Yeah... but after dropping all that acid, I find myself anticipating earthquakes like, ALL THE TIME, man...
It wouldn't be so bad if I didn't live in Michigan.
--
Life is the leading cause of death in America.
Satellites? Why in my day we used dogs!
by
Prince_Ali
·
· Score: 5, Funny
We had a small earthquake a while ago, and about a minute before it happened my miniature pinscher jumped on my back and woke me up. If a single minpin can predict an earthquake a minute before it happens then a beowulf cluster of 1024 minpins could give people several hours notice.
Re:Satellites? Why in my day we used dogs!
by
Suhas
·
· Score: 5, Funny
"my miniature pinscher jumped on my back and woke me up"
A Horny dog is not necessarily predicting an earthquake
Re:Satellites? Why in my day we used dogs!
by
Urkki
·
· Score: 4, Funny
Yes, but all the animal activist groups would skin you alive for plugging network cables into dogs.
Better stick with satellites and computers for longer warning time, much less hassle.
Re:Satellites? Why in my day we used dogs!
by
eclectro
·
· Score: 3, Informative
Interestingly, a 1975 earthquake in China was successfully predicted due in large part to strange animal behavior. A large number of lives were saved.
Needless to say, this is an extreme exception to the rule, and is about as reliable as grandma's old bones are at predicting the weather.
-- Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
Re:Satellites? Why in my day we used dogs!
by
JJ
·
· Score: 3, Interesting
". ..this is an extreme exception to the rule, and is about as reliable as grandma's old bones . .."
I disagree. Dogs can hear much lower frequency sounds than humans and so would have a significant advantage at detecting imminent earthquakes. Farm animals (such as detected the China quake) can be readily shown to be aware of chanegs in a wide variety of situations: Earth's magnetic field fluctuations, gravitational disturbances, minute environmental chemical changes. I was at an air force base where the CO assigned men to watch the nearby reindeer herd. Their behaviour detected (and warned the base) of several natural and unnatural phenomenon. Among them being approaching weather fronts, seismic events and approaching Soviet aircraft and submarines. They were not as good as radar but more accurate at telling changes from routines.
-- So long and thanks for all the fish . . . !!!
Re:Satellites? Why in my day we used dogs!
by
eclectro
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
Sure maybe animals do sense many impending earthquakes, but their behavior is not interpreted as pre-earthquake behavior and goes unnoticed.
Hence, they are as reliable as grandma's old bones are at predicting the weather.
If that was not true, we would have earthquake prediction by animals on a regular basis (which we do not have).
Maybe if we could learn the ways of Dr. Dolittle and talk with them we would be able to do better in this area. But I'm not holding my breath.
-- Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
Re:Satellites? Why in my day we used dogs!
by
NearlyHeadless
·
· Score: 2, Informative
Interestingly, a 1975 earthquake in China was successfully predicted due in large part to strange animal behavior. A large number of lives were saved.
Needless to say, this is an extreme exception to the rule, and is about as reliable as grandma's old bones are at predicting the weather.
I saw a TV show about fringe-scientific earthquake predictors. One of the was quite unconvincing, but the other was interesting. He predicted quakes by satellite photos of "earthquake clouds". The finding mentioned in the Science@NASA article about thermal anomalies might back his theory up some. He makes his predictions publicly on his website.
Re:Satellites? Why in my day we used dogs!
by
sufehmi
·
· Score: 1
...Dogs can hear much lower frequency sounds than humans and so would have a significant advantage at detecting imminent earthquakes. Farm animals (such as detected the China quake) can be readily shown to be aware of chanegs in a wide variety of situations: Earth's magnetic field fluctuations, gravitational disturbances, minute environmental chemical changes
Why can't we develop a device that detects these as well ?
So we can get a more reliable warning of an incoming quake.
Or is it being developed already?
Re:Satellites? Why in my day we used dogs!
by
kerempuh
·
· Score: 1
Yes, but all the animal activist groups would skin you alive for plugging network cables into dogs.
AFAIK, they've developed wireless interconnection millennia ago;)
Re:Satellites? Why in my day we used dogs!
by
Urkki
·
· Score: 1
But I think wireless communication just isn't fast enough to run a Beowulf cluster on. At least not if you have a thousand dogs, like suggested. I mean, going wireless would be just a mess even for regular dog-to-dog communication with that amount of dogs in range. Beowulf on it seems like a no-go from the start. IMHO of course, please note that I don't have even one dog myself and don't have much experience with them at all.
Re:Satellites? Why in my day we used dogs!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
"Why can't we develop a device that detects these as well ? "
It would have been done it that's all the testing that was required. Dogs bark and arse around for all sorts of reasons, so it wouldn't be an earthquake detector - it'd be an earthquake or possibly postman or i'm hungry or is that my master or is that a female dog or what was that noise down the road or i'm stupid detector.
Re:Satellites? Why in my day we used dogs!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
The dog isn't predicting the Earth will move... just hoping.
Re:Satellites? Why in my day we used dogs!
by
JJ
·
· Score: 1
Under normal circumstances I would agree. The CO just happened to have noticed that the reindeer detected approaching Soviet Bear and Backfire bombers (which do have a distinctive low frequency sound profile.) He also had noticed the animals were very much in tune with the weather fronts, which cause quite a bit of havoc in the Arctic. That he ordered airmen (and one particular Lt.) to also learn, identify and report these behaviors plus sit us down and organize our reporting (we correlated and came up with the Soviet sub detection on our own) was what I consider highly unusual. Maybe not General Hammond, but not General Bauer either.
-- So long and thanks for all the fish . . . !!!
Re:Satellites? Why in my day we used dogs!
by
JJ
·
· Score: 1
Well there is scientific equipment that can hear(?) low frequency sounds. (See tree in forest of deaf people issue.) But of course they are expensive and difficult to maintain and if you put out fifty now you keep your five or six gard students busy all day everyday changing the data tapes. In short, its cheaper to buy a dog.
-- So long and thanks for all the fish . . . !!!
Re:Satellites? Why in my day we used dogs!
by
Alphtoo
·
· Score: 1
Hey, don't knock the "grandma's old bones" method of predicting the weather until you get some old bones of your own. Then you'll believe,friend. I'm a grandpa with some old, abused bones, and I didn't even have to look out the window for the last couple of days to know it was going to rain. My left knee, especially, is a dead give-away.
Re:Satellites? Why in my day we used dogs!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Yes, it's a very very California centric article, not really talking about other places in US. Never mind about all the places outside US that are discussed, they're totally irrelevant...
Sure, if you detect an earthquake before it strikes you could get lots of people out of say a city in danger. That still wouldn't prevent the city itself though. And with most people away from town, bad guys could break in to a lot of stores and so on, with little risk of being caught.
Or perhaps there could be panic situations with riots where people get robbed, injured or killed when everybody finds out about the earthquake.
It's a nice technology, but there are many questions around it that need to be solved.
-- Martin
Re:Then what?
by
confused+one
·
· Score: 5, Interesting
The idea is for everyone to have a (precious) few minutes to get to shelter, clear off the roads, etc. That's all. Think of it like the tornado warnings in the central part of the U.S. When the siren goes off, everyone knows it's time to head for the cellar...
Re:Then what?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0, Funny
The glass is half empty...
Re:Then what?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Yeah, you're right. Best to leave everyone to die in their homes rather than risk a few robberies. Remember: property is more important than life!
Re:Then what?
by
ShadeARG
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
Early detection leads to prevention. I'm not sure what the ramifications would be if one could be prevented, but I have a feeling earthquakes happen for a purpose.
Re:Then what?
by
CProgrammer98
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
ummm the purpose is to SAVE LIVES... who gives a damn about property/possessions when your life may be in danger...
-- And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
And with most people away from town, bad guys could break in to a lot of stores and so on, with little risk of being caught. Or perhaps there could be panic situations with riots where people get robbed, injured or killed when everybody finds out about the earthquake. It's a nice technology, but there are many questions around it that need to be solved.
The questions have been solved. Emergency managers on the US east and gulf coasts (and, I assume, their counterparts in other nations affected by tropical cyclones) have plenty of experience running evacuations without causing the collapse of civilization.
This of course assumes several days notice. If only hours or minutes are available, a tornado siren approach would be more effective.
It would be like John Ashcroft's daily terrorist warnings. When people are constantly warned then made afraid and nothing happens, sooner or later they start to ignore the warnings.
With prediction of seismic and volcanic events (Mammoth Mountain anyone?) as bad as it is, you would have a large number of warnings, followed by nothing.
Would you like to be the USGS spokesman who had to admit they had got it wrong - again? No, me neither.
Depends on the prediction window. If it's small, say a few hours, then you can batten down the hatches and ride it out. People who live in single family dwellings could shut off the gas and water, and go sit in the front yard for while. People who live in apartments and other such dense arrangements could get themselves out and to a safer locale.
Now if the window is a number of days, it gets trickier. You would probably have to evacuate the area, which is a very different story.
I don't think you'd just get a blanket warning, I think you'd get a statement such as "Fifty percent of the time that the sensors showed conditions such as these an earthquake in this magnitude occurred in this time period." You'd be making a technically accurate statement, backed up by past performance. I don't think I'd mind being that guy.
If the warning period was on the order of days, there'd be a web page for Emergency Services/Disaster Assistance coordinators to check, and it'd be their responsibility to decide what to do. The USGS doesn't force action, it reports scientific information to decision makers so they can act.
But the point of the project is to give better and earlier warnings with a much higher confidence factor. I don't know how good it's going to get but if, just for argument's sake, they start being right 80% of the time then people will listten and lives will be saved.
Any technology that helps prevent large scale loss of life has to be good. Of course, there will always be the dumbasses who stay put no matter what!
-- And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
Errr...quakes affect the east coast, too
by
godot42a
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
"...with a likely chance of showers. Tomorrow's forecast also includes a 20% chance of EarthQuakes on the 7.0 scale. Watch out Los Angeles, you could have a shaky morning. Phil."
"That's right Tom, and speaking of shaky mornings, here's Wolf with the sports..."
-- Jason Lotito
Aftershock Coming
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
It's like when your friend sitting down the bench lets you know he's about to rip a huge fart. Then he lets one fly that vibrates the hell out of the whole thing and you fall to the ground.
Re:California centric
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Dunno, I'm as far away from California as you can get, but I'm still interested on Arnold's latest adventures, even though his career has somewhat petered out.
Why would we want to do this?
by
Amsterdam+Vallon
·
· Score: 1, Insightful
Earthquakes serve as a population control mechanism, and have been for all of time.
Advanced humans (Americans, etc.) need to stop messing with Mother Nature and just let things run their course.
Why does Science always have to rear its ugly head? Just let things be.
--
Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate. Ex-O'Reilly/MIT employee, now a full-time Google employee.
Re:Why would we want to do this?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Funny, someone with the name Amsterdam in their name critcizing Americans for messing with mother-nature. Guess we should just tear down those dikes and, you know, let nature take its course.
It's only a matter of time...
by
Hogwash+McFly
·
· Score: 3, Funny
Who knows when the next Quake is coming? What will probably happen is that they'll predict a date but when the date arrives the Quake will be nowhere to be seen and then the Quake people will announce another date that may or may not be accurate.
-- Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
Re:California centric
by
Ark42
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
I dunno, I thought there was somewhat of a history of quakes around the mississippi. They happen less frequently but on a larger scale or something.
They are talking about predicting earthquakes, not trying to stop them. She kicks our ass the worst when we don't see it coming.
What about the Panic?
by
dirtydiaper
·
· Score: 3, Interesting
If the TV comes on with the news, and the reporter says, "NASA has recored that we are goning to enter a 6.0 sized earthquake in 1 hour" everyone is going to panic. Then criminals know that people are going to run away from there home. So they go and steal. As all the scared people run (because they a lot of trust in NASA) they get in traffice jams, there are tons of car crashes, roits start on the road, and then people start to fight. But wait! NASA was mistaken. There new system had a little flaw in it..oops
Re:What about the Panic?
by
misterpies
·
· Score: 1
sure, much better to be killed in your beds by falling masonry. By the same logic we shouldn't have hurricane warnings, flood warnings, warnings of imminent terrorist attacks...you've been watching too many movies.
And why this assumption that criminals are any less solicitous about their own safety than other people? How many housebreakers are going to break into a house knowing that it's probably going to collapse on top of them, that they'll probably have nowhere to store the stuff they've stolen, and that they'll be the lone civilians driving round a city empty except for firemen and police...
-- The author of this post asserts his moral rights.
Re:What about the Panic?
by
Pvt_Waldo
·
· Score: 2, Informative
RTFA. They are talking about monthly warnings, not short term notices. Here's a quote...
With some practice, says Raymond, scientists eventually should be able to use the InSAR data to infer when stresses in the Earth's crust have reached a dangerous level, issuing a monthly "hazard assessment" for a given fault. Forecasters might report that the likelihood of having a major quake on, say, the San Andreas fault during the coming month is 2%, or 10%, or 50%.
Yah, but that relies totally on if the cows have come home, and by that time your fat lady've already sung, so you might as well just go back to counting your eggs before they've hatched.
Or...wait for the earthquake that you couldn't predict to count the eggs after it hatches them for you...
--
--"The perfect example of the man of action is the suicide." - William Carlos Williams
Re:Nobody joined the last game
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I'll bite; Holborn.
Hammersmith jink is in play...
Re:California centric
by
Mostly+Harmless
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
"The planet does not revolve around the US. There are many places where earthquakes are a major part of everyday life."
You are absolutely correct. The problem is that this article is coming from NASA, and last I checked, NASA is a US government agency. So, we'll be using our resources and spending our money to develop a technology that we'll probably be nice enough to let the rest of the world use. So read about the San Andreas fault and say thank you.
-- "`Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.'"
-Douglas Adams, THHGTTG
Being able to detect earthquakes would be a huge boon, but you'd still need a way of getting people out of the way of the quake radius in an orderly fashion.
So suppose you get a day's advance warning of an earthquake hitting a major city, and put a warning out? Do people get into leave the city in a calm and orderly fashion or perhaps get to some sort of earthquake shelter? Or does half the populace jam the roads, trying to take every last one of their belongings with them as flee the city, while the other half go on a looting spree?
I know which one my money's on.
Re:Evacuation Chaos?
by
Bushcat
·
· Score: 3, Interesting
People don't need to leave the city. Instead, they move to evacutation zones where nothing's likely to fall on them. People die in earthquakes because (a) things fall on them and they die, or (b) things fall on them, they survive and then burn in the fires. In the Kobe earthquake a few years ago, relatives had time to bid farewell to trapped relatives as the fires approached. Get people a short way away from buildings, and they survive.
The Japanese system envisages, ultimately, being able to give a few minutes' warning, and that should be enough to save the majority of deaths. (Of course, the warning consists of gathering a bunch of learned people who learnedly pool their various thoughts on the matter, and get it wrong, in a learned manner, but the concept's reasonable.)
Having been in a couple of interesting earthquakes in Japan and the US, if someone gives me a 3-minute warning, I'm happy to go stand in the local park for 20 minutes.
And not all cultures loot after an earthquake, but here I'll obviously agree that NASA, spending US taxpayer's money, should clearly focus on the US population.
Re:Evacuation Chaos?
by
Channard
·
· Score: 2, Funny
People die in earthquakes because (a) things fall on them and they die, or (b) things fall on them, they survive and then burn in the fires.
Good point - I was getting earthquakes confused with Godzilla attacks. Though while *you* may know that, I suspect a great proportion Joe Public would still want to get out of the city completely, which could cause gridlock, people stuck in their cars when the quake strikes, etc.
I've always said that panic is a surefire way to go about getting yourself killed. If you:
A) Live in an earthquake zone. B) Panic at first warning, and flee the city C) Get stuck on a bridge trying to escape. D) Die because the bridge fell into the ocean when the earthquake hit
I have no sympathy for you. You were WARNED for cryssakes...
People don't necessarily even need to get out of the city... just out of and away from tall buildings. If you live in a house you could just camp out in your backyard and be safe.
Major quake within the next 30 years?
by
Sherloqq
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
A [US Geological Survey] study reported a 62% chance of a major quake (magnitude 6.7 or greater) hitting the area sometime within the next 30 years--not exactly something to plan your day around.
Any resident of California could tell you that... I guess with the current state of affairs, any progress would be good:)
Makes me think, though. Ability to detect variations of 1mm over the course of a year? How do they account for, say, a satellite drifting slightly (gravity, solar wind, whatever)? How do they measure that? What are their tolerances, a few angstroms?
Sheep bladders? SHEEP BLADDERS! Everybody knows that the true augerer uses the entrails of a pig to predict the future!
Using sheep bladders to predict earthquakes... why I never heard so much nonsense before in my life! Just goes to show how this generation doesn't know anything...
-- .unsigged
Mmmmm.....Critical Crustal Stress
by
Mostly+Harmless
·
· Score: 1
"The satellite earthquake forecast shows low to normal risk, with no critical crustal stresses or infrared signatures around the San Andreas fault."
Critical Crustal Stresses? Did that make anyone else laugh out loud? "Today's CCS Index has been brought to you by your good friends at Entenmann's. Experiencing Critical Crustal Stress? Satisfy your craving with Entenmann's Ultimate Crumb Cake, available now at your neighborhood supermarket."
-- "`Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.'"
-Douglas Adams, THHGTTG
Re:Nobody joined the last game
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I think you'll find Clapham Common is on a diagonal...however,
Goodge Street
nasa doing all the work ...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
19:21 12/8/2003
funny nasa develops the technology and not the insurence companies...
well i guess they don't care until it's proofen the predicion works and then the price of your insurance will go up (WHAT?)
i really shouldn't have missed corruption-class, er... i mean MBA...
A good number of volcanoes - such as those on Hawaii, are fitted with tiltmeters and laser-ranging reflectors.
As magma moves up towards the surface, some volcanoes start to 'inflate', bulging outwards. By measuring changes in tilt, and the geometry of the mountain, vulcanologists can get some warning of the changes under the mountain.
They usually combine this with seismic evidence (that moving magma creates swarms of tiny 'quakes), changes in gas production and the like to try and predict eruptions.
However, volcanoes are just as unpredictable. The USGS made a series of predictions about the Long Valley Caldera in Eastern California. It is an ENORMOUS crater which is underlain by an active magma chamber. The last volcanic activity in the region was about 400 years ago, and it is likely to continue into the future. Slap bang in the middle of Long Valley is the Mammoth Mountain ski resort, built around a dormant volcano.
In the early 1980s, the area around Mammoth Mountain began to bulge, molten rock was being forced upwards, there were swarms of 'quakes, trees began dying as CO2 bubbled up from underground. The USGS cautiously announced that they expected Mammoth Mountain to become active in the near future.
It didn't. The area remains highly active, but doomsday was put off for now.
BTW. if you ever get a chance to go to Mammoth Mountain, Long Valley and the Inyo Craters, do take it - the landscape is simply awe-inspiring.
Another example is Pozzuoli, which lies West of Naples in an area known as the Phlaegrean Fields. This is another colossal caldera with an active magma chamber. The last eruption was in 1538 when a new mountain (called Monte Nuovo somewhat unoriginally) was formed, the crater of Solfatara is still somewhat active, disgorging water and sulphurous fumes.
Pozzuoli is in the the middle of the Fields, a nice seaside town with some Roman ruins. However, during the 1970s, the area began to be shaken by hundreds of 'quakes a day. Even more worryingly, the area began to bulge upwards, sometimes by a centimetre a day! The Italian government ordered the evacuation of the entire city for several years, fearing another massive eruption. Eventually, the bulge subsided, the 'quakes faded and the people went back. But millions had been spent and enormous social dislocation caused.
It's quiet there at the moment, so everyone is looking East, over Naples to Vesuvius, which has been suspiciously quiet for far too long now.
At Yellowstone, one of the world's largest volcanoes, there are indications that something is going on. There's a big bulge on the bottom of Yellowstone Lake, but nobody is sure how long it's been there. It's emitting lots of hot water, though, and there is plentiful evidence of large hydrothermal (i.e. superheated steam) eruptions in Yellowstone's recent past. Also, trails in Norris Geyser Basin have been closed because the ground temperature is near 200 degrees Farenheit. While this is probably hydrothermal, not magmatic, activity, if Yellowstone ever does decide to have another major eruption (as it last did 600K years ago), you can pretty much count on massive worldwide social disruption. Ever wonder what it would be like if all food production in the western U.S. were to go away?
I don't think it was the same technology, but ISTR that the USGS did a pretty good job predicting the eruption in the Phillipines that destroyed Clark Field a few (less than 10) years back.
BTW, that's exactly what I said when I sprained my ankle hiking on it during a field excursion. A mile and a half from the damn truck. Ah, my old ig-pet days...
BTW, that's exactly what I said when I sprained my ankle hiking on it during a field excursion. A mile and a half from the damn truck. Ah, my old ig-pet days..
Nasty, almost as nasty as me slipping on an obsidian flow near Mono Lake. Yep, that stuff sure is sharp.
Best wishes,
Mike.
Re:morons anticipating unprecedented changes
by
Channard
·
· Score: 1
our advise is to be as far away from the walking dead contingent as possible
It can detect zombies as well? Cool. I guess now we know what George Romero's been doing since he wrapped on 'Bruiser'.
Re:California centric
by
usotsuki
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
Niagara Falls, NY. You think we don't get earthquakes here? I've lived here since 199-fsckin'-5 and lived through TWO earthquakes. Not big ones, but certainly earthquakes.
Re:California centric
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
>>we'll probably be nice enough to let the rest of the world use.
Sure, but at a price! NASA sells the reports/information. And NASA will say "thank you" each time a cutomer/governmnet pays!
Re:Nobody joined the last game
by
91degrees
·
· Score: 1
Liecester Square. (For all you pedants - this is quite valid under the ashcroft rule)
Before They Strike?
by
Root+Down
·
· Score: 3, Funny
...before they strike.
This is a follow up to a previous program that was predicting them after they struck. Just last year they managed to predict the 1906 San Francisco Quake with amazing accuracy, and results like that are money in the bank for further research.
Award for Unfortunate Choice of Acronym goes too..
by
Mipmap
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
"the Global Earthquake Satellite System (GESS)"
If I want money from Congress to deploy a constellation of satellites to detect earthquakes, would calling it GESS be my first choice?
Prediction window needs work
by
HarveyBirdman
·
· Score: 1
Phone: Ring!
Mayor Of Los Angeles: Hello?
Voice On Phone: This is NASA! You're about to have-
(Five minutes of rumbling, cracking and breaking glass and then silence).
-- ---
Ban humanity.
Re:Prediction window needs work
by
Channard
·
· Score: 1, Funny
Voice On Phone: This is NASA! You're about to have-
(Five minutes of rumbling, cracking and breaking glass and then silence).
Chronic flatulence, apparently.
Watching the stress build...
by
Cytotoxic
·
· Score: 4, Informative
The nice moire pattern in the photo showing changes in elevation was from after the quake. It does a nice job of showing how the stress along the fault was released at this point during a quake, but isn't directly a lot of help in predicting anything. However, one would assume that if you looked at similar photos along a known fault for long enough, there would be areas that did not show any colorfull moire patterns, surrounded by lots of color (indicating movement in the fault). Pretty cool, but I think most of the major faults already have this information from ground measurements.
The "60% chance of earthquakes in the next two days" portion of the prediction seems to rely on some piezo electric effect detected via magnetometers and thermal imaging. This has been speculated about for at least a couple of decades now, but I guess the signal to noise ratio is pretty bad since they haven't declared success yet. Maybe QuakeSat, mentioned at the end of the article, will provide enough comprehensive data to make some useful predictions. Predicting 12 out of the last 3 earthquakes isn't going to win you any friends!
Re:Watching the stress build...
by
cox075
·
· Score: 1
"Pretty cool, but I think most of the major faults already have this information from ground measurements."
Traditional methods involved in-situ gauges and periodic levelling and surveying lines. But these only provide measurements at a few points or along a few lines. Converting this into a picture of the strain field over an area is quite fraught. The survey lines are also quite expensive to do right (satellites are expensive too, but usually they are up there for more than one reason) but most importantly can only be executed occasionally - the time resolution is lousy.
The remote-sensing methods overcome most of these disadvantages.
Fiction First
by
f8xmulder
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
I read about a system very similar to this before in a book called, of all things, The Illuminati, by Larry Burkett. Burkett didn't go into the science behind it, but one of his characters utilizes satellites and their orbits to monitor seismic anomolies. By working in gravity and nice computer simulations, he is able to predict earthquakes several months in advance. Of course, no one listens to him, so its usefulness is somewhat mitigated by human stupidity. At any rate, I thought this a very interesting article.
What exactly was up with that book? The whole trilogy for crying-out-loud... I've never before read a book written by a dyslexic with ADD before. The way those paragraphs and thoughts just blended together hurt my brain...:-/
Dude,
I think you're thinking of the "Illuminatus Trilogy" by Robert Anton Wilson. If you're not, then let my know - I quite *like* books written by ADD-suffering dyslexics, and if there's another one out there that I haven't read, I'd like to know.
Cheers.
Ah, thanks for the correction. Yes, I was referring to the Illuminatus Trilogy. I actually enjoyed myself up to Book 3, but then took a three month breather, and tried to come back and finish. Not an endeavor I recommend. So how's it end?;-)
How's it end? With, like, a whole bunch of crazy shit... so no surprise there. There's actually a sequel - the Schroedinger's Cat trilogy, set in a variety of alternate universes, each one more confusing than the last. I actually preferred it to the original, but wouldn't recommend it if you get hug up on things like "plot" and "structure".
How Will You Warn The Public?
by
aerojad
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
Yeah, an early warning system for earthquakes sounds all well and good, but how exactly do you go about warning the public? If you go on TV and say "tomorrow there will be a 7.5 Earthquake under downtown Los Angeles", you run the risk of causing a panic in which people will die trying to get out of the city in what could only be described as the traffic jam from hell to get west or north.
If the earthquake occurs, you're a hero; you saved the lives of hundreds if not thousands. If the earthquake doesn't, or is much smaller than predicted, you caused lots of people to die for no apparent reason, and you've lessened the public?s readiness to believe you the next time you make an earthquake prediction like this.
This is nothing like trying to evacuate the shoreline of a major city for an approaching hurricane, because when those evacuations are issued they are in fact for the shoreline. You would be, in theory, proposing the evacuation of an entire metropolis, which no city in this country, or the world for that matter, has the proper infrastructure to handle such an evacuation unless you gave a lead time of a week or so.
Re:How Will You Warn The Public?
by
mike_mgo
·
· Score: 1
Living on the east coast I know next to nothing about earthquakes, but for even a modestly strong earthquake I qouldn't think you would need to evacuate an entire city. If you could just warn people to stay out of high risk areas (bridges & underpasses for example) I would think you would eliminate most fatalities.
Re:How Will You Warn The Public?
by
mikerich
·
· Score: 1
Exactly where on the East Coast?
I ask since the Atlantic Seaboard does have quite severe earthquakes from time-to-time. In 1755 there was a submarine 'quake about 270km off of Cape Anne, Massachusetts. Estimates put it at Richter 6 to 6.5. It caused massive damage to Boston.
Then in 1886 there was big 'quake centred near Richmond, Virginia. Estimated at Richter 6.6 it levelled most of the city.
And the East was heavily shaken by the trio of awe-inspiring New Madrid 'quakes of 1811-1812. Each was between 8.1 and 8.7 and centred on the Mississippi Basin. To give you some idea, people were shaken out of bed in New York, chimneys fell in Washington and church bells rang in Boston!
So that's the East, West and Middle well and truly covered by earthquakes.
Best wishes,
Mike.
Re:How Will You Warn The Public?
by
mike_mgo
·
· Score: 1
Well, since I'm only 27 years old I happened to miss out on those.
Re:How Will You Warn The Public?
by
mikerich
·
· Score: 1
:)
Which of course means you have longer to live so that you can wait for the next one.
Re:Nobody joined the last game
by
Bushcat
·
· Score: 1
Since we're interested in deep, safe places whilst the ground trembles, I'll do Down Street (using the "Did The Earth Move For You, Too?"), adjunct to the original 1907-1930 rules.
Extra-terrestrial seismology?
by
aaaurgh
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
"High above Earth where seismic waves never reach..."...except perhaps for the solar ones.
Only two weeks ago my current boss invited me to accompany him to an evening lecture... on solar seismology! Turns out the guy is not just a paper pusher but actually has some serious qualifications in nuclear physics (of the solar, not bomb, sort - albeit a fine line between). Gave me a fascinating insight into more of the complexities of our sun, how its quakes make ours seem like mere trembles and its potential effects on us.
Unfortunately, coming to Oz from an eastern european country meant he had little opportunity to use those skills, so now he's a frustrated project manager - there ain't no justice, eh?
--
Go permanent? In your dreams and my worst nightmares.
Piezoelectricity?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 1
I've always wondered why there hasn't been more research into piezoelectricity generating output which could be picked up by radios (or some other equipment) due to the sheer stress.
Many people living near the mountains before the Kobe earthquake (Kobe is sandwiched between the sea and mountains 1.5km inland) reported that their houses filled with a blue glow shortly before the earthquake.
Most import prediction: construction standards
by
peter303
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
Sort-term earthquake prediction- hours to weeks- is pyschologically comforting, but not that important in saving lives or property. One needs to predict the maximum likely earthquake force in a neighborhood in order to properly contruct buildings and roads to last for at least 30 years and save lives. In this area the USGS and State Geologic Surveys have made great progress. Case in point: The 1994 Northridge, California earthquake and 1995 Kobe, Japan were the same magnitude, yet the second killed ONE HUNDRED TIMES more people than the first. The success of the Northridge quake was partially attributed to luck and partly to that Los Angeles had more newer buildings than Japan that had implemented the more serious construction codes. It is tragic that M5 quakes that barely spill coffee in San Jose, California, but level mud-brick buildings and kill hundreds in some third world country.
I've been in three near M7 quakes in California and I can testify how psychologically traumatic a sudden quake is. Short term prediction would be comforting. It would also save some lives in large buildings like schools and stadiums (even though the 1989 San Francisco quake happended during a Wolrd Series baseball game without fatallity). And in reving up rescue crews.
Re:Most import prediction: construction standards
by
Bushcat
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
In the 1995 Kobe earthquake, many buildings collapsed at the 4th floor, because they followed the building regulations extant at that time: there was a step reduction in column strength at that point. The breaks were clean enough to be notable. For example, Kobe City Hall collapsed at the 4th floor, and the break was so clean, they cleaned away the debris and re-joined the building. So it looks the same as before, just 2 floors shorter. Building regulations don't always get it right.
Some people might look to the haste with which toppled sections of the Hanshin Expressway and damaged pillars on the Shinkansen were removed, to decide whether the regulations were followed in the first place.
It would be interesting to know whether tuned mass dampers and active mass dampers are performing to spec in the minor earthquakes leading up to the next "big one".
Re:Most import prediction: construction standards
by
dubiousg
·
· Score: 1
Note, too, that two quakes of the same magnitude can cause different amounts of damage depending on their depth. A recent, relatively high magnitude Seattle quake (the Nisqually[sp?] quake) would have done a lot more damage had it been shallower.
The problem of isolated quake precursors
by
peter303
·
· Score: 2, Informative
Short term earthquake prediction (hours to weeks) has not been unsuccessful due to lack of effort. After some promising hints in Russia and China in the early 1970s, scientists around the world looked for a systematic precursor. All kinds of things happen before A COUPLE of large quakes: well-level changes, radon gas burps, scared animals, magnetic anomalies, heat anomalies, foreshocks, and so on. The problem has been they have not been systematic and repeatable. Is is not clear whether a GENERAL THEORY OF PREDICTION is even possible then. One hypothesis is that each seismic region may have its characteristic precursors. However, even the most active seismic areas like the San Fernando Valley, Los Angeles experience large quakes tenty years apart, so its not easy to these this second hypothesis.
heh
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
reminds me of Under Siege 2 and that satellite that could start earthquakes
Actually weather prediction is a good model
by
peter303
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
Meterologists have found that people ignore tornado predictions until they got into the 20% range for a couple hour, single county window. Before that the citizenry would treat these predictions as spam. Now the warnings are good enough to save lives.
Californians are very blazee, and would ignore predictions of low probability. Scientists are happy if they can beat random probablity, which is about 1 in 20,000 of a destructive quake happening on a given day in Los Angeles. This is a far cry from a 1 in 5 that meteorologists have discovered necessary to get people to react.
You hit it on the nose. After any large quake a hoarde of people come out the woodwork from astrologists, to psychics, to pet-owners, and an occasional scientist claiming they've predicted the quake. This is routine in Usenet sci.geo.earthquakes.
Mexico City has a working alarm system
by
peter303
·
· Score: 2, Informative
Mexico City is both cursed and blessed by its earthquake situation. It is built on old lake mud which amplifies seismic waves, making buildings collapse. However, the worst quakes occur on the west coast, which takes seismic waves about five minutes to propagate through the rocks to Mexico City. They've used this delay to install a siren warning system for quakes, so people could leave buildings and turn off power. The first few years it issued too many false alarms, but has worked OK for recent west coast quakes.
A siren system would not work that well in California quakes, because the cities are too close to the earthquake faults for a general warning. However, refineries, power plants, subways, and computer disk farms, all which could react to a 10-30 second warning, are connected to an automatic warning system run by a jopint government corporate progam.
Easier to measure sun-quakes
by
peter303
·
· Score: 1
The ailing SOHO satellite in a parallel orbit to the earth measures vibrations by the Doppler method at 700,000 solar locations several times a minute. This is over a hundred times more locations than earth-based seismographs, where the oceans which make it hard to measure 65% of the earth's surface.
Solar data is "cleaner" and more complete than earth measurements. They dont have soil-coupling problems, nor man-made noise interference. The mathematics of solar seismic waves is the same as earth seismic waves.
They can even see new sunspots forming on the back side of the Sun through helio-siesmology tomography (www.spaceweather.com).
Sunspots are cooler than than rest of the Sun's surface and slow down solar seismic waves.
This is useful, because it takes up to two weeks for the sunspot to become visible on telescopes. In the meantime it may be causing solar flares that could interfere with earth-based electronics.
Re:Nobody joined the last game
by
91degrees
·
· Score: 1
Alwyas been a little wary of playing "ghosts" myself. Nevertheless, it is a valid move, and forces me to respond with Notting Hill Gate.
Re:Nobody joined the last game
by
Bushcat
·
· Score: 1
Well heck, back to the safety of York Road, then.
Good book on quake hazards
by
GeoGreg
·
· Score: 3, Informative
If you are interested in knowing more about earthquake hazards, but you're not a seismologist, check out
Earthshaking Science by Susan Hough. She works for the U.S. Geological Survey. She first discusses the basics of determining earthquake hazard, then discusses the currently estimated hazard in various regions in the United States. She's not optimisitic about specific earthquake prediction, but she thinks that we can improve our estimates of longer-term hazards. These estimates are critical for guiding hazard-mitigation efforts (building codes, for example).
Before posting 'What about public panic?'...
by
Pvt_Waldo
·
· Score: 1
...read the article. You'll see they are talking about releasing monthly hazard assessments, NOT "earthquake in 1 hour/1 day" warnings.
Here's a quote from the article...
With some practice, says Raymond, scientists eventually should be able to use the InSAR data to infer when stresses in the Earth's crust have reached a dangerous level, issuing a monthly "hazard assessment" for a given fault. Forecasters might report that the likelihood of having a major quake on, say, the San Andreas fault during the coming month is 2%, or 10%, or 50%.
"Yes Captain... back in the late 20th century spanning to the early 21st century, a web news site called Slashdot...."
"Get to the point Data..."
"Yes Captain... if we overload the Borg's systems with excessively massive activity... it might, in theory, cause their servers to melt into charred silicon...as the venacular went."
-- .unsigged
Easy to prove if the system works
by
Annamite
·
· Score: 1
... since there are several hundred earthquakes (and aftershocks) everyday. Like in the SoCal-NV area, there are dozens quakes just today. Yes, we get that many quakes and everyone is very much blase about it since it is much ado about nothing.:-)
They can prove if the system works (or not) in no time. The interesting is how the organization of evacuations and prepareness can be trickled down to people. Truth to be told, many SoCal residents still do not know that to do when an earthquake hits. Many homes do not have quake prepared kit. Water, foods, tools etc.. are lacking... We are less prepared than those in the East Coast who have to deal with tornadoes, storms year in and year out:-) (Sorry folks)
Re:Sad news, Stephen King dead at 55
by
Stephen+King
·
· Score: 0
You know, this is really getting old. I'm still not dead yet.
Cripes, And I thought that finally we (people living in Japan) have started figuring in the Slashdot editor's consideration.
These quakes are like, sooooo psychadelic, man.
Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
We had a small earthquake a while ago, and about a minute before it happened my miniature pinscher jumped on my back and woke me up. If a single minpin can predict an earthquake a minute before it happens then a beowulf cluster of 1024 minpins could give people several hours notice.
Slashdotter are stupid and biased.
Exactly, nobody in the world anywhere is affected by caliquakes. Oh, wait... nevermind.
If you get nervous, just remember that there are a few billion other people who don't really give a damn.
I'd be tempted to declare you a troll, actually ;)
Sure, if you detect an earthquake before it strikes you could get lots of people out of say a city in danger. That still wouldn't prevent the city itself though. And with most people away from town, bad guys could break in to a lot of stores and so on, with little risk of being caught. Or perhaps there could be panic situations with riots where people get robbed, injured or killed when everybody finds out about the earthquake. It's a nice technology, but there are many questions around it that need to be solved.
Martin
Ever heard about the Northern Appalachian Seismic Zone?
It's just not as densely populated as California.
"...with a likely chance of showers. Tomorrow's forecast also includes a 20% chance of EarthQuakes on the 7.0 scale. Watch out Los Angeles, you could have a shaky morning. Phil." "That's right Tom, and speaking of shaky mornings, here's Wolf with the sports..."
Jason Lotito
It's like when your friend sitting down the bench lets you know he's about to rip a huge fart. Then he lets one fly that vibrates the hell out of the whole thing and you fall to the ground.
Dunno, I'm as far away from California as you can get, but I'm still interested on Arnold's latest adventures, even though his career has somewhat petered out.
Earthquakes serve as a population control mechanism, and have been for all of time.
Advanced humans (Americans, etc.) need to stop messing with Mother Nature and just let things run their course.
Why does Science always have to rear its ugly head? Just let things be.
Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate. Ex-O'Reilly/MIT employee, now a full-time Google employee.
Who knows when the next Quake is coming? What will probably happen is that they'll predict a date but when the date arrives the Quake will be nowhere to be seen and then the Quake people will announce another date that may or may not be accurate.
Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
I dunno, I thought there was somewhat of a history of quakes around the mississippi. They happen less frequently but on a larger scale or something.
d rid/Charleston1895.gif
Check out this image of damage done by similar quakes: http://quake.wr.usgs.gov/prepare/factsheets/NewMa
Morphing Software
'High above the internet where packets never reach, satellites may be able to detect the slashdot effect--before it strikes.'
It is my view that we shouldn't try to meddle with nature, because everytime we do she kicks us in the ass.
If the TV comes on with the news, and the reporter says, "NASA has recored that we are goning to enter a 6.0 sized earthquake in 1 hour" everyone is going to panic. Then criminals know that people are going to run away from there home. So they go and steal. As all the scared people run (because they a lot of trust in NASA) they get in traffice jams, there are tons of car crashes, roits start on the road, and then people start to fight. But wait! NASA was mistaken. There new system had a little flaw in it..oops
they can also predict the slashdot effect then ?
When will I end this grieving ? When will my future begin ?
Note that there might be some practical considerations having a cow in, say, L.A.
I'll bite; Holborn.
Hammersmith jink is in play...
"The planet does not revolve around the US. There are many places where earthquakes are a major part of everyday life."
You are absolutely correct. The problem is that this article is coming from NASA, and last I checked, NASA is a US government agency. So, we'll be using our resources and spending our money to develop a technology that we'll probably be nice enough to let the rest of the world use. So read about the San Andreas fault and say thank you.
"`Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.'" -Douglas Adams, THHGTTG
So suppose you get a day's advance warning of an earthquake hitting a major city, and put a warning out? Do people get into leave the city in a calm and orderly fashion or perhaps get to some sort of earthquake shelter? Or does half the populace jam the roads, trying to take every last one of their belongings with them as flee the city, while the other half go on a looting spree?
I know which one my money's on.
Any resident of California could tell you that...
I guess with the current state of affairs, any progress would be good
Makes me think, though. Ability to detect variations of 1mm over the course of a year? How do they account for, say, a satellite drifting slightly (gravity, solar wind, whatever)? How do they measure that? What are their tolerances, a few angstroms?
(Not trolling, just asking)
Have EVDO, will travel.
You could always use sheeps bladders...
- m4. f0x
"Don't let your schooling interfere with your education." -Mark Twain
"The satellite earthquake forecast shows low to normal risk, with no critical crustal stresses or infrared signatures around the San Andreas fault."
Critical Crustal Stresses? Did that make anyone else laugh out loud? "Today's CCS Index has been brought to you by your good friends at Entenmann's. Experiencing Critical Crustal Stress? Satisfy your craving with Entenmann's Ultimate Crumb Cake, available now at your neighborhood supermarket."
"`Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.'" -Douglas Adams, THHGTTG
I think you'll find Clapham Common is on a diagonal...however,
Goodge Street
19:21 12/8/2003
...
...
funny nasa develops the technology
and not the insurence companies
well i guess they don't care until
it's proofen the predicion works and
then the price of your insurance will
go up (WHAT?)
i really shouldn't have missed
corruption-class, er... i mean
MBA
I wonder if similar technology can be used to predict impending volcanic activity?
"`Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.'" -Douglas Adams, THHGTTG
It can detect zombies as well? Cool. I guess now we know what George Romero's been doing since he wrapped on 'Bruiser'.
Niagara Falls, NY. You think we don't get earthquakes here? I've lived here since 199-fsckin'-5 and lived through TWO earthquakes. Not big ones, but certainly earthquakes.
-uso.
Dreams, dreams, don't doubt dreams, dreaming children's dreaming dreams. Sailor Moon SS
>>we'll probably be nice enough to let the rest of the world use.
Sure, but at a price! NASA sells the reports/information.
And NASA will say "thank you" each time a cutomer/governmnet pays!
Liecester Square. (For all you pedants - this is quite valid under the ashcroft rule)
...before they strike.
This is a follow up to a previous program that was predicting them after they struck. Just last year they managed to predict the 1906 San Francisco Quake with amazing accuracy, and results like that are money in the bank for further research.
"the Global Earthquake Satellite System (GESS)"
If I want money from Congress to deploy a constellation of satellites to detect earthquakes, would calling it GESS be my first choice?
Mayor Of Los Angeles: Hello?
Voice On Phone: This is NASA! You're about to have-
(Five minutes of rumbling, cracking and breaking glass and then silence).
--- Ban humanity.
The nice moire pattern in the photo showing changes in elevation was from after the quake. It does a nice job of showing how the stress along the fault was released at this point during a quake, but isn't directly a lot of help in predicting anything. However, one would assume that if you looked at similar photos along a known fault for long enough, there would be areas that did not show any colorfull moire patterns, surrounded by lots of color (indicating movement in the fault). Pretty cool, but I think most of the major faults already have this information from ground measurements.
The "60% chance of earthquakes in the next two days" portion of the prediction seems to rely on some piezo electric effect detected via magnetometers and thermal imaging. This has been speculated about for at least a couple of decades now, but I guess the signal to noise ratio is pretty bad since they haven't declared success yet. Maybe QuakeSat, mentioned at the end of the article, will provide enough comprehensive data to make some useful predictions. Predicting 12 out of the last 3 earthquakes isn't going to win you any friends!
I read about a system very similar to this before in a book called, of all things, The Illuminati, by Larry Burkett. Burkett didn't go into the science behind it, but one of his characters utilizes satellites and their orbits to monitor seismic anomolies. By working in gravity and nice computer simulations, he is able to predict earthquakes several months in advance. Of course, no one listens to him, so its usefulness is somewhat mitigated by human stupidity. At any rate, I thought this a very interesting article.
Yeah, an early warning system for earthquakes sounds all well and good, but how exactly do you go about warning the public? If you go on TV and say "tomorrow there will be a 7.5 Earthquake under downtown Los Angeles", you run the risk of causing a panic in which people will die trying to get out of the city in what could only be described as the traffic jam from hell to get west or north.
If the earthquake occurs, you're a hero; you saved the lives of hundreds if not thousands. If the earthquake doesn't, or is much smaller than predicted, you caused lots of people to die for no apparent reason, and you've lessened the public?s readiness to believe you the next time you make an earthquake prediction like this.
This is nothing like trying to evacuate the shoreline of a major city for an approaching hurricane, because when those evacuations are issued they are in fact for the shoreline. You would be, in theory, proposing the evacuation of an entire metropolis, which no city in this country, or the world for that matter, has the proper infrastructure to handle such an evacuation unless you gave a lead time of a week or so.
SecondPageMedia - Wha
The world needs braces to stop earthquakes!
Since we're interested in deep, safe places whilst the ground trembles, I'll do Down Street (using the "Did The Earth Move For You, Too?"), adjunct to the original 1907-1930 rules.
"High above Earth where seismic waves never reach..." ...except perhaps for the solar ones.
Only two weeks ago my current boss invited me to accompany him to an evening lecture... on solar seismology! Turns out the guy is not just a paper pusher but actually has some serious qualifications in nuclear physics (of the solar, not bomb, sort - albeit a fine line between). Gave me a fascinating insight into more of the complexities of our sun, how its quakes make ours seem like mere trembles and its potential effects on us.
Unfortunately, coming to Oz from an eastern european country meant he had little opportunity to use those skills, so now he's a frustrated project manager - there ain't no justice, eh?
Go permanent? In your dreams and my worst nightmares.
I've always wondered why there hasn't been more research into piezoelectricity generating output which could be picked up by radios (or some other equipment) due to the sheer stress.
Sort-term earthquake prediction- hours to weeks- is pyschologically comforting, but not that important in saving lives or property. One needs to predict the maximum likely earthquake force in a neighborhood in order to properly contruct buildings and roads to last for at least 30 years and save lives. In this area the USGS and State Geologic Surveys have made great progress. Case in point: The 1994 Northridge, California earthquake and 1995 Kobe, Japan were the same magnitude, yet the second killed ONE HUNDRED TIMES more people than the first. The success of the Northridge quake was partially attributed to luck and partly to that Los Angeles had more newer buildings than Japan that had implemented the more serious construction codes. It is tragic that M5 quakes that barely spill coffee in San Jose, California, but level mud-brick buildings and kill hundreds in some third world country.
I've been in three near M7 quakes in California and I can testify how psychologically traumatic a sudden quake is. Short term prediction would be comforting. It would also save some lives in large buildings like schools and stadiums (even though the 1989 San Francisco quake happended during a Wolrd Series baseball game without fatallity). And in reving up rescue crews.
Short term earthquake prediction (hours to weeks) has not been unsuccessful due to lack of effort. After some promising hints in Russia and China in the early 1970s, scientists around the world looked for a systematic precursor. All kinds of things happen before A COUPLE of large quakes: well-level changes, radon gas burps, scared animals, magnetic anomalies, heat anomalies, foreshocks, and so on. The problem has been they have not been systematic and repeatable. Is is not clear whether a GENERAL THEORY OF PREDICTION is even possible then. One hypothesis is that each seismic region may have its characteristic precursors. However, even the most active seismic areas like the San Fernando Valley, Los Angeles experience large quakes tenty years apart, so its not easy to these this second hypothesis.
reminds me of Under Siege 2 and that satellite that could start earthquakes
Meterologists have found that people ignore tornado predictions until they got into the 20% range for a couple hour, single county window. Before that the citizenry would treat these predictions as spam. Now the warnings are good enough to save lives.
Californians are very blazee, and would ignore predictions of low probability. Scientists are happy if they can beat random probablity, which is about 1 in 20,000 of a destructive quake happening on a given day in Los Angeles. This is a far cry from a 1 in 5 that meteorologists have discovered necessary to get people to react.
You hit it on the nose. After any large quake a hoarde of people come out the woodwork from astrologists, to psychics, to pet-owners, and an occasional scientist claiming they've predicted the quake. This is routine in Usenet sci.geo.earthquakes.
Mexico City is both cursed and blessed by its earthquake situation. It is built on old lake mud which amplifies seismic waves, making buildings collapse. However, the worst quakes occur on the west coast, which takes seismic waves about five minutes to propagate through the rocks to Mexico City. They've used this delay to install a siren warning system for quakes, so people could leave buildings and turn off power. The first few years it issued too many false alarms, but has worked OK for recent west coast quakes.
A siren system would not work that well in California quakes, because the cities are too close to the earthquake faults for a general warning. However, refineries, power plants, subways, and computer disk farms, all which could react to a 10-30 second warning, are connected to an automatic warning system run by a jopint government corporate progam.
The ailing SOHO satellite in a parallel orbit to the earth measures vibrations by the Doppler method at 700,000 solar locations several times a minute. This is over a hundred times more locations than earth-based seismographs, where the oceans which make it hard to measure 65% of the earth's surface.
Solar data is "cleaner" and more complete than earth measurements. They dont have soil-coupling problems, nor man-made noise interference. The mathematics of solar seismic waves is the same as earth seismic waves.
They can even see new sunspots forming on the back side of the Sun through helio-siesmology tomography (www.spaceweather.com). Sunspots are cooler than than rest of the Sun's surface and slow down solar seismic waves. This is useful, because it takes up to two weeks for the sunspot to become visible on telescopes. In the meantime it may be causing solar flares that could interfere with earth-based electronics.
Alwyas been a little wary of playing "ghosts" myself. Nevertheless, it is a valid move, and forces me to respond with Notting Hill Gate.
Well heck, back to the safety of York Road, then.
If you are interested in knowing more about earthquake hazards, but you're not a seismologist, check out Earthshaking Science by Susan Hough. She works for the U.S. Geological Survey. She first discusses the basics of determining earthquake hazard, then discusses the currently estimated hazard in various regions in the United States. She's not optimisitic about specific earthquake prediction, but she thinks that we can improve our estimates of longer-term hazards. These estimates are critical for guiding hazard-mitigation efforts (building codes, for example).
Here's a quote from the article...
"Slashdot effect?"
"Yes Captain... back in the late 20th century spanning to the early 21st century, a web news site called Slashdot...."
"Get to the point Data..."
"Yes Captain... if we overload the Borg's systems with excessively massive activity... it might, in theory, cause their servers to melt into charred silicon...as the venacular went."
.unsigged
... since there are several hundred earthquakes (and aftershocks) everyday. Like in the SoCal-NV area, there are dozens quakes just today. Yes, we get that many quakes and everyone is very much blase about it since it is much ado about nothing. :-)
... We are less prepared than those in the East Coast who have to deal with tornadoes, storms year in and year out :-) (Sorry folks)
They can prove if the system works (or not) in no time. The interesting is how the organization of evacuations and prepareness can be trickled down to people. Truth to be told, many SoCal residents still do not know that to do when an earthquake hits. Many homes do not have quake prepared kit. Water, foods, tools etc.. are lacking
You know, this is really getting old. I'm still not dead yet.
Karma: Undead.