Slashdot Mirror


Cable Boxes With DVD, MP3, Networking

Bruha writes "It appears that Charter Communications cable division is in the first phase of rolling out a new home media center-style cable box. The article on CNN describes the box with a 80 Gig hard drive, dual tuners (With HDTV), DVD, and WiFi networking capability to allow music to be transferred to the unit along with pictures from your PC. Copyright protection prevents recordings from being copied to the PC, and Charter has ordered 100,000 of these boxes." We covered a preliminary announcement of this box, which uses the Linux-based Moxi software, last year.

150 comments

  1. How long? by trout_fish · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How long will it be before the copy protection is broken and TV programs can be copied off? Two, maybe three days?

    1. Re:How long? by ultrapenguin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If its anything like DTCP, it might not even be broken at all. And infact, that's probably what it uses, since the units support HDTV.

    2. Re:How long? by Nermal6693 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it wouldn't surprise me if it just takes a couple of days. Granted I haven't read the article yet, but it could be as simple as taking the HD out of the box, and putting it into your PC, and voilà! On the other hand, they might be in some weird proprietary format :(

    3. Re:How long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a link for that? Loads of hits on Google, but no overall description. Sounds interesting.

    4. Re:How long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
      How long will it be before the copy protection is broken and TV programs can be copied off? Two, maybe three days?

      What I want to know is why do the devices have copy protection at all? You're just recording stuff off of the cable channels which presumably you've paid for. People record shows to VHS tapes all the time and even *gasp* share them among friends who may have missed an episode here or there. Why is the fact that it records to a hard drive any different? If these companies had any marketing brains they'd put DVD burners in them to let you save shows to DVD or SVCD format to trade with your friends or to archive for your collection.

      What are these companies worried about anyway? Is it that you won't feel a need to buy their 10 disc boxed set of the Sopranos season 1 for some ungodly overpriced amount? If anything people that make these television programs should be jumping with joy that people want to preserve their legacy in their private collections forever!! Inevitably the show gets cancelled and depending on whether it was good enough may or may not go into rerun syndication.

      Unfortunately we see how that works and have 20 episodes of Friends on a week, but trying to find any of the GOOD programs in syndication anymore is impossible. I'm a citizen and not a consumer. Don't treat me like a piece of shit because I'm just a statistic to you. I spent $1200 building a MythTV box thinking I could sift through the cruft of television to find something good to watch thinking that maybe all the good stuff is hiding at 3am on TNT or USA. Well, it's not. I'm really thinking of just abandoning the project and using it for a Windows gaming box or generic HTPC running Windows XP for playing DVDs, DivX, and games. Television is a lost cause.

      * Posted AC since I'm sick of being moderated as offtopic or flamebait for voicing my god damn opinion.

    5. Re:How long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like TiVo series 2. The hack still hasn't been discovered despite months of trying.

    6. Re:How long? by ultrapenguin · · Score: 5, Informative

      DTLA

      Basically a digital content licensing/protection sceme created by 5 companies (listed on that site).
      All HDTV tuners and HDTV-connecting equipment has to support this for copy-protected content.

    7. Re:How long? by ultrapenguin · · Score: 5, Informative

      Few months ago I grabbed and read their "informational version" of the standard (the real version wants you to sign a NDA and pay $$$), and in general, its about high encryption to the data traversing high-speed buses between HD equipment (1394, usb2, etc). It provides mechanisms for scrambling the signal if another device is attached to the bus (sniffing) and methods for "blacklisting" known hacked equipment.
      Pretty hardcore stuff, has been around for as long as I know HDTV tuners existed (in japan at least), and has NOT been cracked, hacked, bypassed or in any other way defeated. The encryption it uses (from reading the informational PDF) is pretty strong, there's a mechanism for refreshing keys every so often, etc.

      Pretty bad stuff, if anyone has any POSITIVE information on this, feel free to reply :)

    8. Re:How long? by VPN3000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It will not take long before someone breaks it, but I would suggest avoiding participating in such ventures.

      Why? Becase in most states owning your own cable box is against the law. If you are leasing a cable box from the cable company, you are fined a huge bill if they catch you modifying their hardware. If you don't pay up, they'll take your arse to court or mess up your credit rating. Trust me, I know someone (guess who!) who's been through that mess over wanting free HBO.

      On a side note, these boxes will have traps in place that will detect if something has been changed. Also, there will be break-away prongs that you can't put back in place once you take the box apart. So even if you get around their copy protection, you still get a rectal modification when they take the box back when you move or change cable providers (or get wise and go with satellite).

      I know I sound like a broken record here, since I seem to say this in any entertainment related post, but go with satellite if you are going to do anything sneaky. You get to purchase your own equipment and the only thing that'll tell on you is the modem in the reciever. Luckily, you are not required to use the modem unless you want to access PPV.

      Remember, all modern cable systems that can carry HDTV signals are advanced enough to communicate bi-directionally with the cable company. You do anything sneaky and they'll know.

    9. Re:How long? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      It think it has been circumvented on the Series 2 Tivos. Was reading on the boards:

      http://dealdatabase.com/forum/showthread.php?s=83b e90a235adaa44a3b7e511adae0a43&threadid=22154

      Its called the '2 kernel monte' system...and it is done without hardware modification. You basically can use an older kernel released by Tivo..and use it in a method to 'chain load' into the new stuff..but, in the middle, you can get your own shells and scripts to run...giving you full access...and the ability to extract video again...I'm waiting for the warranty to run out on mine, and then may start tinkering...at the least I'm going to increase my HD size...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    10. Re:How long? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1
      People record shows to VHS tapes all the time and even *gasp* share them among friends who may have missed an episode here or there. Why is the fact that it records to a hard drive any different? If these companies had any marketing brains they'd put DVD burners in them to let you save shows to DVD or SVCD format to trade with your friends or to archive for your collection.

      I think that you can still share your programs with friends. It is a little harder though. Since the networking TV programs is not possible, probably the thing to do is replay the program and record is using a VCR or even a video capture computer. It's time consuming but it is possible to get your programs off the box.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    11. Re:How long? by drdale · · Score: 1
      I spent $1200 building a MythTV box thinking I could sift through the cruft of television to find something good to watch thinking that maybe all the good stuff is hiding at 3am on TNT or USA. Well, it's not
      Uh, maybe before investing that $1,200 it would have been wise to invest 75 cents in a copy of TV Guide to see what actually was on late at night.
      --
      This post is dedicated to all of those /.ers who do not dedicate their posts to themselves.
    12. Re:How long? by aquishix · · Score: 0

      Russell's paradox, eh?

      --
      - I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. [strain #2] Thank you
    13. Re:How long? by drdale · · Score: 0

      Good old Bertie. I'm your fan. But to go really obscure, I'm much more of a fan of his godfather...

      --
      This post is dedicated to all of those /.ers who do not dedicate their posts to themselves.
    14. Re:How long? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      All HDTV tuners and HDTV-connecting equipment has to support this for copy-protected content.

      Well, there is no copy-protected over-the-air content, so OTA tuners don't have to support it. And DTCP is only for 1394, so boxes that use DVI don't have to support it either. (DVI equipment uses HDCP instead.)

    15. Re:How long? by ultrapenguin · · Score: 1

      There is still no software to record even "unprotected off air" content, is there (over 1394).

      I've been looking at the stuff from 169time.com but that looks like just some hax0r-like device to attach firewire output to a tuner that doesnt have one, and then make you order a $800 PC to process the 1394 signals because they don't have the expertise to do this on-chip in the 1394 adapter.
      Unless there's something else that 169time device does that I don't understand.

    16. Re:How long? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      Just get an HDTV tuner PCI card and record all you want.

  2. Finally a balance by Trigun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Imagine that, giving us what we've been asking for, with only enough restrictions to make it unobtrusive to the user while still protecting the content providers rights.

    Seems like sanity wins out in the end.

    1. Re:Finally a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Watch this get modded up to 5. How is this copy protection any different from normal copy protection? There's no difference? How have "we" been asking for this?

    2. Re:Finally a balance by Trigun · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Because they're not trying to eliminate mp3's or give you a hugely restricted POS hardware. The only thing that you can't do with it is move recordings off the box to the PC. You can still use it as a recorder and move them to some other media.

    3. Re:Finally a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The file format that the audio is stored in is irrelevent. If you can't actually move them around, what advantage is mp3 over wma, au, ogg, or anything else? A digital recorder that doesn't allow transfer to a PC is, in my opinion at least, hugely restricted. I'd rather record onto tape and run the signal in through a video-in card.

    4. Re:Finally a balance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems to me like this is not the case. Without the ability to copy recordings off the device, we find the recordings locked in to this closed mechanism.

    5. Re:Finally a balance by Trigun · · Score: 1

      You can move the audio files around, you just can't use the box to rip video. There's nothing stopping you from putting your video capture card between the box and the tv. Well, maybe MacroVision(TM).

      The masses don't want to trade tv shows on the internet. Maybe if the put a VCR into it to trade shows, that might appease more people. But you can't please everyone.

    6. Re:Finally a balance by shatfield · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But here's the kicker -- these people are competing for TiVo's current and future market share. They know that if they block people from being able to zip through commercials on previously recorded shows, that people will skip this product and go with a TiVo, which doesn't have such a restriction. They are also offering (in my area) this upgraded cable box with PVR for only $7 a month.

      But what happens when these "good enough" devices put TiVo out of business? The good money is on them suddenly announcing that you will no longer be able to speed through commercials. You will only be able to store your shows for x number of days before they will be forcibly erased, you will only be able to watch your recordings from x time to y time, and oh yeah, the $7 a month fee just went up to $14 a month, sorry for any inconvenience. Once their is no competition, the restrictions will be unleashed and we won't have an alternative.

      I say to hell with these upgraded cable boxes, go with TiVo (or build your own) and don't trust the Cable companies to do the right thing. Most of them are owned by big media companies anyways (It's called "Time Warner Cable" for a reason), so you know that they are just itching to control your viewing habits even more than they already do.

      --
      "To make a mistake is only human; to persist in a mistake is idiotic." Cicero
    7. Re:Finally a balance by Montag2k · · Score: 1

      It is a Free Market here - if cable boxes gain market share over TiVo and eventually end commercial skipping alltogether, market demand will create the need for another company to come along and put their own commercial-skipping product together.

      It will probably be more expensive than the no-skipping PVRs, but it seems that people would be willing to pay for this value-added feature.

      Montag

    8. Re:Finally a balance by acousticiris · · Score: 1

      Normally I'd read something like this and say "Geez! Everywhere a Conspiracy!". But, we are talking about the cable companies. These are the same guys that nearly every year--while EVERY OTHER kind of communications services' prices are going DOWN, their bills are rising. And rising..and rising..and rising.
      I recently moved from one city in a Comcast area to another city. Found out that my $121 cable bill (service/internet) from the place I used to live is only $65 here for identical services. Turns out they offer many discounted prices here because the office I'm servied by has areas within it that have a choice between them and Wide Open West. So this idea that "once the competition is gone" the prices will go up (and services down) is their current operating procedure when dealing with competing cable companies.

      --
      "God is dead!" - Nietzsche
      "Nietzsche is dead!" - God
  3. Burner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Where's the dvd burner??

  4. Yes but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Does it run Linux?

    1. Re:Yes but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does it run Windows Media Center Edition?

  5. BoxCrime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At last! The "Do Illegal Things With Me" Box! How much more immoral can hardware get? Not even the Lament Configuration is that scary.

  6. TiVO ++ from India already does all this.. by jkrise · · Score: 3, Informative

    It was covered at Slashdot as well.

    Nothing new here, is there??
    -

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
  7. Wait a Minute! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    It uses Linux!

    But it has copy protection!

    I think my head is going to explode with this paradox.

    1. Re:Wait a Minute! by psavo · · Score: 2, Funny

      It uses Linux!
      But it has copy protection!
      I think my head is going to explode with this paradox.

      Most filesystems in linux do come with copy protection. It's most often used with chmod +/-r command.

      --
      fucktard is a tenderhearted description
  8. Tivo by grennis · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Bad news for Tivo?

    Apparently, investors aren't worried about it.

    1. Re:Tivo by JediTrainer · · Score: 1

      Bad news for Tivo?

      No. I think it's bad GNUs for Tivo.

      --

      You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
  9. are the recordings encrypted ? by maharg · · Score: 1

    Copyright protection prevents recordings from being copied to the PC...

    So are the recordings encrypted on the ext3 filesystem ? I've RTFA(s) - it's not clear from those (pun intended)...

    --

    $ strings FTP.EXE | grep Copyright
    @(#) Copyright (c) 1983 The Regents of the University of California.
    1. Re:are the recordings encrypted ? by spitzak · · Score: 1
      I would expect so, unless they are incredibly stupid.

      Other possibilities that would probably be almost as stupid: the disk is not ext3 or any other known format (that will stop people for about 10 seconds), or the disk hardware is designed so that it cannot be disconnected from the box or accessed without wrecking it.

  10. Dude be realistic..... by botzi · · Score: 0

    ..days???? What are you talking about???? A hack will come out about an hour after the first one is shipped.......
    People have found a way to atach fully capables HD's to GC's, run Linux on a X-box(although the continue to search for the use of it...;oPPPP), and you say days will be needed to discover a method to transfer from a LOCAL hd to a LOCAL hd?????Uhhhh, definitely not so...;o)))))

    --
    1. No sig. 2. ???? 3. Profit!!!
    1. Re:Dude be realistic..... by Troed · · Score: 1

      Please link me to where people have attached "fully capable HD's" to Gamecubes.

    2. Re:Dude be realistic..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May I suggest some form of sedative?

  11. Is it available direct? by Sherloqq · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If I could buy this directly and it were cheap and it worked with any cable provider, I'd be much more interested in it than in building my own... *even* if I can't copy the taped programming off of it. Why invent and make your own wheel if someone's not only done it already, but also done it potentially cheaper and better.

    --
    Have EVDO, will travel.
    1. Re:Is it available direct? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is only cheaper because they collect data on which shows you watch/record and sell this information in aggregate form to advertisers. I predict the fall of Neilson.

    2. Re:Is it available direct? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I predict the fall of Neilson.

      Ha ha!

    3. Re:Is it available direct? by bigfatlamer · · Score: 1

      Not sure. The Digeo website mentions Q4-2003 availability but nothing else about whether that's direct to consumers or only cable companies/OEMs.

      If it does become available though I'm all over it. I built a MythTV box and used it for a few weeks but overall it was just too much hassle and we ended up getting rid of it.

      Assuming this thing is no more crippled than preventing moving video off the machine, this is exactly what I want to have. DVD burner would be nice but not the end of the world by any stretch.

      --
      There's one thing computing teaches you, and that's that there's no point to remembering everything.
      --Doug Copland
    4. Re:Is it available direct? by VPN3000 · · Score: 1

      Your cable company will likely not allow you to purchase and run one of these on their system. It's illegal to own your own cable box in most states. Plus, there's probably some magic switch that has to be flipped at the cable company for these things to be activated.

    5. Re:Is it available direct? by Sherloqq · · Score: 1

      It's illegal to own your own cable box in most states.

      Really? Hmm.... first time I've heard of that.... (no, really, I've never heard of that before...)

      So what about all those cheap cable boxes (granted, only for analog signal) that used to be sold for TVs that were not cable-ready? Those were illegal too? Or are you talking exclusively about the digital cable kind?

      Don't matter, I don't live in the States anymore (but I suppose I should check what my current local law has to say about that).

      --
      Have EVDO, will travel.
    6. Re:Is it available direct? by bitdamaged · · Score: 1

      I doubt it, otherwise it would be marketed as a PVR. But mostly there are features here that are going to require the cable operator. (VOD and probably some sort of interactive television functionality)

      --
      "Not all chemicals are bad. Without chemicals such as hydrogen and oxygen, for example, there would be no way to m
  12. Forward live broacasts!? by the_shaitan · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the article:

    "DVRs allow users to record shows onto a hard drive, and to pause, forward, and rewind live broadcasts"

    How can a DVR allow users to _forward_ a _live_ broadcast???

    1. Re:Forward live broacasts!? by maharg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1. start watching live broadcast
      2. pause live broadcast
      3. resume watching broadcast
      4. fast forward to catch up with live

      --

      $ strings FTP.EXE | grep Copyright
      @(#) Copyright (c) 1983 The Regents of the University of California.
    2. Re:Forward live broacasts!? by Phosphor3k · · Score: 1, Funny

      Maybe they finally decided to integrate a Mr.Fusion and flux-capacitor? I hope it has a real good power-saving mode.

    3. Re:Forward live broacasts!? by jocknerd · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting for that myself. Then I could fast forward through a game and find the outcome and place my bet before the game is actually over! Time travel with a TiVo!

    4. Re:Forward live broacasts!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add an oscillation over-thruster and I'd buy that for a dollar!

    5. Re:Forward live broacasts!? by dr_dank · · Score: 2, Funny

      Biff won't need that Sports Almanac now, just fast-forward to the end of the game.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    6. Re:Forward live broacasts!? by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      But you would create a parallel universe, since, in one timeline, you didn't place the bet. The timelines split from the moment you returned to. Along the "original" timeline you did not place the bet, and the game went a certain way. But when you returned back to the bifurcation point, you created a fresh timeline where the game hadn't been played, and thus you might well end up with a different result than you bet on.

      The real funky stuff in temporal bifurcation theory has to do with how the multiverse tries to merge timelines {which is necessary since each universe is stored using lossy compression techniques. The existence of independent timelines is against the natural order of events ..... cf. what happens when like magnetic poles are forcibly brought close to one another and then released; when oil and water are stirred vigorously together; and various other physical phenomena ..... in pure physics terms, work has been done and potential energy stored, the multiverse is now releasing it}. For this to work, events on both {or all} timelines must be manipulated in such a way that the final outcomes of the alternate sequences of events are equivalent. The amount of effort this involves {and all this energy, BTW, has to come from PE stored during the creation of the bifurcation} depends on the magnitude of the dichotomy between timelines. This begins increasing, and then starts to decrease as the bifurcation passes out of living memory. But sometimes the tendency to merge manifests itself in a person saying the wrong word, for example. Psychologists sometimes attribute this to other causes, but the ones they can't really explain probably are due to timeline merging.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    7. Re:Forward live broacasts!? by skryche · · Score: 1
      1. start watching live broadcast 2. pause live broadcast 3. resume watching broadcast 4. fast forward to catch up with live

      Very nice. But as soon as you pause a live broadcast, it obviously stops being live.

    8. Re:Forward live broacasts!? by zdislaw · · Score: 1

      Until you get to step 4 and "fast forward to catch up with live"

      --
      bad sig...no donut.
    9. Re:Forward live broacasts!? by ncc74656 · · Score: 2, Funny
      1. start watching live broadcast
      2. pause live broadcast
      3. resume watching broadcast
      4. fast forward to catch up with live

      You forgot "Profit!!!" from not having to waste time on dumbass commercials.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  13. LOL! by brunes69 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is like exactly what I built for myself.... down to the letter, including the WiFi! It's runnign MythTV. I should have patented it!

    1. Re:LOL! by kvandivo · · Score: 1

      Somehow I doubt you built this down to the letter. There are no HDTV tuners that MythTV support at this time.

      --
      http://www.WinWithRealEstate.com/
  14. Hack? how hard could that be? by Eminor · · Score: 1

    Gawd damn it. The hack should only take 5 seconds. Instead of hooking the box up to your tv, hook it up to the 'video in' on your capture card. Sheesh.

    1. Re:Hack? how hard could that be? by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Remembering, of course, to include your de-macrovision-iser, in between the two. If it's HDTV it will output encrypted on the DVI and so it wont be as simple as that anyway.

    2. Re:Hack? how hard could that be? by Eminor · · Score: 1

      Remembering, of course, to include your de-macrovision-iser, in between the two. If it's HDTV it will output encrypted on the DVI and so it wont be as simple as that anyway.

      First of all, macrovision only causes interferience on VHS. Macrovision will not affect your ability to capture video on your computer clearly.

      Second of all, HDTV is not standard. There must be a way to hook the device up to a normal TV. Hence, you can capture it with your card.

    3. Re:Hack? how hard could that be? by GigsVT · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Macrovision will not affect your ability to capture video on your computer clearly.

      It will if your capture card has AGC that is freaked out by macrovision.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    4. Re:Hack? how hard could that be? by Eminor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The point is it can be done quite easily. Not everyone has a computer. Not everyone has a video capture card. Still fewer have cards that get "freaked out" by macrovision because of automatic gain control. But the people who are into this sort of thing will have cards that can capture the content. Therefore, it is not copy proof.

    5. Re:Hack? how hard could that be? by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      Macrovision will not affect your ability to capture video on your computer clearly.

      It will if your capture card has AGC that is freaked out by macrovision.

      ...or if your capture card detects it and the driver says, "No video capture for you!" (That misfeature is sometimes correctable with a driver patch...here's one that works with All-In-Wonders.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  15. Yes, yes, yes by heironymouscoward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have seen the future and it is this: set-top boxes that record everything coming in and send it back out onto a global P2P network that turns the RIAA/MPAA's hair a delicate shade of pure white.
    "Select 'Share All' to share your TV programmes..."
    Now, imagine this had the backing of a national government, TV companies, movie distributors, cable distributors and banks, and was tied into a simple payment system. Hold your breath, count to five, and you have instant pay-as-you-go TV and video and music on demand.
    Prediction: this will not happen legally.
    Shame for the media industry, it could make them so... much.... money.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
  16. Digital Copyright Protections... by vudufixit · · Score: 2, Informative

    Only prevent digital copies to and from digital media, right?
    At least with audio, all you have to do is output to analog, and capture from analog to make a pretty decent copy, right?

  17. Bah. by Paddyish · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It's crippled. I'd just build my own - and have full functionality.

    What a waste.

  18. FreeVo by barcodez · · Score: 3, Informative

    Install FreeVo on a PC with a capture card and video out and you have the same thing without the copy protection.

    --

    ----
    1. Re:FreeVo by Sherloqq · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Install FreeVo on a PC with a capture card and video out and you have the same thing without the copy protection.

      Yes. But by the time I spent additional money on a quiet, fanless mobo/CPU and a sleek, esthetically-pleasing enclosure, would it still be cheaper?

      Actually, I don't know, cause nobody seems to know how much these puppies run.

      --
      Have EVDO, will travel.
    2. Re:FreeVo by ./ · · Score: 1

      You mean an iMac?

    3. Re:FreeVo by VPN3000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It will not be a seamless as the cable box.

      Freevo is just a software solution. It does not have a hardware component with dual tuners and complete control over them.

      These commercial PVR solutions are the only way to go if you want it to be functional by the whole family.

      Freevo is a good toy for a geek, but not a complete PVR solution.

      Mind you, only the people without PVRs seem to be talking up the homebrew solutions. Once you go with the proprietary box, you see that it's much easier and more functional in regards to it's intended use than any current homebrew due to the limitations in control over the tuners and program schedules. Plus, I don't think the homebrews can encode the video real-time, so there's no pausing tv programs or commercial skipping unless you record the whole thing, encode it, then watch it. I tend to play a broadcast about 10 minutes after it starts on my PVR so I have enough time shift to be able to skip the commercials.

      Don't get me wrong, I've got both a media PC and a PVR. They both serve their intended purposes. The media PC does divx and high resolution playback of movies/mp3/etc and the PVR does scheduled recordings of programs I like to watch.

      I really don't understand why folks would want to trade tv shows or have access to the files TV programs are stored in to begin with. Do you really want to encode those Farscape reruns overnight, then spend forever uploading them to a friend? I'd tell his cheap ass to just buy his own PVR and schedule the recordings himself. We are talking a waste of hard drive space and time here.

      I've also found that once a program is on my PVR, I don't really care to watch it more than once, maybe twice if I wasn't sober the first time. I'll typically save it long enough for others in the house to watch, then it gets erased to make room for other programs.

      Mind you, if your goal is backing up and archiving, you should just consider getting a netflix account and rip dvds. Yes, it's illegal, but so is sending Farscape reruns to your friend.

      Vic

    4. Re:FreeVo by ThrasherTT · · Score: 1

      That would most definitely not be cheaper...

      --

      All Your Memory Are Belong To Java
    5. Re:FreeVo by Sherloqq · · Score: 1

      Nope, I mean something that looks good enough to be part of an entertainment center -- you know, the form-factor of a VCR, black / silver in color, without a mess of cables in the back going every-which-way... something that looks professional, like an Audiotron (sp?). Definitely NOT a beige box (nor an iMac) sitting next to the cabinet. At best, a laptop -- but those don't meet the criterium of "cheap".

      --
      Have EVDO, will travel.
    6. Re:FreeVo by Jardine · · Score: 1

      All of my entertainment centre devices have a whole bunch of cables hanging out behind them. Do you have some kind of wireless devices or something? I've got 3 kinds of cables for sound (speaker cable, rca cables, coax), 3 kinds of cables for video (rca, svideo, component), and one that carries both (coax).

    7. Re:FreeVo by bobbozzo · · Score: 1

      probably $10-20 EXTRA / month on your cable bill.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
  19. Copyright NOT by ajs318 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Copyright protection prevents recordings from being copied to the PC
    No it doesn't. The thing has an analogue out. Possibly even RGB if it has a SCART conector. Nothing is ever going to stop you copying from that, without also stopping you watching it on a TV set.

    Also, the files on the HDD must be readable, and the software to read them must be in the machine. {Think Spectrum fast cassette loaders. Not just fast, but copy-proof because it makes the whole process that bit more sensitive to fidelity - so an analogue copy is less likely to be successful. The first programme on the tape - often written in BASIC so you can just use LOAD "" - has to use the ROM-resident loading routines to load itself. It then implements the fast loader. All you need to do is to get this first programme to load but not run itself - the usual method was by making a fake header - and then modify the fast loader to read all the rest of the programme without executing it}. Now, 20 years on, the same principles apply. The computer has to be able to read the data from the disk in order to display it on the telly. Whatever can be read, can be copied. Light travels in straight lines. Energy is never created nor destroyed. Pressure in a fluid acts equally in all directions.

    Why can't they just write something on the disk that the program [sic] can read, but the pirates can't? - reader's letter in an old Amiga magazine, offering the holy grail of copy protection.
    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    1. Re:Copyright NOT by VPN3000 · · Score: 1

      And since you don't get to own the box, you get a bill for $1000 when they detect your tamperings with it's hard drive.

      Don't be a fool and think the cable companies don't have counter-measures for having their devices hacked.

      If you tinker with a box that communicates bi-directionally with the cable company, you are probably going to get nailed.

      If you tinker with this box by using a published exploit from newsgroups, go ahead and get your checkbook ready. They will already be watching for this type of activity far before you get your hands on the How-to.

    2. Re:Copyright NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the computer must be able to read the data. Just like PGP must be able to read the data before it decrypts it. Doesn't do you a whole lot of good to stare at the encrypted file, though, does it?

      Suppose, for a moment, that the transport controller on the MPEG decoder supports DES decryption. This means you never see decrypted data on the PCI bus. The only place you see decrypted data is in the frame buffer, and there's no way to snag that except as an analog copy.

      Someday, when we have decryption built into our televisions, we won't even have that.

    3. Re:Copyright NOT by ajs318 · · Score: 1
      Don't be a fool and think the cable companies don't have counter-measures for having their devices hacked.
      If you tinker with a box that communicates bi-directionally with the cable company, you are probably going to get nailed.
      Yeah ..... unplug the cable before you start, obviously. You're forgetting that rental cable boxes have to be robust against all kinds of things; after all, the companies don't want to be despatching service engineers every five minutes. Equipment like that has to tolerate all sorts of abuse, even being painted for crying out loud. Hoik out the drive, dd off the contents {not using BusyBox dd -- it takes forever} and pop it back in. Then plug back into the cable. Nobody any the wiser.

      Also, The Authorities are actually gathering so much surveillance data on all of us, that they have not got actually time to go through it all! The Old Bill only follow up about one in ten producers, for instance. Ask anyone who's ever been given one. You actually can get away with outrageous stuff under people's noses - most of the time they are simply relying on you being scared into behaving yourself.
      Yes, the computer must be able to read the data. Just like PGP must be able to read the data before it decrypts it. Doesn't do you a whole lot of good to stare at the encrypted file, though, does it?
      Except the machine itself must include the decryption process - both the algorithm, which is published anyway if it's a decent system, and the important key. So, you've got your scrambled data, yes, but you also have the very machine that has the ability to unscramble it. That's like writing the decryption key on the same piece of paper as the coded message.

      It was a common enough hack in the days of Sky Analogue to record a "chop-and-swap" encrypted broadcast on VHS, then play it back through a decoder primed with the appropriate data. Someone with a high-end computer and a subscription just had to find the cut points, then anyone with an old '286 could feed them to the decoder. {This was satellite based, so using a one-way link}. That shouldn't have worked, and the fact that it did suggests that someone within BSkyB deliberately weakened the encryption at implementation time. But that's just human nature, and the very same thing might well be done with this system. The cable company's workers get paid the same amount regardless, as long as someone is actually paying for the service. And being able to show someone how to do something they aren't supposed to do is a good brownie-point earner .....
      Someday, when we have decryption built into our televisions, we won't even have that.
      Think of a sawn-off CRT that plugs into your TV chassis, and presents the appropriate impedances &c. so electronically, it is identical to a CRT. And no way they can tell. You can measure the voltage on each of the red, green and blue grids {giving you RGB video} and the current in the scan coils {giving you position on screen}.

      The only way to keep it really secure is to descramble in the viewer's brain, using perception-altering drugs and neurolinguistic programming techniques. {A drug that reacted with growth hormone would provide age-locking}. And even that method probably is not secure, because whatever programme the drugged brain is executing to descramble the data, can be replicated by a machine.
      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    4. Re:Copyright NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I have a go at what you're smoking? :)

    5. Re:Copyright NOT by aquishix · · Score: 0

      Copyright protection prevents recordings from being copied to the PC

      No it doesn't. The thing has an analogue out. Possibly even RGB if it has a SCART conector. Nothing is ever going to stop you copying from that, without also stopping you watching it on a TV set.


      Have you had any actual experience with this phenomenon? Because I have, and you're completely wrong. There is copy protection built into many analogue outputs and inputs nowadays that prevents copying. How do you think they copy-protect VHS tapes and DVDs? Even when you try to feed the RCA video connector(*analogue*) into a recording device(read: vhs recorder, video capture board for PC), it chokes on the first frame or so if it has the copy-protection. I have gone through unheard of frustration with this, which is why I know about it. I tried copying various video game systems into a USB video capture device(which is dumb for me to have bought, because USB has such low bandwidth), and both the SNES and N64 choked. The Playstation 2 didn't. I guess Sony is more compassionate than most.

      Also, I have an old TV that does not have RCA inputs, so I couldn't route my PS2 directly to the TV. I had to hook it up through a VCR first, but guess what happens if you do that? Everything is fine until you try to actually play a copy-protected DVD, and then the scrambling kicks in and screws up the picture. However, if you hook it up through an old Beta player from the 80s(I used a Sanyo, I think), it will strip out the copy-protection and then after that you can record all you want -- or in my case, hook up the PS2 to the Beta, and then to the TV, just so you can watch it, independent of any intended "theft." It really sucks that I don't have the power to route signals in my own damn hardware as I please, and have to play these geek games to get what I want. I want copy-protection advocates to all fall into a pit.

      --
      - I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. [strain #2] Thank you
    6. Re:Copyright NOT by bobbozzo · · Score: 1

      It's called MacroVision.
      Betas are immune to it.
      So are _some_ Tivo's and/or S3 units.
      Maybe some PC cards are immune too, I haven't tried it.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
  20. Who's on first? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
    What's the name of this box? I RTFAed, but it was always "the box", "the device", etc. I don't know how we take this thing seriously if it doesn't have a name?

    Hmm.. Thing, I like it. (Why? I dunno. He's on third, and I don't give a darn...)

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    1. Re:Who's on first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      http://www.scientificatlanta.com/consumers/Exp8000 .htm

    2. Re:Who's on first? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      Charter said the first commercial rollout of the Motorola Broadband Media Center will be for digital cable customers in Rochester, Minnesota.

      "Motorola Broadband Media Center", catchy!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  21. This should be fun.... by haplo21112 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    On Charter's bandwidth poor network...

    While I applaud my cable company for this change, I have many cautions in mind when thinking about...the Charter network is already bandwidth poor...now we are going to be encouraging downloads of Music and such....Ouch!

    They recently(March), dropped everyones upload speeds on the network to 128, where as many customers (me) used to get 512 or higher...this is not a good sign for a company planning to add aditional digital services....

    --
    Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
    1. Re:This should be fun.... by bfischer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just because they are reducing upload speeds does not mean they are maxed out. They are just trying to make better use existing bandwidth and cut down on people using excessive bandwidth running servers from their personal accounts. If you want more outgoing bandwidth, buy a business account. For the average user, 128k is plenty of upload speed.

    2. Re:This should be fun.... by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      Then I assume that you DONT do the following:

      1: Send emails with anything
      2: Talk and share stuff on chat clients
      3: Publish to an offsite web account
      4: Backup remotely
      5: Have more than 2 users on that "high speed" line, as you'll have upload starvation attacks
      6: Have a small-time server for friends

      Of course, this says nothing for P2P and swarming technologies. Now that more P2P client-servers are using a ratio way of accounting for leaches, you probably wont get much good download either.

      If anything, they can provide sync connections at a decent cost. It just depends how they control bandwidth (local P2P, large newsgroup list, local Linux images, game updates......). All of those keep cost from going up for them by giving them less "internet" traffic. It also would provide what users would want.

      --
    3. Re:This should be fun.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why did they also drop the DOWNLOAD speeds by 25% (all for the same price)? I also think they've oversold their network.

    4. Re:This should be fun.... by haplo21112 · · Score: 1

      I am not a regualr user...and 128 is not enough by a long shot...

      Thats whats wrong with the whole damn universe...
      people who support the cable company screwing the users who need/want a little...saying "oh whatever you give us is fine with me"...for your information I use my account to push around alot of content for stuff I am working on with friends, and 128 is just not sufficent for the size of the files we work on....its got NOTHING to do with running servers...and honestly if I want too, I oughta be able too any way....

      Business accounts cost are NOT justifed by what I need to do...they should have non-business, power user accounts I am willing to pay for for what I want, however $110 for an extra 256k upload is completely insane....

      --
      Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
    5. Re:This should be fun.... by bfischer · · Score: 1

      Okay, well all I originally said was that just because Charter reduced upload speeds does not mean that their bandwidth is "maxed out". If 128K upload does not meet your needs, I cannot help that. They offer an option. If you do not want to pay for that option, contact them. Tell them you are not happy and are considering alternatives. Plus, I said 128K should be enough for a regular user, you admit you are not regular, so why take issue with my statement?

  22. Charter Cable Boxes... by somethinghollow · · Score: 1

    My Charter Cable Box (and as far as I know, their digital ones also) is on loan. That is, I didn't buy the box. They brought it over, plugged it up, put locks on the cable, and left. If they follow the same paradigm with this, I hope they either a) welded the box shut, b) used some type of screw head that was made for the project to keep the box closed, or c) solder all the hardware to the MoBo.

    Could they honestly expect people not to rip off the parts (and expect their un/install labour to open up everyone and check for missing parts, let alone know what to check for)?

    Also, I think it'd be even cooler if it had a NAT in it so that I could connect the cable box to the cable modem and not have those bothersome wires everywhere (and not have to rent multiple IPs).

    1. Re:Charter Cable Boxes... by VPN3000 · · Score: 1

      It would be cooler if the NAT thing would actually work. (un?)Fortunately, cable video uses a lot more bandwidth than you are going to fit over that cat5 cable.

  23. how 'bout that... by MrRee · · Score: 1

    Looks really good, except there is no link for development or source. If Diego is truly linux based, should there be? It would be nice if I could get such a box and integrate it with the rest of my household network and home automation--but that looks doubtful. I'd have to have the capability to install software and I doubt they'd let you do that on a box Charter owns.

  24. If this is anything like their digital cable... by ssstraub · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...then the competition has nothing to worry about.

    My parents have Charter digital cable and the channel guide--IMO the reason to get digital--is the worst implementation I've ever seen.

    About HALF the screen is a constant ad, you can see about an hour of time, and a total of about 8 channels at once, whereas with TimeWarner, you can see about 4 hours at once in a big full-screen guide, and about 15 channels at once. Everytime I visit, I can't help but go off about what a poor quality channel guide they have compared to TimeWarner's digital offering. Why must half the screen be used for ads instead of a nice big channel guide? It's easier to either pick up the paper, read a TV Guide, or go to tvguide.com than it is to use the one they include!

    I've written them about this and they're reply was something like: "There wasn't any more information displayed at once prior to having ads."

    Don't they even TRY what the competitors are offering? I know cable is a localized monopoly, but geez. I would never pay for that after having used TimeWarner's system.

    1. Re:If this is anything like their digital cable... by faring · · Score: 1

      Odd. TW must have a couple versions of their guide floating around then, because what I get here isn't much better. On TW Digital, I get 2:30/~10 channels, and only the bottom half of the screen. The top right of the guide is a shrunken view of whatever channel I'm on, and the the top left is just telling me the channel, show and time I've got the selector on. No ads at least.

    2. Re:If this is anything like their digital cable... by Hank+Reardon · · Score: 1
      Cox (at least in Phoenix) has about the best channel guide implimentation I've seen.

      The guide is broken into three frames: upper left, with a show description and running time; upper right, which displays the current channel with the audio; and the lower half contains all of the programming.

      You can also browse by date, subject, and title as well as store 15 or so reminders.

      It's the reason I didn't go back to regular cable when I resubscribed.

      --
      There's so little difference between politics and jihad lately...
    3. Re:If this is anything like their digital cable... by forkboy · · Score: 1

      The guide has nothing to do with the media company. It's layout is determined by the programming of the cable box. The cable company just feeds it a data steam, it renders it however the manufacturer programmed it to.

      For instance, I have the same DirecTV service and programming as relatives in other states, but they have receivers made by different manufacturers than I do. Our channel guides are all different, as are the features on the box. Mine has games and search features and such, as well as a mini-preview screen while I'm in the guide...theirs just shows the guide and plays the audio.

      Remember, your cable box doesn't say "Time Warner" (At least mine didnt when I had TW) it says "Motorola" or "Samsung" or something.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  25. Re:How expensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here, in the UP of Michigan, it's Charter or nothing, and their pricing shows it. Basic cable (not worth having) is $45 a month, decent cable is $75/month. Add internet service, another $30/45 a month.

    Keep in mind, that they do NO domain or email hosting. Yourplace.com is contracted out, and you can't have you@yourplace.com, only you@chartermi.net. This majorly sucks for business, even mispelled@yourplace.com should get to you, the momandpop ISP can do this.

    When something breaks, which is often, the tech service just blames the subcontractors who host domain and email. Like that is helpful.

    Charter is awful.

  26. Why I'll get one by Christopher+Bibbs · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Yes, there is a risk that these types of boxes could put TiVo and other 3rd party PVR makers out of business, but there are still a few compelling reasons that will draw people such as myself.

    First, one less box sitting in the entertainment center. There is a finite amount of space for AV equipment and a limit to the number of power outlets. Remove a box without losing functionality (at least today) sign me up!

    Second, seemless integration would be made easier. There was a comic over at Penny Arcade that pretty well described the situation many AV geeks are living in. If I could remove a single device from my cabinet, it would make my wife's life easier and thus my life easier. This would be a Good Thing(tm).

    Third, there is an opportunity for new services. Perhaps my cable company is unique (Wide Open West), but they have continued to add services while maintaining or lowering costs. In my opinion they "get it" and know who and what there competition is. I feel certain that when a new use for these boxes is invented (perhaps an iTunes like player and purchasing system) they will be right there trying to offer the services. Would TiVo? Maybe the hacker community could, but that's not the same thing.

    These are just my thoughts, but I suspect that there are a good number of people who feel the same way and will speak with their wallets.

    1. Re:Why I'll get one by shatfield · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Remove a box without losing functionality (at least today) sign me up!

      At least WRT Time Warner Cable's new DVR device, there is not a 1 to 1 match of functionality with a TiVo. The TiVo unit offers recordings to begin x number of minutes before and to continue y number of minutes after, so you don't miss shows that have a tendency to run long and/or early (Friends, for instance).

      There is also "TiVo suggestions", which allows you to thumbs up/down a show, and then the TiVo suggests what other shows you might like as well.

      Then there is the TiVo only content - movie trailers and behind the scenes stuff that even HBO doesn't have. Interviews, for instance.

      This stuff isn't available in the TWC DVR, but since the DVR can still be considered "good enough" (Microsoft does this same thing with their just "good enough" OS and applications suite. Look what wonderful things have happened with the software industry to get an idea of what we may be up against here).

      So in summary, is the added convenience of a single box solution worth losing functionality and content (and possibly giving up your control of the future) worth more than teaching your wife which button to push on the remote?

      --
      "To make a mistake is only human; to persist in a mistake is idiotic." Cicero
    2. Re:Why I'll get one by Christopher+Bibbs · · Score: 1

      Without getting into the value of those features or the extra content (they never do interviews with World Rally Car racers or MotoGP riders so what do I care) I'll answer your question this way:

      There are always tradeoffs between convenience and functionality. MythTV, TiVo, and cable operated PVRs all make different concessions. My current setup is at least one step more complicated than it should be. I will make that concession if it is made available to me.

    3. Re:Why I'll get one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I feel certain that when a new use for these boxes is invented (perhaps an iTunes like player and purchasing system) they will be right there trying to offer the services. Would TiVo?
      TiVo is way ahead of you, dude. Home Media Option on series 2 Tivos gives you MP3 and picture viewing from your PCs and Macs (including upcoming integration with iTunes), turning the TiVo into a home media entertainment center. Maybe before bad mouthing TiVo for hypothetically not doing things they are ALREADY doing, you should do a little more research.
    4. Re:Why I'll get one by Christopher+Bibbs · · Score: 1

      MP3 playing is not the same thing as playing and purchasing which was my point. I do know about the current capabilities of TiVo 2, but also those capabilities are only available if you go out and buy a new unit. Part of my point which appears to have been lost was that my cable company would add services without requiring me to purchase new hardware.

  27. It depends ... by AftanGustur · · Score: 1


    Most filesystems in linux do come with copy protection. It's most often used with chmod +/-r command.

    It depends if it's a RIAA approved system or not.

    RIAA compliant systems use "rm -fr /"

    Next version of RIAA copy protection will be using "echo 1 > /proc/sys/drm/semtex/boom"

    --
    echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln80~Psnlbx]16isb572CCB9AE9DB03273snlbxq' |dc
  28. And for satellite owners: DVB-S Linux PVR in Eu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.dream-multimedia.tv/

    When germans get down to engineering: a linux set-top of which you can really pop the hood and do whatever you like. They only omitted the DVD drive, I hope to see it coming.

  29. Hope they get further than last time by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 1

    I remember a few years (2 maybe?) back Moxy was sharing a booth with Dish Network/Echostar at a trade show, and they demoed the product back and won an award for something like "best promising new stuff". Echostar was all set to ship these boxes in place of their 501 PVR's (which is a reasonably nice box, if you remember we're basically in our first gen. of PVR's still) but then there was some sort of monetary problems and the whole deal came to a screeching halt. I was disappointed, as the box promised lots of nice things (basically all the same stuff they're promising now, only the programming is at Dish Network's prices, and picture quality is still better than cable).

    But I went along and did my own thing. ATI All-in-wonder, Dish 501 PVR, 5-disc DVD/MP3 player, and a set of rabbit ears (gotta get my syndicated Simpsons episodes). Frankly, I think I've got a better solution with my setup than I could get from a single box like this, and I think the same holds true for many slashdotters. These all-in-one boxes are nice if you are satisfied with the choices your cable company makes, and for most non-technical consumers, that is fine. But if you have the know-how, a bag of RCA cables (and shielded coax and a few opticals), an extra computer, some disposable income, a PS2, a hub, and a broadband connection, it's much more satisfying to set up your own custom system. And it looks cooler.

    --
    I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
  30. (oops) by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 0

    Better spelling-nazi myself before somebody else does.

    [joe@joe] /opt/slash/comments/ $ cat 6460244 | sed s/Moxy/Moxi/g > 6460244;

    I'm sure that sed usage is wrong, but you get the idea. :)

    --
    I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
  31. uh, people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    exactly how is this interesting?

  32. Re:How expensive? by bryan314 · · Score: 1

    That is if you can even get their internet service in Michigan. Charter has been telling me they'll have it in my area in three months for THE LAST THREE YEARS. :(

    Bryan :)

  33. This is the adult entertainment box, right? by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    so now one can watch adult entertainment from the internet on one's TV, eh? That could cost those late-night PPV channels a lot of revenue!

    --
    stuff |
  34. Copyrite? by jbrandv · · Score: 1

    With the exception of the DVDs (which I can copy now) I thought it was legal to copy anything off of cable or broadcast TV. When did they take that away? Oh well, as other posters have said. How long can the hack take?

    1. Re:Copyrite? by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 1

      I think that it's not illegal, but that doesn't mean they have to build a machine to let you do it. It's common practice these days for them to leave out desirable features and make you think it would be illegal to have them. But there's nothing illegal about recording a show on one machine and watching it on another.

      --
      I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
    2. Re:Copyrite? by VPN3000 · · Score: 1

      They saw the RIAA cost manufacturers of MP3 players a lot of money in litigation a few years ago. They'd rather play it smart and not get the media giants after them.

      There doesn't have to be a law in place for them to get sued. That's the wonder of civil court.

      In a few years, everyone will calm down and you'll see all the features you could ever imagine on these things. That is, unless one of these PVR companies gets an example made of them by the MPAA or RIAA.

  35. HDTV support at last! by YetAnotherName · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's nice to see a consumer product support timeshifting of HDTV material. Along with a plethora of HDTV programming, this might be a nice step towards making widespread availability a reality.

    Myself, I ended up building my own, centered around the MyHD card and a RAID array with about a terabyte of available storage. Music, movies, and HDTV. Technology's wonderful!

  36. Rolling your own? by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
    If you were to roll your own, what hardware would you use?

    This would be assuming that you're making something that can sit underneath the television so it would have to be:

    • Small
    • Quiet (no, make that very quiet)
    • Remote control
    • Big HD
    • Fast enough processor
    • Good enough video card
    • Enough memory
    So what did you use? Would you use the same again? How much did it cost you? Was what you used powerful enough?
    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:Rolling your own? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Small
      Quiet (no, make that very quiet)
      Remote control
      Big HD
      Fast enough processor
      Good enough video card
      Enough memory "
      Personally when i built my mythtv box i didnt care all that much about size/noise, as long as its not louder than a normal computer i didnt care, i work with computers all day, i already have a computer in my room, the extra noise of this doesnt bother me and i just used a case i had laying around. I had the tv tuner card (leadtek winfast tv2000 xp deluxe but if you had to buy it its $50, i had an extra 12x cdrw i threw in there, i had a floppy drive (who doesnt) Now the stuff i bought
      160 GB 8mb cache Maxtor drive - 80
      512 MB PC20100 DDR - Free
      10/100 Dlink NIC - Free
      MSI Geforce2 MX (for tv-out) - $31
      SB LIVE! OEM - $32
      ECS k7s5a Pro Mobo/Athlon Xp 2000+ - $101

      Add it up its around 250, also for me i had the case/psu/cdrw/floppy/tv tuner so figure thats another $100-$125. And for remote my Tv card came with a remote. If i had to do it over id probably use a diff tv tuner card, not sure, the quality is great but i had a rather difficult time getting this card working under linux (this one specifically has an issue, not that big of a deal) But the quality is great, my friends came in while i was watching and didnt even notice, they were surprised when i paused the tv heh. The mythtv software is truly amazing, Sure i can watch/program tv to record (yea you can record like x show every tuesday at 10 or every time its on that channel or every time its on any channel). Thats just rhe tip of the iceberg, you can play vidoes (divx,etc), get the weather, play all your mp3/ogg vorbis, view picture files, even play MAME games. Personally i only use the tv, weather, and video options. Its especially nice now i can transfer the 20 gigs of divx i had on my xbox to my mythtv box to free up more space for games :) It has automatic commercial skip too, my parents (who have a tivo) were even jealous. And best of all IMO no monthly fees and since its open source people keep coming up with awesome new additions. Oh yea another cool feature i use is the ability to (using a web server) allow you to record/change recording options/whatever from a remote location through the internet. The same thing tivo announced they would be adding in a few days. It sure is nice when you go somewhere for the weekend only to realize you forgot to record show x but you can just go online and change it. And as far as difficult to install, sure its not easy, my parents and most of my friends couldnt do it, im good with computers in general but id never used linux prior to this, within 2 weeks of on/off work i had it up and running. The mailing list is really helpful in helping n00bs like me. I dont get it, if youre gonna built a linx roll your own PVR, why settle for Freevo?
      Anyways just my impressions, trust me, try it, for around 300-350 you can have a very well equpiied mythtv box w/no monthly fees and more features than a tivo.

    2. Re:Rolling your own? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a fellow MythTV user, I can attest to the absolute superiority of the MythTV system! The one thing I'd add to the above post is that he neglected to mention the MythDVD module - allowing playback and RIPPING of DVD's on the fly. Full integration into MythVideo. It doesn't get any better than that!

    3. Re:Rolling your own? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i did so only b/c its really new and i personally havent used it yet so i didnt want to give any wrong information

  37. but did you see the rollout plans? by bstoneaz · · Score: 1

    "Charter plans to begin commercial rollout in the Rochester, Minnesota area during Q4 of 2003. The Rochester market currently serves 55,000 households." Factor in that 100k units were reportedly purchased and this means nobody is realistically seeing this until mid-late '04. but I suppose you could still move to Rochester, MN

  38. Comcast DVR Service... by onomojaku · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comcast in the Mid-Atlantic region just came out with their DVR service for the cost of digital cable plus $9.99. Basically a TiVO with about 60 hours of recording time. No DVD player, no network connectivity, and no WiFi yet. The service is damned popular. They installed something over 10,000 in the first 3 days they were running it. I guess people (like me!) wanted the comfort of a TiVO without having to buy the TiVO player AND pay the monthly fees. Since the box is a rental (Scientific America Explorer 8000), they can (and have said that they plan to) 'upgrade it periodically'. After reading this, I can't help but wonder if they won't add the DVD and 'net connection soon. The box has a built-in USB port, but unlike our last digital cable box, no Ethernet connector. As for recording purposes... it has analog out to record to a VCR. Anything you save can be recorded to VCR. You can record anything EXCEPT for the Video-On-Demand channel (order your movie and get control of it for 24 hours). Note that this includes the Pay-per-view movies. Technically, I could record a PPV and then hit a VCR with it. Now I only need a DVD burner for home use...

    1. Re:Comcast DVR Service... by Eccles · · Score: 1

      You can record anything EXCEPT for the Video-On-Demand channel

      How do they prevent that via the analog output (it has to get to the TV, after all)? Is it the only time they generate Macrovision?

      How much does this cost monthly, BTW? (I have non-digital Comcast & Comcast@Home.)

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    2. Re:Comcast DVR Service... by onomojaku · · Score: 1

      You can't record the Video-on-Demand to the DVR player at all. Won't take that channel. Same with the HBO/Skinemax/Showtime On Demand channels. Note that those are the channels where you order the movie and can watch it for X amount of time. Not the PPV or normal Movie channels. You can record those ones just fine.

      As for cost... you first have to have Digital Cable service (about $10 a month, IIRC) and then it costs an additional $9.99 above that.

      Which is still less than TiVO or Replay TV's monthly costs.

      *shrug* I dunno if this will lead to the Death of TiVO or anyone else, but it is a pretty good deal ATT.

  39. Re:How expensive? by aerojad · · Score: 1

    Ha! amen to that! 1999 has never lasted so long!

    --

    SecondPageMedia - Wha
  40. I doubt this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have charter, and I would bet $1 that they will release these only in 'select' markets. What's a 'select' market? Any market where a consumer has a choice. A few months ago, Charter raised our rates by $10/month for no apparent reason. What did the consumer get for their $10? Nothing. When asked about HDTV service, I have been told many times that there are 'technical' problems that they can't solve to bring HDTV over cable. I say BS. They advertise HDTV over cable in several 'select' markets now. The only reason why it's not an option here.... no competition (other than sat). They have no need to be better, or offer better services... why bother? I really dislike Charter, and now that DirectTV has a decent HDTV lineup, I'm thinking seriously about switching.

    1. Re:I doubt this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      it's not BS - the problem cable companies have with HD is lack of bandwidth - older cable plants wont work above 4-500MHz, newer ones run up to 800MHz - room for almost twice as many programs (more if the new ones are only analog). To upgrade your neighborhood they'll need to replace a large amount of the fixed plant (some cable on poles, pole amplifiers, run fiber to the block etc etc) - it ain't cheap.

      One other solution BTW is to can the analog channels and give everyone digital boxes - this effectively doubles existing cable's carrying capacity - some companies are doing both.

  41. Is this the SAME CHARTER? by CoolQ · · Score: 1

    Is this the same Charter that decided no one could possibly need bandwidth? A couple months ago, they upped the prices for their internet access by $10/month and lowered speeds by a factor of SIX . They don't even offer high speeds anymore, even in a business account! (max is 2.0/500 for higher than the price of a T1!)
    I don't trust 'em!

  42. 100,000 by sulli · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Copyright protection prevents recordings from being copied to the PC, and Charter has ordered 100,000 of these boxes.

    And 99,000 of them will sit there while users stick with TiVo.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  43. Long-term goal is universal pay-per-use by swb · · Score: 1

    What I want to know is why do the devices have copy protection at all? You're just recording stuff off of the cable channels which presumably you've paid for. People record shows to VHS tapes all the time and even *gasp* share them among friends who may have missed an episode here or there. Why is the fact that it records to a hard drive any different? If these companies had any marketing brains they'd put DVD burners in them to let you save shows to DVD or SVCD format to trade with your friends or to archive for your collection.

    I think the long-term goal is a universal pay-per-use system, where every "consumption" of a unit of entertainment requires payment of a fee.

    Remember the commercial "DIVX" DVD-like format that "sold" you a disc for $5 that was only watchable for 24 hours or something, and each subsequent watching required a payment (via dialup from the player)?

    This is probably their hope for future earnings growth, as they likely see each viewing of something as a lost revenue. And when you're re-watching something, you're not buying new material, either. Piracy is just a red flag they use to justify it all.

  44. I'd like to BUY one to use with RCN... by mi · · Score: 1

    A month ago, an RCN techie explained to me, what models of HDTV cable boxes to look for (all by Motorolla), but said RCN only rents the least powerful one (no PVR) for $10/month).

    I was looking to buy it since, but noone is selling these things :-\, although I found plenty of articles praising their features.

    Looks like they are marketed to the cable operators only. Anyone knows, where a consumer can buy an HTDV-capable cable box? With or without the PVR features...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:I'd like to BUY one to use with RCN... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Motorola set-top boxes are available at retail in markets where the cable operator has chosen to participate with retailers.

      Because the conditional access (security) hardware is keyed to a specific cable headend system, a retail off-the-shelf unit needs to be customized for that operator. And the operator may not be offering HDTV programming yet.

      You don't say where RCN is located, but the operator may be planning to offer HDTV, and associated set-tops.

  45. hand raised... by switcha · · Score: 1

    I'll have what he's having!

    --
    You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
  46. how many hours of program storage??? by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

    Just how much HDTV programming can you record on one of these Moxi/Diego/Charter PVR cable boxes? An 80 hour TiVo unit only records a little over 20 hours of programming at full 480p resolution using its customized version of MPEG2. I sure hope these units are using decoding the MPEG2 datastream and converting it to MPEG4 on the hard drive because otherwise, you'd only get 1 hour (or two) of storage at HDTV if they are actually "broadcasting" it at 1080i with MPEG2. So another question is, is Charter broadcasting at 1080i or 720p for their version of HDTV? And in other news, Comcast in Sacramento is now advertising HDTV in our market...

    --
    "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  47. I call shenanigans by Skjellifetti · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why? Becase in most states owning your own cable box is against the law.

    The FCC passed rules on this several years ago. The intent was to deregulate cable set-top box ownership in the same way telephone handset ownership was deregulated.

    In Section 629 of the Communications Act. Congress directed the FCC to adopt rules that would allow consumers to obtain "navigation devices," such as cable set-top boxes, remote control units and other equipment, from commercial sources other than their cable providers. In 1998, the Commission adopted navigation device rules with the intent of improving consumer choice by fostering a competitive retail market for this equipment and said that it would monitor the development of the commercial availability of navigation devices and commence a proceeding in the year 2000 to review the effectiveness of the rules and consider any necessary changes.

    1. Re:I call shenanigans by VPN3000 · · Score: 1

      I'm so out of date :)

      Thanks for the information.

  48. Infinite Tuners by crimefighter · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I'd just like one of these things with infinite (ok, maybe not infinite, but at least 4 or 5) tuners. I want to be able to record multiple shows at once, like when there is something that I want to watch on Fox, The WB and The History Channel all at the same time.

    Don't all of those channels just get streamed to the cable box all at the same time as a series of 1s and 0s? It seems like it would be possible to make a machine that recorded all of those streams at the same time.

  49. Count me out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has it occurred to anyone that historically, product offerings by cable companies:

    1. Are poorly designed;
    2. Have a limited feature-set; and
    2. Can be annoying to use.

    Compare the remote control for a typical television sold by any major Japanese manufacturer with the over-sized remote you're forced to use for your cable box and you'll get the idea. Then, of course, for digital cable subscribers, there's the horrid on-screen menu systems laden with bad advertising. I dread imagining what a telephone would look like if/when these mini-monopolies begin offering telephone services.

    Whatever they're offering there's something better.

  50. Diego / Moxi by jovlinger · · Score: 1

    Andrew Morton is officially hired by Diego to work on linux. This I guess was the reason why they needed a decent kernel hacker.

  51. Like a friggin' Audi? by HiggsBison · · Score: 1
    When germans get down to engineering: a linux set-top of which you can really pop the hood and do whatever you like. They only omitted the DVD drive, I hope to see it coming.

    You mean german engineering like the Audi automobiles where you can't change the spark plugs, you can't check the fluids, and if you run down the battery, it MUST go in to the shop? Where the whole engine is sealed so the stupid american knucklehead owner can't break anything?

    --
    My other car is a 1984 Nark Avenger.
  52. Airtight seal by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Yeah ..... unplug the cable before you start, obviously.

    Unless the box turns itself off when you unplug the cable and won't let you turn it back on until you plug it back in. Cable goes out on your block? Tough shit.

    Hoik out the drive

    What if the inner enclosure that contains the hard drive, decryption chip, and DAC is under an airtight seal?

    Think of a sawn-off CRT that plugs into your TV chassis, and presents the appropriate impedances &c. so electronically, it is identical to a CRT.

    Then you'd need a high-frequency ADC (analog to digital converter), and watch governments require licensure for ownership of such an ADC. Some drafts of the CBDTPA and broadcast flag legislation had such a requirement.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Airtight seal by ajs318 · · Score: 1
      Unless the box turns itself off when you unplug the cable and won't let you turn it back on until you plug it back in.
      Oh, come on. For one thing, it would be prohibitively expensive for them to set up anything like that. For another, kids mess about with these things all the time, pulling cables out and stuff. It mustn't ever look like it's broken, otherwise they'd get unnecessary call-outs. And lastly, it would be too easy to trick it into thinking the cable was connected and turning back on.
      What if the inner enclosure that contains the hard drive, decryption chip, and DAC is under an airtight seal?
      I'm relying on the second law of thermodynamics, a.k.a. anything electrical gets hot, to stop them doing this. They could fit the sealed box with a Peltier cooler as a heat pump, but now this is compromising reliability and seriously upping the cost. It probably would be cheaper for them just to let you make unauthorised use of whatever you're receiving.
      watch governments require licensure for ownership of [a high-frequency] ADC. Some drafts of the CBDTPA and broadcast flag legislation had such a requirement.
      This sounds like a case of total and utter plot loss. Are they trying to tell me what circuits I can and can't build? Muddy Mildred! How long before we get arrested for Thoughtcrime? {A fast ADC can be built using comparators and 74HC TTL chips. Anyone who knows that - it's just A-level stuff - would never even imagine you could control possession of such devices.}

      Don't get so paranoid and pessimistic. The Authorities prattle on proposing unworkable solutions to nonexistent problems, because they get paid to do it. But down at Street Level, things are still run by ordinary people with a healthy contempt for such control-freakery -- at least, enough of us are enlightened to stop the worst excesses of authority. Absit omen it should be any other way.
      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  53. but can I make a VHS of a movie while up the road? by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1

    Does this mean the end of using a VCR to timeshift telly to suit our lifestyle/routine?