Slashdot Mirror


Build Your Own Mac With CoreCrib Kit

Mark Dobie writes "I just put up a quick review of the CoreCrib kit I purchased. It is an inexpensive solution to building your own Mac." See our previous Core coverage.

64 of 358 comments (clear)

  1. Please explain... by gricholson75 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    the popularity of these systems. I can get a emac 800Mgz/256MB/40GB for $849, and it comes with a monitor and better graphics, and the operating system. If I was going to build a linux system, you get better bang for the buck from x86 hardware. I don't understand. FP?

    1. Re:Please explain... by thadeusPawlickiROX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The reason this kits are gaining in popularity is that you build the system. You don't go out and buy an eMac, or buy a tower, but you put exactly what you want in it. It's something that PC users have been doing for years, and some Mac users as well. It's not about "better bang for the buck," it's just to say that you custom built your Mac.

      --
      take off every sig for great justice
    2. Re:Please explain... by eXtro · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Don't compare these to an eMac, compare them to a G4 tower. For $849 you get a tower including PCI slots and and AGP port. If you're looking for a Macintosh that you can throw a couple of PCI cards (maybe a couple of SCSI adapters, whatever) but can't justify the price of a new Apple G4 system then maybe this is for you. For instance a dual 1.25 GHz Apple G4 tower costs $1999 with 256 MB RAM and an 80 GB hard drive. The site just stopped responding so I can't determine the price but presumably a dual 1.2 GHz their would be less than 2 grand.

    3. Re:Please explain... by ilsie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You don't go out and buy an eMac, or buy a tower, but you put exactly what you want in it. It's something that PC users have been doing for years

      Yes, but in contrast, the typical custom PC is built to accomplish three goals as opposed to buying a prebuilt desktop:

      1. Look better
      2. Higher performance
      3. Cheaper

      These mac clone kits accomplish none of these things.

    4. Re:Please explain... by drgroove · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not about "better bang for the buck," it's just to say that you custom built your Mac.

      I agree completely. FWIW, if you're looking for better bang for the buck, would you really be use Macintosh in the first place? (That is NOT troll or flamebait...keep reading :) )

      Apple's own Mac systems aren't pitched as 'best bang for the buck' - these are highly integrated, highly specialized computers, designed to 'rise above the masses' of wintel machines. The concept behind the 'build your own' PC follows a different set of rules when its applied to a Mac, because the Mac itself follows a different set of rules. Its great that more companies are offering customizable Mac systems - there is a market for this sort of thing!

    5. Re:Please explain... by the_machine · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Please explain the popularity of these systems. I can get a emac 800Mgz/256MB/40GB for $849, and it comes with a monitor and better graphics, and the operating system.


      How upgradeable is your eMac? How important is that to you?

    6. Re:Please explain... by eXtro · · Score: 2, Informative

      The price of the dual 1.2 GHz kit is $1349, you could throw in 256 meg of ram and an 80 gig hard drive in for around 120 bucks, probably less.

    7. Re:Please explain... by phillyclaude · · Score: 4, Funny

      come on....tell me this isn't cool

      --
      A computer without a Microsoft operating system is like a dog without bricks tied to its head
    8. Re:Please explain... by GlassHeart · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The price of the dual 1.2 GHz kit is $1349, you could throw in 256 meg of ram and an 80 gig hard drive in for around 120 bucks, probably less.

      $120 sounds about right. That makes it $1470. Let's toss in some other essentials:

      • keyboard and mouse - a decent pair might cost $50.
      • MacOS X - $130
      • Combo DVD/CDRW drive - $60
      • Radeon 9000 Pro (64 MB) - $76
      which brings us to $1786. Compared to the $1999 Apple box, the savings are just over 10%, ignoring all the non-downloadable software that the Mac comes with.

      The $1000 model provides more RAM and hard disk space (and of course expandability) than the comparatively-priced eMac, but doesn't have a keyboard, mouse, monitor, or OS, uses a less powerful graphics card and has no combo drive. These will cost at least another $300 or $400 to even out. The prices are not competitive at all for somebody who wants an eMac.

      Essentially, this isn't really a way to build a very cheap Mac. The target market must be those with a very tight budget and require a lot of expansion potential, or those who want a PPC but not MacOS X.

      Another tragic thing is that they didn't seem to learn anything from Apple's superior case design. It's hard to get to the motherboard, and there are cables all over the place. Hell, the handles on the G4 case are worth money to me.

      Still, choice is good.

    9. Re:Please explain... by alienw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      All in one systems are shit. What if the monitor dies in your eMac? What if you want to upgrade the CPU or videocard? After all, not everyone wants to run with a shitty soldered-on radeon 7500 when you can get an 8500 for $20 or $30. The system may very well be fine, but you will have to junk it or perform an expensive repair job.

      I know several people with all-in-one iMacs that have a dead monitor. As a result, the systems are worthless -- unless you want to pay somebody to try to fix the monitor piece. Besides, the monitor that's built in is tiny by modern standards. Today, 17 inches is the absolute minimum, and 19 inches is the only truly acceptable configuration. 15 inch monitors are really passé.

    10. Re:Please explain... by Juanvaldes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But when you already have a Keyboard, mouse, OS, extra RAM/HD/etc lying around the savings become more apparent.

  2. DIY Mac.. by grub · · Score: 5, Insightful


    A Do It Yourself Mac seems tantamount to a Do It Yourself Mercedes..

    These will be popular among the geeks, but the Mac masses will stick to boxes from Cupertino.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:DIY Mac.. by bytes2bu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The mac is suppose to be for those people who don't want to (or can't) build their own computer. Everywhere you look you see this distinction being made that macs are for people who get work done with the computer instead of working on their computer. This just seems a bit out in left field for the whole mac "idea". But then, that's just my opinion.

    2. Re:DIY Mac.. by DrXym · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Well that depends. I guess if you have some outdated Mac hardware lying around, you have a choice - ditch it all or upgrade it somehow. If upgrading turns out to be feasible via cards or a new box, why not do it? And if the cheapest way happens to be some clone kit, it sounds a reasonable option assuming it has the proprietary ports such as the monitor connection and works out of the box with OS X.


      Now obviously if it's approaching the cost of a real mac, it isn't worth it, but if it were 2/3 the price, I'd take the hit in terms of looks and styling for the saving. It's not like I parade my G4 around - it sits under the desk for it's life. I couldn't care any less if there were some generic pizza / tower case there instead.

  3. Hmmm. by Phroggy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, it's a G4/800 tower, for $775 plus extra hardware (hard drive, etc.) plus software (Mac OS X, applications). In contrast, the eMac is a G4/800 for $799 and includes a 17" monitor, 40GB hard drive, CD-ROM, Mac OS X, and a handful of software (AppleWorks, Quicken, World Book Encyclopedia, etc.). Oh, and a full 1-yr warranty from Apple.

    Of course, the eMac isn't expandable (you can upgrade the RAM and add an AirPort card; everything else has to be external, and you can't run a split desktop on dual monitors). Still, compare to eBay...

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    1. Re:Hmmm. by valkraider · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have always wondered though, is there really a shortage in things to build? Why not just buy the eMac, and then build a robot that is controlled via 802.11 wireless? Some things were meant to be "built" and some things were meant to be "used".

    2. Re:Hmmm. by anonymous+loser · · Score: 2, Informative
      Apparently you didn't read the company story. If you did, you would realize that the original goal was to get a mac that didn't come bundled with a specific monitor, etc., so you could mix and match the system as you see fit. As stated in the linked page:

      just didn't like that if I wanted a 21" monitor and wanted to purchase Apple Macintosh, I needed to put down $1699.99 regardless if all I wanted to do was surf the web, check e-mail or purchase off ebay with a larger monitor and low cost processor like in the iBook or iMac.
  4. Ellen Feiss by SHEENmaster · · Score: 4, Funny

    isn't endorsing this one. I don't think it'll do that well.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  5. You just put it up, by The_Sock · · Score: 4, Funny

    And we just put it down.

    --
    For a good time call www.sawkie.com
  6. Mirror by NETHED · · Score: 4, Informative

    Before it went KABAM, I made a quicky mirror

    here

    --
    --sig fault--
    1. Re:Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      1) upload slashdotted .com website with megatonage of images to own homepage account on university webserver
      2) watch own homepage account thence university webserver slashdotted to death by largest geek website in the world in 1 minute flat
      3) see smoke coming out of cheap server PSU and hear teenage girls using IE on campus saying "who turned off the internet I need to google for my term paper"
      4) hope university is more charitable towards having lart student homepage account burn 1000s$ of bandwidth & take down university network than towards P2P file-sharing bandwidth $$$
      5) have 56k modem on hand when dean demands network card confiscated
      6) ????

  7. Waiting for PPC 970 by aSiTiC · · Score: 3, Informative

    Personally I'm waiting to switch for the release of the PPC 970 to switch from my Windows box to a OSX box.

    Can't wait to get away from x86 micro-ops translation to RISC and into the world of straight RISC.

    1. Re:Waiting for PPC 970 by ciroknight · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I completely agree. The problem in Mac-land right now is that while they have superior software (in just about every thing I can imagine), the hardware is so far behind.... This has been stated so many times but never hit home as true until Paladium started becoming a worrisome thing for me. Personally, I'de love to move to a Mac, but it's just out of the question to pay that much for hardware that I'm locked into for a long time. They have came a long way with standardization and upgradibility, but it's still relitivly crappy compared to the intel compat. market. I either see Apple drastically reorganizing their business as a software only company and releasing their software and periferals on all hardware, or them finally making the transition to more complete PC compatibility. I'de love to just take my AGP card (Radeon 8500 Pro) and my 3 maxtor harddrives out of my computer and plug them into a Mac when/if I get one, but I know right now this is practically an impossibility. I only hope someone out there is listening..........

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    2. Re:Waiting for PPC 970 by discstickers · · Score: 3, Informative

      Steps to take:
      1) Buy old(er) G4 tower
      2) Replace graphics card with said 8500Pro
      3) Install hard drives
      4) Theres no step 4!

      --
      I have a shitty sig!
    3. Re:Waiting for PPC 970 by afidel · · Score: 5, Informative

      The PPC970 is not a pure RISC chip, if it were the decode stage would be unnecessary. There are a number of instructions that break down into two or more internal operations that the execution units have to deal with. From the IBM POWER whitepaper "Cracked instructions flow into groups as any other instructions with one restriction. Both IOPs must be in the same group. If both IOPs cannot fit into the current group, the group is terminated and a new group is initiated. The instruction following the cracked instruction may be in the same group as the cracked instruction, assuming there is room in the group. Millicoded instructions always start a new group. The instruction following the millicoded instruction also initiates a new group." This is much closer to CISC->RISC translation that happens in all modern x86 cpu's then it is to a traditional RISC design.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:Waiting for PPC 970 by Alex+Thorpe · · Score: 2, Troll

      I'd already moderated one post, but I just had to reply..

      I've an off the shelf Maxtor hard drive in my older iMac; naturally, there's no room for three of them, but a PowerMac could hold them. You can also use PC USB mice and even keyboards with a Mac if you wish, though I'd recommend a Mac keyboard since there's a FEW differences in the keys used. The PowerMacs also have AGP for video cards, though you may need a firmware upgrade to use yours with a Mac; ATI's site should have more info on that.

      Apple has only really fallen behind lately in raw CPU performance, and since they've sometimes been ahead in the past, they might pull ahead in the future again. Since my 3+ year old G3/400 CPU meets all of my needs, if not all of my wants, I don't think it's a big issue unless you're in a business where your CPU speed affects the amount of money you make.

      --
      "Common Sense Ain't" -Unknown
    5. Re:Waiting for PPC 970 by DreadSpoon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Like this self-built box states, you _can_ drop in your own hard-drives, AGP cards, and everything.

      The only palces Apple breaks compatibility is where their tech is _better_. ADC is awesome, I wish PC manufacturer's would adopt - I have _way_ too many cables behind my computer desk. Some goes for their slick way of hooking the mouse into the keyboard (less cabling, again). You can get away with five cables from your tower (power, adc, keyboard, speakers, network), only one from your display (adc), a cable from mouse to keyboard and keyboard to tower, and the cables hooking speakers together and then from there to tower. Plus you have a spare USB port on your keyboard (tablet, portable drive, whatever) plus two more on the modern displays.

      Compare that to the >10 cables on my machine, and then having to have the cables running back behind the machine versus having even simple things like USB literally at my fingertips...

      The only other big non-compatibility thing is the CPU architecture, but who cares? The prevalence of Java (and soon perhaps .NET) alleviates a large amount of that, and virtual PC helps a lot for business apps.

      I'm waiting for the PPC 970 myself, but I'm switching then; depending on how good Panther is, I might even dump Linux then. ~,^

    6. Re:Waiting for PPC 970 by RestiffBard · · Score: 3, Insightful

      this is not a flame thing. these are some points about apples that informed my decision to switch.

      1. there are people that are still comfortably using older mac hardware.
      2. (I can't recall the exact numbers but...) a IBM compat laptop goes for half what an apple laptop goes for after 2 years.

      --
      - /* dead coders leave no comments */
    7. Re:Waiting for PPC 970 by Mirus+Nex · · Score: 2, Informative
      say... would Apple also be following industry standard on ATAPI devices? How about DDR ram? and PCI cards (like my new Audigy 2?) (Things I'de LOVE to know before I upgrade again)


      Yes. You should be able to install just about any OS supported IDE CD-ROM drive in a newer tower. My 1GHz at work has 3 IDE intefaces ATA/100, ATA/66 and ATA and supports ATAPI (using cable select). As for PCI it supports PCI 2.1 at 33MHz (5, 12 or 3.3v). AGP is 1.5V 4x. The new systems support PC2100 and PC2700 (depending on model) DDR RAM, but doesn't take advantage of it (more of a marketing thing than performance)...


      The only problem is OS support, if you can't find drivers for your card you're kind of SOL... Audigy isn't support (AFAIK) though SoundBlaster Live! is.

    8. Re:Waiting for PPC 970 by physicsnerd · · Score: 3, Informative
      say... would Apple also be following industry standard on ATAPI devices? How about DDR ram? and PCI cards (like my new Audigy 2?) (Things I'de LOVE to know before I upgrade again)

      Yes apple does follow the standard on ATAPI Devices. Apple just sticks standard CD/DVD drives in their systems.

      Yes they do use Standard DDR ram, in the higher end machines, PC133 in the lower machines like the eMac. Also, the laptop ram is standard SO-DIMM 133 or DDR in the case of the 17".

      Yes, PCI cards can be put in the powermac line. I'm not sure if the Audigy 2 has OSX drivers. This tends to be the largest problem I've had with mac hardware. Macs use the exact same standards as PCs, however not all companies will write OSX drivers for them. However, often the *nix/bsd hardware hacks work. Epson never has gotten around to writting drivers for my SS2500, however I use CUPS and it works perfect.

      In conclusion, Apple runs the same basic hardware as everyone else. The difference is in the PPC chip, and of course the bios. Everything else is industry standard.

      physicsnerd

    9. Re:Waiting for PPC 970 by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 2, Funny

      so what you're saying is that you are just another clueless Slashdotter writing off an Apple PC based on ZERO knowledge of the platform? Well done indeed!

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    10. Re:Waiting for PPC 970 by GlassHeart · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I'de love to move to a Mac, but it's just out of the question to pay that much for hardware that I'm locked into for a long time.

      First of all, Macs tend to be usable for longer than PCs, so a slower upgrade cycle mitigates the higher upfront cost somewhat. Two, resale values of Macs are much better than PCs (check eBay, for example). Now, what you don't get is a new toy as often as you used to, but upgrade cycles can be terribly time consuming and tedious, and occasionally risky. It's also better for the environment to use your computer longer.

      Another question to ask yourself is, honestly, what do you use your computer for that you need all the power you can afford? What do you do that "last year's computer" (and Macs are not as far behind as many people think) really really won't do? Is the speed difference so crucial that it overrides all the other benefits you notice with Macs?

      Now, I'm not trying to conceal the raw speed problem with Macs. I'm just trying to promote a task-oriented view of computers. To give a fictitious example, if your PC is 10% faster, but crashes often and costs you about 50 minutes of productivity a day, then it's no faster than another computer that is more stable. The numbers are obviously made up, but try to think in that direction rather than just put specs up side by side.

    11. Re:Waiting for PPC 970 by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Informative
      They've been following most of these standards for a while. I got a Beige G3 from eBay a few months ago. The keyboard/mouse bus was non-standard (ie not PS/2 or USB, it used Apple's ADB system), and the serial and video ports were non-standard (usable with convertors)

      Everything else was standard. I plugged in PCI USB2 card - labelled as compatable with God-knows how many versions of Windows - and was able to attach a standard keyboard. An adapter was what was needed to attach a VGA monitor. I went got a Maxtor 40Gb HD, and that worked out of the box. No mention of Macs on the box either.

      All of that was what I needed to install OS X.

      Of course it also has SCSI built in, but you can't really complain that's non-standard even if it's relatively unusual.

      Since then I've installed cheap CDRW/DVD drives and such without any problems (beyond initially having to hack the odd OS X driver.)

      I think the notion of the "non-standard" Apple has been out of date for many years. It's just not Windows compatable hardware.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    12. Re:Waiting for PPC 970 by 0rbit4l · · Score: 3, Informative
      As I'm sure has been pointed out, you'd still need a decode stage in almost any but the most useless risc architecture - got to convert those opcodes to control lines (regwrite, memwrite/read) and register fields. This doesn't come "for free", even with simple risc architectures like MIPS. Ergo, you need a decode stage. More complexity simply means more stages dedicated to decode (a la x86, power series.)

      Another point: POWER is not the same thing as the PowerPC ISA. POWER (which is cisc) supports some wacky instruction types such as vector load/store - these get cracked into IOPs. The vast majority of PPC instructions do not need to be cracked, though cracking can be useful depending on the microarchitecture that implements the ISA (for instance, fused multiply-add which is common in multimedia apps may get cracked into 2 separate instructions.)

    13. Re:Waiting for PPC 970 by catscan2000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The hard drives should work in a Mac, but the video card probably won't due to differences in the card's firmware. PC video cards typically have a PC x86 video BIOS built in while Mac video cards have something else, perhaps an OpenFirmware thingie that lets the system's firmware start up the video card and video display.

      I've actually tried to put a ATI Xclaim TV PCI Mac card into a PC only to get no video at all in the PC, though Linux booted anyway. I tried to see if XFree86 could somehow handle it, but alas I couldn't get it to work properly. I even tried compiling and running Linux with various ATI framebuffer console settings (man, I must have had a lot more free time than I do now! Though, such toil seems quite boring to me now. Speaking of now-seemingly boring toil, I need to figure out what to do with my basement full of I-Openers, but that's another story). It comes right up on the Mac (a G4 450MHz system).

  8. In other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You can build your own Ford by ordering all the parts from Ford and assembling them yourself.

    1. Re:In other news.... by switcha · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...and it seems higly unlikely as well that Christina Aguilera is really a genie in a bottle. (and more to the point, wants to rub you the right way.)

      --
      You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
  9. Cardboard mac? by NivenHuH · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hey.. maybe you could convince the people out of the earlier story to build you a cardboard case for your mac? =)

    --
    Just when you make it idiotproof, some idiot builds a better idiot.
  10. SLASHDOTTED by rkz · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here is a mirror: Click here I couldnt get all of the images though.

  11. good product for me... by clmensch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have an aging B&W G3 and a bunch of old PC parts. I don't need a monitor. I already own Jaguar, and I'll still utilize the single user license by not running it on my G3 anymore. This looks like a good solution for me until the second generation Powermacs with the IBM 970's are available. (I doubt I'll be able to afford the first gen ones.)

    --
    There is no gravity...the earth just sucks.
  12. Of Subject, I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    But I'm very impressed by the website designer(desginer?) getting the spelling to 'Designed' wrong.

    1. Re:Of Subject, I know by jonfelder · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Much like a spell checker, you seem to be good at correcting spelling but you cannot handle correctly spelled words used incorrectly.

      I believe the subject of your post should say 'Off' not 'Of'.

  13. The case does not look like a Mac by YllabianBitPipe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's the bottom line here ... hardly anybody I know who owns a Mac is gonna want a case that looks like a PC. A fair amount of the fun of having a Mac is the wow factor when people come over and look at it. Superficial, yeah, but if you're gonna plunk down bucks to get a Mac you want it to LOOK like a Mac. My suggestion to whomever makes these cases: make it look cool and Mac like. Don't make it look like PC. Even them AlienWare designs ... not good enough. Make it a big globe or a cylinder ... anything but a copy of a PC case.

  14. Yup, I got one and built it by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Took some pictures too. More coming tonight...

    http://www.sadistech.com/newbox/

    --



    ...spike
    Ewwwwww, coconut...
    1. Re:Yup, I got one and built it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nice, now go clean your room...

      That is an order young man.

  15. Re:But the question is who would want to? by w3weasel · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Do you think "I'm bored, I should troll?". I think almost everyone who understands OSS knows where Apple stands, and most even understand why. Apple does support OSS, and no one is claiming that OS X is OSS. If howver you wish to run Apple's OSS project on your x86, there's nothing stopping you.
    as for:
    You're much better off putting the same money into a Windows machine
    Pass that pipe my way dude!
    As for me, I own four Macs and one PC. My newest mac is 3 years old, and the oldest is 5. All the macs just keep chugging away, and while more speed would be swell, Its nice to not have to replace 30% of the machine every 6-8 months, as has been my experience with all PC's.
    What you're really paying for with an Apple is their support
    Unlike Dell or HP??? Them are some rock solid components you find inside those branded PC's huh?
    their backwards-compatible-with-BSD operating system
    and you're saying that the backwards-compatible-with-DOS operating system is a better option?
    and the pleasure of doing business with a company like Apple
    Well, yes, that's worth a few extra bucks :)
    --

    Just as irrigation is the lifeblood of the Southwest, lifeblood is the soup of cannibals. -- Jack Handy

  16. Mac users, the thinnest-skinned people on Earth by corebreech · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I mean, really, look at some of these responses.

    On /. of all places we see people crying "Why would you want to do this?". Or, "What's wrong with the eMac?"

    This is only the first (or one of the first) homebuilt Macs. If enough people jump on the bandwagon prices will eventually drop. As it is now, the price is competitive with a brand new eMac, the comparable version of which was only introduced days ago.

    I want to see PowerPC chips on PriceWatch. I want to see different people competing to do motherboards that will run these chips. I want to see more and different case designs. Competition is good. Choice is good. Apple doesn't want us to have either of these things.

    And then, there's the thrill of building your own PC. I'm a former Mac person who is now running on my first homebuilt -- which dual-boots XP and Linux -- and the level of satisfaction I have with this machine surpasses anything I've ever owned from Apple (save, perhaps my Pismo PowerBook.)

    This can only be a good thing. And if Apple were smart, they'd put the resources in place up front to help them deal with the complexity of supporting what is sure to be the thousand different configurations or more of Macs that are yet to come. Turn your back on these people and you risk making the same mistake that Microsoft made and that is driving so many people to Linux.

    1. Re:Mac users, the thinnest-skinned people on Earth by weston · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I mean, really, look at some of these responses.
      On /. of all places we see people crying "Why would you want to do this?". Or, "What's wrong with the eMac?"


      It's not so much a "thin skin" thing as a reflection of the fact that slashdot isn't a homogenous group. Some people are going to want to do it because they can. Some people are going to want to do it to reach a new level of hardware customization. Some people are going to want to do it to have the level of configurability/performance that they could get out of a G4 tower at a cheaper price.

      Some people are going to primarily concerned with price. Those people should by an eMac. Some of those people have noted this on slashdot. It's not so much a matter of thin skin as the fact that their focus and accompanying heuristics for evaluating the value of a machine make it so they don't see the other points.

    2. Re:Mac users, the thinnest-skinned people on Earth by beatniklew · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's two things people always overlook when talking about what Apple should do. The biggest strengths of the Mac Operating system have always been the limited hardware. If you control all of the hardware, and only have to worry about dealing with one or maybe two chipsets, you can make sure everything works pretty damn well. If the mac user base is comprised of people with custom machines (and there may be some now, but nowhere near a substantial amount), then their main advantage will be lost. Secondly, Mac is a hardware company. They also sell software, but that is not their bread and butter. Microsoft is a software company. They make money off of software (and some pieces of hardware, like mice and keyboards). But, and this is the important thing, while it might be better for Mac users if mac hardware were an open market, it would be worse for Apple. And it won't happen anytime soon. The world does need for there to be some actual competition for MS, but Mac is never going to be it. Linux might be, if any distribution could try to compete with Windows and not be labelled a sell out. BeOS would have been nice, but sadly, they are gone. Something needs to fill the niche, but it isn't Apple.

  17. I considered corecrib by OmniVector · · Score: 3, Informative

    But then i found out about this site: www.purchaseprogram.com. I haven't bought a system from there yet, but even after you pay the $250 fee, and tax, and shipping, you can still get a kick ass dual 1.25ghz powermac for less than the spare parts that corecrib offers.

    --
    - tristan
    1. Re:I considered corecrib by WebMacher · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yep, it's a scam. MacDV had a long discussion about it. Go to http://lists.themacintoshguy.com/Lists/MacDV/List. html and search for "Marbella".

    2. Re:I considered corecrib by ziggy_zero · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is what's called a straight-line matrix scheme, my friend. It's a scam.

      For more info on pyramid or "matrix" schemes, check this out.

      There are tons of sites like that out there, offering laptops, x-boxes, plasma TV's, etc. I know it's tempting, but don't send them your money, whatever you do.

      --
      I belong to the ______ generation.
  18. Main text (sans pictures) by mrklin · · Score: 3, Informative

    from the /. page:

    My first Mac was a Beige G3 junked from work. I upgraded it to the max, but found it lacking the speed needed to run OS X. I started looking into buying a Power Mac but I was turned off by the inflated prices. $1500 for a box w/ no monitor? Insane. I like Apple's constant innovation but their prices are way too high. I finally came across this story about John Fraser, and his idea to sell a Mac kit aimed at do-it-yourselfers. I've built quite a few PC's but never a Mac. I decided this was the route for me.

    My core crib arrived on Sat. May 3, 2003.

    As you can see, it arrives in a non-descript brown box from USPS.

    The packaging was done well. The CoreCrib was secure in the box and was not damaged. Contents include, power cable, tower case, Apple Gigabit Ethernet motherboard, Apple Power Supply and blue/pink LED case fan. This is a very barebones kit. Provide your own IDE cables, drives, processesor, memory, video card etc....

    I had an old Beige G3 I decided I'd rob parts out of. Most of what was in that box was old PC hardware I had laying around. At first, I could not get the Crib to boot, I checked the support forums and noticed that the only other person who had received a CoreCrib kit said you "HAD" to update the firmware on the motherboard. I assumed this was my problem. So I put the Crib aside and tried to track down an older G4 processor.

    On Tues. May 6 another post arrived in the forums that the firmware was not needed to run newer CPUs. I then decided to investigate on my own. After an hour of testing, my problem was solved. The PC100 memory I tried to use from the Beige G3 did not like the faster G4 800 Giga Designs processor. I put a stick of PC133 memory in and the Crib instantly booted.

    Here are some pictures of the box itself.

    Here are some photos after my parts were installed:

    Back plane is missing. Personally I don't care, I push it under a desk.

    The Crib has changed colors and price. It is now available as Pro model and comes in a nice gmono white case. http://www.2khappyware.com/corecrib.html

    My current expense list:

    CoreCrib kit: $379, Gigadesigns G4 800 cpu, $275, 256mb pc133 $20, ATI Radeon PCI 7000, $100 The other parts I installed were extras from upgrading PC's. I've spent $775 on this machine and it runs OS X smoothly and without problems. I did purchase OS 10.2. I forgot to include that in the price. 2khappyware also sells complete and custom systems, you can add whatever parts you want if you don't want to buy them on your own. This case is expandable, you can add up to 5 hard-drives and multiple optical drives. Which is much different than the new Mirrored Power Macs. My next stop is to add the Radeon 8500 AGP card, the PCI card doesn't do Quartz Graphics.

    Overall I'm extremely happy with the Crib. The noise level is very low. No windtunnel noise going on here. It is upgradable to dual CPU's if you want to spend the cash. A new Support Forum has started flourishing, so help is available. I highly recommend buying this kit.

    Parts purchasing:

    http://www.macsales.com

    Information:

    http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/
    - Permalink
    Posted by Mark Dobie on 5/7/03; 11:36:45 AM

  19. Apple sells refurbished Macs by Andrew+Lockhart · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's silly to compare these kits to a brand new Mac when Apple themselves sell refurbished products.Keep in mind that the refurb'ed PowerMacs already come with ram, an hd, graphics, a superdrive, an os, etc. Oh yeah, they also have a one year warranty from Apple and are still eligible for their AppleCare Protection Plan. Two things that I doubt these kits have.

  20. This machine will only interest /. types by cenonce · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The CoreCrib will only interest ./ build-your-own-PC types.

    First off, anybody who uses a Mac uses it because they don't want the agg of PCs and all of the various config problems with hardware.

    Anybody who "switched" sure as heck isn't going to suddenly decide they want to experiment by building a Mac. Heck, the whole reason they switched was to just use their damn computer!

    I just don't see this ever going any further than the techno inclined... and only to those who really want to run OS X. And let's face it, a Mac capble of running OS X nicely can be had for 500 bucks now! Anybody who runs *nix is going to build a blow-em-away x86 box for the same price as the Core and not deal with the "finding compatible hardware problem". Besides that, at least for Linux, you basically have a choice between YDL, Mandrake (and Suse?)... you got four times the distros for x86!

    I think this is a great idea, but for the price and maybe more importantly the warranty offered, I'd rather buy a used Mac from say Macofalltrades.com. I may not get a brand new machine, but I can get a system that is equal or better than the Core machine with a 30 day warranty (and an option of a one year warranty).

    I hope it catches on though and I hope Apple maybe throws these guys a little help!

    1. Re:This machine will only interest /. types by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The CoreCrib will only interest ./ build-your-own-PC types.

      Exactly. I'm not sure who this kind of system is really aimed at. If you want to hack together a system to run some kind of customised OS then Linux or *BSD on x86 hardware would be a better bet for you. If you want the Apple 'it just works' experience then buy from a vertical monopoly.

      One of the main reasons I'm considering swithcing to Apple is that all of their kit is designed and tested to work as a whole. You don't get that in the PC world, and while I'm happy to tinker with Linux and the BSDs on machines I don't depend on to work on a daily basis I want my main machine to be as simple and reliable as a piece of consumer electronics.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  21. Re:Aw man by Sethb · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm the admin of the server in question, it's running Manila from Userland as the web server/weblog product. Everything is dynamic on there, even the pictures are served out of the database, and it's basically running out of CPU horsepower in this case, Frontier.exe is using about 90% of my CPU time. :)

    --
    When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout. --Robert A. Heinlein
  22. Slashdot Headlines from the Future by ink · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Apple: CoreCrib Kit Website Taken Down
    Posted by smudge on Fri 09, 14:17
    from the apple-lawyers-strike-again dept

    Mark Dobie writes "I just put up a quick protest page against Apple's lawyers who demanded that the CoreCrib kit website be taken down. It's too bad that a company that makes such good products has such a fear of open hardware. [ed: see this story for more information.]

    --
    The wheel is turning, but the hamster is dead.
  23. Re:eMac screen suXX0rs by Golias · · Score: 2, Informative
    However, many other people can't or won't pay more for a flat panel, and would quite happily get by with a $100 Trinitron CRT or a monitor they already have.

    Step 1: Put the eMac under your desk or wherever.
    Step 2: Plug the monitor you have and like into the video out plug (yes, it takes standard VGA connections).
    Step 3: There's no step three.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  24. whats the cool case on the front page?? by cgifool · · Score: 2, Informative

    I dont understand, the home page has a cool looking slim machine pictured, but it just says its a "concept drawing".

    Then, when you go to click "purchase", it looks like any old clunky PC box.

    Whats the deal?

  25. it actually seems to be cheaper... by vena · · Score: 3, Informative

    CoreCrib Dual 1200 Computer for $1799.99

    CoreCrib Fully Assebled System
    G4 Dual 1200Mhz 2MB cache
    1024MB Memory
    52x CD-RW
    120GB Harddrive
    Geforce4MX 32MB ADC DVI and DVI-> VGA Adapter
    2 Firewire, 2 USB Ports, 10/10/1000 Ethernet, Audio in/out
    Front Firewire, 2xUSB and Audio OUT
    Just Add keyboard, mouse, and OS
    ATA, Power Cable and Fans/Heatsink are included.
    Just plug in, add keyboard/mouse, boot from OS Install CD and install your OS. No hardware Installation!

    you're losing .05 ghz of speed (like you'll notice) but gaining ram and hd space for $200 cheaper

  26. Real cost comparison or The myth of low cost by gerardrj · · Score: 4, Informative

    Using the prices the author posts in the review, adding in $120 for Mac OS X and $50 for labor the real cost for hardware for this machine comes to $944, and that doesn't include shipping. Let's assume $5 per item and that's another $20 for a total of $964 for this "low cost Mac"

    Okay, but Apple sells a spiffy new machine for $1,500. That's a difference of $536. Now the question is this:

    Are the "extras" you get with the new Apple Mac worth the extra $536? Lets look at the "extras":

    (numbers in parenthesis are estimated upgrade costs)
    1. Support and warranty. You have someone to point the finger at with hardware failures (priceless??)
    2. 200Mhz faster CPU speed ($225 assumes purchasing 1Ghz instead of 800)
    3. 33Mhz?? faster bus speed (can't upgrade)
    4. 2x faster memory (can't upgrade)
    5. 32MB more Video RAM ( $65 more than the 7000 for the Radeon 8500)
    6. GPU is about 2x more powerful
    7. FireWire 800 ($100 includes USB2)
    8. USB 2.0
    9. Built-in AirPort antenna
    10. AGP port is 2x faster (can't upgrade)
    11. A better looking case

    The things that can be upgraded will cost $390 to do so, and a total build-it-yourself cost of $1,356.
    And this machine still doesn't perform as well as the new system will, and would cost only $140 less than the new Apple PowerMac.

    I'll take the Apple eqipment for the extra $140.

    --
    Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  27. Apple needs to recognize their new audience. by corey18_70 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm more on the graphics side of things than most posters here, but I did start to play around with Solaris and LinuxPPC before Mac OS X, and I've noticed since the release of OS X that Apple has a growing contingent of people who want to be users but can't deal with their hardware restrictions. My thoughts on how they might feasibly begin to encroach on Windows/Intel/AMD/Linux.

    The need to address a new market. Currently their hardware appeals mainly to:

    1. Professional graphics dorks
    2. .edu (losing battle) and home users
    3. Some small business professionals - music, a few lawyers, etc.
    3. Servers meant for Pro use, but too pricey for pro-sumer or consumer use.

    But their new OS appeals to computer professionals, higher end educational and scientific professionals, and anybody else who wants to experiment with and learn about an OS from the ground up. The robustness of the OS is going to be fairly transparent to their current hardware purchasers, manifested by the fact that it doesn't crash and is easy to use (two things which should be expected). But the people who are attracted to the OS by its capability and flexibility expect the same from the hardware and Apple doesn't currently offer that.

    I say reconfigure the product line and the store. Keep the beautiful professional and entry level laptops. Keep the readymade economic and powerful desktop options. But give us one more category. The Tinker-Mac.

    -Appealing yet super-functional case. Easy to open. Designed more to the aesthetic of the Xserve than a desktop. Sleek, basic, tough looking.
    -"Apple" processors in several grades.
    -The option to add another processor.
    -Optional HD's. Space for 2-3.
    -Optional optical media.
    -Optional video board.
    -One Enet card + slot for at least one more.
    -As many open PCI slots as possible
    -Firewire, USB, etc (optional?) preferably on the front
    -Feel free to contribute what I'm forgetting.
    ~$400-500

    Apple needs to capitalize on the fact that many people who like to tinker with the OS and box love their OS, and want a box that's affordable enough to truly personalize. And I think they'd make a ton of dough by offering this option. They give us the option of an empty case with that's capable of running their OS on their processor spec, and accept that the people buying it are capable of researching compatible components on their own will not only sell a boatload of boxes, but persuade more HW developers to write drivers for OS X. Or the open source community will.

    Screw all this "port to Intel" crapola. Apple needs to accept that there are people who want to run their OS in a build-your-own manner, and they can build the bare bones machines for that crowd, make it a unique selling point, and still make their margins.

  28. not if you drag the damn thing around by dj_virto · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I do magazine design work, which involves mostly working at home but then visiting client's offices. The imac is surprisingly well adapted to this lifestyle. LCD is right out, because the colors are too inaccurate, especially when you have 2-4 people looking at the screen at once from different angles.. Anything bigger than 15" would be tough to carry in one hand while you carry everything else in the other one. Anyway, don't be so snooty. Plenty of people who use their computers all the time are perfectly satisfied with 15".. or even 13" *gasp* monitors!