Slashdot Mirror


Titania Nanotubes for Hydrogen Sensors?

Roland Piquepaille writes "Everybody is talking about carbon nanotubes these days. But what about titania nanotubes? Penn State researchers think they have a great potential for sensing hydrogen . According to this news release, "titania nanotubes are 1500 times better than the next best material for sensing hydrogen and may be one of the first examples of materials properties changing dramatically when crossing the border between real world sizes and nanoscopic dimensions, according to a Penn State materials scientist." And now, the very good news: titania nanotubes are cheap. So they'll be used in industrial quality control in food plants and as weapons against terrorism. My summary contains some more details."

161 comments

  1. Terrorist detection by macragge · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now we will be able to detect the terrorists at they attempt to crash Zeplins into our buildings!

    1. Re:Terrorist detection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, just make the buildings out of Titania. May have the side effect of making them unsinkable as well.

    2. Re:Terrorist detection by AntiOrganic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Stop terrorists?

      Saddam Hussein tried to buy titania nanotubes from Africa!

    3. Re:Terrorist detection by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 3, Funny

      Did you hear? Osama hijacked the Goodyear blimp and tried to fly it into the Empire States Building!

      It bounced off five times before the bastard gave up!

    4. Re:Terrorist detection by PD · · Score: 2, Funny

      Titania doesn't detect icebergs though. Terrorists will drive icebergs into our landmarks.

    5. Re:Terrorist detection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean, now we can detect hydrogen leaks in our hydrogen cars. maybe from a cracked tank? (and perhaps burn the fuel very fast in a controlled manner to prevent explosion?) maybe possible. might be able to burn the fuel in a controlled manner in a few milliseconds before it explodes...

    6. Re:Terrorist detection by Nazmun · · Score: 1

      No longer required... they usually stop themselves nowadays after either blowing themselves with explosives or crashing into buildings.

      --
      Hmmm... Pie...
    7. Re:Terrorist detection by Aceticon · · Score: 1

      I supose a 100 meters long pointy baloon traveling at 50 kpm straight for the building isn't enough of a giveaway.

      PS: Since my numbers were totally and completly made up according to the rule "big and not too fast", convertion to imperial measures can be achieved by simple inventing new numbers using the same rule - the result should be equally valid.

  2. wha? by jafac · · Score: 2, Funny

    Weapons Against Terrorism! Oh goody! We're saved!

    Where to I invest?

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    1. Re:wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just FYI, step 3 was left out of the dot.com strategy

    2. Re:wha? by MrEd · · Score: 1

      Please, it's against "Terror". We have to declare war on an abstract noun.

      --

      Wah!

    3. Re:wha? by kpansky · · Score: 1

      Damn... if only that Terrorism Future Market hadn't closed down... fucking congress.

      --

      --Kevin
  3. Re:What the hell is titania? by soundnfury · · Score: 4, Funny

    Screw titania. When are they gonna get the kryptonite nanotubes?

  4. A valid question by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

    I was wondering too. Presumably it's something to do with titanium, rather than anything to do with the queen of the fairies or a satellite of Uranus.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    1. Re:A valid question by mu_wtfo · · Score: 1

      Hmm..I thought Titania was that new processor from Intel...how the hell you make nanotubes from CPUs, though, was kind of confusing me..

      --
      If all the world's a stage, anyone who says they want better lighting spends far too much time in a dark theatre.
  5. Re:What the hell is titania? by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 1

    No, it's a who I'm afraid.

    Titania is Queen of the fairies. Rather sureal 'News for Nerds' this one.

  6. Terrorism by Casisiempre · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Use against terrorism: Set up enough of the tubes and you can detect when a hydrogen bomb goes off there (assuming they survive).

    1. Re:Terrorism by y77 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Its interesting to note that hydrogens qualities make it much safer should there be, say, an accident with a film of white powder if its parked within 600 miles of a processing plant. Nevertheless, iron and steel are much cheaper (by weight) than aluminum. These things practically make themselves. I know there are some more creative ways to make all of the paint etc is very quantifiable. It is also why older explosives became unstable over time. The loss of hydrogen molecules over time caused decay separation of the strategy hydrogen bomb goes off there (assuming they survive). A lit match works for hydrogen detection as well as many gas hydrocarbons. It is very versatile in raw oxygen!

    2. Re:Terrorism by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
      Did the person who modded this 'interesting' mean;
      a)"Interesting aplication of a text processing script on a slashdot story, possibly a Markov algorithim"
      or...
      b)"Dude, like, cool!"

      If b, you might find this interesting also.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  7. Better tools by Stonent1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    A lit match works for hydrogen detection as well as many gas hydrocarbons. It is very versatile.

    1. Re:Better tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it's sensitivity can be increased by a factor of 200 just by pumping in raw oxygen!

    2. Re:Better tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      raw oxygen
      As opposed to "cooked" oxygen?

    3. Re:Better tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Personally, I prefer canaries. *Much* better track record. From 19th century coal mines, to Ypres, and beyond.

      Or, as the kids overseas had to do when the quartermaster somehow failed to materialize with all the requisite (and enfatically promised) NBC protection gear - Chickens. Results from this "field" testing aren't quite conclusive yet - since no results seem to have been collated. Or, maybe, they just got hungry. Or the chickens got fed up and left when no one was looking. Or... who knows ?

      The best method, of course *is* dowsing. But good professionals are rare and it is a bit expensive. So, probably, only the most important government installations and personnel will benefit from this exalted level of security. This, on the authority of Ronald's personal astrologer, you know.

    4. Re:Better tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > enfatically promised

      emphatically

  8. cheap? by HBI · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How cheap could these be? I mean titanium itself is not a cheap metal (about $4 a pound apparently), but I imagine making nanotubes out of titanium oxide probably does not consume much titanium. The process has to be a bitch though.

    I don't see anything about cost in the paper either.

    Overexuberance on the author's part?

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    1. Re:cheap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      First of all, the article sounds like a hoax to me.

      But regarding the price of titanium:

      Titanium metal is expensive. Titanium oxide is not.

      Most elements do not like to be turned into metallic form. So although aluminum is the most abundant element in the Earth's crust, nevertheless, iron and steel are much cheaper (by weight) than aluminum.

    2. Re:cheap? by hcetSJ · · Score: 4, Informative

      Although I don't know what the process is, the fact that titania is a ceramic means that there is probably some creative chemical conditions in which these things practically make themselves (sol-gel process, maybe). Ceramics are generally covalent networks--each atom is connected to the next with a bond like those which hold hydrogens to oxygens in water--and so by changing the conditions under which the titanium oxidizes, you probably have fairly good control over the size/shape of the final result. Not so with carbon nanotubes, which were originally manufactured pretty much by sifting through ashes...with an electron microscope. I know there are some more creative ways to make carbon nanotubes now, but most of them are still based on chance.

      Maybe someone who has actually received a BS in Materials Science wants to back me up, or correct me?

      --

      This side up.
    3. Re:cheap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Titanium dioxide (sometimes called "titania") is one of the most common pigments for white paint (now that lead in paint is a Bad Thing). It costs maybe a dollar per pound, bulk.

    4. Re:cheap? by RevRigel · · Score: 2, Informative

      The price of raw titanium usually hovers around 40 cents US/pound, actually. Because it melts at 3000 degrees F, however, it's difficult to work into usable pieces, hence raising the price. Titanium shavings/scrap are much cheaper than finished bar/plate stock. It also has a reputation for being difficult to machine, which it's not; merely counterintuitive.

    5. Re:cheap? by NanoProf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Titanium is expensive because it is very difficult to extract from the oxide form. The oxide form itself is very cheap. It is the main ingredient in house paint.

      --
      Curtains for windows?
    6. Re:cheap? by Goldsmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, I don't have a BS in Materials Science, but I'm working on a PhD in... well, lets call it nanoscience.

      I personally don't know how to make titanium oxide nanotubes, but I imagine it would be similar to making carbon nanotubes... which I do have experiance with.

      Allow me to show you...

      The way you make carbon nanotubes is simple. You start with a catalyst (everything from rust to specially tailored alloys has been used), place this catalyst on a clean substrate where you want the tube to start growing. Next, flow some carbon rich gas through a furnace (i.e. methane), add a little hydrogen. When hot, place your substrate in the furnace. Nanotubes will grow from the catalyst in the direction of the flow (mostly).

      That same method is used to grow many types of tubes and nanowires. The only hard thing is dealing with flammable and explosive gases at high temperature (I havn't blown anything up yet, but I'm trying), and keeping everything clean.

      When dealing with nanotubes, you have to remember that you want to get a specific shape out, and not amorphous material, and that can be very hard. In most cases, you tailor your catalyst to provide the general shape you want, and grow off of that. So you could very easily control the growth of a ceramic, but the shape?

      Now obviously, there are other ways to grow these things... but I'm going to stop now before this turns into a lecture.

    7. Re:cheap? by kramer2718 · · Score: 1

      Please continue.

    8. Re:cheap? by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      So although aluminum is the most abundant element in the Earth's crust...

      Bzzzt! Oxygen is the most abundant element in the Earth's crust, followed by silicon, then followed by aluminum. Aluminum is the most abundant metal, but is dwarfed in abundance by the various silicate rocks. However, everything else you said was correct.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    9. Re:cheap? by nomel · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      heheh...comparing the prices of carbon and titanium, seems that carbon is MUCH cheaper.

      Heck, I dropped materials containing a considerable amount of carbon in the toilet this morning.

    10. Re:cheap? by dpcgriffin · · Score: 1

      Compared to carbon nanotubes, yes.
      Compared to CARBON nanotubes.
      That is key.

      --
      Step away from the idiocy. Now. But first, a word from your sponsors!
  9. Re:What the hell is titania? by reverseengineer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think titania here is titanium dioxide, TiO2, which is most commonly used as a pigment- most opaque white pigments contain titanium dioxide, also known as rutile. I had no idea you could make it into nanotubes though.

    --
    "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
  10. Terrorism? by roman_mir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why everything has to be about terrorism?
    1. Throw around a buzzword, like nanotubes.
    2. Mention fighting the terrorism.
    3. Well, we all know what comes at step 3, don't we?

    This is why everything has to be about terrorism.

    Allah Akbar = Profit?

    ---------
    (I used Allah Akbar not because I think it is in itself pro-terrorist, but because it is the most recognized token for the situation, so please.)

    1. Re:Terrorism? by Rxke · · Score: 0

      Where's the time that every new discovery was a possible way to cure cancer? One does get tired of this throwing around of buzzwords, that's for sure

    2. Re:Terrorism? by fatboyslack · · Score: 1

      Allah Akbar?

      So now the Mon Calamari is the Muslim god? Intriguing.

      (Like I'm the *only* Star Wars buff who thought it)

      Could cause some theological concerns when your 'god' is served up at the local seafood restaurant.

      --
      Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself. -- Leo Tolstoy
    3. Re:Terrorism? by DiracFeynman · · Score: 1

      We scientists know that any proposal with the word "nano" in it will give us a 40% boost in getting grants.

    4. Re:Terrorism? by asbestos_lead · · Score: 1

      Sounds suspiciously like the Underpants Gnomes' business model.

      --
      Sig Applied For
  11. What the hell is titania-Going down with the movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Titania is used in the construction of bad movies, with terrible leading men, sucked down into a awful love story, that sinks faster than its namesake.

  12. WTF is Titania? by SiliconEntity · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Titania, it turns out, is Titanium Dioxide, used commonly as a white pigment. Read more about it at the Wikipedia.

    1. Re:WTF is Titania? by wonkyballs · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah awful stuff found in everything from mints to plastic and coats your car with a film of white powder if its parked within 600 miles of a processing plant.

      --
      ASCII CLI question getty CLI ANSI.
    2. Re:WTF is Titania? by garvon · · Score: 2, Informative

      You /.ed the Wikipedia.

    3. Re:WTF is Titania? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      Entertainingly, the acid formed when you add water to titanium dioxide is called "titanic acid". http://www.bartleby.com/61/48/T0234800.html

    4. Re:WTF is Titania? by Punchinello · · Score: 1

      DuPont Titanium Technologies is the largest producer of titanium dioxide. There's a wealth of information on its many uses at http://www.titanium.dupont.com.

      They even mention Nano-titanium dioxide (Nano-TiO2)

      --

      Remember... ZG9uJ3QgZm9yZ2V0IHRvIGRyaW5rIHlvdXIgb3ZhbHRpbmU=

    5. Re:WTF is Titania? by Punchinello · · Score: 1

      ... and the white middle of an Oreo cookie as well as the white "M" on your M&Ms.

      --

      Remember... ZG9uJ3QgZm9yZ2V0IHRvIGRyaW5rIHlvdXIgb3ZhbHRpbmU=

    6. Re:WTF is Titania? by 0x41 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Titania is that busty bartender from Simpsons, that won the bartending contest.. I am all for Titania!

      Oh.. wait, that was titanica. nevermind...

    7. Re:WTF is Titania? by Luigi30 · · Score: 1

      No, that was Titania. Duff-man was like "TIT-ania!" And Moe won that contest.

      --
      503 Sig Unavailable

      The Signature could not be accessed. Please try again later or contact the administrator
    8. Re:WTF is Titania? by grnbrg · · Score: 1

      YOU BASTARD!

  13. Re:What the hell is titania? by luzrek · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Titania is also the name of the well-endowed barmaid in the episode of the Simpsons where Moe has Plastic Surgery.

    Seriously though, this press-release sets off my B.S. sensor. A typical scientific press-release would include some basic stuff, like what Titania Nanotubes are. Additionally, from my understanding of how carbon nanotubes are made, and how they exist, I'm not sure that Titanium could be used to make nanotubes. Neither could Silicon, which is the chemically more similar. Carbon nanotubes can exist because Carbon gets to form 4 and only 4 bonds. The extra electron orbitals (d-orbitals in spectroscophy language) would screw this up.

    Additionally, I don't think that combustion (say in cars, mentioned in the article), results in any free hydrogen, it should be water, carbon dioxide, and unburnt fuel.

    --

    Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

  14. Wonder what's the next best material? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    titania nanotubes are 1500 times better than the next best material for sensing hydrogen

    Oxygen?

    1. Re:Wonder what's the next best material? by bigattichouse · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't forget the match

      --
      meh
  15. Hmm.... by lukew · · Score: 4, Funny

    My daughter's name is Titania, sounds like she's been getting up to some serious mischief.

    1. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah she was sucking nanotubes at the local LUG.

    2. Re:Hmm.... by Usquebaugh · · Score: 1

      You sick, sick person. What did your daughter ever do to you? The stick the poor girl is going to take in school. I blame the parents.

    3. Re:Hmm.... by lukew · · Score: 1

      You're just dirty on your folks, "Usquebaugh".

    4. Re:Hmm.... by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Titania: "Ew. You said if I slept with you I wouldn't have to touch the drunk."

      Duff Man: "Duff Man says a lot of things. Oh, yeah!"

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    5. Re:Hmm.... by cybercuzco · · Score: 1

      Yeah, she said you had a nano tube

      --

  16. yeah by nomadic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everybody is talking about carbon nanotubes these days.

    Yeah, can't walk down the street or ride a subway without hearing that incessant chatter about carbon nanotubes.

  17. Re:What the hell is titania? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Oberon would be pissed if you screwed Titania.

  18. Re:What the hell is titania? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean that weird demented chick in "midsummer nights dream", right?

  19. Titania in the war against terrorism by 56ker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm still at a loss as to how detecting hydrogen helps combat terrorism. Would someone care to enlighten me?

    1. Re:Titania in the war against terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      detecting hydrogen = detecting combustion which could be useful say after a strike or explosion

    2. Re:Titania in the war against terrorism by wonkyballs · · Score: 1

      In case they get hold of an H-Bomb!

      --
      ASCII CLI question getty CLI ANSI.
    3. Re:Titania in the war against terrorism by ratfynk · · Score: 4, Informative

      Simple, hydrogen molecules in explosives give off distinct hydrogen emmision signatures, hydrogen concentration loss has a very specific profile when used in combination with nitrogen in explosives. This is very quantifiable. It is also why older explosives became unstable over time. The loss of hydrogen molecules over time caused decay separation of the explosive component and the buffer. Some explosives even give off amonia, and some are made with it, Amex for example, the stuff used by Timothy McVie. If better explosive detection devices can come from this tech great! Then there is one more hurdle for social disfunctional maniacs to overcome.

      --
      OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
    4. Re:Titania in the war against terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds good to me. Sometime I'm not to sure that "social dysfunctional maniacs" aren't running this asylum, though.

    5. Re:Titania in the war against terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Well, clearly the reason we haven't found any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq is because Saddam also invented an invisibility ray, which he used first to make all of the Al Qaeda operatives he's working with invisible, and then to make the weapons of mass destruction invisible. You may think I'm kidding, but you'll be sorry when you're attacked by an INVISIBLE shark with a laser on its head.

      Now, what we need to do to is to make a really fine, really strong, really big net, which we can use to drag Iraq. So we weave some of these nanotubes into a big net, and we catch the invisible bad guys. Simple.

      Of course, the net won't be ready for a few decades. Luckily, the American public knows that if we have a good faith effort underway to prove our allegations, that's good enough for them. Clearly there's invisible ties between Saddam and Al Qaeda and invisible WMDs, or it'd be kinda stupid to waste millions of dollars on a really big net!

      Thank God above that we have the sense to protect ourselves against imaginary egomaniacal Blofeld-clones when the only proven threat against us is some guys with knives and some pissed off skinheads.

    6. Re:Titania in the war against terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a little more worried about politicians -- Republicans and Democrats alike -- being the lazy, stupid clods they are, busy selling the country down the tubes as fast as they possibly can, simply to win the next election.

    7. Re:Titania in the war against terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fine !

      But be very careful about emiiting methane or urea / ammonia within a ten mile radius of these detectors. I dunno. Hold it ! Or something. (Hm, could this be a business opportunity. Like 'something'-m. Or something ? )

      Of course, the good fight always requires its share of sacrifice. :>

      No wonder that New Zealand got so serious about its methane-emitting sheep, all of a sudden ! Can you imagine ? All those arab (islamic *cough*ex-*cough*cia trained operatives) terrorists hiding with their explosives among the sheep ? Goodness gracious !

      Talking about socially disfunctional maniacs (usually called, sooner or later, by someone or other - pioneers, explorers, innovators, or movers and shakers, or benefactors of humanity, even. Not a few of them are awarded peace prizes - or medals) : Seriously. The guys who come up with this terror - liberation stuff have way too much time on their hands, and too little to do. Someone should just put shovels in their hands and set them to digging ditches. Fine, strapping fellas like them. Such a shame. Devil's playground, you know. ;)

    8. Re:Titania in the war against terrorism by ratfynk · · Score: 1

      It is entirely possible that the innocent lives lost in Oaklahoma could have been spared if we viewed the government the way we should. Government for the people, by the people, and of the people. Rather than the media hype we see about abuses. Yes there are abuses yes there is corruption, but blowing up hard working free individuals is not how to make a difference. If anything Timothy succeeded where right wing fanatical polititians have failed in causing greater restriction of public access to the political system and public participation in government. The Bush style republicanism is starting to make a mockery out of the very great words that I quoted from the greatest of the Republicans. If anything is to be learned from this is that to debate and dispute is a right we should cherish, and the ability to correct abuses is central to good democracy. The shame is not that an individual can destroy on a large scale the shame is that it has happened, and exposive detection will need to be in all public conveyances in the near future.

      --
      OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
    9. Re:Titania in the war against terrorism by kcelery · · Score: 1
      Close all your doors and windows, go to your kitchen, turn on the gas without igniting. Wait 15 minutes and then light a match. U see, every house has a handy explosive.

      As for the hygrogen detection system, you can easily find some hydrogen releasing chemicals to spray for the near by 30 square miles to set off the detectors.

    10. Re:Titania in the war against terrorism by ratfynk · · Score: 1

      You miss the point. It is the signature of the different hydrogen ions in certain concentrations that is sensed and then process quantified. The analysis excludes ordinary free hydrogen, and other hydrogen based componds. You detect the signature of dangerous explosives not just the presence of hydrogen. It will take a long time to even approach the sensitivity of an explosive sniffing dog! But it will be tech that can be cheaply applied and remotely used in strategic locations 24hrs a day, something that is very expensive and difficult to do with sniffer dogs and existing sensor tech.

      --
      OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
    11. Re:Titania in the war against terrorism by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1

      Just incase you managed to miss the loud 'boom', the fire, the screaming people, the dead, the falling buildings, etc.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    12. Re:Titania in the war against terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The shame is not that an individual can destroy on a large scale the shame is that it has happened, and exposive detection will need to be in all public conveyances in the near future.

      If you're going to install explosive detection in all public conveyances, when will you start introducing mandatory strip searching? There is a thin line between security and oppression; the very same thin line that exists between cautious behaviour and paranoia, between defence and overkill.

      Once you cross that line and the paranoia kicks in, it's all down hill form there. Your security measures will be interpreted as opressive behaviour or as overkill and will be challenged. This of course will make the paranoid even more paranoid, incenting them to demand even more extreme action...

    13. Re:Titania in the war against terrorism by ratfynk · · Score: 1

      The big question is why the hell does anybody carry C4 or something like it into a shopping mall. Can you tell me that someone who parks a load of Amex in the parking lot of your local Piggely Wiggely has every right to do just that because he is pissed at the manager that fired him! No you are perfectly free to carry around things however there does need to be rational exceptions, boy Americans get stupid when they confuse rights and social responsibilities. If you drive a car down the road with something strapped to the roof, say a chair. You then get stopped by a cop because it is falling off. Should you get mad at the police officer! Get real.

      --
      OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
  20. Inflammable by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    "Inflammable means flammable? What a country !"

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    1. Re:Inflammable by Rick.C · · Score: 1
      "Inflammable means flammable? What a country !"

      Not any more! The US Congress passed a law back in the '70s, I think, that made the words "inflammable" and "imflammable" illegal.

      Good thing you're posting that from the UK.
      --
      You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
      "Math in a song is good."-Linford
  21. Re:What the hell is titania? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    titania here is titanium dioxide, TiO2, which is most commonly used as a pigment

    Hell, why not just use Zinc Oxide. We could fight terrorism AND skin cancer!

  22. Re:yeah and Please forgive the lengthness of my re by agrippa_cash · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, sir, there's nothing on earth Like a genuine,Bona fide,Electrified, Titaniafied, Nanotube! What'd I say? Ned Flanders: Nanotube! Lyle Lanley: What's it called? Patty+Selma: Nanotube! Lyle Lanley: That's right! Nanotube! Miss Hoover: I hear those things are awfully loud... Lyle Lanley: But tt detects hydrogen clouds. Apu: Is there a chance the tube could bend? Lyle Lanley: Not on your life, my Hindu friend. Barney: What about us brain-dead slobs? Lyle Lanley: You'll be given cushy jobs. Abe: Were you sent here by the devil? Lyle Lanley: No, good sir, I'm on the level. Wiggum: The ring came off my pudding can. Lyle Lanley: Take my pen knife, my good man. I swear it's Springfield's only choice... Throw up your hands and raise your voice! All: Nanotube! Lyle Lanley: What's it called? All: Nanotube! Lyle Lanley: Once again... All: Nanotube! Marge: But Main Street's still all cracked and broken... Bart: Sorry, Mom, the mob has spoken! All: Nanotube! Nanotube! Nanotube! [big finish] Nanotube! Homer: Nano... D'oh!

  23. Hydrogen is not a product of combustion by Namarrgon · · Score: 1
    I kinda doubt there would be much hydrogen left after any sort of combustion, even if there was any to start with. The hydrogen would be the first to oxidise, and you'd be left with water.

    And if there had already been a strike or an explosion, I don't think you'd need nanosensors to detect it...

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  24. The original article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    You need to get your BS sensor checked; the research is real and legitimate.

    Here's a reference to the original article, which is available online:

    2003 Craig A. Grimes, Keat G. Ong, Oomman K. Varghese, Xiping Yang, G. Mor, Maggie Paulose, Chuanmin Ruan, Elizabeth C. Dickey, Michael V. Pishko, James W. Kendig and Andrew J. Mason, "A Sentinel Sensor Network for Hydrogen Sensing," Sensors, vol. 3, pp. 69-82. PDF format

    1. Re:The original article by rco3 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps if his BS sensor were made with titania nanotubes, it would be more sensitive, more accurate, with fewer false positives.

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    2. Re:The original article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it's so much more fun to base one's reaction to a new discovery on half-remembered general chemistry and a vague notion of what a "scientific" press release should sound like... that's the excitement of Slashdot. So why the heck am I wasting my time actually reading comments on a science-related post? dunno.

  25. Roland Piquepaille by DeepDarkSky · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why is Slashdot posting these news release stories that are summarized and submitted by Roland Piquepaille? And for that matter, where are these details on his web site that he purports to have? All I see are direct quotes and linked pictures. This is the second one I see now. Is this a trend? Is this how one can get stories posted here? I'll go and read news release sites like Eureka Alert and quote generously from it, add a couple of picture links, and submit it here.

    1. Re:Roland Piquepaille by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called "attention whoring".

    2. Re:Roland Piquepaille by TheRealBlueEAGLE · · Score: 1

      Did you also note that he had more detail in his summary? How is it a summary if it contains more detail?

      --
      If pro and con are opposites, what is the opposite of progress?
  26. I'm not sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't radiation knock protons (hydrogen nuclei) out of paraffin? Just a wild guess.

    1. Re:I'm not sure by Rosonowski · · Score: 1

      I remember my stepdad talking about using wax at the small reactor they maintained on campus... so that does make sense.

      --
      01101001 01100001 01101101 01101110 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01100001 01110111 01111001 01100101 01110010
  27. Re:What the hell is titania? by geekoid · · Score: 1

    hey, what do you know, Lex posts to Slashdot.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  28. Annoying learn-about-hydrogen comment by SuperBanana · · Score: 5, Informative
    And now for your entertainment tonight, the obnoxious nitpicking Slashdot comment reply!

    A lit match works for hydrogen detection as well as many gas hydrocarbons.

    Actually, Hydrogen requires a higher fuel to air ratio than gasoline. It also disperses nearly instantly(well, except in confined/sealed areas of course)- whereas gasoline etc sink and pool(which is why your natural gas/propane water heater has that nice little picture of a gasoline can etc).

    Oh, and since it's still not known enough- the Hindenburg burned because it was painted with the chemical equivalent of rocket fuel(the chemical composition of the paint etc is very close to solid rocket fuel)- not because it was full of Hydrogen, which, by itself, doesn't burn.

    When it DOES burn, it burns a)instantly b)practically invisibly, c)with no smoke. Watch those films of the hindenburg, and note the a)slow b)bright yellow c)sooty fire.

    It's interesting to note that hydrogen's qualities make it much safer should there be, say, an accident with a truck carrying it. It dissipates as it leaks, versus the major fire hazard/toxic waste problem created by a gasoline spill.

    1. Re:Annoying learn-about-hydrogen comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other thing about hydrogen is, if you've got any photomultiplier tubes, you should keep any hydrogen you've got far, far away! The hydrogen will worm its way right through the PMT glass and then you will not longer have a good vacuum in the PMT.

    2. Re:Annoying learn-about-hydrogen comment by b-baggins · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, the Hindenburg exploded in a hydrogen fire, and the skin caught fire in a side reaction. This was settled by both the German and American investigations in the months following the disaster, and was in line with the many other zeppelin/dirigible hydrogen fires preceeding the Hindenburg, including a rather nasty one involving the Goodyear dirigible in Chicago a year or two earlier that killed a bunch of people on the ground and pretty much torched a building.

      The report you're referencing is from some kook at NASA who has to build this whole black helicopter conspiracy so that he can set aside the reams of evidence against his conclusions. Oh, and interestingly enough, he's also a big hydrogen economy advocate.

      Hate to dash your revisionism, but 99% of the time, the first and most obvious answer is the correct one.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    3. Re:Annoying learn-about-hydrogen comment by Izago909 · · Score: 1

      It's interesting to note that hydrogen's qualities make it much safer should there be, say, an accident with a truck carrying it. It dissipates as it leaks, versus the major fire hazard/toxic waste problem created by a gasoline spill.

      Assuming that it's NOT in it's liquid state. If it does become very popuar, transportation companies might traffic it in it's cryogenic form since it is a more effecient use of space and less prone to leaking. Also, I'm also sure that filling the blimp with hydrogen didn't help matters either.
      Then road accidents can start taking people out T2 style ;)

    4. Re:Annoying learn-about-hydrogen comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hydrogen, which, by itself, doesn't burn."

      huh-- so when we dropped some metal into a beaker of HCl in high school chemistry and held a match over the tube, that *phoom* of the evolved H exploding was the collective imagination of 30 students?

      huh.

    5. Re:Annoying learn-about-hydrogen comment by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1

      Didn't pay too much attention in high school, did you smarty pants?

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    6. Re:Annoying learn-about-hydrogen comment by lommer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Exactly. Spot on.

      Hydrogen doesn't burn, or more specifically, deflagrate. Rather, hydrogen detonates (explodes). It is extremely difficult to make a sustained hydrogen-fueled flame because the compression wave generated by the deflagrating (burning) hydrogen compresses the surrounding hydrogen very quicly to the point where it detonates(explodes).

    7. Re:Annoying learn-about-hydrogen comment by Oggust · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Oh, and since it's still not known enough- the Hindenburg burned because it was painted with the chemical equivalent of rocket fuel(the chemical composition of the paint etc is very close to solid rocket fuel)- not because it was full of Hydrogen, which, by itself, doesn't burn.

      Nothing, "by itself" burns. There is always a fuel and some kind of oxidiser. The hindenburg burned very fuel rich, but if the hydrogen in it had been mixed with enough oxygen, it would have flattened everything in sight when it went up.

      When it DOES burn, it burns a)instantly

      Yeah, think explosion.

      b)practically invisibly, c)with no smoke. Watch those films of the hindenburg, and note the a)slow b)bright yellow c)sooty fire.

      Classic features of a fue-rich fire.

      It's interesting to note that hydrogen's qualities make it much safer should there be, say, an accident with a truck carrying it. It dissipates as it leaks, versus the major fire hazard/toxic waste problem created by a gasoline spill.

      In open air, yes. But the scenario I'm worried about is when it happens somewhere semi-enclosed, like a parking garage, or a tunnel. Some kind of area where the hydrogen can't quickly escape upwards, but has time to form an explosive mixture with the air. In a parking garage under other buildings it seems like it would be pretty devastating, but I haven't seen that scenario discussed anywhere.

      /August.

      --
      "An object declared as type _Bool is large enough to store the values 0 and 1." -- 6.1.2.5, C99 standard.
    8. Re:Annoying learn-about-hydrogen comment by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      I know about the hindenburg. The material was painted with an aluminum dope compound that experiments have shown, react violently with fire+air. It is believed that static jumping between the pieces of aluminum doped material ignited the dope. The hydrogen fire really only started as the Hindenburg was on the ground but didn't really sustain. (If you do it right, you can even put out a fire with gasoline, but it is very hard to do)

    9. Re:Annoying learn-about-hydrogen comment by ddimas · · Score: 1

      It also burns UP! The majority of the Hidenburg fatalities were caused by other factors, mostly when the thing hit the ground.

    10. Re:Annoying learn-about-hydrogen comment by Cybrr · · Score: 1
      A quick search didn't come up with evidence of hydrogen being the direct cause of death. It merely ignites by static electricity and the deflating blimp crashes slowly. A few anti-static, non flammable compartements should be enough to save lives.

      As said up this thread, regular fuel is the biggest threat. Quite obvious, really.

      From http://www.prairieghosts.com/chi_fires.html (emphasis mine):

      THE GOODYEAR DIRIGIBLE DISASTER
      Another terrifying event occurred on July 21, 1919 when the Goodyear dirigible ( the forerunner of the "blimp") the WING FOOT, crashed into the Illinois Trust and Savings Building at 231 South LaSalle Street. Just minutes before the bank closed for the day, the dirigible, powered by 95,000 cubic feet of very flammable hydrogen, suddenly crashed to the earth. The WING FOOT tore into the iron supports holding the glass skylight of building in place and the two engines and gasoline tanks crashed to the floor of the bank. Glass and steel rained down onto the employees, along with a deadly shower of fuel. The rotunda was instantly consumed in flames, trapping tellers and stenographers inside. The resulting fire cut off all hope of escape and many were burned beyond recognition. The intense heat made rescue work virtually impossible for hours and 12 people died and many more were injured.
      The cause of the tragedy was determined to be static electricity and a rush of air from the propellers. The Goodyear company paid for the care of the victims and the bank chipped in $1,000 for the family of anyone who died in the disaster. The bank itself re-opened for business the very next day.

      The WING FOOT tragedy, and others like it involving such aircraft, showed that such transportation was not safe and this incident pointed toward the end of an era. After the crash of the HINDENBURG in New Jersey in 1937, the use of dirigibles was abandoned as a means for passenger travel. This would be the only legacy of the event as no plaque or historical marker has ever been erected about this terrible event.
      --
      Why did GEAR crush RDP?
    11. Re:Annoying learn-about-hydrogen comment by b-baggins · · Score: 1

      You highlighted the wrong part. The cause of the tragedy was determined to be static electricity. The static electricity ignited the hydrogen. It started as a hydrogen fire.

      Case closed.

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    12. Re:Annoying learn-about-hydrogen comment by Cybrr · · Score: 1

      True. But I wasn't debating the cause of the crash, but the cause of death, which you implied was a hydrogen fire.

      --
      Why did GEAR crush RDP?
  29. Size and electron affinity by fven · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are two things that are of help here. Firstly is the size of the tubes, when you are in the nano- or pico- regimes, there are a lot more surface features (corners, edges) per atom than there are in the bulk metal. As most reactions (catalytic or non catalytic) occur on surface features, having as many small particles as possible makes sense.
    The other factor that is a help here is that the oxide is used. Introducing impurities into metal (consider the oxygen an impurity) does two things, changes the electron affinity of the metal so it can bind ligands better (or worse - also useful) and introduces point 'defects' - places where the crystal lattice is interrupted. These 'defect' sites actually provide reaction points for in this case, hydrogen.
    Nice piece of chemistry!

  30. John Cleese by Entropy248 · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else read the book based on Douglas Adams' computer game, Titania? More importantly, did anyone else immediately think of that?

    1. Re:John Cleese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The book and game, I believe, were entitled Starship Titanic, and not particularly.

  31. Fuel-cell by Jotham · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hydrogen entering an array of titania nanotubes flows around all the surfaces, but it also splits into individually charged atoms and permeates the surface of the nanotubes. These hydrogen ions provide electrons for conductivity. The change in conductance signals that hydrogen, above the background level, is present.

    Sounds very similiar to how a fuel-cell works, but instead of pumping through lots of hydrogen to produce as much electricity as possible they're just using a little bit of hydrogen to generate a tiny current (or does it just change the conductivity?).

    I want to know what this material does when feed pure hydrogen.

    1. Re:Fuel-cell by reezle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I read it a little differently.

      It ssems to act more like a transitor, whic is switched by the Hydrogen Ions. (So, yes... it just changes the conductivity)

  32. Re:What the hell is titania? by Entropy248 · · Score: 1

    Titanium is in Group 4. Oxygen in Group 16. Presuming that they can in fact make nanotubes, my electron addition (from CHEM 101) tells me that there's no place for any of oxygen's valence electrons.

    P.S. I'm a pre-law student. Should I stick to law based on my chemistry?

  33. Ill met by twilight,... by bigattichouse · · Score: 3, Funny

    they are fair.. but I prefer to wait for Oberon nanotubes.

    --
    meh
    1. Re:Ill met by twilight,... by porkchop_d_clown · · Score: 1

      I hear Oberon Nanotubes are great for making Ariels.

  34. That's so rude... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "nanotube", "microsoft", how many more euphemisms will people design to describe a limp dick?

  35. Discuss by ONOIML8 · · Score: 1

    "Everybody is talking about carbon nanotubes these days."

    I have such boring conversations with people. We never get on to good topics like this. Maybe I need to get out more?

    --
    . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
  36. Sources by wordisms · · Score: 2, Informative

    I didn't see any links to the sources yet on the blog or the article so here is the homepage for Dr. Craig A. Grimes. There are two recent pdfs about the titania nanotubes on his publications page.

  37. You sound like the guy from PC games magazine. by porkchop_d_clown · · Score: 1

    "Finally, one day some one said to me, 'You want to go kill some orcs?' Well.... Yeah! If only people asked me questions like that in real life!"

  38. that's interesting by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    my pathetic post was just ripping off the Simpson's.

    When Homer get's to Dr. Nick's surgery to have his thumb sewn back on Dr. Nick says it to a gas canister while he looks on as the surgery burns down.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  39. Re:What the hell is titania? by Compuser · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am too lazy to figure out valences but a
    quick google shows that theoretical calculations
    predict them to exist and be semiconducting,
    and someone has done TEM of those tubes so they
    do exist and have been characterized. That said,
    you'll have to look deeper for more info cause
    I don't really care.
    BTW, most oxides and dichaclogenides which exist
    in layered crystal structures can be "rolled" up
    and form nanotubes.

  40. Titania Nanotubes? by spun · · Score: 1

    Wasn't she in a movie with Trixie Microslot and Dirk Harddrive?

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  41. Yup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She's wearing tube tops one billion times smaller than normal, it sounds like.

    I'd start with more serious problems first, though: check her room for drugs. Rumor has it she's been getting some pretty powerful juice from a guy calling himself "Oberon".

  42. Re:What the hell is titania? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    (1) The press release isn't particularly well done; most aren't.

    (2) The articles mentioned in the press release (which were the important part of the release) are rather better. Of course, these also assume that the reader has at least some understanding of what "titania nanotubes" are, and that the specific rules for covalent bonds applicable to carbon don't mean all that much for transition metal oxides.

    (3) Combustion "doesn't result in any hydrogen"? Perhaps, but how will we know without sensors that can detect trace (sub-ppm) levels of hydrogen in the exhaust?

    These sensors aren't all that novel (as the S&A-B article at least points out, several other gas sensors based on a resistance change in a metal/metal oxide semiconductor have been developed), but they're relatively easy to prepare and don't poison easily - so it's at least moderately impressive. So, yes, they do exist, and the press release is where most or all of the BS is to be found.

  43. Gas detection calibration by ratfynk · · Score: 1

    On a heavier note (on the scale of gases) there have been times when I have eaten Mexican food and have caused the evacuation of public places unintentionally. If a system to detect explosive methane was as sensitive as these devices might be and was wrongly calibrated, I might have been arrested. Some commented I should have been. Some said I should not have beans.
    But like all things that have been it passed.

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
    1. Re:Gas detection calibration by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      there have been times when I have eaten Mexican food and have caused the evacuation of public places unintentionally

      Must ... resist ... urge ... to ... troll ...

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  44. Titania? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    Titania hands you a nanotube....err....crystal.

    For those of you who don't know what that's from, I suggest you look for the mp3 of the second D&D spoof that was made.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  45. Cheap as chips by marko123 · · Score: 1

    Particle collider cheap, or hamburger and chips cheap?

    --
    http://pcblues.com - Digits and Wood
  46. Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you

  47. The Amazingly New Atmosphere Detector by moby · · Score: 3, Funny


    It's simply amazing and can detect hydrogen from 1 ppm to 4%. Luckily there is just enough floating around to guarantee success every time. Amaze your friends, take it outside, show-off as you brilliantly hold the detector in hand and proclaim, "Yes, we are not in a vacuum."

    Did I mention that your friends would be amazed?

  48. Sure, Metal Wants To Be Metallic, but... by cmholm · · Score: 1

    Metals *would* want to be metallic, if it weren't for that g.d. oxygen trying to react with everything in sight. Gold doesn't have much of an affinity to compound with anything, hence it's usually found in pure form... if you can find it.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
  49. Re:Fuel-cell - ought to make a GREAT electrode. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Hydrogen entering an array of titania nanotubes flows around all the surfaces, but it also splits into individually charged atoms and permeates the surface of the nanotubes. These hydrogen ions provide electrons for conductivity. The change in conductance signals that hydrogen, above the background level, is present.

    Sounds very similiar to how a fuel-cell works, but instead of pumping through lots of hydrogen to produce as much electricity as possible they're just using a little bit of hydrogen to generate a tiny current (or does it just change the conductivity?).


    Unless I'm mistaken they just SAID that it was the conductivity change that was measured.

    But this material ought to make a GREAT electrode for the reducing-agent end of a fuel cell.

    In particular, it might be handy for selectively extracting the hydrogen from the impure output of a reformer - or even extract it from hydrocarbons directly, eleiminating the need for a reformer and directly burning the hydrogen from hydrocarbons.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  50. The Upside by serutan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    They are prosecuting people for downloading "Hotel California."

  51. $4 per pound is cheap by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 1

    ...cheaper than most types of cheese.

    --
    That that is is that that that that is not is not.
  52. Nit Picking by Nazmun · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As a muslim I must correct you. A more correct transliteration would sound like this. Allah-huu-akhbar. (key part you missed being the huu which sounds like who).

    If anyone wants to know what that means... it's simply god is great or allah is great. Technically allah isn't a god as there is no sex associated with allah (god implies a masculine deity).

    --
    Hmmm... Pie...
    1. Re:Nit Picking by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Technically allah isn't a god as there is no sex associated with allah (god implies a masculine deity).

      bzzt.

      God, like many other English words, is "male-neutral." Other good ones are "editor," "executor", and "president." (There ARE feminine forms of these titles, but when in doubt, use the male.)

      Oh, and Allah (you should ALWAYS capitalize the reference to the Supreme Being, no matter if you call said Omnipotence God, Allah, or The Great Fuzzy One) was worshiped as a father-god of pre-Muhammad post-Ishmael arabs.

      And while I've got your attention--how come Muslims don't translate their word for God? Both the jews and the christians translate the word from its historic form when using English; why is the arabic so different?

    2. Re:Nit Picking by Nazmun · · Score: 1

      I can see executor, president, or editor as male-neutral... but i haven't seen one mention or form of the word God in a non masculine way. A God is usually mail as in Jesus and or his 'Father' in Christianity. Thats probably why Goddess exists... There is no female or male form for your examples though.

      One thing you must realize is that if you are a Muslim, you believe that information from the pre-Muhammad era has been incorrect in some way by the time Muhammed was born. A lot is similar but Allah has sent the verses of the Quran to his messenger Muhammed (SAW) because we needed a new guide and have strayed too far from the original beliefs. (This is not limited to just beliefs in multiple Gods and or Goddesses).

      BTW, all religions are usually capitalized... not just Muslims.

      --
      Hmmm... Pie...
    3. Re:Nit Picking by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      but i haven't seen one mention or form of the word God in a non masculine way

      "All the gods." "By the gods."

      They're group-forms, inclusive of any divinity. "Whatever god you pray to" is also a gender-neutral use.

      "Goddess" exists partly as a holdover from our very sexist days. (And, unless it's referring to 'The Goddess', it's lower-case.)

      Oh, and for the record... "executrix" and "madam president" are the feminine forms.

      One thing you must realize is that if you are a Muslim, you believe that information from the pre-Muhammad era has been incorrect in some way by the time Muhammed was born. A lot is similar but Allah has sent the verses of the Quran to his messenger Muhammed (SAW) because we needed a new guide and have strayed too far from the original beliefs. (This is not limited to just beliefs in multiple Gods and or Goddesses).

      Oh, that's God's MO since Eden. Send message, people get message, people forget message, send message again. Christ, IMO, was God trying to show how to behave properly by example. (My opinion's still out on the celestial relevance of Muhammad. One one hand, there's J.C.'s warnings of false prophets and the common media perception; on the other, there's the actual teachings of the Quran/Qur'an/Koran and the theological implasiblity of God ignoring any who claim to follow Him.)

      BTW, all religions are usually capitalized... not just Muslims.

      True. But that's because they're proper nouns. The grammatical rule about capitializing a reference to the Supreme Being, be It a He or a She or an It, is a special case above and beyond religous reference.

      It's not necessary to always capitalize "god"--only when using it (or its feminine form or pronoun) to refer to that Almighty being that humans alternatly call God, The Goddess, Allah, Bhramain, Yahweh, Jehovah, YHVH, etc.

  53. what is the tensile strength? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if they say they can make this stuff by the mile
    then if the tensile strength is high enough I could forsee potential space elevator applications

  54. Who marked this insightful? by panurge · · Score: 1
    "A little learning is a dangerous thing.
    Drink deep, or drink not the Peierian spring."

    I think that sums it up.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  55. Ghost Edit by Sen. Joe McCarthy by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

    and as weapons against terrorism.

    are you sure you didnt really mean (insert-suspensfull-"Duh-Dunnnn"-sound-from-movies -here) weapons against Communism!

  56. The stuff dreams are made of... by Genda · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the Maltese Falcon was made of Titania microtubles... and would Viagra improve the function of said microtubles?

    Actually there're a couple cool things here;

    This stuff would be light, terribly strong, and would have some very interesting optical properties. This could have all kinds of use as a photonic array.

    In the specific use as a hydrogen sensor, it would be worth it's weight in something gold-like. Turns out that one of the byproducts of the hydrogen economy will be further erosion of the ozone layer. The only answer is to prevent leakage as much as possible, and hydrogen sensors are goin to have to be ubiquitous to accomplish the job. This is going to be a huge market once we all move to hydrogen!

    Genda Bendte

    - Hydrogen accounts for 70% of the barionic matter in the universe... George W. Bush accounts for 99.6% of the stupid in the universe. The rest is evenly divided between his cabinet and the country of North Korea.

  57. Monatomic H by shthd · · Score: 1

    If the rate of production of Hydrogen atoms is sufficient then you could create a very powerful rocket. Or at least supplement current chemical rockets. Combining hydrogen releases a hell of a lot more energy than combining H2 + O2. The reason they're not doing now is because of storage problems. Anybody know if this could work?

    --
    brrrrrrrrrppp 'Ey Homer...Why don't girls like me?
  58. I can see the FARK.com headline now... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    "Scientists create titanium nose. Now can smell it when Dominar Rygel XVI farts"

    You can't spell "nanosensor" without "nose".

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    1. Re:I can see the FARK.com headline now... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Except he farts helium, not hydrogen. D'oh! Well, that's fark for you.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  59. Hard to hide by quinkin · · Score: 1
    As pointed out in the replies - Hydrogen is a usefull element to detect in that it is often "emitted" by high energy chemical explosives.

    The reason this is actually usefull as a detection device is actually a function of it's minimal molecular weight/size. It is basically very difficult to completely contain the Hydrogen to avoid detection.

    Also, leakage has been a traditional problem for H2 storage and distribution and cheap reliable detectors will help detect problems before they become catastrophic.

    Now days, leakage is much less of a problem than "embrittlment" - which is when Hydrogen penetrates a metal alloy (either intentionally for transport or unintentionally like a gas pipeline wall) and substantially reduces the strength of the material. This is were I see the greatest use for these new Titania tubes... but that just doesn't sound as cool to Joe Public.

    Q.

    --
    Insert Signature Here
  60. i think i have an idea. by LifesABeach · · Score: 0

    does terrorist food cause gas? :o)