Posted by
CmdrTaco
on from the standardizing-on-no-standards dept.
Corrado writes "According to this article over at Linux Box SuSE Is "Reevaulating Our Relationship" with SCO Group. There is also a reference to this article in wired about OSS developers rallying behind IBM. The best line of the article is "Eric Raymond called SCO's move 'deeply stupid...'""
Re:SuSE *IS* United Linux
by
krray
·
· Score: 5, Interesting
Well, I would _think_ UnitedLinux would want to use one of their own members distrobution, but there is nothing to say that UnitedLinux couldn't base their system off of RedHat -- even though RedHat isn't a member.
Are they pretty screwed though? Yeah...
Re:SuSE *IS* United Linux
by
zanderredux
·
· Score: 3, Interesting
UnitedLinux would want to use one of their own members distrobution. In fact, Conectiva is based upon RedHat, but I think that geography would be an issue for Conectiva (they're based in Brazil).
Re:SuSE *IS* United Linux
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Ah, but United Linux is much more than just Suse 8.1. No one part of United Linux is greater than any other part. Caldera, Conectiva, SuSE and Turbolinux have all combined into one Linux distro.
Its kind of like Voltron for crap.
Re:SuSE *IS* United Linux
by
Angry+White+Guy
·
· Score: 5, Funny
And Calderra/SCO will form the asshole.
-- You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
SuSE is absolutely UL. The others are just repackaging and rebranding it to suit their needs. SuSE and Conectiva could care on..but what would be the point if no one else joins. Everyone things there is some difference between UL and SuSE..NOT! The others are unneeded...however if SuSE left the group. There would be nothing.
-- Tell me what you believe...I'll tell you what you should see.
Bad news.
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 5, Interesting
This is very bad news. I thought UnitedLinux was actually a good idea. It's sad to see it start dissolving because of one bad member. Is there any way for the other groups to kick SCO out, or perhaps form a different group and exclude SCO. This would be a better alternative than everyone splintering again.
The SCO suit is an example of what happens to former SCO technology development partners. Its perfectly reasonable to view a frivolous lawsuit like this as an indication that SCO is not a safe company to collaborate with. UnitedLinux members: watch out.
Re:Bad news.
by
tomhudson
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
from the unitedlinux site:
01/14/2003
UnitedLinux Signs IBM and AMD as First Technology Partners
Didn't take them long (less than 2 months) to screw over their first serious partner. I figured there'd be problems when I tried to download their (unitedlinux) distro after they sent me an email saying it was available, and their server was pretty much hosed.
Dr. Evil: Okay everybody leave! Except for you SUSE, cept for you Number 2 turbolinux, and you Conectiva S.A. cept for you Goldmember, cept for you guy back there, cept for you guy pretending he's working on the computer but really not... *SCO looks at Dr. Evil* Dr. Evil: Yeah! Tight moment right here! Goldmember: HaHa! Little guy can't take a hint!
Which would be better...
by
Nate+B.
·
· Score: 3, Interesting
... for SuSE to drop out or for the other participants to kick SCO-Caldera out? Could the members even boot another out of the consortium?
Perhaps SCO-Caldera has made it plain that they have no intention of leaving United Linux. If so, then it's a good bet that the other vendors will find it necessary to withdraw and leave SCO-Caldera holding the bag, so to speak.
--
"Insanity is doing the same thing over again expecting a different result."
Re:Which would be better...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
Although I have no legal background on this, I would surmise that leaving an organization and reforming would be better than kicking someone out.
If they kicked SCO out, SCO would probably turn around and find some excuse to sue. Leave, wait a bit, and reform under a different name would probably be better.
Re: Which would be better...
by
Black+Parrot
·
· Score: 2, Funny
>... for SuSE to drop out or for the other participants to kick SCO-Caldera out? Could the members even boot another out of the consortium?
Yep, they could all quit and then start a new consortium without inviting SCO to join.
SCO would undoubtedly sue them though, claiming that it was impossible for a consortium to work without stealing something from SCO.
-- Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
Re:Which would be better...
by
sweetooth
·
· Score: 5, Funny
I've got it....
ReUnited Linux!
Oh dear.... did I actually just post that?
Re:Which would be better...
by
kfg
·
· Score: 3, Funny
Or how about "The Linux Confederacy"?
KFG
Re:Which would be better...
by
einhverfr
·
· Score: 2, Funny
Well, 7-Up calls themselves the un-cola.
SCO claims sole ownership of the UNIX trademark
Leaving aside for a moment the fact that the UNIX trademark is owned by the Open Group and that what SCO owns is the source code of the original Linux....
Are you suggesting that they call it UNSCO?
I have a better idea-- UNSCO Megaconglomerate, or UNSCOM, and then they can ask the NSA to join with their SE-Linux;-)
OK, so that was a really bad joke with war looming with Iraq and all, but it had to be said:-P
Re:Which would be better...
by
GOD_ALMIGHTY
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
This might actually work for Connectiva, given the large numbers of Confederates that emigrated to Brazil after the South lost the US Civil War. There was a National Geographic on this a few years ago. Pretty interesting read.
-- Arrogance is Confidence which lacks integrity. -- me
Re:Which would be better...
by
tloh
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
I'm sorry, but did I miss something here? Why does everyone think SuSE is quiting UnitedLinux? How does "*reevaluating* our relationship with the SCO Group" get universally interpreted as "unconditional withdrawl from UnitedLinux"? If I'm not mistaken, the SuSE guy also said: "That said, we want to very clearly and unequivocally voice our support of the ideals and goals of UnitedLinux and the Linux community." To me, it seems like SuSE is sending a subtle message to the other members of UnitedLinux, urging them to adopt their own posture toward SCO. I mean, it seems childish for SuSE to quit on account of one rogue member. Doesn't the rest of UnitedLinux stand to loose much more from loosing SuSE than keeping SCO? Perhaps I don't understand the group dynamics involved in a collaberation like UnitedLinux, but the impression I get from reading the threads on this story make it seem like individual members of the consortium, for the most part, do their own thing....hardly a good way to accomplish a *United*anything.
It is ironic that Caldera's last stand in Linux territory, UnitedLinux, is losing support because its only potential source of income (licensing and suing for license violations) seems to have its sights on milking IBM and Linux itself. Am I smelling mismanagement? UnitedLinux could have actually migrated SCO from UNIX to Linux, but instead now they're going to have to either convince companies to not migrate to Linux, or convince judges that Linux is a derivative of UNIX, and start charging license fees.
-- Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
SCOldera is starting to look a lot like that other lawfirm passing for a tech company. They really should change their company motto to
"SCOldera - You Innovate, We Litigate"
With the current legal system, those with the money always win. Companies like SuSE cannot possibly sustain legal action. So in a way it's good they picked a fight with IBM - at least they've got lawyers to spare.
It'll be interesting to see how SCOldera either tries to backpedal or dies a horrible flaming death. I vote for option 2;)
They don't have to convince judges that Linux is 'a derivative of' UNIX. At least not for patent infringement lawsuits. With patents, you are still infringing even if you independently come up with the same idea. This is one reason why patents suck when applied to software, where coming up with new ideas is not the difficult part so much as the implementation, even though patents may give a net economic benefit in other fields of endeavour.
That's a little bit like saying that all a company needs to do is release one of their software products under the GPL and magically, any other party can then put that company's code into a GPL product and it's legal.
Unless SCO/Caldera put the code in question into the Linux software base themselves, that sorts of claims are groundless. If we're gonna defeat the SCO suit against IBM/Linux we need to do it with arguements that make sense.
That's a little bit like saying that all a company needs to do is release one of their software products under the GPL and magically, any other party can then put that company's code into a GPL product and it's legal.
It's not at all like saying that. It's saying that if you hold a software patent, and release an implementation of that patent under the GPL, everybody who uses the GPL can use your patent. If they have patents that cover Linux, and they ship linux under the GPL, they've given free license to their patents, but if they have other patents that aren't implemented in linux, then other companies/people still have to arrange for licensing.
Unless SCO/Caldera put the code in question into the Linux software base themselves, that sorts of claims are groundless.
They didn't have to put them there, they just had to ship them. By redistributing them they agreed to the terms of the GPL implicitly.
One thing I find funny about this. I contracted for a very large chemical company's R&D function for a while. They were in to patenting everything they discovered. The idea they had was that if some piss-ant company tried to file a patent infringement on them, they'd have a patent on respiration or something and make the piss-ant pay licensing fees for breathing.
An interesting strategy to be sure, but here's the kicker: the company that they borrowed this strategy from was none other than IBM. I wonder if IBM is looking real hard at SCO's products for violations right now...
-- You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
-- Colonel Adolphus Busch
The GPL was the license that gave them the right to distribute Linux and all the other GPL code in their distribution. So yes, they are now subject to the terms of the GPL.
Aha! Now I see it. SCO's in the tank but attacks IBM which has deep pockets, and many lawyers, and is not afraid of a fight.
What company has loads of cash, doesn't like IBM, and could easily buy off the holders of a fading company like SCO on the condition they make it appear that their demise was caused by the GPL? Which company would profit the most by such publicity?
> Now, you can sell consulting, but that's a low margin business. Fer God's sake, don't tell IBM, McKinsey, Accenture, etc. Oh, and stop smoking whatever you're smoking, it seems to affect your thinking...
-- --
Roland Buresund
MBA, MCMI, CISSP
Way to Go SCO! Maybe there is life in Minix
by
BoomerSooner
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
since you've pissed off everyone in the Linux community.
> I would not let my dog be associated with the three lettter acronym SCO.
I wish some of my neighbors would have their dogs "associate with" SCO rather than with the lawn in front of my apartment.
-- Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
Doesn't appear that way?
by
manyoso
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
SuSE, "That said, we want to very clearly and unequivocally voice our support of the ideals and goals of UnitedLinux and the Linux community."
So, how do you interpret this to mean that SuSE is backing out of UnitedLinux?
Re:Doesn't appear that way?
by
einhverfr
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
SuSE, "That said, we want to very clearly and unequivocally voice our support of the ideals and goals of UnitedLinux and the Linux community."
The article is very vague and so are the statements.
My guess is that SuSE is attempting to use what leverage they have to affect a change in the direction of United Linux and SCO. My guess is that SuSE in its statements is also attempting to speak to the other UL parners as well.
This does not mean that they have made a decision one way or another. But they may be consulting with Turbolinux and Conectiva as to options for ditching SCO. That will be about time;-)
Re:SCO sues IBM
by
molarmass192
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
Along the same vein, ten years ago, I would never have believed that I'd be rooting for MS to die off. Ten years ago I was rooting for MS to put the hurt on IBM. Funny how things develop over time. However, I'm 100% behind IBM on this SCO thing! Ironically, if IBM managed to earn it's way back into my good books, it makes me wonder what I'll think of MS 10 years from now.
--
Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
Caldera sposored the work in question
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 5, Informative
Caldera (as early as 1995) sponsored the work they now have a problem with.
The so called "Enterprise features" were developed by the Linux community on hardware provided by Caldera and with support of Caldera Engineers. Which means that they knew what development was under way, at the very least. IBM had very little to do with it, but some of the Linux Community hackers now work there (yeah IBM).
Caldera was involved in selling Linux into the traditional SCO markerplace long before IBM even took notice, and had some of the best talent in Utah, who had seen the internals of UNIX at Novell before it was sold to SCO, working on it.
This suit shows a complete lack of history at Caldera/SCO, which is not surprising since they have had huge staff turn over in thier death throws. Here's hoping they go away quickly, if not quietly... just like their bastard child Lineo did.
Re:Caldera sposored the work in question
by
Alan+Cox
·
· Score: 4, Informative
Let me provide specific data on that
Caldera provided me the SMP machine that was used to write Linux SMP support, that was why they provided it and thats one big reason it happened at that time.
And most of the theory for it came not from secret unix knowledge but a book 8)
Another over reaction
by
andrewm
·
· Score: 3, Informative
SCO has grounds for their suit, though I can't say I agree SCO should win it based on the information that appears in the filing.
SCO's mistake was holding up Linux as being indirectly responsible, and worse, insulting it and all the volunteers that worked on it over the years.
Linus seems to share a similar point of view, if I've understood his comments correctly.
SCO v. IBM...it's not gonna happen.
by
MsGeek
·
· Score: 4, Funny
Fearless prediction: SCO's lawsuit isn't going to get a chance to happen. IBM buys SCO. End of lawsuit, end of story. I think this is the outcome the tattered remnants of SCO wanted in the first place.
-- Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
Re:SCO v. IBM...it's not gonna happen.
by
Otter
·
· Score: 5, Informative
OK, for the zillionth time...
The group that controls SCO has a 5.8% share in TrollTech. They do not in any way control the company. Even by the usual standards of anti-Qt/KDE FUD, claiming they have any significant connection to SCO is pretty weak.
Which Article Did Slashdot Editors Read?
by
Carnage4Life
·
· Score: 4, Informative
According to the current text in the linked article SuSe explicitly stated that they still support UnitedLinux. The relevant excerpt is
"Accordingly, we are currently reevaluating our relationship with the SCO Group," Seibt continued. "That said,
we want to very clearly and unequivocally voice our support of the ideals and goals of UnitedLinux and the Linux community."
Re:Which Article Did Slashdot Editors Read?
by
Gleef
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
We all read the same article. SuSE said it supports the ideals and goals of UnitedLinux, but left out any indication of support of the actions or current composition. They also said they were reevaluating their relationship to the SCO group and that:
SuSE's VP of Corporate Communications. Eckert confirmed that the "relationship with the SCO Group" was in fact the UnitedLinux consortium aarrangment[sic].
So they are reevaluating their membership in the UnitedLinux consortium, as that membership is their primary (and perhaps only) relationship with SCO Group. I'm sure if SCO were to leave the UnitedLinux consortium, SuSE would be happy to stay.
--
----
Open mind, insert foot.
Re:Which Article Did Slashdot Editors Read?
by
jeffasselin
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
"Accordingly, we are currently reevaluating our relationship with the SCO Group," Seibt continued. "That said, we want to very clearly and unequivocally voice our support of the ideals and goals of UnitedLinux and the Linux community."
That's certainly NOT how I read it. He said he was supporting the ideals and goals which would be completely different from actually saying he'd support UnitedLinux itself.
On the contrary, it seems to me that he purposefully avoided saying that he supported UnitedLinux. This is political-talk, didn't you learn how to decode it at school?
-- If he explores all forms and substances
Straight homeward to their symbol-essences;
He shall not die.
Anyone know where I can pick up a cheap copy of Windows??
Last one out, turn off the lights!
United Linux and/or LSB
by
einhverfr
·
· Score: 5, Interesting
Personally I am looking forward to seeing the vendors do exactly what you are describing. But take a look for a moment--
The standardization process for Linux is the LSB. That is where our efforts should be placed. If vendors want to pool their efforts beyond that, all good and well, but the LSB should be our primary focus.
Actually, I am glad to see SuSE make this move. Unfortunately this may be *REALLY BAD* for TurboLinux but they should have known what they were getting into.
[OT] Re:ESR's Site?
by
aridhol
·
· Score: 4, Informative
For some reason, tuxedo.org randomly forwards you to other sites. However, ESR's page is alive and well at http://www.catb.org/~esr/. I can't find any reason for the change on the website, though.
-- I can't say that I don't give a fuck. I've just run out of fuck to give.
They'd be making the right decision in pulling out of UL. From my own personal experience working _at_ IBM, I can tell you first hand the commitment they have towards the Linux community is very real. Conversely, I don't think the Linux community has anything to fear by putting their support behind Big Blue.
Its pretty obvious that SCO's recent "Hail Mary" play is falling flat on its face..Rather than adapt their business model, they're executing one last, desparate attempt to stay in business without a viable customer pool.
Sad, when you get down to it. The suits at SCO are going to run that company into the ground.
"Eric Raymond called SCO's move 'deeply stupid...'"
During a talk here in Oxford University's computing lab, Eric Raymond proclaimed that "UNIX died because it was closed-source", and then refused to accept that Microsoft's multi-billion dollar success suggested that otherwise.
Ever since then, I've taken ESR's pronouncements with several grains of salt.
During a talk here in Oxford University's computing lab, Eric Raymond proclaimed that "UNIX died because it was closed-source", and then refused to accept that Microsoft's multi-billion dollar success suggested that otherwise.
It's true, it's just incomplete.
Unix died because it was closed source and internally competitive. It fractured into a slew of islands of mutually incompatible enhancements, none of which, with the possible exception of Solaris, had sufficient momentum to stand alone.
By contrast, Microsoft, being closed source and a unity, is motivated to converge rather than diverge its OSes, so it doesn't fragment its' user base.
Re: company tries to stay in business
by
Black+Parrot
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
> So SCO is enforcing their IP. It's their call what they open source not IBM's.
Their business model isn't sound in the current environment. Only those vendors who sell UNIX to support their underlying hardware business are hanging in there right now.
And even those businesses' days may be numbered, unless they can convert themselves into service companies. It's getting hard to justify buying a Sun instead of an Athlon.
Although I agree in principle with Suse.
I dont think this decission has got anything to do with Linux or Open Source Philosophy as Suse is trying to make it look it.
Suse has business relation ships with IBM, if i am not wrong IBM linux m/cs do run Suse linux on them.And this is calculated business move.
SCO should realise that with out UnitedLinux they don't have much business to look forward to. Infact i would be surprised if they can even afford the legal fees to persue the lawsuit.
-- for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
1) Try to choose working with as many partners as possible in a spirit of cooperation.
2) Do not reap the PR benefits, nor spin the relationship strongly in the public eye at all.
3) Allow some partner to control the spin to their own agenda (in this case Caldera/SCO).
4) Eventually find that the partner has taken a (to SuSE's viewpoint) incredulous stand. Publically state that they do not agree.
5) Partnership and sails of other company deflate/dissolve.
SuSE is a somewhat naive company in the way it forms alliance, makes choices, etc. They do not believe in strong spin or overbearing marketing. They do not believe in half-truth statements or downplaying their competitors. There may be exceptions to this (there's no single decisionmaker running the whole show), but as a general rule it holds.
When I was there, it was fairly common for them to observe a sharply competitive move and collectively shake their heads. They _do_ believe in making better products, so this kind of competition is welcomed with open arms, but patent lawsuits are viewed in this sort of way I see as typical german: "This is not good."
All in all, I have to say I saw this as the eventual outcome of United Linux. I see SuSE and Connectiva as technology leaders, with Turbo and SCO/Caldera ultimately hamstrung by the strange politics/business of their leadership. The former can make a solid partnership, no doubt, the latter pair do not belong in the same ship.
-- -josh
Re:Typical SuSE
by
Hambone.dk
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
"Translation: they are not an American company."
And don't I wish there were more companies with similar attitudes. When it comes to business ethics, American companies aren't exactly the most shining examples...
The end of Unix? (Not *nix)
by
GrenDel+Fuego
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
This makes me start to wonder if this might be the start of the finish for the Unix codebases.
SCO is threatening to cancel IBM's license to distribute AIX. They have the ability to do this since they own the rights to the original Unix codebase. Could it be very long before they start going after the other Unix vendors?
Sun, SGI, IBM, and other Unix vendors are already throwing their support behind Linux in a lot of ways. Perhaps this will give them the added incentive to finally throw full support into Linux, in order to avoid being subject to the whim of a failing company that may or may not decide to blackmail them.
Of course, the end of Unix has been predicted for many years now, so maybe this will turn out to be nothing.
No, no, not *that* kind of piracy. I mean *real* piracy. With ships, and cannon, and lots of a "Avast there"'s in it and stuff.
I think Doug Fairbanks might have something to do with it too, but I'm a little fuzzy on that part, so don't quote me.
Anyway, around the turn of the century, no, not *that* century. Ummmm, no, not that century either. 1700 to 1800. Various "states" in Northern Africa practiced actual piracy, capturing ships, ransoming the men on board or selling them into slavery if no ransom was paid.
Better yet, they could make a lot of money without any risk if they captured a few ships and then used the terror factor to demand *tribute* from other nations. The would be known as a "protection racket" if it were done on a smaller scale.
And it worked. Most of Europe caved in and payed the tribute. ( Not that the pirates didn't make the occasional "mistake" and sieze a lucrative looking prize anyway, but what the hell).
America held out. America had no Navy and no standing army. So they bloody well built them and went to war. In legitimate defense, of the world even (go figure). The modern Marine Corps was born out of this, and when the song mentions Tripoli this is the conflict it refers to.
The conflict lasted four years, but America, young, brash and still idealistic America, on its own, rid the world of these pirates.
Why am I going on about this?
Well, think about it, what is SCO doing right now?
Practicing true computer piracy, that's what. Demanding tribute on a claim that everyone knows is essentially bogus.
What do we do about it?
Well, an American congressman, in reaction to the demand for tribute from the pirates, made a statement that became the rallying cry in the war against the pirates of the Barbary Coast and an American policy for ever after ( well, at least until Reagan).
"Millions for defence. Not one damned penny for tribute."
That's the way to handle SCO. This is not a time to be "pragmatic" as the lawyer and the accountant see pragmatism.
At the very least SCO should be shunned and isolated. Compleat noncooperation throughout the entire industry. Ostracised in the literal sense. Banished to die in the wilderness. Call them Ishmael. SuSE shouldn't pull out of United Linux. SCO should be ejected.
But beyond that they should not be payed one single penny, not even to save millions in legal fees. They are pirates. They are demanding tribute AS pirates. They need to be crushed. Ultimately and completely.
Please. IBM, I implore you. Stay the course. Buy up what remains of their bloody legal corpse for fractions of a penny on the dollar *after* you have crushed them and reduced their value as a company to nil.
"Millions for defence. Not one damned penny for tribute."
I'm pretty sure it was President Andrew Jackson made this statement. Other than that, you pretty well cover the Barbary pirates situation, though you failed to mention that several European countries could have easily dealt with the problem, but refused to do so due to politics - much to the anger of many British naval officers who didn't like to see British sailors in slavery.
But I'm off-topic and will probably be moderated as such (and I deserve it).
A big well known network gear manufacturer has decided to rename itself 'CI'.
Its spokesman stated : 'With those #@$à3 guys there over at SCO, we didn't wanted anymore to have this acronym inside our name, so we just removed it'
-- #include "coucou.h"
Re:In other news ...
by
SN74S181
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
What are you talking about? Haven't you read any of the history of how Cisco Systems was founded? They basically skitted their way off the Berkeley campus and formed a private company, taking with them publicly funded intellection property.
They should be happy with how SCO is behaving.
Linux is dying...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 5, Funny
...as independent reports confirm. So before you're forced to buy Windows and go to the Dark Side, come on over to the BSD. It's like the Other Light Side Of The Force.
FreeBSD is an excellent choice of operating system. We're happy to share it with any poor Linux refugees such as yourself. I think you've all suffered enough.
First TurboLinux implodes. Now SCO's starting to sue companies who they once looked at as partners, and in the process they're alienating pretty much any and every UNIX related sales opportunity they once had (not to mention they're probably making it tons more difficult for resellers to sell their wares).
That leaves Conectiva and SuSE, at least for now. The rest are business partners who are putting their names behind the UL effort, but many of them are on the "will SCO sue them next" list. Yeah, I'd like to go to a party where I know there's a good chance a certain jerk will want to pick a fight with me. No thanks...
The UnitedLinux effort, for all its hype and all the hope people (some, at least) put in it, is no doubt bruised all over the place by SCO's recent actions. And the incorrect perception that SCO owns UnitedLinux can't be helping the other Linux players who are participating in the project. I can only guess that some folks think SuSE and Conectiva are also evil, if only by association.
It's unfortunate that nobody at SCO thought about the trickle effect and what this lawsuit would do to its former allies "downstream". They've pulled some really stupid stuff in the past, but I truly think this time they've outdone themselves.
UnitedLinux may very well be a sinking ship.
Thanks for nothing, SCO.
No, everyone else has licenses.
by
douglips
·
· Score: 2, Informative
Sun & HP at least have perpetual license to Unix, hence all the stuff about "Solaris is a safe harbor". SCO can't touch these guys.
UnitedLinux is a scam
by
zbik
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
What does UnitedLinux have to offer as Yet Another Distribution? They aren't promoting any new ideas or technologies; their only selling point is to be a "single stable, uniform platform for application development, certification, and deployment" (UL FAQ). In other words, they offer no value unless they become a monopoly. Why on earth would we support a free kernel monopolized by a proprietary distribution? Far better to throw your support behind Gentoo, Debian, or Mandrake. We don't need another RedHat.
In other news, the dinosaurs...
by
expro
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
Um, where was the open source version of Windows that Microsoft had to compete against?
In other news, scientists proclaimed that dinosaurs died because they were no longer adapted to the environment, and then refused to accept that their huge skeletons and the large quantity of other life forms they consumed proved otherwise.
Cue up the banjoes, boys. "The Beverly Hillbillies", if ya please.
o/~ Ooooooo...lemme tell a story 'bout a group called SCO, they was havin' them some difficulty rakin' in the dough. They was lookin' at th'marketplace, decidin' what to do when they saw this li'l penguin an they figgered they would sue....
Big Blue that is. IBM. Deeeep pockets. Moola moooola....
So they filed them a lawsuit a couple billion deep allegin' Blue had fed that bird through source code feature creep. Blue an' Penguin shook their heads, an' marvelled at this feat, sayin' "Not our faults you silly gits ain't able to compete..."
Squeezed by th'market. Billy Gates on one side, Torvaldes on t'other....squisha squish, yeah.
o/~
-- Horse_Pheathers
We must be all missing the point
by
The+Analog+Kid
·
· Score: 3, Interesting
SCO is suing IBM not to win, but they are hoping that IBM will buy them out before the case. IBM could also not buy them out immediatly but drag the case out and put SCO out of buissness or dissolve the case. Then IBM can buy their assets and own Unix. Ofcourse they can GPL Unix (who really care if they do or don't besides the vendors themselves, its going to happen anyway if UNIX wants to still compete with Linux). Put all the good stuff into Linux that isn't there and wala a excellent 1st rate operating system.
does sco hire any techies?
by
kevin+lyda
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
Linux was a bicycle
by
k-hell
·
· Score: 3, Interesting
I haven't been reading many such complaints before (luckily I'm no lawyer;), but it's actually quite interesting to read the complaint from SCO.
84. Prior to IBM's involvement, Linux was the software equivalent of a bicycle. UNIX was the software equivalent of a luxury car. To make Linux of necessary quality for use by enterprise customers, it must be re-designed so that Linux also becomes the software equivalent of a luxury car.
Consider the history of SCO...
by
Black+Copter+Control
·
· Score: 4, Informative
SCO started out life as a part of (tada!) Microsoft under the name Xenix. The group was then then split off/sold to the Santa Cruz Operation and then morphed into SCO.
They just happened to purchase the rights to UNIX somewhere along the line (that somewhere being rather near the end).
-- OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
Re:Oh the irony...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
Being able to code libraries well does not necessarily mean you also have great wisdom about licensing schemes. I'll give him credit for intelligence in the area of coding, but not for understanding real world mechanics of people/capitalism/socialism/software. In many peoples thought (mine included) he's "deeply stupid" in this area. That doesn't mean he isn't intelligent in the area of coding, but almost all folks see of him these days is preaching in the area that many him as "deeply stupid".
I think that poster like most folks will give him credit for his contributions with the GNU libraries, but that does not equate to him being a philosophical guru about licensing and the future of software. The problem is, he thinks he is.
The thing that worries me
by
rudy_wayne
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
It happens over and over again. These stupid lawsuits never turn out the way they should.
What SHOULD happen: Small Scum-Bag Company A, with very little in the way of legitimate product or profits, files a ridiculously stupid lawsuit against Big Deep-Pockets Company B.
Big Deep-Pockets Company B uses their comsiderable financial and legal resources to win the case, crush Small Scum-Bag Company A and obtain a court ruling that deters future stupid lawsuits by other small scum-bag companies..
What ACTUALLY heppens: Big Deep-Pockets Company B doesn't want to be bothered, so they have their insurance company send off a nice fat check to Small Scum-Bag Company A, which now is flush with cash and able to pursue other victims with its stupid lawsuits.
Re:This saves me from dropping SuSE
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
"and have just installed "SuSE Linux Office Desktop""
Why bother?
Why bother running linux if your going to run a proprietary version of Wine, use a proprietary tool to Admin your system, and then run some proprietary MS apps on top of it all.
Seem completely stupid to me and you'd just be better off running Windows.
If this is the future of linux its doomed. You see that don't you? You can't just get a little pregnant and the path of distros like Suse's Office desktop, Lindows, and Xandros leads to a place worse then where we are now with MS.
In fact, if SuSE would this opportunity to jump ship from UnitedLinux and form a partnership with RedHat instead, we could see a major revolution in Linux corporate use.
RedHat has tons of corporate experience, is great with GNOME, and has the US market pretty firmly. SuSE is great with KDE, has a goodly amount of corporate experience, and does a good job on the European market. Both are open-source friendly (although Yast is not open-source and SuSE CDs are not available for free download, IIRC, so SuSE might need to open up a bit). If RedHat and SuSE were to combine their experience, pool their technical resources, and start a combined marketing blitz, I think it would be highly effective at jump-starting widespread corporate acceptance of Linux.
Mandrake would have also made a suitable partner, but unfortunately, their current financial troubles make me think they'll be hitting the ground hard soon. A shame - I've head good things about them.
-Erwos
-- Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
I informed my boss that this lawsuit probably won't impact our Linux development
If you are permitted please write how this was initiated. I think the community is trying to access the impact of this lawsuit and even anecdotal evidence is of interest. Here is Linus' take.
IANAL, and I'm sorry if you mistook my statement above to mean so. I was asking the original poster of what other specific evidence he could provide. He implied that there was additional evidence not supplied by SCO in thier legal filing.
But in response to your question, as the lead Linux developer for my company, my boss tasked me to research this and get back to him. Between Friday and Saturday I read this (provided by SCO) link: http://www.sco.com/scosource/complaint3.06.03.html
From this reading I informed my boss that in my opinion, this did not impact our Linux development. Most of the evidence listed by SCO in my (20+ years programming Apple/DOS/OS2/Win32/Unix/Linux) professional opinion, was speculative at best. They did not provide specific examples of IBM donating AIX code to the Linux kernel.
Concerning the few specific examples SCO listed, the Omni print driver and JFS. I pointed out the fact to my boss that both of these developments appeared in OS/2 long before Linux. Warp 3 and Warp 4 Server respectively.
Again, in my opinion SCO is only providing speculative evidence. It would not suprise me if the judge threw this case out of court in the preliminary hearing. If I find any further detailed information I will more than gladly email it to you.
I think it is important to understand if it was you as a linux developer or your boss as a general manager (I assume) that initiated the research.
No, it was the owner of the company (my Boss) who initiated my research. We do ship a Linux (not GPL'd) product and he was curious about all the SCO press releases. He assumed it was a problem with us using GCC to compile our program.
The fact that is was your boss tells me that the "fall-out" from this might be a bit worse than hoped for. Not at all. Anyone with an interest in Linux would be concerned with this case. We just have to sort out the fact from fiction.
Peace/Love/Linux, Enjoy,
-- It's just the normal noises in here.
News Flash! Rambus and SCO to merge!
by
Newer+Guy
·
· Score: 4, Funny
In a surprise news announcement, the Chairman of rambus announces a historic merger with SCO unix.
"The merged company - to be called RAMBO - will be poised to respond to the challenges of the 21st century" Chairman David Boies said today.
"We are in the enviable position of controlling both hardware and software Intellectual property"
Boies also announced Rambo's decision to sue Microsoft for the use of the name "windows".
and it's use for networking.
"I came up with the idea of windows networking
30 years ago" Boies said. "When I was a kid I opened the window and yelled to my friends that it was time to play baseball. This involved using a window to spread information to them. In other words, Windows networking"
best line of the article is "Eric Raymond called SCO's move 'deeply stupid...'
To which a spokesman from SCO commented 'no, you're stupid, stupid. And I've kidnapped your Tux doll, too.'
I love it when people get quoted not using their 'mass media language':).
--
Karma: pi (Mostly due to circular reasoning in posts).
Eric Raymond has also...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 2, Informative
...said to Linux Business & Technology magazine: "What SCO is doing is ethically wrong and legally dubious. Their complaint rewrites and distorts history."
Ok, it's been said that M$ actually doesn't do anything more than "wound" a company that it feels is a threat or has something it wants. Then they just sit back, wait for it to get financially desparate and buy it up for a pitance.
So, this could be analogous of a Shark and a diver. The shark doesn't rush in and start chomping on the diver. Instead the shark stealthfully attacks the diver from beneath, takes a sizable bite, then backs off. Now all it has to do is is wait a short while until the diver bleeds out and then it can eat at it's leasure without fear of getting damaged by a thrashing victim. Much in the way M$ does financially to it's competitors.
Now, one could say that SCO viewed it self as a diver in hostile waters, surrounded by sharks. So, they take out their knife and slash at the biggest shark they can (IBM) but in doing so the end up cutting themselves. Now the slash is called David Boies and this cut, along with IBMs legal team will bleed out SCO in court costs and attorney fees. Seems that once again SCO leadership has misjudged their environment and is destined to bleed themselves out.
IBM, if they have any desire to appropriate any of SCOs patents, will merely wait for SCO to become so weakened and despararte that when the time is right they can swoop in for the kill (a buyout at a fraction of what SCO may have thought possible).
Meanwhile all the other players in the water, that being United Linux/SuSE, the OSS devs/community, and just about everyone else are all climbing out of the this particular pond to watch SCO thrash around as the IBM bigfish circles around and around waiting for the right moment to make the kill. Don't be surprised if one of those that sought safety in the boat finds a long stick to give a push or two to keep SCO from coming to the surface.
In the meantime, if one listens carefully, they will probably be able to hear Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer snickering in the distance.
Re:Please mod parent up...
by
KeensMustard
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
So, when evaluating a new cart model, do you base you opinion on a car built 5 years previously? How about we make judgements on Linux by using Linus's orignal code? FYI: FreeBSD is now up to 5.0, where have you been??
Re:I like SuSE but...
by
NullProg
·
· Score: 2, Informative
With one exception... YAST!! Yast sucks. It's slow, it won't keep it's hands off your configuration and if you try to break away from it, it causes dependency hell like mad.
Each distribution has it's quirks. IMHO, YaST has been the best hardware detection tool/Linux setup program available out of all the distributions. I have to admit, the only one I have not tried is Debian. Slackware is my favorite, but as I get older and have less time, I tend not to want/desire to dick around with the system anymore. I just want it to work out of the box. SuSE does this on old hardware as well as new.
SuSE uses RPM as it's installation method. If you have a problem with dependencies, then it's RedHat's fault, not SuSE's. I've never had a problem with YaST connecting to any SuSE mirror (Since 6.4). I use a DSL/Cable modem to update, are you trying dial up? You can download the updates separately to your hard disk and burn them to CD.
upgrade from major version to major version I would never recommend upgrading from a major Linux version to another. In my experience none of the Linux distributions get it right and neither does Microsoft. Config file formats change in between releases. Tarball your old config files and merge them after the installation.
As far as your SuSE configuration problem, edit the config files by hand all you want to. Just don't forget to run "/sbin/SuSEconfig" or the next time you run YaST, all your changes will be gone. You did remember to read the nice book SuSE ships with the distribution didn't you:)
Just kidding, YaST has it's quirks, but so does every other installation tool out there. Until there is a common Linux package distribution system (United Linux?), this is what we have to learn to live with in the mean time.
Slashdot Mirror
Good for SuSE.
Why should they stick around when SCO shoots itself in the foot?
If SuSE drops out, do the "UnitedLinux" gang have anything left? Isn't UnitedLinux based upon SuSE 8.1?
My Greasemonkey scripts for Digg &
SUSE spokesman Bruce Campbell was quoted as saying... "Look man, I dont even know these assholes!"
Fire in the hands of the village idiot is no tool, but a weapon of mass destruction
SCO lets loose with one of the silent-but-deadly variety, and everybody is still in the room?
Is this truly the only Earth I can live on?
This is the correct link http://www.wired.com/news/infostructure/0,1377,579 55,00.html
This is very bad news. I thought UnitedLinux was actually a good idea. It's sad to see it start dissolving because of one bad member. Is there any way for the other groups to kick SCO out, or perhaps form a different group and exclude SCO. This would be a better alternative than everyone splintering again.
... for SuSE to drop out or for the other participants to kick SCO-Caldera out? Could the members even boot another out of the consortium?
Perhaps SCO-Caldera has made it plain that they have no intention of leaving United Linux. If so, then it's a good bet that the other vendors will find it necessary to withdraw and leave SCO-Caldera holding the bag, so to speak.
"Insanity is doing the same thing over again expecting a different result."
It is ironic that Caldera's last stand in Linux territory, UnitedLinux, is losing support because its only potential source of income (licensing and suing for license violations) seems to have its sights on milking IBM and Linux itself. Am I smelling mismanagement? UnitedLinux could have actually migrated SCO from UNIX to Linux, but instead now they're going to have to either convince companies to not migrate to Linux, or convince judges that Linux is a derivative of UNIX, and start charging license fees.
Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
since you've pissed off everyone in the Linux community.
Assholes.
Run like your thong is on fire....
I would not let my dog be associated with the three lettter acronym SCO.
Got Code?
SuSE, "That said, we want to very clearly and unequivocally voice our support of the ideals and goals of UnitedLinux and the Linux community."
So, how do you interpret this to mean that SuSE is backing out of UnitedLinux?
Twenty years ago, I never would have believed that I'd be rooting for IBM's lawyers today.
Caldera (as early as 1995) sponsored the work they now have a problem with.
The so called "Enterprise features" were developed by the Linux community on hardware provided by Caldera and with support of Caldera Engineers. Which means that they knew what development was under way, at the very least. IBM had very little to do with it, but some of the Linux Community hackers now work there (yeah IBM).
Caldera was involved in selling Linux into the traditional SCO markerplace long before IBM even took notice, and had some of the best talent in Utah, who had seen the internals of UNIX at Novell before it was sold to SCO, working on it.
This suit shows a complete lack of history at Caldera/SCO, which is not surprising since they have had huge staff turn over in thier death throws. Here's hoping they go away quickly, if not quietly... just like their bastard child Lineo did.
SCO has grounds for their suit, though I can't say I agree SCO should win it based on the information that appears in the filing.
SCO's mistake was holding up Linux as being indirectly responsible, and worse, insulting it and all the volunteers that worked on it over the years.
Linus seems to share a similar point of view, if I've understood his comments correctly.
Fearless prediction: SCO's lawsuit isn't going to get a chance to happen. IBM buys SCO. End of lawsuit, end of story. I think this is the outcome the tattered remnants of SCO wanted in the first place.
Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
SuSE (Software Und SystemEntwicklung) is German.
Anyone know where I can pick up a cheap copy of Windows??
Last one out, turn off the lights!
Personally I am looking forward to seeing the vendors do exactly what you are describing. But take a look for a moment--
The standardization process for Linux is the LSB. That is where our efforts should be placed. If vendors want to pool their efforts beyond that, all good and well, but the LSB should be our primary focus.
Actually, I am glad to see SuSE make this move. Unfortunately this may be *REALLY BAD* for TurboLinux but they should have known what they were getting into.
LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
For some reason, tuxedo.org randomly forwards you to other sites. However, ESR's page is alive and well at http://www.catb.org/~esr/. I can't find any reason for the change on the website, though.
I can't say that I don't give a fuck. I've just run out of fuck to give.
They'd be making the right decision in pulling out of UL. From my own personal experience working _at_ IBM, I can tell you first hand the commitment they have towards the Linux community is very real. Conversely, I don't think the Linux community has anything to fear by putting their support behind Big Blue.
Its pretty obvious that SCO's recent "Hail Mary" play is falling flat on its face..Rather than adapt their business model, they're executing one last, desparate attempt to stay in business without a viable customer pool.
Sad, when you get down to it. The suits at SCO are going to run that company into the ground.
Bowie J. Poag
"Eric Raymond called SCO's move 'deeply stupid...'"
During a talk here in Oxford University's computing lab, Eric Raymond proclaimed that "UNIX died because it was closed-source", and then refused to accept that Microsoft's multi-billion dollar success suggested that otherwise.
Ever since then, I've taken ESR's pronouncements with several grains of salt.
Tarsnap: Online backups for the truly paranoid
> So SCO is enforcing their IP. It's their call what they open source not IBM's.
Their business model isn't sound in the current environment. Only those vendors who sell UNIX to support their underlying hardware business are hanging in there right now.
And even those businesses' days may be numbered, unless they can convert themselves into service companies. It's getting hard to justify buying a Sun instead of an Athlon.
Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
Although I agree in principle with Suse. .And this is calculated business move.
I dont think this decission has got anything to do with Linux or Open Source Philosophy as Suse is trying to make it look it.
Suse has business relation ships with IBM, if i am not wrong IBM linux m/cs do run Suse linux on them
SCO should realise that with out UnitedLinux they don't have much business to look forward to. Infact i would be surprised if they can even afford the legal fees to persue the lawsuit.
for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
1) Try to choose working with as many partners as possible in a spirit of cooperation.
2) Do not reap the PR benefits, nor spin the relationship strongly in the public eye at all.
3) Allow some partner to control the spin to their own agenda (in this case Caldera/SCO).
4) Eventually find that the partner has taken a (to SuSE's viewpoint) incredulous stand. Publically state that they do not agree.
5) Partnership and sails of other company deflate/dissolve.
SuSE is a somewhat naive company in the way it forms alliance, makes choices, etc. They do not believe in strong spin or overbearing marketing. They do not believe in half-truth statements or downplaying their competitors. There may be exceptions to this (there's no single decisionmaker running the whole show), but as a general rule it holds.
When I was there, it was fairly common for them to observe a sharply competitive move and collectively shake their heads. They _do_ believe in making better products, so this kind of competition is welcomed with open arms, but patent lawsuits are viewed in this sort of way I see as typical german: "This is not good."
All in all, I have to say I saw this as the eventual outcome of United Linux. I see SuSE and Connectiva as technology leaders, with Turbo and SCO/Caldera ultimately hamstrung by the strange politics/business of their leadership. The former can make a solid partnership, no doubt, the latter pair do not belong in the same ship.
-josh
This makes me start to wonder if this might be the start of the finish for the Unix codebases.
SCO is threatening to cancel IBM's license to distribute AIX. They have the ability to do this since they own the rights to the original Unix codebase. Could it be very long before they start going after the other Unix vendors?
Sun, SGI, IBM, and other Unix vendors are already throwing their support behind Linux in a lot of ways. Perhaps this will give them the added incentive to finally throw full support into Linux, in order to avoid being subject to the whim of a failing company that may or may not decide to blackmail them.
Of course, the end of Unix has been predicted for many years now, so maybe this will turn out to be nothing.
No, no, not *that* kind of piracy. I mean *real* piracy. With ships, and cannon, and lots of a "Avast there"'s in it and stuff.
I think Doug Fairbanks might have something to do with it too, but I'm a little fuzzy on that part, so don't quote me.
Anyway, around the turn of the century, no, not *that* century. Ummmm, no, not that century either. 1700 to 1800. Various "states" in Northern Africa practiced actual piracy, capturing ships, ransoming the men on board or selling them into slavery if no ransom was paid.
Better yet, they could make a lot of money without any risk if they captured a few ships and then used the terror factor to demand *tribute* from other nations. The would be known as a "protection racket" if it were done on a smaller scale.
And it worked. Most of Europe caved in and payed the tribute. ( Not that the pirates didn't make the occasional "mistake" and sieze a lucrative looking prize anyway, but what the hell).
America held out. America had no Navy and no standing army. So they bloody well built them and went to war. In legitimate defense, of the world even (go figure). The modern Marine Corps was born out of this, and when the song mentions Tripoli this is the conflict it refers to.
The conflict lasted four years, but America, young, brash and still idealistic America, on its own, rid the world of these pirates.
Why am I going on about this?
Well, think about it, what is SCO doing right now?
Practicing true computer piracy, that's what. Demanding tribute on a claim that everyone knows is essentially bogus.
What do we do about it?
Well, an American congressman, in reaction to the demand for tribute from the pirates, made a statement that became the rallying cry in the war against the pirates of the Barbary Coast and an American policy for ever after ( well, at least until Reagan).
"Millions for defence. Not one damned penny for tribute."
That's the way to handle SCO. This is not a time to be "pragmatic" as the lawyer and the accountant see pragmatism.
At the very least SCO should be shunned and isolated. Compleat noncooperation throughout the entire industry. Ostracised in the literal sense. Banished to die in the wilderness. Call them Ishmael. SuSE shouldn't pull out of United Linux. SCO should be ejected.
But beyond that they should not be payed one single penny, not even to save millions in legal fees. They are pirates. They are demanding tribute AS pirates. They need to be crushed. Ultimately and completely.
Please. IBM, I implore you. Stay the course. Buy up what remains of their bloody legal corpse for fractions of a penny on the dollar *after* you have crushed them and reduced their value as a company to nil.
But not one damned penny for tribute.
KFG
A big well known network gear manufacturer has decided to rename itself 'CI'.
Its spokesman stated : 'With those #@$à3 guys there over at SCO, we didn't wanted anymore to have this acronym inside our name, so we just removed it'
#include "coucou.h"
...as independent reports confirm. So before you're forced to buy Windows and go to the Dark Side, come on over to the BSD. It's like the Other Light Side Of The Force.
:)
FreeBSD is an excellent choice of operating system. We're happy to share it with any poor Linux refugees such as yourself. I think you've all suffered enough.
(With only a hint of sarcasm.
First TurboLinux implodes. Now SCO's starting to sue companies who they once looked at as partners, and in the process they're alienating pretty much any and every UNIX related sales opportunity they once had (not to mention they're probably making it tons more difficult for resellers to sell their wares).
That leaves Conectiva and SuSE, at least for now. The rest are business partners who are putting their names behind the UL effort, but many of them are on the "will SCO sue them next" list. Yeah, I'd like to go to a party where I know there's a good chance a certain jerk will want to pick a fight with me. No thanks...
The UnitedLinux effort, for all its hype and all the hope people (some, at least) put in it, is no doubt bruised all over the place by SCO's recent actions. And the incorrect perception that SCO owns UnitedLinux can't be helping the other Linux players who are participating in the project. I can only guess that some folks think SuSE and Conectiva are also evil, if only by association.
It's unfortunate that nobody at SCO thought about the trickle effect and what this lawsuit would do to its former allies "downstream". They've pulled some really stupid stuff in the past, but I truly think this time they've outdone themselves.
UnitedLinux may very well be a sinking ship.
Thanks for nothing, SCO.
Sun & HP at least have perpetual license to Unix, hence all the stuff about "Solaris is a safe harbor". SCO can't touch these guys.
My amazing wife - Artist, Author, Philosopher - Laurie M
What does UnitedLinux have to offer as Yet Another Distribution? They aren't promoting any new ideas or technologies; their only selling point is to be a "single stable, uniform platform for application development, certification, and deployment" (UL FAQ). In other words, they offer no value unless they become a monopoly. Why on earth would we support a free kernel monopolized by a proprietary distribution? Far better to throw your support behind Gentoo, Debian, or Mandrake. We don't need another RedHat.
Um, where was the open source version of Windows that Microsoft had to compete against?
In other news, scientists proclaimed that dinosaurs died because they were no longer adapted to the environment, and then refused to accept that their huge skeletons and the large quantity of other life forms they consumed proved otherwise.
Cue up the banjoes, boys. "The Beverly Hillbillies", if ya please.
o/~ Ooooooo...lemme tell a story 'bout a group called SCO,
they was havin' them some difficulty rakin' in the dough.
They was lookin' at th'marketplace, decidin' what to do
when they saw this li'l penguin an they figgered they would sue....
Big Blue that is. IBM. Deeeep pockets. Moola moooola....
So they filed them a lawsuit a couple billion deep
allegin' Blue had fed that bird through source code feature creep.
Blue an' Penguin shook their heads, an' marvelled at this feat,
sayin' "Not our faults you silly gits ain't able to compete..."
Squeezed by th'market. Billy Gates on one side, Torvaldes on t'other....squisha squish, yeah.
o/~
-- Horse_Pheathers
SCO is suing IBM not to win, but they are hoping that IBM will buy them out before the case. IBM could also not buy them out immediatly but drag the case out and put SCO out of buissness or dissolve the case. Then IBM can buy their assets and own Unix. Ofcourse they can GPL Unix (who really care if they do or don't besides the vendors themselves, its going to happen anyway if UNIX wants to still compete with Linux). Put all the good stuff into Linux that isn't there and wala a excellent 1st rate operating system.
and if so, what's their opinion of this?
US Citizen living abroad? Register to vote!
They just happened to purchase the rights to UNIX somewhere along the line (that somewhere being rather near the end).
OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
Being able to code libraries well does not necessarily mean you also have great wisdom about licensing schemes. I'll give him credit for intelligence in the area of coding, but not for understanding real world mechanics of people/capitalism/socialism/software. In many peoples thought (mine included) he's "deeply stupid" in this area. That doesn't mean he isn't intelligent in the area of coding, but almost all folks see of him these days is preaching in the area that many him as "deeply stupid".
I think that poster like most folks will give him credit for his contributions with the GNU libraries, but that does not equate to him being a philosophical guru about licensing and the future of software. The problem is, he thinks he is.
It happens over and over again. These stupid lawsuits never turn out the way they should.
What SHOULD happen:
Small Scum-Bag Company A, with very little in the way of legitimate product or profits, files a ridiculously stupid lawsuit against Big Deep-Pockets Company B.
Big Deep-Pockets Company B uses their comsiderable financial and legal resources to win the case, crush Small Scum-Bag Company A and obtain a court ruling that deters future stupid lawsuits by other small scum-bag companies..
What ACTUALLY heppens:
Big Deep-Pockets Company B doesn't want to be bothered, so they have their insurance company send off a nice fat check to Small Scum-Bag Company A, which now is flush with cash and able to pursue other victims with its stupid lawsuits.
"and have just installed "SuSE Linux Office Desktop""
Why bother?
Why bother running linux if your going to run a proprietary version of Wine, use a proprietary tool to Admin your system, and then run some proprietary MS apps on top of it all.
Seem completely stupid to me and you'd just be better off running Windows.
If this is the future of linux its doomed. You see that don't you? You can't just get a little pregnant and the path of distros like Suse's Office desktop, Lindows, and Xandros leads to a place worse then where we are now with MS.
In fact, if SuSE would this opportunity to jump ship from UnitedLinux and form a partnership with RedHat instead, we could see a major revolution in Linux corporate use.
RedHat has tons of corporate experience, is great with GNOME, and has the US market pretty firmly. SuSE is great with KDE, has a goodly amount of corporate experience, and does a good job on the European market. Both are open-source friendly (although Yast is not open-source and SuSE CDs are not available for free download, IIRC, so SuSE might need to open up a bit). If RedHat and SuSE were to combine their experience, pool their technical resources, and start a combined marketing blitz, I think it would be highly effective at jump-starting widespread corporate acceptance of Linux.
Mandrake would have also made a suitable partner, but unfortunately, their current financial troubles make me think they'll be hitting the ground hard soon. A shame - I've head good things about them.
-Erwos
Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
If you are permitted please write how this was initiated. I think the community is trying to access the impact of this lawsuit and even anecdotal evidence is of interest. Here is Linus' take.
Help fight continental drift.
In a surprise news announcement, the Chairman of rambus announces a historic merger with SCO unix. "The merged company - to be called RAMBO - will be poised to respond to the challenges of the 21st century" Chairman David Boies said today. "We are in the enviable position of controlling both hardware and software Intellectual property" Boies also announced Rambo's decision to sue Microsoft for the use of the name "windows". and it's use for networking. "I came up with the idea of windows networking 30 years ago" Boies said. "When I was a kid I opened the window and yelled to my friends that it was time to play baseball. This involved using a window to spread information to them. In other words, Windows networking"
I love it when people get quoted not using their 'mass media language' :).
Karma: pi (Mostly due to circular reasoning in posts).
...said to Linux Business & Technology magazine: "What SCO is doing is ethically wrong and legally dubious. Their complaint rewrites and distorts history."
Ok, it's been said that M$ actually doesn't do anything more than "wound" a company that it feels is a threat or has something it wants. Then they just sit back, wait for it to get financially desparate and buy it up for a pitance.
So, this could be analogous of a Shark and a diver. The shark doesn't rush in and start chomping on the diver. Instead the shark stealthfully attacks the diver from beneath, takes a sizable bite, then backs off. Now all it has to do is is wait a short while until the diver bleeds out and then it can eat at it's leasure without fear of getting damaged by a thrashing victim. Much in the way M$ does financially to it's competitors.
Now, one could say that SCO viewed it self as a diver in hostile waters, surrounded by sharks. So, they take out their knife and slash at the biggest shark they can (IBM) but in doing so the end up cutting themselves. Now the slash is called David Boies and this cut, along with IBMs legal team will bleed out SCO in court costs and attorney fees. Seems that once again SCO leadership has misjudged their environment and is destined to bleed themselves out.
IBM, if they have any desire to appropriate any of SCOs patents, will merely wait for SCO to become so weakened and despararte that when the time is right they can swoop in for the kill (a buyout at a fraction of what SCO may have thought possible).
Meanwhile all the other players in the water, that being United Linux/SuSE, the OSS devs/community, and just about everyone else are all climbing out of the this particular pond to watch SCO thrash around as the IBM bigfish circles around and around waiting for the right moment to make the kill. Don't be surprised if one of those that sought safety in the boat finds a long stick to give a push or two to keep SCO from coming to the surface.
In the meantime, if one listens carefully, they will probably be able to hear Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer snickering in the distance.
So, when evaluating a new cart model, do you base you opinion on a car built 5 years previously? How about we make judgements on Linux by using Linus's orignal code?
FYI: FreeBSD is now up to 5.0, where have you been??
With one exception... YAST!! Yast sucks. It's slow, it won't keep it's hands off your configuration and if you try to break away from it, it causes dependency hell like mad.
:)
Each distribution has it's quirks. IMHO, YaST has been the best hardware detection tool/Linux setup program available out of all the distributions. I have to admit, the only one I have not tried is Debian. Slackware is my favorite, but as I get older and have less time, I tend not to want/desire to dick around with the system anymore. I just want it to work out of the box. SuSE does this on old hardware as well as new.
SuSE uses RPM as it's installation method. If you have a problem with dependencies, then it's RedHat's fault, not SuSE's. I've never had a problem with YaST connecting to any SuSE mirror (Since 6.4). I use a DSL/Cable modem to update, are you trying dial up? You can download the updates separately to your hard disk and burn them to CD.
upgrade from major version to major version
I would never recommend upgrading from a major Linux version to another. In my experience none of the Linux distributions get it right and neither does Microsoft. Config file formats change in between releases. Tarball your old config files and merge them after the installation.
As far as your SuSE configuration problem, edit the config files by hand all you want to. Just don't forget to run "/sbin/SuSEconfig" or the next time you run YaST, all your changes will be gone. You did remember to read the nice book SuSE ships with the distribution didn't you
Just kidding, YaST has it's quirks, but so does every other installation tool out there. Until there is a common Linux package distribution system (United Linux?), this is what we have to learn to live with in the mean time.
Enjoy,
It's just the normal noises in here.