Slashdot Mirror


NASA Gives Up On Pioneer 10

Soft writes "Another Energizer Bunny has finally given out: Pioneer 10's generators have decayed to the point that DSN can no longer detect the probe's signals. It was the first spacecraft to penetrate the asteroid belt (1972) and fly by Jupiter (1973). So long and thanks for all the pic's..."

103 of 607 comments (clear)

  1. The Real Reason: by DasBub · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's tired of hearing about Linux kernel releases every ten minutes.

  2. Wow! by cmburns69 · · Score: 2

    It makes me feel old to know that I was alive when this thing launched!

    An online Starcraft RPG? Only at

    --
    Online Starcraft RPG? At
    Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
    1. Re:Wow! by kfg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When people ask me, "What sign?" I say, "Sputnik."

      If you think you feel old now, wait until you start getting old, my son. :)

      America's oldest man died on Monday. He was actually born in a log cabin and of high school age when the Wright Bros. first flew at Kitty Hawk.

      Think about that one the next time you feel "old." Your world has hardly moved at all compared to his.

      KFG

    2. Re:Wow! by dirkdidit · · Score: 2

      The man was the oldest man in America at the time.

    3. Re:Wow! by kfg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It may well have been possible for you to have had a computer all of your life. Even the internet, nascent as it may have been, may well predate you.

      When he was born he had no *electricity* and no one in his family had ever seen an automobile. Geronimo had only been captured three years previously and was not only still alive, but a comparitively young man.

      The world he was born in to was one someone born 500 years before would have recongnized. The world you were born into is one that that hypothetical person couldn't possibly even have conceived of.

      You are talking differences in quantity. I am talking differences in quality.

      There is no essential difference in type or quality of life today than there was 40 years ago when I first entered school. We live the same way now, with mostly the same things, as we did then. Electricity, phones, central heating, planes, automobiles, movies, TV, hydrogen bombs, etc.

      The cars have become a bit more refined, the planes a bit faster, the phones cordless, the movies, well, they havn't changed much at all really. These are just the things we already had becoming better.

      I'm not saying we don't live in interesting times, or that I'm not glad to be here, but the two cases are *damned* different.

      By the way, the commercial sail record from Sandy Point N.J. at the entrance of NY harbor to Lands End England was only 11 days. It stood for 100 years.

      And I'm *damned* glad the internet hasn't come up with one single reason for me not to go to London. That would suck.

      KFG

    4. Re:Wow! by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are not yet grey and know how much your world appears to have changed.

      I am already, shall we say, "distinquished", and know how much that is illusion, even though I remember when they said a 24 hr/day cable news network would never fly. Now I'm old enough not to watch the news much at all because it doesn't effect your life much. Buy a 20 year old NYT. Same shit, different decade. Read it once every year and you'll stay pretty current. You are mistaking a certain "coolness" factor for real change.

      There is no question these are magnificent times, I wouldn't miss them for anything, but the delta of magnificence between 1970 and now is minor compared to the magnificent changes that occured between 1890 and 1960.

      Try this test, take everything out of your house that wouldn't have been there in 1970. Should take you several minutes.

      Now go to a log cabin in Michigan and start shitting in the woods, cutting wood to stay warm and hauling water from the crick as you would have in 1897.

      We stand on the shoulders of giants making crowing sounds every time we grow an inch.

      KFG

    5. Re:Wow! by w42w42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This blows me away, and for some reason, I seem to think of it a lot. Perhaps it's my technical nature, in awe at the speed of progress.

      1903 was the first powered flight. 1957 was the first artificial satellite. 1969 was walking on the moon.

      Only 67 years between two bicycle mechanics essentially playing with a kite to walking on the moon! That boggles the mind!

      What most senior citizens in todays world have been witness to, I cannot even begin to grasp the number of times they must have been collectively blown away at some new advancement or achievement.

      I just hope that we all are fortunate enough to be witness to the same progress and achievement.

    6. Re:Wow! by coastwalker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes I echo your sentiment, I would like to see some more progress

      I still think wow! and enjoy all the wonderfull toys we have to play with these days - but its been a mixed experience since I first started taking notice of the world around me in the mid 70's.

      Sadly since walking on the moon things have fizzled out a bit in the space exploration area. It did cost a lot of money and mars would be even more expensive. It seems to me that things have stood still somewhat since the 60's. I dont see much evidence that anything has changed since then, except for incremental improvements in ideas that had already been thought of.

      Please somebody give me an example of a major breakthrough in ideas, politics, religion or lifestyle that has happened since the 60's

      Even the Internet and the personal computer is only being used as a metaphore for something we already had - library, sheet of paper, telephone, junk mail etc etc. Admittedly it is the greatest library, sheet of paper, telephone ever, I have more access to knowledge information and tools to do things than the most priviledged people in history. But I am not smarter than Julius Caeser, Napoleon whatever and certainly will not achieve a fraction of what they did in their lifetimes - even though I know more than them.

      Pioneer is an aspirational monument to the 20C, our first steps into space

      What is the monument to the 21C going to be? Radically longer lifespan? Environmental meltdown? Bio weapon plagues? The US / China cold war? Clean drinking water for the whole population of Earth? Artificial life software? Money becomes the only motivation? Its all up for grabs, which one is your bet on?

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    7. Re:Wow! by Gonarat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We need a new space race. In the 1950s and 1960s the U.S. was in competition with the Soviet Union for the exploration of space. The race began with Sputnik and ended with the Moon landing in 1969. Since then, the Soviets/Russians have concentrated on the space station (Salyuts and Mir) and the U.S. has concentrated on the Space Shuttles. This has lead to the current International Space Station.


      What we need is a new space race to get us (Humankind) off of our duffs. If China gets their space program off the ground the way they want to, we may see one. Then things will really start to move again. Man back on the Moon, missions to Mars, and more (and better) automated spacecraft exploring the solar system. Pioneer 10 was a well built, wonderful space craft. I'd love to see new ones of that calibur made with today's technology. We just need the incentive.

      --
      Beware of Sleestak
  3. Sorry slashdot.. by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    But I won't believe Pioneer 10 is dying until Netcraft confirms it..

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  4. So long old friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They just don't make 'em like they used to.

    1. Re:So long old friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      So sad, now it is only good for Klingon target practice. :(

    2. Re:So long old friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Note that the triumphs of NASA date from the era when engineers ran the programs, and not political hacks like now. I feel sorry for the young engineers now who will never experience the greatness which was NASA.

      There were no slackers then. There were dedicated young engineers with buzz cuts and and a slide rule. They didn't listen to "Hip Hop" or "Heavy Metal". They didn't wear baggy pants. They weren't interested in fashion or political correctness. Their uniform was a crisp white dress shirt, a string tie, and a pair of drip-dry Hagar slacks, accessorized with a leather holster--which held an 18 inch slide rule. Bang.

      These men were focused on quality and greatness. They were patriotic, dedicated men who strove each day to make America first with the best engineering the human mind could conceive.

      Today NASA is run by "professional" managers and bureaucrats. They cow-tow not to quality but to politically motivated "quotas" and false "diversity". Slackers abound. "Getting over" takes precedence over "getting it right".

      The saddest thing of all is not the failures of the current space program, as disturbing as they might be. The saddest thing is that we have lost the spirit and the system and methodology which yielded our greatest triumphs.

    3. Re:So long old friend by aliens · · Score: 5, Funny

      Cause we all know you can't accomplish anything unless you don't listen to that satan worshipping hardcore or that terrorist supporting hiphop. These kids now adays are a bunch of unworthy anti-americans.

      Only those people who continue to live in the 50's can possibly bring our great civilization forward. Right?

      The thing that hobbles NASA is the politicians and their demand for big results combined with the huge cuts in budget.

      I can't stand closed minded people. I'm sure you can work dilligently and continuously, you must be a blast to have as a friend.

      --
      -- taking over the world, we are.
    4. Re:So long old friend by orenmnero · · Score: 5, Informative

      Huh? The primary engineers in the early days were Germans, including former Nazis, many of whom built rockets for V-2 missle program. After the war just as many went to Russia as came here. They went to any country that had the resources to pursue a space program.

      And there is no way you are going to tell me the space program was anything but politically motivated. It was a platform for Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon to show up the Russians. Johnson particularly used it to keep the nations mind off Vietnam.

      If anything, the lackluster movement of our space program can be attributed to a LACK of political motivation.

      Failure is part of the process. The success of Pioneer's 3-11 came as a result of the failures of pioneer 0-2. The ones where they didn't "get it right"

      It's also not like those engineers in the good old days never killed anybody. We've had three major disasters exploring space in 67, 86, and 03. All about 15 years apart or so. Not bad considering this is easily the toughest and most dangerous job in the world.

    5. Re:So long old friend by varjag · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Note that the triumphs of NASA date from the era when engineers ran the programs, and not political hacks like now.

      NASA was always run by politicians (remember what the space race was about?). It is mostly the difference in funding that makes current spaces program look miserable when compared to the glory past.

      --
      Lisp is the Tengwar of programming languages.
    6. Re:So long old friend by stefanb · · Score: 2, Informative
      Not bad considering this is easily the toughest and most dangerous job in the world.

      Well, no disrespect to anymone working in space programs, but there are a lot more dangerous jobs in the world. Just making the news now are the apparently attrocious conditions in China's mines: "More than 5,000 people were killed in coal mine accidents last year, according to the government."

    7. Re:So long old friend by Gonarat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you look at history, the first voyages to the New World were all politically funded and motivated. Columbus sailed to the New World (actually it funded as a trip to find a quicker route to India and China) with ships and crew funded by Queen Isabella of Spain. Once gold was found, Spain sent ships and men to go get it (the fact that the gold belonged to someone else was a minor point to the Spanish). Once word of gold and land got out, other European nations started sending ships to the New World, funded by their Governments. Later, as new profit opportunities were found, Corporations (Hudson Trading Company) started getting involved.


      The political agenda with space is nothing new. We are still at the stage where Politicans are funding space exploration. We are just beginning to see the beginning of Corporate interest -- mostly in satellites right now.


      That said -- the main difference (other than technology and location) is we haven't (yet) found anyone out there. Pioneer 10 was a well built spacecraft that has given us (and the Gov't) much more than asked for. It has traveled over 11 light-minutes in 31 years before giving up the ghost, not bad for 1972 technology!


      --
      Beware of Sleestak
    8. Re:So long old friend by Erbo · · Score: 4, Funny
      So sad, now it is only good for Klingon target practice.

      Shooting space garbage is no test of a warrior's mettle!

      --
      Be who you are...and be it in style!
  5. Thats one old satelite by kelceylehrich · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It is older than me by 14 years.

    Any one have any really really good pics its taken?

    1. Re:Thats one old satelite by los+furtive · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is twice the distance of the Sun to Pluto (7.6 billion miles away). To look at an object that small, at that distance, travelling at the speed which it is currently travelling, would be harder than playing this game at max zoom.

      --

      I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

  6. Rest in peace by andyring · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Pioneer 10, and other satellites of that era, worked far beyond what they were intended, and did a darn good job (and then some) at what they did. Pioneer 10, you did good. May you rest in peace. A job well done.

    1. Re:Rest in peace by Provocateur · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Pioneer isn't dead as long as its moving and carrying that plaque as its one final message from us.

      You know what I've always been looking for in the NASA site but could never get? Animated clips of its voyage (or that of Voyager's) and its fly-bys of the other planets. I always thought they would make really great looking screensavers to match my wallpapers of the shuttle. Anybody know where I can get them?

      Keep on flyin Pioneer

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    2. Re:Rest in peace by km790816 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      One could imagine that we will see Pioneer 10 again. Within a century, I'm sure (or should I say 'I hope') we'll have craft capable of going much faster and further.

      Quite a collector's item, eh? The 22nd Century equivalent of finding the Titanic. (Except that Pioneer 10 is an example of *good* engineering.)

    3. Re:Rest in peace by superyooser · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No, but this page has some fascinating artist renditions (and *huge* publication size images), including Pioneer passing Jupiter, and the Pioneer looking back at the sun from Neptune's orbit!! Amazing! Nobody's ever seen *our* sun appear so small. (It's more dramatic in the medium-size picture.) It gives me goose bumps thinking what it would feel like to be out there, lost in the bleakness of space.

    4. Re:Rest in peace by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 2, Funny
      Pioneer isn't dead as long as its moving and carrying that plaque as its one final message from us.

      Doesn't the plaque say something along the lines of "Hot man on woman action on the third planet from Sol. Our women are submissive and our men are dolts with small penises. You'll have no problem turning these chicks into your love slaves." Put some pants on those folks next time you go firing off plaques into space!

  7. am I the only one by outsider007 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I worry that we're leaving a trial of breadcrumbs for conquering alien races to find us. fight the future.

    --
    If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    1. Re:am I the only one by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 5, Interesting
      If that were a concern, the constant stream of radio, TV and other telecommunications signals we've been pumping into space for most of the 20th century would be a far bigger problem. There's effectively a big sphere of signals expanding around Earth in all directions at the speed of light, and anyone in space who chanced to stumble across any of our physical probes like Pioneer 10 would most likely have already detected us long, long before. Earth really calls a lot of attention to itself with its broadcasts, and our signals just get stronger and more blanketing as time goes by. Not only that, but even if we stopped all broadcasts tomorrow, there'd still be all our old signals moving out through space, and anyone out there with the wherewithal to detect them would be have several of our earth decades of opportunity in which to do so.

      Moreover, many think it's profoundly unlikely any alien races would be interested in conquering us. Even assuming others out there are hostile, the effort and expenditure of resources to get from there to here would probably mean the payoff for attacking us wouldn't be worth the trip.

      It's also been argued that any extraterrestrial civilizations capable of detecting us will almost certainly be much older and more advanced (the thinking being that on the cosmic timescale, we're just starting off, and any civilization even a little younger than ours wouldn't have the tech to detect us, and the odds are high against another civ reaching this stage of development against the exact same time we do, so if they can hear us they've probably been around a while), and that (presumably, anyway) anyone so advanced wouldn't be warlike, so we'd probably have a lot more to gain than to lose from others finding out about us. I'm certainly no expert, but this does strike me as a fairly reasonable line of thought.

    2. Re:am I the only one by phillymjs · · Score: 5, Funny

      Moreover, many think it's profoundly unlikely any alien races would be interested in conquering us.

      I'm more worried about them seeing stuff like "American Idol," "Survivor," and "Joe Millionaire," and deciding we should all be exterminated, not subjugated.

      We can only hope that their positive perception of our race from the 13 years of Simpsons episodes we've pumped out can withstand the damage the later shows will do to it. :-)

      ~Philly

    3. Re:am I the only one by edunbar93 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm more worried about them seeing stuff like "American Idol," "Survivor," and "Joe Millionaire," and deciding we should all be exterminated, not subjugated.

      Especially if they're a race of ultra-violent beings who can't stand to miss a single episode? :)

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    4. Re:am I the only one by hcdejong · · Score: 4, Funny

      If they can fly at FTL speeds, not missing a single episode is trivial. Just fly to the point to where the broadcast you want has traveled.

    5. Re:am I the only one by AlecC · · Score: 2
      our signals just get stronger and more blanketing as time goes by

      Not so. While the total amount of RF power we are emitting may be increasing, it is becoming progressively less comprehensible. Most signals are now compressed, and the function of compression is to remove from any signal the redundant information that says "this is a signal" when you don't know how it is coded. Essentially, compression makes a signal resemble noise, and the better the compression the closer it is to noise. Sure, you need some kind of sync mark to lock onto the stream, which could in principle be detected, but that is a very small fraction of the signal.

      And we are tranmitting many more, much smaller signals. Instead of broadcasting tens or even hundreds of kilowatts from a hilltop to the universe at large, we are broadcasting a few tens of watts from orbit aimed straight at the earth, or sending it over cable, or broadcasting a few watts from cellphone masts or milliwatts from cellphones. The earths's RF output is raidly becoming indistinguishable from white noise, and from any reasonable distance will be swamped by the much bigger white noise generator nearby (the Sun).

      There is therefore a shell, perhaps a hundred light years thick, of "detectable" transmissions expanding out from the earth, which is already trailing off. To put it another way, any aliens out there will have a hundred year window to look in in the right direction if they are to detect us by our unintentional transmissions.

      Agree with the rest of your comment, though. The ides of aggressive/invasive aliens is purely to make good films/tv. You can't make a good drama out of civilisations getting in contact and just having a pleasant, though rather long drawn out, chat. But that is a far more likely outcome. Even if the cost is not orders of magnitude greater than any plausible benefit (the overwhelming likelihood, IMO), the likelihood of tehir being biologically compatible with us, our environment and our biological products is tiny. And if they don't want out biological products - there is a lot of rock out there to mine for mineral resources. Why try to mine the one bit that someone is sitting on?

      They don't have to be advanced not to want to attack us, they just have to be sensible enough to know what is in their own best interests. And a species which failed that test is unlikely to have space-faring civilisation.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
  8. Such pessimism.. by TeknoHog · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just because we can't hear its signals doesn't mean THEY don't. /me looks forward to the return of P'neer.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  9. Pioneer when you see by nlinecomputers · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...the Klingon bird of prey decloak, DUCK!

    --
    Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
  10. Another article by Zipster · · Score: 3, Informative

    There is another article on the news.com.au site in case the first goes down.

    --
    "I propose we leave math to the machines and go play outside" -- Calvin
  11. So Long So Long Sorry to See you Go by mrs+clear+plastic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So Long
    So Long
    I'm Sorry to See You Go
    I'm So Sad You Are Gone
    I Dearly Miss Your Feeble Little Signal
    You May Be Gone
    But You Are In My Heart Forever
    My Tears Will Follow You Wherever You Go

    --
    Cleara
  12. Haiku by sconeu · · Score: 4, Insightful


    A little spacecraft
    Far away among the stars
    Rest well, Pioneer

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  13. Another Space Era comes to a close by dWhisper · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is the second major deep space probe in the last few months that has gone south. Sad, because Pioneer 10 was the one that paved the way for so many other missions (like the Voyager Missions).

    Here's to a long and steady life to the remaining deep space missions out there.

  14. It's Done For? by rice_web · · Score: 3, Funny

    So, it's just dying out there? And what about our other "deep-space" probes? Yep, on the death bed.

    So, using rice_web's ingenious stupidity, I've come up with:

    (1) Send a new probe to follow our dying probes and act as a relay for the information.

    (2) Just completely start over and get new probes up and running, and moving more quickly than our dying probes.

    --
    The Political Programmer
  15. Pioneer 10 isn't dead.... by Sergeant+Beavis · · Score: 5, Funny
    It was just Slashdotted, that's all.

    Watch, in 5 years, someone will hear from it again.

    --
    There is nothing inherently safe about liberty. That's why so many people died protecting it.
  16. Lifespan? by 1000101 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What is the approximate lifespan of the craft? Will the harsh environment of space eventually destroy it, or will it simply drift along forever? Unless of course it collides with something which I would think would be highly unlikely.

    1. Re:Lifespan? by Sergeant+Beavis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think they said Pioneer 10 was lucky to have just survived the radiation it was exposed to as it passed Jupiter. I think it's safe to say that it last MUCH MUCH MUCH longer than anyone anticipated.

      --
      There is nothing inherently safe about liberty. That's why so many people died protecting it.
    2. Re:Lifespan? by kfg · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, other than the low temperature the enviroment of space isn't very harsh.

      It's when you start getting near things, like planets and stars, that things get dicey.

      Pioneer is heading the other way, and there isn't any reason that it shouldn't drift on for millions of years, God willing and the crick don't rise none.

      That's why they affixed the infamous plaque to it.

      KFG

  17. Distance. by cybermace5 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's 7.6 billion miles away. Almost 12 hours at the speed of light. And it will take two million years to reach a star considered to be in our close neighborood.

    Incomprehensible space...it's incredibly daunting, yet unbelievably appealing. Pioneer 10 was sent out in the same spirit as the pioneers of early America: the lure of seemingly boundless space and undiscovered wonders.

    This pioneer is blazing a trail we all hope to follow someday. Goodbye Pioneer 10, you have served us well.

    --
    ...
    1. Re:Distance. by digitalsushi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      2 million years eh? Ok, here's a thought to ponder. Think some...thing from Earth will go get it before it gets to the next local star?

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    2. Re:Distance. by digital+bath · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well said.
      I wonder if someday we will pick Pioneer up again, or just let it drift forever. Were all probes sent with the "mankind peace" plaque? (the one that depicts a man and women and some other stuff that I can't remember)

      --
      find / -name "*.sig" | xargs rm
    3. Re:Distance. by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 4, Informative

      >> 2 million years eh? Ok, here's a thought to ponder. Think some...thing from Earth will go get it before it gets to the next local star?

      Very good chance, though i think by pass you mean go farther out. I just can't see one pulling up and going by it in the passing lane. Make for fun video though.

      Anyways. This is the problem with earth ship ideas and such. You build a huge ship and start leaving earth today, then 10 years later another group does. They by then have developed a faster earth ship, and soon pass you by. Thus you wasted years in space you could have been on earth.

      We have much faster probes today. Ion engine powered one could probably catch up to it fast. I remember a TLC episode or similar talking about them and how fast they go. They don't start fast but they just keap accelarating forever (pretty much) so they hit insane speeds. The thing we sent to that astoroid and landed on had an ion engine. It traveled way faster then anything else we ever put out there.

    4. Re:Distance. by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 2, Funny
      You build a huge ship and start leaving earth today, then 10 years later another group does. They by then have developed a faster earth ship, and soon pass you by.

      Same deal with some complex computing problems. The best strategy for solving one is to wait for faster computers to be invented.

    5. Re:Distance. by Jason+Pollock · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have to disagree here. The best way is to get started and then improve your ship as you go. You will need generic manufacturing capabilities anyways (replacement parts), so why not build better engines?

      You have to have the ability to manufacture anything that Earth can simply to stay alive during the trip, so all you then need are the plans/templates, which is simple communication.

      So you start, improve your ship and speed up. No time wasted, and you still get there first.

      Unless of course someone invents FTL, in which case, you can't get the plans before they show up and say "hi".

      It's the same with hard computer problems. Sure, it may get faster later, but you start now and improve the hardware as you go. Don't assume a closed system!

      Jason Pollock

    6. Re:Distance. by snake_dad · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The thing we sent to that astoroid and landed on had an ion engine. It traveled way faster then anything else we ever put out there.

      I think you mean Deep Space 1, which has an ion engine and flew within 1,400 miles of comet Borelly. A little extra duty for that spacecraft, not unlike Pioneer greatly exceeding expectations. The one that landed on an asteroid was NEAR Shoemaker, but it has normal thrusters. Both where extraordinary missions.

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    7. Re:Distance. by TGK · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or maybe the Aliens will send a giant probe that will send ultrasonic messages into the oceans in an attempt to get a certain harmonic to occur in New Zion.

      Of course this will disrupt earths weather pattersn and the AI will send someone back in time to 1980s San Fransisco in order to capture two completely sentient members of the human race.

      This is getting confusing. I wonder if they'll run into Sara Conner.

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
  18. Paraphrase from "Apollo 13" by Mr.+Fusion · · Score: 2, Insightful

    She sure was a good ship.
    Farewell, Pioneer. And we thank you.

    -Mr. Fusion

  19. We should retrieve it someday by jonman_d · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If/when technology permits, we should make it a point to send a ship to retrieve the probe, for both practical and symbolic reasons. It'd be interesting to see the ware and tare on a craft that's been through so much as it has; and, it has a great historical value. As a sign of respect to itself and its builders, Pioneer deserves to be in a measeum of sorts.

    Of course, my other half tells me, for the same reasons, let it alone, in space, quietly, where its home is.

    1. Re:We should retrieve it someday by Sergeant+Beavis · · Score: 2
      Yea, if technology permits, a caretaker robot craft should accompany it, keeping it clear of any potentially damaging debris and studying it as it decays over the centuries. If it is to decay in space that is.

      --
      There is nothing inherently safe about liberty. That's why so many people died protecting it.
    2. Re:We should retrieve it someday by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The best way to honor it is to let it keap going. Just cause we haven't heard from it or won't doesn't mean it's job is done. It's out there and traveling even if all systems are dead. Some day something will find it. That's another part of it's mission. You wouldn't pull the statue of liberty down and put it in a mueaseum because it's done a good job. It's still doing it's job. Yeah I would like to see it to, but it's busy working right now.

    3. Re:We should retrieve it someday by alef.01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree. On the other hand, an effort should have been made to retrieve Mir from orbit instead of leaving it fall down liker that. Regarding the statue of liberty, I can't believe we Egyptians had let it go to America instead of it's intended place at the enterance of Suez Canal!! :)

  20. Not too shocking... by mraymer · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The thing has been going longer than it was ever intended to anyway. It's really cold and really far away, so it's not too shocking that it finally quit.

    Has SETI given up on it, too? I know they would do an informal test on their equipment by looking for the Pioneer 10 signal. SETI has been having problems tracking it for a few years at least... here's something Jill Tarter wrote about it.

    If a nuclear war or asteroid or other event destroys all of humanity, probes like this will be our only legacy...

    --

    "To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking

    1. Re:Not too shocking... by mahart · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wish our legacy had better pornography on it

  21. Its a Lie by bastardman · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just detected that probe the other day... wait... perhaps that was a different kind of probe. Never mind then.

  22. Verizon Commercials by dmuth · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did anyone else read that and think of the Verizon Wireless commercials?

    "Can you hear me NOW?!?"

  23. Amateur time by tqft · · Score: 4, Interesting

    OK Pioneer is dying from whatever I read it appears the problem is the signal to noise ratio is too low.

    Perhaps all you amateurs with radio telescopes out there should ask NASA nicely (through whatever an organisation preferably) for the frequency and lcoation data that is not publicly available and do a big combined search.

    Do you have procedures/software for doing VLBI? It would be a good project to do build it around if you do not already.

    A few hours a day or days a month and you might still get some useful data from it.

    --
    The Singularity is closer than you think
    Quant
    1. Re:Amateur time by ender81b · · Score: 5, Informative

      No offense but if NASA's DSN network, the most advanced tracking and recieving facility in the world, cannot detect it why would you think 1000 amateur astronomers would have any luck? I pulled this from the Voyager home page but presumably Pioneer would be much weaker:

      " The antennas must capture Voyager information from a signal so weak that the power striking the antenna is only 10 exponent -16 watts (1 part in 10 quadrillion). A modern-day electronic digital watch operates at a power level 20 billion times greater than this feeble level. "

      Then again I am no radio expert so maybe what you describe is feasible.

    2. Re:Amateur time by captaineo · · Score: 2, Informative

      AFAIK interferometry increases resolution, but it doesn't let you detect signals fainter than any one of the telescopes could individually. And in this case it's the radiation-gathering that's important, not resolution... (I think)

    3. Re:Amateur time by Have+Blue · · Score: 4, Informative

      Very Long Baseline Interferometry increases resolution, not range. It won't help capture a signal too weak for any of the individual dishes to pick up.

  24. Am I missing something here? by itallushrt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why don't all you people stop thanking a hunk of metal and start thanking the scientist and engineers that designed, built, and launched Pioneer 10. They are the real reasons this post even exist.

    1. Re:Am I missing something here? by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have to admit you have a point. The first thing I did when I saw this headline was go to my bookshelf and take out my copy of The Cosmic Connection, by Dr. Carl Sagan, and start crying.

      On the cover of the book is a photo of two humans against a field of stars, mimicing the plaque that Dr. Sagan designed to be affixed to Pioneer 10.

      This book was a personal gift from Carl to me. We "lost contact" with Dr. Sagan some years ago.

      So, Carl, ya done good, and I miss the bloody hell out of you. Goodnight and God bless.

      KFG

  25. No need to worry by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're only coming to serve man.

    KFG

    1. Re:No need to worry by AsbestosRush · · Score: 2, Informative

      And now that we have the cursory Twilight Zone reference out of the way... :)

      +1 funny, tho.

      --
      EveryDNS. Use it. It works.
      AC's need not reply
  26. ObHHGTG by jpetts · · Score: 4, Funny

    2 million years eh?

    Just time for another bath! Pass me the sponge, would you?

    --
    Call me old fashioned, but I like a dump to be as memorable as it is devastating - Bender
  27. Ha! by Quasar1999 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    EchoStar and Bell should have gone with the guys that worked on that satellite... Check out how crappy modern satellites are (Lockheed Martin for example)... hell, they're in low earth orbit and they can't last a whole month before dying(LM's Nimiq 2)... Pioneer went through the asteroid belt... come on... Evolution means going forward, not back... Can't we build reliable satellites of yesteryear?

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    1. Re:Ha! by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Informative

      "EchoStar and Bell should have gone with the guys that worked on that satellite..."

      Apples and oranges. More like apples and rocks. First off, your metaphor breaks down as soon as you describe Pioneer 10 as a "satellite." It is most definately not a satellite.

      Communications satellites are put into earth-orbit with more transponders than you'd care to shake a stick at, its intention being to relay as many communications signals as it can back and forth between ground-based stations. Pioneer was built with one transmitter to beam back periodic signals.

      Communications satellites aren't built to last much longer than a few years to begin with. There is no reason to design one to last more than a dozen years or so when communications technology will outstrip the capabilities of the satellite in that time, requiring a replacement. It took Pioneer over a year just to get anywhere.

      Communications satellites are only 8.5 light-minutes or so from the sun, so there isn't any reason to put a more durable or expensive power supply on them beyond solar panels and batteries for night-time operation. Jupiter alone is more than four times that distance away, and the technology limitations of the time required a (much) more durable atomic solution.

      Geostationary satellites have to deal with those pesky laws of physics that dictate that they will always eventually fall out of orbit. Sure, they don't have to deal with atomspheric drag like LEO objects, but momentum transfer is still an issue. Pioneer isn't a satellite in the remotest sense of the word: It's obviously beyond escape velocity for our solar system, which means it will never come back.

      "Pioneer went through the asteroid belt"

      Lay off the Star Wars. Mass density in that region isn't anywhere near what Hollywood thinks it is. Space debris in earth orbit poses a far greater hazard than passing through the main asteroid belt.

      "Can't we build reliable satellites of yesteryear?"

      The true "satellites of yesteryear" aren't there any more. Try and find three US satellites still in earth orbit that were launched before, say, 1985.

      Now, if you want to talk about space probes, why would we build another Pioneer or even a Voyager when we could build another Magellan or Galileo?

  28. Goddamn by cranos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know you are truly geek when something like this almost brings tears to your eyes. I mean this thing had less computing power than your average calculator and yet it managed to be useful for thirty years?
    See what happens when you actually give your space programme decent funding? You do something like this, something which comes close to making the human race look like something more than six billion savages scrabbling in the dirt.

    1. Re:Goddamn by cranos · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Im sorry where in my post did I say that Pioneer was the greated accomplishment mankind ever achieved?

      Oh and by the way slavery has not been abolished in this world, neither has the issue of equal rights for women been dealt with properly. Smallpox is a great achievement, only problem is now it is being used to develop biological weapons, as is anthrax, botulism and and variety of little nasties.

      When I posted I said the pioneer was an achievement that mankind can look on and say, "My (diety of choice) look where we have been, can we go further".

  29. It's still serving part of its mission. by chaparrl · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the info at Nasa's page on Pioneer 10 "A plaque was mounted on the spacecraft body with drawings depicting a man, a woman, and the location of the sun and the earth in our galaxy."

    1. Re:It's still serving part of its mission. by mahart · · Score: 5, Informative

      pic of it: plaque

  30. Pioneer 10 is dying... by dfenstrate · · Score: 4, Funny

    Netcraft comfirms it.

    (you can shoot me now)

    --
    Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
  31. DON'T MAKE ME RE-LIVE BATTLEFIELD EARTH! by Myriad · · Score: 5, Funny
    I worry that we're leaving a trial of breadcrumbs for conquering alien races to find us. fight the future.

    Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagh! No, make the pain stop! You are causing me a Battlefield Earth flashback! Not only did I watch that evil movie, I've read the damned book years before.

    Don't you know that's exactly how Psychlo's found Earth in the first place?

    Can I believe that I actually know that? Please, shoot me now before the Hubbard cultists get me!

    --
    "They do not preach that their god will rouse them, a little before the Nuts work loose." Kipling, 'The Sons of Martha'
  32. Re:communication via relay? by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 4, Informative

    Possible, kind of, but not really.

    NASA is researching the possibility of setting up a network of satellites around the solar system that can relay information.

    Mars, infact, has 2 relay satellites (MGS and ODY) in orbit that can relay information from rovers/landers/etc from the ground. More will be entering orbit still (ESA's, and another mars orbiter for 2005 or 2007 i think). They will all have the ability to relay information. The beagle lander will rely on this, for example.

    But there is a problem. Those satellites can only relay signals from mars (in orbit, or on the ground). They cannot pick up a signal from Jupiter or Saturn, and retransmit it to earth because they do NOT have a reciever big enough to do that.

    NASA's DSN (look it up) has 100 foot dish antennas to pick up signals from the outter solar system.

    You CANNOT fit a 100 foot dish to a satellite and orbit it around Mars or Jupiter, etc, to pick up signals from further out and relay them to earth. Its simply not possible.

    Because of this, spaceprobes can only relay signals to Earth from signals which are near by. Hence, MGS or ODY relaying from landers on he surface of mars, or Cassini relaying data from the huygens probe.

    Cassini can't pick up signals from a probe around Nepture or Uranus and relay it to earth, because it just cannot possibly have a powerful enough reciever since that requires a huge dish.

    One option, however, is to use laser (optical) instead of radio transmission, which may make this possible.

    That may still have many other problems of its own, however.

    D.

    --
    You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
  33. Re:Radioisotopes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ---..are really cool. Nuclear powered naval vessels don't last a third as long as Pioneer's radioactive batteries have.

    You dont have a clue. A nuclear submarine has 1 battery compartment. This battery is your 50 gallon drum nuclear battery. Those types of batteries have a lifespan (in the submarine) of about 20 years. For that 20 years, it takes care of propulsion, air bladders, CO2 scrubbers, and the 90V AC (I cant remember the freq offhand).

    For disposal, they seal these drums in bigger drums with the bottom of the bigger drum a lead/concrete mesh. They proceed to pour the similar mixture all around the barrel, sealing it totally. Then they lift it 2 miles down a hole in a mountain (Nevada). Once a floor is done, it's sealed by concrete and then a hatch is rivited and then soldered on.

    For what it's worth, ALL the nuclear waste in the US would fit in the dimensions of the football field 6 feet deep. Compare that to COx, NOx, SOx and other organic crap floating from tailpipes. After what I've seen, nuclear is the safest fuel, given non-idiots tending the reactor. You've never heard of a US nuclear powered sub go critical and meltdown. You wonder why? They arent the dumbasses like 3MI. Island.

    From somebody who knows a little too much.

  34. it's doubtfull that anyone far away will hear by autopr0n · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Asside from a few projects designed to beam high-energy signals at spesific stars, most of the radio waves we send out will be so weak that they would never be able to be detected against background nose just a few lightyears away.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:it's doubtfull that anyone far away will hear by RodgerDodger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As a coherent signal, yes. As static, no way.

      The Earth emits almost as much RF radiation as a star. Anyone ET who has been watching our system for the last century would have noticed the massive climb. Anyone ET who is just starting to look at us would notice the anomaly. This would be visible anywhere in the appropriate radius, (about 70 light years), AND that radius is limited by lightspeed, not signal strength.

      --
      "Software is too expensive to build cheaply"
  35. Re:Radioisotopes by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Pioneer 10 & 11 spacecraft used Pu-238 RTGs. The generators initialially provided 155 watts, which diminished to 140 watts by the time the spacecraft encountered Jupiter, 100 watts five years into the mission.

  36. Voyager had a disc. by Goonie · · Score: 4, Informative
    Both the Pioneer probes had the plaque.

    The Voyager probes were sent out with a gold disc which contains, amongst other things, greetings from Kurt Waldheim (former Secretary-General of the UN) amongst ones in a bunch of languages, the "sounds of Earth", including Beethoven and Chuck Berry, the sound of waves against the shore, and various other things, and a bunch of images of Earth life, as well as some instructions as to how to play the disc. It was Carl Sagan's project, IIRC.

    Of course, the odds of the probes ever being detected by extra-terrestrial intelligence is virtually zero, given their slow speed, tiny size, and the fact that they don't emit any signals (or more precisely won't by the time ET is in a position to spot them).

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    1. Re:Voyager had a disc. by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 4, Funny
      Chuck Berry? Man, that's got to be a hell of an honor for ol' Chuck.

      I imagine the first interstellar war will start when an alien civilization "pirates" that copyrighted Chuck Berry recording and the MPAA comes to collect royalties.

  37. Woudn't be worth the trip?? by Phantasmo · · Score: 3, Funny

    the effort and expenditure of resources to get from there to here would probably mean the payoff for attacking us wouldn't be worth the trip.

    My friend, you seem to be forgetting our vast amounts of stable Energon!

    --

    The US Army: promoting democracy through unquestioned obedience
  38. Re:82,000 mph !!!!! by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My interpretation of the article is that the probe briefly reached 82,000 mph during its closest approach to Jupiter. It slowed down considerably as it pulled away from Jupiter's gravity well. IIRC, it's currently moving at something more like 20,000 mph.

  39. Re:Radioisotopes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ---Of course the dumbasses at 3MI don't control the media, nor can they "classify" information, or "disappear" witnesses.

    That doesnt matter. Remember the russian vessal, Kursk? There was a group of people that knew what happened even before the Russians knew. Sesmologists. They heard a 4Hz 'ripple' at that time, from the explosion of that uh air going to the 'top'.

    From their models, they knew something exploded. And if you know your geometry, all you need to know is 3 places for near perfect position. From what they gathered, something exploded in the ocean. That something was quite deep. Sub.

    A nuclear explosion would be totally unhidable. There's nuclear detection sattelites that can detect minute traces of any sub-major explosion. Did you know, that in the mid 70's somebody blew a 2 Kton dirty bomb at the south pole? The US nor the Russians didnt know who did it. We thought it was some 3'rd world dictatorship (similar to Hussein or Kadafee). We still havent figured that one out.

    From somebody who knows a little too much.

  40. Icon of the Space Age by PizzaFace · · Score: 5, Informative

    Pioneer 10's mission continues. Let's not forget the plaque that Pioneer 10 carries. It was world famous when the probe was launched, because it was mankind's first attempt to communicate beyond the solar system. Carl Sagan designed the plaque to be universally (in the truest sense) comprehensible, at least to any civilization sufficiently advanced to capture it. Next to the map of the probe's origin relative to our galaxy, with its key in binary notation, was an etching of a generic man and woman, superimposed on an outline of Pioneer to give a sense of scale. The man's arm was raised in a gesture that Sagan hoped would suggest friendship. Especially given the public's then-new awareness of threats to humanity's survival as a species, there was something very poignant about this cosmic message in a bottle that had no chance of being seen by anyone for millions of years.

    I remember a newspaper cartoon from the day. A man in a business suit and a woman in a dress were looking at the plaque on Pioneer, which was half buried in the ground. The man said to the woman, "They seem very similar to us, except that they don't wear clothes."

    1. Re:Icon of the Space Age by PizzaFace · · Score: 4, Informative

      NASA has published a brief history and a depiction of the plaque.

  41. Re:Radioisotopes by Mark+(ph'x) · · Score: 3, Funny

    Great.. now instead of toshiba notebooks burning my lap, they will also irradiate my genitalia and give me mutated children!

    --
    those who control the past, control the future. those who control the present, control the past.
  42. Re:communication via relay? by MyHair · · Score: 2, Funny

    ("Break your satellite? Need new parts? Just order on the universe wide web at uww.spaceparts.com!")

    Probably more like uww.spaceparts.co.tx.us.sol.arm17.milkyway . :-) Unfortunately the latency for the nearest root DNS server is 217 years.

  43. So let's go pick it up. by blair1q · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just jump in the hyperdrive and go grab it and download it.

    We do have hyperdrive, right?

    I mean, it's 2003.

    We were supposed to be mining Jupiter's moons by now.

    We can't go get one little probe?

    What have we been doing with the last 30 years?

  44. Re:Never again, anything like it. by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Are you going to be dead in 2020? The New Horizons project aims to launch a probe in 2006 to explore Pluto and the Kuiper belt.

    The Voyager 1 probe is more distant than Pioneer 10, and will probably expire within 20 years.

  45. Re:Radioisotopes by LordSah · · Score: 2

    Submarines use active fission, right? Pioneer's only harnesses energy from radioactive decay. It's much safer, and very low maintenance (for Pioneer, it's practically zero). I wasn't really positive on how often nuclear vessels need a refuelling--I thought I had read that the Nimitz's go for 8-10 years.

    You're definitely right about nuclear is by far the safest energy available today. Its problem is that the word "nuclear" scares the bajesus out of folks who don't know any better.

  46. Sad... by AnonymousCowheart · · Score: 2, Informative

    How sad, and last year CNN just had an article about how it got a new lease on life! Also see this link for the picture it carries of us...

  47. Re:Never again, anything like it. by anubi · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It saddens me a lot to see the things that so impressed me as a child now fading into oblivion... but yet knowing they are not destroyed.. they are just on a very very very long voyage.

    I only wish I were as elegant in wording as Carl Sagan:

    Reflections on a Mote of Dust

    We succeeded in taking that picture, and, if you look at it, you see a dot. That's here. That's home. That's us. On it, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever lived, lived out their lives. The aggregate of all our joys and sufferings, thousands of confident religions, ideologies and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilizations, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every hopeful child, every mother and father, every inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every superstar, every supreme leader, every saint and sinner in the history of our species, lived there on a mote of dust, suspended in a sunbeam.

    The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors so that in glory and in triumph they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot. Think of the endless cruelties visited by the inhabitants of one corner of the dot on scarcely distinguishable inhabitants of some other corner of the dot. How frequent their misunderstandings, how eager they are to kill one another, how fervent their hatreds. Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the Universe, are challenged by this point of pale light.

    Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity--in all this vastness--there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves. It is up to us.

    It's been said that Astronomy is a humbling, and I might add, a character-building experience. To my mind, there is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world. To me, it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly and compassionately with one another and to preserve and cherish that pale blue dot, the only home we've ever known.

    -- Carl Sagan (1934-1996)

    You can see the image referred to in the article here .

    (In all honesty, I believe this image was from Voyager, but Pioneer had the same view and I felt it only appropriate.)

    Fare well, Pioneer.

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  48. It might have discovered anomolous gravity by ggwood · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am saddened to hear that we lost contact with Pioneer 10 because we don't understand the forces acting on it. One would think that since we know gravity pretty well, and we know the relivant masses involved, we could predict the motion of the Pioneer satelites. Alas no. Exotic things like dark matter and photon pressure were invoked to explain the extra attraction (back) towards our sun, and failed. I heard a great talk about this while at U.C. Riverside department of Physics and had the chance to ask about photon pressure myself (yes, they take that into account - it is a far, far larger effect than this). The BBC has an old story on this effect, which I am sure many slashdotters have already heard of, here.

    By the way, a similar anomoly is seen in Pioneer 11 and another distant satelite (Ulysses perhaps???).

    Also, there is a link at nasa.gov, but at this time it seems broken. I include it for completeness here.

    It seems John Anderson and friends have written several articles on this. One which you might find interesing has been published in Physical Review D: here.

    --
    a war on terrorism? How can we end a war on a method?
  49. Re:Notice there were no black people or women... by javiercero · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Troll alert:

    Well, for one the first compiler was designed by a woman: Grace Hopper. If that is not a big contribution to the field of computing I don't know what it is.

    African Americans have also had great impact in our society, wether you like it or not, and they are not just in the fields of humanities. And given the background of opression and lack of incentives that some of these people (minorities and women) had to endure just a few years ago, it is even more impressive.

    BTW, what is your contribution to humanity TROLL?

  50. Somewhere at NASA... by darnok · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...an old geeky guy picks up his Coke, brushes the pizza crumbs off his gut, brushes spider web out of his waist length greasy hair, pushes his chair back and says "OK, who's gonna beat THIS uptime?"

  51. Release it to the Public Domain by farnsaw · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How about releasing it with all it's communication protocols, passwords, etc to the public domain. Who knows, there might be an enterprising young genius out there with an array of 120 foot (~40 meter) dishes. ;-)

    --
    "Computer Scientists can count to 1024 on their fingers" (non-mutant, non-mutilatated, human computer scientists)
  52. Re:communication via relay? by way2trivial · · Score: 2, Funny

    Its simply not possible.
    Historically, the most inspirational statement possible.

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  53. Re:Klingon target practice by Walterk · · Score: 3, Funny

    So is this going to mean there'll be a big war between V'ger and P'ner?

  54. Pioneer's camera was unique by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Pioneer had an interesting way of imaging. It did not really have a digital or TV camera like other probes did, but instead had a tube-like thingy that could point at only *one* narrow spot at a time, but could move back and forth. It used the *spin* of the probe to "scan" the target.

    The closest visual analogy I can think of is a phonograph record. The needle can only move right-to-left, so it relies on the rotation of the record to bring the different "sound spots" into "view". IIRC, the probe rotated at something like 6 times per minute. The 1D "stream" of light intensity readings was then reconstructed into a 2D image back here on Earth.