Slashdot Mirror


World's First Encyclopedia of Future Inventions

Deb Hellman writes "WIRED Magazine Writers, Cory Doctorow and Wil McCarthy, have joined VC Rick Patch and 2 futurists to judge the Immortalizer Technologies Project - a project designed to uncover a comprehensive list of future inventions. The project is being spearheaded by a futurist think-tank, the DaVinci Institute. The goal of the project is to create a compendium of future inventions, a roadmap of sorts for innovators. They probably won't get it right in the first edition, but I like how Tom Frey is thinking on this one. People can submit their ideas and have a future invention named after themselves. Deadline for submissions is April 30th."

216 comments

  1. Will this kill all future patents? by gpinzone · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hey look! Prior art!

    1. Re:Will this kill all future patents? by ryanr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, you have to submit a working example of the invention, I believe.

    2. Re:Will this kill all future patents? by bmongar · · Score: 2, Funny

      I only think you need a working example of a perpetual motion machine. All others are issued on plans and descriptions.

      --
      As x approaches total apathy I couldn't care less.
    3. Re:Will this kill all future patents? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are right on the perpetual motion machine.

      A perpetual motion machine is now considered not possible and thus "non statutory" material.

      On the plans/descriptions, you must have specification that would "enable" one "ordinarily skilled in your art" to make the invention with "no undue experimentation".

      There is also a "written description" requirement where the specification must demonstrate that the inventor is in possession of that which he claims as his invention. This requirement is usually relevant in priority conflicts (deciding which inventor was first with the invention).

      The difference between enabling and written description is murkey and in fact the Federal Court of Appeals recently wrestled with the distinction.

    4. Re:Will this kill all future patents? by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      That's actually a really profound statement. Prior Art can stop a patent application dead in its tracks. Prior art can include cartoons (the Jetson's cartoon killed several patent apps), books (fiction and non-fiction), and even movies!

      I tend to think this is a horrible idea because of its "future" impact on independent/small entity inventors.

      IANAL, however, I work in a law firm full of them; and IP is a frequently discussed topic (one of the attys is a Patent atty).

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    5. Re:Will this kill all future patents? by Gnaythan1 · · Score: 1

      No, shouldexist.org will

  2. Nope, can't do it. by ites · · Score: 5, Funny
    My pending patent application ("A SYSTEM FOR FUTURE INVENTIONS", US Pat. Reg. 2221-222633-003) covers this. Invent anything, at all, in the future and I'll sue your pants off.

    Luckily I've not had to enforce my patent yet, since every invention since 1998 (including patented ones but excluding mine) are ideas blatantly stolen from prehistoric (pre-1996) times.

    --
    Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
  3. hmm.. by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    how about GNU/HURD ?

    --
    for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
  4. Future invention #1 by DonkeyJimmy · · Score: 1

    A book that lists future inventions. I call it "Billy and the future inventionasaurus".

    --
    "Probably the toughest time in anyone's life is when you have to murder a loved one because they're the devil." -Philips
    1. Re:Future invention #1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Future invention #1 (Score:1) by DonkeyJimmy (599788) on Friday April 11, @02:38PM (#5712240) A book that lists future inventions. I call it "Billy and the future inventionasaurus".

      It's posts like that which makes me wish there was a -1 So Not Funny option.

    2. Re:Future invention #1 by DaveSchool · · Score: 1

      To people who watch The Simpsons, it's hilarious.

      Skinner: Well...maybe it was for the best. Now I...I finally have time
      to do what I've always wanted: write the great American novel.
      Mine is about a futuristic amusement park where dinosaurs are
      brought to life through advanced cloning techniques. I call
      it "Billy and the Cloneasaurus."

  5. Check it out - funny gag post! by Asprin · · Score: 1



    If Wired is involved, I'm pretty sure one of them won't be a time machine. ;)

    --
    "Lawyers are for sucks."
    - Doug McKenzie
  6. Roadmap for innovators? by DrMrLordX · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It would seem to me that anyone attempting to create an invention that appears on a "to invent" list of this sort would not be an innovator.

    1. Re:Roadmap for innovators? by Uhh_Duh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It would seem to me that anyone attempting to create an invention that appears on a "to invent" list of this sort would not be an innovator.

      Haven't you learned yet that the people who think of the idea get very little. The people who get off their ass and build/market/produce are the ones raking in the cash.

      --
      -- People who hate Windows use Linux. People who love UNIX use BSD.
    2. Re:Roadmap for innovators? by smack_attack · · Score: 1

      All you have to do these days is just patent the damn thing and wait for someone else to build it. Then sue the hell out of them.

    3. Re:Roadmap for innovators? by russellh · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It would seem to me that anyone attempting to create an invention that appears on a "to invent" list of this sort would not be an innovator.

      People had the idea of flying machines long before the Wright brothers came along and invented one - and you know what? it didn't involve feathers or an archimedes screw. And people had the idea of mechanical musical instruments long before any were invented, but they were often imagined to be similar to mechanical musicians playing existing or modified instruments rather than, say, an electronic synthesizer.

      The point is, having the general idea doesn't in any way diminish the innovation of the actual workable implementation; the ancients who imagined themselves flying like birds using some aparatus doesn't at all take away from the Wright brothers.

      --
      must... stay... awake...
  7. Failed Sci-Fi writers. by gurps_npc · · Score: 4, Funny

    So basically these are people that came up with cool ideas but were too lazy or too poor a writer to write a Sci-Fi story about them.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Failed Sci-Fi writers. by skwirlmaster · · Score: 1

      You've got it all wrong, they can't come up with a coherent plot to tie all the gadgets together. :D

      --
      My inner self is ineffable, so don't eff with me.
    2. Re:Failed Sci-Fi writers. by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1

      I thought they did that with the wristwatch on Spy Kids 2

    3. Re:Failed Sci-Fi writers. by Daetrin · · Score: 1
      So basically these are people that came up with cool ideas but were too lazy or too poor a writer to write a Sci-Fi story about them.

      No, judging by the examples given, these are people that read existing science fiction stories and then nominated the cool gadgets in them as their own ideas.

      Rejuvination devices, controlling the weather, space hotels, never heard of _those_ anywhere else =P

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    4. Re:Failed Sci-Fi writers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Instant sleep was in a scifi book. I think it was in Fantastic Voyage.

    5. Re:Failed Sci-Fi writers. by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      LOL,

      I fit in that category, but I spent all my time working to pay bills .

      Studying so I could get a better job so some day I could own a house which I hope to buy next month .

      Here are some ideas for you :

      #1 - Tidal float power generation .

      It is in use in a milder sense, what I am
      talking is much more guargantuan .

      Imagine a Oil tanker that is lifted by rising
      tide, and MANY cables got to hydraulic rams
      that are anchored and this lifting force is
      translated to hydraulic pressure then translated
      to electricity, and best of all the hydraulic
      pressure in theory could be stored in numerous
      pressure cylinders for off peak use .

      #2 - All the sewer systems of the world could
      capture there methane gas and use it as a
      supplement to current power .

      Once methane fuel cells are prevalent it is
      even more applicable , for countries with
      cheap readily available natural gas this
      may not be as applicable .

      #3 - High Altitude launch platform held aloft
      by Enormous ballons similar to those made
      by 21st century airships .

      Launching from 100,000 ft. up would save a
      fair amount of energy , and rail gun from that
      height might be able to pitch non G-force
      sensitive cargo/materials into space .

      Consider it a poor mans verison of the
      proposed space elevator .

      #4 - Gigantic Sunlight steam convection tower .

      A solar powered steam generator that heats
      water and makes steam, and the steam is released
      to turn a turbine that is at the top of a
      VERY tall mountain , ie. 20,000 ft.+

      The water is collected, and returned down the great height, but turns a water turbine at the bottom .

      A steam power, gravity/water power cycle could keep it moving up and down the mountain

      #5 - Blue Algae farms that make massive amounts of hydrogen by oxygen depravation, and feeding them sulfur .

      Good source of sulfur is filtered diesel engine exhaust from bio-diesel .

      other sources of sulfur from carbon based fuels could be used too .

      link below :

      http://www.zetatalk.com/energy/tengy14r.htm

      Peace...
      Ex-MislTech

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    6. Re:Failed Sci-Fi writers. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      Studying so I could get a better job so some day I could own a house which I hope to buy next month .
      What are you studying, dance? It doesn't seem to be science, engineering or English.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  8. Personally... by andyring · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I never cared for all these futuristic predictions. Seems like way more often than not, they are way off. I'm a believer in the old adage "necessity is the mother of invention." Granted, it's not always the case, sometimes the invention preceeds the necessity, but I think a capitalistic society should let things be invented and develop on their own without feeling burdoned by someone else's oddball prediction.

    It's one thing to say "gosh, I wish there was a device that did such-and-such, I could really use something like that." It's another to say "In 10 years, we will have this and that invention." and it being dead wrong 95 percent (or more) of the time.

    1. Re:Personally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      I never cared for all these futuristic predictions

      I predict someone will mod you up for this.

    2. Re:Personally... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      That's because, anyone who can predict the great inventions of the future, goes out to build and patent them. So what's left? The windbags! Same goes for psychics. Perhaps they do exist, but I'm sure they're multimillionaires at this point, and your $3.99 per minute is nothing to them.

      More seriously, the problems with inventions is thinking them up. If there is a niche to be filled, and you can think of how to fill it, it can be done. The problem is that most inventions are flops, so companies have to really proceed cautiously with new ideas unless they have some immediately clear perfect use, and just can't miss.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Personally... by CommieLib · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the problem with these kinds of predictions (and hey, anyway, it's a lot of fun) is that while people are fairly good at predicting the advance of human knowledge, they are very poor at anticipating the economic ramifications.

      There's a great commercial with Captain Sisko where he says "This is the year 2000; where are the promised flying cars?" He then goes on to correctly point out that the advance of telecommunications has substantially decreased the demand for real world transportation.

      Could we have flying cars today? Absolutely. I have a model of one on my desk. It's just that there's no great push for one. Sure I'd like one, but it doesn't solve any great problem in anyone's life, at least not without creating ten more.

      Technology is often the least important factor in the success of a new invention.

      --
      If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
    4. Re:Personally... by StingRayGun · · Score: 1

      I never cared for all these futuristic predictions.

      No kidding, i mean, do they pass out a degree in Futuristics?

    5. Re:Personally... by konteil · · Score: 1

      actually in this day and age it is more like laziness is the mother of invention. at least thats how i explain the tv remote. duh....i dont wanna get up..wish i could push a button from here......etc

    6. Re:Personally... by Monkelectric · · Score: 2, Funny
      What I find the weirdest is, the barrier to entry to "inventor" is now not "doing things", but "thinking of things for other people to do" :)

      Actually, that really sounds ike management.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

  9. I've been asking for this for yeeeeeaaaaaars by L.+VeGas · · Score: 4, Funny

    Chick Magnet

    1. Re:I've been asking for this for yeeeeeaaaaaars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Chick Magnet

      You Called?

    2. Re:I've been asking for this for yeeeeeaaaaaars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Already invented. Its called money.

    3. Re:I've been asking for this for yeeeeeaaaaaars by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 5, Funny
      Chick Magnet

      Be careful what you wish for.

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
    4. Re:I've been asking for this for yeeeeeaaaaaars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop asking for one and make it. It's called a personal trainer and patience for a year.

  10. Heh by keyne9 · · Score: 1

    So basically, you give another person an idea.. they create it.. possibly become filthy rich, and you get to have your name on it? uh-huh. Bridge in Brooklyn for sale. Anyone buying?

  11. AKA Vaporware Catalog by Limburgher · · Score: 4, Funny
    Got a great idea you've not yet executed?

    Want it to bear your name even if it goes undone until someone else does it after you die?

    Even if it's impossible?

    My submission: Zero-Point Energy source /w built-in UPS, Line Conditioner and Drink Mixer.

    --

    You are not the customer.

    1. Re:AKA Vaporware Catalog by Troed · · Score: 1
      I love your signature.


      (yes I know which song it's from)


      Never thought of doing it in ascii.

  12. Whatever by Highwayman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yippie! Venture capital and futurists. Two great tastes that get nothing done together! Don't we ever learn. It is the year 2003 and yet no hover car in every garage, jet packs the realm of a few weirdos, and my computer's cooling system sounds like a malfunctioning jet engine. Why don't we finish the work of the futurists from 50 years ago first?

    1. Re:Whatever by shokk · · Score: 1

      Think about that. People have a hard enough time paying attention while piloting a car on a 2-d course. We really don't need the statistics of road travel to be extrapolated into the air where drunk motorists will come raining down on schools and a stalled engine causes someone to land on some old fashioned wheeled vehicles.

      Besides, we waste enough fuel as it is without someone driving a floating SUV. The advantage of taking to the air would be improving travel speed, and I don't trust the common Joe to have the reflexes to manuever at 200-300MPH.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  13. i call... by sigep_ohio · · Score: 1

    warp drive technology!

    now every time they use it in star trek my name will apear ahead of it.

    SigEp_Ohio Warp Drive!

    has a nice ring to it.

    --
    Beer Die is the game of champions Learning To walk my own path.
  14. Only 19 days?!? by truthsearch · · Score: 1

    I only have 19 day's to invent the next programming language?!? I'd better get to work!

    1. Re:Only 19 days?!? by nojomofo · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm going to invent the anti-apostrophe, so that I don't have to see misplace apostrophes in other peoples' writing.

    2. Re:Only 19 days?!? by Anonymous+Cow+herd · · Score: 1

      Your post has inspired me to invent the anti-typo!

      --
      Ita erat quando hic adveni.
    3. Re:Only 19 days?!? by chrissam · · Score: 1

      I'm going to invent the anti-apostrophe, so that I don't have to see misplace apostrophes in other peoples' writing.

      I think that's "people's." :)

      --
      Is it okay to cry "Movie!" in a crowded firehouse? --Steve Martin
    4. Re:Only 19 days?!? by nojomofo · · Score: 1

      It probably is because people is already the plural of person. I was going to rewrite that without that word (just in case I got it wrong), but I figured that irony can be funny....

  15. Mobile phone home network by smack_attack · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This would allow people to plug their mobile phones into a cradle device, then use any phone in their house instead of having to have a landline phone. The idea consists of a cradle device (or multiple cradles, a base station (that utilizes the wiring of the house, and converts the analog signal to digital so mutiple mobile phones can be used at the same time), and digital-to-analog converters for each analog phone in the house.

    1. Re:Mobile phone home network by smack_attack · · Score: 1

      I'm sure some telco employee is probably going to read this now and say: "OMGLOLBBQ, that's not the future, we're fucking doing it right now!"

      And then I'll never get the royalty payments that I obviously deserve :)

    2. Re:Mobile phone home network by goten · · Score: 2, Informative
    3. Re:Mobile phone home network by smack_attack · · Score: 1

      dammit I just knew someone beat me to this.

      I still want to see a digital version where multiple people can plug in AND have seperate rings AND talk at the same time. It's not a technological feat, it's a matter of "will people buy it"

    4. Re:Mobile phone home network by erpbridge · · Score: 1

      My boss bought one of these to use with his Verizon Motorola phone. I don't remember a site off the top of my head, but it was a cradle that you put the cell phone into, plugged into wall-power, and had a RJ11 (phone) jack on it.

      It worked just fine, but the standard dial-tone sounded slightly off tone. It was either the weird dial-tone or the fact it was going over the cell network that stopped him from doing his ultimate goal, having his Tivo dial over the cell network and get listings.

      Unfortunately, I could only find ones for older (pre-1998) phones at the time, and even then, only for Nokia and Motorola.

    5. Re:Mobile phone home network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This already exists. It's called the DECT standard.

    6. Re:Mobile phone home network by penguinrenegade · · Score: 1

      Been done.

      BLUETOOTH.

  16. Wrong Idea by barryfandango · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Controlling the Weather - Since the beginning of time, man has been fighting the forces of nature. Clothing protects us from the weather in a small way. Buildings protect us in a much larger way. But wouldn't it be nice to spot a hurricane when it first starts to develop, shoot a special wave into it, and just put it out."

    Better invention: How about clothing and buildings that are strong enough to withstand any weather? Why disrupt the natural world when we can adapt to it?

    "Instant Sleep - People who need to finish an important project, but are beginning to get exhausted can just walk into the instant sleep chamber. In just a few seconds they can walk back out totally rejuvenated, ready to tackle their rest of their work."

    Better invention: lets come up with an economy and lifestyle where we get a nice eight-hour sleep at night. I like sleeping. No more sleep, so that my employer can enjoy my improved productivity? This is progress?

    --
    In all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane. -Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:Wrong Idea by barryfandango · · Score: 4, Funny

      Also: there's some prior art on the Instant Sleep machine. The USAF has been using this technology for some time under the codename "amphetamines."

      --
      In all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane. -Oscar Wilde
    2. Re:Wrong Idea by inerte · · Score: 1

      No, it isn't. Progress is when you are your employer :)

    3. Re:Wrong Idea by BgJonson79 · · Score: 1

      How dare you try to suggest a social solution to a technological problem! ;-)

      --

      There are four boxes used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order.

    4. Re:Wrong Idea by Telastyn · · Score: 1

      Probably because it's easier to dissipate a hurricane than it is to make buildings able to withstand them for hundreds of years, even after decay, creep, and mismaintenance.

    5. Re:Wrong Idea by Jester998 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't think the problem with the Instant Sleep machine is the fact that your employer gets more productivity... the REAL problem is "Where's the time for sex?" :)

    6. Re:Wrong Idea by mfrank · · Score: 1

      Well, if you need to have your wet dream, don't use the machine :)

    7. Re:Wrong Idea by mfrank · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or, you can increase the amount of your daily free time by 5 or 6 hours.

    8. Re:Wrong Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Karma: Pornorific! (Mostly due to favorable comparisons to Ron Jeremy).

      Fat and hairy?

    9. Re:Wrong Idea by docbrown42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't think the problem with the Instant Sleep machine is the fact that your employer gets more productivity... the REAL problem is "Where's the time for sex?" :)

      Easy. The "Instant Sleep" machine would be right next to the "Instant Sex" machine. Step inside, and come back out "satisfied".

      --
      Ed Wedig
      Graphic design services
      docbrown.net
    10. Re:Wrong Idea by 2short · · Score: 1

      There are some notable buildings in Egypt that have withstood the weather for four thousand years. I suppose they don't get hurricanes there, but I can't imagine it would make a difference. Making buildings that withstand hurricanes is no big trick. Making them also nice to live in is a little harder, but I know of some very nice houses that have gone through several hurricanes. It's just a matter of construction methods, materials, and location.

      I think you're crazy if you think dissipating a hurricane is easy compared to, well, just about anything.

    11. Re:Wrong Idea by Zirnike · · Score: 2, Funny
      "right next to the "Instant Sex" machine. Step inside"

      Ummm... Can we make this an "Instant Sex Suit"?

      --
      I'm not shy, I'm stalking my prey
    12. Re:Wrong Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There are some notable buildings in Egypt that have withstood the weather for four thousand years ... Making them also nice to live in is a little harder
      The Sphinx was non-residential, and the pyramids were for dead people to live in.
    13. Re:Wrong Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Touche!

  17. Wired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stupid shit and Wired have had this long running love affair that caused me to stop reading it in the '90s. But they keep sending the magazine.

    Every once in awhile I'll have a peek before it goes in the trash and the last one had a special newsvertising section with "articles" about wireless stuff. Stupid shit.

    Most most magaines suck. All flim-flam newsvertising and for hire propoganda slots, like buying hardcopy informercials.

  18. Umm No. by Flamesplash · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People can submit their ideas and have a future invention named after themselves.

    If someone thinks something up and puts in in a book, and then 100 years later I actually make the stupid thing, then I'm pretty sure I get to call it whatever I, or the marketing department, want to call it.

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
    1. Re:Umm No. by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      I am 100% behind you.

      Millions of people thought about flying machines, but the wright brothers actually put one in the air (unless you want to count da vinci's helicopter). Who deserves the credit? The thousands of dreamers or the one 'doer'?

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    2. Re:Umm No. by scrotch · · Score: 1

      If you're able to make anything in 100 years, you'll be doing fine no matter what you call it.

    3. Re:Umm No. by Ser_Olmy · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Right. When I invent tabletop cold fusion, I'm pretty sure I'll call the damned thing "Mr. Fusion".

    4. Re:Umm No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the wright brothers actually put one in the air (unless you want to count da vinci's helicopter)
      ... or Cayley's glider, or the Montgolfiers' balloon...
  19. Wee! by grub · · Score: 2, Funny


    I predict... flying cars will be commonplace! Oh wait, that was the predictions for 2000..

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  20. Top 10 Future Inventions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is not for yucks; just a list of way-cool things I've seen in science fiction over the years.

    10. The Dream Recorder

    9. Impervious material (like Adamantium, General Products Hulls, Mithril)

    8. Teleportation booth/transporter

    7. Time machine

    6. Intelligent, walking robot (I'm thinking more Asimov than Star Wars). Something that can balance, walk and think. Hondo "ASIMO" is a mere toddler.

    5. FTL space drive

    4. Stasis Field (see Larry Niven....who needa a fridge when you have one of these?)

    3. Antigravity

    2. Fully creative genetic engineering. Yes, we need Moties and dragons in our world.

    1. Brain wave reader machine that makes telepathy a reality.

    1. Re:Top 10 Future Inventions by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 4, Funny

      9. Impervious material (like Adamantium, General Products Hulls, Mithril)

      Plus last night's steak dinner

      7. Time machine

      A point in time where the book becomes 100% accurate could prove this invention had (or will have) been invented. Think about it....

      4. Stasis Field (see Larry Niven....who needs a fridge when you have one of these?)

      Built into every Twinkie. They never age.

      1. Brain wave reader machine that makes telepathy a reality.

      My wife already has one. I can't get away with anything because she finds out about it. She just won't admit to having such a device.

    2. Re:Top 10 Future Inventions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VERY funny post! Unfortunately, I used my last mod. point on parent. Sorry, dude!

    3. Re:Top 10 Future Inventions by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      A point in time where the book becomes 100% accurate could prove this invention had (or will have) been invented. Think about it....

      I'm going off topic here, but I believe that if we are ever to time travel, it would be to go forward only, not back. There is too much complexity when going back, unless it is completely 'read only', and you can only observe and not interfere.

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    4. Re:Top 10 Future Inventions by mfrank · · Score: 2

      I think Larry Niven's theory of time travel is
      that travel to the past changes the timeline, so
      the universe will "stabilize" at a timeline
      where nobody travels into the past.

      It may be possible, but nobody ever does it :).

    5. Re:Top 10 Future Inventions by smack_attack · · Score: 1

      You're right, but how do you enforce read only in a theoretical device? I have a few friends, myself included, who think the whole "alien conspiracy" is really just future anthropologist humans who are checking out the past. Except they've been seen, so there's a paradox.

      Who knows, maybe some grey roundhead people came 3.5billion light years to watch us kill each other like savages.

    6. Re:Top 10 Future Inventions by the_consumer · · Score: 1

      According to quantum theory, there is no 'read only' mode of observation.

      --
      "If you're thinking what I'm thinking, you're right." -
    7. Re:Top 10 Future Inventions by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      I actually watched a (made for TV?) movie about this exact topic. Was interesting. I can't remember the title, so I'll dig around for it.

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    8. Re:Top 10 Future Inventions by eQuasarus · · Score: 1
      Number 10: It may not be exactly what you're thinking of but it's dang close.

      Check out the SuperNova (requires the NovaDreamer) (lucidity.com) I've got one of my own, and I'm working on the lucid dream stuff right now, it's amazing. I'll be getting the SuperNova package soon, hopefully.

      Anyway, thought you might be interested in that.

      ~eQuasarus

      "Death is the only great adventure" James Hook

    9. Re:Top 10 Future Inventions by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      There is too much complexity when going back, unless it is completely 'read only', and you can only observe and not interfere.

      Actually, it'll probably be no more complex than heavier-than-air flight, lighter-than-air navigation, or rocket science.

      Theoretically it's complex--but theoretically, there are a lot of possibilities, simply because we don't have any frame of refernece beyond human intuition for "real" time travel.

    10. Re:Top 10 Future Inventions by ultramk · · Score: 1

      Built into every Twinkie. They never age.

      True.

      -m

      --
      You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
    11. Re:Top 10 Future Inventions by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Was there a couple who ran a garden centre, and were about to split up because he was being abducted & she didn't believe him? The 'aliens' crash & in helping the survivor to escape she finds out he's telling the truth. They get back together, it hints that this changes the timeline (a kind of grandfather paradox in reverse).
      If so, I enjoyed it, but I don't remember the name either.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  21. neat by NedTheNerd · · Score: 1

    and over here is our article of 1000 things that could happen. if we get anything right we will forever be known as "visionaris".

  22. Here's the future by mt2mb4me · · Score: 1

    WMAV9 on a beowulf cluster !!

  23. Thieving bastards! by BabyDave · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bastards! I came up with this idea next week!

  24. Human Information Storage Device by smack_attack · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This one is definitely in our future, once we realize the power of knowledge. It's simply a device that will bypass the learning process and education system that takes 16+ years and just beams information and knowledge into your memory. If we every figure this one out, we'll reach a golden age of humanity.

    1. Re:Human Information Storage Device by barryfandango · · Score: 1

      It's definitely an attractive idea, and the first thought that came to mind when i read it was Neo proudly saying "I know ju-jitsu." But the 16+ years i spent getting educated was much more than classrooms, obviously, and has shaped everything about who i am. Wouldn't your invention spit out drones with identical personalities?

      --
      In all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane. -Oscar Wilde
    2. Re:Human Information Storage Device by smack_attack · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The brain works in funny ways... I'm sure it would be possible to condense 16+ of experience and interaction in a virtual world into the span of say, a few weeks of hyperlearning.

    3. Re:Human Information Storage Device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jerkface. Learn to quote movies.

    4. Re:Human Information Storage Device by Rick.C · · Score: 1
      I'm sure it would be possible to condense 16+ of experience and interaction in a virtual world into the span of say, a few weeks of hyperlearning.

      Let's start with the assumption that you're correct.

      Add to this the fact that the human brain develops from birth to maturity in roughly 18 years, give or take.

      The gist of the idea is that we could take a six-year-old and zap in 16 years of experience and then he could just bypass school. But a six-year-old's brain is not able to handle the concepts, so we'd have to wait until he's 18 or 20.

      So what does he do with those 12 years while he's waiting for maturity to set it?

      I grimmace in anticipation of the replies.

      --
      You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
      "Math in a song is good."-Linford
    5. Re:Human Information Storage Device by mfrank · · Score: 1

      Cool. Now it won't take fifteen years of conditioning to be convinced that Kim Il Jung II is God.

    6. Re:Human Information Storage Device by smack_attack · · Score: 1

      The assumption was that the device would be used ethically. We already have devices to brainwash people, it's called television.

    7. Re:Human Information Storage Device by TenDimensions · · Score: 1

      So what does he do with those 12 years while he's waiting for maturity to set it?

      Anything but be mature.

    8. Re:Human Information Storage Device by smack_attack · · Score: 1

      You have a valid point, however I think the hardest part of this would be to dissect the learning process itself and find what causes people to learn and what impedes some from learning faster than others. Once that question is solved, I doubt that would be a serious issue. I'm thinking the more complex issue would have to do with individual rights and whether a 6-year-old can go live on his own, get married, etc.

      It opens a can of worms unto itself in moral complexities. But if it were possible, I think that someone would imbibe themself with the genius to answer the problem.

    9. Re:Human Information Storage Device by phorm · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem is, that knowledge is quite seperate from experience. And experience not only influences what we know, but what we do with our knowledge, and how we grow. If we copied actual memories, then we're left with a bunch of clones with less personal development.

      Think about when Einstein's theories led to the creation of atomic energy sources. Think about what others did with it (nukes). Einstein lacked the comprehension of the sheer evil this knowledge could impart, while others lacked the caution of experience and upbringing.

      How about giving a 12-year-old knowledge which would let him build a death-ray? How about giving a 6-year-old knowledge of sex? Even with useful things, like math/english/physics, knowledge would be more useful to some than others.

      Seriously. How many of us could read a book, understand the concepts, but completely screw up on the implentation? Knowledge is one thing: skill, ability, and experience are completely different.

    10. Re:Human Information Storage Device by Capt.+DrunkenBum · · Score: 1

      1 word... Beer.

      --

      Not everyone deserves a 320i

    11. Re:Human Information Storage Device by realdpk · · Score: 1

      Indeed. If such a device is created, in the future, people will actually think:

      "In order to solve this problem I'm going to need a Big Mac and a Coke!"

    12. Re:Human Information Storage Device by bj8rn · · Score: 1

      Indeed. If such a device is created, in the future, people will actually think:
      "In order to solve this problem I'm going to need a Big Mac and a Coke!"


      Or, using this, you can have a voice in your head say "a big mac and a coke will make it better" in the near future...

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    13. Re:Human Information Storage Device by bstadil · · Score: 1
      that knowledge is quite seperate from experience.

      Indeed, this Sig I saw a few days ago sums it up quite nicely

      Knowledge is knowing a street is one way. Wisdom is still looking in both directions

      --
      Help fight continental drift.
  25. I've got some... by ryanvm · · Score: 2, Funny

    How about the "Death Clock" or maybe the "Smellescope"?

    [Yes - I watched Futurama on TiVo last night.]

  26. The magic BUTTON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about a device that we will

    1. put in your house

    2. you will pay to have this device

    in your house

    3. anyone can use another device to

    interuppt you 7 days per week,

    24 hours per day

    Oh wait, its already been done -...

    IT'S a telephone

  27. Predictions by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 1

    There are some inventions that no sane person could have ever predicted.

    This, for example.

    (Warning: Adult content, Do not open if your children are nearby!)

    --
    I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
  28. sounds like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a lot of bullshit to me

    vaporware nominations to come

  29. Re:Nope, can't do it. by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

    My dad invented the automatic lawn mower. The project was concieved on a rainy night in 1978. It had voice recognition, anger avoidance, and would even refill the gas tank! It took a little over 10 years to develop, but once perfected I got paid $10 every two weeks to keep the lawn trimmed.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  30. Re:Nope, can't do it. by Shads · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hmm, but when the future arrives it is no longer the future, it is the present, and then instantly the past, thus any invention I create in the future will be created instead in the present and the rapidly the past, thus your patent doesn't apply. Nod. Sure. Works here.

    --
    Shadus
  31. Had to be said by Sanga · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Deadline for submissions is April 30th."

    When did they start accepting entries?
    April 1.

  32. Failed Sci-fi guys? by ihatewinXP · · Score: 2, Funny

    You may have a point about these guys being failed Sci_fi writers, I mean look at the names associated with it.

    "VC Rick Patch" - If that isnt a sci-fi name then ive never watched Robotech

    "The DaVinci Institute" - Obviously a front for M15

    And Cory "Doctor O" - This would have to be the leader at The DaVinci Institute.....

    Man with a name like "VC Rick Patch" I could rule the world!

    --
    ---- The real Slashdot is still here. You just have to browse at -1 to read the comments.
  33. Re:Nope, can't do it. by k-0s · · Score: 1

    Well, as luck would have it, most of the truly innovative things being invented today don't come out of the US anyways. Everything except music. Music we like totally rock at.

    I know you were joking but would any of us be suprised if the patent office did issue you this patent? I know I wouldn't be suprised in the least.

  34. Re:Nope, can't do it. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    "My dad invented the automatic lawn mower.... I got paid $10 every two weeks to keep the lawn trimmed."

    My dad invented the self healing computer. Only I got paid in porn bookmarks.

  35. Waste of time? by Arthur+Dent · · Score: 1
    While this seems like a good idea on the surface, am I the only one who thinks this is a waste of time?

    C'mon now, how many present inventions can be claimed to have been predicted? OK, the geosynchronous satellite. But what about the ones that aren't like TIVO ?

    There will always be stuff you can predict assuming progressive evolution of today's hardware and software. But then there will also be the stuff you can't predict no matter how far you take current technology. Flying cars anyone?

  36. I already know... by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 1

    I already know what happens. I've seen "Back To The Future" parts I, II, andIII.

    --
    I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
  37. Re:F*ck Wired by Asprin · · Score: 1

    You should try reading their magazine. (~~shudder~~)

    --
    "Lawyers are for sucks."
    - Doug McKenzie
  38. Flying car accessories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I propose an accessory that people will be able to attach to their flying cars that will emit the sound from the Jetzons cartoon. And a patent on highlighting the flying car's vehicle designation with a border of purple neon.

  39. The most revolutionary invention... by shadwwulf · · Score: 1

    would be a system to use a planet's natural magnetic field as a renewable energy source.

    1. Re:The most revolutionary invention... by cybermace5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How is that renewable? I guess that would be the invention part of it....

      --
      ...
    2. Re:The most revolutionary invention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that would be great until you drag the planetary core to a halt and kill everything on the planet.

    3. Re:The most revolutionary invention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Have you considered the grave ecological consequences of your suggestion?

      Extracting all that energy of rotation would make the core stop spinning, and the magnetic field would go away, and we'd get radiated and stuff, and there'd be earthquakes and San Francisco would get destroyed and we'd have to build some sort of tunneling missile to go back to the core and start it spinning again, but unobtanium is kind of hard to obtain these days and besides, Hillary Swank is busy that weekend or at least that's what she told me at the bar.

  40. Re:Fuck Wired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flamebait? I love morons who waste their mod. points on AC posts! Quick, mod me, mod me!!

  41. Re:F*ck Wired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As in the paper mag.? Bad, huh?

  42. If Only... by Sloppy · · Score: 1
    If only they had come up with this idea last year, then they could have included their own invention on it.

    Oh well, back to working on my web page that contains links to all pages that don't link to themselves.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  43. Duke Nukem Forever by SILIZIUMM · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is Duke Nukem Forever on the list ?

  44. HalfBakery by jbum · · Score: 3, Informative

    This sounds an awful lot like the HalfBakery (which isn't nearly as pretentious-sounding as the "DaVinci Institute").

  45. Best invention yet by whoppers · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm working on a helmet with "eyeports" that only allow you to see things worth looking at and "earphones" that only allow you to hear things worth hearing.

    My prototypes are available at the supermarket under the code name "brown bag please".

    1. Re:Best invention yet by smack_attack · · Score: 1

      May I suggest a platic material for those who find this funny.

  46. Frey????? by stephanruby · · Score: 1

    Is Frey a common last name? Because the person who submitted this news item about Tom Frey is none other than Darby Frey (a.k.a Deb Hellman)

    1. Re:Frey????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first invention has been self submitted by the future requesting futurists. Good catch.

  47. FUTURE tech? They should work on their PRESENT tec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The damned project's page has a horizontal scrollbar! How can anybody who would make an incredibly dumb mistake like that be credible? I mean, assuming anybody who proposes a technology roadmap be credible in teh first place?

    Balls of crystal or balls of iron?

  48. Electric Sports Bra! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone remember that skit from Mr. Show on HBO?

  49. Press Releases??? by Scytle · · Score: 1

    Just out of curiosity, does anyone think /. should have a policy regarding these kind of press releases? Sometimes they may contain useful information to be sure but here you have the Vice President of this very organization really just having the editors post a promo puff piece. Not to impinge on the credibility of an institute represented by the amazing "Father of Invention" as proclaimed by that hard hitting news source the Boulder Daily Camera, but seeing how this issue has come up recently for google it seems relevent to wonder if /. to should be considering it as well.

  50. Five original future inventions by Animats · · Score: 2, Insightful
    OK. Here are a few.
    • The photon screen Turns high-energy photons into multiple low energy photons. Useful for converting gammas from radioactives into heat and light.
    • The flipper Turns matter into antimatter by rotating it through a higher dimension. Useful for making antimatter as fuel. Small versions only flip a few thousand atoms at a time, so the hazard is low. Use with the photon screen as an energy source.
    • High-volume mass spectrograph For element separation. Like the calutrons of the Manhattan Project, but with a useful throughput rate. Raw materials in, elements out.
    • Low-power wireless power transmission Just milliwatts, but enough to keep portable devices recharged. Available in homes, offices, hot spots.
    • Safe third-rail power Power trains, streetcars, etc. with a power rail that's off except for a short section under the vehicle. System safety comparable to other life-safety systems.

    The last two could be built today.

    Don't put these into that DaVinci site; their list is proprietary.

    1. Re:Five original future inventions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Low-power wireless power transmission Just milliwatts, but enough to keep portable devices recharged. Available in homes, offices, hot spots.

      And it keeps you warm when you work near the items!

    2. Re:Five original future inventions by realdpk · · Score: 1

      The neutrino-based power generator. We're still just learning how to detect the various types of solar neutrinos there are out there. I suspect it's only a matter of time til we can build a new-style "solar cell" to generate energy.

      speaking as a layman,dpk

    3. Re:Five original future inventions by chubaca · · Score: 1
      Low-power wireless power transmission
      Wireless power transmission has already be done, I think, or has been finished in the drawing board at least, to transmit power between satellites and ground stations, using microwaves and arrays of antennas. The problem is to build an efficient, multi-purpose power transmitter. Small devices has not enough area to put an efficient directional array of antennas, and it would require some complex circuits to change the directionality when you move the device around the house. Wireless power transmission is not the norm because it radiates a lot of wasted power into the space, and your neighbor can use part of your power without pay for it (poor Nicola Tesla).
    4. Re:Five original future inventions by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but how do you plan on harnessing it? it's akin to trying to run a windmill by shooting it with a machine gun that shoots bullets going mach 100. Not saying it's impossible, but I think it's going to be more difficult than you imply.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    5. Re:Five original future inventions by realdpk · · Score: 1

      I didn't mean to imply it would be easy. I'm also not a physicist, but I imagine that they'll figure out some way to "detect" them that will turn out to be practical for energy generation. Maybe as they pass through something, they generate some sort of "field" that something else can pick up, akin to a bar passing by a magnet.

      I'm truly a layman here, but the stuff they're looking at is really exciting, and they haven't even detected everything yet.

    6. Re:Five original future inventions by Animats · · Score: 1

      There's not much energy in a neutrino. That's why they're so hard to detect.

  51. Addendum by Flamesplash · · Score: 1

    I think that for ideas that are truely novel that it is ok to attach your name to it for eternity and have it remain, but I'm talking truely novel ideas.

    For the most part such things only reside on mathematical theories or other such currently useful ideas. Ie. the Shannon Limit or the Turing Test. If I simply come up with a idea for something like a "glass magnet" to make recycling landfills easier, that's just fairly pointless. No one is going to speak of Flamesplash's Glass Magnet, especially since it doesn't exist. Now if say in 3 years someone hears my idea and actually builds one, then I don't see any real reason I should get credit for it, maybe an acknowledgement or mention in the paper for said Glass Magnet, but little else.

    You could say the person would have never made the device without my suggestion, but I think the actual creation of the device is the harder of the two parts and actually deserves the credit.

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
  52. An invention we need: by timothy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    a safe, handy tool for disposing of whatever sadistic bastard came up with the molded-plastic clamshell packaging that too many smallish products come in?

    Bonus points if it also opens the stupid %$#@ packages themselves, without leaving finger-cutting edges, and double bonus if it leaves the package in a state where the thing can be returned to the store if unsatisfactory.

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    1. Re:An invention we need: by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

      It's called a key. Just take a sharpish key (Titan keys are really good, so are many car keys), slice directly against the edge on the back of the package.

      I do it all the time, and it works really well on that darn blister pack stuff. Even allows for returns.

      -WS

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    2. Re:An invention we need: by mike_mgo · · Score: 1

      I think we already have enough tools to dispose of sadistic bastards...oh, you want a tool to dispoase of the packaging.

  53. well.... by Danse · · Score: 1

    Unless you give it a really stupid name, in which case people will fall back on whatever cooler name someone else came up with.

    --
    It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  54. It should be used that way by ConversantShogun · · Score: 1

    Exactly.

    In fact, I wondered "why the deadline?" Just publish everybody's future invention ideas, ongoingly, and maybe some of the more inappropriate patents can be prevented.

    --

    --When you buy proprietary software, you don't get better software. What you get is the right to complain about it.
  55. Don't forget... by Midajo · · Score: 1

    reverse-SCUBA for fish.

  56. Slightly OT: Anti-narcolepsy drug (ab)use by swb · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've read a few references about a fairly new drug that's been given to narcoleptics and been adopted by others that really seems to be a stay-awake drug that has few known side effects. Unlike stimulants that crank you up, this new drug simply keeps you from getting sleepy.

    Non-narcoleptic users reported being able to stay awake for 4-5 days straight without any sleep. When they stop taking the drug, they get tired as per normal and sleep a normal 8 hours and wake up rested and "normal."

    I think this is pretty revolutionary -- we talk about free time as being important, but what would it be like to get 10 additional hours a day? Feel like watching that 3 hour DVD, but its 11 PM and you know you'll be shot the next day if you do? What if the bigger worry was whether you had enough DVDs to occupy your time between 2 and 6 AM?

    They don't know what the long term psychological impact of sleep deprivation like this would be, but there's no apparent physical problems reported by people who have been up 3-5 days. None of the paranoia and other psychotic behavior typically associated with long-term stimulant use and other sleep deprivation.

    The amount of extra free time would be truly amazing, even if you only stayed "up" 2-3 nights a week, you could be gaining the equivilent of 50 days free time a year.

  57. GURPS High Tech Supplement by spun · · Score: 1

    We already have a good compendium of future technology. Steve Jackson games, makers of the Generic Universal Role Playing System (GURPS) published several supplements detailing future technology. Yeah, it's just a game, but they are very well thought out and plausible (at least for the next few tech levels above 7, which is where we're at now.)

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:GURPS High Tech Supplement by Chris+Y+Taylor · · Score: 1

      Actually we crossed over to Tech Level 8 a couple of years ago.

  58. I looked over the site... by epiphani · · Score: 1
    and it seems to be a large amount of flamebait to me. Take a look at the "Quotable Quotes" Section. About half of them are from the Executive Director of this thing - Thomas Frey. Some of them are completely rediculous, and some are completely obvious. I'll hit one of each by Mr. Frey:
    "The year is 2050, and you are standing in front of a vending machine. What form of payment will you put into it?"
    This is stupid. Go to a gas station now. What form of payment will you put into the pump?
    "Amnesia therapy will someday become widely used on individual's brains to erase select pieces of human memory that cause traumatic impairment."
    I doubt this one. Even if we could, it would distroy the 'live and learn' and 'learn from mistakes' approach to life we have now.

    My personal opinion is that we will see a world much more like Star Trek TNG. Seriously. Think about any one technology in that show that isnt entirely unfathomable. Transporters employ an area of quantum mechanics that we're currently looking at. Computers are almost already at the point where we can interact with them on the same level as the enterprises' main computer. Look at the tablet PCs' people are carrying around, now and on that show.

    The future is all about quantum technology. Thats going to be the next major area of breakthroughs.

    --
    .
    1. Re:I looked over the site... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "The year is 2050, and you are standing in front of a vending machine. What form of payment will you put into it?"

      I'd say none, it will know who I am an automatically handle the transaction, and have the productwaiting for me since alls I did was say into my phone "Find me a cool soda" and then it will direct me to the nearest vending machine, queue up my order, and when I arrive it recognizes me and complees the transaction.

      Lets see you do that with a gas pump.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:I looked over the site... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > My personal opinion is that we will see a world much more like Star Trek TNG. Seriously. Think about any one technology in that show that isnt entirely unfathomable.

      The Universal Translater is impossible.

  59. Prior art is still an issue but by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    This may *limit* the scope of future patents but there are likely *elements* of these inventions that would be patentable.

    Yes, I would think that the prior art would be a reasonable defence, but if there are parts of the invention which are covered by the patent but not the prior art, that would likely still be enforceable. But hey, IANAL.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  60. Re:F*ck Wired by Asprin · · Score: 1

    Yep.

    The page design is loud and annoying and that makes difficult to tell which pages are ads and which are articles. It's like Maxim or Cosmo for computers - looooong on (really bad) style and short on brainpower. The border is freakin' ORANGE AND GREEN for crying out loud.

    They also spend an inordinate amount of pagespace discussing dumb-ass but important sounding issues like "Breaking in to the Hollywood network (an expose of how movie deals are made)", "Instant messaging in the workplace", "Games are teaching kids the things schools are not" and "What metro areas are the biggest for wireless networking". ....AND THAT'S JUST THIS MONTH!

    If computers got you laid, this would be your monthly instruction manual. Imagine a computer magazine who's target audience is Jim Rome. It's like a bunch of cool people set out to write a magazine about how geeky they thing they are and failed miserably because they aren't eggheaded enough to pull it off.

    Really!

    There's not a single damn unnecessary Lego(tm) robot project anywhere near that rag! How are they supposed to have any credibility? Hell, they just caught up with the "classic gaming" fanbase with an article about that guy that re-builds Atari 2600's into hand-held units. Next month they'll probably have a cover story on case mods. "Oooh, Buffy, look. People are installing colored lights in their PC's and cutting windows in the side so..." Arrrrrrgh! I can't even finish the gag it's so stupid.

    If they wanted to make themselves useful, they'd publish articles like "How to still MS software and keep from getting screwed by Licensing 6.0", "Why you should ignore web services just a little while longer" and "Why is Larry Ellison such a psycho?"

    THAT'S info I would pay for.

    On another note, don't these people realize that the niche/canned business software market is STILL DIGESTING AND IMPLEMENTING STANDARDS THAT WERE WRITTEN 5 YEARS AGO? Example: My company is probably going to upgrade one of our two major apps this summer. The major innovation? It's a web based product, so there's a zero client install, it pulls info from credit bureaus automatically and it sends email status updates to applicants. (The old app it is replacing was Win16/ODBC and integrated with MS Office 6.0 standards. Ick!) It's a very powerful and flexible package, but it's brand spanking new with a tiny little installed base, so you KNOW it's going to be problematic. But, enough ranting.

    I've read one issue of Wired, and it's mostly catbox liner as far as I'm concerned. Maybe if I were 25, lived in San Francisco and had schitzophrenic ADD it would be amusing, but it really makes me miss "Creative Computing" and "Compute!". You see, back in the good old days, computer magazines published the source for useful BASIC programs every month!

    --
    "Lawyers are for sucks."
    - Doug McKenzie
  61. Flying cars by Orne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I totally agree. People have trouble enough maneuvering in 2 dimensions, then they want to add a 3rd dimension of movement? I shudder to think of the accidents caused people flying to work, while they drink their coffee, read their papers, and use their cell phones...

    1. Re:Flying cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But this creates even more opportunities to invent things that solve these problems. Duh?

    2. Re:Flying cars by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      People have trouble enough maneuvering in 2 dimensions, then they want to add a 3rd dimension of movement? I shudder to think of the accidents caused people flying to work
      LOL! So instead of just overtaking, you'll be able to overovertake (or overtakeover) and underovertake (or overtakeunder). As you implied, this could provide a lot of business for undertakers.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  62. This one will be neat.. by riflemann · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking of a booth on the steet, kinda of like a phone booth,where you go into it, deposit 25c, then select either a quick and painless death, or a bloody and gruesome one.

    I'll call it a Suicide Booth!!

    What?? Not my original idea? Damn...

  63. Re:Slightly OT: Anti-narcolepsy drug (ab)use by Thing+1 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Here's a link.

    The drug is Modafinil, and is sold under the name Provigil.

    This report is from Dec. 3 (doesn't say what year, I'd imagine 2002), and it discusses the military uses. It warns that we might be messing with something we don't fully understand (like the effects on the endocrine system), but I for one would love to try this out.

    --
    I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  64. Re:Fuck Wired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is a side for geeks. if you use IE, dont use some popup blocker, or/and dont block sides that serve ads, you dont belong here

    but maybe your just new, so i'll try to help you. first, get a decent browser. then, block those evil sites

    as a side note for any newbies, goatex is evil. you dont want to click on any links going there

  65. Re:Slightly OT: Anti-narcolepsy drug (ab)use by bobobobo · · Score: 1

    One of the problems with the drug, is it's like taking a painkiller and burning yourself with a match. I can't feel the pain, therefore I'm alright, right? Sleep deprivation has been shown to be dangerous for your long term health, offsetting circadian rhythms among other things. The body is repairing itself, as well as other maintenance related tasks when you're asleep. You will need to 'catch up' at some point. Bare in mind that this drug is being used by narcileptics, and for military usage in which they had irregular sleeping patterns to begin with.

  66. it's a FUTURE INVENTION by donkiemaster · · Score: 1

    (Score:+1000000, totally ON TOPIC)

  67. Re:Slightly OT: Anti-narcolepsy drug (ab)use by swb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From what I recall, one thing that was kind of disturbing about the drug was that it worked so well that it appeared to have no side effects. Traditional sleep deprivation (ie, just staying awake and not sleeping) and heavy stimulant usage all have psychosis-like side effects (paranoia, hallucinations, etc) as well as big "crashes" of long sleeps to catch up (further worsened by the use of barbituates or tranquilizers). These are all well-known to be really harsh on your phsyical and mental well-being. Anyone who's ever met a hard-core tweaker can tell you about that (and anyone who has who isn't one can tell you how far away you want to stay from them).

    I don't doubt that it might have longer-term psychological effects, but it doesn't appear to have any of the negative physical consequences associated with more familiar forms of sleep avoidance.

    What I wonder about, though, is what's the mind of a 40 year old like if they've "added" an extra 2 years of living by using a drug like this? Does your mind age too fast? Do you feel 42? Wiser? More bored, tired, angry, ?

    There are probably hidden side-effects from this, but they don't sound like they'd be evident without many years of repeated long-term waking "sessions" to find out.

  68. I've used it by Keighvin · · Score: 1

    I was prescribed Provigil (modafonil) as a stimulant to combat sleep disorder induced narcolepsy - didn't do much for myself, unfortunately.

    --
    Any spoon would be too big.
  69. Will hardly cover "all" inventions. by Kjella · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's at least three fundamental types of inventions:

    1. Those people already want, but the tech isn't there.
    2. Those things people don't realize they want, until somebody offers it.
    3. The things people just aren't that keen on, but that just grows on you.

    Typically, #1 is what you'll find here. #2 are those low-tech inventions that just "show up" because one man had a smart idea.

    #3 is maybe the biggest, even though they don't appear that way. I remember before mobile phones took off, when people felt they were flashy and annoying. Well, they still are, but now everybody has one. Age group 18-35 have a 99% coverage here, 85% in general population. Another example is the microwave. In the beginning it was basicly a fancy heater used from time to time, now we use it all the time. With a grill element, even pizza is great, and much faster than a regular oven. This might sound a bit like a luddite, but it's not. You're not against technology, you just don't realize how it will evolve into a central part of your life. Same with internet, even though I admit I saw some of what was coming, many things I didn't. For example P2P and Napster, it was a direction I never expected the Internet to take.

    Ah, this is getting a long rant. The point is at least, much of what is happening is not fundamentally "new" technology, but it starts taking other forms and evolves to something else. For an example try to imagine everything a multi-gadget carryable computer could do for you. One that is integrated with your cell phone so it could connect with Internet, or other similar gadgets (alternatively over Wi-Fi?), and your laptop or tablet pc. Nothing truly new or groundbreaking so far, but I'm sure there's a lot of ideas we just haven't thought of.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  70. colloidal silver by john_smith_45678 · · Score: 0

    Interesting...there just was a documentary about a woman who took colloidal silver and it "embedded" in her skin and gave her an ashen grey skin color over her entire body.

    http://www.immortalizertechnologies.com/immortaliz er-technologies-big-thinkers-page.php

    Al Shugart
    Al Shugart cofounded Seagate Technology, the world's largest independent hard-drive manufacturer. He has more than 45 years of experience in the technology industry and is now chairman, president, and CEO of Al Shugart International, a venture capital and public relations firm.

    "I see the development of new cures or preventive measures for diseases. One such idea is colloidal silver, which works but isn't patentable for human consumption because it isn't FDA-approved. Colloidal silver is a solution of submicroscopic particles of pure silver suspended in water by an electric charge on each particle. It can be taken orally or applied to the skin. When it comes in contact with single-celled pathogens, such as viruses or parasites or bacteria, it disables the pathogens' metabolic enzymes, causing the pathogen to suffocate and die. Perhaps someday colloidal silver will be widely accepted along with other nontraditional methods of treatment once considered quackery, such as acupuncture."

  71. shouldexist.org by throwaway18 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Perhaps they can steal a few good ideas from shouldexist.org

  72. I hope they're all business majors... by eclectic4 · · Score: 1

    ...because it's selling power is what will drive any future "invention'. "Will the public buy it?" If not, it will never see the outside of Professor Frank's garage.

    Pet rocks and Hula Hoops aside...

    --

    "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
  73. Three types of inventions. by Restil · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The itch scratcher is the most common. It's something that's easy enough to do with the technology of the time it was invented, but it was a novel idea that hadn't been though of before, or at least nobody had the patience or resources to follow through on it.

    You also have improvement on existing technology. The Pentium 4 processor is significantly different than the 4004, but it's more of a derivative product rather than an entirely new technology. Nobody who's familiar with the 4004 will look at the P4 and slap themselves on the head wondering "Why didn't *I* think of that!" Certainly there are steps of innovation along the way. The components got smaller, pipelines and cache were implemented to get more bang out of each clock cycle, the bus was widened. But in the end, it's just a technology that evolved from a simpler version.

    Then you have the pipedreams. These are the inventions that should have been invented but never were, simply because innovation didn't follow the path that everyone expected. We don't have flying cars today. AI is little more than a novelty except for a few nitch applications. No colonies on the moon, no men on Mars. Yet for all the fantastic technological advances that didn't happen, nobody predicted the rise of the internet. The concept of a computer on every desk and every lap was difficult to envison when the average computer occupied an entire room.

    Progress provides innovation opportunities. We can always interpolate what we have today to determine what we'll have tomorrow. CPU's will always get faster and cheaper over time and a CPU a year from now will most likely closely resemble a CPU today. But at some point, technology gives us an opporunity to do things that wouldn't have been possible before, and as a result, people will start finding unique solutions. But it's hard to determine what those solutions will be if we aren't aware of the factors that would lead someone to come up with that idea in the first place. And if people COULD predict the future in such a way, the patent office wouldn't be getting overwhelmed with patents based on 20 year old technology.

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
  74. Instant Sleep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instant Sleep - People who need to finish an important project, but are beginning to get exhausted can just walk into the instant sleep chamber. In just a few seconds they can walk back out totally rejuvenated, ready to tackle their rest of their work.

    Someone's been playing too much Chrono Trigger.

  75. Theory on why inventions are being solicited.. by macshune · · Score: 1
    I think that since there is a VC behind this venture, the writers of the book are thinking about paying for someone's education or giving them major bling bling inexchange for stock in future achievements.

    Sweet. Indentured servitude. Yeesh.

  76. Their examples by ItWasThem · · Score: 1

    Okay I think this is a cool idea and I applaud their effort and all...

    but their "examples" don't seem like they're all that revolutionary... it says that they do -not- want something that's just an incremental improvement (the example of something like that they give is better brakes on cars). But then 1 of their 3 examples is "Build the first space hotel". WTF, how is that not an incremental improvement? It's a hotel, in space.

    I just think it's dissapointing that a think tank, whose job it is to THINK, gives a weak example like that when presented with the opportunity to toss pretty much anything out there... hope the submissions are better than the examples. If hotels in space is valid, how about cars in space. Geeks in space. Space motels. Space RVs (been done)... just because you tack "in space" onto an idea doesn't make it good.

  77. Complete bullshit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Futurists and Philosophers all are guilty of being complete idiots. Make a thousand guesses, and when ONE or TWO actually turn out to be right, you are hailed a genius and the ideas are named after you, not the hardworking, innovative inventor who never even heard of your idea but ACTUALLY POSSESSED some sort of REAL TECHNICAL EXPERTISE to pull it off.


    besides, all the futurists and philosophers do is get drunk/high and actually remember the bullshit that spews out of their mouths the next day and put it on paper as an ingenious idea.

    1. Re:Complete bullshit... by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      I respect Knowledge, I respect hard work,
      but Einstein was no dummy ...

      Imagination is more important than knowledge.

      Albert Einstein

      Peace,
      Ex-MislTech

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    2. Re:Complete bullshit... by JWG · · Score: 1

      imagination is more important than knowledge, but it is the imagination of the person who actually was capable of making their dream a reality who deserves credit rather than the one who just dreams the dream, then tosses the idea to the side.

  78. innovation and implementation by bj8rn · · Score: 2, Informative

    In 1876, two Frenchmen, Alphonse Penaud and Paul Gauchot came out with a plan for an airplane quite similar to modern ones and very different from the Wright biplane. Penaud's plane was a monoplane, it had retractable landing gear, windshield and a single control for pitch and directional control - way ahead of time... This ahead-of-time idea is not the thing he's remembered for, though - Penaud's most famous invention was a rubber-band propelled airplane model, which inspired many a men attempt building a flying machine, including the Wright brothers...

    --
    Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    1. Re:innovation and implementation by russellh · · Score: 1

      Yes... yes, and what was cool about that time was that the invention of a flying machine was "in the air" - lots and lots of people were trying (and many not surviving). It seemed like it was only a matter of time... and once it is done, many people all of a sudden seem to be able to do it. Few inventions are truly isolated, and the myth of the lone brilliant inventor is... just a myth, but they play a key role . So though I said the work of the previous thinkers don't detract from "the inventor", it also goes the other way, of course, something we're hardly recognizing in society today- that we do, in fact, stand on the shoulders of giants.

      --
      must... stay... awake...
  79. There just isn't a point by screwballicus · · Score: 1

    Once bitboys invent the fastest GPU ever to grace the earth and Daikatana blows the whole concept of an immersive reality out of the water, future consequent advances will be so drastic as to be unpredictable as of this date.

    Pardon me.

    My spaceshiop needs me.

  80. Futurama by Kirby-meister · · Score: 1

    "I call it the Hawkings Vortex!"

  81. Started last summer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Institute began the project last summer but wasn't able to get any real traction until recently - http://denver.bizjournals.com/denver/stories/2002/ 05/27/newscolumn2.html

  82. The first space hotel creator will become immortal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously if this was something easy to achieve, it would already have been done. The first space hotel will require thousands of inventions to make it adaptable to space. Oh ye of little bandwidth.

  83. Re:The first space hotel creator will become immor by ItWasThem · · Score: 1

    I didn't say it would be easy to achieve, I'm just saying that they said "better brakes on cars" would be one example of an "incremental" improvement. Now better brakes on cars isn't exactly a piece of cake either, but the fact remains that such an invention would be incremental, an obvious eventual improvement upon an existing and known technology.

  84. This is a fascinating concept! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who in your mind is the most famous inventor from the past 10 years?

    We need to give the lowly inventors all the encouragement they can get. They get their ideas stolen from their employers, they have to fight for their ideas in courts, and very few walk away with any money.

    An you have the gall to criticize how this made it into print.

  85. Tiny monitor man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only people with tiny monitors have this problem. You must be totally tech impaired youself if you don't own a "real" monitor

  86. So ????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes this was a staff submission Sherlock. Just like 90% of all the news that makes it into the press. Duh?

    1. Re:So ????? by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      "Yes this was a staff submission Sherlock. Just like 90% of all the news that makes it into the press. Duh? "

      Thanks for the sarcastic compliment Mr. Frey.

      Perhaps next time, you'll make your news submission/web site a little bit more modest and a little less obvious. If you're not convinced yet, please make a list of the top ten sites you visit the most, or the top ten sites you respect the most, and see how arrogant they are compared to your site.

  87. those crazy ancients by jtheory · · Score: 1

    the ancients who imagined themselves flying like birds using some aparatus

    I read that as "flying like birds using some *asparagus*".

    Maybe Icarus didn't make it because he got *hungry* (not because the wax holding his feathered wings melted)....

    And I agree, this certainly doesn't take away from the Wright brothers. Whoever first had the concept of the atom bomb isn't the one who's famous, either.

    And people who have ideas that are almost purely conceptual (like the post-it note) won't add them to this list, obviously.

    --
    There are only 10 types of people: those who understand decimal, those who don't, and, uh, 8 other types I forget.
  88. Re:Nope, can't do it. by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

    Well, it's the present right now... Where the hell is my flying car already?

  89. Obligatory by schroet · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, the car flying YOU!

  90. So that explains the mail logs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here I was, wondering why an account that's been dead for at least 3 years started getting mail from this 'davinciinstitute.com', and now I know. They're obviously using some seriously dirty lists.

  91. You have proved yourself worthy... by Compact+Dick · · Score: 1

    ...of being a friend of mine and I will knight you as such. Not only do you handle all those undeserved [and some deserved] insults well, you seem only too happy to associate and mingle with /. commoners without indulging in condecension. Truly an inspiration for other editors.

    Rise, Sir Timothy.

  92. The Beggars series by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 1

    lets come up with an economy and lifestyle where we get a nice eight-hour sleep at night. I like sleeping. No more sleep, so that my employer can enjoy my improved productivity? This is progress?

    The Beggars series, by Nancy Kress, deals with a future when some humans are engineered to not require sleep. They use the extra time to study, accumluate power and riches. They are actually over ordinary humans. Then the question comes, do the sleepless owe something to the sleepy. What happens when supersleepless people are engineered?

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
  93. OT: Your Sig by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 1
    No, I don't need A.I.'s ending explained to me, but I did read yours. It's interesting, but you're wrong, they're not robots, they're aliens. How do I know? Because the movie tells us they're aliens! Did you see the same movie? And no, even though I own the damn DVD, I'm not going to watch it again just to find the spot where we're told they're aliens. This is one DVD that I'm sorry I bought -- if you want to know, you watch it again; my copy's staying on the shelf.

    P.S. -- Anyone want to buy a used copy of A.I.?

    --
    If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    1. Re:OT: Your Sig by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "...I'm not going to watch it again just to find the spot where we're told they're aliens."

      You're not going to back up your claim? Oooooookay. There's plenty of evidence they're robots, like the DVD saying they are. It's in the making of bit on the second disc. The art designer talked about it. Honestly, if evidence is provided, then why aren't you backing up your claim?

      BTW, NanoGator is actually the one wrote that.

  94. Re:F*ck Wired by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 1
    back in the good old days, computer magazines published the source for useful BASIC programs every month!
    I see your problem: you somehow think Wired is a computer magazine. It's not. It's Mecanix Illustrated for the Gen Xers who weren't in Silicon Valley all these years. You know, the poor slobs selling life insurance in Cleveland who think they're High Tech because they Surf The Web. The sort of guys who, had they lived in the '70s, would have bought Popular Science. And probably do now, anyway.
    --
    If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
  95. Time Travel by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
    It may be possible, but nobody ever does it :).
    Do you mean does it, or will do it? Or even did do it, I dunno.

    There's a similar thing in some of Michael Moorcock's books. No scientific basis for it AFAIK, but time has a kind of immune system, that barfs you out if you change anything too much. It's called the Morphail Effect, IIRC.
    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Time Travel by mfrank · · Score: 1

      I mean, never does it. Ever. Every time someone uses time travel, it kicks the universe into a different state. The universe will eventually reach a state where nobody ever uses time travel, and it'll stay in that state.

      Larry Niven short story collection, "All The Myriad Ways", the story is "The Theory and Practice of Time Travel". Good book.