Slashdot Mirror


Technologies that Have Exceeded Their Expectations?

drfunch asks: "With the recent 'passing' of Pioneer 10 after over 30 years of service, I wonder what other technologies have far exceeded expectations. One example from my own experience is my trusty HP calculator, which is still going strong after 21 years. What technologies or devices have gone far beyond your expectations?"

68 of 1,022 comments (clear)

  1. Voyager by Elvisisdead · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Voyager Probe

    --

    "Want in one hand and spit in the other and see which one fills up first." - My Dad
    1. Re:Voyager by JudgeDredd · · Score: 5, Funny

      Voyager exceeded your expectations? I thought it was the worst of the lot. The characters were flat, and the plots were repetitive. Every other damn episode was about time travel, and they did it poorly.

      Well, except for 7 of 9. She wasn't flat.

  2. Beating a Dead Horse? by superdan2k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The paper-ballot voting booth -- worked just fine for over 200 years...and then, one major screw-up in one state and everything goes to shit. Go figure.

    --
    blog |
    1. Re:Beating a Dead Horse? by Threni · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, well, people were ok with reading and then punching a hole in a piece of paper for 200 years. But that was before MTV, Fox and Hip-hop.

    2. Re:Beating a Dead Horse? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The system has always been as bad as it was in the last election. Ballots lost on the way to the counting center, polling stations running out of ballots, ballots getting jammed in the counting machines, people not understanding what they were doing. It's always been crap. The margin of error was always one or two percent. It's not that people got stupider, it's that this was the first time the margin was close enough that this always-existant problem became relevant.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  3. Washer and Dryer by Andy_w715 · · Score: 3, Funny

    My washer and dryer are almost 30 years old....

    1. Re:Washer and Dryer by lauterm · · Score: 4, Funny

      My body is almost 30 years old. Its still running too. Well somewhat.

    2. Re:Washer and Dryer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My father got a Western Electric 500 telephone about 1946, it was in daily use until about 1991 (about 45 years), outlasting three teenagers, cars, washers, refrigerators, water heaters, the roof to the house.... Heck, lubricate the rotary dial and it would STILL work. (Remind me why the telephone monopoly was wrong.)

    3. Re:Washer and Dryer by stand · · Score: 4, Funny

      My parents have a toaster that they bought at a garage sale back in the 50's. It still works great. I don't think I've ever had a toaster that lasted longer than 2 years. I'm hoping to inherit it.

      --
      Four fifths of all our troubles in this life would disappear if we would just sit down and keep still. -C. Coolidge
    4. Re:Washer and Dryer by freeweed · · Score: 5, Funny

      Pfft, I have some rocks in my back yard that are several billion years old. They still work just fine as lawn ornaments.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    5. Re:Washer and Dryer by soloport · · Score: 3, Funny

      Mom (mine's 84 years old, this year)

      Outlasted Dad... :-(

    6. Re:Washer and Dryer by Virtex · · Score: 4, Funny

      30 years is nothing. You should see my toothbrush. That thing's been through so much history. Passed down through the generations, it was used by one of my ancestors who fought in WW I. Before that it was brought thousands of miles across the ocean by this country's founding fathers. And you know what? It works just as well today as it did back then.

      Also of interest is some of the food in my refrigerator. Perhaps it's not as old as the toothbrush, but it's still a wonder of archeological history.

      --
      For every post, there is an equal and opposite re-post.
    7. Re:Washer and Dryer by orasio · · Score: 3, Funny

      This watch was on my Daddy's wrist when he was shot down over Hanoi. He was captured and put in a Vietnamese prison camp. Now he knew if the gooks ever saw the watch it's be confiscated. The way my Daddy looked at it, that watch was my birthright. And he'd be damned if and slopeheads were gonna put their greasy yella hands on his boy's birthright. So he hid it in the one place he knew he could hide somethin'. His ass. Five long years, he wore this watch up his ass. Then when he died of dysentery, he gave a friend the watch. He hid with uncomfortable hunk of metal up my ass for two years. Then, after seven years, He was sent home to his family. And then he gave it to me (Butch).

      The watch went trhough all that and more, and it still works, but, of course, it doesnt smell nice.

  4. Not Just HP! by davecl · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have a Casio calculator (FX501p) still running happily after more than 22 years!

  5. Magic Eightball by Ec|ipse · · Score: 5, Funny

    My Magic Eightball is great for answering questions from our sales department. Saves a lot of time on some of those questions that rely on actual thinking.

  6. TV/Telephones by binaryDigit · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Both the tv and telephone are excellent examples of technology that seems to defy the ages. Esp. the good ole telephone. In this high tech age, it hasen't changed much (well at least from the end user perspective).

    1. Re:TV/Telephones by NineNine · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree, except for cordless telephones. For some reason, my cell phone works virtually anywhere in the world, for days on a charge, and is usually crystal clear. For the same price, my cordless phone works only up to about 20 feet away from the base, can keep a charge for no more than 1 hour off of the base, and sounds like shit. Cordless phone technology is perhaps the worst technology of our time.

  7. Unix by leerpm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Still going strong after all these years, in some form or another.

  8. Palm OS Devices by IgD · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd have to put Palm OS devices in this category. I have had a Handspring Visor Deluxe for nearly 3 years now. It's black and white. The are no fancy graphics or sounds. However it keeps a mean phone list, address book and calendar. As a Physician, I like the third party software that is a handy quick reference for pharmaceutical dosing information. I have absolutely no reason to upgrade to anything better.

  9. My Apple //e still works. by BoomerSooner · · Score: 5, Funny

    Although all I play on it is Karateka (sp?). That damn bird...

    I got it in 1983.

  10. What else as gone beyond the norm? by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


    ..my liver.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  11. FAA System by Tisha_AH · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The FAA had a top flight (my pun) system 30 years ago. It's still running and they want to spend billions to upgrade it. The programmers have all retired (or jumped off of buildings in the dot.com bust).

    --
    Tisha Hayes
  12. Linux by Rob.Mathers · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a pretty obvious one, but I think Linux has surpassed everyone's expectations, esp. those who knew about it in it's earlier stages. I'm sure Linus never expected it to become so huge, as well as a posterboy for the OSS movement.

    --

    My other sig is funny!
  13. This is Easy... by LordYUK · · Score: 3, Funny

    The Real Doll. That thing goes WAY beyond expectations!

    Oh, wait, I dont think thats what you mean, was it...

    hmm...

    --
    This is my sig. Its pathetic.
  14. I know one.. by WndrBr3d · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The x86 Processor. Created in 1982 with the unveiling of the all mighty 286 (both 8, 10 and 12Mhz speed demons).

    Granted the main core has gone through some overhauls (Major ones include 486DX2, Pentium, P6 Core, K6, Athlon).

    Seriously though, who would have thought it would hang in there for this long ?! :-)

    1. Re:I know one.. by neurojab · · Score: 4, Informative

      You mean you never ran DOS 1.x on a 4.77 mhz 8088 processor? The 8086 was the first x86... it was released in 1978, with the mighty 8088 (actually a scaled down version of the 8086) released shortly thereafter.

  15. The Internal Combustion Engine by sdo1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The design is very much the same as it was 100 years ago and, with the exception of fuel injection and emissions "add-ons", has changed very little in the last 50 years. With some of the V8 engines, manufacturers have been using the same block design for decades.

    -S

    --
    --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    1. Re:The Internal Combustion Engine by good+soldier+svejk · · Score: 3, Interesting
      with the exception of fuel injection and emissions "add-ons", has changed very little in the last 50 years.
      Actually, fuel injection is older than 50 years. Daimler-Benz aircraft motors were using it by 1932, although it took Rolls Royce another eleven years to add it to the Merlin. Other than the belated addition of FI, the Merlin was a remarkable design. It was all aluminium, dual-stage supercharged unit with four valves and two plugs per cylinder. The exhaust valves were filled with sodium to improve cooling.

      I think the biggest changes in internal combustion engines over the last half century are the addition of solid state electronic management and improved production methods and materials. These have rendered high end technologies like the Merlin sported practical for mass production and distribution.
      --
      It is cowardly, and a betrayal of whatever it means to be a Jew, to act as a white man

      -James Baldwin
  16. Homemade marijuana "hitter". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I made it out of a Charmin toilet roll and some tinfoil found on the street back in 1977. To this day I use it.

  17. SR-71 Blackbird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The SR-71 Blackbird aircraft was in many ways 20-30 years ahead of time when it was first created and put into service. An amazing piece of engineering and materials technology.

  18. Tech Life by Fascist+Christ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is it too much to expect a technology to last a few decades, rather than it being a shock?

    --
    TodayTM BillyJoelTM GoogleTMd for StitchTMes due to WindowsTM while RollerbladeTMing with an AppleTM and a PopsicleTM
  19. pants by Hnice · · Score: 5, Funny

    for what seems like decades now we've been hearing wild, utopian speculation regarding an endless stream of leg-covering technologies, each hailed as a 'pants-killer'. on seemingly a yearly basis, it seems, sony or microsoft or archer daniels midland trots out some promising technology to replace pants -- some intended to render not just the item but the entire pants PARADIGM obselete forever. but for all this new-fangledness, what's that on your ass, i ask you? huh!?!?

    man, am i hung over.

    --

    god is just pretend.

  20. Re:As a tech support person... by unicron · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Always remember the immortal rule of tech support: You couldn't do their job, don't expect them to do yours.

    I remember when I was working as a summer intern doing desktop support for a rather large construction & engineering company. I was tagging along with a full-timer, and we walked into a rather large office where the guy I was with remarked "Heh-heh, you're gonna love this guy..stupid fool needed help defragging his HD".

    Then I noticed on the wall he had a PHD in physics. Kind of humbled me right there and I realized he could probably learn my job in a month, where as I probably couldn't do his in a million years.

    --
    Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
  21. HTML by seldolivaw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It started off just being a simple language for describing academic documents. Now you can plug so much junk into HTML that you can create whole applications. HTML is bursting at the seams because of all these hacks and extra languages tacked on to the end, but it still works. I think that's amazing.

  22. My old windows install floppy. by Xzzy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't use floppies for much more than install disks for linux anymore, so pretty much any disk I have rotting in the closet is fair game for a reformatting to serve as a boot disk. I've gone through stacks of disks, one goes bad, I toss it out and pick the next one on the stack.. except for this one ancient maxell floppy I have.

    I used it back when my parents got their 486 (in the early 90's) for holding windows 3.11, it was an OEM release and the first time you loaded the machine it prompted you through swapping disks to copy out recovery disks.

    This disk has followed me in moving about the country four times now, it's gone from alaska to oregon to new jersey to california to illinois. Currently it's a boot disk for redhat 7.1, and I use it at work several times a week.

    No it's not a 20 year old calculator, but considering most claim floppy disks have two year lifespans, the fact this is STILL my most reliable floppy makes it interesting. It even has the original "Windows 3.11 disk 8" label I wrote up for it on it, scribbled out. Underneath it is written "slackware #1" and "redhat boot".

    They really don't make 'em like they used to. ;)

  23. Voyager last forever.... by twert · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hey just you wait until it comes back to destroy earth as VGER.

    --
    Users are like bacteria, each one creating a tiny problem until the host dies.
  24. Casio Scientific Calculator by nanojath · · Score: 3, Interesting
    When I was a Junior in high school - 1989 - I bought a Casio scientific calculator, solar powered with a lithium cell back-up, for about 30 dollars. Through high school Trig and Pre-calculus, three college calculus classes, and a chemistry undergraduate degree, I used the thing a ton and it took a beating in the process. 14 years later I'm still using it... and the battery is still good (I guess that solar cell is doing its job.


    Oh and another thing - when I first started college, I bought a single Sony double-density 3.5 floppy disk. That's 12 years ago and it still works. Yes, yes, I know, floppies are obsolete... but really, I bought a box of 3.5s (figuring they'd be a lifetime supply) and I'm lucky if I get a dozen rewrites out of them. That original floppy has been overwritten literally thousands of times. What gives with that?

    --

    It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries

  25. Trusty Old Computers... by ethzer0 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I love my old Amiga 2000. It still does some things better than a damned PC. *sigh*

  26. Re:The 3.5" Floppy by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'd say it exceeded its expectations. The floppy disk was originally invented by IBM as a way to insert code updates into mainframes (think flash rom but bigger). Computer scientists/engineers found it could make a handy portable storage media and the 3.5" disk that we use today is just an evolved, smaller version.

  27. TCP/IP by clevelandguru · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The people who developed TCP/IP would have never thought it would be used as widely as it is now. ISO OSI stack was supposed to be the standard network protocol. But It failed miserably.

  28. Ballpoint pens by Sowbug · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They're pretty cool if you think about it. A whole bunch of ink that rolls out onto the paper over a tiny little ball. If you remember to keep the cap on and don't leave it on the dashboard of your car in the sun, it doesn't leak. And you can buy 12 for $1.00 at the office supply store, which if you didn't lose them all in a month would be a lifetime supply.

  29. How about the B-52? by elcheesmo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Over 50 years after it was introduced, it's still in use...with a few slight changes of course.

  30. Ethernet by bstadil · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Ethernet must be at the top if the list.

    The Aloha based system was not supposed to scale. The problem pointed out by IBM / TI and others were that collisons increased as the useage increased, prohibiting a steady throughput. The problem of non predictability of packages was equally mentioned.

    Token ring and other methods were supposed to supplant Ethernet in a few years, back when we were at 1Mbps.

    10Mbps were supposed to be the EOL for ethernet.

    Where are we now? 10Gbps is getting to be deployed.

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
    1. Re:Ethernet by geirhe · · Score: 4, Informative
      Ethernet must be at the top if the list. The Aloha based system was not supposed to scale.
      Ethernet is CSMA/CD, not Aloha. Aloha is where people talk regardless of what is happening, and scales like shit. Ethernet is Carrier Sense Multiple Access/Carrier Detection, a refinement of the aloha protocol which scales much better - the dip for high channel utilizations is much smaller. More info here
  31. Unix and C ofcourse.. by dracken · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why Unix and C ofcourse ! Its really amazing that the creativity of one man (oh well, two men) is still going strong now (granted it had many overhauls). The entire concept of operating system has been influenced by Unix. We think processes and files. The beautiful simplicity and elegance! As far as C is concerned, the syntax and the semantics is elegant. (So elegant that I place semicolons at the end of sentences rather than a period).

  32. Colt M1911 by JesseL · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is a firearm originally designed in the 1900's that is still one of the most popular designs of all time. The 1911 is considered by many to be as accurate, reliable, and rugged as any of the most modern firearms available. I inherited one that had originally been made for the U.S. Army in 1918 and belonged to my great-grandfather; it still functions perfectly to this day.

    --
    "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
    1. Re:Colt M1911 by good+soldier+svejk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      AK-47 is not that good, in fact, it's a pretty piss poor rifle in accuracy. The only reason people use it is that it is cheap. There is a saying, "The only people who buy AK-47's are people who can't afford M-16's."
      This is kind of a metaphysical issue. Each system is the pinnacle of its design philosophy.

      The Kalashnikov is inherently rugged and tolerant of environmental variables. AK derivatives operate flawlessly in sand and water, at any temperature. Years ago I read an interview with Uziel Gal where he said that was why IMI (meaning Israel Galili and himself) chose the AK as the basis for the Galil. Israeli combat experience showed the AKs to be the only weapon to operate at or near 100% efficiency in desert combat.

      The AR-15 is a totally different animal. It is a beautifully balanced and elegant design. While the AK was based on proven designs and manufacturing methods, the AR-15 was ground breaking. New materials and manufacturing techniques made it feather light, robust and easy to produce. Eugene Stoner's baby was an unbelievably efficient weapon. As you say it was more accurate than the AKs. Its ammunition was also (at the time, AKs have caught up) lighter, which meant you could carry more of it, and more destructive. The lightweight small bore cartridge also made the weapon easier to use.

      Unfortunately, the AR-15s strength turned out to be its weakness. It was such a finely balanced design that the slightest change in specifications completely destroyed its functionality. This is painfully clear from the history of the M-16 in Vietnam. While the AR-15 was highly prized in that war, the "militarized" M-16 was a disaster. To the casual observer, the differences between the two weapons were trivial. The M-16 had faster twist rifling, which improved the already excellent accuracy but drastically reduced the bullet's destructiveness. The bullet retained stability after impact while the AR-15's tumbled. The M-16 had a plunger on the right side of the receiver for forcing the bolt closed when jammed with debris. Forcing a debris jammed bolt home is probably not going to solve your problem and can permanently damage the weapon. But neither of these changes explained the shocking reduction in reliability between the two designs. The AR-15's reliability had been outstanding, both in tests and in combat. The M-16 was terrible. GI's and parental complaints were so voluminous they sparked congressional hearings. What had changed? Believe it or not the cause of this unreliability, which probably killed hundreds of GIs (and wounded thousands), was a simple change in the type of gunpowder in the cartridge. Against Stoner's advice the DOD had changed from a Winchester bar powder to their standard ball powder. The higher chamber pressure and temperature, as well as the dirtier combustion, completely destroyed the functionality of the weapon. It took years of tweaking to bring the M16 back to reasonable reliability standards. The problems never occurred in testing because the Army never bothered testing the new powder. The M16 evaluation was all don with Stoner's Winchester powder.

      By contrast, the AK variants can digest any ammo you cram into the magazine with roughly equal efficiency. The Russians learned there lesson during WWII when brass shortages forced them to use steel cartridge cases. If you can cram it in the chamber, the AK will fire it, eject it and load another.

      The AR-15 is a fine piece of engineering. Israeli soldiers who used the Galil like it because of its balance and light weight. And for theIDF's current uses it is probably perfect. But it isn't any lighter than the AK-74 and accuracy is a secondary consideration. Reliability, durability, flexibility and quantity are more important. The Kalashnikov wins on all those counts. For most militaries I think the AK-74 is a better choice.

      I also think the Browning Hi Power was a much better design than the 1911, and only twelve years newer (design not production).

      $.02...blah, blah
      --
      It is cowardly, and a betrayal of whatever it means to be a Jew, to act as a white man

      -James Baldwin
  33. old phones by tomzyk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My parents still have a rotary [pulse, dial...] phone in their kitchen. It still works just fine (after about 25 years of use from a family of 7) so there hasn't been a need to replace it. Although impatient people complain that you still have to wait a full 5 seconds longer to complete your outbound phone calls compared to touch-tone phones. (oh the horror!)

    A friend of my younger brother was over there a few years ago and had to ask my dad how to use the phone because he'd never seen a phone without a number-pad on it. Pathetic. Times are changin and these young whipper-snappers aren't learning things that we took for granted. Like learning to read the time off of the face of a (non-digital) clock.

    Anyways... back to the subject.

    TV, telephones, wallclocks, pocket calculators (solar powered ones too), etc... there are a bunch of pieces of technology I use every day that have lasted beyond initial expectation.

    I wish I could say the same thing about computers now-a-days. (Most are considered "old" or "out of date" within 6 months.)

    --
    Karma: NaN
    1. Re:old phones by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 4, Funny
      Is there a HOWTO?

      Next time you're confronted with one, try screaming "MAN CLOCK" at it. Even it that doesn't work, somebody's bound to notice and tell you what time it is.

    2. Re:old phones by freeweed · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A friend of my younger brother was over there a few years ago and had to ask my dad how to use the phone because he'd never seen a phone without a number-pad on it. Pathetic. Times are changin and these young whipper-snappers aren't learning things that we took for granted. Like learning to read the time off of the face of a (non-digital) clock.

      Uh huh. And can you successfully start up a crank-started car? Ride a horse (sans saddle)? Skin an animal from stone chips you've made yourself?

      Remember, just because something *used* to be a certain way, doesn't mean it can't be improved. And people aren't stupid for not learning how things aren't done anymore.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  34. Almost All Apple Products by cbuskirk · · Score: 4, Informative

    Unless your old laptop burst into flames, if you have owned an Apple product, you understand that Macs are a hell of alot cheaper in the long run than any computer out there.

  35. Easy one.. Paper! by k98sven · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously! Given the number of times the "death of the paper document" was predicted
    and the amount of "paperless office" ideas floated,
    one must say that there is still nothing like good old hardcopy.

    In fact, computers have increased the amount of paper used.
    A rep. for a paper-mill I once visited said that the laser printer was the best thing that ever happened to them.

    Computers are great for distribution. But they've got a long way to go
    if they want to beat paper at (text) presentation.

  36. The Wright's four basic airplane controls. by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Look at any aircraft, and the main movement is governent by these four:

    Throttle.
    Ailerons (via "wing warping).
    Elevator.
    Rudder.

    That basic configuration hasn't changed since Orville and Wilber used it in 1903.

    --

    Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  37. Microwave by Salamander · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When microwaves first came out, people thought of them as a new way of cooking the same old foods, quicker. Nice, but not earth-shattering. Since then, though, microwaves have spawned a whole new kind of cooking. Whole supermarket aisles are full of products that have been specially formulated to be microwave-friendly, or that wouldn't exist at all without the microwave. People's lifestyles have changed because of the microwave. If you looked around at all the gadgets in the average person's house, you'd be hard pressed to find more than a couple whose absence would be more keenly felt than the microwave...the computer, the TV, the phone. All of those were expected to be revolutionary though, so they haven't exceeded expectations as the title asks. The microwave has had a much more profound effect than expected.

    --
    Slashdot - News for Herds. Stuff that Splatters.
  38. Sad, I think by GCP · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A free knockoff of a 30-yr-old OS is the "latest thing from the 'bazaar' of great ideas". I think it's really Unix that is exceeding expectations, in its Linux avatar.

    I just find it depressing that, as good as the ideas embodied in Unix were 30 years ago, they haven't been dramatically surpassed, perhaps two or three times, over a time span in which hardware performance has offered four or five *orders of magnitude* increase in power.

    The GUI probably counts as one, but it's not as if the CLI itself has improved dramatically (except in performance), or the GUI and CLI have joined forces to dramatically increase the power of the combination. The closest you get is running a GUI to do GUI-only things and to open several simultaneous windows in which you can do 30-yr-old CLI-only things.

    I guess a technology can exceed expectations by virtue of the fact that no significant improvement has occurred in years.

    --
    "Those who have never entered upon scientific pursuits know not a tithe of the poetry by which they are surrounded."
    1. Re:Sad, I think by kfg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One might point out that the steering wheel is a technology that hasn't moved much in 100 years.

      Technology isn't supposed to change. It's supposed to *optimize.*

      I would suggest that since it hasn't changed significantly for decades is an indication that its users, at least, consider it something near optimum.

      It is the *fact* that it hasn't changed much, and your objections to this, that combined serve to prove it has exceeded expectations.

      Further proof that it has exceeded expectaions can be found in the fact that your premise is essentially flawed. The developers of UNIX have since gone multiple generations beyond in development, i.e. it *has* changed over time, but the users see no particular reason to make any switch.

      About the absolute worst you can say about the 30 year old technology of Unix is that "it suffices."

      KFG

  39. Not the engine itself... by TWX_the_Linux_Zealot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... the spark plug.

    Spark plugs have not changed at all in at least 60 years, as far as the OEM styles go. They have been remarkably similar since their original designs, a graphite core surrounded by a ceramic insulator surrounded by a metallic threaded ring. Amazing.

    --

    IBM had PL/1, with syntax worse than JOSS,
    And everywhere the language went, it was a total loss...
  40. Re:C= 64 - The Commodore 64 by puppetman · · Score: 4, Funny

    You have several good points (4, or 6?) in there.

    Someone, mod this up to 3 (or 5?).

    The Commodore 64 (or 66?) was definately a cool piece of hardware, but at age 12 (if I am accurately recalling my age; 14?) I had to suffer with a Tandy Color Computer 2 (or 3?). :)

  41. Re:As a tech support person... by icewalker · · Score: 5, Funny

    You might want to sit down for this.

    I once knew a Ph.D. who called saying that his "CD-ROM" drive wasn't working right and that it messed up his CD. No problem, I'll be over shortly to check it out. Then, I got to thinking, "He doesn't have a CD-ROM drive!!!"

    Sure enough, the guy tried to put a CD in a 5 1/4" Floppy Drive. The drive actually tried to read the CD! It messed up his CD and the drive! I couldn't decide if I should smack him or just laugh until I couldn't breathe.

    OH, BUT IT GETS BETTER!

    His Ph.D. was in Computer Science!!! I kid you not!!!

    The man was just too smart to get out of the RAIN and had the common sense of a rock.

    --
    The truth is usually just an excuse for lack of imagination.
  42. GalileoSpace Probe! by Arcturax · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Launched October 18, 1989 by the Space Shuttle Atlantis. It had some technical problems in 1991 (high gain antenna wouldn't deploy) but they were able to use the low gain antenna to send data back at a vastly slower rate).

    It became the first spacecraft to take a close up photo of an asteriod and when it reacher Jupiter in 1995, the first space craft to drop a probe into a gas giant. It's mission was to last only until 1997, but it was given a two year extension. The mission continued another three years AFTER the extension, sending its last scientific data back in November 2002 as it passed the moon Amalthea. In August of this year it will burn up in Jupiters atmosphere.

    The spacecraft has operated over twice as long as expected and has taken three times the radiation it was designed for, and still it mostly works. The plunge into Jupiter is because the craft is running low on fuel and they would rather burn it up than risk having it possibly slam into Europa, contaminating it before we can check for native ba cterial life there.

    While it's certainly not lasted as long as Pioneer, it has taken one hell of a beating from the intense radiation of Jupiter, the tidal stresses of orbiting the gas giant and its planet sized moons as well as flying through toxic (and possibly caustic) volcanic plumes kicked off of the surface of Io by eruptions.

    So I would say that Gallileo is in fact in the same class as Pioneer when it comes to be being built tough.

    --

    --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
  43. Old stuff, durability, costs, & the space prog by raygundan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That, my friend, is because the only things that are still around from 30 years ago are the ones that were durable. In another 30 years, people will say the same thing about today's things, because the crap will already be broken and disposed of. Sure, there will be millions of Huffy bicycles in the trash. But people will have forgotten them, and will marvel at the amazing durability of the high-end Treks and whatnot that survive.

    And the space program differences are all about cost. The Pathfinder mission (which landed on mars) was part of the Discovery series of missions, capped at $150 million. Cassini, the last of the Voyager/Pioneer-type "heavy engineering" designs cost $3.4 BILLION. Pioneer 10 cost $350 million, in 1970. Voyager 1 and 2 cost $875 million together, in 1977. (those obviously need some inflation adjustment to be fair to a 1996 mission, but even Pioneer is more than double the cost without adjustment!) Of course there's going to be a performance difference when you pay many times as much. Even so, Galileo (another old-school nasa design) cost $1.6 billion, and its main antenna never opened. Would you rather have 10 cheap missions where 8 fail, or one expensive mission that fails?

    Sure, we've lost lots of recent mars missions. But all added together, they barely cost as much as some of those single probes.

    Links:

    pioneer cost

    cassini cost

    voyager cost

    pathfinder cost

  44. Not a //e but still... by RealisticWeb.com · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The server running our family domain is an old SE/30. It runs totaly headless because the onboard video went out, the ram is maxed way past what you are supposed to be able to put in it, it runs MK linux, and at last count was hosting 15 domains. The surpizing thing is just how fast it is! I never notice any lag when I connect and I'm about 1500 miles away!

    --
    Sigs are out of style, so I'm not going to use one...oh wait..
  45. My vote goes to... by NewbieV · · Score: 3, Informative

    The humble paperclip.

    From a history of the paperclip on about.com:

    "Johan Vaaler, a Norwegian inventor with a degree in electronics, science and mathematics, invented the paperclip in 1899. He received a patent for his design from Germany in 1899, since Norway had no patent laws at that time. Johan Vaaler was an employee at a local invention office when he invented the paperclip. He received an American patent in 1901 -- patent abstract "It consists of forming same of a spring material, such as a piece of wire, that is bent to a rectangular, triangular, or otherwise shaped hoop, the end parts of which wire piece form members or tongues lying side by side in contrary directions." Johan Vaaler was the first person to patent a paperclip design, although other unpatented designs might have existed first."

    Over 100 years old and still going strong...

    --


    "For every right, an equal responsibility..."
  46. DC-3 by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No doubt, the SR-71 is/was purty, but nothing ever has beat the record of the good old Gooney Bird.

    So durable that eventually the FAA gave up and declared it exempt from end-of-life regulations.
    So durable that some have been flown under combat conditions with a third of the wing blown off.
    The only thirty year old cargo plane ever to be reconfigured as a combat gun platform (the Dragon, a.k.a. Spooky, a.k.a. Puff the Magic Dragon)
    Rebuilt as a turboprop and outperformed new aircraft.
    Left abandoned in a field of snow up past the Arctic Circle for an entire winter and then, dug out from under the snow, started up, and flown home.

    No longer manufactured after 1946, still in use to this day.

    The one, the only, The DC-3!

    Yay!

    Rustin

    --
    Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
  47. Shuttle software by drix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, this is not sarcasm or irony. The software that runs the Space Shuttles, to this day, was written in the early 70s. The computers they're running on, IBM AP-101s, were designed in the 60s. There have been a few upgrades over the years but nothing major, e.g. in 1992 they went from magnetic disks to solid state storage. The guts of the system, 400,000 lines of HAL/S, remain the same. NASA has no plans to change that, either; the software just works too well. The difference being able to read gyro data at 1000 times a second with 1960s hardware, versus 10,000,000 a second with today's, is meaningless. Statistically, the software has <1 bug, and none that impact the performance. Basically, it's perfect, and it will continue to exist as long as the shuttles themselves do. (Speaking of outlasting your design, NASA recently decided that the shuttles wouldn't be replaced until 2020, meaning that they could theoretically be launching a 40-year airframe some day. That's older than any school bus you ever rode on, and your school bus wasn't being frozen, pressurized, launched at 3Gs, and torched to 2500 degrees, six times a year, either.)

    --

    I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
  48. Re:Not everyone can do every job by tconnors · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't fault this PhD guy for not knowing how to defrag a hard drive, but I don't necessarily think its all that impressive that he has a PhD and does NOT know how to defrag a hard drive!!!

    Defragging a HD is not an obvious concept. Hell, on a decently designed system, one should never have to invoke a defragger!

    But it doesn't seem to occur to everyone here, than most physics PhD's never use windows. Why use windows when you can use UNIX? The guy has probably used UNIX all his academic life, simply because that is what we use in academia. So he uses a Windows box for the first time, and hasn't heard of defragging or know how to do it. Big deal.

  49. I have an FX-502p by mangu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Bought it in 1981. And, what's more (*much* more), it's still in its second set of batteries. Amazing low power consumption.

  50. The Great Wall of China by fname · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I think we have to remember that "technology" is not really synonymous with electronics/ computers. And the original example was more of an item than a class of technologies.

    So with that in mind, I nominate the Great Wall of China, still standing after all these years. I think it qualifies whereas things like the Pyramids don't, in that they never served any real function. I bet the wall would still work pretty well today, if there was a war. Not perfect, but good.

    If the goal was to pick classes of technologies, I think most of the responses here are exceptionally shortsighted. I think sail technology, the steam engine and the wheel had a lot more staying power, and who knew?

    I think there are some good specific examples. Any real old bridges out there? Panama Canal is great, 'course it was designed to last a long time. I bet there are some irrigation ditches somewhere that were dug thousands of years ago, and still work. Stepped hillsides fall into that category, too. Most people who built them probably paid no heed to them lasting longer.

    Pioneer is unique, because there was really no way to maintain it, and it was a 1 (or 2) shot deal. Those HP calcs are fine, but have more than 10% lasted this long? I'd love t hear about some scarecrow that's been scaring away crows for 200 years without a person laying his hands on it. What's the longest any manufactured item has lasted (and remained useful) for without human intervention? Kudos to the winner.