Ricor PVRs To Hit Russia
BlackShirt writes "Mediacenter acts as a digital video recorder, i.e. it enables the viewer to plan his/her future television broadcast recordings. 'Live' broadcasts can also be recorded. Program recordings are stored in the video archive, and the user can playback, delete or unable deleting of recordings (here are some screenshots). I personally like their advertisements more than their product. (Shopping-tv style, wife doesn't allow to watch football, so disapponted husband knocks on his neighbors' door, as they turn their fabulous Ricor TV box from pause to play.)" It looks like this is being marketed to Russian cable companies as an all-in-one portal, since they also include electronic ordering capabilities and "near video on demand"; I wish American PVRs had all these features by default (ethernet, USB, microphone, camera inputs ...)
This sounds amazingly like a machine that some Sky subscribers in the UK have. Sky plus allows live pause, recording, playback etc etc etc. I can do all this already, but its nice to see this stuff catching on in Soviet Russia
looks nice but you'll have to pry my tivo from my cold dead hands
All I Want For Christmas Is My Constitutional Rights
PVR Records YOU!
"Dancing is the vertical expression of a horizontal desire" --Robert Frost
It's just incredibly asinine that companies which broadcast their content through to open air or pump it into our homes can even think to sue people who make PVRs that aren't to their liking. Go after someone who posts copied shows on their website or Kazza sure, but suing a company because their PVR has an eithernet port.
It's just assinine.
autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
Put Myth TV on a computer with a hardware encoding TV tuner card and you'll have a damn fine PVR.
My older ReplayTV has RCA inputs which lets me hook up my digital camera, and it has S-Video inputs that lets me hook up my All-in-Wonder or my camcorder.
I'm sure a sound card, video capture card, and video card could be thrown into a pentium2/ultrasparc/powerpc with Linux for all of those features and then some.
A router/pvr/fileserver should sell well in the US if properly advertised.
You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
Could someone please explain the reference in the department title for this story?
Honey, I shrunk the Cygwin
Great device, but it looks like the wily "" tag is a bit beyond their technical abilities.
Money I owe, money-iy-ay
<ruskie accent>
Amercian PVRS
Russian PVRS
ALL MADE IN TAWAIIN
</ruskie accent>
damn you lameness filter, sometimes you need to yell.
Did anybody else read the subject line as 'Ricer PVRs To Hit Russia' and get visions of set top boxes with oversized wings and a large aluminum exhause pipe coming out of the back with way too many decals plastered all over it?
___
Cogito cogito, ergo cogito sum.
If you add a IC-R3 Advanced Portable TV in Soviet Russia, PVR records Everything...including YOUUUUUUU!
Maybe my english is a little rusty but "delete or unable deleting" doesn't sound right to me. Shouldn't it be disable deleting of recordings
"playback, delete or unable deleting of recordings"
me fail english, thats unposible.
"'Live' broadcasts can also be recorded." - Why's that mentioned? I think any PVR can do that. A broadcast is a broadcast, the material is the same whether it's 'live' or not.
...)"
:)
:-)
:)
"It looks like this is being marketed to Russian cable companies as an all-in-one portal, since they also include electronic ordering capabilities and "near video on demand";"
Any PVR has that functionality when combined with a proper/integrated tuner and PPV channels. If I know I am watching movies Friday night, I will pick some PPV movies to record during the day. With most providers you have the same movie with staggered timeslots where the movie starts every 15-60 minutes. I assume PPV overseas is similar.
"I wish American PVRs had all these features by default (ethernet, USB, microphone, camera inputs
I think this unit gives up more than it gains in functionality by only having one tuner. I don't see anything in their product description about recording one show on 'live' tv while watching another 'live' show. I don't consider it a true media center until you've got the ability to record one show and watch another one. This doesn't sound like a big deal to the uninitiated, but nothing is more lame than having a PVR and the associated freedoms, then get forced watching something your roomie wanted to record because you can't change channels. The hardware cost for a second tuner is not much at all, well worth the extra $20-30..
Most american units have USB ports on them. I think that about covers the gambit of devices you would be attaching (camera, ethernet, keyboard, etc). I see the 'nifty' factor in being able to babble off how many types of ports something has, but I've noticed the people who own things with lots of ports tend to not own anything to connect to them. The different types of ports also run up the costs of manufacture for features that aren't needed or used. Much like all those funky ports on 8-bit Nintendos and other game systems of yesteryear's 'future expansion slot' thingys that nothing ever connected to. You have a PC, hook your stuff up to it. You have a PVR, use it to watch television.
One nifty feature UTV has is the ability to record a whole timeslot hitting record at any time before the slot expires. That's handy when you are just randomly watching stuff on TV, find something, only get to watch the first 15 minutes before the phone rings and you have to leave. Just hit record and the whole thing is recorded from the beginning.
I am guessing this will be a good hack unit. I don't care about that stuff with PVRs like most folks on here seem to do. From my experiences with modifying these types of devices, I become the only person in the house who can operate them. I'll stick to devices other people in the house don't depend on to modify..
I don't mean to sound rude here, but beyond Russia getting a PVR I don't see how any part of this is news, unless it's a slow news day, especially when I have a unit I spent $40 on almost two years ago and it has way more features minus integrated DVD. I'm not crazy about all-in-one systems either. You try to hack it, break it, you are out a DVD player and a PVR. Same goes for just daily usage, break the tuner time to buy a new DVD player too.
Always buy your components separately and avoid bundles if you want quality. Typically, the parts in multi-function devices are purchased from the lowest bidders. I'd rather be wise, save my money, read some reviews and buy a separate DVD player, PVR, tuner, amp, speakers, etc. You spend a little more but end up with a superior result and the ability to replace parts. Think you are too broke for that logic? You won't be thinking it when your DVD player dies and you have to get a whole new unit. Also, where's the component video connectors for HDTV? Is that dvd player progressive scan?
I apologize, I always post like 20 paragraph messages in regards to home video links. I'm very anti-hype after seeing so many new products all to find they are crap later on.
Just stumbled on an article about PVRs in a specialized magasine. You can access it by a Google redirect for free.
Looks like Russia gets all the good programming. The first picture of the sample screenshots looks like the (very) old Japanese shoujo anime classic Candy-Candy.
I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
There is an interesting follow-up thread in the Klerck Tech Center's message boards. Check it out.
hey!
Twenty years ago every russian family had wired "radio" i.e. speaker plugged into "radio" outlet. The twist was that KGB could use these speakers as a microphones when they need to what people are talking about in their kitchens. Now the story continues
This is bad for software/music/video companies, but good for the consumer. Unlike their American cousins, Russian PVRs don't need to be crippled just to appease some content cartel. Hence all the extra features.
>|<*:=
Nope. I had an image of flaming, glowing PVRs reigning down from the sky onto unsuspecting Russians, and some evil mutated whale with a piece of Mir's reactor in its head laughing insanely.
Please help metamoderate.
- Themeable GUI driven frontend
- Watch live TV
- download XML programming scheduals
- schedual tools make it easy to find what you want to record
- MythWeb extention allows you view schedual and flag programs for capture from remote web browser
- MP3, Ogg rip and playback with visuals
- Xmame frontend (and generic emulator frontend)
- Weather center
- mplayer frontend
- image browser
It can be some work getting it all working, but DAMN it's cool. I would like to see the developers integrate a nuplevideo converter to export to divx:) or vcd.
If you read the web site, their target audience is married women, students and school dropouts and people who like horses!
"Channel audience is middle class well-off families.
The channel covers themes which appeal to 3 main target audiences:
Married women (over 20).
Students, school leavers.
People fascinated by the world of horses."
a PVR originally made by SonicBlue, now owned by digital networks, part of the company that owns Denon and Marantz. There 50x0 series (5040, 5060, and 5080) had two nifty features - commercial advance, which allows people to skip commercials while they are watching as if the were not even there, and internet programing sharing, where you can send another replayTV user a program
RePlay was sued over both these features, and the new model, the 55xx series, won't have either. It was stupid because the MPAA acted like program sharing was like Kazaa even though you had to own a replay to share, and you had to know the person on the other end - it wasn't like you could search replay shares to download. And commercial advance, while cool, is only a slight improvement over the fast forward buttons that viewers have been using to avoid commercials on recorded TV shows since VCR's were top-loading.
I have blog like everyone else
"I wish American PVRs had all these features by default (ethernet, USB, microphone, camera inputs ...)"
...
I could do without the camera inputs and microphones. I don't need the cable company seeing what I do during Baywatch reruns
I think **AAs are not ready for doing a fair business in 21st centure. Somebody please switch them off.
Less is more !
I have yet to see a single DVR, TiVo or anything similar available on the market here. I want one - cause I just dont want to use the VHS anymore. My JVC VHS deck cost me more than my DVD Player... i bought it at the same time... something is wrong here.
Even Russia has units like this available.
Anyone know about the situation here? Shed any light? Is it a conspiracy by Sony to keep us buying VHSs?
"Personal Video Recorder" and its acronym "PVR" are now trademarked by TiVo in the U.S.
It wasn't the MPAA, it was the networks IIRC. MPAA sued over VCRs in the 80s though. Heh. Jack Valenti said they were 'the boston strangler'. God what an idiot.
autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
Speakers work surprisingly well as microphones.. the newest iPods have a hidden feature which lets you use one of the headphones as a microphone and record as MP3.
Oh the joys of living in any country without an MPAA/RIAA... Ummm, except France.
Anyhow, my PVR happens to have Ethernet, USB, Firewire, etc. It's just a PC with a TV-card.
It's unfortunate if you ask me, that better software doesn't yet exist to make your PC a DVR. Sure, MythTV is there, but quality is so horrible that it uses MPEG-4 and still needs a bitrate of 2000+ just for a watchable picture.... Might as well just be using MPEG2/MJPEG. The only Linux app I've found that does good quality recording from the TV card, and great quality MPEG-1/MPEG-4 encoding is MPlayer, and, unfortunately, it isn't really optomized for TV-encoding, so I can't do anything else with my Athlon XP 2000 while it is recording. It would be nice if a package like NVrec made an 'mencoderec' program to compliment 'ffmpegrec' and 'nuppelrec', and hence have the power and quality of mplayer with NVrec's TV recording specific modifications.
MythTV has many other drawbacks I could mention as well.
What is there to use? They all seems to have quite a number of their own serious drawbacks.
Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant