Slashdot Mirror


Wireless Access Point Reliability?

darrelld2 asks: "I'm having problems finding a low cost access point that is reliable. I started searching the web; however, I can't find anyone who has done independent research on access points to find which one is the most dependable. I have had several different brands; Cisco, 3Com, and Netgear. The only one that has lasted more than 6 months was the Cisco. What are other Slashdot users seeing?" Just as an added datapoint, I've been using my Cabletron Wireless AP for well over 2 years, and aside with a (repairable) problem with the power supply, it is still going strong. What have your experiences been with wireless APs?

82 comments

  1. My netgear is a year and a half old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And still works great. I didn't realize this was such a big deal.

  2. In An Unexpected Turn of Events... by Leghkster · · Score: 1

    My Linksys wireless AP/DSL router/4 port switch has run constantly for nearly two years. I just wish I'd paid today's price for it :-)

    --
    Witty signature omitted for brevity.
    1. Re:In An Unexpected Turn of Events... by theNote · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      I've had a linksys BEFW11S4 v1 for almost 3 years now.

      I've never had a problem with it.
      Linksys has always added great new featues to the firmware with upgrades.

      I understand your pain with price.
      I paid $300 dollars for mine and now they cost $99 most places.

    2. Re:In An Unexpected Turn of Events... by CyberBry · · Score: 1

      I've been using my Linksys WAP11 since I bought it almost 2 years ago. Haven't had so much as a single problem with it.

      My friend bought the same one recently (a more recent WAP11) that was dead out of the box. He sent it back to Linksys and quickly got another one, and hasn't had any problems with it in the 2 months or so he's been using it.

      Based on those experiences, and the fact that Linksys is pretty inexpensive, I'd recommend you give them a try (although I've yet to try any of their G products if that's what you're after).

      --

      ----
      Bryan Samis
      http://www.thesamis.net
    3. Re:In An Unexpected Turn of Events... by fehlschlag · · Score: 1

      I've also been using a LinkSys for about 2 years. The only issues were while using VPN from my home LAN to the remote office campus. If my roommate decided to play Diablo 2 online, the router would occasionally shut down.

      Another really good router was the Ugate 3000. Seemed to be more robust than the LinkSys.

    4. Re:In An Unexpected Turn of Events... by fehlschlag · · Score: 1

      Just for clarification: the Ugate was not a wireless one. I just mentioned it since I used it heavily before I got the Linksys. I even used them together on the same home LAN, needed a bit of config tweaks, but worked well.

  3. 3Com by melete · · Score: 1


    3Com WAPs hava always given me exceptional service. D-Link is a brand I would stay away from, though I use one in my house (it sucks).

    I'd imagine you'll find a lot of praise for NetGear, but I've never used one.

  4. What have you been doing with your AP? by eakerin · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm just wondering what you've been doing with those AP's that make them die so easily.

    I've got a Linksys, it's been working fine for probably a year now. At work, we use Cisco AP's and they've been running strong for well over 2 years.

    Do you leave it outside in the rain, drop it in the mud, or kick it?

    1. Re:What have you been doing with your AP? by BenTheDewpendent · · Score: 1

      Drop kicked it into the mud while raining out. Why is that bad for them?

    2. Re:What have you been doing with your AP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not supposed to be taken outside. Stick to kicking them into mud inside.

    3. Re:What have you been doing with your AP? by FFFish · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Indeed. I've been using 3Com HomeConnect for going on forever now (well, three or four years *at least*), and it's ticking along just fine. Even after I shortcircuited the board when I tried to hang the unit from the wall using a bent paperclip... [hangs head in shame]. Even after it fell from the wall, smashing onto the floor. And even after making sparks fly when plugging it into its power adapter (stupid screw located beside the power plug, just ideal for making contact with the plug "tip". Bah.)

      Now personally, I can't imagine being any harder on these devices than I've been, short of storing them underwater, so I should think most any decent brandname AP will do just fine.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    4. Re:What have you been doing with your AP? by battjt · · Score: 1

      Really. I have an Orinoco in a garage that hasn't had a problem in 2 years. (At the other end of the connection, I have an old 486 with ALL the fans ripped out sitting in another garage. It runs great too!) Joe

      --
      Joe Batt Solid Design
    5. Re:What have you been doing with your AP? by ralphb · · Score: 1

      Heat seems to be the enemy of some APs, both in terms of performance and of longevity. I speak from experience on the former, and have heard stories about the latter. Try setting up cooling fans and see if it doesn't make a difference.

      Ralph

    6. Re:What have you been doing with your AP? by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Joe I went to the URL in your sig, seems broken. Too bad, I was looking for the advice of a solid designer.

      As for WiFi reliability, hell they are only $80 apiece, buy a few identical units and keep spares. Make detailed installation instructions (specifically detailing WEP codes so you don't have to reprogram every laptop in your org) when you install the first one. If that one craters pull out your spare and you are back up and running in about 10 minutes.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    7. Re:What have you been doing with your AP? by FFFish · · Score: 1

      oh, sure. bump up the score so that I can be even further embarassed...

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    8. Re:What have you been doing with your AP? by darrelld2 · · Score: 1


      Using them in the manner you are supposed to; however, usually I have them mounted in the warm place (between 80 - 95 degrees). I think heat brakes them...

  5. D-Link DI-614 reliability by snowtigger · · Score: 1

    I hope someone is going to have a counter-example on this one, for D-Link's sake.

    My D-Link DI-614 accesspoint/router has had the habit of crashing from time to time, forcing me to manually reboot it. It happens once or twice a month when the trafic load is high. I have seen other people reporting the same thing on newsgroups/mailinglists, but without any answers to why or what to do about it.

    1. Re:D-Link DI-614 reliability by BenTheDewpendent · · Score: 1

      Its cause Dlink is crap. I had a DI-713p (1 gen) and it would lock up under high traffic aswell. Nothing could fix it but a manual reboot. It also wasn't uncommon to be unable to acces the admin page for no apparant reason.

    2. Re:D-Link DI-614 reliability by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Its not just the wireless ones either. I run a DLink 704P at home, and every once in a while it inexplicably stops giving out IP addresses, and the admin page is unreachable. The only fix is to cycle power on it. This whole time I thought it might just be my unit, but I guess this is more of a general problem with DLink's router software.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    3. Re:D-Link DI-614 reliability by cyb97 · · Score: 1
      My 614 was rather poor too, but most of the problems ceased to exists when I flashed it with the latest software from D-Link roughly 2 months ago...

      Since then the only problem has been the lousy range...

    4. Re:D-Link DI-614 reliability by Tower · · Score: 1

      I've seen that happen with the Linksys BEFSR11/41 as well, usually as a result of running Kazza or an equivalent. It has happened to several people I know with similar NAT boxes (DLink, Linksys).

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
    5. Re:D-Link DI-614 reliability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a D-Link 713P. I bought it since I am still on dial-up and it has a serial port to hook up a modem. I locks up about once a month. It's just for
      home use, so I can live with it. I will look into something else should I upgrade.

    6. Re:D-Link DI-614 reliability by Troed · · Score: 0
      D-Link 624 here:


      *) No WPA, only WEP


      *) DNS via UDP is weird. It seems the D-Link is actively intercepting DNS traffic from NAT:ed hosts to _external_ hosts, inserting its own data in the replies. I've tested this extensively, and reported it do D-Link. It boils down to you getting correct data over dig +tcp but not via UDP.


      *) My WAP has software v1.20b while on the web D-Link lists v1.12 as being the latest.


      However, it works just fine as an actual WAP.

    7. Re:D-Link DI-614 reliability by DRACO- · · Score: 1

      The only trouble with my DL-614+ is that it doesnt like dirty power. I am about to replace my old ups which has a relay that sticks when the load has been high or the ups got hot. Im going to move that ups over to power the dlink wap. I have only had to unplug/plug my dlink 6 times since november and had to factory reset it once last month after a bad power sag. I think just keeping the power clean would help the thing. DRACO-

      --
      Consider yourself blessed if you are sneezed on by a dragon and only get wet, it could have been a fireball.
  6. Linksys WAP11 Version 1 - upgraded firmware by pbulteel73 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Believe it or not, I've had this one since they came out (2 years ago or so) and have had to reset it twice. It's pretty reliable and the transfer rates are decent. I have it plugged into it's own interface on my firewall using a crossover cable so I can section if off from my internal net and log^H^H^H protect my network.

    I have heard horror stories about them but I must admit I am a very happy customer. Their PCCards suck though.

    1. Re:Linksys WAP11 Version 1 - upgraded firmware by topham · · Score: 1

      I have version 2 of the WAP11; while I've only had it for 9 months it has been rock solid. I did a single firmware update to increase security on it, (allowing me to tun off Beacons) it hasn't had any issues at all. Very happy with it.

      I'm also happy with the PCCard I have from Linksys, it has good range and has worked fine, I've had that for about a year. (note: I did notice a lot of people had range issues with their older cards...)

      People can complain all they want about Linksys being low quality, but I've never had significant issues with their stuff. The price its right and it works.

    2. Re:Linksys WAP11 Version 1 - upgraded firmware by ChrisSontagsAnus · · Score: 1

      I have a pair of WAP11's bringing me a T1 connection from 1600' away. They've worked perfectly for 1.5 years despite one of them being located in my tool shed where the temperature gets up to 140 F. in the summer. I bought a spare set and have never had to use them. BTW, version 1, upgraded firmware.

    3. Re:Linksys WAP11 Version 1 - upgraded firmware by theNote · · Score: 1

      Good point about the old WPC cards.

      My v1 sucked, then I upgraded to the 2.5 card.

      The 2.5 was aptly named cuz I got about 2 and a half times the range and speed with WPC 2.5 over the WPC v1.

  7. Orinoco, Proxim, Agere by BenTheDewpendent · · Score: 1

    I will agree with the dlink sucking. I had one and it always locked up on me. I recently replaced it with a Orinoco BG-2000 and zero problems and it runs like a dream. I think it also looks better than many of the other stuff out there. It is a bit more expensive but when it comes to computers and tech you really do get what you pay for.

    1. Re:Orinoco, Proxim, Agere by cyb97 · · Score: 1

      I've got a dlink (614+ ?) that has been running for a couple of months straight now... apart from the webadmin sucks bigtime the only trouble is the puny range it has... the signalstrenght is poor in most of the house...

  8. DLink DWL-100AP by martinde · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've had no problems with it so far. I believe I've had it for a year.

    1. Re:DLink DWL-100AP by cuyler · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've had the DWL-1000AP for just over two years now and it has never had a problem and I have updated the firmware a couple times. The downside now is the product is no longer supported.

      I find that's the biggest problem in the high tech sector - unless you buy very expensive technology and pay for the support you will likely own the product longer than it's supported.

      Some companies are a little better than others when it comes to supporting older products. A quick check of ATI shows they still have very old driver (EGA/VGA cards) available to download.

  9. My trusty Apple AirPort (original) by jht · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've had an AirPort since shortly after it came out, and it's been running nearly continuously since then. I had the capacitor failure that a lot of the early ones had, and swapped them out myself. I also added a Lucent range extender antenna to boost the signal around the house. but it's been running virtually trouble-free since.

    I don't know about the newer versions, but the original Graphite base station has worked great for me. There are Windows and Java-based configurators available for the older Graphite and Snow 802.11b models. I'm not sure about the Extreme (802.11g) version, though.

    A base station of any brand shouldn't fail as quickly as you are experiencing, I think. If they die quickly, they may be getting too hot or perhaps they're getting really crappy power that stresses the power supply beyond what they're spec'd for.

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
    1. Re:My trusty Apple AirPort (original) by JLester · · Score: 1

      I have an original Airport as well that has never gone down.

      Jason

      --
      "FORMAT C:" - Kills bugs dead!
    2. Re:My trusty Apple AirPort (original) by gmhowell · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I have an original Airport as well that has never gone down.

      I'm married to a woman like that...

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    3. Re:My trusty Apple AirPort (original) by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Ditto here, except my caps have all been good. Make sure the thing gets some ventilation (wall mount). I also drilled the hole in the side to plug in a Lucent range extender. If only it handled GRE I'd have zero complaints (the newer ones handle GRE, but I'm cheap). Apple stuff lasts, another reason its TCO is so low.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  10. My thoughts by krangomatik · · Score: 4, Informative

    When you talk about 'reliability' it sounds like you are talking about longevity. In addition to hw failures you also have to worry about the AP's ability to be upgraded to keep up with new authentication/authorization methods and other such software/firmware improvements. That is the biggest difference between the low end and the high end APs. We use Cisco APs and bridges for this very reason. We were steered this direction because we are a Cisco shop, so I'm not by any means trying to steer people towards Cisco APs. That being said, we have been happy with them, but I also know of people who have AP installs using other 'high-end' APs with similar success.
    At my home I have a Linksys box (one of the gateway/wireless/4 port hub boxes) and it has been working alright for a couple years now. With earlier firmware revs the wireless would occasionally drop, but with the later revs its been pretty good.

  11. my netgear.... by m00by · · Score: 1

    is about 5 months old and counting. I had a few problems where it locked early on, but it's been running like a clock for a few months now, barring power outages, which have been happening disturbingly often...

  12. Apple AirPort by infohord · · Score: 1

    I have used an apple AirPort for over 2 years now. I do not own a Mac but someone wrote a nice Java based configuration application so you do not need a Mac to use one. They have a lot of nice features and the new ones look even better. (This is my one and only Apple product.)

    1. Re:Apple AirPort by wimbor · · Score: 1

      Same here: continuous operation of a graphite Airport at home for 2 years now without a hitch. 4 clients attached mixed Mac/WinXP on a cable modem. I bought another graphite and snow Airport for the office, and they all worked flawlessly.

  13. HostAP... by dJCL · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just grabbed an old 233Mhz I had sitting around(small form factor Deskpro) and put in a PrismII based card(DLink DWL500 I think) and installed the Linux HostAP driver. It now runs as the access point on my network, and has built in DHCP and DNS servers and firewall capabilities.

    Just find a rock solid card, ignore the AP issue and build your own with Linux! Hey, it really is that simple. And I have used this now for months without an issue at all. Debian Stable with the hostap driver compiled on and a updated kernel to deal with some speed issues...

    Try it and see...

    --
    On Arrakis: early worm gets the bird. Magister mundi sum!
    1. Re:HostAP... by blate · · Score: 1

      You have to be careful to find a card that uses a chipset that is supported by hostap. As you mention, the only chipset (that I'm aware of) that does is the PRISM-x chipset. Luckily, this is a very good chipset, from what I've seen. It works with hostap in FreeBSD (5.1, at least) was well.

      The other chipsets won't work with hostap. Look in the man pages for hostap for a list of all the cards that it supports -- it's quite a long list.

      Note also that, if you go this route, you'll have to set up your own DHCP, NAT, etc., and make sure that your system is "hardened" so that you don't have a big security hole in your network (or put it behind some other firewall).

      This is a good solution for us Linux/UNIX geeks, but not for everyone.

    2. Re:HostAP... by jimiUK · · Score: 1

      Yep, same here. I've got an old Pentium 100 with a prism 2 based card, running hostap. It's also got an adsl modem, and is bridging my wired and wireless networks so they all share the same subnet. The wireless clients all use IPSEC ( FreeSWAN )along with MAC address authentication, and it's also running DNS, DHCP and NTP services. In addition the kernel is doing traffic shaping and QOS. This all runs on top of Slackware 8 stripped to the bone. Its' reliable, stable and has been running continiously for months. It's worth noting though that the hostap driver is a very special case, and does a lot more in terms of being a true access point than many of the other wireless card drivers. Search out a Prism2 card , and use this driver. You won't be dissapointed !

    3. Re:HostAP... by TheSync · · Score: 1

      In the other direction, I took a useless old laptop running Windows 98, put a static route on it, put the wi-fi NIC into peer-to-peer mode, and that is my "access point."

  14. AP's by blate · · Score: 1

    Personally, I have a 340-series (802.11b) Cisco AP at home, which has been running just fine for about 3 years now. The only real maintenence I've done to it was to upgrade the firmware sometime last year. The only problem with the Cisco boxes is that they're a little expensive; you probably can get one pretty cheaply on Ebay.

    At work, we have several Linksys AP's and I have a Linksys WET11 wireless-to-ethernet bridge at home. I have found Linksys's equipment to be quite reliable and reasonably-priced. Their firmware releases used to be a little flakey about 2 years ago, but their latest couple releases have proved very stable.

    I don't think you could go wrong with either Linksys or Cisco.

  15. Belkin?? by haydenth · · Score: 1

    About 2 years ago, I purchased an old Belkin Wireless AP. It's been running non-stop for the full two years, but about once a Night I have to reset it manually or else I cannot get any outgoing traffic to work.

    --
    - tom -
    1. Re:Belkin?? by BenTheDewpendent · · Score: 1

      Having to reboot once a night isn't non-stop.

  16. SMC2655W by XDG · · Score: 1

    I've been using my SMC2655W for about a year and a half. Rock solid the entire time. Highly recommended.

    -xdg

    1. Re:SMC2655W by MaxQuordlepleen · · Score: 1

      My SMC7004AWBR needs to be rebooted almost daily .. less than a year old.

    2. Re:SMC2655W by Istealmymusic · · Score: 1
      My SMC7004AWBR needs to be rebooted almost daily .. less than a year old.
      Mine too. Stay away from the SMC7004AWBRs!

      I think the problem is that it overheats. I tried raising it up as to increase airflow, and that seemed to help a bit. Still, its not worth it. Don't buy the SMC7004AWBR Barricade. Myself, I'm staying away from all SMC products from now.

      --
      "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
    3. Re:SMC2655W by zetabrown · · Score: 1

      I had one of these as my AP for 2 1/2 years, until recently when it failed (?bad capacitor). In all that time it never gave a problem. Pity that the 1st failure was terminal!

  17. Don't forget Lucent/Orinoco/Proxim/whatever by cede-admin · · Score: 1

    We just decommissioned our Lucent WavePoint II's after 3.5 years of near-perfect service. If it weren't for the 10 Mbps uplink limitation, we'd probably keep them around for a lot longer.

    Our replacements are Proxim AP-600's, and so far they've proven to be less stable. One developed a short on its mainboard and melted down a few days after deployment, and a few others have spurious wireless card failures from time to time. Luckily, a reset from the web or telnet interface seems to bring them back online. If only we didn't need 802.1x and 802.11g :(

    1. Re:Don't forget Lucent/Orinoco/Proxim/whatever by cyb97 · · Score: 1

      Why would 10Mbps be a limitation, I'd say 11Mbps wireless wouldn't be able to fill a 10Mbps wire-pipe anyway...
      Not in my experience anyway...

    2. Re:Don't forget Lucent/Orinoco/Proxim/whatever by cede-admin · · Score: 1

      That's true for 802.11b, but a 10Mbps uplink is a limitation with 802.11g. I still don't understand why the WavePoint II's came with a 10Mbps uplink. They have two pcmcia card slots that are designed to handle two separate ESSID's. That makes the wired uplink a possible bottleneck.

    3. Re:Don't forget Lucent/Orinoco/Proxim/whatever by TeddyR · · Score: 1

      A lot of hardware manufacturers that make "embedded" systems like APs, cable modems, routers, etc used trancievers that the general market would consider "old tech" on their boards so that the product can be made cheaper.... [the board probably has the equiv of a Pent 100 with an ISA bus and a ISA PCMCIA bridge that can handle 2 cards]

      --

      --
      Time is on my side
  18. A plethora of APs by scumdamn · · Score: 1

    I've had an Aironet AP1100 (from Dell), a Lucent AP-1000, a Dell TrueMobile 1170 wireless base station, and about 3 TrueMobile 1184 wireless routers for up to 2.5 years now and they're all working well. As long as you just want regular 802.11b with no WEP, you're golden. Those are all from just one vendor, though, so I couldn't tell ya how others are (except linksys. i've had an odd issue with the BEFW11S4 V2 that I have here)
    The Linksys Issue: Some BEFW11S4 routers have a problem with some 802.11b/g cards. To get the card to associate with the router you have to set the rate to 2Mbps, which is utterly stupid with 802.11g cards! Other BEFW11S4s are just fine and work no matter what you throw at them (Pringles can, a/b/g cards, old lucent cards, whatever.)

  19. Siemens SpeedStream 2623 by oldmildog · · Score: 1
    Whatever you do, save yourself a lot of trouble and avoid buying the SpeedStream 2623. It's been a constant source of frustration. Slowdowns are common due to connection troubles between AP and wireless card. In some cases I can start pinging the router while maintaining solid signal strengths and still have 50%+ packet loss. Hard rebooting the AP clears it up most of the time.

    Yes, I'm using the latest firmware recommended by them. Yes, I know what I'm doing. Steer clear.

    --
    They have the Internet on computers now?
  20. Firmware by kasj · · Score: 1

    Generally, you need to flash new firmware onto these devices in order to correct bugs, improve performance, etc.

    I've seen many instances of (wireless) router misbehavior due to buggy firmware that has since been fixed and posted to the company's web site.

  21. Linksys WAP11B by nemui-chan · · Score: 1

    I've had mine for 2 years and it still works great. I run my Zaurus and my Laptop off it.

  22. Wiring problems? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    AP's shouldn't die the way they are on you. Could be a power problem (wiring?) or maybe humidity or temperature.

    If you have a UPS, you could try plugging your AP into it to smooth things out a bit.

    1. Re:Wiring problems? by darrelld2 · · Score: 1

      I mount them in the so that they are hidden. Always on a UPS; however, there is usually a bit more heat where I mount them than in the room itself. Not out side their suggested operating tempatures though, 80 - 90 degrees usually. I've had Cisco gear mounted in a room as hot as 110 with no problems there.

      I see so many of them die, because I install them all over. In hotels, in homes, and businesses. Everyone wants the cheapest product possible, and I try to steer them to what I know works through the rough conditions.

  23. Re:Linksys WAP11 by MarkusQ · · Score: 1

    I must be odd man out. I had one go bad on me (normal office environment). It got into a mode where it would slow way down, and packet sniffing (with etherial) showed that it was trying to "phone home" (a huge number of HTTP puts to an IP address that resolved to labs.linksys.com IIRC). Cycling power seemed to fix it for a day or two. Three others in the same environment seemed fine.

    -- MarkusQ

    P.S. I also have a Netgear (don't recall the model) that goes wonkers in lightning storms--though I can't say I blame it.

  24. Netgear by sql*kitten · · Score: 3, Informative

    I had a funny problem with my Netgear ME102 at home. The connection gradually got less and less reliable over distance, finally it could sustain a connection (to a Netgear MA401 802.11b PC card) for no more than a couple of minutes at a time. But the status lights on the WAP itself were showing it was fine. The problem was the power supply - it had failed in such a way that the ME102 could still power up, yet it could not run the radio link. It took 6 weeks or so dealing with Netgear's frankly useless tech support organization to diagnose this. I don't just mean that their people are clueless (altho' they are) and that they barely speak English. Their call centre technology is poor - for example, every time I called, I gave the ticket number the last one had given me, but it wasn't recognized and I had to almost start again from scratch each time. There also appears to be no link between their email and phone tech support groups.

    Nezt time, I'll pay the extra money for Cisco.

  25. PC + PRISM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use a PC with a PRISM card plugged into it running FreeBSD. The card has all the bits to make it run as a AP and FreeBSD allows these to be enabled (not sure if linux can do this, it may).

    Waiting for FreeBSD to support the PRISM-GT cards so I can run 802.11g.

  26. Ditto (Re:Linksys WAP11B) by psyconaut · · Score: 1

    Had my Linksys over a year, dropped it many times (don't ask), it lives in a warm environment...still going strong.

    I'd be pretty pissed if an access point only last 6 months!

    -psy

  27. Cisco, LinkSys & Nokia by kjs3 · · Score: 2, Informative
    We are a Cisco shop at work (with the 350-series AP). The hardware has been reliable, though the software has had teething pains. A tad expensive for the home user.

    At home I have a Linksys WAP51AB dual band AP. I've had one or two times where the box has frozen and one time where the A radio froze, but the B didn't. Overall, it's a reasonably good product other than the A radio having disappointing performance and the fact that it seems to have marginal support since the intoduction of the B+G products.

    FWIW...the 2-3 years before I got the Linksys, I had a Nokia 11b AP (only 1MB, though, and no WEP...not exactly featureful) that ran flawlessly.

  28. Here it comes by Mork29 · · Score: 1

    I don't have an AP your insensitive clod!

  29. AirPort , flawless since Xmas 2001 by Kent+Brewster · · Score: 1

    We've got a mixed bag of stuff: WinXP, OSX, and a Palm Tungsten C. The Airport--Snow version--has been bullet-proof for twenty months and counting. I'd love to extend its range a bit; the only thing it's missing is an external antenna jack.

  30. Speedstream 2624 Crashes by Kula · · Score: 1

    I regularly experience the high volume crashes with my Speedstream 2624 wirless router. I bought it because of PCI card compatiblity, and I've had no problems with their cards (PCI and PCMCIA). But having to physically stop and restart the router stinks.

  31. netgear MR314 by eoyount · · Score: 1

    I'll add praise for my Netgear MR314. No problems with it at all. Occasionally I had problems getting a connection with my Netgear MA401 PCMCIA card in my Compaq Presario laptop (I would have to eject the card and reinsert it), but now that I have a Mac G4, I haven't had any problem connecting, and I even have better signal strength than before.
    Long story short, my Netgear wireless router is great, the Netgear laptop card not so much.

    --
    To understand recursion,
    you must first understand recursion.
  32. Reliable AP's by serialdj · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hey there,
    Well I've been using both Cisco and D-link AP's for a few years, and have had neglible problems with either of them.
    In our house we are heavy wireless user's and there are times I'm streaming heavy video to one device or another, and have never had much degredation, or packet drops.

  33. Proxim (Lucent) Orinoco Access Points by pagley · · Score: 1

    Actually, the Lucent WavePoint IIe (note - the "e") has a 10/100 port on it.

    However, you're grossly overestimating the CPU in the box :) Both WavePoint II and IIe's run 486 class CPU's in them.

    I can't say with perfect accuracy, but I believe the WP-II's run a 66MHz processor and the IIe's run a 75MHz processor. Anyway, it's along those lines, perhaps it's 75MHz and 100MHz, not sure - regardless, they're 486's.

    Incidentally, they both do have CardBus controllers in them, so they probably could support newer CardBus cards (802.11a or g), in theory. However, it would be quickly and terribly I/O bound for lack of bus bandwidth I'd think.

    KarlNet wrote the firmware for Lucent (and Proxim) for the WP-II(e)'s, as well ar the OR's. They've had some "troublesome" releases, but in all, the combination of the hardware and KarlNet firmware is *incredibly* stable in recent releases (for me anyway).

    KarlNet and Proxim had a falling-out recently, and is no longer writing the AP or card firmware for them to my knowledge. Since the WP-IIe platform has been obsoleted (nix'ing the AP-1000, and all OR products), Proxim has stopped providing FW updates for those products. You can still purchase new FW from KarlNet, so you're not completely SOL, but it will cost money from here out.

    For a "vanilla" plain old 802.11b access point, even the "old" Lucent AP-1000 with Orinoco radios is still a very choice. It's not cheap, even on the used market (usually >$100 even on eBay), but they're solid - set it, forget it.

    FWIW

    Brad

    1. Re:Proxim (Lucent) Orinoco Access Points by cede-admin · · Score: 1

      I suspect it is only the WavePoint IIe that has cardbus. The II's only have a Cirrus PD6729 PCI to PCMCIA bridge.

      You're right about the CPU specs. Our WavePoint II's have AMD 486 DX2/66 CPUs.

  34. Netgear MR814 = good by ewhenn · · Score: 1

    I have been using this for about 6 mos without a hitch. It is 4port/wireless. I run 2 wireless and 2 wired PCs and have not had to reboot it in about 3 months, and the only reason I had to was my cable modem went down. All of the netgear products I have used in the past have been great.

    I would highly rec. this router.

  35. Re:Linksys WAP11 by Huusker · · Score: 1

    The original WAP11 had a notorious firmware bug that would cause it to lock up every couple days. It was fixed with firmware version 1.4g. Download the fix from the Linksys website.

  36. BreezeCom / Alvarion DS.11 AP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've used Lucent, BreezeCom, Linksys and DLink APs.

    I give the Lucent AP1000 my top rating for overall reliability. (I've got over 50 of them and only one has ever failed, lightning strike.)

    The Alvarion (AKA BreezeCom) DS.11 AP seems to be the best "out of the box" for range and quality. It has slightly higher throughput then the Lucent AP1000. BUT it didn't last as long as my Lucent radios and did not have nearly as much configurability or security as the Lucent.

    The DLinks I have used all seem to need a hard reset every month to two months, but give good throughput. They stink for range, but then again they are built for indoor use.

    The Linksys AP's have seemed to be more reliable then the Dlink ones, but I have typically got less throughput on them when compared to all the other gear I have tested.

    *Last word
    If you want cheap reliability, go for the Lucent AP1000's. You can find them cheap in the used sector (I got 10 off Ebay new in the box for $35.00 each) and buy a UPS to make sure the power is very stable and conditioned. Power was the biggest reliability issue I ran into with them. Next followed up by long term sustained peak transfer rates. IE After several hours of peak throughput, sometimes the radio interface would fall over. This could 90% of the time be cured by a remote soft reboot.

    --JR--

    Outdoor Telecommunications dude, specializing in wireless technologies

  37. Re:Linksys WAP11 by MarkusQ · · Score: 1

    Thanks, I'll look into that.

    -- MarkusQ

  38. D-Link 614 by haut · · Score: 1

    I've used 2 different DLink DI-614+ Router/AP's now and have had great luck. One has been there about a year and was rebooted twice and the other is about 2 motnhs old and hasn't needed a reboot yet. The range is pretty good and the transfer rate is OK. My wired connection is very fast and I get 10,000+ kb/s from computer to computer. They are very cheap (the one I just got was $50 + tax after rebate) and reliable.

  39. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reliable? Wireless? I'm confused.

  40. RoamAbout R2 by AriesGeek · · Score: 1

    Since everyone seems to be offering up home-based solutions, I figured I'd pop in and give you a real-world answer. :)

    Enterasys (formerly Cabletron) has a new line of APs out called RoamAbout R2. They have support for 802.11b, 802.11g, and 802.11a. You can also use one AP to bridge between a G and an A network, or any combination thereof.

    They have full support for 802.1x authentication using a Radius server, re-keying, MAC filtering, etc. You name it, they support it.

    I, too, have had problems with power supplies on these, but we've been running power over cat5, so that has become a non-issue.

    My dos centavos.

    --
    Insert offensive troll-style sig here. Please mod or respond appropriately.