Slashdot Mirror


Return Of Bloom County. Sorta

Slartibartfast writes "According to mycomicspage.com, the entirety of Bloom County will be re-published on their site, starting St. Paddy's day, and at a "highly accelerated" rate of one week every two days, until the entire strip is up. In addition -- an extra-special bonus for us Berke Breathed fans -- his college predecessor, Academic Waltz, will also be run. One caveat: it's subscription-based. However, for $10, I'd call it a huge bargain. I'm signing up."

68 of 221 comments (clear)

  1. Target demographic: 28-38 by Matey-O · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or anybody that had any interest in current events in the 80's. I hope it aged well.

    (I still remember the critters and Steve D on the wheelchair running from the AT&T deathstar logo on a billboard)

    I think a 'buncha younguns(tm)' will miss out on the political satire.

    Now, do this with Calivn and Hobbes!

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    1. Re:Target demographic: 28-38 by RLiegh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Strictly IMHO, but I believe that it's probably aged a lot better than other 'classic' comics (doonesbury comes to mind).

      It's more dated than, say, 'peanuts'; but the quality is also better too. (again, IMHO).

      I completely agree, however, that Calvin and Hobbes would be an even better choice.

    2. Re:Target demographic: 28-38 by Finni · · Score: 5, Informative

      Cutter John was in the wheelchair (typically playing the role of Captain Kirk), NOT Steve Dallas, who typically had little patience for that kind of play. Especially when they removed his transmission from his 'vette. . .

    3. Re:Target demographic: 28-38 by schon · · Score: 4, Informative

      Now, do this with Calivn and Hobbes!

      already done. Except that you can view some for free.

    4. Re:Target demographic: 28-38 by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, you can view them all for free. Their image directory is not protected, you can wget the whole damned thing if you know the naming convention, and it's not difficult to figure out(it's something like CH + YYYY + MM + DD.gif). A perl script and some time you'd have the whole thing in an hour.

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    5. Re:Target demographic: 28-38 by eXtro · · Score: 2, Informative

      Calvin and Hobbes is already online, it's free, but you're restricted in how far back from "today's" comic you can see. You can become a subscriber and get full access though for 10 bucks per year. This doesn't cover only Calvin and Hobbes, it covers around 1000 other comic strips.

    6. Re:Target demographic: 28-38 by sammy+baby · · Score: 2, Funny

      Tee hee.

      "Not to say that we didn't try..."

      Ah, Milo. How I've missed you & your friends.

    7. Re:Target demographic: 28-38 by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm getting the exact same thing now.

      Honestly it worked this morning. Their tech support must read /.

      I've pulled the whole thing numerous times. Looks like I'll have to put up a mirror.

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    8. Re:Target demographic: 28-38 by themurph17 · · Score: 2, Informative

      at the website you can get calvin & hobbes emailed to you everyday, including the sunday comics. i do. i think you get 1 free comic per email address. anymore you have to pay.

    9. Re:Target demographic: 28-38 by anotherone · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've got a CD with every C&H ever on it... All sorted into a nice HTML interface. and you can't have it.

      --
      Username taken, please choose another one.
    10. Re:Target demographic: 28-38 by j_woolf · · Score: 2, Funny
      I think a 'buncha younguns(tm)' will miss out on the political satire.

      Actually, I read through Classics of Western Literature last night... the political satire rather nails the Bush whitehouse.

      It's Reagan redux. Breathed is a prophet!

    11. Re:Target demographic: 28-38 by Moses+Lawn · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You'll note an exception to this is doonesbury, which is hosted on ecomics. He has (almost) every comic from the beginning, only missing a few at first, probably due to having lost them...

      Interesting, that. A bunch of years ago I worked on a CD product called "The Doonesbury Anthology", which was a collection of all the Doonesbury strips, with historical context, games, animations, etc. We (i.e. some poor temp slobs) had to scan in all the damn things, many of which were only available from newspaper clippings. There were a few (mostly the early ones) that are missing, mainly like you said, having disappeared into the mists of time.

      This was just before the Doonesbury site went up, so those are the same images. Let me tell you, *that* was a hellacious job. Half a dozen scanners going full time, always behind schedule, all on slowass Pentium 90s (this was mid-1995). We had to dig up the strips from a bunch of different places, mainly because, for tax purposes, Garry Trudeau doesn't keep the original drawings (can you imagine what an original Doonesbury is worth?)

      It's a shame the company (since assimilated into nothingness) screwed the marketing up so bad - we did two other Doonesbury products that also went thud. Has anybody ever heard of the Doonesbury Screensaver or the Election Game? (Of course, there are good reasons, perhaps. The screensaver didn't work with Windows 95 and the election game was in Visual Basic. Ah well. The comics were cool.)

      --

      What if life is just a side effect of some other process and God has no idea we exist?

  2. Taco's scheme to get more subscriptions by DeadSea · · Score: 2, Troll

    "If we get users comfortable with shelling out cash for web content, maybe more of them will buy slashdot subscriptions. Let's run some articles about compelling web content for sale. After people are used to buying the good stuff, maybe they'll subscribe to /."

    </conspiracy>

  3. Now that's worth paying for... by TopShelf · · Score: 3, Interesting
    To get access to an entire run of a comic strip is indeed a value worth paying for. While I'm not much of a fan of this particular strip, I hope this works out - it could serve as a model for other strips as well.

    Speaking of, what other strips would people like to see republished online?

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    1. Re:Now that's worth paying for... by SN74S181 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd like to see Doonesbury republished, except... ooooh... a few years back I figured out how to hack the HTML serving their comics and I download the whole archive and have it on CD.

      Naw, we don't need Doonesbury.

    2. Re:Now that's worth paying for... by govtcheez · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Speaking of, what other strips would people like to see republished online?

      Calvin and Hobbes and the Far Side would be the only two anyone should ever need.

  4. Content worth paying for by guacamolefoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I already have most of the books, plus the floppy little record (which I should convery to mp3 (and ogg)) and I'll still probably sign up for this. Lord, how I miss Steve Dallas now that I've grown up and become him.

    I'll also make sure that I look at all the comics out there that are derivative of Bloom County (almost wrote B.C. there) today. The guy was funny and he obviously had a huge impact otherwise.

    This is just a neat idea and a bargain price. Count me in, baby.

    GF.

  5. Best...Comic...Ever.... by Kevinv · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I didn't think MyComics was worth signing up for until this became available. Bloom County rocks! And $10 a year is the right price.

  6. How is this a bargain? by elmegil · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Go buy the complete works, you can probably even find them used for less than cover price. Then you don't have to be in front of a tube to enjoy them, you aren't at the mercy of their business model, you've got higher resolution print copies, and you don't have to print and bind them yourself if you want all those advantages.

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    1. Re:How is this a bargain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You should actually price the complete works before making this statement. They are very expensive used, as they have been out of print. I tried to buy them for our kids, $75 for one paperback...

    2. Re:How is this a bargain? by fmaxwell · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Go buy the complete works, you can probably even find them used for less than cover price. Then you don't have to be in front of a tube to enjoy them, you aren't at the mercy of their business model, you've got higher resolution print copies, and you don't have to print and bind them yourself if you want all those advantages.

      You sound like the old people who don't understand e-mail (and I'm 41, so when I say "old" it really means it). They think that they have to print out their e-mail, photos and all, in order to see it. I sent a color photo to an older relative and she asked me why I sent it to her when she doesn't have a color printer.

      If you manage to locate and purchase all of Bloom County in book form, what do you do if you want to e-mail one of the cartoons to a friend. Tear out the page and scan it? How do you read the strips in chronological order? What do you do if you want to be able to see the comics at home and at work? Roll a handtruck of Bloom County books into and out of your office each day? Yeah, that'll impress the boss. While books are nice (I have a house full of them), they are not always ideal.

    3. Re:How is this a bargain? by UrGeek · · Score: 2, Funny

      "don't have to be in front of a tube to enjoy them"

      What is wrong with being in front of a tube? Being in front of a tube is one of my favorite places to be! Especially in the dark with only the beloved Trinitron CRT as the sole light source. Heaven.

      "you don't have to print and bind them"

      And just why would you want to do a dumb thing like that? All I ever print is snail mail for those Luddenites in my life without email or an occasional resume.

      Keep it electronic. Never use paper unless you absolutely have to. Why else would we have all of this disk space?

      Sheesh.

    4. Re:How is this a bargain? by elmegil · · Score: 2, Informative
      Powell's books, www.powells.com:
      • Loose Tails, $9.95
      • Toons for our Times, $6.95
      • Penguin Dreams, $6.95
      • Bloom County Babylon, $6.50
      • Billy and the Boingers Bootleg, $6.95
      • Tales Too Ticklish to Tell, $5.00
      • Night of the Mary Kay Commandoes, $7.95
      • Happy Trails, $7.95
      They don't appear to have Classics of Western Literature, but that was a collection, it's not entirely clear that it had unique content. And they don't have One Last Little Peek, which definitely does have unique content. But then, you might find that one somewhere else. (like http://cagle.slate.msn.com/store/fbloom.asp which has it for $11.95, not the $65 that Amazon thinks is the best used price)

      Unless you're looking for "like new mint condition", I can't see why someone would be charging $75 for one paperback. And if you want them for your kids, I don't think you'd want the mint copy anyway....

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    5. Re:How is this a bargain? by elmegil · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Since I'm not in a rush to go sign up for this service that I don't see as any bargain, I'm not in a position to quote their license in detail, but most of the "subscription" comic sites require you to agree to certain terms of use in addition to paying for the content. If they didn't, why make you pay, right? "You have to pay for access to this content but then you can give it for free to all your friends and also put up your own web page of everything and make local copies of it" is not a commonly working business model, certainly not for comics.

      I don't care what you think about the good sense of copyright restrictions, but the fact is they do exist, and you're quite likely to have to agree to them to get access to this site. Legally speaking, you're not going to be authorized to make your own copy to read wherever you like, copies to send to your friends, or any of the rest of that. You seem hot to sign up, so if there is no such agreement, go sign up and tell me so already.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  7. Already signed up - Calvin & Hobbes too! by Randar+the+Lava+Liza · · Score: 5, Informative

    I read an article about this last week, and checked out the site. It's a really great idea. Not only can you view these online, but you can setup daily emails with as many of these comics as you'd like. There's also a "collection" feature where you can virtually clip comics to save in as many libraries as you'd like.

    Not only do they have Bloom County and will soon have Outland, but they have Calvin & Hobbes as well! $10/year is a pretty good deal for all these great comics. Color me convinced!

    --
    Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage. - Anais Nin
  8. how to save $10 by Mr2cents · · Score: 5, Funny

    However, for $10, I'd call it a huge bargain. I'm signing up.
    If you mention you posted the story on slashdot, you might get it for free.

    --
    "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
  9. Actual cost: $50 by DeadSea · · Score: 5, Informative
    The subscription of $10 is for one year. They say there are 15 years of comics and they will be released at a rate of one week every 2 days. That means that it will take 4.3 years to get through all of them and by the end you will have paid $50.

    Number of comics = (15 Years of comics) * (365 comics / year) = 5475 comics.

    Release rate = (7 Comics / 2 Days) * (365 days / year) = 1277 comics/year.

    Release time = (5475 comics) / (1277 comics/year) = 4.3 years

    Cost = (4.3 years) * ($10 / year) = $50 (assuming you can't pay for part of a year)

    1. Re:Actual cost: $50 by DeadSea · · Score: 2, Interesting
      That all depends when it started in 1995 and when it ended in 1980, the page doesn't say.

      If it started December 31, 1980 and ended January 1, 1995 that is closer to 14 years. In that case, All but a couple comics would fit in a four year subscription.

      If it started early in 1980 and late in 1995, it would be closer to 16 years of comics.

  10. bloom county! by mrtroy · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is one of those old-time-memories that you forget about until something like this brings it back. I remember reading this comic every Saturday morning, often thinking "what the f^%#" is going on, but laughing a lot. I really love the cat, how wierd it looks, and the content of the strips was such that if you didn't laugh, there must be a physical reason as to why you cannot laugh...perhaps you are heavily medicated in a coma. Of all days, St. Paddy's day, I have another reason to turn green today.

    On a side note, have an extra pint of green tonite to celebrate the second coming of bloom county

    --
    [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
  11. You're dead wrong. by Slartibartfast · · Score: 5, Informative

    One thing I didn't put in the article -- 'cause I didn't know until today -- was that they are posting _EVERYTHING_. In other words, today is the first time I've seen a new Bloom County strip in 14 years. Phrased yet another way, in case you never noticed, the anthologies were incomplete. This re-posting -is- complete. For example, in the first book, notice that there were no Sunday strips? I'm dying to see my first new Sunday strip tomorrow...

    1. Re:You're dead wrong. by geekoid · · Score: 2, Informative

      in the begining, he was in some local papers, and didn't do Sunday strips.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  12. Not sure how it aged by ianscot · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Bloom County was lumped in with Calvin and Hobbes in my mind: the two early-to-mid-80s comics that got tired after a while and took "sabbaticals." (Calvin and Hobbes wasn't really just "time off," the author quit, but anyway, both of them got tired after maybe five years.)

    I went to find collections for my kids this last year. Calvin and Hobbes is still as good, even better, than I remembered it. But Bloom County, sorry to say, is not just highly topical with 80s politics and all... it's just not quite as fantastically good. Sorry to say it, but there it is. Once you get past the initial "cute Opus" phase it just felt kind of seedy. The kids never got into the big book, either, though they're obsessed with Calvin and Hobbes now.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    1. Re:Not sure how it aged by Squideye · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They were lumped together in my mind too, but in the "infinitely re-readable" sense. While Calvin and Hobbes has aged somewhat better, you don't have to appreciate *who Ed Meese was* in order to be entertained by Opus' discussion of him. Often the Meadow Critters' understanding of the '80s politics was fairly superficial, which was okay.

      It's a good recapitulation of history, especially to read about Cold-War era fears; "The Iron Giant" didn't lose any points from me for being about the '50s, nor "Cradle Will Rock" about the '30s.

      But when I read Bloom County or Outland today, I find it even more compelling as a discussion of a political era that could shed some light on today's. With similar attitudes in the Bush Administration II and today's media about what it is to be God-Fearing and Rifle-Toting as in the 1980s, Opus and Milo and Binkley and Oliver... and even Bill... give us Berkeley Breathed's perspective as he was living through it, and we can get a sense of just how similar distant times can be.

      I'd say it aged well.

  13. Re:Lost its Bloom by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Charles Schulz: drawing Peanuts to the end.

    ...long, long after he wrote any new jokes for the poor weathered keychain-adorning tykes.

    Give Breathed and Larson credit for knowing when to hold, when to fold, and going out on top.

  14. cool stuff by larry+bagina · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I did an interview with Berke a couple years ago (for the school's weekly newspaper that no one reads), and bloom county came up, natch.


    I asked him how everyone would have ended up, and he said that Wendell (the nerdy computer geek that Urkel was based on) would have ended up as a Linux kernel developer.


    Cool stuff.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    1. Re:cool stuff by LookSharp · · Score: 2, Informative

      The moderators have been trolled;

      I asked him how everyone would have ended up, and he said that Wendell (the nerdy computer geek that Urkel was based on) would have ended up as a Linux kernel developer.

      This is not true. You can count on one hand how many interviews Berke has given in in the past 7 years. I'm a bit of a fanboy so I can vouch for that. The kid had nothing to do with Urkel, and the Linux remark only solidifies the troll.

      Check out his .sig if you still need proof of trolling.

  15. Historical strips! by Slartibartfast · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'd pay -- through the nose -- to see original strips like Blondie (back when it was a social mores shattering strip), Krazy Kat, etc. Comics back in the 30's, during the heyday, etc. These things can be found, piecemeal, in various anthologies. To have 'em all in one place for reference, well... not only would it be a terrific glimpse into Americana, it would be great fun to read, too!

    1. Re:Historical strips! by dotPliska · · Score: 2, Informative
      The main reason we can't find the originals anymore is because the newspapers have been discarded. The libraries screwed up and threw out the papers after microfilming everything, in the name of preserving "intellectual content" and "saving shelf space".

      Note that microfilm is black & white only and often of poor quality.

      You can read more about it in Nicholson Baker's controversial "Double Fold", excerpts at nytimes.com or bookreporter.com.

  16. Can I browse it... by John+Harrison · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...on my Banana 2000?

    1. Re:Can I browse it... by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 3, Funny

      You'll have to upgrade to the new model, now with Tint Control!

  17. _Academia_ Waltz by Allen+Varney · · Score: 2, Informative

    In addition -- an extra-special bonus for us Berke Breathed fans -- his college predecessor, Academic Waltz, will also be run.

    Pedantic correction: Breathed's original strip was called "Academia Waltz," not "Academic." It was a modest little Doonesbury ripoff that ran in THE DAILY TEXAN, the student newspaper of the University of Texas at Austin. A few of the characters later seen in "Bloom County" debuted there, but the strip is said to be of interest for Breathed completists only.

    Then again, don't trust me. I never saw much of interest in "Bloom County" itself. When it won a Pulitzer Prize for editorial cartooning, that seemed to me a sad moment in the history of the Pulitzer. THE COMICS JOURNAL writer R. Fiore once commented that saying "Bloom County" was funny was like complimenting a shoplifter on her taste in clothes.

  18. Re:Actual cost: $10 by Jens_UK · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Or wait and subscribe in 2008 and get them all for $10.

  19. For $10 bucks... by bahamat · · Score: 3, Funny

    Let me know when/where you mirror it. I'd like a copy too.

  20. Image quality kind of sucks by cjpez · · Score: 3, Informative

    I may go for their "not completely satisfied in seven days?" bit. The image quality is pretty awful . . .

  21. Reminds me of my college days... by wazzzup · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...when all of the drives and network shares for the Macs in the public computer labs were Bloom County characters. Remembering clicking on Portnoy or Opus to run Gopher brings a tear to my eye.

    I remember getting my first Mac my senior year and instantly replacing the default hard drive icon with Bill the Cat's image and renaming it Ack!

    Anybody know where to get Bloom County icons for OS X?

  22. Deep, man, deep by somethingwicked · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Those who "steal" music clearly believe that $18 a CD, which contains songs the listener is not interested in, is too high a price to pay.

    Make all the arguments you want about obscure/old unattainable bootlegs/etc that you want, HOWEVER : I love file sharing, but there is no doubt in my mind that when I download a music file that I could easily walk into any music shop and pick up right off the shelf of the "Top 20" rack, I am circumventing paying for that song. If you want to sample it, turn on the radio.

    Think the whole album might suck except for the one song? Don't buy it and wait for my one kick ass song to come on the radio.

    In the absence of any alternatives, theft is the only other option.

    ...Yeah, I wont even waste anyone's time with this one. Just highlighting you said it is enuf

    Put true competition (of choice, price and flexibility) into the market and then those on Kazaa et al; can be called thieves.

    There is choice. Buy the package, OR there is likely a mid priced single.

    If I am selling my car, does that give you any right to say- "Hey, I wasn't interested in the entire car, I only wanted the leather seats out of it for my tricked out Ford Escort. Since you were unwilling to sell it them separately, I took the liberty of just taking them. If I like them enough, I might just buy the whole car"

    Yes, I am oversimplifying thing by looking at only the current music...Are you saying you never download a current song?

    --

    ---"What did I say that sounded like 'Tell me about your day?'"---

  23. Re:Great! by JudgeFurious · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The difference is simple. This is priced in a reasonable manner for what it is. Actually it's priced very attractively if you are a fan of the strip. It's compelling.

    Niether music nor software are priced in accordance with their value to the people who are supposed to be doing the buying. The typical CD is immensely overpriced unless you are a fan of that artist and enjoy everything he/she/they record. For most of us it's just not worth the price for a couple of tracks. Microsoft Office for example isn't worth half of what they price it at and a $50 game is just flat out stupid in my opinion.

    Where games are concerned I play the demo sometimes. Other times I'll clone a friends copy to check it out. Legality has nothing to do with it. If it's more convienient to borrow and clone then I go that way.

    If it's worth buying I'll buy it. In the past year or so I've bought 5 or 6 games like that. I still think they're overpriced at $50 a pop but if it's a good game I give them their reward.

    The same thing goes for new music. Old music I don't pay for. In almost every case where I have older music on my hard drive that I've downloaded or borrowed/ripped then I once owned that LP/8-track/Cassette. The way I see it that music has been paid for. I'm not 100% compliant but for the most part I am.

    New music on the other hand is all about not getting ripped off.

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  24. A cool Penguin by helfon1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think the /. crowd is just mad because opus is cooler than the linux penguin.

    I think 10 dollars is a good price for a year subscription. I am tired of people overcharging for web content. I would like to see buisness models that rely on volume rather than high prices per customer.

  25. Re:Are archives accessible? by Randar+the+Lava+Liza · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes! The way it works, at least with Calvin & Hobbes, is that they picked some arbitrary date to start running it, and you can go back into the past as far as you'd like. There's a little archive icon under each comic, click on that and you'll get a little calendar, so you can browse back to view other comics. You can't go into the "future" (which is the past in this case, natch) but you can view comics that have already run.

    Kind of like being forced not to skip ahead on those old Far Side off the wall calendars.

    --
    Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage. - Anais Nin
  26. Low cost, low quality by leipold · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sadly, the image quality for the first week's strips is pretty bad, and the images are small. You'd think premium content would be of higher quality...

  27. I hope it encourages more like it by fermion · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I hope that the services introduces Bloom County to a new generation of readers. The strip had a depth seldom seen on the daily comic page. Well developed deep characters, relatively long story arcs, appropriate political satire, and very good drawings, particularly in the later strips and Outland.

    Some of the specifics may be lost on those who did not live through it, but generalities are always funny. For instance when Rosebud was outed as female, Cutter John and the crew of the Enterpoop, Bill the Cat for president or as a fundamentalist preacher. On more serious sides we have the eternal physiological truths of searching for one's mother or trying to get acceptance from ones father(the later is a theme of King of the Hill).

    I really hope this encourages the development of new strips that are self aware and humble. I think a comic should be more than just a contrived excuse for a punchline.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  28. Re:woot! by jridley · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They didn't cancel it. Breathed stopped. I respect people who can stop when they feel their creation has run out of steam. Too many comic strips and other stuff (xanth books, for example) just keep coming as long as the money is flowing, and they turn into sad, embarassing crap.

  29. Re:Are archives accessible? by Mournblade · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just a quick FYI. You do not need to be a subscriber to get the C&H strips. They've been running for a copule of years now.

  30. Why great comics blink out or fade to crap... by Mossfoot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sometimes what I hate is the pressure on cartoonists to publish something every damn day. No wonder a comic I find funny this year has changed to something very weak the next. Either the author opts for middle of the road cute crap with no edge meant to put a smile on your face (at best), or they keep the edge going as long as they can until they realize there just isn't enough left for them to keep their pace.

    Problem is, these authors, rather than being allowed to publish on a semi-regular basis (ie whenever they want) they have to retire, some say they're taking a break, but they never come back... inertia takes over at that point.

    I wonder if there would still be a Bloom County or Outland if Breathed was allowed to publish once every two weeks or once a month or so during the drier spells... I can only imagine what he would have done now with George W and Gulf War II... lots of material there ;)

    --
    Fuzzy Knights: New RPG Strips Tuesday and Friday!:
    http://www.fuzzyknights.com
    1. Re:Why great comics blink out or fade to crap... by Black+Jack+Hyde · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I wonder if there would still be a Bloom County or Outland if Breathed was allowed to publish once every two weeks or once a month...

      So why can't he do that now? Couldn't BB get a deal with a monthly (Playboy, Popular Science, Ladies' Home Journal, whatever) and do four strips an issue?

      It's too much to hope for Bloom County to return and snuff Cathy out of the dailies, yes?

      Bloom County, Calvin and Hobbes, and The Far Side made the comics page a great place to visit every day. Nothing's come close to replacing them (sorry Zits and Bizarro).

      Jack

  31. Re:woot! by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I respect people who can stop when they feel their creation has run out of steam.

    I've said it before, and I'll say it again:

    There's something deeply, fundamentally wrong with a universe in which Bloom County, The Far Side, and Calvin and Hobbes are gone, while Beetle Bailey, B.C., and Blondie linger on and on and on.

  32. Some favorite BB strips of mine by frozenray · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One can be found on his official website.

    And here's the other one (younger slashdot readers may not know about Reagan's infamous microphone test which probably inspired this strip).

    --
    "There are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare." - Blair Houghton
  33. Re:Bill the Cat says.. by i.r.id10t · · Score: 3, Funny

    And I think userfriendly.org had Bill the Cat on as a guest, since he is/was the only one able to properly pronounce "HTTP".

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  34. Too bad... by 72beetle · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Breathed won't start doing strips again. Can you IMAGINE the midnight revelations Binkley would be having about Michael Jackson these days?

    -72

    --
    -Those who dance are considered insane by those who can't hear the music.
  35. Oh, we can decide what to pay now? by khrustee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Great. So when I steal the Dodge Viper and leave $20 under the door of the Dodge dealership, I can use your argument? I don't think that $15 dollar cds are a great value, but then I don't think that you can 'justify' stealing tracks because it doesn't fit -YOUR- price scheme. If everyone held this view regarding all products/services...

    1. Re:Oh, we can decide what to pay now? by JudgeFurious · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, the way I see this it's not about MY price scheme at all. It's about the "value" of a song undergoing change.

      This is really an interesting thing to watch happen because for the first time in my life I'm watching an industry fighting to keep their product from losing it's value while at the same time a huge number of people are using file sharing to redefine what that product is worth.

      This is so much different than someone stealing cars and paying what they can afford for them. First of all a Dodge Viper (your example) is clearly worth vastly more $20. That's completely lopsided. At this point lets take a $15 CD (again your example) and then lets say it has 10 tracks to keep my math challenged brain from thinking too much so we're talking about a buck and a half a track. Good track, bad track, it all breaks down the same way.

      Go back to your Dodge Viper and say for instance it's a $60,000 car. I admit to not having a clue what they get for a Dodge Viper so let's use that number for conversations sake. Now if the Dodge Neon also was priced at $60,000, and so was every other model of truck Dodge made then do you think many people would buy the Neon? Do you think many people would even buy Dodge products at all? Surely not enough of them to allow Dodge to keep charging such a ridiculous price for a Neon.

      The thing is a lot of people will buy a Neon at a reasonable price. A lot of people will buy music at a reasonable price too. I'd be happy to pay the $1.50/track price I mentioned if I could buy three of the songs I like and pass on the crap. That's what it's going to be. If they don't like it their entire industry will slip out from under them.

      Software is a completely different matter. OSS is going to do (and is doing) to retail software what file sharing is doing to record labels. It's going to take the field and level it, albeit without having to resort to obviously illegal means in order to do so.

      In either case it's going to change. You can change with it or get run over by it but it's going to change.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  36. But I already have copies of every Bloom County by noewun · · Score: 3, Funny
    in these, whadayacallem, books. . .

    For those born after me, these are an ancient storage media which consist of pieces of paper, on which images have been permeneantly inscribed, bound together in bundles. They are unique in that they require no electricity, no networking, do not crash, may comfortably be rested on one's lap when one is in the bathroom thinking, and contain absolutely no DRM

    I know, I know - what's the fun in that. You can't even make 'em run Linux.

    --
    I am a believer of momentum and curves.
  37. Fishing for MyComicsPage opinions... by Thedalek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just how tedious is it to archive (locally) huge quantities of strips like this? I mean, using MyComicsPage, let's say I sign up for a year and wish to archive Calvin & Hobbes on my computer (so's I can view 'em offline). Is this so impractical as to be impossible?

    Also, which comics do they have full archives of? Is it all of them, or just a select few?

    --
    Happiness is relative, Based upon the way we live.
  38. wrong icon by Iowaguy · · Score: 2

    Shouldn't the logo for this section be a penguin instead of a foot? -Iowa

    --
    "He who laughs last, didn't get the joke."-Cap
  39. Peanuts by John+Bayko · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Peanuts was less about humour than about situation. How funny can the "football gag" be the tenth time around? What I enjoyed about it was more about what it meant that Charlie Brown would know full well what was going to happen, but still manage to convince himself that someday it might be different, and if he didn't give it a chance today, it might never happen.

    It never did, and Lucy always put his optimism in perspective with some quip. It might have been funny, but if you chose to think about it further, it made you reflect a bit on your own situation. You go to work/school/look for work every day, even if it doesn't seem like it'll make a difference, because of that same sort of optimism, right?

    Not everyone gets the same thing out of Peanuts, or if they do, it's not always consciously. Sometimes it's kind of like those "Chicken Soup for the Simple Minded Optimist" books - kind of gives you a good feeling even if it doesn't really do much good.

    Of course, you can always spend more effort and get as self-reflective about the Peanuts characters as you want. You can see the same things in Calvin and Hobbes and occasionally in a different way in Bloom County (but not Far Side - that was just plain wacky fun). But it wasn't fundamentally about being funny, so that's the wrong way to judge it.

  40. Good points, but I still don't agree by khrustee · · Score: 2, Interesting
    My point about the lopsided $20 Viper was that let's say perhaps (perhaps?) I'm just really not mentally sound, and to me, $20 is fair for a Viper. My saying it's worth only $20 doesn't make it so; just as someone saying "I'm only going to pay $4.50 for those 3 songs" isn't right. That may be fair to most people, but if the cd costs $15, it still costs $15. Stealing tracks is still stealing, however you justify it or whatever end you hope to see come about.

    As far as leaving the original intact being justification, I'm not sure I agree. What would happen if this argument were used in other areas?

    - Movies: (or even new albums). We've heard of people sneaking out digital copies of flicks/songs, and making them available on the net. In a perfect world of no-limit bandwidth, those songs could theoretically be available worldwide instantaneously. How long do you suppose people will keep putting out movies/songs if everyone had access to them before they even hit shelves/stores? If everyone thought $10 was too much for a movie, and felt they were 'harming nobody' by just downloading it...

    - Drugs: Pfizer spends 10 years and $400 million finding the cure to AIDS. Your buddy works in the lab, takes home a copy of the magic formula, and soon everybody has it. Great, AIDS has been eradicated, but Pfizer soon goes out of business, and no further research is done, anywhere, because all companies have an 'information wants to be free!' guru.

    - Software: Is $50 ridiculous for a game or program that took years and $millions to develop? See above movies argument. If lifting a program is made very easy and very quick; how much real advance will we see in the future? Not everyone can program fulltime just for fun and the knowledge that they are betting society from their efforts.

    - How many other jobs/products/services could be lost under this justification? How many people would be out of work if everything were fair game?

    I'm sure some will say that's the natural evolution of things, but I really don't think so. Someone has to spend their full time jobs creating, editing, performing, designing, programming, etc. When you, or anyone, lifts something by saying 'it's too expensive, PLUS it really isn't harming anything', I think the damage done is beyond estimation. How many people will just throw their hands in the air and say 'screw it' when they realize that they won't get paid for their work.

    Would you work for free? At the end of the week, if your employer said, "well, chuck, you worked 40 hours, but I really only liked about 5 of them. Here's your check for five hours." Would you still work there? What if all companies did that? Their argument would still hold. "Hey, you're still intact! And you went bathroom SEVERAL times during the week, which we we're reimbursed for. So quit yer whining."

    Mmmmm sacrilicious.

  41. Breathed's complaint about shrinking comics. by Hobart · · Score: 2, Informative

    If I recall correctly (and it's mentioned in his recent Onion-AV-club interview), one of the major factors that made Berke Breathed retire was that comic strips were being shrunk to unreadable sizes. (This is currently really annoying me with Boondocks, even ONLINE fer Goodness sake!).

    I always wondered, though, what if Berke had followed the path blazed by Dr. Fun , who from day 1 was publishing a 640x480 color image for each panel? Keep each daily strip 480 pixels high, and stipulate that it not be shrunk ... end of problem!

    --
    o/~ Join us now and share the software ...
  42. Not sure what you mean... by Slartibartfast · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Have his works in paper format..." Well, no, you don't: you have *some* of his works in paper format. I, for example, can quote virtually all the anthologies: I'm that much of a fan. The six strips I saw today were _NEW_ to me, and, I promise, were never in Loose Tails.

    As for "I would pay the 10 bucks if it included a week of new strips, including Sunday", what do you mean? Every two days, it publishes "a week of new strips, including Sunday." Specifically, on a given day, it publishes the dailies (Mon - Sat), and on the next day, it does the Sunday.

    Granted, if you Just Don't Care, that's one thing, but this is stuff that, unless you read from Day One in the Washington Post, you've likely never seen... 'cause it ain't been anywhere else. Granted, the stuff we've seen in the books will also be putting in an appearance, and I'll enjoy them, too, but DAMN, I'd been hoping for this for years.