Slashdot Mirror


Three More Solar Flares

Evil Adrian writes "Space.com reports that the sun shot off three more solar flares on Monday. This is quite a historic period for solar activity." The article breaks down the recent flares, and what the effects have been. Update: 11/05 01:57 GMT by T : cyberMalex writes "Space.com is reporting the 10th in a string of major solar flares which have been errupting from the sun over the past two weeks. "This one saturated the X-ray detectors on the NOAA's GOES satellites that monitor the Sun. The jury is therefore out on the definitive classification of the flare." "Other scientists have indicated the flare may indeed be an X20 or stronger. Only one X20 event has been seen in recent years, and it was not Earth-directed and had little effect.""

22 of 519 comments (clear)

  1. Aurora Cam by dolo666 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the site: Aurora Cam, which "shows the current extent and position of auroral activity in the northern hemisphere, based on measurements taken during the most recent polar pass of the NOAA POES satellite."

    Does this recent solar activity make any of you feel uneasy? I mean... is it time for Bruce Willis to suit up again and save the planet? Nine X-class solar flares... eeeek. That has to be bad.

    1. Re:Aurora Cam by JamesD_UK · · Score: 4, Funny

      How about sending Red Adair off to the sun to cool things off a bit?

    2. Re:Aurora Cam by zephc · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Does this recent solar activity make any of you feel uneasy?"

      No no, it's a perfectly natural, healthy thing for a star of his age to... want to experiment in self-gratification. You see, a star that age is still learning more about itself, and should be encouraged to do so, in a healthy way. Of course, our star may be doing this a bit too often right now, but it is a novelty that will soon wear off, and once he has become more accustomed to his self, he may do it a lot less. In the meantime, we here on earth must not make our Sun feel ashamed of this, merely support him, and try not to get hit in the face.

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    3. Re:Aurora Cam by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Funny
      It might be something to worry about when we have the means of evacuating the solar system, or at least the planet. Even if someone knows the sun is going to explode in a week, is there any reason for us to worry? We can't do anything to stop it nor can we save ourselves, so why worry?

      No, we need to know about it so we can all eat, drink, and be merry in the time that we have left.... then all feel really stupid (not to mention owe apologies to that girl in the cubical down the hall) when nothing happens ;) Y2K anyone?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  2. Biblical by GaelenBurns · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wish I had my Revelations better memorized.

    1. Re:Biblical by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wish I had my Revelations better memorized.

      "And the horsemen spoke "Behold 9 solar prominences" And the Earth was smited by an X15.

    2. Re:Biblical by Theatetus · · Score: 5, Informative

      First off: why?

      Secondly, it's Revelation or if you prefer Apocalypse (which is just Greek for "Revelation"). Books back then didn't have titles, and this one simply comes from the first word of the book.

      Thirdly, it's a very thinly-disguised mid-2nd-century political invective about the fall of Rome and Judaism and the establishment of a Christian hegemony in eastern Europe and western Asia, not the end of the world.

      Fourthly, in most modern Christian's minds it has been hopelessly confused with Daniel and John's letters (for example, most people you ask will tell you that Revelation mentions the Anti-Christ; it does not. The only biblical references to "antichrist" are in John's letters, and it's "antichrists" not "The Antichrist").

      Fifthly, the reference to the sun in Revelation is:

      "I watched as he opened the sixth seal. There was a great earthquake. The sun turned black like sackcloth" (Rev. 6:12)
      which is the exact opposite of what the sun is doing right now.

      Sixthly and lastly, memorizing books about imaginary tribal deities strikes me as an immense waste of time, but if it works for you, more power to you.

      --
      All's true that is mistrusted
  3. From the article by UrgleHoth · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Sun cut loose with three severe flares in less than 24 hours through Monday morning

    cut loose? Is thr journalist trying to make a gastrointestinal metaphor here?

    --

    Dogma - "let's just say we'd like to avoid any empirical entanglements."
  4. It's not the # of flares .. it's by jaxdahl · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's the size of these flares that's unusual. Never have astronomers seen 2 Jupiter sized sunspots tranversing the sun at the same time. The number of sunspots is about normal for this time in the 11 year solar cycle. Here's a nice summary page: http://www.n3kl.org/sun/noaa.html

    1. Re:It's not the # of flares .. it's by JamesD_UK · · Score: 4, Informative

      This page from Nasa's Astronomy Picture of the day site shows some amazing images of these sun spots.

  5. Re:Historic Period? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Scientists have been using beryllium content in icebergs to trace the general prominence of sunspots and their activity over the last 1150 years. This activity exceeds any on that record as well.

  6. aurora by Rumagent · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I always find it fascinating, when the universe demonstrates just how small and insignificant we really are... that, and watching aurora is a great way of getting kids interested in astronomy.

  7. Re:Historic Period? by skarmor · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sorry, I might not be all that caught up on my solar flare monitoring, but how long have we been doing that exactly?

    Richard Christopher Carrington published his Observation of the Spots of the Sun in 1863. He was observing a group of sun spots when, "...two patches of intensely bright and white light broke out."

    His description:

    "I saw I was an unprepared witness of a very different affair. I therefore noted down the time by the chronometer, and seeing the outburst to be very rapidly on the increase, and being somewhat flurried by the surprise, I hastily ran to call some one to witness the exhibition with me, and on returning within 60 seconds, was mortified to find that it was already much changed and enfeebled. Very shortly afterwards the last trace was gone. In this lapse of 5 minutes, the two patches of light traversed a space of about 35,000 miles."

    So I guess we've been monitoring solar flares for some 140 years...

  8. Bennifer by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 5, Funny
    What did we have to sacrifice to prevent this again?? i can't read mayan..

    Oddly enough, we have to sacrifice Ben and JLo.

    The Mayan line in question is "Big head, snake, rock shaped thing, potato with teeth, something that looks like a broken Trane air conditioning unit, something with three legs and four ears, a bigger potato with teeth and breasts, Jabba The Hut, another big head, a pile of little tiny heads, a medium sized head with a smaller head next to it, an aborted fetus someone inflated with an air pump."

    The rough translation is "annoying couple (in unity) with mighty hair and (ass) who commit crime of that (terrible) Gigli."

    Yes, there's a heiroglyph for "Gigli".

    Hey, they were WAY ahead of their time.

    Related Link

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  9. Re:Historic Period? by Gulthek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We have samples from icebergs measuring beryllium-10, which give us a good picture of solar activity for the past couple thousand years or so.

    Aside from that, it's a historic period in solar flares simply because we haven't seen it happen before. Just because we don't know how common this occurence is in the full grand scheme of things, doesn't mean that it isn't noteworthy when we see it for the first time!

  10. Nice Headline by Captain+McCrank · · Score: 4, Funny
    Sun on Fire, Unleashes 3 More Major Flares

    Scott McNealy is such a fucking loose cannon. When will his handlers reign in his hockey-rage?

    FOR THE SAKE OF THE CHILDREN, PLEASE STOP SCOTT!

  11. Re:Anyone see anything? by FrostedWheat · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here you go:

    http://www.sec.noaa.gov/pmap/index.html

    That shows the current aurora activity for both poles. Click on the one nearest to you and wait until there's some activity near you :)

    Even if the activity looks quite far from you, check anyway. We had lots of aurora visable here even tho the map showed it about a hundred miles away.

  12. Re:Historic Period? by kevlar · · Score: 4, Informative

    Whats even more interesting is that there are fairly solid theories that solar flare activity is directly related to the mean global temperature. In other words, the green house effect may very well be *mostly* caused by the Sun, rather than CO2 in the atmosphere.

  13. Re:I wonder why by DogIsMyCoprocessor · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bush - "The more solar flares are shot at us, the more it shows the desperation of the Sun."

    --

    "And this is my boy, Sherman. Speak, Sherman." "Hello." "Good boy."

  14. Arnold Schwarzenegger? by Omega · · Score: 4, Funny

    Doesn't anyone else see the correlation between Arnold Schwarzenegger becoming governor of California, the Yankees losing the World Series to the Florida Marlins and the repeated solar flares? I'm counting at least 3 horsemen of the apocalypse here.

    1. Re:Arnold Schwarzenegger? by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 4, Funny

      We still need Microsoft Linux, so we'll be safe for a while.

  15. Re:Historic Period? by TGK · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For the record, most environmentalists are less worried about the planet and more worried about you.

    No one has any doubts that if human kind makes the biggest mess we can of this ball of mud that life will go on. The industrial companies are right, human kind is small change in the cycles of global climate.

    Of course, when you're small change it doesn't take a whole hell of a lot to exterminate you and most everything like you.

    No one thinks we're gonna wreck the planet, but aside from Al Gore, most of us wouldn't want to see Florida under water.

    Humankind probably won't make any major changes in the global scheme of things, but the minor changes we make could cause untold havoc, suffering, and chaos... at least on the human scale.

    So yes... the Sun might be the major cause of global warming.... in much the same way that your heater is the major thing that heats your house.

    Does this mean it's a good idea to set the drapes on fire?

    --
    Killfile(TGK)
    No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.