Slashdot Mirror


IBM To Repair Smoking Monitors

Rio writes "A local6.com story says IBM is recalling to repair 56,000 G51 and G51t computer monitors because the circuit board can overheat and smoke, posing a fire hazard. IBM has received several reports of monitors overheating and smoking, including one report of minor property damage, according to the U.S. Consumer Products Safety Comission." And I thought all that smoke was just my mobo overheating.

193 comments

  1. MMmm! by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd like one of those monitors! I'll find myself some dremel and a steel girder to create the first monitor/grill combo ever! Steak anyone?

    1. Re:MMmm! by DriceX · · Score: 1

      I doubt it would taste too great since it's probably plastic burning... mmm mmm mmm charred plastic tasting steak!

    2. Re:MMmm! by Wino · · Score: 0
      Combine this with the recall on 1st generation MS Optical mice...

      Grilled Rodent anyone?

    3. Re:MMmm! by Kailden · · Score: 1

      I have a G70, and after an 11-hr day of programming if you touch the top, you'll quickly draw your hand away. I don't recommend stacking any papers up there.

      I assume thats how it is with any monitor, though.

      In Soviet Russia, there is no need to worry, begauze even if you burn your monitor, you can always binge yourself on Vodka at McDonalds.

      --
      I need a TiVo for my car. Pause live traffic now.
    4. Re:MMmm! by tomhudson · · Score: 3, Informative
      If you notice, the monitors were made under subcontract by the same company that made/used the exploding capacitors that have caused so much motherboard/poer supply grief lately.

      Probably not a coincidence :-(

    5. Re:MMmm! by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      No, it shouldn't be like that. I've got a Hitachi CM715 (19") that's often on for longer than 11 hours without interruption, and it only gets a bit warm. My cat loves sleeping on it, and that hasn't caused any problems yet. I will have to open it to see how much hair got into it, though.

  2. Well that's corporate civic-mindedness! by Tofino · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If only tobacco companies would be as obliging!

    1. Re:Well that's corporate civic-mindedness! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh, try our goverments anti-smoking policies. If they went after the nicotine levels instead posturizing for the next election they'd have a much bigger effect. Kinda tells you they're mentality and what kind of morons are running this country.

    2. Re:Well that's corporate civic-mindedness! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are, just give 'em a can of Copenhagen, and they'll think that stopping smoking is easy!

  3. They missed the marketing boat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "IBM G51: The hottest monitor available!"

  4. Great White by filth+grinder · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hmm, maybe it wasn't the pyro after all, maybe Great White just set-up some IBM monitors in the back...

    1. Re:Great White by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great White (Score:0, Flamebait)
      by filth grinder (577043) on Tuesday March 04, @12:16PM (#5433717)
      Hmm, maybe it wasn't the pyro after all, maybe Great White just set-up some IBM monitors in the back...


      Ha Ha. It's a post about fire modded "Flamebait".

  5. OT What kind of tech news site is this? by binaryDigit · · Score: 5, Funny

    When right next to the article on the monitors, is this:

    Man Who Allegedly Ate Cat's Tail Ruled Insane

    and

    Thousands Flock To See Gold Toilets

    1. Re:OT What kind of tech news site is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehe, must be a very respectable one as CNN had coverage of the golden toilet story with video/interviews!!!

    2. Re:OT What kind of tech news site is this? by Xtraneous · · Score: 1

      Slashdot

      --
      .noitacidem deen uoy siht daer nac uoy fI
  6. why does everyone hate smokers? by neal+n+bob · · Score: 1, Funny

    As long as they go outside to do it, I don't care.

    1. Re:why does everyone hate smokers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same for the morons who cook and burn their fucking popcorn every afternoon, then sit ath their desk chewing that shit with their mouth open. Then after that they pick the pieces of kernels out of their teeth. There ought to be a law.

    2. Re:why does everyone hate smokers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who pop corn to fuck it are just nasty.

    3. Re:why does everyone hate smokers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking stupidity. That's the reason. I actually worked with one of those dumbasses. She was a secretary where I worked as an Engineer, and I kept smelling that burning smell regularly so I casually drew a LOOOOONGGGG cup of coffee in the break room to see what the fucking problem was. This stupid asshole(ette) was putting in the popcorn and setting the microwave for like 20min-30min. The dumbshit was relying on getting back to the oven in 5 minutes to shut it off (which rarely happened, since the birdbrained fuckwad would get on the phone and completely forget she had popcorn burning in the break room, until the smell propagated throughout the place.
      Whata dumbfuck. I briefed her on the concept of timers and how they run down automatically whether or not your stupid ass is there to watch, and further re-introduced her to the concept of RTFM wherein the popcorn bag CLEARLY states DO NOT SET THE TIMER FOR MORE THAN 5 MINUTES!. I'm not sure if any of those ideas penetrated her unusually thick skull, but I did my part to help eliminate the burnt popcorn menace.

    4. Re:why does everyone hate smokers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if my monitor smokes (keeping on the topic) then it's because of downloads of Bettie Page images. I'm not setting it outside, then the neighbors will know what I am up to. btw, two piano-legged church ladies turned up at my door this afternoon, and I told them I was just the refrigerator repairman to keep them at bay. I was working on the refrigerator at the time, and the telephone also (both needed repair) so that worked as an excuse not to invite them inside. One look at me and they beat a hasty retreat. If that's all I get to look at around here, then no wonder my monitor smokes.

  7. Smoking monitors?! by gpinzone · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Will we be seeing those lame "truth" ads lambasting IBM and their nicotine laced monitors? Oh wait...

  8. They be smokin' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Proof that where there's smoke, there isn't always fire.

  9. Smoking? by Soko · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can't they just *cough* *cough* patch it?

    *cough*

    Soko

    --
    "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    1. Re:Smoking? by SuicideDog · · Score: 1

      Not if you are allergic to the damn adhesive like I am. I wore one on my arm for about 2 hours.. then my arm swelled up like I had elephantiasis.

    2. Re:Smoking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put it on your COCK!

      LOL

  10. What next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    First IBM hard drives, now IBM monitors. What's next to kick the bucket?

    1. Re:What next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      IBM enterprise class servers.

    2. Re:What next? by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 1

      Actually, this is not new to IBM. I have an old 15" IBM monitor that I had to replace a capacitor in, because they used inferior parts. Most of the time, the cap would blow, but every so often it would take the board out as well.

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    3. Re:What next? by ralphus · · Score: 2, Funny

      ummm, IBM? ;)

      --
      Revolutions are never about freedom or justice. They're about who's going to be top dog. -- Kilgore Trout
    4. Re:What next? by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      Wonder if they got their caps from Taiwan? since most caps coming from there in the late 90s early 00s have been failing.

    5. Re:What next? by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 1

      Most likely. I went from a ceramic cap to a surface mount and have had no troubles whatsoever.

      From what I could find out, the monitors were used in a lot of POS terminals, so there could be hundreds floating aroud that could be fixed for as little as 34 cents a pop.

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    6. Re:What next? by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 1
      What do you expect from Idiots Building Machines?

      Just kidding, I'm using an IBM hard drive myself, and it has never caused my any probl...hey what's that clicking nois&T%$%%%;%%:

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
  11. if you can find any! by tx_mgm · · Score: 1

    how old are these things? i havent seen one in years! right now at work we're phasing out the G74 series and those are early 17 inch models. right now, our instructions are to immediately replace any 15 inch monitors we come across and add them to our "junk" box

    --
    Gentlemen...BEHOLD!
    -Dr. Weird
    1. Re:if you can find any! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're widely used on the desks of IBM's Gerstner Slaves, right along with the Pentium IIs...

    2. Re:if you can find any! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something is happening here, and I'm getting a little worried. Let me preface my discussion by quickly reasserting a familiar theme of my previous posts: If IBM got its way, it'd be able to break our country's national and patriotic backbone and make it ripe for the slave's yoke of international absolutism. Brrrr! It sends chills down my spine just thinking about that. Think of IBM's editorials as being the sum of two components: a depraved component that consists of IBM's desire to thrust all of us into scenarios rife with personal animosities and petty resentments and a pesky component that consists of everything else. We are concerned primarily with the former. IBM's hectoring, garrulous beliefs are largely due to its drawing mistaken conclusions from what it wrongly takes to be evidence. Think about it, and I'm sure you'll agree with me. I hope that IBM's subliminal psywar campaigns were intended as a joke, although they're not very funny if they were. Whatever IBM claims to the contrary, many people who follow its holier-than-thou attitudes have come to the erroneous conclusion that the ideas of "freedom" and "insurrectionism" are Siamese twins. The truth of the matter is that IBM's misguided, dour newsgroup postings are in full flower, and their poisonous petals of Fabianism are blooming all around us.

      What this underlines, I think, is that IBM is the embodiment of everything petty in our lives. Every grievance, every envy, every self-indulgent ideology finds expression in IBM. By framing the question in this way, we see that IBM's hypocrisy is transparent. Even the least discerning among us can see right through it. I had a brief conversation recently with some odious fence-sitters who were trying to trick our children into adopting unconventional, disapproved-of opinions and ways of life. That conversation convinced me that I want to give people more information about IBM, help them digest and assimilate and understand that information, and help them draw responsible conclusions from it. Here's one conclusion I sincerely hope people draw: IBM's arguments would be a lot more effective if they were at least accurate or intelligent, not just a load of bull for the sake of being controversial.

      Apparently, I am not trying to save the world -- I gave up that pursuit a long time ago. But I am trying to act against injustice, whether it concerns drunk driving, domestic violence, or even clericalism. Let IBM's disrespectful wisecracks stand as evidence that ignorance is bliss. This may be why IBM's secret police are generally all smiles. You may make the comment, "What does this have to do with what I call mingy salacious-types?" Well, once you begin to see the light, you'll realize that there are two related questions in this matter. The first is to what extent IBM has tried to operate on a criminal -- as opposed to a civil disobedience -- basis. The other is whether or not IBM's doctrinaire, venal anecdotes can be quite educational. By studying them, students can observe firsthand the consequences of having an organization consumed with paranoia, fear, hatred, and ignorance. I close this letter along the same lines it opened on: I wish loud fast-buck artists like IBM's habitués would quit whining and try doing some honest work for a change.

  12. smoke by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1, Redundant

    The engineers were obviously smoking something themselves and couldn't tell the monitors had problems

  13. Obligatory one liners by hardaker · · Score: 0
    • Don't the monitors know smoking causes cancer? We need a anti-smoking advertising series targeted for youthful monitors of tomorrow. Sponsored by an mandated tax on the sale of monitors, of course.
    • Oh, I thought that was just a quake feature for every time I fired the BFG!

    (on a side note, big kudos to IBM for actually being willing to fix the problem instead of just hiding it or merely announcing the problem without being willing to fix it)

    --
    The next site to slashdot will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and start slashdotting it early!
    1. Re:Obligatory one liners by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. I suppose, with a wide enough monitor, even 'War and Peace' could be a one liner....

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  14. They were probably made . . . by Rocko+Bonaparte · · Score: 3, Funny

    . . . from components they popped off of returned deskstars.

    --
    No I'm not trolling.
    1. Re:They were probably made . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, only the 75GXP, and to a lesser extent, 60GXP, models had higher perceptions of failures. The 120GXP, 180GXP, and earlier lines were all very good.

  15. Monitors by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


    Do those smoking monitors have to be used outside in California?

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Monitors by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "Do those smoking monitors have to be used outside in California?"

      Makes you wonder what the emissions tests are like on these bad boys.

  16. I can't wait..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...for the IBM 970 PPC chip to come out. Pentium toasting performance!

  17. Will IBM refund my life ? by borgdows · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    My IBM monitors has burned last year, the fire has spread in my house, burning everything, including my wife and my 4-year son who were sleeping!
    I'll never buy something from IBM until they refund ME!

    1. Re:Will IBM refund my life ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this a troll or are you serious? If you are serious, WTF are you doing without a lawyer?! If you are a troll, thanks for the bait but that was a lame post.

    2. Re:Will IBM refund my life ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, his wife and 4 year old son were killed or maimed and he responds with a personal boycott of IBM stuff.

      Must be a real post.

      Is it tuesday already?

    3. Re:Will IBM refund my life ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey buddy, IBM isn't the one who put the can of gas and the matches in your hand.

    4. Re:Will IBM refund my life ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silly, Tuesday was last week!

  18. Mobo? by chowdmouse · · Score: 5, Funny
    And I thought all that smoke was just my mobo overheating.

    Did you mean mojo? Yeah, Baby!

    1. Re:Mobo? by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 1
      Did you mean mojo? Yeah, Baby!

      Yeah, as if we want to hear about Taco's Mobo. I think I might skip lunch today.

      --
      Forget the whales - save the babies.
    2. Re:Mobo? by Landaras · · Score: 2, Funny

      *regarding mojo overheating*

      Well maybe Taco finally figured out that what works for Perl works for the bedroom as well...

      "There's more than one way to do it"

    3. Re:Mobo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Have you seen his Perl skills? Not exactly the Kama Sutra.

    4. Re:Mobo? by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      hmmmm..... O'Reilly Associates presents "The Perl Kama Sutra"

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  19. IBM by grub · · Score: 3, Funny


    Maybe IBM should rethink its business focus. Perhaps they should manufacture baseboard heaters, toaster overs, wave solder baths...

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:IBM by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Maybe IBM should rethink its business focus. Perhaps they should manufacture baseboard heaters, toaster overs, wave solder baths..."

      Man, if they had a strategic partnership with AMD, they'd OWN that market.

    2. Re:IBM by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      Nah. Intel would crush them in that market. :)

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
  20. New IBM acronym by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IBM = Internally Burned Monitors. :)

  21. Now, if we can just get them to... by asdfasdfasdfasdf · · Score: 1

    recall the deathstar drives, we'd be making progress.

    Seriously, I had 2 drives (same manu. date/place) go within a day of each other. Coincidence? I think not. (Link goes to Class action lawsuit page)

  22. anti-tobacco by VEGx · · Score: 1

    In other news: Anti-tobacco treaty agreed [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/2810195.s tm]

    So, IBM is catching up with the latest trends, huh?

  23. monitors are in trouble by Dylan2000 · · Score: 3, Funny

    IBM has received several reports of monitors overheating and smoking

    sounds like these monitors just bought themselves a first-class ticket to detention. They should have smoked in the bathroom where nobody would see them.

    I blame the parents.

    --
    Build your own website - full service homepage system your m
  24. Nice to hear by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's good that a company actually has the balls to recall a faulty product. It's kind of a shame that it has to be a fire hazard to make it happen, and not poor quality. I guess it's the lawyers who made the call, fearing wrongful death suits when some kid dies of inhalation while playing UT.

    The PC market is flooded with second rate, faulty, poorly designed and nonfunctional hardware.

    I once had an NEC monitor that burned out on me, had it replaced, that one burned out, replaced again, that one burned out ad nauseum - 5 in a row. By the 6th, they had stopped manufacturing them and I got a different one, which still works fine today.

    I knew the monitor was designed poorly, they knew it was designed poorly (they only made 'em for like 6 months). Wouldnt a recall have been easier and cheaper than cross shipping me 5 replacements in a row?

    Oh well. I just wish there were more corporations willing to stand behind their merchandise.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Nice to hear by DJ+FirBee · · Score: 3, Insightful

      //I knew the monitor was designed poorly, they knew it was designed poorly (they only made 'em for like 6 months). Wouldnt a recall have been easier and cheaper than cross shipping me 5 replacements in a row?//

      The answer is no. If they had a recall they would have to recall every monitor not just yours. If it would have been cheaper, they would have done it like that. They are a company with accountants and what not. They know what is cheaper.

      IBM is doing it's recall no doubt because they fear litigation. IBM did not recall it's crappy GNX series hard drives that fell apart, because they would not catch fire and expose IBM to a lawsuit.

    2. Re:Nice to hear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The PC market is flooded with second rate, faulty, poorly designed and nonfunctional hardware.

      No, you mean: The PC market is second rate, faulty, poorly designed and nonfunctional hardware.

    3. Re:Nice to hear by vasqzr · · Score: 5, Interesting


      The PC market is flooded with second rate, faulty, poorly designed and nonfunctional hardware

      Consumers want $1,000, $500, $300 PC's. What do you expect?

      Let's go back in time a few years. The Pentium 133MHz had just come out, making the 120MHz look like a sweet deal. 16MB of RAM was pretty good, and 56K modems were all the rage. You'd get this kind of a deal for $1,999.

      A monitor back then, 14" and 15" were standard, would cost you nearly $200. A 17" was a $350-$400 luxury. 19"? $500-700. And 21" monitors would cost you $1,000-$2,000!

      Think about how cheap monitors are now. You can't GIVE away a 15". 17" are available for $69 after rebate from any retail store. 19" monitors are $200-$300. Once considered extravagant, 21" monitors are just a little more than the 17" monitors of yesterday. Hell, you can get a 15" LCD for $199.

      The problem has always been quality. Sure, the bargain basement monitors work, but the colors are bad, they lack focus, and aren't the brightest, or are too bright.

      The de facto standard has usually been the Sony Trinitron displays. I'd rather use a 3 year old Trinitron than a 1 year old bargain brand.

      Now, the PC market is flooded with crappy monitors. (Not to mention OTHER components) Take a look at the Apple side of things, or the SGI/Sun workstations. They've had their share of bad products, but much of the OEM equipment is re-branded Sony models etc.

    4. Re:Nice to hear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unless you are one of the few that are bothered with that line running trhough your monitor..

    5. Re:Nice to hear by k3v0 · · Score: 1

      i could be wrong, but my reasoning seems logical to me. it would seem that a recall would depend on which scenario would cost the most: the percieved cost of lawsuits etc. relating to the malfunction, or the percieved cost of constanly replacing the faulty merch. if it is something not-dangerous but annoying, they would probably go with replacements. fire is a little different however, since people would sue like crazy if their house burned down because of a flaming monitor. much like ed norton's job in fight club (excuse the cheesy referemce)

    6. Re:Nice to hear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What were you watching that caused the monitor to go up in flames? Must have been some hot...

    7. Re:Nice to hear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh fuck off with that stupidline already! That's really fucking anal. If you stare at the monitor long enough, you'll notice the line. During normal use your brain (well, ok, NORMAL brain) will discard and ignore the line, which is much thinner than a pixel and just barely visible shade of grey.

    8. Re:Nice to hear by freeweed · · Score: 1

      Good point, but consumer electronics are a lot more complicated than that. In the early Pentium days, most people didn't own a PC. Today, almost everyone does (or so it seems, anyway :).

      In 1977 you could pay $4000 for something that is outperformed by my wristwatch today (cost: $5). Prices go down as technology matures, and *especially* with volume. Old hard drives used to cost thousands - but really, once you've paid off the R&D, there's not much to them beyond $20 worth of electronics and some aluminum platters.

      Sure, there is a lot of crap out there, but the days of $2400 for a 100% no-name PC are gone more because of volume (trust me, my Creative PCI sound cards not only do a whole bunch more but have lasted a lot longer than the Zoltrix pos that came with my 486).

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    9. Re:Nice to hear by jdrugo · · Score: 1

      You've never heard of a standard companie's callback procedure, right?

      Products are only called back for repair if the probability that the costs of customers complaining and hurting the image of the compay (also related to income) is higher than the costs of the recall. Ethics is way behind this simple calculation.

      Uhm, just had a Fight Club flashback, sorry.

    10. Re:Nice to hear by KiwiSurfer · · Score: 1

      Now, the PC market is flooded with crappy monitors. (Not to mention OTHER components) Take a look at the Apple side of things, or the SGI/Sun workstations. They've had their share of bad products, but much of the OEM equipment is re-branded Sony models etc.

      I know this isn't related to monitors, but the company that made the monitors for IBM was Lite-On IT Corp. Lite-On has also been making CD-ROM and CD-RW drives for Sony (as well TDK, ASUS, etc) for a few years now.

      So maybe, Sony isn't entirely reliable as they were in the past.

      - James

    11. Re:Nice to hear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to prefer Sonys to everything else too, until my second Sony burnt out on me. Both, of course, did it just a few months after the warranty expired. My current monitor is a Hitachi with a 5 year warranty. The picture isn't as good as a Sony, and the OSD lacks some features the Sony has, but the warranty more than makes up for it. No more monitors crapping out after 3 years and a day.

    12. Re:Nice to hear by Sarcazmo · · Score: 1

      Writing this on a circa 1992 20 inch monitor, I can say I probably agree with you. This monitor is a little whacky, getting a dried cap I think, but the brightness and focus is still great, which is something I can't say for a 1 year old CTX monitor.

      My local Goodwill thrift store sells monitors for about $2 to $4 generally, no matter what the size or age. They are totally computer illiterate, so the pricing is pretty random. In any case, I can pretty much judge the quality of what is left of the monitor's life before ever turning it on.

      I know that a CTX that is more than one year old will definitely suck, with bad focus and/or brightness, 100% of CTX monitors wear out very quickly. You can tweak the flyback, but it's just buying time, it will drift out of spec again within a month.

      A MAG from the last several years will generally be a crapshoot, there is about a 50% chance of some problem.

      Dell branded trinitron monitors are very high quality on average, and almost always still in very usable shape without any internal adjustments. KDS monitors are surprisingly usually pretty good as well, but not as reliably good as older Dell or Gateway branded trinitrons. Newer Dells are usually OK, but not always. Old IBM VGA monitors that come off PS/2 systems are fine for servers, and usually work well enough, at their limited res and refresh. Older Magnavoxes are a great find as well.

    13. Re:Nice to hear by hplasm · · Score: 1

      These must be over-engineered. Usually, things quit once the Magic Smoke (TM) leaks out...

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
  25. Call a lawyer by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

    If IBM's faulty product caused you to lose house, home, and family, get yourself a god damn lawyer and shut up about it.

  26. Paradigm shift by L.+VeGas · · Score: 2, Funny

    All this time I thought it was my bikini models screensaver that was smokin'.

  27. fire? by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd say they were more of a water risk....

    If you have a smoke detection system that will set off sprinklers in the event of smoke....

    then all your machines are Toast!

    1. Re:fire? by fruey · · Score: 1

      Yeah right. Like if you have a lot of computers in a room, then you're going to use water extinguishers? Ever heard of Argon and all that?

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    2. Re:fire? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      We have water sprinklers in our server room, something about it being extremely expensive to replace them with a non-water system, and the fire code prohibits us taking them out. I did convince them to give us some halon-type hand held extinguishers.

      Of course, I'd venture to say 95% of sprinklers are not triggered by smoke, or triggered globally, almost all installations I have seen have a system where a piece of metal must melt from the heat in each sprinkler head to turn it on.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:fire? by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 1

      Maybe you arent too familiar with many many buildings in the world.

      Not everyone has ARGON or halon suppression systems. Many older buildings that people have their offices setup in actually do have sprinkler systems which are not allowed to be removed.

      We used to have a big mainframe room that had a halon system that would fill the room with halon in the event of a fire. But we had to remove it eventually cuz it was a risk that had it gone off while anyone was in the room they would suffocate...

      Guess what was required to put in instead?

    4. Re:fire? by fruey · · Score: 1
      Yeah well I'm basing my ideas on old stories I heard. Note my sig. How many places do you think even have water systems here?

      Oh, and Halon was only ever used in rooms that people don't go in. The consoles were all wired out, and if anyone went in, as they unlocked the door they also disabled the system. Something like that.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    5. Re:fire? by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 1

      ya - that was how the halon systems were sposed to work - but we had to remove it because it wasnt a trusted system - especially cuz it got so old. There was a big red button that was supposed to disable the Halon and open the door.

      Almost all buildings have water systems. If they were not designed from the ground up to have a Data Center like room then every room will likely have it.

      When a tennant leases a building the likely hood that they will use an existing room for their servers is high. The likely hood that they will actually do something about the water systems that may be in the rooms is not as high.

      Many companies that dont have computers as their core business (like manufacturing) may not have the sense about them to look at all the risks to their systems in the event of even a small fire - one where the fire doesnt actually damage anything, but just sets off the sprinklers.

    6. Re:fire? by fruey · · Score: 1
      Almost all buildings have water systems.

      Not where I live they don't. In fact, not in most places except the most developed nations.

      Good point about the water thing though. A lot of people don't think about shit like that when they're putting in thousands of dollars of computer equipment next to dusty machines, etc - they just don't have a clue about the environment stuff that is needed, because they don't come from the previous computer culture where everything was so valuable, breakable, and unreliable!

      I've seen inches of dust inside top end Cisco hardware in factories, poor air conditioning that is often left switched off at busiest times (power drain too high) and servers worth $$$ just sitting on a cold concrete floor with cables running all over the place. Madness.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    7. Re:fire? by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Not in the Dinosaur Pen in a company I interned for about 6 years ago. They had Ops in the pen most of the time (apparently because the PC and MAC servers were in with the big iron) and an alarm system. When I was given the tour, I was told "if this goes off, you have X amount of time to get out the door, or you're dead, because the room will fill up with Halon."

      Posted signs all over the place gave the same information. Signs in the NOC outside the Dino Pen indicated that if the alarm went off, get the hell out of the way of the door, because people would shortly be hauling ass through it.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    8. Re:fire? by operagost · · Score: 1

      Can anyone explain to me why fire departments would require you to use an inappropriate fire control system? Even high school dropouts know from their Wal-Mart orientation that you don't use a class-A extinguishing agent like water to put out a class C electrical fire, at least not unless you cut power first. Even then, water is not the best because the burning materials are not paper but plastics, and often you have volatile chemicals in the mix such as those in UPS batteries. Oxygen-displacing chemicals are the only real solution. Frankly, if you're still in the room with visible flames and sirens when the halon goes off, I call it NATURAL SELECTION at work.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    9. Re:fire? by endoboy · · Score: 1

      well, for starters there's the problem that Halon's been illegal in most uses for a couple years now... Ozone hole, and all that...

  28. 970 PPC chip? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe. Motorola did coldfire, IBM PPC does HOT! Fire!

  29. It's expensive enough if your girlfriend smokes... by VEGx · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...now double the expenses with a chain smoking monitor, darn!

  30. Inevitable by limekiller4 · · Score: 4, Funny

    AOL Member: My monitor seems to be smoking.
    Customer Support: Oh. Err... [looking at breakroom longingly] Is that an IBM monitor you have there, sir?
    AOL Member: Why yes, it is.
    Customer Support: Well, then that would be the new Smell-sation monitor feature, sir. It ...uh ...tells you, by olfactory cues, how fast your internet connection is. [co-workers dying of laughter in background, turning blue] We just upgraded our network, so that's probably what you're seei ...er, smelling, sir.
    AOL Member: Oh, wonderful! Thank you! [click]

    --
    My .02,
    Limekiller
    1. Re:Inevitable by GreggBert · · Score: 2, Funny

      **POOF ** You've got SMOKE !!!

      --


      If you don't understand anything I post, please accept that I ate paste as a small boy...
    2. Re:Inevitable by AppyPappy · · Score: 1

      If this were a Microsoft product, smoking would be a feature. If you don't want smoking, you have to upgrade all your software to the nosmoking versions.

      And you would be the only customer who didn't like smoking boards.

      --

      If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem

    3. Re:Inevitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, that sig is getting tired - If you were ever a moderator you'd know you cant post and moderate the same discussion. So, if I'm modding the channel I can't reply, and vice versa.

    4. Re:Inevitable by limekiller4 · · Score: 1

      My tagline reads:
      "It's much easier to mod me down than to post an intelligent reply."

      An AC (aren't they all?) replies:
      "Man, that sig is getting tired - If you were ever a moderator you'd know you cant post and moderate the same discussion. So, if I'm modding the channel I can't reply, and vice versa."

      Of course I know this. It appears you're missing the point. Discussion is preferred to an add-nothing vote. I read Slashdot to see interesting commentary. Even crappy posts can get insightful replies, which are worth reading. I'm encouraging people to add to the signal, not the noise.

      Unfortunately, people seem to think this is a not-too-subtle attempt to save my karma. To those people I'd suggest that they're way too interested in some fucking point system. Don't believe me?

      GoatSe.cx. Moderators, please mod this post down. Everyone else ...please don't click that link. =)

      --
      My .02,
      Limekiller
  31. OH YEAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I forgot - CmdrTaco is an idiot!

  32. related news... by new+death+barbie · · Score: 4, Funny
    Although IBM has admitted problems with smoke, a representative was quick to point out that noone has complained about the mirrors.

    --

    It's supposed to be completely automatic, but actually you have to press this button.

    1. Re:related news... by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      That's just silly. Everone knows IBM replaced their standards-compliant "mirrors" with proprietary "light-reflective image replication" devices that plug into the MCA bus back in the late '80's.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
  33. Somewhat OT...but... by bdowne01 · · Score: 2, Funny

    There was something simliar with smoking hardware that happened where I work--

    We had a developer who was coding on a Dell Latitude w/ Dell's huge (and expandable) C/Dock-II. For those who don't know what that is, it's basically an expandable dock with which you can add PCI cards, SCSI, etc..

    Anyway, the dock started smoking one day during his coding session. I just happened to be walking by and quickly unplugged it from the wall. Apparently a small capacitor inside the dock exploded and got all over everything, causing it to smoke.

    We told the developer that because his code was so ineffecient, his compile had melted the dock.

    He believed us! har har...

    --
    -brain
    1. Re:Somewhat OT...but... by Tim+Macinta · · Score: 4, Informative
      We had a developer who was coding on a Dell Latitude w/ Dell's huge (and expandable) C/Dock-II... the dock started smoking one day during his coding session. I just happened to be walking by and quickly unplugged it from the wall. Apparently a small capacitor inside the dock exploded and got all over everything, causing it to smoke.
      Heh heh... and that's not the only thing from dell caught smoking.
    2. Re:Somewhat OT...but... by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      The Dell C/Ports and C/Docks are notorious for other things as well. Generally speaking, they were the last "true" docking stations ever made (correct me if i'm wrong), and with good reason.

      Dell wanted to keep compatibility within their Latitude CP line, and did a pretty good job of it. The docks worked on all of the CP machines from the original P-200 upto the P3 mahines. All had compatible batteries, drives, and docking ports, and were built on the same chasis. But the similarities ended there.

      Unfortunately, as the hardware evolved, it became increasingly difficult to build new machines around the existing hardware. Dell never bothered to add additional USB ports, intergrated modems, LAN, etc. to any of the models. They eventually made the chasis slightly wider for the PII models (for bigger 1024x768 screes), and thicker for the PIII models (more on that later)

      The chasis eventually expanded to the maximum size which would physically fit into the C/Dock. Then they went thicker. The original P-200 models were light and relatively thin for their time (~4 pounds). By the time the PIIIs came around, they were big, thick, and weighed 8+ pounds.

      I am currently typing this on a Latitude CPx. I can tell you that it has its share of problems due to bad design. With the new heat requirments of the PIII, they had to add a humungous heatsink to the design to properly cool the chip without having to modify the chasis, and break compatibility. Unfortunately, Dell put the fan on the back of the machine, smack up against the Dock. One night, I left my PC on in the dock. By the morning, the keys were gooey from the heat output. Even in it's undocked state, it's impossible to use "on your lap". To this day, the keys don't work properly due to the exessive heat the pressure-switches had to absorb.

      Twoards the end of the line, the Docks became increasingly flaky with new hardware, and occasionally refuse to power up, or assigns phony IRQs to devices which don't exist (P3 chipsets were obviously quite different than P1 chipsets). The docks got hot, overheated, etc. The computers apparently also had a speed-control mechanism for the fans and speed-throttling (NOT speedstep, that came out later), it apparently works in both the bios and OS. Either way, it doesn't work in windows, and often does the opposite of what it should. Audio is a whole mess by itself. The win32 drivers cause the audio chipset to produe a 1:1 signal to noise ratio (an AM radio inside a power plant would sound better)

      Switching to Linux has suprisingly helped. Even without installing the i8k packages (which aren't even compatible to my knowledge), thermal performance is much better, the fans work when the should, the keys still require a massive amount of force to work (but that's a hardware problem), and best of all, sound works properly. Finally, a computer (a laptop at that!) with better hardware support under linux than in windows. Unfortunately, the c-docks still have the same issues.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    3. Re:Somewhat OT...but... by xombo · · Score: 1

      I got a picture of the dell dude right here

    4. Re:Somewhat OT...but... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Same here... Bought 100 Dell monitors and had 5 of them burn up. In fact, up until the recall (months and months later) they continued to insist that nothing was wrong with the monitors.

      We had a service agreement, so they were replaced, but only AFTER they each burnt up. It's damn good they were in open spaces, and not under a shelf or on a computer desk with over-head compartments (like other monitors in other offices are).

      You can't imagine the number of "Dude, you're getting a flame-thrower" jokes I've heard because of it.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  34. What a warranty! by big_groo · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Here is the link to IBM's page about these monitors. That's one hell of a warranty on a monitor.

    My guess is that most of the people that use these are business customers (ie. used as cash register displays or something like that) and they don't want to lose any repeat business.

    1. Re:What a warranty! by Pharmboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My guess is that most of the people that use these are business customers (ie. used as cash register displays or something like that) and they don't want to lose any repeat business.

      My experience with IBM has always been great. Twice they have replaced minor parts OUT OF WARRANTY with just a call, free. And this was just on consumer grade products. One reason I half a dozen IBM servers now. (ppro 2 dual's, never a down day in over 4 years, even the used one i bought off ebay).

      I am betting most (not all, but most) people that talk trash about IBM have never been IBM customers. As always, you mileage will vary, but they have always treated me, a very tiny customer, like gold.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    2. Re:What a warranty! by daaan · · Score: 1

      we use IBM stuff at work as well, and I had a system go down on us about a week or so ago. NT blue screened, and I had to do a hard reboot on it. Only problem was, the machine didn't reboot.

      I placed a call to our help desk, and after 20 minutes of having some twit on the other end of the phone tell me to "wiggle the network cable" to see if it was a network problem, they placed a call to IBM.

      Less than an hour later, a technician phoned me and asked if i had any idea what the problem was. I said motherboard or Power Supply, one of the two. He showed up about 30 minutes later with a new power supply and mobo in hand, and we replaced both parts (turned out to be a shot ATX power supply) and the machine worked just fine after that.

      While he was here, he mentioned that the color was "off" on the monitor, pulled out him blackberry and placed a new service call for me. I had a new monitor in less than an hour.

      IBM, really is a company, in my experience that deserves a lot of respect for what they do best. And what they do best, is not home PC's. Go to Dell for that, but if you want top notch support, fuck the savings, and buy IBM.

    3. Re:What a warranty! by sirwired · · Score: 1

      Errr... I doubt the CPSC gave IBM much of a choice. If your has a defect that causes it to catches on fire, and you are in business, then you MUST recall it, no exceptions.

  35. Ultimate Kitchen computer by VictimlessChris · · Score: 0, Troll

    Most smokers I know like to have a cup of coffee and a smoke in the morning, and a smoke after meals. Slap a java runtime environment in there and you could market a rockin computer designed especially for a smoker's kitchen!

    --
    Then I put on a suit, because you can get away with anything if you're wearing a suit. Suits lie.
  36. Maybe a flamebait....but by greymond · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It seems like IBM is really half-assing their recent products/services. Within the last 12 months I've seen them take a lot of flak for their flaky batteries, and bad hardrives

    I know their stance for linux has improved, but still seems somewhat wisshy washy at times....IBM IMO is a really strong business, but they seem to be half-assing a lot lately

    1. Re:Maybe a flamebait....but by freeweed · · Score: 1

      You did read the article to see that this recall applies to 5 and 6 year old monitors, right? Don't know what kind of hardware I'd call 'recent' from back then.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    2. Re:Maybe a flamebait....but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is Slashdot, who the hell reads the articles?

  37. Quite old by rirugrat · · Score: 4, Informative

    The 6541 model of IBM monitors are quite old since they were manufactured from June 1997 - September 1997. It's amazing that they still work. Our company used to purchase Acer 34 and 76 monitors and they all failed within 3 years.

    And only 5 reported failures? In almost 6 years? That doesn't sound too bad to me...

    Chris

    1. Re:Quite old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "June 1997 - September 1997. It's amazing that they still work."

      What's amazing is that you think 6 years is a long time. I used my 14 inch monitor for 10 years before I bought a LCD panel. I have equipment that's 40 years old and can still compete with the latest stuff.
      When did people start accepting crap as a standard? Oh wait, Gates is a billionaire after all...

    2. Re:Quite old by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You should not be amazed they still work, you should be angry that the acer only lasted 3 years.

      I just lost my 19", but that was after 7 years. I have a 14" that is 10 years old.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Quite old by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      We have several still in service as the monitors hooked up to a IBM Infowindow II 3270 Dumb Terminals. I imagine there are many that are still in service in Banks, Grocery stores...etc etc. Just because you as a slashdot geek upgrade hardware every year doesn't mean companies do too. Although these ARE getting long in the tooth. LCD's should last a bit longer in my opinion. They tend to run much cooler. We had some G54's loose horizontal size control and the image looks like it's pregnant or being viewed thru a fisheye lense. Now the Nec Multisync E1100+ I am typing this on is awesome....and quite LARGE! :)

      --

      Gorkman

    4. Re:Quite old by evilviper · · Score: 1

      My experience with Acer is that they are one step up from Korean manufacturers (eg. Samsung, Magview).

      I've got numerous CD-Rs, DVD-ROMS, Monitors, etc., that crap out (on average) just a year or so after I buy it. I wouldn't take Acer products if they were giving them away for fear that they would damage the components they connect to.

      The problem, as I see it, is that there are no brand names that strive for quality. Every brand, even if they make decent equipment, has a line of crappy products. You can no longer just purchase everything from DEC and know it'll last for years without fault... You just about have to do an extensive test of every product by every manufacturer to know what has been built well.

      Not long ago you could tell the quality of a product by the length of the warranty, but now everyone has standardized their warranties based on their competitors, so it's now useless.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  38. Oh, great. by 13Echo · · Score: 0

    Here come the Deskstar trolls.

  39. Saved! by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

    It's a good thing that my parents only have the regular IBM 17" monitor, the one that has an annoyingly loud 16-19 kHz whine when left on for too long. They may go deaf, but at least their house won't burn down in the process...

    1. Re:Saved! by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, the sound goes away when you get older.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  40. Eerie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    S'funny, I just got out of my shower to notice there was no more power in my place. Then I got into the the kitchen and saw there was power. So I checked the breaker box and the living room was tripped, so I check it out... My humidifier just blew up! Then when I get back on-line, I see this story!
    Good thing IBM doesn't make humidifiers! I'd be dead!

  41. Wouldn't it be cheaper to just replace them? by brickbat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    These things are ancient. I've gone through at least two monitors since the G51 was introduced. And a decent new 17" monitor is about $120. Seems like it would be cheaper for IBM to just give owners a credit towards a new monitor.

    Perhaps IBM is banking on the fact that most of these dinosaurs are sitting on a shelf somewhere because their tubes blew out long ago. I know I wouldn't bother getting a 6-year-old 15" monitor fixed, even if it was for free.

    1. Re:Wouldn't it be cheaper to just replace them? by michrech · · Score: 1

      I know I wouldn't bother getting a 6-year-old 15" monitor fixed, even if it was for free.

      This is why any business you may decide to start will more than likely fail rather quickly.

      Lets see... Spend somewhere around $100 for a decent 15" replacement (and stay clear of the $49 bargan basement, crap-o-the-day monitor) or spend a few bucks shipping to fix your monitors..

      I know what I'd do...

      --
      bork bork bork!
    2. Re:Wouldn't it be cheaper to just replace them? by truenoir · · Score: 1

      I dunno, you'd have downtime introduced by the missing monitors for however long it takes IBM to fix them. Shipping on monitors isn't cheap either. 17" ones I think are about $50 to ship. With an old monitor, you might have to get packaging too.

      Not to mention that new monitors will likely make your employees feel loved ^_^

    3. Re:Wouldn't it be cheaper to just replace them? by brickbat · · Score: 1

      This is why any business you may decide to start will more than likely fail rather quickly.

      Lets see... Spend somewhere around $100 for a decent 15" replacement (and stay clear of the $49 bargan basement, crap-o-the-day monitor) or spend a few bucks shipping to fix your monitors..


      You totally missed the point of my post, but let me explain again more slowly:

      It is often cheaper for a manufacturer to simply replace a defective product than to pay for shipping it back to a service center, swapping out a part, and then paying again to ship it back to the customer. It depends on the age of the product and its fair market value.

      In Real Life, a used G51 is worth maybe 25 bucks. If it works. It doesn't seem cost effective for IBM to pay to replace parts in something that obsolete. It'd be like Ford recalling the Pinto now to fix the gas tank.

      I guess it makes for good customer relations, but since when has a megacorporation been concerned with such trifles? ;-)

  42. Up in smoke by Smallpond · · Score: 1

    This happened once with computer terminals at C-MU. They had about 50 that had accidentally been built with a star washer on the power supply connection to the motherboard. All of the current going through the small contact area of the points of the washer caused the PCB to heat up, char and finally catch fire. Some unlucky soul got the job of dismantling them all and replacing the star washer with a flat washer.

  43. inflation by VEGx · · Score: 1
    My .02
    Just a few years ago it was .01, now inflation and economic slowdown had finally impacted /.


    PS. Don't worry, I don't even pretend as if my reply were intelligent

  44. FLAME POST! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 5, Funny
    Not true dude. I'm using a Deskstar right now and it has never fai^HHHHHHHHHHHH[no carrier]

    1. Re:FLAME POST! by blixel · · Score: 1

      Not true dude. I'm using a Deskstar right now and it has never fai^HHHHHHHHHHHH[no carrier]

      Coincidental that I'm reading this since I litterly just got done boxing up a Deskstar drive for RMA less than 5 minutes ago. This is the second time I've sent "this" drive in for RMA. ("This" drive being the original purchase. "This" drive is a replacement for the first one that died.)

      I'm not messing with these pieces of junk any more. I've never had hard-drive failures like this. I'm buying a replacement drive, probably WD, and as soon as this one comes back from RMA I'm auctioning it on Ebay. Feel sorry for the winner but wish them the best of luck with it.

    2. Re:FLAME POST! by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


      I too have had problems with the Deskstars. I just returned another one a few months ago; and have one that's been RMA'd twice - and the second time it was out of warranty, but failed in less than 6 months; they replaced it anyway. Interesting thing is that the computers these are in are only on about 2-3 hours per day. Hmm.

      What I found fascinating about these drives - and still do - is all the CRC errors I see while booting Mandrake Linux.....and while the (replaced) drives operate correctly, I don't see those errors on any other drives, not even that old 2.5G Quantum bigfoot with stiction problems I have.

      Sigh.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  45. IBM To Repair Smoking Monitors by pebs · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just make sure you don't leave your weed next to the monitor. It may mysteriously disappear. If the monitor starts acting funny, you may not want to believe the excuse that its just degaussing itself. If you notice that there is a lot of red in the picture, or a glazed over look in your screen, your monitor could very well be a pot smoker.

    In that case, hey, let the monitor smoke, you may notice improvements when playing games.

    --
    #!/
  46. Attach some mirrors� by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and you get the perfect display device for those powerpoints from marketing.

  47. hard drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if only they recalled their crap hard drives as well. I'm on the second repacement of the same 60 gig drive already and I only bought the original one last March. At this rate I'll have another 4 repacements before the warranty is out, unless the quality improves.

  48. Re:sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    YES! AQUA TEEN HUNGER FORCE OWNZ YOU!

    Meatwad: Hey frylock, look at yer carpet. Iz burnin'.
    Frylock: Meatwad, you know better than to play with fire. Fire is dangerous.
    Meatwad: I know, I know, I use it in my work.
    Carl: WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED TO MY LAWN!?

  49. smoke test... by mike77 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    silly engineers, when I worked for motorolla and we had a new product, the FIRST test we put it through was the smoke test. We went for lunch, and on the way plugged the devices into the car lighter socket to see if it smoked.

    we rolled the windows down alot....

    --

    --Keeping the flame wars alive, one post at a time

  50. More than 56,000 by EinarH · · Score: 5, Informative
    From the IBM-site. :
    Between 1997 and 1999, a total of approximately 700,000 G51 series monitors were manufactured for IBM in Malaysia and China by LiteOn Technology International, Inc. Approximately 117,000 monitors that could potentially include this component were shipped worldwide, and about 56,000 were sold in the U.S.

    They are withdrawing all the 117,000:

    If you live outside of the US, click here. for a list of phone numbers to contact a repair center.

    [rant]
    It's only the US-centric slashdot, who want us Europeans to burn... ;-)[/rant]

    --

    Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

    1. Re:More than 56,000 by mpe · · Score: 1

      If you live outside of the US, click here [ibm.com]. for a list of phone numbers to contact a repair center.

      Strange how they list what looks like an international freephone number for Turkey. Unless Turkey, like North America, has a non standard numbering plan.

  51. Thanks for makeing me feel safe at work by TitleSeventeen · · Score: 0

    i read slashdot about monitors explodeing and what do i use an IBM monitor, it is only a G74 so that makes me feel a bit better, but my TP 600 is ready for another new screen (dead pixles) and i have to call IBM about the one year warranty on my TP600 battery. manufactured march 2002 and what month/year does it die? march 2003. on the plus side my old model "M" keyboard from ibm still works fine

  52. Not so old... by hirschma · · Score: 1

    I have a 14" Viewsonic monitor that has a Windows 3.1 UPGRADE sticker on it that I placed there about 12 years ago. It's been reduced to being the orphan monitor hanging off a KVM switch.

    It's been in operation almost every day of those 12 years. It starts right away, syncs to different VGA/SVGA resolutions without fail, has its colors intact, the whole thing - functions like new.

    The fact that anyone considers a monitor from '97 to be ancient, useless and presumed dead really indicates that they really don't build 'em like they used to.

    1. Re:Not so old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup.... I have a 17inch Viewsonic G771 that I bought in 1996 that is still running....

    2. Re:Not so old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Yup.... I have a 17inch Viewsonic G771 that I bought in 1996 that is still running....

      That's nothing. My small arcade cabinet is running on an old Commodore 1084s monitor. Still runs perfectly fine, picture is sharper and better then all 13" TVs you can find, including professionnal models.

    3. Re:Not so old... by operagost · · Score: 1

      I have a 20" NEC 5D that still works perfectly. I got it in 1997 to settle a $200 debt, and it was worth it. Just needed a new cable to fix the red tint (it was detachable). The thing was manufactured in 1989, but it has digital controls and goes up to 1280x1024 at 60 Hz. Since I don't like strobe effects on my screen, I use it at 1152x864, 70 Hz.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  53. Fiery IBM monitors are nothing new by netringer · · Score: 4, Funny
    Nuttin new.

    The IBM monitors that shipped with IBM PS/2 computers in the late 1980's were notorious for bursting into flame. Flames would shoot out of the monitor's vents at the top of the case. One morning I found one had charred the top of its case overnight. Luckily it burned itself out without tripping the office sprinklers. THAT would have been more exciting.

    Which reminds me of the sick joke I dreamed up for our IT boss at that job. We were thinking of calling him up on his honeymoon vacation, and saying, "Don't worry about the fire in the data center. The sprinklers put it out!"

    Around that time I was interviewing at a 100% "True Blue" IBM shop. I mentioned that the new IBM monitors are known to burst into flame. The response was, "Oh yes, the monitors do often catch on fire. But then IBM replaces them for free under warranty!"

    IBM's immediate response was to send adhesive labels for the monitors that advised powering them off when not in use. New monitors came with the sticker pre-applied at the factory.

    --
    Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
    1. Re:Fiery IBM monitors are nothing new by melted · · Score: 1

      Anyone who suggests using sprinklers in the datacenter should be immediately fired. Datacenter fire extinguishing systems should only be gas-based. That's in fact the way it is in any well-equipped datacenter.

    2. Re:Fiery IBM monitors are nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hence the second half of the joke.

    3. Re:Fiery IBM monitors are nothing new by netringer · · Score: 2, Informative
      Anyone who suggests using sprinklers in the datacenter should be immediately fired. Datacenter fire extinguishing systems should only be gas-based. That's in fact the way it is in any well-equipped datacenter.
      Yeah, right. You don't have to deal with Chigaguh.

      This particular (small) data center had a Halon system. It also still had sprinkler heads.

      Sprinklers can be required because the building owners or city code will not allow them to removed. If the rules or building code say "All rooms on all floors must be equipped with a sprinkler system" it will be interpreted to mean exactly that, no substitutes allowed.

      BTW, electrical conduits MUST be metal, we don't get to use the plastic sheathed stuff like the rest of world. Ditto for plumbing pipes, although PVC plastic waste pipes are legal in the city now, after 40 years of being banned. The unions/building departments (often headed by the same person) claim that the plastic would contribute toxic fumes in the event of a fire.

      BTW II, Halon is effectively banned now, too. Because the EPA banned freon because of risk to the ozone layer, the gas is not made and thus is so expensive that a installing Halon or replacing it after a discharge would cost $100,000.
      --
      Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
  54. smoking monitors by kurosawdust · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought that new Photoshop filter was a little too realistic...

  55. See Monitors aren't any different by ksplatter · · Score: 0, Troll

    Smoking is unhealthy for Any[body|thing]

    But it just tastes so Darn Good!

  56. had to ... by nostrodecus · · Score: 1

    couldn't they just have published the 'nosmoke' download on their website and let people fix it themselves ?

    --
    cloak of invisibility not working, there are squirrels everywhere
  57. The real cause... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those damn overclockers! When will they learn?!?!

  58. nosmoke.exe.... by 3-State+Bit · · Score: 4, Funny
    apparently a true story:

    I used to work in a computer store and one day we had a gentleman call in with a smoking power supply. The service rep was having a bit of trouble convincing this guy that he had a hardware problem.

    Service Rep: Sir, something has burned up within your power supply.

    Customer: I bet that there is some command that I can put into the AUTOEXEC.BAT that will take care of this.

    Service Rep: There is nothing that software can do to help you with this problem.

    Customer: I know that there is something that I can put in... some command... maybe it should go into the CONFIG.SYS.

    [After a few minutes of going round and round]
    Service Rep: Okay, I am not supposed to tell anyone this but there is a hidden command in some versions of DOS that you can use. I want you to edit your AUTOEXEC.BAT and add the last line as C:\DOS\NOSMOKE and reboot your computer.

    [Customer does this]
    Customer: It is still smoking.

    Service Rep: I guess you'll need to call Microsoft and ask them for a patch for the NOSMOKE.EXE.

    [The customer then hung up. We thought that we had heard the last of this guy but NO... he calls back four hours later]
    Service Rep: Hello Sir, how is your computer?

    Customer: I called Microsoft and they said that my power supply is incompatible with their NOSMOKE.EXE and that I need to get a new one. I was wondering when I can have that done and how much it will cost..


    An old but good story...
    1. Re:nosmoke.exe.... by Moses+Lawn · · Score: 1

      This was always my favorite tech support story. Oddly enough, the support guys where I used to work never laughed much at this one.

      --

      What if life is just a side effect of some other process and God has no idea we exist?

    2. Re:nosmoke.exe.... by le_jfs · · Score: 1
      Under Linux, just type:
      insmod /usr/havenoclue/nosmoke.o
      --
      main(char O){O++&&(((O-291)*O+27788)*O-868020?1:putchar(O++) )&&main(O);}
  59. Flaming Monitors by McSpew · · Score: 1

    Once upon a time, I used to work for a large electronics retail chain that had just (finally) implemented a point-of-sale computer system about 10 years after introducing one of the first personal computers.

    The point-of-sale system, affectionately known as the POS (and boy, was it ever!) used bare-bones diskless PCs as dumb terminals. The onboard video was good old fashioned TTL monochrome and the monitors we used were 13" monochrome monitors OEM'd by a large Korean congolomerate.

    We started receiving reports of burnt out monitors from other stores and one day, as I walked by the sales counter, I noticed an acrid smell. I looked at the nearest POS terminal and sure enough, the monitor was smoking. We unplugged it and replaced it, but I never did hear of a recall of the monitors, and the retailer continued to sell the same monitors to customers.

    1. Re:Flaming Monitors by mpe · · Score: 1

      We started receiving reports of burnt out monitors from other stores and one day, as I walked by the sales counter, I noticed an acrid smell. I looked at the nearest POS terminal and sure enough, the monitor was smoking. We unplugged it and replaced it, but I never did hear of a recall of the monitors, and the retailer continued to sell the same monitors to customers.

      Without either looking inside or checking a service manual you can't be sure that it was actually the same monitor. Far easier to quietly fix a design fault than issue a recall.

  60. Re: Quite impresses by IBM... by op51n · · Score: 1

    I am still stuck on an old IBM 6314 (yea, I know, ick!) due to cost, even having had a problem with it a few years back. A fuse went in it, and I took it to get repaired, where they said "Well, we'll see but it's unlikely to be repairable due to it's age."
    They ended up sending it back to IBM who managed to find a replacement fuse for it at the back of a warehouse or something and got it fixed for me, all for, I seem to recall, about £30.
    So I'm still using it to this day, til I get round to getting a 19" Trinitron. And Apart from the odd color flicker, which is fixed by smacking it around a bit, it still works as good as ever!

  61. OT: golden bathroom by wtarle · · Score: 1
    Hmm, I wonder if its a complete set:
    "Thanks Mr. Simpson. Because of you, we're all taking golden showers" - Kent Brockman
  62. No your MONITOR is flambait. by nlinecomputers · · Score: 2, Insightful

    RTFA! :-D

    Sorry I could not help myself.

    It isn't just IBM the whole industry is starting to put out crap. Everyone wants cheap PCs and you take a hit on the quality when you go for that.

    --
    Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
    1. Re:No your MONITOR is flambait. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean you can't get high quality at a low cost?

      But my boss expects those things from me, but it has to be done quickly too?

    2. Re:No your MONITOR is flambait. by daaan · · Score: 1

      i only wish more people understood this as well as you do.

  63. Re:as long as monitors dont rollover by Minn_Kota_Marine · · Score: 1

    then they'd get a tax-break (as long as they wasted petro-chemical resources at the same time).

    All thanx to 'W'

  64. The solution is a pre-action system by swb · · Score: 1

    We just built a new data center. I wanted gas, but it was just too expensive, so we got the next best thing, a pre-action system.

    We have sprinkler heads like everyone else, but the pipes feeding them are filled with compressed air. A special valve/air pump setup keeps the pipes pressurized and the water out until the alarm is set off by smoke. The pipes then fill with water but it takes a hundred mublemumble degrees to melt the sprinkler heads and dump water on everything.

    The advantage is that you can have smoke OR heat (or a busted sprinkler head) and not douse the room with water. You need smoke AND heat to spray water -- any room that gets 150 degrees and is full of smoke has some pretty serious problems that sparing the water alone won't fix.

  65. Don't let IBM change the subject! by Provocateur · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Focus, guys, focus! Thinkpad Batteries!

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    1. Re:Don't let IBM change the subject! by racermd · · Score: 1

      I agree. What happened to you IBM?

      On a related side note, I had one of the recalled APC UPS units (the BK350 and BK500). It was recalled for almost the exact same reasons: Component gets too hot, melts exterior casing (plastic) coating whatever it touches, and possibly starts a fire. (rhetorical) Is the reason computer parts like monitors and UPSs are running so hot because they are now required to run overclocked to keep pace with the insane speed of today's CPUs? (/rhetorical) Other than the bum capacitor theory being tossed about, I can't think of any other realistic reason for this. QA departments around the globe need to start re-evaluating their testing procedures if these products are getting out the door into customers' hands.

      --
      My sources are unreliable, but their information is fascinating. -- Ashleigh Brilliant
  66. Samsang also made some smelly monitors by zymano · · Score: 0
    i had 2 samsungs replaced because some smokey circuitry that caused me some throat trouble because of invisible fumes.

    Cathode monitors piss me off , as much as hard drives!

  67. ob:Breakfast Club by GTRacer · · Score: 1
    "Wanna see a picture of a guy with elephantitis of the nuts? It's pretty tasty."

    GTRacer
    - Best...bratpack movie...ever

    --
    Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
  68. I saw a buggy program toast one of these... by Moses+Lawn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I saw one of these smoke itself spontaneously through code.

    When I was in college, we had a couple of labs full of PS/2 Model 50s (286-based). One night, a friend of mine was testing calling assemply language routines from Turbo Pascal. She must have gotten some parameter passing or something very wrong, because as soon as she ran the app, it crashed and smoke started pouring out of the top of the monitor. At the time, we all thought that was the most impressive damn thng we had ever seen - a program that crashes so badly that it kills the machine. That takes more than a 3-finger salute to fix. Today, I'm a little more doubtful of the exact cause. It could have been a flaky monitor, but it would be a BIG coincidence for it to have had nothing to do with the program. (I wanted to try running the program again on a different machine and see if it happened again, but that seemed like a bad idea.)

    On the subject of crappy IBM hardware, the PS/2s were far way from five 9s. I wasn't impressed by their service, either. Out of 35 or so systems, there were always about 3 or 4 dead ones. The service rep would come by about once a week, open them up and fiddle around inside, and then leave with at least one still dead. Admittedly, they were in regular use by student goons, but these were supposed to be high-end professonal quality tools. We had less trouble with the Leading Edge 8086es in our old lab.

    Oh, and don't even get me started on the Microchannel architecture and the proprietary IBM configuration floppy you had to use to add new hardware and tweak the BIOS. Feh.

    --

    What if life is just a side effect of some other process and God has no idea we exist?

    1. Re:I saw a buggy program toast one of these... by radish · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Reminds me of what is one of the only viruses I've ever heard of which could cause physical damage. It was for the venerable old BBC Micro Model B (ancient british home micro for you yanks). Legend has it that when originally designed this thing had some kind of rechargable backup battery for storing state, but it turned out to be too expensive for the final product. However, they left in the charging circuit, just disable. Someone figured out how to switch the thing on through an undocumented system call (well, actuall a POKE in the right place!). Wait 30 mins while it overheated, and voila, molten mainboard. That's worse than even RedAlert ;)

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    2. Re:I saw a buggy program toast one of these... by nothingtodo · · Score: 1

      RE: PS/2s... I have a number of PS/2 models, both ISA and MCA types and I say they are bulletproof. I expect them to run longer than anything built these days. Once you know how to configure these units, it's almost too easy, being PnP in the truest sense. The only reliability issue I remembered was out of focus displays on the 8513 displays.

      --
      -- After all is said and done, more is said than done.
    3. Re:I saw a buggy program toast one of these... by Moses+Lawn · · Score: 1

      I'll grant you they were well made. They just seemed to die a lot. Like I said, this was probably due in large part to the fact that they were used daily by the General Student Population, and consequently power-cycled regularly (Done with Wordperfect? Reboot. Maybe you'll save your work first.) and left on all day.

      The hardware *was* pretty much bulletproof, especially the keyboards (I spilled half a beer into one one night, when the machine was running, and just took it outside and drained and rinsed it. It was good as new in the morning.) and cases. I think we mainly had bad motherboard chips or flaky RAM. It was hard to tell because all you ever got for diagnostics was a set of beeps and a 4-digit number at POST if something failed.

      Other than that, my only complaint was how hard it was to configure the BIOS and add new hardware without the magic disk. That and the fact the you had to plug the mouse in *before* powering on the machine or it wouldn't recognize it. And if the mouse ever came loose, you had to reboot.

      Best damn keyboard I ever used, though. Even better than my Northgate Omnikey.

      --

      What if life is just a side effect of some other process and God has no idea we exist?

  69. Coincidence can be scary... by greed · · Score: 1

    I didn't have the monitor catch fire, but (wavy lines) way back when I was learning C, and making lots of stupid errors, I had finally fixed what I hoped was the last one in a particular program. (hello-something-or-other, IIRC).

    So I called out, "Here we GO!" and hammered on the return key.

    All the lights went out. All the computers went out. All the other students in the lab turned around and said, "what did you do THIS time?!"
    Turned out we were normally running 14.9A on a 15A fuse, and a full lab of students had put it over the line. We plugged some of the boxes into a different circuit after that.

    But no-one believed that was the real cause. They all blamed me.

    1. Re:Coincidence can be scary... by Moses+Lawn · · Score: 3, Funny

      That reminds me of the best coincidence I ever ran across. At my first job, we were developing a desktop environment for DOS (file manager, various utilities, etc). This was in Southern California in 1990.

      One of the project managers was testing the calculator and did something to get an overflow error. At that moment, the Whittier quake happened. The PM filed a bug report: "Arithmetic overflow in calculator causes earthquake." The bug stayed open until just before shipping, when it was closed as "Cannot reproduce."

      --

      What if life is just a side effect of some other process and God has no idea we exist?

  70. Manufactured by Lite-on? by doormat · · Score: 1

    Between 1997 and 1999, a total of approximately 700,000 G51 series monitors were manufactured for IBM in Malaysia and China by LiteOn Technology International, Inc. Approximately 117,000 monitors that could potentially include this component were shipped worldwide, and about 56,000 were sold in the U.S.

    No wonder Liteon sells CDRW drives now...

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
  71. Re:It's expensive enough if your girlfriend smokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your girlfriend smokes my COCK!

  72. The patch or gum? by Vooch · · Score: 1

    For these smoking monitors, is IBM giving them the patch or the gum?

  73. You let your motherboard overheat till it smokes? by evil_one · · Score: 2, Funny

    And I thought all that smoke was just my mobo overheating.

    Well that makes you look pretty stupid, doesn't it?

    --
    Desperation is a stinky cologne
  74. Doesn't this aways happen.. by kiwi-matgar · · Score: 1

    when you're so *HOT* as I, everything seems to heat up.

  75. Up in Smoke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Had the 15" model about 2 years ago go up in smoke after pushing the power button. Black flakes could be found all over the room. Smelt pretty decent though!

  76. They can't have mine by Hubert_Shrump · · Score: 2, Funny

    I put it on the patch, it said it would try. I think it'd be a breach of trust to send it back.

    --
    Keep your packets off my GNU/Girlfriend!
  77. I am Jack's complete lack of surprise... by KewlPC · · Score: 1
    I can't be the only one who thought of Fight Club when reading this.
    Narrator: A new car built by my company leaves somewhere traveling at 60 mph. The rear differential locks up. The car crashes and burns with everyone trapped inside. Now, should we initiate a recall? Take the number of vehicles in the field, A, multiply by the probable rate of failure, B, multiply by the average out-of-court settlement, C. A times B times C equals X. If X is less than the cost of a recall, we don't do one.

    Woman on plane: Are there a lot of these kinds of accidents?

    Narrator: You wouldn't believe.

    Woman on plane: Which car company do you work for?

    Narrator: A major one.
  78. First they should fix their hard drives. by azookeeper · · Score: 1

    How about they repair their piece of shit fucking hard drives before they send them back to me.

    Yeah, I know this post sucks major ass.

  79. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    From the moment I picked your book up until I put it down I was convulsed
    with laughter. Some day I intend reading it.
    -- Groucho Marx, from "The Book of Insults"

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...