Slashdot Mirror


New Palms: Zire 71 and Tungsten C

securitas writes "Today Palm released their latest in the PDA arms race: the Zire 71 and the Tungsten C. The Zire gets a color screen, digital camera and multimedia capabilities such as MP3 playback and 640x480 VGA video playback -- interesting since the screen is 320x320. The Tungsten C gets 802.11b (WiFi) connectivity and a VPN client to protect your data while in transit. More at InternetNews, PC World and Business Week/CNet."

212 comments

  1. processors... by profet · · Score: 1

    how many different processors is palm going to use in its product line....?

    1. Re:processors... by jht · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, hopefully they stick to three for a while ;-)

      Seriously, it's a Good Thing that PalmOS has become as portable as it now is - different processors are best suited for different applications, and if you run on a particular platform, then there's a possibility that your OS gets selected for that use.

      Dragonball, OMAP, and XScale aren't bad for starters. Though OMAP and XScale are members of the ARM family, and the software is probably pretty much compatible.

      --
      -- Josh Turiel
      "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
  2. NO Bluetooth by makapuf · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's a shame such a prodoct doesn't have bluetooth : I think It would have been much cheaper and battery saving than to use WiFi ?
    Any Ideas why it hasn't been included ?
    Besides, it's important noting those PDA have an integrated keyboard.

    1. Re:NO Bluetooth by rosbif · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because Bluetooth is for connecting peripherals together, 802.11 is for providing TCP/IP-style networking. I could see Bluetooth for connecting your wireless headset (maybe), however you can get Bluetooth cards for this.

    2. Re:NO Bluetooth by DrXym · · Score: 4, Informative
      Well the Palm Tungsten A has bluetooth so take your pick. No doubt Palm will be selling expansions that provide the missing functionality if you absolutely have to have both.


      Of the two I would guess that 802.11b is much more useful for places like restaurants / shops etc. that might use wireless for stock control or whatever. Bluetooth is neat but how many people have other devices to sync up with? Personally I'd just prefer 802.11b.

    3. Re:NO Bluetooth by Dylan+Zimmerman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, in my opinion, it's more of a shame that they have such fast processors. The Dragonball was never meant to run much faster than 66 MHz and they designed PalmOS very efficently while they had that limitation. Using a 66 MHz Dragonball (or even one of those tweaked 200 MHz ones that Sony uses) would have cost less and it would probably be more efficent in terms of power useage.

      Bluetooth should have been included. It was meant for connecting devices to each other over short ranges, wheras WiFi can be used for much longer distances. PDAs and such don't need WiFi nearly as much as they need Bluetooth.

      And to that guy above me who said that WiFi is used for TCP/IP, well, so is Bluetooth. Or, at least, it can be.

    4. Re:NO Bluetooth by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 3, Interesting

      yeah, but the (much more attractive) Tungsten T DOESN'T use the faster(?) CPU. This is a really dumb move by Palm - their Tugsten T product is REALLY nice, but using a different (better?) CPU in the C naturally causes one to ask "why shouldn't I just wait for them to upgrade the T to the newer Xscale chip?".

      So which is better? OMAP or Xscale? And why is the C so fugly?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    5. Re:NO Bluetooth by Stalus · · Score: 4, Informative

      The short answer, because it's easier to add Bluetooth. I currently own a Tungsten T, which is the first Palm I've actually loved, but it has two main flaws from my view and both of these are fixed in the Tunsten C.

      1) T comes with Bluetooth built in, but I can buy a Bluetooth card from Palm. I can't seem to find an 802.11b card for the life of me. Though different companies claim to have card designs that they've sold to other people, nothing has made it to market yet that I'm aware of.

      I could be up and running with 802.11b, but since I have Sprint, and Sprint hasn't come out with a bluetooth phone yet (Though SonyEriccson is rumored to have the T608 coming out this quarter), I have no internet connectivity with my Palm.

      2) I used to own a Treo 300, which had a keyboard and I must say it's a heck of a lot faster to type on that mini-keyboard once you get used to it than to write grafitti. I'm kind of neutral, but somewhat leaning toward keyboard designs - especially now that the OS supports some keyboard navigation.

    6. Re:NO Bluetooth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, that's not right. Look at high-end cell phones (e.g. Sony-Ericssen t68i), which have adopted Bluetooth for low data-rate synchronization of contact info, etc. I would think that's what you want the wireless for. In spite of the toted ability to stay connected in 'hotspots' with WiFi, I have to think this is a fairly useless feature. You're not going to do much browsing on this tiny screen. If you want basic info, use the GPRS/1x abilities of your cell, which operate at much longer range.

    7. Re:NO Bluetooth by tyen · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Any Ideas why it hasn't been included ?

      IMHO, it is because Bluetooth recognition/adoption by both manufacturers and users has been slower than WiFi. Also, the implementations of Bluetooth have been pretty uninspiring. I can create a Bluetooth net with a Tungsten, headset and SonyEricsson, and with the phone in my briefcase place a call using the Tungsten. Neat. When a call comes in however, the Caller ID information is not passed back to the Tungsten through the Bluetooth net so I can see on the Tungsten who is calling (the Mac OS X Address Book supports this). Almost a textbook illustration of flashy demo technology that is impractical in daily use.

      Palm's choice of data architecture unfortunately makes it difficult to take advantage of these technologies that bring a Unix-like philosophy to devices (make 'em small and usable in different contexts, allow users to combine and recombine, sometimes in ways the original designers never thought of). These types of devices really come into their own when they can fluidly share data between themselves; their utility grows far beyond the hardware's core benefit, and is only limited by the software. The Apple Newton's Lisp'ish soups data architecture held a lot of promise, and worked really well when vendors took advantage of it.

      Manufacturers also share some responsibility however for lacking some marketing foresight. Not being able to reprogram the Bluetooth support in their devices limits their future utility. It also places a cap on possible revenue streams for software upgrades, implementing features for increased and diverse uses, often driven by businesses, that the market finds. These uses sometimes fall outside of the original vision of the device, and add revenue streams from unexpected places. And That's A Good Thing (tm). A lot of people who hear about Bluetooth, and it seems these people might include the device manufacturers, do not understand that simply implementing the Bluetooth transport doesn't make magic happen. Just as simply expressing your invoices into XML doesn't replace your EDI system overnight. The magic happens because a protocol is exploited by both sides of a transaction. Locking up your protocol support implementation into non-replaceable firmware means you just locked yourself out of exploiting different uses of your hardware that become apparent later on. This drives up the useful lifecycle of your product line's core implementation, drives down R&D costs, and drives up the number of revenue sources to tap into.

      These are a very rich vein of sales and marketing possibilities that Palm and manufacturers spending R&D money on Bluetooth support for their product lines have failed to grasp. They implemented Bluetooth without grasping these possibilities and taking action upon them, then stood aside expecting the world to beat a path to their door. When that didn't happen, they charged off to chase the next chimera of profitability, which you see today.

    8. Re:NO Bluetooth by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth capability is available as an insert for the SD coard slot:

      http://www.palm.com/products/accessories/expansi on cards/bluetooth/

      However, this is only compatible with the older i705, m515, m505, m500, m130 and m125 handhelds. $129, for those who don't want to change their PDA, just upgrade the capabilities.

      --
      The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
    9. Re:NO Bluetooth by transient · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth can also be used to sync a Palm with iSync on a Mac.

      --

      irb(main):001:0>
    10. Re:NO Bluetooth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very simple:

      Use 802.11b when it is available.

      Use Bluetooth to talk through my Ericsson T39m over GPRS when wi-fi is not available.

    11. Re:NO Bluetooth by rosbif · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well no, actually. WiFi (802.11b) is an implementation of the 802.x standard which includes wired ethernet and is aimed at LAN access. It is immediately compatible with any other 802.11b device (OK, passwords may be needed) and runs at the physical/network layer of a TCP/IP stack. The fact that the packets are travelling over a spread-spectrum radio connection, rather than Cat5 cable is of no issue to the upper layers of the stack. 802.11b gives you 11Mbps.
      Bluetooth, on the other hand, is a wireless connectivity protocol which is primarily aimed at connecting individual devices together - for example, a cell phone and an unwired earphone. Devices need to register with one another and a maximum of 8 devices can be supported on a Bluetooth network. Bluetooth gives you about 700kbps.
      Yes, you can use Bluetooth for wireless networking, in the same way that you could use your IR port or a USB connection for networking - but that's not its primary purpose.

    12. Re:NO Bluetooth by barnaclebarnes · · Score: 1

      That was the first thing I noticed as well. Most of the time you won't be using WiFi. There simply are not enough Hotspots around. In the inbetween times you are likely to use GPRS. And to use that you need to connect to a phone. For that you could use IR to phone (line of site an crap) or Bluetooth to phone (Perfect).

      Of course you could buy an add-in Bluetooth SD card but then that ties up your SD slot which may be needed for things like a GPS unit, which in turn may need a GPRS connection to download location based services....Catch 22. you wouldn't be able to use both at once.

      Why can't they just learn to put Bluetooth into all devices? The chip costs are down to $5 and the power consumption is low. It is also ver versitile for connecting devices. It just makes sense. /b

      --
      [Please type your sig here.]
    13. Re:NO Bluetooth by HanzoSan · · Score: 1



      I live in boston and theres hotspots everywhere. Where can I find a bluetooth hotspot?

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    14. Re:NO Bluetooth by Casal · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Palm sells a Bluetooth SDIO. This page (http://www.palm.com/products/accessories/expansio ncards/bluetooth/) doesn't state it's compatible with the Tungsten C but that may simply be because Palm's pages haven't been updated yet. The Tungsten C can take SDIO cards.

      --
      Santiago Oleas
      Strada Consulting Group Inc.
      http://www.stradasystems.com

    15. Re:NO Bluetooth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So which is better? OMAP or Xscale?

      Ok, first thing, disclaimer: I work for TI. We make the OMAP chip.

      It really comes down to power (as in battery power) vs. performance. While the Xscale has more Mhz, OMAP kicks it ass all over the map when it comes to how many MIPS you get for the same amount of power.

      So, while your Xscale may run faster, you have to ask yourself if the extra performance is worth the extra battery power to you. Admittedly, John Q Executive that buys a Palm doesn't neccessarily understand this, and thus probably doesn't really care. And honestly, if you're not the type that has to go for long times without charging, you probably wouldn't care too much either.

      The other nice thing about the OMAP chip is the on-chip Digital Signal Processor. This can be used to do a lot of cool shit, e.g. audio decoding/processing in the background (i.e. MP3 decode). Hell, if they made the right add-on module, they could even take advantage of the DSP for some cool communications shit, like making your palm a cellphone, or a modem, or, *gasp* a cellular modem. Or, they could use it to hook up to a cheap digital camera add-on. All of these things already typically use DSPs when you buy them stand-alone, but if Palm were smart, they could make some cool plugin modules that would actually be cheaper because they could use the DSP that's already in the Palm rather than having to have their own DSP hardware.

      Unfortunately, Palm seems to have rather dropped the ball on taking advantage of the DSP. IMO, there is no valid excuse in hell why they didn't have it supporting MP3 playback out of the box, and that's only the beginning of what they could have been doing. Sure, the MP3 players are there now, but I'd call that too little too late.

    16. Re:NO Bluetooth by WinterSolstice · · Score: 3, Insightful
      What I have found in my personal Bluetooth net (Apple G4 desktop, Powerbook G4, S/E T68i, Palm Tungsten T) is that Bluetooth is an almost technology. It almost solves all your problems. It almost is awesome, and it almost is worth the trouble.

      For example, I love the SMS bluetooth stuff on the Tungsten. I can feel my phone buzz during a meeting, and just hit my hotkey on the palm (which I was taking notes on) to see/respond to the message. But I can't send attachments or text via SMS unless I use the email program to dial my ISP. WTF?

      Again, I can hotsync with my Mac using Bluetooth. This is super awesome. But, I can't hotsync repeating appointments with my phone. Only single occurance appointments. WTF?

      The bluetooth headsets which could be so hot for gaming/chatting/etc if they would work with every device (the SOCOM/CS/Diablo implications are fantastic), but OS 10.2 doesn't have the voice gateway working properly for the headset, and the Palm ignores it entirely! WTF?

      See, my point is that everything Bluetooth can do is already implemented in hardware, but all the developers are still pushing beta software for it. If the market people will just cool their jets for a bit, it will become amazing. Too bad we'll probably lose the single coolest Super Local LAN due to the lack of good software.

      Sounds like OSS to the rescue?

      -WS

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    17. Re:NO Bluetooth by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      It's a shame such a prodoct doesn't have bluetooth : I think It would have been much cheaper and battery saving than to use WiFi ?

      Get a Tungsten T if you want Bluetooth.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    18. Re:NO Bluetooth by lsd · · Score: 1

      The trouble you're having syncing recurring events to your T68i doesn't really have anything to do with Bluetooth - it's simply because the T68i's calender doesn't support them. Using Multisync to sync your phone with Evolution shows up the same problem, regardless of whether you're using Bluetooth, IrDA or a cable to link your phone to your PC. Multisync can nicely create a bunch of individual appointments for each recurring event in order to fake the recurrance - I'm surprised iSync or whatever you're using on the Mac can't do this.

      Hopefully newer generations of phones will have more complete calendars - at the moment, i'm fairly content with the partial support for recurrance on my Siemens S55. However, until the phones get there, there's not much point shootiing the messenger :)

    19. Re:NO Bluetooth by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      offtopic - but your sig is a great quote, and one I've never heard before. cool as.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    20. Re:NO Bluetooth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want Bluetooth get a Tungsten T. It has it build in.

    21. Re:NO Bluetooth by stingaway · · Score: 1

      This is a serious oversight IMHO. I currently use Bluetooth on the Tungsten T religiously with my Sony Ericcson T68i. Using Iambic mail - found at http://www.iambic.com/mail/palmos/ - I am able to IMAP from my tungsten to my work email from anywhere I have service, not just work, home, or the oft mentioned but locationally inspecific cafes, aiports and 'other places'. When stuck in traffic I like to work the emails, and until I can install 802.11b in my car, I guess I am stuck with the Tungsten T. Of course, with 64 megs, I could switch out the SD 256 card for a SD Bluetooth I suppose.. but that really cuts into my storage... Sorry for the late rant...

    22. Re:NO Bluetooth by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

      iSync on the Mac can do this. I think you didn't understand the point of my post. Bluetooth rocks, but the software for it is very much so beta. Lots of missing features. Compared to say... IR, which has most of the software support it needs.

      I appreciate the link, though. I'll go check it out.

      -WS

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    23. Re:NO Bluetooth by neilkraft · · Score: 1

      th blue tooth sdio car WILL NOT WORK WIth THE C. if you have a workaround let me know

    24. Re:NO Bluetooth by neilkraft · · Score: 1

      palm sdio bluetooth card doesn't work.any thoughts

    25. Re:NO Bluetooth by neilkraft · · Score: 1

      it doesn't work

    26. Re:NO Bluetooth by stingaway · · Score: 1

      Only thoughts are that I will not be getting one of these if that is the case...

  3. With this new hardware... by levik · · Score: 5, Funny
    ... you can finally do what people probably wanted to for a long time - keep track of your appointments in glorious 320x320 full screen anti-aliased 12 bit color 3D!

    --
    Ñ'
    1. Re:With this new hardware... by Viqsi · · Score: 1

      And if you really have a problem with that and want to just keep appointments, there's the original Zire.

      They actually *make* devices for segements like that; what's the point of mocking the other segment for not being in yours?

      --

      --
      viqsi - See "vixen"
      If we do not change our direction we are likely to end up where we are headed.
    2. Re:With this new hardware... by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Why could Palm make something like the o-Zire, but not so shitty? I mean, yes, not everyone needs a super-fancy PDA- but I've met plenty of non-nerd folks who would like a simple PDA with a backlight and maybe 4 MB of RAM.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    3. Re:With this new hardware... by dbazile · · Score: 1

      For a seemingly eternal period of 10 seconds of battery life provided by our cutting-edge alkaline power supplies... ;)

    4. Re:With this new hardware... by Viqsi · · Score: 1

      They already did that; it was called the Palm IIIe, and it was out years ago. You can prob'ly easily find one on eBay or maybe even in a few stores.

      Admittedly, the fact that it's not currently on most store shelves kind of limits its current accessibility, but the point remains that they've done all this already.

      --

      --
      viqsi - See "vixen"
      If we do not change our direction we are likely to end up where we are headed.
  4. Making the connection by Mattygfunk1 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Yet more mobile devices that provide the hardware but can't see the posibilities of software features. Almost every current model mobile phone and gradually more PDAs are getting the combination of a camera and wireless / infrared connectivity. Why not spend a little extra time programming and create a webcam feature?

    No extra hardware increases the value to the user without the cost of production. What's the hold up?

    __
    cheap web site hosting on linux

    1. Re:Making the connection by Malc · · Score: 1

      The IR capability of my M515 is a bit over-rated. It communicates at dial-up modem speeds, which makes syncing things like AvantGo really painful... easily 30 minutes. I wish they would upgrade it to fully utilise the 4mbs that the IR port on my laptop is capable of.

    2. Re:Making the connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the Nokia 3650 has several web cam type software apps already available. One even has a motion sensor so it mails you a picture when it senses motion.

  5. And why would I upgrade? by digitect · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Funny, my Palm m100, upgraded to 8mb still does everything I need. Sure it doesn't play 31337 videos and MP3s, but 95% of what I need a PDA for can be satisified by an Ebay m105 for

    Sorry, Palm. I love ya and all, but until you make a PDA that can replace the usefulness of a cheap laptop, I've got no reason to upgrade.

    --
    There is no need to use a SlashDot sig for SEO...
    1. Re:And why would I upgrade? by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Funny, my Palm m100, upgraded to 8mb still does everything I need. Sure it doesn't play 31337 videos and MP3s, but 95% of what I need a PDA for can be satisified by an Ebay m105 for

      I dig. I was home sick (non-SARS, thankyewveramuch) when /. carried the HSN/Zaurus deal, I plunked my cash and got the 5500 and it does more stuff than I'll probably ever need. I'm probably not the targetted audience, though I'm sure our CIO is, whatever is the latest and greatest, he's got it and turns green with envy when someone trots in the door with something newer, more flash A-1.

      In other news: Colin Powell has suggested the US punish France for their principled stand on Iraq and I got 6 spams this morning (all identical subject, varying forged send addresses) telling me how I can "Take a BITE out of SPAM". New day, same old crappy world.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:And why would I upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      my palm vx still does what i need it to do (keep contacts, appointments, memos, and todos), plus a bit more. i'm already looking into buying the zire 71 when it comes out. it comes with everything i need, plus beautiful colored screen (easier on the eyes especially in dim places), a cheap camera (for the quick photo ops with friends, girls, cars/houses for sale, etc.), mp3 player (for when i'm really bored), and double the memory, plus sd card slot expansion.

      the point is... a palm isn't for what you need. it's for what you want. i'm pretty sure that you could replace your m100 with an old filofax, but would you? sure you'd lose the computer connectivity, but you still keep your info, and not have to charge every week, hassle with grafitti, not worry about it getting stolen, and the filofax won't play video and mp3s to waste your time.

      and when you want a pda to replace a cheap laptop... then you're in trouble. it won't happen. that's an entirely different market at the moment. maybe in a few more years they'll add a 12" screen, keyboard, expandable battery, cd burner, harddrive, and speakers to the palm, but would you want to keep it in your pocket?

      plus what do you need a laptop for? you can backup to sd cards (no laptop needed), type stuff (wordsmith), print stuff (printboy), view a dictionary (noah lite), read ebooks (acrobat, palmreader, plucker!!!), compute (calculator), keep databases (list, mobiledb), store info (splashdata stuff), and the all important "file management" (with filez).

    3. Re:And why would I upgrade? by goatboy_14 · · Score: 1

      Same here. I've got a m100 in its original 2MB 16MHz glory and it suits most of my needs just fine (mostly tetris). Plus, you can't beat the 1 month/charge time on a pair of AAA's

    4. Re:And why would I upgrade? by RevAaron · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Believe it or not, different people have different needs/wants.

      For me, a Palm m100 is mostly worthless. For that matter, any current Palm OS model is. I use my PDAs like a 'real computer,' it is just as useful (or perhaps even more so) than a cheap laptop.

      But then again, as you say, until Palm makes a PDA that replaces a cheap laptop, you'd have no reason to upgrade. And I would have no reason to buy a Palm OS device. Perhaps by Palm OS 6, the POS will both be good enough for me and compelling enough for you. For someone who uses a PDA as an overpriced organizer and gimpy gamestation, darn near any model of POS device works great. My girlfriend has a very old Palm Pro, and besides the hardware sucking, I does pretty much everything the vast majority of what POS users do with their Palms. No wifi, no color, but eh. POS is POS, how useful is that stuff without a real OS backing it?

      The main PDAs I've used were a Newton MP2100, a Jornada 720, and a Zaurus. The first two managed to be great for both using as a computer as well as a PDA- the Newton was 100% perfect for notetaking. The Jornada wasn't perfect, but it was pretty damn good. (No reflective screen, so I had to say bye-bye)

      The Zaurus is another story alltogether- it kind of sucks as both a small 'real' computer as well as a PDA. No decent notetaking app exists for it and the software can often be slow, memory-hoggish, and flakey. Oddly enough, I honestly think that there has been more Unix software ported and adapted to WinCE (which I used on my Jornada 720) than for the Zaurus. Take for instance LaTeX- I could certainly cross-compile the full distro. I could even show that I'm super l33t and run LyX under X11... But why the hell would I want to waste my time doing that? With WinCE and PocketPC, there were a couple nice packages that gave you an integrated LaTeX front-end. Tap on a button and it would compile the TeX and display it in a port of WinDVI. Not so for the Zaurus... it seems people are too busy cheerleading that no one has time for any software development.

      And yes, I'm taking matters into my own hands and working on Dynapad, a PDA OE/OS which manages to already pack more functionality is a number of ways than the Zaurus does- 1 developer (me) vs all of them. Heh.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    5. Re:And why would I upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you want a Zaurus.....

    6. Re:And why would I upgrade? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      "though I'm sure our CIO is, whatever is the latest and greatest, he's got it and turns green with envy when someone trots in the door with something newer, more flash A-1."

      Yeah, I work with an idiot like that too. When i got my new 'phone a week or so ago (Nokia 8910) I deliberately didn't mention it to him - even though I knew my colleague WOULD - he only managed to contain himself for about a day and a half before DEMANDING to see it - took the shine of his stupid, ugly little T68i - simply because he bought it for all the wrong reasons.

      Gadgets for gadgets' sake is a waste of everyone's time.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    7. Re:And why would I upgrade? by tomcio.s · · Score: 1

      I call your bluff:
      How in the world did you upgrade m100 to 8mb???
      Unless you are talking about a different model.

    8. Re:And why would I upgrade? by lowmagnet · · Score: 1

      I was home sick (non-SARS, thankyewveramuch) ....

      Yes, we all know it was for ebola.

      --
      Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!
    9. Re:And why would I upgrade? by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      Take for instance LaTeX- I could certainly cross-compile the full distro. I could even show that I'm super l33t and run LyX under X11... But why the hell would I want to waste my time doing that?

      You probably don't have to complie anything, just grab the right packages from debian-arm.
      http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
      As far as note-taking, have you tried IQnotes?


      Not so for the Zaurus... it seems people are too busy cheerleading that no one has time for any software development.

      I don't think that's a fair statement. There are 807 applications currently listed in the Zaurus Software Index. Seems like someone's doing software development.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    10. Re:And why would I upgrade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, your last paragraph contridicts your second to last. If you have a pda that is capable of all of those things, then it is basically a small laptop that is just missing a few things. That is exactly what your parent is talking about, continually adding new features to the pda until it becomes a poor-man's laptop, and soon it won't be cheaper than a low end laptop.

    11. Re:And why would I upgrade? by rkz · · Score: 1

      im glad im not the only one to hate modern PDA's. the only PDA functionality i need is provided by my nokia 6310i's calendar (its also possible to sync to outlook). My dad uses a PDA i got free from the bank when i opened an account i doubt its worth any more than £10 but it saves phone numbers and appointments so hes happy! If you need to use anything other than calendar, notes, address book you might as well buy an ultra portable notebook.

    12. Re:And why would I upgrade? by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      Mod down parent. This is offtopic. We're discussing Palm here, not your particular needs. For every device there is a person who says "I can't see the use" and for every such person there are 10 others who can see the use. Please don't upgrade but please don't feel the need to tell us all about it.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    13. Re:And why would I upgrade? by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Yes, I've tried IQNotes. See my post about notetaking on the Zaurus in this same story... IQNotes falls woefully short. For now though, that is what I am using on the Z- at least I can get some organization to the notes.

      You probably don't have to complie anything, just grab the right packages from debian-arm.

      Again, what good would that do me? The LaTeX package for debian-arm would be good to have, but I am still stuck without anything useful, as there is no practical front-end for LaTeX on the Z. Furthermore, it was simply an example out of many similar- a cohesive LaTeX package for the Z may show up, and I hope it does... but that won't fix all the other problems with the Zaurus.

      I don't think that's a fair statement. There are 807 applications currently listed in the Zaurus Software Index. Seems like someone's doing software development.

      Perhaps my statement was a bit confusing. Naturally, I do not think that there is really no one doing any development for the Z, and that isn't what I meant to say. However, anyone who has used a Zaurus for more than a few minutes and has previous experience using almost any other PDA (Newton, PocketPC, WinCE, PalmOS, Psion) knows that the Z is sorely lacking good apps. Look through the ZSI, try out as many of those apps as I have- a lot of them simply duplicate the functionality of another Zaurus app with a few changes, but not really improving toward an actually good or great app. And there are some great apps for the Z, don't get me wrong. I am still using mine.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    14. Re:And why would I upgrade? by iamhassi · · Score: 1
      "For me, a Palm m100 is mostly worthless. For that matter, any current Palm OS model is. I use my PDAs like a 'real computer,' it is just as useful (or perhaps even more so) than a cheap laptop."

      I originally went with Palms because of the size & price: they pack more into a smaller area than any PocketPC and Palm's are half the price. Ok sure I can't play movies (until now) but I can shove it in my pocket and carry it with me everywhere without looking like a dork carrying a purse or beltcase around. My m515 in a strong aluminum case is smaller than my wallet, try doing that with a PocketPC.

      I think of it like this: what good is a $500+ PocketPC I don't carry around with me because it needs a giant case?

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    15. Re:And why would I upgrade? by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      You can get some Palm OS models pretty cheap, like the Zire at $99, but PocketPCs aren't as expensive as you may think. Rather, they're not all that expensive and haven't been for a couple years. Yes, there are $700 PocketPCs, but there is also an $800 Sony PalmOS device.

      You can buy a 300 MHz Dell Axim for $200. Before that, you could buy a iPAQ 3100 series for $150-200. A Palm OS device that does everything that these do can't be found, but something mostly similar in functionality as well as hardware capability easily costs $300 with the Zire 71, and $400 before that. How much did that m515 cost when you got it? I imagine quite a bit more than $200, when for that money you could've had a much more functional device. Don't take that the wrong way, I am not saying people should just buy PocketPCs instead of POS devices, but don't pretend that PocketPCs are all $500+ (as you say) while POS devices are all cheaper.

      A giant case? Heh. You're grasping at straws my man. Yes, pretty much any PocketPC is thicker than a Palm m515 for sure. But look at the newer Palms, just as big as an iPAQ. I guess a 206 MHz processor rather than a funny little 20 MHz Dragonball, a relatively big screen compared to a silly 160x160 as well more RAM may have something to do with that.

      Again, I don't think that PocketPCs are better for everyone, but you've got your reality distortion glasses glued on if you think that Palms are half the price of most PocketPCs, or that PocketPCs don't fit in a pocket. Maybe you should employ google or a local retailer and have a look at PocketPCs, new and old...

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  6. 640x480 VGA video playback? by ardiri · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >> 640x480 VGA video playback

    well, thats not really true. the screen is only 320x320 - so, your limited to that. the Zire 71 has the ability to take up to 640x480 pictures. infosync.no has some good examples of the pictures taken at day and night with the Zire 71.

    the Tungsten|C is a nice unit - definately up there now with the Pocket PC equivalents. very fast.

    1. Re:640x480 VGA video playback? by pherris · · Score: 3, Informative
      ardiri said:
      infosync.no has some good examples of the pictures taken at day and night with the Zire 71

      day photo
      night photo
      Infosync's full review of the Zire 71

      --
      "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
    2. Re:640x480 VGA video playback? by fliplap · · Score: 1

      Go suck a sausage Aaron, no one will ever forgive you, EVER.

      In case any of you missed it, ardiri up there was the author of the only Palm virus (thats right, he was the only one to sink that low).

      He would hang out in the Palm channels on EfNet and give it out to people looking for cracks to his software. Yet somehow he decided that none of these people would ever give it out to anyone else? Of course, he told the media a different story, that he only gave to it friends, but even the media put "'s around the word friends.

      Here's a link to an article tho many more can still be foud on google

      You could equate this to being proof of concept and that he was trying to show vulnerability, but this is obviously not the case. Its not like he sent it to Palm or any anti-virus companies before giving it out. He didn't do it for the good of users, he did it because he couldn't figure out a scheme to stop people from cracking his software and though he'd teach them a lesson. In fact, if any of you attended the Defcon 8 Palm security talk, the presenter gave a rather nice break down of the protection scheme.

  7. Zire Product Name by Christopher_G_Lewis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's quite interesting that Palm selected the low-end Zire name for the 71. It 3 times the price of the original Zire, 8 times the memory, a much faster processor and a *much* better display.

    If I recall, the Zire was an attempt to get the "its just a little too expensive" consumer crowd to buy into the Palm family.

    BTW, my non-techie wife loves her Zire. It's just good enough to do the things she wants (calendar, address book) but nothing more.

    1. Re:Zire Product Name by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      The Zire product line is aimed at home users, the Tungsten line is for business. Palm had said earlier that there would be high-end Zires and possibly cheap tungsten devices.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    2. Re:Zire Product Name by enjo13 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just to clarify. The Zire brand is not aimed at 'low end' devices, but rather is focused as the consumer brand for Palm. So Zire == Consumer oriented devices, while Tungsten == professional.

      Or something like that.

      --
      Turn s60 photos into awesome videos with mScrapbook for all S60 3rd edition phones!
    3. Re:Zire Product Name by LNN · · Score: 1

      Speaking of product names, I might as well add that here in Sweden, we believe the name "Tungsten" is a little bit funny, and a whole lot inappropriate for the products they sell. Tung means heavy and sten means stone, so for selling handhelds, the heavy stone approach might not be very appealing. Need I tell I was quite surprised when I opened the post order catalog that I get for free every month, reading how small and light that heavy stone is supposed to be.

      I've never heard of anyone buying anything from Tungsten...

    4. Re:Zire Product Name by iamhassi · · Score: 1
      I've always thought the Zire was worthless. For $20-$40 you can get a m100 in great shape that does everything the Zire does but adds 2 more buttons and a backlight.

      They make great gifts too, since everyone thinks Palms are expensive. For $20 it sure beats giving them a CD.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  8. Zire 71 review at infosyncworld.com by GQuon · · Score: 3, Informative

    Review on infosyncworld.

    The main gripe they have is the lack of Bluetooth, and that the IR diode isn't any stronger.

    But are there not Bluetooth cards for the SD port?

    --
    Irene KHAAAAAAN!
    1. Re:Zire 71 review at infosyncworld.com by dulinor · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth SD cards are, as yet, incompatible with PALM OS 5.x. So if you don't have it built in, you're SOL.

      For me, given that my workplace requires LEAP support for 802.11b I'd *much* rather have bluetooth and gateway through my laptop. But then, that's what the Tungsten T is for I suppose.

    2. Re:Zire 71 review at infosyncworld.com by fhammond · · Score: 1

      FYI, I think the Tungsten C might have LEAP-compatible 802.11b! See this page:

      http://www.palm.com/uk/products/tungsten-c/specs .h tml

      "Enterprise supported standards: 802.11b2, LEAP Plug-in, PPTP, Enhanced Security Services (ESS)"

      Very exciting, if it's true.

      fh

    3. Re:Zire 71 review at infosyncworld.com by jason.romney · · Score: 1

      Dulinor, if you are correct that bluetooth SD cards are incompatible with Palm OS5.x then there is an awful lot of disinformation going around in reviews about the palm Tungsten C. For example "The Tungsten C has an SD slot that can accommodate SD and MMC memory storage cards as well as SDIO cards such as the Palm Bluetooth card" at http://www.pdabuyersguide.com/palm_Tungsten_C.htm with similar views at http://www.brighthand.com/article/Tungsten_C_Preli minary_Review and elsewhere. If you are correct, does this mean there is NO possibility of using bluetooth with a Tungsten C? Or is there a workaround?

  9. PocketPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    PocketPC surrenders.

  10. Palm screens too small... by dethl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can't stand Palm's, or anything with that small of a screen. This is one of the reasons I sold my PEG-N710C and got a Newton. No, I'm not trolling for Apple, I'm saying that Palm needs to look back at what jumpstarted the industry: larger screen and non-grafitti handwriting recognition (the Newton had what was called Rosetta, still unmatched, even Apple's Inkwell on Mac OS X can't beat it).

    --
    "Some fight for law. Some fight for justice. What will you fight for? One day, you will see."
    1. Re:Palm screens too small... by reiggin · · Score: 1
      You must have the most proper and beautiful handwriting on the planet. What I wrote on my Newton: "Have lunch with Betty tomorrow." What it gave me back: "Hato lunar white Ballv lavawen." Kiss this Rosetta.

      And how do you lug around a Newton? Got one slung over your neck? I keep my tucked inside my sock. Works great as a shin guard.

    2. Re:Palm screens too small... by tuffy · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'm saying that Palm needs to look back at what jumpstarted the industry

      Before Palm, where wasn't much of a PDA industry. The Newton was a great piece of hardware, but Apple didn't stop production because they were selling too many of them.

      (Sorry about the blank post, had a bit of a mouse slip-up)

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    3. Re:Palm screens too small... by RevAaron · · Score: 2, Informative

      While POS devices have typically had very tiny screens, with these models they're the same as what you can get in the PocketPC world. The Sony models at 480x320 have the same res of a Newton screen, but are physically smaller and Palm OS still lacks the advanced features of the Newton OS. Some non-PocketPC WinCE PDAs have a screen about the size of Newton 2100, but they're overpriced and hard to find. It is a damn shame- it is a huge pain in the ass to take notes on a tiny 320x240 screen, especially when you've been spoiled by a Newton 2100...

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    4. Re:Palm screens too small... by NMerriam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm saying that Palm needs to look back at what jumpstarted the industry

      What jumpstarted the industry was Palm. Apple did it first, but Palm did it successfully: small enough to fit in a pocket, accurate recognition with minimal training, extensive battery life, simple functionality.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    5. Re:Palm screens too small... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Apple didn't stop production because they were selling too many of them

      Sure they were. But Newton was a Scully project (who Jobs hated), and, serendipitously they were signing a deal with Microsoft to keep Office on the Mac, and Microsoft was desparetely trying to get WinCE off the ground. Microsoft asked Apple to 'knife the baby', meaning at least Quicktime, but many feel Newton was included as well. There's little doubt that Apple could have delivered a Palm-sized Newton to keep in the PDA market if they wanted to.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    6. Re:Palm screens too small... by tuffy · · Score: 1

      "Selling briskly" (per the link) is one thing, but the Newton was no iMac in terms of sales. Palm delivered a lightweight, Good Enough PDA at just the right time to match what consumers were looking for. I have no doubt Apple could've trimmed down their Newton to better compete, but Apple's PDA will likely always remain one of those "what if" products that never quite took off.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    7. Re:Palm screens too small... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      You forgot the key words. Too small for you. I got glasses years ago and have no problem. I've probably read 30 MB of books now on my 'tiny' screen with no problem.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    8. Re:Palm screens too small... by PowerBook2k · · Score: 1
      Hate to break it to you, but Mac OS X's Inkwell *is* Rosetta. The technology had sat shelved at Apple until OS X 10.2.

      Why do you think Apple pulled the Newton group back in after they had spun it off as a separate company?

  11. MB by jmays · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Granted, I could add an SD or MMC card but really ... 16MB is pretty weak. I would like to see Palm at least have 256MB on board, especially if I am going to use this for any type of music or video!

    $300 better spent on a 5GB iPod. I can use my phone for PDA functions.

    PS. I have and use a Palm m125.

    --
    KARMA TAG! You're it.
    1. Re:MB by RevAaron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      256 MB on board wouldn't be possible as far as regular RAM is concerned. I guess they could have flash built-in, such that you'd have 16 MB of regular RAM and then the 256 MB Flash, which would basically just be an internal SD card.

      Why do we see POS devices top out at 16 MB? That is, until Palm OS 5.2.1 and the Tungstep C... That is because, until a few days ago, POS devices couldn't have more than 16 MB of internal RAM! You see, Palm did us all a favor and had a major breakthrough in technology, allowing the PalmOS to finally utlitize more than 16 MB of RAM.

      That sounds great and all, but guess what? You still couldn't have your 256 MB of on-board RAM, because-- even with this super-advanced technological breakthrough -- the POS can still only have 128 MB of RAM. How splendidly limiting!

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    2. Re:MB by jmays · · Score: 1

      Ok ... that is great and wonderful and I think you missed my point ... although, I wasn't real specific. Why not have an internal SD card? Hell, they don't even have to call it that. They could just say 256MB built-in! I am not looking for 256MB RAM ... 16MB RAM and 256MB internal would be just fine. Just give me something STOCK AND ALREADY BUILT-IN that I don't have to add-in to throw a couple of CD's worth of MP3's on.

      --
      KARMA TAG! You're it.
    3. Re:MB by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Umm, I don't think I missed your point considering I said "I guess they could have flash built-in, such that you'd have 16 MB of regular RAM and then the 256 MB Flash, which would basically just be an internal SD card."

      But yeah, it would be nice if they did do something like that. I mean, 256 MB of RAM is like $20- battery back it (skip the flash), and bam, there you go, a cheap place for a lot of data.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    4. Re:MB by TedTschopp · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you are right... 16MB sucks... NOT!

      Then again I learned how to program on a computer with only 64k and a processor that could have been rated in single digit megahertz. As opposed to the hundreds and thousands which are nor available.

      I also remember my first hard drive had 10mb on it and I paid $1500 for it.

      Anyway, enough with the 'good ol days'.

      --
      Fantasy remains a human right; we make in our measure and in our derivative mode... -- JRR Tolkien
  12. No, I'm not bitter... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 3, Interesting

    God fsckn' damnit!!! I just did a 5-second snipe on a Tungsten T last night on eBay and I see this in the morning!

    Overall, I think I still would have bought the TT over the TC. I bought my Palm mostly for portable editing of Word & Excel files (Palms do this better than PocketPC apparently).

    In connection with the foregoing, I intend to buy the full-sized Ultra Thin keyboard. I've seen a lot of nice Clie's with built-in keyboards already, and I think for any real work a bigger keyboard will be better, supplemented by grafitti for quick note jotting.

    The Wi-Fi built-into the TC would not be of much use to me. In fact, I have no use for the Bluetooth built-into the TT. If I ever need to use Wi-Fi, there's always SDIO add-in cards.

    1. Re:No, I'm not bitter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, the TC and Z71 have been available from various Targets and Circuit Citys for a few days now. It's all over the boards at brighthand.com and palminfocenter.com. People posted pics and specs. Shoulda done a little research! :)

      I'm with you though, I like my TT better than the TC. It's still smaller and lighter and Bluetooth is now a must have for me.

      And as of now, there aren't any SDIO WiFi cards. They're pretty much all coming Real Soon Now.

      On top of that, there are reports that current SDIO implementations will probably limit the WiFi bandwidth to 2Mbps. Not too bad for a PDA, but pretty limiting for wireless sync and file transfer.

    2. Re:No, I'm not bitter... by Circuit_Burnout · · Score: 1

      No worries man, I love my TT and so will you. Nevermind the free camera you can send away for, though I'm not sure you can, if you got it on ebay.

    3. Re:No, I'm not bitter... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Actually, I will be getting the camera; it was part of the package I bought. The guy who sold me his TT has yet to receive it from the fullfillment center, but will send it over when it arrives....or face the full wrath of hell!

    4. Re:No, I'm not bitter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      portable editing of Word & Excel files (Palms do this better than PocketPC apparently).

      Excel maybe, but definitely not Word.

      TextMaker for Pocket PCs and for Handheld PCs is many times better than QuickOffice, WordSmith, or DTG on the Palm. There is so much of a difference that it isn't even funny anymore.

      I just hope that they port TextMaker for Linux to the Zaurus...

  13. Still Love my CLIE by EvlOvrLrd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With WiFi and Bluetooth becoming standard (or at least peripheral), I am waiting on the applications to make my PDA even more usefull than it already is. Like an SSH client and true IMAP, POP3 email client.

    --


    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear to be bright. Until you hear them speak.
    1. Re:Still Love my CLIE by dsandler · · Score: 1
      I believe the Tungsten C comes with VersaMail (originally MultiMail), which does POP3 and IMAP.

      Also, check out Top Gun SSH for Palm OS.

  14. Forget Palms... New Zaurus rocks by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

    The new Zaurus is the top of the tree as far as
    I'm concerned.

    http://www.expansys.com/product.asp?code=SL-C700

    same size as a normal pda, but flips round to reveal a proper keyboard... Just wish they would
    hurry up and start shipping them. Im already on the pre-order list :)

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    1. Re:Forget Palms... New Zaurus rocks by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      If by proper keyboard you mean a slightly bigger thumboard, then you'd be right. I don't mean to rain on your parade, but the C700's keyboard is far from proper. I was hoping it was something touch-typable- a small keyboard on the order of that of the Jornada 720 or a Psion. Not so. Stop by in #zaurus on ircfreenode.net sometime, there are a couple folks there who are C700 users. The keyboard can only be used practically for thumboarding, it isn't a regular keyboard at all. It looks like one in the photos, though. I wanted one pretty darn bad, and almost considered trading in my iBook for one, but I am very glad I sought one out before making any rash decisions about spending US$700 on something with a bigger screen, but otherwise no better than a SL-5600.

      Why can't someone make me the perfect (for me) PDA? The C700 would be if it had a bigger keyboard. The concept is great, but what use is such a tiny keyboard- it's too small to type anywhere near fast, yet it takes up so much space. Oi.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  15. Data ROMs? by astroview · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Most people I know that have PDAs download dictionaries, thesauri, maps into their RAM. Would it be possible and realistic for manufacturers to sell PDAs with ROMs that have data like the aforementioned dictionaries, thesauri, & maps? Perhaps this static memory would include music files, and books from Project Gutenberg that are in the public domain.

    I guess this would make the PDAs akin to the Hitchikers Guide to the Universe.

    Does anyone know if this is feasible?

    1. Re:Data ROMs? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Informative

      They already do. Go to the store on Palm's website and you'll see all sorts of books, manuals and guides on SD cards.

    2. Re:Data ROMs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      How about a harddrive with about 10 gigs in it? That's be so cool. Imagine a 1024x748, 600Mhz 10gig palm? I would just do all my programming in it. I think that's about couple years off, unless some brilliant mind come in and tackle it. This will be the start of PDA (real start). That's when laptop start to have a challenger.

      Palm should see this.

    3. Re:Data ROMs? by kalidasa · · Score: 3, Informative

      Handspring sells such ROMs for the Springboard slot. My black Visor Deluxe has a 32 MB CF card with about 40 books in it, including H2G2 (I own more than one paper copy, so I don't see that as pirating).

    4. Re:Data ROMs? by bhtooefr · · Score: 0

      What, the Tiqit eightythree? It has a 266-300 MHz Pentium-compatible processor, a 4" 640x480 touchscreen, 256 MB RAM, and a 10 GB HDD. It doesn't have WiFi/Bluetooth, but it'll take PCMCIA/CardBus cards.

    5. Re:Data ROMs? by astroview · · Score: 1

      The problem with the SD cards is they use up a slot and require you to change cards if you want different data. Wouldn't somthing onboard be a lot cooler?

    6. Re:Data ROMs? by djeaux · · Score: 1
      Using a Palm application like JackFlash, you can move files into the extra ROM area where the OS is stored. This doesn't work well for read-write databases, but is great for executables or read-only data. The data will survive a hard reset, which will erase the contents of user RAM.

      But the best way to deal with dictionaries, thesauri & maps is to put them on an SD card...

      djeaux

      --
      "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
  16. Finally... by uwbbjai · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Palm has decided to break away from the DragonBall 16 and 33 MHz CPUs and use a faster processor. They should have made this move a long time ago when all other WinCE devices were running at 200+Mhz and multimedia capable. Good thing they finally realized that once a leader is not always a leader. My advice is don't put so much effort in making things run better and start adding in loads new features...it's the only way to sell

    1. Re:Finally... by dsandler · · Score: 1
      My advice is don't put so much effort in making things run better and start adding in loads new features...it's the only way to sell
      Wait, should this be moderated "Funny"?
    2. Re:Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you go to ask 10 palm users before the release of Sony Clie, 10 of them will tell you 33 MHz CPU is already enough, 8 MB data storage is more than what they're demand, PDA is not designed for multimedia, color display is not useful except make thing poor to color blind, plus it is cheaper than its 200+ MHz + 16+ MB Ram + color screen competitor several dollars, etc...

      With such great basis of supporter, why they need to change? I really can't see any reason. (now I just wonder why so much die hard "simple" Palm user switch to the "complex" Clie)

  17. Reasons to Upgrade by Christopher+Bibbs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1) Color. I look at lot of graphs and charts on my Palm and color makes a big difference.

    2) Wireless access. Being able to retreive e-mail without going back to the desk is great.

    3) Audio and video playback. I don't want a Palm to replace an iPod, but it is good for watching business announcements that are streamed.

    If you do none of these things, fine, stick with the m100/m105. However, I think most handheld users will find at least one of the three compelling enough to get a new model.

  18. Apropos... by GQuon · · Score: 1
    --
    Irene KHAAAAAAN!
    1. Re:Apropos... by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Yup. It's funny, and we've all seen it. Yet, there is nothing that can challenge the Newton in a lot of respects, with POS and Linux (Qtopia or X11) devices not offering any sort of real HWR. You can get Newton-like real HWR on PocketPC, Windows CE, desktop Win32 and OS X, but there is scarecely a device worth using it on, between something too big (a laptop or big tabletPC) and too small (a PocketPC).

      I just watched that again and was surprised to see that they made no cracks about the HWR not working right- I thought that the guy would write "Your girlfriend called" and the Newton would recognize "Your girlfriend dumped you." I think that "WARMING UP" part actually was longer than it takes for a Newton to boot after a reset, and it certainly has instant-on regularily. :P

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  19. Re:Who cares... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Actually what I want is for them to make a Palm OS based device that has all the normal organaser stuff plus:
    • phone and
    • camera
    in the same device, and ideally
    • GPS
    • bluetooth
    • 802.11b
    • 64MB RAM
    while remaining organiser (not laptop) sized
    maybe Handspring's next product might come close?

    and before anyone else says it no don't imagine a beowulf cluster of them.
  20. Don't knock the resolution. by dsandler · · Score: 1

    Seriously. The double-density screen substantially improves legibility of type (rendered at the same optical size) on-screen, especially for older eyes than yours or mine.

    1. Re:Don't knock the resolution. by levik · · Score: 1

      I wasn't knocking the resolution so much as the processor specs. Do you really need a 400Mhz processor to drive a 320x320 screen?

      --
      Ñ'
    2. Re:Don't knock the resolution. by twiztidlojik · · Score: 1

      ...Do you really need a 425 MHz processor with 8 rendering pipelines and 128 MB of ram to run a 1024x768 screen?

      My theory is, the faster the processor, the more programmers will take advantage of the speed.

      (not a troll)

      --
      I will now redundantly add my name to the end of my post. You know, in case you forgot me or something.
    3. Re:Don't knock the resolution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. The faster the processor, the looser the code. Just take a look at the responsiveness of the original 16MHz Palms, vs. a 200MHz WinCE/Pocket PC device.

    4. Re:Don't knock the resolution. by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Especially when it is the Palm OS driving it- what is the use of a 400 MHz CPU in a PDA if the OS ls so archetecturally limited?

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  21. Tungsten = Heavyrock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's worth noting that the word Tungsten comes from the swedish words tung and sten meaning 'heavy' and 'rock'. Heavyrock C, anyone? If you don't believe me, check out Merriam-Webster.

  22. Internetnews review by Jacco+de+Leeuw · · Score: 4, Funny
    We've also worked hard to extend the battery life to give you a full 8-hour day of work on one 1500-amp charge."

    1500 Amp? Yikes! :-)

    --
    -------
    Warning: Slashdot may contain traces of nuts.
    1. Re:Internetnews review by Sporkinum · · Score: 2, Funny

      The new Palm Tungsten Inert Gas welder.

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    2. Re:Internetnews review by stak · · Score: 1

      I vote for taser like functionality.

    3. Re:Internetnews review by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

      You have that backwards. Tasers use high frequency, high voltage, low amperage.

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    4. Re:Internetnews review by machine+of+god · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it charges really quickly.

  23. Extra features not a bad thing by amnesty · · Score: 4, Informative

    You know, I've agreed with your sentiment for a long time. But recently I bought a Sony Clie SJ33 as a birthday gift for probably the most amazing, beautiful girl in the world, and after seeing her daily use with it, I've changed my mind on this.

    I started with Palms ever since I got a Palm 1000. You know, that boxy dark-grey thing that had 128kb of memory long before Palm realized that independent developers would write thousands upon thousands of applications for the platform. Back then, they did one thing and one thing well--organize. Finally, there was some device I could hold in my hand that could actually improve my day-to-day life. Something that wasn't merely a toy but a real, useful tool.

    I eventually moved up to a Palm Vx for the 8mb RAM, LiIon battery and small form-factor. To me those were great features that complemented the key point of it all--to organize. I loved my Palm Vx and shook my head with disgust as the Palms that came after disappointed me. The next Palms traded battery life for fancy colour screens and suddenly you were paying extra for features that didn't matter.

    Well, this Clie SJ33 has changed my mind. Now they are actually coming out non-organizer features that are actually useful. The MP3 playback integrated with the Palm alone makes this handheld amazing. Sure, you can carry around your Palm, music playing device and cellphone. I've done that before, but I always had heavy, bulging and uncomfortable pockets as a result. The best solution I've seen is more than three years old, and it's the eholster which tucks your miniature high-tech devices under your arms. Unfortunately they aren't actually usable because they actually look like real gun-holsters and pulling out a PDA has made a few people around me jump as it looked like I was drawing a gun. Practical, but doesn't work too well in this post 9-11 society. This girl that I speak of prefers wearing pocketless skirts over bulding pants, so integrating the music player with a small form-factored Palm works perfectly for her.

    Digital cameras on a Palm also work very well, found on the Zire 71 mentioned in this Slashdot article and also the memory stick cameras, not to mention the built in one on the Sony CLIE PEGNX70V or PEGNZ90. Sure, they are barely 1 megapixel, but they are a lot of fun. Basically if you're like me, you're going to have your Palm on you at all times. But I only think to bring my camera to social events. So now you have the ability to capture anything, anytime as you go through life. See a funny subway ad that you want to show your girlfriend? See Natalie Portman walking down the street and want to take a picture with her? End up spontaneously at a party and want to take some pictures? Sure the quality won't be up there, but you can still capture some memories at unexpected moments.

    I could go on with the many more features available, but my point being that mere organizing changed my life, but now they are adding features that can also improve my day-to-day life, and everyday these features dive cheaper and cheaper.

    1. Re:Extra features not a bad thing by lowmagnet · · Score: 1

      But recently I bought a Sony Clie SJ33 as a birthday gift for probably the most amazing, beautiful girl in the world, and after seeing her daily use with it, I've changed my mind on this.

      Changed your mind on your lady or on the handheld?

      --
      Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!
    2. Re:Extra features not a bad thing by lowmagnet · · Score: 1

      Practical, but doesn't work too well in this post 9-11 society.

      Now we know you are Jon Katz in disguise!

      --
      Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!
  24. Very dissappointing.. by Scyber · · Score: 1

    Palm seemed to have been backing BT pretty strong prior to this.

    The worst part is that I heard that the BT SD card doesn't work with Palm OS 5.

    1. Re:Very dissappointing.. by Stalus · · Score: 1

      Well, they're advertising their BT SD card as an accessory to the C, so I would think that works.

    2. Re:Very dissappointing.. by neilkraft · · Score: 1

      it doesnt work with os 5 or the tungsten c. i'm really pissed because i bought the c thinking it would do both

  25. Re:Who cares... by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What I want is color, 640x480 screen, wireless, with VNC, ethereal, netcat, shell, ssh, web browser, etc. In short, the ultimate lanalyzer, and under $300. That's what I'm holding out for, the ultamite network troubleshooter.

    --
    You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
  26. Don't panic! by GQuon · · Score: 1
    Perhaps this static memory would include music files, and books from Project Gutenberg that are in the public domain.

    I guess this would make the PDAs akin to the Hitchikers Guide to the Universe.


    If I know those Vogon bastards, they'll make an alliance with the RIAA, the MPAA and Microsoft, and make their poetry public domain to kill us open source people.
    But then, public domain books could aid terrorism, so then the Vogons will have the US government on their backs.

    BTW, my edition still says
    "Earth: Mostly harmless"
    when is the new updates comming in on the sub-etha net? I think my clone complies with the RFCs.
    --
    Irene KHAAAAAAN!
  27. Re:Stupid name for a PDA by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1
  28. Shoulda bought a zaurus then. by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

    ssh client available, pop/imap client, synchronises over tcp/ip, so can sync with your PC over usb, wifi, ethernet etc. Has a CF camera, can act as a camera server.

    Having said that and having been impressed with the connectability and flexibility of having a linux box as a palmtop, the Psion Series 5 and Revo are miles better as personal productivity tools. Try creating a pie chart in the Zaurus spreadsheet, try pasting the pie chart into the word processor. Try adding voice notes to a document, to a presentation. The software which comes with the Zaurus is fairly limited.

    It's damned near criminal that Psion killed their consumer range in preference to Symbian. I can't get anything with a decent keyboard now.

    Still, the Zaurus is only 180 quid plus VAT at the moment.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
    1. Re:Shoulda bought a zaurus then. by EvlOvrLrd · · Score: 1

      I had thought about the Zaurus when I thought about upgrading from my N760C, but it really didn't seem like an upgrade, rather than a lateral move. Plus, I couldn't find out if I could still use Graffiti.

      Plus, I found a Clie NX70V on eBay that I got lucky on, for $227.

      Advantage is that I wouldn't have to upgrade my Memeory Sticks or reader. The camera is gratis, that would only be used to take quick snapshots for documentation or such.

      --


      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear to be bright. Until you hear them speak.
    2. Re:Shoulda bought a zaurus then. by RevAaron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed, the Zaurus sucks at a number of things. The disapointment and shock I experienced moving from an Apple Newton MP2100 to the Zaurus was quite gigantic.

      Some of those things you mention may not seem like actions most people would perform very often... But one thing I've not been able to do worth a damn on my Z is take notes. The built-in software is worthless, and I have yet to find a third-party app which can do the job. It's kind of funny, but mostly sad- what the Newton did so perfectly, and Pocket PC does good enough, the Zaurus fails entirely.

      I am not talking about little memos, but real notes. I am a college student, and have been using a MP2100 for taking all of my notes in lecture for 4 years now. Since the Zaurus has no real handwriting recognition, and not even decent character recognition (the built-in CR is way too slow when writing letters), a notes app that takes notes in drawn form is a must. If anyone knows of an app, or future app for the Zaurus that has the following features, I'd be willing to pay $50-

      1. Be able to organize notes. A monolithic list of all the damned notes on the PDA, without any sort of sorting or organization is worthless.

      2. Have a continuous scrolling canvas for writing notes, not something fixed at either the size of the Zaurus screen (as with IQNotes) or fixed at some pixel value (as in DrawPad).

      3. Have the notes stored in some sort of vector format, not straight bitmaps. A 5 page note, approx 220x1500 in pixel size should not be 60+ KB.

      4. The app should be able to keep up with the drawing. That is, in DrawPad, you cannot even draw a circle without it being recognized as a 12-sided polygon. I don't know, maybe the Qtopia events system sucks or is very slow.

      Optional feature, but it would be very nice:
      5. Be able to take both text and drawn notes in the same note. See the built-in PocketPC notes or Newton notes for an example.

      Overall, my Zaurus experience has taught me that Qt/Embedded is really poor for writing pen-based applications. It works wonderfully if you're just wanting to write an app that works about the same as it would on the desktop, but with a design better fitting the small screen, but as soon as you want to write something that really fits the way one interacts with a PDA, it seems to really lack.

      Dynapad, my own OS/OE for PDAs already has a Notes app that is light-years ahead of anything on the Zaurus. Luckily, Dynapad runs on the Zaurus (and faster than on a similarily CPU'd iPAQ!), but until other apps in Dynapad are more functional than on the Zaurus (which they are fast approaching- not to brag, it's just the built-in Z apps are not hard to beat), I'd really like a Qtopia solution.

      (Anyone want to buy me Z for $200, incl shipping? Only two weeks old... rev aaron {at} hotmail {dot} com )

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  29. ARM is a great thing but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    POSE allows for a program to run in a virtual device, complete with virtual hardware that, to the software, is indistinguishable from the real deal. Right now, I either need a physical device for testing ARM, or dredge up a Win32 box and use it, but then I have to write special support code because the simulator is actually i386 code instead of ARM. Plus, it only works for those blessed with Codewarrior, so anybody who uses gcc(prc-tools) is out in the cold. Before Palm gets to quick to release new devices they should update POSE so they can get more ARM-native programs.

    Just my opinion tho'

  30. Just like HDTV by gr8_phk · · Score: 1
    " 640x480 VGA video playback -- interesting since the screen is 320x320."

    That's just like going to a store and looking at all those "HDTVs". They don't advertise resolutions, and when asked, the sales pud seems to think they can all handle all resolutions. "when you switch channels it says 1080i right on screen". When you tell him that's just what it's receiving - not displaying - he gives a blank stare, then says we can go look up specs on the internet.

  31. BT SD cards don't work in Palm OS 5 by Scyber · · Score: 1

    Or at least that is what I remember hearing. But it could just be because there was never a need as the Tungsten T had builtin BT.

  32. Evil bit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when is the new updates comming in on the sub-etha net? I think my clone complies with the RFCs.

    No it doesn't! The newest update required RFC3514 compliance to work. You need to download new firmware. Who made your Guide clone?

  33. Illegal in Michigan? by Royster · · Score: 1

    Since the VPN client could obscure both the origin and destination of Internet traffic.

    Bad Palm!

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous sig, unfortunately the sig limit is too small to contain i
    1. Re:Illegal in Michigan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah well like we say in the Big Ten conference, Muck Fichigan!

  34. Looking back, when I say "has" CF camera by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

    I mean, a CF camera is available for it... separately.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  35. Sirius Cybernetics Corporation by GQuon · · Score: 1

    Who made your Guide clone?
    The Sirius Cybernetics Corporation, of course. The marketing division claims that the lack of updates "Is a feature".
    I should have bought an original Guide.

    --
    Irene KHAAAAAAN!
  36. Ugly by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I may be crazy, but I don't want a miniature keypad that mimics Graffiti! If your interaction system is designed around pen-based text input and you get rid of the pen-based text input isn't it time to re-design the interface?!

    Graffiti is easy to learn and becomes accurate with use - I don't want a keyboard in my pocket.

    --
    That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    1. Re:Ugly by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I tend to agree. I'm a Newton 2100 veteran, and always found that a pen based system - if done properly - has certain features that are impossible to equal using a keyboard/pointer combination. Pen interfaces have drawbacks too, but I still have never found a match for the Newton (paper excepted) when it comes to note taking on the go. My Tungsten T has Bluetooth as it's main USP for me - Palm's implementation JUST WORKS - and this finally makes a mobile email solution for me that hits the spot. The Palm just chats away to my Nokia 8910 in my pocket via Bluetooth, GPRS and Orange do the rest.

      But a Bluetooth enabled neo-Newton with a note-takable sized screen and Mac OSX would be the product I've been waiting for since the newton 2100 died.

      Apple could do it EASILY with current technology - but will they? So Palm get my money until something better appears.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  37. Some Bluetooth by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Well I happen to have Bluetooth on my laptop. Would be nice to use and I suspect would be easier on batteries than 802.11b for palm type devices. Plus it would be nifty to have my cell, palm and laptop all able to communicate without any wires or other silliness. (too bad the software on my laptop, mozilla in this case, isn't up to the job yet)

    But you are right in that it is definitely less common. Most folks would have to get a Bluetooth USB key or something similar to make it work. Not a big problem but an added expense and possibly mildly redundant. After all, while the two wireless standards are designed for different purposes, one has to admit there is a lot of potential overlap.

    I've suspected for some time that Bluetooth may not catch on, not because it isn't good, but because it overlaps too much with 802.11b in capabilities. I fear Firewire may one day suffer the same fate. True, it's better than USB in many ways but USB seems to have better mind share. Network externalities like that seem to push such technology towards a single platform, even if it isn't the best one for a given job.

    1. Re:Some Bluetooth by Richy_T · · Score: 1
      Uh, what does Mozilla have to do with anything? Surely bluetooth integration would/should be handled by the OS?


      Rich

    2. Re:Some Bluetooth by sjbe · · Score: 1

      Mozilla is my address book, email and calendar. While it is true that bluetooth doesn't directly matter, since my addressbook and calendar cannot easily synch with any given PDA, bluetooth (or any other connection for that matter) doesn't really help much.

      Sorry, that wasn't entirely clear of me...

    3. Re:Some Bluetooth by Richy_T · · Score: 1
      Ah, so what is needed is a multi-protocol standard address/calendar sync interface (that can work over bluetooth, TCP/IP, serial, USB etc) in the same way that twain works for scanners. Then Mozilla needs to implement *that*.


      Gotcha :)


      Rich

  38. Absolutely! by metamatic · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm thinking about getting a Sony with a 480x320 screen, but even those are kinda small.

    I can't believe nobody makes a handheld with a screen the size of a paperback book. I don't even care what it runs, so long as it's not WinCE...

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    1. Re:Absolutely! by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      Just slightly smaller than a paperback would be better. I've often found that th average paperback will perfectly exactly just not fit into most coat pockets.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
  39. Working links by GQuon · · Score: 1

    Wolfram, not "Volfram".
    history

    --
    Irene KHAAAAAAN!
  40. Is VPN really VPN without IPSec? by mac123 · · Score: 2

    The VPN capability of the Tungsten-C is PPTP only....no IPSec capability.

    Is this really useful?

    1. Re:Is VPN really VPN without IPSec? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you have a pptp server it is. Don't forget that windows already comes with a pptp client.

    2. Re:Is VPN really VPN without IPSec? by squintin · · Score: 1

      There is other software that does ipsec

      look at the following site:
      http://palm.com/wireless/vpn/

  41. That's too easy by uradu · · Score: 1

    Googling returns as one of the first hits http://www.palmpilotupgrade.com/prices.html.

    1. Re:That's too easy by digitect · · Score: 1

      Yes, indeed that's the exact service I used. Killer response time and quality, would do it again for the same 50 bucks I spent two years ago. (Just the 8Mb RAM, didn't go with the flash ROM.)

      --
      There is no need to use a SlashDot sig for SEO...
  42. No more GOOD PDA's out there? by ErikJson · · Score: 1

    I own a Palm Vx. I charge it once every two weeks. I use it as a calendar, as a phonebook and to ssh to my machine at home using my Nokia when I absolutely need to (20 column terminal... ).

    My Palm is a great little thing but it's getting old and worn down. I need to replace it soon and I can't seem to find any alternatives out there. I want 8+ MB, good PIM-software and AT LEAST the same battery life as the Palm Vx. Bluetooth would be nice as my cell phone has that. I don't care about color screens, mp3-players and digital cameras. What I DO care about is battery life. It's NOT tolerable that my calendar dies because I forgot to put it in the cradle yesterday. Any suggestions?

    1. Re:No more GOOD PDA's out there? by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1
      I agree. There's pretty slim pickings out there. The only ones I can think of are the Handera 330 and the Clie SL10. Both of these use AAA batteries (4 in the 330, 2 in the SL10) and are monochrome (240x320 for the 330, 320x320 for the SL10 - which works better for some apps since it can do 160x160 as well) so they get great battery life. Just get a couple sets of NIMH batteries and swap them every few weeks. I have both of them, though the 330 has a broken screen from when I was hit by a truck. I don't know about how good the PIM software is, though, as I've never tried it.

      Besides the above, if you can find something that is monochrome, it's a good bet that it'll get decent battery life. Or maybe just something that can be run without a backlit screen - I've got a GP32 handheld, and it gets good battery life (>10 hours? I haven't really tested it...) despite having an ARM processor, stereo sound, and a beautiful PDA-sized (but landscape) reflective colour screen that puts the Gameboy Advance to shame.

  43. Don't *just* knock the resolution by fmaxwell · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My theory is, the faster the processor, the more programmers will take advantage of the speed.

    And the more they take advantage of the speed, the shorter the battery life.

    High speed processors, color screens, and bright backlighting all contribute to shorter battery life. When you are miles from home, the batteries are dead, and you have no way to sync your data back on to the device, you'll wish Palm had gone for long battery life instead of glity features.

    Another point to consider: One of the strong points of Palm's handhelds has been the tremendous quantity of software available. You could take an app written for an original Palm Pilot and run it on a Palm Pilot Pro, Palm III, Palm M100, Handspring Visor, etc. The differences were largely limited to quantity of RAM and physical dimensions of the device. Sure, there were minor CPU speed variances, but it wasn't a whole new CPU at 10x-30x the clock speed. Apps for a Palm with a 400mhz ARM CPU with a 320x320 color screen won't run on the older Palms. Older apps will be unappealing to someone who has plonked down a big chunk of cash for a color, hi-res Palm. An app that requires the new Tungston C's 400mhz ARM CPU won't run fast enough on the Zire 71's 144mhz CPU.

    If Palm was going to change things, they should have done it all at once, going from the original standard to a new one. Now they've got a current product line with 16mhz Dragonball CPUs, 33mhz Dragonball CPUs, 144mhz TI ARM CPUs, 400mhz Intel ARM CPUs, 160x160 monochrome screens, 160x160 grayscale screens, 160x160 color screens, and 320x320 color screens. They've really lost it.

    1. Re:Don't *just* knock the resolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the older apps on the newer devices aren't so bad if they don't assume a 160x160 screen. As was previously stated, the same amount of text, input boxes, etc. is displayed, but at a higher resolution. Think of it as increasing the dpi, not the size.

      It makes text, etc. much more legible, and when possible, lets you see text a much smaller sizes.

      Of course, you really do start to notice the lack of color in some apps, but color has been around far longer than 320x320 screens, so most major apps are already in color.

      Jason

    2. Re:Don't *just* knock the resolution by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      Actually, the older apps on the newer devices aren't so bad if they don't assume a 160x160 screen.

      But many of the newer apps won't run on the older Palms. Many apps, especially graphics apps, had to, and did, assume a 160x160 screen.

      Of course, you really do start to notice the lack of color in some apps, but color has been around far longer than 320x320 screens, so most major apps are already in color.

      Yes, and there has been a significant drop-off in new apps that run on all machines across the product line. The complications of multiple resolutions, CPUs, color vs. non-color, clock speeds, etc. means that developing PalmOS apps is not as easy as it used to be. And, when one develops one, there is either a lot more work to make it device-independent or it appeals to a much more limited audience because it only runs on a small percentace of the machines.

  44. And a whopping 16 MB of storage....or not by Alcimedes · · Score: 0, Troll

    What the hell. Reading over their tech specs it flat out says that the device has 16MB of storage, brags about it in fact. Right up until you click on the little number after that factoid to see it only has 13MB of storage. THEN SAY IT HAS 13! Is it that hard to just tell the damn truth?

    1. Re:And a whopping 16 MB of storage....or not by Trillan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It likely has about 3MB of extra applications. My Clie NR70V is similiar.

  45. We dont need speed. by HanzoSan · · Score: 1



    What we need right now is good internet connectivity.

    Speed is one thing, but the problem right now is the networking abilities, a portabble device is supposed to connect to your network, its not designed to be some kinda portable computer, if you need power pull out your laptop.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  46. Who'll be first with "Build your Own"? by dschuetz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd like to know who's going to be the first to market with a "Build your Own PDA" system. It seems that a lot of the discussion today is centered around why this or that feature is or isn't included. Ultimately, it probably comes down to some combination of price / power / volume.

    So why can't Palm (or someone else? Handspring, are you listening?) build a fairly modular inner chassis, slap on different plastic shells, and allow people to select which features they want?

    For example:

    Size:
    * Regular (1.7 cm thick) [$200]
    * Thin (1 cm thick) [$300]

    Display:
    * Traditional - 320x320 (with grafitti area)
    * QVGA - 320x480 (virtual grafitti area)
    * No Grafitti - 320x320 (with thumb keyboard)

    Standard options (any or all can be removed):
    * IR
    * BlueTooth
    * SD/MMC slot

    Major Expansion (not avail on thin model) [+ $150]
    + 802.11
    + GSM
    + CDMA
    + CF
    + Camera

    Minor expansion: [+ $50]
    * 2nd SD slot
    * mini-SD
    * XD
    * Audio chip (for music playback)

    To do this, they'd need:

    * 3 CPU cores (corresponding to display options)

    * Four cases (thick and thin models, with and without thumb keyboard) with knockouts for different options

    * Internal "expansion card" space for WAN wireless, Camera (like the old memory card space was)

    * Second internal expansion space for additional SD, mini-SD, XD, or audio playback

    * Removable internal daughterboards for IR, BT, and the main SD slot

    I really don't think this is so impossible. You'd have 39 (27 regular and 12 thin) standard configurations, and I'd bet only 5 or so would be really popular (and can be mass-produced in advance and sold at retail). Drop XD, mini-SD, and maybe CDMA, and you're down to only 24 configurations (18 and 6).

    Including removal of standard options obviously increases the number, but very few customers will be likely to take that route (think "Palms used in a classified environment"). Include a grayscale option and double the count, but realistically, you can keep a separate, non-modular, grayscale model for $100 as a stocking-stuffer target).

    Finally, you could even sell some of these as after-market items, so people could buy the basic model today, and then add the camera later with just a little screwdriver and some patience.

    Is this so crazy?

    1. Re:Who'll be first with "Build your Own"? by dvk · · Score: 1

      I can't comment on how crazy it is, although IMHO this is not as easy engineering-wise as you think for hardware. Also, software would be a problem too in terms of supoprting those options, for example QVGA on Handera required their new version of PalmOS.

      However, one place where you're dead wrong is the grayscale part - unless and until someone comes up with a color screen that doesn't eat up batteries any faster than grayscale one, i'm opting for grayscale, and i'm sure many other people too. I don't need color for PIM functionality, nor for reading books on my Handera. And battery life is very important.

      What i WOULD like, would be ClearType support on Palms for either color or grayscale screens... then again, i'd like world peace too :)

      -DVK

      --
      "The right to figure things out for yourself is the only true freedom everyone shares. Go use it"-R.A.Heinlein
    2. Re:Who'll be first with "Build your Own"? by Sandor+at+the+Zoo · · Score: 1

      I really don't think this is so impossible. You'd have 39 (27 regular and 12 thin) standard configurations, and I'd bet only 5 or so would be really popular

      Is this so crazy?

      Let's pretend that this is a stunningly great idea to have 39 "standard" configurations of which maybe 5 would sell. Oddly enough, nobody's doing anything like this.

      What are the chances that everyone else is crazy, and you're the only sane one with this great idea?

    3. Re:Who'll be first with "Build your Own"? by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      Man, you'll be happy when you upgrade...reading in true black and white (not green monochrome) is so much easier on the eyes!
      I was so glad when I got my IIIc :)

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    4. Re:Who'll be first with "Build your Own"? by dschuetz · · Score: 1

      Let's pretend that this is a stunningly great idea to have 39 "standard" configurations of which maybe 5 would sell. [....] What are the chances that everyone else is crazy, and you're the only sane one with this great idea?

      Judging from past experience, the chances I'm the crazy one are pretty good.

      However, I still wonder if there isn't a possibility here. I mean, Palm's selling, what, 5 different color models, right now. And people are already complaining about many of the feature exclusions -- want this, get that, want both, sorry.

      Is this really so different from what Dell or Apple do? How many different ways (CPUs, memory, video hardware, hard drive space, etc.) can you configure a Mac G4? I'd bet many more than 39.

      No, I still think there's merit. I'm sure the beancounters and smart people at Palm, Sony, and Handspring would agree, but that the merit doesn't yet outweigh the costs, and that's why nobody's done it so far.

      Also, it wasn't until about the last 12 months that we had so many things we wanted *in* our Palms -- how long have we had 802.11, BlueTooth, cameras, GSM phones integrated? (Oh, I can't believe I forgot this one -- GPS.) We're only now reaching the point that there are more desireable options than can fit in one box, and so we're only now seeing mutually exclusive featuresets in different products.

  47. Zire processor by Drakonian · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure how many of you know this but I only found this out the other day and think it's pretty cool. This Zire 71 (and some other new Palms I think) ses a TI OMAP processor which is a C55x DSP with a ARM core on chip. So it's able to do fast DSP routines and fast microprocessor routines.

    --
    Random is the New Order.
  48. Hire a professional. by HanzoSan · · Score: 1



    You suck at marketing, you saturate the field too much.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  49. pda or... by Luke+Skyewalker · · Score: 1

    ... corporate espionage. seriously, besides the "fun factor" of having a camera built into the zire 71, why would you put such a thing into it knowing that it could be used for stealing corporate secrets?

    generally, i use a pda to store appointments, phone numbers, addresses and notes. i don't need a camera or phone or any other high tech gadgetry built in. when will palm and others get this? i use my pda for just that - a personal digital assistant. not a personal photographer, personal communicator, or anything else.

    in fact, the only rational i have for this that the cheap, garbage camera they have built into each unit really only cost them 10 bucks, but they can charge another 100 bucks for the added "functionality".

  50. Can I ask you all for some advice? by HanzoSan · · Score: 1



    I want to buy a PDA, I'd like to be able to get online, check my email, get icq/aim/msn msgs, play the occassional mp3, and take notes.

    I'm a college student, I dont really want to spend $500 on a PDA, but I like the WiFi ability.

    What are my options? The Zire71 is perfect in design and features but it lacks the internet so what good is this?

    Is there an expansion slot? can I buy a WiFi card with this device? Or else what are my options? I want to be able to connect remotely to my desktop and run or mess with applications, upload and download files to it, little stuff like that.

    Whats the best PDA for a college student?

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:Can I ask you all for some advice? by steveha · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Your requirements are pretty stiff for a PDA. I use a PDA for these things: appointments, phone numbers and email addresses, todo lists, notes, reading novels, playing games, taking notes, and listening to music. Almost any PDA will do all these things well (maybe not the music part; lots of PDAs don't do music).

      You could buy a Microsoft-based PDA, a PocketPC, and that might meet your specs. However, I hate Windows CE, much preferring the Palm system.

      I have a Palm Tungsten T, and I love it. But there is no 802.11b for it yet. It should otherwise meet your specs, including the ability to play MP3 and Ogg files.

      Personally, I think you would be better served with a really compact laptop. If you really want to check mail, upload/download files, listen to music, remotely run things on your desktop... a laptop really is the way to go. A Lindows Notebook PC is $800, and you can always install some other OS if you don't like Lindows. You can check eBay for a used tiny notebook. You could probably get a Libretto cheap, and that's really tiny!

      You might even want to get a NEC MobilePro. That's a Windows CE based subnotebook: it's like a really big PDA with a really big screen and a really big keyboard. Jerry Pournelle uses one to take notes, and he gave it his "Cold, Dead Fingers" award (as in, if you want to take it away from him you will have to pry his cold dead fingers from around it).

      If you insist on something in your pocket, maybe you should check out the Zaurus PDAs. Since they run real Linux, you can make them do lots of stuff, and I hear they are great. I've never used one yet so I don't know.

      Good luck.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    2. Re:Can I ask you all for some advice? by HanzoSan · · Score: 1


      well no I dont need a powerful CPU, a huge harddrive , etc etc.

      I need something better than a toy however, which is what most PDAs are. Why cant I pay bills and buy stuff with my PDA? why cant I check my email? sure its cool to take notes, but a PDA should do momre than just let you take notes.

      Zaurus is good, its only problem is,its not good at taking notes.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    3. Re:Can I ask you all for some advice? by tchapin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My vote is for getting one of the combo phone/PDAs. I have a Kyocera 6035 and love it. Of course, the 7135 is out now, which has a color screen and can also play MP3s, but it's also around $600.

      You can pick up the 6035 for under $200 if you look. The two things about it that I want now are: more memory (it has only 8MB), and a better screen (it's one of the black/ green ones).

      I recently purchased a hard drive-based MP3 player, which is fantastic. I can't imagine going back to being limited to one or a few albums at any one time. So, for me, integration of an MP3 player into a PDA isn't really going to be useful for listening to music. Perhaps for using MP3s for ring tones, but that's about it.

      The same goes for digital cameras. Unless the storage capacity grows quite a bit and the resolution grows as well, I'd just rather have a standalone camera. My current 1.3MP has 256 MB of storage, which is enough for a week's vacation anywhere without needing to bring a computer or multiple memory cards.

      With my combo phone/PDA, I can use the phone as a modem for the PDA functions (Avantgo, web, PQAs, email, etc), dial phone numbers from within any of my palm applications (address book, memos, Vindigo, etc), do "yellow pages" searches (and dial the number directly, get maps, and directions), access AIM via SMS, and a whole bunch of things.

      Sure, the device is a bit large, but it beats carrying around two devices (phone & PDA).

      Another feature that I like about the 6035 is the hard keyboard. I hate touch-screens for dialing phones; you can't do it w/out looking at it...

      Todd

      --
      -- !todd erases a red dot! I steal music on the internet.
    4. Re:Can I ask you all for some advice? by steveha · · Score: 1

      well no I dont need a powerful CPU, a huge harddrive , etc etc.

      Nor did I say you need them. The MobilePro has no hard drive and a weak CPU. An old Libretto from eBay has a small hard drive and a weak CPU. But both of those have relatively large screens (at least compared to a PDA), and touch-typable keyboards, and expandability (such as a PC Card slot). You want to do things like remotely control your computer, those features will be nice.

      Why cant I pay bills and buy stuff with my PDA? why cant I check my email?

      You can do all that, with a network enabled PDA that does 802.11b... but you will be doing it on a tiny screen. I used to have a Libretto with a 6" screen that was 640x480, and that's about as small as I'd like to go for web surfing.

      Also you said you don't want to spend too much money. You will pay far more for the newest and shiniest PDA than for an old Libretto from eBay.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    5. Re:Can I ask you all for some advice? by NightWhistler · · Score: 1

      I don't know what you are talking about, but even the most simple Palm can do email and webbrowsing.
      It wasn't included in the "normal" Zire, but you could easily download an open source mail app from palmopensource.com.

      --
      PageTurner Reader: open-source e-reader for Android with cloudsync. http://pageturner-reader.org
    6. Re:Can I ask you all for some advice? by HanzoSan · · Score: 1


      I want a tiny screen, small enough to fit into my pocket, I dont need a big screen for my cellphone so why do i need a big screen on my pda?

      Ill check out the libretto

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    7. Re:Can I ask you all for some advice? by HanzoSan · · Score: 1



      how are you going to do email with no wireless connection? duh! I could write my own SMTP based email software, I'm talking about hardware.

      If i had the app, how would I get online if theres no wifi?

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    8. Re:Can I ask you all for some advice? by Anti-HanzoSan · · Score: 0

      I don't know what you are talking about

      Don't let that worry you - he doesn't know what he's talking about either.

  51. So what can I get under $500? by HanzoSan · · Score: 1



    I'm not going to spend $500 on a PDA, thats ridiculous, $300 is reasonable and maybe $50 for a wifi card.

    $500 is too expensive as much as I want 802.11b, I'd rather just be ale to expand on the Zire later on w hen I have an extra $50-100 and use something else in the meantime.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:So what can I get under $500? by twalk · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't pay $500 for a PDA either, but...

      Dell Axim: $350 for 400Mhz, 64M, physically larger screen, 2 slots.

      T|C: $500 for 400Mhz, 64M, higher resolution screen, wifi, KB, smaller and lighter.

      Add a wifi card (~$100), and a memory card (~$25, to make up for PPC's more wasteful memory usage), and they aren't far off in price.

      Seems to be pretty price/performance competitive to me.

  52. Ports to PocketPC hardware? by dschuetz · · Score: 1

    Speaking of multiple chip architectures, has anyone managed to get PalmOS hacked into any PocketPC box? I know there's been a port of coPilot (or something like it) to PocketPC, but I mean has anyone actually hacked basic IO drivers together and gotten a PalmOS image to run directly (or even within a micro-emulation shell) on PocketPC Hardware?

    1. Re:Ports to PocketPC hardware? by twalk · · Score: 1

      The latest version of PalmOS5 now has support for the 320x240 screens on PPC hardware and some other stuff. A couple of the asian licensees wanted to produce one box that could handle both PalmOS and PPC.

      So in theory, you could see an offical PalmSource version of this in the US at some time.

    2. Re:Ports to PocketPC hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Augh! Don't use the acronym "PPC!" You're making us PowerPC-using Mac-lovers nauseous! (Whatever happened to "WinCE" anyway?)

  53. Palm Zire 71 Review by nacs · · Score: 2, Informative

    There's a Palm Zire 71 Review at PDABuzz.

    --
    "I filter at +6, and have yet to miss out on an important comment." (#822545)
  54. That's KARMA, BABY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Serves ya right, ya goddamned sniper!

  55. Re:And why would I need anything except... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And why would I need anything except a HP or TI calculator. It can store data, it can do calculation, and the most amazing thing is that it can let your programming it. Wow~~ I think in this world with HP or TI calculators it is already enough.

    I really wonder why there's company go built something like P4, Athlon, etc... Even a 8086 is already more than what I demand. Never able to understand how they can make profit.

  56. m500 by DannyiMac · · Score: 1

    Well, I'm off to eBay to sell my Palm m500...

    --
    - Danny
  57. 3650 Remote Spycam by henele · · Score: 1
    You'll find with most Palms are connected to the net via pay-per-MB GPRS, so high-bandwidth application isn't really going to be too popular..

    However, you can get close to what your asking (in an efficient manner) with MMS Cam (link could well be broken, but you can do another search). With this software you send a specific text to your sneakily located 3650 (Nokia VGA Camera/Video phone) and it will email or MMS to a specified address/number whatever is in it's sights. It's close to what your thinking, and won't inflate your phonebill...

  58. Palm sturdiness and quick access. by willutah · · Score: 1

    I wish Palm would instead focus resources on making a more rugged PDA that could be dropped repeatedly without breaking. At the same time it should be easy to pull it out of your pocket and get to the screen quickly (with minimal time spent pulling it out of a case, fumbling with a stylus, etc.) For a Palm to me useful, you have to carry it almost all of the time, and it needs to be quick access. The camera has good gee-whiz factor, but probably makes it easier to break overall. Also, the joystick seems like a potentially less sturdy item.

  59. Everywhere? by barnaclebarnes · · Score: 1

    So you are telling me you can roam the entire city of Boston without losing a connection via WiFi? Not likely.

    Also I wasn't saying that there are Bluetooth hotspots, what I was saying is that you use your Bluetooth to talk with your mobile phone which in turn connects to a GPRS network. The GPRS network is far more widespread than WiFi and fills in all/most of the areas. having this access is key for a mobile worker. /b

    --
    [Please type your sig here.]
    1. Re:Everywhere? by HanzoSan · · Score: 1



      Actually you can, this is a college town, most of Boston is wired, you can go all around Cambridge, Harvard Square or anywhere and be connected.

      GPRS is nice but I hear it costs money. WiFi hotspots are free and yes they are all over Boston.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    2. Re:Everywhere? by neilkraft · · Score: 1

      i agree but the really nasty thing is that the bluetooth sdio card wont work with the c. it sucks

  60. Piece of what? by steveha · · Score: 1

    Perhaps by Palm OS 6, the POS will both be good enough

    Now, now, PalmOS may not be perfect, but there's no reason to call it a "POS".

    steveha

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  61. Note to Palm: by hdc · · Score: 1

    Take the Zire 71, give us a WiFi card that works with it, dump the USB for Bluetooth sync built in and you've got me buying. I really like the Zire - metal case is solid, I won't buy a PDA now without it. I'm sold on it since my Palm V which I still use. Keep the internal built in rechargeable battery. Give me these options on that Zire model at the same price point and I'll replace my V. 90% of the way there. *I like the Zaurus but I'm not looking for a laptop replacement in my PDA. Its overkill for my needs. Plus its syncing options are a kludge at best. PalmOS does exactly what I need it to and it has since I bought a USR PalmPilot years back.

  62. Re:Some Bluetooth -- iSync by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yeah, there's something out there right now called iSync from Apple!

    Works over Bluetooth, USB, WiFi to sync your address book, calendar and stuff!

  63. This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    <irony level="sarcastic">
    Ha! I think everybody already got spammed with this info by Palm earlier!
    </irony>


    :-p
  64. [OT] troll reponse (lets get the facts straight) by ardiri · · Score: 1

    author of the only Palm virus

    it wasn't a virus, so, you probably need to get your facts straight on this one.

    if you ever saw it, it was actually labelled as "Crack 1.1" [i didn't label it like this - but, thats how it ended up floating on efnet irc channels]. eventually, it came down to "if you run this, you are 100% intending to crack the program, that is, do something illegal". if you got burnt, bad luck. the correct term for such a little program is trojan horse, and, it required the user to intentfully do something illegal before it did anything.

    hang out in the Palm channels on EfNet and give it out to people looking

    actually, i was banned from #pdawarez - and, i wasn't the messanger for passing this onto other warez kiddies on irc. the user who posted it went under the name "mac" (and, he doesn't do irc anymore - so, good luck finding him).

    he told the media a different story

    actually, i told the truth. it was one of my more 'evil' thinking friends who though the discussion to make it go further would be more entertaining.. trust me, being hoarded by reporters isn't entertaining at all. the whole ordeal was so upsetting for me i focused my efforts on a new PDA (vtech helio) for six months to let the whole issue rest. this made a lot of other pda users happy - palm still survives though.

    Its not like he sent it to Palm or any anti-virus companies before giving it out.

    wrong, Palm knew about it way before. i called personally, they said "dont worry about it". anti-virus companies wanted to use it to exploit people into purchasing their software; why would we want that? if they dont have it, how can they justify the anti-virus software? and, you have no idea what type of research projects i have been involved with directly with Palm and their licensee's (current and future). some of the projects are so contraversal, i cannot even discuss them publically. and, i wont ever disclose such information to anyone.

    if any of you attended the Defcon 8 Palm security talk, the presenter gave a rather nice break down of the protection scheme.

    so, i guess you never saw the paper i wrote for PalmSource 2000 the same year. it also goes into detail about how the system worked for Liberty, the gameboy emulator. it wasn't too bad, no-one could trust the warez community after they were the ones publically saying "download this, lets destroy ardiri - its the first virus" and, users were confused about what was a real crack, and, what was a trojan - so, they purchased the full version. (extra + points for us dont you think)?

    PalmSource 2000: Software Protection

    anyhow, this whole crap was a media frenzy that went wild way over 2 years ago. what people also fail to realize is why i would personally do something so stupid to commit suicide professionally - if you were so smart, you would also realize my involvement in the palm community in regards to the development of PilRC. so, technically, if you boycott any product - maybe you shouldn't use PilRC. currently, over 85% of developers on the palmos platform depend on PilRC. life goes on. get over it.

    i guess you dont even get into the concept of the |HaCkMe| program - which, i released them pulled. i must be so evil.

  65. Impressed with Zire by iamhassi · · Score: 1
    Considering the current Zire has only 2 megs, no backlight and only a 16mhz processor the new Zire 71 is a huge improvement.

    I think it's time to sell my m515 and upgrade.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  66. Please mod up parent by RoboProg · · Score: 1

    I very much like / agree / (AOL!) the parent post about modular PDA frame & guts. Good idea.

    (sorry for the lame post, but I *can't* moderate today)

    --
    Yow! I'm supposed to have a plan?
  67. battery life sucks by frankmu · · Score: 1

    i just got the tungsten t, and though i like it, the battery life sucks compared to previous models. i have to keep the thing in a charger every day. my old USR palm pilot went weeks before a new battery. i understand the need to keep up with the pocket pc's but one thing palm shouldn't emulate is battery life.
    the blue tooth is cool though, and eats up less batteries than wifi. i'm tempted to get a bluetooth access point with a bigger coverage. voip would be cool too.

    the most effective way to use your palm is to have someone else fill up your calender and phone numbers.

    --
    Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
  68. Re:Who cares... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Grab a thinkpad 240x >3 pounds, 800x600 res even. Unless you needed that battery life. $300 or so on ebay.

  69. Holy Crap by danoaks15 · · Score: 1

    I really need to get a new computer. The XScale prossesor in thr Tungsten C is twice as fast as the Cyrix 6x86MX in my computer!!!

  70. Re:Who cares... by Trillan · · Score: 1

    You should really rethink that. A phone in a PDA sounds useful, but the reality is that the form factors are incompatible. What makes a good PDA makes a lousy phone, and vice versa.

    A separate phone/PDA that link together with Bluetooth is much more useful.

  71. Re:Who cares... by hyeh · · Score: 1

    VNC for Palm has existed for a long time at http://www.wind-junkie.de/PalmVNC/.

  72. Re:Who cares... by bwhalen · · Score: 1

    If you want all that stuff, how about a Linux based pda??

    --
    Where do you want to be, What are you doing to get there.