Slashdot Mirror


Google Turns 5

Gantic writes "The BBC has an article on Google's 5th birthday. The popular search engine now handles over 200 million queries a day and the word "Google" is now a noun, adjective and verb. Lets see how long the most popular search engine in the world can last, here's to another 5 years and more Google!"

36 of 368 comments (clear)

  1. a correction by madcoder47 · · Score: 4, Informative

    the article states 200 million queries a day, not 200,000 million (200 billion) queries as the slashdot post says.

  2. Adjective? by Phantasmo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, that's just about the Google-ist thing I've ever heard!

    --

    The US Army: promoting democracy through unquestioned obedience
  3. Do you use another? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What OTHER search engine do you still use, and why?

    1. Re:Do you use another? by Organized+Konfusion · · Score: 5, Interesting

      alltheweb. why? because they still have kazaa lite, anti-scientology and DeCSS links.
      Because they are European
      Because they have the biggest index of pages on the web.

    2. Re:Do you use another? by mindriot · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Alltheweb is quite good. But even there do you see the effects of Google. Just look at the page design and layout. Same thing goes for Altavista and even Yahoo! search.

      And I'm really, really glad that Google has this influence. Before Google, most search engines were getting cluttered with advertisements and nasty, slowly-loading designs (yes, that was when modems were prevalent). Google did the one right thing and focused on the important stuff, building a good and fast search engine with a pragmatic, to-the-point, minimalist design and about every function you'd need to find what you're looking for.

      That's why I love Google. And also, I for one never really had censoring problems with my searches. And what can Google do when others threaten them with lawsuits? It's those others that we should criticize, not Google itself... I'm rather glad when Google makes a small adjustment (though I don't like it either) that at least allows them to continue to exist instead of being driven out of money.

      But bringing up Alltheweb is also interesting in this regard; it shows that nobody can really stop the spread of information, whatever kind it is... if Google is sued, somebody else will link to KaZaA Lite. In this regard, the Web is like a Hydra for free information.

  4. Hello, editors??! by henriksh · · Score: 4, Funny

    What about a fscking link??

    Where can I find this Google company?

    1. Re:Hello, editors??! by presroi · · Score: 3, Funny
      Where can I find this Google company?

      Hmm, indeed. Maybe "google" was misspelled. My favourite search engine was unable to find it.
      Sorry, no results were found containing "google" [some minor things omitted]
      SEARCH TIPS
      1) Check your spelling. Are the words in your query spelled correctly?
      2) Try using synonyms. Maybe the site you're looking for uses slightly different words, like "film" instead of "movie".
      3) Make your search more general. For example, instead of using specific product names, try using the generic product category.

      For more tips and answers to frequently asked questions, check out MSN Search Help
      (PS: I know, I did this weeks ago with overture and google)
    2. Re:Hello, editors??! by puppet10 · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's a hack of the URL.

      Original posts URL:

      http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe =UTF-8&q=msn&num=-1&btnG=Google+Search

      A URL returned from a query from the google homepage:

      http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF -8&q=msn&btnG=Google+Search

      note the num=-1 in the original post URL.

      One thing I'm not sure of is why new searches in the search box from the original URL return a num=0 instead of whatever number you have set as the number of results you wish to see on google, but it seems like a small bug because of the original badly formed url given to it.

      --
      -------- This space intentionally left blank --------
    3. Re:Hello, editors??! by SlashSim · · Score: 3, Funny


      I put up a mirror in case they get slashdotted:
      http://puddle.dyndns.org/google.htm

      --
      If the only tool you have is a hammer, you'd better start looking for a carpentry job.
    4. Re:Hello, editors??! by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Funny, it works for me. Maybe if you didn't have "&num=-1" in the URL string, it would work for you too.

  5. Hah! by BJH · · Score: 3, Funny

    At last, my sig is relevant to a story!

    Let's see, today's total is:

    Results 1 - 10 of about 344,000,000. Search took 0.10 seconds.

    Not bad.

  6. Not the same by Quasar1999 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It may be 5 years old, but it's not the same as it was back in the day (say 2-3 years ago)... when it truely did 'google' the internet... Now it has all sorts of filters and junk.

    Do you remember when you could do a search for a file and it would return hidden ftp sites? Now I do a search for something and all I get are the top sponsored sites. I can't find anything useful using google anymore... all the darned links point to mainstream sites. At the first sign of a potential lawsuit google removes references to potentially offensive material... what good is a search engine that doesn't do a good search?

    At this time I can't find anything better than google, but I really hope something comes out that is, cuz I miss the good ol' days when I could actually find stuff on the net...

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
  7. google censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While I normally have nothing but praise for google, there have been a number of recent censorship issues which one should be mindful of. Google is a privately own company, based on profit, don't forget it.

    That said, thankfully you can still type "google censorship" into google itself and get a heap of results. The force may be strong with this one.... but it was strong with Vader also.

    1. Re:google censorship by Sphere1952 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm very impressed with the way google is handling the whole DMCA crap. They are adhering strictly to the law in order that they not be the butt of a lawsuit, but they are also making a mockery of the law.

      It is google policy to: "...document all notices of alleged infringement on which we act. A copy of the notice will be sent to a third party who will make it available to the public."

      The third party is the Chilling Effects Clearinghouse, and Google puts up a statement at the bottom of the page pointing at this notice. Since the notice has to list the specific sites to be removed, there is a nice list of all the removed sites -- and who wanted them removed.

      If this isn't giving the DMCA the finger then what is?

      --
      Big Brother Bush is doubleplus ungood.
    2. Re:google censorship by jesterzog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The third party is the Chilling Effects Clearinghouse, and Google puts up a statement at the bottom of the page pointing at this notice.

      I agree entirely, but I'd prefer it if google put the notice at the top of the results instead of the bottom. How frequently do you scroll to the end of a page of search results?

  8. Google Fan Boys by digitaltraveller · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think google's great, but just to counter the usual fan boy posts here is a link to some people who don't think so:google-watch

  9. Tech beats marketing by j_dot_bomb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The thing that makes feel good about google is that it is a company that is so driven by what tech people think would be useful to people rather than by MBA marketer types who seem to want popups and cluttered image filled pages. Employees spend 1/3 of their time just creating new wild ideas. I wish I was good enough to work there.

  10. Google is good but dangerous as well by acegik · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Since google is the most popular search engine out there, they have the power to "remove" you from the internet. If someone at google headquarters decides to remove you from the search results, you don't exist. I know this debate is old but maybe some restrictions should be enforced since they hold much power, some would say too much.

    1. Re:Google is good but dangerous as well by smart.id · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They don't just remove people for no reason, and they certainly wouldn't do it for their own vendettas. Google has shown that they believe in free speech. In the past, the only reason they've censored their results is because of cease and desist letters claiming DMCA violations (usually from big companies). Besides, you could always use MSN, with their Fair and Balaced(TM) results!

      --
      blog & fiction: jd87
  11. Re:Happy Birthday! by Zalgon+26+McGee · · Score: 4, Funny

    That song is protected by copyright. Please send your royalty cheque to the RIAA.

    --

    ---

    Book(n): Utensil used to pass time while waiting for the TV repairman

  12. Remember when they bought the Dejanews archive? by mfarah · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Man, we've come a long way. Back when they bought the Dejanews Usenet archive, all comments I saw were of the "Who are these guys?"-"What do they want with our beloved archive?"-"Will they keep it public or they'll make it a paid service?"-"Is their search engine any good?" kind.

    Now we take its groups search feature for granted, we think nothing of other search engines (Yahoo!, anyone?) and we use Google to search for images (back in MY day, those were the hardest to search, having to search and download lots of stuff from ftp sites and then discard the junk).

    I love Google.

    --
    "Trust me - I know what I'm doing."
    - Sledge Hammer
  13. Innovation keeps them up . . . by shamitbagchi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When Teoma etc came in I thought Google would be in for some tough competition - but everything has blown away in front of them - a case in study for technology and services analysts for years to come.

    Their PageRank technology is something that they have leveraged on . . .


    [PageRank relies on the uniquely democratic nature of the web by using its vast link structure as an indicator of an individual page's value. In essence, Google interprets a link from page A to page B as a vote, by page A, for page B. But, Google looks at more than the sheer volume of votes, or links a page receives; it also analyzes the page that casts the vote. Votes cast by pages that are themselves "important" weigh more heavily and help to make other pages "important."

    Important, high-quality sites receive a higher PageRank, which Google remembers each time it conducts a search. Of course, important pages mean nothing to you if they don't match your query. So, Google combines PageRank with sophisticated text-matching techniques to find pages that are both important and relevant to your search. Google goes far beyond the number of times a term appears on a page and examines all aspects of the page's content (and the content of the pages linking to it) to determine if it's a good match for your query]

    Their continuing language translation initiative and innovative Google Labs keep up the momentum in their favour - searching now is heading for Google thats it, nothing else comes to mind !

    Also there have been amazingly few outages too on their side; as they add more and more pages to their cache and more services !

  14. More Google ... by crumbz · · Score: 4, Informative

    Google has added a calculator function to it's primary search page. Simply type in 4*6 or (9+13)/7 into the search box and out pops the answer. Unit conversions (i.e. "how many inches in a lightyear") are performed as well. And if that wasn't enough, simply type in "the answer to life, the universe and everything" for a calculation that takes significantly less time than seven and a half million years. A nice plug for Google's computing power being equivalent to Deep Thought of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.

    1. Re:More Google ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      jeeze, all this censorship stuff and chilling effects of DMCA..... and now a calculator.

      I guess that makes google cold AND calculating.

    2. Re:More Google ... by WCityMike · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Amusingly enough, the Google Calculator has read Douglas Adams.

      It also knows smoots.

      More fun here and here and here.

    3. Re:More Google ... by at_18 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's even better:

      sin( arcsin(0.5))

      yelds 0.5

      It knows about hexadecimal too

      (try entering 0x2ff * 3)

  15. Google by ReTay · · Score: 4, Funny

    A boss at work has observed that if WW III were to hit and Google survived they would probibly worship the thing. heh

  16. Then Don't Forget by Kozz · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
  17. Just in case... by evil-osm · · Score: 5, Funny

    Here is the cache for it

    ;)

    --


    E.

    Never rub another man's rhubarb - The Joker
  18. Re:In case it get's slashdotted by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 4, Funny

    In case that gets here's Google's cached verson.

    My favorite line is:Google is not affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its content.

  19. Penguin Computing by cpopin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I watched an article on the CBS "Sunday Morning" show where they interviewed Google founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page while sitting at the breakfast table absorbing my first cup of coffee when noticed stackes of boxes in their office labeled "Penguin Computing". That put a smile on my face!

    --
    -=- Many seek good nights and lose good days.
  20. another correction by RobotWisdom · · Score: 3, Informative

    The 'prenatal' Google was already being discussed on netnews in March 1998. [more history]

  21. Google toolbar by myov · · Score: 4, Informative

    Their new toolbar is great (when I'm stuck on IE). Forms autofill, popup blocking, and even the ability to vote a site up or down. Hmm... site to vote down... of course, sco.com!

    --
    I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
  22. Long Life... by willll · · Score: 4, Funny

    Lets hope that they can live to be a googol (10^100)

  23. Google Toolbar by FsG · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've often wondered why, in all of the attempts to mimic google's toolbar, no one has ever reproduced the handy pagerank indicator; I began hacking at it, wondering if I'll be the first, only to run into a brick wall.

    Here's the request it sends; if you duplicate it with telnet or whatever, it really will spit out slashdot's pagerank:
    GET /search?client=navclient-auto&googleip=O;216.239.5 3.104;131&ch=53856195705&freshness_check=3f1eAVUrj Mj2meFfx-IZI&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&features=Rank&q=inf o:http%3A%2F%2Fslashdot%2Eorg%2F HTTP/1.1
    User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; GoogleToolbar 1.1.70-big; Windows XP 5.1)
    Host: 216.239.53.104
    Pragma: no-cache
    Connection: keep-alive

    But there's a little program, the ch= field. That's a special hash of "http://slashdot.org," and if you don't send it, it doesn't work.

    So as I continue attempting to work out the algorithm for this mysterious hash, I wonder: why has Google gone to such great lengths to make sure nobody duplicates the toolbar's pagerank indicator? Would a copy of that feature for Mozilla's google toolbar really be so awful?

    --
    I made a PHP/MySQL library that prevents SQL injection & makes coding easier!
  24. Re:Happy Birthday! by eyeye · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was on metacrawler before google.
    Google is great esp. with the newsgroups they rescued from deja.
    One thing though for the googleguy/gals reading (and i'm sure they are) please do something about the spam on google, I cant search for anything without fucking "kelkoo" appearing in the listings, they are doing a fantastic job of shitting all over google listings.
    Not just kelkoo either, search for houses and you get urls like www.buy-houses-property-homes.com and www.search-property-buy-cheap.com and a few others that all link to the same site, last time I checked the source code to one of these it was a js redirect - I thought google would have coded around that exploit by now.
    Ditto with the keywords seperated by dashes bollocks as in the examples above. Would anybody register those domains for any other reason than spamming search engines, they are hardly easy to tell someone about otherwise.
    My less tech savvy partner has allready noticed the amount of noise on google seems to be increasing over the signal.

    I did try alltheweb as I heard good things about it. It does return some other results but is also less accurate with its relevancy.

    --
    Bush and Blair ate my sig!