- it isn't just a "quantity" (better, newer phone) issue.

      There is no essential difference in type or quality of life today than there was 40 years ago when I first entered school. We live the same way now, with mostly the same things, as we did then. Electricity, phones, central heating, planes, automobiles, movies, TV, hydrogen bombs, etc.

      I'd argue that we do a lot of things differently -- seeking employment, conducting business, etc.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    22. Re:Wow! by Izmunuti · · Score: 1

      "POS.... I mean Shuttle...now their stuff can't even get through a mission"

      You don't think there were missions lost in the "good old days"? Ever wonder why they sent probes out in pairs? Pioneer 10 and a Pioneer 11, Voyager 1 and a Voyager 2, Viking 1 and Viking 2? One's the freaking spare in case the other fails! It's only recently that NASA has been confident/foolish/cheap enough to launch probes without a spare. So now when there's a failure the whole mission is forfeit.

    23. Re:Wow! by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      I rememember watching the launch on TV. I also remember watching Neil Armstrong step onto the moon for the first time.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    24. Re:Wow! by bytesmythe · · Score: 1
      Try this test, take everything out of your house that wouldn't have been there in 1970. Should take you several minutes.

      Several minutes? It only takes a few seconds to walk out the front door, since I didn't exist in 1970. ;)

      --
      bytesmythe
      Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
      -- Scott Meyer
    25. Re:Wow! by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Did you encounter any killer alien clowns in the sewer system around your town when you were a kid?

      Not in a sewer. But I did have to endure a really crappy movie about them... Think that's it? :-)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    26. Re:Wow! by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      The world he was born in to was one someone born 500 years before would have recongnized. The world you were born into is one that that hypothetical person couldn't possibly even have conceived of.

      Let me assure you that I have no intention of getting into a pissing match on whose world will change more. I was just saying that I think our future can be as exciting, especially if we put our minds to it. For example, we can now afford financially to explore for exploring's sake.

      Can you imagine the impact to society if SETI turned up anything?

      You are talking differences in quantity. I am talking differences in quality.

      There is no difference. Before the invention of the printing press, books were copied by hand, and therefore scarce. The only thing that the printing press did was to make more and cheaper books. However, the qualitative effect was mass education.

      The quantity at which resources are available inevitably lead to qualitative changes. More and cheaper flight means more people get to see foreign lands, and perhaps learn something they didn't know.

      There is no essential difference in type or quality of life today than there was 40 years ago when I first entered school.

      Then praise your deity that you were born into the First World. Your experiences are, on a global scale, somewhat unique. Some people don't have flushing toilets yet, today.

      And I'm *damned* glad the internet hasn't come up with one single reason for me not to go to London. That would suck.

      Indeed. What I said was that you mostly don't have to go, perhaps just to attend a short meeting or deliver a document.

    27. Re:Wow! by ScuzzMonkey · · Score: 1

      Not to mention, what happened to the first nine, eh? ;)

      --
      No relation to Happy Monkey
    28. Re:Wow! by Theodore+Logan · · Score: 1

      America's oldest man died on Monday.

      No, no, he's still alive. But he has only been America's oldest since Monday, when a guy who was even older than him passed away.

      --

      "If you think education is expensive, try ignorance" - Derek Bok

    29. Re:Wow! by Sgt+York · · Score: 1
      I think the removal of the Berlin Wall and the end of the Cold War goes a bit beyond "coolness factor". That is real change; I remember the Cold War and the fear. I remember when my Dad first told me about The Bomb. I was eight. I could hardly sleep for a week. "Mr Gorbechev, tear down this wall!"...THAT was beyond simply being "cool".

      No doubt there has been more change in the past 113 years than there has been in the last 30 years. It doesn't take a huge leap of logic to arrive at that conclusion, and I don't think any rational person would argue with you.

      I guess my point is that I think that the next 113 years will yeild much more change than the last 113 years. Instead of pooh-poohing the change in our own short lifetimes as compared to the change seen in a century, we should recognize and appreciate how the world around us changes today. When the Wright brothers flew, most people thought that was simply "coolness factor" (or whatever the slang of the day was). Most people thought little of it. After all, they had balloons to get up in the air if we wanted to, so what's the point of this noisy thing? Same sentiment for the automobile. And the steam engine.

      Computers are probably not the best examples of the revolution, they are now more of a rapid evolution, and they have exsisted in some form for more than 50 years. Revolution in our times? The net, the genome project, the end of the cold war....more?

      --

      There is a reason for everything. Sometimes that reason just sucks.

    30. Re:Wow! by renehollan · · Score: 1
      This seems like a pointless argument -- anything you've lived through, Mr 113 years lived through as well and the previous 70-odd years. Those 70 years included two world wars, the first atomic bomb, the invention of the airplane, widespread industrialization, etc etc etc ... etc. He's got you beat.

      Obviously, I didn't get my point across (though, my rapid response and plethora of typos may have something to do with this).

      My point was not that I had lived through greater societal change. Obviously not. But, rather that the societal changes I (and others of "my generation") have gone through rank "up there" with the transition from a non-electrical to an electified society. To repeat: the transition from a non-wired (i.e., non-ubiquitious internet-connected to internet-connected) society has about as much socio-technological impact, relative to the status quo, as did the internal combustion engine, electrification, steam engine, invention of steel, and control of fire.

      Yes, obviously, if you are to add up such disruptive changes, a longer life suggests increased exposure to more such techno-social changes. And, relative to the first one you experience, successive ones might pale in comparison.

      But, society is sensitive not to aggregate changes over time, but rather relative changes: once electrification becomes widespread, it is no longer disruptive. Some would suggest that these relative disruptive changes are becoming more frequent and more disruptive as we approach a "technological singularity". I don't know that I buy into this apocalyptic singularity argument, but the pace of change does appear to be increasing, and opportunity for disruptive change in any given interval increasing in likelihood as well.

      Certainly, someone born 100+ years ago would not have imagined our world in their youth. But, I maintain that this is true for someone born 40, or even 20 years ago. For those born in the early 1980's, would you have imagined laws like the DMCA in your early teens? That real ownership of non-weaponry entertainment hardware would be so regulated (or attempt to be so regulated)?

      --
      You could've hired me.
    31. Re:Wow! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Could you have imagined an Alpha Micro?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    32. Re:Wow! by renehollan · · Score: 1
      Could you have imagined an Alpha Micro?

      Wouldn't have had to.

      20 years ago was 1983, and the AM100 was released in 1976, IIRC.

      Actually, the idea of a microprogrammed PDP-11 in a microcomputer form-factor (for those days) would not have been much of a stretch of the imagination: the PDP-11 was a real machine, and micros were already here, vis. the Altair (January, 1975). The issue was only one of the complexity of the instruction set.

      The subsequent Alpha Micro machines (AM100/L, AM1000, AM2000, etc.) represented a move from the PDP-11 instruction set to the mass-market 68000 and derivatives. The cool thing was that the operating system (AMOS: Alpha Micro Operating System, what else), appeared the same to high-level language programs, and application migration was a slam dunk -- no small feat for those days where code portability was generally a non-issue.

      They always used top-quality hardware: CDC disk drives (10 MB Hawk, 80 MB Phoenix), and later SCSI drives and controllers: never IDE.

      While the company still exists in some form, they always targeted niche vertical markets and never became a dominent force: they didn't make "PeeCees" but rather higher-end machines, by comparison. Of course, AMOS functionality stagnated around the capabilities of a cross between PCDOS 1.0 and RSTS (though multi-tasking and multi-user), and their limited-hierarchy file systems (two level: by project and programmer, hence "project-programmer" number, or PPN, a DEC idea) and file name limitiations (six character name and three character extentions, upper-case only) were a bit of a joke. But, you could write blindingly fast business applications for them in AlphaBasic (complete with ISAM extentions). (I, of course, stuck to PDP-11 and 68k assembler coding for that platform, with a SPY program as my claim to fame (or not): it permitted the monitoring of terminal I/O on a different terminal (even a different screen type, with translation)).

      I've often thought of designing an AMOS compatibility layer, and porting AlphaBasic to a more modern platform: there's a surprising amount of business applications still running on AlphaMicros.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    33. Re:Wow! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      Heh, Rene and Alpha Micro. It's good to know that some constants remain .. constant. (Ron here from the VE2CUA days.) While I do have the January 1975 Popular Electronics issue in front of me, with the faked picture of the Altair, I'd still give the Mark-8 a nod as the first micro. 8008, what a chip! :^)

      Eh, I should talk. My Explorer-85 is 23 years old, and should have been dumpster food long ago. But damnit, I soldered that beastie from scratch. (And the S-100 cards) It hacked PSBGM (before there were laws against that sort of awful thing). I wonder if my BASEX tapes will still load?

      I've got a case, V20 cpu, lots of LEDs, and loads of wire-wrap. Someday I'm going to have a computer with blinky lights. (I love the smell of solder in the morning... Just don't wear shorts.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    34. Re:Wow! by renehollan · · Score: 1
      Geez, that goes back a ways.

      I haven't coded for an Alpha Micro in years, and recently convinced the copyright holder on SPY (I guess one is a success if someone writes a clone program -- in this case, "TheSPY") to release it to the public domain. Believe it or not, there's a lot of businesses that still run on such machines, and surprisingly well (though they've moved on to 680x0 varients, AMOS remains pretty much as it has been).

      Most of my work these days is embedded (TMX320Cx0, MIPS), Linux, or BSD-based. At home I run GNU/Linux on an Athlon XP1600+ with 100+ GB disk and 1/2 GB DDR RAM, and an old P200 clunker with a whopping 80 MB RAM. With the telecom bust in the U.S., I returned to Ontario from Texas (damn I miss that place - big houses and lotsa' guns), and accepted work with ATI.

      I too junked a lot of old stuff in my last three moves (Montreal to Chicago, Chicago to Dallas, Dallas to Toronto): a perfecrly working Multisync EGA monitor, a bunch of S100 and SS50 cards (remember the SWTPC?), bunches of MFM drives, printers and so on, as well as some 20+ year old 9 track 1600 BPI tapes: sorry, can't provide any copies of the SPAM (System Programming for Alpha Micros) PASCAL-ripoff compiler I wrote).

      With the move back to Toronto, I gave up my beautiful ADSL service and am stuck with dialup for a while: do I get a non-winmodem PCI modem for the Athlon? or jury rig an ethernet crossover cable to the P200 using it as a firewall, with it's ISA modem? Decisions, decisions. As I added structured wiring to my Dallas, house, I threw in all the routers, firewalls, satellite multiswitches, etc. when I sold it.

      --
      You could've hired me.
  3. Sorry slashdot.. by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    But I won't believe Pioneer 10 is dying until Netcraft confirms it..

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  4. So long old friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They just don't make 'em like they used to.

    1. Re:So long old friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      So sad, now it is only good for Klingon target practice. :(

    2. Re:So long old friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Note that the triumphs of NASA date from the era when engineers ran the programs, and not political hacks like now. I feel sorry for the young engineers now who will never experience the greatness which was NASA.

      There were no slackers then. There were dedicated young engineers with buzz cuts and and a slide rule. They didn't listen to "Hip Hop" or "Heavy Metal". They didn't wear baggy pants. They weren't interested in fashion or political correctness. Their uniform was a crisp white dress shirt, a string tie, and a pair of drip-dry Hagar slacks, accessorized with a leather holster--which held an 18 inch slide rule. Bang.

      These men were focused on quality and greatness. They were patriotic, dedicated men who strove each day to make America first with the best engineering the human mind could conceive.

      Today NASA is run by "professional" managers and bureaucrats. They cow-tow not to quality but to politically motivated "quotas" and false "diversity". Slackers abound. "Getting over" takes precedence over "getting it right".

      The saddest thing of all is not the failures of the current space program, as disturbing as they might be. The saddest thing is that we have lost the spirit and the system and methodology which yielded our greatest triumphs.

    3. Re:So long old friend by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1, Troll

      Buzzcuts and string ties? I have a copy of NASA's history, Pioneer Odyssey and few, if any of the many engineers pictured fit your stereotype.

    4. Re:So long old friend by aliens · · Score: 5, Funny

      Cause we all know you can't accomplish anything unless you don't listen to that satan worshipping hardcore or that terrorist supporting hiphop. These kids now adays are a bunch of unworthy anti-americans.

      Only those people who continue to live in the 50's can possibly bring our great civilization forward. Right?

      The thing that hobbles NASA is the politicians and their demand for big results combined with the huge cuts in budget.

      I can't stand closed minded people. I'm sure you can work dilligently and continuously, you must be a blast to have as a friend.

      --
      -- taking over the world, we are.
    5. Re:So long old friend by orenmnero · · Score: 5, Informative

      Huh? The primary engineers in the early days were Germans, including former Nazis, many of whom built rockets for V-2 missle program. After the war just as many went to Russia as came here. They went to any country that had the resources to pursue a space program.

      And there is no way you are going to tell me the space program was anything but politically motivated. It was a platform for Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon to show up the Russians. Johnson particularly used it to keep the nations mind off Vietnam.

      If anything, the lackluster movement of our space program can be attributed to a LACK of political motivation.

      Failure is part of the process. The success of Pioneer's 3-11 came as a result of the failures of pioneer 0-2. The ones where they didn't "get it right"

      It's also not like those engineers in the good old days never killed anybody. We've had three major disasters exploring space in 67, 86, and 03. All about 15 years apart or so. Not bad considering this is easily the toughest and most dangerous job in the world.

    6. Re:So long old friend by M1FCJ · · Score: 1
      Oh that's all bollocks.

      I have been reading a history book called The Space Shuttle Decision for some time because I wondered how they ended in that piece of crap and I can see that it wasn't the "dedicated young engineers" doing the work even in late 60s. You can see that NASA was a political tool from the start.

      NASA was always ran by "politicians", from the start to the end. It was a political tool when it transferred from being NACA to NASA and it is still a political tool to spend more money.

      Human space travel might have been managed in a much better way, no argument and definitely space science would be much better without NASA spending all its money on bureucracy and making contractors in Boeing etc. rich. Read the NASA History books for their shame value. Although they do best to paint a rosy picture, if you can read the lines, you will be disgusted with NASA for the rest of your life.

    7. Re:So long old friend by varjag · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Note that the triumphs of NASA date from the era when engineers ran the programs, and not political hacks like now.

      NASA was always run by politicians (remember what the space race was about?). It is mostly the difference in funding that makes current spaces program look miserable when compared to the glory past.

      --
      Lisp is the Tengwar of programming languages.
    8. Re:So long old friend by bradkittenbrink · · Score: 1

      The saddest thing of all is not the failures of the current space program, as disturbing as they might be. The saddest thing is that we have lost the spirit and the system and methodology which yielded our greatest triumphs.

      no, the saddest thing of all is the fact that that post makes me wish I knew how to use a slide rule. I'm such an inferior geek.

      ps - alcohol is the best catalyst for karma combustion ever, here's to getting drunk on a tuesday night!

    9. Re:So long old friend by stefanb · · Score: 2, Informative
      Not bad considering this is easily the toughest and most dangerous job in the world.

      Well, no disrespect to anymone working in space programs, but there are a lot more dangerous jobs in the world. Just making the news now are the apparently attrocious conditions in China's mines: "More than 5,000 people were killed in coal mine accidents last year, according to the government."

    10. Re:So long old friend by coastwalker · · Score: 1

      I am sure that the cultural inclinations of the people who work for NASA has very little to do with the quality of the work that they do. If you investigate the science that is visable on the web from NASA it all looks to be of excellent quality. The question you raise might more usefully be addressed to what the goals of NASA are and whether it is funded to achieve them.

      We all look back with great admiration to to time when NASA put people on the moon (still room for first woman on the moon incidentally). It was a teriffic spectacle and the general population got a great buzz out of it. However I suspect that we get a lot more usefull science out of NASA's current activities, they just dont look very exciting in a ten second news slot.

      Take a look at the results of the mapping work being done on Mars and the papers being written on the geology and water, I cant tell whether the authors listen to hip-hop (yeah I detest it too) or opera, but the science is brilliant.

      I agree that it would be nice to have spirited public support for space exploration. But as you point out we did the engineering in the 50's and it still appears to be too expensive to bring it up to date.

      Nuclear powered propulsion anyone?

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    11. Re:So long old friend by Gonarat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you look at history, the first voyages to the New World were all politically funded and motivated. Columbus sailed to the New World (actually it funded as a trip to find a quicker route to India and China) with ships and crew funded by Queen Isabella of Spain. Once gold was found, Spain sent ships and men to go get it (the fact that the gold belonged to someone else was a minor point to the Spanish). Once word of gold and land got out, other European nations started sending ships to the New World, funded by their Governments. Later, as new profit opportunities were found, Corporations (Hudson Trading Company) started getting involved.


      The political agenda with space is nothing new. We are still at the stage where Politicans are funding space exploration. We are just beginning to see the beginning of Corporate interest -- mostly in satellites right now.


      That said -- the main difference (other than technology and location) is we haven't (yet) found anyone out there. Pioneer 10 was a well built spacecraft that has given us (and the Gov't) much more than asked for. It has traveled over 11 light-minutes in 31 years before giving up the ghost, not bad for 1972 technology!


      --
      Beware of Sleestak
    12. Re:So long old friend by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      Actually, the most dangerous job is supposedly Alaskan crab fisherman, followed closely (and probably not in the right order) by truck drivers, loggers, miners, and firefighters.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    13. Re:So long old friend by Erbo · · Score: 4, Funny
      So sad, now it is only good for Klingon target practice.

      Shooting space garbage is no test of a warrior's mettle!

      --
      Be who you are...and be it in style!
    14. Re:So long old friend by Michael_Burton · · Score: 1

      I guess when all you have is an axe, everything looks like a grindstone...

      --
      When all you have is an axe, everything looks like a grindstone.
    15. Re:So long old friend by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      I'm just working from pictures-- my grandfather worked at Ames Research Center on heat shield technology. But if you say engineering culture and management style remained constant from Gemini to Pioneer, who am I to disagree?

    16. Re:So long old friend by jcherland · · Score: 1

      All I can say is "amen". I worked for the government for 2 years. People hated me there because I actually expected to accomplish something in a day. They just showed up to get their pay check and go home. What happened to taking pride in what you do and, in that context, pride in your country!?

    17. Re:So long old friend by evocate · · Score: 1

      And black lung is a more frequent killer of coal miners than accidents. And slower. And more painful.

    18. Re:So long old friend by mustangdavis · · Score: 1

      So sad, now it is only good for Klingon target practice.

      Shooting space garbage is no test of a warrior's mettle!
      Indiana Jones might have been a bit more on target here ...

      "It belongs in a museum!"


      Don't let the stupid Klingon's shoot it!


    19. Re:So long old friend by M1FCJ · · Score: 1
      Not really true. Even restrictions on moving a piece of equipment out of USA that's going to shot up to the space prevents what you are talking about.

      Corporates always choose the cheapest way, if it is blasting something from Kazakhistan steps, that must be allowed.

      Just to protect "American interests", USA alone prevents the mankind's dream. Go taikonauts go!

      It is not expensive to put a man in space. Developing the technology is. On the other hand most of the technology is already more than 40 years old and most of it has already been forgotten. It can be said that USA has forgot more than Russians ever knew about getting a man in space.

      What happened to this "know how"? It wasn't transferred to the "public" domain or even wasn't sold to other companies for money, just for the sake of "national security". Countries like India are penalized because they want an independent space program and they bought the know-how from Russia, until USA prevented Russia by blackmailing them.

      You Americans only think of yourselves, highways, national defence... How many billions do you spend annually for national defence? 380 billion $$ was last year's budget. Mitra knows how much was spent from undercover budgets. And total cost of NASA? Only a couple of billions and they spend most of the money for the sake of keeping their croonies in aviation business happy.

    20. Re:So long old friend by unicron · · Score: 1

      Look at them sideburns! He looks like a girl. Now, Johnny Unitas -- there's a haircut you could set your watch to.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    21. Re:So long old friend by sean23007 · · Score: 1

      Failure is part of the process. The success of Pioneer's 3-11 came as a result of the failures of pioneer 0-2. The ones where they didn't "get it right"

      Significant difference: those were in the days when we were willing to try again. Now, if NASA puts up a failure, their budgets are cut and they have to start over anew.

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    22. Re:So long old friend by freeweed · · Score: 1

      I don't know, 1 in 50 is a pretty high death rate for any job. And that's *per mission*, not per astronaut.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    23. Re:So long old friend by Tetsujin28 · · Score: 1
      They didn't listen to "Hip Hop" or "Heavy Metal".

      Instead they listened to Frank Sinatra. Because everyone knows it's better to support an Italian-American with apparent mob connections than to support an African-American with apparent gang connections. Right?

      --
      - - - -
      The real Tetsujin 28 is a giant robot.
    24. Re:So long old friend by u2rmad · · Score: 1

      I agree with the comment on professional managers and bureaucrats. I sell to NASA and there seems to be fewer and fewer engineers and more people manning desks to push form A to desk B to conform with government rules. My guess is that in ten years, NASA here in Houston will be just a tourist attraction. I have no idea what kind of music people listen to there, but you are as likely to here C&W as hip hop or metal.

  5. Thats one old satelite by kelceylehrich · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It is older than me by 14 years.

    Any one have any really really good pics its taken?

    1. Re:Thats one old satelite by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 1

      You can take your own, just gonna need one big telephoto :)

      Actully would be a fun thing to try. They find astoroids out that far, but then again they are far bigger then Pioneer 10. But just for a challenge just see if anyone can locate it as is, via photo observation or some sort of detection system. I'm sure it could be done, but it would be one very hard challenge.

    2. Re:Thats one old satelite by los+furtive · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is twice the distance of the Sun to Pluto (7.6 billion miles away). To look at an object that small, at that distance, travelling at the speed which it is currently travelling, would be harder than playing this game at max zoom.

      --

      I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

    3. Re:Thats one old satelite by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 1

      I never said it would be easy :)

    4. Re:Thats one old satelite by AcquaCow · · Score: 1

      "The Truth Is Up There"
      I dunno, that game isn't all that hard with a clean mouse, I ranked top 10 on my 3rd try...

      --

      up 12 days, 22:30, 2 users, load averages: 993.20, 994.21, 994.56
      *makes note to limit user processes...
    5. Re:Thats one old satelite by AcquaCow · · Score: 1

      http://www.orisinal.org/games/truth.htm I actually rank first now... I used my wacom tablet this time...and a lower screen res...1600x1200 was hard...

      --

      up 12 days, 22:30, 2 users, load averages: 993.20, 994.21, 994.56
      *makes note to limit user processes...
  6. Rest in peace by andyring · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Pioneer 10, and other satellites of that era, worked far beyond what they were intended, and did a darn good job (and then some) at what they did. Pioneer 10, you did good. May you rest in peace. A job well done.

    1. Re:Rest in peace by Provocateur · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Pioneer isn't dead as long as its moving and carrying that plaque as its one final message from us.

      You know what I've always been looking for in the NASA site but could never get? Animated clips of its voyage (or that of Voyager's) and its fly-bys of the other planets. I always thought they would make really great looking screensavers to match my wallpapers of the shuttle. Anybody know where I can get them?

      Keep on flyin Pioneer

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    2. Re:Rest in peace by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 1

      Pioneer 10, and other satellites of that era, worked far beyond what they were intended, and did a darn good job (and then some) at what they did. Pioneer 10, you did good. May you rest in peace. A job well done.

      Now it's confirmed... They really "don't build 'em like they used to."

      --
      I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
    3. Re:Rest in peace by $$$$$exyGal · · Score: 1

      I still wonder whether we'll figure out a way to communicate again with it in the near future. Regardless of what they say, I still have hope ;-).

      --
      Very popular slashdot journal for adul
    4. Re:Rest in peace by zapp · · Score: 1

      Just a thought, but perhapse your (valid) point would be better accepted if you could state it without using fuck 4 times, amongst other prophanities.

      --
      no comment
    5. Re:Rest in peace by JimPooley · · Score: 1

      Just a thought, but perhapse your (valid) point would be better accepted if you could state it without using fuck 4 times, amongst other prophanities.

      Telling people off for using profanities works a lot better when you can actually spell profanities. And there's only one 'e' in 'perhaps'.

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    6. Re:Rest in peace by km790816 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      One could imagine that we will see Pioneer 10 again. Within a century, I'm sure (or should I say 'I hope') we'll have craft capable of going much faster and further.

      Quite a collector's item, eh? The 22nd Century equivalent of finding the Titanic. (Except that Pioneer 10 is an example of *good* engineering.)

    7. Re:Rest in peace by superyooser · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No, but this page has some fascinating artist renditions (and *huge* publication size images), including Pioneer passing Jupiter, and the Pioneer looking back at the sun from Neptune's orbit!! Amazing! Nobody's ever seen *our* sun appear so small. (It's more dramatic in the medium-size picture.) It gives me goose bumps thinking what it would feel like to be out there, lost in the bleakness of space.

    8. Re:Rest in peace by Lshmael · · Score: 1

      Maybe one day, one of our faster spacecraft will cruise by and pick it up. Either that, or our colonists on Aldebaran will get a surprise 2 million years from now.

    9. Re:Rest in peace by thogard · · Score: 1

      I wonder of Cheops had similar thoughts about his his creation and what would follow.

    10. Re:Rest in peace by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 2, Funny
      Pioneer isn't dead as long as its moving and carrying that plaque as its one final message from us.

      Doesn't the plaque say something along the lines of "Hot man on woman action on the third planet from Sol. Our women are submissive and our men are dolts with small penises. You'll have no problem turning these chicks into your love slaves." Put some pants on those folks next time you go firing off plaques into space!

    11. Re:Rest in peace by BTWR · · Score: 1

      One could imagine that we will see Pioneer 10 again. Within a century, I'm sure (or should I say 'I hope') we'll have craft capable of going much faster and further.

      Yes, but should we try and recapture Pioneer/Voyager spacecraft? They may have finished their Earth-Solar-System use, but they still have one more secondary (maybe even tertiary) goal - their plaques for interstellar communication.

      To capture them and place them in the Smithsonian would cancel it's final purpose.

    12. Re:Rest in peace by km790816 · · Score: 1

      We could send out a new plaque much faster from the point of discovery.

      Come on: we could make that naked chick a lot hotter , too. :-)

    13. Re:Rest in peace by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      One could imagine that we will see Pioneer 10 again. Within a century, I'm sure (or should I say 'I hope') we'll have craft capable of going much faster and further.

      Yeah. Some yahoo will someday pluck it out of the sky when nobody is looking and put it on ebay.

    14. Re:Rest in peace by BTWR · · Score: 1

      We could send out a new plaque much faster from the point of discovery

      ood point - if we did that, sort of a relay-race where wach leg is stronger, then I agree that'd be a good idea.

    15. Re:Rest in peace by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      "Within a century, I'm sure (or should I say 'I hope') we'll have craft capable of going much faster and further."

      Very interesting thought! How cool would it be to get that sucker back and stick it in the Smithsonian. Right next to the Mars Pathfinder Rover that we get back 15 years from now.

      Hrm.. I guess the only thing that would be even cooler is that it was delivered back to us with a bow on top.

    16. Re:Rest in peace by Turbyne · · Score: 1

      Wait a minute, not everything from the current era is "bad engineering." Remember Galileo? Galileo was launched in 1989, was designed to operate until 1997, and they're finishing up the tour now. I'd call that a good job. NASA, keep up the good work. And remember, meters != feet!

      --
      ~A'Ëq'i4d)^'$ÊSÈòB
  7. am I the only one by outsider007 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I worry that we're leaving a trial of breadcrumbs for conquering alien races to find us. fight the future.

    --
    If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    1. Re:am I the only one by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 5, Interesting
      If that were a concern, the constant stream of radio, TV and other telecommunications signals we've been pumping into space for most of the 20th century would be a far bigger problem. There's effectively a big sphere of signals expanding around Earth in all directions at the speed of light, and anyone in space who chanced to stumble across any of our physical probes like Pioneer 10 would most likely have already detected us long, long before. Earth really calls a lot of attention to itself with its broadcasts, and our signals just get stronger and more blanketing as time goes by. Not only that, but even if we stopped all broadcasts tomorrow, there'd still be all our old signals moving out through space, and anyone out there with the wherewithal to detect them would be have several of our earth decades of opportunity in which to do so.

      Moreover, many think it's profoundly unlikely any alien races would be interested in conquering us. Even assuming others out there are hostile, the effort and expenditure of resources to get from there to here would probably mean the payoff for attacking us wouldn't be worth the trip.

      It's also been argued that any extraterrestrial civilizations capable of detecting us will almost certainly be much older and more advanced (the thinking being that on the cosmic timescale, we're just starting off, and any civilization even a little younger than ours wouldn't have the tech to detect us, and the odds are high against another civ reaching this stage of development against the exact same time we do, so if they can hear us they've probably been around a while), and that (presumably, anyway) anyone so advanced wouldn't be warlike, so we'd probably have a lot more to gain than to lose from others finding out about us. I'm certainly no expert, but this does strike me as a fairly reasonable line of thought.

    2. Re:am I the only one by phillymjs · · Score: 5, Funny

      Moreover, many think it's profoundly unlikely any alien races would be interested in conquering us.

      I'm more worried about them seeing stuff like "American Idol," "Survivor," and "Joe Millionaire," and deciding we should all be exterminated, not subjugated.

      We can only hope that their positive perception of our race from the 13 years of Simpsons episodes we've pumped out can withstand the damage the later shows will do to it. :-)

      ~Philly

    3. Re:am I the only one by russellh · · Score: 1
      Moreover, many think it's profoundly unlikely any alien races would be interested in conquering us. Even assuming others out there are hostile, the effort and expenditure of resources to get from there to here would probably mean the payoff for attacking us wouldn't be worth the trip.

      But we have weapons of mass destruction, and have ignored the wishes united federation of planets for far too long.

      --
      must... stay... awake...
    4. Re:am I the only one by kaoshin · · Score: 1

      As if there aren't easier ways to find us, seriously. They probably already have obs floating all over the place and are pumping out reavers and goons. Who cares. Terran owns. We just need to stop our infighting and quit turtling.

    5. Re:am I the only one by Decimal · · Score: 1

      Moreover, many think it's profoundly unlikely any alien races would be interested in conquering us.

      If you had the most advanced warships in the universe and your intergalactic neighbor kept spewing out a constant stream of spam, what would you do?

      Be afraid. Be very afraid.

      --

      Remember "Bring 'em on"? *sigh
    6. Re:am I the only one by edunbar93 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm more worried about them seeing stuff like "American Idol," "Survivor," and "Joe Millionaire," and deciding we should all be exterminated, not subjugated.

      Especially if they're a race of ultra-violent beings who can't stand to miss a single episode? :)

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    7. Re:am I the only one by Sayjack · · Score: 1

      Imagine a universe where instead of a mere 95 cable channels, a universe where we could tap into the near limitless broadcasts of other races on other planets. The Andromedan Home Shopping Channel or Mercutian Lifetime Channel for instance. Ah...dare I dream?

      Perhaps other races would be interested in conquering us for our media content. Screw your water and mineral resources, we want syndication rights to the Simpsons!

      --

      -- Good judgement comes with experience. -- Experience comes with bad judgement.

    8. Re:am I the only one by lingqi · · Score: 1

      what will be funny is one day our radio waves will disrupt some alien civ's communications, when it reaches their place, and will continue for many years (about a century so far, and unless we all get wiped out I don't see it slowing down), much like the cosmic background radiation was puzzling the AT&T engineers - there will be engineering classes in alien universities on how to overcome the problem caused by us.

      and then it will trigger some inter-galactic war because some revolutionary student decides that he / she / it has just HAD it with the repetitious ClearChannel broadcasts of B.Spears and the boy bands - which is on every frequency spectrum.

      --

      My life in the land of the rising sun.

    9. Re:am I the only one by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

      Dear God, no, I don't think I could handle finding out that Seinfeld and Friends have been voted the funniest shows in the galaxy. Or that the funniest joke in this quadrant is that stupid one about the two hunters from New Jersey.

    10. Re:am I the only one by hcdejong · · Score: 4, Funny

      If they can fly at FTL speeds, not missing a single episode is trivial. Just fly to the point to where the broadcast you want has traveled.

    11. Re:am I the only one by AlecC · · Score: 2
      our signals just get stronger and more blanketing as time goes by

      Not so. While the total amount of RF power we are emitting may be increasing, it is becoming progressively less comprehensible. Most signals are now compressed, and the function of compression is to remove from any signal the redundant information that says "this is a signal" when you don't know how it is coded. Essentially, compression makes a signal resemble noise, and the better the compression the closer it is to noise. Sure, you need some kind of sync mark to lock onto the stream, which could in principle be detected, but that is a very small fraction of the signal.

      And we are tranmitting many more, much smaller signals. Instead of broadcasting tens or even hundreds of kilowatts from a hilltop to the universe at large, we are broadcasting a few tens of watts from orbit aimed straight at the earth, or sending it over cable, or broadcasting a few watts from cellphone masts or milliwatts from cellphones. The earths's RF output is raidly becoming indistinguishable from white noise, and from any reasonable distance will be swamped by the much bigger white noise generator nearby (the Sun).

      There is therefore a shell, perhaps a hundred light years thick, of "detectable" transmissions expanding out from the earth, which is already trailing off. To put it another way, any aliens out there will have a hundred year window to look in in the right direction if they are to detect us by our unintentional transmissions.

      Agree with the rest of your comment, though. The ides of aggressive/invasive aliens is purely to make good films/tv. You can't make a good drama out of civilisations getting in contact and just having a pleasant, though rather long drawn out, chat. But that is a far more likely outcome. Even if the cost is not orders of magnitude greater than any plausible benefit (the overwhelming likelihood, IMO), the likelihood of tehir being biologically compatible with us, our environment and our biological products is tiny. And if they don't want out biological products - there is a lot of rock out there to mine for mineral resources. Why try to mine the one bit that someone is sitting on?

      They don't have to be advanced not to want to attack us, they just have to be sensible enough to know what is in their own best interests. And a species which failed that test is unlikely to have space-faring civilisation.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    12. Re:am I the only one by phillymjs · · Score: 1

      Try to be funny without quoting the Simpsons, go ahead, try.

      Hmmm. Well, my parent post got +5, Funny, WITHOUT quoting the Simpsons.

      And I'm not into Monty Python, and I own my own home so no need to go to my parents' basement.

      To sum up, kiss my ass.

      ~Philly

    13. Re:am I the only one by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      anyone so advanced wouldn't be warlike

      I think that's overly optimistic. We've reached our level of advancement largly through being warlike, inventing new ways to fight our wars. It's not unreasonable to believe that a more advanced civilization would also be warlike.

      Also, looking at earth's history, there's a long pattern of advanced civilizations conqering the more primitive.

    14. Re:am I the only one by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      More likely it would be used to embarass and ridicule us. Kinda like when your friends come over to your house and find pictures of you a 2yr old running around nekkid in the back yard under the sprinkler.

      I can see it now:

      Morbo: Heh, lookie what I found! The earthlings sent out a cute little probe 50,000 years ago! How pathetic. Look! Here's nekkid pictures of his great, great, great [...] grandmother and grandfather!

      earther: Hey! Give that back, dammit!

      Morbo: He he, well well. So the big bad earthers want their itty-bitty wittle spacecwaft back, doo dey? Hee hee, can't wait to show this to the guys on Omicron Persei 8!

      earther: &**#(@$!


      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    15. Re:am I the only one by GlassUser · · Score: 1

      Talk about upgrading your TIVO

    16. Re:am I the only one by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      And that's presuming that water is a valuable commodity to any planet except our own...

    17. Re:am I the only one by will592 · · Score: 1

      A lightyear is a distance, just so you know.
      Chris

    18. Re:am I the only one by sbaker · · Score: 1

      Our radio transmissions reduce in intensity (and thus detectability) as the square of the distance from earth - so they become pretty hard to detect. Remember, our best radio telescopes would be unable to detect any of our transmissions from earth if they were mounted on the nearest star - and that's just four lightyears away. This is a big problem for the SETI guys BTW.

      OTOH, Pioneer 10 (if found) would point directly and unambiguously back to us and is just as detectable a billion years from now as it is now.

      IIRC, it's not pointing towards any known stars right now - so it's unlikely anyone would just happen to find it. Space is *BIG*.

      --
      www.sjbaker.org
    19. Re:am I the only one by zipwow · · Score: 1

      "The earths's RF output is raidly becoming indistinguishable from white noise, and from any reasonable distance will be swamped by the much bigger white noise generator nearby (the Sun)."

      I've always found it amusing to imagine that many of the stronger sources of white noise outside our solar system are not the stellar objects we believe them to be, but encrypted communications devices for the multitudinous ETs we've been looking so hard to find.

      Maybe that's what keeps me up at night. That and this foil hat...

      -Zipwow

      --
      I don't know which is more depressing, that 2/3 didn't care enough to vote, or that 1/2 of those that did are crazy.
    20. Re:am I the only one by Senator_B · · Score: 1

      I believe it was an allusion to an episode of Futurama where aliens miss the last episode of an Ally McBeal style show. They come to Earth demanding to see the last episode.

    21. Re:am I the only one by sean23007 · · Score: 1

      The next step in "Pause-live-TV"... Just travel at the speed of light parallel to the incoming signal until you are ready to start playing again, at which point you just stop. It's efficient and plausible. That's what I like about it. ;)

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    22. Re:am I the only one by dcmeserve · · Score: 1
      ...The Andromedan Home Shopping Channel ...

      "Please allow 6e7 to 8e7 weeks for delivery..."

      --
      "Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" - Orwell
    23. Re:am I the only one by Turbyne · · Score: 1

      [SARCASM]Well in First Contact it was the vulcans that first came to Earth, but by Star Trek III the Klingons were trying to kill us! Then again we did secure peace by The Undiscovered Country, although that asshole Gowron screwed it all up again. I'm glad Worf killed Gowron.. Worf da man![/SARCASM]

      --
      ~A'Ëq'i4d)^'$ÊSÈòB
  8. I kind of expected to read by Argon · · Score: 1, Funny

    So long and thanks for all the fish :-)

    1. Re:I kind of expected to read by FireballFreddy · · Score: 1

      Ok, now THAT was funny. :)

      -FF

      --
      SQUEAK, the Death of Rats explained.
  9. Such pessimism.. by TeknoHog · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just because we can't hear its signals doesn't mean THEY don't. /me looks forward to the return of P'neer.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    1. Re:Such pessimism.. by Jenova · · Score: 1

      I wonder who is going to mind meld with it.

    2. Re:Such pessimism.. by Sayjack · · Score: 1

      After having detected the signal to noise ratio of Earth and having engaged in heated deliberation for nearly 20 minutes the intergalactic council voted 2,112 to 8 (with 2 abstensions) to set the interplanetary firewalls to block out all Earth packets.

      --

      -- Good judgement comes with experience. -- Experience comes with bad judgement.

  10. Pioneer when you see by nlinecomputers · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...the Klingon bird of prey decloak, DUCK!

    --
    Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
    1. Re:Pioneer when you see by Beebos · · Score: 1

      I think you are thinking of Voyager's appearance in the original series transformed into V'ger. V'ger was the probe that was destroying all the imperfect species and thought Kirk was "the Creator".

    2. Re:Pioneer when you see by Oobyscood · · Score: 1

      No, he is thinking of the time a Klingon BoP used an old earth probe (dont recall which one, maybe pioneer 11) as target practice.

    3. Re:Pioneer when you see by nlinecomputers · · Score: 1

      Yes, and In Star Trek V a real stupid body builder dressed up as a Klingon decloaks and for target practice shoots up Pioneer X. Maybe it was a Voyager probe but I was thinking that it was Pioneer in Star Drek V.

      --
      Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
    4. Re:Pioneer when you see by Beebos · · Score: 1

      My bad. I replied to the wrong parent. I meant to reply to the guy who thought the grandparent meant Voyager.

  11. Another article by Zipster · · Score: 3, Informative

    There is another article on the news.com.au site in case the first goes down.

    --
    "I propose we leave math to the machines and go play outside" -- Calvin
  12. So Long So Long Sorry to See you Go by mrs+clear+plastic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So Long
    So Long
    I'm Sorry to See You Go
    I'm So Sad You Are Gone
    I Dearly Miss Your Feeble Little Signal
    You May Be Gone
    But You Are In My Heart Forever
    My Tears Will Follow You Wherever You Go

    --
    Cleara
  13. Haiku by sconeu · · Score: 4, Insightful


    A little spacecraft
    Far away among the stars
    Rest well, Pioneer

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:Haiku by rossifer · · Score: 1

      Thanks.

      Haiku really is a wonderful form of expression.

      Ross

    2. Re:Haiku by 403Forbidden · · Score: 1

      Not it isn't... It's like listening to a fuzzy cell-phone line.. *cheesh*ca-*cheesh*bill*cheesh*

      Just say what you mean, don't conform.

    3. Re:Haiku by rossifer · · Score: 1

      You must have amazing insight into my own communication preferences to be able to see, more clearly than I, that I don't think Haiku is really a wonderful form of expression...

      <sarcasm>
      Gosh, thanks for helping me out there! I almost conformed to... well I almost conformed to something anyway (though you didn't help me out by explaining what my personal opinion had been in conformance with)! Now I'll just jump up and conform to your assertion!
      </sarcasm>

      The next time you think of posting something like this, think twice. You've managed to remove all doubt.

      As it turns out, I really do like Haiku and tend to find that people who don't get it are rather astonishingly boring company. Though it is only one observable factor, in my experience, the correlation is amazingly good.

      Good luck,
      Ross

  14. Another Space Era comes to a close by dWhisper · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is the second major deep space probe in the last few months that has gone south. Sad, because Pioneer 10 was the one that paved the way for so many other missions (like the Voyager Missions).

    Here's to a long and steady life to the remaining deep space missions out there.

  15. It's Done For? by rice_web · · Score: 3, Funny

    So, it's just dying out there? And what about our other "deep-space" probes? Yep, on the death bed.

    So, using rice_web's ingenious stupidity, I've come up with:

    (1) Send a new probe to follow our dying probes and act as a relay for the information.

    (2) Just completely start over and get new probes up and running, and moving more quickly than our dying probes.

    --
    The Political Programmer
  16. Pioneer 10 isn't dead.... by Sergeant+Beavis · · Score: 5, Funny
    It was just Slashdotted, that's all.

    Watch, in 5 years, someone will hear from it again.

    --
    There is nothing inherently safe about liberty. That's why so many people died protecting it.
    1. Re:Pioneer 10 isn't dead.... by wirefarm · · Score: 1

      Watch, in 5 years, someone will hear from it again.

      Or it will show up on eBay...

      --
      -- My Weblog.
    2. Re:Pioneer 10 isn't dead.... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, it'll be reposted within days. :^P

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Pioneer 10 isn't dead.... by Subground · · Score: 1

      It could happen. The AO-7 Satellite, launched in 1974 was "dead" for over 20 years when someone heard it by chance one day. And that satellite was built by amateurs.
      More info here.
      Of course, even if Pioneer "comes back", it's still travelling away from us and the signal might be far too weak to detect. It's also possible that it's operating fine, we just can't hear it anymore.. Isn't it the fastest moving object man has ever created? I admittedly not an expert on the matter.

    4. Re:Pioneer 10 isn't dead.... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      It was just Slashdotted, that's all. Watch, in 5 years, someone will hear from it again.

      No, somebody modded its signal down to "troll" because it kept bragging about its distance.

    5. Re:Pioneer 10 isn't dead.... by Turbyne · · Score: 1

      2743: P'ner seeks its maker! And they wear really wierd clothes! (Ref: Star Trek, The Motion Picture)

      --
      ~A'Ëq'i4d)^'$ÊSÈòB
  17. Lifespan? by 1000101 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What is the approximate lifespan of the craft? Will the harsh environment of space eventually destroy it, or will it simply drift along forever? Unless of course it collides with something which I would think would be highly unlikely.

    1. Re:Lifespan? by Sergeant+Beavis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think they said Pioneer 10 was lucky to have just survived the radiation it was exposed to as it passed Jupiter. I think it's safe to say that it last MUCH MUCH MUCH longer than anyone anticipated.

      --
      There is nothing inherently safe about liberty. That's why so many people died protecting it.
    2. Re:Lifespan? by kfg · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, other than the low temperature the enviroment of space isn't very harsh.

      It's when you start getting near things, like planets and stars, that things get dicey.

      Pioneer is heading the other way, and there isn't any reason that it shouldn't drift on for millions of years, God willing and the crick don't rise none.

      That's why they affixed the infamous plaque to it.

      KFG

    3. Re:Lifespan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You are forgetting the solar wind. Throwing charged particles at a tenth of the speed of light, not great for electronics.

    4. Re:Lifespan? by Student_Tech · · Score: 1

      Article says the original missions were for about 21 months. But that doesn't say anything for how long it will actually last.

    5. Re:Lifespan? by Amroarer · · Score: 1

      Most of the electronics, anyway. The scientific payloads were variously turned off one by one to save power, but the SNAPs are still generating, and if they could get even a partial DSN lock, the navigation system and high-gain transceiver must be working.

    6. Re:Lifespan? by tomzyk · · Score: 1

      ...there isn't any reason that it shouldn't drift on for millions of years...

      What about the gravitational pull of the Sun? Does Pioneer 10 have enough velocity to escape its pull? (I've been looking around for this and can't find the answer anywhere.)

      --
      Karma: NaN
    7. Re:Lifespan? by spectrum- · · Score: 1

      Who cares about the electronics condition though? They're useless now that the batteries are dead
      so its just a floating monument...

      G.

    8. Re:Lifespan? by KlausBreuer · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but won't vacuum sublimation eat it up after a couple of million years? ...unless it's brought back to us by some friendly aliens first: "Hey, you dropped this."

      --
      Free PC version of ChipWits at http://www.breueronline.de/klaus/chipwits/
    9. Re:Lifespan? by Gleng · · Score: 1

      I just had a look around the net and found the following:

      The escape velocity of the sun is 600km/sec.
      The speed of Pioneer 10 is 12km/sec.

      Now, I'm no expert on space travel, and I can't guarantee the validity of those numbers , but it does seem like we'll be seeing Pioneer 10 again in the future. Although the site where I found the speed of Pioneer 10 seemed to reckon that it's on its way to Aldebaron.

      On the surface it does seem like it's not leaving the solar system. Maybe someone with knowledge of these things can help.

      --
      "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
    10. Re:Lifespan? by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      What about the gravitational pull of the Sun? Does Pioneer 10 have enough velocity to escape its pull?

      Yes.

  18. Distance. by cybermace5 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's 7.6 billion miles away. Almost 12 hours at the speed of light. And it will take two million years to reach a star considered to be in our close neighborood.

    Incomprehensible space...it's incredibly daunting, yet unbelievably appealing. Pioneer 10 was sent out in the same spirit as the pioneers of early America: the lure of seemingly boundless space and undiscovered wonders.

    This pioneer is blazing a trail we all hope to follow someday. Goodbye Pioneer 10, you have served us well.

    --
    ...
    1. Re:Distance. by jeffy124 · · Score: 1

      wow .. and some people agonize over a network latency of a few seconds, imagine forcing them to wait 72 hours just for TCP's 3-way handshake!

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    2. Re:Distance. by digitalsushi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      2 million years eh? Ok, here's a thought to ponder. Think some...thing from Earth will go get it before it gets to the next local star?

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    3. Re:Distance. by jeffy124 · · Score: 1

      yeah, i sure know my math: 12 * 3 = 72. That should be 36 hours.

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    4. Re:Distance. by digital+bath · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well said.
      I wonder if someday we will pick Pioneer up again, or just let it drift forever. Were all probes sent with the "mankind peace" plaque? (the one that depicts a man and women and some other stuff that I can't remember)

      --
      find / -name "*.sig" | xargs rm
    5. Re:Distance. by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

      Most pioneers either tried to coexist with the Indians, or cowered and ran away.

      It was the armies that came later that wiped out/corraled up the Indians.

      Perhaps there are things we have learned from our history, that we will remember not to repeat.

      Also, I was talking about the spirit of exploration, not the effects of civilization.

      If you take offense at my use of the word civilization, what I mean by it is building farms, houses, and cities.

      --
      ...
    6. Re:Distance. by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

      Maybe around the year 2300, if something along the lines of the Matrix occurs (however unlikely).

      Plenty of room for Matrix plotline expansion if the dodging-bullets-in-the-Matrix thing gets old: let's see how far the AI has gone in terms of space research. Would make it pretty interesting if an alien race began attacking Earth because they viewed it as a hostile Borg-like planet. Perhaps some of the less hostile AI, which we get to see in some of the upcoming sequels, would join forces with the humans to defend the planet.

      Anyway...it's not my job to come up with plot devices and make Hollywood any more money!

      --
      ...
    7. Re:Distance. by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Guess what, many of the American Indian tribes were warlike, too. They would just as happily have kicked the Europeans' butts, had they posessed the wherewithal to do so. They weren't morally superior, just technically inferior.

    8. Re:Distance. by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      I assume you know that TCP ha a much shorter timeout and isn't even appropiate for a link to the sun. Then again your jsut trying to getr a few +1 funnies.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    9. Re:Distance. by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 4, Informative

      >> 2 million years eh? Ok, here's a thought to ponder. Think some...thing from Earth will go get it before it gets to the next local star?

      Very good chance, though i think by pass you mean go farther out. I just can't see one pulling up and going by it in the passing lane. Make for fun video though.

      Anyways. This is the problem with earth ship ideas and such. You build a huge ship and start leaving earth today, then 10 years later another group does. They by then have developed a faster earth ship, and soon pass you by. Thus you wasted years in space you could have been on earth.

      We have much faster probes today. Ion engine powered one could probably catch up to it fast. I remember a TLC episode or similar talking about them and how fast they go. They don't start fast but they just keap accelarating forever (pretty much) so they hit insane speeds. The thing we sent to that astoroid and landed on had an ion engine. It traveled way faster then anything else we ever put out there.

    10. Re:Distance. by tuba_dude · · Score: 1

      I remember a lecture somewhere about this. Along with that, there was a plaque with 'hello' in every language on the planet, and a recording too. I think they might have included some (classical) music too.

      --
      "The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion."
    11. Re:Distance. by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 2, Funny
      You build a huge ship and start leaving earth today, then 10 years later another group does. They by then have developed a faster earth ship, and soon pass you by.

      Same deal with some complex computing problems. The best strategy for solving one is to wait for faster computers to be invented.

    12. Re:Distance. by Jason+Pollock · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have to disagree here. The best way is to get started and then improve your ship as you go. You will need generic manufacturing capabilities anyways (replacement parts), so why not build better engines?

      You have to have the ability to manufacture anything that Earth can simply to stay alive during the trip, so all you then need are the plans/templates, which is simple communication.

      So you start, improve your ship and speed up. No time wasted, and you still get there first.

      Unless of course someone invents FTL, in which case, you can't get the plans before they show up and say "hi".

      It's the same with hard computer problems. Sure, it may get faster later, but you start now and improve the hardware as you go. Don't assume a closed system!

      Jason Pollock

    13. Re:Distance. by snake_dad · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The thing we sent to that astoroid and landed on had an ion engine. It traveled way faster then anything else we ever put out there.

      I think you mean Deep Space 1, which has an ion engine and flew within 1,400 miles of comet Borelly. A little extra duty for that spacecraft, not unlike Pioneer greatly exceeding expectations. The one that landed on an asteroid was NEAR Shoemaker, but it has normal thrusters. Both where extraordinary missions.

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    14. Re:Distance. by oPless · · Score: 1

      No doubt if aliens find it and come to earth, Bush will demand they disarm all their weapons of mass destruction. Not to mention that he would align them with the axis of evil, and then the media will show them eating children and small pets.

    15. Re:Distance. by jdaily · · Score: 1

      > It was the armies that came later that wiped out/corraled up the Indians.

      Well, technically the Indians had already been wiped out by the explorers. 95% or so...what a staggering number. Stalin was right.

    16. Re:Distance. by TGK · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or maybe the Aliens will send a giant probe that will send ultrasonic messages into the oceans in an attempt to get a certain harmonic to occur in New Zion.

      Of course this will disrupt earths weather pattersn and the AI will send someone back in time to 1980s San Fransisco in order to capture two completely sentient members of the human race.

      This is getting confusing. I wonder if they'll run into Sara Conner.

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    17. Re:Distance. by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Now *THAT* was funny...

    18. Re:Distance. by nuintari · · Score: 1

      Yeah, except that you have to spend a lot of time slowing back down again. Not as big an issue wioth a probe, you can rivet all the stuff down, it doesn't need to maintain an atmosphere, and it has no soft fleshy inhabitents that tend to die if you make them go from 500,000 to 0 in 2 seconds flat.

      So basically, ya spend years accelerating, run at some ridiculous, or maybe even ludicrous speed for a while, and yes, to land on something, Colonel Sanders was write, "we've got to slow down first."

      --

      --Nuintari

      slashdot : where an opinion can be wrong.

    19. Re:Distance. by Spunk · · Score: 1

      And it will take two million years to reach a star considered to be in our close neighborood.

      Or much, much, longer, depending on which direction it's pointed.

    20. Re:Distance. by ipxodi · · Score: 1

      This is getting confusing. I wonder if they'll run into Sara Conner.

      If they do... Don't bang her! Your scenes will be cut in the sequel.

      --
      load "windows7" ,8,1
  19. Amazing... by dgoodell · · Score: 1

    I still think it's amazing that these things lasted this long, whereas modern probes often don't even accomplish the mission before failing, let alone lasting 30 years. They just don't make 'em like they used to

  20. Paraphrase from "Apollo 13" by Mr.+Fusion · · Score: 2, Insightful

    She sure was a good ship.
    Farewell, Pioneer. And we thank you.

    -Mr. Fusion

  21. DSN by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    The first thing I thought of was Deep Space Nine. And I thought... My God, that thing has traveled far!

  22. We should retrieve it someday by jonman_d · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If/when technology permits, we should make it a point to send a ship to retrieve the probe, for both practical and symbolic reasons. It'd be interesting to see the ware and tare on a craft that's been through so much as it has; and, it has a great historical value. As a sign of respect to itself and its builders, Pioneer deserves to be in a measeum of sorts.

    Of course, my other half tells me, for the same reasons, let it alone, in space, quietly, where its home is.

    1. Re:We should retrieve it someday by Sergeant+Beavis · · Score: 2
      Yea, if technology permits, a caretaker robot craft should accompany it, keeping it clear of any potentially damaging debris and studying it as it decays over the centuries. If it is to decay in space that is.

      --
      There is nothing inherently safe about liberty. That's why so many people died protecting it.
    2. Re:We should retrieve it someday by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The best way to honor it is to let it keap going. Just cause we haven't heard from it or won't doesn't mean it's job is done. It's out there and traveling even if all systems are dead. Some day something will find it. That's another part of it's mission. You wouldn't pull the statue of liberty down and put it in a mueaseum because it's done a good job. It's still doing it's job. Yeah I would like to see it to, but it's busy working right now.

    3. Re:We should retrieve it someday by kisrael · · Score: 1

      I was wondering if a flying museum would work, built around it as it continued its journey.

      Then I started wondering about the effect of the gravity generated by such a museum...

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    4. Re:We should retrieve it someday by captaineo · · Score: 1

      Hmm... Inside a hollow sphere, the net gravitational field is zero. So if the museum were relatively sphere-shaped and mostly hollow inside, it wouldn't disturb the path of the probe that much.

    5. Re:We should retrieve it someday by Nick+Barnes · · Score: 1

      We don't have to retrieve it just to put it in a museum. The Pioneer 10 museum will be there, at Pioneer 10, coasting along through interstellar space. A large museum will completely contain the probe, allow visitors to inspect the plaque and so on, without disturbing its mission in the slightest. The museum won't get many visitors, of course, and in practice its main function will be to provide a virtual Pioneer 10 to a sister museum located closer to home.

    6. Re:We should retrieve it someday by alef.01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree. On the other hand, an effort should have been made to retrieve Mir from orbit instead of leaving it fall down liker that. Regarding the statue of liberty, I can't believe we Egyptians had let it go to America instead of it's intended place at the enterance of Suez Canal!! :)

    7. Re:We should retrieve it someday by hplasm · · Score: 1

      1. Catch it

      2. Grab it

      3. Ebay.

      4. Profit!!

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
    8. Re:We should retrieve it someday by Tweakmeister · · Score: 1

      I'd love to retrieve it... and throw it on ebay :D

      --

      Colossians 2:8

    9. Re:We should retrieve it someday by anshil · · Score: 1

      Someday it will might as well crush into a star and melt.

      --

      --
      Karma 50, and all I got was this lousy T-Shirt.
    10. Re:We should retrieve it someday by KlausBreuer · · Score: 1

      Ware and tare?

      Hm. Yes, I guess you're right.
      We should remove any ware(z) from it in case the space cops find it, and while we're at it, might as well clean up all the space-tar it picked up from travelling along the space-lanes.

      Right?

      --
      Free PC version of ChipWits at http://www.breueronline.de/klaus/chipwits/
  23. Not too shocking... by mraymer · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The thing has been going longer than it was ever intended to anyway. It's really cold and really far away, so it's not too shocking that it finally quit.

    Has SETI given up on it, too? I know they would do an informal test on their equipment by looking for the Pioneer 10 signal. SETI has been having problems tracking it for a few years at least... here's something Jill Tarter wrote about it.

    If a nuclear war or asteroid or other event destroys all of humanity, probes like this will be our only legacy...

    --

    "To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking

    1. Re:Not too shocking... by mahart · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wish our legacy had better pornography on it

    2. Re:Not too shocking... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      It does not show up well in your link, but she has great hips.

    3. Re:Not too shocking... by Caffeine+Pill · · Score: 1

      Seriously, since it was the 70s, they could have at least put John Holmes and Ginger Lynn on that bad boy...

  24. Re:Netcraft Confirms... by grub · · Score: 1

    Not a bad try, better man sed though, you missed a couple. ;)

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  25. Radioisotopes by LordSah · · Score: 1

    ...are really cool. Nuclear powered naval vessels don't last a third as long as Pioneer's radioactive batteries have.

    It would be great if we could roll radioactive waste into similar devices to power cars, remote buildings, or even laptops--if we could effectively shield the power source with a small light enclosure.

    1. Re:Radioisotopes by ThePeices · · Score: 1

      as nice a thought it is, i dont think it would ever happen. youve got a few kg of highly radioactive material in a "battery", the potential for using it in a bad way is just too high. would anyone like to see our favorite terrorists using these as dirty bombs? i sure as hell wouldnt. Bring it on fuel cells. bring it on.

    2. Re:Radioisotopes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      ---..are really cool. Nuclear powered naval vessels don't last a third as long as Pioneer's radioactive batteries have.

      You dont have a clue. A nuclear submarine has 1 battery compartment. This battery is your 50 gallon drum nuclear battery. Those types of batteries have a lifespan (in the submarine) of about 20 years. For that 20 years, it takes care of propulsion, air bladders, CO2 scrubbers, and the 90V AC (I cant remember the freq offhand).

      For disposal, they seal these drums in bigger drums with the bottom of the bigger drum a lead/concrete mesh. They proceed to pour the similar mixture all around the barrel, sealing it totally. Then they lift it 2 miles down a hole in a mountain (Nevada). Once a floor is done, it's sealed by concrete and then a hatch is rivited and then soldered on.

      For what it's worth, ALL the nuclear waste in the US would fit in the dimensions of the football field 6 feet deep. Compare that to COx, NOx, SOx and other organic crap floating from tailpipes. After what I've seen, nuclear is the safest fuel, given non-idiots tending the reactor. You've never heard of a US nuclear powered sub go critical and meltdown. You wonder why? They arent the dumbasses like 3MI. Island.

      From somebody who knows a little too much.

    3. Re:Radioisotopes by waveclaw · · Score: 1
      t would be great if we could roll radioactive waste into similar devices to power cars, remote buildings, or even laptops--if we could effectively shield the power source with a small light enclosure.


      Hmmm....intersting idea, except the radio-iso-thermo-electric generators depended on heating thermocouples with nuclear decay. I don't think we'll get as good a temperature differential in our lovely atmosphere at sea level as there is in the near-vacuum of inter-steller/planetary space. And there is the whole radiation problem of decaying unstable matter.


      But these people with their
      quantum nucleonic reactor might be able to do it. While based on X-ray induced gamma ray emission of halfium isomers , rather than (I think) thorium isotope-decay powered thermocouples, it still sounds cool (which we all know means its better.) Besides, with a throttle-able power supply with which you could save the juice your not using at any given moment, your probe - unlike poineer - could be still tickin' away.

      --

      "You cannot have a General Will unless you have shared experiences. You cannot be fair to people you don't know."
    4. Re:Radioisotopes by ThePeices · · Score: 1

      well, i didnt mean go critical and nuke half a city or anything. I meant "dirty bomb" when i said dirty bomb, which is simply a good way to spread a good sized amount of radioactive material in a wide area...in the middle of a city, can you imagine the chaos that will ensue?

    5. Re:Radioisotopes by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Pioneer 10 & 11 spacecraft used Pu-238 RTGs. The generators initialially provided 155 watts, which diminished to 140 watts by the time the spacecraft encountered Jupiter, 100 watts five years into the mission.

    6. Re:Radioisotopes by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Al Qadea could bang on an RTG all day and all night without getting one into shape to make into a dirty bomb.

      http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/galileo/messenger/oldmes s/ RTGs1.html

      http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/galileo/messenger/oldmes s/ RTGs.html

      http://nuclear.gov/space/space-desc.html

      Fuel cells will require fuel and electricity and will not be as hardy as an RTG. And RTG doesn't need maintance nor does it need an environment similar to that of a human.

      Nuclear is what we need for space.

    7. Re:Radioisotopes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      you dont have a clue do you. Two different processes are going on. Radioisotope batteries use radioactive decay for creating heat and in turn use thermocouples to make electricity. Nuclear-powered submarines use nuclear fission to heat water in a closed loop to exchange that heat with water from the sea to creat steam to drive a turbine. Those reactors are like any other on the surface and soon use their fuel up and need to be replaced (about 10 years or less). Don't forget the Trident sub. It went down and littered the sea with radioactive junk.

    8. Re:Radioisotopes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ---Of course the dumbasses at 3MI don't control the media, nor can they "classify" information, or "disappear" witnesses.

      That doesnt matter. Remember the russian vessal, Kursk? There was a group of people that knew what happened even before the Russians knew. Sesmologists. They heard a 4Hz 'ripple' at that time, from the explosion of that uh air going to the 'top'.

      From their models, they knew something exploded. And if you know your geometry, all you need to know is 3 places for near perfect position. From what they gathered, something exploded in the ocean. That something was quite deep. Sub.

      A nuclear explosion would be totally unhidable. There's nuclear detection sattelites that can detect minute traces of any sub-major explosion. Did you know, that in the mid 70's somebody blew a 2 Kton dirty bomb at the south pole? The US nor the Russians didnt know who did it. We thought it was some 3'rd world dictatorship (similar to Hussein or Kadafee). We still havent figured that one out.

      From somebody who knows a little too much.

    9. Re:Radioisotopes by Mark+(ph'x) · · Score: 3, Funny

      Great.. now instead of toshiba notebooks burning my lap, they will also irradiate my genitalia and give me mutated children!

      --
      those who control the past, control the future. those who control the present, control the past.
    10. Re:Radioisotopes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually we were thinking of either somewhere in Africa, or China. The USSR kept some distance from China in terms of weapontry, and the chinese "democracy" hated it. They've always had the manpower for nearly everything, but the destruction of the Soviet Bloc helped all of the non-nuclear countries start up their own project.

      Then there's the case with Africa. You have 2 groups of people: leaders, sheep. The leaders were usually bent towards destroying the biggest world power, the US (surprise). The sheep who didnt follow got massacred. Then there's Kadafee. We believe he possibly did this "test". Still, we dont know if it was him, because somebody would have had to sell him the materials. the US wouldnt. The Russians wouldnt either. They knew how crazy he was.. and if they took us out, Russia would have been next. Isreal wouldnt have needed it either.. They'd be glowing too if they used it in the Middle east, which is the same reason Saddam probably wont use most of the WOMD. It'll hit him too.

      Trust me... It'll stay a mystery. The only evidence was blown up at the south pole.

    11. Re:Radioisotopes by LordSah · · Score: 2

      Submarines use active fission, right? Pioneer's only harnesses energy from radioactive decay. It's much safer, and very low maintenance (for Pioneer, it's practically zero). I wasn't really positive on how often nuclear vessels need a refuelling--I thought I had read that the Nimitz's go for 8-10 years.

      You're definitely right about nuclear is by far the safest energy available today. Its problem is that the word "nuclear" scares the bajesus out of folks who don't know any better.

    12. Re:Radioisotopes by AndrewRUK · · Score: 1

      A dirty bomb would be an excelent terrorist weapon. The fact that the chaos one would cause is due to people's misunderstanding of the physics is irrelevent. It would cause chaos and panic in the general public, and that can be an excelent tool for terrorists.

      People believing that a dirty bomb is more dangerous than a 'non-dirty' bomb is enough to make it more dangerous by making people panic more.

    13. Re:Radioisotopes by wjsteele · · Score: 1

      The US has lost two nuclear powered submarines. The Thresher in 1963 and the Scorpion in 1968. But, neither one was a Trident (Ohio Class) sub, which didn't enter service until 1982.

      Bill

      --
      It's my Sig and you can't have it. Mine! All Mine!
    14. Re:Radioisotopes by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      It's much safer, and very low maintenance (for Pioneer, it's practically zero).

      Only 'practically' zero? You mean they've had to have a service call? I'd hate to be paying the repairman's travel expenses!

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    15. Re:Radioisotopes by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1
      ALL the nuclear waste in the US would fit in the dimensions of the football field 6 feet deep.

      Of course, things would get pretty warm if you actually tried to put them all together like that.(And I have to presume you're not talking about "low-level" waste...)

      I always liked the idea of dropping them into the ocean where one continental plate is subducting under another. It'd be a long time before you'd see that stuff again.

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    16. Re:Radioisotopes by LordSah · · Score: 1

      Practically zero in that the folks who run deep space probes do maintainence--rebooting circuits, flushing data buffers, moving parts around, etc. I have no idea if the power source has needed any such operations during its history.

  26. Its a Lie by bastardman · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just detected that probe the other day... wait... perhaps that was a different kind of probe. Never mind then.

  27. communication via relay? by klaricmn · · Score: 1, Interesting

    i wonder if it would be possible to use some the other satelites that us earthlings have out the the solar system to contact these probes when they get farther and farther away.

    Imagine a chain of probes sent out in the same direction, all relaying information back to earth via one another. I wonder if any research has been done on the feasibility of such an approach...

    1. Re:communication via relay? by ThePeices · · Score: 1

      i think the size of the receiving dish would be too high for any probe acting as a relay to get a decent signal.

    2. Re:communication via relay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If its batteries are (almost) out, then a relay isnt much help since there is no signal at all.

    3. Re:communication via relay? by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 4, Informative

      Possible, kind of, but not really.

      NASA is researching the possibility of setting up a network of satellites around the solar system that can relay information.

      Mars, infact, has 2 relay satellites (MGS and ODY) in orbit that can relay information from rovers/landers/etc from the ground. More will be entering orbit still (ESA's, and another mars orbiter for 2005 or 2007 i think). They will all have the ability to relay information. The beagle lander will rely on this, for example.

      But there is a problem. Those satellites can only relay signals from mars (in orbit, or on the ground). They cannot pick up a signal from Jupiter or Saturn, and retransmit it to earth because they do NOT have a reciever big enough to do that.

      NASA's DSN (look it up) has 100 foot dish antennas to pick up signals from the outter solar system.

      You CANNOT fit a 100 foot dish to a satellite and orbit it around Mars or Jupiter, etc, to pick up signals from further out and relay them to earth. Its simply not possible.

      Because of this, spaceprobes can only relay signals to Earth from signals which are near by. Hence, MGS or ODY relaying from landers on he surface of mars, or Cassini relaying data from the huygens probe.

      Cassini can't pick up signals from a probe around Nepture or Uranus and relay it to earth, because it just cannot possibly have a powerful enough reciever since that requires a huge dish.

      One option, however, is to use laser (optical) instead of radio transmission, which may make this possible.

      That may still have many other problems of its own, however.

      D.

      --
      You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
    4. Re:communication via relay? by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      You CANNOT fit a 100 foot dish to a satellite and orbit it around Mars or Jupiter, etc, to pick up signals from further out and relay them to earth. Its simply not possible.

      Are you saying we can't do it now or we can't do it ever? The Thuraya satellite, which serves mobile phones from geosynchronous earth orbit, has a 12.25 meter dish antenna.

    5. Re:communication via relay? by bengoerz · · Score: 1

      You CANNOT fit a 100 foot dish to a satellite and orbit it around Mars or Jupiter, etc, to pick up signals from further out and relay them to earth. Its simply not possible.

      Perhaps this is only not possible by conventional thinking, if even then. But picture the Space Elevator hoisting up a large dish, or several small pieces of it. Beyond that, if we can launch an International Space Station that weighs 393,733 lbs, then even a dish factory in space is fathomable. ("Break your satellite? Need new parts? Just order on the universe wide web at uww.spaceparts.com!")

    6. Re:communication via relay? by MyHair · · Score: 2, Funny

      ("Break your satellite? Need new parts? Just order on the universe wide web at uww.spaceparts.com!")

      Probably more like uww.spaceparts.co.tx.us.sol.arm17.milkyway . :-) Unfortunately the latency for the nearest root DNS server is 217 years.

    7. Re:communication via relay? by dexter+riley · · Score: 1

      You CANNOT fit a 100 foot dish to a satellite and orbit it around Mars or Jupiter, etc, to pick up signals from further out and relay them to earth. Its simply not possible.

      Not necessarily. Check out a proposed Neptune Explorer mission here. It would use an inflatable lens of 25 meters or so to focus both light and microwaves, to provide energy and communications to the probe.

      Yes, yes, the inflatant will gradually escape, but once you have your space elevator and nuclear powered engines, you'll be able to call "Culligan's Volatiles Service (We Deliver)" and have your tanks topped off periodically.

    8. Re:communication via relay? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Are you saying we can't do it now or we can't do it ever? The Thuraya satellite, which serves mobile phones from geosynchronous earth orbit, has a 12.25 meter dish antenna.

      I'm not sure what he meant by "cannot fit a 100 ft dish", but the example you cite as rebuttal is less than 40 feet (12.25m * 39inches = 39.8125 feet), so what you said makes no sense either...

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    9. Re:communication via relay? by hughk · · Score: 1
      Why? You do not need a rigid antenna in space. A lot of the solidity of a ground based antenna is because it has to withstand a lot of wind. Then the head amp has to be kept cold to reduce the noise. Both of these are a lot easier in space. There also isn't the problem of ground (or even air based) interference, not to many microwave ovens or mobile phones in space!

      One of the early satellite projects sent out an aluminiumised mylar ball that was inflated. Radio waves were bounced off the thing from the ground. The technology isn't difficult.

      It wouldn't be hard to put something up that could be inflated. Sure it would deflate with micrometiorites or whatever, but that would take time and a little gas goes a long way in space.

      The main asset would be the ability to do really large baseline interferometry.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    10. Re:communication via relay? by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 1

      You (and some of others who replied to my comment) have made some very good points.

      I have been corrected :)

      That said, i still think optical will be better then radio in the future.

      It would also be cool to have a relay satellite in orbit around venus.. which could relay data between earth and mars when earth and mars are on opposite sides of the sun. Usually venus would be on either side then (tho not neccesarily).

      D.

      --
      You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
    11. Re:communication via relay? by way2trivial · · Score: 2, Funny

      Its simply not possible.
      Historically, the most inspirational statement possible.

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    12. Re:communication via relay? by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure what he meant by "cannot fit a 100 ft dish", but the example you cite as rebuttal is less than 40 feet (12.25m * 39inches = 39.8125 feet), so what you said makes no sense either...

      And the satellite I cited is in GEO, not around another planet. I'm well aware of the difference. I'm just pointing out that a 40 ft dish can in fact be launched, because it is deployed only in space.

      Therefore, if we can do this now, it doesn't make much sense to say we can't do it ever. Which is why I asked what he/she meant.

  28. Pioneer 10 is dying by ItsBacon · · Score: 1
    It is official, NASA confirms: Pioneer 10 is dying.

    One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered Pioneer community when NASA confirmed that Pioneer 10's signal strength had dropped yet again. Coming on the heels of a recent NASA commnications attempt which plainly states that Pioneer 10 has lost all communication with home, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along, Pioneer 10 is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by being completely unable to send a receivable signal in the last NASA communications attempt.

  29. Verizon Commercials by dmuth · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did anyone else read that and think of the Verizon Wireless commercials?

    "Can you hear me NOW?!?"

  30. Amateur time by tqft · · Score: 4, Interesting

    OK Pioneer is dying from whatever I read it appears the problem is the signal to noise ratio is too low.

    Perhaps all you amateurs with radio telescopes out there should ask NASA nicely (through whatever an organisation preferably) for the frequency and lcoation data that is not publicly available and do a big combined search.

    Do you have procedures/software for doing VLBI? It would be a good project to do build it around if you do not already.

    A few hours a day or days a month and you might still get some useful data from it.

    --
    The Singularity is closer than you think
    Quant
    1. Re:Amateur time by ender81b · · Score: 5, Informative

      No offense but if NASA's DSN network, the most advanced tracking and recieving facility in the world, cannot detect it why would you think 1000 amateur astronomers would have any luck? I pulled this from the Voyager home page but presumably Pioneer would be much weaker:

      " The antennas must capture Voyager information from a signal so weak that the power striking the antenna is only 10 exponent -16 watts (1 part in 10 quadrillion). A modern-day electronic digital watch operates at a power level 20 billion times greater than this feeble level. "

      Then again I am no radio expert so maybe what you describe is feasible.

    2. Re:Amateur time by captaineo · · Score: 2, Informative

      AFAIK interferometry increases resolution, but it doesn't let you detect signals fainter than any one of the telescopes could individually. And in this case it's the radiation-gathering that's important, not resolution... (I think)

    3. Re:Amateur time by tqft · · Score: 1

      >No offense

      None taken

      >Then again I am no radio expert
      Neither am I, that's is why I am asking.

      >this feeble level
      Radio astromers are used to weak signals - that weak maybe not for amateurs but 100 (or 1000?) widely spaced maybe.

      The problem with NASA's DSN is not that it cannot detect it, but cannot lock on. So there is a signal they can detect but it is not strong enough. I am not asking the amateurs to upload to the sucker (first /. in space?).

      So collect a whole lot of radiation over from 1000 radio astromers (is there that many?). Then combine the data. The DSN works basically one antenna at a time (10's to 100's of m), with VLBI you get a truly huge antenna (100's to 1000's of km) - a factor of 10,000 increase in dish size.

      Is the equipment up to it? Would the amateurs consider it a worthwhile diversion from their pet projects?

      --
      The Singularity is closer than you think
      Quant
    4. Re:Amateur time by Have+Blue · · Score: 4, Informative

      Very Long Baseline Interferometry increases resolution, not range. It won't help capture a signal too weak for any of the individual dishes to pick up.

    5. Re:Amateur time by Amroarer · · Score: 1

      I'm not an electronics engineer, so perhaps my understanding is flawed here, but:

      Isn't the problem here just that the signal is very weak?

      Radio telescopes like the ones DSN use use a very large reflector dish to catch more of the radiated energy. Distributed (or synthetic) arrays, like the VLA, or military JSTARS radar can increase the angular resolution of their gathered data by using a longer baseline, but simply increasing the baseline without increasing antenna area won't help you pick up a weak signal.

      If I have missed something obvious, have pity upon a poor spanner-wielder.

    6. Re:Amateur time by Celandine · · Score: 1
      You're right that VLBI is not what's wanted in this case -- extra resolution is not needed -- but the original poster was right that connecting large numbers of small telescopes together would give you an increase in sensitivity. It just wouldn't be VLBI.

      Having said that, the way that communications with Pioneer work isn't at all adaptable to this sort of approach, as I understand it.

    7. Re:Amateur time by hughk · · Score: 1
      What you pick up when you point your antenna somewhere in the cosmos is essentially just noise. The signal sits under the noise and when you amplify the signal, the noise is amplified with it.

      When you have more than one antenna, interferometry allows you to look for coincidences between the signals which would not necessarily be reflected in the noise level. Multiply the antennaes and you have a very nice synthetic antenna which would exceed the resolution (and signal pulling ability) of a single DSN antenna. The paricipants would have to use some fairly high tech though, especially for cooled RF front-ends.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    8. Re:Amateur time by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

      IIRC Pioneer's transmitter uses a Pencil tube. If the power supply is crapping out the tube may not be getting enough power to run it's cathode and no longer has enough emission to generate a signal.
      Damn old fashioned empty state devices!

    9. Re:Amateur time by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      The paricipants would have to use some fairly high tech though, especially for cooled RF front-ends.

      To do interferometry don't you need time resolution on the order of the frequency being analyzed? The average PC and satellite dish doesn't come with atomic clock... Maybe if the frequency happens to be low enough you could use a GPS receiver as a time reference and save a lot of money, but I don't know the details on what kind of time resolution those give and what frequencies deep space probes use.

      If interferometry were possible, and contacting the probe had some benefit, you could do better using professional radio astronomy resources for this kind of work. No matter how many amatuers you stick on the job you can't emulate a dish bigger than the earth, and the pros can already pull that off.

      Maybe once a decade or so they might try it to study the trajectory of the probe to map the solar wind in that area, perhaps...

    10. Re:Amateur time by hughk · · Score: 1
      The problem is that most telescopes these days, whether optical or radio are project financed. They depend on a stream of researchers with time financed by funding authorities. They don't tend to have much time that is just 'open', as in unallocated. The pros could definitely do the job, remember when Jodrell Bank was used to pull down images from one of the Soviet Lunar missions. The problem is to get a number of telescopes tasked would be nigh on impossible unless someone could convince the authorities in the various countries that it was a good idea.

      Amateurs do what they want. Their dishes are smaller, but they can choose where they look. The same goes for smaller University instruments. As regards timing, with the advent of GPS, getting good atomic time really isn't a major issue. In earlier times, people could lock to standard frequency transmissions but these are only good over a limited range.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  31. Take the long view..... by siasl · · Score: 1

    ..2 million years to Aldeberon?

    Maybe our decendents x 100,000 (assuming 20 yrs/generation) will recover it...

    One can only hope....

    1. Re:Take the long view..... by jaoswald · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what you are hoping for.

      Keeping it sailing through interstellar space will probably preserve it much longer than keeping it with human civilization. The Earth isn't permanent, either.

  32. Am I missing something here? by itallushrt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why don't all you people stop thanking a hunk of metal and start thanking the scientist and engineers that designed, built, and launched Pioneer 10. They are the real reasons this post even exist.

    1. Re:Am I missing something here? by cranos · · Score: 1

      Hey its a common human activity to anthropomorphise inanimate objects, just one of those little quirks I guess.

      Really what we are doing is paying homage to the idea embodied by Pioneer 10, that the human race is capable of becoming more than it is, extending beyond our own earth bound origins. When we do this we include the men and women who worked on this. Pioneer is a symbol, nothing more nothing less.

    2. Re:Am I missing something here? by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have to admit you have a point. The first thing I did when I saw this headline was go to my bookshelf and take out my copy of The Cosmic Connection, by Dr. Carl Sagan, and start crying.

      On the cover of the book is a photo of two humans against a field of stars, mimicing the plaque that Dr. Sagan designed to be affixed to Pioneer 10.

      This book was a personal gift from Carl to me. We "lost contact" with Dr. Sagan some years ago.

      So, Carl, ya done good, and I miss the bloody hell out of you. Goodnight and God bless.

      KFG

    3. Re:Am I missing something here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Because in just a few hundred years it will return as a massive self-aware being, destroying everything in its path.

      I say we bow down and worship our new metallic master before we incur its wrath.

    4. Re:Am I missing something here? by Goldsmith · · Score: 1

      No one knows those guys names, and chances are, that's the way they like it.

      It's the work and the ideas that are important, not necessarily who did it.

    5. Re:Am I missing something here? by buckminsterinsd · · Score: 1

      Wow, alot of emotional postings here.

      I had the privilege of writing software for the Pioneer project in the 1970's. I worked on the dirtside command and control systems and supported the mission ops people. My ex-spouse was a mission controller. During one of the planetary encounters, an FOA snuck my ass into mission control and then she got the flight director to let me stay. One day, I'm cruising down the hallway and my boss stopped me so he could introduce me to one of the project scientists, a guy named "Jim". It took me a minute before it dawned on me that I was talking to James Van Allen. I saw the first close-up photos of Saturn before the images were enhanced at the UofA. I even got to remotely pilot one of the Pioneer spacecraft in orbit around Venus - completely by accident!

      So I've been a geek for almost three decades now. The Pioneer project is where I learned to hack, generating R/T OS kernels for the PDP-11s used on the uplink side. I started writing network software while working there. When Ed Post mentioned the folks who worked on Pioneer and Voyager in his 'Real Programmers Don't Use PASCAL' you should of heard my balls clank as I walked around. The code I've written code was part of software that has made more money than the fuckin' movie "E.T.", and twice I've made (and lost) a damn million buck$ at two startup software companies, but of all the places I've worked, the stuff I've written, the coolest, the best, the most fun and exciting job I ever had was working on Pioneer.

      I really consider myself so fortunate to have been part of humanity's first step into interstellar space and hope that the Pioneer project may be seen by history as the equivalent to when life here on earth first crawled up out of the sea onto dry land. Hey, I figure that oughta look good on my resume...

      best regards,

      buck

  33. Not even Deep Space Nine?!? by rollingrock · · Score: 1

    Man, you know its having trouble when even the advanced sensors on Deep Space Nine cannot detect its signal.

  34. Pioneer 10, Dead at 55 by egg+troll · · Score: 1, Funny

    I just heard some sad news on talk radio this morning. It seems that space probe Pioneer 10 was found dead in its distant space home this morning. Even if you didn't enjoy its photos of our planets, there's no denying its contribution to astronomy. Truly an engineering icon.

    --

    C - A language that combines the speed of assembly with the ease of use of assembly.
  35. No need to worry by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're only coming to serve man.

    KFG

    1. Re:No need to worry by AsbestosRush · · Score: 2, Informative

      And now that we have the cursory Twilight Zone reference out of the way... :)

      +1 funny, tho.

      --
      EveryDNS. Use it. It works.
      AC's need not reply
  36. ObHHGTG by jpetts · · Score: 4, Funny

    2 million years eh?

    Just time for another bath! Pass me the sponge, would you?

    --
    Call me old fashioned, but I like a dump to be as memorable as it is devastating - Bender
  37. Ha! by Quasar1999 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    EchoStar and Bell should have gone with the guys that worked on that satellite... Check out how crappy modern satellites are (Lockheed Martin for example)... hell, they're in low earth orbit and they can't last a whole month before dying(LM's Nimiq 2)... Pioneer went through the asteroid belt... come on... Evolution means going forward, not back... Can't we build reliable satellites of yesteryear?

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    1. Re:Ha! by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Informative

      "EchoStar and Bell should have gone with the guys that worked on that satellite..."

      Apples and oranges. More like apples and rocks. First off, your metaphor breaks down as soon as you describe Pioneer 10 as a "satellite." It is most definately not a satellite.

      Communications satellites are put into earth-orbit with more transponders than you'd care to shake a stick at, its intention being to relay as many communications signals as it can back and forth between ground-based stations. Pioneer was built with one transmitter to beam back periodic signals.

      Communications satellites aren't built to last much longer than a few years to begin with. There is no reason to design one to last more than a dozen years or so when communications technology will outstrip the capabilities of the satellite in that time, requiring a replacement. It took Pioneer over a year just to get anywhere.

      Communications satellites are only 8.5 light-minutes or so from the sun, so there isn't any reason to put a more durable or expensive power supply on them beyond solar panels and batteries for night-time operation. Jupiter alone is more than four times that distance away, and the technology limitations of the time required a (much) more durable atomic solution.

      Geostationary satellites have to deal with those pesky laws of physics that dictate that they will always eventually fall out of orbit. Sure, they don't have to deal with atomspheric drag like LEO objects, but momentum transfer is still an issue. Pioneer isn't a satellite in the remotest sense of the word: It's obviously beyond escape velocity for our solar system, which means it will never come back.

      "Pioneer went through the asteroid belt"

      Lay off the Star Wars. Mass density in that region isn't anywhere near what Hollywood thinks it is. Space debris in earth orbit poses a far greater hazard than passing through the main asteroid belt.

      "Can't we build reliable satellites of yesteryear?"

      The true "satellites of yesteryear" aren't there any more. Try and find three US satellites still in earth orbit that were launched before, say, 1985.

      Now, if you want to talk about space probes, why would we build another Pioneer or even a Voyager when we could build another Magellan or Galileo?

    2. Re:Ha! by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "12 weeks to Mars. And -- last time I looked -- Mars was somewhere."

      Except that Pioneer 10 didn't go anywhere near Mars on its mission to Jupiter and Saturn. Mars was ~3.5 AU away, practically on the other side of the sun when Pioneer passed through its orbit.

  38. Goddamn by cranos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know you are truly geek when something like this almost brings tears to your eyes. I mean this thing had less computing power than your average calculator and yet it managed to be useful for thirty years?
    See what happens when you actually give your space programme decent funding? You do something like this, something which comes close to making the human race look like something more than six billion savages scrabbling in the dirt.

    1. Re:Goddamn by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

      I agree...but it only make the human race look like 5,999,000,000 savages scrabbling in the dirt. Do we even have 1,000,000 people in the world capable of doing something like this?

      --
      ...
    2. Re:Goddamn by groomed · · Score: 1

      Right, sending Pioneer 10 into outer space is the greatest accomplishment mankind has ever achieved. Equality under law, suffrage for women, the abolishment of slavery, the virtual eradication of smallpox; they all pale in insignificance compared to Pioneer 10, a hunk of metal drifting aimlessly through space.

      Geeks suck.

    3. Re:Goddamn by cranos · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Im sorry where in my post did I say that Pioneer was the greated accomplishment mankind ever achieved?

      Oh and by the way slavery has not been abolished in this world, neither has the issue of equal rights for women been dealt with properly. Smallpox is a great achievement, only problem is now it is being used to develop biological weapons, as is anthrax, botulism and and variety of little nasties.

      When I posted I said the pioneer was an achievement that mankind can look on and say, "My (diety of choice) look where we have been, can we go further".

    4. Re:Goddamn by syrinx · · Score: 1

      Right, sending Pioneer 10 into outer space is the greatest accomplishment mankind has ever achieved. Equality under law, suffrage for women, the abolishment of slavery, the virtual eradication of smallpox; they all pale in insignificance compared to Pioneer 10, a hunk of metal drifting aimlessly through space.

      Christ. How are "abolishment of slavery" or "suffrage for women" *accomplishments* on the order of space exploration? They're just the social changes of the aforementioned 6,000,000,000 savages scribbling in the dirt.

      Smallpox was certainly an accomplishment though. However, I don't believe the original poster was saying that Pioneer 10 was the only accomplishment ever made by humanity ever.

      Basically, you're trolling, and I don't know why I'm responding to you. But whatever.

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    5. Re:Goddamn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Right, sending Pioneer 10 into outer space is the greatest accomplishment mankind has ever achieved. Equality under law, suffrage for women, the abolishment of slavery, the virtual eradication of smallpox; they all pale in insignificance compared to Pioneer 10, a hunk of metal drifting aimlessly through space.

      Yep!

    6. Re:Goddamn by Nexx · · Score: 1

      Other posters have said, abolishment of slavery, equality under law, and sufferage for women are rightings of the wrongs our society (and others!) have created.

    7. Re:Goddamn by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      Amen :) Does anyone know how many mW the last transmission was?

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    8. Re:Goddamn by sameyeam · · Score: 1

      There's quite a lot of technical info on it here . I dunno about the signal strengh but the data rate was running at a scorching 16bps (compared to around 2kbps near jupiter) at it last encounter, easily rivaling that of a slashdotted site.

    9. Re:Goddamn by jonerik · · Score: 1

      "Aimlessly?" It's traveling in a straight line at a little less than 8 miles per second and we know it'll reach Aldebaran in about 2 million years. Doesn't sound very aimless to me....

  39. Re:serving man by Rauser · · Score: 1

    ... in a nice curry sauce with some decent wine!

    --
    The white zone is for loading and unloading only. If you need to load or unload go to the white zone. It's a way of life
  40. It's still serving part of its mission. by chaparrl · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the info at Nasa's page on Pioneer 10 "A plaque was mounted on the spacecraft body with drawings depicting a man, a woman, and the location of the sun and the earth in our galaxy."

    1. Re:It's still serving part of its mission. by mahart · · Score: 5, Informative

      pic of it: plaque

    2. Re:It's still serving part of its mission. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Wow! Humans are *hot*!

    3. Re:It's still serving part of its mission. by l810c · · Score: 1
      So you find both of them *hot*, eh?

      I guess if we were to remake this in todays PC world, we would have to show man/woman, man/man, woman/woman, she-it, he-it, etc.

    4. Re:It's still serving part of its mission. by indiigo · · Score: 1

      I think it's pretty obvious the aliens that discover this will be rather disappointed at the lack of masturbationary material.

      --
      fslg503-985-8686503-985-8686503-985-8686503-985-86 8650 3-985-fdsg8686503-985-8686503-985-8686503-9
    5. Re:It's still serving part of its mission. by Myopic · · Score: 1

      We're TELLING the aliens where we are!?!? Didn't the NASA engineers see Independance Day!?!?

    6. Re:It's still serving part of its mission. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      ID4? Fuck. Starman.

      "We *invited* him!"

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  41. 30 years, that's nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Pah! That's not so special. My car is over 30 years old and it's still going. OK, the mileage is not as high but Pioneer 10 didn't have to worry about corrosion. In space, nobody can hear you rust.

    1. Re:30 years, that's nothing... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I suppose that you have never had to fix your car either?

      Pioneer has been on it's own for the last 30 years.

  42. "relay" for deep space by bofkentucky · · Score: 1

    Might be a good idea for future missions, but more than likely its batteries finaly died or couldn't produce enough current to thaw out the transmitter array, so I doubt it could leave a signal trail. But the staggered launch on the same vector would be a great idea for future series. Imagine a transmitter followed by a train of repeaters launched on the same vector every year.

    Is there a "radio" hubble or one in planing that tries to duplicate the hubble's mission of getting to orbit to try and avoid earthbound interference. Imagine a listening array on the far side of the moon to try and listen in on even fainter signals than we can pick up with the VLA or Aracebio[sp]

    --
    09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0
  43. Pioneer 10 is dying... by dfenstrate · · Score: 4, Funny

    Netcraft comfirms it.

    (you can shoot me now)

    --
    Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
  44. Re:First "pics" or "pictures" not "pic's" post by kfg · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it should be its pics.

    There, no nasty apostrophes implying possession here.

    KFG

  45. DON'T MAKE ME RE-LIVE BATTLEFIELD EARTH! by Myriad · · Score: 5, Funny
    I worry that we're leaving a trial of breadcrumbs for conquering alien races to find us. fight the future.

    Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagh! No, make the pain stop! You are causing me a Battlefield Earth flashback! Not only did I watch that evil movie, I've read the damned book years before.

    Don't you know that's exactly how Psychlo's found Earth in the first place?

    Can I believe that I actually know that? Please, shoot me now before the Hubbard cultists get me!

    --
    "They do not preach that their god will rouse them, a little before the Nuts work loose." Kipling, 'The Sons of Martha'
    1. Re:DON'T MAKE ME RE-LIVE BATTLEFIELD EARTH! by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      Having read (and enjoyed) Battlefield Earth several times, I can assert with great confidence that enjoying this book will not make you into a Sciengologist.

      Sorry.

      Heinlein has a better chance...

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    2. Re:DON'T MAKE ME RE-LIVE BATTLEFIELD EARTH! by hplasm · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, the film will scare them away.

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
  46. 82,000 mph !!!!! by Beebos · · Score: 1

    I knew space probes travelled fast, but 82,000 mph !!! Could we get a ship with people in it going that fast??? Of course at that speed I imagine that when it eventually was hit by the smallest spec of space dust the ship would be toast. Then again, Pioneer 10 made it 82 AU alright.

    1. Re:82,000 mph !!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      the trouble is you have to expend a lot of power to stop somewhere. Not a problem if the people don't intend to come back.

    2. Re:82,000 mph !!!!! by Beebos · · Score: 1

      Good point. Couldn't you reduce speed the same way you build it up, by using the gravity of the planets? Could you travel a circular path through the solar system by repeatedly using the planets to speed up and slow down?

    3. Re:82,000 mph !!!!! by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My interpretation of the article is that the probe briefly reached 82,000 mph during its closest approach to Jupiter. It slowed down considerably as it pulled away from Jupiter's gravity well. IIRC, it's currently moving at something more like 20,000 mph.

  47. it's doubtfull that anyone far away will hear by autopr0n · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Asside from a few projects designed to beam high-energy signals at spesific stars, most of the radio waves we send out will be so weak that they would never be able to be detected against background nose just a few lightyears away.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:it's doubtfull that anyone far away will hear by RodgerDodger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As a coherent signal, yes. As static, no way.

      The Earth emits almost as much RF radiation as a star. Anyone ET who has been watching our system for the last century would have noticed the massive climb. Anyone ET who is just starting to look at us would notice the anomaly. This would be visible anywhere in the appropriate radius, (about 70 light years), AND that radius is limited by lightspeed, not signal strength.

      --
      "Software is too expensive to build cheaply"
    2. Re:it's doubtfull that anyone far away will hear by gunnk · · Score: 1

      However, we deployed military RADAR designed to watch for Soviet ICBM's. One strand runs up and down the Atlantic side of the US and one runs up and down the Pacific side. As the Earth rotates these very powerful beams sweep out into space. An extraterrestrial civilization would see an extremely regular double-pulse pattern coming from Earth. It should show up as a big red flag that a technological civilization is on Earth. The signal strength from the RADAR is huge compared to our TV/radio noise. ET has a good shot at detecting it.

      --
      Life is short: void the warranty.
  48. Don't you mean by jagripino · · Score: 1
  49. Kid you only got to read about it. by nlinecomputers · · Score: 1

    I lived through most of that. I saw man walk on the moon when I was 4 years old. I can remember it barely. My older brother who was 10 years old was trying to take poloraid pictures of the TV. Somewhere in my basement I still have them. When I was a kid I thought that we would be on Mars by 2000. Now I seriously wonder if we(the US) will get to Mars or even back to the Moon in my lifetime. China will get to the Moon in the next 5-10 years and maybe that will wake us up.

    --
    Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
  50. I doubt it by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    these probes follow a 'path' through the solar system, slinging their way from jupeter/satern/etc. If we sent another probe in 5 years, it wouldn't be able to follow the same path, as the planets would be in diffrent places.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:I doubt it by bofkentucky · · Score: 1

      Ohhh yeah, don't guess that would work, but the "dark-side" array for the moon might be useful

      --
      09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0
  51. Never again, anything like it. by ayeco · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Most of us will never again see anything like this. Neither the last communication of a space probe like this nor another space probe at the edge of our solarsystem. Will we make more? Probably. Will we see the edge of the solarsystem again? 30 years is a long time, most of us will be dead in 30 years.

    1. Re:Never again, anything like it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Oops, it did! September 1995. Damn Klingons!

    2. Re:Never again, anything like it. by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Are you going to be dead in 2020? The New Horizons project aims to launch a probe in 2006 to explore Pluto and the Kuiper belt.

      The Voyager 1 probe is more distant than Pioneer 10, and will probably expire within 20 years.

    3. Re:Never again, anything like it. by anubi · · Score: 4, Interesting
      It saddens me a lot to see the things that so impressed me as a child now fading into oblivion... but yet knowing they are not destroyed.. they are just on a very very very long voyage.

      I only wish I were as elegant in wording as Carl Sagan:

      Reflections on a Mote of Dust

      We succeeded in taking that picture, and, if you look at it, you see a dot. That's here. That's home. That's us. On it, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever lived, lived out their lives. The aggregate of all our joys and sufferings, thousands of confident religions, ideologies and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilizations, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every hopeful child, every mother and father, every inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every superstar, every supreme leader, every saint and sinner in the history of our species, lived there on a mote of dust, suspended in a sunbeam.

      The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors so that in glory and in triumph they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot. Think of the endless cruelties visited by the inhabitants of one corner of the dot on scarcely distinguishable inhabitants of some other corner of the dot. How frequent their misunderstandings, how eager they are to kill one another, how fervent their hatreds. Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the Universe, are challenged by this point of pale light.

      Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity--in all this vastness--there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves. It is up to us.

      It's been said that Astronomy is a humbling, and I might add, a character-building experience. To my mind, there is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world. To me, it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly and compassionately with one another and to preserve and cherish that pale blue dot, the only home we've ever known.

      -- Carl Sagan (1934-1996)

      You can see the image referred to in the article here .

      (In all honesty, I believe this image was from Voyager, but Pioneer had the same view and I felt it only appropriate.)

      Fare well, Pioneer.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    4. Re:Never again, anything like it. by vertigoalopolus · · Score: 1

      im not so sure..with the advances in ion propulsion lately, we shold see at least one within 10 or so years.

      and who knows what other space drive technologies will come about in the next 30 years? im not sure if electrogravitic propulsion works in a vacuum, but if it did, that would be a very promising drive system.

      --
      Dont ask me, im just the bass player!
  52. Voyager had a disc. by Goonie · · Score: 4, Informative
    Both the Pioneer probes had the plaque.

    The Voyager probes were sent out with a gold disc which contains, amongst other things, greetings from Kurt Waldheim (former Secretary-General of the UN) amongst ones in a bunch of languages, the "sounds of Earth", including Beethoven and Chuck Berry, the sound of waves against the shore, and various other things, and a bunch of images of Earth life, as well as some instructions as to how to play the disc. It was Carl Sagan's project, IIRC.

    Of course, the odds of the probes ever being detected by extra-terrestrial intelligence is virtually zero, given their slow speed, tiny size, and the fact that they don't emit any signals (or more precisely won't by the time ET is in a position to spot them).

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    1. Re:Voyager had a disc. by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 4, Funny
      Chuck Berry? Man, that's got to be a hell of an honor for ol' Chuck.

      I imagine the first interstellar war will start when an alien civilization "pirates" that copyrighted Chuck Berry recording and the MPAA comes to collect royalties.

    2. Re:Voyager had a disc. by Erik+K.+Veland · · Score: 1
      Chuck Berry? Which one? My dingaling?

      My favorite :D

      --
      "I tend to think of OS X as Linux with QA and Taste", James Gosling, creator of Java
  53. Technically, we should by Cappy+Red · · Score: 1

    It would certainly be nice to. However, aside from the obvious funding differences(adjusted, of course) the newer satellites are also built differently... much like buildings erected hundreds of years ago were built differently than modern buildings. The farther back you go, the less sophisticated the buildings tended to be. The buildings built to last back then were done through brute force.(much, I'd imagine, like Pioneer 10 versus more contemporary satellites)

    More effort, but more consistant results.

    *honk*

    --
    This is my sig. It's prescription, I swear. I need it for reading things... on the other side of things
  54. Hold on by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

    When Columbia failed it was bad for the government to run space programs.

    When Pioneer works its is a testiment to NASA and shows how crappy the private sector can be.

    So which is it? NASA bad or Private Sector bad?

    1. Re:Hold on by cranos · · Score: 1

      Umm I'll bite, severely Underfunded NASA bad. Now if we had a truly international effort run by the UN or some other similar organisation the costs for a truly spectacular Space programme could quite easily be shared across the many nations.

      Just my bright eyed little idea.

    2. Re:Hold on by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      I meant, here on /. everytime NASA somwhat somehow screws up people clamer for Private Space Everything. The poster I replied to said Pioneer was great and private space like the EchoStar showed that was a waste.

      I'm asking whos side /. is on this week.

      Now I'll say this and I'm not trolling or looking for flames.

      The UN couldn't run a space program.

      Why not? Because the UN hasn't accomplished anything of any technical merit since the Smallpox innoculation program ended, and in some ways the US/UN/Russians and others dropped the ball at the end of Smallpox.

      The problems with the UN isn't the Security Council or vetos, it's the fact that a a vast organization populated by autocrats doesn't solve a problem. What would the UN do, what could the UN do, that NASA or ESA can't do?

      Throw extravagant parties like OHCHR in Durban? Oh wait, here is why NASA can't run a space program, because they do totally stupid things like making newly elected chair of the UN Human Rights Commission Libya, or passing, the presidency of the UN Conference on Disarmament to Iraq.

      NASA/ESA/JSA do a god enough job with funding, but as funding decreases or remains constant programs shrink.

    3. Re:Hold on by njchick · · Score: 1
      NASA is better for unique projects, like Pioneer, when the new technology needs to be tested.

      When it comes to routine operations, like sending spacecrafts into LEO, private sector is more effective.

    4. Re:Hold on by nurightshu · · Score: 1

      Now if we had a truly international effort run by the UN or some other similar organisation the costs for a truly spectacular Space programme could quite easily be shared across the many nations.

      Because the Tanzanians, Bolivians, and Tongans will definitely be able to pony up the scratch to make a top-notch space program work. No, a UN effort would be primarily supported by the G-8. Everyone else would just feel good about "being a part" of the program without pulling their own weight. Hmmm, that almost sounds like everything the UN gets its hooks into!

      NB: The only exception I can think of to the "UN involvement equals hamfisted fiasco" scenario is the WHO. Cool organization.

      --
      They that would sacrifice their .sig space for that cliched Franklin quote deserve neither.
    5. Re:Hold on by Nexx · · Score: 1

      I'll partially disagree. NASA in competition with CCCP good. NASA alone bad. It's funding + competition, not just funding.

    6. Re:Hold on by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      I'm asking whos side /. is on this week.

      Now I'll say this and I'm not trolling or looking for flames.

      Not intentionally, perhaps, but you did just make the implication that Slashdot is a hive mind, or at least you wish it was. It is not hypocritical for some slashdot posts to favor one thing and some to favor the opposite if those posts are coming from different members of slashdot.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    7. Re:Hold on by cranos · · Score: 1

      Because the Tanzanians, Bolivians, and Tongans will definitely be able to pony up the scratch to make a top-notch space program work.
      Well I'ld be more worried about getting the US to pay up given their history with paying their UN dues, but thats besides the point.

      If we spread the cost across the whole spectrum of nations according to their ability to pay then we could easily build a space programme that would achieve more than taking ants into space to see if they can turn those tiny screws. And hell spending the money on space research has got to be better than spending it on a new damn arms race.

  55. Woudn't be worth the trip?? by Phantasmo · · Score: 3, Funny

    the effort and expenditure of resources to get from there to here would probably mean the payoff for attacking us wouldn't be worth the trip.

    My friend, you seem to be forgetting our vast amounts of stable Energon!

    --

    The US Army: promoting democracy through unquestioned obedience
  56. Yes and no by Goonie · · Score: 1
    Yes, it had a map to Earth displaying Earth's position relative to the nearest dozen or so pulsars.

    No, it didn't play Bach. Voyager probes have a disc on them which features, amongst other things, excerpts of classical music (I assume there's some Bach on there), but not Pioneer.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  57. part of its mission. space pron by paughsw · · Score: 1

    that's the closest i've been to a woman in a while

  58. *shoots dfenstrate* by Akardam · · Score: 1

    Netcraft confirms it.

    dfenstrate is dying.

    *looks down*

    Er, make that dead.

  59. Icon of the Space Age by PizzaFace · · Score: 5, Informative

    Pioneer 10's mission continues. Let's not forget the plaque that Pioneer 10 carries. It was world famous when the probe was launched, because it was mankind's first attempt to communicate beyond the solar system. Carl Sagan designed the plaque to be universally (in the truest sense) comprehensible, at least to any civilization sufficiently advanced to capture it. Next to the map of the probe's origin relative to our galaxy, with its key in binary notation, was an etching of a generic man and woman, superimposed on an outline of Pioneer to give a sense of scale. The man's arm was raised in a gesture that Sagan hoped would suggest friendship. Especially given the public's then-new awareness of threats to humanity's survival as a species, there was something very poignant about this cosmic message in a bottle that had no chance of being seen by anyone for millions of years.

    I remember a newspaper cartoon from the day. A man in a business suit and a woman in a dress were looking at the plaque on Pioneer, which was half buried in the ground. The man said to the woman, "They seem very similar to us, except that they don't wear clothes."

    1. Re:Icon of the Space Age by PizzaFace · · Score: 4, Informative

      NASA has published a brief history and a depiction of the plaque.

    2. Re:Icon of the Space Age by fobbman · · Score: 1

      " It was world famous when the probe was launched, because it was mankind's first attempt to communicate [planetary.org] beyond the solar system."

      Minor factual error. We sent William Shatner, Leonard Nemoy, and many others out a few years before Pioneer 10.

  60. Well... by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    Either something will have gotten there, or nothing ever will. By two million years from now, humanity will have either destroyed itself or achieved the Singularity.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  61. That's no "Mankind Peace" plaque! by Robber+Baron · · Score: 1

    It really says: Get your free porn here!

    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

  62. Yeah by Goonie · · Score: 1
    What do you reckon Bach, Beethoven and Mozart would have thought?

    Incidentally, they were going to put a Beatles song on there but the Beatles' record company refused permission...

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    1. Re:Yeah by digital+bath · · Score: 1

      If I were the Beatles, I'd be quite pissed that one of my songs had the chance to make it into space didn't because of my record company. IMHO, that would be fair grounds to look for a new record company =P

      --
      find / -name "*.sig" | xargs rm
  63. Have a moving museum... by gnovos · · Score: 1

    Of course, my other half tells me, for the same reasons, let it alone, in space, quietly, where its home is.

    Do both! Build a "space museum" around it that is traveling at the same speed and people can come and visit and watch it just hang there in the middle of the moving museum.

    --
    "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    1. Re:Have a moving museum... by AnimeFreak · · Score: 1

      The last thing I need to do is wonder where the heck I parked my space car.

      "Oh, it is right by the moon next to Planet Zebus... fuck, that is a good two year drive!"

  64. So let's go pick it up. by blair1q · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just jump in the hyperdrive and go grab it and download it.

    We do have hyperdrive, right?

    I mean, it's 2003.

    We were supposed to be mining Jupiter's moons by now.

    We can't go get one little probe?

    What have we been doing with the last 30 years?

    1. Re:So let's go pick it up. by machine+of+god · · Score: 1

      patenting.

    2. Re:So let's go pick it up. by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      Shows how much you know about hyperdrive! Even if we get to it, we still have to match velocity, capture it, return, and kill that velocity.

      Yeah, sad. 2003, and we're still building half-assed pogo-stick rockets. (And not as well as we used to.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:So let's go pick it up. by mdmarkus · · Score: 1

      building the Internet. other useless shit...

    4. Re:So let's go pick it up. by DJ+Mc+Hugh · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the 'Monolith' will bring it back for us :)

    5. Re:So let's go pick it up. by TheAntiCrust · · Score: 1
      *Alien comes back and drops off probe*

      Alien: "Keep your shit on your side of the damn galaxy!"

      *leaves*

    6. Re:So let's go pick it up. by blair1q · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of teleportation.

      What we do, see, is hyperdrive to the probe, place a stargate in its way, and place the other end of the stargate in Saddam's bathroom, right next to the shitter.

  65. Way to go by xihr · · Score: 1

    Hell of a track record for what was intended to be a 21-month mission, eh?

  66. when I grow up, I want to be an orbital mechanic by pyrrho · · Score: 1

    anonymous... good choice.

    --

    -pyrrho

  67. Kurzweil? by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    Kurzweil didn't start this; he has his own take on the Singularity thing which is a subtle but important departure from Vinge's vision. Kurzweil sees humanity as being empowered and enlightned by the Singularity; Vinge sees it as being replaced.

    But hey, nothing like an insta-attack on someone who I wasn't even referencing...

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  68. Sad... by AnonymousCowheart · · Score: 2, Informative

    How sad, and last year CNN just had an article about how it got a new lease on life! Also see this link for the picture it carries of us...

    1. Re:Sad... by AnimeFreak · · Score: 1

      Are you somehow a relative of that probe? ;)

      That article is from 2000. You're three years off. ;)

  69. Social Change. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    On the other hand, think of the social change that people in my parents' generation accomplished from 1960 to 1980. Civil rights, the second wave of feminism, gay people being able to live openly, safe and legal abortion. These aren't little things, especially when you consider what happened between 1980 and 2000---not much, especially compared to the previous two decades.

    I really think that Reagan's election in 1980 and the rise of the Religious Right was the death knell for the will to change that had marked the nation for those twenty years. I wasn't there, but it stands out as a turning point when you look at it.

    Anyone who was actually there want to fill me in?

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Social Change. by kfg · · Score: 1

      That's what I was trying to do. :)

      By the way, your synopsis of the social change would have applied equally well to the world of H.G. Wells.

      Society doesn't change. It only appears to change when viewed from a certain limited context.

      Look at your own sig. The man who wrote those words would have said, "Oh yeah, I remember those times."

      KFG

  70. Retrieving it would be counter-productive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    One of the Pioneer 10's missions (that will continue indefinitely) is to introduce ourselves to other life forms. The famous plaque onboard describes where things about the Earth, our galaxy, human beings, etc. We don't need to maintain radio contact for that 1-way communication to continue.

    Assuming we haven't yet been contacted by another form of life, why would you terminate that wonderful mission prematurely?

    The Pioneer 10 was designed to still have a valid function once radio contact was lost. Out of respect for its builders (and Carl Sagan, at the very least), its mission should continue.

  71. Re:when I grow up, I want to be an orbital mechani by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Look dude the guy is right on. When they built stuff in the 50's and 60's they built them tough
    and reliable. the word "overbuilt" was not in thier vocabuary. The sr71 was the fastest thing in
    the sky and if you discount missiles it still is unless perhaps the aurora is operational.

    the b52 is still in use for basicly the same mission it had in the 50's. Parts still fall off commercial airliners less than half the 52's age.

    THEY WENT TO THE FUCKING MOON AND BACK WITH SLIDE RULES! Damn your a fucking troll!

  72. I'll bite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'll bite, you troll. How long have women and blacks had a chance in any of these fields? Thirty years or less? It's been three hundred or more years since the Enlightenment; I'm sure Newton wouldn't have accomplished what he did if he were born into slavery, or Einstein if he were never allowed to learn anything of substance. (And still, women were mathematicians.)

    Twit. Oh hell, who am I kidding. The great early mathematicians who weren't Greek were Indian. Anyone remember Ramanujan? What about the scads of Asians in the field?

    Sheesh.

    1. Re:I'll bite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How long have women and blacks had a chance in any of these fields?

      Just as long as white and asian people. In fact, longer - asians and whites are mutations from blacks.

      And who gave asians and whites "a chance" in those fields? Hmmmm?

      Idiot!

    2. Re:I'll bite. by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      As much as I hate the fool for his racist comments, I'll buttress his argument with an observation that it's partially true: with respect to the entitlement establishment that this country has built, where in some cases, your ability to get into schools and jobs depends more on the color of your skin than on the things you know.

  73. You better believe someone will! by uptownguy · · Score: 1

    Think some...thing from Earth will go get it before it gets to the next local star?

    You're darn right someone will! Just imagine what it would go for on eBay!!!

    --


    I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.
  74. It might have discovered anomolous gravity by ggwood · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am saddened to hear that we lost contact with Pioneer 10 because we don't understand the forces acting on it. One would think that since we know gravity pretty well, and we know the relivant masses involved, we could predict the motion of the Pioneer satelites. Alas no. Exotic things like dark matter and photon pressure were invoked to explain the extra attraction (back) towards our sun, and failed. I heard a great talk about this while at U.C. Riverside department of Physics and had the chance to ask about photon pressure myself (yes, they take that into account - it is a far, far larger effect than this). The BBC has an old story on this effect, which I am sure many slashdotters have already heard of, here.

    By the way, a similar anomoly is seen in Pioneer 11 and another distant satelite (Ulysses perhaps???).

    Also, there is a link at nasa.gov, but at this time it seems broken. I include it for completeness here.

    It seems John Anderson and friends have written several articles on this. One which you might find interesing has been published in Physical Review D: here.

    --
    a war on terrorism? How can we end a war on a method?
    1. Re:It might have discovered anomolous gravity by thogard · · Score: 1

      What Pioneer 10 (&11) have proved is we don't know about gravity. We understand how it effects things but we don't know what it is and we don't know how it works. There are many theorys but none of them even come within 10% of variations of reality. There are several sats that show these gravity problems including the gps sats. The interesting bit is you can prove to your self that gravity isn't what we've been lead to believe simply with the right kind of pendulum durring an eclipse.

    2. Re:It might have discovered anomolous gravity by Fweeky · · Score: 1
      By the way, a similar anomoly is seen in Pioneer 11 and another distant satelite (Ulysses perhaps???).

      The Voyager probes, probably; they're still functional, and have encountered this effect, being a similar distance away (they're also going to overtake Pioneer iirc).
    3. Re:It might have discovered anomolous gravity by sameyeam · · Score: 1

      They already have! :-)

    4. Re:It might have discovered anomolous gravity by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      The Voyager probes, probably; they're still functional, and have encountered this effect, being a similar distance away (they're also going to overtake Pioneer iirc).

      I read somewhere that there was something different about the Voyagers such that they could not be used to detect this drag, but it did not go into details.

      But, it appears that this mysterious force is fairly well measured already, being that the drag was consistent in magnitude accross all probes that were used to detect it. They just don't know the cause.

  75. Re:Notice there were no black people or women... by javiercero · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Troll alert:

    Well, for one the first compiler was designed by a woman: Grace Hopper. If that is not a big contribution to the field of computing I don't know what it is.

    African Americans have also had great impact in our society, wether you like it or not, and they are not just in the fields of humanities. And given the background of opression and lack of incentives that some of these people (minorities and women) had to endure just a few years ago, it is even more impressive.

    BTW, what is your contribution to humanity TROLL?

  76. snif, snif...... by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    I'm sad. I feel sorry for the poor little thing, all alone in the dark forever. No one to talk to anymore. :-(

    Maybe it will end up like V...ger.

    I hope they included some human DNA.
    Perhaps it will enter the atmosphere of another planet and that DNA will give rise to a new form of life, or perhaps some intelligent being will find it and use it to recreate human life elsewhere in the universe..

    Bye bye little guy....

  77. No, it would work by pyrrho · · Score: 1

    You could send a probe every 12 years when Jupiter is in the same place in it's orbit. You could also send them more often in a spiral as Jupiter went around.

    I guess the point is that to go to deep space you only need one planet so you have a lot more flexibility. And if you did need a multiple planets, it's still only the vector from the final planet that has to be the same.

    --

    -pyrrho

  78. Its kinda sad... by vertigoalopolus · · Score: 1

    its kinda sad to think how its dying..alone, cold, and its energy slowly fading away..
    rest in peace Pioneer, you sure were.

    --
    Dont ask me, im just the bass player!
  79. too late, we missed our chance. by vertigoalopolus · · Score: 1

    Please, shoot me now before the Hubbard cultists get me!

    our chance has been and gone unfortunately. shouldnt be too long for it to come around again tho, so just sit tight till then. dont worry, we'll contact you.

    --
    Dont ask me, im just the bass player!
  80. Somewhere at NASA... by darnok · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...an old geeky guy picks up his Coke, brushes the pizza crumbs off his gut, brushes spider web out of his waist length greasy hair, pushes his chair back and says "OK, who's gonna beat THIS uptime?"

  81. Obligatory TNG reference by Oriumpor · · Score: 1

    kinda funny how kirk ...erm I mean picard experienced a lifetime through something a bit more advanced than pioneer, yet along the same concept.... you think maybe, just maybe it was one of the original intents in sending V'yger in the first place?.... oooh spooky ... seeing as how brinkmanship was much larger and in peoples minds much more back then...

  82. Re:Map to earth and J.S Bach by PizzaFace · · Score: 1

    Voyager, not Pioneer, took a "Golden Record" with encoded images, spoken greetings in dozens of languages, a variety of natural and human sounds, and an anthology of music from around the world, including both classical (e.g. Bach) and popular (e.g. Chuck Berry) selections.

    The record is 12 inches in diameter and plays at 16 2/3 r.p.m. The long-playing record of the day played at 33 1/3 r.p.m., but Carl Sagan's committee had the foresight to predict that advanced extraterrestrials would get double the music by playing their LPs at half the speed.

    Just kidding. Sagan's committee included instructions for playing the record, and even a phonograph needle cartridge. I hope the species that finds it has ears.

  83. FISH! by cca93014 · · Score: 1

    No.

    So long, and thanks for all the fish.

    Jesus!

  84. Re:Notice there were no black people or women... by Mant · · Score: 1

    I know they have. The problem is, that "impact" hasn't necessarily been positive. Whether you like it or not.

    As opposed to all the positive impact by white guys like Hitler and Stalin and their organisations, that also didn't have women or blacks.

    Sorry, I have I just knocked your idols?

    Mant

  85. WRONG! by The+Apostrophe+Guy · · Score: 1

    So long and thanks for all the pic's...

  86. This Pioneer is not dead by michajoe · · Score: 1

    This Pioneer 10 is not dead - it is resting.

  87. Release it to the Public Domain by farnsaw · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How about releasing it with all it's communication protocols, passwords, etc to the public domain. Who knows, there might be an enterprising young genius out there with an array of 120 foot (~40 meter) dishes. ;-)

    --
    "Computer Scientists can count to 1024 on their fingers" (non-mutant, non-mutilatated, human computer scientists)
    1. Re:Release it to the Public Domain by sameyeam · · Score: 1

      I was reading about it somewhere eariler today, it's not so much that it's now too far away to get a signal from it...more that it's long out lived it's useful life. Most of the onboard systems used to provide telemetry are now dead...I *think*, there was only one of the original 12 readings still available. The project was officially terminated in 1997, they were just tracking it as long as they could really.

    2. Re:Release it to the Public Domain by bytesmythe · · Score: 1
      How about releasing it with all it's communication protocols, passwords, etc to the public domain...


      They can't tell us the password. To keep from having to remember different ones, NASA used the same one for everything.

      --
      bytesmythe
      Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
      -- Scott Meyer
  88. Save us from this, please!! by hughk · · Score: 1

    The last thing we want is a rerun of ST:TMP.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  89. Mitnick hacked it off course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    and you know that's the truth.

  90. Here's an idea... by teaserX · · Score: 1

    Somebody should design and launch a probe with the sole purpose of seeing how far it can get and how long we can communicate with it. No (other) on board experiments, no camera. Just a beacon and a propulsion system. A big fat RTG with a freakishly huge antena. It might even be useful for space navigation since it should travel in the same direction for a damned long time. Just a thought.

    --
    We really need your help
    http://www.gofundme.com/help-sherry
    1. Re:Here's an idea... by buckminsterinsd · · Score: 1

      Teaser suggests:
      > launch a probe with the sole purpose of seeing how far it can get and how long we can communicate with it.
      > No (other) on board experiments, no camera. Just a beacon and a propulsion system.


      As I recall the transmitter power on Pioneer 10/11 was a whole 8 watts. Shows ya how sensitive those DSN receivers really are. In order to get that kinda S/N ratio, the amps sit in a tub of liquid nitrogen to reduce the noise in the circuits due to Brownian motion.

      Its like being able to see a nightlight that's so damn far away it takes 12 hours for its light to reach us.

      Just a little over the top, huh?

      best regards,

      buck

  91. 6502? by Marc2k · · Score: 1

    oo..You mean a Nintendo Entertainment System? Me too! We're like brothers! ;)

    --
    --- What
  92. What happened during my life? by Marc2k · · Score: 1

    Nothing, I was IRCing..

    --
    --- What
    1. Re:What happened during my life? by azav · · Score: 1

      Sheesh. I start the thread and get a 0 for it being off topic but the folks who reply get modded up.

      No justice I tells ya. None.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  93. Built for purpose by CharlieO · · Score: 1

    I mean this thing had less computing power than your average calculator and yet it managed to be useful for thirty years?

    And this is something we tend to lose sight of, we've become so conditioned to believe that something somehow becomes less capable than it originally was as time passes.

    A screwdriver today will still do the job it did 100 years ago.

  94. Re:Klingon target practice by Walterk · · Score: 3, Funny

    So is this going to mean there'll be a big war between V'ger and P'ner?

  95. Reminds me of a tune once sung by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 1

    by a wonderful metal band called "Warlord"...partial lyrics are below:

    Through Pioneer 10 and Voyager 1
    We've launched our knowledge to other suns
    Aspiring and reaching for the highest of beings
    We've lost our search for the world's basic needs

    The Aliens - inside our machines! The Aliens - inside our dreams!
    The Aliens . . . The Aliens, The Aliens are here!

    Through fiction and lies we gaze at the skies
    For flying saucers and men with three eyes
    Creating those monsters we seek to destroy
    Like children at play smashing their toys!

    The Aliens - controlling our spheres! The Aliens - so far yet so near!
    The Aliens . . . The Aliens, The Aliens are here!

    All myths of men and gods will apply
    when sanity and reason begin to die
    the dragons you've denied and wish to slay
    may rise to conquer us all someday!
    the aliens - the message is clear!
    the aliens - the aliens are here

    One of the only tunes I know that mention the great Pioneer 10 by name. It will be missed.

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    1. Re:Reminds me of a tune once sung by tfulton2 · · Score: 1
      Are you familiar with the Britcom, Last of the Summer Wine? [http://www.summer-wine.com/] The longest-running active sitcom in history, I believe, started just after the launch of Pioneer 10.

      It is still going, as well. Check it out, on PBS.

    2. Re:Reminds me of a tune once sung by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      Good morning America how are you?
      Don't you know me I'm your native son,
      I'm the probe they call The Pioneer te-en,
      I'll be gone five million miles when the day is done.

      Nighttime on Pioneer te-en,
      Changing course at Jupiter, outer space.
      Half way gone, we'll be there by morning (second star on the right)
      Through the interstellar darkness
      Climbing up from the well.
      And all the clowns and policians seem
      To fade into a bad dream
      And the mundanes still ain't heard the news.
      The universe sings its song again,
      Earth passengers will please refrain
      This probe's got the disappearing program blues.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Reminds me of a tune once sung by Lovepump · · Score: 1

      It's also bloody awful.

      It's also (partly) filmed in my village in West Yorkshire, meaning each weekend hundreds of Tourists come on busses to look at absolutely nothing. Seriously - nothing at all.

      Apart from the outside of Sid's Cafe...

  96. 20,000 by AppyPappy · · Score: 1

    it's currently moving at something more like 20,000 mph.


    And somewhere in space, some asshole in a VW Beetle is honking at it to pass.

    --

    If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem

  97. Re:Notice there were no black people or women... by RogueMaverick · · Score: 1
    You notice in most of the old footage showing these 'real engineers' as I like to call them, that there are no black people and no women.
    -Perhaps this has something to do with the next thing you wrote:
    Once women and black people got equal rights and companies were required to have a certain percentage of each, everything went to hell.
    -Yes, who would come up with such an idea that all humans are humans? How ridiculous!
    I'm not trying to sound racist
    -Some people don't have to try... it just comes naturally to them.
    I can't think of one black person or woman that made a 'major' contribution to humanity, not like you would think when you hear the name Einstein or Newton.
    -What is your contribution to humanity? Is it perhaps the great achievement of you being a part of a group that you consider so great, that you, too, become better just because of that?
  98. Coolest thing about the plaque... by celerityfm · · Score: 1

    Coolest thing about the plaque is the illustration with the numbers 4 and 5 on it-- the position of the sun with respect to nearby pulsars and the center of the galaxy.

    You can see this illustration (or something very similar) for yourself by firing up Celestia, turning "draw constellations" on, then setting your orientation to earth or sun and zooming out to galaxy level or so-- Cool eh? It draws lines from each of the constellations to the center of the view and looks strikingly similar to the plaque's illustration :) I would even venture to say that it is the same illustration that is on the plaque but I can't confirm this- can anyone else?

    --
    ...unfortunately no one can be told what The Mat^H^H^HGoatse is...they must experience it for themselves...
  99. Re:Didn't any of you watch 'The Dish'?` by thogard · · Score: 1

    "The Dish" is a good techie movie. Its mostly right on its facts and there isn't any technobabble.

    What happened in the movie (and real life) was that the 210 ft dish (aka radio telescope) wasn't pointing at the correct spot. The reason they can't hear pioneer is that the signal is so weak that it can't be picked up with most sensitive recievers ever built. The gear that they are using to find pioneer's singal could pick up an Apollo 11 type signal without much effort at all.

  100. Re:Notice there were no black people or women... by spectrum- · · Score: 1

    What about the programmer Lady Ada Lovelace
    (as in the programming language that Ada was named after her)

    G.

  101. anyone home? by ciscoeng · · Score: 1

    Hello? Can you hear me now?

  102. 2 million years to reach Aldebaran... by mi · · Score: 1

    From the article:

    The spacecraft continues to coast toward the star Aldebaran in the constellation Taurus. It will take 2 million years to reach it.

    I imagine weekend trips to see the old "spaceship still crawling towards Aldebaran" being available in a few hundred years to our (grand-)children...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  103. Making them like they used to? by nanojath · · Score: 1
    "Originally designed for a 21-month mission, Pioneer 10 lasted more than 30 years..."


    I think this is an interesting question - 'cause frankly it seems like they DON'T make them like they used to. Is Pioneer a fluke, like the odd VW Rabbit that racks up 350,000 miles? Or was there something special about the technology, team, design, and/or construction effort that we could really learn from in designing DEEP space probes... the kind DESIGNED to last decades... even centuries? (I honestly don't know the answer. Any input from space geeks?)

    --

    It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries

    1. Re:Making them like they used to? by Izmunuti · · Score: 1

      'it seems like they DON'T make them like they used'

      Helping the Pioneer and Voyager's longevity was that they were cast into escape trajectories after their encounters. They've basically been coasting along in interplanetary space for decades with most of their instruments turned off. Pretty static environment. Now poor Galileo has been orbiting Jupiter, dipping in and out of that planet's enormously intense radiation belts for years. All that radiation takes a toll. If Galileo had just done a flyby and then a long coast, it would have aged much better.

  104. Re:Oh No! by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    I keep forgetting that people here need smileys.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  105. klingons blew it up! by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Dudnt people see that star trek movie?

  106. Re:Notice there were no black people or women... by malfunct · · Score: 1
    Black people and women have made HUGE contributions to humanity. Washington Carver and Madam Currie are two I can think of right off the top of my head and I suck at history.

    I don't usually beat the racial or sex horses but that comment was absurd. I'm also not at all for affirmative action and think it has watered down the core of people in many important fields, but I just can't believe that someone could say that women and african americans haven't contributed to humanity, crazy talk for sure.

    --

    "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

  107. Videos of the launch and Carl Sagan by Drog · · Score: 1

    Just wrote an article on this at SFT, with links to video clips of the launch and Carl Sagan discussing the significance of the gold plaque.

    --

    Looking for political forums? Check out "The World Forum".

  108. Re:Notice there were no black people or women... by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

    Fucking troll. I can come up with three off the top of my head.

    How about George Washington Carver, who revolutionized agriculture by improving crop yields and finding the first non-food/clothing applications for plant products, as well as introducing plastics into automobile manufacturing and starting the development of the first synthetic rubber?

    Or Lewis Latimer, of Thomas Edison's research team, who literally wrote the book on electric lighting (Incandescent Electric Lighting, 1890) and invented the threaded light bulb socket?

    Last, but by no means least, there's Marie Curie. If I have to explain her importance to you, you shouldn't be reading Slashdot.

    --

    Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  109. Message From ET received... by objekt · · Score: 1

    "Send more Chuck Berry!"

    --
    -- Boycott Shell
  110. Pioneer 10 - Intel Inside by jonelf · · Score: 1

    I never would have thought I would be the one pointing out something that could be positively interpreted for Intel but as it happens Pioneer 10 was powered by the Intel 4004.
    http://www.geocities.com/thestarman3/epc/40 04.html
    http://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/releases/ 20 011115corp_a.htm

    --
    /J - to know recursion you must first know recursion
  111. Actually... by BTWR · · Score: 1

    FYI - the "Sun from beyond Neptune" was entirely conceived by Carl Sagan. He wanted this to show Humanity's place in the cosmos (why we quabble over such small problems, etc) and that's why he called his "sequel" to Cosmos Pale Blue Dot.

  112. Re:It's not by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

    It is not in orbit around anything.

    Technically, it's still in orbit around the center of the Milky Way, isn't it?

    --

    Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  113. Inertia? by BTWR · · Score: 1

    I'm no physics major, but in space, since there's no friction, shouldn't P10's 82k mph speed continue at 82k until something physically stops it (inertia anyone?). Obviously I'm wrong here, so can someone steer me in the right direction?

    1. Re:Inertia? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      It slowed down for the same reason that a ball slows down after you throw it upwards: the pull of gravity.

      The probe only reached 82,000 mph because it was falling towards Jupiter. It gave back that energy as it moved away.

      It's like a roller coaster with Jupiter creating a big dip in the track. The probe goes fastest at the bottom of the dip, but returns to its original speed after it climbs out.

  114. I'm afraid that would violate the DMCA. by orichter · · Score: 1

    It would also violate a couple of other laws. This is the last straw. We need to force Congress to repeal the law of relativity now. Maybe we should do something about the DMCA as well.

  115. Re:when I grow up, I want to be an orbital mechani by RatBastard · · Score: 1

    When I grow up I want to be a quantum mechanic!

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  116. Why not use the ISS? Or the moon? by evil_pb · · Score: 1
    Everyone is saying "you can't go put a 100-foot dish in orbit on a satellite"... Ok maybe not. But, what about attaching something like that to the ISS, a piece at a time? Send a bit of dish up on subsequent supply missions, let the guys there bolt it on with some sort of highly accurate positioning system (solar powered or something, doesn't take a lot of force to move a dish in zero-grav).

    Then use this dish to communicate with probes like Pioneer 10, or others we might launch with much faster propulsion systems, where the Earth's atmosphere would just muddle the signal too much. Utilize a nearby relay station like ISS to rebroadcast the signal.

    Even if the ISS couldn't be used, for what I'm sure are a multitude of reasons (I'm not an astrophysicist and don't claim to be), all a dish or array of dishes really need are a big base to attach to, with some corrective thrust ability and control systems, and a power source. Wouldn't really even need to be manned, though it should be accessable by a shuttle or the transport of choice that year.

    This could just be a pipe dream ... but look at what the Hubble did for space imagery, by taking the interference of the atmosphere out of the equation. I suspect a space-borne orbiting deep-space communications platform would benefit us immensely, and probably allow much more complex probe missions in the future.

    What about attaching a big DSN, i.e. an array of antennas, at various points around the moon? That's a nice big base already in Earth orbit, far enough away to be relatively clean of our interference, easy to find for location purposes and handily made of rock - good stuff to attach say radio tower pieces to.

  117. Berzerkers on the starbord bow! by RatBastard · · Score: 1

    Afraid the Berzerkers are coming? It's far too late to do anything about it now.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  118. Must... resist.... by KingTank · · Score: 1

    ... urge to... anthropromorphize... space probe!

  119. Why a disc? by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    What's the point? Us humans have a hard enough time trying to read 5yr old DAT tape half the time!
    Great. Aliens are going to find that disc and will have to travel billions of miles just to find a Radio Shack.

  120. Re:Irony... by kfg · · Score: 1

    I know. It was a bit of a private joke I'm afraid. :)

    KFG

  121. Pioneer's camera was unique by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Pioneer had an interesting way of imaging. It did not really have a digital or TV camera like other probes did, but instead had a tube-like thingy that could point at only *one* narrow spot at a time, but could move back and forth. It used the *spin* of the probe to "scan" the target.

    The closest visual analogy I can think of is a phonograph record. The needle can only move right-to-left, so it relies on the rotation of the record to bring the different "sound spots" into "view". IIRC, the probe rotated at something like 6 times per minute. The 1D "stream" of light intensity readings was then reconstructed into a 2D image back here on Earth.

  122. Re:when I grow up, I want to be an orbital mechani by pyrrho · · Score: 1

    they landed a RC car on mars and drove it around you idiot.

    AND they were always a political organization at the top, the engineers were merely the best... guess what? They still ARE!

    Why anonymous?

    --

    -pyrrho

  123. You might see bits from it on eBay by simonharvey · · Score: 1

    like i said
    mind you i would like to see it up close and smell the 'burned' steel smell that comes from metals explosed to space, not to mention any pits /craters caused by impacts with space debrie.

    but then so would other people
    hence eBay :)

  124. Re:when I grow up, I want to be an orbital mechani by pyrrho · · Score: 1

    so, where did I steal that from?

    (I've heard "I'm a quantum mechanic" before... but I don't recall where, and I was ripping off that term consciously with "orbital mechanic")

    --

    -pyrrho

  125. Undiscovered Wonders of America by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 1

    Ugh. The colonizer's model of the world strikes again. There were people in America before the disease ridden, mass murdering Europeans showed up! Cahokia was a large city until smallpox swept across the continent after Spanish contact. When everyone else showed up in later years, it seemed empty because the only people left were the descendents of the folks who surived being the earlier plagues. Yes, the archaeological evidence exists. I'd have to take you there though ...

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
  126. Bill And Ted Reference by thumperward · · Score: 1

    Spare a single mod point for the parent, if you will.

    - Chris

  127. Re:Probes might outlast the Earth itself by lugonn · · Score: 1
    I just read some speculation on the BBC that says that Pioneer 10, 11 & Voyager 1, 2 will probably outlast the Earth. When the sun goes nova in a few billion years and destroys earth, these craft could still be "floating" through space. Assuming they don't fall into stars, black holes, or come back as sentient machines intent on destroying us pesky Carbon Units.

    The space-probes will be all that is left to prove that mankind ever existed.

    Substitute "Eva" for "space-probes" in the sentence above...cool huh. Fuyutski and Yui were right!

  128. R2D2? by rtscts · · Score: 1

    w00t! Astrodroids.

  129. Older civializations by bluGill · · Score: 1

    Re:am I the only one (Score:5) by Blondie-Wan (559212) on 10:09 PM February 25th, 2003 (#5384357) ( http://www.filmscoremonthly.com/ ) If that were a concern, the constant stream of radio, TV and other telecommunications signals we've been pumping into space for most of the 20th century would be a far bigger problem. There's effectively a big sphere of signals expanding around Earth in all directions at the speed of light, and anyone in space who chanced to stumble across any of our physical probes like Pioneer 10 would most likely have already detected us long, long before. Earth really calls a lot of attention to itself with its broadcasts, and our signals just get stronger and more blanketing as time goes by. Not only that, but even if we stopped all broadcasts tomorrow, there'd still be all our old signals moving out through space, and anyone out there with the wherewithal to detect them would be have several of our earth decades of opportunity in which to do so. Moreover, many think it's profoundly unlikely any alien races would be interested in conquering us. Even assuming others out there are hostile, the effort and expenditure of resources to get from there to here would probably mean the payoff for attacking us wouldn't be worth the trip. It's also been argued that any extraterrestrial civilizations capable of detecting us will almost certainly be much older and more advanced (the thinking being that on the cosmic timescale, we're just starting off, and any civilization even a little younger than ours wouldn't have the tech to detect us, and the odds are high against another civ reaching this stage of development against the exact same time we do, so if they can hear us they've probably been around a while),

    I disagree with this. The universe is a large place. I mean an incomprehensiabley large plave. There are places out there that have plenty of time to go from biological soup to intelligent socity more advanced than we are today, and then die out, starting tommorow, before the signals we have broadcast their direction arrive! Think of it, radio wave travel fast, and evolution is slow, yet the turtle of evolution has time to start from scratch, create something better than us, and kill them off, before our rabbit radio waves can get to them, even though the rabbit got a head start and won't take a nap.

    Of course when you get that far out, odds are even a signal aimed directly at them will be too faint to detect.

  130. Cheers by SubliminalLove · · Score: 1

    We crawled from the muck on malformed fins and sucked hot air into barely functional lungs. Preyed upon by the greater beasts of the land, we sought solace in the trees. Gradually we developed intelligence and tools, and we became the hunters. We tamed the wild grasses and settled together, forming the first civilization. Through centuries of toil we have made art, science, mathematics, and endless perseverence our tools and our allies. And now, millions of years after we first set out on our voyage, we are slowly setting out to escape the bonds of Earth. We are reaching up, and with outstretched hands, touching the face of God.

    I know that we all ache in our hearts for everything that NASA has not been able to do these last forty years. Don't ever forget, however, all the incredible things that have been done. Cheers, to everyone at NASA, and to all mankind.

    ~SL

  131. Kudos to the engineers by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 1

    Respect to the engineers behind the Pioneer hardware and software. Truly "doing more with less" legends.

  132. Shabby Grammar by Dingel · · Score: 1

    Putting an apostrophe in "pics" is incorrect. As a general rule, people overuse apostrophes....

    --
    ---- Live for Music. Die for Trance.
  133. Peachy. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    Four responses, three trolls (mostly incompetent) and one actual response. What a shitty SNR.

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  134. Gravity Assist Trajectories - Re:82,000 mph !!!!! by buckminsterinsd · · Score: 1

    You guys should go check out JPL's website.There are some great tutorials on this subject.

    From JPL online course in orbital mechanics
    ___________________________________________
    "Chapter 1 pointed out that the planets retain most of the solar system's angular momentum. This momentum can be tapped to accelerate spacecraft on so-called "gravity-assist" trajectories. It is commonly stated in the news media that spacecraft such as Voyager, Galileo, and Cassini use a planet's gravity during a flyby to slingshot it farther into space. How does this work? By using gravity to tap into the planet's tremendous angular momentum."

    If the spacecraft was only moving 20,000 MPH it could not exit the solar system, that's even slower than earth's escape velocity.

    What always blew my mind was how accurately the nav guys could can get the speed and position of the Pioneer 10 spacecraft. It was like shooting a freethrow from 3000 miles and swishing it with no mid course corrections.

    best regards,

    buck

  135. Re:Inertia? No, angular momentum by buckminsterinsd · · Score: 1

    Waffle Iron said:
    > It's like a roller coaster with Jupiter creating a big dip in the track. The probe goes
    > fastest at the bottom of the dip, but returns to its original speed after it climbs out.


    Sorry, but that would only be true if the planet wasn't moving.

    It's actually more like playing crack the whip on ice skates. The planet's huge angular momentum transfers an incredible amouut of energy to the little spacecraft and it leaves way faster than the speed it was moving before the encounter.

    best regards,

    buck

  136. James Van Allen on Pioneer 10 (feb 20) by buckminsterinsd · · Score: 1

    ______________________________________________
    "Pioneer 10 called home for over thirty years of spaceflight.
    Its future is now transferred from NASA to Isaac Newton and
    Johannes Kepler, neither of whom could be reached for comment"

    _______________________________________________
    -- James Van Allen