Slashdot Mirror
Ask Larry Niven
If you read science fiction at all, you're familiar with Larry Niven. (If you don't, his work is a great place to start.) Anyway, this is a golden opportunity to learn more about a truly innovative author. (Thanks go to Chris DiBona for arranging this interview; he met Larry during one of his TechTV appearances.) One question per post, please. We'll post Larry's answers to 10 of the highest-moderated questions shortly after he gets them back to us.
What do you think of halo's "ringworld"?
Was your cease-and-desist regarding Elf Sternberg's The Only Fair Game motivated more by a personal aversion to the content, or a desire to retain control over "your universe"? How does this jibe with your statement in Ringworld Engineers that "If you want more Known Space stories, you'll have to write them yourself"?
Fuck Slashdot
In the prologue to one of the Ringworld Engineers editions you talk about how some students went to a convention with banners and were chanting "THE RINGWORLD IS UNSTABLE!". I thought that was cute. What's the weirdest thing a fan of your work has ever done? Something like sending you detailed calculations on how to figure out the density of scrith?
Is the RingWorld really unstable?
In your works you tend to try to pick out trends that'll continue into the future, i.e. organ transplants leading to increased capital punishment and organ thieves, or the role playing game's transformation into "Dream Park" style VR environments. What do you see as the next series of advancements and trends that will affect us in the future?
The first time I read the Ring World many years ago in Russian, I still have this book, it travelled with me around the world :)
Here is the question for you:
What do you think about the Columbia accident and what do you think about the general direction that Nasa should be taking in order for us to actually make some progress in space exploration.
What do you think about the space elevator?
Thank you for your books!
Roman
You can't handle the truth.
Mr. Niven,
Any plans to do a movie (or better yet!) an animated version of any of the Man-Kzin Wars stories? These are, I think, the most accessible stories of Known Space (Ringworld might go over the heads of quite a few folks out there).
Also, why not raise attention about how Wing Commander--both the computer game and the attrocious movie--is almost a direct "borrow" of Man-Kzin Wars?
I'm not an actor, but I play one on TV.
How difficult is it to prevent technical anachronism? Early science fiction movies had people being shot to the moon with guns, 2001 would have had us with manned spaceflights to Jupiter, and Star Trek is currently dealing with how to show Starship technology more advanced than year 2003 tech while not being as advanced as the original series' audio intercoms and Motorola cellphone communicators.
Do you have a means of avoiding anachronism? What suggestions do you have for other budding authors regarding this problem?
Terrycloth Lobster
Are the plans for a Ringworld movie (or indeed, any LN filmatizations - Gill the ARM would be great) totaly dead, or can we still hope to see Louis Wu and Speaker on the silver screen?
Moderators: These interviews are probably the neatest thing Slashdot does. Please only moderate up actually interesting questions that can't be answered with a quick Google search, a read through his (excellent) work, a few moments thought, or a handful of words ("Yes, I do like to write.").
;-)
I particularly recall the Dave Barry interview where it seemed like half the questions were pathetic attempts to toss him a straight line, rather then really interesting questions.
I think these are the most "importent" moderations you can do on Slashdot, as they are the only ones that have any real effect on the world. Please consider them carefully.
Again, this is not a question so should this happen to get modded highly please do not forward
Will we ever establish and sustain a colony off of the Earth? If so, where, when and how do you think we'll make it?
You only use 2% of your DNA
In The Ones Who Stay Home, in a recent issue of Analog, you raise some pretty serious issues about terrorism and retaliation.
The technology of violence is an arms race which in my lifetime seems to have been pretty well balanced, attacker vs. defender. Lately, the worst the bad guys have done to the U.S. is take down a few buildings: no nuclear weapons yet in the hands of honest-to-goodness madmen, no "gray goo" against which there is no defense except going offplanet, no asteroids being dropped from the moon.
How long do you think this balance will hold? And what do you think the first weapon will be against which it is infeasible -- because of economics, technology, politics, or otherwise -- to mount a successful defense?
I know most SF writers aren't big on religion, but religion occupies a very large space in your collaboration with Pournelle, "The Mote in God's Eye", yet is conspicously lacking in Known Space. Is the religion in "Mote" all Jerry's doing?
A. Rightmann
Larry,
What 3 or 4 TV SF programs have you found most to your liking over the years (if any), and what significance do you think those shows brought to the overall quality of TV SF?
For instance, if I were to ask myself this question, "Star Trek", the original show, remains a classic, but all the sequelized spinoffs (except portions of TNG, and almost all of "Enterprise", which seems to "get it" again) have driven this show into the state of a repeatedly bludgened, very deceased equine.
Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
Mr. Niven,
I'm always curious about what authors read for either inspiration, or what they find to be good literature. What books (science fiction or otherwise) have influenced your work, or do you find to be delightful reads. Any favorite authors?
Thank you for your time.
-When going for broke, go for Ithaca!
Dear Larry Niven - I regard this /.-item as a real opportunity. ... if yes, what is your opinion? Blatant rip-off of your ringworld universe, or homage? And, what is you opinion of how it compares to your ringworld series?
A question I have had in my mind for a couple of years now: have you read Terry Pratchett's novel "Strata"?
If no, you might find it interesting
yes, we have no bananas
My favorite stories of yours are the series of short stories you wrote about Gil Hamilton, the ARM agent with "invisible hand." Aside from the interesting character, what fascinated me was the strange, nearly dystopian world where a good thing (amazing advances in the science of organ transplants) led to a world so desperate for organs that you could get the death penalty for almost every crime in the books.
In an essay, you mentioned you'd written those stories at a time when you were very concerned about the possibility of that future actually coming to pass -- that the convenience of a technology would make the general population so rabid for it that they would become more tolerant of things we would find excessive and cruel in today's world. You also mentioned that you were less concerned about that specific future coming to pass.
If you were to write the Gil Hamilton stories today, what would be the technology you would be concerned about *instead* of organ transplants? What convenience would you see as the basis and rationalization for receiving the death penalty for breaking the speed limit more than three times?
Eviscerati.Org: All Hail the Eviscerati
Mr. Niven,
First, thanks for the awesome books that you have written-- I am a big fan.
My biggest question about the universe in which many of the stories take place is about the "Outsiders." They seem to be extremely technologically advanced; they jump in whenever something impossible needs to be done, such as the Puppeteers moving their worlds around. How come the Outsiders didn't end up competing with Protectors, or do something on the scale of building a ringworld?
Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
Having been an avid reader of the "chaos manor" site for a while now, I have to wonder. Are you as tech savvy as Jerry, and (more importantly) with you guys having done SO much together, do you find you "share a brain" occasionally, and is it difficult to write with/without him (and/or Steven) after so much work together?
(pick any one or all to answer, as you choose!)
Thanks for the great work!
Maeryk
Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
Well, being a successful and already well known author, when you write something, do you write it just to write something, keep your name known, get money .. etc, or do you write because you feel there is something in your head that needs to be put down in paper and read by others?
In other words, what is the "motive" you are writing for?
Thanks, Khalid
"What you 'seek' is what you get!"
Although Carl Sagan purported to be a fan of fiction based on scientific possibilities, he didn't appear to have much of a use for more fantastic works. You write pretty hard science fiction, so what on earth was Carl Sagan's beef with you?
In these Pak Protectors, we have unbelievably intelligent and clever beings, but wisdom does not seem implied. What are your thoughts on wisdom, and what points were you trying to make? Considering the audience for most of your books (geeks, "smart folk"), it's an interesting point to include.
Side question: where did you come up with the idea of the Pak, especially as human ancestors? It has to be one of the more original conjectures about affects of old age that I have ever read :-)
"Doubt your doubts and believe your beliefs." -- Switchfoot, Ode to Chin
I've generally found that most people recognise RingWorld, but few people have heard of my favorite series - Dream Park (it's very hard to find).
Gaming technology, although holography isn't at the stage yet, is constantly moving towards more realism. And trends in online gaming and MMORPG's are setting the mentality. However what are your opinions on the social feasibility of something like DP ever becoming a reality, given the rapid movement away from traditional GMs and social non-computer RPG'ing? Would people just prefer to stay at home fully virtual rather than participating in an event with other actual physical people?
Of the work you've written, does one title in particular have a special place in your heart? Douglas Adams once said that his book "Last Chance to See" was the one book he'd hope that people read if they only read one of his books. Is there one book of yours you'd like people to have read?
Similarly, if I were to introduce someone to your books, which one would you suggest I give him first?
What is your view of ametuer rocketry and the teams going for the X-Prize?
I came up with an interesting (and, dare I say, slightly original) concept for an alien world. I'm toying with different ideas for short stories within it. So far, my two biggest problems are
1) Finding a good enough story, and
2) Worldbuilding.
The latter problem is the one I actually care the most - I don't want all of my aliens to be "disguised humans", so I've done big efforts into figuring out how do they behave, what their culture is like, how their physical differences affect their way of thinking AND language, and all that. However, I can't shake the feeling I am missing aspects I shouldn't. This process is tedious and takes long, but I consider it very important.
Are there any guidelines you'd suggest to do it properly?
"Trust me - I know what I'm doing."
- Sledge Hammer
I'm a big fan and have read most of your works. I (and I'm sure many of your other fans) think that some of your best books are the result of collaboration with others, particularly Jerry Pournelle. When working with Jerry and others, how is the work divided? Are there particular aspects of the story that each author contributes? What do you think are your strongest contributions to such a partnership?
So, there's this rumour that you and Jerry Pournelle used the 'Star Wars' SDI to bankrupt the USSR. Specifically, given that the USSR had to maintain equality in military hardware with the USA, you, and several other advisors who had the ears of infulential people in Government, proposed a hugely expensive series of projects which, if the USSR was to match, would break their economy and cause a collapse of their economy.
Is this true? Is it classified?
dave "and did Bjo Trimble take the minutes?"
Larry,
In Ringworld Engineers, you spend an great deal of time surrounding the concept of inter-species sex and copulation. Luis Wu engages in it frequently, it's even mentioned that it has evolved into a means to seal a bargain.
Why the fascination?
"Times have not become more violent. They have just become more televised."
-Marilyn Manson
Mr. Niven,
As a young adult, I was a huge fan of science fiction. As an adult, and a scientist, these days I find I can no longer read much of it, because of the ignorance many authors display towards our current scientific understanding of the physical universe.
You at one point in your past went to Cal Tech, and also have a degree in math, so you are clearly technically minded. So I am very curious about your opinion on the science in science fiction. What do you do these days to keep abreast of current science or is that important to you now? Also, what do you think of science fiction such as Star Trek that uses crutches like Warp Drives and Transporters that ignore science as we know it?
Download my free songs!
Hey Larry,
I've been a fan since, well, I was knee high to a grasshopper. _The Mote In God's Eye_ was my first introduction to you, and JP, via my father when I was 11. Some of your earlier work has been amazing and fun, re _Ringworld_, _the Magic Goes Away_, etc. So please don't take this wrong.
I have been seeing something that has been, well, frankly, disturbing as of late in some of the books that have been coming out with you in colloration. While the first Renner and Bury chunk of _The Gripping Hand_ was quite good, the rest felt, uh, unworthy of the original. There were a lot of inconsistancies with the previous book. Ditto for _Beowulf's Children_ vs _Legacy of Heorot_.
What's the reason for this, if I may ask? Is this a side effect of just working up a sequel (already difficult) compounded with the added difficulty of working in collaboration? Or is that the collective you felt pressured into writing the books and just wanted to get them over with? Or was it due to the fact that they didn't get the scrutiny of previous works before going out the door (re Heinlein's famous critique of _The Mote in God's Eye_)?
You did note in one of your delightful mental dumps (_Playgrounds of the Mind or _N Space_, more please! Perhaps call it the _N Body Problem_? ;)) that inconsistancies do tend to pile up (re Known Space). However, in both the cases I'm noting above, it's just single stories and their sequels (discounting JP's shared _War World_ books for the moment...)
So is this the case of an overly zealous fan (re trek[ies/ers] ;))?
Thanx and have fun playing! The rest of us thoroughly enjoy it when you do!
Do you know why the road less traveled by is littered with the bones of the unwary?
I've recently read and enjoyed Ganthet's Tale, your collaboration with John Byrne about the origins of the Green Lantern Corps as well as the DC Universe. With all the attention comic books have been getting in Hollywood lately, with movies from Road to Perdition to Daredevil being produced from comic stories, and screenwriters such as Kevin Smith writing comics, do you have any plans to return to this media?
Yes, Virginia, there really is a CowboyNeal.
We've been hearing rumors about various stories of yours, particularly "Ringworld" being given the Hollywood treatment for ages.
Have you gotten proposals to do any stories for good animated science fiction?
the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
I think this is a good question - does Larry Niven feel ripped off or flattered that the game designers used this idea? And has he played the game or seen the graphics? They're quite good, BTW. Without going into much detail (spill mountains, etc.) they sort of "capture" the mental image I first had when I read the RW books.
You've built worlds with uncommonly dystopian elements, such as Plateau's long tyranny over a disarmed populace, organlegging, all-out war with ruthless aliens, and suppression of dangerous technology. Have you intended any of these to be cautions about likely (or even inevitable) events, or just interesting to think about?
I seem to recall some years ago reading that Dream Park had been optioned for the big screen.
a) Was this true, and if so, what is the status of this project?
b) Do you feel that the current level of technology in todays world would allow an accurate portrayal of the computers/holographs in the book on the big screen?
R
(thanks for introducing me to Kuru!)
As a long time reader of your work,(I first read Ringworld in the 6th grade) I would love to see your known space series brought to the Big Screen. Would you be involved in such a project? I would also like to see Lucifers Hammer as a movie, and the only way do do it right is to involve the authors in the project to make sure the original story is kept intact.
Stupid Humans.....
With all the possiblities for Known Space movies and television programs, especially the Man/Kzin Wars, why have none been made?
The only show episode to incorporate your vision I know of was The Slaver Weapon in the Star Trek Animated Series. It was based on your short story, The Soft Weapon.
Have stories been optioned and live in development limbo?
nuclear iraq bioweapon encryption cocaine korea terrorist
Mr. Niven, How do you respond to writers such as Greg Bear and Gregory Binford who complain that there is no "hard" science fiction today of the sort that Asmov wrote? Do you explain to them that Asmimov wrote pulp fiction, even if it was pretty good pulp fiction; or do you point out that stories without character development but lots of whiz-bang tech were part of the era they were written in and fans have moved on?
What do you think of video games as a future outlet for original SciFi universes? Do you think that the interactive environments games provide will appeal to writers who would otherwise create movies or shorts?
If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
Mr Niven,
First, thanks for the playground and the many happy hours I've spent there.
Can you tell me how you perceive the maturation of your writings ?
Your more recent books seem to have less of the idea-a-second, dare-devil excitement I enjoyed so much.
Thanks for everything,
Philip
Follow up question: if you were to write a similar article based on one of the recent or upcoming movie superheroes (Hulk, Daredevil, Spiderman, X-Men, etc.), who would it be?
Corporate Jenga: You take a blockhead from the bottom and you put him on top...
But I wonder if have problems with translation to other languages. At least in spanish, the same book title was translated to "El tercer brazo" (the third arm) that was not so far from the book content. What was the funniest/weirdest translation you found for one of your books titles?
I always felt that the literal translation of "The end of childhood" of Clarke to spanish ("El fin de la infancia") was better than the original title in english, In spanish "fin" also means for what something is done, and well, I'm not sure if in english I could understand the title in that way.
As a sci-fi fan and (hopefully) a future author, I am very interested in knowing how you got your first published work through the "slush pile" that every editor keeps on their desk. Is it true that the only way you'll get your work noticed is by knowing someone who knows someone who knows and editor somewhere, or is it just chance?
The Dopester
"Yes, I'm a Karma Whore, but I'm doing it to pay my way through school."
Something I'm puzzled by is the SF genre's increasingly bizarre take on the subject of sex. Sex seems to be more and more gratuitous and graphic in a number of the works I've read by various authors. In the so-called "Golden Age" of science fiction sex was not commonly dealt with, probably as a result of the mores and values during that time. Now the discussion of sex is no longer taboo.
What is your take on this trend? Are authors simply trying to tittilate their audience(s) or are they really attempting to explore the implications of sex in the futures (or pasts, or parallel universes) that they're predicting?
-----------------------
To understand recursion, one must first understand recursion.
Yes, precisely, that's the argument. But the assumption there was that the ringworld and the star are effected only by gravity. For instance, solar wind has no stabilizing effect, because as the ring shifts along it's axis, the solar wind actually accelerates it away from the star; similarly, as the ring shifts perpendicular to it's axis, the solar wind's net force is zero. That is, there's the potential for small changes, and no force to restore them. On the other hand, the neutrino pressure provides the opportunity for negative feedback. Looking at the perpendicular-to-the-axis case (the parallel-to-the-axis case is more difficult, and may require treating the ringworld as a section of a sphere, with significant width, which the original didn't really have), as the ring shifts relative to the star the force can be made (by selective absorption) to push back against the shift; that is, to be greater against the portion of the ring closer to the star. I'd appreciate if you were to give some more feedback, before I get out the numbercrunchers, if I'm clear enough to make sense.
I've had this sig for three days.
I greatly enjoyed Inferno. It caused me to later go and read (a translation of) the original by Dante.
I must have missed something, however... What was "the secret" that Mussolini (and later Carpentier) knew that allowed them to move freely about Hell?
General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
Since we're only allowed one question per post...
One of the things I have greatly admired about some of your works, and especially your info dumps (_N Space_ & _Playgrounds of the Mind_) is the raw creativity that comes through, especially in describing your sessions like at Contact where you pull out some really weird and fascinating ideas for aliens.
Have you ever considered, whether here on slashdot as a guest writer, or in your own web page (like what Jerry Pournelle does) or through UseNet (like Steve Stirling does), putting together an online presence/participation that would allow you to periodically spin out, with your fans, worlds and ideas?
Do you know why the road less traveled by is littered with the bones of the unwary?
Do you have any strong views or insight on the state of space exploration today and in the near future? If you were appointed NASA administrator and given a free hand to set its direction along with a healthy budget and no political interference what would you do? In particular, what are your views on manned missions to and colonization of Mars.
@de_machina
Howdy Mr Niven,
I am a daily reader of Dr Pournelle's Chaos Manor & have read quite a number of your joint projects not to mention quite a few of each of your individual books. What is it like working with Jerry days on end & how do you manage to blend your writing styles so well? I often wonder, while reading one of your books, who did which chapter. I've read that you alternate writing chapters. How does that work so that the book flows so well? Do you two have compatible writing styles or has it come from years of working together?
CyberRanger cyberranger@gmail.com
Hello Mr Niven.
I have been a reader of yours for about 15 years now, and have enjoyed reading and rereading your many works.
I have two questions I would like to ask
First is where did you get the idea for "The Integral Trees"? It is the most amazing "planet" that I have ever heard of.
How Important is Classical Mythology in your writing? I know that many of your books are based on it , Legacy of Heorot, Beowulf's Children & Inferno come to mind, but are all your books influenced by mythology or just certain ones?
Thank you for your time
Lord Of the Beer
D.A.K.D.A.E.---- Deny all Knowledge, Destroy All Evidence
Reading any of your works that involve the kzinti, and then reading the Man-Kzin Wars stories, I was struck by the difference in in behavior of the alien characters between your own work and that of others. (For example, Speaker-to-Animals takes the variable sword back from Louis at a time when Louis expected curiosity to distract him - I don't think any other author would have thought of that.) How do you get inside the minds of aliens in order to understand what their reactions to a given situation will be? You seem to be considerably better at this than most other SF authors out there.
Also, you mention - I believe in the introduction to a section of Ringworld in either N-Space or Playgrounds of the Mind - that a student had written a paper based on the thesis that the novel Ringworld was a sci-fi rehash of the plot of the The Wizard of Oz. You denied having done this intentionally, but have you ever "borrowed" a plot from a work in another genre and attempted to adapt it to a sci-fi setting? If so, what work did you borrow the plot from, and how do you feel the story turned out?
-Ender
Loose things are easy to lose. You're getting your hair cut. They're going there to see their aunt.
I never could see a mechanism for how Pak protectors could have evolved in symbiosis with Tree-of-life virus (or vice versa). It always seemed to me that tree of life virus would have to have been designed. Perhaps the pair were the follow-on tnuctip weapon after Jinxian Bandersnatch against the Thrint, since humans have latent resistance to Thrints (World of Ptavvs).
Much to my chagrin, since then it has occurred to me that this is similar to the argument that many Creationists use to push so-called "intelligent design" theories.
So, 3rd-stage Pak - evolved or designed? If evolved, what mechanism would you propose since the effects of tree-of life virus happen after the Pak breeder phase and have no foreseeable effect on the ability of ToL virus to reproduce.
Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
Could you *Please* let us in on all of the puns and injokes and cameos in these books!!!
I know about "As a shade of Purple Grey = Asimov", and the Roddenbery Bush in Flying Sorcerors, what are the many others?
ttyl
Farrell
CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
Mr. Niven, in many of your books, space travel plays a much more prominent role than does the contemporary computer network. The network is usually there, and its presence is implicit in the story, but it's not really important to the story. Here on earth in the present day, the computer network is much more important than space travel, except on the rare occasions when space travel goes wrong. Even space travel seems to be mostly for further propagation of the computer/communications network.
As I was growing up, reading science fiction of all varieties, I had dreams of one day flying in spaceships, living on the moon, etc. It just didn't seem that far away. Now, however, the dream of space seems further and further away -- it feels as though my generation (I'm near the end of Generation X, though I despise the term) has traded the difficult goal of space for the easy goal of computers.
How do you feel about this apparent trend in modern history as compared to the predicted space-based future of many older SF stories? Would you have steered humanity's course differently if you had the chance?
It seems to me, in looking from the outside, that a large majority of successful SF writers have degrees in the sciences, but not in the writing. In college, I bailed from the hard sciences and majored in English (creative writing concentration). Some might argue that this gives me a leg up, but I don't really see it. Generally speaking, the writing in SF, which I read extensively, seems to be more prosaic/utilitarian than "literary" fiction, and I guess I can see the need for that, given the materials covered. I guess my question is this: do I rely on my not-as-vast scientific knowledge that I maintain by reading the science journals and rely on the strength of my writing to carry me through to publication? Or do I focus away from writing science fiction?
(A subset question of this is: is it easy to get pigeonholed in a particular genre? I am putting the finishing touches on a pair of SF short stories that I am going to be sending out, but I'm writing "literary"/mainstream fiction novels that I'd like to see in print. Am I going to face discrimination working in two blatantly different genres if I try and publish in both under the same name?)
blog |
As a youth I was quite neurotic and obsessed with my imminent death. I had this nicely bound family medical guide. I used to dutifully read each section and work myself into a hypochondriac lather. I still remember going to family doctor convinced I had terminal cancer of the pancreas. He laughed at me like Dr. Hibbard between puffs of his cigarette.
Then your Pierson's Puppeteers introduced me to whole new level of dread and paranoia. As a youth, I dreamed mankind would have already permanently occupied the moon, started terraforming Mars, and be well on our way to mapping all those nasties that might want to impact our little backwater. And yet, as of 2003, we barely seem able get our sorry asses past low earth orbit.
We've got this nasty solar system, twitchy sun, wacky galactic core, and an uncaring universe and the wackjobs that are running the show here on the surface do nothing inspire confidence in our long-term survivability. We've got no fallback options. No Ben Affleck and Bruce Willis with their gattling guns in space. Not even a droud to deliver the sweet bliss of the wire!
How are you sleeping these days?
Some trends you anticipated seem to be coming about to greater or lesser degrees. Increasingly, governments track their own citizens. Some are pushing for mandatory ID's at birth. In the U.S., activities that would have caused outrage 50 years ago are becoming commonplace. Activities like warrant-less searches, random highway stops based on 'racial profiling', surveillance cameras that see through walls, etc. Other countries like the U.K. and Australia have (attempted) to ban all firearms. Gene sequences are being patented and cloning is a reality. In your Known Space timeline, these were generally good things. The U.N. ran an effective world government. Surveillance tech let planetary police get crime under control. Organ theft was only existed until lab growing techniques were perfected, and mass disarmament put an end to intra-species conflicts. Given that context, where do you see these trends ending up? What do you see at the history of the next X number of years?
What is your opinion of "A Darker Geometry" by Benford & Martin? Was this book written with your permission, considering it explains a number of Known-Space mysteries?
Personally, it's one of the few books in my collection that I'm sorry I bought and read (I keep it only for completeness).
Ed Wedig
Graphic design services
docbrown.net
I have read several of your books, including the Ringworld series. I thought the first Ringworld was awesome! However, as you progressed through the other two, the plots seemed to center more and more around having sex with aliens.
It seemed to me that you were using "rish" way past the point of being an interesting plot twist, or a literary device to illustrate how different people are all the same inside, and even too far to set up the evil power of vampires.
It seemed to me like you needed to get out and find yourself a girlfriend!
Can you explain why you were so obsessed with inter-planetary inter-species lust?
Disclaimer: I am generally in favour of sex -- I like pictures of sex, reading about sex, having sex, etc... but just not with aliens.
I don't want to be here.
It has been a recurring theme that the "science fiction" genre has always been about speculating future technology and then writing about its plausible effects on mankind (and the lead character).
My question is this: Now that the scientific society today has pretty much figured that the majority of scientific problems have been solved (its only working out the details), how is the science fiction genre going to change? I mean, are all the topics/plotlines already written about and will all the new works just be re-hashes of older ideas?
L7
See also Inferno. It's set in the Christian hell -- you don't get much more explicitly religious than that.
-- Support Ometz le-Serev.
While the universes of Known Space and the Draco Tavern and even magical prehistory (The Magic Goes Away, etc.) have been wellsprings of inspiration for you, the universe of The State seems to be a second-class citizen. I've greatly enjoyed all three novels, and I've been hoping for an expansion of their universe for some time, especially some greater exploration of living in such a society on Earth itself. I'd also like to read the story of the dispute between Earth and its colonies. Have you lost interest in the world of The State?
One of my favourite books is "The Mote in God's Eye" (written by you and Jerry Pournelle). . I'm very interested in knowing how do you and Pournelle split the work (no only in this book but in general). Is anybody in charge of the dialogs ? Do you have a preference to create certain situations that he doesn't like (or viceversa) ? How do you decide the course of a story, etc.
Mr. Niven,
In "A gift from Earth", you make the point that technological changes precipitate changes in popular mainstream ethics. What technological changes do you see having the most impact on ethics over the next thirty years and what are the changes you see them causing?
How do you go about coceptualizing an alien race?
"All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke
I've been a fan since I was 10... and it took me years to realize one of your major contributions: returning real science to science fiction, which had gone down a less rigorous path when you came on the scene and was slowly turning into fantasy.
Where would you say that science fiction as a genre is going? In the direction of more science, or less? More galactic epics, or more personal stories? And, of course, more mainstream acceptance?
Larry, special effects and CGI have progressed to the point where Ringworld could finally be credibly realized on the big screen. Is there any possiblity of rescuing it from the rights limbo it has wandered into?
A CGI rendition of Nessus could make Gollum look as ordinary as Sean Astin was in Rudy. Speaker would be a kick to realize on CGI as well.
So what's the story, is there any hope of a Ringworld movie?
Edith Keeler Must Die
The "Ringworld" in Halo is much much smaller than The Ringworld, and the details actually seem to come from another source. In Ian M. Bank's Culture series, there are structures called habitats which are like ringworld, except much smaller. Since they are smaller they can be put into real orbits, and don't have to worry about falling into the sun. Also, one habitat rotation producing about 1 G takes 24 hours, eliminating the need for shades like The Ringworld had.
There is another Banks reference in Halo too. When ship is attacked the Captain refers to downloading information into his "neural lace." That is a term Banks used for a computer in someone's head, htough other people have used it too.
This sig wasn't worth reading, was it.
Meaning: Is it more difficult to be scientifically convincing, or to create futuristic scenarios that are plausible?
I've been waiting for a Mote movie ever since reading that book 20+ years ago. Now that the technology exists to do it well, any chance of it happening?
David Brin has been forthright concerning his jealousy over bad SF being made into movies while his work is not. With the exception of 'Forbidden Planet' I have yet to see a science fiction movie that draws me in the way a good Sci-Fi book does.
I also think that your works would make excellent movies. Brin's work would probably play well in Europe, where people seem to prefer a little more ambiguity in their movies. It probably wouldn't do well here. Now, I'm not saying your writing isn't of the same caliber as Brin's work, but it is a little more accesible to the common man, and therefore seems well suited to be made into a blockbuster that would do well in the states. My questions: 1.) Are you at all jealous that lesser talents get to have their work seen by millions on the silver screen? 2.) Have you been approached by any producers regarding screenplays of your work? 3.) Would you even want to have your works made into movies?
That said, I just have to say thank you for providing me with so much quality entertainment! I grew up reading your stories from the time I was ten. In my esteem, you are one of the best well rounded Sci Fi authors out there. Your work has great characters, fantastic settings, believable science, and lots of action. Thanks again.
- None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
Some authors write books that are obviously self-contained and when reading these works it is intuitively obvious that there were no sequels planned by the author. Yet, a few years later, you find that the author has succumbed to sequel-mania. More often than not, these sequels detract from the original work. A disastrous (set of) sequel(s) that comes to mind are the sequels to "Rendezvous with Rama". While your Ringworld sequels arent as bad those, nevertheless, those works prod me to ask "Why?". Couldnt you leave that story line alone and let your masterpiece be a monument by itself? Sometimes, the Washington monument is what one needs rather than a Stonehenge.
Note that I am not against sequels per se. It is possible to plan sequels ahead of time when authoring the first book, and sometimes, the effect is well done. Orson Scott Card's "Speaker for the Dead", and "Xenocide" comes to mind as examples of the good variety of sequels. But a lot of sequels to bestsellers were written because the first book was a bestseller, and those are the variety that more often than not make readers cringe.
There is no such thing as luck. Luck is nothing but an absence of bad luck.
In the Draco tavern tale "Ssoroghod's People", you tell a cautionary tale about experimenting in your only living space. What do you feel is the greatest danger from biotechnology? What do you feel is the most promising application for it?
("Ssoroghod's People" can be found in the collection Redshift, ed. Sarrantonio)
How would you describe the relationship between sexuality as presented in your work and your own personal views on the subject? (What does your wife think about it?
P.S. Great fan, so is my girlfriend - question not meant to offend.
I never have frustrations, the reason is, to wit:
If at first I don't succeed, I quit!
In Niven's Laws, you discuss how we could have seriously changed the world by now if we launched solar-collecting power satellites 20 years ago. Do you still think these satellites are a good idea? Is it (ever) too late?
-Joe
Lose = not win
Do you advocate Rishathra and if so, could you recommend a species that is particularly good at it?
My, uh, friend wants to know...
Show me an effect without cause and then I'll believe in chaos.
Well? Who would win?
All it takes is nukes and nerves.
Lots of folks love SF: Today there's a cable network and a nauseating volume of Star Trek reruns. Computer graphics makes it feasible to put a movie into any imaginable setting. Technology is being deployed so quickly that Vernor Vinge's singularity comes to mind. Technological progress is moving so fast it is hard to anticipate it.
NASA is dinking around in LEO: Boldly going where John Glenn has gone four decades before. I don't know who said it: The future just ain't what it used to be.
The Sputnik generation is graying: When I was a lad, I watched moon shots. It captured my imagination. I read any book that had a rocket on its cover. I'm late forties and will be dead of cancer soon.
Writers are moving out of SF: William Gibson's latest novel has high geek content, but none of the science isn't already deployed. Same for Neal Stephenson's _Cryptonomicon_: good story with high geek content, but nothing beyond the current state of the art. And I've seen guys who once wrote Hard Science Fiction branching out to Fantasy.
Publishing is corporatized: The huge bookstores I haunt have SF sections that are overcrowded with Fantasy and StarTrek, StarWars, Babylon5 & <insert corporate franchise here> serials.
It looks to me as if Science Fiction is in trouble, or it may be sick, or it may be dead and doesn't know it yet.
What is your assessment of SF's health and which of these considerations do you think most significant?
Yeah, I saw that Outer Limits episode when it first aired. I was pretty pleased with it, although the very end of the episode made some changes that weren't in the original story and seemed gratuitous and somewhat implausible. (For those that aren't familiar, at the end of the episode, the main character is pretty severely injured for no particular reason -- particularly considering the new world he's going to be living in, it seems pretty highly likely that the injury will be life-threatening; the original story does not have the character receiving any serious injuries at all.)
I'd be curious if Niven was aware of and authorized this change.
What comes first, the science or the fiction? Did you imagine a ring shaped world and then build the physics model afterward, or start with a Dyson Sphere and end up with a ring? Are your creatures created and then put into an ecology, or do you think of an ecology and evolve a creature out of it? Did the Kzinti exist before the Kzinti homeworld?
Carpe Deez
Part of the background of your Known Space novels was the ARM governmental organization on Earth. You described ARM as a paternalistic, totalitarian world government that existed for the most part to protect humankind from the consequences of unrestrained technological development (widely available fusion bombs, exotic weapons, etc.) and to control population growth (which could be seen as another outcome of improved technology). In contrast. the Belt civilization seemed to be a much freer society, perhaps because of its different situation (more distributed == less vulnerable, more room == less worry about population pressure).
With that as a background, both of these societies sacrificed different levels of freedom for different amounts of security, certainly a relevant issue in todays post-9/11 environment where there is an increased awareness that technology (secure communications for terrorists, increased travel, biological, chemical and nuclear weapons, etc.) have made society more vulnerable. What do you think of the United State's steps towards increasing safety (perhaps at the expense of freedom)? Do you feel that as Earth becomes more technologically advanced and more densely populated and interconnected that some movement towards an ARM level of social control is inevitable?
PS: Just wanted to thank you for your many stellar (pun!) novels. Your books never cease to provoke new ideas and questions and were/are a tremendous influence on a developing young technie. Keep it up!
What is the status of Ringworld Child, the third sequel to your sublime Ringworld? If it hasn't been abandoned, could you give us a few hints about its plot?
Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
You stated in Ringworld Engineers that Louis Wu was incorrect in assuming Ringworld was build by the Pac. My theory is that it was built by the tnuctipun, who also created the Pac. Am I correct?
Here's my reasoning:
The Tree Of Live virus is just too convenient to have evolved naturally. Somebody made it - who? The tnuctipun. They wanted a race of warriors smart enough to use Soft Weapon level tech, but fanatical enough to resist the Thrint Power.
Now, being nicely paranoid the tnuctip would be unlikely to make a warrior race without some form of control. What better control than making them pathetically stupid and weak until a trigger event you can control, and after triggering them keeping them addicted to something you control, like Tree Of Life root. So the tnuctip could have worlds full of stupid monkeys, and when needed dust the worlds with Tree Of Life virus and BANG - instant army.
I'd also bet that ANY tnuctip "smells right" to any Pac.
Now, where did the tnuctip survive The Great Suicide command? In statis, of course. However, once out of statis they would need a safe place to be - a place shielded from the Pac, hard to get to, defensible from long range. I'll bet scrith blocks The Power. And by the time a Thrint could get over the edge of the Ringworld and start ordering folks around, "Hey, what's that violet glow around everythZZZZAP".
So the Pac probably found monkeys on Earth when they got here, but just "displaced" them.
Am I even remotely correct?
www.eFax.com are spammers
Particularly the more obscure relationships between characters in your know-space series?
One that springs to mind this the question of just who is Louis Wu's father.
The question came up as an impromptu trivia question somewhere on Compuserve once. Thinking about it, I realised that it's likely that Louis Wu's biological father and the husband of his mother are likely to be two completely different people.
I don't think it's entirely stated anywhere but it's likely that his father was Carlos Wu (registered genius with an unlimited fatherhood license) - while his mother was Sharrol Shaeffer (husband to Beowulf Shaeffer - the pilot who attempted to travel to the core).
In discussion with the guy who prompted this trivia question, he mentioned that you had confirmed this to him personally a convention - and had referred to other obscure relationship between the characters.
Which leads back to the original question - would you care to elaborate on any of these relationships.
Cheers.
I too consider the Dream Park books to be some of my favorites, most notably because they explore the interesection of reality and fantasy in yet another new way.
My question is this: in one of the books, you note that Dream Park has never quite gotten over the hump and been picked up by Hollywood. Can you update us if there's been any progress made?
In addition, would you say that the premise of Dream Park (where actors act out a virtual game on what is essentially a sound stage) has been made irrelevant by scifi "advances" like the Star Trek holodeck and by Jurassic Park? My analogy is the sort of disdain that people had for DareDevil whenn it first came out: that his special power was that he could see--something that had essentially been "done" on Star Trek: The Next Generation.
I've often wondered why you only wrote one sequal to The Integral Trees. It seems that the world of the Smoke Ring calls for at least a 3 part series. I've always found the basic world more enthralling and magestic than Ringworld.
So why did you leave Kendy waiting, and never come back to it? I've read about how Known Space was getting full of too many special cases (statis fields, general produces hulls, Sinclair string, stepping plates, etc, etc) to make it much fun to try to write stories set in that universe, but the Smoke Ring is on the periphery of Known Space, it doesn't seem this should be a problem. And all those poor folks in the smoke ring are just gonna fry when the core explosion hits.
see shy jo
You've explained the various properties of 'scrith' in the Ringworld novels. Have you or has anyone else ever devised a hypothesis on how such a material could be made? I realize that there are quite a few technologies in your works which are beyond today's science and engineering (General Products hulls, hyperdrive, autodocs, etc.), but for some reason scrith seems to me to be the most fascinating. Also, does the building of the unstable and ostentatious Ringworld betray a flaw in Pak Protector intelligence?
Hi Larry,
I've always thought The Integral Trees and the Smoke Ring were the best visual imagery ever featured in a book, hard core sci-fi or otherwise.
Have you ever approached any moviemakers with the idea of making a feature-length film that takes place in a 0-G environment society such as the one in The Integral Trees? In a related note, do you think the special effects are up to par yet for this?
I, for one, would pay cold, hard cash to see the trilaterally symmetric fish, "ponds," foilage, and of course the trees themselves...
Dear Mr. Niven, I ask this respectfully. With the exception of yours (which I have enjoyed very much)and a very few other author's works, why is so much SF so badly written? Does the focus on unusual ideas mean that the quality of the literature must suffer, do we readers have low expectations,did the evolution from Pulp culturally imbue trashiness, or what? It seems that so many readers who love this genre feel "I can write SF too", and I've always felt we really mean "I can write better stuff than this", but I'd rather that other writers do it so I can continue to enjoy reading it. In any event, thank you for yours.
Larry,
I am a big fan of all your work but especially your "one man against the universe" type of stories, for example: A World Out Of Time, in which the hero finds a way to escape the grasp of a super-government called The State.
How do you think computer technology will affect the nature of government? Is The State inevitable, or will our decendants with Protector-level intellects someday shrug off any government "babysitting"?
Thanks!
-- laws are the opinions of politicians --
We had a planet full of them at the end of Protector, what happened to them, surely some of them had something else to do after defeting the Core Pak second wave?
Drunkeness is an electron free version of virtual reality.
Science fiction or otherwise.
It's been years (>20) since I read the RingWorld novels so it's interesting what things stick in my head (and now I've got to go back and read them again). Many sci-fi books discuss lifespans extended by technology but either ignore or or skim past its psychological and societal impact. I found Louis Wu's habit of going on sabatical's particularly interesting and possibly appealing. When you imagine "conquering" life - having raised a family, become financially independent, enjoyed a long retirement but still not even having reached middle-age, its not hard to imagine needing something to shake you up and revive your taste for life. Of course some just go on the "wire" and eventually waste away in bliss - Wu having nearly done so himself. It's obvious that you've given the impact of serious life extension a lot of thought. Now that bio technology seems to be giving such life extension a palpable credibility - what other impacts do you anticipate when we finally reach common, healthy lifespans of two or more centuries?
Hi Larry,
I've been a fan for a long time (I have a first printing of "Ringworld" that I'd like you to sign some day).
While being a fan, I don't consider myself a rabid fan (ie I don't dress up as a Kzinti or make scale models of Dream Park out of Lego and I have never considered a career as an organlegger), but over the years I've been amazed at the lengths fans will go to emulate and understand the characters and locations in your books. One of the classic examples this is the efforts to understand how strong scrith would have to be. It seems like your fan base, while somewhat smaller, is at least as hardcore as the "Trekkie" (or "Trekker", for purist) culture and has been so for thirty years or more.
I'm curious to find out if you think your fan base has changed over the years because of the Internet (ie getting larger, smaller, more or less extreme). Do you find that personal information (address, phone number, email) has become more difficult to keep private from (cyber) stalkers and other people that have a need to tell you how great your work is?
A loyal, but not weird, fan,
myke
Mimetics Inc. Twitter
Which of all the predictions of the future in your books do you most wish would come true?
www.sjbaker.org