Slashdot Mirror


Sony & Toshiba Disclose Cell Fab Plans

sean23007 writes "InfoWorld is running an article about Sony and Toshiba's plans for new fabrication plants to build the 'Cell' chip jointly developed by Sony, Toshiba, and IBM for use in the Playstation 3 and other home entertainment uses. The new fabs will be located in Nagasaki and Oita, and both companies plan to spend $1.7 billion over the next 3-4 years in their construction. They will be capable of using 300 mm wafers with a 65 nm process. The chip is slated to be the first 1 teraflop consumer device."

138 comments

  1. Make "Cell" chip Open Source! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    It would greatly benefit the Open Source developer to have such a chip with such a vast potential.

    1. Re:Make "Cell" chip Open Source! by Dajur · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What the hell are you talking about. Even if they "open sourced" the processor, how many open source developers do you know that have access to a 65nm Fab to play around with it.

    2. Re:Make "Cell" chip Open Source! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are so amusing. I personally know two such individuals, Lorenz Huelsbergen at Bell Labs, and the other one is Dr. David Kranz at MIT.

    3. Re:Make "Cell" chip Open Source! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess that got the automatic "+1: Open Source Is Good"

    4. Re:Make "Cell" chip Open Source! by NanoGator · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "I guess that got the automatic "+1: Open Source Is Good"

      Well I for one am not buying it until it plays Ogg.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:Make "Cell" chip Open Source! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I for one am not buying it until it plays Ogg.

      Right, but just to piss off OSS'ers, they'll make it so it'll only play Ogg files off of the memory stick ;)

    6. Re:Make "Cell" chip Open Source! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mods, get with the program!

      parent is +1 funny

    7. Re:Make "Cell" chip Open Source! by yomegaman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and tabbed browsing. Don't forget about that.

      --
      ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
    8. Re:Make "Cell" chip Open Source! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Well I for one am not buying it until it plays Ogg. "

      Ugh. If I don't explain the joke, I'm off-topic. If I do explain it, I'm overrated

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    9. Re:Make "Cell" chip Open Source! by Dajur · · Score: 1

      Considering there are currently no 65nm fabs in existence, these two will be the first, I doubt either of them do.

  2. not for Playstation 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Another article elsewhere already reported that this chip would not be available in time for use in the Playstation 3. - NCDave

  3. But the Cel isn't going to be in the PS/3 by BancBoy · · Score: 5, Informative

    According to IGN anyhow... To quote - Online news sites are reporting that the spring 2003 issue of Electronic Design Chain, an electronics trade magazine, features PlayStation creator Ken Kutaragi on the cover, and also contains very surprising news about the Playstation 3. According to the reports, Kutaragi mentions that final production of the "Cell" chip, originally thought to be used in the PlayStation 3, may not be ready until 2007. He also confirms that the CPU in the PlayStation 3 will in fact not be the Cell processor, contrary to earlier reports. With a targeted PlayStation 3 launch in 2005/2006, delayed production of the Cell processor may have caused Sony to find a different solution for their next-generation console.

    --
    [UID-HeinzIntel]
    1. Re:But the Cel isn't going to be in the PS/3 by shione · · Score: 0

      Well that certainly contrasts the following article released by sony on the 21/april/2003 ie today. source:
      http://www.scei.co.jp/corporate/release/p df/030421 ae.pdf

      and I quote:

      "With this investment, SCEI will manufacture the new microprocessor for the broadband era, code-named "Cell", as well as other system LSIs, to be used for the next generation computer entertainment system."

      and heres more links, only a day or two old:

      "The most noteworthy chip to emerge from this investment is of course the Cell processor, co-developed by Sony, Toshiba, and IBM. Sony
      confirmed that this investment will be used to produce the Cell, which will be part of its next game console."
      http://www.gamers.com/news/1356804

      "More details about the highly secretive "Cell" processor--slated to power the upcoming Sony PlayStation 3 game console --emerged Monday"

      http://www.businessweek.com/technology/cnet/stor ie s/997596.htm

      "The new chip would be used in SCE's next-generation PlayStation game console, as well as high-performance home computers and other products."
      http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topN ews&storyID=2591208

      I'll take the first one as being the most reliable. I got a question aboutthe trade magazine which ign got its source from.. how long do you think it takes for them to interview/write it up and get the magazine on the newsstands compared to doing releasing that pdf document?

  4. 2007 Then by Josuah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I guess this answers all of the speculative questions on when the PS3 will be able to come out. If Toshiba needs four years for its 65nm production lines, then 2007 is the earliest point that wafers could start coming off the line. So Christmas 2007? Looks like the PS2 still has a very long life ahead of it.

    1. Re:2007 Then by Josuah · · Score: 1

      Hm. I just saw those other comments about not using the Cell in the PS3. Guess that's what I get for not buying all those gaming magazines.

    2. Re:2007 Then by sigep_ohio · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i don't think microsoft will wait until 2007 to release Xbox2. Nor will nintendo wait that long to replace the gamecube. I would say that cell will not be in the PS3. More likely sony will put say 2 emotion chips in the same box and in a way double the processing power of the current PS2. this would be a good stop gap before the Cell processor is ready.

      --
      Beer Die is the game of champions Learning To walk my own path.
    3. Re:2007 Then by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1

      It's also noted in the article that they're moving the PS2 chip to 90nm later this year, which gives the capability of 4 (rather than 2) Mbytes of RAM on-board. The Sony plant is supposed to be 3 years (not 4) so I guess Xmas 2006...

      Perhaps a PS2.5 ? Maybe with 2 emotion chips on them ?

      What gives the PS2 so much power is the DSP-like vector units, (2 per emotion engine), although what gives the vector units a lot of their power is the fast direct (DMA) link to the graphics system (which presumably wouldn't exist on the 2nd emotion chip if the 1st was handling the display), so maybe adding another emotion engine would just confuse matters.

      Certainly doubling the local RAM would help with texture space (at something of a premium compared to PC games...) but the PS2 is supposed to be a dataflow architecture which doesn't therefore need large texture space. Maybe it would help port games from the PC with less rewrite though.

      Simon

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    4. Re:2007 Then by GweeDo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This would be one of the worst things Sony could imagine doing. The EE (emotion engine) is already massively parallel and a pain the butt to program for since you have to have so many things synced. Double that you are asking to kill off programmers as they try and work. The Gamecube and the Xbox have proven to developers that it can be easy to develop for a console as well as be powerful. The design behind the PS2 was bad bad bad...Sony had 2 generations on the top...the PS3 might be their N64....

    5. Re:2007 Then by RoLi · · Score: 1
      Why not just take the existing EE, produce it with a modern technology (90nm) and push the clockspeed a bit.

      The EE will wipe the floor with any x86-design at a similar clockrate. Microsoft would have to wait another 2 years (again - just like with XBox1) to play catch up with XBox2. No way they can put out something similar at the same time.

    6. Re:2007 Then by ahfoo · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't assume that even 90nm is as all set and ready to roll. Just because Infineon has already sold it to SMIC doesn't mean it's yesterday's news.
      I read an article on EETimes last year where a researcher claimed to be finding an average of a few dozen bad circuits caused by mask problems in 130nm chips that were being cleared by fabs. He seemed to think that this problem was going to increase exponentially as processes were scaled down.
      That doesn't mean it doesn't work, it's just that yield rates go down and the products that go out the door might not have the same durability levels we previously expected from ICs.
      And, speaking of durability, I haven't seen any specs on the voltage they're going to be using, but I have to wonder about heat dissipation if they're remaining above one volt.
      If they're dropping the voltage very low then the clock speed should be interesting. I notice the articles I could find on Google all talked about TFlops, but nobody seemed to have any GHz numbers to toss around.
      I tend to think that what should be interesting below 90nm is FPGAs. If anybody is going to drastically re-write their software for performance, it seems like this is where it gets interesting. I have found that there is even a virtual FPGA core that you can use within an FPGA. Now that's got to be compelling for the software, networking mindset. Hell, that's art.

    7. Re:2007 Then by Emil+Brink · · Score: 1

      That part about the memory is weird, since the original PS2's GS already has 4 megs of RAM on the same silicon die. That's used for the frame- and depthbuffers, and to hold the texture being used to render each polygon.

      --
      main(O){10<putchar(4^--O?77-(15&5128 >>4*O):10)&&main(2+O);}
  5. New Media Center? by webdevcoder · · Score: 0

    Very nice, I guess they are trying for a more advanced game station, ot media environmnent for tomorrow's home.

  6. Too bad... by rkischuk · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    Seen any BadMarketing lately?
  7. it looks like scea will lose their way by Luke+Skyewalker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i expect that there will be lots of sony consumer electronics (dvd players, entertainment systems) embedded with ps3 technology. scea has been fighting to keep the ps series as a game console only, but MS is forcing them to integrate the ps3 with dvd/music/internet technology...

    conversely, sometimes i wonder if MS is striving to be the north american Sony (tablet pc, xbox, windows ce, keyboards, mice, etc...)

    1. Re:it looks like scea will lose their way by sigep_ohio · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I always got the impression that Sony wanted to go the integrated home electronics route way before MS entered the game. I mean the original PS was always able to play music CD's if i recall correctly. Then PS2 was in developement before MS ever got in the video game business. So many of its capabilities have been in since the begining I am sure.

      Plus, Sony would love to be able to cheaply manufacture and sell at their usually high markups, one box that can be a PVR(whose abilities they would control), dvd/cd player, video game system, and maybe even throw in a Home theater capability. This seems to be both Sony and MS's ultimate goal, along with subscription services for games and other online activities.

      --
      Beer Die is the game of champions Learning To walk my own path.
    2. Re:it looks like scea will lose their way by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 4, Insightful

      scea has been fighting to keep the ps series as a game console only, but MS is forcing them to integrate the ps3 with dvd/music/internet technology...

      More like the reverse. Sony always wanted to be a hub. MS saw that if this thing became a hub, the (relatively) cheap game console could become an alternative to a real PC, therefore an alternative to MS. Coudn't have that, came out with XBox.

  8. 32 MB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    With 1 Teraflop of processing power, I hope it'll come with more than 32MB RAM this time.

    1. Re:32 MB? by rushiferu · · Score: 1

      "With 1 Teraflop of processing power, I hope it'll come with more than 32MB RAM this time."

      Yeah, but it'll still use eight meg memory cards for saved games.

    2. Re:32 MB? by Rayonic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and four megabytes of video RAM.

  9. Where's IBM in all this? by Ra5pu7in · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why are only Sony and Toshiba reported? Does IBM not plan to produce and Cell chips or do they already have fab facilities?

    --
    I was taking one day at a time, but then several days got together and ambushed me. (from a Rhymes with Orange comic)
    1. Re:Where's IBM in all this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to guess that it's a mixture of things. IBM probably doesn't feel they have a market for that processor, really, and even if they did they probably do already have the fabs as you suggested.

    2. Re:Where's IBM in all this? by sigep_ohio · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or maybe IBM just plans on using their IT to help design the Cell, then they can make royalties off any Cell chips produced and sold by both Toshiba and Sony. I would think that is what IBM would like, saves their fab plants for other things.

      --
      Beer Die is the game of champions Learning To walk my own path.
    3. Re:Where's IBM in all this? by Samir+Gupta · · Score: 2, Troll

      Nintendo currently has a contract with IBM to fab the processor (a PPC derivative) for the "Dolphin", aka GameCube and other future consoles. While I'm not privy to the details (not my department), I imagine the contract has some anti-compete clause for some time.

      --
      -- Samir Gupta, Ph. D. Head, New Technology Research Group, Nintendo Co. Ltd., Kyoto, Japan.
    4. Re:Where's IBM in all this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so what are you privy to disclose? maybe what could be down the line for future nintendo consoles? i mean if you work in future technology, future consoles seems like it would fit in that department.

    5. Re:Where's IBM in all this? by Wattsman · · Score: 1

      It's quite possible there's an anti-compete clause. It could just be that all information relating to the processor design (papers and personnel) are not allowed to work on other projects for home entertainment devices.
      Given the size of IBM, they could have numerous people working on the Nintendo and Sony processor designs at the same time. As I understand it, a fabrication plant can make any kind of chip it wants (up to the nm limit of its equipment). So both Nintendo chips and Sony chips could come out of the same building.

    6. Re:Where's IBM in all this? by devinoni · · Score: 1

      Fabbing the chip is only one part of the things. It'd probably be cheaper for Sony to have Toshiba to make the chips themselves, since any IBM chip will probably come from America and need to be shipped to Japan for final assembly. The 65-nanometer (isn't it funny we all moved from micron to nanometer now) process is most likely IBM's. I would be suprised if it weren't SOI and a number of other IBM owned manufacturing techniques. The basic PowerPC chip design is probably from IBM. Then add on the additional work for for the Cell itself. IBM has a slice of the pie. Toshiba gets a nice fab plant. Sony gets a processor.

    7. Re:Where's IBM in all this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the PowerPC risc chip was a co-design effort between Motorola, IBM, and Apple.

    8. Re:Where's IBM in all this? by tigress · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dear Mr Gupta,

      I thought you worked at Sega?

      How's your Smell-o-vision (also here) project going?

      Your educational background is pretty impressive too.

      What about Super Marx Brothers?

      Finally, how's the Gameboy Advance Porn Industry going?

      Anyway, good luck at your job.

      (Thanks to Klaruz and cascino)

  10. Who said anything about phones??? by jayratch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm sorry, but this conversation somehow went past me.

    Where in the article does any reference to wireless phones occur? And where in reality does a teraflop processor have its place in a phone?

    The real question here for us ignorami like myself is, how will this processor stack up against PC processors- and will it run Linux?

    Joking aside- and Beowulf clusters aside- this sounds like it could be a good idea for a versatile chip. If Toshiba's involved my guess is it will not be just for PS3, perhaps we'll now have another major plaer (or two) in the PC chip market? Hmm, Sony and Toshiba, leading laptop manufacturers, making their own chips. It's like Microsoft making keyboards and mice, I suppose, but perhaps better.

    Just my .02

    1. Re:Who said anything about phones??? by jayratch · · Score: 1

      duh to myself.. plus at 65 nm for better power efficiency? sounds like a laptop chip to me.

    2. Re:Who said anything about phones??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cause in the future, your cell phone is going to be everything your hiptop, PDA, iPod, smartcard, micropayment system, gameboy, 2way, pager, GPS, HP48, social security number, credit card number, global ID card, etc., said they were going to be. With all those responsibilities, eventually someone will need teraflop+ capability for the next killer app. I'm only partially kidding here.

    3. Re:Who said anything about phones??? by demonbug · · Score: 1
      Where in the article does any reference to wireless phones occur? And where in reality does a teraflop processor have its place in a phone?


      Want a cellular phone, but don't have anyone to talk to? NO PROBLEM! Our new TeraFlop SCS micro-cellular phone has the processing power to allow you to carry on a conversation with just your phone, with no need to make friends or actually connect to anyone! Amaze your friends by carrying on a conversation on your TFlop SCS while 600 feet underground! Best of all, you never need worry about roaming charges again with our patented Network-Free Communications System, as your entire calling area follows your phone wherever it goes!

      (What, you don't think that was funny? Something must be wrong with you.)

    4. Re:Who said anything about phones??? by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

      Where in the article does any reference to wireless phones occur? And where in reality does a teraflop processor have its place in a phone?

      This has nothing to do with cellular phones. The article refers to the processor rumored to be used in Sony's PlayStation 3 video game console.

      The name spawns from the fact that the Cell processor is to be designed so that several chips can work together, forming a larger processing entity. The individual chips being the cells, that is.

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
  11. cost justification by ih8apple · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I used to work for Intel in the Fab automation software department and I find it hard to believe they're can justify investing this much to start up new fabrication plants for an unproven product.

    Usually, with initial chip production at this scale, they lease out fab production time from other companies. Only huge production plans (like Pentiums or PowerPCs) generally justify building entire new Fabs. Plus, with the world economy slow, there's plenty of capacity at the world's fabs. Here's a good article on fab capacity

    1. Re:cost justification by sigep_ohio · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well with the number of PS2's that have sold so far worldwide, I guess Sony thinks the demand for Cell will be even bigger. I know Cell won't be in the PS3, but since it is a scalar architecture it can be placed in anything from cell phones to video game machines to computers. This makes the market for Cell even larger than that of a Pentium or PowerPC or The Emotion Engine in PS2.

      --
      Beer Die is the game of champions Learning To walk my own path.
    2. Re:cost justification by watzinaneihm · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Atleast some part of the decision may be due to the culture of Sony
      Sony (the original one, not their music division) have always been about making a product and then finding a market for it. They pride themselves on being the lone-wolves and hence came up with a lot of products which are completely non-standard (unless the world accepted their standards)the oft used betaMax being a good candidate. Sony's memory products today are a good example, they are tiny but are not interchangeable with others (not all prodcuts, but there are examples like their USB cables etc.) .A completely new chip for a game machine seems to fit right in, compared to MicroSoft moving to Celerons.
      But then again they used to be able to come up with a product so good that they opened up whole new markets.
      This post is partially based on a reading of "Made in Japan" by Akio morita, and I understand that decisions of Billions are not always decided by the "culture" of a company.

      --
      .ACMD setaloiv siht gnidaeR
    3. Re:cost justification by Enigma2175 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Usually, with initial chip production at this scale, they lease out fab production time from other companies.

      True, but what fab has the capabilities to produce the 65nm parts that they require for the chip? AFAIK, there aren't any current fabs that could produce the chips they want (at least not in volume).

      --

      Enigma

    4. Re:cost justification by Blaine+Hilton · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Very good point, also they probably have some deals they they are keeping their mouths shut about. When you are dealing with this kind of money I'm pretty sure they have a very good feeling about making a profit.

    5. Re:cost justification by mnmn · · Score: 1

      If youve worked in a CPU fab plant, I wonder why you would hate apple, with their PowerPC choice over x86... ...does Intel still monitor your slashdot posts? :)

      --
      "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    6. Re:cost justification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I find it hard to believe that you know anything about the economics of the semi-industry. Semicondutor manufacturers build a Fab to support a process, not a product. The need to expand the manufacturing capacity for a particular process might be predicated on the demand for a family of devices. That is not usually the case with Fabs designed for new processes. And not the case here. Just because the new processes will be needed for the viable production of the Cell chip, which potentialy will be a big money maker, does not mean that the plants will not be used for other devises. Farthermore, Japanese companies tend to take a lot longer view of things and are not put off by short term economic sluggishness. Unlike manufacturers in the US, who clench their collective A-holes at the slightest murmerings of uneducated Wallstreet analists. Fab capacity must be catagorized by the processes the Fabs support. After all one usualy does not use Dachshunds to pull dogsleds, or Pitbulls to herd sheep ( though the latter has been done). The Fab capacity for a new process is obviously going to be limited.

      BTW, 15+ years experience in Semiconducor Manufacturing in many different capacities including capacity managment.

    7. Re:cost justification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...it can be placed in anything from cell phones to video game machines to computers

      Could you stuff one in an Xbox? Maybe they wouldn't suck so bad then. Maybe, but doubtful.

    8. Re:cost justification by AxelTorvalds · · Score: 1

      They won't use the fab solely for this product. Sony isn't stupid and they make a ton of different chips and ICs. The fab will have capabilities to build the cell but it will also be able to fab parts for camcorders and DVD players, PS2s and such.

    9. Re:cost justification by vistic · · Score: 1

      ...and MiniDisc.

    10. Re:cost justification by sigep_ohio · · Score: 1

      MiniDisc really wasn't a total failure. It just never caught on in countries were CD's were inexpensive(ie. America). In Japan, miniDisc did quite well, and it is popular among many music enthusiasts in America.

      --
      Beer Die is the game of champions Learning To walk my own path.
  12. Re:I've never cared for cell fabs either by confused+philosopher · · Score: 0, Funny

    ...but come on Moderators! Where better to put a cell fab than in a cell phone! It sure isn't going into a vibrating PS/3!

    --
    Why slashdot? Why not?
  13. PS3 idea by RealErmine · · Score: 5, Funny

    They should just transcribe the Final Fantasy combat system into a hardware implementation. That's the only reason people buy these things anyway.

    I propose that the limit break be implemented by some sort of register overflow.

    They should do this in the Cell chips that are rumored, in the future, to be deployed in various home appliances. I, for one, would be impressed when my dryer finishes the tumble cycle and then performs a super-attack on the toaster.

    --
    Dewey, you fool! Your decimal system has played right into my hands!
    1. Re:PS3 idea by photon317 · · Score: 3, Funny


      Hey! I bought mine for Gran Turismo. I'd rather see a dedicated hardware implementation of that (oh wait, I already have one of those in my garage...).

      --
      11*43+456^2
    2. Re:PS3 idea by 13Echo · · Score: 1

      Hahaha.

      FFNow!(TM) processor extensions. I wonder if you'll be able to compile PS3 Linux apps with those optimizations?

    3. Re:PS3 idea by kisrael · · Score: 1

      Nonono, it's all about "Grand Theft Auto".

      I guess I potentially can get the hardware implementation of that, but I'm kinda scared.

      Though I am more waterproof than the stuff in the game.

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    4. Re:PS3 idea by photon317 · · Score: 1


      Heh, I got the hardware implementation of that two weeks ago, but I was on the wrong end of it :(

      Luckily I got my cfar back a week later - the dumbass got away cleanly, but then proceeded to steal about $500 worth of crap from the inside and then leave the car on the side of the road somewhere. If I were him it would've been in a chop-shop somewhere for parts money.

      --
      11*43+456^2
    5. Re:PS3 idea by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
      They should just transcribe the Final Fantasy combat system into a hardware implementation. That's the only reason people buy these things anyway.

      Yeah, that's it. 50 Million Final Fantasy players can't be wrong.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    6. Re:PS3 idea by Keeper · · Score: 1

      Me too! The only thing I'd rather see in a game like that is support for a clutch pedal on the aftermarket steeringwheel/pedal controllers...

  14. Cell Won't Be In PS3 by elwoodblues16 · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Yet another article citing Sony execs saying that Cell won't be in the PS3...

    http://www.designchain.com/coverstory.asp?issue=sp ring03

    These problems may be a few years out, though. IBM has not announced when it will release the final chip, but the Cell project was originally envisioned as taking five years, suggesting that the final product may not be ready until as late as 2007. Although Sony refuses to talk about its future plans for the chip, it does admit that the Cell chip will not be the CPU in the Playstation3, reportedly slated for release in 2005.

  15. Hmmm... by UndercoverBrotha · · Score: 0, Informative
    --
    Solid!
    1. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought this rumour was debunked ages ago.

  16. Who knew? by psyconaut · · Score: 2, Funny

    That the move to 65nm fabrication would be due to the machine that'll be running a to-be-released version of Grand Theft Auto and not some military system or huge scientific cluster ;-)

    -psy

    1. Re:Who knew? by Sdrawcab · · Score: 1

      Ah, but that is the power of a market economy, if demand exists, someone will meet it if it is thought to be profitable. Since it turns out millions of people are willing to pay hundreds of dollars to beat up a virtual 'ho with a virtual 'bat, companys not only meet demand, but are forced to use the most cutting edge product to stay ahead of thier competitors.

    2. Re:Who knew? by psyconaut · · Score: 1

      I hope this new technology leads to more realistic blood and a better selection of cars ;-)

      -psy

    3. Re:Who knew? by demonbug · · Score: 1

      In related news, I hear that the military has decided to try out this new technology they heard about called the "transistor". If tests go as planned, they plan to phase out all vacuum tubes by the end of this century.

      Really, where did the idea come from that our military has these super-advanced systems? Sure, they've got a lot of money, but they also have decade-plus testing regimens before they actually use anything.

  17. I just wanted to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Thank you for making my eyes bleed. I've always had a theory that improper text formatting could cause physical pain, and now it's been proven.
    Thank you.

  18. Re:Wowza by Blaine+Hilton · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Also, I should clarify, not just cell phones, but all electronics should have better methods of recycling them. When you went out to buy that PS2, what happened with the PS died? Circuit boards have many elements that should not be in a standard landfill.

  19. PS2 updates by orthancstone · · Score: 1

    Considering Sony has updated the PS2 numerous times since the original, I wouldn't be surprised if they end up re-releasing it with the Cell chip just to screw with people's minds.

    1. Re:PS2 updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not? The PS2 was just a re-released PSX with a more powerful CPU.

  20. Thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Websense here at work blocks this site for whatever, so I am glad that Dakryx posted this article although the formatting could have been done better.

    Thank you.

  21. A fab is a 3d fax ? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I'd not before seen "Fab" used for fabricating plant, but I did know the "fab" as a sort of 3-d fax machine that re-creates solid objects (in shape anyway). It laser-scans the original, and creates a solid copy (corn starch?) at the receiving end.

    The item title gave me visions of a new breed of cell phone that could spew solid objects.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  22. makes perfect sense... by sterno · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even if this chip's architecture turns out to be a dud, they'll have plants ready to produce 65 nanometer processors. Eventually they'll have some chips running at 65 nanometers, and they'll have a fab ready to produce it. Worst case scenario is that they can sell their fab capabilities to other companies that want to run at 65 nanometers. The odds that these plants won't have a long run value seems pretty small to me.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    1. Re:makes perfect sense... by demonbug · · Score: 1
      Even if this chip's architecture turns out to be a dud, they'll have plants ready to produce 65 nanometer processors. Eventually they'll have some chips running at 65 nanometers, and they'll have a fab ready to produce it.


      Thats what they think. In reality, everyone will skip right by the 65 nanometer process to the 63 nanometer process. Its much better. If Sony and Toshiba were really forward-thinking, they would be working on building 42 nanometer fabs. As everyone knows, that will be the answer to everything.

      (Due to the uselessnes of this post, I have been sacked.)

  23. Fabber, it is by AtariAmarok · · Score: 0

    Hope this is not too off-topic. The device is called a fabber not a fab (but no doubt if it were ever common, it would become a noun and verb as just "fab", similar to "Fax".

    Here is a good link: fabber.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  24. YHBT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like YHBT. HAND.

  25. Re:YHBT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Sounds like YHBT. HAND.

    Hand, what the heck is YBHT? Is this like doing a BLT at the YMCA during TGIF?

  26. Red Book in CD-ROM game consoles by yerricde · · Score: 1

    I mean the original PS was always able to play music CD's if i recall correctly.

    So could the TurboGrafx CD, the Sega CD, the CD-i, the 3DO, and the Saturn. Had Sony not included Red Book CD audio playing in the original PlayStation, PSX buyers would have felt cheated.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  27. Make all cells linux Transmeta devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you amend it to an item about the cell phones being all Linux-based Transmeta devices that melt if someone tries to put Windows CE on them, then you, sir, are on your way to Karma Nirvana!

  28. Re:Who knew?-"1-T GPU." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm waiting for the one-teraflop GPUs to get here.

    If they can get the cost and heat down (and it is for a game machine), then "Reality(TM)" just may be closer than we think.

  29. more detailed story.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative


    http://www.designchain.com/coverstory.asp?issue= sp ring03

  30. That beats Intels 90nm fab out of the water by mnmn · · Score: 3, Interesting


    And so does including memory and GPU with the CPU. You could imagine the desktop computer market for these babies.... if released with Linux.

    Thinking of that, I wonder if they would allow hookup to a DVI connector, or replacing the BIOS, or adding PCI/ISA slots, or even producing whole chips for third party taiwanese boards that would then be built into workstations. If the chip is up to the spec, on time and reasonably priced, theres already a big Linux-based market for it, meself included. Saddams gotta steal only a FEW of these to build nukes. Wonder if an anarchist teen could do that with this christmas present.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    1. Re:That beats Intels 90nm fab out of the water by DrMrLordX · · Score: 1

      I would be really impressed by the Cell processor if it were released today, or even by 2005. However, will this CPU be anything of note in 2007? Intel has, as of late, been very aggressive in shrinking transistor size. By 2007, they may have the 65nm process licked and then some.

      Cell may be more of a threat to Transmeta depending on its power consumption.

      As for anarchist teens, I'll bet they'll play Grand Theft Auto 6 just like all the other teens. They may be using it as a training simulator though.

    2. Re:That beats Intels 90nm fab out of the water by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      AMD will probably also have a 65nm process, if the're still in business.

  31. Re:heat dissipation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heat sink or no, Nothing will survive. As Goku said fighing Cel, "YOU CAN'T PUT THAT MUCH POWER INTO THE KAME HAME HA!!!!"

    The spirit bomb on the other hand, depending on the size of the planetoid...

  32. That was a hoax by yerricde · · Score: 1

    It won't be called the PS3

    The report of Nintendo's stake in the "PlayStation" name was a hoax.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  33. Why Stop There by Rayonic · · Score: 1

    You can put in a hardware implementation of all the stereotypical character types too. Moody Teenage Hero, Overly Happy Tomboy, Gruff Loner, Tough-but-Eventually-Helpless Love Interest...

    Talk about "Emotion Engine".

  34. Re:2 Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Poor Nintendo? Don't you mean Poor Sony? All that hype about this magical Cell CPU going intot he PS3, now, its not going to be.

  35. 65 nm process by Mezzrow · · Score: 1

    Anyone know what type of process will be used to get 65 nm lines? They make a vague reference to a process designed by three or four companies. I figure that at 65nm we're beyond DUV. EUV maybe? How small can traditional laser lithography get us?

  36. Lets remember the HYPE Sony created with ps2 ! by zymano · · Score: 1
    Let's call it HYPEware.
    All the game console companies sell it too. Remember all the things Sony said that ps2 could do ?

    Real life looking characters!
    128 bit processing ! Wow.
    Supercool demos.
    Wait one second. Alot of the Ps2 game aren't anywhere near as good looking Sony said they would be.

    Don't get fooled . I will check the games before i believe the hype about how the processor can do so many trillions of polygons and how well it does textures.

    1. Re:Lets remember the HYPE Sony created with ps2 ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, from now on companies should downplay the performance of their consoles. Demos should only be done at the lowest resolutions using black and white and should only reflect the lowest common denominator that their isv's can produce. Any attempts to grow enthusiasm shall be frowned upon.

      To think, this poor gentleman actually being forced to "check out the games" instead of being able to blindly assume that every single one of them max's the machines capabilities. To shame Sony, to shame.

    2. Re:Lets remember the HYPE Sony created with ps2 ! by zymano · · Score: 1
      yes. look at the top of this page and read that Cell will NOT be in ps3.

      You are what is called a SUCKER.

  37. Re:Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these babies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great to see someone posting humor about slashdot on slashdot.

  38. Therefore CELL was HYPE and media bought it. by zymano · · Score: 1
    All i have been hearing is
    cell,cell,cell,cell,ce,cell,cell,cellll,cell,cel l,cell,cell,cell,ce,cell,cell,cellll,cell,,cell,ce ll,cellcell,cell,cell,cell

    And now it wont be in the new Ps3!

    Another example of the media buying into everything HOOK , LINE and Sinker!

    We are fricking idiots. Don't trust what the game companies say but look at their actions.

  39. japan and cash by zogger · · Score: 1

    Japan, Inc. in general is sitting on WADS of cash, with little place to put it that seems even worthwhile right now. Buying a new fab is as good as anything else. It's certainly better than building unused office space or whatever else japan has been doing lately. They want to dump shaky petrodollars and own tangible *stuff* that you can actually do work with, not think about making a plan to form a committee to design a thought process that might lead to establishing a think tank to contemplate how to trade other think tanks ideas around, which is what US busy-ness is doing now. Japan has learned it's lesson, and hard, on busy-work and dot bombs, the US is now entering phase two of that economic reality, one big giant step behind japan.

    Next bubble to pop, real estate in the US. It already popped in Japan. Stocks are heading to pop too,once again, from pension over-exposure and global trade re-arrangement which forgets about lost customer spending money when they yank jobs and move them around in wholesale lots based on this-quarter priority levels of awarness. Slow, very, very gradual "free trade" could work, wholesale do-it-all-right-now sure ain't..

    As to the chips, no idea what they will do with them, but the world in general seems to want more chips of every description, especially newer designs. Pretty soon hammers will come with chips in them, and forks. Who knows, seems the trends though.

  40. Other uses... by uwbbjai · · Score: 1

    If this baby runs linux or windoze, I think all the scientific research based on distributed computing ie. SETI@home and Foldings@Home can replace all their server farm with a bunch of PS3s. Each work unit can probably be processed within seconds. Drool.

  41. Here's another word... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...dumbass.

  42. the triple truth....ruth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the project was sabotaged by IBM

  43. Radation by Bruha · · Score: 1

    Nagasaki hmmm

    What kind of halflife will the PS3's have?

    ===Insert Quality Sig Here===

  44. Re:Wowza by demonbug · · Score: 1

    My PS still hasn't died. It just sits, ruler of the coffee table (which is too far away from everything to allow it to be plugged into anything). I fully expect it to outlast my PS2 (which my girlfriend stole and currently has at her apartment; not that that has anything to do with my prediction of an early demise. Really.)

  45. Cell chip is the next jump for smart machines by end15 · · Score: 1

    The Cell chip could function as a super microcontroller. For anyone who likes to build robots this could represent a huge leap forward. If it could be connected to some type of flash ram we might be able to home build bots with speech recognition and neural nets. The cell should give new bots more on board intelligence. Let's hope they aren't too expensive (under $500?).

    --
    All glory to the Hypnotoad!
  46. Re:Article Text by shione · · Score: 0

    Despite the negative karma the mods gave you, I appreciate you posted the article because the site is blocked here at work.

  47. Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the PS2 we were forced to purchase several machines to provide guidance for *ONE* cruise missile, this will cut our expenses in half. I'll just send Uday out to the Damascus Wal-Mart (you can't even recognize him without the mustache) to pick up a few and bang, we're back in business.