Slashdot Mirror


ReplayTV and TiVo Compared

j0atz writes "The New York Times is running a story today that, while it's a bit redundant in the beginning and a bit short on technical details later, gives a rundown the newest features for ReplayTV (numbered 4000 or above) and TiVO (Series2); basically, you can program your favorite DVR to record a show from a remote computer or from another (same-brand) DVR. Along with that, you can stream MP3's and pictures with TiVo now. Still...I'd much rather use something like FreeVo or MythTV and actually burn my shows to cd, stream whatever I want, etc, etc."

28 of 328 comments (clear)

  1. Tivo can burn too by shokk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From what I understand, you can hack your Tivo series 1 to enable video extraction which you can then burn to DVD. That isn't much more of a hack than a FreeVo, and I expect that the schedule handling of the TiVo is much more advanced than what you will get out of the free systems, albeit much pricier.

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  2. In other words... by GreenJeepMan · · Score: 4, Funny

    "while it's a bit redundant in the beginning and a bit short on technical details later"

    This article sucks, but hum... here it is anyway.

  3. imagine that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The New York Times runs an article that's "a bit redundnat in the beginning and a bit short on technical details"? Well, at least they didn't plagiarize, or declare it a quagmire after 2 weeks, so they're improving.

  4. Question about Tivo / PVR quality by coupland · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Was speaking with a friend recently and he had heard through the grapevine that the compression done on Tivo video renders very poor quality output, well below that of standard cable TV. I've been thinking of jumping on the PVR bandwagon for a while now but this worries me a lot. Can anyone who has a PVR comment on video quality? How does it compare to things like DivX, VCD, cable TV, satellite etc? I don't want to plug a DVR into my expensive TV and end up with something that makes live cable look awful. Thanks in advance for your insights.

    1. Re:Question about Tivo / PVR quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      At the high or best settings, you'd be hard pressed to pick out a digital cable signal from a tivo recorded digital cable signal.

      At the basic quality setting, you'd have no problem whatsoever.

      However, if your input signal is poor, tivo will have a harder time compressing it (as it tries to store all the noise), and compression artifacts might become obvious at High.

    2. Re:Question about Tivo / PVR quality by Qube · · Score: 5, Informative

      You choose the picture quality (a default which you can override for specific shows/SPs) but higher quality uses more disk space.

      Basic looks pretty horrible, and it does the usual blocky MPEG artefacts when something moves quickly but it's better than VHS at least.

      Medium is quite watchable, and OK for fairly static programmes (gameshows and the like)

      High is what I use for day-to-day and is very good - I have (UK) Sky Digital as the source and it's as good to my eyes.

      Best uses even more disk space, but will be as good as what you throw at it. It's what the live buffer uses and is recommended for sports and other fast-moving stuff.

      It's pretty straightforward to upgrade a TiVo to use a (cheap now) 120Gb disk and you can store a lot at High or Best with that.

    3. Re:Question about Tivo / PVR quality by zsmooth · · Score: 4, Informative

      Your friend heard incorrectly. TiVo has 4 levels of compression available: Basic, Medium, High, and Best.

      Best: Virtually indistinguishable from the original broadcast. This is a good level for sports or movies with a lot of action scenes.

      High: I record everything (except sports) in high. For most shows, it's also very very close to original broadcast quality. On my 120GB TiVo I get about 40 hours recorded at High quality.

      Medium: Obviously a small step down from High. Dark scenes start getting hard to see, there are artifacts, etc. I never record at medium.

      Basic: I think this one sucks pretty bad and never record anything with it. However, I would get like 130+ hours of recording time on my 120GB TiVo if I used it all the time. Some people are satisfied with it, but I suspect those people have smaller TV sets.

      We have a 60" TV, so it's big enough for the quality to be important, and with High and Best, TiVo's quality is awesome. Definitely better than VCD, and better than most DivX encodings I've seen (although I understand you can encode DivX at real high rates too).

  5. Let me Guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Still...I'd much rather use something like FreeVo or MythTV and actually burn my shows to cd, stream whatever I want, etc, etc.

    I guess you never actually TRIED to use any of these apps, have you?

    Features are one thing, but when talking about an appliance, it's all in the UI. And nothing free out there yet remotely compares to TiVI's UI.

  6. Re:An issue with Replay by clonebarkins · · Score: 4, Funny
    After SonicBlue declared bankruptcy, I would be wary of buying one simply because the future of the service is in jeopardy.

    Whatever! I only buy stuff after the company goes bankrupt. That way you know they won't try and pull any sh*t on you!

    --

    "The evil of the world is made possible by nothing but the sanction you give it." -- Ayn Rand

  7. Why keep them? by Malc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why would you want to burn stuff to CD to keep? I filled dozens of VHS tapes back in the 80's with stuff from the TV. Now I wonder why as I rarely rewatched any of it. I guess I was young and had too much spare time. These days there's rarely anything broadcast that I feel is so important to my life that I want to keep it. Why do people want to keep stuff from TV. What is so compelling that I'm not finding when I flip through the channels? It seems to me there are better things to do than waste ones life re-watching things you've already seen. Anybody watched the Royle Family? I find it painful and a rather uncomfortable reminder about the mindlessness of TV.

    1. Re:Why keep them? by HamNRye · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ummm... Getting movies from HBO?? Original series (Mr. Show for example), or even just sharing with friends. Recording and storing concerts, etc...

      The fact that none of the TV you watch is worth storing doesn't make it a bad idea.

    2. Re:Why keep them? by Eccles · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why would you want to burn stuff to CD to keep?

      Because then I'll feel no compulsion to watch it when it comes on the air. Those of us who remember the pre-VCR days remember seeing that, say, "The Great Escape" was coming on, and arranging one's schedule to watch it.

      Kids watch the same thing numerous times, so they're more likely to want things recorded. A computer PVR is also useful for making CDs/VCDs/DVDs of home videos, which are worth archiving.

      I suppose one might also end up trading for shows one hasn't seen.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  8. Umm.... by caffeinex36 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Still...I'd much rather use something like FreeVo or MythTV and actually burn my shows to cd, stream whatever I want, etc, etc."

    Who says you can't do that with TiVo? Also...Compare the prices of hardware you need to decently do a good job doing it your way. Why bother? At most, hack TiVo, put a few HD's in it and rip right off TiVo...at least then you have a hardware encoder and dont have to worry about everything being all shitty, and spending 1k on hardware

    Just my 2cents - Rob

  9. roll your own by kajoob · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In the face of pressure from the tv industry, Replay may be dropping the 30 second skip feature and Tivo doesn't even have it unless you do the little hack and even then it's a pain in the butt. May I suggest taking a look at MythTV - it's a homemade PVR using linux, but if you take a look you'll see that it's full feature. You can schedule shows, the program listings are all there, it notifies you of scheduling conflicts, etc.. it is truly a Good Thing.

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
    1. Re:roll your own by zsmooth · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How is TiVo's 30-second skip a pain in the butt? You type a six button sequence to turn it on, which doesn't need to be done again until a reboot. Then it's just 1 button to skip 30 seconds. How is that hard?

      I'll tell you what's a pain in the butt - building your own PVR. Trust me I've done it. I still love my TiVo more.

    2. Re:roll your own by jayemdaet · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have tried both MythTV and Freevo.. Each of which took days to get to work and not fully. The quality of the broadcasts was very low and there were driver issues and hacks all over the place that had to be done just to get a common TV tuner to work correctly (AvertMedia). That aside I wasn't impressed with either product after weeks of fighting and research. I am looking at TiVO at this point.

  10. Re:An issue with Replay by BonrHanzon · · Score: 5, Informative

    The ReplayTV series was purchased by Denon & Marantz (makers of higher-end A/V receivers), a company with greater resources that SonicBlue ever had. So really they are better off now than they were before. Buy with confidence.

  11. Re:An issue with Replay by bazabba · · Score: 4, Informative

    I would be wary of buying one simply because the future of the service is in jeopardy.

    That is some horrible information there. I am not worried about my ReplayTV service that has not had a single problem since my purchase last year. If you haven't heard/read, ReplayTV was purchased by a good company, D&M.

    Here's an article

    Maybe you should reconsider giving out advice.

    Anyway, yeah, it'd be cool to have some kind of software solution to all this (preferably Free software), but as it is, it just doesn't seem feasible, mostly because TiVO hardware is cheap and a large part of what you're paying for is the guide service, anyway.

    These are mentioned everytime a TiVo/ReplayTV article is published, do a Google search for MythTV or SageTV

  12. A much better comparison by anaradad · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are much better comparisons available, including http://pvrcompare.com/ , a great site for people considering a PVR purchase.

  13. Why is ReplayTV always picked on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I own a ReplayTV 5000 series. There is a lot of open source software available for it to allow for endless uses. The best is DVArchive. This software basically emulates a new ReplayTV on your network. It allows you to have an unlimited amount of space for shows (limited by your available HD space) without having to "hack" your ReplayTV. These shows play in real time from your computer just as if they were on the local box. They are saved as MPEGs, so you can easily burn an SVCD or convert to another format.

    As for the bankruptcy issue, ReplayTV was bought by D&M, the company that produces products under the Denon and Marantz brands. The Service has and is going to continue as normal. The price for monthly service and lifetime activation are going to increase (they will now be equal to Tivo's), but that does not affect current lifetime customers in any way.

  14. Directv Tivo by asdfasdfasdfasdf · · Score: 5, Informative

    The DirecTV Tivos copy the satellite stream including Dolby digital as they come off the Sat-- so they are as "perfect" as the source-- which means for hi-bitrate channels like HBO, it's not DVD quality, but it's better than any cable I've seen.

    The flipside is that the DirecTivos are more difficult to hack, and I don't think there's any easy way to Hack the HDVR2 (latest and 'greatest')

    As others have mentioned, the HDVR2 is plagued with audio issues, while not devastating, still annoying-- and there hasn't been a patch since release-- 8 months ago. Also, there's no word on support for Home Networking for this model, even though the hardware supports it. :-P

    I've been too lazy-- but if if I give up on DirecTV sanctioned networking, I'm going to actively persue video extraction options.

    1. Re:Directv Tivo by chhamilton · · Score: 4, Informative

      asdfasdfasdfasdf said:
      The flipside is that the DirecTivos are more difficult to hack, and I don't think there's any easy way to Hack the HDVR2 (latest and 'greatest')

      Not necessarily true. In fact, the DirecTiVos are just as easy to hack as the stand-alone TiVos, and most of the hacking work on the two types of boxes overlaps.

      The TiVo hacking community is quite strong, and things have come a long way. If you haven't checked things out recently, then you owe it to yourself to do so. There are lots of cool hacks out there:

      • FTP or HTTP extraction of MPEG2 video
      • FTP or HTTP insertion of MPEG2 video
      • complete and useable WUI
      • sharing recordings between boxes
      • on screen caller display
      • on screen email/instant message notification
      • much more...
      My favorite resource are the forums over at DealDatabase (http://www.dealdatabase.com/forum/). You'll find lots of info and links on hacking your TiVo (new or old, DirecTV or standalone). Oh, and the Series2 TiVo's have been thoroughly hacked as well.

      asdfasdfasdfasdf said:
      The DirecTV Tivos copy the satellite stream including Dolby digital as they come off the Sat-- so they are as "perfect" as the source-- which means for hi-bitrate channels like HBO, it's not DVD quality, but it's better than any cable I've seen.

      The DirecTiVo saves video at 480x480, standard 29.97 fps, with some channels coming in at 720x480. This is less then HDTV at its best (1920x1080), roughly the same quality as DVD (720x480), better than standard broadcast (~460x360), and much better than VHS (~300x360).

  15. Re:Building your own by atrus · · Score: 4, Informative

    Huh?

    A decent tuner card does not run for more than $60. And you only need one (MythTV for example can use more than one though). Now, a TiVo (not counting service) is still cheaper than a PC you build for the same functionality. Thats what you get with mass produced bare bones hardware.

  16. APEX DVR by bazabba · · Score: 5, Informative

    Looks like APEX is joining the bunch. This also includes a DVD player, or rather this DVD player includes a DVR. I don't read anything about a service fee either.

    ADR-1000

  17. Re:Building your own by gosand · · Score: 4, Funny
    Then along comes the OSS community.

    Psst. TiVo runs Linux. Pass it on.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  18. Re:Building your own by eyver · · Score: 4, Informative

    The /. crowd is still missing a valuable lesson in "building your own tivo" -- it's freaking EXPENSIVE! I love how all the lists of "needed hardware" included multiple super high-end video capture cards -- each of which costs the same as a full TiVo. Now mind you, I have not yet built my own PVR, but have actually been looking into it quite a bit now. How is it more expensive? First, as far as I know, you'd need a VIA EPIA with at least around an 800MHz chip on it; that should set you back around $105 shipped. Then you'd need some memory; an extra $50. 80 gig hard drive; should be around $80. WinTV PVR card, to handle all the MPEG2 encoding from TV; $125. Mini-ITX power supply; $30. (Throw in some extra for a case, or put it in something fun like at mini-itx.com.) Linux distribution and an installation of Freevo or MythTV; free. No priceless joke at the end of the list: good. That totals under $400 ($390). I'd say put an extra $75 in the mix, just in case there are upgrades/other necessities, and you're at $465. When I was looking at TiVOs this past December, they ended up being well over this price with subscription services. Now, the question remains of whether or not my product list up there would be feasible...

  19. Re:Building your own by Zathrus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    you'd need a VIA EPIA with at least around an 800MHz chip on it

    I think you'd be deeply, deeply disappointed in the performance with that chip.

    You've also forgotten an IR receiver, keyboard, mouse (both wireless... right?), CD-ROM (unless you somehow planned to boot and install Linux over the network), and probably a few other items. Toss in another $100 or so.

    You know you can buy a refurb 80 hour S2 TiVo for $250 right now. Or a brand new one for $350. Or go to eBay and get a S1 box for ~$150. Add $300 for lifetime service and suddenly you have a box with an intuitive user interface that just plain WORKS.

    If you find fiddling around with things to make them work is enjoyable, and what you like to do in your spare time, then go for the build your own route. After all, getting there can be half the fun, and no doubt -- you can get more options that way. If you like doing other things in your spare time, want your wife/family/SO/children/random strangers to be able to use it then get a TiVo or Replay. Then you can spend all your free time doing whatever else you want to do (be it watching TV or something else) instead of trying to make something that's "nearly there" there.

  20. Explain to me why I want to "roll my own" by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 4, Informative
    I'm serious, and not trying to pick on people, but I can't quite see my way to bothering.

    I used to have a Replay (Panasonic Showstopper), but bought a Tivo when I went to DirecTV because my local cable provider finally annoyed me enough. I picked up a combined "DirecTivo" unit.

    For $199 I got free installation with dish (and they did a great job) and a dual tuner unit (Hughes HDVR2). The HDVR2 records the original data stream from the satellite (IOW, no digital-analog-digital generation loss) so the recorded shows look as good as watching live. My local channels come in over the dish now, and show up in the proper channel slots (2, 4, 5, 7, etc.) instead of up in the 600s or 700s. Satellite, local, and pay per view are all integrated into a slick package.

    Cost in time: none. I'm able to log into work from home over a VPN, so I just worked at home the days of installation. Yeah, my cable company still gets me for Internet, but they achieved fiber optics at the curb in my area and reasonably priced megabit access, so that's OK.

    The monthly charge for the Tivo service is only $6 through DirecTV for some reason. Honestly, if I have to worry about a $6 a month charge, I have greater concerns that watching television more efficiently.

    I read accounts of the roll your own approach, and it just seems like endless hours of annoyance. I like to program and mess about with my computers (I have Macs, PCs and Linux boxen), but I really can't see the point to re-inventing the wheel in this case. They do seem to be getting a little more plug and play, but still... the claims of "it's free this way" completely ignores the value of a person's time.

    As for the comparison, I liked the Replay a lot. It was my first DVR, and I had a definite "how did I live without this" reaction. However, I like the Tivo more for three reasons: "to do" list, better conflict resolution, and better search functions.

    I like the direct recording of the original data stream, but Replay could just as easily do that in a combo unit, I imagine. I don't care about sending stuff to the computer, so I can't speak to that. Ultimately, it's just TV... that's why I like the DVRs in the first place- they make my TV time much more efficient (and shorter). If I just HAVE to have a copy of a movie, DVDs are cheap.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.