Slashdot Mirror


The Origin of Murphy's Law

LauraW writes "HotAIR, the web site of the Annals of Improbable Research , is publishing a fascinating series on the Origin of Murphy's Law. It turns out there really was a Murphy, and the story of his law involves rocket sleds, Chuck Yeager, and Edwards Air Force Base. The article covers all these topics and more, and includes interviews with Yeager, the son of Murphy (really), and several surviving members of the project that inspired the law."

240 comments

  1. As my uncle used to say... by proj_2501 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Murphy was an optimist.

    1. Re:As my uncle used to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The ultimate pessimism:

      An optomist can never be pleasantly surprised.

    2. Re:As my uncle used to say... by drakaan · · Score: 1

      Hey, I say it every day ;)

      --
      "Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
    3. Re:As my uncle used to say... by 2.3.PROFIT!!! · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    4. Re:As my uncle used to say... by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      thank you, mr. pedant-at-all-costs. i HAVE read that, thank-you-very-much.

    5. Re:As my uncle used to say... by Glock27 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Murphy was an optimist.

      My favorite variation is:

      "Nature sides with the hidden flaw."

      :-)

      --
      Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
      Score: -1 100% Flamebait
    6. Re:As my uncle used to say... by Bob+McCown · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yea, but its true. If anything can go wrong, it w.#*kl* 74,D8 38Fd3kds
      NO CARRIER

    7. Re:As my uncle used to say... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Another important attribute of ma nature, complementary to that cast-iron skillet she keeps hidden behind her apron; Nature bats last.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  2. Murphy's Law... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    is also known as Sod's law in the UK

    1. Re:Murphy's Law... by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1, Funny

      But is there a Mr. Sod in the UK ?

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:Murphy's Law... by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 5, Funny
      But is there a Mr. Sod in the UK ?

      Sod's his first name. 'Off' is his last.

      I've heard of him :)

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    3. Re:Murphy's Law... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or more accurately, a typical Irish-American trying to claim the invention of an ancient and well understood Anglo-Saxon law.

    4. Re:Murphy's Law... by latency · · Score: 0, Troll

      Sod's Law is another name for Finagle's Law of Dynamic Negatives (which most people inaccurately believe is Murphy's law.)

      Finagle's Law of Dynamic Negatives states: if something can go wrong, it will. or "anything that can go wrong, will."

      Murphy's Law was much more eloquently worded: "If there are two or more ways to do something, and one of those ways can result in a catastrophe, then someone will do it. "

      Latency

    5. Re:Murphy's Law... by NickFitz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, but most people use the name "Blair" for him.

      --
      Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
    6. Re:Murphy's Law... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Including your egos, arses, and inability to acknowledge something might have been done outside the US first.

    7. Re:Murphy's Law... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      read the story...

    8. Re:Murphy's Law... by drakaan · · Score: 1

      That's not a troll...it corresponds with one of the opinions in the article, as a matter of fact. I suppose if you're modding based on the beginning of the article alone, you'd see it as such, but hey, since when do moderators read the article.

      --
      "Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
  3. The surviving members spawned the law? by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it was more like the ones that didn't survive inspired the law in those that did! What a crazy story!

    --
    stuff |
  4. More elegant? by Brahmastra · · Score: 5, Funny
    To others however the Law is a pessimistic comment that underscores, albeit in more elegant terms, that shit happens.
    Does anyone else agree with me that "shit happens" is a much better way of saying it?
    1. Re:More elegant? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, no.
      Murphy was an Engineer. His original formulation "'if there is any way to do it wrong, he will", has some value in ergonomic design. Controls should be designed so as to eliminate chance accidents. For instance, in computers, most connectors are shaped, or keyed, so as to reduce the chances of someone plugging in wires the wrong way.

      Some accidents are avoidable. Some are not. The adage "Shit Happens", while perhaps emotionally comforting, may lead some to confuse an entirely avoidable situation with the truly unpredictable.

    2. Re:More elegant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree. Your choice is crude.

    3. Re:More elegant? by deuce868 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You've obviously never seen someone shove a monitor plug in upside down. Shapes and keys be damned ... it will happen. It just takes a large enough idiot.

    4. Re:More elegant? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I note that almost none of the recent connector designs share the DB configuration used by VGA plugs. DVI does, but at least it's internally keyed.

      Personally,I look forward to connectors that can be plugged in despite low lighting and cramped conditions, purely by feel, without risking pins on a cable, that by some fiat (FCC?), is non-replaceable.

    5. Re:More elegant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BNC, RCA

      But I'm guessing you were talking about monitor cable plugs.

      How about a new multi-conductor connector with coaxial contacts? No wrong way for that to go in.
      Or a symmetrical flat connector with a pinout such that it can be inserted into the plug either way.

    6. Re:More elegant? by cybercuzco · · Score: 1

      I say faeces occurs.

      --

  5. But the site is Slashdotted, right? by TerryAtWork · · Score: 4, Funny


    Thereby proving the law!

    --
    It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
    1. Re:But the site is Slashdotted, right? by Brahmastra · · Score: 1

      Slashdotted is a case of something that WILL go wrong going wrong.

  6. Shameless TV Quote by GaveUp · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Bad people are punished by societies laws and good people are punished by Murphy's Law." --George, Dead Like Me

    1. Re:Shameless TV Quote by 4of12 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've noticed that, in terms of direct consequences, there isn't much difference between the actions of deliberately evil people and the hopelessly oblivious and ignorant.

      Most of the people cutting you off on the freeway belong to the latter category, as much as we tend to think of them in the former.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    2. Re:Shameless TV Quote by Atario · · Score: 2, Informative

      Also known as Hanlon's Razor.

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  7. One of my favorites.... by SailFly · · Score: 5, Funny


    If computers get too powerful, we can organize them into a committee -- that will do them in.

    1. Re:One of my favorites.... by beppu · · Score: 5, Funny

      If computers get too powerful, we can organize them into a committee -- that will do them in.


      But wouldn't that make them a Beowulf cluster?

    2. Re:One of my favorites.... by Robber+Baron · · Score: 1

      If computers get too powerful, we can organize them into a committee -- that will do them in.

      But wouldn't that make them a Beowulf cluster?
      ...or Skynet?

      --

      You're using her as bait, Master!

    3. Re:One of my favorites.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If computers get too powerful, we can organize them into a committee -- that will do them in.

      But wouldn't that make them a Beowulf cluster?

      No, that would make them a Beowulf clusterf^ck...

    4. Re:One of my favorites.... by Nakoruru · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't your comment be in response to MOORE'S LAW, not MURPHY'S LAW?

    5. Re:One of my favorites.... by AaronStJ · · Score: 1
      But wouldn't that make them a Beowulf cluster?

      Or the internet. That seems pretty good at reducing productivity.
      --
      Stupid like a fox!
  8. It's true! by jbellis · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I was skeptical, so I google'd for it and found that pretty much everyone agrees with these guys that it was Ed Murphy of the Air Force bemoaning a technician's incompetence: "If there is any way to do it wrong, he will."

    So there you have it. Truth according to the Internet. :)

    1. Re:It's true! by herwin · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was more a recognition that user interfaces should be designed to be used correctly. It was possible to do the fastenings both a right and a wrong way. At least the technician was consistent.

    2. Re:It's true! by c_ollier · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought Murphy's Laws weren't written by Murphy, but by someone who has the same name...

    3. Re:It's true! by drakaan · · Score: 1
      Actually, most of the sites that repeat each other agree on it. Some of the few in which minimal research effort has been expended agree that Murpy's quote is something like "If there is more than one way to do a thing, and one of those ways will result in catastrophe, someone will do it". Check here for an example (Sometimes, it's a good idea to go beyond the first page of Google's search results).

      I can't help being a Murphy zealot, my sig expects it of me. ;)

      --
      "Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
    4. Re:It's true! by Saarus · · Score: 1

      So there you have it. Truth according to the Internet. :)

      The Internet is not so much a bastion of truth as it is a bastion of Mob Mentality. Still - as the number of people who believe something is true gets large, the relevance of it's actual truth or falsehood approaches zero.

      --><--

      --
      "That man lives best who's fain to live half mad, half sane." -Flemish Poet Jan Van Stijevoort, 1524.
    5. Re:It's true! by InfoVore · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well at least one person disputes it:

      Nagler's comment on Murphy's law: Murphy's law was propounded not by Murphy, but by another man of the same name.

      I.V.

      --
      "These laws they're passing won't even compile anymore, let alone execute." - anon
    6. Re:It's true! by xoboots · · Score: 1

      awesome--nearly 200 posts in and I'm the first to mention that AIR is a complete parady and send-up, even if it accidently contains truths here and there. Quoting or picking up a story from AIR is like picking up a story from the Onion. sheesh.

      The originial poster probably knew that and is just having us on, it being monday and all.

    7. Re:It's true! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you 100% sure???

      if there's even the slightest chance that the source is wrong, it is.

  9. another murphy's law by GarbanzoBean · · Score: 5, Funny

    If a server can be slashdotted, it definetly will be.

    1. Re:another murphy's law by fruey · · Score: 1
      And the corollary:

      If a word can be spelt wrong, it definitely will be on Slashdot!

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    2. Re:another murphy's law by shfted! · · Score: 1

      You mean, If a server can't be slashdotted, it definitely will be.

      --
      He who laughs last is stuck in a time dilation bubble.
  10. Re:Who was Sod then? by nate+nice · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What does sod mean in the dirst place? I have heard it in songs etc from UK bands but just assumed they had a passion for lawn care,

    --
    "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
  11. If it were a national government... by blcamp · · Score: 1

    ...would Murphy's Law be a dictatorship, a democracy, or something else?

    Just curious.

    --
    The problem with socialism is that they always run out of other people's money. - Margaret Thatcher
    1. Re:If it were a national government... by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

      would Murphy's Law be a dictatorship, a democracy, or something else?

      All of them ?

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:If it were a national government... by zeus_tfc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ...would Murphy's Law be a dictatorship, a democracy, or something else?

      Bureaucracy.

      It takes the longest amount of time to do anything, spends the most amount of time to do it, and still doesn't accomplish what it set out to do.

      --
      "...At the end of the day"..."when everyone goes home, you're stuck with yourself." RIP Layne Staley
    3. Re:If it were a national government... by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      Absolute Monarchy.
      The user, the king, is essentially chosen by chance. Once in, he can't be dismissed. And, if he chooses, he may ignore his training and education, often to the detriment of the people.

    4. Re:If it were a national government... by RandomHavoc · · Score: 1

      Hmmm ... sounds like court judges--especially liberal ones. Since when do animals have more rights than humans?

      --

      --
      But then again I thought VCR+ was a stupid idea and would die a quick death--so what do I know?
    5. Re:If it were a national government... by Prior+Restraint · · Score: 1

      Since when do animals have more rights than humans?

      I would go so far as to suggest, "Since never." Would you care to identify what rights judges have granted to animals that humans do not enjoy?

  12. I disagree with Murphy's Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I don't believe processor speeds double every 18 months. I upgraded in 2000 to an P3 800 Mhz, and now I bought a AMP Athlon 2400 which only runs at 2.03MHz. Bogus I say.

    1. Re:I disagree with Murphy's Law by miodekk · · Score: 1

      > I don't believe processor speeds double every 18 months.
      This is Moore's law.
      Murphy's Law says that if something may go wrong, it will.

    2. Re:I disagree with Murphy's Law by drakaan · · Score: 1

      I thought Moore's Law had something to do with a character named "Jaws" being required in a given James Bond movie...

      --
      "Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
    3. Re:I disagree with Murphy's Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Murphy's Law says that if something may go wrong, it will.

      Is this an example of self-proving statement?

    4. Re:I disagree with Murphy's Law by The+Almighty+Dave · · Score: 1

      Thanks for clearing that up.

    5. Re:I disagree with Murphy's Law by Glock27 · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      > I don't believe processor speeds double every 18 months.
      This is Moore's law.

      Actually, he said transistor density will double every 18 months. Not quite the same thing.

      BTW, computer power could continue doubling every X amount of time for quite a while - once parallelism is exploited more fully.

      --
      Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
      Score: -1 100% Flamebait
    6. Re:I disagree with Murphy's Law by jak163 · · Score: 1
      > I don't believe processor speeds double every 18 months.


      This is Moore's law.
      Murphy's Law says that if something may go wrong, it will.


      The corollary to this would be, if processor speed doubles, so will the number of lines of Microsoft code.

  13. Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Anyone who has read through the original "Murphy's Law" books, published in the late 70s / early 80s, should remember that this was well documented in the prefaces. This is hardly new information. Come to think of it, it's not really "science" either, as suggested by the category.

    1. Re:Old News by TonyZahn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Busted.

      If you'd actually read the article, you'd see that the writers covers the story in the preface of the book and researches it in much greater detail. Apparently everyone involved at the time has their own version of the story, and some of them have rather strong feelings about it. It's really an interesting read. it's too bad the link is posted before all 4 parts of the article are finished.

      --
      - sig? who is this sig of which you speak?
    2. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, I can't believe he got modded up... Anyways, had read the article he would have realized it did have to do with Science, it's first application being in rocket sled tests by an engineer.

  14. It must be true! by mulhall · · Score: 5, Funny

    I read it on Slashdot!

    1. Re:It must be true! by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 1, Funny

      I read it on Slashdot!

      Twice!

      --

  15. Re:Who was Sod then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  16. Slashdot's Law. by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


    "Anytime a camera is present, someone will stretch open their bottom."

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  17. Evolution of Murphy's Law by heironymouscoward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Initially, it was "if the damn idiot can get it wrong, he will", which was an indictment of poor design assuming that the user was smart, when we all know that a smart design assumes the user is stoned and half-asleep on a muggy Monday morning.

    The victims of Murphy's Law then turned around and said "if the system can go wrong, it will", which was around the same period we invented the notion of "computer error".

    Finally, Murphy's Law made the leap to non-technological domains, "if something can break, it will, in the worst possible way".

    So Murphy's Law today delegates responsibility for our fuck-ups to the hostile hand of fate, whereas Murphy's original comment was all about our own responsibility for making systems that actually work.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
    1. Re:Evolution of Murphy's Law by HawkingMattress · · Score: 1

      Finally, Murphy's Law made the leap to non-technological domains, "if something can break, it will, in the worst possible way".

      Yeah, but a tech person (should) still understand it as 'whatever the number of chances that this state can happen, if you don't check for it it will happen.' I always say this to my coworker, who each time looks at me and says that this particular state can't happen, since blah blah blah... sigh...
      Each time, the case definiltely happens, one day or another. Can be pretty fustrating when you try to debug the things months after and spend hours looking for the damn bug !

    2. Re:Evolution of Murphy's Law by indianajones428 · · Score: 1
      Actually, Murphy's Law was originally:
      "If there are two or more ways to do something, and one of those ways can result in a catastrophe, then someone will do it."

      Commonly mistaken for Murphy's Law,
      "Anything that can go wrong, will go wrong"
      is actually Finagle's Law of Dynamic Negatives.

      I don't have any links (don't feel like googling for it), but I'm sure someone else will post a few.

      --
      When a thing has been said, and said well, have no scruple. Take it and copy it. --Anatole France
    3. Re:Evolution of Murphy's Law by fm6 · · Score: 1
      So Murphy's Law today delegates responsibility for our fuck-ups to the hostile hand of fate, whereas Murphy's original comment was all about our own responsibility for making systems that actually work.
      Well yeah, a lot of hapless idiots like to cite Murphy's Law as an excuse for their fuckups. I prefer to think of it as a condemnation of their lack of foresight. If you're planning or designing something, you should assume there will be unforeseen mishaps, and do what you can to minimize their effect.

      The obvious implication is that you shouldn't make something more complicated than it needs to be, since the extra bits increase the odds of that unforseen mishap. Something nobody at Microsoft seems to understand.

      I'm often struck by the similarity between Murphy's original exasperated remark and something I heard about a class that was taught at the Naval Academy when Heinlen was a cadet there. It was a class in giving orders, and one of the mottos of the class was, "Any order that can be misunderstood will be misunderstood." Very likely Murphy attended a similar class wherever he got his officer training.

  18. IIRC by jeffy124 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Murphy's law originally stated that if something can go wrong, at some point it will, therefore make it such that the somthing can't go wrong. In other words, idiot-proofing is required when building something.

    For example, PS2 connections for keyboards and mice are keyed to prevent being plugged in the wrong way.

    GUI developers (especially KDE and GNOME developers!!!) should take notes on things like this.

    --
    The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    1. Re:IIRC by dAzED1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      they might be keyed so that they can go in only the right way, but when the keyboard and mouse are both ps/2 connections...
      For the first little while ps/2 connections became popular in the compat-world, I was a lowly it tech and saw many a motherboard where someone simply plugged the mouse into the keyboard socket and vice-versa. Blew out most keyboard bioses back in those days. Pretty damn stupid. Sure, key it...but make one an AT connection (keyboard) and one a ps/2. Yeesh. Not really idiot-proof otherwise.

    2. Re:IIRC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      GUI developers (especially KDE and GNOME developers!!!) should take notes on things like this.

      Maybe Microsoft should take better note. "We are not responsible for the damage of these viruses, we had a patch out 2 months ago!"

    3. Re:IIRC by julesh · · Score: 1

      For example, PS2 connections for keyboards and mice are keyed to prevent being plugged in the wrong way.

      Umm, no they aren't. At least not on any of my keyboards, mice, or motherboards.

      They *should* be, cause it'd save an awfully large amount of annoyance...

    4. Re:IIRC by jeffy124 · · Score: 1

      uh, yes they are. (oh how i love google image search)

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    5. Re:IIRC by Eccles · · Score: 1

      The connectors may not fit into the socket in more than one way, but the mouse and the keyboard connector are identical, making it possible to switch them and make the computer unhappy.

      USB helps with this, as the sockets are not device-specific.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    6. Re:IIRC by mccalli · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Sure, key it...but make one an AT connection (keyboard) and one a ps/2. Yeesh. Not really idiot-proof otherwise.

      Better still, design it so that either device would work in either port. Similar to the USB or firewire ports - it doesn't matter which USB port you plug the keyboard into and which the mouse, either will work.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    7. Re:IIRC by zsazsa · · Score: 1

      Better still, design it so that either device would work in either port.

      If my memory serves me right, this is the way at least some of the original PS/2s worked. This was the case at least on the lowly Model 25.

    8. Re:IIRC by julesh · · Score: 1

      Oh, I see what you mean. Yeah, you can't put em in upside down. I thought you meant they're keyed differently to one another so you can't put the keyboard in the mouse socket or vice versa, which would be a smart addition...

    9. Re:IIRC by connorbd · · Score: 1

      You can't *fit* them upside down, but they're a royal pain in the kiester to plug in anyway, because most of the PS/2 plugs I've seen are round. They may as well not be keyed because a lot of the time you need to see to plug them in anyway.

      Now Apple used to use similar mini-DIN plugs for their serial and ADB connectors, but they always, always, always had a flat side that you could use to figure out how to plug in the cable. What's so hard about doing that on a PC?

    10. Re:IIRC by default+luser · · Score: 1

      The funniest thing about this:

      The PS/2 ports didn't get standardized placement and orientation until ATX, and any proper, standardized markings / colorings until the PC '99 standard :)

      At least today you can easily match a modern keyboard and mouse to their proper ports, as their plugs and ports are colored pink and teal respectively ( PC '99 ). It's a good thing too, because as amazingly stupid as it sounds, most manufacturers are still shipping PCs with PS/2 keyboards and mice.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    11. Re:IIRC by shadow_slicer · · Score: 1

      Yeah..we all know what such flexibility did for "Press any key to continue" messages....

    12. Re:IIRC by julesh · · Score: 1

      Actually, most of my equipment here has a flat side at the top, except for Microsoft mice which seem to have a ridge on the round barrel of their connector pointing towards the top, which isn't as easy to use but works OK. Different suppliers, I guess, using different cheap OEM manufacturers end up with different results... wonder what the ratio is?

  19. Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mirror here.

  20. Re:Who was Sod then? by DigitalBubblebath · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to this page, sod's law was the original name for "if anything can go wrong it will" and has been around for much longer than "Murphy's Law". The 'sod' simply refers to an arbitrary unfortunate individual..

  21. Murphy's law is recursive by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Whatever can go wrong, will go wrong"

    including for Mr. Murphy himself, who most likely has been trying to stay very low profile for decades, and who now sees his hopes of finally not being associated with this calamitous law utterly vanish with a single Slashdot article.

    Hi Ed :-)

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Murphy's law is recursive by bandy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, it isn't:

      If you wash your car to make it rain, it will not rain, even though it normally rains right after you wash your car.

      --
      "You might as well get your son a ticket to hell as give him a five string banjo." -unknown minister
    2. Re:Murphy's law is recursive by drakaan · · Score: 1

      Isn't that an example of the law? (Well, Finagle's Law, in that case..."Anything that can go wrong, will go wrong")

      --
      "Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
  22. Re:Who was Sod then? by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Funny

    Noun. 1. A contemptible or objectionable person.

    2. A pitiable person. E.g."He's just had his car stolen and his wife has just run off with the milkman, the poor sod." This use is also be found with the expressions 'poor bastard' and 'poor bugger'.

    * Abb. of the word sodomite.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  23. Donath's Observation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Donath's Observation: Murphy was misquoted.

    (Murphy actually said "If there's any way they can do it wrong, they will." They even quoted him wrong.)

  24. Re:Who was Sod then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Mild form of abuse, suggesting the sod is cruel or heartless, milder than "bastard".

    According to the h2g2 swearing page...
    The famous and probably apocryphal epitaph says, 'Under this sod, lies another'. Sod means turf, but here is an abbreviation for 'Sodomite'.

  25. Post your corallaries here. by MickLinux · · Score: 1

    Just a thought: we can all post our corallaries all over the place, or we can put them together. I say, 3/4 of you post your corallaries here, and the other 1/4, make some more top-level posts reasonably identical to mine!

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
    1. Re:Post your corallaries here. by Walrus99 · · Score: 0

      Having worked in shipping and now for a state office that often has to ship computer and computer equipment by UPS I would say that Murphy's law of packing is: "If UPS can damage your package they will."

      The lesson is to use lots of peanuts and or bubble wrap, even it means the box is twice as big as what you are shipping. Obviously the people moving boxes around at UPS terminals are either illiterate or illegal immigrants, since English terms like up, down, fragile, breakable, etc. are not understood by them.

  26. If something can be misspelled... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    ...it will be misspelled.

    --Slashdot editor's law

  27. Re:Who was Sod then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's short for sodomy.

  28. My first corollary: Murphy's Law of Packaging by MickLinux · · Score: 5, Funny
    When you're sending out a fragile mailing, be sure to put near the top an identifier that it is the top (with an arrow).

    up ^

    Then, to make things doubly clear, put another identifier near the bottom, with its own arrow:

    dn v

    That way, with up saying up, and dn for down, the UPS (pronounced oops) guys can't get it wrong.

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  29. Just karma whoring by NorthDude · · Score: 3, Informative

    With a 2 sec google search:
    Murphy's Law

    If I remember correctly, there is even a picture of the guy in question, and some pretty funny story to in the "Origin of Murphy's Law" section...

    --


    I'd rather be sailing...
    1. Re:Just karma whoring by rot26 · · Score: 1

      or you could have just read the article, which attempts to be much more objective and definative than anything currently google-able.

      --



      To ensure perfect aim, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target
  30. Reverse Murphy's Law by KrunZ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Reverse Murphy's Law:

    "Things never go as bad as they could have."

    A teacher one introduced me to it for fun, but I think it holds.

    1. Re:Reverse Murphy's Law by CoolVibe · · Score: 1
      That's the reverse Finagle's law. Finagle's law states that whatever can go wrong will.

      I believe that Murphy's law happened to Murphy's law, since almost EVERYONE interprets it wrong. Check your local jargon file.

    2. Re:Reverse Murphy's Law by kisrael · · Score: 1

      "There's no situation so bad that it can't get worse. So be glad that it isn't. At least, not yet."

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    3. Re:Reverse Murphy's Law by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I have not one but two sayings to combat your feckless optimism. The first is "It's always darkest before it's pitch black", and the other one (a railroad saying) is "There's a light at the end of the tunnel, and it is an oncoming train."

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Reverse Murphy's Law by sootman · · Score: 1

      A high-school spanish book had a little saying at the end of each chapter. (Example--"No todo lo que brillo es oro"--All that glitters is not gold.) One showed a girl sad that she got a 97 on a test (with a thought baloon showing 100) and a guy happy that he got a 55, with a thought bubble showing "0." The caption (I don't remember it in Spanish) was "There is no stroke of luck that couldn't be better and no misfortune that couldn't be worse."

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  31. Murphy and the slashdot effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If it can go wrong, it will": site is now slashdotted.

  32. Re:Who was Sod then? by muffen · · Score: 2, Funny

    We are all individuals!

  33. Let's make a law... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that says Ellen Muth has to get nude (hot grits scene optional) in an upcoming episode. Who's with me??

    1. Re:Let's make a law... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want Betty back...and naked.

  34. If Murphy was right by Rutje · · Score: 1, Funny

    you wil never read this post...
    so much can go wrong when posting to /.

    --

    I want my karma, and I want it now!
    1. Re:If Murphy was right by Little+Brother · · Score: 3, Funny

      Apparently even Murphy's Law went wrong. Thus proving Murphy's Law.

      --

      Little Brother, watching the watchers

  35. Re:My first corollary: Murphy's Law of Packaging by CoolVibe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The moderators are on crack. To understand this joke, take a good look at the parent post and turn your monitor upside down, or go stand on your head. And yeah, it pretty much murphy-related.

  36. And in other news.... by jbottero · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Slashdot finally achieves total irrelevancy...

    1. Re:And in other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, actually it's very "On Topic", and everyone but YOU realize what the funny is.

  37. Bah! by TeknoHog · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was expecting a scientific explanation for Murphy's Law. You know, like conservation laws for energy and momentum are explained from the symmetry of spacetime. If we maintain that Murphy's is a law of physics, there must be a *&^[#%&]$^#%{[[::@;' NO CARRIER

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  38. Murphy's law strikes again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Everything You Know About Murphy's Law is Wrong"

    fsck, Murphy did it again.

  39. Article: (Part 4 is not up on the page yet) by big_groo · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have become the world's leading expert on Murphy's Law. No really, I'm serious. You doubtless have heard the Law: Whatever can go wrong, will go wrong. To some it is a profound statement of philosophy, a reminder that life can be defined just as much by its inherent challenges as anything else. To others however the Law is a pessimistic comment that underscores, albeit in more elegant terms, that shit happens.

    Whatever you might think about Murphy's Law, one thing is certain: it is as ubiquitous an expression as there is in American English. Over the years it has been cited in thousands of articles, websites and news reports, been the subject of several books, appeared as the title of at least one bad Charles Bronson movie and a TV show, and inspired about a dozen zillion corollary Laws. Just about every time something goes wrong somewhere, the Law gets its two cents in. Fortunately my expertise owes very little to actual adversity -- I'm not writing this from a hospital bed -- and almost everything to research. Historical research. Which is to say I have become the expert on the origins of Murphy's Law. This happened by accident...and if I'd known what the consequences would be of sticking my nose into it -- how I'd draw the wrath of Chuck Yeager, get caught in the middle of a nasty 20-year feud, and nearly wind up in a hospital bed -- I probably wouldn't have bothered.

    The Road to Murphy's Law

    This all began a few months ago, after I showed an article I'd written for an aviation history magazine to my neighbor. The article concerned some goings on at Edwards, the famed Air Force flight test facility, in the 1950's. "You know," my neighbor said, "You'd probably be real interested in talking to my father, David Hill Sr. He worked at Edwards, on a bunch of rocket sled tests in the 1940's. In fact," he continued proudly, "he knew Murphy."

    "Murphy?" I inquired, searching my memory for a test pilot of the same name. Yeager, Crossfield, Armstrong... It didn't ring a bell.

    "You know, Murphy," he went on. "The guy who invented Murphy's Law."

    I didn't say it, but I was absolutely skeptical. Who wouldn't be? One might as well claim to be friends with Kilroy, know the identity of Deepthroat, or the whereabouts of Amelia Earhart. The notion seemed outright laughable. Your father knew Murphy? Sure he did! If Murphy wasn't some imaginary Irish folk hero, then he was probably a gentle sage who drank a lot of Guinness and lived back in the 1700's. Needless to say I let the subject slide.

    But a day or two later, I almost tripped over a slender book called Murphy's Law and Other Reasons Why Things Go Wrong that had been left on my doorstep. The book cited Murphy's Law and then listed literally hundreds of amusing corollaries. The extremely brief forward to the volume included a letter written by an engineer named George Nichols. And this is where things got interesting. Nichols said he'd worked on a series of rocket sled tests at Edwards in the 1940's with a Colonel John Paul Stapp and that Murphy's Law emerged from these tests.

    "The Law's namesake," Nichols wrote, "was Capt. Ed Murphy Jr., a development engineer... Frustrated with a strap transducer which was malfunctioning due to an error in wiring the strain gauge bridges caused him to remark -- 'if there is any way to do it wrong, he will' -- referring to the technician who had wired the bridges. I assigned Murphy's Law to the statement and the associated variations..."

    That appeared straightforward enough, and piqued my interest. I subsequently did some research and I discovered to my surprise that the story of the origin of Murphy's Law was not something generally agreed upon. Accounts in fact varied wildly. Some sources gave the credit solely to Ed Murphy Jr., a man they praised for his wisdom, insight, and panache, but said almost nothing about. In other places, Nichols' letter appeared -- often word for word -- explaining how he had come up with "the statement." And at least a few writers suggested that Co

    1. Re:Article: (Part 4 is not up on the page yet) by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Exactly who was Capt. Ed Murphy?

      He's the guy who runs Sealab, right?

      His law is derived from the fact that even the slightest mistake will cause Pod 6, if not the entirety of Sealab, to explode.

    2. Re:Article: (Part 4 is not up on the page yet) by Carlk · · Score: 1

      Serendipitous re-discovery of old truth.

      DISCOVER mag, ~1988, someone tracked Murphy down and wrote an article. As I remember Murphy (1) was USNavy in the NASA program. And (2) did NOT like the modern "...anything that can...will...".
      Too fatalistic.

      HE said he said "If there are 2 way do something sooner or later the wrong one will be tried."!
      [Polarized plugs were OK w murphy.]

  40. More details but... by chowdmouse · · Score: 1
    Read this in the Jargon Dictionary years ago.

    http://info.astrian.net/jargon/terms/m/Murphy_s_La w.html

  41. This is news? Besides he's quoting the wrong Law! by xA40D · · Score: 3, Informative

    According to FOLDOC, Murphy's Law is:

    If there are two or more ways to do something, and one of those ways can result in a catastrophe, then someone will do it.

    The FOLDOC entry (from the Hacker's Lexicon I believe) also mentions the rocket sled thing....

    --
    Do you mind, your karma has just run over my dogma.
  42. murphey's slashdot rule: by 1eyedhive · · Score: 1

    anything that can be slashdotted, has been slashdotted... all those mirrors are FUBAR, i'd hate to be the sysadmin of the main site right now.

    --
    Logistical Chaos Officer http://www.slagg.org - LAN Gaming in Sarasota FL,USA
  43. So what ? by ANTI · · Score: 1

    I couldn't connect the site (slashdotted),
    but every geek out there knew the story for at least 20 years.

    Just google it (hint: adding finagle or niven might help) and you get dozens of pages explaining it.

    Nothing special. Just someone being smart in bringing his server down....

    --
    On the other side of the screen it all looked so easy.
  44. As my boss used to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    (Bemoaning our organization's hardware department):

    "Those assholes won't do a job unless they can fuck it up first."

  45. Re:not so sure by Bastian · · Score: 1

    I'm not so sure that the standard version of Murphy's Law really delegates our fuck-ups to the hostile hand of fate. I've always thought of it as a reminder of just how much attention it takes to succeed in our responsibility to make systems work properly.

    A program, for example, should be able to handle every possible strange situation or user input that can be thrown at it, even the ones the programmer would never have expected, and at least be able to generate an error and stop executing rather than exhibiting unexpected behavior. The responsibility is entirely on the programming team - nobody's going to cut them any slack if that ICBM launch detecting system sets off all the alarms because it thought a DC-10 with all four engines burning was really a missile launch.

  46. See the jargon file by fcanedo · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    alt.binaries.erotica.hamster.ducktape ;-)
  47. Where Murphy went wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His "If it can go wrong," part of the clause is akin to Einstein's "fix factor." The truth is, it just will god wrong, regardless.

    1. Re:Where Murphy went wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      " His 'If it can go wrong,' part of the clause is akin to Einstein's 'fix factor.' The truth is, it just will god wrong, regardless."

      What an excellent typo. The truth without Einstein's fix is just the will of God gone wrong.

  48. Re:Who was Sod then? by fruey · · Score: 1
    A sod of earth, of course

    Where did you get your dictionary from?

    --
    Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
  49. Jargon by bahamat · · Score: 1, Funny

    I guess this could be considered "news for newbies" because this has been in the jargon file for quite some time.

    That's ok, you go read it guys. I'll just sit back sipping my ISO standard cup of tea and enjoying some ANSI standard pizza.

    Be sure to submit a story when you find out why it's called El Camino Bignum.

  50. Murphy was an optimist. by Tony-A · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Mother nature sides with the hidden.

    If it's flaws you're hiding,
    That's where nature's siding.

  51. Timing is of the essence by geschild · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've always thought that "Murphy's law" was not precise enough. There's this addition that is needed to make it really work.

    Murphy's law revised:

    "If anything can go wrong, it will. At the worst possible moment."

    Try that one on for size. Proof? Two examples.

    When a wing on an aircraft fails, not too many people will notice, unless the aircraft is flying.

    You don't mind getting butter on your suit too badly, except when it's your new suit, that you just bought yesterday for this really important job-interview you're due for in about an hour.

    I could go on for hours. :D

    --
    Karma? What's that again?
    1. Re:Timing is of the essence by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      One could make an argument that "wrong" encompasses the concept of the event happening at a bad time.

      To follow your example, if the situation is such that "you don't mind getting butter on your suit", then it's not really *WRONG* in the disastrous Murphy-esque sense, it's simply an inconvenience.

      Perhaps the problem is that "wrong" is too general, and would benefit from a qualifier. How about, "If something can go disastrously wrong, if will."

      What can I say.. I'm a fan of succinctness.

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    2. Re:Timing is of the essence by geschild · · Score: 1

      A good argument, but I meant wrong in the sence that you wouldn't want it to happen. Wrong in the Murphy's law sense is, in my opinion, therefore not strong enough. An unwanted event only becomes a disaster if it happens at a time that it causes great harm, hence disaster. Murphy seems to have meant 'wrong' much more in line with your reasoning but I think that Murphy's law is currently more used by the general public to express the view that I hold.

      I, therefore, stand behind my ammended law.

      --
      Karma? What's that again?
  52. And one of mine... by mindriot · · Score: 2, Funny

    Has nothing to do with computers, but I read it on a Murphy's Law poster once: "Celibacy is hereditary." That just killed me.

  53. Too long to read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can somebody summarize this article with a bias towards Java and Sun so I can understand it?

    1. Re:Too long to read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Sunshine Law': if the sun was shining over Edwards, there must be work to do.

      About as much on topic.

  54. Murphy's law and Meyer Brigg's by f97tosc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In the famous Meyer Brigg's [spelling?] personality test Murphy's law is commonly associated with the "J" type personality.

    J is for judgemental; it is the 50% of people who like to be well organized and plan things in advance.

    Murphy's law basically says that you should always do more preparations and planning to be better prepared; it thus rings very well with this group.

    The other half of the population are much more interested in living in the present, for them the idea of always doing more preparations and planning for the future is not so appealing at all.

    Tor

    1. Re:Murphy's law and Meyer Brigg's by Don'tTreadOnMe · · Score: 1

      "Chance favours the prepared mind." - Louis Pasteur

    2. Re:Murphy's law and Meyer Brigg's by f97tosc · · Score: 1

      "Chance favours the prepared mind." - Louis Pasteur

      I interpret this as an argument in favor for being well prepared and planning things in advance.

      And indeed, in many activities (rocket engineering, for example), it is necessary to proceed that way.

      But in most circumstances it is very subjective. Vacation planning is the textbook example. Some people ("J") are careful to make advance bookings of hotels and restaurants. Others ("P") can show up at the airport with a small bag and hoping to catch a flight to an arbitrary location.

      In such cases it is meaningless to try to say that one way is better than the other. It is simply a matter of personal preferences; how we feel about risks and oportunities.

      Tor

  55. Prior art by ballpoint · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A story (don't know the origin) involves a thirsty emperor arriving at a bar and ordering a pint of mead (old times, you know). When the waitress arrives she holds the pint by the ear so that the emperor cannot grab it easily.

    The mead must have tasted well enough for him to return to the bar with a built-to-order pint with two opposite handles. Sure enough the waitress returns the full pint to the emperor holding the pint with both hands by both handles.

    Third time's a charm, the emperor must have thought as het returned to the bar, this time with a pint having three handles. Unimpressed the waitress returns the full pint holding it by two handles with the third handle pointing towards her chest.

    Moral: idiot-proof design is difficult, and requires many iterations.

    --
    Flourescent (adj): smelling like ground wheat.
    1. Re:Prior art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After which, the emperor should have just grabbed the waitresses breasts and called it even. (how else is he going to get to the third handle?)

      Come on, he is the emperor. Who else could get away with something like that?

    2. Re:Prior art by NoWhereMan · · Score: 1
      Moral: idiot-proof design is difficult, and requires many iterations.

      The obvious conclusion: If you make something idiot-proof, a better idiot will come along.

  56. So... by draxredd · · Score: 3, Funny

    So murphy's law *IS* rocket science.

    --
    --- Back to the trees, back to the trees !
  57. snopes?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This story is begging for elitist revisionism. Where is snopes.com in all of this!? Oh, wait, slapping an urban legend tag on this story wouldn't further a particular political agenda.

  58. Slow news day? by bs_02_06_02 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Nothing else going on in the world?

    Time to create a new poll?

    --
    -- No sig for you!
  59. Supreme being by basingwerk · · Score: 0

    If anything that can go wrong does go wrong, this may be due to chance. It seems unlikely, though, given the usual outcome of our feeble attempts to improve the world. Straight odds could not leave the world as buggered up as it is. The other possiblility is that another force, or 'supreme being' is at work, interfering with our honest efforts. I suspect this is the case, because Murphy's law (or Sod's law) is a _REAL_ thing; of that I am certain.

    --
    I stole this .sig
  60. Hanlon's Razor by josquin00 · · Score: 1
    I've always been partial to Hanlon's Razor. From the Wikipedia entry:

    A corollary of Finagle's law, Hanlon's Razor reads "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." The derivation of the common title "Hanlon's Razor" is unknown; a similar epigram has been attributed to William James. One possible derivation is from the similarity to Ockham's Razor. The website http://www.statusq.org/2001/11/26.html attributes it to one Robert J. Hanlon who seemingly contributed it to a book about Murphy's law.
  61. Explanation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've interpreted this incident as follows: (dunno if it really has anything to do with whatever Murphy was thinking)

    Given n independent probabilities, the likelyhood that they all happen at the same time isn't what you'd mathematically come up with.

    How on earth is this possible?
    Simple, chances are that they aren't independent after all. This probability may seem diminishingly small and thus it is often ignored, but it comes into play when the former product results into something even smaller.

  62. Eddie Murphy?? by Choco-man · · Score: 1

    You might have seen a house fly. You may even have seen a super fly - but you ain't never, ever, seen a donkey fly!

    That would explain brutha numsei in the golden child, i reckon.. Didn't know he was in the air force. Perhaps he invented flubber and robin william's is just covering for him..

  63. Downey's Constant by thanester · · Score: 0

    A friend of mine forumulated the following:

    Downey's Constant: Things will tend to go wrong in a fashion most pleasing to a malevolent deity.

    Burrough's Corollary: The malevolent deity acts to conceal its existence.

    Therefore: The more certain you are of the Constant, the less subtle the deity in its manipulations.

  64. maybe I've been abducted by aliens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somehow I read "Annals of Improbable Research" as 'anal probe research'.

  65. And then... by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 1

    "Once in, he can't be dismissed. And, if he chooses, he may ignore his training and education, often to the detriment of the people"

    a geek would come and rm -r the bastard luser...

    --
    It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
    1. Re:And then... by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      The original question was ill posed. It could mean one of several situations.

      Murphy's law was inspired by a ill-trained, if not diim, technician who was assigned to assist in these experiments. The careful plans of the engineers were screwed up by a less than competent man. In a very broad sense, the assignation of this dimwitted technician could be compared to the coronation of a idiot king. Add in the various mores against regicide, and you've got yourself an absolute disaster.

      But Murphy's Law is more than simply an observation. It can be applied to improve safety and usability. If such cynical advice is applied to political engineering, the end result might be a polypartite government, constructed so as to deny a monopoly over political power to members of any one branch.

  66. Site slashdotted! by Kazir · · Score: 1

    Looks like the site has been slashdotted. Though at least two of the pages are cached on Google:

    The Fastest Man on Earth (Overview and Index)

    The Fastest Man on Earth (Part 2 of 4)

  67. Obligatory Blackadder Quote by Dan-DAFC · · Score: 4, Funny

    Blackadder: "First Name?"
    Baldrick: "I'm not sure."
    Blackadder: "Come on, you MUST have a first name."
    Baldrick: "It might be Sod Off."
    Blackadder: "Sod Off??"
    Baldrick: "Yeah, when I was a young lad playing in the gutter, I used to say to all the other snipes, "Hello, my names Baldrick". And they'd say, "Yes we know, Sod Off Baldrick"

    --
    Suck figs.
  68. Re:Who was Sod then? by Hitch · · Score: 1

    I'm not!

    --
    You see, without that little doohicky, the universe stops.
    http://propheteer.org
  69. Re:Who was Sod then? by NickFitz · · Score: 1

    Wrong. From Dictionary.com:

    sod (1) n.
    A section of grass-covered surface soil held together by matted roots; turf.
    The ground, especially when covered with grass.
    tr.v. sodded, sodding, sods
    To cover with sod.
    [Middle English, from Middle Low German, or Middle Dutch sode.]
    Source: The American Heritage(R) Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition

    sod (2) Chiefly British Vulgar Slang n.
    A sodomite.
    A person regarded as obnoxious or contemptible.
    A fellow; a guy: "Poor sod, he almost got lucky for once" (Jack Higgins).
    tr.v. sodded, sodding, sods
    To damn.
    Phrasal Verb: sod off
    Used in the imperative to dismiss someone angrily.
    [Short for sodomite.]
    Source: The American Heritage(R) Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition

    So the usage relating to earth has a distinct derivation from the usage as a term of abuse, which is indeed short for sodomite.

    --
    Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
  70. Another version... by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

    I've actually heard another version of the Original Myrphy's law... "If there are two or more ways to do something and one of those results in a catastrophe, then someone will do it that way". The reference is here.

    Does anyone know the validity of this version?

    --
    .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
  71. Murphy's Law of Packaging and atomic physics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Q: How do you split the atom?

    A: Send it through the post marked 'fragile'

  72. Strangedog's Law by stinkydog · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you post it on your web site, it's available even if you don't directly link to it.

    Part 4 early for your viewing pleasure.

    SD

    --
    âoeWho knew something as harmless as willful ignorance could end up having real consequences?â
    1. Re:Strangedog's Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod the parent up. You can actually read the fourth part right now!

  73. The Linux Connection by digitalhermit · · Score: 1

    Murphy's Law is one of the pillars of the entire Open Source idea. Send your code to the world. Someone, somewhere will screw something up, often with amusing or frightful consequences. Something will go wrong.

    The problem with traditional methods of testing is that these worst cases -- the outlier condition, the far-fetched and novel usage -- are not even considered let alone tested. You can make default conditions for wildcard input, but cannot test for what you cannot conceive. So Murphy's Law is actually a good thing.

  74. The law about Murphy's law by sigxcpu · · Score: 1

    Murphy's law was not created Murphy, but by another man with the same name.

    --
    As of Postgres v6.2, time travel is no longer supported.
  75. NEWS FLASH: Murphy's Law Wasn't Written By Murphy by Little+Brother · · Score: 1

    Murphy's Law wasn't written by Murphy, but by another man with the same name.

    --

    Little Brother, watching the watchers

  76. Two comments on idiot-proof design: by SolemnDragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    first, the reason nothing can be made truly idiot-proof is that no rational human being can guess all of the variations that an idiot is going to somehow come up with. And the idiot in question isn't going to be coherent enough to tell you, either. (No matter how well it's designed, there are always going to be those individuals who could be left in a padded room with two steel ball bearings- and in ten minutes, will have lost one and broken the other... and they're going to want to use your design, too)

    the second one that we talk about where i work is that for design purposes, you have to think about how bright the 'average' guy is... and then realise that, by definition, likely half of them are going to be dumber than that!

    1. Re:Two comments on idiot-proof design: by o'reor · · Score: 1
      the reason nothing can be made truly idiot-proof is that no rational human being can guess all of the variations that an idiot is going to somehow come up with.

      This confirms what I have learnt from experience, although I was not able to come up with a well defined law to rule it: idiots are very creative. As a software designer, this kind of creativity is definitely something I dread.

      Oh, and I'm also a part-time CVS repository administrator. In this field, creativity among clueless users is also a possibility that keeps me awake at all times.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, our new overlords are belong to all your base.
    2. Re:Two comments on idiot-proof design: by PGillingwater · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unfortunately, in the race to produce more and more idiot-proof designs, versus the proclivity of the universe to produce more idiots, the latter is winning.

      --
      Paul Gillingwater
      MBA, CISSP, CISM
    3. Re:Two comments on idiot-proof design: by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      although I was not able to come up with a well defined law to rule it: idiots are very creative.

      How about:
      As soon as you make it idiot-proof, someone comes along and invents a better idiot.

      -- Unknown

  77. Corollary Laws by bnavarro · · Score: 1

    Two memorable Corollary laws that I remember from a Murphy's Law calendar I once had:

    -- Where there's a right, there's a wrong.

    -- A fool and your money are soon partners.

  78. RTFA: by mks113 · · Score: 1

    Fantastic write-up that geeks need to read. Insight on history, human nature, science, and safety.

    For every poster who wrote "I've heard this before!" read the article and you will see that the author compares the different versions of the origin.

    p.s. congrats on slashdotting improb.com. They run the Ignoble prizes, and publish "The Annals of Improbable Research" A great blend of science and humo[u]r.

    mks

  79. Murphy's corollary to Moore's Law by panurge · · Score: 1

    Presumably says that not only will things go wrong if they can, but the rate of their going wrong is doubling every 18 months. Which explains a lot...

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    1. Re:Murphy's corollary to Moore's Law by bheerssen · · Score: 1

      Actually, that pretty much describes entropy.

      --
      (Score: -1, Stupid)
  80. Re:This is news? Besides he's quoting the wrong La by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Informative

    The article indicates (from one account, mind you) that murphy kicked out a shorter version - "If anything can go wrong, he'll do it." or possibly "If that guy has any way of making a mistake, he will." Both of them have the same spirit as the foldoc entry, but are referring to a single individual, not making a general statement about life.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  81. The other line *does* move faster by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 1

    If there are 5 checkout lanes open in a grocery store, only one of them will be the fastest. So, 4 times out of 5, the lane you pick will be slower than another lane.

    Murphy's Law is all about perception.

    --
    The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
    1. Re:The other line *does* move faster by ambisinistral · · Score: 1
      That's because the choice of lane isn't random. Face it... you always pick the register with the hottest looking cashier.

      --

      deserve's got nothing to do with it...

  82. How on earth is this flamebait? by 2.3.PROFIT!!! · · Score: 1

    The whole point of the article is a fact so well known that it's included in the jargon file. What's next an article describing the meaningAunt Tillie?

  83. Sod off means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...basically, "go f--- yourself in the @$$", in its most derogatory form.

  84. Part 4 _is_ there.... by eli173 · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... you just have to follow a simple pattern:
    http://www.improb.com/airchives/paperair/volume9/v 9i5/murphy/murphy4.html

    Enjoy!

  85. It was required by Murphy by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 1
    If I recall, it was one of "Murphy's" Prime Directives
    1. Serve the public trust
    2. Protect the innocent
    3. Uphold the law
    1. Re:It was required by Murphy by zanderredux · · Score: 1

      4. Do not mess with any member of OCP's board of directors (something like that)

  86. Sexual Intellectuals..... by gsfprez · · Score: 1

    "Guys become, if you'll pardon my expression, sexual intellectuals. You know what the phrase is for that?"

    I have to admit no, I'm not familiar with the term. Sexual what?

    "Sexual intellectuals. They're fucking know-it-alls, that's what."

    i shot my Dr. Pepper out my nose reading that.

    every - and i do mean EVERY single person i've met that's ever seen or dealt with Chuck Yeager (given General for the hell of it) has used the word "asshole" to describe him.

    (i'm former AF officer and have dealt with enough guys at Edwards to have been able to "trend" this)

    --
    guns kill people like spoons make Rosie O'Donnell fat.
    1. Re:Sexual Intellectuals..... by InfoVore · · Score: 1

      Your observation about Gen. Yeager is an interesting contrast to what I know about Col. Stapp. Every person I've met who knew Col. Stapp was uniformly impressed with him, including me.

      I got to meet Col. Stapp on a couple of occasions, including one meeting where he gave a rather lengthy project presentation (he ran a small foundation after he retired). He seemed like a great guy. He was a little hard of hearing (and who wouldn't be after what he had been through) and he had a tendancy to draw out his statements as older folks tend to do, but a great old guy none the less. I'm glad I had the chance to meet him.

      --
      "These laws they're passing won't even compile anymore, let alone execute." - anon
  87. Everyone knows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Slashdot mods have no life other than video games and jacking eachother off...

  88. Anal sex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh. The brittish like their anal sex, or at the very least accusing people of it. Sod off, has a cousin buggeroff. Bugger being the act of anal sex. Other variations that have carried over to Australian English include bugger me (used comically in a recent car ad, everytime something goes wrong, which it does around this type of car, the character says, Bugger ME!), go to buggery, and probably others I can't think of.

    Not to mention all the variations of names used to call homosexuals.

    BTW, the 4th page of this article is already available. Just substitute page no. in the url to 4 and there you go. No need to wait 2 days for the final installment.

  89. Slashdotted... by keplon · · Score: 1

    Site's slow, so here is a website about the origins of Murphy's Laws:
    Origin of Murphy's Law

  90. Who wouldn't? by Anonym1ty · · Score: 1

    My question is, what self-respecting Slashdot reading nerd here wouldn't already know the story about Murphy's Law?

    Just wondering --since I think it's stuff that matters

  91. Murphy's Law = Crutch by liam193 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    About 15 years ago a computer systems professional wrote an article which was published in Network World magazine that discussed Murphy's Law. The basic premise was that Murphy's Law was a crutch used by incompetants to justify they're lack of planning. The ideas expressed by Murphy should be a warning to all to prepare for the worst you can imagine so your not caught by the small shortcomings; however, they are all too often used to justify the failure of someone to plan. A disaster does not have to be a catastrophe if proper planning is done.

    I'm providing the text of the article below. It is used by permission of the author.

    Brandt's Laws

    It was 1959. I was sixteen years old and had just accepted a job with a small electronics firm. I was employed there but a few days when I learned of Murphy's Law. I had previously learned of Charles' and Boyle's laws and the law of gravity. I instinctively knew if they called it a law, Murphy was right. After all, the other laws I had learned were valid.

    I spent four years in electronics and moved to Data Processing after college. From what people said, Murphy seemed to be alive and well in the computer industry too. Something bothered me from time to time. People who had not been prudent used Murphy to avoid facing up to their failures. After all, if something was going to happen no matter what you did, how could you be held responsible for it? Carelessness crept in when Murphy could be blamed.

    In the early eighties, I was introduced to men like Ken Copeland, Phil Crosby, Edward Demming and Ken Hagin. They all teach that we are responsible for our actions and we control our futures.

    It took time but their message finally started to sink in. If I was prudent, I could control many of the things I had considered beyond my control. If I didn't accept unfavorable results as inevitable, they were not. Slowly, I formulated what is nearly the antithesis of Murphy's law. Although I didn't invent these laws, since I recorded them I don't blanch at calling them Brandt's Laws. Like anyone who is ahead of his peers, I've even been criticized for them. The following are several of the basic ones.

    1. Murphy's law is a crutch used by incompetents to excuse their failures.
      Too often, things happen and we simply write them off as inevitable. All too frequently, these are the result of a lack of prudence, fueled by carelessness caused by Murphy's laws.
    2. Things go wrong only if you fail to take action to prevent them.
      I have never seen a well-planned fiasco.
    3. If you plan to survive the worst case and plan to avoid its happening, it'll not happen and you will survive.
      By carefully studying the situation and engaging in good contingency planning, your survival is assured.
    4. There is no substitute for knowing what one is doing.
      Lack of academic preparation and carelessness in on-going study frequently cause failures. I've seen many so-called professionals who don't study enough to keep up with even a minimum of available knowledge. Many work harder at their hobbies than their professions. These are not professionals but overpaid day laborers.
    5. A quick fix is neither quick nor a fix.
      So frequently a band-aid is used to treat a severed artery, assuming or hoping it will heal if ignored. This is not to say that there frequently isn't a "simple" fix, but it should correct the problem and not create future problems. A quick fix targets symptoms, not the cause.
    6. Few problems have only one cause.
      If, on the surface a problem has one obvious cause, there are several others and the most significant is not the obvious. The most obvious cause is frequently the one attacked, often at the expense of ignoring the real cause.
    7. The path we recognize as the right one but think we cannot afford is usually the one we use after we h
    1. Re:Murphy's Law = Crutch by MajesticFiles · · Score: 1

      2. Things go wrong only if you fail to take action to prevent them.
      I have never seen a well-planned fiasco.

      You've obviously never been to a wedding.

      --
      AOL IM? ICQ? Yahoo Chat??? Bah! I use Bitwise baby! http://www.bitwisechat.com/ My BW ID: virginia
  92. a Beowulf cluster of beaurocrats! by wiredog · · Score: 1

    We're doomed.

  93. Best part by gr8_phk · · Score: 1
    I found the best part to be this bit while he was talking to Chuck Yeager:

    I have to admit no, I'm not familiar with the term. Sexual what? "Sexual intellectuals. They're fucking know-it-alls, that's what."

    That destroys the credibility of the piece for me. I swear I've seen stuff on TV where Chuck himself admits to having cracked ribs. But as he would point out, that's just the way I remember it.

    1. Re:Best part by warpup · · Score: 1

      Yeager didn't say that about his ribs being cracked, he made the statement in reference to his going to Stapp to clear him for the flight because the other flight doctors would have grounded him.

  94. Re:My first corollary: Murphy's Law of Packaging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean:
    up ^

    v dn

  95. My favorite corrolary by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 1

    is also known as Silverman's Paradox:

    "If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will."

    This is the only possible explanation of why things sometimes go right.

    --
    Someone you trust is one of us.
  96. Of course... by stonecypher · · Score: 1

    ... anyone which reads the Jargon File has known this for a decade, and anyone which reads Niven knows that Finagle got Finagled.

    </insidejoke>

    --
    StoneCypher is Full of BS
  97. Anything can be a fuse! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As my EE professor exclaimed when I let the magic smoke out of a microprocessor (the EPROM version of the 8047, back in '83 when they were rather expensive): "another example of Finnegans' Law - anything can be a fuse."

  98. Brandt's Laws = Corrolaries to Murphy's Law by analog_line · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The laws themselves are fine as far as they go, and I've heard many of them before, but the original author's fatal flaw lies in the fact that he, and many others, mistake Murphy's Law for a physical law, like gravity. Murphy's Law, as we know it today (anything that can go wrong, will) is fundamentally a law of humanity, and our propensity for planning and design in general.

    Nature doesn't "go wrong". An asteroid hitting the Earth and wiping out life may seem like a fine example of Murphy's Law, but only to those entities capable of making plans and designing things. Earth didn't plan to let dinosaurs evolve into a higher form of life, and have it's plans marred by that meddling asteroid hitting around the Yucatan. Nothing went wrong, on any kind of cosmic scale, though I imagine any dinosaurs capable of thought at the time might have come up with a simillar law, as their plans for dinner, having some offspring, and maybe surviving another few years, or even a few minutes, were pretty much ended right quick.

    Bad things are only inevitable if you assume that good things are inevitable. That's Murphy's Law reworded, and it is the fundamental basis for Brandt's Laws. I think the original author missed the point.

  99. what about Audie Murphy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always thought that the term Murphy's Law came from the many trials and tribulations of the famous war hero: Audie Murphy.
    http://www.grunts.net/legends/audiemurphy.html

  100. Like the IDE cables? by SharpFang · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nowadays it's been pretty much cleared up. But in times between 286 and early P2, there were two basic methods as how to "protect" the ide tapes from plugging them in the wrong way. One was a bit of plastic sticking out from the side, the other was one of the holes in the plug filled. One was solved by corresponding gap in the plastic around the pins, the other by a missing pin. The problem though, was that apparently the producers couldn't come to agreement which one is right. So sometimes there was no gap, sometimes there were all the pins, so sometimes you checked 4 different IDE cables and you found none of them fits particular drive or motherboard. And finally, when you did and wanted to follow the "Red line to pin 1" ultimate rule, you found out that nobody took care to mark "1" on the motherboard and you had to look at other devices to recall "where the "1" is?"

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:Like the IDE cables? by dfn_deux · · Score: 2, Informative

      FYI ide HD's and standard floppy drives always (at least in my experience) have the #1 pin on the same side as the power connector YMMV

      --
      -*The above statement is printed entirely on recycled electrons*-
    2. Re:Like the IDE cables? by TwistedGreen · · Score: 1

      This isn't true for many floppy drives, actually.
      For some, yes, but not in general.

    3. Re:Like the IDE cables? by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      What about motherboards and IDE tapes without distinct features (the plastic piece, "blind" hole, no red wire)?

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  101. Re:Who was Sod then? by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

    What does sod mean in the dirst place?

    Stormtroopers of Death. Sargent D is coming, and you're on his list.

    --
    Like what I said? You might like my music
  102. Page 4 is already online by Dan+East · · Score: 1

    Take a look at the urls for the first 3 pages and use your imagination. :)

    The Voice of Murphy

    Despite how badly my interview with Yeager concluded, I feel strangely relieved. I don't feel nearly so bad that...


    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  103. Historical Revisionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Murphys law was known and often quoted well
    before the Civil War. So this Idea that it is somehow involved with rocket sleds and Yeager is
    nonsense.

  104. obligatory fight club quote by roskakori · · Score: 1
    Reverse Murphy's Law:
    "Things never go as bad as they could have."
    Tyler Durden: It could be worse. A woman could cut off your penis while you're sleeping and toss it out the window of a moving car.
    Narrator: There's always that.

  105. Page 4 is up by powera · · Score: 1

    Check URL http://www.improb.com/airchives/paperair/volume9/v 9i5/murphy/murphy4.html . They just don't have a link yet.

    Text:

    The Voice of Murphy

    Despite how badly my interview with Yeager concluded, I feel strangely relieved. I don't feel nearly so bad that I?ve failed to find a definitive answer about the origins of Murphy's Law. Yeager's right: there is no definitive truth. History, as the old saying goes, is nothing more than a pack of lies that everyone agrees are true.
    The second thing that transpired was that I unexpectedly received several emails from Robert Murphy. In one he wrote that he wanted to clarify that his father passed away in 1990, not 1989 as he'd written in his letter to the editor. In another he wrote that he'd found a note on Los Angeles West Point Society stationery asking ?if they could make a plaque about Murphy?s Law for possible submission to the Academy. In other words,? he continued, ?this was not something my father was campaigning for. As I told you, self promotion was completely foreign to my Father?? In the same email Robert cited the comments I made at our meeting and noted that in his view ?George Nichols is just an angry old man who regrets that the Law was not named after him, nothing more. He is a self-tainted source.?

    And then Robert wrote an email containing some exciting news. He?d been going through some things ? I?d asked him to please find a photo of his father ? and he?d come across a cassette tape of a radio interview about the Law. He presents it, and a photo of his father working on some rocket sled components, to me at a subsequent meeting.
    The cassette tape is unmarked, and there is no spoken introduction whatsoever on the recording. I guess it might be the CBC, or NPR, and probably dates from the time of the People article, early 1980?s. It?s as close as I?m going to get to interviewing Ed Murphy, and of course I can?t wait to hear it.

    ?Yes, Virginia,? says the nameless commentator broadly, ?there really is a Murphy. Ed Murphy, who we?ve got on the phone today...?

    Ed Murphy?s voice is serious, deliberate and humorless. Absolutely appropriate, I decide, for a career engineer. Asked to tell his version of the Murphy?s Law story he goes into the kind of excruciating detail you?d expect from someone obsessed with precision. It leaves the interviewer, who apparently believed he was going to interview a slick, witty personality, completely flummoxed.
    The senior Murphy said clearly in the interview that, as Nichols and Hill claimed, he wasn?t part of the Gee Whiz team. He?d only been to Edwards once during Stapp?s tests. He was working at Wright Field he recalled, on a project similar to Stapp?s but which involved the use of a centrifuge. He?d designed some innovative electronic measuring equipment for the centrifuge, and when John Stapp heard about that, he called and asked if Murphy?d design some similar components for the Whiz. Murphy?d leapt at the chance, he said, because he admired Stapp and the groundbreaking work he was doing.

    According to Murphy, he sent his equipment out to Edwards and it worked well for a few tests. But then something went wrong. Stapp called him to say that he?d ?risked his neck riding on that darn sled? and the instruments had produced no data. ?So I got on the next airplane to Muroc and had a meeting with him,? Murphy explained. ?And I said all right, let?s see the accelerometers.? An examination revealed to Murphy that ? like Hill and Nichols said ??they had put the strain gauges on the transducers ninety degrees off.?

    Yet contrary to what Nichols said about Murphy not taking the blame for the trouble, Murphy said in the interview that he felt ? to a certain degree ? it was his fault. ?I had made very accurate drawings of the thing for them, and discussed it with the people who were going to make them? but I hadn?t covered everything,? he sighed. ?I didn?t tell them that they had positively to orient them in only one direction. So I guess about that tim

  106. Carter's Law by refactored · · Score: 1
    "The only reason why things ever go right, is so that they may go more spectacularly wrong later."

    All of Physics may be deduced from this statement.

  107. Guess it's time to rewrite the Jargon File entry.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Clearly lots of errors in the Murphy's Law entry:
    The correct, original Murphy's Law reads: If there are two or more ways to do something, and one of those ways can result in a catastrophe, then someone will do it. This is a principle of defensive design, cited here because it is usually given in mutant forms less descriptive of the challenges of design for lusers. For example, you don't make a two-pin plug symmetrical and then label it THIS WAY UP; if it matters which way it is plugged in, then you make the design asymmetrical (see also the anecdote under magic smoke).

    Edward A. Murphy, Jr. was one of McDonnell-Douglas's quality-control engineers on the rocket-sled experiments that were done by the U.S. Air Force in 1949 to test human acceleration tolerances (USAF project MX981). One experiment involved a set of 16 accelerometers mounted to different parts of the subject's body. There were two ways each sensor could be glued to its mount, and somebody methodically installed all 16 in a replacement set the wrong way around. Murphy then made the original form of his pronouncement, which the test subject (Major John Paul Stapp) mis-quoted (apparently in the more general form Whatever can go wrong, will go wrong) at a news conference a few days later.

    Within months Murphy's Law had spread to various technical cultures connected to aerospace engineering. Before too many years had gone by variants had passed into the popular imagination, changing as they went. Most of these are variants on Anything that can go wrong, will; this is more correctly referred to asFinagle's Law. The memetic drift apparent in these mutants clearly demonstrates Murphy's Law acting on itself!

  108. Murphy's golden rule by glenebob · · Score: 1

    He who has the gold makes the rules.

    Murphy's number one rule:
    Never mess with Mrs Murphy.

  109. an alternate source of the law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If you check the Oxford English Dictionary, the earliest occurance in print they could find was 1955 in the Aviation Mech. Bulletin.

    They also cite John Glenn from Into Orbit 85 who says that "'Murphy' was a fictitious character who appeared in a series of educational cartoons put out by the U.S. Navy"

  110. politics by pyrrho · · Score: 1

    works well in politics... when you do something malicious, always be prepared to assign it to your "stupidity".

    Step one: elect a president everyone thinks is stupid.

    Step two: do whatever

    Step three: oops! we're just so stupid! Innocent harmless stupid person over here, bless our hearts!

    --

    -pyrrho

  111. TMTOWTDI! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At the bottom of this page, I see a quote by Larry Wall:

    Perl is designed to give you several ways to do anything ...

    Ol' Murphy would be proud!

  112. Re:Who was Sod then? by nate+nice · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I still love SOD myself. Had a cassette of theirs at some point, ehich qualifies me for a free MP3 download of their album. (I think they only had one...had like 20 songs on it)

    Man, those were the days. Pre-Anthrax, rofl.

    SPEAK ENGLISH OR DIE!

    --
    "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
  113. Re:Evolution of ... (Chuck Yeager on Murphy's Law) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If there's anyone who's right it probably is Chuck Yeager. In the third article he says "You tell it the way you believe it and that's not necessarily the way that it happened. There's nothing more true than that." And I think that's all there is to it. At least until we get to see the 4th and final part ;-)

  114. Part 4 link by NaDrew · · Score: 2, Informative
    it's too bad the link is posted before all 4 parts of the article are finished.
    Part 4 of 4
    --
    Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
  115. Not Murphy, Parkinson by bettiwettiwoo · · Score: 1
    Government and their bureaucracies are primarily governed by Parkinson's Law:
    Work expands so as to fill the time available for its completion. ...

    Of more interest to the general reader is the explanation of the factors underlying the general tendency to which this law gives definition. Omitting technicalities (which are numerous) we may distinguish at the outset two motive forces ...[:] (1) "An official wants to multiply subordinates, not rivals" and (2) "Officials make work for each other." ...

    In any public administrative department not actually at war, the staff increase may be expected to follow this formula:

    $x = {{2k^m}+l} /over n$

    where k is the number of staff seeking promotion throught the appointment of subordinates; l represents the difference between the ages of appointment and retirement; m is the number of man-hours devoted to ansswering minutes within the department; and n is the number of effective unites being administered, x will be the number of new staff required each year. Mathematicians will, of course, realize that to find the percentage increase they must multiply x by 100 and divide the total of the previous year (y), thus:

    ${100({2k^m}+l)} /over {yn}%$.

    And this figure will invariably prove to be between 5.17 per cent and 6.56 per cent, irrespective of any variation in the amount of work (if any) to be done.

    C. Northcote Parkinson: Parkinson's Law Or The Pursuit Of Progress (Penguin, (1986) pp.14-24)
    --
    The liver is evil and must be punished.
  116. Cole's Law by clockmaker · · Score: 1

    Shredded Cabbage

  117. Re:Who was Sod then? by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I still love SOD myself. Had a cassette of theirs at some point, ehich qualifies me for a free MP3 download of their album. (I think they only had one...had like 20 songs on it)

    They had two, for awhile anyway. Speak English or Die, then Live at Budokan. A few years back, though, they got back together and made Bigger than the Devil.

    Man, those were the days. Pre-Anthrax, rofl.

    Actually, iirc, they recorded the original SOD tape with extra studio time they had left during Among the Living. It may have been Spreading the Disease. IN any case, Anthrax had already put out 3 albums (well, 1 ep, 1 album, and working on another) when they did the first SOD tape.

    I get a kick out of singing Speak English or Die, though. You come into this country, you take upo all our jobs. Boats and boats and boats of you go home you fuckin' slobs. heh.

    But man, they were like prescient. I think George W. Bush took them a little too seriously, man. "Fuck the middle east, there's too many problems. They just get in the way, we can sure live without 'em. They hijack our planes, and raise our oil prices. Let's kill them all and have a ball and end their fuckin' crisis." Heh. Except that I think they wrote that song when the Libya thing was going on.

    YOu should be virutally guaranteed to find them on WinMX right now, since I'm logged in. ;)

    --
    Like what I said? You might like my music
  118. Another /. law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If an article should be read before commenting on whether or not it's "old news", it won't be read.

  119. Don't forget Murphy's first law: by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Don't touch Mrs. Murphy.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  120. Re:My first corollary: Murphy's Law of Packaging by geekoid · · Score: 1

    You really need +1 Clever.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  121. WOW a week after Dr Karl told us all on TV by agronomous+cowherd2 · · Score: 1
    Karl Kruszelnicki told me and all the kids who watch Australian ABC TV a week ago about this (and on the web site in january 99), you guys dont watch enough kids TV. He mentions venus exploration, land speed record mistakes and all. Me I am 34 and an engineer with no children or girlfriend (engineer and single being a tautology). kids TV is great!

    Something like "If there are two or more ways of doing something and one of them is wrong, the wrong one will invariably occur"

    I am not behind, I am just SO FAR AHEAD it looks that way :)

  122. Re:Part 4 Early - MOD PARENT UP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Woohoooo! Thanks for sharing that, it's like an early christmas!

  123. My Law by LuYu · · Score: 1

    "So my law," Nichols says proudly, "is: 'If a proposed action has any unsatisfactory results, forget about it.'
    Well, my law is:
    Never make a Law that contributes to the obsolecence of your chosen profession.
    --

    "I tell it the way I remember it, and that's not the way it happened."

    -- Chuck Yeager

    (This new sig is from this article, too :)

    --
    All data is speech. All speech is Free.
  124. Serendipitous re-discovery of old truth. by Carlk · · Score: 1
    DISCOVER mag, ~1988, someone tracked Murphy down and wrote an article. As I remember (1) Murphy was USNavy in the NASA program. And (2) did NOT like the modern "...anything that can...will...".
    Too fatalistic, Murphy was said to have said.

    HE said he said "If there are 2 way do something sooner or later the wrong one will be tried."! [Polarized plugs were OK w murphy.]

  125. Re:My first corollary: Murphy's Law of Packaging by fm6 · · Score: 1

    This only works if the UPS guy isn't cixelsyd.