Slashdot Mirror


Parking Garage Of The Future

Spunk writes "Like something out of the Jetsons, this NYTimes article [no-reg link] describes a parking garage that automatically stores cars in a 3-dimensional grid, and retrieves them when you return. Europe and Asia have several already."

111 comments

  1. Not much new here... by Mattcelt · · Score: 1

    ...the U.S. has had marinas doing this for boats for many years. I'm curious, though, about what happens when the power goes out, like it did in the mid-atlantic states this past week?

    1. Re:Not much new here... by Mattcelt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And boy, I wonder how they handle rush hour with a system like this... What if all 324 people want to get out at the same time?

      324 cars
      *2.5 mins/car

      /2 elevators
      =405 minutes or 6.75 hours to get them all!

    2. Re:Not much new here... by fm6 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      ...what happens when the power goes out, like it did in the mid-atlantic states this past week?
      You're screwed, of course. Just like the people who couldn't get their cars out of our company garage during the last blackout. Supposedly there was a way to operate the security curtains without power, but the guy who knew how to do it was off that week. Being dangerously dependent on technology that goes away with the first infrastructure glitch is nothing new.

      I seem to recall seeing one of these in a 50s crime movie. Not that Jetsony. Now if the cars were held up by magnetic levitation. Oops, there's that power issue again...

    3. Re:Not much new here... by bofkentucky · · Score: 1

      Supposedly there was a way to operate the security curtains without power

      No one had a baby-killing SUV to drive through the gate, I call shenanigans

      --
      09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0
    4. Re:Not much new here... by fm6 · · Score: 1

      No, there were several. I mean, this was a major software firm, it's practically mandatory. I guess nobody wanted to scratch their paint.

    5. Re:Not much new here... by bofkentucky · · Score: 1

      Pansies, it is urbanites like that that piss me off. It used to be, you bought an SUV b/c you had the triple requirements of more than one (small) child, needed 4WD to get your job(s) done, and needed the ground clearance of a truck. SUV's cost about the same as the truck packages they were based on (1/2 or 3/4 ton shortbed trucks) and could be bought without 4 10-way powered and heated captains chairs . Fast forward to today, a full-size truck-based SUV with a V8 costs more than my parents house did 20 years ago and it is those assholes that drove up the demand for them. Let them buy a pissant geo Tracker or Kia Rio so I can actually afford a decent truck.

      --
      09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0
    6. Re:Not much new here... by Cy+Guy · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall seeing one of these in a 50s crime movie.

      RTFA - the NYT article discusses and has a pic of one the '50s era garages in NYC. They have elevators which lets them save the ramp space, but rely on valets to park the cars on each level - the article says 8 valets are needed during peak periods. I believe the one and only time I had to park in Manhattan I parked in one of them.

      The new system has only two staff, and it sounded like they could get by with having only one working at a time if the maintenance tech worked the night shift and doubled as shift "manager".

      I'm glad to see the one in DC has different prices for SUVs versus standard cars. Since in the fully automated system you only need a space 5 ft high for a standard car, and with a smaller wheel base. The pricing should in large part be based on the cubic footage the car takes up when parked.

      All-in-all, the whole system reminds me of those sites that store paper archives. You give them a box identifier and a robotic forklift seeks out the proper aisle, row, and shelf, and retrieves the box. Finally modern logistics principals are being applied to parking.

    7. Re:Not much new here... by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Silicon Valley pansies like serious SUVs because all that metal gives them the illusion that they're protected from "all those bad drivers" (a class nobody will admit to actually belonging to, no matter how much they speed or jump lanes). Of course, the tendency of any truck-like vehicle to tip at high speeds kind of wipes out any safety advantage -- but it's the feeling of safety that counts. You can't get that illusion from a fake SUV like the Tracker or Rio.

    8. Re:Not much new here... by alayne · · Score: 1

      Many of the parking garages in NY as well as other major cities do not allow people to retrieve their own car anyway. There is a staff of people who get the cars. It can normally take 5-10 minutes to get a car from one of these garages with wait times longer during rush hour.

      I imagine the designers in a high traffic area would add more elevators to compensate. Not to mention it isn't likely that all 324 would want out at once. Most people leave work between 3 and 7 with a spike at 5. As long as it can handle its spike (putting the ~5:00 cars in the quicker bays) There wouldn't be a problem.

    9. Re:Not much new here... by mog · · Score: 1

      A point that you allude to but don't quite get there brings into play the beautiful fact that the whole thing is computerized. This allows for to 8-5 driver's car to be placed in the slowest to retrieve location at 8, and shifted to the quick location during downtime around 4:30 or so, ready for when they arrive. Very cool indeed. I want one!

    10. Re:Not much new here... by RevDobbs · · Score: 1

      First, the vast majority of people in Hoboken use mass transit; we're just across the river from NYC, minutes away from Jersey City & Newark via train.

      Second, the density of bars & taverns in Hoboken is greater than anywhere else in New Jersey; after work, there's no great rush to get home and drive anywhere.

    11. Re:Not much new here... by RevDobbs · · Score: 1

      HA! I love the sight of a tiny chick sitting in a Ford Excursion, just barely able to see over the steering wheel.

      ... and dents and scratches all over the truck from the many fender-benders.

      Oh, oh... or all the k3wl SUVs stranded all over the highway during a snow storm. Yes, 4WD will keep you moving; that doesn't mean you're going to have absolute control at 70 MPH in a blizzard. It's great to carefully pilot my Saturn past SUVs in ditches or tettering over the center median divider.

    12. Re:Not much new here... by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Yeah, it's great fun to sneer at all those idiots in their SUVs. I just hope I never collide with one. Or am driving nearby when they decide to show off their acrobatic capabilities.

      OK, this yuppie-SUV-bashing thread is pretty long by now, and we havent' gotten flamed by any SUV lovers yet. Chicken?

      Another sad thought: the next governor of California may be the idiot who started the whole SUV thing, when he decided that a HUMV made a good city car!

    13. Re:Not much new here... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I don't see any reason you couldn't have a generator on site, though in cities you mostly have to run natural gas generators. Cisco in Santa Cruz got a nice Onan natural gas generator, it was tolerably quiet. You don't need to supply 100% of working power anyway, you can run one motor at half power, if you're geared low enough, instead of both motors at half power, and still get around, just slower.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  2. Japan has used them for years... by orn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When in Japan for work, I found these at lots of buildings. I thought of them as car vending machines - stick a ticket in, get a car out.

    They even used a giant motorized lazy susan to turn your car around for you.

    What a great country.

    --
    1. 2.
    1. Re:Japan has used them for years... by xiopher · · Score: 0

      This could be a easier way to steal a car. How long will it be before you don't even lock your doors. You just lock up you car in the parking lot.

    2. Re:Japan has used them for years... by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Still have the little problem of needing a key. And what with laser cut keys these days and internal keyfob computer locks, all the cars worth stealing are impossible to steal. :-)

      Doesn't give me much hope for my Sable, though, but who'd want to steal that?

    3. Re:Japan has used them for years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taurus Car Club of America, sir. I have three Tauruses sitting in my driveway, and I love them all. Your sable is a sister car. Join us.

    4. Re:Japan has used them for years... by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      I loved those things when I was there. It was another example of Japan's great will to use engineering to overcome the problems of their population density and the ludicrous price of real-estate there. I always wondered how they'd fare in America.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  3. Future? by Lomby · · Score: 1

    Why future?
    Several such parking systems are already in use in different countries.
    There is one near Lugano (Campione) in Switzerland, and I saw one in Japan.

  4. Just me? by eviljolly · · Score: 1

    It is just me, or does this remind you of a gigantic CD changer for cars?

    1. Re:Just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except that you can just use a screwdriver to take it apart and get your car out when it fucks up....and it will fuck up. It's a machine and they all do that eventually.

  5. This would be great for... by xiopher · · Score: 0

    Base ball games. collages. or even you 9-5 job.

  6. another solution by Parsec · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Would be to ban large vehicles from the city. Only allow one or two-person mini-vehicles in, while every SUV has to park on the border and take public transportation. It wouldn't be a politically popular move, but it would be space and fuel efficient.

    1. Re:another solution by Parsec · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One way to ban large vehicles, would be to only fund / build parking for mini-vehicles. Sure you could drive around in your SUV, but there's nowhere to park the thing.

    2. Re:another solution by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 1

      I've always thought that at least on specific roads at specific times they should ban private cars. delivery truck, buses and cabs only.

      It would probably be more trouble to do that then its worth.

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
    3. Re:another solution by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Well it would be better to take it one step further. On the border of the City have a Giant Parking lot and use public transit. In and out of the City. The only non-public viechicals allow are for shipping.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:another solution by Chilles · · Score: 2, Informative

      You have this in/around a lot of city centres here in the Netherlands.
      Shops, businesses and residents of a restricted area get a drive-in permit (for delivery) (and maybe one parking space) all public transport is allowed in (buses and cabs) and everybody else can park on the edge. Vehicles that are allowed in get a pass that unblocks the roads into and out of the system.
      solid metal blocks block the roads and can sink down when needed, controlled from some control centre that you can call and by some automatic card system that I don't really know.

      When the traffic get's more troublesome it's probably worth the trouble :)

    5. Re:another solution by isorox · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we have them in almost all British cities - they're called BUS LANES, not exactly hard to do.

    6. Re:another solution by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 1

      its not hard, if your road is wide enough to do it. A lot of roads around here are just not that wide. And then of course there is the old city of Jerusalem, where the majority of "roads" are foot trafic only as there are too many stairs etc on them to do anything else.

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
    7. Re:another solution by flikx · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, my Suburban should be banned in cities. Now everyone who usually rides with me can divide up and take three small cars instead. Sounds like a great idea.

      --
      One future, two choices. Oppose them or let them destroy us.
    8. Re:another solution by nutsy · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't work. SUV-owning ingrates already squeeze their rolling death-traps into spaces plainly marked "compact".

    9. Re:another solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you'll find them wedged into small spots completely destroying anything around them. Clearly the only solution is to ban people from driving at all.

    10. Re:another solution by Parsec · · Score: 1

      So make new parking garages 5' tall. You'll get more vehicles in per vertical unit of space. And enforce already existing laws about parking over two spaces. Also, handicap vehicles would remain exempt and still guaranteed a minimum height for the first level of the garage (so they could fit their wheelchair lift equipped van somewhere).

    11. Re:another solution by Parsec · · Score: 1

      No you'll find them wedged into small spots completely destroying anything around them. Clearly the only solution is to ban people from driving at all.

      The way some people drive, that sometimes doesn't seem like a bad idea.

      I know, you're arguing the point of absurdity here. But we already legislate, to some degree, certain minimum requirements of vehicles on the road. Why should we, as taxpayers, spend more money on maintenance and construction of roads and parking structures for those who insist on taking much more than they need? Let them fund it by charging a premium for excessively large vehicles.

    12. Re:another solution by Parsec · · Score: 1

      Wow, you actually commute? If you start counting the number of SUVs with passengers and the number of motorcycles with passengers, I'd bet the ratio is similar.

      But, I do agree with you... commuters should be taken into consideration... somehow.

      Though I have to ask... why can't you fit three people in a standard sized passenger car for travelling to the office?

    13. Re:another solution by jonm · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Why don't you all take one bus instead?

      Was that so hard?

    14. Re:another solution by flikx · · Score: 1

      A suburban can carry a lot more than three people. Nine people could split into two cars, but it would be cramped.

      --
      One future, two choices. Oppose them or let them destroy us.
    15. Re:another solution by flewp · · Score: 1

      You mention cabs being allowed in the public transportation lane. Well, how is a cab different from someone driving a normal mid sized car? Unless the cab is being shared amongst a few individuals, it doesn't seem any more efficient than a regular car. In fact, the cab might be more inefficient as it has to drive to pick up the person and then take them to wherever their destination may be. OTOH, the person who drives themself only has to drive from their starting point to their final destination. It's like going from point A to point B instead of the cab's going from current position to point A and then to point B. Then again cabs reduce the number of cars needed on the road, so I don't know what my point is :P .

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    16. Re:another solution by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      As much as I hate SUV's (but dammit, I love Jeeps and Pickup's, and you have to admit the Suburban can be a handy little truck to have), many people will already argue that drivers who own SUV's are already paying a disproportionate part of the tax burden of road maintenance through their excessive gas taxes (mmmm $100 tank fill ups yummy!)

      Damn Chevy and their Blazer for starting this whole mess. Before the Blazer came around you could still call the Suburban a truck... :-(

    17. Re:another solution by whorfin · · Score: 1

      Perhaps because it takes an hour to get somewhere in a bus, especially if you need to transfer, when it takes 15 minutes to do the same by car?

      I live downtown in a major US city, and have begun driving because although we have fairly complete mass transit, it can take a damn long time to get around on the transit system, especially when the bus that's supposed to run every ten minutes somehow doesn't show up for 30 minutes at a stretch fairly regularly.

      Yes, I will get flamed for this, I'm bad, I'm destroying the environment, but I'd rather spend that hour with my family than standing on a corner and sitting next to the people who take the bus!

      --
      Laugh while you can, monkey-boy!
    18. Re:another solution by Kris_J · · Score: 1
    19. Re:another solution by flikx · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's one problem with that. There are a lot of stairs and steep hills in my city, and my Suburban can crawl over more features while the bus takes the long way around. People don't realize how useful 4WD is in an urban environment.

      --
      One future, two choices. Oppose them or let them destroy us.
    20. Re:another solution by isorox · · Score: 1

      the U.S. has a limitation of 2 lane roads? Make them one way, bus lane in one lane, normal traffic on the other (or just have bus lanes only like many roads)

    21. Re:another solution by applemasker · · Score: 1
      In some European cities (thinking of Rome in particular) there are entire sections (or times) that only taxis and delviery vehicles are allowed. People adapt because they have to.

      Not too great of a chance of anyone doing anything for the greater good on this side of the pond anytime soon, unfortunately. (Thanks, W.)

      --
      Bush Lies On the Record.
    22. Re:another solution by mcmonkey · · Score: 1
      One way to ban large vehicles, would be to only fund / build parking for mini-vehicles. Sure you could drive around in your SUV, but there's nowhere to park the thing.

      That's 100% backwards. Smaller vehicles mean smaller number of people in each vehicle mean more vehicles over all.

      Cities should encourage the use of large vehicles as long as folks are taking advantage of the high capacity. The extreme case is a city where everyone takes the bus versus a city where everyone drives a single-occupancy car.

      Sure, an SUV is larger and less efficient than a mini cooper. But an SUV with 4 or 5 occupants is better than 4 or 5 mini coopers.

      A city overflowing with vehicular traffic wants to encourage the use of larger vehicles in conjunction with enforced car-pooling and use of mass transit.

    23. Re:another solution by s.fontinalis · · Score: 1

      I've found the wait for the initial pickup to be longer than any transfer time. If only they would institute web (cellphone) based tracking of the buses. Now there's a useful application! (and there's a market - even many bus users have cellphone's now)

    24. Re:another solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw this somewhere - Eastern Europe I think, Prague possibly. All of the bus stops on the route have electronic timetables that are updated according to the current position of the bus, combined with city traffic reports. Very cool.

  7. Speeds up as it empties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If all the people wanted their cars out at the same time, then hopefully the algorhythm recognizes this and delivers the easiest ones first, with a much shorter delivery time. Also as the garage empties, the time to retrieve cars also decreases.

    The 2.5 min per car is based on an average retrieval of a normally packed garage, retrieving cars from far back. I'd guess it would take about an hour to empty the system in this case - probably not more than what it would take for all the cars in a normal garage to emtpy out from similar experiences I've had in Hoboken.

  8. Wuhoh by kurosawdust · · Score: 2, Funny
    Oh christ - as if we didnt have enough trouble with people forgetting "Section 7 - Orange" when they go to the mall...

    "Honey where are we parked?"
    "space 3-16-47...or was that 3-17-46??"

    1. Re:Wuhoh by mopslik · · Score: 1

      "space 3-16-47...or was that 3-17-46?"

      Ahhh, space 36-24-36. The perfect space.

    2. Re:Wuhoh by metamatic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and if you enter the wrong parking space, you get cut into tiny cubes of flesh by razor-sharp wires, or your face is eaten away by acid.

      (OK, I've been watching too many cheesy SF movies.)

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  9. Jetsons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like something out of the Jetsons, this NYTimes article [no-reg link] describes a parking garage that automatically stores cars in a 3-dimensional grid, and retrieves them when you return.

    I don't recall the Jetsons having a 3D lattice parking garage.

    Then again, that was a long time ago. And usually I only caught glipses of The Jetsons when there were commerical breaks of Giligan's Isle. I mean, c'mon, what horny young boy is going to waste his afternoon watching The Jetsons when you can yank yourself silly to Ginger and Mary Ann?

    1. Re:Jetsons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i hear you man. Before there was the www, the only way a young lad could relieve his sexual tension was to enjoy gilligan's isle. kids today don't know how easy they got it with gigabytes of porn at their fingertips. i can't begin to count the number of times ginger's tits, hips, and pouty lips got me off.

    2. Re:Jetsons? by renehollan · · Score: 1
      i can't begin to count the number of times ginger's tits, hips, and pouty lips got me off.

      Perhaps, but it was Mary Ann (Dawn Wells) that usually wore the tighter tops and shorts (and was better endowed in the "top" department, IIRC), though Ginger (Tina Louise) played the part of the flirtatious movie star.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    3. Re:Jetsons? by xiopher · · Score: 0

      a quick google image search proves your memory to be wrong :-)

    4. Re:Jetsons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no shit. Ginger had nice tits. C cups, but still nice. Mary Ann was as flat as the farmland that produced her.

  10. Murphy by madkow · · Score: 2, Funny

    Welcome to the fully automated garage. Step awy from your car and rest assured that nothing can go wrong ... go wrong ... go wrong ...

  11. Why they're used. by Chilles · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The main reason these things are used (in europe) is space.
    My dad is an expert on various car park solutions, mainly to let people "store" (park) their car somewhere at the edge of a city to use public transport to get to the centre (so called transferia). And he traveled around the world looking at how other cities/nations did this. He found that in europe solutions focus on using as little space as possible for as much cars as possible, which naturally led to this system. In the states however, the usual solution to this problem was taking a huge slab of land, covering it with some concrete or asphalt, throw a bus/subway/train station in the middle and call it a transferium. The US will get these things when empty land becomes as rare and expensive as it is now in most areas of europe.
    Which may never happen because malls (easily accessible by car) fulfill much of the functions for americans that city centres fulfill for europeans, so The US has fewer areas where lots of people need to go that are nearly impossible to get to by car. Maybe when people get fed-up with walking hundreds of metres across a huge car-park to the nearest mall entrance?

    1. Re:Why they're used. by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Kunstler is always a good authority on this kind of thing (he believes that American cities are wretched wastelands devoted to the worship of the automobile). Here is an article in which he compares how Europeans walk a lot more than Americans because they have the kind of cities that make walking possible (and enjoyable). Big and Blue in the USA

      Here is his website: http://www.kunstler.com/index.html His "Clusterfuck Nation" ongoing commentary is worthy of a bookmark, even from a right-winger like me.

    2. Re:Why they're used. by ckaminski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I gotta tell ya, living near Boston has been an interesting ride/walk the past couple weekends. I've been in and out of town hundreds and hundreds of times, but it wasn't until two weeks ago that I actually walked across town. From BU to the Aquarium, via Copley Square and the Commons. Bar hopping.

      Did it again last weekend for the Freedom Rally (aka Hemp Fest). This town is relatively easy to walk around in (not if you're in a hurry, I guess)... Even Chicago wasn't too bad on foot. An hour and a half puts you almost anywhere you want to go.

      Americans are just lazy.

    3. Re:Why they're used. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think a common misnomer is that walking is good for you. Unless you're wearing the proper foot-wear, walking around all that asphalt/concrete can be absolutely horrible for your legs and back. Being sore at the end of the day does not mean you got healthier.

      You may think walking around in your business suit (or sandals and socks for Slashdotters) and a heavy brief case is a good work out, but it's doing much more harm than good. It's not a matter of laziness, but a matter of self preservation.

    4. Re:Why they're used. by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think it's my beer gut that's killing my back... any amount of walking right now is better than sitting in a car. :-)

      But you make a good point, proper footwear is essential for sidewalk-warriors.

  12. Beats 324 people trying to drive out by girth · · Score: 1

    In the current system, what happens when 324 people want to get into their cars and try to drive out? I would suspect that the wait would be even longer. You would then be relying upon several hundred people to cooperate. Plus you would have more emmisions with all the cars sitting idle.

  13. System Failure by Slick_Snake · · Score: 1

    What happens when part of the system fails. For example the article mentioned cards that get scanned to identify which car it is storing and which car to retrieve when the driver returns. What if the card failed like some of my credit cards have in the past. Your now stuck in the middle of the city with your car being held hostage by an over grown vending machine. This isn't the only point of failure I see, but is the easies to illistrate.

  14. That won't work -- I've seen what happens by GuyMannDude · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I grew up in a fairly progressive midwestern city and they tried something similar. They wanted to encourage people to use public transportation to go down to the center of town. That's where the state capital was and also the university (which had a student population of 35K-40K). To "encourage" everyone to take the bus downtown, they severely limited parking and made State Street a no-car street (buses, bikes and cops were the only things that could go down it).

    Anyhow, even with these measures, people never learned to ride the bus. They refused to carpool. They continued to drive downtown. Parking was a nightmare. Eventually the city had to cave in and build parking structures down there because things were getting out of hand. Of course, since the downtown had originally been designed to avoid parking structures, adding them in after the fact was difficult, time consuming and expensive. But the voters demanded it.

    I don't mean to rag on you Parsec, but I think your ideas of encouraging transportation habits by engineering are naive.

    GMD

    1. Re:That won't work -- I've seen what happens by Parsec · · Score: 1

      I don't mean to rag on you Parsec, but I think your ideas of encouraging transportation habits by engineering are naive.

      Understood, and taken into consideration. I'm just posting as an idea to be considered. People will drive even if it takes many times times as long to find a spot as walking. Part is probably learned helplessness, and just plain laziness. Engineering and social engineering are both required... and good luck on that!

      I don't think we should stop trying and experimenting to improve our cities, though. Even if we make mistakes along the way.

  15. It's too bad... by sofo · · Score: 1

    ...that more SUV driving, republican voting, steak eating, three-putting meatheads won't want to trust their leased pride and joy to some automated parking garage.

    1. Re:It's too bad... by syrinx · · Score: 1

      ...that more SUV driving, republican voting, steak eating, three-putting meatheads won't want to trust their leased pride and joy to some automated parking garage.

      Well, then it should free up some space for all you Civic driving, Green voting, tofu eating, tree-hugging meatheads!

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    2. Re:It's too bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Civics, as are all cars, are bringing the environment to shit, I ride a bike, you insensitive clod.

    3. Re:It's too bad... by Debillitatus · · Score: 1

      Hey, I drive an Accord, but I try to be a "two-putting" meathead if I can help it. Where do you think I fit into this scheme?

      --

      Come on, give it up, that's

  16. TCO? by n-baxley · · Score: 1

    There's no precise figures on what the operating costs of one of these would be and how it compares to a traditional garage. Looking at constuction costs alone, there's an additional 3 years to get a ROI with the 22K and 15K quotes for building the automated and ramped garages: If you look at a standard $225 a month charge for both scenarios. If you could prove that the long-term costs are less on these you might convince more people. The thing is though that there is very little ongoing maintenance to do with a ramped garage while you have many more parts to maintain on the automated garages.

    The automated garages seem like a good idea. But like some many other things, they are only practicle in America if the economics work out for our benefit. And is that a bad thing?

    1. Re:TCO? by Scyber · · Score: 1

      The automated garage is more expensive monthly than the regular lots. I live right down the road. They even recently cut there prices to try and fill up the garage.

  17. YOUR_MOM? (free reg) by flikx · · Score: 1

    1. http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/21/realestate/21C OV.html?ex=1064721600&en=9dfde624d25e3a67&ei=5062& partner=YOUR_MOM ???
    2. Why go to all the trouble to bypass the registration system? The same people who do so have no problem signing up for a slashdot account.
    3. I have seen this exact technology in Mexico City. I hand the guy $1 (10 Pesos), and he hands over my car. It is much cheaper.
    --
    One future, two choices. Oppose them or let them destroy us.
    1. Re:YOUR_MOM? (free reg) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha, I was beginning to wonder if I was the only one who noticed that. Nice to see the editors are mature :)

    2. Re:YOUR_MOM? (free reg) by Spunk · · Score: 1

      Hehehe. I was waiting for someone to notice my ... modified link. Well done :)

      I also considered using I_DONT_HAVE_A_PARTNER_YOU_INSENSITIVE_CLOD.

  18. Re:No shit, Shirlock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So true. Ancestor post makes obvious point, is overrated.

  19. RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You give the system a card/ticket. Where your vehicle is parked is of no concern to you. All you have to remember is where the garage is.

  20. Gerhard Haag by nutsy · · Score: 1

    The oracle of the Internet (i.e., Google) indicates that Haag used illegal employment methods in Germany and has been involved in setting up front groups for Scientology. Gee, I wonder if the parking is done not by robots at all but by body thetans.

  21. Europe and Asia are like the Jetsons? by chia_monkey · · Score: 1

    First there is "Like something out of the Jetsons"

    then it says "Europe and Asia have several already."

    So Europe and Asia are far ahead in time, with cool futuristic things and the US is in the Stone Age still?

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
    1. Re:Europe and Asia are like the Jetsons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Europe and Asia are far ahead in time, with cool futuristic things and the US is in the Stone Age still?

      That's about right. Have you seen the kind of tech they have in Japan? They have car radios that are probably more powerful than your computer. In Europe, you can call a vending machine on your cell and have it give you a coke (with the price deducted from your phone bill).

    2. Re:Europe and Asia are like the Jetsons? by trinitishwar · · Score: 1

      The parent post should be moderated up. Apparently some people need get over their nationalism and realize that yes, in some ways parts of Europe and Asia are way ahead of us in tech.

      --
      A sufficiently advanced culture would leave almost no trace of it's existence when it was gone.....
  22. Re:That won't work -- I assume you mean Madison? by thomis · · Score: 1

    I found a scooter to be the ideal transport in Madison, but this was back in '88. I think the one think they could have done there to encourage mass transit and walking is beer. Allow beer on the buses, allow beer in hand while walking, and no-one in Madtown, Wisconsin would care about driving around. Except the legislature... no, wait... beer should work for them too...

    --
    ceci n'est pas un 'sig'
  23. Anyone seen CUBE? by Vector7 · · Score: 1

    I think this explains the true origins of the Cube.. It was a prototype for these parking garages!

    1. Re:Anyone seen CUBE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea that movie sucked too. Well I guess it wasn't so bad, but the sequel was just the same as the first but with different people.

    2. Re:Anyone seen CUBE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and you have to figure out which space your car's in by checking to see if the numbers on the door are prime. Which doesn't really matter anyway, because it was in the first cube to begin with.

      Seriously though, I was just waiting to see how long it'd take for somebody to mention CUBE.

  24. Jetsons??? by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1, Insightful

    George Jetson didn't need to park his car (ship/whatever.) It was his briefcase if I remember correctly. Seriuosly though, some parking facilities in Manhattan have something similar. The only real problem is that it is not automated and the operators aren't too fluent in English. I can't recall how long we had to wait to receive our car but it wasn't anything too outrageous. I just remember it because it was something I had never even considered. I really can't see the wait being too much of a problem. What are the odds of 300 people showing up at the exact same time wanting to get their cars? How much different would that be from 300 people arriving at a ramp based garage and all trying to leave at the same time. It would probably be a lot easier actually getting out onto the road then a ramp based garage would.

    --
    Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
  25. Re:That won't work -- I assume you mean Madison? by GuyMannDude · · Score: 1

    You are correct, Sir. I was indeed talking about Madison, Wisconsin.

  26. "Thunderbirds" did this in '66 by belroth · · Score: 1
    In the Thunderbirds episode "Move and you're dead" aired 10th Feb '66 Alan Tracy parks his car in the 'Parola Sands' automated car park.

    Sad (me) but true...

    --
    I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
  27. Point A to point B by randito · · Score: 2, Insightful
    People get so obsessed with how they get from point A to point B, that sometimes they forget what point A and B are. If point A was designed properly, getting to point B would suddenly become much less important.

    In the debate over public vs private transport, people overlook WHY there is so much traffic in the first place.

    Low density suburbs with no commercial or industrial space cannot support mass transit. They barely have the tax base to support basic amenities like roads, police, sewers, water and firestations. It is a no-brainer that a high density neighbourhoods like those found in Manhattan, Tokyo or many European cities can support a lot more amenities per capita than can your typical American suburb. A city block like mine with 20 buildings each with 150 units has the same sewers, water pipes, telephone lines and other infrastructure under the street as any suburb. A look at policing cost will show that the neighbourhood is partly self-policing too.

    When I moved into this neighbourhood (the West End of Vancouver, Canada), I quicky found that my car was useless. There is no parking anywhere for more than 2 hours at a time without a permit. Once I got my permit, the car didn't move from that spot for over a month. EVERYTHING is in walking distance. From specialty grocery stores to incredible restaurants to the commercial district for work, to bars, to the beach and forest (one block away), there is no need to drive. The only exception is the mountains for snowboarding, which take 45 mins by public transit or 25 min by car. Not worth the cost of owning a car! Needless to say, after three months, I sold the car and saved over $500 CDN /month, three quarters of the cost of my rent! That was seven years ago. Never looked back.

    Part of the reason this neighbourhood developed the way it did is out of necessity. Long ago the city of Vancouver decided that they would never build a freeway. The suburbs built them, but they promptly end at the border of Vancouver. Parking is also limited. This makes driving in Vancouver difficult, to say the least. A city of only 2 million, we also have invested in 2 subway lines and we are building a third. This is not so much to help people get from existing neighbourhoods into downtown, as to to encourge more high density neighbourhoods to cluster around the stations.

    In short, increasing population density is the solution to many of the problems facing American cities today. Counter-intuitively, lack of transportation can actually encourage good urban planning. Dense neighbourhoods save the government money , and save the consumer money. It is a win-win situation. Suburbs are simply, unsustainable. Want to fix the transportation problem? Don't build any more transportation infrastructure. Just loosen your zoning laws so developers can build up instead of out, stop subsidizing new developments farther out in the burbs, and let the marker do the rest.

    1. Re:Point A to point B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FUCK YOU and all your pinko Commie Canuck friends! If I wanted to live in a goddamn brick box packed with people, I'd move to NYC. Compare crime rates in the crowded cities to suburbs and the suburbs win - that's why they were created: to get away from the crowds, crime, and undesireable people found in cities. I hate people and want my own fucking house. BTW, the sewers, water pipes, power lines, etc. are not the same since they are providing services to a much greater number of people.

  28. Parking in the Cube (Re:Wuhoh) by NaDrew · · Score: 1
    Yeah, and if you enter the wrong parking space, you get cut into tiny cubes of flesh by razor-sharp wires, or your face is eaten away by acid.
    As long as you only park in spaces where all three co-ordinates are prime, no problem...
    --
    Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
    1. Re:Parking in the Cube (Re:Wuhoh) by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

      You mean, _AREN'T_ prime or a factor of a prime.

      --
      ^_^
    2. Re:Parking in the Cube (Re:Wuhoh) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talk about a terrible movie, god damn. The only redeeming part of that movie is that almost every one of those shittily-acted characters *SPOILER* dies.

    3. Re:Parking in the Cube (Re:Wuhoh) by sbszine · · Score: 1

      You mean, _AREN'T_ prime or a factor of a prime.

      Yeah, avoid that '1' cube...

      --

      Vino, gyno, and techno -Bruce Sterling

  29. MAD Magazine #174, July '76 (50 cents, cheap) by NaDrew · · Score: 1

    I knew I remembered reading about this somewhere back in my mis-spent youth. Turns out that way back in July '76, MAD Magazine's Al Jaffee did a piece on "MAD's Solutions to Big City Parking Problems", which included several variations on this idea.

    Concepts such as the "Curbside Multi-Level Parking Elevator Facility" and "Multi-Leveled Lazy Susan High Speed Parking Facility" show that once again, the usual gang of idiots leads the way. Unfortunately I haven't been able to find a scan of the piece, just the cover from that issue.

    --
    Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
  30. Suburban a LITTLE truck? Since when? by Tau+Zero · · Score: 1
    Man, if you think the Suburban is little, I'd hate to hear what you think about sanely-sized vehicles like 4-door sedans.

    I admit it does look normal next to a Ford Excretion or a Dodge Durigible.

    --
    Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
  31. Cabs are different from personal cars... by Tau+Zero · · Score: 2, Interesting
    in that they take up far less parking space per ride. Even if the cab is only carrying one rider at a time, it is carrying far more riders on an average day and it still takes only one space at the taxi stand.

    When the day's activities are over, the driver of the car has to get to the car and get it out of there. The person who rode the cab in can just as easily take the bus out.

    Don't get me wrong, I'm a dedicated driver and I can barely get along without a car. But I'm not about to sell buses and cabs short on their strong points, and parking and road congestion are darn good ones in their favor.

    --
    Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
    1. Re:Cabs are different from personal cars... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I think they ought to replace taxis at least with air cars, or electric vehicles. They are the perfect vehicles for it. They ought to at least all be hybrids in the city, they do a lot of stop and go, aggressive manouvering, and so on. They just need to be more powerful than the average hybrid.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  32. Re:Suburban a LITTLE truck? Since when? by flikx · · Score: 1

    Any truck under 10,000 LBS GVW is little.

    --
    One future, two choices. Oppose them or let them destroy us.
  33. The Down Side by Packet+Fish · · Score: 1

    I lived in an apartment in Japan that used a system like this. One day, after some adverse weather conditions, the power to the building was out.

    I'll never forget the pointless small talk i had with 4 Japanese businessmen standing around in front of the parking structure full of working cars and dead car delivery systems, unable to get their cars out and go to work, and trying to remember how the salesmen had convinced them that cars would be more convenient than the train.

  34. Re:Suburban a LITTLE truck? Since when? by ckaminski · · Score: 1

    After driving a 24' 24000# GVW box truck a number of times for moving, I can say the Suburban is little. :-) I could FIT a Suburban on the back of that thing.

    I like my little Mercury Sable. She's a peppy little 6 cylinder and gets decent gas mileage. But she's no cargo hauler, she's a commuter, which is why I also own a suburban. :-)

    If you think the laws are insane that let people who can barely see over the steering wheel drive SUV's, come to Massachusetts, where ANY driver possing a class D license can drive any non-trailer vehicle up to 24000# GVW. Without training. SUV's don't scare me. People like me (no training) getting behind the wheel of 12ton moving trucks scares me.

  35. SUCK COCK TACO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SUCK CLIFF'S CoCk TACO YOU ARE A NiGgEr.

  36. Engage your brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You Sir are a MORON (plus everyone who moded him up)

    like this problem wouldn't exist with any human operating garage.

    Once again sir you are a complete MORON.

  37. Engage your brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am sure they asked the same question when elevator was invented.

    So, what does it mean - absolutely nothing, except maybe that you are a HUGE MORON, an outdated HUGE MORON.

  38. I tell you why "Future"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Future - because until it happens in AMERICA the fucking idiots wouldn't know it exists.

  39. I hope so! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's only because you are a moron.

  40. Finally some one with a brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    good catch!

  41. I tell you what to do then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should start running around naked while waiting exactly 2 minutes for a technician to arrive from a near by monitoring station that got the error signal from the that same garage.

  42. Down Side Allright by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's just the down side of your brains