Slashdot Mirror


India Joins Galileo Consortium

ghoul writes "Yahoo! is reporting that both India and China have joined the Galileo Consortium as part of an effort at building a Multipolar world. Of note is the fact while China is giving money (200 Million Euros) India is giving 350 million Euros(almost half a billion dollars) in parts and services as Indian satellite makers are considered world class. Makes you think with all the outsourcing and stuff maybe America's century is coming to an end and this century will belong to India or China. After all one of them is 1/6th of the world and the other 1/5th."

67 comments

  1. Good news by Mod+Me+God · · Score: 1

    Global cooperation.

    --
    --

    FreeNET user? Comfortable with the adverse selection?
  2. Indiana Jones Galileo Consortium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    wha? ... ohhhh.

    1. Re:Indiana Jones Galileo Consortium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought just of the same thing ...

      aww, fuck you!

  3. ONLY AN AMERICAN WOULD WONDER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Everyone already KNOWS your time is at an end. Guess what else we welcome it! Congratulations America you're irrelavent.

    1. Re:ONLY AN AMERICAN WOULD WONDER by Mod+Me+God · · Score: 1

      India commits $0.5bn, China commits ~$0.4bn. Yeah great. But the USA is spending $400bn in 'defence'. In one year!!!

      --
      --

      FreeNET user? Comfortable with the adverse selection?
    2. Re:ONLY AN AMERICAN WOULD WONDER by ghoul · · Score: 1

      I dont think America would be irrelevant unless they go and lose a world war. They woul probably be more like Britain and France. Still relevant but not the 800 Pound Gorilla

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    3. Re:ONLY AN AMERICAN WOULD WONDER by avalanche75 · · Score: 1

      The research budget for General motors is $7 billion.
      The budget for ISRO (Indian Space Reseaerch Organization) is $ 1 billion.

      But ISRO looks like covering a larger scope of work compared to GM R&D.

      Direct figures 0.5 Bn and 400 billions do not represent the real proportions of projects. However no denying that there is lot of catching up to be done for people who want to compete USA

  4. Its all that stuff by fiftyLou · · Score: 2, Funny

    Makes you think with all the outsourcing and stuff maybe America's century is coming to an end

    Not sure about the outsourcing but you're bang on about the "stuff". It'll bring down any civilization.

  5. Wrong "Galileo" link. by dbirchall · · Score: 4, Informative
    Galileo.com is, despite the image on its homepage that looks for all the world like a GPS mesh, a Central Reservation System in the travel industry. (It competes with best-known SABRE and also with WorldSpan and possibly others - it's been a little while since I worked for a division of the folks who own Galileo, so my memory's fading.)

    The European satellite navigation project Galileo is at http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/energy_transport/gal ileo/index_en.htm.

    That's what India and China are getting involved with. Airlines, not nations, get involved with Galileo.com.

  6. Heh by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Funny

    "India Joins Galileo Consortium"

    I haven't had enough sleep today. I read that as "Indiana Jones and the Galileo Consortium." I just had this image of Harrison Ford saying with that ever so famous smile on his face "The old fool was right, the Earth does orbit the sun."

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Heh by Alsee · · Score: 1

      I haven't had enough sleep today. I read that as "Indiana Jones and the Galileo Consortium."

      Same here, except I read it as "Indiana Jones in the Galileo Coliseum." I had the image of Harrison Ford fighting off lions with his whip as the Emperor gave the thumbs-down.

      As it slowly dawned on my very fuzzy brain that there was something very wrong with this image, I had the added bonus of "watching" the Roman Emperor morph into Emperor Palpatine with Darth Vader by his side.

      No, I haven't been toking on the wacky weed, it's just really REALLY time for me to log off. Eww, yuck, the sun came up. Must ... get... in... coffin. Must... sleep... until.. sunset. Sun baaad. Sun hurt. No... more... internet. Must... log... off.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  7. India & China by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Makes you think with all the outsourcing and stuff maybe America's century is coming to an end and this century will belong to India or China.

    I don't think so. Both of these countries have political issues that interfere with their reaching their economic potential.

    Both countries have severe educational, economic and political problems. India has a deeply entrenched bureaucracy and strong Marxist political elements. India has an illiteracy rate about 70%.

    China has similar problems, perhaps even worse including rampant corruption. The literacy rate in China is lower that the US rate of people granted post-graduate degrees.

    Here is an article in Forbes describing some of the issues with China:

    http://www.forbes.com/2003/11/14/cz_rm_1114china .h tml

    1. Re:India & China by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Our American political, educational and economic problems, never insignificant, are starting to counterbalance our original advantages of unspoiled resources, strategic position, and freedom. In Confucian China, complacency is a sin; in America, it's a way of life.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    2. Re:India & China by fault0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      > India has an illiteracy rate about 70%.

      Erm, that hasn't been true since around 1970.

      Indian Literacy Rates:
      1951 - 18.33%
      1961 - 28.31%
      1971 - 34.45%
      1981 - 43.56%
      1991 - 52.21%
      2001 - 65.38%

      Assuming another 13% Jump in literacy, India will be at western standards in less than twenty years. It might even be faster than that, because between 1991 and 2001, there was greater change in India as a whole in terms of economic reforms than the whole fifty years since Indian independence before that. In any case, there is already more literate people in India than in the US.

    3. Re:India & China by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      India will be at western standards in less than twenty years.

      You are extrapolating in a linear fashion based on the highest growth rate recorded this century. That is VERY unlikely to be valid. It is much more likely that the rate of change will decrease as literacy increases due to the difficulty of inclusion of all groups.

      My guess would be something like:

      2011 - 74%
      2021 - 81%
      2031 - 86%
      2041 - 89%
      2051 - 92%
      2061 - 94%
      2071 - 95%

      Western Europe and the US have literacy rates circa 95%. Some relatively homogeneous countries like Norway and Korea are 99%+. Since India has a highly diverse population it may in fact be harder to achieve 95% than my guess.

    4. Re:India & China by zungu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Indian economic potential will be witnessed in few years. Despite the Asian currency crisis, India fared very well. Indian economy is booming right now. Indian space program is painfully put together with many setbacks. Let's give credit to a developing nation that has built it's own launch vehicles and satellites that are very good.

    5. Re:India & China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      India has an illiteracy rate about 70%.

      Judging by the average post to Slashdot, we're not doing much better...

    6. Re:India & China by Gaurang · · Score: 1

      Indian space program is painfully put together with many setbacks. Let's give credit to a developing nation that has built it's own launch vehicles and satellites that are very good.

      What sort of objective statement is this...????

      "You know, that guy has had some real trouble passing the exam. Lets give credit to that guy that has passed the exam on his own, and has written some very good answers."

      --
      I have found a solution to Riemann's Hypothesis, but have run out of spac
    7. Re:India & China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong ! India doesnt have a illiteracy of 70% , It has a illiteracy of 42 % , the difference between 42 % and 70% is about 280 million people

    8. Re:India & China by fault0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      > You are extrapolating in a linear fashion based on the highest growth rate recorded this century.

      No, as I started, there was a large amount of economic and social reforms put in place after 1991 (when the Rao government took power, and instituted massive reforms in not only education, but the economy-- moving from post-Gandhist "lets leave most Indians as farmers", to a different post Cold War reality. Much like China did in 1978, but in a perhaps more accelerated manner)

      > Western Europe and the US have literacy rates circa 95%

      Of course, that's why I said "western standards". It's unlikely India will ever reach 99% literacy.

    9. Re:India & China by ashayh · · Score: 1

      Those are official figures. I would take them with grains of salt.
      My mom worked in the social sevice dept. of Maharashtra state in India. Part of the Depts duty is to help increase literacy.
      Eager officials will add anyone who can draw something resembling signatures to the literacy list. Or simply say "X district (county) added 1000 people to the literate list".. whos to verify ? They conduct literacy campaigns for adults in the same fashion... in 15 days taech them to draw signatures.
      This is not always the case.. and things *are* improving..
      I cannot say what the real literacy rate/literacy growth rate might be.. but its got to be lower than official figures.

    10. Re:India & China by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      What have *you* done to make yourself proud to be an American? Or Indian, Chinese, or Brazillian, for that matter?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    11. Re:India & China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both countries have severe educational, economic and political problems. India has a deeply entrenched bureaucracy and strong Marxist political elements. India has an illiteracy rate about 70%.

      US has a similar stupidity rate..

    12. Re:India & China by zungu · · Score: 1

      The simple logic is that every person (country) which takes the exam (technological achievement) get grades that it deserves. American space program was an amazing achievement, where the NASA put man on moon using elementary computing at its disposal. That was America's A+ grade. India also went the 50 year development route from sounding rockets to Geo-stationary launch vehicles. That is India's A+ grade in its test. I am just saying let's give India due credit for doing its exam ok too. One country's progress is not a negative aspersion on another country's progress. However, many in America think that anybody progressing after them is just not worth giving credit for since "oh, we did that 50 years ago!".

    13. Re:India & China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever actually been there? Chinese companies have a general lack of planning in almost all areas, power and internet can be unreliable in some areas. Almost nothing is ever planned in advance.

      I would not consider American as complacent as the Chinese in most respects.

    14. Re:India & China by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Have you been to America? Sure, the 2003 Blackout was unusual in its scope, and the 2002 California Rolling Blackouts were intermittent, and the hurricane blackouts like 2003's Isobel happen only every year or two. And getting dropped from AOL, or any ISP, after 10 minutes of busy signals, can be solved with a cablemodem or DSL. Those lines only go down about a couple of minutes each day, on average; only about 10% of servers blogged get slashdotted. The rest of the business landscape, of course, reflects these inadequacies, especially outside the more rigorous fields of engineering.

      Nobody's got sufficient planning. America is starting from a position of strength, and decaying rapidly into monopolistic gangsterism. China is starting from medieval fuedalism, and rapidly sophisticating into some kind of gangsterism. Where equilibrium will be found will depend on the relative cultural tolerance for stagnation. American complacency, thinking we've got a lock on supremacy, works against us. Chinese progress works for them. American preoccupation with the the relative superiority of the present is the gateway to future inferiority - cultural attitudes are self-reinforcing, and last longer than buildings and compaines.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    15. Re:India & China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, if you just look at the current issues going on in India and China, they do not look poised to surmount the mighty US. But one needs to look at the rate of change, rather than just the current rate, of literacy. That rate is on a steady climb, and in a certain number of years, that number will equal the literacy rate of the US. Knowing the history lets you guess at the future, and my (educated) guess is that India and China will surmount the US in terms of global dominance. Just looking at their population numbers alone tells you we can't hold out forever.

      If you don't believe me, then you need to read this article:

      http://www.findarticles.com/cf_dls/m1181/138/108 27 8502/p1/article.jhtml

      It is a review of the highly insightful book, "Apres L'Empire: Essai sur la decomposition du systeme americain", by the frenchman, Emmanuel Todd. He studies the history; he studies the rates of change; and he studies the CURRENT statistics ... all of which point to a gradually shifting center-of-power away from North America.

      Sure, China and India might not be perfect, model nations, but that does not mean they won't surmount the US (which of course, is no perfect country either... just think about the percentage of Americans incarcerated here!). The change in power is going to shake everything up, and knowing from where it will come is a sign of wisdom and a sign that one can prepare for the future. I'm sure the top US brass knows this, and thus the current show of our military might is a reminder to everyone of "who's in charge." Yet, one could see it as the gasp for air of a country drowning in the globalised world that it created, so long as the US insists on doing things selfishly.

      Of course, this says nothing towards the rising power of the European Union.

      Nothing is for sure, but you can't deny the patterns set down in history: know your past, predict the future.

    16. Re:India & China by rdean400 · · Score: 1

      The credit usually goes to those who did something first. India and China have the benefit of standing on the shoulders of those who did it before. The USSR/CCCP and the USA deserve credit for being the inventors...India gets not as much credit because it duplicated the efforts of those that came before. Who remembers who the second person was that noticed what gravity was? Everybody sure remembers who did it first (Newton).

    17. Re:India & China by zungu · · Score: 1

      You are right the pioneers get the top credit. That is the right of USSR/CCCP and USA in the field of space exploration. However, neither ISA or USSR have given India space technology on a platter. Agreed, Ford Aerospace built the first Indian communication satellites, and Russia is giving India is first cryogenic engines for its Geo-synchronous launch vehicle. However, Indian space program is not exactly "standing on the shoulders" of giants. India has to paintstakingly do its own research and spend tons of money over 50 years to do Nuclear and Space research. I guess if it were so easy to stand on shoulders of giants, even Vatican would have launched satellites to relay the word of Lord. However, giants will not let others stand on their shoulders. Therein lies the lesson that each space pioneer has to "Do It Yourself" the whole story. And do it all over again, inspite of theories being validated, is an engineering marvel of no small measure. Again, what USA and USSR/CCCP did was 100% amazing work, yet that does not diminish India's achievement in space. Please see www.isro.com for more information.

    18. Re:India & China by zungu · · Score: 1

      Oops...it should www.isro.org

  8. Article has some misleading numbers by notyou2 · · Score: 5, Informative

    At present, the only global satellite system available to civilians is GPS, but it is accurate only to 100 metres (325 feet) for civilians, or 22 metres (71 feet) for the military, and is under the control of the Pentagon.

    What the hell are they talking about? With off-the-shelf equipment and a clear sky, you can easily get under 10-foot accuracy (I do on a very regular basis). With averaging and/or fancy equipment you can easily exceed that, too.

    If they're talking about accuracy while the military has implemented that signal degredation stuff, it's misleading not to mention that fact. But either way, the military would still be able to do a hell of a lot better than 71-foot accuracy... that's ridiculous.

    1. Re:Article has some misleading numbers by tigerc · · Score: 2, Informative
      Indeed, President Clinton cancelled selective availability, as it was called, in May of 2000. This order effectively stopped the intentional degredation of satellite signals (which might aid the enemy). Apparently, the benefits outweighed the potential costs.

      http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/gps/selective_availab ility.htm

    2. Re:Article has some misleading numbers by trinitrotoluene · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall that the military cut off GPS signals in Iraq during the recent war. (For everyone except the military off course.) It would be interesting to know if they are still denying civilian access to GPS in Iraq.

      --
      boom boom boom
  9. Re:For a second... by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 0

    So why is Indiana joining this consortium?

    Or is it the Indians? I read today that there was some ceremony regarding the deification of Sakakejewa in Washington? Is that what this is about?

  10. It's not how much you spend... by Tau+Zero · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ... it's what you get for your money.

    As a citizen of the USofA I face facts about the huge wastes of money we endure every day, such as:

    • The dead-end Space Shuttle program
    • Farm subsidies
    • Ethanol subsidies (which intersect somewhat with the above)
    • Mandated "special education" to the student's needs regardless of cost, while regular classrooms languish and the gifted are conspicuously neglected
    • Million-dollar healthcare for very premature infants (who will be lucky to ever get past "special ed")
    That doesn't include other things which could save piles of money, such as making the people who "develop" rural areas pay the full cost of all the roads, sewers, schools and whatnot that they require while abandoning cities where all those things already exist.

    Getting back to space, it no longer surprises me that the price of several Apollo projects has not taken humans beyond LEO in 3 decades nor given us a real space station, while a few tens of millions in SDIO gave us an SSTO technology demonstrator and one aerospace engineer was able to construct a scenario for a full manned mission to Mars for a fraction of the Shuttle budget. It disgusts me, but it is not surprising... it's all money politics, and the future is sold down the river because it has no constituency while the past chows down at the trough. Kind of like the pandering to old people with "free" drugs while the children whose future is going to be largely determined in classrooms over the next 10 years are ignored beyond mandates on top of mandates which all go unfunded.

    --
    Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
    1. Re:It's not how much you spend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Kind of like the pandering to old people with "free" drugs

      Yeah, why not just shoot them. I mean, you clearly don't care in the slightest about the old, who have passed their productive best and so won't produce any tax money, so just line them up and shoot them. But remember to save a bullet for yourself as soon as you get old and useless. Which you will.

      And yes, just in case anyone is being really thick, I am being sarcastic.

    2. Re:It's not how much you spend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool..

      I'm guessing you are employed, consider yourself still young, have reasonably smart children who are doing ok in school, and you live in a city..

      and you are SO PISSED OFF that YOUR tax money is getting spent on people that ARE NOT LIKE YOU!!!

      That's a very powerful argument, that complements quite well your complaint about the space program inefficiencies.

      Honestly, your post is so moving I almost cried.
      I'd raise you at +5 if I had mod points.

    3. Re:It's not how much you spend... by ghoul · · Score: 1

      I think your point about money spent on social programmes hurting competitiveness is valid. However these programs are worth it despite the cost. Perhaps to regain its competitiveness the US should force India to have a social welfare programme too.(China already has universal welfare Its called Communism)

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    4. Re:It's not how much you spend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      But you're not worried over 400b$ spent on army ?!?!

    5. Re:It's not how much you spend... by rwa2 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Well, you're sort of nitpicking, as far as where the bulk of our money goes.

      Take a look at these three US Budget plots http://hairball.bumba

      Four items far outweigh all of the others combined: SSA, Healthcare, Treasury (interest on national debt), and Defense. Everything else (including those items you mentioned) add up to diddly. SSA and Healthcare also show no signs of slowing down, and the baby boomers are just starting to retire.

      I'm kind of surprised the Howard Dean campaign has't harped more on this data (which is from the White House budget & management administration itself). If the #1 & #2 things we spend on are SSA and Healthcare (they're listed separately from the rest of the our taxes on our W2's for chrissake), it seems like a doctor would be the kind a person we need to figure out how to trim them surgically without harming the programs as a whole. Then once those things are under control, we could use a good economist and maybe a general to strategically trim the other two big budget items.

      To your credit, the Department of Agriculture is the biggest of the "small fish" budget items. :)

    6. Re:It's not how much you spend... by firewrought · · Score: 2, Interesting
      you clearly don't care in the slightest about the old

      Keep in mind that it's the old people who have all the money in this country. Of course, some of them have a lot more money than others. You can address this by "redistribution of wealth"... taxing richer and/or younger tax payers to cover the drugs and other medical expenses of the old.

      There are no easy answers here... redistribution is unfair, but NOT redistributing causes problems too.

      Once concern with providing medical care for the old is that there is unlimited upside potiential: We may be facing a lot of old versus young issues if technology start to significantly extend lifetimes during this century. Bruce Sterling's novels explore this issue a good bit (Holy Fire and Schismatrix).

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
  11. yeah... i wondered that too by Vitriolix · · Score: 1

    the garmin GPS i've used claims to get about 16t ft accuracy, and starting at the long/lat numbers while i walked around in my back yard seemed to verify that.

  12. nothing is forever by mOoZik · · Score: 1

    The U.S.'s domination as a world power and as a leader in whatever field (in this case, aerospace) will end at one time or another. Perhaps that time is dawning. I don't know, but for certain, looks like others are starting to pull ahead.

  13. more articles by jubalj · · Score: 4, Informative

    okay the story doesnt really have that much information, if you want to find out more, try:

    http://www.spacetoday.net/Summary/2003
    http://w ww.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=%2F news%2F2003%2F10%2F31%2Fwspace31.xml
    http://www.s pacedaily.com/2003/031030141843.79tqo7 1o.html
    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articl eshow/293 953.cms
    http://www.dw-world.de/english/0,3367,478 9-184676_ W_1017248,00.html
    http://english.peopledaily.com. cn/200310/28/eng200 31028_126977.shtml

    that should quench your thirst!

    1. Re: more articles by jubalj · · Score: 1
      this should save u some cutin' n pastin'..

      http://www.spacetoday.net/Summary/2003 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=%2F news%2F2003%2F10%2F31%2Fwspace31.xml http://www.spacedaily.com/2003/031030141843.79tqo7 1o.html http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/293 953.cms http://www.dw-world.de/english/0,3367,4789-184676_ W_1017248,00.html http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200310/28/eng200 31028_126977.shtml

    2. Re: more articles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, WTF?

  14. Someone has to say it by ottothecow · · Score: 1

    *texan voice*So what? we have the other 19/30 of the world dont we?

    --
    Bottles.
    1. Re:Someone has to say it by Red+Rocket · · Score: 1


      You're assuming he could do the math to figure that out.

      --
      - Hail to our fearless misleader! Fool speed ahead!
  15. USA is pretty damn big its own-self by foniksonik · · Score: 1

    "After all one of them is 1/6th of the world and the other 1/5th."

    http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/pri nt /us.html

    "about half the size of Russia; about three-tenths the size of Africa; about half the size of South America (or slightly larger than Brazil); slightly larger than China; about two and a half times the size of Western Europe"

    "world's third-largest country by size (after Russia and Canada) and by population (after China and India); Mt. McKinley is highest point in North America and Death Valley the lowest point on the continent"

    --
    A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    1. Re:USA is pretty damn big its own-self by ghoul · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually in todays service oriented world what matters is more the no of skilled people you have to do the work than the amount of land. For example Japan is much more densely populated than India and is a rival to a United States 50 times larger.
      Till now Indias population was that while it had the population the population was not skilled which made it a liability instead of a resource but now the trickle down effect of the nuclear and space programs is being felt in higher levels of education and competency at all levels

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    2. Re:USA is pretty damn big its own-self by PatrickThomson · · Score: 1

      Mt. McKinley is highest point in North America and Death Valley the lowest point on the continent

      So what? In my newly independant country of backyardia, Mount Mccompostheap is the highest point and The Big Ditch the lowest.

      --
      I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
    3. Re:USA is pretty damn big its own-self by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      world's third-largest country by size (after Russia and Canada

      Ooh! Canada! Scary. I mean, we're all just terrified of the Canadians. Skulking up there in the north, ready to take over the world. Oh, don't be fooled by their 'nice' face they try to put on and their cheap prescription drugs - look at ice hockey! Is that a sport invented by nice people?

    4. Re:USA is pretty damn big its own-self by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Ahem, well you should have stated you were speaking of "world population in terms of service oriented skilled labor".. ;-p

      My comment stands and to clarify I will state that USA may be the next 'sleeping giant' but it still has the best overall infrastructure and political climate for massive economic growth... if we'd all just get off our collective ass (or else we'll end up the way China has been for the last century or two, remembering the golden days).

      The recent generations and several following simply have little incentive, collectively, to do so. Standard of living in USA has got to be highest ever (I'm talking real standard of living, not income vs expense version) in that we have the easiest most convenience based lifestyle ever.

      "Why should we invent or innovate, our parents did it for us."

      "Let the rest of the world shoulder the burden of progress for a while. We want to be lazy sons-a-bitches for a while."

      Doesn't mean individuals aren't still working hard just that welfare is rampant and US society is 'okay' with it for now.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  16. what the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Wow, how many pro Europe, anti-American hints could be found in that post alone?

    * Throwing out the world "Multipolar". It's also capitalized for extra emphasis.
    * Referencing the money values in euros, even though the world standard is dollars. (Even the Yahoo article did it right. But the article writer decided to switch them around).
    * Of course, the final sentence that says "perhaps America's day is past" stuff

    Of course, when I saw this biased piece of crap article, I immediately knew it was michael accepted it. Because as we all know, michael doesn't care about honest journalism, he already admits he's heavily biased

    1. Re:what the by gloth · · Score: 1
      While it's obvious that there is some strong bias in the oritinal post, your knee-jerk reaction also doesn't really help to paint a nicer picture of the US and its people...

      * Throwing out the world "Multipolar".

      Before Gallileo, the US was the sole provider of a GPS system. Now there'll be another player. I don't see how the term "multipolar" is inappropriate. About the capital M... come on now, how many posts on slashdot are spelled correctly?

      * Referencing the money values in euros, even though the world standard is dollars.

      Gallileo started out as a European project, and it would seem pretty obvious that they'd use Euros.

    2. Re:what the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Throwing out the world "Multipolar". It's also capitalized for extra emphasis.

      It is 100% accurate. Perhaps you did remember that US publically advised against Galileo, on the grounds there is already GPS? And the EU decided to go on? It's 100% a political issue, the one of who will be in control of satellite positioning systems. China has already its 3-satellite local "GPS", but apparently, with India, joined the Galileo consortium. Again a pure political choice, which is by definition "anti-american", since EU was choosen instead of US.

      Referencing the money values in euros, even though the world standard is dollars.

      Galileo consortium counts in euros. Who said the world standard is dollars?

      the final sentence that says "perhaps America's day is past"

      A provocative, but somewhat correct statement. In 1945, US was 50% of the world GDP. In 1980, US was the only hope against the evil USSR. In 2003, US is only 22% of the world GDP, and is no longer leading the world (at least other people don't care and don't accept it) - the fact in the article is one more data point in this trend. It's called putting things into perspective.

    3. Re:what the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. I think we just found the most hypersensitive American redneck on the planet.

      * Multipolar was a reference to China and India making deliberate steps to democratise the world, a single dominating power is internationally undemocratic. Of course, America is all for democracy and freedom so they should think this is a good thing. Right?

      * Euros were the currency of reference, given that its is a project based in Europe and it is being funded in Euros. Hey not everyone converts to the US dollar before tracing you know. In fact, there are small African countries that even have thier own currencies. No really.

      * Perhaps America's day is past is not really anti American, its just a comment on the changing international political landscape. America used to enjoy a huge political support base, but its recent unilateralism and blatant and irresponsible misuse and abuse of its power has caused other potential powers to disalign themselves with American furtherance. Many countries who previously thought American would be the vehicle to bring about freedom now just think America is out to rule the world and should be counterbalanced in the same way the rising communist powers needed to be counter balanced in the 70s. If you ask me, I agree. Down with America I say, they are NOT a good leader for this world.

  17. world company loses half world market by jeisc · · Score: 1, Offtopic


    The world is sick of hearing the same old song: "We will save your behinds for your own sake".
    No one is dupe to the fact that US military behavoir is only market expansion
    so that multi-nationals can do business without risking their own behinds.

    US military presence is the private police force of US big business.
    But India and China are to big to be intimidated by US military presence.
    See TIBET and CASHMIRE.

    --
    This is a test!
    1. Re:world company loses half world market by vijaya_chandra · · Score: 1

      CASHMIRE

      wow!!! that's the best westernisation of anything that I have seen in my life

    2. Re:world company loses half world market by jeisc · · Score: 1

      more like
      to bet and cash mire

      The world company is the US Incorporated
      logo
      "We wipe out who says no, and we exploit who says yes"

      --
      This is a test!
  18. Don't tell that to these guys by rrace · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.newamericancentury.org/

  19. I should have been clearer for overseas audiences by Tau+Zero · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I think your point about money spent on social programmes hurting competitiveness is valid. However these programs are worth it despite the cost.
    As you are not a US resident, you probably don't appreciate the true nature of these programs. I'll list them for you, with my complaints:
    1. The Shuttle program mainly continues to keep the program's suppliers and contractors in business. The same people could produce far more in the way of truly useful goods and services if they were merely diverted to working on different launch systems, but today's gravy train is guaranteed while any change implies risk to the contractors (the taxpayer would properly see it the other way, but the taxpayers do not have lobbyists working the capitol).
    2. The USA used to have a program of farm set-asides, where farmers were paid to idle some of their acreage and prevent overproduction. This guaranteed farmers a profit on those acres and kept prices from tanking. This program was replaced with one of pure subsidies 20 or so years ago. The results have been predictable: we have rampant overproduction while prices remain too low for many farmers to remain in business, all at taxpayer expense.
    3. Ethanol subsidies mostly go into the pockets of wealthy corporate interests like Archer Daniels Midland. Some of the surplus corn (from the excessive subsidies) is consumed by the ethanol program, but the taxpayer pays more for a gallon-equivalent of motor fuel produced by this method than a British driver paying 75 p per liter. Ethanol production requires roughly a gallon-equivalent of fossil inputs to produce 1.2 gallons-equivalent of output, at a subsidy of $1.90/gallon; if I have that right, the taxpayer is paying $9.50/gallon for the energy actually created by this process. The rest of the energy is merely transformed from other forms, such as coal, gas and petroleum used on the farm.
    4. "Special education" for children who will never be able to function on their own is likely wasted. "Education" for those who are both mentally defective and dying from their conditions is completely wasted.
    5. Spending a million dollars (or a half, or a quarter million) to save a very premature infant, when the parents cannot support such a child's needs and the child will sustain serious brain damage, is wasted. Once these babies are born there is nothing medical science can do to make up for the damage that results. We would save more lives by letting them die naturally and putting the money into prenatal care, schooling and programs to prevent pregnancies among people who won't take prenatal care seriously.
    These programs are not worth it; they destroy value, not create it.
    --
    Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
  20. European paranoia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More European paranonia about US "power" ... whatever that means. Can't do it themselves anymore more so they turn to China, India, etc.... pathetic.

  21. A Question about GPS? by iriles · · Score: 1


    A friend of mine had a GPS Unit in Chile, and he said it didn't work the entire time he was there, but in the United States it worked fine. This was several years ago.

    Is there less coverage in the Southern Hemisphere?

    1. Re:A Question about GPS? by notyou2 · · Score: 1

      There isn't supposed to be. I believe the military does have the ability to selectively block or degrade the signal based on rough geographic location, though... so depending on the exact timing of your friend's travel, it's possible something was going on in the world that made the U.S. choose to degrade things in Chile (or perhaps all of South America).

      Additionally, most GPS units come with a basemap for only one continent. In particular, most sold in the US only have a north american basemap. If you took such a unit to south america (and didn't load any additional maps onto it), the unit wouldn't give you anything more than latitude and longitude while you were there. No roads or other features would be visible on its map screen.

  22. Why Agriculture bugs me by Tau+Zero · · Score: 1
    I'm sure there are a number of expensive tax preferences which don't rate line items because they aren't "spending".

    My nit with ag subsidies and whatnot isn't necessarily their size, it's their corrupting influence. The amount of money spent is secondary to the damage it does, which can be all out of proportion.

    --
    Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.