Slashdot Mirror


Better Than Bit Torrent, For Internet2 Users?

FastDownload writes "New technology for doing mulitsource/multithread downloads of ISOs is making Linux users on Internet2 happy. It's called Logistical Networking and is being developed at the University of Tennessee. Though there are some obvious similarities to Bit Torrent, Logistical Networking uses fixed, shared infrastructure instead of being peer-to-peer, which makes it useful for moving big content even when no peers are available."

40 of 176 comments (clear)

  1. Internet 2 ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is there pr0n on this so called internet 2?

    1. Re:Internet 2 ?? by LittleBigLui · · Score: 2, Funny

      not pr0n, strictly speaking, but it's more modern alternative pr1n

      --
      Free as in mason.
  2. I've never had much luck with BT by Powercntrl · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think the Internet2 users should use Kazaa Lite and eMule just like the rest of us. Throw caution to the wind, screw the RIAA.

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  3. P2P is NOT Going Anywhere by Preach+the+Good+Word · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Especially for legal content... bit torrent has made it so that you can get all sorts of legal content like game demos, linux distros, etc. off p2p without having to be on horribly slow ftp servers.

    1. Re:P2P is NOT Going Anywhere by xenocide2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      And you know what? That didn't stop my university from blocking all packets over the bittorrent protocol! Bastards.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    2. Re:P2P is NOT Going Anywhere by calebtucker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, I remember during my freshman year in the dorm I'd do "research" in a divx trading irc channel just for internt2 .edu connections (heh, a script would only give you +v if you had .edu in your host).

      I guess research was the original intent, but obviously not the only use.

      --
      My sig can beat up your sig.
  4. BitTorrent is too ad-hoc by Space+cowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was considering setting up a download of a database dump for hostip.info using BitTorrent, but it's too awkward to create, and there's no guarantee that there's any saving, as far as I can see (people turn their machine off, and you're stuck waiting for a chunk in the middle). Instead, I let people download the meta-data, and construct the DB - much faster :-)

    The idea of fixed nodes is less "cool" I guess, with less of the "dynamic network adapting to the load", but probably more useful...

    Simon.

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:BitTorrent is too ad-hoc by koreth · · Score: 4, Insightful
      people turn their machine off, and you're stuck waiting for a chunk in the middle

      Generally it's a good idea to run a seed for your files if you're running a tracker. That way everyone will always have at least one source for the file -- i.e., you fall back to roughly the download performance level you'd have without BitTorrent, with people downloading from your server.

      If you just run a tracker and don't provide an always-on source for the actual underlying files, then yeah, BitTorrent will pretty much suck for infrequently-accessed files.

    2. Re:BitTorrent is too ad-hoc by Kris_J · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I thought ad-hoc was a good thing. Sure, businesses who want things to be simple and predictable might consider ad-hoc to be unworkable, but there's heaps of "little people" out there without big budgets that benefit from co-operative networks that can be assembled as needed by everyone pitching in their bit.

    3. Re:BitTorrent is too ad-hoc by yerricde · · Score: 4, Insightful

      people turn their machine off, and you're stuck waiting for a chunk in the middle

      As long as the first publisher of the file leaves a BT window open, nobody is "stuck waiting for a chunk in the middle."

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
    4. Re:BitTorrent is too ad-hoc by halr9000 · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you think bittorrent is too adhoc, you've never been to 3dgamers. For every game demo or movie they provide information about, they provide a bittorrent seed. In addition, they do provide direct download mirrors, but I don't even bother anymore.

      Another tip: The official bittorrent client isn't that great. You should try Azureus. It's written in Java, which sucks (flame me, I bite back), but even so I love it. In fact it might be the only java program that I like now that I think about it.

  5. Dear Santa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    Please put me on Internet2. Internet1 is old and busted. I've seen all the pr0n, downloaded all the songs, and I'm tired of getting viagra penis spam 418 times a day.

    I'll be a good boy next year, you can believe it.

    Thanks in advance,
    Johnny

  6. fish is to apple as... by glassesmonkey · · Score: 4, Informative
    What a HORRIBLE description this is to compare with BT!!
    From this page you can see a graphic representation of the Application Layer and Local Layer this program works in (I2). From the description below we can see that this is more like every ISP making local copies of large files available!
    The LoRS tools give you read/write access to the unused storage space on the L-Bone. The L-Bone is a collection of IBP depots spread across the globe. The distribution of Linux using this infrastructure is to us an experiment, and to you, the chance to get your ISO in about 5-10 minutes. Our intention is to upload multiple copies of the ISOs into the L-Bone using the lors_upload tool. These copies will be geographically dispersed and broken in to smaller pieces. Once the copies are uploaded, the tool generates the exNode pseudo-file. These exNodes will be available from this page for download with names like [distribution_name].iso.xnd.
    ...
    After installing these tools, you can upload your own files to the L-Bone and then send the exNode to others who would be interested in having a copy of the file. During the upload process you can determine how long your uploads reside in the L-Bone and even which depots to use based on locality/proximity (like ZIP codes). The depots themselves also determine how long an allocation is allowed to exist. After the allocation time (user or depot determined) expires, the data is erased from the L-Bone.

    Also, a Director for this stuff hints at it being a fee-based in the future. (More documentation here)
    "Well . . . It's new! It's cool! It solves a big need! It's free (for now)! And it has a good instruction manual. Woo-hoo! I'll take Joe's opinion that you don't even have to be "a minor league geek" to play around with this new stuff with the proverbial grain of salt, but I'll bet quite a few of you will be "LoRSing around" with it soon."
    -- Terry Calhoun is director of communications and publications for the Society for College and University Planning (www.scup.org)
    1. Re:fish is to apple as... by Zach+Garner · · Score: 2, Informative

      What a HORRIBLE description this is to compare with BT!!
      *shrug* The technologies have different end users in mind, but both are interesting to the same kind of geeks.

      Most researchers are probably not interested in BitTorrent since their transfer rates will not be imporved by BitTorrent's model (There's likely only one or two downloads going simultaneously for research data, since the audience isn't large)

      The LoRS tools give you read/write.... [full text truncated]

      You highlighted a few phrases from the above, and seemed to make a big deal about them. But, basically, this project is like every other Grid project.

      Resource owners define the conditions of use, such as when and how the resource can be used (in this case: how much space and for how long). Users can search and see if resources are available that meet their requirements. If a match is made, great. If not, oh well, you can always pay for service to ensure you have what you need.

      Also, a Director for this stuff hints at it being a fee-based in the future

      LoRS source code is available, see freshmeat.

      The software is under the revised BSD license. When they refer to "free (for now)" they're likely refering to the actual storage service.

      This is no different than developers of ftp software releasing the client and server for free, but restricting access to their ftp site.

      I can certainly see a pay-per terrabyte service. If a researcher needs professional grade quality of service, massive data storage and high bandwidth, they will have the grant money to afford it.

      For those that want something cheap, roll your own service, with your own terms.

    2. Re:fish is to apple as... by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Funny

      so it's kinda like those unsecured windows servers that get used as public ftp dumps?

      hmm.. i wonder if ms has a patent coming on this..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  7. Re:Of course, the important question is.... by Matey-O · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You'll get is when you pay cubic buttloads of cash to hook yourself up. You think that $45 Cable ISP fee is arbitrarily set?

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  8. Re:Of course, the important question is.... by Ianoo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Internet2 is such a stupid name. It's just another high-speed network linked to the Internet. We technologically backward countries have similar schemes but don't have the audacity to call them Internet2. In the UK, the high speed academic network is called JANET, for example - and they do quite a bit of research-type things with high speed links. Even has extensive peering with Internet2 IIRC.

  9. Re:Yeah right... linux isos..... by Urgo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That is definitely not true. Bit Torrent has a lot of legitimate uses. I used Bit Torrent to download an ISO for clusterknoppix and the multi-disk ISO's for red hat when their servers were swamped. Bit Torrent is a great concept that is not going to be going away. It's sort of like multicasting over the traditional internet structure. I see BT only growing is variations and uses in the future both for good and bad.

    --
    Belive in Technology and AMAZE yourself. -- RIP ZDTV/TechTV
  10. Oh please by Sanity · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This sounds like Akamai, you still need to pay for server bandwidth - it isn't competitive with P2P content delivery networks like BT.

    Oh, and as soon as Freenet gets N.G Routing working nicely, BitTorrent will be obsolete [/flamebait] ;-)

  11. I wouldn't say 'better' exactly, just different by RalphBNumbers · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd hardly call this "better than bittorrent". While the principles may be similar, the target users are entirely different.

    Bittorrent is for people who can barely afford to run their one server, and need others to take some of the load off.

    This seems to be targeted at people who can set up a whole bunch of servers in a bunch of locations, and just want to use them efficiently to deliver huge content very quickly.

    --
    "The worst tyrannies were the ones where a governance required its own logic on every embedded node." - Vernor Vinge
    1. Re:I wouldn't say 'better' exactly, just different by Wolfrider · · Score: 2, Informative

      --AFAIK, Multicast only works if everyone who wants the content, wants it at the EXACT SAME TIME.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  12. Give it up for the coward! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    LINUX USERS ON INTERNET2 NETWORKS ENJOY THE BENEFITS OF LOGISTICAL NETWORKING

    PHOENIX, AZ - November 17, 2003 - Linux users on Internet2 networks are enjoying the benefits of a new approach to high performance content distribution, called Logistical Networking, which will be on display this week in the Internet2 booth at SC2003 in Phoenix, AZ. Developed by a research team from the Logistical Computing and Internetworking (LoCI) Laboratory at the University of Tennessee, Logistical Networking (LN) combines state-of-the-art data transfer technology with storage resources provisioned throughout the network to create a convenient and powerful new paradigm for distributed data management.

    To test this technology, the LoCI team has used the 22 terabyte (TB) testbed of LN "depots" deployed across Internet2 networks to create an ad hoc content distribution network for distributing 650 megabyte (MB) CD-images (called "ISO's") of Linux and FreeBSD software. Users are now employing the Logistical Runtime System (LoRS) tools to download these ISO's at speeds of 30 to 80 megabits per second (Mbps)--roughly tens times faster than from traditional HTTP or FTP mirror sites. Downloads for gigabit Ethernet connected users can exceed 150 Mbps.

    "We think that this kind of network storage infrastructure paves the way for a new era in content distribution," said Dr. Micah Beck, Co-Director of LoCI Laboratory and the chair of Internet2's Network Storage Special Interest Group. "For example, although using multiple copies and multiple TCP streams to increase transfer speed is similar to what some peer-to-peer systems do, with our fixed but shared infrastructure of well connected nodes, you can scale up the size of the content without sacrificing performance."

    What makes this unique combination of flexibility and performance possible is an XML encoded metadata file called an exNode. A content publisher who uploads a file to the testbed of LN depots, which is called the Logistical Backbone (L-Bone), receives an exNode containing metadata that maps the segments of the file's content to L-Bone storage allocations, which are time-limited to make them more shareable. A single exNode can represent content that has been fragmented across multiple depots to accommodate large sizes, replicated to ensure fault tolerance, or both replicated and geographically dispersed to improve accessibility and performance. A single exNode used to distribute a Linux ISO represents eight copies of the ISO's content, which has been broken up into 8-20MB chunks and spread across L-Bone depots nationwide.

    Publishing content that has been stored in the L-Bone is as simple as sharing the exNode that represents it. Since exNodes are text files, they can be published via HTTP, sent as e-mail attachments, or passed on a floppy disk. When they are posted on a Web site, as with the exNodes for Linux ISOs, the result is called an exNode Distribution Network, or XDN. To access the content in an XDN, users simply retrieve the relevant exNode from the site, and then use them with the LoRS tools to download the content. The LoRS tools are freely available and easy to set up, have a convenient GUI, and run on Microsoft Windows, Apple OS X, and all common variants of UNIX and Linux. The LoRS tools make fast, mulitsource/multistream downloads routine for Internet2 users when the content is suitably replicated, as in the Linux XDN,

    "As compared to some of the other things we're doing with Logistical Networking, like managing the data sets from supercomputer simulations or accelerating remote browsing of massive image databases, putting up an XDN is a pretty simple application that anyone on Internet2 can do," explains Dr. Beck. "And prototype applications like IBPvo show that there are some easy variations on XDN that can automate different parts of the process."

    IBPvo is an Internet2-enabled personal video recorder (PVR) service created to show the flexibility of LN technology. Like TiVo or ReplayTV, IBPvo can be scheduled in advance

  13. What if a node goes down? by menscher · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Bittorrent works well, because it doesn't matter if one of your peers dies. There are lots of others. (When I downloaded the Fedora ISOs, for example, there were hundreds of peers.)

    This new thing looks like each site has a piece of your data. If one site loses everything, then wouldn't any file that had even a piece of it in that site be forever lost? Sounds like a distributed RAID0 (stripe) array to me. And everyone knows that reliability of those goes down as you add more stripes....

    1. Re: What if a node goes down? by taco8982 · · Score: 2, Informative

      LoCI deals with this by having multiple copies of the data spread around (mirroring in your RAID analogy). So if one site goes down, no data will be lost. For instance, "A single exNode used to distribute a Linux ISO represents eight copies of the ISO's content, which has been broken up into 8-20MB chunks and spread across L-Bone depots nationwide."

  14. You think that's cool? by DroopyStonx · · Score: 4, Funny

    You think the Internet2 is cool?

    Wait until Paris Hilton sex tape #2 hits the P2P networks on OUR internet.

    How you gonna DEAL WITH THAT, INTERNET2? HOW? YOU CAN'T TOUCH THIS.

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
  15. Re:Oh please [OT] by Magila · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sure it'd be great if Freenet was working nicly, but that's a big if. It's been in development for more than 3 years now and they're still not even close to having a network that's ready for use by the masses. I'm not sure it'll ever get to that point either. One of the golden rules of P2P is that bandwidth is precious, yet Freenet merily uses n times the amount of data being moved in bandwidth passing that data up a chain of nodes to preserve anonimity. This is probably going to forever relagate Freenet to solution-in-search-of-a-problem staus as the vast majority of people arn't that worried about anonimity.

  16. As a LoRS User by barureddy · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is like bit torrent, but not any way close to the redundancy of users. Right now there are only a few servers that host a file. There isn't a need for much more because A. the network doesn't have that many people B. there is so much bandwidth. There is no organized p2p warez network setup. It is in the experimental phase and only used now for research applications.

    As stated in previous posts, Internet2 is only accessible by academic institutions and corporations. I'm just a student at a university that is connected to the internet2 and I use LoRS for a smaller cooler application where I download recorded tv shows that I can select to be recorded at a central server.

  17. Re:Nothing is better than bit torrent for piracy by quakeroatz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Kirk would kick Picards little French butt all over the vinyard. Then he'd bang all the whores in Paris.

  18. mod_torrent is the way to solve this by belphegore · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The way to go here is to make serving content through bittorrent easier. Ideally, as easy as publishing a resource on a web server (that is, copy a file into a directory and figure out what the URL is). This is the goal of the mod_torrent project. We're building an apache plugin on top of libtorrent which automatically creates torrents in response to http requests, and then begins serving them, in response to conditions on the apache server. Load is low? Fine, service with good-old HTTP the normal way. Load is high? Instead of a direct HTTP download, instead have the HTTP GET respond with an application/torrent file, which then launches bt to grab the content (all automatic). Goodbye slashdot effect.

    1. Re:mod_torrent is the way to solve this by belphegore · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The idea would likely be to have the plugin only kick in for either certain mime types, or content above a certain size, at least for today. Yes, currently you need to have a bittorrent client installed, or integrated into your browser, but the content is at least available in a slashdot-like situation. I agree that it's likely HTML or small image files will never usefully be conveyed by this mechanism, but larger files, or any content that's rendered inline in a page would benefit.

  19. Aww, how nice. by Anenga · · Score: 5, Funny
    New technology for doing mulitsource/multithread downloads of ISOs is making Linux users on Internet2 happy.

    Aww, good for those Internet2 users. All 15 of them.
    1. Re:Aww, how nice. by finkployd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Aww, good for those Internet2 users. All 15 of them.


      There are around 130,000 Internet2 (actually Abilene) at my university

      Finkployd

  20. Re:Of course, the important question is.... by MarcQuadra · · Score: 5, Informative

    As mentioned earlier, Internet2 is NOT what it sounds like. It's just another high-speed WAN, like the commercial backbones, but because it's *cough* academic only *cough* it's got a lot less traffic and there are no artificial speed bumps.

    See when you get an internet connection, of any kind, you usually get wired up for a LOT more bandwidth than you buy, but the ISP caps it to make a market.

    On the Internet2 there are different grades of connection, but a huge number of schools are chatting to each other at 155Mbps, full-rate ATM. If you're in a dorm at any of those schools on the I2, chances are some of your regular ho-hum web/p2p traffic flows through the I2.

    The real advantages of the I2 project are reduced school ISP costs, as inter-school traffic doesn't have to traverse a commercial line, and much better collaborative access for research, development, and distance-learning.

    --
    "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
  21. Re:Oh please [OT] by Feztaa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Freenet merily uses n times the amount of data being moved in bandwidth passing that data up a chain of nodes to preserve anonimity.

    That's the whole point of Freenet! It's not designed to be the easiest way to get the latest DVD rips, it's designed to be a way to communicate 100% anonymously, for example if you're living in a repressive regime, and you need to send a message without getting killed.

  22. Freshmeat home page. by infolib · · Score: 2, Informative

    LoRS Tools are on Freshmeat
    The download link works ok - it seems the slashdotting has merely taken out dynamic HTML generation, not the bandwidth.

    Apparently it's under a BSD License - IMHO quite suitable for a publicly funded project. (Flamewar ensues...)

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
  23. Re:Oh please [OT] by Magila · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, if you absolutly positivly need to be anonymous Freenet is the way to go. But the parent was talking about Freenet making Bittorrent obsolete, which is never going to happen because Freenet has to sacrifice too much efficency to maintain anonimity.

  24. Call me ignorant but ... by Carmelia · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What's internet2 ???

  25. Re:bittorrent.... by AntiOrganic · · Score: 2, Informative

    Unfortunately, most campuses use Packeteer or other packet-shaping devices to analyze the packets to determine the traffic type in order to throttle bandwidth-hogging applications rather than blocking ports explicitly. While port-changing tricks may have worked in the past, even the most incompetent administrator can set up one of these, and no matter how many ports you try, you're not getting around it.

  26. Re:Of course, the important question is.... by nr · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yep, been there, done that. :)

    Our research/education network here in Sweden called SUNET (Swedish University NETwork) runs at 10 Gbit/s in the core and providing all connecting nodes with minimum 2 GB/s trunks, all the major universities are directly connected with 10 GB/s trunks.

  27. Re:bittorrent.... by Wolfrider · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1. Get To Know your Campus Admin
    2. Buy Him/Her $quantity of their favorite $consumable
    3. Ask for Local Bittorrent Access
    4. Profit!

    --
    .
    == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??