Slashdot Mirror


Opera Releases Version 7 For Linux

Wee writes "I happened to notice this morning that Opera 7 for Linux has been released. New features include fastforward and rewind, the ability to take notes in conjuction with web pages, a cookie manager, a password manager, and a very serviceable integrated email client called M2 (which was previously only available for the Windows version). Version 7 of Opera also represents a complete code rewrite, from the rendering engine up, and the improvements are fairly significant. Mirrors for debs, rpms and tarballs are on Opera's download page."

46 of 391 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Old news by Brummund · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is the release, the other were "technology previews" (ie alpha versions) and betas.

  2. MSN Bork bork! by agentZ · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does this version still display the MSN homepage in Sweedish Chef?

  3. Re:Eventually, this would happen by shatfield · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All of that new functionality, and I still can only send the equivalent of postcards -- Opera's M2 Email client doesn't have any support for PGP or GPG at all.

    While their initial betas were pretty shaky, this "gold" build is very stable and looks terrific. Once they get the PGP/GPG thing sorted out, I'll have to evaluate it against Mozilla and see which I like more :)

    --
    "To make a mistake is only human; to persist in a mistake is idiotic." Cicero
  4. Re:It's not free! by Cyno01 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, but its definitly worth paying for.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  5. True, BUT by Hal+The+Computer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    True it may not be open source, But No one claimed that it was free software. Heck, the title for slashdot even says, News for nerd, Stuff that Matters. It dosent say, all free software.

    --

    int main(void){int x=01232;while(malloc(x));return x;}
  6. Helping everyone... by zbowling · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Great. By releasing this newwer version of Opera, they are helping them get themselves more credit in the browser market. This will make it harder for designers to make the point that IE is the most used browser, so we will target only them, an idea of the past. Its hurting the Microsoft monopoly. I support this move all the way. It will make content more execessable to Linux users, but in the process will force people to make their information accessable to everyone without IE by weaning away from their IE only technologies (like VBScript, ActiveX controls, ASP.NET objects designed just for IE, and a number of other MS only techs). I don't personally like Opera but I use Mozilla (mostly the Firebird/Phonix version).

    --
    No.
    1. Re:Helping everyone... by _newwave_ · · Score: 3, Informative

      ASP.NET objects designed just for IE

      I don't know what you're talking about...ASP.NET controls run server side and has little or nothing to do w/ specific browsers.Are you insinuating that the asp.net objects purposely render html code that works only w/ IE? If so, I'd love to see an example of this.

      The only distinction that ASP.NET makes is between "up/down level" browsers, which really only affects a small subset of validation controls. The behaviour difference is whether some javascript validation code is referenced in the page, if you've used one of these validation controls. If this code doesn't work for a particular browser, one is always free to replace/modify it...either way, the validation is always performed server side.

    2. Re:Helping everyone... by zbowling · · Score: 3, Informative

      not really... ASP.NET objects do use embeded javascript and style commands that only IE will understand and display correctly. I've seen it first hand.

      --
      No.
  7. Be careful... by emo+boy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Fat lady in viking hat not included.

  8. Opera 7.11 RPMs on default Red Hat 8.0 don't work by rklrkl · · Score: 5, Informative
    All 4 varieties of RPMs for Opera 7.11 don't work on Red Hat 8.0 because they've linked dynamically against an older openmotif library - I'm guessing possibly because of Netscape 4.X plugin incompatibilities with the later openmotif library that comes with Red Hat 8.0 by default. I'd have linked statically against the appropriate library in that case, but the Opera folks decided not to.

    To fix this, you have to "rpm -Uvh openmotif21-2.1.30-6.i386.rpm" from one of your Red Hat install CDs (yep, the older openmotif21 RPM is not installed by default on Red Hat 8.0). Sadly, this crucial dependency problem is not mentioned on either the download page or the FAQ, but is buried in their knowledge base here. Hope this helps folks struggling out there...

  9. Opera has lost it's appeal by Zeut · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I used to use Opera a lot. Primarily due to the fact that I could have it open up with all my web pages at once. Now that I can do this with Mozilla, I no longer use Opera. The only thing I still miss are the mouse gestures.

    1. Re:Opera has lost it's appeal by cscx · · Score: 4, Informative

      The only thing I still miss are the mouse gestures.


      Actually in IE if you hold down the shift key, the scroll-wheel becomes a back-forward wheel, which is all I used the gestures for when I used Opera. Although they were cool, I have to admit.

  10. Re:It's not free! by cscx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Warning! The slice of pizza I had for lunch wasn't free either.

    Some things are just worth paying for.

  11. Flash, Opera, and Firebird? by loomis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From what I've read, people have had 50/50 success with getting flash working correctly. Sort of the same thing that's been haunting Firebird/Phoenix.

    So my question is, have you gotten Flash to run correctly under the new Opera, and more importantly, why are there so many problems with these fringe browsers and Flash?

    Loomis

    --
    "The television is the retina of the mind's eye" - Videodrome
    1. Re:Flash, Opera, and Firebird? by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd have to venture that part of the problem, if you want to call it that, is that a good portion of users that use "fringe" browsers don't WANT flash, and so don't encounter any problem. I certainly don't need advertisements barking at me, so I would consider having Flash not work a bonus.

      Just a thought.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
  12. Re:Why does Opera get so much play on Slashdot? by KrispyKringle · · Score: 5, Funny
    Oh, lingenfr, when will you learn? Unlike MS, who simply cannot afford such services (they barely have enough money for advertising as is), Opera, being one of the world's largest (and most sinister) software companies, spends billions to get the media in their collective pockets. This includes, of course, the editorial board of Slashdot.

    The days of journalistic integrity are gone. How does the NYTimes manage to maintain their position at the top of the newspaper food chain? Well, they make up stories, but thats an exception (well, they and Fox). How does Slashdot afford all those fancy newfangled features, like "graphics" and "icons"? Simple. By allowing their opinions to be bought by Opera.

  13. Re:Why does Opera get so much play on Slashdot? by Moses+Lawn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It gets a lot of play because it's a cool piece of software and a lot of people use it. Their licensing model is about the very opposite of Microsoft's: use it for free and look at a small ad (that your eye will not notice after a week), or pay a bit and don't see the ad. I somehow can't see Microsoft adopting this.

    No, it's not free. So what? This is a geek news site that discusses things of interest to the community, not a Free Software site. You don't complain when articles about Unreal Tournament and Neverwinter Nights get posted, do you?

    As a user of Opera since v.3.something, I'm nothing but impressed by how it's improved. It's a lot better at getting to most sites, especially if you tell it to pretend to be IE in the agent string. I don't do online banking, so I can't say how well it works everywhere. I sometimes have to use IE on a page it doesn't like, but it's damn rare.

    --

    What if life is just a side effect of some other process and God has no idea we exist?

  14. Re:Opera 7.11 RPMs on default Red Hat 8.0 don't wo by IO+ERROR · · Score: 4, Informative
    On Red Hat 9, I did this instead:

    # ln -s ../../X11R6/lib/libXm.so.3 /usr/local/lib/libXm.so.2
    # ldconfig
    # rpm --nodeps -ivh opera-7.11-20030515.4-shared-qt.i386.rpm

    Works perfectly, as far as I can tell.

    --
    How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
  15. Mouse Gestures for Mozilla by friedegg · · Score: 4, Informative

    Have you tried Optimoz Mouse Gestures?

    --
    Google doesn't index user sigs, so stop trying to "Google Bomb" with them.
  16. Mouse Gestures here Re:Opera has lost it's appeal by EricHsu · · Score: 5, Informative

    Check out the Mozilla Mouse Gestures project. I don't use Opera, so I'm not sure if it reproduces all Opera gestures, but knowing Mozilla, there will be a very awkward but powerful way to customize it the way you like... - Eric

  17. Re:Why does Opera get so much play on Slashdot? by Wee · · Score: 4, Informative
    My question is why a closed, not free product gets a plug every time they put out a new release?

    It's good software. Being closed or open doesn't matter to many people as long as the software is good. Quite a lot of Mac software (including the OS itself) isn't open, yet you'll see plenty of it here for that same reason. Opera is incredibly fast, very stable and secure. It's not IE, and so represents choice. It's cross platform. It's highly configurable. Lots of people use it, especially those not quite "in the mainstream" (geeks; Slashdot's target audience). Pick one reason I guess.

    As far as needing another browser for MS-centric stuff, well I suspect you'd have the same problem if you used Moz, Konqueror, Netscape 4, or anything that isn't IE with MS Money and such (in fact, you'd probably have issues even with older versions of IE). I've seen some issues with sites and online apps that cater exclusively to IE. And since IE isn't available for Linux I have no choice but to find alternatives. Ecommerce hasn't been a problem, however. I've shopped online at about every major ecommerce site you could probably think of without any issues I can recall.

    Is this one of those nested advertisements?

    No. They may exist, but this isn't one of them. At least nobody paid me to submit it. I literally happened to go to opera.com this morning to insatll the beta of version 7 on a new machine and saw the press release about 7 going gold. Figuring that other people on Slashdot might like to know about it (see above), I submitted it. I also recalled seeing the 7 beta get a mention a few months ago (which is what caused me to go an grab the beta, actually) and I figured folks here would like to know about the final release version too.

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

  18. It's easy to be fast... by mikol · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...when you don't care about being correct. I grabbed a copy of 7.11 to see what's what. It's still blazingly fast, but can't render DOM/JS heavy content that both Mozilla and MSIE can.

  19. No Mac Opera 7 by runenfool · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It looks like they have indeed given up on working on the Mac version.

    http://www.opera.com/products/desktop/index.dml? pl atform=mac

    I don't think a lot of Mac users will miss it, however. With Safari doing the things that people would have bought Opera for, its a tough sell. Of course, Opera could have made it better for themselves by making a browser that wasn't dog slow on the Mac.

    1. Re:No Mac Opera 7 by Creosote · · Score: 3, Informative

      It may be that few Mac-only users will miss a decent Opera version, but it's a loss to people who move around from Mac to Windows to Linux. I used (and paid for) Opera when I was predominantly working on a Windows desktop, and used the Linux version from time to time. Last year when I migrated to OS X for my work platform I tried to stick with Opera, but the Mac version was so deficient and buggy that I shifted to Mozilla on all platforms; I preferred Opera's navigational modes and shortcuts, but cross-platform consistency and reliability was much more important. Proper CSS rendering is another factor in Mozilla's favor.

      Nowadays I use Mozilla at work for my heavy-duty functioning, while on the iBook I got for home use I'm tending to use Safari and Mozilla Firebird. On the family desktop PC that handles finances and Internet commerce it's Mozilla. (Opera on Windows was less likely to work with secure commercial websites than Mozilla anyway, in my experience.)

      If Opera had kept current with its Mac development, chances are I'd have paid for a two-platform license. Now it's unlikely I'll go back to Opera on any platform. Don't know if that's at all a representative experience, but there it is.

  20. Ads by The+Bungi · · Score: 4, Funny
    I happened to notice this morning

    ... when I got to work at

    Opera Software ASA
    Waldemar Thranes gate 98
    NO-0175 OSLO
    NORWAY

    ... that the new version for Linux was released! Imagine that!

  21. Re:Why does Opera get so much play on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Haven't you hung around these type of people before? The more obscure a product and the less people use it, the cooler you are. Example:

    circa 1998:

    Bob: I use Windows.

    Bart: *nose in the air* Hmm. I hope you enjoy your indentured servitude, Gatesophile. I bet you can't even compile a kernel. Hell, my *mom* uses Windows.

    circa 2002:

    Bob: Linux really is great, I think I'm giving up Windows for sure.

    Bart: *nose in the air* Hmm. Linux is all right, but monolithic kernels are so .. 1998. Besides everyone knows the GPL is evil. Personally I'm using Mac OS X on my iBook. I bet you don't even know how to unload a kernel extension. Hell, my *wife* uses Linux.

    circa 2005:

    Bob: Wow, you're right Mac OS X Bobcat 10.5 is awesome, I love how my PowerBook's desktop automatically transfers to my iPad whenever I unroll it.

    Bart: *nose in the air* Mac OS X? Please, it hit its peak at 5% market penetration. Now it's just another piece of closed source software. Personally, I use GNU/HURD. Hell, my *son* uses Mac OS X.

    Bob: I bet you use Opera don't you?

    Bart: I certainly do. Version 10.0 finally supports CSS style sheets. I bet you don't even know what that is, trendmonkey.

  22. Re:Opera just feels... odd by mattyj · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've been using, and paying for it, on Windows since version 4.x. I've been using it on Linux since the day the first technology preview came out. I think I've had a good amount of time to see it evolve, along with all the other browsers. For me, Opera has always been on the cutting edge.

    Opera had tabbed windows five years ago. Opera (I think) invented mouse gestures. Opera was the first with a cookie manager and had settings for privacy issues before it was an issue.

    Opera has had a popup blocker for longer than anyone.

    If all these features sound familiar, because Mozilla/whatever has them, it's because those 'other' browsers are just now catching up.

    There is a new feature in this version of Opera called 'FastForward/Rewind' that, astonishingly, works really well. I would expect Mozilla to pick this up in about a year.

    If you don't like the look and feel out of the box, you can change just about anything regarding Opera. I like having my location bar on the bottom, so that's where I put it. I have my tabs down there, too. I can put my button bar at the bottom, but I prefer it on top. I don't like skins, so I turn them off. It's a browser how I want it.

    Back in the day, Opera sold itself on size alone. When Internet Explorer and Netscape clocked in at 10 megs plus, Opera for Windows fit on a floppy (sans Java, of course.) It's not currently small enough to do that, but it is still much smaller than any other browser, and takes less resources. It is not a memory or drive space hog. It is small, fast and sleek.

    For this alone, it's worth paying for. Mozilla/Netscape are still whores to M$ as far as I'm concerned, and even Phoenix/whatever is getting too big and klunky.

    Innovation in the browser market costs money, and I'm more than happy to put a few bucks into Opera. The tradeoff on price is that I don't have to have my browser core dump a few times every day, and I don't have to beta test software for them. This software is consumer grade, not nerd grade, if you catch my drift. I love it, and you should love it to.

    Maybe it's because I've been running it so long, but I've never had any real problem running plugins, especially Flash. When you rpm your opera, it tells you the Motif version you are missing. A slashdot user of average intelligence can search opera.com for download links to motif. Or follow the link posted previously. Plugger and all it's various codecs work flawlessly, as well as the Acrobat Reader plugin and RealPlayer. Perhaps the only thing I have trouble with is Microsoft specific languages (.asp) but if you're frequenting places that are dumb enough to expect everyone to have a M$ OS, maybe http://www.ilovewindows.com is a better web site for you to frequent.

    -mattyj

  23. Lost it's appeal? Are you kidding? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Informative

    Opera has a lot going for it.

    In the past, Opera made a name for itself by being a smaller, faster browser. That's still true, but now it also has a superior feature set that elevates it above all browsers.

    Som of the better features include:

    Sessions - allow you to open up many different pages at once, either at startup or at any time;
    Mouse gestures - semi-intuitive mouse click and movement patterns that allow you to go back (hold down right mouse button, click the left one), go forward (hold down left mouse button, click the right one), etc, that greatly speed up the browsing experience;
    Notes - just what the name suggests; this lets you save and enter snippets of text to and from a browser window;
    M2 mail client - integrated mail client with spam filtering and POP3, IMAP, and ESMTP support;
    Wand - a fantastic password manager that saves lots of time when logging into sites;
    Transfers - a decent download manager; and
    Fast Forward and Rewind - lets you navigae forward automatically using the most obvious link (which can great but can also be a bit hit and miss sometimes).

    That's not an exhaustive list, it's just some of the features that I've found in Opera that make me love it. Yes, some of these features can be found in Mozilla but, equally, some of them can't.

    And while Opera might not be free, it's not exactly a rip-off either. True, there is an ad-supported version that won't cost you anything (and that doesn't impact on your surfing speed - check out the Opera website to find out why) but when a product's this good and "just works", why not support the developers by buying it?

    If you haven't already tried Opera then do it right away. Give it a month or two and you'll never want to go back to MSIE, Netscape, Mozilla or whatever else you've been using.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:Lost it's appeal? Are you kidding? by critter_hunter · · Score: 4, Informative

      Opera has a feature similar to type-ahead. Type ctrl+j to open a list of links in the page. Type in letters - the list of links will decrease as you type in new letters to display only those containing the sequence of letter you've specified (similar to the Jump feature in Winamp (and I believe, XMMS)

      The list of features the parent has posted are the features your grandmother would use. Opera has a lot more features than that - excellent keyboard navigation, incredibly configurable interface, the ability to change your Quick Preferences (UA string, pop-up blocking, toggling Java/JavaScript/Background Music/Plugins/Gif Animation, cookies, referrer logging and proxy servers) in a few keypresses, image zooming, Navigation Bar (allowing you to get to a document's related document (link rel = First, Previous, Next, Last, Home, Index, Search etc). Then there's Kiosk mode (allowing you to securely setup a browsing computer in a public place), all the neat things for developpers (such as the ability to see what your page would look like when viewed from a PDA, or to validate your page by pressing alt+ctrl+v), the useful user stylesheet they provide (Accessibility layout, Debug with outline and Hide certain-sized elements, in particular are nice) and tons of things I'm just forgetting or haven't even discovered yet.

      Opera 7 is light, fast, incredibly efficient and full of features - well worth the money. Now that it's (officially) out on Linux, I'll be able to take advantage of their multiple platform discount :)

      --
      Karma: Could be worse (could be raining)
    2. Re:Lost it's appeal? Are you kidding? by interiot · · Score: 3, Informative
      Mozilla also has most of those features. They may not be as straightforward or as immediately available as in Opera (eg. may require downloading a module, hacking the prefs file, etc.) but in a sense, this is one of Mozilla's strenghths, at least for programmers/hackers (not grandmothers).

      Besides being open source and having the C source availalbe, Mozilla contains approx 150,000 lines or 4.5mb (uncompressed) of javascript code. Its object hierarchy is very accessible and can be easily reconfigured. New modules can alter the existing set of javascript in infinite ways.

      So, while it's likely harder to tweak Mozilla to exactly suit your needs, in the long run, it's much much more flexible than opera, and because it has a larger marketshare, its features will eventually easily surpass Opera's. Mozilla may always be a step behind in terms of speed, but in terms of features, it definitely won't.

    3. Re:Lost it's appeal? Are you kidding? by maxpublic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Who cares if they can be found in Mozilla or not? This article isn't about Mozilla - it's about Opera.

      In any event, Opera is still much, much faster than Mozilla, and it looks like it always will be.

      The real question here is: what makes Mozilla more appealing than Opera? That it's free and open source? Big - fucking - deal.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  24. My word by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Funny
    Opera 7 for Linux has been released.

    [checks to see if Satan is skating]

  25. Re:Why does Opera get so much play on Slashdot? by interiot · · Score: 4, Funny
    Their licensing model is about the very opposite of Microsoft

    Or you can use Mozilla and take out the word "about".

  26. Re:Opera 7.11 RPMs on default Red Hat 8.0 don't wo by shancock · · Score: 3, Informative

    I tried this also on my RH9 system and yes, it forced the install but I still have problems. Only root can run Opera and I get a message complaining of a segmentation fault and it does not find my java installation which I have.

    It seems very very fast but I also seem to have some font problems. The menu bar fonts are very small and the rest of the page seems a size or two large.

    I really want to use Opera but these install problems are simply not acceptable. I had to pay up another $15 to upgrade from 6 to 7 and this shouldn't be happening.

  27. Most Probably by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've only got the Windows version to go on at the moment but Opera 7 can window every which way you like. Tabs, subwindows or top level windows in whatever mixture you choose.

    In this respect Opera have done a great job in sidestepping any doctrinal war and just letting each user work however suits them best.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  28. All very well... by Faust7 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Cookie manager, password manager, skinning, fine, fine.

    This is the part I actually care about:

    The standards support in Opera 7 has been improved with added support for DOM level 2 and CSS2; improved ECMAScript and HTML 4.01 support; and complete WML 1.3 and 2.0 support. Opera 7 also handles non-standard pages using DHTML, giving Opera's millions of old and new users a hassle-free Internet experience.

    That is what's important to me. What I ultimately want to hear is that Opera can render everything Internet Explorer 6.0 can, if not more. Most websites are designed with IE in mind--like it or not, the dominant browser drives website innovation, not the W3C. It's not right, but that's how it is.

    The only way I would ever switch to Opera would be if I knew I was going to have the same, or better, viewing functionalty as IE. It looks as if they're finally making progress in this respect.

    1. Re:All very well... by maxpublic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      the dominant browser drives website innovation

      The dominant browser drives website *stagnation*. It's the maverick that drives innovation - in *any* area of human endeavor.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    2. Re:All very well... by NisJ�rgensen · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The standards support in Opera 7 has been improved with added support for DOM level 2 and CSS2; improved ECMAScript and HTML 4.01 support; and complete WML 1.3 and 2.0 support. Opera 7 also handles non-standard pages using DHTML, giving Opera's millions of old and new users a hassle-free Internet experience.

      That is what's important to me. What I ultimately want to hear is that Opera can render everything Internet Explorer 6.0 can, if not more.


      I hope you realize you are asking for two different things:

      1) Opera implements more standards.
      2) Opera renderssall the pages that IE does.

      For sure Opera can render things TODAY that IE cannot. However, for some reason very few people are using the features not supported by IE
  29. The irony... by KevinIsOwn · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ironically enough, my Opera crashed on me when I viewed this... Looks like there's still some work to do ;)

  30. As someone who paid for Opera 5.0 . . by alhaz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I will not be upgrading to 7.0 any time soon.

    Not just because i'd have to upgrade my registration key to get rid of the ads, but because the entire ui just feels dumb. They threw the baby out with the bathwater.

    I don't like the new UI. If they release a skin that makes it look and behave like opera 6 (or, better yet, 5), maybe I might consider it then, but they also dumbed down the configuration interface.

    Great to hear that it's a complete rewrite. I guess now they'll never fix the ECMA bugs in 6.12.

    --
    This is just like television, only you can see much further.
    1. Re:As someone who paid for Opera 5.0 . . by Yosho · · Score: 4, Informative

      http://my.opera.com/customize/skins/index.pl?cat=O pera%20style&author=0&perscreen=10&skip=0&search=& show=new

      Enjoy! If you don't like those particular skins, they have a lot of other ones, many of which look quite nice. Also, although the button layout and such is different from older versions, it's pretty easy to rearrange them as you like. I don't understand what you mean by "dumbed down the configuration interface," though -- it seems pretty much the same to me..

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
  31. Re:Why does Opera get so much play on Slashdot? by kurosawdust · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm tolerant of people overestimating the Law of Accelerating Returns to say that we'll be in flying cars and talking to our quantum computers real soon now, but HURD working in 2005?!?

  32. Re:Does disabling it get me extra functionality? by skt · · Score: 3, Informative

    Mozilla is very hack-friendly, most simple customizations like remapping the keyboard are found here. The deeper you get, the more technical the documentation becomes, but that is what is so great about open software like mozilla IMHO. If you ever have a need for that kind of information, it's there.. use software like IE and you're stuck with what your vendor provides.

    I think that type-ahead-find in mozilla is a great feature as well, but it does kill off keyboard mappings in its current state. Hopefully when it becomes more mature it will require a leader for all searches or at least leave it as a preference to the user. I had remapped mozilla with a vi-like keyboard interface that worked out well until type-ahead-find came along. The only thing better than using hjkl for navigation is type-ahead-find in mozilla :P

  33. Re:How about W3C DOM support? by yaphadam097 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    In reply to my own question, I found this doc on the Opera site

    Looks like the support has improved but there are still some areas that need work.

  34. Re:Opera just feels... odd by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Opera also support yet another innovative feature. If the feature is enabled, it analyzes web pages to present a navigation bar where possible. For example, when I browse this Slashdot topic, I have a small navigation bar with these links:

    Home (goes to news page)
    Search (goes to search page)
    Previous (goes to previous topic)
    Next (goes to next topic)
    Author (goest to all Slashdot stories written by Timothy; i.e. the author of this topic)

    Pretty cool, and the user can furhter customize the bar if necessary to have more buttons.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  35. Opera for USB Memory Sticks by Mubarmij · · Score: 5, Informative
    I have installed Opera on my USB memory stick. Now I can just launch it in my office, home, an internet cafe.. and even when I am not connected to the internet, and it will open with all the pages I have last viewed the exact way I have had them before removing the USB stick.

    This is possible because Opera has two great features:

    1. On Windows at least (I have no idea about the Linux version), it installs cleanly to a directory. There are no hard coded registry keys or such. Everything is under the installation directory.

    2. It has a great crash recovery feature. If a PC (or just Opera) crashes for whatever reason, I just relaunch it and it will get me back to exactly where I was before the crash, and all the pages will load from the up-to-the-minute cache.

    If you want to do the same, here is the trick:

    1. Install Opera to a directory in your USB memory stick, ie, K:\Opera

    2. Configure all that you want.

    3. That is it. Now, the only thing that is hard coded in the installation is the drive letter (K in the example above), so when you go to the other machine, just issue the DOS command "SUBST G: K:\".

    This will give you a new drive named K: pointing to the actual USB drive, which is G: in the example.

    Now I have my favorite browser, my links, and the web papges I was reading last all in my key ring. Can't say I can do this with any other browser.

    Have fun.