Slashdot Mirror


Build Your Own PCB Milling Machine

mwandel writes "It used to be that one off amateur printed circuit boards were all etched in acid. A lot of companies nowadays use a special form of milling machine to mill them out of solid copper clad circuit boards. This guy Jonathan Westhues built his own PCB milling machine out of various parts, with a laminate trimmer as the milling head. Lots of other neat hacks on his Webpage as well."

210 comments

  1. Amateur by djupedal · · Score: 0

    ...is the key word.

    Whatever happened to the guys that were going to print out boards on inkjet printers?

    Also since these would be milled, they would be called MCB's. Get it straight.

    Milling machines, while a marvel of modern technology in their own right, cannot create multi-layered circuit boards, unless you ignore the obvious extra steps involved. Sounds like overkill, and a solution looking for a problem.

    1. Re:Amateur by bjcubsfan · · Score: 4, Informative

      They're still called PCBs even if they are milled. It's a naming convention that has stuck. It is in no way incorrect.

      Also, It is not difficult to make a double sided PCB with a milling machine. There are many times in circuit board design that you don't need more than one or two layers. This is a solution that solves a lot of smaller problems every day.

    2. Re:Amateur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Also since these would be milled, they would be called MCB's. Get it straight. "

      Yeah and traditional boards are ECBs right?

      "Milling machines, while a marvel of modern technology in their own right, cannot create multi-layered circuit boards, unless you ignore the obvious extra steps involved."

      Yeah and etching a board obviously couldn't either, could it??

      Troll alert!

    3. Re:Amateur by uglomera · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Milling machines are not an overkill or a solution for amateurs, they are a very good solution for inexpensive prototypes or production needed in small-mid volume.

      Acid etching produces a functional board, but it simply does not look good, and you can't make 100 boards that are exactly alike. The lines are almost straight, the edges are not perfect, and if you are on a contract to deliver a product, this is not an option. Examples of where a milling machine is one of the best solutions: a university lab where the researchers are under government/industry contract and are supposed to deliver a working prototype or a small business with a military contract (small volume products).

      I worked for a startup company for a while, and part of my job was to work on a QuickCircuit milling machine, and that thing had milling bits that were 4 mils thick (comparable to hair). You can hardly reach this precision with acid etching. I also adapted the machine to dice wafers, which replaced the company's practice of using an exactoknife :)

      If you are in the IC design business, testing cheaply is of primary importance. You can get a full setup for producing boards for less than $10K. How's that compared to billions of $$$ for setting up an IC production plant? And if you are in the RF design business, you need the precision so that a crappy board does not screw up your high-frequency measurements.

      Of course, milling is no option for producing high-volume PCBs with many layers, but don't think that ASUS spent months to design such a board to test their new motherboard design. First they have to verify that design works, which is done with a cheap PCB design, one that would hook up the ICs. Only after that stage can the final PCB design begin.

      As long as the Z80 or 68K processors are still in use, simple PCBs will be here, and we need a cheap and fast way to design and make them.

    4. Re:Amateur by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

      Agreed at one time I ran a shop doing engineering modifacations for a high end workstation mfgr
      did it all with saws and files High tech is not always necessary or even the right way to go
      by the way they thought since we did the cuts to about .001" that we used lasers I told them that I used a chainsaw

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
    5. Re:Amateur by darqchild · · Score: 1

      Then, with your own two hands, build somthing better than this. Show me a better tool for building short-run products, or prototypes. Hell, just build a CNC mill. If you can make it all by yourself, i will be impressed.

      If you can, show us.

      If you cant, then maybe you should try to be a little more polite.

      --
      What? Me? Worry?
    6. Re:Amateur by kcelery · · Score: 1

      Last time I check the T-tech, the startup miller is about $8,000. That's the heavy for my pocket, is there any other work-around?

    7. Re: Amateur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Making your own multi-layer (>2 layers) board by etching is no walk in the park, either! The lamination process requries high temperature and pressure, pre-preg is no fun to handle, and then there's the alignment issues. If you really need more than two layers, you're in need of a quick-turn proto shop (and there are many around with quite reasonable prices for short runs of small cards).

      If you don't need the layers, the milled boards work fine up to limits of their resolution. Just be sure to have an efficient dust control system, as you don't want to be inhaling the glass fibers.

      Of course, in the stone age of LS-TTL speeds we had all the layers we wanted. We called it wire wrap. But don't try building a 266MHz bus that way!

    8. Re:Amateur by mbreitba · · Score: 1

      The CNC system here http://www.cocopuff.net/cnc is hopefully going to be an inexpensive cnc system aimed at enthusiasts, hobbyists, and educational institutes. The photo's located at the above URL are a prototype of our cnc machine, with the final version being slightly smaller (12"x12"x5" working area). We're planning on offering it at sub 2k prices, including all motors, controllers, and software. Should begin production sometime early this summer. Questions and comments can be directed to mbreitba@shanje.com -Flash

    9. Re:Amateur by Degrees · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I used to work at a factory that made these, and the primary owner was an electrical engineer. He used to point out that really, we should call them PWB - Printed Wiring Boards. They were after all, just wiring, not actual electronic cicuits.

      Once in a great while, we got a board with a funny pattern for some traces, and he pointed out those were actual circuitry. He said that at high enough frequencies, an engineer could play with the trace pattern and fiddle with impedence or frequency attenuation.

      Lastly he said of course we can call them whatever we want - but whatever the customer says, goes. The customer was always right. :-)

      --
      "The most sensible request of government we make is not, "Do something!" But "Quit it!"
    10. Re:Amateur by TimTheFoolMan · · Score: 1

      Another consideration is that circuits dealing with very small signals (i.e. RF or nanovolt amps) will be all over the place with an etched board (remnants of the etching process). For several years, I worked for an electronic scale company where we would build custom load cell trimming boxes. The leakage from a hand-etched board relegated most of these to the "this is what it will look like" collection, and not something you could actually install at a job site for beta feedback.

      In contrast, milling the board would give you similar turnaround time (less than an hour or so) but without the leakage. At the time I was doing this (about 10 years ago), I was printing out negatives on laser transparencies, photo-etching directly from the printer output, and then straight to the drilling machine. In one case, I was able to prototype a new trimming box for a customer within 2 hours, including layout & board stuffing time.

      Being able to produce a milled board in an hour or so would be pretty groovy, but I have to think a pen plotter & Dremel tool would be more accurate.

  2. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  3. his Webpage by nother_nix_hacker · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Lots of other neat hacks on his Webpage as well...

    That you'll never get to see because it's Slashdotted already! :)

  4. milling machines are cool by zymano · · Score: 3, Interesting
    If you type in "home built milling" at google you'll get an interesting type of mill called a CNC mill that is made out of regular Dremel rotary drills and computers. Very cool.

    More people need to be able to make their own parts out of steel and plastic. The problem is cost. It's curious that a country that is inventive as ours doesn't have some type of affordable CNC(computer numeric computation) milling machine.

    Affordable metal cutting lathes are expensive too.

    1. Re:milling machines are cool by Cyno01 · · Score: 1, Funny
      Affordable metal cutting lathes are expensive too.
      Huh?
      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    2. Re:milling machines are cool by robwills · · Score: 2, Informative

      CNC == Computer Numeric(al) Control

    3. Re:milling machines are cool by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ""The problem is cost. It's curious that a country that is inventive as ours doesn't have some type of affordable CNC(computer numeric computation) milling machine.""

      You underestimate what it take to make a good mill. A none computer controlled Bridgeport Vertical Mill will set you back 16 grand depending on how you option it. There are not a highvolume thing. It takes massive peices of perfectly machined metal to do this. Theres a lot to it. You can't just cheapen one up without it becomeing well cheap.

      Adding Computer Numeric Control is not so easy. Though i'm sure if someone wanted to do it it would not be impossible. But there is a heck of a lot to G code (what runs CNC's). You'll be working the bugs out for a while. And then you still need a CAD program to pop out G code, thats a few grand there at the cheapest level. Granted if you want to spend a lot of time you can code it by hand. Many machinist do much of the G code by hand, but they do that everyday.

      There are reasons CNC's aren't cheap, Mainly the fact everything about them is expensive. If you ever get to see a real high end CNC mill or lathe going you will understand why the cost $100K to a million bucks. Watching one at work will blow your mind. Especialy if you stick your head in it.

    4. Re:milling machines are cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your search - "home built milling" - did not match any documents.

    5. Re:milling machines are cool by MBCook · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Good try, but not quite. If all you want to do is mill simple things and etch circuit boards with it, it's not that hard. There are a few little bits, but you can build a good one for under $100 (plus steppers, etc). It would cost less if you already have some of the stuff around.

      As for CNC not being easy, it's not easy, but it's not impossible. Especially if all you're doing is PCBs. How expensive is the software? Dirt cheap. You can use the free version of TurboCAD to make your parts. You export them as DXF files. Then the program that controlls your motors can convert that to gcode for you (or you can use another piece of software). You can get free DXF->GCODE converters that work quite well. You can also get free software to run your motors, or nice commercial programs for $20.

      It's true that a "real" CNC machines start in the 10s of Ks, but you can make one that will do just about everything a hobbiest will ever need for just a little. For more information see my other posts to this discussion, or see John's website.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    6. Re:milling machines are cool by Jason1729 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What would be perfect is if there were places where you could rent time on a CNC mill, sort of like kinko's for engineers.

      I make about 20 PCBs a year (with FeCl3 etching). It would be nice to just go into the store CD and blank copper clad board in hand and rent the machine for an hour for $50-$100 and make 5 boards.

      Since the boards are generally all different or at most 2 copies of a single one, I can't justify spending $80 for each board at a place like PCB express. This is just a hobby after all :).

      Jason
      ProfQuotes

    7. Re:milling machines are cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not practical for the same reason you cant just put your own code on some one elses web server without them charging you to check it.

      And with CNCs its much worse if something goes wrong. Its can get very loud, scary and expensive.

      Even something as simple as leaving a period off the end of a number will cause the machine to interepret it as a zero. Then fun things like the head of the machine running into the job can happen causing $10k+ damage to the machine.

      What would be perfect is if there were places where you could rent time on a CNC mill, sort of like kinko's for engineers.

      I make about 20 PCBs a year (with FeCl3 etching). It would be nice to just go into the store CD and blank copper clad board in hand and rent the machine for an hour for $50-$100 and make 5 boards.

      Since the boards are generally all different or at most 2 copies of a single one, I can't justify spending $80 for each board at a place like PCB express. This is just a hobby after all :).

    8. Re:milling machines are cool by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 1

      I wasn't talking about making PCB's. The person was talking about CNC's and didn't refer to as just for PCBs. For the purpose of just PCB's one could probably just by a router carving table. They work much the same as these types of machines.

    9. Re:milling machines are cool by ArsonPanda · · Score: 1

      Of course, it would be fairly simple to make a mill simulator program. Something that would take the .dxf, and run through it really quick and say "Error: Collision kills orphan holding a puppy on line 38" etc.

      With your webserver code example, there's hundreds of ways something could go wrong. Buffer overflows, memory leak, etc etc etc... with a milling machine, it goes from point A to point B. All variables are known. Material rigidity, support beam locations, etc.
      It's a totally different issue.

      --

      --I don't want the world, I just want your half.
    10. Re:milling machines are cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you would think that it should be simple but it is far from it.

      The packages are not mature enough to pick up all the problems that you come across. The biggest been the quality of the model supplied by the customer. They often have gaps between surfaces which cause the head to 'plunge'. But some of the higher end packages can pick this up.

      These gaps also occur when converting from one file format to another.

      I would agree that all this should have been sorted out years ago, but unfortinately that isn't the case.

    11. Re:milling machines are cool by madfgurtbn · · Score: 2, Informative

      What would be perfect is if there were places where you could rent time on a CNC mill, sort of like kinko's for engineers.

      Try your local high school or middle school industrial technology teacher. I betcha you could work a deal where you could use their equipment if you can provide something of value to them in return, other than money (although a few bucks for the budget never hurts). Most valuable is your time and expertise. Least valuable, most likely to get you a no answer is anything that is going to take up any of his/her most valuable asset--time.

      It is a big hassle to have to help a newbie set up a mill and even if the user has experience, it is generally a hassle to help them find the tools, widgets, and toolbits needed for your particular project. So make it clear from the get-go that you are going to make it worth their time, or you will probably not get near the equipment.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money. Dad, get me out of this.
    12. Re:milling machines are cool by madfgurtbn · · Score: 4, Informative

      See www.desktopcnc.com for a comparison of various tabletop cnc machines. Depends on your personal definition of "affordable", but there are some small machines $3k

      I don't think you could reach .0001 tolerance on those low-end machines, but most of them would get close to .001, which is plenty for most hobbyist projects.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money. Dad, get me out of this.
    13. Re:milling machines are cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assume your talking inches??? .001" = 0.0254 mm

    14. Re:milling machines are cool by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised to hear high schools have equipment like a CNC. When I was in HS, the most advanced equipment our metal shop had was a bandsaw and lathe. I didn't even know a CNC existed until University. While I was there, they shut down all the tech labs and replaced them with computer labs to offer courses like "aldus pagemaker" and "corel draw". I thought it was an incredibly stupid thing to do.

      I didn't know high schools still had any tech equipment at all.

      Jason
      ProfQuotes

    15. Re:milling machines are cool by zymano · · Score: 2, Informative
    16. Re:milling machines are cool by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

      Not necessarly, old miling machines can be picked up for very little forget the CNC not necessary for one-offs (you spend more time programming it than it would take to do it manualy
      (If you want to be the most popular guy in the neighborhood buy a welding machine)

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
    17. Re:milling machines are cool by Compuser · · Score: 1

      This is what he means. On the best mills, if you
      are careful about temperature of the surface being
      worked and if you machine slowly with sharp bits
      you can get 0.0001" precision, i.e. 2.5 micron.
      Going beyond that requires a polishing jig.
      It is not uncommon for people to give specs to the
      machinist with the precision of a few micron but
      that HAS to be dimensions at some given temperature.
      At those precisions, thermal expansion matters.

    18. Re:milling machines are cool by mlh1996 · · Score: 1
      My high school had a CNC lathe. In 1990.

      But my high school voc/tech department kicked some pretty serious ass. In western Nebraska, being a good welder is actually prestigous.

      I'll tell you one thing, my friends who can weld have jobs right now, and I'm working phone tech support.

      --
      Lack of creativity is no excuse for not having a .sig
    19. Re:milling machines are cool by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

      There is its called your local community colledge need a custom part. take machine tool 101 (done it 6 times now)

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
    20. Re:milling machines are cool by SpamHeart · · Score: 1

      Do a search on "used machine tools"

      Many really nice older CNC vertical mills (vertical machining centers) are *reasonably priced* and available from shops that had to upgrade to get higher spindle speeds etc. Your main cost is tooling (You usually get a buck nekkid machine) & rigging (moving something that weighs maybe 10,000lbs plus) and the wiring and transformers...(440v 3-phase is common)....G-codes are not that hard, you can play with a program like CamExpert (Linux!) to make your drawings and generate 2-D G-codes....the more modern controllers have proprietary interfaces that sort of hide the ugly details in a menu-driven graphical format...long as you know what all that stuff is called and actually does. Prepare to feel really stupid for a while. A CNC *crash* is much more violent than a PC crash.

      DC

    21. Re:milling machines are cool by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      I'll tell you one thing, my friends who can weld have jobs right now, and I'm working phone tech support.

      I agree with you. I thought it was a stupid idea when they got rid of the tech courses and I still do. I value what I learned in auto mechanics a lot more than my practice using a flatbed scanner.

      Jason
      ProfQuotes

    22. Re:milling machines are cool by Silicon_Knight · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, it really depends on what sort of precision you need. You're really comparing a cadallac to a geo metro here! :-).

      For those wondering, a milling machine is like a drill press, only the part can be positioned accurately relative to the spinning metal cutter, and the cutter and head is designed to take side loads as well as axle load encountered in drilling. In all machine shops, calibration marks are in increments of 0.001", or 0.01mm. A human hair is usually 0.003", and most skilled operators can hold 0.001" precision quite nicely. This gives you an idea of what sort of cutting operations we can do.

      The cool thing about CNC is that under computer control, 3, 4 or even 5 axis can rotate simultaneously. It is like drawing vector graphics, and vector shapes, except in 3D. Newer CNC mills can actually be programmed using NURBS. They really are amazing robots to watch, they can rapidly accelerate to over 200 inch per minute tranverse speed, and come to a stop within 0.0005" of their target.

      A bridgeport machine is about the best manual milling machine you can buy. Everything, as the previous poster pointed out, is a piece of art - down to the table (the surface the work is held on), which is hand-engraved by some old 80 year old guy with a chisel, then finished to within 0.0002" flatness. That's right, every point on a 12 x 60" table is within 0.0002" in vertical height.

      On the other hand, home brew variety uses regular screws for motion control, cut corners everywhere, etc. You really get what you pay for.
      My team used extensively Sherline milling machines, and recently acquired a TAIG. Both are very nice, hobby priced CNC mills, both can be had for under $1000.00. They have all the features of the big industrial machines, and we've made parts from aluminum, delrin, steel, and even titanium on them. As long as you're not in a hurry to get parts done, they work quite well.

      Here's a few links to get newbies started:

      Vendor neutral information links:
      http://www.mini-lathe.com
      http://groups.y ahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/
      http://groups.yah oo.com/group/sherline/
      http://groups.yahoo.com/gr oup/taigtools/

      Hobbiest turned vendors site with great info:
      http://www.seanet.com/~dmauch/
      http://www. cartertools.com/

      Commercial products:
      http://www.sherline.com
      http://www.tai gtools.com

      BTW - if you're looking at getting one of these machines for PCB milling - my advice is to invest in a black light and a UV etch resist kit. Even with our most well maintained machine, and a 10,000 rpm spindle upgrade, production of anything that allows surface mount components is still a bit of a nightmare. The fibreglass (FR4) dust is very very abrasive and will do BAD THINGS to your lungs. Also, keep in mind that most of these hobby machines cannot match a commercial unit for spindle speed - and a higher spindle speed is required for small diameter cutting bits to adequately cut detailed features. (Commercial engravers run at 300,000 rpm - yup, 0.3 million revs per minute, on air bearings). Food for thought.

      BTW, I am the shopmaster (read, machine sys-admin ;-) ) for a high school robotics team [www.swatrobotics.org] . We have 6 weeks to build a robot, and I am in charge of production to make sure the crew get their training, their tools, and their machine time to get things made. Pretty cool project :-).

      -=- Terence

    23. Re:milling machines are cool by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes you can get old ones pretty cheap. But as the poster I responded to was going towards new, so I responded as such. Your right about the wiring and toolling, mills and collets and such are the reall hidden cost. And yes a CNC crash is ugly. Thats why untill the program has been tested a Machiniest stands there and watchs.

      I do know G code, I had to learn it. It's not the hardest thing in the world, but it's not the funnest thing either. it's like playing 3D logo. But making software to take a 3D cad file into G code is not so fun.

      And sorry but there are no free CAD programs out there that are worth a damn.

    24. Re:milling machines are cool by anubi · · Score: 2, Informative
      I read the links over at crankorgan and note he's come up with a nice homebrew CNC machine. Note.. if you are gonna brew your own, you might wanna check out any tossed copy machine, printer, or old 5 inch floppy drives. You would be surprised at the wealth of motors, gears, shafts, whatever, you will find in one of those big clunkers! ( Especially those with those big collator bins. ). You not only get the motors, but with a lot of old machines, they were made before everything went ASIC and you can probably retrieve the power supply and basic motor drive circuits intact.

      Find the biggest ugliest old battleship printer at the swap meet. Its apt to be brimming over with usable mechanical parts. You may have to haul the thing away in a truck, but you can probably pick one up cheaper than the gas it takes you to get it home. I've seen sellers get so frustrated trying to rid themselves of an old line printer that they gave it away rather than try to pack it up for the next meet. And the older, bigger, heavier, and uglier it is, the more apt it is to have salvageable parts and powerful motors - because they were made from standard parts before everything was mass-produced for a specific use. As well as being over-designed.

      A lot of those old 5 inch floppy drives had a quite decent stepper motor for head positioning that had a standard 1/4" dia shaft. And most had a standard driver chip for the motor too.. those quad-darlington on a chip things. A little inspection on the circuit board usually confirmed how to hook it up.

      A side note - if you luck out and get one of those "pancake" spindle motors, some have one helluva disklike planar magnet in them - already mounted in a steel cup. It has a really unique magnetization pattern to it - where it has alternating patterns of North-South on the face that faces the windings. Once removed, it has an extremely powerful attraction. Do not remove it from its cup. Do not even try. You will ruin it if you do. The cup not only mechanically supports the magnet, it also assists in focusing its field. It makes one helluva "refrigerator magnet"! I would advise gluing a piece of felt to it. This magnet will stay where you put it.

      Arethan has a post on this forum about some software his dad coded. . I looked at it and it really looks promising. Note it used the standard CNC G-code language and had a really nice port setup so you could drive the interfaces from a pair of standard run-of-the-mill parallel ports. I cite his post because if you are considering rolling your own, you will probably need something like this. This looks like good practical software.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    25. Re:milling machines are cool by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > In western Nebraska, being a good welder is
      > actually prestigous.

      There are places where it isn't?

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    26. Re:milling machines are cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give me about 3 more months, and I'll have an inexpensive (under 2k) cnc machine that'll do 12" X 12" work based on a dremel. Current prototype photographs are here http://www.cocopuff.net/cnc/, these pics are a few months old, and don't reflect quite the current design, as the model pictured has an approx. 18X18 working area.

      -Flash

      questions and comments can be directed towards mbreitba@shanje.com

  5. slashdotted already by doowy · · Score: 2, Funny

    /. really needs a mirroring system or at least ask guys like this and/or give them fair warning to prepare.

    2 comments so far and its already down. What's the point? The article might as well be yanked all together.

    --
    ..mork
    1. Re:slashdotted already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      read the faq!!!! slashdot doesn't mirror for a reason!!!

    2. Re:slashdotted already by maxentius · · Score: 1

      There's a good mirror in this thread. You could look around before complaining.

      --
      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of neurons.
    3. Re:slashdotted already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the point? The article might as well be yanked all together.

      You underestimate the ability of the slashdot crowd to comment on articles they cannot read.

    4. Re:slashdotted already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wooooo its in the faq!! I was all confused until read it, now everything makes sense!!!

    5. Re:slashdotted already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      classic. ;o)

    6. Re:slashdotted already by sketerpot · · Score: 1
      Speaking of things slashdot needs, I have an idea for an improvement to the moderation system: flag moderations. These would be like the normal moderations (eg, Troll, Funny), but they wouldn't affect the score of the comment in question. People could then change their preferences to change the scores of all the comments the way they wanted. This would be useful for knocking comments like yours down to -1, since I would set my preferences to subtract a lot of points from anthing with a "Slashdotted Already" moderation.

      The possibilities are endless!

  6. There are easier ways by John+Jorsett · · Score: 4, Informative

    Seems like a lot of trouble to go to when it's pretty cheap to get small-quantity custom boards done.

    1. Re:There are easier ways by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      that looks awesome! know of a simliar place for plastic molding? :D been trying to get a product made forever ... :D

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    2. Re:There are easier ways by lirkbald · · Score: 3, Informative
      A couple others to try:

      ExpressPCB- Has an offer that will let you make 3 3.8"X2.5" 2-sided boards for about $60, as well as a more general off that's not too much more pricey. They have their own board design software you have to use, which is a bit primitive but adequate for hobbyist use, though it's a problem if you were to ever want someone else to make your boards.

      Advanced Circuits- Has a deal to make 2-sided boards for $33/ea, min qty 3. These boards have a solder mask, which is required for dealing with fine-pitch SMT parts, and makes your board all pretty and professional-looking ;-)

      Sierra Proto Express- Has a similar deal to Advanced Circuits, but also has a good price to make four-layer boards.

      Some general notes- I've used the first two, and it worked alright, but I haven't tried the third one. The latter two require Gerber and Excellon data- this is the standard format for PCB plotting and drilling information information. Essentially any board layout software should be able to generate them. However, it is not trivial to figure out what precisely to send the board manufacturer- you can't just blindly trust your layout software to do the Right Thing. I keep meaning to write a little tutorial on my hard-won knowledge about this, but I've never gotten around to it :-/

    3. Re:There are easier ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, but you can get multi-layer (more than 2) boards this way. 4-layer is pretty standard for simple boards, the latest gforce board has something like 12. The middle two boards are traditionally mostly solid (with holes where needed to avoid shorts) and one carries the supplied voltage and one carries the ground return.

      Wumpus2112

    4. Re:There are easier ways by worst_name_ever · · Score: 1
      know of a simliar place for plastic molding?

      Yep: These guys will do small SLS parts for $N, where N is in the mid-hundred range.

      SLS is great for checking fit and function of your design; less useful for actual structural use. They (or other places) can however take an SLS part and form an RTV mold around it, from which they can cast urethane parts. For quantities less than 1000 pieces it's a lot more cost-effective than having an injection-molding tool made up.

      --

      In Soviet Rush, today's Tom Sawyer gets high on you.
    5. Re:There are easier ways by Ratso+Baggins · · Score: 5, Insightful
      You may be missing the point, he machine's turn-around-time is 1 hour(ish) the best you can get is 1 day from the fab co's. Secondly @$80 a board you will quickly pay for the milling machine, if you have need for it. I like it because @ 1:00am when I'm ready to do the board - I can... and how many things geek are done "because I can"?

      Granted it's only double sided - but at that it's wonderful. Wow, no more chemicals! I've always-forever wanted one of these but the pro milling machines are out of my league.

      --

      --
      "we live in a post-ideological world..." - Billy Bragg.

    6. Re:There are easier ways by c_oflynn · · Score: 1

      you can't just blindly trust your layout software to do the Right Thing.

      Thats what something like this is for. Or there are lots of other free gerber viewers...

    7. Re:There are easier ways by c_oflynn · · Score: 1

      The 'this' was supposed to be:

      http://www.pentalogix.com/Products/ViewMate/regist er.cfm in my last post.

    8. Re:There are easier ways by kaleth · · Score: 1

      If you're looking for very small quantities, overseas vendors (relative to the USA) are the only way to go. I have used both of these, with excellent results:

      Olimex - Bulgaria
      MyroPCB - China

      Some others that I haven't used personally:
      CustomPCB - Malaysia
      PCB Pool - Ireland

      The only downside to these is the rather long shipping times.

    9. Re:There are easier ways by tftp · · Score: 1

      I worked with Sierra Proto Express. They have MIL-SPEC technology. They made me a few boards with 4 mil trace/space, gold plated. They also did a production run for me as well, with excellent quality. If you have the money, they are the best.

    10. Re:There are easier ways by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      I *really* apprectiate it. Shoot me an email Id like to ask you some more about it if you dont mind :)

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    11. Re:There are easier ways by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      I had a couple of designs that I sent to Olimex for production...one as an EAGLE file, the other as a set of Gerber and Excellon files. They arrived here a couple of weeks after ordering, and they turned out fairly well. One of the boards was a fairly small design, so I was able to get a dozen of them for ~$30. One of those is now sitting in an Apple IIe, controlling my beer fridge. :-)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    12. Re:There are easier ways by arhines · · Score: 1

      True, but who says you have to use it for PCBs? With a little work this could probably replace those $1000+ rigs (at least for as much as a hobbyist needs it). I could certainly go for a homebuilt CNC mill :)

    13. Re:There are easier ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Granted it's only double sided - but at that it's wonderful.

      You never have made multilayer boards have you.

      If you use this device I can easily make a 3-4 layer board simple as running each board through and then gluing them together JUST LIKE THE BOARD HOUSES DO IT.

      Get some 1/2 ounce copper boards that are not -phenolic and thin enough for layering. 2 dounbsided plus one insulator board = 4 layer board.

      then simply glue- drill and do your copper plate then tin plate and either press in your Via's or use the plating dye to coat the via holes first then thay will get plated during the plating processes.

      so this machine as far as I can tell can make 9,000,000,000 layer boards.

    14. Re:There are easier ways by anubi · · Score: 2, Informative
      I do all my proto work through Advanced Circuits.

      I use PADS PCB ver 7.0 for DOS to generate the Gerber photoplot, aperture, and excellon drill files. Once I have the fileset intact, I zip them and email my rep ( in my case, Anthony Estes ) over at Advanced Circuits with my zipfile package as an attachment, and about a week later I get a large padded envelope in my mailbox with my boards in it. Every one has been exactly what was ordered. Excellent workmanship. And on time.

      Getting started is the hardest part. They know that too, and thats why they have the reps. There is a little hand-holding to be done to make sure you are sending the right stuff, as you do not want a botched job, and they do not want unhappy customers either. When I started off, I first talked via email to my rep, sent him my filesets, and had him review them to make sure they made sense to him too, and were complete and manufacturable. I was impressed with my rep, as he knew just by looking at my files in his viewer if I had screwed up the aperture files or had a bad excellon file. ( The gerber photoplot files shows how the lines are routed, the aperture files show how wide the traces or pads are, and the excellon files show where and what size drill for the holes. You get one photoplot file and one aperture file per layer, and one excellon file per board. ) Once I had confirmed I had a producible fileset, I called him on the phone to set up an account and get the boards made. Since then, every time I need a board, I email him my fileset, and he sends my boards back.

      They have quite a sophisticated system to track the progress of manufacturing the boards. You note that little window on their opening page. When you place your order, they will give you a key number to find your order in their database. They know minute to minute where your order is in the manufacturing process - and you can verify at any time where it is. It looks as if they have some very sophisticated PCB manufacturing automation going on over there. My guess is that its like a giant one-hour photo machine. Files go in, boards come out.

      No, I do not work there. I am just a pleased customer. I feel I have spewed enough venom at those who did not come through that I feel I must give equal time commending those who did.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    15. Re:There are easier ways by Suidae · · Score: 1

      All of those run about 80 bucks minimum order. More than I want to pay for one or two boards.

      Now, Olimex will do up a single small double sided, masked and silk screened board for 26 bucks. They'll panelize it for free too, so you can use a decent free tool like Eagle, which is limited in the PCB size, and still get the whole board.

      Just be sure to have them ship it via regular mail, otherwise UPS will charge you about 75 bucks brokerage fees for bringing it into the country.

    16. Re:There are easier ways by John+Jorsett · · Score: 1

      I acknowledge the "just because" aspect. However, once you've milled the board, you still have the hole drilling and through-hole plating (or little wire-stub soldering, if that's your method) to do. Not to mention the solder masking and silkscreening that can be had with the commercial product. More power to those who like to do the entire job themselves, but I'll stick with getting my custom boards done by a board house. I'm far too lazy to do otherwise :-).

    17. Re:There are easier ways by John+Jorsett · · Score: 1

      Anyone else interested in hobbyist-level services for prototyping and whatnot: pick up a copy of "Nuts And Volts" magazine. They have tons of ads for things like board houses, plastic parts making, etc. You might also take a look at "Robot Builder's Sourcebook" for lists of sources for just about anything electronic or mechanical that you can imagine.

  7. Do It Right - John Has Great Plans by MBCook · · Score: 4, Informative
    note: the site is down, so I'm going off a mirror of the front page of the site, sorry if I get things wrong

    If you want to build a machine to mill circuit boards, do it right. Build a machine designed by John C Kleinbauer. The Brute is designed to make PCBs cheaply. I recently bought some of John's plans (well worth it) and they are quite nice. They are very well done, easy to understand, don't need things that are exotic and hard to get (if your in the US). He includes a booklet on how to mill PCBs with The Brute, or you can order it seperatly. He even maintains and activly participates on his forum, Hardware Store CNC.

    I've started to build a brute, and things are going pretty well considering I'm doing this in my spare time with only some time to work on it. If you guys are like me (I really like to build things with my hands) this is a ton of fun. I can't wait to get it running so that I can make PCBs, robot parts, a wooden clock and more.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Do It Right - John Has Great Plans by Compuser · · Score: 2, Informative

      Kleinbauer claims 3 mil accuracy whereas pcb lines
      can be 5 mil wide or even smaller. I am saying this
      because I had a design which needed to have ultra
      thin traces and have them straight (low capacitance
      and inductance were key). This method just isn't
      accurate enough for the most demanding PCBs.

    2. Re:Do It Right - John Has Great Plans by Stephen+VanDahm · · Score: 1

      Dude -- that's awesome! I've wondered off and on about what I'd need to do to make a little CNC machine to cut inlays and fret slots into guitar fingerboards, and this might help out....

      Steve

    3. Re:Do It Right - John Has Great Plans by bono2001 · · Score: 1

      John's plans are definitely the way to go if you are a hobbiest looking to learn CNC and don't mind spending the time to build the machines. Your not likely going to be able to build large complex, multi-layer boards with one of these. That is not the intent. You will be able to build a 6"x6" double sided board having a fairly good density and will drill all the holes. Once built you can use it to mill other items in plastic or soft non-ferrous metals. I built the PCBmill from John's plans (replaced by his newer BRUTE model). The tools and materials are easily found and the learning experience is well worth the time. CNC can be pretty addicting.

    4. Re:Do It Right - John Has Great Plans by phriedom · · Score: 1

      If you really want controlled impedance, then you probably don't want a double-sided board with no soldermask anyways. So lets put some realistic expectations on it: its sounds like it doesn't take much longer than wire-wrapping a "breadboard" like what you see in the linked article first attept at controlling the stepper motors, but is of higher quality. If you are doing 10 of them, it is surely faster too. Compare the white plastic wire wrap to the board he put in the junction box. Its for hacking low-speed circuits up without relying on an outside vendor, and it looks pretty good for that.

      I'm designing a 16 layer board with .0035 traces and .0045 spaces for 100-ohm controlled differential impedance right now (well its in the window behind my browser anyways), and it has lasered .004 blind vias on the outer layers and some .8mm pitch BGAs, etc. so obviously a mill cut PCB is out of the question, but that doesn't mean it doesn't have its place.

      --
      Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
  8. It's a shameless plug, but.... by Arethan · · Score: 2, Informative

    My dad wrote some CNC control software that would work quite well for this application. It's designed to run anything from table top machines (such as this) all the way up to large scale CNC retrofits, where the iron is good but the control is shot. Very competitively priced as well. Even has a free demo version with no time limit for those that want to check it out. Requires a dos based machine to run it on though. FreeDOS works fine, of course so does MS-DOS.

    I'm sure this will kill his pipe, but here is a link: www.cnczeus.com

    It's listed in google as well, so you may want to check that out if/when the pipe goes dead from the load. :)

    1. Re:It's a shameless plug, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow thats really impressive it even has a few different colors in the interface. kid get a clue yout dads software is 5 years out of date i'm not saying that it needs to run on linux i'm saying that it should be able to deal with new hardware if i put that software on a P4 2 GHz it wont perform any better than or a P90 dos is just out of date and any real programmer wouldn't fee right charging some one for such a piece of crap.

    2. Re:It's a shameless plug, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow.

      who pissed in your cheerios this morning?

    3. Re:It's a shameless plug, but.... by AnotherBrian · · Score: 1

      You clod,

      What's the problem with a CNC control program that only runs in DOS? I'm not going to put my sweet-ass expencive gaming pc out in the shop and I don't want to have to be walking back and forth from my garage and my room all the time. I sure ain't going to be shelling out $300 bucks for XP and the hardware I need to run it when a $50, 8 year old, 386 with a mono monitor will work fine. I don't know anything about porting a program from DOS to Win but I assume it rquires you to rewright a lot of code and put in all the GUI crap. I'm glad he spent his time making a DOS version.

    4. Re:It's a shameless plug, but.... by anubi · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Brian:

      I could not agree more with what you said.

      I would bet you in five years time, that DOS system will *still* be chugging along just fine.

      I work with systems like this all the time in the robotics world. You do not have to be a gigahertz machine to spin steppers! There is *nothing* to be gained once you can process faster than the physics of mass and energy will allow.

      Now, *most* (not all) of my clients are in business to make money. They want to set up a machine to crank out something, and do it for years. I often work with multi-millionaires who have quite "obsolete" machines toiling 24 hours a day making product. The machines, long since paid for, are working far better than the day they came out of the box, as by now, we have found the bugs and have the system tuned to repeatedly make perfect product.

      I mentioned not all of my clients thought this way - there are some who just have to have the absolute cutting-edge stuff. Yes, they are the same guys who spend money they don't have, drive really fancy cars, live in fancy homes, and we spend our days raising money and debugging, then after a while, we have to explain why the money is gone and there is no product. Its not a skill I care to develop.

      With one paradigm, continuous reliable production supports an almost perpetual research effort into making more product lines and the company tends to grow exponentially. With the other paradigm, our length of employment tends to approximate the total amount of funding received divided by the "burn rate".

      Maybe this is flamebait - but I have been involved in both. And I have developed an intense distaste for the latter. There is something in me that writhes in acid when I have to face investors with nothing to show. I know the business books are full of advice on using "other people's money", but I would rather lose my own than take down all those other people with me.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    5. Re:It's a shameless plug, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you're such a moron. On Slashdot it takes some doing to be picked out for special attention as a mornon, but...wow, you're a moron!

      Any idea what CNC software is used for? Any idea why your ultra-leet P4 2Ghz doesn't mean didly over that old 486 proping up his dads table? Any clue at all? Hello McFly?!

      any real programmer wouldn't fee (sic) right charging some one for such a piece of crap.

      I doubt you know any "real programmers" Your mates on ICQ who've told you that they just hacked the Pentagon don't count.

    6. Re:It's a shameless plug, but.... by mister+boo · · Score: 1

      Hey 1337 haXXor- It's called Real Time operations. DOS can run close enough to real time for this. Bloatware like windows can't, unless you rum Windows Embedded with RTX. Or you can use RT Linux like ther EMC Project. Or use QNX. But stock windows is useless without an exernal timing controller like http://www.flashcutcnc.com/ So don't attack someone without knowing what you're talking about. Oh, wait- this is /. and you're posting as an AC

  9. question? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Could someone explain what a milling machine is? Thanks

  10. Acid etching is nearly extinct by green+pizza · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Good article for those that don't already have access to PCB milling equipment. There really is no reason to do the old-school etching method anymore, in fact, I don't even know any hobbyists that do that anymore. Milling equipment can be found, borrowed, or made pretty easily these days. I've even seen a working setup made from Lego Mindstorms and a cordless Dremel! Hey, it works and beats the heck outta the mask-and-acid roll of the dice method.

    1. Re:Acid etching is nearly extinct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nah. the problem with milling machines is you can't get much below 10 mil traces, which if you've ever tried to make a board for any surface mount devices is impossible. with a good laser printer onto transparecy, then photoresist and a UV lamp, you can make a damn good board and I've managed to get down to .65mm pitches.

    2. Re:Acid etching is nearly extinct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Three points I suppose:

      1. Maybe it's just me, but I don't like have metal conductor where it's not needed. I would not feel comfortable using this method on anything using more than say 12 volts, or anything handling serious current.

      2. Seems to me like it would be easy to short with some careless soldering (Particularly when the board gets older, and therefore the board isn't as clean, and you try and make repairs). Or for that matter dust and a humid atmosphere could also cause problems.

      3. Etching is still used by the big boys, and cheap low volume PCB production, including multilayer, is now available.

      Of course if the miller was instructed to remove all metal not required, rather than just "digging a moat" around the track, the first two points would no longer apply. In truth, that's what I initial thought they were doing till I saw the results. Unfortunately this would no doubt cut down on the speed.

    3. Re:Acid etching is nearly extinct by Wansu · · Score: 1


      There really is no reason to do the old-school etching method anymore, in fact, I don't even know any hobbyists that do that anymore. ... beats the heck outta the mask-and-acid roll of the dice method.

      I don't know any hobbyists who do this either but a former employer still etches photoresist boards in ferric chloride. The techs call it ferrocious chloride and despise building boards. The ferric chloride is a hazmat and everything exposed to it's fumes, rusts. If you spill any on your clothes, toss 'em. It's a very messy chemical.

      You can make do with a cardboard box but if you're serious about this, you'll need to build a darkroom, a ventilated darkroom. Depending on the kind of photoresist, you may be be using Trichloroethylene or Xylene as a stop bath. Those are carcinogens.

      Yeah, it's a crap shoot. If you under-etch, you'll get bridges; over-etch and you start over. But the hassles and hazzards of handling these chemicals give more compelling reasons to abandon this method.

      --
      Wansu, th' chinese sailor
    4. Re:Acid etching is nearly extinct by kaleth · · Score: 1

      For hobbyists there is one very good reason - price. Even a cheap homebuilt milling machine costs a lot more than some ferric chloride.

    5. Re:Acid etching is nearly extinct by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

      Etching photoresist and a copper board are rather different. Copper boards can do with only a small channel routed/etched to isolate the trace. Photoresist etch you really need to etch everything (either the positive or negative image of the mask). Photoresist isn't hard to etch. I think you can do it in pretty simple solutions. (We do it in a normal basic solution for positive photoresist.) It's the SIO2 we have to use hazardious stuff for. (We use HF which is very nasty stuff to come in contact with.)

      --
      I do security
    6. Re:Acid etching is nearly extinct by kyoorius · · Score: 1

      Ferric Chloride is pretty corrosive.
      I've started using a Cupric Chloride solution to do etching. The stuff is reusable, and due to the
      chemical reaction, the resulting etched copper sludge can combine with the free H+ in the solution to form... more Copper Chloride! It doesn't seem to be as corrosive as FeCl, and because it's reusable, you don't have to pour it down the toilet when you're done.

      some pics: http://www.techfreakz.org/cucl2/
      The resist on the copper board was printed on regular paper (in reverse), then ironed onto the copper PCB.

    7. Re:Acid etching is nearly extinct by AnotherBrian · · Score: 1
      I've even seen a working setup made from Lego Mindstorms and a cordless Dremel!

      A bit OT, but that reminded me of this site I ran accros a while a go with neet Lego machine tools.

    8. Re:Acid etching is nearly extinct by unitron · · Score: 1
      "Of course if the miller was instructed to remove all metal not required, rather than just "digging a moat" around the track,..."

      If you are referring to the picture at the bottom of the page, be aware that it is probably far from being the finished product. Also large areas of copper are often left on circuit boards to serve as part of the ground plane.

      Does anyone out there know if there are any truly printed printed circuit boards, i.e., unclad boards upon which the traces are laid down with some sort of copper "ink"?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  11. It's a plotter by oneiros27 · · Score: 1

    I admit that there are some CNC machines that have more degrees of freedom, but for sign cutters and circuit boards, it's just a large plotter.

    I'm surprised that as the old school plotters get decomissioned, more people haven't snatched 'em up.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    1. Re:It's a plotter by Kevin+Burtch · · Score: 1

      I'd love to get one, if I knew where I could find one.

      I've got the feeling all the old flatbed plotters were dumpstered many years ago.

      --
      - Preferences: Solaris 10 (servers), Ubuntu (desktops), Solaris 11 (personal servers) -
    2. Re:It's a plotter by modecx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      On the contrary, large flatbed plotters are pretty popular for sign cutting, routing, etc. I used to work at a large custom print company, and we had a couple WILD plotters hooked up to a Xenix server.

      At the time I left, they had 2 Zund tables, complete with conveyors, automatic sheet feeders, roll feeders, with a nifty camera hooked up to the cutting head that would track 1/4" dots on the media and compensate for stretching/shrinking that is common with the 3M vinyl that we used.

      A while back I was looking through the Zund catalog, and they have all sorts of heads for their plotters, such as routers with z axis, laser, etc.

      When we bought the Zunds, we sold the WILD tables to someone else (though I'm not sure why anyone would bother, they were known for their controller board problems.) I doubt that any functioning table would be trashed so readily.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    3. Re:It's a plotter by Kevin+Burtch · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I forgot about the monster cutting-plotters (I worked in a sign-shop for a while too).
      I was referring to the old table-top flatbed A and B size pen-plotters - the ones that either held only one pen, or some of the fancy ones that had a carousel of 4 or 6.
      Last one I saw was at a ham-fest several years ago... think they had it for $20 and no-one bought it.
      At the time, the idea of making a PCB mill out of it never even crossed my mind.

      --
      - Preferences: Solaris 10 (servers), Ubuntu (desktops), Solaris 11 (personal servers) -
    4. Re:It's a plotter by modecx · · Score: 1

      Oh, I thought you were referring to plotters in general... The Xenix system I referred to had an HP legal size plotter with a 6 pen carosel (for small drafts). I think someone finally took it home, or chucked it. You're right, though, that smaller plotters are on the way out. I was looking for an older draft plotter (in the 48" range) a couple years back, and had about zero luck. Inkjets have just about replaced them all, I guess.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
  12. Electronics Enthusiasts... by Kevin+Burtch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It seems dabbling in electronics is a dying hobby for the younger crowds... I hope projects like this spawn new curiosity and interest.

    For those new to this hobby... here are some publications that could be of great value to you:
    http://www.nutsvolts.com/
    http://www.circui tcellar.com/
    http://www.poptronics.com/

    Anyone know of any others?

    --
    - Preferences: Solaris 10 (servers), Ubuntu (desktops), Solaris 11 (personal servers) -
    1. Re:Electronics Enthusiasts... by Smidge204 · · Score: 4, Informative

      How about sources for new/surplus components?

      http://www.goldmine-elec.com/
      http://www.alltro nics.com/
      http://www.allcorp.com/
      http://www.new ark.com/
      http://www.jameco.com/

      Try to never buy from Radioscrap. Overpriced and crap quality...

      I've ordered from Alltronics before. They have a $15 minimum order, and sometimes an order may be delayed if something you requested is out of stock. They answer your e-mails rather quickly, though.

      Jameco also sells the seemingly elusive PCI prototyping cards, though they're pricey ($70). Anyone know another supplier of these? (They're also good if you're looking to pick up a 266MHz PII motherboard for $20)

      =Smidge=

    2. Re:Electronics Enthusiasts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh, it's not dying, you're just looking in the wrong place. the audio scene in cookin with the kids. here's just one diy headphone amp forum.

      http://www4.head-fi.org/forums/forumdisplay.php? s= &forumid=6

      scroll through, follow links. lots of fun stuff, like penguin altoid tin portable amps, anyone?

    3. Re:Electronics Enthusiasts... by c_oflynn · · Score: 1

      Poptronics is gone now though :(

      They recently killed the mag.

    4. Re:Electronics Enthusiasts... by Thatmushroom · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As one of the members of the younger crowd of which you speak, I'd like to express my own (personal) opinion.

      I'm certainly curious, and the multiple articles about home-made tools for dabbling with electronics certainly contribute to my curiosity. The problem, however, is two-fold. One, some of this is rather daunting for most beginners. I see some of the talk about people on here building their own circuitboards and such, and I'm a little intimidated, frankly. Two, I wouldn't know why to dabble in electronics, and the lack of an interesting and simple project just means that I won't get the basics that would let me move on to more advanced projects.

      www.nutsandvolts.com certainly looks like an interesting resource, but I'm not sure it's as good for complete newbies such as myself. I'm going to sign up for a sample issue to better evaluate it, but I'm still afraid I'll miss a lot of critical background information.

      --
      You zap the moderators with a wand of humor! The moderators resist!
    5. Re:Electronics Enthusiasts... by Kevin+Burtch · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, there used to be Electronics Now and Popular Electronics (which merged, and became Poptronix), but the printed publications are gone (to my knowledge). You may be able to find all the old issues at your local library... although ones over 1 year old may be only on microfische.

      As much as I'm annoyed with Radio Shack for turning into a toy and appliance store (they used to be an electronics hobbyist store), they do still have a handfull of items for the electronics tinkerer.
      I'd recommend picking up all of their Engineer's Mini-Notebooks to start with.
      I'd also recommend checking out some of their X-in-one kits... I think they have a 300-in-one now (I hope they haven't stopped making these).
      They have all kinds of example circuits that you can make by hand wiring (read: no soldering) the circuits together - and some of the examples are kind of cool for a beginner. I started with a 150-in-one kit (it was the biggest at the time) way back when I was a teen.

      After this... if you want to get into digital electronics, pick up the TTL Cookbook and CMOS Cookbook by Sam's.
      If you want to get into audio electronics, pick up the Audio IC OP-Amp Applications (also by Sam's).
      If you're a musician, there's a VERY cool one called Electronic Projects for Musicians by Craig Anderton. Use this one with the above audio book to come up with some really cool guitar effect "pedals".

      I hope this helps!

      --
      - Preferences: Solaris 10 (servers), Ubuntu (desktops), Solaris 11 (personal servers) -
    6. Re:Electronics Enthusiasts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If anyone has truly good resources that's starts out like you're an utter and complete dumbass and spoonfeeds you through every circuit, every design, every part, explains everything, why it's there, nearly all the equations, of increasing complexity to something useful and reasonable, building but not leaping on previous designs, PLEASE let me know.

      For me, dabbling in electronics is a dying hobby because it's so damn hard to learn the basics to get started.

      Unlike a lot of tech areas, cost isn't an issue; parts are cheap, easy to find. What to do with them and progress in understanding and designs, well, just doesn't come easy. Maybe we have a mental block, or it's like our unicorn (e.g. reference Gone in 60 Seconds movie), but for whatever reason, I and my friends are electronic design idiots.

      Not sure why, but I know it's not just me. Myself and several college-educated (not that is a requirement of course or even validation that we should be able to understand electronics, just that we aren't total idiots, unless you count giving money for a degree silly) friends have tried to understand electronics independently and collectively.

      We just can't find that project or book that crystalizes the main points or solidifies our thinking--that key to enlightenment in opening the floodgates to understanding electronics, if you will. We've gone through probably 20 some books and probably another 12 separately on our own, and found most are either way over our heads or too general. Hell, we still think Tipler's overview of some electronic circuits is the best resource really in some ways to date, and that was entry-level college physics (which posed no problem if you're solving a problem, but doing something with it, that's another matter).

      Even the mags you've mentioned we've studied in the past. Sometimes we'll have a project that starts out easy, then all of the sudden, bam, the author either assumes something we have no clue about or the complexity takes off, or we don't understand what the hell that path is necessary in the circuit, but without it, everything dies, but why is not covered/explained. Hours of study just doesn't help. Looking shit up turns us into mice that have the whirling/waltzing gene and we just go in circles, spinning, lost and confused.

      Each of us knows a few programming languages each. We've built PCs. We've messed with databases, done audio-video projects, messed with mpeg2 code, shell scripting, networking, constructed networks, build wireless networks, done RS232 and 485 commands, setup satellites, fixed engines, built client server apps, touched on clustering, etc., all the typical "geek" things. Problems, yes, but overcome reasonably enough. Oddly enough, all have us have done basic biological research in college, so we can tackle a diverse set of things (like many geeks). We know the "level" of work that has to go into a project, and the common "fun" times are really times of pure evil trying to get something to work. But, regardless, we succeed--unless it has something to do with building a custom circuit. We can "cludge" things together (for example, the fellow that tracked a weather balloon, we had a similar project mapped out that we never got around to doing, but it was amazingly similar). Usually we come across some resource that opens our eyes to the possibilites.

      With electronics, we just haven't come across it. Freakin annoying too. The last times we had this much trouble was learning shell scripting, and that took us 2 weeks to solve, solved by finding a book by Blinn that, for whatever reason, just made everything easy to understand. Had some difficulty with assembly, but we hammered through that in 4 months on weekends. But electronics? Haven't found it...and we've been working on the problem off and on for about 4 years (not counting the past year and half where we've generally stayed away from anything close to basic electronics), such that it's just a point of near panicky frustration whenever we get a "fu

    7. Re:Electronics Enthusiasts... by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      Jameco also sells the seemingly elusive PCI prototyping cards, though they're pricey ($70).

      I've seen them at Fry's...they're even more expensive there, but if you need one right away, that's another option. (Assuming you have a Fry's nearby, of course...)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    8. Re:Electronics Enthusiasts... by AnotherBrian · · Score: 1
      You can get the X-in-one kits from a lot of places. I just got a 50-in-one at HobbyTron. You might also want to get a set of reenforced jumpers (like Jameco part# 126324, 126341 and 126359 ) because the wires that come with the kits get all bent up and split. I can almost smell the fried LEDs from when I was 15, ah the memories.

      :sniff:

    9. Re:Electronics Enthusiasts... by haggar · · Score: 1

      I am an old-school electronic engineer, I loved to play with electronics already in primary school. The truth is, the bar has been raised considerably nowadays. The entry into electronics has been made way too fucking high with SMD devices. They are totally unsuitable for home/hobby experiments and prototyping, they are way too small for most people to solder (without a microscope) and the PCBs are just impossible for a home enthusiast to construct.

      Moreover, interfacing computers has become much more complex: previously you vould connect to a 8 or 16 bit address and data bus, you could still manage that. You could manage with RS232 and printer ports with not too complex microcontroller codes. Nowadays you have to deal with PCI, USB etc.

      Yes, it all can be done, but it definitely is out of the possibility of us mortals.

      --
      Sigged!
    10. Re:Electronics Enthusiasts... by PD · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. When I was in high school, I tried and tried and tried to design my own audio amplifier. I didn't care if it made things very loud or not. It was only 2 transistors, and I just wanted it to work. It didn't.

      So, I tried using vacuum tubes instead, thinking that I might get the hang of that more easily. Well, I built my circuit and fired it up. MUSIC CAME OUT OF THE SPEAKER!!! I thought that I was successful. So, I decided to turn off the power to the tube filaments. They cooled off. Music was still coming out of the speaker at the same volume. Obviously, I wasn't successful.

      Ack. There is some kind of voodoo to analog electronics that I don't understand.

    11. Re:Electronics Enthusiasts... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      If you're a musician, there's a VERY cool one called Electronic Projects for Musicians by Craig Anderton.

      I second this recommendation. The second project I ever built, and the first board I ever etched was his four channel mixer. The author does a very good job at making the projects inviting to beginners.

      Also, if anybody in the Sin Lab down at WPI happens to be reading this, I want my copy back!

    12. Re:Electronics Enthusiasts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it really so hard to use HTML?

  13. I could see where this could be handy by bplipschitz · · Score: 1

    for general mcb construction, but it really depends upon the application. Most of the stuff I would use it for would be RF, and 'ugly' construction is a heckuva lot faster, and usually performs better.

    For computer hacking stuff, or for audio, this might be a handy thing to have.

    1. Re:I could see where this could be handy by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      How could "ugly" construction perform better on something so sensitive to impedance and trace layout and length as RF?

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:I could see where this could be handy by bplipschitz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      --
      How could "ugly" construction perform better on something so sensitive to impedance and trace layout and length as RF?
      --

      Simple--you have a continuous ground plane underneath your components, which means that ground leads can be made as short as possible. Also, since you're not constrained by layout, you can ensure that inter-component leads are as short as possible, and that the input is nowhere near the output, etc. etc.

      It's often the case that there are fewer problems, less stray capacitance, etc. with ugly construction over PCB construction.

      As a benefit, it's faster as well.

    3. Re:I could see where this could be handy by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Oh, I misunderstood. I think you meant Ugly PCB constructions as opposed to milled PCB.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    4. Re:I could see where this could be handy by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Thought...Not think. Thought you meant that. Argh. Mornings.

      It's been -549 seconds since you last successfully posted a comment. Hrm.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    5. Re:I could see where this could be handy by bplipschitz · · Score: 1

      --
      Oh, I misunderstood. I think you meant Ugly PCB constructions as opposed to milled PCB.
      --

      'Ugly construction' [or 'dead bug' construction] is putting things together over a solid [unetched] piece of PC board. All connections are lead-to-lead, and grounds go staight to the pcb. Works great at RF.

    6. Re:I could see where this could be handy by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Oh, I've heard of this, all the components are upside down. Never really built anything personally that would need more than stripboard however.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  14. Milling machine by oneiros27 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Milling is the process of cutting by movign a quickly rotating cuting head in relation to the item being cut down. Most machine shop milling machines have a stationary head, and move the item around, while some cnc machines have a head that moves.

    Of course, questions like this are where search engines come in handy -- http://www-me.mit.edu/Lectures/MachineTools/mill/i ntro.html

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    1. Re:Milling machine by MBCook · · Score: 1

      Read around on John's website. The best machine to make PCBs (according to him) is the one called "the brute". You can get all the software that you need for free. You can use TurboCAD to design the boards, and other free software to etch them. The software that I mention isn't opensource, but I'm sure such software exists. All you really need to design somehting is a CAD program that can output things in DXF format. Or you could be a REAL geek and write the raw GCODE in vi or something.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    2. Re:Milling machine by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

      Is there any way to use the machines John creates, (as he's referenced a ton of times in this thread so seems to be reliable), compatible with orcad? For my school's router we use orcad layout plus to build the boards and, honestly, having something I can autoroute with is nice. So is there any way to use the output of layout plus with these machines?

      --
      I do security
    3. Re:Milling machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For software checkout www.linuxcnc.org

  15. Coming Soon! by 1stflight · · Score: 1

    Opensource Hardware!!!

    1. Re:Coming Soon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3000 dead over past 2 years, still no free Palestinians, still [electronicintifada.net]

      3000 down, only a few million to go. I just wish we could start with you.

    2. Re:Coming Soon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Coming Soon! by c_oflynn · · Score: 1

      Don't forget http://www.opencores.org/ or opencores.org

  16. Useless by tftp · · Score: 2, Informative

    I can't get to the site (slashdotted). But I used one of such machines. Nowadays they are absolutely, unconditionally useless. They can't make the fine traces that are required for modern chips. Instead, it is cheaper now to order your PCBs from a board house (such as Advanced Circuits). $30 per board is not that expensive.

    1. Re:Useless by MBCook · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can make a very nice machine for not that much money that has a very nice accuracy. You could do surface mount stuff with it. That said, how many hobbiests base their projects mostly on 88 pin TQFPs? And once you build your machine, all it costs you is a little time and the blank PCBs. That's alot less than $30 a board, especially if you are going to make 10 of 'em.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    2. Re:Useless by tftp · · Score: 1
      Yes, you can make the machine, no problem with that. But the resulting PCB is garbage. There are many problems with this method. As I already said, small trace/space is out of question. Then you have to have very flat sheet of material, or else the tool either cuts air, or dives too deep into the fiberglass (and breaks). You have to have a set of tools as well, and they don't come free (or even cheap), and they break often. Also, fiberglass is a very tough material to cut, it dulls blades very quickly. Also, you often have to breathe this glass dust in, which is not very healthy either.

      I do not know how many hobbyists use TQFPs, but today they don't have much of a choice. A fresh example for you: I wanted to do a project with ATMEGA32-16. I chose through-hole part. Went to Digikey... and found that it is not in stock, and delivery time is months away. I changed the part to SMD, and got it in stock and delivered in 2 days.

      Fact is, less and less circuits are available in through-hole packages. Also, the more integrated the circuit is, the easier it is to use for a hobbyist. What would you prefer, to put one Atmel AVR chip on board, or 10 boards full of SN74 logic?

      I had the machine at previous job, and I used it couple of times. The results are junk. Avoid it if you can. Also notice that these machines are not used in the industry (if they were ever really used in the industry). They fill a very narrow niche, and that's it. They are probably OK for an analog board, preferrably one-sided. But as soon as you start doing something really worth doing, it will fail you, and you will regret that you haven't ordered your boards from a decent board house (as I said, they are now working for pennies).

    3. Re:Useless by theLOUDroom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But I used one of such machines. Nowadays they are absolutely, unconditionally useless.

      Not true. I have also used such machines. They are actually very useful. Yeah you can't make a new motherboard for your PC with them, but for making quick prototypes they are great. You get your board the same day, and if you made any mistakes, you can fix them the same day and make another board, you don't have to spend time waiting for someone else to do things, the mail, etc.

      As far as SMT goes, they can handle everything but the smallest of SMT parts. I built a prototype that had one such part, and afterwards I had to sit there under a stereomicroscope with an exacto knife cutting the traces in a half dozen places, but it really wasn't that bad. No one said my prototype had to use parts in packages that small anyways.

      They are also killer for making quick interface boards, extender boards, etc. No you can't make anything you want with them, but just because they didn't work for your application doesn't mean they're useless. You're not getting four-layer boards with silkscreening for $30 anyways. If you want a board with a few connectors and minimal circuitry on it, you can have the finished thing in your hand by the end of the day and go back to doing your tests.

      Since I've been able to get some use from one, they are clearly not "absolutely, unconditionally useless." Hell, there are still companies out there that use through-hole parts and phenolic PCBs in their final products. You don't need that dense of a circuit board when all you're doing is controlling a toaster.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    4. Re:Useless by FotoPlasma · · Score: 1

      I would assume that any problems you'd see with precision could be remedied by gearing the stepper motors down (increasing the ratio of steps to distance), and by using a fine point dremel bit or endmill.

      I, personally, have a huge interest in both mechanical and electrical engineering, so I think that a project like this could be quite fun, despite the fact that you may think it's "unconditionally useless." I even have a couple stepper motors laying around...

    5. Re:Useless by tftp · · Score: 1
      That's not enough. The mechanical action of the tool lifts edges of the copper foil, and makes the surface uneven. The tool will start lifting the whole trace if the trace is thin enough. Fine point tool may work well with soft copper.

      You should also consider that this technology does not apply solder masks, and does not do plating of pads/vias, or tinning of exposed surfaces. Bare copper is not very suitable for soldering, and it oxidizes quickly.

      When I say "unconditionally useless" I mean it. Myself, I went through all PCB technologies, at home and at work - from cutting the traces with a hand tool, to etching, to milling. And now I know that only a professionally made board can be trusted.

      Of course, a hobbyist always can use a simpler, home made (and broken) board. But this is a waste of time, IMO. Your time is better spent developing a circuit, instead of making a PCB. Get your free copy of Eagle, and learn how to do boards the right way - through Excellon and Gerber files. This knowledge is very useful in real life (unlike the milling adventure.)

      Cost of the board is comparable, if not below, to the cost of components that you intend to solder to the board. If your board is defective (which is a function of its complexity and your technology's reliability) then your whole work will fail, and you will be cutting traces, lifting pins and doing all other kinds of invasive debugging only to find a short circuit between traces, *under* some chip. That's a pain. My advice is simple: just don't go there.

  17. Re:Mirror by Blaine+Hilton · · Score: 1

    Great idea there, I went to the mirror and was able to read it with pictures and all. I bookmarked his site though and will check back tomorow as it looks pretty interesting.

  18. Re:Mirror by bluyonder · · Score: 1

    Thank you, I would love to see that done more often. If it is worth listing in Slashdot, it should be worth helping the guy out with bandwidth.

  19. A mill is... by Kevin+Burtch · · Score: 1

    A mill is sort of like a drill-press that can go sideways.
    In reality it's much more complicated than this, but you get the idea.
    The bits are not pointed, they have flat ended cutting flutes. There are exceptions, of course, like ball-end-mills (but that's just adding to the confusion).

    A mill in a machine shop can be used to make quite complex parts out of a billet (big chunk) of metal. It's table can move in X and Y axis, and the mill-bit moves in the Z axis. They can get much more complicated than this, but you get the idea.
    A PCB mill typically operates more like a flatbed pen-plotter with a dremel attached... as it doesn't have to have much Z axis travel.

    Unlike a drill-press, a mill will have micrometer controls, which means if you want to make a cut that's accurate within .001", you can quite easily.

    Here's a quick search that should help: http://www.google.com/search?q=bridgeport+mill

    Hope this helps.

    --
    - Preferences: Solaris 10 (servers), Ubuntu (desktops), Solaris 11 (personal servers) -
    1. Re:A mill is... by mhesseltine · · Score: 1

      Not that your google query is bad, but keep in mind that Bridgeport is going out of business, so good luck finding new good machines. As an alternative, Republic Lagun seem to be good manual knee mills.

      --
      Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
    2. Re:A mill is... by Kevin+Burtch · · Score: 1

      Wow!
      That really sucks, they used to be great!
      I guess too many companies are going Mazak.
      Dunno, been out of that business for over a decade.

      --
      - Preferences: Solaris 10 (servers), Ubuntu (desktops), Solaris 11 (personal servers) -
    3. Re:A mill is... by Silicon_Knight · · Score: 1

      Bridgeport actually got picked up by Hardinge. Fitting end for such a company, the lathes by Hardinge are simply beautiful.

      http://www.hardinge.com/Pages/16_bridgeport.html

      -=- Terence

  20. That's all well and good.... by miketang16 · · Score: 1

    At the risk of sounding like an idiot, how exactly do you get the electrically conductive metal in the etching?

    --
    -------
    "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
    -- George Orwell
    1. Re:That's all well and good.... by jfmiller · · Score: 1

      the entire palte is coated with copper. The etching define non-conducting lines. It's almost to opisate of a printed or etched PCB.

      JFMILLER

      P.S. Good question I had to look at the pictures to understand this.

      --
      Strive to make your client happy, not necessarly give them what they ask for
    2. Re:That's all well and good.... by Kevin+Burtch · · Score: 1


      You buy the board that way from any real electronics parts supplier (read: probably not Radio Shack).

      The boards are fiberglass (or fibreglass if you're in the UK), with copper cladding on one or both sides.

      --
      - Preferences: Solaris 10 (servers), Ubuntu (desktops), Solaris 11 (personal servers) -
    3. Re:That's all well and good.... by miketang16 · · Score: 1

      Ok, I get it. I assume that's not how large manufacturers do it though.

      --
      -------
      "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
      -- George Orwell
    4. Re:That's all well and good.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both processes use the same initial product.

      Fibreglass coated (well cladded, since it is essentially glued on, just uses the fibreglass setting time to make it stick) with a thin layer of
      copper on both sides.

      Etching:
      This can actually happen several different ways:

      Amatuer: Apply the tracks using a resist pen, or other mechanism to directly apply a "resist" chemical paint. (There is a trick that can use a laserjet print onto inkjet clay based paper that works fairly well after a bit of practise)

      Pro: Apply a photo-resist chemical to the entire board, you then project your board design onto the PCB using a special projector (Think this is UV, but can't remember), The board is then emmersed in a developer solution, which combines with the "photo-resist" where the light touched the board, to form a "resist" chemical.

      Then for both processes, the board is soaked in a chemical etching solution, which removes the copper not protected by "resist".

      You remove the board from the etching solution, rinse it, then soak it in a solution to remove the resist you used.

      The board is then ready.

      Mechanical etching, removes the copper around the tracks, essentially digging a trench or moat arount the tracks. Personally I would prefer to remove all metal not required by the tracks.
      As it stands mechanical etching is good for people who do a lot of one off runs. Eg: for prototypes.

      However mechanical etching is limited by the size of the milling bit.

      In summary:

      Mechanical etching: no chemicals needed, quick for small runs.
      Chemical etching: quick for large production runs, photo etching allows for smaller physical circuits, safer for high current applications.

    5. Re:That's all well and good.... by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      Pro: Apply a photo-resist chemical to the entire board, you then project your board design onto the PCB using a special projector (Think this is UV, but can't remember), The board is then emmersed in a developer solution, which combines with the "photo-resist" where the light touched the board, to form a "resist" chemical.

      Can you still get the photo-resist chemical? I used to buy the MG Chemicals positive photo-resist, but they don't seem to make it anymore. They just sell the pre-treated boards.

      I'm not complaining too much since the green colouring on the pre-treated boards makes them a lot easier to work with, but it was a lot cheaper to coat the boards myself, especially since I'd get surplus board at supremetronic.

      Jason
      ProfQuotes

    6. Re:That's all well and good.... by kaleth · · Score: 1

      Actually, they do. They don't buy the "blank" boards from Radio Shack (which does carry them, by the way), and they use fancier methods to etch them, but they do start with a copper-clad board.

    7. Re:That's all well and good.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wrote the poorly worded, and badly spelt AC post (emmersed, bah).

      If its positive photoresist you are looking for you could try:

      http://www.dse.com.au/cgi-bin/dse.storefront/3e8 7e 7b2036ba8f4273fc0a87f9c0781/Product/View/N1003

      However shipping of these types of chemicals are always problematic.

      You could search for an electrolube reseller closer to home.

  21. Milling vs. Etching by KillerHamster · · Score: 1

    Back in my high school electronics class, we used to etch our PCBs in acid, and when the teacher was out of the room, we'd put things like pennies and copper wire in the tray just for kicks. Milling the boards is probably a lot more efficient and safer, but doesn't sound like as much fun.

  22. Whatever happened to the guys... by The+Jonas · · Score: 1

    Whatever happened to the guys that were going to print out boards on inkjet printers?

    Maybe they statred doing this. Modified Printers Used For Tissue Engineering

  23. Am I the only one who read this as by yakko+nef · · Score: 1

    PCB killing machine? I guess more beer less sleep isn't always better but it can be more interesting.

  24. Recursive construction by FTL · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The best thing about this milling machine is that it built itself. The first version was controled by electronics on a breadboard. The second version uses much more sophisticated electronics on a PCB that had been milled by the first version of the machine. That is unbelievably elegant.

    --
    Slashdot monitor for your Mozilla sidebar or Active Desktop.
  25. CNC Milling Machines by cybergibbons · · Score: 1

    I used a small CNC miller to produce two complex alumnium plates that I used to produce a winch. It was complete overkill, but I was bored, and it did a very good job.

    It had dodgy software and the sheet I was using was too large (X and Y) to use in the machine, so I had to make a jig using MDF and steel rod to locate the plate, so that it could be flipped, and the machine used to cut material much bigger than it was designed for.

    The software and PC controlling it was updated last year, and now it can accurately profile 3D shapes. There are obvious restrictions, such as no undercutting (unless you use special bits, which is awkward). You can use opaque acrylic and etch photos onto it, with the darkness being converted into depth. By then holding it up to the light you see an image. Quite a neat idea.

    I could see it being used for PCB production, but to be honest, it wouldn't be much use for anything small. It is very accurate, without a doubt moreso than the homebuilt one, but even with the smallest tips, I can't see SOIC outlines being milles with enough precision to be used. And most PCBS have some sort of surface mount components now.

    I also see problems with raising the edges of the copper tracks slightly with milling. This would make surface mount components hard to get flat on the board.

  26. Isn't it a salt? by shoppa · · Score: 3, Informative
    were all etched in acid

    Isn't Ferric Chloride (the stuff you buy in bottles at Radio Shack, or at least I did when I was a kid) actually a salt? FeCl... looks like a salt to me!

    1. Re:Isn't it a salt? by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 1

      Try Sodium Chloride - NaCL.

      --

      "Bah!" - Dogbert
    2. Re:Isn't it a salt? by sstamps · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well. Whaddya expect? This IS Slashdot, after all. :O)

      --
      -SS "Teach the ignorant, care for the dumb, and punish the stupid."
    3. Re:Isn't it a salt? by Paul+Neubauer · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, it is a salt. Copper is more reactive than iron, so the etch works by the chlorine trading iron for copper. The "filings" left after etching are the iron that was freed in the reaction.

      Some folks see it anything that 'eats' away at something as being caused by an acid, even if no acid is really involved. Wouldn't it be nice if chemistry was taught? And taught in a way that was effective?

      --
      I don't subscribe to RMS's GNUtopian vision.
    4. Re:Isn't it a salt? by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      Chemistry is taught, it's just that most people are too stupid to understand much beyond "acids disolve things". I'm sure the idiot who posted an earlier reply to the parent saying salt is NaCl would be shocked to learn that vinegar and vitamin C are both acids.

      Jason
      ProfQuotes

    5. Re:Isn't it a salt? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try not being an asshat. Salts == ionic solids. Sodium chloride is not the only one.

    6. Re:Isn't it a salt? by Woodmeister · · Score: 1
      Wouldn't it be nice if chemistry was taught? And taught in a way that was effective?
      Heh, indeed.

      Now pay attention class :) This is a classic example of a redox reaction where the iron(III) chloride (FeCl3) acts as a fairly powerful oxidizer, at least to bare copper metal. The iron 3+ ions react readily to the surface of the copper, and the copper metal becomes oxidized to copper 1+ ions (the iron is reduced in the reaction from 3+ to 2+ - hence the name of the reaction: REDuction-OXidation). The chloride ions have to real purpose in such a reaction - they are spectator ions - simply there the balance out the overall electronic charge.

      Copper itself is actually LESS reactive than iron (typically - in their metal forms). The filings you speak of is probably a precipitate of some sort of the iron(II) ions. I believe the lower oxidation state salts of iron are less soluble than it's iron (III) counterpart. It could be accurately described a chemical-leftover crud :)

      --

      Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati
      -Possum Lodge Motto
  27. Maybe if it weren't for... by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1

    1.) United Auto Workers 2.) Gun control zealots

  28. Milling machine by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

    The college I go to has a milling machine. I've milled about 4 boards from it. That would be great if I could just have my own though and use it on my own time. However, could a home built milling machine achieve an accuracy of 10 mills for track width? Also, what software (opensource) could be used? I couldn't imagine a homemade machine achieving the same functionality as a $15,000 device, but if it could, a low cost home milling machine for hobby projects would be a great product.

    Now they just need to make a low cost device for placing and soldering SMD components on the boards.

  29. UV Light does the trick by __aafkqj3628 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Over here, (in school at least) we just print out the circuit diagram onto a transparency sheet (inkjet printer of course) and then just use a UV light to destroy the appropriate parts of the circuit.

    Use some chemicals (stored in a safe location and brewable in your own home) and you've got a nice PCB for you to use.

  30. Re:Mirror by caino59 · · Score: 1

    ahh....so if you pay...

    does that still make you a karma whore? ;oP

    thnx for the link/mirror.

  31. Zodiac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, so what other Stephenson fans in here went, "Holy $h!t! A machine to *MAKE* PCB's?

  32. okay, where can I buy a pcb milling machine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I really want to get out of having to send boards out to be made. It costs a lot (I do a lot of one-off projects, no profit, I don't want to buy 3x$30 boards for one circuit), the turnaround is poor. One week is okay, but between the shipping (canada), brokerage, and the fact that half the time you get them and something stupid is wrong (do again) it's a pain.

    I'd really like to have something for myself. I'm not big on the chemical method because of the mess involved (and the fact that getting programs to make the trace image is getting difficult - everything is gerbers now).

    Having said that, I'm not really interested in buying a chunk of aluminium and ending up with a working milling machine. I respect guys who do that, but I don't really want to.

    So, who makes cheap machines like this for purchase? Sure you get what you pay for, but I don't want to spent $15,000 on a machine.

    1. Re:okay, where can I buy a pcb milling machine? by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 1

      You might want to see if you can pick up an old X-Y plotter somewhere and use that as the basis of a DIY design.

      Replace the pen with a high-speed cutter and then you can interface to the plotter quite simply through the RS232 port or whatever the plotter supports.

      Here's a plotter on eBay that might be a good starting point.

    2. Re:okay, where can I buy a pcb milling machine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cheap plotters are too weak for this application in general. They are designed to push a pen around with accuracy, not a dremel or router rotating at 30000rpm!

      Richard.

    3. Re:okay, where can I buy a pcb milling machine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can use a plotter with a carbide or diamond tip in the pen.

      Spray the board with Dykem Steel Blue Layout fluid, let dry thoroughly before scribing. Then drop the board in the etchant of your choice.

      From someone who tried it: .006 inches width etched, or with a double pass .011 inches.

      This was a brainstorm on the Homebrew PCBs list on Yahoogroups.

      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs

  33. Re:what is with the website addy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're thinking of www.goatse.cx

  34. Old news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok people... this is really old hat... While it's interesting stuff (I've build one myself), there's nothing new or extraordinary about it. NIST has even had free Linux-based CNC software called EMC (Enchanced Machine Control) for at least two years.

    As for PCB milling, it's just one of many solutions. Many people want to be able to rapid prototype, without the use of harsh chemicals. So much so that there are commercial versions of this technology available, and there has been for many years!

    The true beauty of these machines is that with a little planning, you can make the design flexible enough to not just etch PC boards, but carve/engrave/etch/machine all kinds of things! I've only built a small one (8"x8"x2.5" work envelope, but I plan to build a slightly larger one for model airplane parts. Once you've taken the time to write a program for the part, then it's nothing to whip off spares (invaluable for a beginner model aviator). For those who aren't in the know yet, but are interested, check out the cad_cam_edm_dro discussion group on yahoo, or http://linuxcnc.org/ ! Have fun!

  35. There is a necessary market for milling machines. by uglomera · · Score: 1

    Milling machines are not an overkill or a solution for amateurs, they are a very good solution for inexpensive prototypes or production needed in small-mid volume.

    Acid etching produces a functional board, but it simply does not look good, and you can't make 100 boards that are exactly alike. The lines are almost straight, the edges are not perfect, and if you are on a contract to deliver a product, this is not an option. Examples of where a milling machine is one of the best solutions: a university lab where the researchers are under government/industry contract and are supposed to deliver a working prototype or a small business with a military contract (small volume products).

    I worked for a startup company for a while, and part of my job was to work on a QuickCircuit [t-tech.com] milling machine, and that thing had milling bits that were 4 mils thick (comparable to hair). You can hardly reach this precision with acid etching. I also adapted the machine to dice wafers, which replaced the company's practice of using an exactoknife :)

    If you are in the IC design business, testing cheaply is of primary importance. You can get a full setup for producing boards for less than $10K. How's that compared to billions of $$$ for setting up an IC production plant? And if you are in the RF design business, you need the precision so that a crappy board does not screw up your high-frequency measurements.

    Of course, milling is no option for producing high-volume PCBs with many layers, but don't think that ASUS spent months to design such a board to test their new motherboard design. First they have to verify that design works, which is done with a cheap PCB design, one that would hook up the ICs. Only after that stage can the final PCB design begin.

    As long as the Z80 or 68K processors are still in use, simple PCBs will be here, and we need a cheap and fast way to design and make them.

  36. CNC Engraving Machines by Jennifer+E.+Elaan · · Score: 1
    Check out a local key or engraving store. Nowadays, even a small one will often have a computer-controlled engraving machine. The depth and/or breadth of cutting will probably mean that you will have to buy your own milling bits, but these things still appear to be able to handle cutting traces in copperclad.

    As for drilling the PCB holes, I found that a good set of second-hand carbide bits, a dremel drill press, and a thin center punch could provide nearly perfect results. You *MUST* center-punch with the carbide bits, though, or they might start to "walk" across the board, which due to their brittleness could get quite expensive. Presumably the engraving machine can cut a nice pit in the surface to serve the same function, even though they often lack the force to actually drill the hole.

    1. Re:CNC Engraving Machines by ThisIsAPainInMyAss · · Score: 1

      Been there, done that. At least the research. :)

      Computer controlled engravers usually start around $4k (and they go up to $100k or better for the biggies). The simple pantograph units are far less expensive, but still start around a grand.

      Of course, the panto's won't work well for grinding PCB's unless you are flat-out awesome at freehand work ;>

      Some of our toolers (toolmakers) have built their own mills out of, uhh, scrap laying around (high-dollar scrap to be sure) and these work pretty much as well as a professional engraving machine. However, they don't even come close to competing with one of our Bridgeports, but the cost is around a grand (steppers, lead screws, software, Roto-Zip, and our high-dollar frame).

      You can get the basic drive stuff from www.stepperworld.com for $200 -$350, but you still need the frame, screws, Roto-Zip, and other bits.

      John

  37. Scanner guts...r by cr0sh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Scanners are essentially a flatbed plotter with only one axis of travel - cheap USB scanners can be had for under $30.00, buy a couple to get a two axis system, third axis could be a simple solinoid config. There would still be a lot of work left to do to get it all to go together, but it could be done (whether you stuck with the USB stuff, or just kept the stepper motor and drivers, then added you own custom interface). Also, back in the early 1980's there was a BYTE magazine article on building your own plotter (not that difficult)...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    1. Re:Scanner guts...r by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      Check out "The Robot Book" by Richard Pawson (around 1985). About half the book covers various projects made from Lego and Fischertechnik (aluminium extrusions). Among other things, there's an XY plotter, a 3-axis robot arm, several walking (on 2 or 4 legs) robots, and a card dealer.

      One of the coolest things was a controller called the Beasty that would control up to 8 R/C servos, allowing fine control of various devices. I even wrote a Z80 assembler program on a Sinclair Spectrum to drive the Beasty via a parallel port, though a R/C transmitter/receiver would have worked too.

      I spent a lot of money on Lego back then, but the Fischertechnik extrusions were more difficult to get hold of...

  38. take a breath... by djupedal · · Score: 1

    bit tense aren't we...oh wait... AC...too scared to come out from under the bed. PMS alert!

    1. Re:take a breath... by ThisIsAPainInMyAss · · Score: 1

      Hi there, just a non-AC confirming what the AC had said.

      You're clueless.

      We've built some of these at work, and along with using them to mill PCB's (yes, Printed Circuit Boards), they are also used to mill (engrave) device tags (which is what we have them for). And for a hell of a lot less than a "professional" engraving machine would cost.

      They won't do much in the way of cutting steel, but plastics & wood do very well.

      And while this gent has apparently gone whole-hog homebrewing his mill, you can easily get what you need to make a very nice mill off of the web.

      And since we have toolers building the mills the results tend to be very pretty indeed :) Sort of hard to duplicate at home though...

      Try http://www.stepperworld.com/ for starters.

      Consider yourself educated.

  39. If you thought that was bad. by Jennifer+E.+Elaan · · Score: 1
    If you thought the 88-pin TQFP's were bad... try some BGA's. The higher integration of some chips, like the new system-on-a-chip ones, make the actual design a lot friendlier to the amateur... But they are almost all in BGA packages.

    Thankfully, the pin pitch is often a little bit easier to deal with, so it's not QUITE as difficult for making boards.... As long as you're willing to make multilayer boards.

    The problem is SOLDERING the damn things! The balls are UNDER the package, facing the board, with no accessible places to work with. Some sort of area heating is required to solder them at all (normal hobby methods include hot-air heat guns and little temperature-controlled ovens).

    Worse still, you have to hope that you have the chip aligned correctly. This is normally done via xray, but most of us don't have access to xray machines (although there was that "radio tube xray machine" thing around...).

    As electronics get more and more integrated, they become less and less friendly to amateurs.

  40. Get off my lawn you little punks!! by ArsonPanda · · Score: 1

    Expense, both monitary and temporal. Most of the damned kids figure "why bother spending months learning basic electroncs theory, hundreds on breadboards and LCDs and Microcontroller programmers, when I can just go buy something that will do what I need for $10 at RadioShaft? Sure it'll break in two months and I won't have a clue of how to fix it, but so what? by then I'll be bored with it and be on to something else. Anyone want to buy a meow-chi?"

    Another part of the problem is that pretty much anything you buy today is made with propritary custom BGA ICs. Even if you could get a hold of the chips to do some of the really suh-wheat stuff, have you ever tried to solder a BGA? right, doesn't work to well unless you have a half million dollar IR reflow oven. Hell, can you even buy DIP form factor for half the IC's out there anymore? Sure, you could do the same thing with 3,000 descrete components, but again, why would they bother?

    --Spoken as one of those little whipper-snappers, and a Nuts and Volts subscriber.

    --

    --I don't want the world, I just want your half.
    1. Re:Get off my lawn you little punks!! by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      Another part of the problem is that pretty much anything you buy today is made with propritary custom BGA ICs. Even if you could get a hold of the chips to do some of the really suh-wheat stuff, have you ever tried to solder a BGA? right, doesn't work to well unless you have a half million dollar IR reflow oven.

      Sounds like you missed this article from Friday...

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  41. PC Motherboards by TheDarkRogue · · Score: 1

    Sorry if this is slightly off topic, but seeing that it seems that alot of people responding to this story know about board design and such, about how many layers does a normal PC (like an Athlon/P3 if that matters) motherboard have in it?

    --
    (Score:0, Interesting)
    1. Re:PC Motherboards by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      I would say its on-topic because someone might be musing whether they could build anything like a modern PC board themselves (no). Here's one company that makes 10 layer motherboards Here's an article on the guts of a typical PC mentioning 4 to 7 or more layers

      Just think of the microwave frequency considerations & the complexity of routing traces in a multilayer board. Yow.

    2. Re:PC Motherboards by afidel · · Score: 1

      Hehe, that's why companies use software autorouters that know all that stuff =) The software has huge libraries that know the physical and electrical properties of basically every material you would use for circuits and it knows how best to arrange traces even between layers. Of course this stuff is freaking expensive, I remember that one of our packages was like $60K/year per installation!

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  42. And for the real, hardened professional. by Jennifer+E.+Elaan · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Actually, you missed the secret of the really high-volume people. Photoresist is actually primarily for rapid prototyping, not production. Due to the harsh nature of etchants, there are very few compounds that are both photosensitive and resistant to them. Most of them are quite dangerous.

    The most serious problem comes in from the really high-end etching systems. Photoresist is fine with ferric chloride, but when you start using something like an acid-peroxide etchant, it will actually eat many "resist" inks. The resist pens become TOTALLY useless, for example.

    And so this is where the old technique of serigraphy comes in. This is the "screen-printing" that makes the name Printed Circuit Boards. The resist ink used on the actual board is usually just some form of lacquer, which holds up well to even the harshest etchants. A stencil is prepared on a screen, usually through a photographic process. Since the screen resist doesn't have to deal with the same harsh chemicals, it is generally much more environmentally conscious and cheaper than PC-Board photoresist.

    I actually set up to do this method myself, in a semi-hobby context. I had some previous experience with serigraphy, and the acid/peroxide system was cheaper, far more effective, and much easier to dispose of than the ferric chloride. On the flip-side, it will eat virtually anything metallic and smells aweful (it isn't much of a health hazard except in the sulphuric/peroxide system, but should be ventilated nonetheless), so it's not for the faint of heart.

  43. Polychlorinated Biphenyls by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 2, Funny

    I dont know about milling, but I've got a PCB mining machine right here: a fishing pole dipped in the East River.

  44. Not Just Ferric Chloride by Jennifer+E.+Elaan · · Score: 1
    There are other etchants, many much, much more effective. Acid/peroxide is one of the cheapest agressive etchants I have ever worked with. I used to mix it up for about $3/gallon (you ALWAYS mix right before you use it, since the peroxide doesn't really like being in contact with acid and dissipates rather quickly). It can take between 5 minutes to a half hour to etch in ferric chloride. Acid/peroxide will do it in 30 seconds to a minute or so, meaning less undercutting, finer traces, less washout, etc.

    The nice thing about it is that, unlike Ferric Chloride, there are ways of reclaiming acid/peroxide systems. I used hydrochloric/peroxide, since it was the cheapest and safest (concentrated HCl hardly itches if you spill it on yourself, the 25% peroxide is a lot worse). In this system, if you dumped in some standard Lye (sodium hydroxide), the copper all precipitates out as a brown sludge (copper hydroxide), and you're just left with a mixture of salt water and peroxide, which decomposes to salt water when left open. The copper hydroxide isn't as hard to deal with as it sounds. If you're running a copper sulphate/sulphuric acid plating system, you can just dump it into the plating system.

  45. Don't bother by Animats · · Score: 1
    "In this world, you do not make your own PC boards" - The Art of Electronics, by Horowitz and Hill.

    Realistically, PC boards are made by sending output from a board design program to a service that makes boards. It's reasonably cheap, turnaround is good, and you can get double-sided with plated through holes, which is what you want.

    Toner transfer methods are for people who like looking at their boards under a magnifier and doing rework. Do it yourself photographic methods work better, but few people bother any more. Anybody still have one of those small etching tanks with the aquarium bubbler?

    A related business is making front panels. Send out your design and let a computer-controlled punch make all the connector holes. They also etch the lettering and anodize.

  46. forgot one. by zymano · · Score: 1
  47. Re:These are NOT "Hacks" by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

    A little P.C wouldn't hurt you either Ps that don't mean personal computer go to the redneck board

    --
    Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
  48. Clever of you by Neophytus · · Score: 1

    /. a sympatico cable modem. Next time use your head :) - If he caught it in time before his poor innocent home pc burned out he would have changed the ip on dyndns.org... if not you've just used his bandwidth quota for the month.

  49. $1995 cnc , $600 mill by zymano · · Score: 1

    http://www.taigtools.com/

  50. Awesome. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was just thinking about making something like this only yesterday. I'm one of the home electronics hobbyists who makes PCBs in the garage with chemicals and things like that. Right now, I drill everything by hand using my dremmel and a pillar stand, and was pondering making a system exactly like this one for automating the drilling process. I'm really really very pleased that Jonathon already did all the hard work in designing and making this....

    Now all that remains is for me to rip off his design and make my own one.

    Congratulations... Looks like a marvelous project.

    P.S. #electronics on irc.freenode.net - for people who want to chat about open-source hardware and general electronics chat etc...

  51. pretty unfortunate by RestiffBard · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is one of the cooler "News for Nerds" articles I've seen in a while and its completely unreachable at 4 in the morning because of the slashdotting.

    this is no longer humorous. As much as I often enjoy the +4 comments on certain articles reading slashdot is pretty much no longer worth the frustration of not being able to RTFA.

    Can't wait till this article moves down the frontpage.

    --
    - /* dead coders leave no comments */
    1. Re:pretty unfortunate by mattax · · Score: 1

      Perhaps Slashdot should automatically try to cache a site once a message gets a certain number of responses.

    2. Re:pretty unfortunate by Raven42rac · · Score: 1

      Would that or would that not be a productive use of the subscription dollars? The articles are available to subscribers earlier, why not make it self-supporting? Makes sense to me.

      --
      I hate sigs.
  52. Re:Sites for Oz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surplus/parts: www.oatleyelectronics.com
    Parts: www.dse.com.au, www.jaycar.com.au
    Microcontrollers: www.dontronics.com
    industrial computers/microcontrollers: www.mgram.com.au

  53. To plot.. by saqmaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is quite cool.. I wonder if you could hook up a drill to a normal flatbed plotter.. You can find old Roland plotters quite cheap on ebay and places now..

    --
    "Never let the truth get in the way of a good story..."
    1. Re:To plot.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh.. A friend of mine had the same idea a few years ago. He took an old 16-color IBM plotter and placed either a drill or a sharp object (exacto knife?) on the arm of the plotter that held the pens. He said he got the thing to work, but the noise was unbearable (he had to put it in his basement and leave the house while it was running). I think he used some generic MS paint program to draw his circuits. Now days, I think it makes a lot more sense to just send the design off to a place that does low volume PCBs (which weren't available back then).

  54. TurboCNC by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

    I absolutely have to put in a plug for TurboCNC.

    It really works on machines down to 486-SX33, it has a HUGE and growing user base and support network, it is actively being developed (version 4 almost out!). Best of all, it is free. As in, you can download a the full working program and use it as much as you like. If you want the source code, it's $20. That's a much better deal than any other functional CNC program out there, and you think you'll ever see the source?

    EMC is out there, but...forget it. It's clumsy, fragmented, and requires a fast computer. TurboCNC can directly drive steppers at 20KHz...there's even phase drive available, which makes driving bipolar steppers as simple as wiring up a bridge chip and a power supply.

    Check it out at DAK engineering. Also take a look at the Yahoo! group at turbocnc.

    --
    ...
  55. etching has advantages.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember milling a double sided 6x9" board once at work on a pro machine. It took several hours. The nice thing about acid etching is, everything is done in parallel, and it takes 30 minutes from printing the artwork to washing the finished board.
    I've recently done boards with a pitch of 10-mil with no problem using positive photoetching. You're limited only by the resoluttion of your artwork really...

  56. Re: Radio Shack by shades6666 · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure if it's chain wide but the Radio Shacks around here are selling off the last of their stock in electronic components. The staff tell me that they'll no longer be carrying them.

    So, if the shack is your only local source of simple electronic components, you'd better stock up now. (Or find a good mail order source)

  57. milling pcb's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Comments above suggest that 4 mil 'milling bits' provide greater accuracy than chemical etching. A 4 mil 'milling bit' would undergo deflection up to 4 mils in the routing process. A standard routing tolerance (profile or outline of a pcb) is +- .005". This is using state of the art Excellon driller/router. I am able to etch circuitry day in day out to +- .0005" for RF customers. (and controlled impedance customers as well.) I don't think you can achieve +-.0005" using a milling machine. RF designs are totally geometrically controlled (trace geometry drives everything.) As far as board costs go... minimum lot charges of $C 1000 including tooling and yield of parts is not uncommon for 2 layer boards...depending on turn time. This is not cheap.... (well..it is cheap compared to 2-3 years agao). So mechanical milling of pcb's might be useful for a hobby shop or university lab environment.. however if you are developing product lines the traditional pcb fab process enters into the design timeline at an early stage where the milled pcb would not perform. Watch for inkjet printing of conductive inks and/or dielectrics that can/will yield the way for rapid production of multilayer/ fine line pcb's.

  58. Advanced: BGA and multilayer by LordMyren · · Score: 1

    I'd consider dumping $1000 and a couple months of "spare" time into building my own miniature end to end fab to serve me the rest of my life, but it seems kind of pointless without two/three features which seem to becoming exponentially more important: bga capabilities and multilayer.

    What would be required for BGA work? what sort of accuracy? does BGA automatically imply multilayer, or can you route between the contact patches? what sort of "fill rate" do the solder balls form? do you need to add more solder, or do the solder balls themselves suffice?

    Also, does anyone have thoughts for a BGA capable DIY soldering system? you'd have to hold the parts in place, i assume? heating elements: what's used by the big boys? how can you get a system that would provide the appropriate ramp up in temperature from that system? pizza ovens come to mind, but maintaining the constant and low delta-t has been described as an absolute requisite.

    moving on to multilayer...

    *gulp*.

    i'd think this would vaguely just be like solder masking - with which i happen to have no experience either. just mask a nonconductive coating, then glue. what adhessive is used? what is done for interboard connectivity?

    and where do you find thin PCB for use in such a system? somehow those 6 layer nvidia boards (random guess) are just as thin as my single layer ISA serial cards (bless them both).

    Myren

  59. This is neat by iamroot · · Score: 1

    I've always thought that CNC/rapid prototyping was pretty cool. The ability to take a design from CAD and manufacture a prototype that is true to the original design is cool in and of itself, not to mention the time it saves. I also like the artistic side to it. You can take complex shapes and lines, or a picture used as a depth map, and create a "carving" from it with great precision.

    My current CNC mill is a MaxNC NC-10. At around $1,300, it was the best deal I could find. Its a little slow, and not the best thing by any means, but works nicely. I'm going to be selling engraved desk signs, I'm going to use it for engraving. I'll probably eventually do 3D image engravings(depth mapping), but at first I'll just do lettering.

    I've made a couple keychains of Tux, some 3D statuettes, several more keychains, some lettering on wood, some robotics parts, etc... They all look really nice!

    Actually, my biggest complaint about that machine(the NC-10) is that the effective X work distance is only about 6 or 7 inches. Its big enough for small work, like engraving signs, but I'm thinking about building a much bigger CNC router with a 5x10ft(or something) table sometime.

    One thing I have to say to everyone who is going to buy or build a mill. Software for these can cost over $1000! You need the CAD program to design the item, the CAM program to create G-code from it, and the actual CNC program which will come with the mill, or be freely available. MecSoft did offer a free "lite" version of their CAM program, but don't seem to anymore(Luckily, I have it archived), but that is what I'm using.

  60. Vinyl and Inkjet by SWTP_OS9 · · Score: 1

    Have tried vinyl and the material is not destroyed by the normal RS etching solution.

    Found a printer late last year that has a strate paper path. A Lexmark i3. Cramed a CD and it actualy printed on the top of it. Did try a test with paper and printed test in some etching solution and it seam to pass ok. Now if I can get some time will cram a pc board and print out a circuit! Be nice if I could replace the std ink with a copper based and just print the layout.

    1. Re:Vinyl and Inkjet by SharpFang · · Score: 1
      Be nice if I could replace the std ink with a copper based and just print the layout.

      Or replace the ink with the etching solution and print the PCB in inverse video on a copper-covered board? simpler but there's more risk for the printer...

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  61. What using about an old plotter. by lukme · · Score: 1

    I have an old XY plotter that seems to have enough clearance for PCB. I just ran it over a piece of crappy perfboard that looks to be about 1/16 of an inch thick.

    You could either draw the traces and etch away the rest, or you do as my grandfather did in building a computer back in the 60's and that is to deposite a 1/64" x 1/64" silver trace onto the board. It was one of his achievements that his company gave him an award for.

  62. Manual? by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    Would it make sense (for strictly home use, no ultra-high precision required, just enough to attach normal surface-mounted chips) to build such a machine without step motors, just with manual dials, driven manually - so you follow a drawing on the board while etching, lift the drill manually, move the board by turning the dials etc? I have to admit my etched circuits with tracks thinner than some 3mm were a complete failure, the paths either shorted or broken (or both).

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2