Slashdot Mirror


DoCoMo To Use Linux On Their 3G phones

ilbrec writes "Looks like NTT DoCoMo will be using Linux on their 3G phones next year. This actually was reported yesterday in Japan (here), but I could not find any article in English until now. While it's not clear who will be making the Linux phone for them, I would certainly be interested in seeing them once they are out. No word on this anywhere at DoCoMo's website at all, however." Reader paku adds links to similar coverage in Forbes and in Japan Today.

139 comments

  1. Montevista by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

    That's who makes just about anything embedded-Linux based.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:Montevista by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      MontaVista. You can at least spell their name correctly.

  2. I can't stand Symbian ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow...
    Finally we'll get rid of that symbian OS! It gets at least 45'' to shutdown on my Nokia!

    1. Re:I can't stand Symbian ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It gets at least 45'' to shutdown on my Nokia!

      wow! that's fast! but what velocity are you travelling at when you shutdown?

      I get about 400 feet for mine to shut down but that's when travelling at 70Mph.

      are you walking? that's still pretty fast.

      I hated my older phone it took at least 600-700 feet to shutdown.

  3. bad idea.... by k0d0 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    top use something like linux on a mobile IMO... we have enough exploitable mobiles out there already, better use something simple without toys...

    greetings,

    Kodo

  4. Linux /Java virus. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coming soon to a phone near you.

    I'm eager to see the outcome when someone unleashes a virus/worm that infects all these phones and renders them useless en mas. I've always questioned the need for games and apps on a phone.

    1. Re:Linux /Java virus. by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny
      I've always questioned the need for games and apps on a phone.

      How else will we overhear things like this on the bus: "Beep-beep-boop, *Ring*! Hello, yeah, I'm on the bus. Listen, I'm going for a high score in Dark Evil Castle of Doom, can I call you back? Yeah, I'll put it in my schedule. Okay, bye! Boop-beep-beep..."

      Happy happy, joy joy.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Linux /Java virus. by Mnemia · · Score: 1

      In Japan people seem to be a lot more considerate of others when using cellphones than here in the US. Most of the time people don't have audible ringers on when they are in a crowded space, or they use headphones plugged into their phones. Maybe it's not consideration for others so much as a different social norm, but it's very refreshing compared to here. When I've seen people in Japan playing games on their phones it was usually someone doing that silently on a train.

      Granted, I'm sure that when this techonology finally makes it to the US in about 2 years we can count on American rudeness to make your scenario come true.

    3. Re:Linux /Java virus. by caluml · · Score: 1

      Americans do seem to like, and think that everyone else likes, the sound of them shouting loudly into phones. At one company I worked for, all the English employees had phones with speakerphones built in, but used the handset out of consideration. Any American employees that came over always put the phone on speakerphone, and shouted their conversation loudly with the other person. Maybe they were taking advantage of the nice quiet office.

    4. Re:Linux /Java virus. by bugbread · · Score: 1

      Maybe true in the U.S., but not Japan. People turn off the ringers on trains, busses, etc. No more beep beep boops, and games on phones are a kick ass way to avoid being bored to death during commuting. Sure, so are books, but on a fully packed train, with one hand on the support strap, trying to flip pages on a book is a pain in the ass. Much easier to play a game, and much less intrusive to the people pushed up against you.

    5. Re:Linux /Java virus. by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Good luck, Java implements a security manager so the user would have to explicitly grant the malicious code to do nasty stuff, assuming of course that the platform even worked in the ability to let the user choose.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  5. Well, it's an option anyway. by Space+cowboy · · Score: 4, Informative
    Quoth Forbes article

    DoCoMo does not intend to force them to use the Linux-based software and it does not preclude the use of other operating systems including Smartphone software from Microsoft Corp as future OS candidates for its 3G phones, the source said.


    Simon.
    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Well, it's an option anyway. by tftp · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The engineers decided on Linux, but the PHBs don't want to take risks (correctly, by the way.) So they, in their usual manner, tell us something while telling us nothing, and not committing to anything.

      But seriously, Linux is great on embedded systems. I am right now working with Arcom's PC/104 board that has XScale CPU on it. I left the board plugged in for several months, and when I checked it was still working fine :-) It's Debian, btw, and takes only 8 MB Flash (other 8 MB are free, and I have larger CompactFlash plugged in as /dev/hda for development).

    2. Re:Well, it's an option anyway. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And perhaps this is why:
      No word on this anywhere at DoCoMo's website at all, however

      Maybe this is just another attempt at blackmailing Microsoft into reducing their exorbitant fees?

    3. Re:Well, it's an option anyway. by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Just as long as they don't use Qtopia, but I rather doubt it. There is no way that a 18 MB memory footprint at boot with no apps started for a Linux + Qtopia setup is good.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  6. dont hold your breath by mpost4 · · Score: 1

    I don't think the cdma people will even carry it. I reather have a 2.5G phone since the GSM carriers deliver, sprint has been promising for 7 months a bluetooth phone, so I don't think that eather sprint of verizon, the 2 cdma and therefor the only 3g networks in the us, will ever carrie it, I ditched sprint last week for a 2.5G company T-Mobil because they have the better phones, yes the theredical speed of the net is slower but the applided speed is faster because it is there. see this page I did http://slashdot.org/~mpost4/journal/53591

    1. Re:dont hold your breath by TonkaTown · · Score: 1

      They're talking about a *Japanese* 3G phone, so different wireless standards to anything the US uses.

      However, I can imagine the Motorola Linux phones might be of interest when they ship one with a US "standard".

  7. It'll be Monte Vista Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    If it's the Panasonic model.

    (posted anonymously because I'm working on that project)

    1. Re:It'll be Monte Vista Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There really isn't another big player in the embedded Linux market besides Monte Vista. They are the only ones with the expertise to pull off something like that in a cost effective manner.

      Microsoft Smartphone development is typically done by BSQuare in Bellevue.

      And Symbian just works with the OEMs directly.

      It may seem like a large OEM market, but behind the scenes, it's only a few companies providing the backbone engineering for all these OEMs.

  8. Reasons for adopting Linux by Trbmxfz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nitpick:

    Linux is an open-source, easy-to-modify, and license-free product.

    No it's not. It's free licence. These people need to understand libre software.

    Manufacturers are expected to comply with DoCoMo's request to replace their systems with a unified Linux standard apparently for fear of being left out in the cold

    Now, is this a good reason to move to Linux? I mean, if this is the reason for small manufacturers to move, had DoCoMo chosen Windows, they would probably have moved to that instead. Oh well.

    1. Re:Reasons for adopting Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still trying to figure out why a phone company names itself "nowhere". Customers and competitors maybe but????

    2. Re:Reasons for adopting Linux by Trbmxfz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      According to J. W. Breen's Japanese-English dictionary, DoCoMo (dokomo) translates to "everywhere". Now that makes sense.

    3. Re:Reasons for adopting Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, Jim Breen. The godfather of Japanese on the internet.

    4. Re:Reasons for adopting Linux by BJH · · Score: 1

      Well, Japanese for non-Japanese, anyway...

    5. Re:Reasons for adopting Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These people need to understand libre software.

      Newspeak is doubleplusungood. Stop inventing new terms to justify your stupid hippie OS.

    6. Re:Reasons for adopting Linux by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Nitpick:

      Now, is this a good reason to move to Linux? I mean, if this is the reason for small manufacturers to move, had DoCoMo chosen Windows, they would probably have moved to that instead. Oh well.

      They didn't choose Linux, at least, no more than they did Symbian or Microsoft's SmartPhone. They simple choose to provide specs for manufactuers of iMode compliant phones who wish to make Linux phones. They aren't making the phones themselves, and certainly are not switching to Linux.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    7. Re:Reasons for adopting Linux by apetime · · Score: 1
      According to J. W. Breen's Japanese-English dictionary, DoCoMo (dokomo) translates to "everywhere". Now that makes sense

      It does, but that's not all. DoCoMo also stands for DO COmmunications on the MObile network.

  9. On Bizzaro World... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can you hack these phones to run Windows and not support the Evil Penguin Empire?

  10. GPL by h4rm0ny · · Score: 4, Insightful


    How does this work as far as distributing the source code? Is that available for modification and if so is it possible to upload a self-improved OS to the phone?

    Does that open up the possibility of doing clever things or am I being ignorant? If the former then this could be great, if the latter - hey, I only wrote telecommns code for two years, what do you expect?

    --

    Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    1. Re:GPL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuckwad.

    2. Re:GPL by cyberformer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To comply with the GPL, they need to make source code available. But it's perfectly possible (and legal, IMHO IANAL) to embed the OS in ROM in such a way that it can't easily be changed. Source code availability is still useful, though: It helps developers of apps understand how the system works, makes security audits possible and means that once the device is no longer produced, it'll be easier to make an emulator.

      The downside for the phone makers is that their competitors can also take the source code and use it in their phones, but that's the price they pay for using any pre-existing software (free or not) rather than developing something from scratch. The phone makers are better off standardizing on Linux than Windows (no MS tax), and so are DoCoMo and its customers.

  11. Re:3G is dying by Clay+Pigeon+-TPF-VS- · · Score: 1

    I predict that 3g will eventually catch on as 2g clients wish to upgrade to bigger and better things. 3g isn't dead yet.

    --
    Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
  12. Dude, Symbian rocks the house. by karmaflux · · Score: 2, Informative
    At the same time, DoCoMo is also looking into the possibility of developing a standard based on an OS made by Symbian Ltd., a British firm whose OS is used widely in Europe and in some handsets in Japan.
    (the above from the article.)

    My wife's phone uses Symbian's OS. It's very, very nice. Unless someone comes out with a killer phone app requiring the linux kernel, I think DoCoMo would be better off with Symbian.

    Although I would give a mint to be able to use regexps on my phone book.

    --

    REM Old programmers don't die. They just GOSUB without RETURN.

    1. Re:Dude, Symbian rocks the house. by TonkaTown · · Score: 3, Informative

      And also here - Japanese mobile operator to develop user interface and service delivery technologies for 3G handsets using Symbian OS

      The Symbian OS is nice, I've played with one of the Symbian based FOMA phones, and it's very cool indeed.

    2. Re:Dude, Symbian rocks the house. by Kenja · · Score: 1

      Its also very nice to write software for. Soon as I get a free moment I'll break the seal on the dev kit Nokia/Borland gave me, but from what I've read and seen it has a very good system model that makes it VERY hard to have an app crash the OS. In addition the System 60 phones have a screen that is higher res then the defalt Palm screen of 160x160, granted it is smaller. So there is little to stop you from porting or creating "real" applications for the platform.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    3. Re:Dude, Symbian rocks the house. by Sviams · · Score: 1
      "I think DoCoMo would be better off with Symbian."
      Just to clarify things...DoCoMo will likely be very well off with *both* Symbian and Linux. I think this is great news considering that DoCoMo and Symbian has already signed an operator technology integrator agreement.
      So in the end, all this really says is that MS appears to be on the loosing end of the stick concerning a very large market indeed.
    4. Re:Dude, Symbian rocks the house. by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's too bad you can't buy PDAs that run EPOC32/Symbian anymore. Some of those phones are almost as good- the P800 for instance- but it'd be nice if there were a few Symbian devices that were simply dedicated PDAs.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    5. Re:Dude, Symbian rocks the house. by cpeterso · · Score: 2, Informative


      Except that Symbian is controlled by Nokia. And the Symbian dev tools are sucky. You have to use their wacky C++ variant, incompatible with all your legacy code. They don't even have a remote debugger to debug programs running on the phone! Borland sells a Symbian remote debugger, but you have to pay extra, you have to switch to Borland's C++ compiler, and it barely works.

      From the user's perspective, they can't tell the difference (given a decent GUI). Using Linux underneath a user-friendly GUI is an advantage to the phone manufacturer.

  13. Will there ever be a standard? by SexyKellyOsbourne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We all know Microsoft is trying to be the "standard" for cell-phone operating systems much in the way that they took over almost the entire desktop and workplace market, but will there ever be a Linux standard? I know Symbian is also trying to create a standard for cell phones that already is quite strong in Europe, but there really should be a consortium where Linux developers can get together and set standards, instead of them being scattered across the internet proposing a few ideas.

    If there's going to be standards, they should always be open source and free as in beer. Corporate control of standards only creates monopolies. Even in America, a lot of people are dropping their landlines for cellphones, and if there's ever a Linux standard for it, it should be created quickly before it's too late.

    1. Re:Will there ever be a standard? by AndIWonderIfIWonder · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... I'm a bit dubious about the site you linked to Sybian.com, although that would give a whole new meaning to an embedded operating system. I think (am hoping) you must have been meaning Symbian.com. Of course sybian they might have helped developed the vibrate features...

    2. Re:Will there ever be a standard? by Xophmeister · · Score: 1

      Sybian, eh... now there's a Freudian slip/typo, if I've ever heard one ;)

      --

      Christopher Harrison

    3. Re:Will there ever be a standard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, it's because he's a troll

  14. One Year From Now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I can just see the headline on Slashdot a year from now will be:

    DoCoMo accused of GPL violation, fails to release modified code.

  15. But will they include the sources? by plinius · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Given that the FSF will not pursue anyone who abuses the GPL unless the abused code's copyright is owned by the FSF, and given that no other organization seems to be protecting the GPL, what guarantee do we have that the sources will be included and this will be legit? Answer: None.

    1. Re:But will they include the sources? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      ..they will probably be. ..what use will them be for you? probably none, since you can't probably upload your own firmware code without a big fuss(for apps, i take it as a pretty sure bet that it has j2me of some grade).

      the symbian phones allow the most flexibility currently(most lowelevel tricks you can do in software compared to other phones.. like answering machines that run on the phone&etc..).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:But will they include the sources? by aug24 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      AIUI, the FSF own copyrights over a large selection of code fragments in the kernel. It's quite unlikely that DoCoMo would be able to strip out the FSF's code and still have a running kernel.

      Anyway, anybody whose code is in the kernel can pursue any GPL-transgressor themselves if they like. In other words, Red Hat, IBM et al could chase it if they thought it was worth their while.

      J.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    3. Re:But will they include the sources? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Given that the FSF will not pursue anyone who abuses the GPL unless the abused code's copyright is owned by the FSF, and given that no other organization seems to be protecting the GPL, what guarantee do we have that the sources will be included and this will be legit? Answer: None.

      It's attitudes like this that I really have to wonder why ANY business would use Linux instead of something more free like FreeBSD. Say what you will, but the GPL is a big negative to me if I wanted to incorporate Linux into my business's product. If you want the source code then I'll point you to kernel.org to go get it. Why people feel they are entitled to proprietary source code modifications is beyond me. Just as you choose to license your code under the viral GPL, a business should be able to choose not to. Thus, the BSD license is the true open source license to use if you want to develop free software.

    4. Re:But will they include the sources? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, yeah, heard it before. If you don't want to slave under the terrible burden of the GPL, DON'T USE THE CODE. It's not yours, OK? If you want to use it, ABIDE BY THE LICENSE. Otherwise, shut up and go wank over FreeBSD.

    5. Re:But will they include the sources? by plinius · · Score: 1

      FreeBSD more free? Last I checked the kernel coders were a small closed group. Their sources may be open but not the group!

    6. Re:But will they include the sources? by dorward · · Score: 1

      It's attitudes like this that I really have to wonder why ANY business would use Linux instead of something more free like FreeBSD. Why people feel they are entitled to proprietary source code modifications is beyond me.

      Why people complain that Joe Coder says 'You can use my code if you let other people use your modifications to my code' is beyond me.

      As to why people would choose Linux over BSD - maybe Linux does somethings that BSD doesn't. I certainly don't remember hearing lots of talk about embedded BSD.

    7. Re:But will they include the sources? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ohh, waaa. Get over it. Linus doesn't let me over to eat his dinner or fondle his wife; I suppose that makes Linux even less free, huh?

  16. Re:Obligatory Beowulf joke.... coming up :-) by Icarus_SFX · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hey! distributed computing to cure cancer.

    Hmmzz... Didn't they say that Cell Phones could be causing cancer ?

  17. Probably will be modded a troll, but... by mental_telepathy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I mean this seriously. Would a good sign of Linux becoming more mainstream be when it's no longer news that a company is using Linux in their products?

    1. Re:Probably will be modded a troll, but... by martingunnarsson · · Score: 1

      And does it really matter that this phone will run Linux? That alone is not a reason to buy it, at least not for me. Phones with PalmOS are great since there's a lot of software developed for that platform. I guess the phone wouldn't run any linux program right out of the box. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

      --
      Martin
    2. Re:Probably will be modded a troll, but... by sharkey · · Score: 1
      Phones with PalmOS are great since there's a lot of software developed for that platform.

      Perhaps software developed for the Sharp Zaurus would run out-of-the-box on the phone, or be trivially ported.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    3. Re:Probably will be modded a troll, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but that'd would only be a good thing if there was a lot of good software around for the Zaurus. And there isn't. There are a lot of quick-n-dirty ports of limited usefulness and plenty of poorly written software, but only a handful of gems. Certainly not anywhere near even a tenth of PalmOS has.

    4. Re:Probably will be modded a troll, but... by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      And does it really matter that this phone will run Linux? That alone is not a reason to buy it, at least not for me.

      That is not a reason to buy it for almost anyone- except a lot of the Linux cheerleading slashdot crowd. NTT DoCoMo certainly won't be marketing this as a special Linux phone, in a lame attempt to cash in on interest in Linux without having to produce a decent system; at least, they won't if they want this phone to be a decent seller to general consumers, which is their style.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    5. Re:Probably will be modded a troll, but... by martingunnarsson · · Score: 1

      Yes, that sounds possible.

      --
      Martin
    6. Re:Probably will be modded a troll, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since the market for advanced smartphones is still in it's infancy it would be news whatever operating system DoCoMo decides to use.

    7. Re:Probably will be modded a troll, but... by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      I think this would be bigger news if DoCoMo had chosen NetBSD over Linux. NetBSD prides itself it being a portable and lightweight OS, but why doesn't it get more attention? You would think NetBSD's BSD license would be more attractive to manufacturers than Linux's GPL license. There is even commercial dev support for embedded NetBSD systems from Wasabi Systems, but they don't seem to be having much success in the cell phone arena.

    8. Re:Probably will be modded a troll, but... by bugbread · · Score: 1

      Judging from the rest of the cellphones in Japan, the OS will be absolutely transparent to the user. No additional programs can be run (except Java apps, which are basically platform independent). I have a J-Phone (er, I guess technically "Vodafone" now), and no idea what OS it is. Since all I can do is what the phone manufacturer (Sharp) programmed it to do, I don't care what OS it runs either.

  18. Security features? by BallPeenHammer · · Score: 0
    Since wireless is so notoriously insecure, I'm wondering if the use of Linux has any security implications.

    Does anyone know if this will positively affect security?

  19. Re:3G is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no one will ever need more than 459 SMS characters on a mobile device.

    640K [of memory] ought to be enough for anybody." -- Bill Gates (1981)

  20. Re:3G is dying by rokzy · · Score: 1

    yes, that was the general idea I was hinting at. good to see not everyone here is totally dim.

    the "I predict.." is also based on a Homer Simpson quote.

  21. Re:Setting the pace by musikit · · Score: 1

    you mean there is 4G? if 3G was marketed as the best thing since sliced bread what will 4G be marketed as?

  22. Re:3G is dying by leerpm · · Score: 1

    I think 3G is dead in terms of what it originally aimed to be. Wifi has virtually destroyed what was supposed to be the most lucrative market for 3G. But if the carriers are somehow able to make their 3G offerings work side-by-side with Wifi, they might stand a chance of making some money off their investments. But I suspect you won't see any major innovation until 4G or 5G when carriers are able to integrate their networks in the Internet. When I can get native VOIP on my cell phone (without paying through the nose!), then the killer apps will really start to happen.

  23. Phones and operating systems by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 3, Interesting
    What I don't understand is why anyone needs to cram a whole multi-user, multi-tasking OS onto a small device with only two or three modes of operation (voice phone, Internet and maybe digital camera). None of these devices really need to be upgradeable - most Europeans get a whole new phone every 12-18 months because their network provider allows cheap upgrades - so that can't be the reason.

    Presumably it's cheaper to build additional processor speed and storage into the device, to cope with the overhead of Linux/Windows Embedded, than it is to spend developer time to knock up a custom OS for the limited hardware?

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    1. Re:Phones and operating systems by aug24 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Cos you can rip out what you don't need and add what you do fairly easily.

      For example, all the userland stuff can go - just cos it'll have a user doesn't mean it needs to use the existing, highly secure multi-user stuff.

      The multi-task stuff may well be of use, as phones are not RTE any more. The chips almost certainly are still, but certainly not the front end.

      Justin.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    2. Re:Phones and operating systems by BJH · · Score: 1

      Have you seen what the latest phones in Japan can do? MP3 playback (including replacement of ring tones), external storage on MemoryStick, movie recording and playback, digital still camera with 1.3-2Mpixels, Bluetooth, two displays (one internal, one external so you can check your mail without opening it)...

    3. Re:Phones and operating systems by joib · · Score: 2, Interesting


      What I don't understand is why anyone needs to cram a whole multi-user, multi-tasking OS onto a small device with only two or three modes of operation (voice phone, Internet and maybe digital camera). None of these devices really need to be upgradeable - most Europeans get a whole new phone every 12-18 months because their network provider allows cheap upgrades - so that can't be the reason.


      The new generation of 2.5G/3G phones are more like computers stuffed into a small case than a traditional phone. While multi-user functionality perhaps is unnecessary on a phone, multi-tasking is definitively needed. OTOH, how cool wouldn't it be to run sshd on your phone?


      Presumably it's cheaper to build additional processor speed and storage into the device, to cope with the overhead of Linux/Windows Embedded, than it is to spend developer time to knock up a custom OS for the limited hardware?


      Yeah, you got it!! Hooray!

    4. Re:Phones and operating systems by paku · · Score: 1
      What I don't understand is why anyone needs to cram a whole multi-user, multi-tasking OS onto a small device with only two or three modes of operation (voice phone, Internet and maybe digital camera). None of these devices really need to be upgradeable - most Europeans get a whole new phone every 12-18 months because their network provider allows cheap upgrades - so that can't be the reason.
      I would think of two reasons:

      1: Because they can. Japan has always been the land of new miniaturized geek gadgets. They also like first bragging rights.

      2: Culture and life-style. When you spend 2 to 3 hours a day commuting on the crowded train, you have very little choice with that time except to look at that little screen that is three inches from your face. Games, email, i-mode web browsing, picture and video recording and playback. Just today, I saw an ad for J-phone (Vodaphone) for a cell phone that allows you to watch TV!

      Sure a PDA will do as well. But try juggling all that while having your body pressed against the train door.

      Culture wise, the Japanese really do not start up conversations with strangers on the train. They are most likely to disappear into a book, a comic, a newspaper, or a small gadget. The cell phone has become one of the more popular train riding past-times.
    5. Re:Phones and operating systems by bugbread · · Score: 1

      "how cool wouldn't it be to run sshd on your phone"

      I have no idea how cool it would be, but since Japanese manufacturers don't allow user access to the OS, you couldn't run it anyway. The only external applications that can run on Japanese cell phones are Java applications. The manufacturers use the OS to run phone functions (user interface, dialing, phonebook, digital camera, internet, and video), and that's all the customer can see.

  24. Mods on crack by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1

    Please could some mods with functional brains actually recognise this for the bullshit it is? "Host the phone interface on a central Solaris cluster," my arse!

    1. Re:Mods on crack by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      Please could some mods with functional brains actually recognise this for the bullshit it is?

      Generally if you use at least 4 major buzzwords and can make your post more than a few sentences you will get moderated up as insightful. Basically most of the moderators seem to only glance at the posts without actually understanding the content before making their moderation decision. It's a sad state of affairs, but that's what you get when you use mob rule moderation.

    2. Re:Mods on crack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Please could some mods with functional brains actually recognise this for the bullshit it is? "Host the phone interface on a central Solaris cluster," my arse!"

      Actually, my first thought was: Gee, Sprint is just stupid enough to do something like this. :P

      But yeah, we so need more ways of subtracting mod points.

  25. Re:3G is dying by tftp · · Score: 2, Insightful
    3G is not dead yet, but it is not alive either. From a few reports that I read, the network is a solution in search of a problem. Who would regularly need to stream real time video on the phone, paying 10 cents (or something) per minute, all the while trying to make out details of a tiny 2" barely visible picture?

    Maybe in Japan, or in Europe, train or bus passengers would want the network to entertain them in some way while in transit. But most likely IP rights will make it impossible anyway, so they will be limited to simple Web browsing (on a phone? come on...) In USA there are no trains or buses, for all intents & purposes; people fly. But you can't use 3G in flight, so back to old trusty laptop with all the wealth of video and audio one can only imagine...

    If anyone really wants to make a killer phone, make it just small enough to be worn as a wristwatch. That would be much more useful than all those petabytes per second. My friends always leave their phones where they themselves are not - on the desk, in a bag, in a car, at home - you name it, they left it there. And of course once someone leaves the phone on the desk and walks out, the phone rings...

    Many best things that we enjoy are not marvelous novelties, but something well known, but perfected to absolute excellence, to its limit. I dare say, the phone shall follow this path.

  26. Not DotCom ! by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    Don't forget: re-arrange the letters in NTT DoCoMo and what you get is "Not Dotcom" !

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  27. a few standards to be available... by mm0mm · · Score: 4, Informative

    according to zdnet japan (sorry link in japanese), DoCoMo added Linux as an option for manufacturers to choose from, by setting standardized specs for Linux on 3G. apparently DoCoMo doesn't want to limit choices of OS on 3G. The article says that they have specs (requirement) for Symbian OS available also.

    As Japan's largest provider, DoCoMo's relaxed stance on choice of OS may benefit manufacturers and consumers in a long run. Obviously people at DoCoMo can't care less about the OS that will soon be running inside of every car .

    Freedom of choice is a blessing these days...

  28. Re:3G is dying by musikit · · Score: 1

    considering that you can't get a cell phone these days without GPS technology would you really want the government, or anyone else to locate your wrist within 6ft of it's actual position?

    can me a tin foil hat wearing freak but how long until your implanted with a GPS transmitter/receiver upon birth.

    "Ok mom and dad, here is your child's birth certificate, SSN, and GPS transmitter number"

    Anyone have a hack for a nokia 3589i do completely disable the GPS functionality?

  29. Re:Setting the pace by iantri · · Score: 1
    so we're thinking of installing the Citrix ICA client and host the phone interface on a central Solaris cluster.

    HA HA HA! This is great. Clearly, AC does not know what he is talking about and is a karma whore. Hosting the phone interface on a central Solaris cluster and connecting to it by a Citrix ICA client? Did it occur to anyone else that this doesn't make the least bit of sense?

  30. Re:Obligatory Beowulf joke.... coming up :-) by arcanumas · · Score: 0
    Hey! distributed computing to cure cancer.
    Hmmzz... Didn't they say that Cell Phones could be causing cancer ?

    Maybe that's what Microsoft people had in mind when they said Linux is a cancer.

    --
    Slashdot Sig. version 0.1alpha. Use at your own risk.
  31. On Bizarro World by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    On Bizarro World:

    SCC makes you pay them $699 if you DON'T use Linux.

    The recording industry sells all their material online, in a usable format, at a fair price

    We don't, for one, welcome our new overlords.

    Windows Security is not an oxymoron.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  32. Re:Setting the pace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the lightweight version of Fedora from Red Hat (codenamed "Touque")

    Truly a masterpiece. I salute you, Sir Karma Whore.

  33. Yeah, but . . . by Idou · · Score: 1

    what would become of /. !?

    Don't like the direction this country has taken? Go to www.blogforamerica.com

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  34. O/S not the main consideration by wombatmobile · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Many handset vendors are working with Linux in some way, and some vendors like Motorola are working with all kinds of O/S from Linux through to Symbian and MS.

    But does the O/S really matter if all the phones support Java now anyway? If you're going to write software for open mobile deployment, wouldn't you be inclined to consider Java first since it alone is ubiquitous on phones? O/S generally doesn't count for much in that decision.

    More than that, consider the data formats... Those indespensible new compelling 3G services if they ever eventuate will be all about selling and consuming data. Whose format(s) are service vendors going to use and support and work with? The content is what will be monetized with consumers and the format is what determines the nature of the franchises, like e.g. Office on the desktop.

    Whether the data format is something proprietary like .ppt or .doc or .swf or something open like SVG or XHTML I think is more significant to mobile developers' careers than the O/S.

    Look at the SMS business - the SMS standard can be implemented on any phone O/S and in fact it has been implemented on all of them. That is why SMS has been able to grow to $36b per year today.

    1. Re:O/S not the main consideration by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      and what does the J2ME VM run on? The phone needs an OS to run the user apps.

    2. Re:O/S not the main consideration by bugbread · · Score: 1

      "But does the O/S really matter if all the phones support Java now anyway?"

      Bingo. Since all Japanases phone manufacturers allow only Java for external apps, users have no access to the OS anyway. It's completely transparent. Linux may help the manufacturers, but the customer can't interact with the OS in any way, so it's a non-topic here (in Japan). Don't know about the U.S.

  35. Wont they cost $1499 dollars? by goombah99 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Well I figure the phone will cost $100 with a discount for a service contract. Then add on the $1399 per platform SCO tax and you get $1499. ouch.

    But on a more serious note if they really want to put a nice OS with an exapansible API on the phone some company should think about partnering with apple to do it.

    Also I dont know much about kernels, but from a superficial knowledge level I'd speculate that BSD with its modular microkernel might be slightly more adapted to niche platforms than linux which is more globally integrated and optimized for its more standard platforms. Perhaps some more wise person can comment on this?

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  36. Also On Bizzaro World... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cell phones use the x86 hardware architecture, or Windows source is available to you.

  37. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hope they bought a license from SCO...

  38. Who is making the phone by neglige · · Score: 2, Informative

    While it's not clear who will be making the Linux phone for them [...]

    As I recall from the NTT iMode service, NTT just set the technical specifications. Any manufacturer who wants to sell iMode phones has to follow these specs, and they do it, because the iMode market in Japan is huge.

    My guess is that the same thing applies to the 3G handset. There probably won't be a dedicated handset manufacturer but each of them will produce a "NTT compliant" phone.

    And since the Japanese version of IMT 2000 is "slightly" different than those in Europe and America, you won't be able to use those phones anywhere else without modifications.

    --
    My cats ate my karma. They also wrote this comment.
  39. Re:3G is dying by tftp · · Score: 1
    Anyone have a hack for a nokia 3589i do completely disable the GPS functionality?

    If you worry about GPS as such, the signals from satellites are very weak, and so you need clear view of the sky to receive them. This means that the GPS will not work within buildings, for example, or in the streets of some larger cities (Manhattan, for example, might be one; it's even dark there.)

    If you worry about cruder methods of locating you - turn the phone off (remove the battery to be sure, though I don't think it transmits when powered off. But it may receive - and may listen for a magic packet, if your tinfoil hat is slightly off :-) If you use the phone, your location is instantly known to the base station(s) that service your call, and the GPS only improves the accuracy.

    But the general rule is simple - do not take the phone with you into places which you are not willing to disclose to the whole world. A grocery store might be OK; a spare wife's house probably is not :-)

  40. Mod parent up by RevMike · · Score: 1
    Many best things that we enjoy are ... something well known,... perfected to absolute excellence, to its limit. I dare say, the [mobile] phone shall follow this path.

    That is the most insightful statement I've seen on slashdot in quite a while.

    Tools that are too complex, that ry to do too many jobs, are rarely as important as simple tools that do one job extremely well. Take the traditional land-line phone. In the US, at least, it had been implemented amazingly well. It works. No one needs to read a manual to use it. It works during blackouts. It works clearly and consistently. It is ubiquitous. Historically, it is pretty much a model of how a utility should operate.

    The fact that every time I get a new mobile phone, I have to fumble to configure it is not a good thing. The fact that I have patchy service in many areas is not a good thing. The fact that my mobile phone bill is not predictable is not a good thing.

    I want a phone that will be inexpensive, durable, nearly 100% reliable, nearly 100% available, allow me to make and receive clear phone calls nearly 100% of the time, be small enough that I never have to be without it, but large enough that it is comfortable to use.

    If I wanted a camera I'd buy a camera. If I wanted a game machine I'd buy a gameboy. If I wanted a to look at porn, I'd use a real PC with a decent screen, or maybe even buy a magazine.

    Build a phone, not a 10 in 1 tool that doesn't do anything well.

    Rant over. Cheers,
    Mike

    1. Re:Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to you, life should be perfect. Shut the fuck up pls.

      If there's a market for something, in this case a feature-less phone, it'll be made. It seems the market is not profitable as of now. Suck it Trebek!

    2. Re:Mod parent up by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      I doubt your "inexpensive, durable, nearly 100% reliable, nearly 100% available" cell phone will ever be created. Cell phone carriers and manufacturers don't want to sell an inexpensive commodity. They need differentiating features and services with which to nickel and dime their customers.

  41. Makes A Lot Of Sense. by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

    In many ways Linux and the whole Open Source way of doing things is ideal for this kind of application. It makes a certain amount of sense to standardize certain aspects of the OS on mobile phones, after all it is a communication device, and having every thing talk the same language is an obvious bonus.

    The article talks about how many different manufacturers are running different systems on their phone. The linux initiative would mean that all of those companies can contribute to an open standard codebase and have the same os running on a bunch of different architectures, The other bonus of course is that they can choose their hardware based on merit / cost instead of having to choose the hardware based on whatever hardware company is sharing the redmond pie.

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  42. Interested to see one? by peterpi · · Score: 1
    "I would certainly be interested in seeing them once they are out."

    Of course, if they do their job properly then you wouldn't be able to tell that it runs linux. It would just do phone stuff.

  43. Re:It'll be Monte Vista (MontaVista) Linux by blane.bramble · · Score: 1

    If you're working on the project you could at least get the company name right - it's MontaVista. Not posting anonymously, because I used to work for them :-)

  44. Additional links & NEC to offer Linux phones by securitas · · Score: 1

    This actually was reported yesterday in Japan (here), but I could not find any article in English until now.

    Courtesy of the Rejected Post Machine:

    NTT DoCoMo: Linux-based 3G Mobile Phones in 2004

    * 2003-12-02 11:59:33 NTT DoCoMo: Linux-based 3G Mobile Phones in 2004 (articles,pilot)(rejected)

    Reuters cites a confidential source as saying that NTT DoCoMo will offer its customers Linux-based 3G mobile phones in 2004. DoCoMo has apparently sent specifications to handset manufacturers and DoCoMo supplier NEC has said that it will offer Linux-based phones by 2004. If true, the report would indicate a shift from the dominant TRON and Symbian-based handsets.

    This was also submitted yesterday morning, but I guess Reuters wasn't considered authoritative enough until the English version of the Japanese story. =)

  45. hmmm by XO · · Score: 1

    I just wanted to add that I had put this in as a submission 3 days ago. I know the submission big can be a bit lagged, but I know damn well it isn't 3 days lagged. Grr.

    --
    "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  46. DoCoMo & Linux ... AT&T Wireless & Mic by XopherMV · · Score: 1

    This is particularly interesting considering DoCoMo bought a large stake in AT&T Wireless last year. AT&T Wireless is based in Redmond, WA, and has announced that they plan to use Microsoft products in their phones. I suppose DoCoMo could influence AT&T Wireless to switch over.

  47. Great news of Openwave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds like great news of Openwave which recently ported their products to Linux.

  48. J2ME : Java :: Javascript : Java by GGardner · · Score: 1

    Keep in mind that these "Java phones" are running J2ME of some flavor or another, which is about as close to the desktop Java you are familiar with as Javascript is.

  49. Re:Setting the pace by ahdeoz · · Score: 0

    the return of sliced bread

  50. Re:3G is dying by ahdeoz · · Score: 0

    nobody flies less than 200 miles in America. Nobody travels further than that in Europe or Japan.

  51. Re:Setting the pace by caluml · · Score: 1

    What was the best thing before sliced bread though?

  52. I was one of the first Westerners by BillsPetMonkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    to get a Docomo imode phone.

    Docomo, like Sony is one of those companies you want to hate but end up rather liking. Sony, you hate for the AIBO hacking controversy, saves itself with the Linux kit for PS2.

    Docomo is a money-grabbing, high priced qu(e)asi-governmental monopoly. But it knows that by adapting Linux to run on a phone, it wins tecchie friends.

    The first imode phone came out in February 1999. I bought one (the black f501i) in March 1999 when I arrived in Japan. I wanted a phone I could send email from because I didn't have a PC. That phone was nice and was way ahead of it's time (even in Japan)

    Docomo's Linux offering will also be good, as it has tecchie know-how. Oh, and NTT Docomo has one of the highest market capitalisations on the planet.

    --
    "It's not your information. It's information about you" - John Ford, Vice President, Equifax
    1. Re:I was one of the first Westerners by bugbread · · Score: 1, Troll

      "The first imode phone came out in February 1999...I wanted a phone I could send email from because I didn't have a PC. That phone was nice and was way ahead of it's time (even in Japan)"

      FUCK J-Phone and its horrible horrible public relations. J-Phone (and Digital TuKa) had email on phones way before iMode came out, but they didn't advertise or hype it at all, and only techies knew about it (it wasn't hidden, by any means. Clearly explained in the manuals, obvious on menus, etc., but they didn't advertise it). Then iMode came out and basically lied about being the first (I think they said something along the lines "iMode is the first phone that allows you to send e-mail, check your bank account, and make ticket reservations!", which is true: it was the first that allowed you to do all three, but not the first to allow you to do any of them). They charged 2 to 3 times the cost of their competitors, but people bought iModes out of ignorance.

      Recently, thankfully, their prices have become sane, but they really don't deserve to be the top carrier in Japan. Currently EzWeb (KDDI) is probably the best, followed by Vodafone (J-Phone), and then DoCoMo...And then TuKa and its glorious bid to avoid going out of business.

  53. Re:PUSSY AMERICUNTS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually this is mostly true! I love how you pointed out that it was a french division guarding the flank of the Americans during the Gulf war. Fuck they'd hate to hear that! Write this in an email to Miss (read bitch) Coulter please.

  54. English site by schouwl · · Score: 1

    http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS8011783890.html

  55. Re:Setting the pace by schouwl · · Score: 1

    Why use redhat when Asia has their own Linux?

  56. Don't forget... by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    Also on Bizarro World... Soviet Russia jokes make you!

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  57. Oh Goodie! More Freaking Cellphones! by windside · · Score: 1

    No matter what the operating system, I have no doubt that mobile phones in Japan will continue to be used by pedestrian-endangering people on bicycles and incredibly irritating Japanese schoolgirls who insist on keeping their "SMAP" ringtone at TOP VOLUME while riding the train.

    Dear God, perhaps Linux based phones will be able to tell when this is happening to reach out and give them a good whack. (That was a joke. Please don't reply and tell me why the OS doesn't make a lick of difference. Thanks.)

    Moderators: Think this is a Troll? Move to Japan - I DARE YOU! They'll make you give up all your moderator points at your port of entry, but in return you'll get a delightful pack of ad-ridden tissue paper.

    --
    ...Whether my Maker is prepared for the great ordeal of meeting me is another matter.
    Churchill
  58. Keitai carriers by achurch · · Score: 1

    Recently, thankfully, [DoCoMo's] prices have become sane, but they really don't deserve to be the top carrier in Japan. Currently EzWeb (KDDI) is probably the best, followed by Vodafone (J-Phone), and then DoCoMo...And then TuKa and its glorious bid to avoid going out of business.

    I don't know; I haven't been impressed with KDDI ever since I tried reporting spam to them and was told "we don't have a reporting address and we're not taking any action against spam senders". (DoCoMo, on the other hand, set up a reporting address last year, received about 400,000 reports over a one-year period, and took action against about 250 spammers in that period, IIRC. About half the spam I receive these days is from KDDI.) I use DoCoMo, but mostly for coverage: I haven't looked at coverage maps recently, but when I got my first keitai 4 years ago, DoCoMo was substantially ahead of everywhere else. As long as I'm going to have a mobile phone, I want it to be useful, well, mobilely . . .

    1. Re:Keitai carriers by bugbread · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how KDDI works their mail system, but J/Voda-fone automatically transmit the first 128 characters for free. If you get longer mail, and want to read the rest, you can choose to download the rest for a cost. This means that spam, while a pain in the butt, is free for the user (yes, yes, I know, indirect costs associated with increasing bandwidth and equipment to handle spam loads, but you know what I mean). DoCoMo used to charge for EVERY mail, whether you want it or not. A big scandal came out in the press (you may remember it), where they determined that a huge percentage of DoCoMo's income came from charging users for the spam they received (sorry, can't find links now). It was after that came to light that they started putting countermeasures into effect and offering "first X number of mail free!". It's a good thing, don't get me wrong, but they have gotten lots of bad karma from me from the old days, when the phones cost 4 times more for the same specs, the mail cost twice as much, receiving cost mail, and their features were no better than anyone elses.

      That tirade being said, I use Vodafone myself, so I don't know the spam situation for KDDI.

      And as for coverage: amen. DoCoMo is still the head of the pack when it comes to the countryside. In any city, the three big companies are all equal, but when I go to a rave, only the DoCoMo phones still get a signal. DoCoMo does have its good points, and countryside coverage is definitely one of them.

    2. Re:Keitai carriers by BillsPetMonkey · · Score: 1

      iMode came out and basically lied about being the first

      No, they didn't lie, they actually covered up the fact that it had an always-on connection to the Internet, because people in Japan were kind of scared of the Internet then.

      JPhone certainly didn't have email and Internet then either as NTT Docomo was the first to request W3C's comments on CHTML which became the standard subset to display content for the phones. JPhone was too busy concentrating on increasing the pixel-depth of their colour displays back then to think about network functionality.

      It's a while since I've been there. Why does everyone hate JPhone now?

      If you go to the raves I used to go to, they're all in 3rd floor basements. And I never even tried to use a phone down there. Hehe.

      --
      "It's not your information. It's information about you" - John Ford, Vice President, Equifax
    3. Re:Keitai carriers by bugbread · · Score: 1

      A few points

      Ok, they didn't lie, but they did massively represent (in implying that they were the first to offer email via cell phone).

      NTT DoCoMo was the first to have internet, true (ref CHTML comment). However, J-Phone had email before that (no need for HTML). I had a Digital TuKa (a company that no longer exists composed of Digital Phone (also known as J-Phone) and TuKa) Denso DN-174 in late 1997 (it came out in November, I think I got mine in December) which I used to send email to my parents, before iMode came out in Feb 1999.

      JPhone didn't come out with a color phone until much later, December of 1999...which I bought too (I've gone through a lot of cell phones...I think I'm on number 7 now, but I may have missed one)

      People don't hate J-Phone (as far as I know) (oh, and it got bought out by Vodafone last year. The name change became official October 1st of this year), but TuKa is slipping and slipping fast. Each maker has/had a strong point (J-Phone had color first, then made cameras on all phones standard first; DoCoMo had first 3G, plus a huge user base and name recognition; KDDI/AU/EzWeb had cool design, external flashes, and now ChakuUta (song sample ring tones, as opposed to synthesized tones). TuKa's only strong point was price, and now that they're all pretty cheap, it's going by the wayside. They have tried a new advertising approach, "simple is beautiful", or, as their recent spokesman, Matsumoto Hitoshi says, "It's a phone. You only need it for talking", and they foreswore digital cameras, mp3 playing, Java apps (I think) and everything besides the standard "Talk/Mail/Email" bundle. From what I gather, it's been disastrously unsuccessful. I can say for certain that I don't know a single person with a TuKa. For a while, they were doing OK because they had Hamasaki Ayumi as spokesperson, but now she's gone and they're screwed.

      As for raves, I'm using the Japanese definition (bad habit) meaning outdoor techno concerts (usually goa). Indoor stuff doesn't get called raves here. Odd linguistic quirk.

      If you can read Japanese, here's a slighly amusing page I found while looking up all my facts on Google (wouldn't want to get caught with my pants down in Slashdot!): http://www.yukawanet.com/sunday/tuka.html

  59. Re:3G is dying by achurch · · Score: 1

    they will be limited to simple Web browsing (on a phone? come on...)

    . . . says he who has never actually tried it, I assume? I find browsing capabilities quite useful for:

    • Reading news
    • Checking mail (on my server at home)
    • Checking train timetables
    among other things.
  60. Re:3G is dying by TonkaTown · · Score: 1

    Indeed, checking train timetables and getting live train status reports on the move can be a godsend when you're running late and you need to plan a connection.

  61. Re:PUSSY AMERICUNTS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your facts are so wrong, it's unbelievable, and so I will just comment on the last one. Daguet lead the charge? Here is some info. from the French Foreign Legion (so you can look it up yourself)

    www.frenchforeignlegion.org

    "The Legions mission was to safeguard any reprisal by the Republican Guarde"

    "The French columns-the most westerly, screening the Coalition left flank-punched through the Iraqi 45th Division"

    Safeguard any reprisal?
    Flanking the MOST westerly side of the collation forces?
    Less than 15,000 troops out of 500,000?
    AND
    Not 1 French casualty in a war in which they lead the charge?

    The rest of your statements are just as faulty, France's reparations on Germany created the environment that lead the rise of Hitler.

    The reason more French died in the first 6 months of 1940 the war was because they we hiding behind their "impenetrable" and "impassable" Maginot Line (in other words the mountains) and got slaughtered. 2 WEEKS later the French were trying to surrender. The Germans held out and had that humiliating ceremony on June 22 in Paris when the French signed an armistice with Germany, leaving their ally Britain to fight alone (gotta give it to the Brits, they are men and would never ever cower down and surrender).

    I could go on identifying all the junk in this post but that's enough, point made.