Slashdot Mirror


SETI@Home 2nd Look at Possible Hits

cpk0 writes "This article from MSNBC discusses how data returned from SETI@Home users is beign retested by the Institue for a possibility of alien radio signals being included. At just over 4 years old, I think this would be the first big break for SETI@home." This is a followup to a December Slashdot story. Apparently this is getting some major attention in the mainstream media lately.

85 of 407 comments (clear)

  1. could be just what we need... by mike77 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Maybe I'm being too poetic, but with a world on the brink of war, a confirmation of an alien civilization would be an amazing thing right now. Maybe give our leaders a kick in the ass that their petty squabbles are not the end all be all of our existence.

    --

    --Keeping the flame wars alive, one post at a time

    1. Re:could be just what we need... by borgdows · · Score: 4, Insightful

      yeah!! bomb these terrorists aliens!!

      and bring them democracy and liberty!!

    2. Re:could be just what we need... by unicron · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can imagine a beautiful, peaceful alien race. Free of crime, war, and violence.

      Then I can see us taking over that race, cuz those fuckers would NEVER see that shit coming.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    3. Re:could be just what we need... by ip_vjl · · Score: 5, Funny

      Reminds me of a Twilight Zone episode (from the version that ran in the 80's)

      Aliens come to Earth and tell us that they seeded our planet years ago ... but are disappointed in us because we have this "small talent for war with all our petty border skirmishes and such" and will wipe us out in a few days.

      World leaders feverishly work to hammer out their differences in the days before the aliens return.

      When they return, they are handed a huge treaty as we stand back and proudly proclaim "Peace in our time."

      The alien laughs.

      "No, you misunderstood. We breed warriors."

    4. Re:could be just what we need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      First Contact will go something like this:

      "This is Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz of the Galactic Hyperspace Planning Council. As you will no doubt be aware, the plans for development of the outlying regions of the Galaxy require the building of a hyperspatial express route through your star system, and regrettably your planet is one of those scheduled for demolition. The process will take slightly less that two of your Earth minutes. Thank you."

    5. Re:could be just what we need... by DonkeyJimmy · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Higher beings from outer space may not want to tell us the secrets of life, because we're not ready. But maybe they'll change their tune after a little torture." -Jack Handey

      --
      "Probably the toughest time in anyone's life is when you have to murder a loved one because they're the devil." -Philips
    6. Re:could be just what we need... by jokercito · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I can imagine a beautiful, peaceful alien race. Free of crime, war, and violence.

      Actually, THEY would probably be able to kick OUR collective asses since what they would need to gain the security of being able to have a society free of crime, war, and violence is the ability to kick anybody's ass.
    7. Re:could be just what we need... by unicron · · Score: 3, Funny

      In all truthfullness, it will come down to who has the bigger board with bigger nail.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    8. Re:could be just what we need... by uptownguy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I can imagine a beautiful, peaceful alien race. Free of crime, war, and violence

      I wrote a short story on this subject. When they step foot off of their ship, just like any other visitors to a foreign shore we greet them with open arms. They come in peace... they don't want our oil... They don't want our water...

      They want to convert us...

      Makes sense if you think about it. Missionaries would be on that first ship, my friends. And if you think the whole Arab vs. Jewish vs. Christian thing that's playing itself out right now looks bad, just imagine an alien religion gaining mass numbers of converts (free technology, free alien schools, nice little carrot there)and the opposition to it...

      Summary: Just because they are free of crime, war and violence doesn't mean that those buggers won't spell trouble!

      --


      I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.
    9. Re:could be just what we need... by unicron · · Score: 2, Funny

      No alien technology, discipline, or dedication can even BEGIN to compete with the unfathomable power of the lawyers of the scientologist. Those 2 butt heads, you'll be buying siezed alien spacecraft at insurance auctions for low low prices.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    10. Re:could be just what we need... by fobbman · · Score: 3, Funny

      They'd better not stop at my house first, cuz I'll blow smokerings in their bug-eyed grey faces, too. Hell, I don't even smoke. But I keep a pack of cigs right next to the door for just that type of emergency.

      The Mormon's have already condemned me to Hell, so I might as well take the planet with me for company.

    11. Re:could be just what we need... by blincoln · · Score: 2, Interesting

      it will come down to who has the bigger board with bigger nail.

      IMO it's more like who has the board with the big nail and who has the supernova-inducing solar system destroyer.

      The chances of an alien race developing at about the same time as us (thereby giving them technology that's only a bit better than ours) are essentially nonexistent. Aliens are most likely to either be way behind us or way ahead of us.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    12. Re:could be just what we need... by Anonym0us+Cow+Herd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >>but with a world on the brink of war, a confirmation of an alien civilization would be an amazing thing right now. Maybe give our leaders a kick in the ass
      >I can imagine a beautiful, peaceful alien race. Free of crime, war, and violence.


      The aliens land. They want peaceful relations with us.

      I can then imagine some insane nutcase attacking the aliens using chemical weapons. Probably for religious reasons (they don't worship Ala or somesuch, even though the political leadership may not actually be "believers" themselves). Or perhaps for political reasons, they aren't picking sides in <favorite conflict>. Or the aliens pick the wrong side by siding against the blowing up of civilian busses, pizza parlors, etc. Or the aliens interfere with soverign powers because the aliens are against the poverty and oppression of the mass population by a few nutcase greedy dictators.

      But hey, I'm being too pessimistic. I should trust in the goodwill of insane madmen not to do stupid things. The discovery of aliens would completely invalidate any possible motive (right or wrong, regardless of disagreements with other nations) for being on the brink of war.

      --
      The price of freedom is eternal litigation.
    13. Re:could be just what we need... by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Funny

      espically cince the first transmission from them is more than likely the following ....

      A/S/L Wanna?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    14. Re:could be just what we need... by rabidcow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not quite. The spanish were primarily interested in taking gold from America.

      Sure, they were blessed by the Pope so long as they tried to convert the heathen they found there (and gave Rome a cut of the spoils), but they didn't make more than a symbolic gesture for that. They told the natives, in a foreign language, that they had to convert or they would be tortured. Then, they tortured them and took their stuff.

      They worked the natives to death to get gold which wasn't there, then they worked the survivors to death growing sugar cane so they could sell rum to europe.

      Religion was a minor factor in South America in the 16th and 17th centuries, it was all about money. Religion was a rationalization at best.

    15. Re:could be just what we need... by TheOldFart · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you think he sounds like a Nazi, you sound just as foolish. It's not about "forcing" the end of religions or "forcing" the adoption of a single religion. The point brought up has to do with the fact we as a civilization, kill each other in name of our respective religions and we would probably be better off without it as we know it.

      The answer to most our problems will arrive the day we realize religion does not make us any different from each other. Ending all religions, the adoption of a single religion, or learning how to cope with the differences is irrelevant to the extent we differentiate people based on their religious believes.

      Religion, as I see it has two unrelated purposes. The first is trying to explain the inexplicable. Giving people hope and meaning to their lives in a spiritual level. The second is the corruption of this belief system in order to obtain power and control. The latter however is what we see the most across the board. From radicals in the Middle East to the White House.

      Alien life shakes the very foundation of this belief system. That's why it is a threat to so many. I have no doubts we will be a very different society after the discovery of new life elsewhere. We don't ever need to contact them. The knowledge of the existence will suffice. It makes every thing else look petty and irrelevant. Only than we would concentrate on living our lives as one unit as opposed to go on as warring idiots trying to prove to each other we're better.

  2. What a waste by Quasar1999 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The probability of catching radio waves from intelligent life forms in a 4 year window is crazy. The distances they'd have to travel are enormous, and that civilization is probably long extinct, and the spectrum we are looking at is very narrow, and our definition of intelligence is also very narrow... what if what we think of cosmic background noise is in actuality encrypted data transmissions, meant to be indistinguishable from background noise? Too many assumptions are taking place, it's really a waste of resources.

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    1. Re:What a waste by no+soup+for+you · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Too many assumptions are taking place, it's really a waste of resources.
      A waste of resources? If the idle cpu cycles are being used to perform calculations, what resources are being wasted?
      --
      If you blog it...
    2. Re:What a waste by SpamJunkie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      that civilization is probably long extinct

      You're assuming they also have Bushes as leaders. That's unlikely.

      what if what we think of cosmic background noise is in actuality encrypted data transmissions, meant to be indistinguishable from background noise?

      Then it wasn't meant for us. We're not trying for a man-in-the-middle attack, we're looking for life explicitly trying to contact another civilization.

    3. Re:What a waste by adpowers · · Score: 2, Informative

      Idle cycles that could go to other better projects.

    4. Re:What a waste by sethaw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The probability of catching radio waves from intelligent life forms in a 4 year window is crazy

      You have to start somewhere. Its not really just a 4 year window, since all searches for other civilizations occur one after the other building upon each other and using previous discoveries. This is just the way science works.

      The distances they'd have to travel are enormous, and that civilization is probably long extinct

      This is irrelevant.

      definition of intelligence is also very narrow

      And what is our definition?

      what if what we think of cosmic background noise is in actuality encrypted data transmissions, meant to be indistinguishable from background noise?

      Yes some data may be encrypted, however it is a reasonable assumption that some of it is not. In general most data that we send is not encrypted. If also including data that has been compressed (which would seem like encryption to us) we would just need to find something about it that is not a natural pattern, we wouldnt have to be able to read it.

    5. Re:What a waste by Skyshadow · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I'm not sure I agree with you 100% on your police work there, Lou.

      Firstly, the distance that signals from another potential civilization *could* be enormous, but then again they could be reasonably small. There are a pretty fair number of stars within, oh, 100 light years or so of our own primary. The real question there is what sort of values to plug into the Drake equation, and we won't have a good idea there until we collect some data points.

      Secondly, why would you assume that an alien civilization would carefully hide their transmissions? We don't, even though we understand that we're basically advertising the location of our planet with TV and radio and radar. Besides, if you really wanted to mask your location, you'd stick to cable. Sure, we wouldn't pick them up, but for each ultraparanoid civilization (and I'll grant you that they very well may exist), there are probably others less cautious.

      Sure, we could be all the life that's out there -- in the absense of any concrete proof, there's always that chance. That said, I personally have a hard time believing that in a universe as big as ours the there's a unique instance of anything. Anyhow, putting in a minimum of effort seems pretty reasonable when you're talking about making the greatest discovery in the history of history, doesn't it?

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    6. Re:What a waste by geekoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Much of the data is data that they have had for a long time, just didn't have the resources to process. So yes, seti@home is 4 years old, but the data is not.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:What a waste by LMCBoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, you will be glad to hear that no tax money goes to support SETI. Zero public resources are spent on it.

      Everyone that contributes to SETI, from Paul Allen to Team Lambchop, is spending their own resources of their own free will. They obviously think it's not a waste.

      So, what exactly are you complaining about?

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    8. Re:What a waste by LMCBoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How about this? You spend your spare cycles on something you think is important, and I'll do the same.

      Sound good? Alllllllllrighty then.

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    9. Re:What a waste by quantaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The probability of catching radio waves from intelligent life forms in a 4 year window is crazy.

      I don't know we've been sending signals pretty much continuously for over 50 years. They could be sending something but we just haven't got it yet.

      The distances they'd have to travel are enormous, and that civilization is probably long extinct, and the spectrum we are looking at is very narrow, and our definition of intelligence is also very narrow...

      I'll give you the first point, the second is doubtfull since they could only be a few hundred away, they've probably changes but extinct? doubtfull. Even if they are extinct does it really matter? We kind of got a speed limit already so chances are we wouldn't have much meaningful communication anyways. The fact is that all we need is a confirmation of their existence, and if we were able to distinguish their signals we might get some interesting TV programs. Which brings we to you narrow spectrum comment. The fact is that we've pretty much saturated the spectrum for quite a region. If the aliens did used radio waves for their communication as well they would be likely to use up a fair region also meaning all we need is one hit from that portion. And I'm not sure what you're getting at with def'n of intelligence. Either thier sending signlas or their not. Maybe that they've found a better means of communication?

      what if what we think of cosmic background noise is in actuality encrypted data transmissions, meant to be indistinguishable from background noise? Too many assumptions are taking place, it's really a waste of resources.

      Well hopefully they didn't feel the need to encrypt everything. So what if they did maybe someone else didn't. I really don't see anything here to convince me that your assumptions that we won't find anything are any more convincing than the assumptions that could lead us to something. As to a waste of resources perhaps if you consider the cycles that people actually do donate to be a small resource that could better go to curing cancer than perhaps. On the other hand in real economic costs it's almost trivial! Really when it comes down to it we're drilling for oil. We probably won't find anything and it costs a bit to do it but if we ever find something...

      --
      I stole this Sig
    10. Re:What a waste by asparagirl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "I think, perhaps, the poster meant that with the amount of assumptions being made, and the unlikelyhood of being able to do anything with the fact that "oh, there is alien life out there", the idle cycles could be used more efficiently..."

      Now this is an interesting point. Suppose we do find out that somewhere out there is intelligent life. Would it *really* change things that much?

      I mean, the assumption that the discovery of alien life would radically change human behavior on an indivdual and international level is just that: an assumption. It presumes the aliens are some sort of messianic figures, the answer to all our petty Earth problems.

      I don't see it that way at all. Human nature being what it is, I find it much more likely that we'll all oooh and aaah over the discovery for a while, and then go back to being the squabbling low-brow folks we usually are. Once the novelty wears off, we've still gotta go about our mundane lives.

      This is the more likely scenario: if we find life, it's probably going to be very, very far away, so unless there were the possibility of trade between our planet and theirs or one of us threatening the other in some way, we'll probably just shrug, sit back, and wait for a loooooong time for the most basic information to flow both ways. Meanwhile, we'll still pick fights with one another, still watch bad TV, still have corrupt politicians, still have yokels claiming to have been picked up by UFO's and given proctological exams. Life goes on.

      To be clear, I do support the search for extraterrestrial intelligence and have been running SETI@Home for a few years now- over 1000 data units processed. And I think the discovery of alien life would be way cool. But is it going to radically change my outlook on the world? Nope. And that's because I already assume it's out there--which is why I'm running SETI@Home in the first place.

      --


      - Asparagirl
      asparagirl at dca dot net
    11. Re:What a waste by LMCBoy · · Score: 2, Informative

      You are correct, time on large radio telescopes is a precious resource. The decision of who gets to use a telescope is almost always left to a panel of experts called a Time Allocation Committee (TAC). Astronomers write proposals to use the telescope, and the TAC weighs them by scientific merit, awarding time to the best of the proposed projects.

      So, apparently the TAC at Arecibo also thinks that a few nights for SETI are resources well spent.

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    12. Re:What a waste by AssFace · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IMO, just the "itelligence" issue alone is enough to make the SETI effort questionable at best - not to mention the stats side of things.
      What is intelligent to us is limited to the breadth of our experience and environment - we treat communication with very high regard... but perhaps that isn't a true definition of intelligence - it just serves our purposes well.
      "Intelligent" is just a term related to our outlook - it just replaces a certain construct that we are looking for - but to match that construct doesn't necessarily fufill the true definition of that word.

      I would think that one could postulate on other life forms out there with pretty close to near certainty.
      But in order to think of other life forms that would communicate in a way that we would know about adds so much more complexity that I personally think SETI is a total waste (in terms of its end goal - in terms of getting people together and also in terms of a well known distributed system, it serves its own purpose).

      Were there bacteria and/or viruses out there, I'd not be surprised at all.
      Where there some sort of creature out there that is animal-like? Even that doesn't surprise me as much, but I still find that much less likely.

      But is there something else out there that commincates via radio waves? I really don't know - but looking at the numbers, I'd bet a lot against it.
      It is a wonderful thing to think that we aren't alone - whether in terms of a God or in terms of others in space - but there are so many parameters at work that I certainly don't count on it.

      And for those that think of things such as the greys - that is beyond retarded. To think that something will look anything like earth - let alone us is pretty narrow minded to say the least.
      And that doesn't even approach those that think the Earth was seeded by aliens landing here and we are the offspring of that...

      In the end, it saddens me - I tend to put too much faith and trust in people that have strong scientific outlooks.
      But those same people then frequently end up failing my idealistic view that they are somehow immune to the logical curiosities of religion or search for alien communication - two things that I group in the same.
      (although interestingly the absolute discovery of one would negate the other by their current definitions)

      And this thread seems to be full of the people here on slashdot that are of the "I don't agree with you, therefore you are a troll" mentality, so I don't suspect this post will last long.

      --

      There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    13. Re:What a waste by ianscot · · Score: 4, Insightful
      So, what exactly are you complaining about?

      This is slashdot. S/he needs a reason? From SETI@home's donations page:

      Almost none of our budget is spent on hardware (desktop and server computers, disks, tapes, telescope electronics etc.); these items have been generously donated by corporate sponsors.

      Yeah, it does sound like a real sinkhole for money, doesn't it?

      Why is it that people whining about waste always pick on the government and nonprofit tries like SETI@home? Could their objection be to the ends, and not the means they claim to be ridiculing? Gillette's initials plans, at least, were to spend $300 million on marketing the Mach 3 razor. Their previous model, the Sensor, cost nearly $200 million to develop. If you want to complain about waste, why is it you're choosing the idealistic scientific endeavor?

      --
      "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  3. Hack by Deton8 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There were so many well-publicized hacks to SETI@home that I'll bet that there will be a lot of skepticism about any results even if we discover a jpeg file of an Arcturian time machine in there.

    1. Re:Hack by Directrix1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm sure they have the original data. The only thing they have to do to settle a claim like this is to reprocess the data in question.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    2. Re:Hack by sethaw · · Score: 4, Informative

      Thats why they send every packet to multiple people to verify the results. Conflicting results should appear and the scientists can execute tests on that data. However, even if there are positive results this doesn't mean anything is found. This is why we have to go back and look for signals where they were found in the past, because there is justified skepticism in any result that says "we found aliens."

  4. sei@home by wiggys · · Score: 2, Funny

    I always thought that "settee at home" was a reference to armchair astronomers.

    --

    Sorry, but my karma just ran over your dogma.

  5. Issue by BenV666 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The only problem they have with Seti@home these days is the statistics.
    I know a few people who actually compete over who has computed the most packets. People also try to cheat to get high stats, that is where it goes wrong...
    Therefore it might be better to ditch those stats all together, or at least make them less informative...

    1. Re:Issue by k3v0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      i believe that the powers running SETI@home send out redundant data and compare, so as to reflect a more accurate statistic

    2. Re:Issue by insanecarbonbasedlif · · Score: 4, Funny

      The only problem they have with Seti@home these days is the statistics.
      I know a few people who actually compete over who has computed the most packets. People also try to cheat to get high stats, that is where it goes wrong...
      Therefore it might be better to ditch those stats all together, or at least make them less informative...

      Yeah, cause that worked to stop all the Karma whoring on slashdot...

      --
      Just because I doubt myself does not mean I find your position compelling.
  6. The late great Carl Sagan once wrote by wiggys · · Score: 5, Insightful
    http://www.seds.org/billa/psc/pbd.html

    We succeeded in taking that picture [from deep space], and, if you look at it, you see a dot. That's here. That's home. That's us. On it, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever lived, lived out their lives. The aggregate of all our joys and sufferings, thousands of confident religions, ideologies and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilizations, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every hopeful child, every mother and father, every inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every superstar, every supreme leader, every saint and sinner in the history of our species, lived there on a mote of dust, suspended in a sunbeam.

    The earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors so that in glory and in triumph they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot. Think of the endless cruelties visited by the inhabitants of one corner of the dot on scarcely distinguishable inhabitants of some other corner of the dot. How frequent their misunderstandings, how eager they are to kill one another, how fervent their hatreds. Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the universe, are challenged by this point of pale light.

    Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity -- in all this vastness -- there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves. It is up to us. It's been said that astronomy is a humbling, and I might add, a character-building experience. To my mind, there is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world. To me, it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly and compassionately with one another and to preserve and cherish that pale blue dot, the only home we've ever known.

    --

    Sorry, but my karma just ran over your dogma.

    1. Re:The late great Carl Sagan once wrote by Sedennial · · Score: 5, Funny

      There needs to be a new moderator choice - 'Depressing' :)

    2. Re:The late great Carl Sagan once wrote by Directrix1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You cannot experimentally prove or disprove an oppinion (which that post was nothing more than). You are being ignorant to what science actually reasons about.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
  7. bizarro universe by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 3, Funny

    Alien message decrypted: "Greetings. I am the Democratic, peaceloving, and openminded President Eroeg W. Hsub, from the plant Htrae. We will allow your planet to continue to produce weapons of Galatic Destruction, instead of wiping your puny solar system off the map.

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  8. War, warrrrrr by DonkeyJimmy · · Score: 5, Funny

    (from the article) "Our chances right now [of finding something] are small," SETI@home chief scientist Dan Werthimer said in a telephone interview. "But you have to plan for success"

    He continued: "and in this case, success would mean an intergalactic war that would result in the destruction of entire galaxies. We have already begun training our astrosoldiers in the art of zero-G warfare, but chances of defeating the alien menace is slim. I for one welcome our new alien overlords... Hail ants."

    --
    "Probably the toughest time in anyone's life is when you have to murder a loved one because they're the devil." -Philips
  9. The message by soundofthemoon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Someone in the Pleiades needs help moving 50 billion quatloos out of a forgotten government bank account, and they want Earth to help.

    1. Re:The message by Exedore · · Score: 4, Funny

      Increase the size of your spore-pods naturally! 100% safe and effective!

      --

      I take drugs seriously.

    2. Re:The message by zephc · · Score: 2, Funny

      ya know, I bet there's this really sad guy in Nigeria asking himself "All i need is help with this money, I wonder why no one wants to help me? *sniff sniff*"

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
  10. lost my interest by milktoastman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know, I used to be so interested in SETI, but in the last few years I've lost all enthusiasm for it. I guess because, ultimately, I don't think its likely that intelligent civilizations are very dense out there, and if they did, we'd probably never recognize the signal...and if we did, I'd say, 'okay, now what? We still have to go on living alone because we can't talk back and forth, so it's even more disappointing to know they exist but are unreachable.' We'll probably destroy ourselves before that's an issue, anyway.

    1. Re:lost my interest by Tripster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your post is interesting, personally I feel that too many people discount alien visitation to our planet as nothing more than mass halucinations or weather anomolies.

      We aren't far away from improving technology allowing us to reach other star systems within a few hundred years in some cases.

      On the other hand, we aren't that far ahead in time from our recent past when we still thought the earth was flat, when we thought the earth was the center of the universe, when we thought our star system was the only one with planets, when we had to travel for months or years to discover just another land mass on our own planet, etc. etc.

      I tend to actually hope that we have been visited, because that gives us a chance at longevity by being able to leave our home planet if needed should it become uninhabitable (and it will eventually).

      There are certainly enough *hints* left in the past that some type of visitation events may have happened, ancient pictures and artwork have some peculiarly familiar ships in the sky for example, many years before "flying saucers" were coined as a name for them.

      We live on a funny world, a good number laugh at the notion of alien visitations and pass it off as fairy tales, yet at the same time these same folks believe in an invisible "God" like creator who apparently watches out for them and created the Earth just for our use, conveniently ignoring the fact that reptilian based lifeforms ruled the planet for millions of years before us (oh yeah, God planted these fossils there just for us to have something to do by digging them up, convenient for their storybooks no doubt).

      Then again, we could be just a giant computer simulation in some huge universal mainframe, after all, just try and fathom the very notion anything exists in the first place and what it is we exist in, it's tough to come up with a how scenario, but just because we can't figure out how/why it happened doesn't mean we should start praying to a creator.

      In a universe as vast as ours seems to be, the notion that who/whatever created this (if it was created) pays any particular attention to every grain of sand in our universe (apparently there are likely more stars than grains of sand on all of our beaches on earth), the chances of us being noticed, beyond passing interest in "how is my Build your Own Universe kit doing?", is to me laughable.

  11. Global Extraterrestrial Hunt to Revisit Old Signal by rpiquepa · · Score: 2

    Besides MSNBC, other medias are *revisiting* the SETI@home project. Read for instance this Space.com article, published yesterday (March 10, 2003). Tariq Malik wrote: "Researchers spearheading a worldwide effort to find ET, or anyone else out in space besides us humans, plan to revisit a group of their most likely candidate radio signals using the world's largest radio telescope." He added that "the Arecibo Observatory will work for three and a half days, starting March 18, to revisit the candidate signals identified by SETI@home users."

  12. Guess they were right by rde · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As someone who scanned that part of the sky for seti@athome (so to speak), I got a mail from our berkelean chums, suggesting that a lot of media interest might be forthcoming. I mentally scoffed at the possibility, but here I am talking about it on a *cough* reputable site like slashdot!

    seti - acting under the auspices of the planetary society - were kind enough to ask whether I'd like my fifteen minutes now, and make my name available for interview to those legions of reporters who'd be after a human interest angle.

    Of course, 'human interest' is exactly not the reason I signed up for seti@home, but there you go. Nonetheless, I volunteered, just in case they want a European perspective. However, I really, really doubt that anything will come of it. Just like a seti user should.

  13. Useless piece of software by supergiovane · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dear Mr Seti@home project leader,
    we can tell for sure that your software needs some serious revision because as it is it doesn't work well in finding alien lifeforms.

    Respectfully yours,

    Alf
    Mork
    E.T.
    Chewbecca
    Yoda
    Spock

    --
    Signatures are for stupids.
  14. Four year window by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not really a 4 year window. You can sample 10 seconds of data and the time origin of the information that reaches you in that period can range from a year to many billions of years.

  15. Or even better.. by Mindjiver · · Score: 2, Interesting

    People could lend their cpu cycles helping something worthwhile out Folding @ home instead of looking for something that isn't there. Helping the fight against diseases like Alzheimer and Parkinson is a lot more rewarding than looking for little green men.

    --
    I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!
    1. Re:Or even better.. by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Helping the fight against diseases like Alzheimer and Parkinson is a lot more rewarding than looking for little green men.

      No, everybody's going to eventually die one way or another, and we have no problem making replacements. Curing any given disease is just a temporary stopgap which isn't that significant in the big scheme of things. Our race somehow muddled through millions of years before we had cures for any diseases.

      OTOH, finding little green men would probably be the single most significant moment in human history.

    2. Re:Or even better.. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "People could lend their cpu cycles helping something worthwhile out Folding @ home [stanford.edu] instead of looking for something that isn't there."

      If we knew that nothing was out there, Seti wouldn't be looking for it. Seti doesn't know, none of us knows, and you certainly don't know.

      It's one thing to say "medical research is more important", it's another to say that something doesn't exist when there's no proof that it does or doesn't. Space is awfully large.

    3. Re:Or even better.. by Greedo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What if the little green have the cure for Alzheimers and Parkinsons?

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    4. Re:Or even better.. by moominpapa · · Score: 3, Funny

      And wouldn't ya bet the first words the aliens say to us are "Have you guys found a cure for Alzheimers yet?"

    5. Re:Or even better.. by PyroMosh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Using your logic:

      Our race somehow muddled through millions of years without finding little green men.

      That said, I run SETI@home myself. According to my SETI@home user profile, I've dedicated 1.788 years of CPU time so far and I've been a user for 3.694 years. So I'm certainly not against the program.

      But to say that everybody's going to die anyway, so why bother is the most absurd thing I've ever heard. By that logic, we might as well shut down all the hospitals, and repeal all the laws on murder. After all, we're all going to go sometime.

      It's kind of interesting. I've been using SETI@home for years now, and as far as I know, it was the only distributed computing application when I first started. For a long time, it certainly seemed the most worthy of my spare cycles. Now, however, there are apps for cancer research and other life and death ailments. It's got me thinking...

      Which discovery would have the greatest impact on us? ET or a cure for cancer? Now, nobody supports space exploration, research, etc. more than I do. And I've put my money where my mouth is on this subject. But I've thought about this.

      If today, while watching CNN, I saw breaking news, and it was a press conference where NASA or SETI or some other organization announced definitive proof of Extra Terrestrial Intelligence, how would it change life here on earth?

      Well, most likely, the news media would immediately wet their pants, ask all kinds of stupid questions "is it likely that they're hostile?" "Could they support the terrorists?!?" etc.

      But that wouldn't last long, because eventually the scientific community would be able to explain to all but the thickest skulled journalist that that they're 500 light years away, and that the message we received left their planet while Christopher Columbus was still alive. They'd also have to explain to them that it would take just as long for us to *respond* to their message, and that with a 1000 year delay, the very civilization that sent the message might not even be there any more.

      So to make a long story short, if SETI finds ET, all it will do is make us *know* that ET is out there. It won't make any difference in our day to day lives what so ever. Basically what we are undertaking is the most expensive quest to find an answer to a trivia question ever. Because that's all we can hope to get out of this: trivia. Knowing that there's ET intelligence is no more useful than knowing that in another million years there will be another Hawaiian Island.

      Now what about cancer research (just to name one example). Let's say that distributed computation does lead somehow (I'm nowhere nearly as well versed on how this works as I am SETI@home) to a cure for cancer... Millions of lives will be saved. Millions of people will be spared suffering. Drugs or treatment programs will come to market. This will effect economies. Our understanding of our own biology will be expanded, and that could lead to even *more* quality of life improvements. I'm sure there will be other benefits that I can't even think of.

      Being the space buff that I am, finding ET would move me more emotionally. Wow, what a discovery. But it wouldn't actually *do* all that much. I have no illusions that it would. On the other hand, medical research is perhaps one of the most noble things that we can lend our proc cycles to. And it's been tempting me for several months now. I'd certainly recommend it to anyone else.

    6. Re:Or even better.. by oni · · Score: 2, Informative

      But to say that everybody's going to die anyway, so why bother is the most absurd thing I've ever heard.

      Fortunately, you did not hear it in the comment you replied to. He didn't say "so why bother" and he didn't imply that medicine was worthless - just that in the larger scheme of things it's futile.

      His comment was more about the relative importance of healing one individual human vs. contacting an alien race.

    7. Re:Or even better.. by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2, Interesting
      But to say that everybody's going to die anyway, so why bother is the most absurd thing I've ever heard. By that logic, we might as well shut down all the hospitals, and repeal all the laws on murder. After all, we're all going to go sometime.

      That's not what I meant. I was reacting to the prevalent attitude around here that until we find a cure for every fatal disease, no other activity is worthwhile.

      Why don't people say: "Those guys on TV in that NASCAR race are just wasting resources we could be using in the war on cancer!" For some reason they don't. They save their criticism for activities that actually have their own intrinsic value.

    8. Re:Or even better.. by PyroMosh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sure I did. We can nitpick about the exact wording until the end of time, but he said that medical research is a waste of time compared to SETI. That's absurd. And he implied (whether intentionally or not) that such pursuits are futile. The inferance that "Our race somehow muddled through millions of years before we had cures for any diseases" implies that such cures for diseases aren't important. Again, I'm not a mind reader, so I don't know if that was the idea the post's author *intended* to convey. But never the less, that's what it looked like.

      Also, if you had read my post, you'd see that I made (IMHO) a fairly good argument for why medical research is relativly more important than SETI. SETI is a feel good "because we can" type of project. Worthy in my mind, but not nessisarily best for humanity.

      Not only that, but who said anything about healing *one* individual? These programs are about finding cures for diseases that strike millions, not just an individual.

    9. Re:Or even better.. by PyroMosh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why don't people say: "Those guys on TV in that NASCAR race are just wasting resources we could be using in the war on cancer!" For some reason they don't. They save their criticism for activities that actually have their own intrinsic value.

      Good point! Sorry if I took the wrong meaning form your first message. I do of course support SETI, but I guess the only point I disagreed with your post on was that I don't nessisarily see SETI as the *best* use of my space clock cycles, it just happens to be my *favorite* use.

      But I see what you mean. It's tempting to say "let's not wast resources on x, when y is a big problem to life an limb" Keep doing this long enough (eliminate pro sports, record companies, video games, and anyother high dollar but unimportant-to-life-itself industry) and pretty soon you're living to be 280, but there's no books ,or films, or video games, or art, or sports, or computers, or any of the things that make life so *enjoyable* today!

    10. Re:Or even better.. by Ian+Peon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So to make a long story short, if SETI finds ET, all it will do is make us *know* that ET is out there. It won't make any difference in our day to day lives what so ever.

      Think about it - Learning that the world is round, learning that the the Earth revolves around the Sun, and indeed many other discoveries were inconsequential to the Joe Sixpacks of the time. The persons tilling the fields and squabbling, their lives were not effected by those realizations. However, those advances in understanding had very large ramificaitons years later.

      Einstein's theories initially had no effect on people - who cared that time slowed down when you moved near the speed of light? Wasn't driving that fast anyway! We have yet to see the practical implications of his ideas, but the impact they have had is enormous.
    11. Re:Or even better.. by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Apparently, I'm not getting my point across very well. What I'm doing is pulling my focus way up past the 200,000 foot level and looking at the really big picture. Look over thousands of years of history, Civilizations come and go. Tens of billions of people come and go. Epidemics, diseases, wars and famines come and go.

      Amongst all that, contacting an alien civilization would really stand out. Maybe it would take a century for round-trip communications. That amount of time is still only 1/50th of recorded history. We might not see any benefits from such a discovery in our lifetimes, but we could still make a contribution to help shape the destiny of the human race.

      Nobody's saying that we have to stop working on curing diseases. I'd be surprised if the money spent on SETI is more than 1/1000th of the money spent on medical research. All I'm saying is that demanding that that last tidbit be taken away as well is short sighted, especially when the majority of the people in this country piss away most of their spare time and resources anyway.

      As far as the probability question goes, the odds of payoff for this project may be slim, but I'm sure it's better than the 1 in 50,000,000 that drive people into a frenzy over lotto tickets.

    12. Re:Or even better.. by oliphaunt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not to be a total ass, but what makes you think that folding@home is altruistic? Sure, I can help scientists learn how proteins fold with spare cycles. Do they pay me? No. If my cycles find something significant, do i get rewarded? No. If they win the Nobel for the research done on my equipment, do I get any thanks? No. When they license their discoveries to AmGen, do I get a cut? No.

      fuck Stanford and their never-ending supply of MBA-wannabees. They can buy their own lab equipment. I'd rather waste electricity looking for aliens.

      --




      Humpty Dumpty was pushed.
  16. Either that by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 2, Funny

    or they are running out of money, and need some more.

    "Hey...that data sounds just like a....Higgs Boson!"

    1. Re:Either that by Zak3056 · · Score: 2, Funny

      or they are running out of money, and need some more.

      Or, worse yet, the first alien communication begins, "Dear Sir, I am contacting you with a business proposal. My brother, Melgar, is the former head of the government of Tau Ceti, and is attempting to export 30,000,000 galactic credits..."

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
  17. Slashdot vs UT by wiggys · · Score: 3, Funny
    Ever played Unreal Tournament? It would be satisfying to have the announcer shout out the moderator categories, ie instead of "Dominating!", "Godlike" or "Multi-kill!", a well-crafted response on Slashdot would be rewarded with cries of "Fascinating!" or "Thought-provoking!"

    Just an idea...

    --

    Sorry, but my karma just ran over your dogma.

  18. And if they find ET? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Assume for a moment that this second pass finds a signal that is not random and is coming from a Sun like star 3,000 light years away. We watch it with more and more telescopes and damn if it doesn't send a big old red flag of intelligence.

    Now what?

    Any transmission there and back will have a 6k year life span. That's far to great of a distance for us to explore yet, and far to much of a time to comprehend between signals. So how will we deal with another society 17,597,088,000,000,000 miles away?

    My pessimism says we let it divide us even more. Some will claim it as Atlantis, others will see it as home of the Aliens that have abducting them. The religious zealots will condemn, and our government will try and ignore it.

    My optimism hopes that it will inspire us to space. Give us a goal worthy of sending Humans to, and something that will also inspire kids to get more involved in Science.

    I know that there has been much written about what a positive result in this search would mean to society, but I'm wondering if anyone else has their own thoughts?

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:And if they find ET? by Skyshadow · · Score: 5, Insightful
      So how will we deal with another society 17,597,088,000,000,000 miles away?

      That's a plausable scenario and a good point. A signal lag time which represents most of the whole of human history is obviously not workable, and given the size of the universe (big), it's not hard to see it happening.

      But that hardly means such contact could in any way be considered a failure. As I see it, we as a species stand to gain a lot from it:

      A data point for the Drake equation. Hey, if *somebody* else is out there and within 3000 light years, there are quite probably a lot of other somebodys out there.

      Potential research value. Their science may be more advanced and would certainly be different from our own. We could almost certainly pick up insights into our universe just by interpreting and communications (or, at least, Fox could steal their reality shows and produce them on earth).

      Mindset. A lot of the conflict of the last 50 years or so has been centered around the fact that our technology is making the earth "smaller" far faster than our various cultures are able to compensate for. This sort of discovery could give some perspective as to what "us" means, or at the very least drive some competetive juices that drive humans (gotta get to Mars, gotta colonize the Oort belt, gotta get good at this whole space thing...)

      Sure, some people'd react badly to it. We'd probably see some mass suicides, maybe a couple of new religious cults, but that'd all encompass people who'd go for that shit anyhow (Tom Cruise, etc). Seems like a fair trade-off to me.

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    2. Re:And if they find ET? by Tailhook · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Now what?"

      Good question. Whatever the consequences, bring it on. Yeah, we'll probably see new religions appear. They'll be radical cult like messes that contribute nothing. Our existing religions will adapt, because they're good at it, or they wouldn't still exist.

      Bring it on. I've got about 30 worthwhile years left in me. I have no intention of allowing the fools of this planet to keep me ignorant. Lets have at it.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    3. Re:And if they find ET? by PygmyTrojan · · Score: 3, Funny
      So how will we deal with another society 17,597,088,000,000,000 miles away?

      Eh, more like 17,636,358,300,000,000, but who's counting.

      --

      Trying is the first step towards failure.

    4. Re:And if they find ET? by TheHawke · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This finding might inspire NASA to move up their next generation of deep space telescopes and infereometers, like the OWL project that uses adaptive optics in a array that spans 300 square meters.
      Of course, we do need to get improved reuseable launching systems in place first...

      --
      First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
    5. Re:And if they find ET? by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Potential research value. Their science may be more advanced and would certainly be different from our own. We could almost certainly pick up insights into our universe just by interpreting and communications (or, at least, Fox could steal their reality shows and produce them on earth).

      I highly doubt we'll be able to recieve the equivalent of "Mr Wizard" or "Bill Nye the Science Guy" (Morbo the Xenogeneticist would be quite entertaining tv though)

      we might get a glimpse of what they have, that is considering we can even decide what is in the carrier and subcarriers, the modulation type, are they even 10 based? they might be a race based on 9 or 11 for their "decimal system" the periodic table may be listed backwards or sideways from their point of view.

      remember EVERYTHING we have as a "standard" is only a decision made by a person or group of people for no real concrete reason other than perspective.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  19. Space.com article by lucretio · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is also an article here.

  20. Decrypted Alien Message by papadiablo · · Score: 5, Funny

    "No! All your base are belong to us!"

  21. You left out the most RELEVANT part! by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Funny
    "The plans have been displayed for comment for the last 200 years at your regional planning board in Alpha Centuri.

    What do you mean you've never been to Alpha Centuri?!!!

    If you can't be bothered to take an interest in local affairs, then that's your own lookout. "

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  22. ET already knows all about us by scotay · · Score: 4, Funny

    The fact that we're still using screen savers on non-monochrome monitors is proof we're not advanced enough for first contact.

  23. Another Possible Message by Snowgen · · Score: 5, Funny

    Greetings, earthling!

    Now Your Fliddleton Can Be Bigger and Longer!

    This Doctor Approved Enhancement Ray Will Actually Help You Expand, Lengthen And Enlarge Your Fliddleton Safely and Naturally

    100% MONEY BACK GUARANTEE

    Click Here

    You subscribed to the fliddleton.com newsletter as SETI@EARTH.SOL. We hope you enjoyed receiving this mailing, but if you are receiving it in error, please visit here to unsubscribe and you will automatically be excluded from any future mailings.

    Thank you, and please excuse any inconvenience.

  24. Too bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    data returned from SETI@Home users is beign retested

    Too bad that those CPU cycles can't be used for spellchecking Slashdot submissions.

  25. If the universe has a sense of humor by saddino · · Score: 2, Funny

    the signals will be calls to American Idol.

    Advance note to comic book guy:
    Yeah, yeah, I do know they couldn't have received those TV signals from Earth yet.

  26. What about sending out our own space signals?? by mech_attack · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What about sending out our own space signals??

    We have been sending out weak radio and TV signals into the universe for over 50 years now ( and more...) However, I doubt that any of these same signals coming from other solar systems would be detectable by us.

    Instead of listening in to E.T. - Why don`t we go ahead and beam out stronger signals to `local` planets that would seem like likely candidates to harbor civilizations. For instance, http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~mwm/planet.html, these seem like they could be potentially good targets.

    It could be, like SETI, a joint effort too. In order to sustain the signal on a certain timeframe, specific dishes around the planet set up by amateurs and universities could be responsible for targetting specific planets for a number of days(hard due to earth's rotation). A central team would be responsible for targets and messages sent while others executed.

    I have sent this to the SETI institute as an idea, but never received a reply. If you agree that this is an interesting idea, maybe you could interest them in it too.
    http://www.seti-inst.edu/email.html

    Thanks.

  27. Re:a million turtles vs one hare by sirgoran · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Part of the problem is the cost. By using the distributed method, they are actually getting the best bang for the buck. The cost of building the kind of computer to crunch the numbers, or renting the time on someone's system is simply too high.

    By spreading the work around the world to the 4 million subscribers, the cost of the project really is quite low. It also allows them to pay for more time at the observatory (they have to pay to use the telescope).

    Basically, it may not be faster, but it is cheaper in the long run.

    -Goran

    --
    Carpe Scrotum - The only way to deal with your competition.
  28. Re:Like others have pointed Seti can seem a waste by SETIGuy · · Score: 3, Interesting
    No doubt actually finding and verifying(good luck) alien signals would a great discovery. But at the same the practically speaking its a complete waste. All of these people could and should be donating to something like Folding or some other distributed effort that actually will probably help humanity by finding a cure for cancer or some other disease. But I guess actually helping your fellow humans is less glamourous then being the first nerd or geek to discover some faint signal which when discovered probably won't even be accepted by the rest of the world and will be debated forever.

    Ever consider how many hours a week you spend reading slashdot, watching TV, or listening to music. Practially speaking what you spend most of your spare time doing is a complete waste of time and resources.

    Why aren't you volunteering your time to something that will actually help humanity? Try volunteering in a soup kitchen. Cut all power to your house in order to reduce greenhouse emissions. Travel everywhere by bicycle. Give all of your money to charity.

    There are other more practical and worthy uses of the time and resources you waste on yourself. It's time to shift those resources to tasks which will actually improve the world's quality of life.

    To get real for a moment, SETI@home has about half a million machines running at the moment. That might represent at most one percent of the available resources. There's plently to go around.

    Granted, I'm not unbiased, since I'm working on the observing schedule right now. Next week, Arecibo...

  29. My Favorite Jack Handey by rhfrommn · · Score: 3, Funny

    The best Jack Handey I ever heard went like this:

    One day my son asked me "why does it rain?" I told him it rained when God was crying. Then he said "why would God cry?" and I told him "Oh, probably because of something you did."

    --
    My motto is: Never give up - unless it's harder than you want it to be.
  30. My favorite Jack Handey by Rai · · Score: 2, Funny

    "It's hard to believe that entire families can be torn apart by something as simple as wild dogs."