Mandrake 9.2b1 Released, 2.6 Test Kernel in Cooker

FP NIGGAZ! by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 02:25 · Score: -1, Offtopic

i made it!

FP by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 02:25 · Score: -1, Offtopic

Gnaa sucks !

Sweet... by GameGod0 · 2003-08-02 02:27 · Score: 4, Interesting

Will this be the first major distro running the 2.6 kernel?

Re:Sweet... by MuParadigm · 2003-08-02 02:36 · Score: 5, Informative

I think so.

Word on various boards seems to be that the 2.6 kernel is much faster than 2.4.x. People are claiming improvements of up to 50% in some operations.

Of course, these are early adopters, most of them with single cpu machines. I haven't heard of anyone testing it for robustness or stability in a high-end environment yet.

Anyone else got word on it's performance or bugs?
Re:Sweet... by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 02:38 · Score: -1, Flamebait

> I think so.

Think again ASSHOLE!

You can run 2.6 with 9.2 if you wish, but the default will be a 2.4 kernel, jackass.
Re:Sweet... by MuParadigm · 2003-08-02 02:43 · Score: 5, Informative

Sorry to post to myself, but I was wrong about Mamdrake being the first major distro to supply the 2.6 kernel. Red Hat has had an RPM for a few weeks.
Re:Sweet... by Tirel · 2003-08-02 02:44 · Score: 5, Informative

Well, not really, gentoo has had the option since 2.6.0-test1 came out. The portage tree is wonderfully updates within a few hours with the main branch and others (mm, aa, ac, ck, ...), so the only thing you need to do is check out /usr/portage/sys-kernel and decice which one you want to have at install time (or later, if you're upgrading like me)
Re:Sweet... by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 02:49 · Score: -1, Flamebait

>> Will this be the first major distro running the 2.6 kernel?

> Well, not really, gentoo has had the option since 2.6.0-test1 came out

You see how your answer doesn't apply? Gentoo is a joke of a distro for people who are jokes. Thank you.
Re:Sweet... by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 02:51 · Score: -1, Flamebait

Yes, but gentoo is slow
Re:Sweet... by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 03:30 · Score: -1, Troll

Gentoo is a joke of a distro for people who are jokes.
But for people who aren't jokes, it's a perfectly fine distro, right?
Re:Sweet... by dhawton · 2003-08-02 03:31 · Score: 0

Maybe this will be the first distro to release the 2.6 kernel as the default kernel for installation? I hope so, I've been running Windows on my laptop now because its too much of a pain to setup Linux thanks to ACPI. I hear 2.6 has a really sound ACPI module, hopefully when a distro releases using the 2.6 kernel by default, I'll be able to run Linux on my laptop.
Re:Sweet... by Arker · 2003-08-02 04:23 · Score: 1, Interesting

Funny thing is, I'm no compiler guy, but even I know that a lot of the optimisation code is inefficient. Notice that Debian came out the best in that little test? And Debian sticks with i386 code. As does most of the commercial software. And Intel and AMD optimise their processors to run that commercial i386 code as fast as possible. Doh!

It wasn't a fair comparison since they were using different video drivers, of course, and also because 'identical machines' never are. To be fair you really have to run the same tests with the same drivers, and swap the installs around to each machine as well, so you can see just how unidentical they really are.

The really interesting thing to do would be to test various compiler settings with gentoo on those machines first. Try 386, 486, 586, 686, try -O2, see what works and what doesn't. Then compare the other distros to Gentoo with the best settings.

At any rate, it's not the processor optimisation flags that are the important part of compiling from source - you're not likely to see really dramatic results from them alone, even if you do take the time to experiment and find the best set for your architecture. Much more important are the configure scripts for individual applications. Leaving out KDE and/or Gnome support, for example, can seriously trim a program up without losing anything if you don't use KDE or Gnome.

--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
Re:Sweet... by mickwd · 2003-08-02 04:36 · Score: 5, Insightful

"Well, not really, gentoo has had the option since 2.6.0-test1 came out."

Yes, but all Gentoo does with a kernel is download the source and install it into /usr/src/linux, leaving you to configure it, build it and install it.

Anyone who can download a file and use 'tar' can do the same thing, quite easily.

And when you install a new kernel, Portage doesn't even tell you which ebuilds need to be re-installed (nvidia-kernel, i2c, lm-sensors, etc).

Not knocking Gentoo (I run Gentoo and Mandrake), but the binary distributions do more of the hard work for you. To some people that is their strength, to others it is their weakness.
Re:Sweet... by DrXym · 2003-08-02 04:44 · Score: 1

Not to put too fine a point on it, but 2.6 isn't out yet and is extremely unlikely to be for several months possibly even six months from now. The 2.6 test and prerelease stages are only starting and is likely to go through a significant number of iterations before being called 2.6.0. Therefore, unless Mandrake intend to release what is essentially a alpha state kernel with broken drivers and the ensuing carnage when it trashes or doesn't work in various machines, it would seem highly unlikely to me.

Of course they could always include it as a 'try this if you dare' advanced feature, which might make some sense, but one would hope that they kept the 2.6 package up to date with the latest changes if they did that.
Re:Sweet... by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 05:28 · Score: -1, Flamebait

Yes, and I like the idea behind Gentoo, but in practice it is nearly unusable. It takes days if not weeks to even get to the point where the system is usable.
Re:Sweet... by Slime-dogg · 2003-08-02 06:10 · Score: 2, Interesting

Gentoo's had the source available in portage since test 1 was released. It works too.

The only problem is that you need to use the open nvidia drivers, since the old drivers are not compatible. Who knows when Nvidia will release a version for this kernel. :sigh:

--
You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
Re:Sweet... by Slime-dogg · 2003-08-02 06:13 · Score: 1

Um... More like 4 hours. That's about how long it takes to download and compile the GNU OS. Once that's done, you have a fully usable system.

If you want X installed, which is completely optional and unnecessary, it'll be another 8 hours or so. All in all, it just takes a good day to do, not weeks.

--
You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
Re:Sweet... by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 06:14 · Score: 0

People are claiming improvements of up to 50% in some operations.

I'll bet those people run Gentoo.
Re:Sweet... by Bryce · 2003-08-02 06:14 · Score: 2, Interesting

OSDL has been doing heavy duty testing of the kernel 2.4, 2.5, and 2.6 on 1, 2, 4, and 8
processor systems, for the past 2 years. See
its Kernel
Testing website and tools. The particular tool
that does this is the Scalable Test Platform.

Bryce
Re:Sweet... by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 06:50 · Score: 0

What the fuck is the GNU OS?

You mean Linux, so say it asshole.

BTW, Gentoo is for losers that have never even touched a woman.

Surprise, that's you.
Re:Sweet... by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 07:01 · Score: 0

>> What the fuck is the GNU OS?

It means the linux kernel + A LOT OF OTHER STUFF THAT IS NOT LINUX BUT IS DISTRIBUTED UNDER THE GNU GPL (includes GNU and non-GNU software).

Got that, fuckhead ? Try using a GNU/linux system with the linux kernel ONLY !!. Its not worth the trouble for 99.9% of GNU/Linux users. And don't forget to compile the kernel with some compiler other than GNU GCC.
Re:Sweet... by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 07:09 · Score: 0

Oh ya!! X is completely optional and unnecessary !! Spoken like a true caveman who thinks 99% of the linux desktop users will use the console vt terminals to get their job done !! And these days even linux servers are configured thru web interfaces and GUI tools.
Re:Sweet... by FeeDBaCK · 2003-08-02 07:53 · Score: 1

Gentoo's ebuilds for the nvidia-kernel build perfectly under a 2.6test kernel. Have you tried it again recently?

--
wolf31o2 Developer, Gentoo Linux Games Team
Re:Sweet... by Anime_Fan · 2003-08-02 08:01 · Score: 1

Actually, if you tried 2.6.0 you should see that it isn't as broken as you say. Its stability is excellent (I'm thinking of bringing the test1 kernel down just to test2, been running it since the first test was released).

Sure, some old modules won't work, but nvidia-kernel, nvidia-glx and vmware all work. Also, ALSA works straight from the kernel. True ATAPI burning is also nice (no more SCSI emulation).

I think it's a Good Thing (tm) that they release a beta of their OS, simply because it will make it easier for them to deploy the kernel when it is called stable.
Re:Sweet... by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 08:02 · Score: 0

> Oh ya!! X is completely optional and unnecessary !! Spoken like a true caveman who thinks 99% of the linux desktop users will use the console vt terminals to get their job done !! And these days even linux servers are configured thru web interfaces and GUI tools.

Spoken like someone who doesn't know what a "production server" is.

Oh, I forgot.... most Linux installations are "desktops", right?

Preview before you post; think before you type..
Re:Sweet... by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 09:09 · Score: 0

> Yes, and I like the idea behind Gentoo, but in practice it is nearly unusable. It takes days if not weeks to even get to the point where the system is usable.

You are thinking of "Linux From Scratch"

Gentoo downloads source and builds it for your system. Everything is compatible -- conflicts are very rare. the actual "install" process is mostly automated... you can treat a Gentoo system like you would a Redhat (up2date or Ximian) or Debian box. Assuming you set all your build prefs, often the install process is transparent.
Re:Sweet... by flatface · 2003-08-02 09:19 · Score: 0, Flamebait

Last week, one of my friends wanted a hard drive prepped so that he could play OGMs at a fairly decent speed on a P3 600, something Windows can't do. I plugged in the hd, and in 3 hours I had everything working (Aside from X, svgalib does its job quite well in mplayer.) If he wanted X too, I could have that done in 30 minutes + compiling time (12 hours max).
Maybe it would take someone with an IQ as low as yours a week to install it, but for most of us, it doesn't.
Re:Sweet... by KentoNET · 2003-08-02 09:35 · Score: 1

Given your arguments, I find it difficult to believe you actually use Gentoo regularly. (I know this post is incredibly late...). Gentoo now has a genkernel script which can build a .config, kernel image and initrd all automagically. And also, revdep-update.sh (a new Portage addon) allows reverse dependencies of libraries and other packages (also including kernels) to be calculated and reinstalled if needed. Yes, it does still make you configure grub/lilo...

--
"You tried your best and failed miserably. The lesson is...never try. Heh!" -Homer
Re:Sweet... by jonadab · 2003-08-02 13:03 · Score: 1

Depends what you count as a major distro. Gentoo has the
2.5/2.6pre option I think. I suspect it's not what most people
choose yet, though. I didn't choose it. And it's several options
down the list of choices, IIRC, after the regular Gentoo sources,
the vanilla kernel.org sources, the server-oriented sources,
desktop/game-oriented sources, and maybe WOLK and a couple of
other options. Incidentally, ISTR that 2.2 was an option also. So,
to say "Gentoo uses the 2.6 kernel" without qualification would be
an overstatement.

--
Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
Re:Sweet... by jonadab · 2003-08-02 13:27 · Score: 1

> All in all, it just takes a good day to do, not weeks.

Depends. Depends on your connection, on how much you want to
install, and to a lesser extent on your system speed. It took
me several days, but I was installing over a shared dialup[1] and
had a number of packages I wanted to install (gnome-terminal[2]
has a lot of dependencies... so does DBD::mysql...), and I had
to work around other activities (such as going to work).

I did wimp out and use stage 3, though. If I'd have gone with
stage 1 I'm sure it would have taken somewhat longer.

ObTopic: I use Mandrake on my desktop, both at home and at work,
and on the whole I've been quite pleased with it. I'm not chomping
at the bit for 9.2, but as much as anything that's because the
version I have works. (At home, 9.1. At work, actually, I'm still
using 8.1, with upgrades to strategic packages (Mozilla, OO, Emacs,
and security updates), and honestly I don't feel compelled to
upgrade to 9.1 at work. I am glad I upgraded at home, though,
because the games have improved, and sound stuff, and other stuff
I don't use at work.)

As far as Linux 2.6, I'm looking forward to it, but at the same
time I'm hesitant to jump on it too soon. There are some features
in it that I want, but I'm afraid to try a x.x.n kernel where n is
a low number. It'd be different if I had a sandbox system to
just play with, but currently I don't, because I parted out my
old desktop and put half its parts in my new desktop and the other
half in a server. Such is the nature of living on a budget.

[1] Note: when doing this, make sure you're the one paying
the internet bill. My family would have rioted otherwise.
At one point, my dad was complaining about how long it was
taking to get his email; I told him I was emerging Emacs on
a PC downstairs, and he said that I should immerse it.

[2] I use gnome-terminal for remote administration, even on
headless systems, because of its terminal classes. This
way I can ssh into the remote system and have scripts that
launch terminals for various purposes which will each have
their own color scheme, their own icon, their own title,
and so forth -- so they're easy to recognise in my window
list. I generally use one of these for MySQL, one for CPAN,
one for tailing logs, and one for a regular shell prompt.
And I configure different appearances for these (especially
the shell prompt one) for each system. Helps me keep things
straight. That's worth some disk space.

--
Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
Re:Sweet... by jonadab · 2003-08-02 13:32 · Score: 2, Insightful

> Of course they could always include it as a 'try this if you dare'
> advanced feature

That's what Mandrake Cooker is all about. The regular Mandrake
distro is somewhat less bleeding-edge (though more cutting-edge
than some other distros), but Cooker is for testing alpha stuff.

--
Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
Re:Sweet... by DrXym · 2003-08-03 01:24 · Score: 1

But the thing is there is no 2.6.0. There are 2.6.0-test releases, but there is a way to go yet. Even Linus says as much. And if you read the kernel traffic & post halloween documents you'll see there are a lot of things that have not been fixed or tested, especially some of the less common drivers.

And drivers and stability are the two most important things dists are interested in. And just like the 2.4.x series it was only after several more iterations after 2.4.0 that both of these things are likely to be achieved for mass consumption. Mandrake might pick it up pretty quickly once 2.6.0 is out proper but I imagine that 2.4 is still going to be the mainstay of dists until they go through their next major iterations.

11 days late by peek-n-squeeze · 2003-08-02 02:28 · Score: 3, Funny

Beta 1 was put onto the mirrors on 22nd July. So by the time you read this, it'll be at beta2

--
"My dog needs new ears"

Re:11 days late by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 02:41 · Score: -1, Flamebait

WRONG! Beta 2 isn't supposed to come out until August 5th, and today is August 2nd. What a dumbass, thinking that the 5th comes before the 2nd.
Re:11 days late by jm.one · 2003-08-02 03:10 · Score: 2, Insightful

August 2nd + 11 days = ? oh it is so hard to understand so i`ll explain. July 22nd: Mandrake 9.2iisos where put on mandake ftps and mirrors. July 24th: the Mandrake website was updated so that day was "offical annouce" August 2nd: there`s a slashdot aricle claiming that mandrake9.2b1 was released today span between July 22nd and August 2nd is 11 days. i hope now you got it.

666 by iocc · 2003-08-02 02:32 · Score: -1, Offtopic

NcFTP 3.1.1 (Dec 23, 2001) by Mike Gleason (ncftp@ncftp.com).
Connecting to 194.71.11.77...

Swedish University Network SUNET
Archive ftp.sunet.se

Welcome to the ftp.sunet.se MkIV archive, which now resides on a
couple of alphaservers running TruCluster.

You may also use WWW (http://ftp.sunet.se/) to access this archive.

This system may be used 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

All transfers are logged with your host name and whatever you entered
for the password.

DISCLAIMER: Neither Uppsala University nor SUNET are liable for any use, storage or
transmission of any files stored on this archive.
If you have any problems or comments about this archive, please send
them via e-mail to archive@ftp.sunet.se. Please also let us know if
there is something we don't have that you think we should!

You are user number 666 of 3000 allowed.
... ohh PHEAR!

Unfinished product? by Scalli0n · 2003-08-02 02:34 · Score: -1, Insightful

- In RpmDrake, selection of package with the mouse doesn't work, one must use the keyboard.
- Due to unfinished new signature handling feature, RpmDrake complains about bad signature (Urpmi suffers from the same pain).

is mandrake trying to push an unfinished product on us? I realize it's a cooker, but these are minor glitches they can work out PDQ rather than giving new users a bad impression when they hit one of these problems.

--
Sig & Below
Yuck Fou

Re:Unfinished product? by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 02:37 · Score: 1, Insightful

It's a beta. Of course it's unfinished, they want you to help find bugs...
Re:Unfinished product? by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 02:39 · Score: 0

Beta 1 of many is an unfinished product? Gee, who knew?? Yes, there most certainly trying to push an unfinished product on you. In fact, I think they'll just release beta 1 as 9.2 final in the future. What a fucking tool.
Re:Unfinished product? by azzy · 2003-08-02 03:01 · Score: 3, Insightful

New users shouldn't be using a beta
Re:Unfinished product? by snoozerdss · 2003-08-02 03:16 · Score: 5, Informative

Mandrake Linux 9.2 Beta 1 has arrived to offer you the opportunity of an entertaining summer bug squashing. Ranking of this next Mandrake, as for level of refinement, is partly in your hands. Join forces with the Mandrake Development team! Install the Beta and send your reports. Remember however that this is an experimental distribution not suitable to everyday-tasks machines. Take care.

Thats from Mandrake's website.
Jeeze...RTFA next time. Or go look up the definition of BETA software.

--
Snoozer.
Re:Unfinished product? by rocjoe71 · 2003-08-02 03:27 · Score: 4, Funny

is mandrake trying to push an unfinished product on us?
Those *jerks*! The nerve of them shipping a BETA release with bugs in it.
And here I am, sitting around like a fool thinking "beta" was short for "betar than the final release".

--
Height: 38U, Weight: 0 Newtons, Eyes: #0000FF, OS: Gray Matter 1.0 (Alpha)
Re:Unfinished product? by G3ckoG33k · 2003-08-02 05:11 · Score: 1

Yup! IIRC, that was the strategy when 2.4.x came out too. Release the new series as a toy for early adopters, but with more frequent bug squashing as the serious agenda.

No, nothing more. Nothing less. Now, move on, here is nothing to see.
Re:Unfinished product? by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 10:32 · Score: 0

What (de) ga(u)ll(e)! Next thing you know, they'll be selling us beta software at hundreds of dollars a box, or forcing computer manufacturers to bundle it with their systems. Good thing honest American companies would never do that.

If you're running Redhat... by warmcat · 2003-08-02 02:35 · Score: 5, Informative

... note that this guy at redhat is tracking the test releases with redhat-installable RPMs, over RH9.

If you try it, note that you must upgrade modutils and some other packages given in the link. Many modules have changed names, like usb-ohci.o -> ohci-hcd.ko so you will need to do some screwing around. I have been running test1 then test2 for a couple of weeks from the link on top of Redhat 9 and it has been working very nicely.

Re:If you're running Redhat... by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 02:36 · Score: -1, Troll

Off FUCKING Topic, Nigger-kike
Re:If you're running Redhat... by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 03:59 · Score: 0

You're an idiot.
Re:If you're running Redhat... by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 05:59 · Score: 0

If like me you're so clumsy that you install this rpm with the -i arg, instead of -Uvh, and then find rpm failing with:
rpmdb: unable to join the environment error: db4 error(11) from dbenv->open: Systeembron tijdelijk niet beschikbaar error: cannot open Packages database in /var/lib/rpm
then simply execute "export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5" in bash, before you run rpm.
Next simply download an old kernel from rpmfind.net, and install it with the command "rpm -iv --force kernel-2.4.20-20.1.2013.nptl.i686.rpm". That should offer you the option to boot with the old kernel (so that, in my case, I can again access my reiserfs partitions), and still allow you to test 2.6.

The Mandrake Boycott (Please Read!) by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 02:36 · Score: -1, Troll

Dear fellow patriots: It is with great urgency and sincerity that I bring to your attention the Mandrake Boycott.

You may not be aware that Mandrake Linux is a French product. Indeed, you would never know because of their shallow attempts to conceal this fact. But a simple trip to the whois database can reveal the truth. Now, you and I would never spend our American dollars on French wine, and we would certainly never travel there. So, why should we support a French company? We shouldn't.

While talking out of one side of their mouth about peace and security, the French have been actively engaged with terrorist groups and terrorist nations to sabotage our efforts to secure our future. You can read about this here and here. The French have stabbed us in the back repeatedly and, driven by their jealousy of our great Nation, they have exposed themselves as the traitorus liars that we have always suspected. It is also widely known that Jacques Chirac was an active supporter and business partner of Saddam Hussein. This is well documented; you can learn more here and here.

The French are having a very difficult time because they are long past their colonial greatness and have descended to a chaotic socialist society of laziness and ineptitude. Rather than realistically assess their own blame and work to restore their own status, they seek to bring us down. They lash out at the great nations who now lead the world community. The French are a shallow people who resent with great bitterness those who saved them. In WW1 and WW2 we rescued the French after they surrended and allowed them to preserve their way of life. But who can forget that the French jeered and spit on our liberating forces, before the final shot had even been fired? For more information check here or here.

We must now teach the French a lesson, and it is for their own good. They should not bite the hand that saves them, for soon we may decide they are not worth saving anymore. Therefore I urge you to boycott Mandrake Linux. Of course it would not be American for me to tell you what to do. If you must use Mandrake, then use it. Simply do not pay for it.

Now that I have your attention, I would like to discuss the larger issue of Linux in general. It is time for us, fellow patriots, to look at our situation in the world on a global scale. Microsoft is an American company. Bill Gates started with nothing and built an empire. What is the problem here? We should be supporting American enterprise, not undermining it. The simple fact is that no true partiot would use Linux at all. In these hard times we must rally around our companies, our economy, and our president. If we let the 'Linux Community' have their way, we will all be at the mercy of the Germans making KDE, or the Japanese with their desktop. Do you plan to learn Japanese in the near future? You may have to, if we don't start poneying up to the bar and laying it down for our cause.

Thank you for your attention. I trust I have reached you with this message, and we all look forward to a world united under the flag of Freedom, Democracy, and the American Way.

Re:The Mandrake Boycott (Please Read!) by MuParadigm · 2003-08-02 02:38 · Score: -1, Redundant

Please, someone mod this shit down.
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (Please Read!) by gilesjuk · 2003-08-02 02:45 · Score: -1, Offtopic

Oh and the US has never had links to the IRA and never allowed the IRA to raise funds in the US.

Every nation has its dark secrets, France is a democracy like many others.

As for "being at the mercy" of a nation Linux and Open Source software is written worldwide. All each company does is package it up neatly. Is it any wonder people want a choice given how the US government has failed to tackle a huge monopoly like Microsoft? you might think Microsoft is good for the US but they quite often buy up companies laying off the workforce.
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (Please Read!) by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 02:47 · Score: -1, Offtopic

Please, someone mod this shit down.
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (Please Read!) by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 02:58 · Score: -1, Offtopic

Hahahahahaaa. What the fuck have you been smoking? I want to make sure I don't get any of it.
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (Please Read!) by confuseddasein · 2003-08-02 02:59 · Score: 1, Troll

Support Microsoft over Mandrake? Why, just because the French are percieved as snobby? Setting the merits of their respective products aside for the moment, which company would you say is more honest and a better corporate citizen? As far as their products go, which OS is more secure? If you can't see past your hatred of the French, why not support Red Hat instead of Microsoft? After all, choosing Microsoft over Linux is like choosing slavery over freedom.
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (Please Read!) by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 03:13 · Score: 0

Now go away, or I shall taunt you a second time you silly english k-nnnnniggets..... Fetchez la vache!
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (Please Read!) by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 03:16 · Score: 0

YHBT, you stupid FUCKING idiot. YHL. HAN FUCKING D.
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (Please Read!) by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 03:19 · Score: 0

aj@teinixxx:~$ whois boycott-mandrake.com

Whois Server Version 1.3

Domain names in the .com and .net domains can now be registered
with many different competing registrars. Go to http://www.internic.net
for detailed information.

No match for "BOYCOTT-MANDRAKE.COM".

Can you spell T-R-O-L-L?
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (Please Read!) by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 03:23 · Score: 0

Can you spell S-A-T-I-R-E?

Anyone who took that shit seriously is a TOTAL MORON.
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (Please Read!) by Telex4 · 2003-08-02 03:48 · Score: 0, Offtopic

Dear fellow patriots ...
we all look forward to a world united under the flag of Freedom, Democracy, and the American Way

I hate to burst your bubble here, but is the American Way, led by the principles of freedom and democracy and free market capitalism, to give people the freedom to choose what they want? To let the market decide which products are bad and which are good? To engage other nations in dialogue and promote the values of liberty and democracy?

Was America not won from the British, supported industrially, and motivated ideologically by the French? Did these two countries not have a very good relationship for hundreds of years?

Oh, sorry, when you say The American Way, what you mean is the Neo-Colonial Conservative way, that belies instead in the preservation of successful American private enterprise for its own sake, the flattening of all who disagree with you, the curtailment of civil liberties and outright arrogance, and the selective use of tariffs to protect American industry against foreign competition, regardless of what you tell the rest of the world to do.
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (Please Read!) by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 03:52 · Score: 0

The French are having a very difficult time because they are long past their colonial greatness and have descended to a chaotic socialist society of laziness and ineptitude.

The British and the Spannish are long past their colonial greatness. The French never had any. Please be more careful with your facts in future.
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (Please Read!) by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 03:59 · Score: -1, Troll

Shut up you fat basterd. No one likes you anyway.
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (Please Read!) by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 04:21 · Score: 0

Boycott Mandrake and support Microsoft for more Freedom.

Contradictory, isn't it ? :)
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (Please Read!) by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 05:01 · Score: 0

Finally someone understood! I modded that +1 funny earlier
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (Please Read!) by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 05:29 · Score: 0

Surely you are kidding yourself, turn off the am radio man. While the French had dealings with Saddam, what about our deals with the Taliban for running a pipeline through Afghanistan? What about us supporting Saddam back when he was gassing his own people. In fact, I willing to bet that you don't even know that when Saddam gassed his own people, the U.N. had a vote to Censure Iraq, and guess who vetoed it? The U.S. did, how is that for supporting an evil regime. My point is that, Sure the French have and will Fuck up, but so do we, and like Ghandi said , " An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind."

Secondly are we in the U.S. so short sighted as to think we are the only people who can have a decision as to who we will and will not buy from? This is a two way street and the more we piss off the rest of the world the more they can tell us to
take a hike and buy products from other places. I can't imagine that the current Administrations attitude torward the rest of the world won't hurt our own exports.
I hope your not expecting Limpbaugh, Orielly or Hannity to offer you a helping hand when you need it.
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (Please Read!) by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 05:48 · Score: 0

You're not a patriot. You're a fucking Fox News watching neocon.
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (Please Read!) by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 05:50 · Score: 0

On that note, I'm gonna go out to Trader Joe's and buy some imported Camembert cheese just to piss you off.
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (Please Read!) by Centinel · 2003-08-02 06:17 · Score: 2, Insightful

Pretty hard to boycott something you can't even buy
Mandrake 9.1 isn't available from any vendors listed on PriceGrabber.com, and I doubt 9.2 will be either.
Face it, Mandrake's US channel sales suck.
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (Please Read!) by common_sence · 2003-08-02 06:49 · Score: 1

Buy from the Mandrake store directly. Problem solved.

--
sig? No thanks, I don't smoke.
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (Please Read!) by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 06:56 · Score: 0

people can get pissed about this but i think it's one of the funniest things i've read in ages.

the way the author tied governmental decisions and oplitics to a little company making a product is beautiful--it's exactly what boycotts are all about, trying to put pressure on the government from the inside.

of course, it's hard not to notice that the american administration "sexed up" the war on iraq, etc...and france claimed that all the way. certainly appears to be the case.

and in these troubled times, my fellow countryman, let us not forget that greatest of all gifts the french have bestowed upon the westarn world, oral sex. for that reason alone, i will buy a german beer today, watch some japanese anime, and boot up my mandrake 9.1 install.

vive la [dif]france!
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (Please Read!) by antiMStroll · 2003-08-02 07:04 · Score: 2, Funny

In this day and age of slapdash, sophmoric, poorly crafted trolls, it's a rare pleasure to find an artiste of your stature craft a world-class gem such as you've graced us with today. Patriotism, xenophobic rants, feux anti-capitalist baiting, dead and foreign language links, you wield them as a master wields the foil. Sir, I salute you and your unwavering determination to rise to the top of your field.
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (Please Read!) by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 08:40 · Score: 0

He's probably a neocon Jew or Christian Zionist redneck who thinks the whole world should bow down and worship Israel, and he's pissed because the French told the US to fuck off because they weren't interested in making the world safe for Israel

KDE menu lacking by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 02:37 · Score: -1, Offtopic

Mandrake, please, please leave stuff in the menus alone!
From version to version you always change what's on the KDE menus, I use a program and now it's gone, then wait! It's back next version, please leave it alone!
Please make security updates easy, one RPM, some click on a link, notify by e-mail with a link, when I click on it it launches a program that verifies a PGP sig for you and then installs a RPM and we are all updated, would blow away MS for security! and make sure the security patches don't crash anything, just minor adjustments NOT TOTAL PROGRAM UPDATES!! get it?
and get Xine working better, thanks

Why is this on the front page? by groove10 · 2003-08-02 02:37 · Score: 3, Insightful

I know a lot of people use Mandrake (myself included), but really is it necessary to annouce the beta version of a point release? C'mon... Not that many people are interested in burning the ISOs for a b1. When the point release comes out of beta, then maybe it deserves a front page article, but this is just wasted space on /.s front page.

--
MMORPG fan-boy? Prove your worth

Re:Why is this on the front page? by OS24Ever · 2003-08-02 03:13 · Score: 1

Maybe because it's kernal 2.6 usage instead of YAPR (yet another point release)

Maybe that's why redhat just went from 8 to 9 , they want to be on the front page of Slashdot!

--
As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.
Re:Why is this on the front page? by questamor · 2003-08-02 04:19 · Score: 1

More than a "Mandrake has updated" or "Look at this new point release" this is a "the 2.6 kernel is finally out and being used by AverageUser!" story.

That being said, if we have another dozen stories where every other distro releases a 2.6 kernel standard then I might go postal... but not yet :)
Re:Why is this on the front page? by antiMStroll · 2003-08-02 06:40 · Score: 4, Funny

What part of 'News for Nerds' do you find confusing?
Re:Why is this on the front page? by Vellmont · 2003-08-02 06:54 · Score: 1

"the 2.6 kernel is finally out and being used by AverageUser!" story.
Hardly... this is only the second test version of 2.6 that started in July. The 2.4 release had 12 test versions that stretched from May to December. This is simply an optional kernel included with Mandrake. Linus himself has previously asked that distributors include a test 2.6 kernel option to encourage more testing.

--
AccountKiller

Missing option by vidnet · 2003-08-02 02:38 · Score: 1

ftp.sunet.se _is_ my favorite mirror.

Oh, never mind.

Re:Missing option by jonadab · 2003-08-02 13:37 · Score: 1

> ftp.sunet.se _is_ my favorite mirror

Yes, but the "your favorite mirror" part isn't supposed to be
evaluated unless ftp.sunet.se returns undef, because the or will
short-circuit. HTH.HAND.

--
Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
Re:Missing option by vidnet · 2003-08-03 00:35 · Score: 1

Crap, did I just admit to using VB?
Re:Missing option by jonadab · 2003-08-03 12:16 · Score: 1

> > Yes, but the "your favorite mirror" part isn't supposed to
> > be evaluated unless ftp.sunet.se returns undef, because the
> > or will short-circuit. HTH.HAND.
>
> Crap, did I just admit to using VB?

Dunno about you, but my comment indicated Perlish thinking.
It's a standard idiom in Perl to do something like this...
open FOO, ">somefile" or die "Cannot write somefile: $!";
The program won't die unless the open fails somehow, because
or (like its higher-precedence cousin ||) short-circuits. If
you couldn't tell I was thinking in Perl, you must not be in
the habbit of reading signatures ;-)

As far as VB, I haven't used that since college. Version 3 IIRC.
I never considered it to be a programming language, so much as a
GUI macro toolkit for Windows. (Not that such a toolkit is a bad
thing to have around... but I never squeezed it into my budget.)

--
Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
Re:Missing option by vidnet · 2003-08-04 02:21 · Score: 1

Indeed. VB has the ugly habbit of not short circuiting conditional statements (I'm a java guy dammit!)
And was your signature perl? I thought the article was corrupted :p
Re:Missing option by jonadab · 2003-08-05 14:26 · Score: 1

> And was your signature perl? I thought the article was corrupted

Yes, a Java guy wouldn't understand my signature, because it
uses closures. A lisp programmer might understand better.

--
Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.

test kernels by Tirel · 2003-08-02 02:40 · Score: 4, Insightful

Don't be fooled by labels such as "beta" and "test", I've been running 2.6.0-test1-mm2 on a server for about a week now and it's extremely stable. If you need any of the features that the 2.6 branch introduces or if you just want to try it out, mandrake is the way to go.

OTOH, the only thing I dislike about mandrake is that they force KDE down your throat like it's the next best thing after bread and butter, I really wish they would include mode optinons at install like wm2, ion, openbox, icewm, but also install the qt and gtk libs in the background so you could run gnome/kde applications. That way more people would find out about the alternatives to KDE (it's too distracting and relativealy slow for my tastes.)

Re:test kernels by groove10 · 2003-08-02 02:45 · Score: 1

Since I'm too lazy to go look at the changelog, could you tell me what's changed with the 2.6 kernel? I'm no kernel hacker, so put it in basic sysadmin terms if ya don't mind. Thanks.

--
MMORPG fan-boy? Prove your worth
Re:test kernels by Tirel · 2003-08-02 02:49 · Score: 5, Informative

read this
Re:test kernels by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 02:58 · Score: 0

Thank you
Re:test kernels by leviramsey · 2003-08-02 03:25 · Score: 1

Though Buchan has beat me to it, if you don't want KDE or GNOME, do a minimal install with urpmi, and then you can get most of the wm's you've listed from Mandrake contribs with urpmi.
Re:test kernels by Azureflare · 2003-08-02 03:45 · Score: 2, Insightful

Most Newbs who will be using that package selection during the install (i.e. not selecting individual packages) aren't going to want to muck around with the more complicated interfaces (Hey, I think it's complicated, and I'm a newb...kde and gnome are reassuring, because they are more like windows than the others. I like the speed of icewm, but config of toolbar/menu is a pain, and KDE is just so much easier.)
I think KDE is a good newbie GUI, and it's pretty effective for the average user. If you include all the window managers (A heck of a lot) it will only confuse the user. Limiting it to two good, solid GUIs that are very user-friendly, especially to people coming from windows/mac, is a good idea on Mandrake's part. If you're a pro, you should be using individual package selection. There's no other way to tailor a distro to an individual's tastes, since everyone is different.
Re:test kernels by pa-guy · 2003-08-02 03:58 · Score: 1

Mandrake started life as an offshoot of RH that included kde. It should be no surprise that kde is the default. There are also a whole pile of alternative window managers with it. Just install the one you want.....
Re:test kernels by usotsuki · 2003-08-02 04:18 · Score: 1

How about Themed and Unthemed FVWM2, they seem pretty simple for a n00b... ;)

-uso.
Raised on GS/OS

--
Dreams, dreams, don't doubt dreams, dreaming children's dreaming dreams. Sailor Moon SS
Re:test kernels by Read+Icculus · 2003-08-02 07:46 · Score: 1

If you do a minimal install make sure that you check the "with documentation" option if you ever plan on needing the man pages and any type of /usr/share/doc files. If you choose to not install the docs you will be screwed if you try to install man or rute or anything along those lines. At least this was the case as of 9.1, maybe it's fixed in this release?

--
Anti-social? My code is just platform-specific.
Re:test kernels by rootyard · 2003-08-02 22:56 · Score: 1

Did you know that you don't have to run KDE if you don't want to?

The Mandrake Boycott (IMPORTANT!) by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 02:40 · Score: -1, Troll

Dear fellow patriots: It is with great urgency and sincerity that I bring to your attention the Mandrake Boycott.

You may not be aware that Mandrake Linux is a French product. Indeed, you would never know because of their shallow attempts to conceal this fact. But a simple trip to the whois database can reveal the truth. Now, you and I would never spend our American dollars on French wine, and we would certainly never travel there. So, why should we support a French company? We shouldn't.

While talking out of one side of their mouth about peace and security, the French have been actively engaged with terrorist groups and terrorist nations to sabotage our efforts to secure our future. You can read about this here and here. The French have stabbed us in the back repeatedly and, driven by their jealousy of our great Nation, they have exposed themselves as the traitorus liars that we have always suspected. It is also widely known that Jacques Chirac was an active supporter and business partner of Saddam Hussein. This is well documented; you can learn more here and here.

The French are having a very difficult time because they are long past their colonial greatness and have descended to a chaotic socialist society of laziness and ineptitude. Rather than realistically assess their own blame and work to restore their own status, they seek to bring us down. They lash out at the great nations who now lead the world community. The French are a shallow people who resent with great bitterness those who saved them. In WW1 and WW2 we rescued the French after they surrended and allowed them to preserve their way of life. But who can forget that the French jeered and spit on our liberating forces, before the final shot had even been fired? For more information check here or here.

We must now teach the French a lesson, and it is for their own good. They should not bite the hand that saves them, for soon we may decide they are not worth saving anymore. Therefore I urge you to boycott Mandrake Linux. Of course it would not be American for me to tell you what to do. If you must use Mandrake, then use it. Simply do not pay for it.

Now that I have your attention, I would like to discuss the larger issue of Linux in general. It is time for us, fellow patriots, to look at our situation in the world on a global scale. Microsoft is an American company. Bill Gates started with nothing and built an empire. What is the problem here? We should be supporting American enterprise, not undermining it. The simple fact is that no true partiot would use Linux at all. In these hard times we must rally around our companies, our economy, and our president. If we let the 'Linux Community' have their way, we will all be at the mercy of the Germans making KDE, or the Japanese with their desktop. Do you plan to learn Japanese in the near future? You may have to, if we don't start poneying up to the bar and laying it down for our cause...

Thank you for your attention. I trust I have reached you with this message, and we all look forward to a world united under the flag of Freedom, Democracy, and the American Way.

Re:The Mandrake Boycott (IMPORTANT!) by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 02:47 · Score: 1, Insightful

You sir are an idiot. I am American, a Marine, and a patriot. Mandrake is a great product.
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (IMPORTANT!) by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 03:00 · Score: 0

Craig?? Is that you?
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (IMPORTANT!) by PeteQC · 2003-08-02 03:13 · Score: 5, Insightful

The simple fact is that no true partiot would use Linux at all. In these hard times we must rally around our companies, our economy, and our president. If we let the 'Linux Community' have their way, we will all be at the mercy of the Germans making KDE, or the Japanese with their desktop.

What are you saying? Oh no, there's other country outside USA... We should not help them. Yeah, they should buy US products, but please don't buy their products?

And after that, people will still be amazed that there could be an anti-american feeling in the old countries...

--
Montreal - Best city to live in!
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (IMPORTANT!) by tytanic11 · 2003-08-02 03:27 · Score: 0

how the fuck does this shit get on slashdot ?! Sure Mandrake is a French product - but your computer was probbably made in China too. The French might not have wanted to get involved in a war, but they are not involved in terrorisim. Linux is un american ?! allowing one company control over your desktop and what you do on it is un American. (if this post was a joke, i probbably look like an idiot now, and for that I apoligize)
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (IMPORTANT!) by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 03:43 · Score: 0

You, sir, are the idiot. Stupid fucking slashbots. How could so many of you bite such an obvious troll... and then get modded up for it?

Slashdot sucks.
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (IMPORTANT!) by coats · 2003-08-02 03:54 · Score: 4, Interesting

The simple fact is that no true partiot would use Linux at all. In these hard times we must rally around our companies, our economy, and our president... What are you saying? Oh no, there's other country outside USA...

One of the most profound students of "what is different about America was the Frenchman, Alexis de Tocqueville. I*n his book Democracy in America describing what makes American culture distinctive, he said that the inclination of Americans to form informal, community-based non-government, non-corporate associations in order to do the projects the community needs. Volunteer fireman associations are but one common example.
And now the Internet has expanded the notion of community past walking-distance geographic boundaries, has expanded those needed community projects to include Linux, Apache, and the like, and has exported the whole volunteer community association idea to the world.
The sad thing is that now big government and corporatism -- and collusion between the two -- are destroying that uniquely American practice of volunteer community associations at home!

--
"My opinions are my own, and I've got *lots* of them!"
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (IMPORTANT!) by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 03:56 · Score: 0

The French might not have wanted to get involved in a war, but they are not involved in terrorisim.

What about the Rainbow Warrior? Or don't you count covertly blowing up manned civilian ships as an act of terrorism?
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (IMPORTANT!) by MuParadigm · 2003-08-02 05:01 · Score: 1

To say that the French are terrorists because of some random French idiots is kind of like saying Americans are terrorists because of Timothy McVeigh and the Unabomber.

God, I must be bored. I'm talking to trolls.
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (IMPORTANT!) by WindBourne · 2003-08-02 05:14 · Score: 2, Interesting

I am a fool, but...
Now that I have your attention, I would like to discuss the larger issue of Linux in general. It is time for us, fellow patriots, to look at our situation in the world on a global scale. Microsoft is an American company. Bill Gates started with nothing and built an empire. What is the problem here?
Bill Gates father is a high-end corporate attorney. Bill grew up in a house that would be the == of somebody makeing > 7 figures today. In fact, Bill's father funded much of the early work. That is the fact.
There are many american enterprises that are failing due to MS's tactics.

We should be supporting American enterprise, not undermining it. The simple fact is that no true partiot would use Linux at all. In these hard times we must rally around our companies, our economy, and our president.
And the www.whitehouse.gov runs what? The software that is sold to the CIA/NSA/Home Seucrity requires what? Say the word; Linux. Even the DOD is now moving to Linux as their base.
I agree about the economy. As such, our companies that have to move forward, but can not spend money wastefully, have all moved to Linux and are getting profits. Google, Amazon, Walmart, and Lowes are either running Linux or are moving to it (quietly).
I find it ironic that you are pushing MS when the net is horribly slow due to something aimed straight at its black heart. Likewise, the fact that Ridge had to issue a national security alert yesterday about it.
And this disregards the fact that MS IIS systems account for less than 25% of web servers and yet have nearly 100% of the credit card thefts (normally American CC's; These could be used by terrorist to further blow us up).

If we let the 'Linux Community' have their way, we will all be at the mercy of the Germans making KDE, or the Japanese with their desktop. Do you plan to learn Japanese in the near future? You may have to, if we don't start poneying up to the bar and laying it down for our cause...
hummm.... free enterprise sounds like a good cause. If they are better, well.....

I hate the fact that I even took a second to answer back, but man, oh man...

--
I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (IMPORTANT!) by Chicane-UK · 2003-08-02 05:16 · Score: 1

Holy cow... Microsoft must be getting desperate. They are really scraping the barrel with these AC anti-linux trolls on Slashdot! :)

--
"Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (IMPORTANT!) by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 05:28 · Score: -1, Flamebait

Mandrake is a great product.

Maybe, but they're owned and run by fucking pussy frogs. That's the point.
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (IMPORTANT!) by rking · 2003-08-02 05:52 · Score: 1

To say that the French are terrorists because of some random French idiots is kind of like saying Americans are terrorists because of Timothy McVeigh and the Unabomber.

Well, the French certainly aren't the only western country to have a history of state sponsored terrorist acts but the "random idiots" who destroyed the Rainbow Warrior in New Zealand's waters and caused one death (it could easily have been more, others managed to escape) were working for the French government.

I don't think any court has officially concluded that the French Government were responsible but I think you'd have to be fairly gullible to doubt it. Undeniably those convicted were agents of the French Government. Being as generous as possible to the French Government you'd have to say that commissioned officers that they assigned to assist their security forces were people who planted bombs in their spare time.

I'm sure you can dig up serious wrong doing by most powerful countries though. And that doesn't justify it of course.
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (IMPORTANT!) by antiMStroll · 2003-08-02 06:49 · Score: 1

......Japanese with their desktop.
The Japanese with their one desktop?!?!? +5 Funny!
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (IMPORTANT!) by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 07:21 · Score: 0

You, sir, have been trolled. :)
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (IMPORTANT!) by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 08:08 · Score: 0

And I am sure you can dig up enough evidence of the US supporting innumerable terrorist groups in Latin America, Africa, Asia and Europe. US also has the distinction of beiong condemned by the International court.
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (IMPORTANT!) by rking · 2003-08-02 09:06 · Score: 1

And I am sure you can dig up enough evidence of the US supporting innumerable terrorist groups in Latin America, Africa, Asia and Europe.

Agreed.
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (IMPORTANT!) by MuParadigm · 2003-08-02 10:32 · Score: 1

Offtopic, but...

Thanks for the link. That's actually a pretty interesting article and I wasn't aware of the French Secret Services responsibility for that particular act.
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (IMPORTANT!) by rking · 2003-08-02 11:19 · Score: 1

Oh yes, definitely offtopic, and I'm not supporting a boycott of Mandrake or whatever :)

It's mainly interesting to me as a relatively clear cut example of a Western government doing something very wrong, apparently just to prevent a civilian group from embarrasing them. (Incidentally, in a world where tens of thousands can get killed in a terrorist attack or a retaliation it's hard to find words to describe an attack like this where "only" one person died that doesn't sound like either hyperbole or ridiculously weak).

I think the moral of the story is that whilst you don't want to fall for every conspiracy theory going that governments do need watching, and I certainly wouldn't limit that to the French Government.
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (IMPORTANT!) by crusher-1 · 2003-08-02 20:41 · Score: 1

Urah! Semper Fi! :)

Troll boy just forgot to take his lithium. :)
Re:The Mandrake Boycott (IMPORTANT!) by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-03 01:32 · Score: 0

You're from Adequacy, aren't you?

Nice try tho.

Does anyone know of old archives of Mandrake 6.1 ? by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 02:40 · Score: -1, Offtopic

ibiblio.org only has the latest. Mandrakelinux.com wants me to pay. I just want the 6.1 .iso files.

Anger problem. by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 02:42 · Score: -1, Offtopic

MENTAL ILLNESS ALERT: The parent poster has an anger problem.

Re:Anger problem. by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 03:30 · Score: -1, Offtopic

No shit? Thanks for the info Captain Obvious.
Re:Anger problem. by Grizzlysmit · 2003-08-02 16:33 · Score: 1

How'd you notice :-)

--
in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
Francis Smit

More mental illness by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 02:44 · Score: -1, Offtopic

More mental illness: Anger problem.

ANGER PROBLEM again by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 02:48 · Score: -1, Troll

ANGER PROBLEM. Note to the person who posted the parent comment: Please take your mental problems somewhere they can be helped.

Re:ANGER PROBLEM again by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 03:03 · Score: 0

You mean... you won't help me?

Join the America religion now. Worship the U.S. by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 02:51 · Score: -1, Troll

Join the America religion now: America is a religion

Don't post to stories you don by Futurepower(R) · 2003-08-02 02:54 · Score: 3, Insightful

Please don't post to stories that you don't think are interesting. If you do, you will just post uninteresting comments. A new release of a beta of linux version is very important. That's how the news reaches those who would beta test. I'm very interested in knowing what to expect, even if I don't test the beta.

Re:Don't post to stories you don by hkmwbz · 2003-08-02 04:45 · Score: 1

Hear, hear! I don't even know what to say about people who don't want to read about something, but still post comments about it!
This is Slashdot. The editors will post whatever they feel like. You can even filter it out if you want to. There is no reason to whine about stories like this.
And a new release of Mandrake will indeed be interesting to a lot of people. It shows that troubled Mandrake is still up and running, working on future versions of their distribution.
Spam apologists and story whiners are two of the worst things about Slashdot. Quit promoting spam, and quit crying like a baby because someone posted a story you didn't like.
So you don't approve of a story posted on Slashdot? Tough luck. Maybe you should go and read some other site instead.
Anyway, commenting on stories you aren't interested in in the first place just goes to show that you need to get out more. Get off Slashdot and get a life.
HTH. HAND.

--
Clever signature text goes here.
Re:Don't post to stories you don by Vellmont · 2003-08-02 06:32 · Score: 1

I think his objection is that it was posted to the Front Page of slashdot. It should have been posted to something like Developers, as it's really not big enough news for a front page story IMO.

--
AccountKiller

Moderations from the short bus by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 02:58 · Score: 0

Episode 90127:

In this episode, the moderators mod a stupid post insightful. Even though it seems this has been done a million times before, they never tire of it. I don't know what they were thinking.

0 stars

Re:Moderations from the short bus by alienhazard · 2003-08-02 03:05 · Score: 0

crap! I used up all my mod points yesterday, so now I can't mod your post insightful or informative...

--
> "I allege that SCO is full of it" -Linus
Re:Moderations from the short bus by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 06:47 · Score: 0

I don't know what they were thinking.
Just killing time during recess?

What, 16 alternative WMs too few? by buchanmilne · 2003-08-02 03:11 · Score: 5, Interesting

OTOH, the only thing I dislike about mandrake is that they force KDE down your throat like it's the next best thing after bread and butter, I really wish they would include mode optinons at install like wm2, ion, openbox, icewm, but also install the qt and gtk libs in the background so you could run gnome/kde applications.

$ cat /etc/mandrake-release
Mandrake Linux release 9.2 (Cooker) for i586
$ urpmq --sources enlightenment windowmaker blackbox xfce olvwm waimea AfterStep amiwm evilwm fluxbox fvwm fvwm2 ion ion-metadome pwm ratpoison rox-session swm
ftp://ftp.cae.co.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/ Mandr ake/RPMS/enlightenment-0.16.5-13mdk.i586.rpm
ftp: //ftp.cae.co.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS/WindowMaker-0.80.2-4mdk.i586.rpm
ftp://f tp.cae.co.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS/blackbox-0.65.0-1mdk.i586.rpm
ftp://ftp. cae.co.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS/xfce-3.8.18-1mdk.i586.rpm
ftp://ftp.cae. co.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS2/swm-1.2.5-3mdk.i586.rpm
ftp://ftp.cae.c o.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS2/fvwm2-2.4.16-2mdk.i586.rpm
ftp://ftp.ca e.co.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS2/amiwm-0.20.48-6mdk.i586.rpm
ftp://ftp.c ae.co.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS2/waimea-0.4.0-3mdk.i586.rpm
ftp://ftp.ca e.co.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS2/olvwm-4.4-14mdk.i586.rpm
ftp://ftp.cae. co.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS2/AfterStep-1.8.11-3mdk.i586.rpm
ftp://ft p.cae.co.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS2/ratpoison-1.2.2-2mdk.i586.rpm
ftp://ftp .cae.co.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS2/fluxbox-0.9.4-2mdk.i586.rpm
ftp://ftp.c ae.co.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS2/pwm-1.0-11mdk.i586.rpm
ftp://ftp.cae.co .za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS2/ion-metadome-20020605-3mdk.i586.rpm
ftp ://ftp.cae.co.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS2/evilwm-0.99.14-1mdk.i586.rpm
ftp://ftp. cae.co.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS2/fvwm-1.24r-23mdk.i586.rpm
ftp://ftp.cae .co.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS2/ion-20030627-3mdk.i586.rpm
ftp://ftp.ca e.co.za/pub/mandrake/cooker/i586/Mandr ake/RPMS2/rox-session-0.1.20-1mdk.i586.rpm

(this is our internal mirror, find your own)

Is that enough? (oh, there's still qvwm in PLF, since it looks too similar to some other desktop we know).

Mandrake has never forced a desktop on anyone, and all you need to enjoy the Mandrake configuration tools is gtk+2 and perl.

Sure, not all the window managers are in the main distro, but without contrib, you're missing half of the distro anyway!

Re:What, 16 alternative WMs too few? by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 03:20 · Score: 0

well correct me if i'm wrong (the last mandrake i used was 8.0), but the install defaults to KDM and KDE, without asking you which WM you would like. I admit that it has been a while and things might have changed though.
Re:What, 16 alternative WMs too few? by buchanmilne · 2003-08-02 03:29 · Score: 4, Informative

Sure, the default is KDE, usually with GNOME also (would you prefer newbies straight from Windows to be dumped into ion?), but you can uncheck KDE and GNOME during installation in the main package selection (this has been the case as long as I can remember, so at least since 7.0), and installing a different one is trivial. Plus, they all work out-the-box from whichever display manager you use, and most of them have the consistent Mandrake menus throughout.

If you don't want KDE, all you have to do is uncheck one pretty obvious checkbox ...
Re:What, 16 alternative WMs too few? by coats · 2003-08-02 03:40 · Score: 1

Yes, but does fvwm actually work?
Under MDK 9.0, at least, there were serious focus problems that kept you from being able to use it ;-(

--
"My opinions are my own, and I've got *lots* of them!"
Re:What, 16 alternative WMs too few? by Arker · 2003-08-02 04:05 · Score: 1

Sure, the default is KDE, usually with GNOME also (would you prefer newbies straight from Windows to be dumped into ion?)

KDE AND Gnome?

I'd prefer they be started with something sensible that doesn't cause them to think 'Linux is slow and bloated' right off the bat, frankly.

IceWM maybe. Personally I prefer WindowMaker, but Ice is probably better for the folks that have never used anything but windows. Either way, if they'd put half the time they spend on KDE and Gnome into a sensible default setup with a WM that doesn't require a supercomputer to run at a decent speed, I think it would give a better initial impression to most newbies.

Instead, these things are left exclusively for those of us that know about them, know how to find them and how to configure them on our own time, while the newbies are being given a very bad impression of Linux, if they try to install it on anything but a brand new box at least.

--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
Re:What, 16 alternative WMs too few? by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 04:38 · Score: 0

This is Mandrake's endless problem, quality control. They constantly do releases just to get them out the door (since after all, they're going out of business RSN, unless they put out new product and get more suckers to sign up for the useless mandrake club).
They ship distros with half the stuff not working, and never issue fixes. Instead the "fix" is to get the new distro release.
Case in point: Mandrake 9.1, out for several months, still no fix for the XFree crash when logging out when using a Radeon card. (Like nobody has a Radeon card or something).
Case in point: don't bother installing AbiWord, as it will fuck up all your fonts.
Case in point: under 9.0, change your font settings and all fonts get set back to whatever the first font was in your font list, regardless of your choice. Pretty useless.
Re:What, 16 alternative WMs too few? by jbolden · 2003-08-02 04:59 · Score: 1

In general very new computer users tend to care more about ease of use than speed. More importantly the application they often run the most, web browsing against multimedia intensive sites, is very demanding by PC standards. Quite simply beginner, modern and light have become one of those "pick 2" type choices in design.
Re:What, 16 alternative WMs too few? by Arker · 2003-08-02 05:13 · Score: 1

And just how do you figure that Ice with the menus and basic configuration setup would be harder to use?

I think the opposite is the case. The sort of bloat typical of commercial distros defaults these days are usability nightmares that not only bog the machine down but also bog the users brain down. The easiest way to make a machine easy to use is with a simple and consistent interface that doesn't have too many artifacts simultaneously crying for attention.

--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
Re:What, 16 alternative WMs too few? by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 06:10 · Score: 0

I have an older Radeon card (64MB Vivo DDR) and I'm running mdk 9.1 with no issues. Maybe I haven't logged out since I installed it :)
Re:What, 16 alternative WMs too few? by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 06:46 · Score: 0

KDE AND Gnome?

I'd prefer they be started with something sensible that doesn't cause them to think 'Linux is slow and bloated' right off the bat, frankly.

IceWM maybe.

I just installed Mandrake 9.1 in my second computer the other day. Guess which window manager was installed apart from KDE 3?
Re:What, 16 alternative WMs too few? by Read+Icculus · 2003-08-02 07:33 · Score: 1

WTF? I've got a Radeon 9700 that works just fine with MDK 9.1. But I will agree that certain programs included with 9.1 are more buggy than I would like. GNOME and Nautilus for example will crash/lockup constantly on both of the Dell test boxes I've used, and some contrib packages seem to be straight out screwed-up. However even with it's faults I still think that MDK is the best newbie-friendly distro out there. Easy configuration and ease of use are a good addition to the distro pool.

--
Anti-social? My code is just platform-specific.
Re:What, 16 alternative WMs too few? by buchanmilne · 2003-08-02 08:21 · Score: 3, Insightful

I'd prefer they be started with something sensible that doesn't cause them to think 'Linux is slow and bloated' right off the bat, frankly.

Remember that the competition now isn't Windows 3.11, it's Windows XP. We don't need to worry about bloat too much by default, but we are behind on features and usability.

If speed was all that mattered, why don't we just give them twm, mutt, links and vi?

Sorry, but there is no way you can put ice up against WindowsXP for a newbie, but you can with KDE, and maybe the latest GNOME release.

I think it would give a better initial impression to most newbies.

Riiight. Why can't I drag and drop to the desktop? Where is my "My Documents?", "Where is my CD-ROM drive?", "Why is the text in the menus so ugly?. Maybe 7 years ago, before Windows 98 ice could have competed with Windows ...

Instead, these things are left exclusively for those of us that know about them, know how to find them and how to configure them on our own time, while the newbies are being given a very bad impression of Linux

No, the people at mandrakeusers.org, mandrakeclub.com etc will quickly set them right.

if they try to install it on anything but a brand new box at least.

KDE plus OpenOffice.org plus Mozilla plus a few more utilities run just great on my 800 Duron which is now 3 years old (assuming you have about 192MB ram or more). My girlfriends 366 Celeron/128MB ram machine is a bit slow, but not noticably slower (except OpenOffice.org startup) than it was running Windows98.
Re:What, 16 alternative WMs too few? by FeeDBaCK · 2003-08-02 08:26 · Score: 1

Do you really think beginners are picking up Linux in droves? Most people I know switching from Windows to Linux are quite technical people. I don't see too many Joe Rednecks out installing Mandrake Cooker. You also have to remember that "modern" does not equal "eye candy crap that has real addition to functionality" such as semi-transparent menus and other junk.

--
wolf31o2 Developer, Gentoo Linux Games Team
Re:What, 16 alternative WMs too few? by jonadab · 2003-08-02 13:47 · Score: 1

> GNOME and Nautilus for example will crash/lockup constantly on
> both of the Dell test boxes I've used

Nautilus is buggy. I removed it from my Gnome session and the
result was improved performance and stability. If you must use
a graphical file manager, there's gmc, but I prefer to do my file
management from the commandline anyway.

Another option is to use the gnome-panel (and possible a Gnome
window manager, such as sawfish) without the whole gnome-session.
But I found that just removing Nautilus solved my problems.
(This issue is not unique to Gnome; the file manager is a very
significant source of instability on Win32 also. That may or
may not be a coincidence. Unfortunately, removing the file
manager in Win32 is somewhat less practical than in Gnome because
then (among other things) where would your panel be? (There is
LiteStep, but that's hardly an improvement IMO).)

--
Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
Re:What, 16 alternative WMs too few? by jonadab · 2003-08-02 14:12 · Score: 1

> KDE AND Gnome?

Yes and no. The default is to _install_ both of them (so that you
can use the apps from both), but only to launch one of them for
any given session; I believe the default is to launch KDE. Having
Gnome also installed only consumes disk space, not memory or other
system resources, unless you use it.

And it's quite handy to have both installed. That way you can use
the calculator from KDE (which is far superior to the Gnome one) and
the gnome-terminal (which is far superior to Konsole), and so on and
so forth.

Though, for end users, I would like to see the default be one
panel along the bottom with nothing but a task list and clock, and
another panel along the left edge with launchers for "Surf the Web"
(Moz or possibly Moz FB), "Type a Paper" (OO.o), and so on and so
forth, a drawer for Advanced/Setup (containing launchers for the
Mandrake Control Center, the Gnome Control Panel, and so on and
so forth), and the logout button at the bottom. Oh, and a drawer
full of games. I suppose the foot menu should be included as well,
but labelled "Extra Stuff" or something. For reasons involving
phone tech support, there should also be a terminal launcher,
probably in the Advanced/Setup drawer.

Oh, and the _first_ launcher, at the _top_ of the panel, should
bring up a help thingy that explains what each of the launchers
on the default panel do, and how to use (at a very basic level)
the apps that they launch. This should probably be described
backwards, as in:

* To Surf the Web:
(Explanation of the Mozilla launcher and how to use Moz,
and link to more info about using Mozilla.)
* To Type a Paper:
(Explanation of the OO.o launcher and how to use OO.o,
including how to turn off all the #@$! AutoCorrect/
AutoReplace/AutoFormat/AutoBullets/AutoNumbering crap,
which is the first thing every newbie asks me about it.
And a link to more info about using OO.o)
(And so on and so forth...)
* To Use Other Software:
(Explanation of foot menu and links to further info about
what programs to use for various tasks and also about
learning to download and install additional stuff, and
finally links to general, more advanced info.)

--
Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
Re:What, 16 alternative WMs too few? by Reziac · 2003-08-02 17:22 · Score: 2, Insightful

Speaking as a DOS/Windows user (accustomed to beating every species of Windows into submission, from 3.1 thru XP), Mandrake is the *one* linux disty that I immediately liked (out of a dozen or so that I tried), and found relatively straightforward to use right off -- for pretty much the reasons you cite. My first impression was "It works enough like Windows to be immediately usable", *not* "WTF do I do now??"

I really oughta update it, but.. I have MDK 7.2/KDE on a P3-450/256mb (a poor old K6-200 was too slow) and even that venerable disty compares more or less to WinXP on the same hardware. Not exactly crisp, but not notably laggy.

I'm glad to see Mandrake still progressing despite the company's setbacks. It gives me hope that there *will* be a viable alternative for myself and my clients, once M$'s ambitions go where I won't follow (as threatens to be the case with the next consumer Windows).

BTW, the MDK newsgroup was the first linux watering hole where I was *welcomed* as a newbie, rather than derided for my ignorance. Cheers!

--
~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
Re:What, 16 alternative WMs too few? by jbolden · 2003-08-03 15:14 · Score: 1

I moved about 3 weeks ago. One of the movers saw my bookshelf and spent the day asking me detailed Linux questions (not advanced level). But in general I agree most people trying Linux are technical. They aren't neccesarily knowledgeable about windows. They often are quite young, and hence my comments about multimedia and web browsing are even more applicable.
Re:What, 16 alternative WMs too few? by jbolden · 2003-08-03 15:16 · Score: 1

On IceWM

1) No obvious "start here" button
2) No simple collection of desktop icons
3) No set of built in apps with unified theme and ways of working
4) No obvious choices for web/ftp/local file browsing.

etc...
Re:What, 16 alternative WMs too few? by Arker · 2003-08-03 18:02 · Score: 1

1) No obvious "start here" button

Bzzt Wrong. Windows style taskbar with start button. Never used it have you?

2) No simple collection of desktop icons

That's not the WMs job, and it's debateable if it's even a good thing. If you think it is, it's simple enough to configure. I did say they would need to spend a little time developing a good default setup.

3) No set of built in apps with unified theme and ways of working

Again not the window managers job, and again perfectly easy to setup. Ice is completely compatible with Gnome and KDE apps, so you could use one or the other set, or built another set of more traditional apps.

4) No obvious choices for web/ftp/local file browsing.

Hello?

File managers; DFM - TkDesk - Xfm - Xplore - FileRunner - kfm - sfm - XNC - Kruiser - gentoo - Gnu Midnight Commander - Nautilus, and more.

Web Browsers; Mozilla and derivitives - Opera - Konq - more there too I'm sure.

All the distro needs to do is choose a set and make sure they're on the menus and setup sanely.

--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
Re:What, 16 alternative WMs too few? by jbolden · 2003-08-04 05:09 · Score: 1

If you read the original post the arguments was Ice vs. KDE. Now ICE itself can work as a windowmanager for KDE. What I was responding to is why use KDE type configurations rather than a more typical ICE. I don't have any opinion on ICE as a pure window manager in the sense you mean it vs. KDE's built in Window manager.

If I look at ICEWM themes ICE from an end user prespective doesn't look like anything (as is true with most window managers with different styles of thems). Its a pure framework. So it does or doesn't have icons on the desktop
Re:What, 16 alternative WMs too few? by Arker · 2003-08-04 05:35 · Score: 1

Ice went themeable due to user demand, of course. It originally was a light and fast win95 look-alike, and it's all still there, depending on the theme.

I've used it with both KDE and Gnome, it's quite easy to set up a good working environment with either using Ice as the WM, and it's noticeably faster and cleaner than using the POS that 'pure' KDE uses.

Not sure about KDE but with Gnome you can even set it up so that you can retheme the WM and the Gnome apps together, so that everything matches up nicely.

As I said in my original post further up the thread, I personally prefer WindowMaker. Using WindowMaker as the WM for Gnome is really far better in my opinion than the typical Gnome setup, it's faster, cleaner, and easier to use. You do have to do a little menu editing, not much else. If you want the desktop icon stuff you just have the file manager load with the WM. If you want the panels it's a one line entry and there you are. Personally I find them annoying and unecessary - the dock works great for persistent indicators, the clip works great for desktop management, and the regular WindowMaker interface is just fine for desktop management and task lists. Better than panels and start menus and taskbars any day, IMHOP.

The point is just that there are a lot more options available than people seem to give any credence too, and this fixation on full blown 'desktop environments' which seems to mean in practice 'windows clones' is counterproductive, I think. Why on earth, for instance, would you want a task bar and a start menu when there are so many more usable equivalents that don't take up screen space like that? With WindowMaker you just right click on the root window to bring up your applications menu. You can make it persistent, place it wherever you want, open a submenu and do the same with it, get rid of the main list but keep the submenu open or vice versa... it's much more flexible. Want a task list? Middle click on the root window. Again, you can make it persistent, relocate it wherever you want it, and close it completely if you don't need it. And it's always readable. That task bar sits there whether you need it or not, can be relocated but only to a limited set of options, and is often completely unreadable.

--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
Re:What, 16 alternative WMs too few? by jbolden · 2003-08-04 18:00 · Score: 1

Why on earth, for instance, would you want a task bar and a start menu when there are so many more usable equivalents that don't take up screen space like that?

I don't I agree with you regarding windowmaker and tend to prefer a simple windowmanager running terminals with a few X apps over a full blown gui (provided it has an automated menu building system from the distribution). On the other hand for a beginner the loss of screen real estate so that they have some idea on how to start (hit the start button) is cheap. Beginners can't generally use more than one app at a time anyway so they are either full screen or only need 1/2 the screen for their work....

Huh? by ErikZ · 2003-08-02 03:22 · Score: 4, Interesting

I thought Mandrake needed millions of dollars in donations or it was going out of business? What happened?

--
Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.

Re:Huh? by t482 · 2003-08-02 03:40 · Score: 3, Informative

There distribution was alway profitable. It was there other business which pushed them into the equivalent of chapter 11.
Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 03:40 · Score: 0

I guess they were lying. Imagine!
Re:Huh? by miTMan · 2003-08-02 03:41 · Score: 0

Good point. I switched my attention from Mandrake to Red Hat when I read that Mandrake was doomed. Now it looks like Mandrake is back on track, or are they releasing work that had already been done and this is going to be the last we hear?
Re:Huh? by buchanmilne · 2003-08-02 04:50 · Score: 5, Interesting

I switched my attention from Mandrake to Red Hat when I read that Mandrake was doomed.

Isn't that like kicking people when they're down? Here I was buying stuff from them (since I do generate spare income using Mandrake), and contributing to the distro, when I should instead have dumped and run for a distro that doesn't pay attention to the features *I* want?

Now it looks like Mandrake is back on track

They weren't ever off-track ... they have just had to cut down on cash-sapping activities, like expo-attendance etc

or are they releasing work that had already been done and this is going to be the last we hear?

Well, since they went into bankruptcy protection, they released 9.1, which was a pretty good release. And since 9.1, they have been making serious changes to allow greater community participation, to the extent that community contributors who know their stuff have commit rights into the main distro (although more recognition for the community work on maintaining the ports to alpha, hammer, sparc and ppc would be nice). But they have done a lot of work on GUI cleanups in the config tools etc, added more features in urpmi, and of course updated to the latest packages.

And they are still innovating more than Redhat ever did (unless the only thing you use linux for is an Oracle cluster - in which case you're probably better off with SuSE anyway ...).

Now, imagine what they could do if they had enough resources to employ more hackers?
Re:Huh? by WindBourne · 2003-08-02 05:31 · Score: 1

I thought Mandrake needed millions of dollars in donations or it was going out of business? What happened?
No, you misunderstood. What they said was that if they did not get another million, that God would recall them. Apparently it worked. Just like it does here in America.

--
I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
Re:Huh? by bogie · 2003-08-02 06:30 · Score: 1

I appreciate your loyalty to Mandrake, but to say "They weren't ever off-track" except for some little things like oh say blowing through millions of capital while going into bankruptcy sounds pretty foolish. Mandrake was off track, waaay off track. I am glad they didn't disappear entirely and that they are still around since we need more desktop linux vendors, but at the same time I'll never have the faith in them I once did.

"Now, imagine what they could do if they had enough resources to employ more hackers?"

I don't know, they had a lot more resource available not long ago and it seemed to me that they were really just good at blowing money. Maybe the people that ran Mandrake into the ground are gone now?

Former Mandrake user.

--
If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
Re:Huh? by common_sence · 2003-08-02 06:38 · Score: 1

Couldn't that same thing be said of a good number of software companies during the dot-com era? It was OK to blow through capital. I'm glad they were able to hold on. I'm a Linux n00b and definitely prefer Mandrake to RedHat.

--
sig? No thanks, I don't smoke.

YHBT, fucker. by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 03:25 · Score: -1, Offtopic

YHL. HAND.

Re:Does anyone know of old archives of Mandrake 6. by MuParadigm · 2003-08-02 03:35 · Score: 1

Well, it's offtopic, but here ya' go anyway:

No iso's available. You *can* get the RPM's and SRPM's at:

ftp://ftp.linuxforum.hu/mirror/Mandrake-old/upda te s/6.1.

Heh, Slashdot's slow . . . by Idou · 2003-08-02 03:38 · Score: 2, Funny

I downloaded those bitorrent iso's last week, way before they could get slash . . . wait . . . bitorrent . . .

I CAN'T WIN!

--
Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!

Re:Does anyone know of old archives of Mandrake 6. by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 03:39 · Score: 0

Please pay. Mandrake needs donations desperately or else it will go out of business.

Re:Does anyone know of old archives of Mandrake 6. by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 03:42 · Score: 0

I need also donations otherwise I will loose my house, could you help me please ?

I would like to see OpenOffice 1.1 in mdk9.2 by t482 · 2003-08-02 03:43 · Score: 3, Informative

I have been using OO 1.1 now for 6 months or so. Its beta - but it is very stable. Some of the features (print to pdf) make it worth including it in the distro now.

Also does anyone know if they have included the Ximain OO hacks for OO?

Re:I would like to see OpenOffice 1.1 in mdk9.2 by Kid+Brother+of+St.+A · 2003-08-02 06:14 · Score: 1, Informative

You can print to PDF in OO Writer 1.0.2 already. Just go File > Print... and select PDF converter under the printer name popup menu. That said, I'm looking foward to OO 1.1 as well. Good product.
Re:I would like to see OpenOffice 1.1 in mdk9.2 by Sivaram_Velauthapill · 2003-08-02 11:38 · Score: 1

How that post gets marked as troll is baffling ??:|

--
Sivaram Velauthapillai
Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
Re:I would like to see OpenOffice 1.1 in mdk9.2 by jonadab · 2003-08-02 15:40 · Score: 1

The really great feature in OO 1.1 for me is that the error message
when it reads an invalid .sxw file is _informative_ (i.e., it tells
you where the problem is). This won't matter to people just using
it as a word processor, but since I generate documents using Perl
(pulling data from MySQL) and use OO.o to print them, this feature
is really incredibly helpful for debugging my scripts. Using this
feature, I was able to track down a problem (involving characters
that needed to be encoded as entities) that had me stumped under
OO.o 1.0.x.

--
Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.

Learn some econ, Troll-Boy by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 03:43 · Score: 4, Insightful

Look, when I spend $50 on Red Hat instead of $2000 on Microsoft, the other $1950 doesn't just disappear. I spend it on other goods and services. So I still purchase $2000 of goods and services into the world economy, it just goes to more people than the ass-hats at Microsoft.

Ironically, the name of this fallacy is the "broken window fallacy".

XFS by rf0 · 2003-08-02 03:55 · Score: -1, Offtopic

Does anyone know if the bug where 2.6 can't mount an XFS route fs is still there. Lots of things I want to try but last time it just hung on boot trying to mount rootfs fs as UDF?!

Rus

--
Cheap UK and US VPS

Torrents by Bruha · 2003-08-02 04:06 · Score: 2, Interesting

Those torrents I pointed out are from mandrake themselves.. They're running the tracker appareently.. I have not looked but I bet BT is installed in 9.2b.

Now I'm curious what bandwidth savings Mandrakesoft made with using Bt to distribute the files!

Re:Torrents by Feztaa · 2003-08-03 18:49 · Score: 1

Those torrents I pointed out are from mandrake themselves..

I was quite impressed to see that. I hope that the Mandrake guys save lots of money on the bandwidth they save there. I seeded the files for about a day.

One thing, though -- I wasn't able to find the link to the torrents from their official website. Oh well; I guess BT is at that stage where it's provided but not actively advertised as the primary download method :)
Re:Torrents by Bruha · 2003-08-04 09:11 · Score: 1

Actually the torrents were on the announcements page.. The portion of the story I posted was a exact copy of that announcement.
Re:Torrents by Feztaa · 2003-08-04 11:46 · Score: 1

You quoted from the WIKI. Go to www.mandrakesoft.com, and try to find a link to the torrents. good luck :)

France by Jack+Comics · 2003-08-02 04:27 · Score: -1, Funny

So, since Mandrake is a French-based distro, does this mean it'll pretend that it doesn't understand English after you finish installing it? Or will it just promise to veto any program you install?

--
"We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." - Oscar Wilde

Re:France by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 05:31 · Score: 3, Funny

Since Red Hat is an American distribution, will it brutally murder innocent civilians after I install it? Will it leave dupleted uranium on your keyboard? Inquiring minds want to know.
Re:France by gurumeditationerror · 2003-08-02 06:00 · Score: 1

Heh! Good one dude.
Re:France by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 06:14 · Score: 0

No it won't do that but it will come in and bail out you European fuckheads the next time you need help. Ungrateful bastards!
Re:France by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 06:43 · Score: 0

No, but it will help you rebel against the crown!
Re:France by mhesseltine · 2003-08-02 07:22 · Score: 1

Since SuSE is a German distro, will it gather and slaughter millions of innocent people based only on their religion? Inquiring minds want to know.

--
Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
Re:France by mhesseltine · 2003-08-02 07:26 · Score: 1

Since Turbolinux is a Japaneese distro, does that mean it will launch its CDs into your servers, killing thousands when you least expect it? Inquiring minds want to know.

--
Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
Re:France by tindur · 2003-08-02 10:12 · Score: 1

French-based distro
Don't use a French-based distro. Use a freedom-based instead.
Re:France by bhtooefr · 2003-08-03 04:35 · Score: 1

IMHO, if their religion is RedHat, yes.

Does anyone know of old archives of Mandrake 6.1 by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 04:28 · Score: 0

I'd consider paying, if I knew if you guys had Mandrake 6.1 in the archives. But since my experience with Mandrake has been that old copies disappear from ibiblio and wuarchive, I'm not about to shell out any money without some guarantee.

Personally, I think Manfrake is one of the best distributions. However, I see no reason to stop them from going out of business. This lack of archives is serious issue. RedHat sucks, but they have archives all the way back to 1.0 (you do have to dig around a bit).

I am fixing someone's old server which runs M 6.1. It's not on the internet, so no immediate security issues, just an NFS file server thats been running happily. They wanted to add a few packages to it and discovered they had to call me because they couldn't find an iso of RPMS on the net. I had the original burned copy it was installed from. They want to know where an internet copy is, because the lack of it makes them nervous. If they decide to upgrade the entire machine because of this, I'll use Debian.

Go and test it! by christophe · 2003-08-02 04:44 · Score: 1

...So it will be stable and clean when *I* will migrate to 2.6 :-)

--
Christophe (Don't hesitate to point out my spelling and grammar mistakes, I want to learn - Thanks).

Re:Does anyone know of old archives of Mandrake 6. by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 04:48 · Score: 0

That's nice, I've made it into a link:

ftp://ftp.linuxforum.hu/mirror/Mandrake-old/update s/6.1

But it isn't actually all of Mandrake 6.1. It's just the updated RPMs. Nice, but not that useful -- you can't even do a Mandrake 6.1 install by hand, because the X packages never needed an update, so it's just not all there.

What I am looking for the is the .iso files of the CDs, or the directory tree I can build them from. The first one should be bootable and have the install program on it, the second one should have just the source, if I remember correctly.

And no, the czech site ftp://mandrake.redbox.cz/Mandrake-old/ doesn't have it either. I'm painfully going through all the mirror sites and then checking to see if that mirror kept old copies, with no luck yet. I think I'll move to the German mirrors in hopes that those conservative squareheads kept something around.

No way I'm paying money to Mandrake now. Why should I set myself up for a disaster years down the road where I can't add to or re-create the machine ? If I wanted to forced to stay up to date I can always use windows.

I hope Mandrake doesn't burn it's self on this one by Mipsalawishus · 2003-08-02 04:49 · Score: 4, Insightful

The last Mandrake release ran a 2.4.21 prerelease kernel. I personally never had any stability problems with it. I also understand that Mandrake tends to gravitate toward the bleeding edge of the packages they include in their releases, but the kernel is one place I think shouldn't be included in this manner. I think Mandrake is a wonderful company who makes an awesome distribution. I even have a customer's server running Mandrake 9.0 for 7 months and they haven't had a single problem with it (they use it for Samba and DHCP primarily). I suppose if one is looking for the latest and greatest, look toward Mandrake. Otherwise stick to Slackware or Debian for more matured packages in a distribution release.

There vs. their.. ARGH! by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 04:51 · Score: 0

THEIR distribution. THEIR other business.

Is it so damn difficult to learn the difference between THEIR, THERE and THEY'RE? Let me guess, you get "they're" wrong too?

Re:There vs. their.. ARGH! by jbolden · 2003-08-02 05:03 · Score: 1

Yes it is difficult. Once the verbal language evolves so that two words are pronounced the same the written language evolves so they are spelled the same. 75% of all irregularities in a language are purged in each generation. Only very heavily used words manage to keep irregularities (like man and men which goes back to indo-european pluralization rules).

Their, there and they're are pronounced the same hence the spelling difference is highly unnatural.
Re:There vs. their.. ARGH! by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 06:52 · Score: 0

Yes it is difficult.

If you're an idiot it is, yes.

Their, there and they're are pronounced the same..

No they're not. There and their may be pronounced in a similiar manner, but they're is a contraction of they are. Do you pronounce they are as there?

English speakers can not get the usage of three words correct. How do the Japanese or Chinese manage to write with ideograms and get it right?
Re:There vs. their.. ARGH! by jbolden · 2003-08-03 15:18 · Score: 1

How do the Japanese or Chinese manage to write with ideograms and get it right?

They don't. Written literacy is much lower in these languages relative to education, intellegence... With a complex script people produce less, more slowiy and of lower quality.

Do you pronounce they are as there?
No but I pronouce they're as there.

Take the context of the reply into account ... by buchanmilne · 2003-08-02 06:48 · Score: 1

In my reply, the context of "ever" was post-bankruptcy filing, due to this being the context of the post I was replying to. Sorry, I should have been more clear about that.

Maybe the people that ran Mandrake into the ground are gone now?

They were kicked out a good few months before the bankruptcy protection filing, but it was too late ... to prevent the layoff of developers.

Former Mandrake user.

What changed?

Apples and oranges by stud9920 · 2003-08-02 06:50 · Score: 1

Thank you for coming (totally selflessly as there was no Lusithania nor Silberberg telegram) to help us beat the Germans in 1917 (three years after the war began) after we decided to invade germany to rid them of their so blatant weapons of mass destruction.

Thank you again for coming (totally selflessly again as Pearl Harbour is a myth) to help us beat the Germans in 1941 (2+ years after the war began; 1+ year after the french lost it).

We are so selfish to have refused to help you defend yourselves against that internationally dangerous Saddam Hussein, who had already taken all of your east coast. But be sure we may eventually help the US in 2006 when it will be fully occupied by Saddam's world's fourth largest army in the world, might they decide to attack us by surprise.

Re:Apples and oranges by stud9920 · 2003-08-02 06:52 · Score: 1

nor Silberberg telegram
Oops I meant "Zimmerman". I guess Dr Kelly thought "Silberberg" would be cooler.

open driver is not "nvidia" by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 06:54 · Score: 0

Just as a note, the open-source XFree86 driver is called "nv". It is independent of the kernel since all it does is:
- provide 2D support, that too for some nvidia cards only
- has no AGP support
- does not support the latest nvidia cards (geforce4 and geforce FX)

I hope the 2.6 kernel forces nvidia (and ATI) to change that so that we get open-source drivers that are really worth using.

Paille. Poutre. Oeil (Pot. Kettle. Black) by stud9920 · 2003-08-02 06:58 · Score: 1

Because obviously, as a French speaking tourist in Western US, Everybody from the slave class people in the restaurant/hotel/tourism addressed me in a French that would have put Victor Hugo to shame...

The number one thing I'd like to see by Joe+Tie. · 2003-08-02 07:11 · Score: 1

Python 2.3. I was very surprised to not see python 2.3, even in mandrake cooker. Given the increased stability and speed I would have thought they'd have rushed to update to it when 2.3 was released. Worse for me, I'm unfamilier enough with rpm building to take the risk of trying to update python myself.

--
Everything will be taken away from you.

Its ALPHA, not beta by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 07:16 · Score: 0

The subject says it all. Redhat relased a beta about the same time and I am sure it does not have such glaring bugs. If the purpose of the release is bug fixing, it should be installable first. I know (since I installed LM 9.2beta) how hard it was to select/unselect packages using mouse from hundreds of them. If mandrake wants users to report unknown bugs they should atleast fix the known ones before putting it out. After all, the bugs in question are not from 3rd party software but in their own tools.

Re:Its ALPHA, not beta by buchanmilne · 2003-08-02 11:34 · Score: 1

I know (since I installed LM 9.2beta) how hard it was to select/unselect packages using mouse from hundreds of them.

When you could have taken the defaults, updated your drakxtools package, and been able to select again as usual.

Redhat uses a different beta cycle strategy (AFAIK, with only one beta release), and Mandrake uses multiple betas. This was just to get people up to speed with the changes in cooker (note the old kernel for example), especially to find the as yet unfound bugs in the mods they have made.

Anyway, since cooker is always in flux, *it* is considered alpha ... and it hasn't been too bad this release cycle (it's been worse).
Re:Its ALPHA, not beta by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 12:52 · Score: 0

> When you could have taken the defaults, updated your drakxtools package, and been able to select again as usual.

There is almost always a workaround but I won't bother to risk so much trouble for alpha testing. If this had been 9.2 final then this may be worth a try.

Also, if bug fixing is the aim, I can bet that 80% of the bugs in 9.1 have not been fixed in 9.2 beta. On top of this, there are new bugs.

Re:ALPHA product? by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 07:18 · Score: 0

Thats assuming beta is the right word. I think the right word is alpha.

Linux is NOT slow and bloated by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 07:55 · Score: 0

I am running a 750MHz duron + 256MB pc133 SDR RAM with mandrake-9.1 and kde-3.1.3 and its fast enough. I have no speed problems with starting a konqueror window (1.5 s with preloading) with 12 existing windows (5 konsole + 7 konqueror; each konqueror window with multiple tabs).

Note that any average desktop user switching from MS windows these days will have a more powerful machine (a CPU of 1.4 GHz P4/Athlonxp at least + 256 DDR RAM) so KDE speed problems are going to be an issue if only you try to run it on a 500 MHz k6-2 with 128MB SDR RAM. But these days with RAM being so cheap, almost any reasonable CPU with 256+ MB RAM will make KDE 3.x run really good. Besides, in my experience, KDE-3.1 was faster than KDE-3.0.x and KDE-3.2 will be faster than KDE-3.1 on the same hardware.

actually boot? by Doppler00 · 2003-08-02 09:09 · Score: 1

Will this new version of Mandrake actually boot from the CDROM ISO (like redhat or slackware)? I've had trouble with the last two versions simply giving me an error that it cannot read from the device during installation. This was tested on 3 different computer systems and none of them could even get to the installation screen.

Re:actually boot? by jrcamp · 2003-08-02 09:23 · Score: 1

Mandrake has booted just fine from the CD-ROM for the longest time. Maybe you burnt a bad CD...?
Re:actually boot? by Electric+Monk · 2003-08-02 12:17 · Score: 0

Taking a stab in the dark...

Could it be an oversight in your CD/DVD drive's firmware that causes it to baulk at booting the 700MB ISOs that MDK uses?

MDK did provide 650MB versions in the end, since it caused a few problems for people.
Re:actually boot? by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 12:55 · Score: 0

I have never had problems installing mandrake from cd or iso (on hard drive). However, install from iso is broken in the sense that it always reports missing packages for those which actually are in the 2nd and 3rd isos.
Re:actually boot? by Jamey12345 · 2003-08-02 16:21 · Score: 1

Your problem might have just been the install kernel that was used in the prior versions. Beta 2 will be switching to a different install kernel, to fix some problems and unsupported hardware in the prior ones.

9.2 will default to a 2.4 kernel by buchanmilne · 2003-08-02 09:52 · Score: 1

I also understand that Mandrake tends to gravitate toward the bleeding edge of the packages they include in their releases, but the kernel is one place I think shouldn't be included in this manner.

Ummm, you did notice that the 2.6 kernel we're talking about is in contrib? Most newbies won't even be able to find it! 9.2 Will most certainly default to a 2.4.22 kernel (since we are rapidly approaching version freeze time), but there are already a few alternative kernels in contrib, and this will be just another choice.

I even have a customer's server running Mandrake 9.0 for 7 months and they haven't had a single problem with it (they use it for Samba and DHCP primarily).

Same experience, on a clients Compaq Proliant (the software is more reliable than the hardare ;-), one disk failure, no software failures), on our own Dell PowerEdge boxes, but then again I can't think of a recent release that had issues on server applications (and I have run everything since 7.0 on production servers ... but 7.2 and 8.0 were a bit rough around the edges if you happened to use ReiserFS 2.x on a 2.2 kernel).

Otherwise stick to Slackware or Debian for more matured packages in a distribution release.

Would that be the Debain that lets you choose between samba-2.2.3a and 3.0.0alpha, with nothing in between? s/mature/obsolete/g (not that there's anything wrong with samba3, it's also available in Mandrake contribs since 9.1, and for a few other releases from my site).

Re:9.2 will default to a 2.4 kernel by David+Hartigan · 2003-08-02 17:12 · Score: 1

Well, I suppose that would make sense, since a new kernel is a major enough change for a version number change to 10, not 9.2

But in my opinion, Mandrake 9.1 was such a dramatic change from 9.0 that it should have been called Mandrake 10.. RedHat seemed to have got away with it.

Cheers,
David
Re:9.2 will default to a 2.4 kernel by buchanmilne · 2003-08-02 23:36 · Score: 2, Interesting

But in my opinion, Mandrake 9.1 was such a dramatic change from 9.0 that it should have been called Mandrake 10.

Well, some people complained that it was too similar to 9.0, and that it should have been called 9.0.1!

RedHat seemed to have got away with it.

Well, they broke binary compatability with their premature inclusion of NPTL.
Re:9.2 will default to a 2.4 kernel by David+Hartigan · 2003-08-05 17:07 · Score: 1

To me, Mandrake 9.0 and 9.1 are so very different that a .1 increment isn't enough.

Mandrake 9.0 had something that just felt out of place, but 9.1 felt right, it had something that made me think, wow, this is now going to be my primary operating system - and it has been, for the past few months - no Windows at all.

To me, that is reason enough for it to be called Mandrake 10.

Cheers,
David.

Re:50% faster? by emuman_de · 2003-08-02 10:24 · Score: 1

Come on, why should 2.6 be 50% faster than 2.4? Maybe SCO will sue us 50% faster because of the stolen codelines in 2.6, e.g. for (i=0;in;i++)? But give me an benchmark to show the 50% performance improvement.

Here you go by Newtonian_p · 2003-08-02 10:35 · Score: 1

Go here.

--

There are 2 kinds of people in this world: Those who write in decimal and those who don't

Re:Here you go by Sivaram_Velauthapill · 2003-08-02 11:46 · Score: 1

lol.. hilarious quote... hehe :)

--
Sivaram Velauthapillai
Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
Re:Here you go by Anonymous Coward · 2003-08-02 14:33 · Score: 0

That's awesome. I will have to get on the Milwaukee Linux User's Group list and thank them.

However, without seeming to look a gift horse in the mouth, I must note that they only have the first CD. If I could get the sources CD, I would feel comfortable about hosting it myself.

2.6.0 Auto Loading Modules in Mandrake by Totally_Tux · 2003-08-02 14:25 · Score: 1

Since we're talking about the Mandrake distribution here - has anyone found out why kernel module auto loading appear to be broken when using 2.6.0test2 in Mandrake 9.1?

One symptom of this is booting 2.6.0test2 and finding out that NO modules are loaded in for mouse, USB, Ethernet and so forth unless. To get around this I've had to manually list related kernel modules in /etc/modules or manually modprobe them in.

I'm wondering if this problem occurs in the 2.6.0 test kernel supplied by Mandrake?

Re:2.6.0 Auto Loading Modules in Mandrake by Jamey12345 · 2003-08-02 16:32 · Score: 1

The old modutils package doesn't work with 2.6 - there's a seperate version for 2.6, I'm guessing it's probably a dependancy of the 2.6.0 mdk kernel though. urpmi can grab the new modutils, but I don't remember the exact package name.
Re:2.6.0 Auto Loading Modules in Mandrake by Totally_Tux · 2003-08-02 17:35 · Score: 1

You mean the module-init-tools package? Yes, we needed this in order for make modules_install to work.

My friend and I are not having that problem, but specifically that the 2.6.0 kernel doesn't appear to auto load kernel modules as needed. There is something specific in Mandrake that breaks this and I'm trying to find out why.

Re:I hope Mandrake doesn't burn it's self on this by abdulla · 2003-08-02 16:16 · Score: 1

I've had one bad experience with Mandrake using the pre-release kernel for 9.1, I wasn't able to run GDB (it kept saying it could not set a breakpoint) until the latest kernel update (I think about a week ago). Since GDB is critical to development, I'd think they would have ironed out that problem a little earlier. Aside from that I've had no problems at all, it's been great.

Join the club and vote for this! by egghat · 2003-08-04 00:56 · Score: 1

You'll get two votes each week to vote for your favourite programs. The ones ranked highest will be packaged first. Very good idea.

Bye egghat.

--
-- "As a human being I claim the right to be widely inconsistent", John Peel

Slashdot Mirror

Mandrake 9.2b1 Released, 2.6 Test Kernel in Cooker

219 comments