Slashdot Mirror


Crippled CD Deemed Defective In France

Noryungi writes "The daily newspaper Liberation reports that at least one person got her money back, by suing EMI, no less. She was able to do that with the help of the largest consumer organization in France, which has its own list of articles on this subject. So, French people who cannot read their copy-protected CDs can get their money back, but copy protection is not made illegal by the court decision... It's certainly a step in the right direction, though..." For the French-impaired, an anonymous reader adds "The Register has a good article on EMI being forced to refund the cost of a copy-protected CD, because it was found to have a 'hidden defect' -- it wouldn't work on a car's CD player ... Is the tide changing?"

81 of 388 comments (clear)

  1. Rimshot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    EMI surrenders to France?!

    1. Re:Rimshot by Zeinfeld · · Score: 5, Insightful
      EMI surrenders to France?!

      I find it somewhat bizare that EMI would even littigate the case. The product was clearly defective as manufactured and so under EU law the consumer has an absolute right to a full refund. No pissy-US '90 day' guarantees here. If you sell something that is broke the consumer gets a refund, period.

      As for the wider political context, don't forget what the French Ambassador to the UN said on the subject of Iraq, basically that France belives it is not opposing US interests, just that it believes it has a better idea of what those interests are. The US came to regret not taking French advice in Vietnam and according to Paris will come to regret not taking their advice on the subject of invading Iraq.

      From this we can deduce two things, first that the French can be insufferably arrogant for such a small country whose military success under Napoleon turned out to be what the music industry would call a 'one hit wonder', being followed by flop after flop. The only recent successes being in the consolation prize category of 'quickest surrender'. And no Jaques, the magnificent conquest of the Sahara desert does not qualify a country as an empire. The test of an empire is not merely the acreage under occupation, the locals have to actually be at least aware of the occupation.

      The other thing we may deduce is that despite the fact they are frequently arrogant and obnoxious the French are frequently right, particularly when it comes to the 'stop the US from pig-headed self defeating policy blunder' category.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    2. Re:Rimshot by zangdesign · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please don't let France know your opinion - they'll become insufferable.

      Oh, yeah, and don't let the Department of Homeland Security or the Justice Department know either.

      For obvious reasons.

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
    3. Re:Rimshot by ajnlth · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Arrogance is thinking that one needs to have military succes behind one self to say what one believes.

      To have military victories is not an achievement, it's merely a proof of the failure that lead up to the armed conflict.

    4. Re:Rimshot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That is so true. After all, look at France's diplomacy in the late 1930s.

  2. Hmm by blitzoid · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow, I really don't blame EMI. I mean, who could have known beforehand that they wouldn't work in some extremely common devices? Come on, guys. Testing can only go so far before they have to release it into the real world. And I'm sure that for the tuesday afternoon that they DID test compatability, they were very thorough.

    --
    I am a filthy pirate.
    1. Re:Hmm by Matrix272 · · Score: 4, Funny

      And I'm sure that for the tuesday afternoon that they DID test compatability, they were very thorough.

      You give them too much credit to say Tuesday Afternoon... I would have said between 12:15pm and 1:45pm on Tuesday afternoon... with lunch in there too. And, since pirates are taking away so much money for research and development of the anti-piracy schemes, they didn't even have a CD Player to test on... so I suspect they looked at a drawing of a CD Player on a chalkboard, and if when they closed their eyes and concentrated really hard, they heard the music playing, they declared it safe to sell.

      --
      "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
    2. Re:Hmm by blitzoid · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh please, that 'piracy is bad' excuse is just pissing me off to no end.

      Look, if it weren't for filthy pirates like me constantly ripping music and software, the copyprotection industry would STAGNATE. Millions of jobs would be lost, and the economy would start to collapse. The fact is, pirates and mp3 traders are keeping the industry alive. It's anti-economy types like YOU GUYS that are causing the downfall of everything we hold dear!

      --
      I am a filthy pirate.
  3. Clear Labeling of CDs.. by FileNotFound · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is an Act that if passed will require clear lables on all copy protected CDs. From EFF:

    Senator Ron Wyden recently introduced the Digital Consumer Right-to-Know Act (DCRKA), a bill that would require entertainment companies to label products with copy-protections that limit consumer use. Support the DCRKA if you think the content industry should be ordered to clearly label media that restricts your rights!

    http://action.eff.org/action/index.asp?step=2&it em =2664

    --
    In Soviet Russia, the television watches YOU!
    1. Re:Clear Labeling of CDs.. by samsmithnz · · Score: 4, Informative

      This act is hardly going to help though. If you buy a CD that is labeled, and then it doesn't work, you're not going to be able to return it, because you were warned before you purchased!!!

    2. Re:Clear Labeling of CDs.. by FileNotFound · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Needless to say (but I'll say it anyway) the clear answer to that is:

      "DON'T BUY COPY PROTECTED DISKS"

      It's called boycotting and it works.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, the television watches YOU!
    3. Re:Clear Labeling of CDs.. by ajnlth · · Score: 3, Interesting
      As far as I know it's already so that Copyprotected CD's aren't allowed to use the "Compact Disc" symbol since they don't follow the CD standard.

      Might just be fun to go into a record store and ask why they put a disc that clearly isn't a CD (no label) in the CD-section.

    4. Re:Clear Labeling of CDs.. by Le+Marteau · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Might just be fun to go into a record store and ask why they put a disc that clearly isn't a CD (no label) in the CD-section.

      What are you, a masochist? Have you seen the people they hire in record stores these days? I don't know about you, but if I wanted to make a point, it wouldn't be with one of those simpletons.

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    5. Re:Clear Labeling of CDs.. by Aadain2001 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, then the RIAA will just blame piracy for the drop in sales, like always, and press Congress/law enforcement agenecies to track down these horrible pirates to protect their old and failing business model. They've done it before, they'll do it again. And again. And again. And again. And...

      --
      Space for rent, inquire within
    6. Re:Clear Labeling of CDs.. by jsfetzik · · Score: 5, Informative

      Check out the list at Fat Chuck's

    7. Re:Clear Labeling of CDs.. by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "It's called boycotting and it works."

      No it won't. Every CD not sold will be accounted for by piracy. Buy the CD and take it back, that'll perk their ears up.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    8. Re:Clear Labeling of CDs.. by FileNotFound · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Fine, let them blame piracy.

      If it's piracy then the "protection" obviously isn't working.

      Boycotting will do some good,,,

      --
      In Soviet Russia, the television watches YOU!
    9. Re:Clear Labeling of CDs.. by carlos_benj · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's called boycotting and it works.

      Not if you don't let them know you're boycotting. As another poster said, they'll blame the lost sales on other things. It might be better to buy copy protected CD's and then return them for a refund with an explanation that it didn't work, or that you didn't realize it was copy protected and you don't buy copy protected CD's (to ensure compatibility with future hardware purchases).

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    10. Re:Clear Labeling of CDs.. by swordgeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The only way this would work is thus:

      1) All playback media that _looked_ like a CD but wasn't would have to have a label on the front in large letters saying, "THIS IS NOT A CD. IT MAY NOT PLAY IN YOUR CD PLAYER."

      2) All such media would have to be shelved separately in the stores. There would be a CD section, and an "other" section.

      What I don't understand is why Phillips can't sue for the misuse of their physical format, even if it's not labelled as a CD. It's pretty clear that these things are intended to be almost exactly like a CD, but violate the standard (and hence, not always work.) This is damaging to Phillips, damaging to their product, and damaging to the (real) CD format.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    11. Re:Clear Labeling of CDs.. by amRadioHed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      OT, but as a music store employee I have to comment... ...is alphabetical order really that complicated?
      You woulnd't think so, but nevertheless a large percent of the customers in music stores don't put any effort at all into putting cd's back where they came from. Now, if the customers just left stacks of CD in a pile on the floor or on a counter, then it wouldn't be much of a problem. Sure, I would desire to inflict great suffering on them, but the discs could still be easily put back where they belong with no problem. However, the customers aren't happy leaving them in a stack somewhere, instead they put them back in the completely wrong section on the opposite end of the store, thus when someone needs to find the disc it is impossible to locate. I even had a customer complain about not being able to find a CD that I know for a fact he was looking at earlier in the day, but of course he just dropped it off in the Soul section (i found it later) when he previously decided he wasn't going to buy it.

      Obviously, the employees do what they can to find cds that are misfiled, but the customers have us vastly outnumbered.

      I have been told that our store is actually quite well organized compared to others, so I probably shouldn't take your commment personally, however my store is still not as good as I would like it to be. It's a never ending job. (/rant)

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  4. I'm surprised... by trompete · · Score: 2, Funny

    that they got their money back, considering that most of those CDs have warning labels on them like a PC with an 'X' through it.
    I guess that if a woman can get millions of dollars for spilling hot coffee on herself, someone else can get a refund for a CD that they couldn't play in their computer.
    I hope this encourages record labels to stop making that type of CD!!

    1. Re:I'm surprised... by SydShamino · · Score: 3, Informative

      Obligatory links to TRUTH about McDonald's case whenever a person speaks of it based on IGNORANCE:

      http://www.centerjd.org/free/mythbusters-free/MB_m cdonalds.htm

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    2. Re:I'm surprised... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So a symbol with a PC with an "X" through it is supposed to communicate clearly to consumers that the CD won't work IN A CAR STEREO?

      Unless the CD said is was designed to fail in the type of equipment she tried to use it in, I think there is definitely a reasonable consumer expectation that a CD will produce music if placed in a CD player, unless otherwise notified. Call me kooky.

    3. Re:I'm surprised... by Qzukk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Obligatory pointing out the OBVIOUS about the McDonald's case:

      The woman was still stupid and should have been at greater fault (she was found to be partially at fault and the reward was reduced proportionally) because opening hot coffee in your lap is stupid regardless of the temperature.

      The fact that the coffee was hot enough to give third degree burns doesn't make this any less stupid. Do you think she would have cared what temperature the coffee was at when she did this? If the sign had said "Warning: Coffee causes third degree burns" do you think she would have acted differently? Assuming she's mentally stable she doesn't go around her daily life deciding whether to do things or not based on how bad a burn she gets ("Gee, I should touch the hot stove, I only get a second degree burn this way!") so why was this important for her coffee?

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    4. Re:I'm surprised... by squarooticus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      : Is opening up a cup of coffee over your lap the
      : smartest thing? perhaps not. But why would you sell
      : something at a drive thru-window that people would
      : have to get out of there car to open?

      Because if you are able to accomplish this feat of legerdemain without burning yourself (as 99.9% of people seem able to do), then you should have right to buy your coffee piping hot. Stupid and/or clumsy people have the choice to buy their coffee from restaurants that don't make it so hot. Don't take away the rights of the vast, vast majority to get their coffee hot, the way they like it.

      It's attitudes like this ("Everything that's gone wrong in my life is someone else's fault") that makes life in the US so stressful and expensive for those of us who think it isn't right to blame someone else for everything.

      Things are seriously at the point now that I can't even leave a hedge trimmer sitting on the floor near a window for fear that someone I didn't invite into my home (i.e., a burglar) would accidentally cut off his fingers and successfully sue me for damages encountered in the process of his performing an illegal act. The stress of having to worry about every little thing that I could possibly be sued for is the clearest argument (IMO) for tort reform.

      --
      [ home ]
    5. Re:I'm surprised... by Mikeytsi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Have you ever heard of a cupholder? You know, that thing you can stick drinks in to?

      --
      I've been called a "Fucking Dick" by better people than you.
    6. Re:I'm surprised... by sholden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do you think she would have cared what temperature the coffee was at when she did this?

      Yes.

      If the sign had said "Warning: Coffee causes third degree burns" do you think she would have acted differently?

      Yes. Though that would still be stupid, a cup which has enough structural rigidity to not collapse without the lid would be a better solution.

      Assuming she's mentally stable she doesn't go around her daily life deciding whether to do things or not based on how bad a burn she gets ("Gee, I should touch the hot stove, I only get a second degree burn this way!") so why was this important for her coffee?

      That's exactly what everyone does.

      I don't put on safety gloves when I get a can of coke from a vending machine. I assume it will be cold but not so cold as to hurt me. If the vending machine operator decided that keeping the cans in liquid nitrogen made them last longer I would expect some warning about the unexpected temperature the cans would be.

      When I buy a coffee I expect it to be reasonably hot and I take suitable care. I don't tip it over my head, for example. However, I don't put on safety gear before buying my morning coffee. I don't make sure everybody around me keeps at least a meter away. Since I know if someone bumps into me and my coffee splashes onto my chest it won't do serious damage - it'll just wet my shirt. If the coffee vendor decided that the coffee would be better if it was acidic enough to eat through clothing and skin, then I would expect some warning - and I would take more precautions...

      When I buy a slice of pizza I don't test the temperature with a thermometer. I assume it is at a suitable temperature for eating, though the first bite might be a bit careful in case the cheese is too hot. I assume it isn't hot enough to burn my hand through the plate as I hold it though.

      Everyone I see does numerous things everyday that are slightly risky because the potential damage is small enough to not be worth taking more care.

      If the potential damage of those actions suddenly increased they would want some warning.

      I've spilt coffee on myself before. All it did was make my clothes a bit wet. I've never spilt any potent acids on myself (even though I used them way back when I was doing chem. eng.). I must have been more careful with the acid than with the coffee. I did exactly what you seem to think is abnormal. I figured wearing safety gear and being very precise about my movements wasn't necessary when I was carrying the cup of coffee down the hall, because the damage it could do (making me wet) wasn't worth the hassle.

      Then again, maybe you walk around in a plastic bubble (after all you could catch a virus and die - that's a pretty serious thing) and handle your hot coffee and cold coke with tongs.

    7. Re:I'm surprised... by lawpoop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nobody should be distributing 180 - 190 F liquids to the public FOR ANY REASON, ESPECIALLY AS A FOOD PRODUCT! This is not just 'hot coffee', this is scalding liquids which caused 3rd degree burns. If you had to work with 180 liquids as a part of your job, you would have protective gear and OSHAA regulations all over the place. Why do people think McDonalds should get away with handing this stuff out to people in the drive through?

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    8. Re:I'm surprised... by squarooticus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So if your estimate is that 1 in 1000 people burn themselves, how many cups of coffee are sold per day? Divide that by a thousand, and multiply it by the cost of a casualty department treating burns.

      Those individuals' insurance companies should pay for that cost, and those individuals' premiums should go up as a result of the economic consequences of their risky behavior. I shouldn't have my liberties reduced because some people are dumb.

      What, you've never fallen over?

      I'm smart enough not to buy 190 degree coffee, because I know I'm clumsy! As one of my friends said recently, people should not be able to use the courts to turn their stupidity into an asset.

      --
      [ home ]
    9. Re:I'm surprised... by goon+america · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Don't take away the rights of the vast, vast majority to get their coffee hot, the way they like it.

      The point was it was so hot no human being could consume it safely. That woman had third degree burns on the insides of her legs. Do you have an asbestos mouth?

  5. france surrenders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    don't worry, next week the riaa will send to france a man wielding a sharp stick and german accent to sort this mess out.

  6. Is the tide changing? by Jason1729 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's good to see not all countries have turned themselves over to corporate interests, but a victory in France (which doesn't exactly have a history of putting foreign corporate interests ahead of their own citizens) doesn't say much about the tide in the US.

    Jason
    ProfQuotes

    1. Re:Is the tide changing? by selderrr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      doh ? And who says the tide in the US is to anyones interest ouside the US ? For all I care, DRM can be enforced on everything in the US, as long as Europe sticks to its senses. In fact, that's what it's going to with US vs Asia. No way that Asia is ever going to DRM stuff that's intenede for bigbucks flowing to the US.
      And just maybe, that's where your only hope lies : Europe & Asia NOT DRMing and exporting to a black US market. Remember that US alcohol fiasco some 80-70 years ago ? You guys are geniusses at fucking over consumers whilst creating a market for the mob.

      Call me a troll, but if you're honest you'll admit that US politics holds world record in screwing its own people while trying to control the world market.

  7. Viva la France! by macshune · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hey, we got the bomb now! We'll never surrender! Screw you EMI!

    1. Re:Viva la France! by Hatta · · Score: 2, Funny

      As long as you don't start catapulting livestock.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  8. If it's defective - isn't a recall in order? by machinecraig · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Seems like they've proved that EMI made defective disks, shouldn't a recall be necessary?

  9. EMI response by MCS · · Score: 5, Informative

    I actually e-mailed EMI about the copy protection on the new Jane's addiction CD. Here is the reply I have recieved:

    "We are in receipt of your email and regret you have experienced a problem with one of our products.

    The technology we are using is designed to ensure that the disc plays on multiple devices. There have been playability problems with a very small number of players, but the vast majority of these problems have been fixable by our technology suppliers as they are constantly updating and improving the technology that is included in the copy controlled discs.

    As long as consumers alert us to the problem we will endeavor to adapt the copy control technology.

    Please forward your address as we search for a replacement from another territory. Thank you.

    Regards,

    Emi Music Canada
    Quality Control Dept
    1 (866) 553-0220"

    1. Re:EMI response by mopslik · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're luckier than I was. I contacted EMI Canada about several of their defective discs, only to receive several suggestions to upgrade my CD players and/or operating system. Sorry, no sale there.

    2. Re:EMI response by MCS · · Score: 3, Informative

      If it helps any, here is the letter I sent:
      ---
      To: qc@emimusic.ca
      Subject: A message from CapitolMusic.ca

      Sent to Department: manufacturing

      To whom it may concern:

      I recently purchased the CD Jane's Addiction: Strays at my local Best Buy. This CD was released in Canada through EMI Canada. While the music on the CD is stunning, I cannot help but feel angered/frustrated by the lengths I have had to go through in order to hear it. The physical CD itself does not allow it to be read on my Rio Volt CD player, while my I-Book will play all but the first track. During the 3:49 of the first track all I hear is silence. It was only with luck that my girlfriends car stereo could play the CD as it was meant to be heard.

      Why have I had such trouble listening to this CD? It is because of how it was manufactured. It was produced in a non-standard way in order to give it "copy control". While I fully understand the company or artist desire to protect their music, it does not excuse the sale of a product that does meet universal CD Audio standards. Why should I the consumer suffer, and not be able to play the CD in it's entirety on any CD player I own? Because of this problem, I now refuse to buy any CDs with "Copy Control" and will recommend to my friends and anyone who listens to follow suit with me.

  10. CDs Death March by Sophrosyne · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Once (and if) Apple gets their iTunes music store over to windows, and into international markets we will slowly begin to see the CD market go the way of the horse and buggy.
    The market has been declining for years due to high prices, and formulaic content... there is still a possibility record labels may become more innovative and profitable with newer technologies.
    I think that it's about time these huge record labels had some sense knocked into them (even if it is by the french government).

  11. Is the tide changing?" by FreeLinux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You are kidding, right? Do you honestly believe that EMI, let alone the record industry as a whole, is going to change their practices because of a single insignificant law suite that cost them a single CD and court costs? Here comes the clue train.

    This will have no impact on them whatever. They will continue with business as usual and for each returned CD that they get, they will sell millions.

    The only way for there to be a "changing tide" is if they are seriously affected monetarily, as in a major drop in sales, or if they are legally bound by a class action suite or something similar.

  12. Copy protection = Defective by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 4, Interesting

    EMI being forced to refund the cost of a copy-protected CD, because it was found to have a 'hidden defect'

    What beautiful wording. And absolutely true. If you purchase data, it should be that, data, plain and simple, with no extras or hitches.

    Theory and Philsophy lesson 1 for Copy protection companies:
    If you can read it, you can copy it.

    I think they already know that deep down. So their idea is to make the data harder and harder to read... to the point where it becomes defective.

    ...morons

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    1. Re:Copy protection = Defective by xenobyte · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I recently bought two EMI releases, both labelled with "Copy Control" logos and disclaimers: Kraftwerk's "Tour De France Soundtracks 2003" and Delerium's "Chimera".

      I have no idea whether these actually were protected but I was able to fire up my Exact Audio Copy, load the disks and make a flawless rip of everything without the slightest problem or need for tweaks.

      Both disks held the data track at the end which seems to be omnipresent on these disks so I guess they were something besides a normal CD, but the copy protection was worthless to say the least - it didn't even slow me down.

      The CD drive used was a regular A-Open CD-RW/DVD combo drive, about 3 months old.

      The rips are to be used by myself at work (nobody wants to drag along thousands of CDs just to be able to have a decent selection of music to listen to), so they are perfectly legal under danish law, even with the stupid european DMCA in effect, according to CONSOLIDATED ACT ON COPYRIGHT 2003 (Consolidated Act No. 164 of March 12, 2003), paragraph 12, section 2, subsection (v):

      "The provision of subsection (1) does not provide the right to ... make single copies in digital form of other works than computer programs and databases unless this is done exclusively for the personal use of the copying person himself or his household."

      Source: http://www.kum.dk/sw4550.asp
      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
  13. Re:I'm surprised and didn't read the article by Pius+II. · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Achete par une consommatrice, Francoise Marc, dans un hypermarche Auchan, le CD d'Alain Souchon etait illisible sur l'autoradio de sa Clio."

    A PC with an X through it doesn't really help to show that the CD doesn't play in your car. If that isn't enough, most DVD players don't play these, either. This policy is starting to really piss consumers off. As far as I know, most retailers around here (Germany, that is) just take all the CDs back, if you give them "it doesn't play on my DVD/car stereo/discman" as the reason.

  14. Moot by doctechniqal · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you believe
    the study referenced in this article, then the whole issue of copy protecting audio CDs is pretty much dead in the water anyway.

  15. Defective CDs by Fareq · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is very interesting, and was probably the right thing to do.

    After all, when one sells a disc that looks like a standard CD in a store that sells standard CDs, especially on the same racks as standard CDs, it is a reasonable assumption for the consumer to believe that the product is a standard CD.

    If there were significant visible markings on the disc that said something to the effect of "This disc does not meet the red-book standard for Compact Disc Digital Audio" then it would be reasonable to allow the sale of the crippled CD -- after all, the manufacturer has made it apparent that this disc is not a Compact Disc, but that it *might* support some of the same functionality. If you are concerned, don't buy, if you buy, well, you were warned.

    This is how I feel the "broken CD game" should be played. I have no problem with companies trying to peddle "broken" CDs, just so long as every consumer knows that it is "broken"

    As for the CDs/DVDs that become opaque after a certain time? I'm not sure what to do there. You see, the trouble stems from the fact that, until it becomes opaque, the disc conforms to the standard. Still, I am certain that an appropriate "warning label" can be determined.

    In the end, it ought to be up to an informed market to decide whether "broken" or "sudden-death" media are acceptable -- not the government to mandate.

    That said, I applaud the decision made, and will continue to support these kinds of decisions until it is made blindingly obvious which disks are crippled

    1. Re:Defective CDs by ruiner13 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "If there were significant visible markings on the disc that said something to the effect of "This disc does not meet the red-book standard for Compact Disc Digital Audio" then it would be reasonable to allow the sale of the crippled CD -- after all, the manufacturer has made it apparent that this disc is not a Compact Disc, but that it *might* support some of the same functionality."

      Knowing the technical knowledge of most consumers, when you refer to "red book" they'll probably think the magazine and wonder what the hell that has to do with CDs and buy it anyway. I think the disclaimer needs to be... how should I say... dumbed down.

      --

      today is spelling optional day.

    2. Re:Defective CDs by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the consumer does not now what 'red book' means.
      they should have to put on the from cover, in at least 10pt font:
      "This cd will not play in some home stereo equipment, most computers, and some cars."
      Becasue thats the truth, and they no it.

      for the other case, it should say "This cd will be unplayable X days after the package is opened."

      the goverment should stepmin and force these kind of clear labels. If the market bears it, then fine.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  16. Insensitive Headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Should read:

    Differently-Abled CD Deemed Special In France

  17. Tide changing my ass... by Rinikusu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I doubt that this means much. Just like the guy who was able to get $200 back from some major OEM for Windows XP by taking it to small claims, it's not going to change "business". It will take hundreds of those kind of lawsuits and the accompanying legal bills to make a difference. I mean, if you're spending $1 million in attorney's fees to represent a company for $100k in refunds, what do you think you're going to do? Look at how effective "our" /. boycott on the RIAA, Sony, Disney, et al is. A few loud mouth geeks don't mean anything in the real world. Remember high school? Remember how nobody listened to you because you were just a nerd and were "uncool"? What makes you think things have changed just because you're an adult? We can raise a stink, but no one cares. They're still writing the checks, consuming like mindless idiots, and the vocal minority still doesn't get what we want. You have to think to yourself that most of the Joe Consumer's out there will buy a defective product and if it doesn't work, are still too lazy to take it back (see Radar Jammers).

    --
    If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
  18. Good step... by KinkyClown · · Score: 2, Interesting

    At my work we don't have a CD player and a audio set. We all have computers, CD-ROM players and a set of speakers. I can not listen at my work to some CD's I have bought. I am not doing anything illegal and I can not listen to my own bought CD's.
    I hope that a similar case will hit the courts as well. I don't want to rip my CD's and make MP3's, I just want to listen to the music. Why do I have to be punished for something I did not do? Getting my money back is no option, I can play my CD's back home on my normal audio set, but I don't like it when I am programming that I can not listen to my good-mood-programming-music.

  19. Despite all the France-bashing of late by West+Palm+Beach · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have to applaud their Court's decision on this matter.

    If the CD doesn't play in certain devices, it's defective. Period.

    When is the RIAA going to realize that they're eroding their own customer base with lawsuits, faulty products and such. Especially when the end product costs almost $20 a pop.

    I've bought precious little music since the advent of copy-protection, though it doens't help that theoverall quality of music lately has declined. Until such defects are corrected, I'll simply continue my stance.

  20. Think of the future by OMG · · Score: 4, Informative

    The copy protected CD you buy today may run on your current CD player. But what about your next CD player? How much percent of your CD collection will not run on the new player?

    heise.de has setup a register for copy protected CDs and on which drives/players they are playable. The results so far show, that the copy protection is not PC drive specific. Some CD players do play some copy protected CDs, some players don't. The same goes for CD-ROM drives. Depends on the copy protection system also. Thus you can't tell which copy protection system will stop your next CD player from playing the CD.

    Thus the record companies are FORCING music fans to make a digital copy (which is a crime in Germany now if you have to circumvent a copy protection mechansim).

  21. CD Spec? by Cynicx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Possibly a stupid question: Does a copy-protected CD actually follow the CD specification from Philips et al.?

    1. Re:CD Spec? by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 2, Informative
      Possibly a stupid question: Does a copy-protected CD actually follow the CD specification from Philips et al.?

      Depends on the copy protection the record company used. Some copy protection schemes do in fact mess up the CD data in a way that computer CD drives can't read, and such CDs typically don't have the official CD logo on them. They did at one time, but Philips got upset about it and now they don't.

      One recent purchase of mine (Doll Revolution by The Bangles) says it's copy protected, and doesn't have the CD logo on it. As nearly as I can tell, they make it all but impossible to play it on a Windoze box unless you use their (brain-damaged) CD player application. My Linux box played it without comment, and cdda2wav ripped tracks without comment.

      Another recent purchase (Unicas by Azucar Moreno) also says it cannot be played on a PC or Mac, but doesn't seem to incorporate any copy protection of any kind. Go figure.

      ...laura

  22. How about a copy-protection standard? by alexre1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is understandable that the music industry would want to have copy-protection on the CDs they distribute to curb piracy. However, their current piecemeal approach leads to situations such as these - where some CDs can be read only in some readers.

    Secondly, this type of copy-protection is a clear violation of the rights of any person who buys such a CD. Under U.S. and Canadian copyright laws (I don't know the European equivalents), a person has the right to make one copy of a legally purchased CD for backup/archival purposes.

    I suggest that the Music Industry come together and create a new standard for copyright protection that

    1. Re:How about a copy-protection standard? by swordgeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmm. And then what do I do with my $12,000 CD player? Oh, I guess I quit listening to new music.

      All right, I don't personally have a CD player that expensive (although my turntable is worth about $1500). It's irrelevant--if they're going to force me to upgrade my stereo, then they'd better be offering me something POSITIVE, not just more restrictions!

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    2. Re:How about a copy-protection standard? by Alien+Being · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Secondly, this type of copy-protection is a clear violation of the rights of any person who buys such a CD."

      Here's where that argument breaks down. You have no rights. Rights in this country are granted by congress. You can't afford to outbribe industry lobbyists, so the laws are being made in their favor.

      Many of the new laws go against the fundamental concepts of American freedom that we had drilled into our heads in public school. We want to believe that the government is "for the people", but what we see is a bunch of fatcats who don't give a damn about the Constitution and who cannot relate to the other 90% of the population.

      One psychobabble term for the way all of this makes us feel is 'cognitive dissonance'. The choices for coping with it are

      a) fix the problem.
      b) give up your old beliefs.
      c) find some new beliefs that are more important than the old ones.

      Our feckless fuckwads in the whorehouse and the war department know they can't convince people to give up the beliefs that we should live free, that we're innocent until proven guilty, etc. They sure as hell don't want us to fix the problem, because that would mean putting Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, Powell, Wolfowitz, Dewey, Cheatham, and Howe in front of a firing squad. Their method is to give us some new things to believe in.

      In other words, due to 9/11 our rights are not important. Due to 9/11 we must go occupy Iraq. To protect the economy (what economy?) we must allow big business to run roughshod over American citizens.

      Damn, i need a drink. I guess that's option d).

  23. Re:I'm surprised and didn't read the article by phelddagrif · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And if you were living in the states, you'd have committed a federal crime, by violating the DMCA. As you circumvented a copy protection system.

  24. If they were really overlords... by corebreech · · Score: 2, Informative
    ...then they'd rule Windows defective as well.

    It's crippled too.

    Latest outrage: I can't format drives as FAT32 under XP. Just found this out yesterday.

    The reason why:
    • a) The retards who call themselves engineers at Microsoft forgot how.
    • b) Windows XP has been deliberately crippled.
    • c) All of the above.
  25. this isn't the first time by bodrell · · Score: 5, Informative
    I knew this article seemed familiar . . . At the end of June, there was another article about a consumer in Brazil who sued for the same reason. And won. In contrast to this French case, the guy won about $340. Whether that is in addition to legal fees, I don't know. The original Brazilian article referenced is here.

    Interestingly, the Brazilian CD which was defective (Tribalistas, featuring Marisa Monte, Arnaldo Antunes, and Carlinhos Brown) was not copy-protected in the US (I was worried after reading this article, but I bought a copy and had no problems reading it on my Mac).

    --
    Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar
  26. Way to go Europe by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I normally consider myself a die-hard american. I tend to support our government through thick and thin. But as of late, it seems like European government (courts especially) are the only ones that care to protect their citizens. Look back through Slashdot articles for the past week or two. You'll see what I mean.

    I had never considered moving to another country. But the more European governments step up to this crap while our own government takes the DMCA attitude, the better my chances of visiting the EU for an extended stay.

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
  27. Re:What's the "offensive" part? by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Whats offensive?

    Have you ever heard any french pop music?

    It'll make you run screaming to the Backstreet Boys and Britney Spears.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  28. Good work France! by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I for one am sick of non-standard standards. Can you picture how backwards civilization would be if every book every published required a secret-decoder ring to read?

    What if you needed special glasses to see the great works of art from the Renasance?

    Copyright law is about giving companies a way to profit from selling their works for a limited time before said works become part of our collective culture. Just because computers enter into the picture does not make it okay to take a jackhammer to tradition.

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  29. But is it a Compact Disc? by Brahmastra · · Score: 2, Informative

    A while ago, I heard that philips wasn't going to allow the crippled CDs to be called Compact Discs because it doesn't follow the Compact Disc Spec. Is that true or does anymore have more information about that?

  30. Actually... by Electrode · · Score: 3, Informative

    According to this article, FAT32 can be up to 8 TB. However, due to limitations in Windows 2000 and XP's FAT driver, it can only create a FAT32 filesystem as large as 32 GB.

    1. Re:Actually... by joe_bruin · · Score: 3, Informative

      nope. windows xp can only format filesystems as fat32 up to 32gb. however, windows 2000 can format fat32 disks much larger than that (i've never hit the limit). the reason this is intentionally disabled in xp is to discourage the use of fat32 in favor of ntfs on new drives. whether this is due to purposeful compatibility breaking (yes, everything reads fat), or simply a well-intentioned plan to get rid of the ancient fat file system is only known to microsoft.

    2. Re:Actually... by mst76 · · Score: 2, Informative
      nope. windows xp can only format filesystems as fat32 up to 32gb. however, windows 2000 can format fat32 disks much larger than that (i've never hit the limit). the reason this is intentionally disabled in xp is to discourage the use of fat32 in favor of ntfs on new drives. whether this is due to purposeful compatibility breaking (yes, everything reads fat), or simply a well-intentioned plan to get rid of the ancient fat file system is only known to microsoft.
      Although fat32 supports filesystems up to 2TB in theory, there are sound reasons to get rid of it soon. Summary: for large filesystems, you end up with either large cluster sizes (leaving you with a lot of wasted space like on fat16), or large file allocation tables (FATs).
  31. DORKA by tds67 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Senator Ron Wyden recently introduced the Digital Consumer Right-to-Know Act (DCRKA), a bill that would require entertainment companies to label products with copy-protections that limit consumer use.

    Contrast this with the Digital Online Right-to-Know Act (DORKA), which would let us geeks know when the RIAA is spying on our P2P activity in an attempt to limit consumer use.

  32. Re:CD Format Is The Problem by Petronius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    if the new media can be plugged into anything that can be programmed, the game is over. Even if it's not, you can still re-capture the (analog) audio with a sound card and make a pretty good copy. it's not perfect but but people will still do it. I don't think there's anything the RIAA can do at this point. And this is the tale of what's to come for the movie industry with DVD ripping/burning.

    --
    there's no place like ~
  33. Re:End this madness! by indianajones428 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One of the least effective ways of getting something to stop is telling people to stop doing it (especially on /.)

    --
    When a thing has been said, and said well, have no scruple. Take it and copy it. --Anatole France
  34. You make me sad by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    On the one hand, you link to a (very accurate) anti-Bush site in your sig. On the other, you've bought into the anti-French propaganda pushed by the same right-wing idiots that site criticizes. The fact is that the French military record overall is no better or worse than the record of most of the other great powers. Win a few, lose a few; that's the way it goes.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    1. Re:You make me sad by canajin56 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, the worst they can do is a nuclear missile to the face.

      On the note of France and nuclear weapons...anybody notice how France resumes nuclear testing, and everybody makes a big stink. The US announces it is pulling out of nuclear treaties, and resuming testing, and nobody cares.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
  35. Re:CD Format Is The Problem by t_allardyce · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That works quite well for somethings, games consoles with proprietory storage devices like cartridges, but it becomes expensive. PS2's have DVD drives and that works pretty well because a) not as many people have DVD writers and b) it requires modding the hardware. The only reason i have ever bought PS2 games is because its too hard for me to copy or download them but thats only temporary - if i ever got a dvd burner and could easily download full iso's or swap with friends then that would be it for paying. With music its very different. Music is just sound in the end and whatever lock-in hardware system you design, as long as it has an output someone will have an input ;) Although they are trying this anyway with their stupid new system i cant remember what the piece of shit is called..

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  36. CD Verity: open source compliance testing software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    There is actually a group of standards that apply to CDs. The trick is figuring out what exactly is happening on any particular disc. For example, in the official Compact Disc Logo Guide published by Philips, there are different logos to show discs compliant to the following standards:

    • CD-DA for Compact Disc Digital Audio
    • CD-G for Compact Disc Graphics
    • CD-EG for Compact Disc Extended Graphics
    • CD-MIDI for Compact Disc MIDI
    • CD TEXT for Compact Disc TEXT
    • CD EXTRA for Enhanced Music Compact Disc
    • CD-ROM for Compact Disc Read Only Memory
    • CD-i for Compact Disc Interactive
    • CD-V for Compact Disc Video
    • Video CD or VCD for Video Compact Disc
    • Photo CD or PCD for Photo Compact Disc
    • CD-R for Compact Disc Recordable
    • CD-RW for Compact Disc ReWritable
    • SVCD, Super VCD or Super Video CD for Super Video Compact Disc
    • High Speed CD-RW for HIgh Speed Compact Disc ReWritable
    • DD-ROM for Double Density Compact Disc Read-Only Memory
    • DD-R for Double Density Compact Disc Recordable
    • DD-RW for Double Density Compact Disc ReWritable

    There is actually a specification for each one of these logos. Also, there is no guarantee that a CD-ROM drive will be able to play a CD-DA disc (per the spec, though the spec says that it would be easy, and it is).

    There is an effort underway to understand all of this stuff and to figure out how these things work together, and with various types of hardware. The project has an Open Source (BSD-style license) package called CD Verity that performs some testing of discs. The software is part of Interhack's Digital Media Project and might be of interest.

  37. CDDA Vs CCCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My CD-players say "Compact Disc Digital Audio" and not "Copy-Controlled CD", therefore, my CD-players are not compatible with these CDs and must be returned. Period.

    BTW: Have any of you seen the Copy-Controlled labels on these CDs? It's always on a TRANSPARENT sticker, making it as hard as possible to spot, but just enough to hold in court. Slick! I sure as hell didn't know until I put it in my CD-player on the computer at home, finding it wouldn't play. The CD (Radiohead) was returned. :( The store didn't even make me aware of this, naturally, they just want to sell whatever they have blindly.

    As for these Midbar/Macrovision guys (the guys who made these "protections" (*cough* programmers with screw-drivers *cough*)), they must be wizards in the field of business. I mean, managing to fool the music industry giving them false hopes like this.

    Midbar/Macrovision

    Why the protection is completely useless: if you can play it, you can copy it. I don't see how it matters with copy-controlled CDs in that respect. Especially in the Internet world, where it's enough with one person sharing it, and given the fact that audio compressions are lossy means that it doesn't matter much what the heck your source was when recording it quality-wise.

    Geez. Wake up!

    Yeah, whatever. But this article really made my day. At least someone pays attention to this open injustice.

  38. I'm seeing more of these from outside the US... by djaj · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I buy a lot of CDs (yeah, I'm a sucker, what can I say?), and I still haven't seen a US-based copy-protected CD, but I've recently purchased three imports (one each from Australia, Germany and France) which were very clearly labelled as such. (I didn't know they would be copy-protected when I plunked down money for them, and I've been able to make perfectly good MP3s of the contents from the analog source.)

    Neither disc has the CD logo on it, and both had very large stickers on the shrink-wrap with this logo on it and descriptions of what it meant, and what systems you should be able to play it on. (Since I refused to install the software necessary to actually play these on a computer, I have no idea how well they work in that respect.) I'm certainly going to avoid these from here on out if I can. I've noticed that amazon.co.uk, amazon.fr and amazon.de will occasionally note that a disc is copy-protected, so I'm going to check there first before buying from here on out.

    --

    Your mileage may vary, but mine is constant.

  39. My conversation with EMI: by LadyLucky · · Score: 2, Informative
    Dear [name removed]

    Thanks for your e-mail and we are sorry you have experienced playability issues with the new [CD removed] and your PC.

    It would help us a lot if we could get the model details of your PC so that we can make sure that the compatibility issue will be resolved as we continue to evolve this technology.

    If you could attempt the following and send the resulting file to us, it would help a lot. Go to START -->Programs-->Accessories-->System Tools-->System Information. Please save this information as a text or nfo file and send that back to us.

    Please note that you will require at least "Power Users" access or higher to install the application on Microsoft Windows NT operating systems and above.

    With these details we can forward your query onto our European technology partner.

    Please be aware that, if you prefer, you can return the copy controlled CD to the place of purchase to obtain a refund. (my emphasis)

    sincerely
    [name removed]
    IT & New Media Director

    > Hi

    > I recently bought [CD removed], with your copy control stuff on it. When I try and play it on my computer, it uses 100% CPU, and also sounds terrible. There is a lot of high pitched screeching, and it cracks and sounds scratchy. All normal CDs sound fine. >

    > What should I do? I play most music on my computer, and your label says it works fine, but it doesn't at all.

    > Regards, [name removed]

    --
    dominionrd.blogspot.com - Restaurants on
  40. Re:Frances loses out there by jorgen · · Score: 2, Informative
    In Iraq, France proppsed up Saddam Hussein as he executed 100,000 or so a year.... while the US is rebuilding the place.

    Excuse me? Like the US didn't help Iraq build its military and WMD capabilities, especially during its war against Iran.

    You don't have to dig deep to find that from 1982 to 1990 the United States supplied Iraq with not only conventional arms and cash but also chemical and biological materials, including the precursors for anthrax and botulism, so point your own dirty finger elsewhere.

  41. Re:Does this also apply to 10gb drive out of XBox by toddestan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My guess is no chance, as Microsoft in no way has advertised the XBox's hard drive as a standard PC hard drive. Did you also expect that the Pentium chip they put in the thing would also be a standard chip you could slap in a standard PC board? Or that it came with a standard network card? Besides, in the USA - where the corporations own the government, it would seem that you are already on shaky ground just for taking the thing apart in the first place.

    I don't even think you'd have a case if you bought some OEM computer and found out that the drive was keyed to work only in that brand of computer. Heck, I know IBM had some seriously propriety stuff going on with the PS/2's (hard drives that had a special connector and controller card that would only work on a card that went on IBM's own MCA bus). I know people didn't like it because it stunk, but I never heard of anyone suing over it.

  42. I broke it and complained too.. by mattr · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Well I'm not going to stick my neck out but their copy protection can be easily broken by a popular unix tool that I found after ten minutes of searching the net for it. Starts with "cdp" if that helps..

    I had been presented with an EMI audio cd with their lousy Copy Control CD protection scheme, actually this is I think Macrovision/Cactus Data Shield's thing which Avex proceeded to dump all over Japan. There's windows stuff which does it too it seems.

    Well I had just seen this concert as a guest of the producer and I got the CD for free. I get back for a long coding session over the weekend and want to play it on my linux laptop of course..

    Well after some swearing and wasted a lot of time I solved my personal problem and no, I'm not sharing it to the masses. Even though I suspect EMI has either done a bad job of the production, or has suffered reduced quality due to this scheme (I don't know if it is true but I read somewhere that these are really just 46 kbps wmf files.. if so that is robbery).

    I told the producer that they should stop using that protection which in addition to making the cd not work on my laptop or in car stereos, also is quite easy to break, plus the recording either sucks or it is made worse by the protection scheme. I certainly wouldn't buy a cd with that protection on it normally.

    I don't know if this is going to make a difference but I hope these organizations get as many complaints as possible from people who are seriously pissed about this situation. The artist of course knows nothing about the issue, it is not really considered by most people in the business either yet, the protection scheme just gets steamrolled everywhere as a matter of policy I'm sure. If you have a similar situation (especially if you've actually paid for the cd, since I got mine free) please tell them.