Slashdot Mirror


Gyroscope Gives CellPhones 'Tilt Control'

Paul Stamatiou writes "You can now control cellphone activities by simply tilting it. "If you have a game involving keeping a car on the road, you do that by tilting," says company spokesman Jan Ahrenbring. The tilting technique can also be used to sweep large virtual pages across the phone's screen, which acts as window on the information."

48 of 213 comments (clear)

  1. It is still... by chipster · · Score: 2

    going to be a distraction while driving...no matter what.

    1. Re:It is still... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 3, Funny
      Indeed, that's true... but another thing struck me: the notion that the "...technique can also be used to sweep large virtual pages across the phone's screen".

      If the phone is anything like my Motorola T720, if I tilted it in any way, I wouldn't be able to see anything on the screen.

  2. Another feature I don't want/need. by vasqzr · · Score: 5, Insightful


    How about 3 day battery life with 6 hours talk time?

    How about good, clear calls?

    How about not magically losing signal when I walk in to another room?

    1. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by heironymouscoward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Perhaps you're living in the wrong country. My Nokia GSM has more than 6 hours' talk time, the battery runs for ten days or so, and reception is crystal clear everywhere I go.

      All it is really missing is motion control. That way I can answer the phone simply by picking it up, hold a call by putting the phone down, and scroll through my address list by shaking the phone like a lunatic instead of clicking those damn arrow keys.

      My guess is: if the rocker control is cheap and easy to hook up to the UI, it will be a natural and useful extension to the way we use phones.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature
    2. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by tempest303 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, well, some of us live in the US, where we like to Let the Market Decide(TM), and we apparently Decided to get Screwed with crap like CDMA instead of the pre-existing global fucking standard of GSM. Hooray for free market capitalism! :-P

    3. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny
      How about good, clear calls?

      I suggest NOT calling poor conversationalists, and dumping Sprint.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    4. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by gpinzone · · Score: 4, Informative

      Get educated. CDMA is much more advanced than the TDMA technology that's in the GSM standard. Besides, you want GSM? Get T-Mobile. You see how easy that is when you have a choice?

    5. Re:Another feature I don't want/need. by OlaL · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not that familiar with CDMA, so I cannot comment on it being more advanced, but GSM is a combination of FDMA and TDMA, not only TDMA.

  3. Driving on Cell Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "If you have a game involving keeping a car on the road, you do that by tilting,"

    How about you try keeping your car on the road by NOT talking while driving?

  4. Cue article... by Channard · · Score: 2, Funny

    .. about a guy whose car went off the road while he was tilting his mobile trying to keep a virtual car on the road.

  5. Palm! by RMH101 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Didn't Palm (sorry, Pa1m!) have a patent a year or so ago about this moving-a-window-on-a-bigger-virtual-screen thing?

    1. Re:Palm! by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, I don't know about patenting, but there's been hardware and software to do tilt sensing on a Palm for a while. Sure, it's not exactly common, but it's out there. There's even a game or two that use it.

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
  6. low viewing angle by SirLanse · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah tilt it and you cannot read it anymore. That won't cause more frustration on the highway.

  7. Give me a break by Mr.+Droopy+Drawers · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's a Cell Phone...
    No, it's a camera...
    No, it's a video game...
    No, it's a breakfast cerial...

    When I thought of digital convergence, this isn't what I had in mind...

    --

    To Copy from One is Plagiarism; To Copy from Many is Research.

  8. Drunk by zeth · · Score: 3, Funny

    Then I guess using it while being drunk is out of the question.

  9. Not all that new by chamenos · · Score: 3, Informative

    the technology used in this case might be more advanced (gyroscope), but the idea of tilting the phone to activate a function or control something isn't new. i had a casio watch many years back that would automatically turn on the backlight for a few seconds if you lifted up your wrist to look at it. i'm not sure this is a good thing though...just one more thing to keep drivers who shouldn't be on the road in the first place distracted.

    1. Re:Not all that new by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Old stuff indeed, the Microsoft Freestyle Pro gamepad is five years old and has a very similar feature, but instead of a gyro, it uses an acceleration sensor (ADXL202) to sense the angle of the controller relative to the earth's gravitational field. A gyro is actually not a good idea for this kind of control because it can only sense relative rotation angles (i.e. you have no zero point).

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
  10. It's also been done.. by Channard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... with a Gameboy Advance game, Kirby's Pinball - you put the cart in, moved the GBA abound and the onscreen character reacted appropriately.

  11. Cellphone Game by gykh · · Score: 4, Insightful
    If you have a game involving keeping a car on the road
    Thank you but I've had it with people, cell phones and keeping their cars on roads.

    Gits.
  12. To turn it off... by PiscoX · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... just tilt it vigorously against a wall.

  13. You WILL like this by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But he adds that consumers will have to be convinced that the technology is useful.

    How about stop all the crap 'features' that people have to be convinced are useful, and just get the damn things to work...

    (blissfully, I don't really care, because I remain cellphone anchor-free)

    1. Re:You WILL like this by jridley · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why? As a programmer, what the HELL could they want you for that wouldn't wait until tomorrow? Yes, if you're a sysadmin and something breaks, or if you're in charge of something online, they may need you now. But if the boss decides to address bug #132203 that's been on the books for two months, I think he can wait until tomorrow.

      I finally bought a cell phone for my wife and I to keep in contact easier. I tried to give it to my boss (I'm a programmer with some responsibility for an on-line service) but he refused to take it, saying that nothing was that important that it couldn't wait until tomorrow. He did take it eventually when I went on a 2 week vacation but he never called it, even when there was trouble; he found someone else to deal with it, even though he knew I could have handled it faster.

  14. Usefull feature? Hmmm by ultraw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is is only me, but I'm surpised every time some company comes up with some new feature for a cellphone, and they demonstrate it by saying it might come in handy when playing a game? Every new phone is marketeered by saying how much games it has, how much ringtones, how easily you can change the cover,...

    I can't think of a good thing I can do with a phone with a gyroscope in it right now. I assume that anyone can come up with some basic telephone feature that is still missing. One I can come up with is "if busy, present a callback function (Call back in 30 seconds? Yes/No)". Another one is "answer and delete message".

    Oh boy, if only I would design phones...

    1. Re:Usefull feature? Hmmm by gr66nman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The average cell phone is already more "usefull" than the average house phone. Cell phone marketers are trying to get those crazy teens with expendable cash to buy their gadgets. They want games! They want pretty colors! They want ringtones! Heck, if I was a teen right now, I'd buy one! (I spent $500 on a discman when I was 16 cuz I thought it was cool. To think, I could've put that in a mutual fund!)

    2. Re:Usefull feature? Hmmm by jargoone · · Score: 2, Funny

      I spent $500 on a discman when I was 16 cuz I thought it was cool. To think, I could've put that in a mutual fund!

      If you still have it, sell the discman on eBay. You'll probably get more than the mutual fund would be worth today.

  15. Been done before - quick patent it by sr180 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Is it like this or this or this And this goes back to 1999. Ahh but its on a phone now. Quick, I'd better patent it before someone else does. Bah.. Old idea. Just a new application.

    --
    In Soviet Russia the insensitive clod is YOU!
  16. A solution in search of a problem by Nutcase · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They keep trying to use this "tilt" technology somewhere. I first saw it at PC Expo several years ago (but before it became "techxNY" or whatever) - It was a SD card add on for a palm V. They were making a big deal out of scrolling maps with it. I demoed it, and tried to be polite about it, but the fact is that it is useless.

    There is much less control in tilting a palm while trying to watch the screen scroll, and then tilting it to level again to read the map - and once you tilt it level, you have to switch the toggle to stop it scrolling if you tilt it up to look at it.

    It reminds me of those games where you have a marble and have to make it fall in the hole in the middle of a big plate - you always overshoot the hole and end up on the other end.

    It's a dumb way to solve a problem that has already been solved via scroll bars and/or buttons.

  17. Bah... by KrunZ · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bah no news... My girlfriend has been tilting the control on our PlayStation for many years now when she do an extra sharp turn in SSX...

  18. What I really want.... by Crash42 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    is a $20 phone with a 200 hours batterylife for making phonecalls. I don't want a $2000 mp3 playing, fm radio, camera, tilt controlled gamecosole, pda, alarmclock thingy wich btw can also be used (if you ever might want to) to make phonecalls...

    --


    ....Excuse me, but ... ah, forget it...
  19. pro and con by jpellino · · Score: 2, Interesting

    pros:
    - my seimens phone is now so small I can't reliably grasp it and press keys.. need somethign else to control now (or just return the phones to hand sized)
    - it could standardize some controls (think t9) as opposed to a new set of buttons to think about on every brand

    cons:
    - we have enough gesturing while driving

    - you can't reliably track something that's in motion (try reading a book thaqt you're waving back and forth, then try reading when the book ist still and your head is moving - big difference)

    - i don't want the gyroscopic effect when i'l trying to wrestle with the phone (ok, they'll likely be small) or the dam thing precessing while on my driver's seat...

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  20. Tilting pie menus by SimHacker · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Here's a cool research paper from Sony's Computer Science Labs, about "tilting pie menus". I love it! I can't wait till all cell phones can sense tilt. Tilt control rocks!

    Tilting Operations for Small Screen Interfaces (Tech Note)
    By Jun Rekimoto, Sony Computer Science Laboratory, Inc. www.csl.sony.co.jp/person/rekimoto/papers/uist96.p df

    HTML version from google:

    http://216.239.53.104/search?q=cache:xf0Rxikgk34J: www.csl.sony.co.jp/person/rekimoto/papers/uist96.p df+tilt+pie+menu&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

    -Don

    --
    Take a look and feel free: http://www.PieMenu.com
  21. The downside of tilt control by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So every time someone bumps into me on the train or it jerks on the tracks I'm going to lose my place in a document?

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  22. Mercury switch vs Gyroscope? by Koos+Baster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    IMHO even a very small gyroscope seems pretty impractical wrt. (innertial) forces, size and battery life. How about simply using mercury switches to measure/estimate the cell phone's position?

    1. Re:Mercury switch vs Gyroscope? by njh · · Score: 2, Informative

      Firstly, do we really want to be putting more mercury into the environment, even in its safer metallic form?

      More importantly though, you can make an accelerometer using a single silicon chip. At last year's UIST I saw a tilt keyboard which used the standard silicon accelerometer.

  23. Re:More features I'll never use by dagbrown · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Oh how nice. You just use your cellphone to make calls.

    Thank you for your input. I DON'T CARE.

    I don't even know why the vast batallions of people who insist on saying "Hi! I only use my phone for making calls!" think they're saying anything new or original.

    If all you care about is making phone calls, there are lots of good, cheap phones which just do that. The VTech A700 comes right to mind--it's cheap, weighs nearly nothing, and just to keep all these people who insist on mentioning that they don't want their phones to do anything fun, has NO FEATURES. (Oh wait, I lied, it can send text messages. Sorry if that's too overwhelming a proliferation of features for y'all.)

    If you don't like gadgets that do cool stuff...what the heck are you doing on Slashdot?!

    And for the dude who bitches that all he wants is a few days of battery life and clear audio--hey, perhaps you should get rid of that 1989-standard brick and spend the twenty bucks to get a phone made this century! I've enjoyed crystal-clear audio and nice long battery life with every phone I've bought since 2000.

    In the meantime, I'll just enjoy my own phone--it has a color display, polyphonic ringers, a web browser with freakin' Java, a built-in FM radio, a speakerphone, and it's tiny and weighs 83 grams (that's less than 3oz for the American readers). Oh yeah, and it can go for a week between charges and I can talk for hours on it.

  24. Rotation by rf0 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Also from this months Stuff Magazine there is a perview of this phone on the inside back cover. One other funky thing it can do is that if you rotate it 90 degrees it will actually flip the screen orientation

    Rus

  25. Pseudo/alternate GPS use? by Channard · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Could this perhaps be used as a pseudo GPS system? Rather than determining your position by a GPS signal, could have data on gradients of an area and have the PDA in your car in some sort of cradle to hold it flat. Then the PDA would detect when you were going up a hill (the software would have to discount speed bumps) and update your shown position. Provided you kept to the roads, by checking your car's angle it could determine your exact position, at worst it could be used to show were on a contour map you were.

  26. The market by heironymouscoward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For some reason you Americans (though eminently logical in most areas) persist in believing that you live in a free market. A free market is one where government does not choose the winners but defines the rules and allows any player to compete. The USA just does not work like this: most significant industries are incredibly regulated, and telecoms is one of these. Energy is another.
    The USA's "free market" is anything but. For a really free market in telecoms, you have to look to countries where there is no anti-competitive parastate monopoly.
    Amazingly, also the countries with the cheapest and often best mobile phone services.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
    1. Re:The market by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 2, Informative

      "The USA just does not work like this: most significant industries are incredibly regulated, and telecoms is one of these. Energy is another."

      Energy and telecoms are regulated out of necessity. It makes sense for one company to run power lines and one company to run phone lines. Having 10 companies compete would be nice, but it is not likely to happen. So regulation is how the industry is kept from price-gouging. The power blackout in New York was caused by a (British owned) power company that neglected upgrades and maintenence - this happened because of deregulation, not because of regulation.

      Wireless telecoms don't work the same way. That's why they are much less regulated in the US.

      And, frankly, we have the best, cheapest mobile phone services. Yes, we have the odd "recieving party pays", and we pay a monthly fee. But for my $40 a month ($30 without the data), I get:

      - Unlimited calling on nights, weekends, and to other phones on the same network
      - 600 minutes to use anytime else
      - Unlimited SMS and 1xRTT (144kbit data), not billed by the messege or the kilobyte
      - Free roaming in a country roughly 3x the size and with as many people as the EU
      - Free long-distance, anwhere within the same area

      My friends all have the same provider, so I can call them whenever I want, for as long as I want, wherever I am in the country. Now, is coverage as good as it is in Europe? No. But all the major roads are covered, as well as all towns and cities with more than a couple of thousand people. And it's CDMA, too. I thought that my GSM phone sounded good until I got CDMA. No static, no wierd artifacts, no hiss. And data service with 3x the bandwidth and 1/2 the latency of GPRS.

      Prefer GSM? Fine. T-Mobile, AT&T, or Cingular will be happy to have your business. They even have roaming agreements so you can roam (free, of course) onto other GSM networks in the US. Prefer CDMA? Verizon and Sprint will be happy to give you service.

      Look at the progression of the US wireless industry:

      1983: First (analog) cellular service in US begins
      1992: First GSM service in Europe
      1995: First GSM service in USA, First CDMA service in US
      1999: First "No Roaming, No Long Distance" promotion (AT&T OneRate)
      2000: First "Free Nights/Weekends" Promotion (Verizon), First "Others on the same network" promotion
      2001: AT&T Goes GSM
      2002: LEAP introduces Cricket, $32 unlimited calling, but only works in your home area.
      2002: Sprint introduces unlimited 1xRTT
      2003: Cingular introduces "rollover", lets you keep unused minutes for 1 year after they are (not) used.
      2003: Free Nights/Weekends, Free Roaming, Free Long Distance, Same network promotions are the standard. So is unlimited data.

      So, are we really that far behind? CDMA, GSM, 1xRTT? Our wireless system works differently. Yes, the person recieving the call pays (with plan minutes (or with unlim. night/wknd/same service), but the person calling doesn't pay (no $0.25 per minute; it's just another local call, or, if the cellphone number is in a different area code, it's $0.03 a minute). It's partially because the US had cellphones in 1983. It's not "worse" just because it doesn't work like the European system.

  27. How about... navigation use by neodymium · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now, if the phone would use a 2-axis or even better 3-axis gyro, it could be used for navigation, even in GPS-uncovered areas (buildings...). It's the same principle they use in planes for the so called INS - inertial nav system.

    Just imagine the possibilities of such a navigation system. Finally, there's no more excuse for not finding the office of your PHB in a new building .

  28. Why a gyroscope? by pesc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Most modern phones have a camera. Why not just activate it and perform some image processing. Now you can determine how you tilt the phone just by looking through the camera.

    Another nifty thing you could do; if the camera is on the back-side of your phone, you should be able to activate it and use the phone as an optical mouse. Just slide the phone on your desk, and the mouse pointer on the phone screen moves. Cute eh?

    Maybe I should patent this and get rich?
    But now I have already written about it on slashdot. Too late. Damned slashdot, hindering innovation like this!

    --

    )9TSS
  29. Obvious pr0n industry application... by glassesmonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ..can't you see the interactive applications of tilt/movement of portable devices that also have a vibrating ringtone function.

    I'm just saying it seems the sex trades are the first to jump into new technology. (I'm still waiting for the multi-camera function of DVDs to appear in anything but adult entertainment)

    Did I mention they also have cameras??

  30. Been done before by redNuht · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nintendo had a similar engine in Kirby's Tilt 'n' Tumble for the Gameboy Color, where the player had to tilt the Gameboy to make Kirby roll. And the gyroscope thing was inside the game cartridge too.

    Too bad the GBA SP loads the cartridges from below, making the game unplayable. :)

  31. Re:Absolutely brilliant - in principle by Nutcase · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As a guitar player, I can understand the nuances involved in motion patterns, control, differentiation of player/user, etc. But in practice, tilt control provides no real value. It requires you to change the orientation of the device to provide input, even though your primary method of feedback is dependant on the orientation of the device.

    Imagine if you typed into your word processor by placing your hands in the middle of the document on your screen and typing on a virtual keyboard - you can't see what you are typing until you stop, look, and then you have to fix mistakes blind as well. It just doesn't work, even though a virtual on screen keyboard has instant geek appeal.

    Besides, the nuances you are talking about don't really apply to the cell phone/pda market - that is about getting information into and out of the device as quickly and accurately as possible. subtle wrist flicks and tilting are not the way to do that. I can't actually think of an application (except perhaps security/authentication) that would benefit from nuanced control in this medium. Maybe if they created a virtual theramin or something... but talk about a niche market. ;)

    If you want to spend your phone real estate on a screen, do two things:

    1) Voice dialing. When done right, this is a killer feature.

    2) Touch Screen. Scroll maps and such by simply placing your finger (thumb?) on the screen and "pulling" it.

    the physical orientation of the device in the real world should have no bearing on the behavior of the systems software.

  32. The gyro is too small... by dpbsmith · · Score: 4, Funny

    I want a cell phone with a big honking gyro that resists any attempt to change its orientation in space. When I put it on my belt clip and try to turn a corner, I want it to precess, fall off my belt, hit the ground with the antenna downward, and slowly rotates around in a cone-shaped evolute. I want it to exercise my wrist muscles when I pick it up and clip it on again.

    It would be JUST as useful as that silly tilt control, and a lot cooler.

    I also want it to have flip-out accessories for clipping nails, opening cans, and extracting stones from horse's hooves.

    I've given up on the things ever being reliable ways to make telephone calls.

  33. Gyroscope? by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While this could be done with a gyroscope, that would be an incredible waste of energy (motor+cellphonebatteries=BAD). What I hope they mean is a simple spherical mercury switch.

  34. Much more advanced... by heironymouscoward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This may be true but it's close to meaningless when it comes to the market and quality of coverage. The great debate over CDMA/TDMA/whatever is fun for telco engineers but the public wants to know only:

    1. does it work in my area?
    2. is it reasonably reliable?
    3. is it economical?

    And most of the mobile networks in the USA fail on these grounds for reasons that have nothing whatsoever to do with technology. I remember trying to use my GSM in the States, frustrated to find that outside the airports and a few major cities, nothing worked.

    Mobile telecoms in the US are handicapped by the regulations surrounding fixed lines: in most European countries mobile phones outstrip fixed lines because they are as cheap and much more useful. In the US, the "local calls are basically free" regulations mean mobile phones can't compete fairly.

    This kind of issue is much, much more important than the relative merits of CDMA, TDMA and their variants.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
  35. I like the old game better... by volkerdi · · Score: 2, Funny

    "If you have a game involving keeping a car on the road, you do that by tilting," says company spokesman Jan Ahrenbring.

    It's hard enough to keep my car on the road while blathering on the cellphone, but now I have to tilt, too?