Slashdot Mirror


Wireless Wine Monitoring

Wynken de Word writes "An article in Canada's Globe and Mail says 'vineyard owner Don King is coaxing 30,000 plants to grow grapes of exactly the right colour, size and sweetness to produce great ice wine and other fine vintages...with the help of judicious watering, a knowledge of the age-old art of viniculture -- and electronic sensing devices linked together in a wireless network.' Using an Intel-based TinyOS and TinyDB, multiple sensing devices monitor grape micro climates and help determine irrigation and frost patterns."

124 comments

  1. oh YES!! by purduephotog · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As an avid wine consumer (not the french word;P) you can have no idea how happy this makes me. My cellar is currently stocked with ~130 bottles, mostly from SE Australia (Cabs) and quite a few from upstate NY where I live. Managing the microclimate to produce consistent wines is far more important than trying to hit a home run. I shy away from buying multiple cases of wine until I sample several different bottles of the same year, just on the chance that I got lucky.

    Now if I only owned a larger back yard.....

    1. Re:oh YES!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the word "wine" is French. I think "comsume" is, too. Why is the so much anti- French feeling at the moment?

    2. Re:oh YES!! by the+clean · · Score: 1

      I would guess it is due to the fact that the French were so insistant, persistant, consistant in their attempts to keep the US out of Iraq. Some (not all) Americans have seen this as anti-american, and consequently have decided to do sillyin things like stop saying French derived words, calling liberty fries instead of french fries, throwing out their bottles of french dressing, and other totally unrelated and irrelevant acts that few people notice and no one really cares about.

    3. Re:oh YES!! by snatchitup · · Score: 1, Informative

      Sorry, the SE Australian Cabs are run of the mill at best.

      All this, Oooh Ahhh it's a Cab from Chile, or, it's a local wine from Upstate Wherever. Or, "Oh no, this is a Shiraz"...

      Don't kid yourself.

      They still can't touch a medium priced CAb from Sonomoa or Napa. I mean, Napa or Sonoma Grapes, not, "made in Napa" which means the grapes could've been shipped in from the mid-coast.

      The Californian product is even better than most French Bordeaux. You have to go to a First Growth to get something really, really good. Then you're talking $200/bottle new, and you have to wait a few years to get the real value.

      Me? Yeah, I've got a few bottles. I buy by the case to get the discount. Probably have about 25 cases downstairs. Some bought new in 1989. Yummy.

    4. Re:oh YES!! by Juln · · Score: 0, Troll

      We notice acts like throwing out Fench dressing, but mainly think those who would do such things are brainless slugs who are unable to think or follow logic, much less remember even recent history, and thus have the Fox News Channel form all of their opinions for them.

      --
      Juln
    5. Re:oh YES!! by aborchers · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, if Americans really knew anything about France and wanted to piss them off, we'd name more of our lousy food after them. ;-)

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    6. Re:oh YES!! by Achoi77 · · Score: 2, Informative
      It's completely unfair to compare California Cabs to French Bordeaux. First of all Boredeaux wines are always going to be blends of Merlot and Cab Sauv. While it is true that some Cali Cab makers also use Merlot to blend into their Cab labels, the amount of Merlot may be anywhere from between 10-2%. Bordeaux wines can have as much as 30% Merlot, depending on the year, the maker, etc.

      The Californian product is even better than most French Bordeaux.

      True, there are millions of gallons of French Bordeaux wines out there that just suck. But there are some nices ones out there as well. Chateau D`Armailhac is a 5th Growth, and for it's price it's quite excellent.

      To be fair, California makes LOTS of mediocre Cab Sauvs as well. In fact, in these past few years there has been just TOO many grapes grown in california, resulting in a grape glut. Some of those grapes are just going to be used to make industrial alcohol (Italy does the same with their grapes). But a lot of these grapes are used to make cheap, terrible mass-produced wine (or brandy, or vodka).

      My personal opinion is that Cali Cabs in general have too much tannin. Take a look at this year's Silver Oak. Bleah, I hate that. However, my favorite Cali Cab is Stags Leap SLV. I guess I could always age the wines, let the tannins soften up, but I hate the wait. :)

    7. Re:oh YES!! by cheesyfru · · Score: 1

      > They still can't touch a medium priced CAb from
      > Sonomoa or Napa.

      In price, you're certainly right. Napa cabs are second only to French Bordeaux in the "ridiculously overpriced" category. It's not to say these wines aren't good, or great at their best, but you can find wines that are just as good for a third of the price. I'm not sure I agree with you about Sonoma cabs, either, it's not the right area to grow a top-notch cab. It's better suited for whites, Zins, Pinots, etc.

      Unless you're a millionaire who can afford to spend obscene amounts of money on faddish wines, there are much better options out there. Try a Malbec from Argentina. Or a good-quality Aussie Shiraz. And even California Zins are still a decent value for an amazing wine.

    8. Re:oh YES!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fox channels eh? sounds like TV to me ....A french invention (Logie baird got there first but it is the French system we all use, not his- sorry Scots) Also, if the USA is so keen to set up democracy in every country it doesn't like, why can't it accept a democratic decision made by the democratic countries of the world. France was acting as the opposition party and bringing control to the madness, USA didn't like someone disagreeing and demonised the French to it's dumb public. This is very sad. Wake up America!!

    9. Re:oh YES!! by mrfrogx · · Score: 1

      quoted from: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/ga te/archive/2003/05/22/worldviews.DTL . . "It's one thing to rename french fries "freedom fries" in the dining halls of the U.S. Congress, but accusing France of having issued passports to officials of Saddam Hussein's regime so that they could leave Iraq is simply "unacceptable," French Foreign Minister Dominique de Villepin has warned. (Le Monde, http://www.lemonde.fr/article/0,5987,3222--320256- ,00.html) The passports allegation surfaced in The Washington Times earlier this month. Paris took it as another shot in a "disinformation campaign aimed at sullying France's image and misleading the public" as retribution for the Chirac government's opposition to Bush's Iraq policy. Now, Jean-David Levitte, France's ambassador to the United States, has sent a letter to the White House, the Pentagon, members of Congress and American newspaper and television-news editors asking them not to take part in a smear campaign that he believes can be traced to officials in the Bush administration."

    10. Re:oh YES!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The Californian product is even better than most French Bordeaux

      Only an American would ever say that. Come to Europe and have some decent German, French and Italian wine, then go home and see if you can drink more than a mouthful of American slop.

    11. Re:oh YES!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "the French were so insistant, persistant, consistant in their attempts to keep the US out of Iraq"

      Yeah, we were all like `lets go and kick some butt and kill us some gooks` and the french were all `hey, shouldn't we do this via the UN, and obey international law?` but we said `no WAY dude, we godda get out there now and show 'em who's boss, and gedda shit load of money for rebuilding all the bridges and shit we blew up`

    12. Re:oh YES!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ignorance in your post is amazing. Everyone has their own taste, but to speak in such generalities is amazing, not to mention that you're a bit behind the times. I can tell you that prices for California wines, Cabs in particular, have skyrocketed over the last 5 years. Sure there are plenty of fine Cal Cabs at nearly every price level, the problem is that there are better wines for less money from other countries.

      Consider the following:
      The 1999 Chateau St Jean Cinq Cepages, a well known and well made Bordeaux style blend from Sonoma, will set you back between $65 and $75 depending on where you're from.

      Now consider that the 1999 Chateau Lynch Bages, a well known and well made Bordeaux with a very similar blend of grapes, will set you back about $35 and offer similar quality.

      Don't even get me started on many of the Napa/Sonoma "premium blends" Its getting more and more difficult to find quality Cal Cabs for less than $40, which is unfortunate. This is all to apparent in the under $15 range, which is rightly dominated by excellent wines from Chile, Australia, and France.

      Here are some excellent recommendations of non Napa/Sonoma wines that'll make you change your mind.

      Chile:
      Casa Lapostelle Cabernet Sauvignon - about $10
      Montes Cab Sauv Reserve - About $8
      Montes Cab Sauv Alpha - About $14
      Almaviva - About $60

      Bordeaux:
      Cambon Le Pelouse - About $15
      Ste Colombe - About $12
      Marjosse - About $10
      D'Armailhac - About $25
      Branaire - About $25
      Lagrange [St Julien] - About $25

      I'd happily match any of these wines up against any California wine in their respective price categories.

      Lastly, unlike California, Bordeaux sets their prices based on current economic conditions and the quality of the vintage, which is something most other wine regions need to learn before puching more of their high priced swill from an off vintage onto us (see Napa 1998 for example). Oh yeah, and 2001 first growths are easily found for under $130, the 99's have been sighted for under $100 on occasion, and the 2002 futures are listed for about a $100 as well. Not cheap, but well less than the $200 price you stick on them.

    13. Re:oh YES!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you hate waiting and don't like young Cabs, stick to Pinot Noir then =)

  2. Don't know by Cackmobile · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This starts wine down the mass production route where they all taste the same. The grape variety is what gives wine is distinctiveness. If you had a whole vienyard the same you couldn't have nice blends. What about for sweet wines where they have the fungus growing, botrytus (i think thats how its spelt), they would go all wrong.

    --
    -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
    1. Re:Don't know by HowlinMad · · Score: 5, Interesting

      While I understand your concern, I do not think this will be such a problem. There are plenty of other factors, such as soil composition (nutrients et al.), pollution, and even the amount of sunshine it gets. There may be more, or less sunny days. I think this will help in getting more quality grapes out of a crop than it will for making a grape that tastes exactly the same year to year.

      Of course, I just might be full of it.

    2. Re:Don't know by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      as long as the grapes are cultivated outdoors, there will be variances in the taste from year to year. the only way I can think of to produce the same-tasting wine would be to cultivate your grapes in a hydroponic environment.

    3. Re:Don't know by squaretorus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      INSIGHTFUL!!!!!

      The biggest driver of mass produced wine is exactly the opposite of whats happening here. Grow bad / inconsistent grapes due to bad watering / pruning and you get unreliable wine.

      What happens to unreliable wine? It gets blended with all the other unreliable wine from the region and sold as 'Californian Red' or 'Chilean Merlot'.

      This is aiming to produce a saleable quantity of consistently good wine - not mass production. This is ambitious wine making - in that he aims to produce GOOD wine - not just wine.

      I assume you dont drink a lot of the stuff!

    4. Re:Don't know by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, this day is a lot closer than you might think. Do a Google on "wine reverse osmosis", and you'll see what I mean. Reverese osmosis allows the vintner to selectively remove water and sugar so as to adjust the brix, acidity, and concentration of volatiles, tannins, etc. Nobody produces crappy years anymore, because even good vintages are run through a reverse osmosis machine to make them better and more consistent... more "mass produced". Every year is a good year, although some are still outstanding.

      The grape varieties are being modified with modern agronomic breeding tools, including genetic modifications, to make them better able to produce decent juice from poorer soils/sites. As with beer, the yeast strains used in wine making are being controlled with sophisticated molecular biology tools to get the mixes of micromolar end products of fermentation that make for an interesting wine. Precision agriculture has been used in high-value crops like wine grapes for many years, it's just that now it's starting to be wirelessly networked and automated.

      Only small-volume boutique wines are made by Francois/Guisseppe relying solely on the wisdom his father handed down to him from his father before him.

      --
      The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
    5. Re:Don't know by m00nun1t · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Would you like a McWine with that big mac?"

    6. Re:Don't know by inoffensif · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have to agree and I am a little suspicious about the long term effects this will have on the wine industry, although the trend has been in this direction for the last few years. The homogenization of wine crops over an area and over time goes against everything that makes wine appreciation worthwile.

      You could draw an analogy between wine and theater.

      The theater differs from the movies in the way that the audience knows that they are assisting a unique event where there are subtle differences in the play and in the interaction with the audience each and every night, and where once in a while something totally stands out in the performance and makes it truly unique. Whereas at the movies, however good the movie may be, you can be assured that what you are seeing will be exactly the same as what everybody else will see, and if you see it again it will again be the same.

      The same can be said about winemaking, some years a vineyard will produce a crop that has had more exposure to the sun, more rain, etc... Even the fruits and nuts which grow next to the grapes any given year will greatly affect its taste, this is what makes wine appreciation and comparison a delightful experience. The homogenized and controlled approach ressembles cinema in the way that it aims to deliver the same experience over and over again with the least variation.

      --
      - you are sofa king weed todd did
    7. Re:Don't know by the+clean · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you are somewhat mistaken. While it is true the grape variety adds to the distinctiveness of a wine, it is the specific blend of different varieties of grapes that lead to these wine varities. I am not aware of any comercial wines (although I see no reason why there shouldn't be any) that are solely comprised of one variety of grape. Infact, in most countries the exact blends and precentages are strictly regulated by the national governments. Again, while it is true the different grapes add distinctive quailites to the wines, if a vineyard wants to produce a run of brollos, say, they want to make sure the entire run is of the same quality, otherwise the reputation of the wine and the vineyard will be at stake. Consequently, they would want some guarantee that every grape of a certain variety which is to make up the wine is exactly the same. Hence, each crop can be massed produced to be identical (please, no grape clones!), and yet keep the distinctive wines as different blends are produced.

    8. Re:Don't know by jpc · · Score: 2, Informative

      I dont know where you come from or what what wine you drink, but large numbers of wines are only made from one grape variety. SOme wine varieties are almost never blended (eg Sauvignon blanc, Riesling, often Pinot noir). But this in no way means they taste the same. A lot of the taste depends on how you grow the grape and produce the wine.

    9. Re:Don't know by zakath · · Score: 4, Informative

      This 'all tastes the same' has already been identified as a problem by many wine purists. The Bordeaux flavour paradigm being copied by everyone from Oz to Chile to the US and on and on has brought on a homogenous affect to wine making. Not to mention the 'Parker effect' whereby taster/critic Robert Parker scores a wine well by his (impressive) palate and the wine immediately goes through the roof in terms of price. This has made wine makers all over the world scurrying to produce wines they hope will appeal to his taste thus enabling them to command great prices. Wine is already being mass produced everywhere - its not the quantity of grape that is so much the problem you appear to be referring to but the wine maker and the flavour he's targetting that are more of a problem for those who crave variety and maybe mor of the 'way things used to be'.

      --

    10. Re:Don't know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll post as "anonymous coward", only because I don't feel like signing up for yet another account for which I will make a one time comment.... :-)

      The one thing that it appears alot of people are forgetting is that it is the terroir that makes for a consistently interesting palette possibility. Note the word possibility... The other two major influences are the weather (which helps achieve grape quality for the yard) and wine-growing/making style/skill (amount of canopy, balance of barrel, malolactic fermentation, etc. fits in this category).

      It is terroir that influences more than anything why a Sauvignon Blanc from NZ tastes nothing like a Sancerre.

      Some weather aspects will not be in control of the winegrower either - such as the amount of sunshine, etc.

      I hope this helps achieve consistently higher quality year-to-year so that every year will be more enjoyable (meaning less peaks and valleys, but the overall altitude is closer to the peaks) rather than having the drastic year-to-year changes.

      Paul B "aka Anonymuous Coward"

  3. Don King.. by Blaster+Jaack · · Score: 5, Funny

    owner Don King is coaxing 30,000 plants to grow grapes of exactly the right colour, size and sweetness

    because of legal issues they had to replace the word boxers with plants

    1. Re:Don King.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      owner Don King is coaxing 30,000 plants to grow grapes of exactly the right colour, size and sweetness

      because of legal issues they had to replace the word boxers with plants


      Makes sense as most boxers have the brains of a plant...

    2. Re:Don King.. by Eberlin · · Score: 1

      Damn, only in America!

      But seriously, what does 802.11 have to do with running Windows programs in Linux?

  4. Wireless wine by oniony · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can't say I've ever known a wine with wires.

    Seriously though, as more product based (manufacturing and farming) companies turn to wireless technology the potential for disaster grows. Someone spoofing these plants' state could seriously write-off the crop. I'm counting the days until I see the first wireless industrial sabotage.

    --

    Powered by onion juice.

    1. Re:Wireless wine by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      Someone spoofing these plants' state could seriously write-off the crop.

      Well...growing anything--grapes included--will always require the grower to go outside and look at the plants periodically. If a grower gets messages from his plants saying they need water, and this happens while it's raining, he would probably be suspicious.

      There's lots of feedback in this system--the grower can use the wireless network to monitor very closely the conditions in the vineyard, but he has to go out and physically examine the grapes.

      The only way to sabotage a vineyard is to walk into the field and poison the plants. Or bribe someone who works the fields to do it. Or employ biological warfare. Ontario wineries have had to discard roughly a million liters of wine from the 2001 vintage because of an infestation of Asian ladybugs. (The ladybugs took shelter from the cold nestled among the bunches of grapes. They ended up pressed and vinified with the grape juice. Though nontoxic, they add an unpleasant aftertaste.) Someone bent on sabotage might be smarter to raise ladybugs.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    2. Re:Wireless wine by davidgay · · Score: 1

      This is where TinySec comes in handy ;-) (making sure that at least one Berkeley reference shows up in this thread ;-))

  5. Branching out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice to see Don King taking the time to enjoy some of the finer things in life... rather that exploiting young boxing talent and squeezing them dry like grapes.

  6. other-kind-of-wine dept.?? by Lu+Xun · · Score: 4, Funny

    And here I thought it was something to keep those pesky Windows APIs from getting all uppity.

    --
    That's not a soda... it's a caffeine delivery device!
    1. Re:other-kind-of-wine dept.?? by bdc0 · · Score: 1

      I have had a wireless whine monitor for years and it does a great job of monitoring whines and cries. They called it a "baby/child monitor" at the store though ;-) Oh, slightly different spelling, I guess.

  7. Probably redundant by Cackmobile · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I forgot to mention that this would eliminate yearly changes. Every year would be the same. you wouldn't get the great vintages. Also how would you know that you have the best vintage possible if its always the same.

    --
    -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
    1. Re:Probably redundant by Jellybob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just because things can be monitored, it doesn't stop you changing things.

      Anything can be abused in some way - it's the decision of the producer whether or not they still make changes to their procedures to produce different types of wine. The monitoring just assists them to make sure that the changes can be reproduced if it *does* turn out to make an excellent wine.

    2. Re:Probably redundant by RealErmine · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Every year would be the same. you wouldn't get the great vintages. Also how would you know that you have the best vintage possible if its always the same.

      Couldn't a vineyard owner set up microclimate zones within his crops to produce a wide range of specific flavored grapes? Then it would only be a matter of picking specific flavors from the crop either for a homogenous wine made of grapes from a single zone, or a blended wine which incorporates the flavor of multiple Flavor Zones(TM). The experimentation could lead to a better wine for each vintage instead of a semi-random distribution of great vintages.

      I can also see how this would allow smaller vineyard owners the opportunity to produce more than one or two types of wine since the management of microclimates would ensure better crop yields in smaller areas.

      It's up to the vineyard owner how (s)he wants to experiment with the microclimates in order to produce grapes/wine. The imaginitive ones will probably make good use of the technology to make excellent wines of all types.

      --
      Dewey, you fool! Your decimal system has played right into my hands!
    3. Re:Probably redundant by farmerj · · Score: 1

      Couldn't a vineyard owner set up microclimate zones within his crops to produce a wide range of specific flavored grapes? Then it would only be a matter of picking specific flavors from the crop either for a homogenous wine made of grapes from a single zone, or a blended wine which incorporates the flavor of multiple Flavor Zones(TM). The experimentation could lead to a better wine for each vintage instead of a semi-random distribution of great vintages.

      That presumes that we know how all the factors come together to produced good wine, and the micro-climate around the plant can be controlled with enough precision to produce the desired flavours.

      The main advantage of this technology seems to be the possibility to produce less lower quality grapes by knowledge of the crop micro-climate, and alternating the irrigation regime accordingly. By reducing the level of low quality grapes the quality of the wine as a whole should be improved.

      --
      Independence? That's middle-class blasphemy. We are all dependent on one another, every soul of us on earth. G.B Shaw
    4. Re:Probably redundant by lovebyte · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Yearly changes are what make wine such an enjoyable experience. If you don't want yearly changes do what Cognac producers do, mix several years together.

      --

      I'll do it for cheesy poofs.

    5. Re:Probably redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yo, stop posting on /. and get to work!
      You don't even like red wine man!

  8. This is Fantabulicious! by leviramsey · · Score: 0, Funny

    I am sure you are all amazled by this noveliffic use of wireless technology. And, aftr sampling some of my fortifiedallic wine, I'm sure you will want to see my latest fight, featuring the "Weirdo from Bordeaux" and the "Jappa from Napa". It's only $49.95 on Pay-Per-View!

  9. I need some coffee. by Cyno01 · · Score: 0, Funny

    Anyone else read the headline the first three times as "Wireless Wire Monitoring"?

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  10. Ice wine art ? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Interesting

    produce great ice wine and other fine vintages...with the help of judicious watering, a knowledge of the age-old art of viniculture

    We in France never mix great, fine wintage and age-old art with ice wine and watering in our phrases.
    (Then again, since all our phrases are in french, I suppose it explains ...)

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Ice wine art ? by lovebyte · · Score: 4, Informative

      In fact it is illegal for many regions of France to water vineyards.

      --

      I'll do it for cheesy poofs.

    2. Re:Ice wine art ? by jpsst34 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought they renamed your country to "Freedom."

      --
      How are you going to keep them down on the farm once they've seen Karl Hungus?
    3. Re:Ice wine art ? by Idarubicin · · Score: 2, Interesting
      In fact it is illegal for many regions of France to water vineyards.

      Makes sense. With too much water, you get large, juicy grapes--which in turn produce dilute, watery wines. The chief cause of disappointing vintage years (in France) is excessive rain.

      Which is not to say that watering the grapes leads to poor wines. In some wine regions (parts of California, for example) the weather is just too dry, and irrigation is necessary. Excellent wines can be produced through judicious watering--and year over year consistency is sometimes better because of the greater degree of control.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  11. Don King? by brunes69 · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Gather around ladies and gentleman for the most outrageous, the most stupendous, the most fabulous, the most amazing wine you have ever tasted! This wine will knock your hat off, knock your socks off, knock your block off! I say I say again, the match of the millenium, they will call this wine "the tasteah oh the greatah", "the wineah oh the fineah"!

    1. Re:Don King? by jcenters · · Score: 1

      Each bottle only fourty nine ninety five!!! Call your local liquor store TODAY!!!!

      --

      vi ~/.emacs

  12. wireless this and that by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    before moding me down, read...

    remember keanu reeve's johnny mnemonic ? a cyberpunk data courrier carrying the cure for a brain disease caused by excessive exposure to information ?

    science fiction appart, we're more and more exposed to wireless communications and other forms of electro-magnetic interference since the radio was invented and no one knows exactly what kind of consequences this exposure has over humans (if some one knows, tell me. all I heard until now is noise. ppl from the industry says one thing, environmentalist another...).

    what if all this electro-magnetic noise around us proves to be harmfull ? remember that early in the 20th century doctors used to prescribe cigaretes to relieve stress, and it took a century or more before everyone, including the tobacco industry, to agree smoking was not exactly healthy. how many time it'll take before we're sure about radio signals all over us ?

    --
    What ? Me, worry ?
    1. Re:wireless this and that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what if all this electro-magnetic noise around us proves to be harmfull?

      Then we're fucked.

      how many time it'll take before we're sure about radio signals all over us?

      If all we do is worry about what might be harmful then we're not going to get very far. What if wax is harmful? (No candles!) What if molten iron is harmful? (No axes!) What if fire is harmful? (No fire!)

      If you're seriously concerned that something might happen to be found to be harmful then you may just have to hole yourself up in a cave in Montana (Although caves might be dangerous. What if rocks fall on your head? What if you get bitten by a snake? What if a bear attacks you? Oh dear..)

    2. Re:wireless this and that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I checked it was Phillip K. Dick's Johnny Mneomic!

    3. Re:wireless this and that by the+bluebrain · · Score: 1

      There is a certain difference: the ability to distinguish between that which is "harmful" and that which is "harmless" has improved since the time of the example of doctors recommending smoking for some conditions. "Cancer" used to be "an enlarged organ", perhaps "unnatural growth", or if the no autopsy was performed, just plain "died prematurely of old age".
      Let alone the issue of following all the "maybe"s will eventually stop you in your tracks - the possibilities of gauging how dangerous something is better now than it was several decades ago, and will be better again in another couple of decades. Yes, it may turn out in retrospect to have been a bad idea, but from what I have read about the issue of "electrosmog" I have the firm impression that to the best of human knowledge today it's harmless.

      Personally, I still worry more about what I eat, drink and breathe - and figure that by the time I kick the metaphysical bucket, someone will have found cause or other to pin it on to - and it will probably turn out to be something completely unexpected, like, oh, I dunno - could beer be lethal?

      BTW: I recommend reading William Gibson's original story "Johnny Mnemonic". The "memory overload" is a total crap idea inserted by the makers of the movie, and not part of the original.

      --
      yes, we have no bananas
    4. Re:wireless this and that by the+bluebrain · · Score: 1
      • (Although caves might be dangerous. What if rocks fall on your head? What if you get bitten by a snake? What if a bear attacks you? Oh dear..)
      Radon, and natural radioactivity. We're fucked, life's just plain dangerous.
      Hey! who came up with the idea anyway? Refund! Refund!

      :)
      --
      yes, we have no bananas
    5. Re:wireless this and that by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      It's quantum mechanics that proves radio waves are safe (well, certainly from a cancer causing/mutation point of view).

      Electromagnetic radiation either has the energy to ionise an atom by knocking an electron out of its shell, or it doesn't. There isn't a middle ground; no matter how many of the weak radio signal photons you fire, you still won't cause any damage.

    6. Re:wireless this and that by good+soldier+svejk · · Score: 1
      --
      It is cowardly, and a betrayal of whatever it means to be a Jew, to act as a white man

      -James Baldwin
    7. Re:wireless this and that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If all we do is worry about what might be harmful then we're not going to get very far. What if wax is harmful? (No candles!) What if molten iron is harmful? (No axes!) What if fire is harmful? (No fire!)

      Those are all old technologies. We've taken the time to prove them safe, or to learn how to deal with them (e.g. not to inhale the smoke from that fire).

      If you're seriously concerned that something might happen to be found to be harmful then you may just have to hole yourself up in a cave in Montana (Although caves might be dangerous. What if rocks fall on your head? What if you get bitten by a snake? What if a bear attacks you? Oh dear..)

      Electromagnetic noise is also practically unavoidable in many places.

      You haven't responded to this guy's concern. You responded to something else.

    8. Re:wireless this and that by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 1

      my comment was taken from the movie because the example fitted my idea.

      i'm not paranoid with the possibility of geting cancer from radio waves but I know ppl who are so i posted to get more info on the subject.

      anyone here knows a trusted (as in neutral) source of information on the subject of radio waves x health ?

      --
      What ? Me, worry ?
    9. Re:wireless this and that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are all old technologies. We've taken the time to prove them safe..

      But did man stand around and wait for the men in labcoats to conduct extensive studies in safety with the materials, or did they just use them?

      or to learn how to deal with them

      No we havn't; thousands of people a year still die from accidental fires. Have you ever seen a demonstration where water is thrown in burning oil? Why do you think we still need to tell people not to do that?

      You haven't responded to this guy's concern.

      No I havn't, because his concerns arn't worth repsonding too. They're a reactionary knee jerk based on poor science and basic misunderstanding that he read somewhere in a newspaper and figured he had better we concerned, too.

      You responded to something else.

      Yes, I was responding to his reactionary stance using sarcasm. Now I'm doing the same to you.

  13. Frost Patterns Thwarted By AMD by Root+Down · · Score: 4, Funny

    Using an Intel-based TinyOS and TinyDB, multiple sensing devices monitor grape micro climates and help determine irrigation and frost patterns.

    Now, if they had only used AMD chips, the increased heat alone would have obviated the need to check for frost patterns!

    1. Re:Frost Patterns Thwarted By AMD by afidel · · Score: 1

      That would be a very bad thing. Speaking as someone who absolutly loves a fine winter wine for desert (sp?) I must say that the elimination of frost from wine would be an awful thing.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  14. is it me or is that kind of weird? by lingqi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know - when I read this, I got the same feeling of "bleh" I get when I think about genetic engineered corn and machine-pressed hamburger patties.

    I mean, I know this will eventually comes out to be better wine (I hope), but I somehow feel creeped out by it.

    Maybe this signals an oncoming age of specialty "wine made the same way as it always has been for the past 3000 years" niche.

    Why does human mind do that, anyways - such illogical creatures, no?

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

    1. Re:is it me or is that kind of weird? by pubjames · · Score: 1

      I don't know - when I read this, I got the same feeling of "bleh" I get when I think about genetic engineered corn and machine-pressed hamburger patties.

      It's not just you!

    2. Re:is it me or is that kind of weird? by cruppel · · Score: 2, Funny

      This whole idea sounds like sour grapes to me =)

    3. Re:is it me or is that kind of weird? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, please. This is completely different than modifying the genetic code of the grape to do things like freeze at 5 degC. All he's doing is putting a sensor array out there to detect harmful conditions, thus allowing him to maximize profits. Ever wonder why some wines out there cost $20 a bottle, and still taste like that $5 bottle of wine you had last week? More than likely it was the vintner trying to cover losses. If you're creeped out by the process, then maybe it's time to pull the thermostat out of your house to eliminate technology-creep. I applaud this guy's efforts, as it will lead to the ability to produce more 'organic' crops (applying pesticides and fertilizer when needed, as opposed to using it in large/frequent doses as a precautionary measure).

      Personally, I'm more creeped out that Intel has a research psychologist on staff.

  15. Super Grapes Galore? by Ese+L0C0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Maybe hooking up computers to grapes I will finally be able to discover how to make my army of Super Grapes......Then, I will be able to finally take over the world......Muhaha muhaha......

    --
    jC - sweet sweet squirrel on sheet metal
  16. In addition by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    There are plenty of other variables that are essentially at the discretion of the vintner (I believe that's the correct word?), all of whom have different tastes/beliefs.

    Plus there's quite a bit of influence on the wine's taste in the genetics of the grapes themselves. Many wines are named based on the variety of grape that they use, and there are MANY.

    Even with precise control over the variables the vintner can control, there are simply too many other variables he/she cannot.

    Overall, I think this is good quality control, since IIRC moisture levels and sun tend to contribute the most to seasonal variations in wine. Sun is not very controllable (unless the vintner adds lighting/shades), moisture is. It's a good way to avoid "bad years", which I consider a good thing. (As almost all of my favorite wines had a "bad year" due to rain patterns last year. Wagner Vineyards in Lodi, NY usually produces an excellent Niagara, this past year it was horrendous, as were most of my other favorites from the area.)

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:In addition by HowlinMad · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I was thinking with my original post. This is a good way to grow a quality consistent grape. This does not mean however, that the grape will taste exactly the same.

  17. Not really. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    There are too many other factors.

    It will probably reduce a lot of the variation, but there will still be quite a bit.

    Good news is that the thing this is most likely to eliminate are the "really bad" years, like last year in upstate NY - Almost every wine from that region last year sucked due to rain patterns, even my personal favorites which were pretty consistent with mild variation from year to year in the past.

    Mild variations OK - Total suck, BAD.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  18. don? by romit_icarus · · Score: 0
    I used to know a lot of Don King jokes, but none ome to mind.

    Anyone?

  19. Backups by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    I'm sure that the vintner will also trust his own instincts and use the new datacollection system as an auxiliary tool and not rely on it 100%.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Backups by schlach · · Score: 1

      At first, probably.

      But if he's changing his behavior based on the availability of the new data, he's vulnerable either way. Best-case scenario is everything is cryptographically secure so it's hard to just add hostile nodes, and evil Pierre will have to actually spoof the motes (might as well be destroying the crops). Easier would be to jam the data transmission. WCS would be ... too easy.

  20. It's the analysis tools that count by Alan_Peery · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Getting large numbers of sensors in the field in the field is only part of the battle. Once this is done you must

    1) Make sure that you're not swapping sensors around. Reading temperature sensors in the shade versus one in the sun will back a huge difference.
    2) Calibrate the sensors so the readings are sensible. 0.1 degreees may not sound like much, until you're at the edge of frost formation.
    3) Reliably deliver that data to a server.
    4) Detect failing sensors.
    5) Grant visisibility of the data to only those people who should see it.
    6) Raise alerts if things get far out of range. This will often require a model of how things should behave...

    and most imporantly
    7) Let the users access the gathered data in many ways. For example, the raw temperature may be important--but rate of change even more so. You'll also want to be able to compare different fields, and this year's data against last year's. Graphed versus downloadable, etc.

    We've been working on remote sensing for a while, check out www.telegnomic.com.

  21. Wireless Line.. oh, by Juln · · Score: 0, Troll

    I thought this was about 'Wireless Line Monitoring'.
    Let me know when slashdot is done catering to you horde of techno-yuppies on the hill growing your silicon regulated grapes, and gets back to posting articles about information technology.

    --
    Juln
    1. Re:Wireless Line.. oh, by Juln · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Listen, you fuck, Grape Monitoring is INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY.
      How about you read the article, and FUCKING DIE, not necessarily in that order.

      --
      Juln
  22. And once you've got the wine by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Funny

    Start up your Computer controlled barbecue slow cooker and have a party! Yeeha!

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    1. Re:And once you've got the wine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      20 hours is too long. How do you overclock the meat?

  23. Price vs Quality by purduephotog · · Score: 1

    It's hard to beat a 5$ bottle from Australia that tastes as good as a 15$ bottle from Sonoma. Which is entirely my point- there are several good wines that are inexpensive, although there are considerably more that are bad.

    Don't be such a California snobb ;-)

    Seriously tho, every area has (zone 1/2) some outstanding wines, but I tend to like more pepper than tannin, and I've found that (for the price!) I get a better deal buying down under than across the plains.

    1. Re:Price vs Quality by schlach · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is hilarious. A first for Slashdot: the high-brow flame war.

      Let those suits tell us we're a bunch of unsophisticated cretins now. =p

  24. Will Wireless Networks Lead to Better Wines? by rpiquepa · · Score: 1

    I already commented in this column about this. But it was based on this Wired News article, Making Wines Finer With Wireless.

  25. Just like in Startrek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Maybe this signals an oncoming age of specialty "wine made the same way as it always has been for the past 3000 years" niche.

    The Picard family winery in an age of replicators?

  26. Hmmm... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wine growers somehow have the money and the desire to use the latest technology...hmmm...could it be because they are often rich ex-technologists who have retired and gone into a field where the right attitude and social networking can lead other rich people to pay $100+ for grape juice that's gone bad?

    Sorry, it's my birthday, and I'm cynical. Fact is, the best wine I've ever had was 2001's St. Ives from Bully Hill. It's $6/bottle but tastes EXACTLY like what I want wine to taste like. Last year's batch tastes completely different and has lost all the really good, excuse the bullshit term, undertones, of the old wine of which I still have a dusty bottle in my basement. Sure, I'd like to have this years' batch taste the same as it did in 2001, and an expensive digital setup would help that. But Bully Hill is a very laid back organic winery. The reason St Ives was so perfect two years ago was that the weather was perfect, and nobody fucked with it. If they had, it would have lost its wild flavor, and I would have never gotten a taste of it.

    Too much control is going to turn wine into Buddweiser. It's never skunky, it's never watery or too strong, but it's also never _GOOD_. Goodness is randomness in my book, but I'm a Wolfram-ite.

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju
    1. Re:Hmmm... by good+soldier+svejk · · Score: 1
      Too much control is going to turn wine into Buddweiser. It's never skunky, it's never watery or too strong, but it's also never _GOOD_. Goodness is randomness in my book, but I'm a Wolfram-ite.
      Sounds like you are describing the current state of Australian wine.

      Support your local wineries. Especially the tiny crafty ones.
      --
      It is cowardly, and a betrayal of whatever it means to be a Jew, to act as a white man

      -James Baldwin
    2. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry you've never tasted Ch. Petrus or Latour, or any of the other great Bordeaux :)
      My opinions of what wines taste good are constantly evolving, but to date I've tasted nothing better.
      Remembering a past time where blush wine tasted good :P

    3. Re:Hmmm... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      In my defense, blush tastes like ass and I will not drink anything my mom likes, eg your desert wines and gross champagnes.

      However, I have been known to order a lambrusco with pasta. Because I'm such a puss.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    4. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry you've never tasted Ch. Petrus or Latour, or any of the other great Bordeaux :)
      Why restrict the poor bastard to Bordeaux? I once had a 1990 Domaine Romanee Conti, which was unbelievable. Also there was a fantastic Chateau D'Yquem, I forget the vintage. I like bubblies, so my favorite halfway reasonable bottles would have to be the 1989 and 1990 Grande Dame.
    5. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my defense, blush tastes like ass and I will not drink anything my mom likes, eg your desert wines and gross champagnes
      Try this, then tell me you don't like dessert wines. Not sure what constitutes a gross Champagne in your opinion. I've had some gross bubblies, but not from Champagne.
    6. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh, sorry to burst your bubble dude, but Budweiser is skunky. In fact, in civilised places (like Germany and Belgium) Budweiser is considered one of the definitions of "skunky beer".

    7. Re:Hmmm... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Then they need a dictionary. "Skunky" beer is beer that has attracted a number of non-standard types of yeast to the party, yeasts which grow faster when exposed to sunlight. This is the reason most beers is bottled in brown or green bottles -- to prevent ambient sunlight from damaging the in bottle fermentation process, which is where most of your flavor comes in. Right out of the initial fermentation, beer tastes like a thin, grassy malted milkshake.

      Budweiser is absolute shit beer, but it is NEVER "skunky." The hops and wort are so heavily treated that no ambient yeast can survive. All that's left is the special blend of Bud yeast and a specific amount of sugars, which will be quickly eaten by the yeast after bottling and promptly stop any future fermentation. The end result of this is you can drink a hundred bottles of Bud and it will always taste exactly the same. Not that this is a good thing.

      You might be referring to Bud's sourness, which is a result of the young hop blend and to "afficianados" is the reason to drink it. Of course, they'll give you shit for the "bitterness" of European beers. There's no pleasing some people.

      Me? I like a nice, burnt taste in a thick, sweet beer. An oatmeal stout or a brown ale.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  27. no, but they have a very fast learning curve... by jpellino · · Score: 1

    The vintners know in excruciating detail the exact temperatures and numbers of days in a certain weather that led to one vintage or another - and you'll hear wine buffs recite these and swoon over the details of a specific year and things like which hill certain grapes came from... and they can opt to time things the best - right down to things like opting for night harvest, etc... this gives them a finer mesh on their data, both in space and time. I can just about listen to all the details without just leaping up and well open the bloody bottle and just drink it already! *ahem* but when it works, it's wonderful. this should help - i presume they won't be going for an average here, but going for optimum. i'm trying hard not to imagine days on a hillside in the finger lakes with my iBook checking on the grapes under a big tree, sampling the last batch, and fragging other thinktanks... starbucks eat your heart out.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  28. Use your power for Good, not Evil by HalfFlat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The chief advantage of this sort of thing, as far as I can tell (IANAWM), is that it allows the wine maker to practice their craft with more consistent and better quality raw materials.

    Like all good tools, it's how it is used that counts. Certainly it could allow greater homogenisation. On the other hand, it can allow the wine maker to create better and more interesting wines, when they do not have to cater to the vagaries of the environment to such a degree. If anything, I think such technology will have more of a positive effect than a negative, because the "consistently good but not great, dull but predictable and affordable" market seems to be sewn up already by the large wine manufacturers.

  29. Prior Art! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Elron Hubbard already did this with a tomato! Did you really think those movies were based on fiction?

  30. Coaxing by kingswell · · Score: 3, Funny

    When I first skimmed the blurb I seriously thought "Well if he's coaxing the vines that's not very wireless, is it" and had odd thoughts of RG-6 throughout a vineyard. Glad to hear he's not co-ax-ing.

    --
    i might've been born yesterday, but i stayed up all night
  31. Plants by beeswax · · Score: 1

    I could use this to monitor how my plants are doing in jamaica, nice red hairs.

  32. That's no vineyard! by Spunk · · Score: 1

    It's the grapetrix.

  33. MOD PARENT -1 PARANOID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or -1 OFFTOPIC

  34. Great Ice Wine - Contradiction in Terms? by hndrcks · · Score: 2, Informative

    'Icewine' or 'Eiswine' is a German thing, using Reisling grapes left on the vine past their prime (spatlesen or late picked) and through the first frost, then picked frozen. The ice is pressed from the frozen grapes, leaving behind a very high-solids, high-sugar must.

    Executive summary: this stuff is going to be super super sweet . Consistency (and sugar content) of maple syrup. Not to be served with meat or fish. Most likely served in a small apertif glass after a meal.

    Personally, I hate wines of this type - I'd much rather open a good Zin or Shiraz - but hey, to each his own.

    --
    Everyone will start to cheer when you put on your sailin' shoes.
    1. Re:Great Ice Wine - Contradiction in Terms? by Soko · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, this stuff is rather thick (for wine) and super, super sweet. It's intended to be that way too - it's considered a desert wine.

      IceWine grapes (Reisling or Vidal) are optimally picked when the temperature first drops to -9C - that's when the freezing perfectly concetrates the sugars in the juice and produces the best flavour balance. IceWine is produced by most vintners in Canada, since it sells very well at rather high prices, and it's not uncommon in Canada's wine regions to have a summer exactly like Bordeaux and a winter like Siberia - perfect for making scads of the stuff. I'm not much of a winer myself, but I've had several excellent bottles from the region as of late.

      I live in Niagara, which is the other Canadian wine region (the story is about a British Columbia vitner), and a lot of the tourists love IceWine. You can learn more about Niagara wines at the Ontario Wine Route website.

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    2. Re:Great Ice Wine - Contradiction in Terms? by Achoi77 · · Score: 1
      German wines are typically sweet. I don't know too much about German wine laws, but I know that their wines are goverened by how much suger is in the grapes at harvest, regardless if the grape is ripe or not.

      Another thing to note is that German wines have lower alcohol amounts (~9%) than regular wines (~12.5%), which makes it a very good starter wine, if you are trying to get into wine.

      Spatlese are typically sweet, Auslese has even more sugar. Try to find a bottle with a good amount of acidity and WOW, it's amazing. Try it with meatloaf. :)

      Eiswine definately has LOTS of sugar. But a good bottle will have enough acidity to balance out the sweetness, resulting in some very interesting taste-changing action in your mouth. Try it with a pastry, or a peice of cake.

  35. Canadians has other uses for this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
  36. LOL - Someone mod the parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too funny

  37. No viniculture... viticulture by crgrace · · Score: 3, Informative

    age-old art of viniculture

    That's viticulture...

  38. Western Australia - watch out by Drunken_Jackass · · Score: 1

    There are a number of great producers in western australia that are starting to get some notice (Howard Park is really good). Ask your wine guy to introduce you to some the next time you go shopping.

    But, as the original poster mentions in a follow-up, it's hard to beat a $5 bottle that tastes like it should cost $35.

    --
    There are 01 types of people in this world. Those that understand binary, and me.
    1. Re:Western Australia - watch out by larryleung · · Score: 1

      I've never found a $5 bottle of austrailian wine that tastes like it should cost $35. Inexpensive australian wines at best seem to taste like $10 wines. But perhaps you have suggestions?

  39. Been done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone is doing this same thing using a grid network of monitoring devices to monitor sea bird nesting activity on a remote coastal island. The low power monitors are placed in each nest and each communicates with neighboring devices which then forward the data on until it traverses the grid to a central system which aggregates data and transmits it via satellite to the researchers.

    Pretty cool stuff.

  40. too many growers already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The biggest problem that wine has these days is that everyone and their brother has suddenly bought land and started growing grapes. So, the price of wine quality grapes has completely dropped through the floor.

    In turn, now there is glut of good wine on the market, and people are hard pressed (sorry for the pun) to make any profit when there are so many other wineries out there with the same products.

    In the past, there were only relative few number of producers so the price would remain high enough to keep them going.

    If you drive around the coast in California between LA and San Francisco, nearly every available hillside has been cut back and planted with thousands of grape vines. You can't go a few hundred yards in some places without crossing a vinyard.

    In a few years, I think many of these will be left to go fallow because there's just no money in undercutting the market in the long term.

    1. Re:too many growers already by pmbuko · · Score: 1

      Since when is competition a bad thing? Are you a bitter winemaker or something (not bitter wine, bitter you)?

      Also, you make it sound like the entire coast of CA is covered with grapes. That's simply not true. Sure, there are pockets of "mass-grapeage" up and down the coast, but you can go for miles and miles without seeing a single vine.

  41. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It might not just sabotage to worry about. What about slash and dot agriculture?

  42. Yes. by John+Penix · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'd like to share a revelation that I've had, during my time here. It came to me when I tried to classify your species I realized that you're not actually plants. Every plant on this planet instinctively develops a natural equilibrium with the surrounding environment, but you grapes do not. You move to an area, and you multiply, and multiply, until every fencepost is consumed. The only way you can survive is to spread to another fence. There is another organism on this planet that follows the same pattern. A virus. Grapes are a disease, a cancer of this planet, you are a plague, and the French are the cure.

    --
    Someone named an OS for me.
  43. A great deal by Greg_D · · Score: 1

    The cool thing about this is that the grower can tweak the grapes to yield a high quality product. And if others do it too, so what? The worst that can happen is that all the trolls who horde obscure Bordeaux wines for the prestige suddenly find their stock worth about a quarter of what it once was. Wine is meant for drinking anyway.

    I'm privileged in that I get to sample a whole lot of the finer things in life for free or reduced cost as part of my job, but I'd be happy if people were able to get a really nice cab for $5 just as I would if they could be sampling Cohiba Robustos and Partagas Lusitanias from Cuba for the same price. Quality makes a huge difference, and more quality to more people is fine with me.

  44. "Bad" wine is made into cooking wine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup.

  45. Is this wine GPLed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't they be releasing the growing techniques into the GPL, since the wine is now a derivative product? Someone needs to contact the FSF so they can sue them for this GPL violation.

  46. Bzzzt - wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    German wines are NOT typically sweet. There's plenty of excellent dry Rieslings (not to mention interesting local reds) that don't seem to make it onto the shelves of foolish foreign wine dealers.

    BTW, Why are people so ignorant about German wine, but feel so qualified to talk about it?