Slashdot Mirror


Disney to Make Movies Available Online

musiholic writes "Disney has cut a deal with Movielink to make various Disney (and Disney subsidary) films available for 30-day paid downloads. Users can watch the film an unlimited amount of times before the movie expires. The movies requre Real Player or WMP."

55 of 355 comments (clear)

  1. a new hell by gokubi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ah, a new hell for us parents:

    "IS THE DOWNLOAD DONE YET?"

    "No, 63% to go."

    "IS THE DOWNLOAD DONE YET?"

    "No, 62% to go."

    "IS THE DOWNLOAD DONE YET?"

    "No, 61% to go."

    "IS THE DOWNLOAD DONE YET?"

    "sigh"

    --
    I'm much funnier now that I'm a subscriber.
    1. Re:a new hell by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      {After waiting two hours for the movie to download}

      OK kids! {hits play}
      "Now available from Disney on DVD..."
      {FastForward}
      "Coming soon from Disney Home Theater..."
      {FastForward}
      "Now playing in theaters from the creators of..."
      {FastForward}
      "Walt Disney World presents..."
      "Coming..."{FastForward}"From..."{FastForward}"Now available..."{FastForward}"Kids..."{FastForward}"M aw..."{FastForward}"Angels..."{FastForward}"After. .."{FastForward}
      "Now the Feature Presentation... please wait while your movie downloads..."

      99.99% to go...

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
  2. Good by digital+bath · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Now if only the RIAA could follow this lead. I don't seen anyone hating disney - oh wait, they're not suing the youth of America.

    --
    find / -name "*.sig" | xargs rm
    1. Re:Good by grennis · · Score: 4, Funny
      I don't seen anyone hating disney

      I guess you are new here?

    2. Re:Good by David+Hume · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now if only the RIAA could follow this lead. I don't seen anyone hating disney - oh wait, they're not suing the youth of America.


      I suspect it will not be enough for the majority on Slashdot. Why? Because the movies expire within 30 days, and many may find that to be unacceptable. I mean, why should Disney be allowed to offer its movies only on terms it deems to be acceptable?

    3. Re:Good by RdsArts · · Score: 2, Informative

      The record company your looking for is Hollywood Records, who had ICP and Danzig on their lable for a whole week.

  3. Wow! by WuWarrior · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can't believe Disney actually came up with this. But what prevents the people who pay for the movie to share it?

    1. Re:Wow! by RatBastard · · Score: 4, Informative

      DRM. You did notice that the files are available in RM and WMV formats only, right? I'm not positive abiout Real files, but I know that WMV files (especially Media Player 9, which I'm sure you will need) can phone home to get permission to actually play.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    2. Re:Wow! by aking137 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At the moment, only if you use (closed source) codecs imported from the commercial versions of those programs, which are closed source (AFAIK). The status page for the various formats is here. I don't know if this closed source component will therefore still prevent you from getting around the restrictive DRM measures in place.

  4. They Don't Get It! by blackmonday · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't watch movies on my computer screen. I watch them on my TV.

    1. Re:They Don't Get It! by interiot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yup. Laptop + svideo out + wifi + bittorrent = instant set-top box with free movies.

    2. Re:They Don't Get It! by moncyb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Are you saying you don't want to watch movies on your computer screen? Don't you realize just about any computer's display is far better than analog TV? According to my communications book, NTSC analog TV is 428x339 60 Hz interlaced. Unless you're using an Atari 130XE, that's quite bad.

      As to "they don't get it", they don't. I'm not paying money to a company who wants to take control of my computer. I don't want to pay money to a company who is trying to extend their copyrights forever, yet they will wait until the copyrights of others expire so they don't have to pay royalties. There are plenty of other nasty things they do.

  5. Screen captures? by GuyMannDude · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Users can watch the film an unlimited amount of times before the movie expires.

    What's to stop me from using a screen capture program while I'm playing it to make an unexpiring copy for myself?

    GMD

    1. Re:Screen captures? by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 2, Funny

      Guilt? :P

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    2. Re:Screen captures? by jared_hanson · · Score: 4, Funny

      I made a LEGO MindStorms robot that would hit "Print Screen" at exactly 29.97 frames per second to do just this. A small utility program I wrote then writes a bitmap of a screen out to a file on disc. A little splicing and encoding, and *ta-da*, a never expiring movie.

      I nearly shot myself when I found out I could pipe the screen to my VCR through S-Video.

      --
      -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
    3. Re:Screen captures? by rgoer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What's to stop me from using a screen capture program...

      Nothing, probably.

      But, assuming they are going to treat this like a thirty day "rental," my guess would be that copyright law would be applicable and such a screen-capture duplication would be illegal--since you don't own the thing you rent, it is not yours to duplicate.

      Then again, I could be wrong about this (among other things).

    4. Re:Screen captures? by Alton_Brown · · Score: 4, Funny

      Um, you're not a parent are you? ;) Not being able to watch the movie after 30 days is a GOOD thing! Trust me! Added bonus - kids won't be tying up the home theater either! I think *I* know all the lines to Monster's Inc. now :)

    5. Re:Screen captures? by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Macrovision on the tv-out and overlay mode for VGA that makes it near impossible to get a screen capture of the actual movie (you just get a grey box that is underneath the overlay). So other than defeating Macrovision (easy), or hacking the video driver to record the overlay (almost as easy), there isn't currently a lot to stop you if you REALLY want to, in the future they will have Palladium and encrypted HDTV firewire tunnels.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    6. Re:Screen captures? by rgoer · · Score: 2, Informative
      Sorry, but I'm sure you're familiar with the phrase "all rights reserved," aren't you? That phrase, combined with the © copyright symbol, generally stands for section 106 of the 1976 Copyright Act:
      106. Exclusive rights in copyrighted works

      Subject to sections 107 through 122, the owner of copyright under this title has the exclusive rights to do and to authorize any of the following:

      (1) to reproduce the copyrighted work in copies or phonorecords;

      (2) to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work;

      (3) to distribute copies or phonorecords of the copyrighted work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending;

      (4) in the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and motion pictures and other audiovisual works, to perform the copyrighted work publicly;

      (5) in the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and pictorial, graphic, or sculptural works, including the individual images of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, to display the copyrighted work publicly; and

      (6) in the case of sound recordings, to perform the copyrighted work publicly by means of a digital audio transmission.

      Source: copyright.gov
      So yeah... I mean, I love fair use as much as the next guy, but I'm pretty sure that the whole "the owner of the copyright reserving the right to reproduce the copyrighted work in copies or phonorecords" means that you can't duplicate a rental.

      Like I said before, though: I could be wrong... I just don't think you have yet demonstrated me to be so.
    7. Re:Screen captures? by FueledByRamen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't think so. I've used an SIS315 (think onboard shitty AGP graphics, except on a card) and a Radeon AIW 8500 - neither of them had problems recording to video tapes, even when playing movies (I used the SIS315 to dump video edits to tape).

      --
      Every cloud has a silver lining (except for the mushroom shaped ones, which have a lining of Iridium & Strontium 90)
    8. Re:Screen captures? by Adam9 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wait.. you used LEGOs to do this? I think you need to put the 50mb movies on your cable/DSL server and then submit it as a story to Slashdot. That would be in the true Slashdot spirit.

    9. Re:Screen captures? by 222 · · Score: 2, Informative

      even if it did, a wonderfull little program known as tvtool (http://www.tvtool.de) takes care of that, and offers *alot* of other very handy features for the small price of 15 dollars US.

  6. So . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    . . . How much less is this going to cost than a brick and mortar rental, because of the reduced expenses involved and the use of the customer's bandwidth for transfer?

    Or is this going to be just as expensive, but require the introduction of DRM crap into the holy of holies that is my machine. (Which implies that it's DOA, as far as I'm concerned.)

    That, and I wouldn't give the jackbooted DMCA-wielding, CTEA bribing thugs at Disney a cent, anyway. Mickey Mouse can suck my cock.

    ~~~

  7. Here we go again: by oscast · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Thank you for your interest in Movielink. We want you to take part in the powerful Internet movie rental experience that Movielink delivers; however, you currently do not meet our minimum system requirements. You will need to adjust the following: You Need Windows 98, ME, 2000, XP"

    1. Re:Here we go again: by Trelane · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What's really dumb is that (so far as I can tell), there isn't anything that is Internet Explorer-, let alone Windows-specific there. If they do both Windows Media Format and Real Player 8, it should work on most all desktop OSes, since there is a Real Player 8 client for most desktop OSes (either through Real or through one of their "community" versions).

      Quite assinine requirements, imho.

      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    2. Re:Here we go again: by fermion · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I mentioned this earlier, but I think it bears repeating.

      MS is working closely with the content providers. The content providers are going to reward MS but insuring that IE and Windows is the only platform that is supported for content distribution. MS guarantees total copyright owner control and will happily implement arbitrary restrictions.

      Furthermore the content providers are going to run away from anything remotely open source. OSS, in their minds, are synonymous to pirates. It would be easy to write code that intercept the data stream and copy it with perfect quality.

      Finally, IE is not a web browser. It can be used as a browser, but it is really an application front end, a fancy terminal if you wish. Most web designers, especially those who come from traditional media, don't understand what web publishing is. They want to control precisely how the content is presented, exactly what ads the user will see, exactly how the user works with the content. IE provides that level of control. Sites like /. that are web publication don't need it. Other sites that can't think into the abstraction of the WWW can do nothing more that duplicate traditional media.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    3. Re:Here we go again: by Durandal64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's why you code to standards, genius. You would spend the same amount of time developing a site and product that was standards-compliant as you would locking non-Winblows users out, and it'd be open to everyone. If a browser doesn't do it correctly, then it's not standards-compliant, and the developers need to fucking fix the thing. Imagine a TV that didn't follow NTSC in North America. Web browsers are one of the only products whose main features include performing their basic tasks correctly. Do TV's advertise "Can display any NTSC video stream correctly!"? No, they talk about features.

  8. Linux version of Real support? by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was trying to find out if the Linux version of Real player was supported, but it blocks anyone not in the US.

    Guess they haven't quite got the hang of the fact that the biggest advantage of the internet is it's worldwide reach yet.

    --
    Beep beep.
    1. Re:Linux version of Real support? by elysian1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nope. I'm using OS X and it requires IE 5.0+ and Windows just to enter their site!

  9. should be fun... by BFedRec · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Should be fun, but I don't think the disney rental world is the best for downloaded time stamped movies. I know as a parent, the KID movies are the ones you end up BUYING, as they are most likely to be watched over and over and over again for the next several years... and disney is the most common of that genre. Though if it's not TOO expensive I would probably try it... and if they tied it into a discount if you purchase the DVD... hmmmmmm

  10. Not unlimited viewings for 30 days, but 24 hours by Cancel · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is closer to renting a movie than anything else, aside from the 30-day storage option. From the story: Customers will be able to store movies for up to 30 days. Over that span, they can watch a movie as many times as they wish in a 24-hour period.

    Another article is more detailed: The movie files can be viewed on a PC or on a television connected to a computer, but customers have a maximum of 30 days to begin watching their downloaded movie. Once they begin to do so, the movie can be viewed only over the next 24 hours.
  11. Why RM or WMA? by dethl · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If this is going to be targeting the broadband users, then why don't they use a better codec? I know I'm burning karma here, but I'd rather see the movies in mpeg4 or divx form.

    --
    "Some fight for law. Some fight for justice. What will you fight for? One day, you will see."
    1. Re:Why RM or WMA? by XSforMe · · Score: 2, Informative

      ... why don't they use a better codec?
      wmv9 is up there along with divx4/mpeg4. Take a look here

      But I doubt that is the reason why they are using wmv, more probably it is due to its DRM capabilities more than anything and its ability to self destroy past its expiration date.

      Still, it would be interesting to see if you can still convert it using TMPGEnc to any of your preferred DRM free formats.

      --
      My other OS is the MCP!
    2. Re:Why RM or WMA? by vikool · · Score: 2, Informative

      it wasnt sarcastic, but given the original post, i can see why you though so. WM9 is really good format and in fact they are using it show movies in theatres since it can be shown on a 60ft screen and still be clear enough.

  12. Mmmm.. minimum requirements.. by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 4, Informative

    Movielink Minimum Requirements

    You need Windows 98, ME, 2000, XP
    You need Internet Explorer 5.0 or higher - Upgrade Now
    You need RealPlayer 8.0 or higher - Upgrade Now OR
    Windows Media Player 7.1 or higher - Upgrade Now
    You need a Connection Speed of 128 kbps or higher - Retake Connection Speed
    Scripting must be enabled

    To enable jscript, follow these steps:
    Internet Explorer 5
    1. Select "Internet Options" from the "Tools" menu on your browser
    2. Click on the "Security" tab
    3. Set the security to Medium on "Trusted Sites" and click "Apply"
    If jscript still doesn't function:
    1. Highlight the "Internet" icon and click "Custom Level..."
    2. Select "Enable" on all 3 radio buttons under "Scripting"
    3. Click "OK"
    Internet Explorer 6
    1. Select "Internet Options" from the "Tools" menu on your browser
    2. Click on the "Security" tab
    3. Highlight the "Internet" icon and click "Custom Level..."
    4. Select "Enable" on all 3 radio buttons under "Scripting"
    Cookies must be enabled

    To enable cookies, follow these steps:
    Internet Explorer 5
    1. Select "Internet Options" from the "Tools" menu on your browser
    2. Click on the "Security" tab
    3. Highlight the "Internet" icon and click "Custom Level..."
    4. Select "Enable" on all radio buttons under "Cookies"
    5. Click "OK"
    Internet Explorer 6
    1. Select "Internet Options" from the "Tools" menu on your browser
    2. Click on the "Privacy" tab and press "Advanced..."
    3. Check "Override automatic cookie handling"
    4. Accept both cookie options and check "Always allow session cookies"
    5. Click "OK"

    1. Re:Mmmm.. minimum requirements.. by chmilar · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, how many security holes have you opened up?

      --
      Reading Slashdot is ruining my spelling and grammar.
  13. Disney and risks by thule · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Disney seems to get a lot of grief, but it does seem that they are able to take some risks every once in a while. Disney said they'd never release their animated classics on DVD, but they did (and they've made a lot of money on them). Disney feared VHS/DVD, now they embrace it. Disney fears the Internet, but now it seems they are trying to embrace it.

    Do a search on "Moviebeam" and check out what else they're up to. Moviebeam is a TiVo like service that beams digital movies over the broadcast airwaves (encyrpted of course) to a set to box. The box stores something like 100 movies that a person can purchase for viewing on demand.

    Disney gets a lot of flack, but at least they experiment.

  14. While in the real world.... by darth_silliarse · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dear Disney, I have two children. They are demanding. What the hell makes you think they are going to wait for a goddamn movie to download? My two year old son throws a fit if I can't put the Ice Age DVD in quick enough!

    --
    I've noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born - Ronald Reagan
  15. and so on until.... by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 5, Funny

    "IS THE DOWNLOAD DONE YET?"

    "No, 1% to go."

    "IS THE DOWNLOAD DONE YET?"

    "Yes! You can watch Monsters Inc 2 now!"

    "I DON'T WANT MONSTERS INC ANYMORE I WANNA PLAY PLAYSTATION"

    *twitches, vein in forehead pops*

    --
    Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
  16. Miramax included? by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The last I heard, Disney owned Miramax -- does that mean that titles like Clerks and Pulp Fiction will be released? Don't get me wrong -- I like both movies, but I'm not sure that Disney would want people to associate them with movies that use the word "fuck" more than the word "the"... :^)

  17. Why would _Disney_ do this? by jdbo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    While I may have a misunderstanding of Disney's market, I am under the impression that they primarily sell family entertainment, esp. movies for children.

    Now, children's entertainment is a special category, in that kids watch movies OVER and OVER and OVER again - more often on VHS format than DVD, due to the relative durability of the former (though this may be changing). because of this, families tend to BUY disney movies (vs. renting); if they rent, it's to check something out before buying it.

    Now what aspect of the above market does Disney hope to satisfy with downloadable movies?
    - these movies will have to be accessed on the computer (not as easy as VCR/VHS, let alone half as childproof)
    - these movies expires after 30 days
    (not as permanent - and kids will obsess over their shows for far longer than 30 days...)
    - the cost is $3-$5 dollars per download (cheaper than rental for the amount of time, but even considering an optimistic 1-hour download time, it's still going to be faster to drive to the store and back (for most US citizens) than to download - and (I believe) that there's still not much coverage for broadband in most rural areas...
    d) Also, for those who don't mind waiting (or lack broadband), Netflix (and its competitors) offer a similarly-priced, keep-as-long-as-you-feel rental system.

    Now I realize that Disney is not just a kids' movie company, but I still don't see how this system makes much sense.

    OTOH, I am pleasantly surprised to see (even this much) innovation from a company with such a draconian distribution history.

  18. Re:These are the same guys by shamino0 · · Score: 2, Funny
    On the other hand you can bet your ass there will be DRM out the wazoo on these files.

    And let me tell you, when you've got DRM coming out your wazoo, it doesn't do a thing for your complexion.

  19. Re:These are the same guys by ncc74656 · · Score: 2, Informative
    I bet the FIRST trick is make it too big to be burned to a CDR.

    Put it on DVD-R, then...they're getting cheap enough now.

    On the other hand you can bet your ass there will be DRM out the wazoo on these files. It will be interesting seeing how quickly they can be removed.

    Having never run across a DRM'd file, it's hard to say...maybe it'd be possible to cobble something together between GraphEdit and the Windows Media Format SDK that would at least strip out the DRM. As for converting to other formats, mplayer seems to do a better job than anything else. (WMV allows for either variable framerate or frame skipping...not sure which, but I know you don't get frames from the decoder at a constant rate. mplayer converts WMV to AVI by writing a 1000-fps AVI with the source frames put in wherever they need to go. You can then use an Avisynth script to convert the framerate to something more normal (like 29.97 fps) before reencoding with whatever you want.)

    I don't know about Real, but then I don't have any of their stuff on any of my computers.

    Nah, they are going to put it into M$ Word format. Let's see anyone figure that one out.

    <rolleyes>
    Score: -1, Unimaginative, Repetitive Microsoft-Bashing.
    </rolleyes>

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  20. A pointless service by shamino0 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Let's see here....

    For $3-5, you get to spend all evening downloading a file. When you get it, you have 30 days to play it before it self-destructs. And it self-destructs 24 hours after you start playing it. And you have to watch it on your computer, and the computer must be a PC running Windows.

    On the other hand, video rental stores charge you the same $3-5, and you usually have at least three days to watch it.

    Or pay-per-view cable which costs the same $3-5 for 24 hours, but doesn't involve any download time.

    Or NetFlix where a $20/mo fee lets you watch your rentals for as long as you want.

    Can someone tell me again what advantage there is to using Movielink?

  21. An opportunity for Apple... by Chief+Typist · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is lame, for the many reasons pointed out in this thread (too short expiration, buy vs. rent for kids, etc.) The interesting thing, at least in my mind, is that Disney is opening their intellectual property up a bit (granted, it's got DRM up the wazoo.)

    What would happen if Apple/Jobs did a movie service like they've done with the iTunes Music Store?

    They've got the inside connections in Hollywood (Pixar, editing suites, etc.)

    They've got the technology (QuickTime, delivery mechanisms & bandwidth)

    And they could make it easy enough for my Mom to use...

    -ch

  22. Re:They should release non-expiring versions by Anonym1ty · · Score: 3, Informative
    Why is it....

    Because the copyright they hold on Steam Boat Willie should have ended when the law originally said it should have expired, not 80 or 100 Years Later

    For the good of man copyrighted material was Supposed to end up in the Public Domain at some point

  23. Don't trust it!! by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't trust this scheme. I smell spyware being loaded into these movies or something. Last thing I want is for my harddrives to be commanded with del *.mp3 when I least expect it.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  24. This is nothing new... by EverDense · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is nothing new...

    How is this possibly news?

    Disney and ShareReactor have partnered up for quite a few years now.

    --
    http://jesus.everdense.com/
  25. Re:Good -- Well, Maybe just Okay. by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Funny
    oh wait, they're not suing the youth of America.

    Of course not, they're too busy extending copyrights from here to eternity.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  26. Oh? by DesScorp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    " Now if only the RIAA could follow this lead. I don't seen anyone hating disney - oh wait, they're not suing the youth of America."

    Rest assured that if movie downloading ever matches the level of music downloading, they will. Disney aggressively protects their copyrights and properties, and was one of the prime movers in getting copyright terms extended.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  27. DRM Alternative? by randallman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    On topic, I tried the service and the video quality was quite poor. Off topic (slightly on), since DRM is bad, what would be a good alternative? I don't think online rentals will ever work without some restrictions. There has to be an opportunity for profit. I would like to be able to download a DVD quality movie and watch it.

    I think the answer should be open (not proprietary). Like SSL encryption. How about some time of key encryption system. Your system uploads unique data which is used to encrypt the movie and generate a decryption key that will only work on your system.

    There is no perfect solution, because of our lack of integrity. If everyone was honest, we wouldn't need locks on our doors.

  28. Cops suck too by KalvinB · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...because they arrest the youth of America. And judges because they put the youth of America in jail. And our peers too because they form the jury that convicts the youth of America.

    How dare we punish kids who do illegal things.

    Ben

  29. Disney is suing the youth of America by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Now if only the RIAA could follow this lead. I don't seen anyone hating disney - oh wait, they're not suing the youth of America.

    Disney has a music branch, Walt Disney Records that is a member of the RIAA, so yes, they are suing the youth of America.

    --
    -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
  30. Not going to work! by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 3, Insightful

    * I will not use Windows to do anything, and you're not going to make me.
    * I don't want to wait an hour to download it and then get to view for 24 hours, when I could get it for the same price in 10 minutes from Blockbuster.
    * The rental will have far superior video and audio quality.
    * My computer is upstairs, and the TV with a real sound system is downstairs.
    * DRM. Although at any rate, I could simply connect my video cards' S-Video out to my capture cards' S-Video in :)

    So, in short, the quality necessary to shove it down even a broadband connection sucks, it's DRMed, and I don't like watching movies on my computer.

  31. WMP DRM Smoke by MrEnigma · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I thought the DRM in WMP was all smoke, and that using some Dev tools provided by Microsoft, you can easily grab a lossy stream (and possibly a lossless one using more advanced techniques) of any DRM file.

    If I was a business, I would definitely make sure that my files were protected going out there...then again they don't care, they just want the money at first, then they get real greedy.

    --
    GeekWares - Buy and Download Today!