Slashdot Mirror


Build Your Own Mac With CoreCrib Kit

Mark Dobie writes "I just put up a quick review of the CoreCrib kit I purchased. It is an inexpensive solution to building your own Mac." See our previous Core coverage.

35 of 358 comments (clear)

  1. Please explain... by gricholson75 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    the popularity of these systems. I can get a emac 800Mgz/256MB/40GB for $849, and it comes with a monitor and better graphics, and the operating system. If I was going to build a linux system, you get better bang for the buck from x86 hardware. I don't understand. FP?

    1. Re:Please explain... by thadeusPawlickiROX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The reason this kits are gaining in popularity is that you build the system. You don't go out and buy an eMac, or buy a tower, but you put exactly what you want in it. It's something that PC users have been doing for years, and some Mac users as well. It's not about "better bang for the buck," it's just to say that you custom built your Mac.

      --
      take off every sig for great justice
    2. Re:Please explain... by eXtro · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Don't compare these to an eMac, compare them to a G4 tower. For $849 you get a tower including PCI slots and and AGP port. If you're looking for a Macintosh that you can throw a couple of PCI cards (maybe a couple of SCSI adapters, whatever) but can't justify the price of a new Apple G4 system then maybe this is for you. For instance a dual 1.25 GHz Apple G4 tower costs $1999 with 256 MB RAM and an 80 GB hard drive. The site just stopped responding so I can't determine the price but presumably a dual 1.2 GHz their would be less than 2 grand.

    3. Re:Please explain... by ilsie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You don't go out and buy an eMac, or buy a tower, but you put exactly what you want in it. It's something that PC users have been doing for years

      Yes, but in contrast, the typical custom PC is built to accomplish three goals as opposed to buying a prebuilt desktop:

      1. Look better
      2. Higher performance
      3. Cheaper

      These mac clone kits accomplish none of these things.

    4. Re:Please explain... by drgroove · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not about "better bang for the buck," it's just to say that you custom built your Mac.

      I agree completely. FWIW, if you're looking for better bang for the buck, would you really be use Macintosh in the first place? (That is NOT troll or flamebait...keep reading :) )

      Apple's own Mac systems aren't pitched as 'best bang for the buck' - these are highly integrated, highly specialized computers, designed to 'rise above the masses' of wintel machines. The concept behind the 'build your own' PC follows a different set of rules when its applied to a Mac, because the Mac itself follows a different set of rules. Its great that more companies are offering customizable Mac systems - there is a market for this sort of thing!

    5. Re:Please explain... by phillyclaude · · Score: 4, Funny

      come on....tell me this isn't cool

      --
      A computer without a Microsoft operating system is like a dog without bricks tied to its head
    6. Re:Please explain... by alienw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      All in one systems are shit. What if the monitor dies in your eMac? What if you want to upgrade the CPU or videocard? After all, not everyone wants to run with a shitty soldered-on radeon 7500 when you can get an 8500 for $20 or $30. The system may very well be fine, but you will have to junk it or perform an expensive repair job.

      I know several people with all-in-one iMacs that have a dead monitor. As a result, the systems are worthless -- unless you want to pay somebody to try to fix the monitor piece. Besides, the monitor that's built in is tiny by modern standards. Today, 17 inches is the absolute minimum, and 19 inches is the only truly acceptable configuration. 15 inch monitors are really passé.

    7. Re:Please explain... by Juanvaldes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But when you already have a Keyboard, mouse, OS, extra RAM/HD/etc lying around the savings become more apparent.

  2. DIY Mac.. by grub · · Score: 5, Insightful


    A Do It Yourself Mac seems tantamount to a Do It Yourself Mercedes..

    These will be popular among the geeks, but the Mac masses will stick to boxes from Cupertino.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  3. Hmmm. by Phroggy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, it's a G4/800 tower, for $775 plus extra hardware (hard drive, etc.) plus software (Mac OS X, applications). In contrast, the eMac is a G4/800 for $799 and includes a 17" monitor, 40GB hard drive, CD-ROM, Mac OS X, and a handful of software (AppleWorks, Quicken, World Book Encyclopedia, etc.). Oh, and a full 1-yr warranty from Apple.

    Of course, the eMac isn't expandable (you can upgrade the RAM and add an AirPort card; everything else has to be external, and you can't run a split desktop on dual monitors). Still, compare to eBay...

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  4. Ellen Feiss by SHEENmaster · · Score: 4, Funny

    isn't endorsing this one. I don't think it'll do that well.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  5. You just put it up, by The_Sock · · Score: 4, Funny

    And we just put it down.

    --
    For a good time call www.sawkie.com
  6. Mirror by NETHED · · Score: 4, Informative

    Before it went KABAM, I made a quicky mirror

    here

    --
    --sig fault--
    1. Re:Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      1) upload slashdotted .com website with megatonage of images to own homepage account on university webserver
      2) watch own homepage account thence university webserver slashdotted to death by largest geek website in the world in 1 minute flat
      3) see smoke coming out of cheap server PSU and hear teenage girls using IE on campus saying "who turned off the internet I need to google for my term paper"
      4) hope university is more charitable towards having lart student homepage account burn 1000s$ of bandwidth & take down university network than towards P2P file-sharing bandwidth $$$
      5) have 56k modem on hand when dean demands network card confiscated
      6) ????

  7. Waiting for PPC 970 by aSiTiC · · Score: 3, Informative

    Personally I'm waiting to switch for the release of the PPC 970 to switch from my Windows box to a OSX box.

    Can't wait to get away from x86 micro-ops translation to RISC and into the world of straight RISC.

    1. Re:Waiting for PPC 970 by ciroknight · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I completely agree. The problem in Mac-land right now is that while they have superior software (in just about every thing I can imagine), the hardware is so far behind.... This has been stated so many times but never hit home as true until Paladium started becoming a worrisome thing for me. Personally, I'de love to move to a Mac, but it's just out of the question to pay that much for hardware that I'm locked into for a long time. They have came a long way with standardization and upgradibility, but it's still relitivly crappy compared to the intel compat. market. I either see Apple drastically reorganizing their business as a software only company and releasing their software and periferals on all hardware, or them finally making the transition to more complete PC compatibility. I'de love to just take my AGP card (Radeon 8500 Pro) and my 3 maxtor harddrives out of my computer and plug them into a Mac when/if I get one, but I know right now this is practically an impossibility. I only hope someone out there is listening..........

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    2. Re:Waiting for PPC 970 by discstickers · · Score: 3, Informative

      Steps to take:
      1) Buy old(er) G4 tower
      2) Replace graphics card with said 8500Pro
      3) Install hard drives
      4) Theres no step 4!

      --
      I have a shitty sig!
    3. Re:Waiting for PPC 970 by afidel · · Score: 5, Informative

      The PPC970 is not a pure RISC chip, if it were the decode stage would be unnecessary. There are a number of instructions that break down into two or more internal operations that the execution units have to deal with. From the IBM POWER whitepaper "Cracked instructions flow into groups as any other instructions with one restriction. Both IOPs must be in the same group. If both IOPs cannot fit into the current group, the group is terminated and a new group is initiated. The instruction following the cracked instruction may be in the same group as the cracked instruction, assuming there is room in the group. Millicoded instructions always start a new group. The instruction following the millicoded instruction also initiates a new group." This is much closer to CISC->RISC translation that happens in all modern x86 cpu's then it is to a traditional RISC design.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:Waiting for PPC 970 by RestiffBard · · Score: 3, Insightful

      this is not a flame thing. these are some points about apples that informed my decision to switch.

      1. there are people that are still comfortably using older mac hardware.
      2. (I can't recall the exact numbers but...) a IBM compat laptop goes for half what an apple laptop goes for after 2 years.

      --
      - /* dead coders leave no comments */
    5. Re:Waiting for PPC 970 by physicsnerd · · Score: 3, Informative
      say... would Apple also be following industry standard on ATAPI devices? How about DDR ram? and PCI cards (like my new Audigy 2?) (Things I'de LOVE to know before I upgrade again)

      Yes apple does follow the standard on ATAPI Devices. Apple just sticks standard CD/DVD drives in their systems.

      Yes they do use Standard DDR ram, in the higher end machines, PC133 in the lower machines like the eMac. Also, the laptop ram is standard SO-DIMM 133 or DDR in the case of the 17".

      Yes, PCI cards can be put in the powermac line. I'm not sure if the Audigy 2 has OSX drivers. This tends to be the largest problem I've had with mac hardware. Macs use the exact same standards as PCs, however not all companies will write OSX drivers for them. However, often the *nix/bsd hardware hacks work. Epson never has gotten around to writting drivers for my SS2500, however I use CUPS and it works perfect.

      In conclusion, Apple runs the same basic hardware as everyone else. The difference is in the PPC chip, and of course the bios. Everything else is industry standard.

      physicsnerd

    6. Re:Waiting for PPC 970 by GlassHeart · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I'de love to move to a Mac, but it's just out of the question to pay that much for hardware that I'm locked into for a long time.

      First of all, Macs tend to be usable for longer than PCs, so a slower upgrade cycle mitigates the higher upfront cost somewhat. Two, resale values of Macs are much better than PCs (check eBay, for example). Now, what you don't get is a new toy as often as you used to, but upgrade cycles can be terribly time consuming and tedious, and occasionally risky. It's also better for the environment to use your computer longer.

      Another question to ask yourself is, honestly, what do you use your computer for that you need all the power you can afford? What do you do that "last year's computer" (and Macs are not as far behind as many people think) really really won't do? Is the speed difference so crucial that it overrides all the other benefits you notice with Macs?

      Now, I'm not trying to conceal the raw speed problem with Macs. I'm just trying to promote a task-oriented view of computers. To give a fictitious example, if your PC is 10% faster, but crashes often and costs you about 50 minutes of productivity a day, then it's no faster than another computer that is more stable. The numbers are obviously made up, but try to think in that direction rather than just put specs up side by side.

    7. Re:Waiting for PPC 970 by 0rbit4l · · Score: 3, Informative
      As I'm sure has been pointed out, you'd still need a decode stage in almost any but the most useless risc architecture - got to convert those opcodes to control lines (regwrite, memwrite/read) and register fields. This doesn't come "for free", even with simple risc architectures like MIPS. Ergo, you need a decode stage. More complexity simply means more stages dedicated to decode (a la x86, power series.)

      Another point: POWER is not the same thing as the PowerPC ISA. POWER (which is cisc) supports some wacky instruction types such as vector load/store - these get cracked into IOPs. The vast majority of PPC instructions do not need to be cracked, though cracking can be useful depending on the microarchitecture that implements the ISA (for instance, fused multiply-add which is common in multimedia apps may get cracked into 2 separate instructions.)

  8. In other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You can build your own Ford by ordering all the parts from Ford and assembling them yourself.

  9. Cardboard mac? by NivenHuH · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hey.. maybe you could convince the people out of the earlier story to build you a cardboard case for your mac? =)

    --
    Just when you make it idiotproof, some idiot builds a better idiot.
  10. SLASHDOTTED by rkz · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here is a mirror: Click here I couldnt get all of the images though.

  11. good product for me... by clmensch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have an aging B&W G3 and a bunch of old PC parts. I don't need a monitor. I already own Jaguar, and I'll still utilize the single user license by not running it on my G3 anymore. This looks like a good solution for me until the second generation Powermacs with the IBM 970's are available. (I doubt I'll be able to afford the first gen ones.)

    --
    There is no gravity...the earth just sucks.
  12. The case does not look like a Mac by YllabianBitPipe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's the bottom line here ... hardly anybody I know who owns a Mac is gonna want a case that looks like a PC. A fair amount of the fun of having a Mac is the wow factor when people come over and look at it. Superficial, yeah, but if you're gonna plunk down bucks to get a Mac you want it to LOOK like a Mac. My suggestion to whomever makes these cases: make it look cool and Mac like. Don't make it look like PC. Even them AlienWare designs ... not good enough. Make it a big globe or a cylinder ... anything but a copy of a PC case.

  13. I considered corecrib by OmniVector · · Score: 3, Informative

    But then i found out about this site: www.purchaseprogram.com. I haven't bought a system from there yet, but even after you pay the $250 fee, and tax, and shipping, you can still get a kick ass dual 1.25ghz powermac for less than the spare parts that corecrib offers.

    --
    - tristan
  14. Main text (sans pictures) by mrklin · · Score: 3, Informative

    from the /. page:

    My first Mac was a Beige G3 junked from work. I upgraded it to the max, but found it lacking the speed needed to run OS X. I started looking into buying a Power Mac but I was turned off by the inflated prices. $1500 for a box w/ no monitor? Insane. I like Apple's constant innovation but their prices are way too high. I finally came across this story about John Fraser, and his idea to sell a Mac kit aimed at do-it-yourselfers. I've built quite a few PC's but never a Mac. I decided this was the route for me.

    My core crib arrived on Sat. May 3, 2003.

    As you can see, it arrives in a non-descript brown box from USPS.

    The packaging was done well. The CoreCrib was secure in the box and was not damaged. Contents include, power cable, tower case, Apple Gigabit Ethernet motherboard, Apple Power Supply and blue/pink LED case fan. This is a very barebones kit. Provide your own IDE cables, drives, processesor, memory, video card etc....

    I had an old Beige G3 I decided I'd rob parts out of. Most of what was in that box was old PC hardware I had laying around. At first, I could not get the Crib to boot, I checked the support forums and noticed that the only other person who had received a CoreCrib kit said you "HAD" to update the firmware on the motherboard. I assumed this was my problem. So I put the Crib aside and tried to track down an older G4 processor.

    On Tues. May 6 another post arrived in the forums that the firmware was not needed to run newer CPUs. I then decided to investigate on my own. After an hour of testing, my problem was solved. The PC100 memory I tried to use from the Beige G3 did not like the faster G4 800 Giga Designs processor. I put a stick of PC133 memory in and the Crib instantly booted.

    Here are some pictures of the box itself.

    Here are some photos after my parts were installed:

    Back plane is missing. Personally I don't care, I push it under a desk.

    The Crib has changed colors and price. It is now available as Pro model and comes in a nice gmono white case. http://www.2khappyware.com/corecrib.html

    My current expense list:

    CoreCrib kit: $379, Gigadesigns G4 800 cpu, $275, 256mb pc133 $20, ATI Radeon PCI 7000, $100 The other parts I installed were extras from upgrading PC's. I've spent $775 on this machine and it runs OS X smoothly and without problems. I did purchase OS 10.2. I forgot to include that in the price. 2khappyware also sells complete and custom systems, you can add whatever parts you want if you don't want to buy them on your own. This case is expandable, you can add up to 5 hard-drives and multiple optical drives. Which is much different than the new Mirrored Power Macs. My next stop is to add the Radeon 8500 AGP card, the PCI card doesn't do Quartz Graphics.

    Overall I'm extremely happy with the Crib. The noise level is very low. No windtunnel noise going on here. It is upgradable to dual CPU's if you want to spend the cash. A new Support Forum has started flourishing, so help is available. I highly recommend buying this kit.

    Parts purchasing:

    http://www.macsales.com

    Information:

    http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/
    - Permalink
    Posted by Mark Dobie on 5/7/03; 11:36:45 AM

  15. Apple sells refurbished Macs by Andrew+Lockhart · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's silly to compare these kits to a brand new Mac when Apple themselves sell refurbished products.Keep in mind that the refurb'ed PowerMacs already come with ram, an hd, graphics, a superdrive, an os, etc. Oh yeah, they also have a one year warranty from Apple and are still eligible for their AppleCare Protection Plan. Two things that I doubt these kits have.

  16. Re:Aw man by Sethb · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm the admin of the server in question, it's running Manila from Userland as the web server/weblog product. Everything is dynamic on there, even the pictures are served out of the database, and it's basically running out of CPU horsepower in this case, Frontier.exe is using about 90% of my CPU time. :)

    --
    When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout. --Robert A. Heinlein
  17. Slashdot Headlines from the Future by ink · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Apple: CoreCrib Kit Website Taken Down
    Posted by smudge on Fri 09, 14:17
    from the apple-lawyers-strike-again dept

    Mark Dobie writes "I just put up a quick protest page against Apple's lawyers who demanded that the CoreCrib kit website be taken down. It's too bad that a company that makes such good products has such a fear of open hardware. [ed: see this story for more information.]

    --
    The wheel is turning, but the hamster is dead.
  18. it actually seems to be cheaper... by vena · · Score: 3, Informative

    CoreCrib Dual 1200 Computer for $1799.99

    CoreCrib Fully Assebled System
    G4 Dual 1200Mhz 2MB cache
    1024MB Memory
    52x CD-RW
    120GB Harddrive
    Geforce4MX 32MB ADC DVI and DVI-> VGA Adapter
    2 Firewire, 2 USB Ports, 10/10/1000 Ethernet, Audio in/out
    Front Firewire, 2xUSB and Audio OUT
    Just Add keyboard, mouse, and OS
    ATA, Power Cable and Fans/Heatsink are included.
    Just plug in, add keyboard/mouse, boot from OS Install CD and install your OS. No hardware Installation!

    you're losing .05 ghz of speed (like you'll notice) but gaining ram and hd space for $200 cheaper

  19. Real cost comparison or The myth of low cost by gerardrj · · Score: 4, Informative

    Using the prices the author posts in the review, adding in $120 for Mac OS X and $50 for labor the real cost for hardware for this machine comes to $944, and that doesn't include shipping. Let's assume $5 per item and that's another $20 for a total of $964 for this "low cost Mac"

    Okay, but Apple sells a spiffy new machine for $1,500. That's a difference of $536. Now the question is this:

    Are the "extras" you get with the new Apple Mac worth the extra $536? Lets look at the "extras":

    (numbers in parenthesis are estimated upgrade costs)
    1. Support and warranty. You have someone to point the finger at with hardware failures (priceless??)
    2. 200Mhz faster CPU speed ($225 assumes purchasing 1Ghz instead of 800)
    3. 33Mhz?? faster bus speed (can't upgrade)
    4. 2x faster memory (can't upgrade)
    5. 32MB more Video RAM ( $65 more than the 7000 for the Radeon 8500)
    6. GPU is about 2x more powerful
    7. FireWire 800 ($100 includes USB2)
    8. USB 2.0
    9. Built-in AirPort antenna
    10. AGP port is 2x faster (can't upgrade)
    11. A better looking case

    The things that can be upgraded will cost $390 to do so, and a total build-it-yourself cost of $1,356.
    And this machine still doesn't perform as well as the new system will, and would cost only $140 less than the new Apple PowerMac.

    I'll take the Apple eqipment for the extra $140.

    --
    Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  20. Apple needs to recognize their new audience. by corey18_70 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm more on the graphics side of things than most posters here, but I did start to play around with Solaris and LinuxPPC before Mac OS X, and I've noticed since the release of OS X that Apple has a growing contingent of people who want to be users but can't deal with their hardware restrictions. My thoughts on how they might feasibly begin to encroach on Windows/Intel/AMD/Linux.

    The need to address a new market. Currently their hardware appeals mainly to:

    1. Professional graphics dorks
    2. .edu (losing battle) and home users
    3. Some small business professionals - music, a few lawyers, etc.
    3. Servers meant for Pro use, but too pricey for pro-sumer or consumer use.

    But their new OS appeals to computer professionals, higher end educational and scientific professionals, and anybody else who wants to experiment with and learn about an OS from the ground up. The robustness of the OS is going to be fairly transparent to their current hardware purchasers, manifested by the fact that it doesn't crash and is easy to use (two things which should be expected). But the people who are attracted to the OS by its capability and flexibility expect the same from the hardware and Apple doesn't currently offer that.

    I say reconfigure the product line and the store. Keep the beautiful professional and entry level laptops. Keep the readymade economic and powerful desktop options. But give us one more category. The Tinker-Mac.

    -Appealing yet super-functional case. Easy to open. Designed more to the aesthetic of the Xserve than a desktop. Sleek, basic, tough looking.
    -"Apple" processors in several grades.
    -The option to add another processor.
    -Optional HD's. Space for 2-3.
    -Optional optical media.
    -Optional video board.
    -One Enet card + slot for at least one more.
    -As many open PCI slots as possible
    -Firewire, USB, etc (optional?) preferably on the front
    -Feel free to contribute what I'm forgetting.
    ~$400-500

    Apple needs to capitalize on the fact that many people who like to tinker with the OS and box love their OS, and want a box that's affordable enough to truly personalize. And I think they'd make a ton of dough by offering this option. They give us the option of an empty case with that's capable of running their OS on their processor spec, and accept that the people buying it are capable of researching compatible components on their own will not only sell a boatload of boxes, but persuade more HW developers to write drivers for OS X. Or the open source community will.

    Screw all this "port to Intel" crapola. Apple needs to accept that there are people who want to run their OS in a build-your-own manner, and they can build the bare bones machines for that crowd, make it a unique selling point, and still make their margins.