Slashdot Mirror


Mars Sundials - True Colors, Ambiguous Hours

An anonymous reader writes "NASA's Astrobiology Magazine today has an interview with Bill Nye, the Science Guy, who spearheaded the first interplanetary sundial, which will land on Mars in early January. The Cornell sundial inscription reads "Two Worlds, One Sun" in 17 languages [including ancient Sumerian and Mayan], and was selected over such historical mottos as one French sundial that reads: "Every hour injures; the last one kills". The sundials were an inspired transformation of a needed [mainly orange-pink] color wheel to calibrate the Mars' panoramic cameras to give true Martian colors, but so resembled the shadow-casting time pieces, that Nye took it over to become an internet-updated interplanetary dial." Read on for some more. Our reader continues: "There are no conventional hour lines at all on these dials, because unlike regular sundials, they are on moving platforms. Nye says: 'Before people figured this out back in the first era of Mars probes (also the first Disco Era) the images from the Viking spacecraft were too pink or orange. Those "over-pink" images still show up in Mars science fiction movies and Mars-themed posters and restaurant walls. One of the charming challenges is roughly, "What is an hour on Mars?" Is it a "Mour?" Is it a "quadraduodeci-sol," a twenty fourth of a sol, a Mars day? ' The interview recounts the Apollo 12 controversy over whether one of the first lunar probes, Surveyor, returned viable contaminants to Earth."

184 comments

  1. I can't wait until it's almost live by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 1

    And then it doesn't work. Or it blows up.

    Sound familiar Bill?

    1. Re: I can't wait until it's almost live by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > And then it doesn't work. Or it blows up.

      Hopefully they remembered to use metric time when the calibrated it!

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:I can't wait until it's almost live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gotta play to the room, man. Not to the freak in the corner (now you've got me doing it).

    3. Re:I can't wait until it's almost live by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 1

      Sounds familiar to me. My first date with the woman I married was to Almost Live! I met Bill backstage, too. Thanks for the memories. :-)

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    4. Re:I can't wait until it's almost live by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:I can't wait until it's almost live by portforward · · Score: 1

      Almost LIVE! I loved that show. It was even better than Saturday Night Live. Speedwalker, Billy Quan, Sluggy, The Ballard School of Driving ("you paid taxes for the whole road, right? So weave!") This here house, and the Lame List were all hilarious skits.

      If you didn't live in Seattle in the late eighties, you missed out. They picked out pecularities of every town in the Puget Sound area and just ran with it. Well, except for my hometown Bremerton which just pretty much makes fun of itself.

  2. See Jane run, run Jane run. by malakai · · Score: 3, Funny

    At some future point, when human existence is long forgotten, some entity will find this plaque long since buried in the martian dust, and think to themselves "My god, what shitty artist they were".

    Seriously, i'm not a big fan of UI design, what being a programmer and all, but come on, shell out five grand for something better than squiggly "see jane run" pictures of people. Or hell, at least use better stick figures. I'm sure the whole development team has access to MS products and can grab the annoying clip-art stick figures we see in every fookin slide at a conference. I swear if I see another image of a stick figure guy scratching his head on the slide entitiled "Any Questions?" I'm going to start shooting people...

    1. Re:See Jane run, run Jane run. by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      I think they got elementary school kids to draw those pictures.

      oh wait, you're being hilarious. my bad

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:See Jane run, run Jane run. by eyeye · · Score: 1

      they look cute but...
      If anyone really thinks some martians or aliens in general might read it surely they could have put more useful information on it than some sickly sweet rambling and childrens pictures.

      Something like a rosetta stone....

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    3. Re:See Jane run, run Jane run. by Have+Blue · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The images aren't meant to be realistic, they're meant to be representational. The images mean that humans have a torso, a smaller head, and 4 limbs in upper and lower pairs. Remember that these plaques may be seen by entities with no concept of shading, muscles, or any other style of art that we either innately comprehend due to our brain's "greedy" pattern recognition or have learned to accept as part of our years of seeing images. Every single element of the drawing must have a precise and unique meaning.

      Although, the plaques carried by Voyager and Pioneer used more realistic artwork.

    4. Re: See Jane run, run Jane run. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > At some future point, when human existence is long forgotten, some entity will find this plaque long since buried in the martian dust, and think to themselves "My god, what shitty artist they were".

      Better we should have sent the Phaistos Disk, to unleash a plague of kooks saturating their internet with claims of having deciphered it.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    5. Re:See Jane run, run Jane run. by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      noone really thinks aliens will see it. And we pretty much know there's no martians.

      If an alien race came a bazillion light years to mars, and didn't notice earth with all its satellites and radio waves, well then, the pre-school drawings and poetry will be way over their head.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    6. Re:See Jane run, run Jane run. by eyeye · · Score: 1
      In reading I also found that unlike the slashdot description claims it only says "two worlds, one sun" in english.

      Each sundial is inscribed with the words "Two Worlds, One Sun" and bears the name "Mars" in 17 languages, including Bengali, Inuktituk, Lingala and Malay-Indonesian, as well as ancient Sumerian and Mayan.


      So its only got "mars" in 17 languages.
      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    7. Re:See Jane run, run Jane run. by ejito · · Score: 1

      I agree on some level.

      In the impossible chance a being finds a picture of caveman figures on a probe, they probably wouldn't be able to understand it, let alone somethign even more complicated.

      At least they have the right idea and used a plaque. If they had used a normal image, aliens probably wouldn't see it at all, depending on the chances of them seeing in the same spectrum of colors that we see. Even more likely, as stated by parent, their pattern recognition would be different etc., etc. There's millions of reasons that it wouldn't really matter what you put on there.

      I consider it more of a inside joke for humans.

    8. Re:See Jane run, run Jane run. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Am I the only one that thinks having the same message(or same word) in 17 languages is going to keep those alien linguists scratching their heads a while? Like they are supposed to KNOW that those are all different languages, and not all different words from the SAME language. I, for one, would not like to decode something like that if I had no idea what it was in the frist place.

    9. Re:See Jane run, run Jane run. by RayBender · · Score: 1
      "My god, what shitty artist they were".

      The stick figures were made by the kids of some people on the team. At least that was what I heard via the grapevine.

      --
      Human genome = 3 billion base pairs = 6 GBit. Windows + Office = 20 Gbit. Which is more impressive?
    10. Re:See Jane run, run Jane run. by nacturation · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The images aren't meant to be realistic, they're meant to be representational. The images mean that humans have a torso, a smaller head, and 4 limbs in upper and lower pairs. Remember that these plaques may be seen by entities with no concept of shading, muscles, or any other style of art that we either innately comprehend due to our brain's "greedy" pattern recognition or have learned to accept as part of our years of seeing images. Every single element of the drawing must have a precise and unique meaning.

      So some future entity will think that all the creatures depicted in those crude drawings must be a lifeform that exists solely by being chained together at the arms. There's not one example of a human existing on its own. Just look at it again. Every depiction of a human is done through joining of two or more people at the hands. They would think we're some kind of chained lifeform.

      Granted, an alien being may not have any concept of shading, muscles, etc. but neither did the six year old who drew those pictures. If the goal is to have every single element stand on its own and be uniquely defined, surely they could come up with something non-stick figure. Even a simple silhouette would be orders of magnitude better. And your argument falls apart anyway. In the first image strip, the people on the left have torsos. The people on the right have no torsos. One person on the right has a triangular hip, whereas nobody else in that strip has a triangular hip. How are they to know a triangular lower part means a skirt and, hence, the stick figure must therefore be the child-bearing member of the species? And look at the bottom image. There's not even a remotely accurate sense of scale. The first person is a tiny neckless balloon on top of a large balloon, out of which huge disproportionate sticks protrude. On the right of that bottom image strip, there's another triangle hip person joined to a big fat person where the triangle represents the torso and hip and most of the legs too, leaving only stubby feet. And god only knows what the hell is dangling from the fat triangle's arms. Is that supposed to be a purse? A dog?

      Precise and unique meaning, my ass!

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    11. Re:See Jane run, run Jane run. by Bazzargh · · Score: 1

      Talking of shitty artists, I noticed this sundial is the equivalent of the spot painting on Beagle II. The Beagle II device is also intended for camera calibration, but they had theirs made by Brit-artist Damien Hirst, styled after his spot paintings that can be seen in places like Lot 61 in NY.

      A lot of people think Hirst might just be spending his whole life taking the piss.

    12. Re:See Jane run, run Jane run. by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1


      I swear if I see another image of a stick figure guy scratching his head on the slide entitiled "Any Questions?" I'm going to start shooting people...

      I would call that an argument against the export of Microsoft imagery to alien worlds. What if the Martians are a bunch of Linux h@xorz, see the PowerPoint influenced design, and decide that it'd be better to nuke us from orbit?

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    13. Re:See Jane run, run Jane run. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only a parent could argue in favour of those ugly-ass drawings. Here I would post a link to the maddox site where "your kid's drawings suck" or whatever, but that's been overdone.

    14. Re:See Jane run, run Jane run. by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      At some future point, when human existence is long forgotten, some entity will find this plaque long since buried in the martian dust, and think to themselves "My god, what shitty artist they were".

      Or, they'll look at it the same way we study stonehenge. Was it a primitive calender? ;-)

    15. Re:See Jane run, run Jane run. by mwood · · Score: 1

      "...Rosetta stone."

      Didn't you read "Omnilingual"? Send them an elementary math textbook, dude!

    16. Re:See Jane run, run Jane run. by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Look at it again. Man on bottom left is by himself.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    17. Re:See Jane run, run Jane run. by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Look at it again. Man on bottom left is by himself.

      That's clearly a case of "severed adult-child hand grip syndrome" and is an exception. It is obvious from the picture that, moments prior, they were joined at the hand in an unbroken chain of order 3. However, due to the fat man slipping backwards, the untimely sprawling caused a momentary chain breakage. Rest assured, had the picture been drawn only a few seconds afterward, the man would have recovered and the chain would once again be established.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    18. Re:See Jane run, run Jane run. by pyrrhonist · · Score: 3, Funny
      Look at it again. Man on bottom left is by himself.

      That's the token Slashdot reader.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    19. Re:See Jane run, run Jane run. by rifter · · Score: 1

      noone really thinks aliens will see it. And we pretty much know there's no martians.

      If an alien race came a bazillion light years to mars, and didn't notice earth with all its satellites and radio waves, well then, the pre-school drawings and poetry will be way over their head.

      Yes but you forget.. when they make it to earth it will be an irradiated cinder, and since shortsighted politicians did not see any value in the space program beyond military ventures nothing will be left of our civilization but th espace trash and little vignettes like this one. Of course they will likely never find a sundial a few inches across in the dust of a barren planet, but, hey, it is fitting.

    20. Re:See Jane run, run Jane run. by ChickenAintDone · · Score: 1

      Someone needs to tell those kids how shitty of artists they are. I've never even attempted to learn how to draw well, and I could sure as hell come up with better pictures than those.

    21. Re:See Jane run, run Jane run. by norton_I · · Score: 1

      Actually, having the same message in several languages is very useful (see the Rosetta stone). Even with only a relatively small number of words it is relativly easy to distinguish different languages, even if you have never seen either of them.

    22. Re:See Jane run, run Jane run. by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      Maybe they should used 250 pound overweight fat asses as the stick figures are completely wishfull thinking and fake :)

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    23. Re:See Jane run, run Jane run. by trisweb · · Score: 1

      And of course this begs the question, what were these plaques really for?

      Aliens? I don't think so. People? Yes. Not people from the distant future (they would probably know what they look like) but people today.

      It's publicity. The chances of any extraterrestrial being seeing that plaque on Mars are a billion to one, but people on earth? Just by putting that link there you got a few thousand people to look at it. It may be shallow to think that the plaque wasn't solely made for scientific purposes, but it's so scientifically flawed (Language (only english?), anatomy, everyone holding hands, etc.) that you have to think as shallowly as the designer, who probably was thinking something along the lines of, "No alien will ever see this." But then again, if he's wrong, they'll never understand it either... oh well.

      --
      "!"
  3. The obvious question is? by dnotj · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What time is it on Mars?

    --
    No more Micro$oft bashing from me. Its like bashing at the special olympics.
    1. Re:The obvious question is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://www.giss.nasa.gov/tools/mars24/

    2. Re:The obvious question is? by Koyaanisqatsi · · Score: 1

      What is time on Mars?

    3. Re:The obvious question is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Today is Boomtime, day 63 in the season of Bureaucracy, 3169.

  4. all that trouble.... by KiwiEngineer · · Score: 5, Funny

    And they could have used a colour chart from a paint store with a digital watch taped to the side for the same effect.

    Occam's (spelling?) razor, people. Go for the simplest solution.

    --
    Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!!
    1. Re:all that trouble.... by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      a sundial is many times less complex than a digital watch.

      You think you're 20 dollar "water resistant" timex can survive a trip to the red planet?

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:all that trouble.... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      You think you're 20 dollar "water resistant" timex can survive a trip to the red planet?

      Having watched dozens of Timex ads in the 60s and 70s, I have to say: Yes, definitely. (But only if it's firmly strapped on to the probe with duct tape.)

      "It takes a licking and keeps on ticking."

    3. Re: all that trouble.... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > Occam's (spelling?) razor, people. Go for the simplest solution.

      If Occam really believed in simplicity, he wouldn't have cast his razor in Latin.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    4. Re:all that trouble.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please stop propagating myths

    5. Re:all that trouble.... by stfvon007 · · Score: 1

      I have a timex computer (Yes, they used to make computers) 1k of memory, over 25 years old. Still works perfectly.

      --
      All misspellings and grammatical errors in the above post are intentional and part of my artistic expression.
    6. Re:all that trouble.... by red+floyd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's an urban legend, dude.

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    7. Re:all that trouble.... by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I didn't believe it was true, I just thought it was funny. Thanks for the link though.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    8. Re:all that trouble.... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "You think you're 20 dollar "water resistant" timex can survive a trip to the red planet?"

      Whatcha think the first man to step on Mars will be wearing?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    9. Re:all that trouble.... by inflex · · Score: 0

      If I had mod points, I'd put you up a few - that's such a brilliantly simple, yet clearly indicative example of far off track things have gotten.

    10. Re:all that trouble.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amd if I had mod points, I'd mod you -1 redundant, because of the post above yours that was posted earlier than yours explaining this as an urban legend.

    11. Re:all that trouble.... by ultrasound · · Score: 1

      Whatcha think the first man to step on Mars will be wearing?

      A perfectly colour co-ordinated, colour calibrated Armani space suit with a Timex custom sundial (no batteries required, totally solar) set far MarsTime.

      And probably drinking colour calibrated Coca-Cola.

    12. Re:all that trouble.... by krilli · · Score: 1

      Cool, they're selling EMP hardened wristwatches now? Where can I order one?

      --
      Jag pratar lite svenska.
    13. Re:all that trouble.... by Zutroi_Zatatakowsky · · Score: 1

      No, it's a metaphor.

      --
      All Hail Discordia. Hail Eris. Fnord.
  5. Such a waste of money by egg+troll · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    While I'm all for extra-planetary studies, I don't believe it should be funded by taxpayer dollars. I know this won't make me popular with the Slashdot crowd, but I think most NASA missions are overpriced boondoggles. I would much rather see things like this done via the private market. This would free up money for more important things, like fighting terrorism and tax relief to a beleagured public.

    --

    C - A language that combines the speed of assembly with the ease of use of assembly.
    1. Re:Such a waste of money by agent+dero · · Score: 3, Funny

      This leads to a lot of other problems,

      Mars! Brought to you by Microsoft

      Hailey's Comet! Sponsored for the next 76 years by AOL Time Warner

      All viable space science! Funded by SCO

      Alright, maybe not that last one, but you get the point

      --
      Error 407 - No creative sig found
    2. Re:Such a waste of money by the_other_one · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I suggest that you file a patent application with the USPTO for the sundial.
      They will undoubtably grant you said patent after a summary verification of your email address.
      You will then be able to sue NASA for enough money to start your own private market space exploration program.

      --
      134340: I am not a number. I am a free planet!
    3. Re:Such a waste of money by caughty · · Score: 1

      Don't even get started on patents.
      Could you imagine Interplanetary patents - that's all the world... um, galaxy needs!

    4. Re:Such a waste of money by rosbif · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find:
      Halley's Comet - rock around the Sun
      (Bill) Hailey's Comet - rock around the clock

    5. Re:Such a waste of money by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      All viable space science! Funded by SCO

      Yeah, like SCO funds anything. They just wait for someone else to do it and then say 'that's ours!'

    6. Re:Such a waste of money by RobinH · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While I'm all for extra-planetary studies, I don't believe it should be funded by taxpayer dollars. I know this won't make me popular with the Slashdot crowd, but I think most NASA missions are overpriced boondoggles. I would much rather see things like this done via the private market. This would free up money for more important things, like fighting terrorism and tax relief to a beleagured public.

      I hate to break it to you, but if you leave it to businesses to fund space research, then the entire population of Mars is going to be Chinese. Not that I really mind that, but I figured that, being an American, you might.

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    7. Re:Such a waste of money by fuctape · · Score: 1

      That's Halley's Comet -- he probably pronounced it like 'Hall E's', but the acceptable pronunciation is 'Hale E's'.

    8. Re:Such a waste of money by Suidae · · Score: 1

      I find it kind of amusing that every time the subject of space exploration comes up many slashdotters say it should be done by someone other than the government (as if there is something stopping those others from doing it now), but when there is a story about mega-corporations (you know, the ones that would have the money and the motive to develop and use space technologies), slashdotters complain about them.

  6. Re:Bill Nye speaks out against Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where do I sign up?

  7. That's a relief... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Funny


    > The Cornell sundial inscription reads "Two Worlds, One Sun" in 17 languages [including ancient Sumerian and Mayan]

    So when that Sumerian spaceship finally reaches Mars, they'll feel at home and know what time it is.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:That's a relief... by kubrick · · Score: 1

      I read it as official confirmation that Chariots of the Gods was actually correct.

      Be right back -- I'm going to add another few layers to my tinfoil hat... :)

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    2. Re:That's a relief... by LorneReams · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the people who made the Rosetta stone thought the same way.

    3. Re:That's a relief... by TummyX · · Score: 1

      Future archaeologists will probably find the sundial and conclude that the sumerians and mayans actually had space travel and made it to mars. I mean, what other explanation would there be?

    4. Re:That's a relief... by ChickenAintDone · · Score: 1

      And had also developed time machines to learn the languages of the future.

  8. I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ...welcome our new MMT (mars mean time) overlords.

    1. Re: I for one... by Brad+Mace · · Score: 1

      Why the hell do people keep modding these things funny? We get this same comment on every damn article; it's old and busted. It is not, and will never be, associated with any new hotness.

    2. Re: I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree...and I wrote it.

    3. Re: I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..and if you're going to split some wigs, you need some wig-splitting mod points.

  9. Bill Nye was like a hero to me... by ejito · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Then they changed his time slot so it was during school hours. I guess they thought unemployed people would enjoy the show more than gradeschoolers. For a latchkey kid like me, it was shows put on by people like Bill that got me interested in science, along with my science inclined uncle.

    As for the sundial, I'm not exactly wetting myself, but it's not as stupid as other posters are making it out to be. If you're gonna do something trivial like color correction, you might as well spice it up and do it nerd style.

    1. Re:Bill Nye was like a hero to me... by reconn · · Score: 1

      In 8th grade my science teacher got caught peeking into the girl's locker room within the first two months of the year. We had a string of substitutes then untill they settled on one to finish out the school year, and he didn't know much about science.

      We ended up just watching taped Bill Nye episodes almost every day. That class was awesome.

      --
      Everything that was once directly lived has receded into a representation. -debord
  10. Why? by quantaman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Two Worlds, One Sun" in 17 languages [including ancient Sumerian and Mayan], and was selected over such historical mottos as one French sundial that reads: "Every hour injures; the last one kills".

    I can't imagine why, I mean that second motto is just such an optemistic and inspirational message to send to another world! I mean just repeat it to yourself,"Every hour injures; the last one kills," don't you feel better already?!

    --
    I stole this Sig
    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the French for ya. Defeatist to the end.

    2. Re:Why? by critter_hunter · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The actual saying is "Omnis vulnerat et ultima necat" and is, obviously, latin. "Chacune blesse, la derniere tue", or "Chaque heure blesse, la derniere tue" are but adaptations.

      Not really sure why they didn't go with the latin, at least *somewhere* on the sundial - I think the saying has been put on sundials since the Antiquity...

      --
      Karma: Could be worse (could be raining)
    3. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey, c'mon now, look who it's from - this was the best choice. The French only submitted two for consideration. The other one said "We surrender..."

    4. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I would think that for the first humans visiting Mars, the more appropriate inscription on the sundial would be:
      "If this is your only method of telling time on Mars, you're fucked."

    5. Re:Why? by slb · · Score: 1

      > The actual saying is "Omnis vulnerat et ultima necat"

      Almost ;-) It is in fact "Vulnerant omnes, ultima necat"

      I personnaly prefer this one : "Aspiciendo senescis"

      Also used by our Latin ancestors on their sundials it mean "While you watch me, you age"

      --
      http://www.transparency.org
    6. Re:Why? by krymsin01 · · Score: 1

      Well, assuming that they understood the meaning behind the words after they deciphered them, it IS a good way of showing them that we shared something in common with them, mortality. Assuming of course they aren't immortal space jellyfish or something.

      --
      stuff
    7. Re:Why? by Aloctus · · Score: 1

      exactly it is omnes vulnerant ultima necat at least one thing i remember from latin classes . Crap that Slashdot can't display french accents ...

  11. The time is..... by stfvon007 · · Score: 1

    At the beep it will be 25:62:87 on Smarch 47th GMT (General Mars Time) BEEEP!

    --
    All misspellings and grammatical errors in the above post are intentional and part of my artistic expression.
    1. Re:The time is..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn that Smarch weather!

  12. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  13. Occam's Razor by kobukson · · Score: 1
    According to Jodie Fostor in the movie Contact, it states that when faced with numerous different possible explanations for a mysterious phenomenon, the simplest one is likely the most plausible one. It is a Scientific premise. This is not the same as the Engineering principle that a simpler design is better than a complicated one.

    BTW, the simpler design of the Kalashnikov AK-47 rifle was what enabled the Vietcong to prevail over American soldiers equipped with the Stone M-16, which was more advanced.

    --
    -- I hereby announce, on behalf of my great ancester Oog, a retroactive patent on THE WHEEL.
    1. Re:Occam's Razor by GooberToo · · Score: 2, Informative

      BTW, the simpler design of the Kalashnikov AK-47 rifle was what enabled the Vietcong to prevail over American soldiers equipped with the Stone M-16, which was more advanced.

      That's another myth. It was bad politics, plain and simple, that allowed the Vietcong to prevail. You try fighting a war where you can't bomb their factories, not allowed to destroy their air bases, weapon depots, or radar stations. You try winning a war where you can be jailed for actually attempting to win. You try winning a war were most of the S. Vietnam officials were corrupt and giving bad intelligence; the US knew full well this was the case but still continued to heavily use it. Toss in non-professional soldiers and it couldn't of been won with God's own hand. All that, without even talking about the tactics that the Vietcong used.

      Once the bullets were changed back to their proper powder, and cleaning kits were finally issued, the m16 proved it self. Likewise, before it was officially issued and cleaning kits were made available and proper ammo was being used, it was in high demand by special forces and other elite units on the ground for "instruction" and "training". The reason being, it was fairly accurate even to extreme ranges (for open sights), light, and they could carry a lot more ammo.

      The AK, on the other hand, could be tossed in the mud or in a rice field, let rust, kicked open, and be ready to fire in combat. It's accuracy at medium to long+ ranges *significantly* suffers because of this. This generally wasn't a problem for the Vietcong because combat was generally was short and hand-to-hand ranges.

    2. Re:Occam's Razor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      BTW, the simpler design of the Kalashnikov AK-47 rifle was what enabled the Vietcong to prevail over American soldiers equipped with the Stone M-16, which was more advanced.

      That's another myth. It was bad politics, plain and simple, that allowed the Vietcong to prevail. You try fighting a war where you can't bomb their factories, not allowed to destroy their air bases, weapon depots, or radar stations.

      This reminds me of that scene in "A Fish Called Wanda".... "You like winners? Like, say, North Korea?". "It was a tie!!". etc..

      To my knowledge we did bomb the shit out of the North on several occasions. I think the reasons we lost the Vietnam war are complex. Certainly not as simple as what kind of weapons were used. But I also don't subscribe to the idea that we were "fighting with our hands tied". Short of nuking the North, or resorting to area bombing of their cities what would you have had us do? (oh wait, we did area bomb them).

    3. Re:Occam's Razor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all that guy was saying was that we would have won handily if we used the same tactics on the north vietnamese that we used on germany/japan.

      clearly he's ex-military or a military apologist and is very angry that the US military and military capabilities/technologies get blamed for the loss by the uninformed.

      he's right, you're right.

      it had nothing to do with technology - it had everything to do with politics and decision making. there's no doubt we could have 'won' militarily. but the reasons we were even there were so shady that even our policing action was largely unsupported. an all out assault and occupation of the north would surely have drawn the red giant into the conflict and made a bad situation worse.

      the US 'won' vietnam the day we left. anyone with the ability to read knows better than to consider it a military defeat. Why we didn't just burn down a hundred meter wide stretch of jungle and treat the situation more like korea is an entirely different question.

    4. Re:Occam's Razor by instarx · · Score: 1

      It seems like no one ever learns any lessons. It wasn't technology that won or lost that war, it was the North Vietnamese' will to win. Saying that the simplicity of the Kalishikov "allowed" the NVA to win the war is absurd. What allowed them to win was their tenacity and willingness to fight a 20 year war against what appeared to be overwhelming odds. For example, they were willing to carry ammunition on their backs 300 miles, at night, while being bombed. We (the Americans) were able to airlift unlimited ammunition and supplies at will to farflung outposts (a technological coup) but still couldn't win the war. If the VC and NVA had M-16s and the Americans had AK-47s, the Vietnamese STILL would have won the war. (And before I get flamed as a commie pinko traitor - there is no dishonor in respecting your enemy's willingness to fight.)

      And please, I've heard that "We weren't allowed to bomb factories, or Russian ships in Haiphong Harbor, or use nukes - our hands were tied" argument far too long. The fact is that we couldn't do those things - it would have brought Russia and/or China into the fight and could very well have started a thermonuclear world war. Even if it stayed conventional we would have had hundreds of thousands or millions of casualties rather than the tens of thousands we had. It was a lot like someone saying "I could have had that parking space at the mall if I had pulled out my 45 and shot the SOB that got there first!". The consequences would far outweigh the benefits.

      It rankles me to hear someone simple-mindedly say we lost that war because of a gun. There really would be no honor in that and what a shame it would have been if true. Tens of thousands of my peers died in that war, and they fought a determined, dedicated, and motivated enemy. And there was honor in that.

  14. Check yer facts by Wonko42 · · Score: 3, Informative
    The Cornell sundial inscription reads "Two Worlds, One Sun" in 17 languages

    Actually, according to the article (there's even a picture where this is visible), the inscription "Two Worlds, One Sun" is in English only, and the word "Mars" is in 17 languages.

    1. Re:Check yer facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh great, that's helpful. So they'll be able to tell us they visited Mars first when they invade... Why not include an MP3-player with a recording of somebody pronouncing "Mars". Wouldn't want them to be ridiculed due to their German accents.

    2. Re:Check yer facts by Jim+Hall · · Score: 1

      ... the inscription "Two Worlds, One Sun" is in English only, and the word "Mars" is in 17 languages.

      And sadly, Klingon is not one of them. And I have to ask: Would it make a difference to future Martians? :-)

  15. Interesting Rover data by -tji · · Score: 3, Informative

    Following a few links from the mission site, I found the answer to a question I had about the communications capabilities of the rovers.

    They can communicate directly back to Earth at a slow speed ( 3,500 to 12,000 bits/sec ) or they can communicate via the Mars orbiting spacecraft (Odyssey or Mars Global Surveyor) at a rate of 128,000 bits/sec. The orbiters are only 250 miles from the planet surface.

    Unfortunately, there was no information about protocols, encoding, or error correction schemes..

    Some good info is here: http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/mer/mission/communication s.html

    1. Re:Interesting Rover data by snake_dad · · Score: 1
      The 2005 Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter is supposed to be able to send a lot faster:

      In contrasting the huge data output expected from MRO, Graf said while present Mars missions are returning terrific data, "they are sending it over the equivalent of a dial-up modem line." "When we get to Mars, and at the planet's closest approach to Earth, we're going to be able to have the equivalent of two Digital Subscriber Lines (DSL). It's going to be an amazing amount of data coming back," Graf said.
      You can get DSL with different speeds, so I think this statement is a bit ambiguous, but it still seems a lot faster than 128kbps dual isdn speed.
      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    2. Re:Interesting Rover data by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Unfortunately, there was no information about protocols, encoding, or error correction schemes.."

      They're going to use 802.11g with the Hubble Scope in place of the Pringles can.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Interesting Rover data by GileadGreene · · Score: 1

      MER is using Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems protocols (although I'm not sure which parts of the protocol suite they are actually using). As far as error correction schemes go, they were considering using a CCSDS standard Turbo code. I'm not sure if that actually went through - if not they are probably using a Reed-Solomon code.

    4. Re:Interesting Rover data by QuantumFTL · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unfortunately, there was no information about protocols, encoding, or error correction schemes..

      Well, I happen to work on MER as a software engineer, and I was consulted for an article on the Athena web site (athena.cornell.edu) on the communications system, but I'm certainly no expert.

      The X-Band system uses Binary Phase Shift Keying, which is a lot like the modulation used in QPSK (Used sometimes to send data upstream over cable as it is more resistant to noise) and 64QAM (Used to send data downstream over cable, as it is more efficient and noise is not an issue).

      There's a ton of papers out there on this sort of stuff... if you wish to get nitty-gritty with dsn, I reccommend some of the articles on this page

      There's obviously a lot more to it... I know DSN uses MASERS for certain things, but not sure about this mission. To see how odyssey uses the DSN, read this pdf.

      And if you wonder exactly what I do, check out this article.l

      Cheers, Justin

    5. Re:Interesting Rover data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod funny please, cause it is

  16. Should'nt it be nine worlds one sun? by annisette · · Score: 1

    I just looked up world in the dictionary and deffination #14 "A planet or other celestial body" sure Pluto has a bit of a struggle (unjust I may vote) but to siginify where we came from or even where we are at, I would think a decent representation of our solar system would be a good start. It is a nice touch but maybe the Europa(ian?) race of things that live under the ice are upset.

    --
    I eat my grapes at room temperature, cuz the cold ones hurt my teeth
  17. Mars' true colors by moltar77 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm more excited about the use of these dials for photocalibration. Mars may or may not have a blue sky, but at least we can know for sure with these things on their way.

    1. Re:Mars' true colors by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I'm a little confused by this.

      I have always assumed that the redness we see in pictures of Mars from the surface is due to airborne dust. Will this not tint the available light reddish, and cause objects to appear red? What is the photocalibrator calibrating? Are the cameras not, in fact, reporting an accurate (to the human eye) representation of the surroundings?

      Thanks for your edification.

      I don't pretend to understand optics. It's like electricity: Since I can't use a wrench to fix it, I'm happy to have it be somebody else's problem. : )

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    2. Re:Mars' true colors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would not trust that http://mars-news.de/life/ site too much. It claims that Mars is not too cold for life, and links to a page that supports its claim that Mars has 15 degree temperatures. HOWEVER, it neglects to note that those 15 degree temperatures are surface temperatures. As I'm sure you've noticed, if you go out on a sunny afternoon the rocks will be significantly warmer than the air. This is exactly what we're seeing here: the atmospheric temperatures for the same regions are about minus 40, while nighttime surface temperatures drop as low as minus 100 degrees. That is far too low for life by any measure.

    3. Re:Mars' true colors by krymsin01 · · Score: 1

      I've been under the impression, after reading the article, that it will still be reddish. It just might not be as red as what we have been seeing. Basicaly it will subtract the colors that the dust adds to things, changing the image to what it would appear like under earth-conditions. Then again, I could be wrong. I don't see how this will be the "real" color though, since if you were there on mars looking at it with your own eyes, you'd still be seeing things with the colors cast by the dust in the atmosphere. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, though.

      --
      stuff
    4. Re:Mars' true colors by WegianWarrior · · Score: 1

      That is far too low for life by any measure.

      Is it really? Since the last serious attemt to look for traces of life on Mars (the Viking probes), we have found life on earth living under conditions we previously thought it was impossible for life to exist under; in black smokers, in the middle of hot geysirs, inside rocks in the middle of saltlakes and so on. Life is amazingly adaptable, and - despite what some biblethumpers says - able to evolve to suit the place it exists. And martian life, if it exists, have evolved on Mars and as such will be adapted to the contitions there.

      Or to qoute someone most /.ers know who are: "It's life Jim, but not as we know it."

      --
      Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
    5. Re:Mars' true colors by c.emmertfoster · · Score: 1

      "Life is amazingly adaptable," is a statement I would agree with in the best of environments, ie. Earth, where life is able to reach out to fill vacant niches as a matter of course.

      In my opionion, extreme temperature organisms are a luxury that can be afforded by our massive and fertile biosphere.

      I'm assuming that the extreme temperature organisms are the decendents of more temperate forms of life, and not vice versa. Does anyone have evidence either way?

      --
      We can neither love nor pity nor forgive. If you make a slip in handling us you die!
    6. Re:Mars' true colors by Nosher · · Score: 1

      There's an increasing suspicion in some circles that life may have first evolved in extreme locations: some believe that Black Smokers may have harboured the first life, or a recent article in New Scientist postulates that the heat generated by meteor/comet impacts may have created local "hot spots" that could have given rise to the earliest extremophiles (aparently larger impacts can remain hot for around a million years - long enough for simple life to evolve). Only later would these organisms have spread out to occupy cooler climes. Or so that particular theory goes...

      --
      It's too late for me to die young
    7. Re:Mars' true colors by c.emmertfoster · · Score: 1

      That's a particularly interesting argument! Is there any genetic evidence to support it though, I wonder. Since deep-sea worms require the oxygen in the seawater which is a byproduct of surface algae, I'm a bit heistant to accept that particular ecosystem as being totally independant, or as capable precursors.

      I am reminded of a science-fiction story I read some time ago which involved engineering tubeworms to survive the Europan sea and seeding them there.

      --
      We can neither love nor pity nor forgive. If you make a slip in handling us you die!
    8. Re:Mars' true colors by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      Life in antarctica survives under those conditions.... your conclusion?

      Besides NASA should give UNEDITED r/g/b maps of images, not color adjusted images coz they think it should look red. Well, if mars sky is red, then why are its polar caps white? not pink? If you can see the ground well, then the sky isnt that THICK in dust really, and must be blue.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  18. Bill Nye rocks! by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1
    Man, I remember when ol' Bill had his 5-minute bit on a local half-hour show in Seattle back in the day.

    It's cool to have seen him progress so far. Truly, the world needs more guys like Bill Nye, the science guy.

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    1. Re:Bill Nye rocks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck Bill Nye, we need more Beakmans!

  19. So now... by blitzoid · · Score: 0

    When someone wants to be really geeky and someone asks them the time, they can say "For where? Here, or on mars? AHAHAH! MARS! HAHAH! BET YOU WEREN'T EXPECTING THAT!"

    --
    I am a filthy pirate.
  20. Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    So I guess we can use the Hubble telescope to look at the sundial on Mars (when it's visible) to tell the time! What'll they think of next??

    1. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you gotta account for the time delay of light. Anybody know what it ranges for Mars?

  21. Well, they could... by Kazuko · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just throw humans on there. I mean, all these rovers and probes, they could turn to research to enable humans to travel to mars, i.e. supplies storage/possible cold(cryo) sleep/faster propulsion, etc; There are enabling technologies out there and with physics horizons being redefined every day, there's no reason to say "Look. We've got pictures, we've got soil tests, we've got maps, we have a whole lot of stuff, but let's get on with it and focus on putting humans on Mars." Apparently it has some sort of thin atmosphere, it just needs to be temerature regulated. Well, with some sort of habitat that can withstand the Martian weather and control internal climate, there's no limit to the utility of it. It could be the first base humanity establishes on another planet.

    1. Re:Well, they could... by WegianWarrior · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just throw humans on there.
      Yes, in theory, we could have done that in the seventies (by 'we', read NASA and the american taxpayers). The technology needed for a "there and back again" style of mission isn't substancially different from what you need to go to the moon, if you don't mind hanging around with a couple of buddies for, oh, around three years. In fact, NASA did play with the idea of a Mars flyby or landing using Appolo hardware.

      ...to enable humans to travel to mars...
      We already have that technology. Once we managed to stagger up off earths gravitywell - and we did that by going to the moon - we had the tech needed to go anywhere. But again, not fast.

      ...faster propulsion...
      I suppose you mean 'propulsion allowing a higher terminal speed'. Todays chemical rockets are basicly 'burn, then coast'. You accelerate a lot for a while, then glide towards the target. A ion-engine or a nucular rocket will let you accelerate less but for a much longer time, meaning you'll get a higher terminal velocity. The providial Holy Grail for interplanitary missions would be an engine which would let you accelerate forever. Just think about it; you blast off into orbit, then turns on the flightengine. That gently accelerates you to one G.. and keeps that accelatation all the time. Halfway to the target, you simply turns around and deacceleate with one G, leaving you with zero relative speed as you enter orbit around Mars (or wherever you want to go). The speeds you'll reach are way higher than any chemical rocket can provide, the flighttime shortens and we don't have to worry about the determinal effects of living in zero G for years on end. I havn't got my notes and calculator here right now, but maybe someone could punch up some numbers on this?

      ...possible cold(cryo) sleep...
      With the right sort of propulsion (see above), there is no need to bother with things we probaly wont master for centuries anyway.

      It could be the first base humanity establishes on another planet.
      Maybe - but it probaly wont be the first base humans establish on another heavenly body.

      --
      Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
  22. Hilaire Belloc's quote on sundials by alanw · · Score: 2

    I am a sundial
    and I make a botch
    of what is done far
    better by a watch!

    1. Re:Hilaire Belloc's quote on sundials by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "better by a watch!"

      Sundials tend not to gain/lose up to 30 seconds a month like your average cheap quartz crystal watch does (unless, of course, the sundial is on a moving platform). Short of a cesium clock, if you want something that approaches that kind of accuracy, you want a decent marine chronometer, which is probably heavier (ie. more expensive to put into space) than a sundial. And even if you did, who's going to wind it?

    2. Re:Hilaire Belloc's quote on sundials by fciron · · Score: 1

      Sundials are cool!!

      Sundials actually do their jobs very well. Sun and planetary time vary by season but the sundial will always show noon when the sun is at its apex.

      If it is provided with the formula of time the viewer can adjust the reading to stay within minutes of clock time (Sundials can be built to compensate for the seasonal variations, but it's a pain.) If there is an anallema it can also show the day of the year.

      Sundials can give a better illustration of the planet and the solar system than anything you can wear on your wrist.

      Plus the batteries never die.

    3. Re:Hilaire Belloc's quote on sundials by alanw · · Score: 1

      Sundials tend not to gain/lose up to 30 seconds a month

      No - but they can be out by as much as 16 minutes.

      Google for "sundial" and "analemma" or "equation of time"

    4. Re:Hilaire Belloc's quote on sundials by alanw · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here are two very pretty photographs of the analemma - composite photographs of the sun taken at the same time and place every few days for a year, and a simulated martian analemma

  23. A sad substitute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For Carl Sagan.

  24. Not so French by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one French sundial that reads: "Every hour injures; the last one kills"

    "Vulnerant omnes, ultima necat", French ? that's latin...

  25. Re:Hilaire Belloc's other quote on sundials by panurge · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Based on the French quote they didn't use:

    Here in a secret place forgotten, I
    Mark the tremendous process of the sky.
    So may your inmost soul, forgotten mark
    The dawn, the noon, the coming of the dark.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  26. Well... by TexVex · · Score: 0, Funny

    I for one welcome our new Martian overlords.

    --
    Fun with Anagarams! LADS HOST, SHALT DOS. HAS DOLTS. AD SLOTHS, HATS SOLD. ASS HO, LTD.
  27. Re:How is this going to work? by RayBender · · Score: 1
    Sundials only work if it's a clear day. Mars has such a thick layer of clouds that the surface temperature is over 800 degrees due to the greenhouse effect. In fact, the surface of Mars is hotter than the surface of Mercury even though Mercury is closer to the sun. How do they expect a sundial to work?

    s/Mars/Venus

    --
    Human genome = 3 billion base pairs = 6 GBit. Windows + Office = 20 Gbit. Which is more impressive?
  28. Done the math for you... by Otto · · Score: 2, Informative

    I suppose you mean 'propulsion allowing a higher terminal speed'. Todays chemical rockets are basicly 'burn, then coast'. You accelerate a lot for a while, then glide towards the target. A ion-engine or a nucular rocket will let you accelerate less but for a much longer time, meaning you'll get a higher terminal velocity. The providial Holy Grail for interplanitary missions would be an engine which would let you accelerate forever. Just think about it; you blast off into orbit, then turns on the flightengine. That gently accelerates you to one G.. and keeps that accelatation all the time. Halfway to the target, you simply turns around and deacceleate with one G, leaving you with zero relative speed as you enter orbit around Mars (or wherever you want to go). The speeds you'll reach are way higher than any chemical rocket can provide, the flighttime shortens and we don't have to worry about the determinal effects of living in zero G for years on end. I havn't got my notes and calculator here right now, but maybe someone could punch up some numbers on this?

    This is an easy one.. Okay, Mars was at it's closest a few months ago, right? A quick google tells me that it was 55.76 million kilometers away at the time.

    So, since we're accelerating to there and then slowing down halfway, basically we divide the problem into two parts. How long will it take to get halfway there? Then we simply double it to get the reverse, how long it'll take to slow down.

    -Half of 55,760,000,000 meters is 27,880,000,000 meters.
    -One G is 9.8 m/s^2

    Distance traveled = .5 * acceleration * time^2
    27,880,000,000 = .5 * 9.8 * time^2

    Solve for time, and you get 75430.73589... seconds. But that's only halfway to Mars, so double it to get the slowdown part too and you have 150861.4717... seconds. Divide by 60 for minutes, divide by 60 for hours, and you come up with roughly 41 hours, or about a 1 and 3/4 days total.

    So yeah, if you had all the delta V you could handle, you could be there in under a couple days.

    Too bad we don't have that.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Done the math for you... by bhima · · Score: 1
      So yeah, if you had all the delta V you could handle, you could be there in under a couple days.

      I could be wrong but doesn't the Delta V rocket burn tons of fuel a second?

      Given that you need to fire the rocket for "150861.4717... seconds" wouldn't that be a fair bit of fuel?

      Say more fuel than would actually fit in a Delta V (or even all that were ever made)?

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    2. Re:Done the math for you... by WegianWarrior · · Score: 1

      Delta V is not a reference to a spefisic rocket, but a measurement of change in velocity. To bad I can't use greek letters, but delta in this meaning looks like a pointy triangle with the point up.
      End velocity - initial velocity = Delta Velocity
      Or, more simply: V1-V0=DeltaV =)

      Your second point however is valid; there is no way we can hope to make a chemical rocket capabel of giving us unlimited DeltaV. One possible suggestion that has been proposed is a nucular or ion engine using interstellar hydrogen as fuel... but to collect enought hydrogen to maintain an acceleration of one G you would have to travel 'plenty fast' allready.

      --
      Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
    3. Re:Done the math for you... by Machine9 · · Score: 1

      interesting. especially when you keep in mind that you don't HAVE to accelerrate ALL the way, you can strike a balance between the time it takes you to get there and the amount of energy required to go there. you might decide to take two weeks to get there, and significantly decrease the fuel requirement.

    4. Re:Done the math for you... by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      Must... resist... citing... Case for Mars...

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    5. Re:Done the math for you... by Otto · · Score: 1

      Delta V isn't a rocket, it's a shorthand term for "change in velocity".

      Spaceships don't measure fuel in terms of tons or pounds or gallons.. Well, they could, I suppose, but a more sensible way to measure how much fuel you have left, when in space, is by how much change in velocity you've got left. Once you run out of the ability to change your velocity anymore, you're stuck at whatever speed and direction you happened to be going when you ran out.

      This is why spaceships don't make right turns, much less reverse their course. They'd have to burn fuel to eliminate their current velocity (eating up some of their delta V) and then burn more fuel in order to get a new velocity going elsewhere. It's wasteful. If you want to turn around, then it's best to find a handy planet to swing around using its gravitational pull. Get your change in direction for free that way.

      Anyway, if you could accelerate at something like 1 G for a pretty much unlimited time, then you could achieve tremendous speeds. In this particular example, you'd be doing 739,214 meters per second at the turnaround point, which is roughly 1.6 million miles per hour.

      But, of course, no chemical rocket could achieve that kind of delta V. It's utterly impossible. The problem with a chemical rocket is that you have to carry all the fuel you're going to burn, and you have to push it too. At a certain point, your rocket gets so big that the amount of fuel you've got actually means you lose delta V, because you've got all this fuel to shove around. It's the same reason that it take 2,500 tons of fuel for us to shove a 100 ton shuttle into orbit. All that fuel has to push all the other fuel a good portion of the way up.

      In order to get an acceleration for anything remotely like a day and a half, you'd have to have something that didn't weigh so much or use so much fuel. Ion drives can produce fantastic speeds of the particles coming out, and use very little fuel, but the acceleration they produce ain't much. Enough to move a satellite around, I grant you, but it's a long way from what exists now to shoving around ships. And high accelerations with ion drives is just a fantasy. Nuclear power could possibly do it, if someone could come up with a way of harnessing that power and putting it to work. Current tech is woefully poor at extracting the vast amount of power locked up in the atom.

      But it's quite possible for it to be done. Just not for a while. :)

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  29. And it will be more in the future by ControlFreal · · Score: 1

    Using mars-orbiting spacecraft (plural) for communication with earth is not a new thing: it's very efficient since the distance to the orbiter is small and the orbiter has big solar cells and can thus send a powerful signal back to earth.

    NASA has extensive plans to develop this scheme much further, the eventual goal being the Mars Network that, through a number of orbiters, will/should enable a "downlink" speed Mars->Earth of about 3 Tbit/Sol in 2015 (which is slightly less than 100 Mbps).

    This network is then of course shared by all Mars surface and orbital missions.

    (And yes, I've commented on this before)

    --
    Support a Europe-related section on Slashdot!
  30. Ooo neato by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    My girlfriend thinks Nasa's going to arrive there and find the origins of my gender.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Ooo neato by boogy+nightmare · · Score: 1

      WOW.... /.'er has girlfriend shocker...

      --
      Kingdom of Loathing (www.kingdomofloathing.com) Addicted is me
  31. Two Worlds, One Sun?? by floydman · · Score: 1

    I thought that should be

    "Take Me TO Your Leader!!!"

    --
    The lunatic is in my head
  32. bill nye is an asshole i hear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a friend of mine saw him at the king county library and she said "he was an ass"
    and this last summer another friend of mine worked for a company that does business with bill nye's internet stuff, and he said "he was an ass"
    sorry, thats how i heard it

  33. Bill Nye is a geek. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give me Beakman any day of the week. And Josie. Gotta have Josie.

    1. Re:Bill Nye is a geek. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lest we forget Jax? And that jackass in the rat-suit, whatever his name was.

    2. Re:Bill Nye is a geek. by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      Karma be damned: Beekman's a retard. He can't even hold down a show himself. At least Bill Nye doesn't need a guy in a rat suit. And if you have problems with geeks, you're posting in the wrong place.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  34. ISDN reaches the parts other DSLs can't reach by evilandi · · Score: 1
    -tji: Mars orbiting spacecraft (Odyssey or Mars Global Surveyor) at a rate of 128,000 bits/sec

    See, I told you flat-rate ISDN is always the best solution when you can't get broadband! :-)

    --
    Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
    1. Re:ISDN reaches the parts other DSLs can't reach by idontgno · · Score: 1
      But I bet the provider will cap upstream bit rates when everyone starts running P2P (Planet-2-Planet) filesharing apps.

      And the RIAA will try to find some Martians to sue. Bet on it.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  35. why not Latin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you imagine our new alien overlords greeting us in Latin? What would they think if the first they read of us was a long-time extinct language. No thanks.

    1. Re:why not Latin by AWxSlashdot · · Score: 1

      Latin as lived longer (and is still living in studies and books) than any other language. I think you would suggest english ... but in a few years/decades, it might have disappeared being spanglish or something else. AWx PS : latin does not evolve anymore PPS : latin is based on logic and not usage : so it is much easier to decodef for 'aliens'.

    2. Re:why not Latin by lxs · · Score: 1

      Ok you asked for it.
      (warning: my latin is a bit rusty, and I welcome grammatical corrections)

      Ego per unum, saluto nostris novem imperatores extra terrestris.

    3. Re:why not Latin by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      What about chineese? Even the writing is older than latin, and had no "major" changes.
      Or the korean language(which is also a very logical one, as it is an artificial languge like Esperanto).
      angel'o'sphere

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    4. Re:why not Latin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Korean is not artificial in the sense you are using.

      Their ALPHABET was concocted by a group of scholars but the language itself existed before the alphabet they adopted. So they basically just adapted to their alphabet which was tailored to represent the most common sounds in their language.

      So the only thing that really changed was that Korean peasants could now learn to read and write.

    5. Re:why not Latin by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I was told that the first so called "emporer" of korea, got the gift of the korean language by the gods.

      In our words: he wrote down the first "dictionary" and the first "grammatic" of the korean language.

      Some guy I know, who studied chineese and korean said: he basicly invented a new language, using the older korean base as "word pool" and drew a new grammatic and new flexations on top of it.

      It seems that even in our days korean is the most regular ... and besides of the writing ... most orthogonal language. If it had only the usual 4 or 5 cases, western languages have ... it would even be considered "easy".

      angel'o'sphere

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  36. Re:Such a waste of money (Hmmmm...) by FauxReal · · Score: 1

    I would much rather see things like this done via the private market.

    You know, I think you got something there... I'm sure we'd all find it very endearing to see a glorius coke bottle shaped rocket blasting off into space.

  37. Re:How is this going to work? by Machine9 · · Score: 1

    can you please explain to me how the surface temperature is relevant to a device that uses no moving mechanical, nor electronic parts.

  38. Trivia: Where did he get "Science Guy" Title? by sonnik · · Score: 2, Informative

    If I recall, Bill Nye was a character on a Seattle-based comedy show called "Almost Live". He's actually educated, but the whole "Science Guy" character came from a comedy show. (And the kid's show started there.) And now he's heading up projects like this???

    That was about 15 years ago, so maybe people who remember will remember more clearly and call me an idiot. Other Slashdot readers will probably call me an idiot regardless...

    1. Re:Trivia: Where did he get "Science Guy" Title? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      idiot.....

    2. Re:Trivia: Where did he get "Science Guy" Title? by inertia187 · · Score: 1

      Bill Nye: The grass is green. The GRASS is GREEN!
      Bill Handel: The grass is green. The GRASS is GREEN! Well there you go.

      Coincidence? I think not.

      --
      A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
  39. Bill Nye, The Science Guy by pangu · · Score: 3, Funny

    Can anyone even say Bill Nye, without feeling a compulsion to add "The Science Guy"?

  40. Ob. Fight Club Quote by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    "When deep space exploration ramps up, it will be the corporations that name everything; the IBM stellar- sphere, the Microsoft galaxy, the planet Starbucks."

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Ob. Fight Club Quote by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      Mmmmm... planet starbucks

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  41. Missing the 'point' by webrunner · · Score: 1

    You know, with all these languages they have printed on this thing, you'd think they'd put it in Martian! ... what do you mean they don't know Martian?

    --
    ADVENTURERS! - ANTIHERO FOR HIRE - CARDMASTER CONFLICT
  42. he was misinformed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he thought we were sending this to venus.

  43. Meaning of phrase & KIDS DRAWINGS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2 worlds 1 sun? How does this have any meaning at all? Our solar system has alot more than 2 planets, and we have sent off observational probes to many more than just "2 worlds", so what exactly is this phrase supposed to mean?

    Also I have a theory that the stupid drawings actually WERE done by kids. They probably had some contest or something. Remember, Nye is into educating kids and thus probably wanted to involve them at some level.

    1. Re:Meaning of phrase & KIDS DRAWINGS by ChickenAintDone · · Score: 1

      "Also I have a theory that the stupid drawings actually WERE done by kids. They probably had some contest or something. Remember, Nye is into educating kids and thus probably wanted to involve them at some level." Ah, wonderful theory Sherlock, now shall we put it to the test by actually reading the fucking article?

  44. One of the other inscriptions.... by Chapium · · Score: 1

    Also included in the dial is another clever inscription written in Black speech that translates to:

    One Dial to rule them all, One Dial to find them,
    One Dial to bring them all and in the darkness bind them

  45. Actualy the citate is Latine one not french by aepervius · · Score: 1

    Omnes Blessant Ultima Necat if I am not mistaken. it was ingraved on all roman sundial.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  46. What is an hour on Mars? by mwood · · Score: 1

    Obviously it's 3,600 seconds, same as everywhere else in the Universe. That is, the amount of time it takes for light to travel (300,000 - epsilon)km, 3600 times. Silly humans.

    A more useful question would be, "what is a useful way to divide up the Martian day?" The obvious answer is 10 decads, each composed of 100 centads. :-)

    1. Re:What is an hour on Mars? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but NASA is using Mars Hybrid Solar Time. Problem is, I can't find the specifications for it.

      Anybody got them?

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  47. Atleast they didn't... by dq5+studios · · Score: 1

    Atleast they didn't put "All your base are belong to us" on the sun dial, although I have to admit that would be kind of cool.

  48. new joystick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where's the fire button?

    /clueless

  49. Oooh! This creates a nice impression! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please tell me that they did not send these things to Mars with the following incorrect use of an apostrophe:

    "We sent this craft in peace to learn about Mars' past and about our future."

  50. deltaT dependance for a sundial by rhombic · · Score: 1

    It's called the coefficient of thermal expansion, and given the difference between the daytime temp on Mars vs. Mercury or Venus, it'd have a measurable effect on the sundial reading (depending on what the dial was made of, 'course)

    --
    1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual.
    1. Re:deltaT dependance for a sundial by Machine9 · · Score: 1

      one would assume, that like the rest of the rover, it's built to accomodate the heat deformation.

  51. That's not french, it's roman. by Roberto · · Score: 1

    That's roman. Am I the only one who read "each hour hurts, the last one kills" and thought... hey, that's just a bad translation of "vulnerant omnia, ultima necat"?

    The original is better because it only says "each one hurts, the last one kills", adding "hours" makes it too obvious, and lessens the effect.

    If anyone said this already, sorry, I am not reading the comments if that prevents me from writing a pedantic nitpick.

  52. color callibration by equivocal · · Score: 1

    What if it gets dirty?

  53. Re:How is this going to work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Mars has such a thick layer of clouds that the surface temperature is over 800 degrees due to the greenhouse effect.

    No it doesn't. Check out those white bits at the poles of Mars. Solid CO2, sublimation temperature -80 degrees C. Mars is COLD.

    I believe it's Venus you are thinking of. Greenhouse effect AND sulfuric acid rain, very welcoming.

    If you can't tell the difference between Mars and Venus (insert obvious lame joke here)...

    - PW

  54. Hilaire Belloc on sundials on spacecraft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a sundial, turned the wrong way round.
    I cost my foolish mistress fifty pound.