Slashdot Mirror


Remote-Controlled Robot Could Browse The Stacks

An anonymous reader writes "A Japanese team of researchers has developed a robot that could help browse for books in a library by receiving instructions via the Internet, a team member said Friday. The robot, a wheeled vehicle measuring 50 by 45 centimeters with a digital camera, mechanical hand and arm, follows orders received through the Internet." This reminds me somewhat of Sonoma State University's (quite different) system profiled a few years ago in Wired.

156 comments

  1. Robot Labor by Raindance · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great idea, but grad students are still cheaper. :)

    RD

    1. Re:Robot Labor by cgranade · · Score: 1

      And undergrads are cheaper still.

      --

      #define DRM chmod 000

    2. Re:Robot Labor by TwoBit · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can see the denial of service attacks already: hundreds of computers all direct bots to get the same book, with the result being a crowded and deadlocked hallway of stuck robots.

    3. Re:Robot Labor by Meddel · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah, but that can happen with grad students, too.

      --
      You just come along with me and have a good time. The Galaxy's a fun place. You'll need to have this fish in your ear.
    4. Re:Robot Labor by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, but one of the greatest problems in large libraries is when a checked-in book gets placed on a shelf other than the one it belongs on. A needle in the haystack situation results.

      Robot book-searchers means that the stacks can be nearly completely closed to human access, since a failed robot delivery is far more likely to result in a book being placed out of bounds where it will stand out than neatly placed in the wrong pile, and even then the discrepancy would soon be discovered when the robot discovers n+1 books in a pile the computer records say it should only be finding n books.

      They might not be cheaper, but they certainly would be more accurate and dramatically cut the risk of books being lost within a library.

    5. Re:Robot Labor by Shoggoth+of+Maul · · Score: 1

      But the grad students are funnier to watch.

      I think this will probably be another Asimo; fun to think about, but generally impractical. Who wants to sit online waiting in a queue because all available robots are looking for The Catcher in the Rye?

    6. Re:Robot Labor by dreadnougat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wouldn't it be cheaper, easier, and generally better to use RFID tags on the books, and then some lowly student like me who's trying to pay his ever rising tuition to file the books?

      Just something short ranged, so it won't track you out of the library.

      Or do I not know what I'm talking about?

    7. Re:Robot Labor by beakerMeep · · Score: 0, Insightful

      this could also lead to increased life span for the books since they wouldn't be exposed to the oils on peoples hands.

      --
      meep
    8. Re:Robot Labor by RealProgrammer · · Score: 4, Funny

      and undergrads are cheaper still.

      But you have to teach them to read first, so it's a wash.

      --
      sigs, as if you care.
    9. Re:Robot Labor by RealProgrammer · · Score: 1
      "But you have to teach them to read first..."

      Sorry I posted that. Maybe someone will erase it, or mod it into never land.

      --
      sigs, as if you care.
    10. Re:Robot Labor by Phat_Tony · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is a really impotant issue. I used to go to the University of Chicago, and a friend there who worked in the library (Regenstein) told be they think that as much as 5% of the collection cold be missing due to mis-shelving. Millions of dollars worth of books. They try to audit the shelves one by one to find these, but it takes them something like 20 years to do a full circuit on the book-by-book auditing at the rate they go. At least that's what he told me, don't know if it's true.

      What I do know is true is a guy in my dorm who was a complete asshole who used to have a job at the library reshelving books, and every day he'd go in, check out his cart of books to return, and ditch all of them in any space he could find on the nearest shelves, and leave. He got paid for 2 hours of reshelving a day for this. All those books will be lost for up to twenty years. They'll show that they're in, until someone goes to try to find one. He single handedly lost thousands of books from the collection. -Phat Tony

      --
      Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
    11. Re:Robot Labor by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Try triggering on a shelf and you'll get readings from a few thousand books, and still not be accurate enough to tell you if a book is in exactly the right place. A book placed on a shelf that's three spots higher than it belongs is still a lost book that might take years to notice, and result in frustrated attempted borrowers not knowing where to start their search...

    12. Re:Robot Labor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? You seem to be saying that RFIDs can't show you location to the detail required (within 10cms), but you haven't proved it.

    13. Re:Robot Labor by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 1

      Having RFID sensors on the shelf would alert you to a book that doesn't belong on the shelf. The difficult thing would be isolating by individual shelves; a sensor in the middle of the shelf would pick up tags above and below since they're closer than books on the end of the shelf. You could put several sensors on the shelves, or one very low level sensor that runs on a track and zips along each shelf reading each RFID tag individually. There you could easily find books that are out of place.

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    14. Re:Robot Labor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Next time you see that guy, kick him in the nuts and tell him the notorious Bookworm Mafia will soon make him an offer he can't refuse.

    15. Re:Robot Labor by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Just knowing which shelf a book is on can sometimes be the information you need. It certainly narrows things down. Hell, knowing the book is in the right section could really help. As for finding it, I suggest pictures of the spines of the books in the library's catalog - after all, they're all computerized now. It doesn't have to be very high resolution, a JPEG of about 4kB in size would be more than sufficient to help with a quick optical search.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    16. Re:Robot Labor by bhima · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Good use for RFID. Then the book is never lost as long as it is in the building. And it could be self repairing. If the robot wanders by a book out of place it simply returns the book to the proper place.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    17. Re:Robot Labor by darthBear · · Score: 1

      Its really quite simple. RFID tags have a unique ID so in situtations like this they could be programmed only to respond when that ID is queried. It shouldn't make them too much more expensive and a computer can run through all the possible IDs pretty quickly.

      Of course if you wanted to find them all there could still be particular IDs that cause all the chips to respond.

      Definetly makes sense in the case of a library.

    18. Re:Robot Labor by danila · · Score: 1

      The robot can also make a photo every time it places the book on a shelf. If the book can't be found where it should be, a human librarian can check the photo, find the book and place it where it belongs.

      On a side note, this is extremely important development. Just think how much work is in warehousing and retail for such robots!

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    19. Re:Robot Labor by danila · · Score: 1

      Well... if all books have some ID on the spine, you just need to make photos of all the shelves, then feed the images to OCR program, then search for text fragments that look like IDs and voila! You can easily see where a particular book is. A relatively simple program could them generate a list of misplaced books.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    20. Re:Robot Labor by antin · · Score: 1

      With your help... if you think what he did was so wrong, why didn't you say or do anything?

      Watching it happen and doing nothing, is half as bad as doing it yourself.

    21. Re:Robot Labor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except of course when they are read by the humans who first commanded said robot to fetch said book.

      I don't know who is more stupid, you, the original poster, or the ass clown that modded you insightful.

    22. Re:Robot Labor by Illbay · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Um, why not just spend the money on rendering all these volumes into "eBooks"?

      --
      Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
    23. Re:Robot Labor by Lemmeoutada+Collecti · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, this combined with precise computer location fo books could make the Dewey Decimal system obsolete. In order to optimize the robot search function, titles are shelved with respect to frequency of use/demand rather than an arbitrary classification. Computers at the end of the aisles (as mentioned elsewhere) keep track through a central server of the location of each book, and can direct the human users to any book in the library. Of course, the robots would need to be the only ones pulling/shelving other than the librarians... might be great for the huge archives that constantly lose books due to human error.

      On the other hand, browsing randomly might be easier, but the computer would be necessary for browsing related titles. Maybe have the computer keep the dewey orginization for displaying titles and pictures of book spines, perhaps even with the cover excerpt/summary...

      Argh! Too many ideas too early in the morning!

      --

      You can have it fast, accurate, or pretty. Pick any 2.
    24. Re:Robot Labor by bhima · · Score: 1
      Hah! it's 15:16 here and I'm done with work and about to go home. But there is another reason to abondon the Dewey Decimal system! It is copyrighted or trademarked or whatever, anyway it is not free.

      I would think browsing could be done via PC anyway, worked OK with me using NetFlix (which I dearly wished existed in Austria)

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    25. Re:Robot Labor by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      The Dewey Decimal system has been obsolete for years. Even libraries that don't have the resources to recatalog all of their old holdings even frequently use Library of Congress cataloging for new items and just shelve them seperately.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    26. Re:Robot Labor by LuYu · · Score: 1

      That sounds like GPS.

      Are you suggesting a Stack Positioning System where 5 or more sensors would determine the position of the book?

      --
      All data is speech. All speech is Free.
    27. Re:Robot Labor by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Get the robot to reshelf all the returns, too. Then all those lost needles in the haystack will be debuggable. All humans will have to do will be to request books, or even browse the stacks, misunderstand the content, and leave them in the reading rooms for collection and reshelving by the robot.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    28. Re:Robot Labor by alonsoac · · Score: 1

      And then you just know people will start putting more powerful motors to make them faster and arming them with weapons to one-up the other robots when looking for the same book. With live webcast from the library halls this could be quite amusing.

    29. Re:Robot Labor by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Slashdotting the library?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    30. Re:Robot Labor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the less people that handle the books the less wear and tear and oils from there hands -- i am not sure why you call that stupid but you're obviously and angry person that needs to relax

    31. Re:Robot Labor by CharlesClarkson · · Score: 1

      If each book is tagged with an RFID tag, why would they need to be filed? You can find the book by its tag. There's no need to place it on a particular shelf. Any shelf (with adequate space) would do. A central system might be used to track the general where abouts and a scanner could be used to find that specific book.

      --

      Charles K. Clarkson
      Many people truly want to help. Unfortunately, many people truly suck at it.
  2. Just have the robot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Scan the books into computers (or itself), and then we have no more need for the actual book.

    1. Re:Just have the robot by Eberlin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You may not have a NEED for the actual book but there's always going to be people who prefer a hardcopy of something. There's something about having to wait for something to boot, fire up a reader, then scroll or click through pages that could possibly turn off a few users.

      I know it's an overused cliche but I'll use it anyway -- it's a bit cumbersome to sit under a tree for hours reading from a laptop. Books should always be a cool thing.

    2. Re:Just have the robot by turtlexit · · Score: 1
      This will certainly begin to occur in the future.

      Remember though, that one of the defining characteristics of a civilization is a written language. What might happen, hundreds or thousands of years from now, when ALL 'writing' is digital? If our modern civilization ever disappears from the planet... perhaps due to natural disaster, illness, or blowing ourselves up... the history of mankind could be lost. Take into account the past... there are large periods of time (pre-history) when written language had not been developed yet. We know little to nothing of these early humans since they kept no written records.

      Just something to think about...

    3. Re:Just have the robot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So instead of looking for hundreds of pounds of books, they'll look for hundreds of pounds of dvds with .pdfs or .txt files? The only really bad part is if files end up being encoded into doc files. I'm not so sure how portable pdfs will be 1000 years from now, either. Of course, dvds will probably be obsolete 1000 years from now..and we'll still be using 1.44MB floppies. j/k

      I seriously, think, though, that you're over simplifying the issue. Even without written records, pictorial art serves to tell about the past. Written language is just a condensed form of pictorial art. And dvds that can store hundreds/thousands of books are an even more condensed form. If anything, the two things that helped preserve written language is a combination of having good preservation of a copy of a work and the work itself being composed of something able to survive a couple thousand years.

      The former is much better facilitated with dvds, since it's possible to easily copy a thousand books in a matter of 15 minutes. Even printing presses can't pull off that level of duplication in a single printing press. The biggest issue is the fact that dvd-r dyes might not last nearly 1000 years. So, effort should be made into pressing, casing, and distributing the books. Also, it'd be a good idea to include a written explanation on making a dvd-rom drive, file formats, the file system format, and a working drive. The end result should be a pretty good ability to preserve the data.

    4. Re:Just have the robot by turtlexit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Two big differences: Technology is much more fragile. Tear a page out of a book, and you haven't lost much. Put a gash in a DVD, and you've done a lot more damage. Secondly, you can open any book and view the contents, the main limitation being knowledge of the language. It takes specialized equipment to view the contents of say, a DVD, and then to be able to decipher it's content - and THEN deal with the language.

    5. Re:Just have the robot by bigberk · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Scan the books into computers (or itself), and then we have no more need for the actual book.

      I'm one of the biggest geeks out there, and electrical engineering is my life but I still know that printed books are very valuable. Just how long does digital media last? CDRs, 5 years. How about digital memory, like PROM - 50+ years. And what guarantees that we will still have the tools to easily read these even 20 years from now?

      Paper books are awesome. Although it's not typical in a library, you could find a century-old book and read it. If it degrades there is still mostly legible information. The data is not destroyed by impact, large electromagnetic fields (including nuclear/EM bomb) and the data can be wired directly to our brains via the eyes.

      Books are pretty friggin' neat.
    6. Re:Just have the robot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Books are horribly fragile. That's why monks spent most of their time making copies of texts. It's been more the rare instance that's spared books for any significant period of time (mud slides and the like). It's really been the consistent recopying that's spared any books.

      Your point about needing special tools, I'll agree, is very true. That's the reason I made mention to show how to make said tools and to use open formats. Have you ever heard of any archeological digs that have managed to dig up entire libraries? The fact is, just finding a single dvd is like finding a library. Even if they had no idea how to access the dvd, they'd work their ass off to access it. And that gash that whipes out 30 books is admittedly a terrible loss, but the sheer easy of duplication greatly increases the odds that another copy of the same dvd will be found at another site of the same era. Properly sheltered, it's not clear if archived pressed dvds will every degrade.

      So, while a dvd compared to books is an added complexity step, if properly undertaken using open formats, any spared dvds have a massive potential of providing information over any single book you might find.

    7. Re:Just have the robot by ncr53c8xx · · Score: 1
      Paper books are awesome. Although it's not typical in a library, you could find a century-old book and read it. If it degrades there is still mostly legible information. The data is not destroyed by impact, large electromagnetic fields (including nuclear/EM bomb) and the data can be wired directly to our brains via the eyes.

      And most of the old books in a library are thrown out (What do you think they sell in those library sales?). Have a look at the arguments in Eldred. With a digital book, you will never have to make that decision.

    8. Re:Just have the robot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or if you use a device that is actually good for reading books with, such as a PDA, you can forget all of the "hassle" you describe. Boot up time? Non-existent. Fire up a reader, a few seconds at the most. "Turning pages" is easily done with a single button. And when you are done, your entire library slips into a pocket.

      Not only is that an overused cliche, but when was the last time you read a book under a tree? Maybe it is just where I live, but the last time I even saw anyone reading a book under a tree was in a painting. All of the trees around here are manufactured, and I wouldn't sit down under them anyway, as the ground is covered with the ancient crackles of a thousand loogies.

      Anyway, there are certainly uses for paper books, and there is indeed a nice nostalgic feel to reading a paper book, but it's really not much more than that. Screens are to the point where reading off of them is not fatigueing. You can annotate them non-destructively all you wish. Search through them with a speed you'll never equal with a book. Et cetera. At any given moment I have access to Webster's Third International Unabridged Dictionary, a good sized thesaurus (those two alone are about thirty pounds and the bulk of ten other large sized books), news, two periodicals, several hundred novels, a couple dozen of those purchased, most free from Project Gutenburg. I literally have an average middle-aged person sized library in my pocket. Hundreds of pounds worth of books.

      It would take a lot of convincing to make me give up that ability.

    9. Re:Just have the robot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Written language is just a condensed form of pictorial art.

      I disagree with this. Both forms of art appeal to different types of thought. Sure, you can emulate one or the other with either. Pictures can be made to told stories, and likewise words can be used to describe a picture. But that is a very small area of eclipse.

      The fundamental difference is that language is a bridge into the very part of the mind that triggers thought. Language is one of the first ordered constructs that we learn after behavioral cause and effect. And after we learn language, we apply those behavior precepts to language. It is an extremely deep, active form of mental activity.

      Pictures on the other hand go just as deep, but act in a passive manner. They trigger entirely different kinds of thoughts which eventually surface in the language of the mind. There are certainly feelings that can be evoked with an image that simply cannot be described in words, even by a master linguist.

      Likewise, there are powerful word constructions that cannot be rendered as a picture, even by a master painter.

  3. and so it begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    First they get our books, then they become our librarians, people don't return their books on time and no one pays their overdue fine and the robots get mad at us...

    ...and that's how it begins

    1. Re:and so it begins by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 1

      Ah, so that's why the Terminator broke into the humans hideout, to collect a past due fine. Reese probably just edited it out of his flashback/nightmare, it was probably pretty scary seeing the Terminator break into the compound shouting "I want my two dollars!"

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    2. Re:and so it begins by tiled_rainbows · · Score: 1

      No, you're getting Terminator confused with Conan the Librarian.

  4. *sigh* by WesG · · Score: 5, Funny

    And I thought I was cool when I found my book using the Dewey Decimal System :-)

    1. Re:*sigh* by MikeDawg · · Score: 1

      Will you teach me? I think the Dewey Decimal System is an awful method for finding books. Which brings up a point, does the robot have any links to the Dewey System, or is it ran by a different preset, like the library's book isle, I'm curious now to how the robot works. Time to dive a little deeper into the article.

      --

      YOU'RE WINNER !
      Another lame blog

    2. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      give every book an IP and skip the whole IPv6 and move to IPv8 or something to accomodate for everything in the world having an IP.

    3. Re:*sigh* by Pudusplat · · Score: 1

      Ut oh. Watch what you say or you might get sued! Just kidding, of course ;)

      --
      "If you put butter and salt on it, it tastes like salty butter." -Terry Pratchet, on Popcorn.
  5. 1000 Robots by pvt_medic · · Score: 2, Funny

    a thousand robots at a thousand typewriters in a thousand years could reproduce the works of Shakespeare, but now its just a lot quicker to pull it up.

    --
    30% Troll, 50% Underrated, 10% Interesting
    Score:5, Troll
  6. Dude - go for undergraduates! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    You can pay them much less and they could be more attractive!

    1. Re:Dude - go for undergraduates! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're right! even guys!

  7. But! by wifitek · · Score: 0, Troll

    I can't read Japanese, so what good is it?

    --
    Sig: BEEeeeP,,Please press pound, so I can get on with my fucking life!
  8. Yes but if we had robots by beakerMeep · · Score: 2, Funny

    There wouldn't be any librarian action figures with hot shushing action!

    http://www.gothamist.com/archives/2003/10/09/hot_s hushing_action.php

    --
    meep
  9. Cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Do I get a little readout that says:

    Result 1 of about 3. Search took 25 minutes

  10. but by goon+america · · Score: 2, Funny

    yes, it saves you a little bit of trouble, but you'd still have to *read* the book. I want a robot that will learn for me.

  11. I can probably find it faster. by MagicDude · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If I know the title and author of the book I'm looking for, I can find it just as easily, and odds are I can outrun this little robot. Now, if I ask the robot a question (IE, What causes Parkinson's Disease?) and it brings me back the most relevant book on that question, that'd be awesome.

    1. Re:I can probably find it faster. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grammar lesson:

      i.e. = id est = that is = in other words

      e.g. = exempli gratia = for example

      IE = Internet Explorer = shitty web browser

      In your post, you should have used e.g., not i.e., and definitely not IE.

      I hope this clears things up for you.

      And while I'm at it, please don't use "begs the question" to mean "raises the question", because they aren't even remotely the same. (You didn't do this, but lots of people do, so I might as well mention it while I'm in that sort of mood.)

    2. Re:I can probably find it faster. by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

      I usually don't bother to correct people like that. Eventually, there will be so few educated people who will know the difference between e.g. and i.e., so it won't matter. Of course, by then, people will use language, but not know why.

      I guess ultimately, it doesn't really matter.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    3. Re:I can probably find it faster. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you could have it hold the book steady for you while you read it.

      Sorry, sorry, I couldn't resist.

  12. Why do the simple things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why do the simple things get the same billing as the complicated things?

    Why is it significant that the orders are "received through the Internet?" Shouldn't the navigational and computer vison aspects be overarching?

    It reminds me of Visual Studio .NET; it sort of misses the point.

    1. Re:Why do the simple things... by gilgongo · · Score: 1

      > It reminds me of Visual Studio .NET; it sort of misses the point.

      And you don't miss a chance for a quick troll, do you ;-)

      --
      "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
  13. a robot by jjeffries · · Score: 1
    that can re-shelve them would be just as, if not more, useful, and probably friendlier than most librarians as well.*

    * my mom was a librarian** for a while, chill out

    ** then she got a real job

  14. Help "browse"??? by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's interesting. I love browsing for books... walking along the racks just looking at the titles and picking out those which sound interesting. Only problem, you're walking with your head tilted, which gets sore after a few minutes.

    It'd be cool to have the robot walk along and you'd see the image rotated 90 degrees, and the tiles scrolling by. Heck it'd be nice to get that on a video at the end of the aisle so you wouldn't have to go into the crowded aisle itself.

    Libraries are where RFID tags will really shine. The robot wouldn't need a camera, just run run along the shelf with a sensor until it picks up the right tag. As for placing a book in the wrong place, smart bookshelves that read the RFID and record all the books that are there, and report any that are out of place.

    --
    -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    1. Re:Help "browse"??? by Brataccas · · Score: 1
      Heck it'd be nice to get that on a video at the end of the aisle so you wouldn't have to go into the crowded aisle itself.

      Yeah, especially when you're in one of those "bad parts" of the library. You don't want to be seen hanging around with the wrong sort of bibliotheque riff-raff. Imagine running into a surly group of business majors...*shudders*

    2. Re:Help "browse"??? by jafuser · · Score: 1

      Heck, just stack the books vertically and feed the robots a Towers of Hanoi algorithm... =P

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    3. Re:Help "browse"??? by ndinsil · · Score: 1

      I the library where I used to work the computerized card catalog had an "on-the-shelves" display similar to that. It was text but it was rotated 90 degrees and scrolled as you liked. There was also a map that showed the exact shelf the book was on. Of course, this was all from tracking, if a book was misshelved it was lost. Carpe RFID!

  15. This reminds me of.... by jcp797 · · Score: 1

    Anybody remember the slugbot from a while back?

    1. Re:This reminds me of.... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I remember it fondly, I remember wondering, when will these go on the market? Seems like tobacco growers would buy them by the zillion, slugs are a big problem. What I found amusing was the following quote:

      "Molluscicides have the side effect of killing off other things and because they are used in such high quantities they can get into the ground water," Kelly said.

      This is really hilarious to me because I know that beer kills slugs. People talk a lot of shit about American beer but if British beer won't even kill slugs, there is no room to bitch.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:This reminds me of.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      British beer will kills slugs, but we prefer to drink it and give the American piss to the slugs. They are not at all discerning.

  16. Pop Sci by General+Sherman · · Score: 1

    In a recent PopSci little tidbit article I read, they had an automatic book scanner that used a series of 2 mirrors and a scanner to scan books page by page and special software to convert it from an image to a text document.

    What would be nifty would be to combine the two and convert old/out of print books into data, where they would last forever, free from the stresses of our world.

    Paper doesn't last forever you know.

    --
    - Sherman
    1. Re:Pop Sci by theTerribleRobbo · · Score: 1

      > Paper doesn't last forever you know.

      Neither will digital media if you can't access the book's contents five years down the track thanks to DRM.

  17. Nothing visible in Japanese by shanen · · Score: 1

    Well, I know the Japanese are strong in robotics and Tsukuba is a very well known university, but this story sure doesn't seem to have gotten any mention in the local (to me) press. I read Japanese well enough, but nothing in the Japanese Google, and nothing showing up in the Yomiuri or Asahi newspapers. Nothing obvious in the university's Web site, either. Makes me wonder if they're just fishing for some foreign venture capital?

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    1. Re:Nothing visible in Japanese by News+for+nerds · · Score: 1
  18. Of *course*. The *Internet*. by TexVex · · Score: 0

    Why is it important to stress that the robot receives orders through the Internet? Is that somehow more important than the fact that it navigates bookshelves to find books? That's like stressing that a television receives pictures through Radio Raves. Hey, look! This magic picture box gets its images from **ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION** Ooh! Ahh!

    Why are people still capitalizing "Internet", for that matter? Good Lord. Da interweb ain't nothin' but a thang anymore, folks. It's like radio waves. Useful for transferring information and the band is full of static. Get over it.

    --
    Fun with Anagarams! LADS HOST, SHALT DOS. HAS DOLTS. AD SLOTHS, HATS SOLD. ASS HO, LTD.
  19. robot librarian -- NOT! by RealProgrammer · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does it tiptoe about going

    Sshhhhhh!
    when it's not looking for a book?

    What about a pair of hornrimmed batgirl glasses with nice shiny chain, does it have that?

    Can it read me a story, and make me think I'm there?

    If not, it's not a proper librarian in my book.

    Hmm, OTOH I'm thinking this whole robot thing may be going somewhere, after all.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
  20. HEY DAN!??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    whats the frequency kenneth!!

    whats the frequency kenneth!!!!!!!

  21. Re:Of *course*. The *Internet*. by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why is it important to stress that the robot receives orders through the Internet?

    If you read the article (which is only two paragraphs long, is it too much to ask people to read a two paragraph article?), you find it was designed to be used by people who cannot physically access the library. The robot finds the books, opens the books, flips through pages and sends the images back over the internet to the person who for some reason is housebound. That person can then request the book be sent to them. So yeah, the internet plays an important role here.

    --
    -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
  22. Takes the fun out of the library by Brataccas · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Maybe I'm just too much of a geek...but this robot takes all the fun out of going to the library. When I need to find information on a subject, I find the general area and then leaf through as many related books as I can. Gives you a much better overview of the subject to see it from different perspectives, you discover new ideas and relationships to other subjects.

    Bah! In my day, we actually read the books...and we LIKED it!

  23. Re:Of *course*. The *Internet*. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    people like cowboi neal who are too fat to get out of bed could shop for books then??

  24. It runs Linux by NonaMyous · · Score: 5, Informative

    More details here: original pdf, converted html.

  25. Obscure Simpson's Reference by MagicDude · · Score: 2, Funny

    Somebody took first place at the National Grammer Rodeo in Canada. ::Looks around as nobody understands the reference::

    1. Re:Obscure Simpson's Reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ironic, isn't it, that 'grammer' is actually spelled 'grammar'. I'll bet more people understand the reference than you might think, as well, magic dude.

    2. Re:Obscure Simpson's Reference by tiled_rainbows · · Score: 1

      Well, that depends if you're talking about the guy who plays Frasier or referring to one of your parents' mothers, doesn't it?

  26. But public domain has died long before the books by MacFury · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    With copyrights being held indefinately, public domain has all but disappeared. Even converting a book into pure text may very well land you in prison, you thought mongering criminal!

    Books are meant to be burned. Long live the digital revolution!

  27. Find a book from your home PC. by complete+loony · · Score: 1
    In Soviet Russia the beowolf cluster of robot librarian overlords welcomes you.

    Hmm, I definately should have tried harder to resist that one.

    It's not (yet) a robot to help sort books, It's so that people can find a book, or page therein, in the library from the comfort of your home PC.

    Personally I wouldn't bother, since I can already reserve a book from my local library over the internet, and then the librarian has to go find it for me, much simpler for me than a robot I'd have to control myself.

    As other people have pointed out, somthing like a mail room for sorting books, possibly based on short range RFID tags would be more useful in your average library, though certainly not as cool.

    --
    09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
  28. I, for one... by eatdave13 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...wish you would stop with the robot stories! They're never gonna forget this damn cliche! AAARGH!

    --
    "Verbing weirds language." -- Calvin
  29. Re:Of *course*. The *Internet*. by TexVex · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Ok, here's the first HALF of the article:
    TOKYO -- A Japanese team of researchers has developed a robot that could help browse for books in a library by receiving instructions via the Internet, a team member said Friday. The robot, a wheeled vehicle measuring 50 by 45 centimeters with a digital camera, mechanical hand and arm, follows orders received through the Internet.
    So, the first paragraph of the article (two rather unspectacular examples of writing to begin with) rather redundantly explains that the robot takes its orders from the Internet. You're so special for pointing out what an insensitive fuck I am for not caring about poor housebound Internet users who want to go to the library.

    Let me ask you something. Why go through all the trouble to design, build, and debug a digital camera wielding box of bolts with a D-Link wireless Internet gateway jammed up its rear just so homebound people can visit the library, when existing technology known as "scanners" and "permanent storage" could store and make available every book in that library on the Internet? Not only that, there would be no queue to use the freaking robot, and the robot wouldn't be running over human library browsers' toes. Oh, "scanners" and "permanent storage" aren't experimental technologies either. Hmm!!!

    Go ahead and mod me down for pointing out UTTER STUPIDITY. I just call it like I see it.
    --
    Fun with Anagarams! LADS HOST, SHALT DOS. HAS DOLTS. AD SLOTHS, HATS SOLD. ASS HO, LTD.
  30. John Hopkins Does This Too by RobPiano · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't know why I know this, but I read an article sometime ago about a similar thing.. I found a link
    http://www.jhu.edu/news_info/news/audio-vide o/robo t.html

    Enjoy!

  31. Needless robots... by feelyoda · · Score: 2, Informative

    I love robots (i work in robotics), but this is a waste. Clearly, digitizing the text is a faster and easier solution. A clever hack at CMU for such a project was used to solve the problem of turning pages. Pull too hard, and the page rips. Push and more than one page goes for the ride. Solution: silly (or thinking) putty! It sticks to the page perfectly, i.e. it lets go when it should. This is an example of coming up with a solution to a given problem. A mobile robot that needs to perceive its environment, make local decisions, take up space, incur battery power, etc. is just making more problems and solving nothing. It is creating problems, though you get some wow-effects along the way.

    --

    Robo-Blogs of the world: UNITE!
    1. Re:Needless robots... by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Clearly, digitizing the text is a faster and easier solution.

      Well, you'll need some expensive equipment to digitize an entire library. The fastest way is to rip the books apart, and feed all the pages into a fast scanner. No problem, unless you want to use the books again. Most of the books in libraries are expensive, out of print books, so you probably don't want to destroy them. Clearly this option is out.

      So you're left with scanning by hand. This is an arduous process. Especially for larger books, pages are difficult to scan properly thanks to the binding. It will take a hundred years to do this by hand. Because the sloppy scanning, OCR is a nightmare; so you'll have to either spend another century correcting the OCR, or leaving the pages as sloppy images. Neither sounds appealing.

      Suppose you've done it, and put every book online. Now you hire lawyers to protect you from the publishers and authors who's work you copied and distributed illegally and are now suing you. As this is Japan, you'll apologize for putting the university in such a shameful position and resign in disgrace, never to work again. Your children will be ostricized in school and will hate you for it.

      The robot is a much better solution.

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    2. Re:Needless robots... by bhima · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I agree that some of it is a waste, but not all.

      Where I work we have a robotic stockroom. Its product density is amazing compared to the one we had where people worked. It takes dramatically less time to actually have a part in you hand, particularly odd parts. And it's really interesting to boot. We stuck a video camera on it the day it opened and got some cool footage. So what does this have to do with libraries? Simple I'd give up lurking about in the stacks to have the actually books take up less room and be easy to find. Now this page turning is a waste. They need to loose the camera and just bring me the book! Also I prefer books to digital for most things. (except long tables of numbers).

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    3. Re:Needless robots... by meadd00d · · Score: 0
      Or, you could buy one of these:

      Book Digitizer

      At $150k, probably cheaper than a prototype stack robot, but more expensive than a grad student to perform the same task.

      *f*

  32. Re:Of *course*. The *Internet*. by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 1, Informative

    Let me ask you something. Why go through all the trouble to design, build, and debug a digital camera wielding box of bolts with a D-Link wireless Internet gateway jammed up its rear just so homebound people can visit the library, when existing technology known as "scanners" and "permanent storage" could store and make available every book in that library on the Internet? Not only that, there would be no queue to use the freaking robot, and the robot wouldn't be running over human library browsers' toes. Oh, "scanners" and "permanent storage" aren't experimental technologies either. Hmm!!!

    Why doesn't Amazon.com have scanned pages of all the books they sell? Maybe because it'll take a dozen years and millions of dollars to scan in all those pages? Maybe because the authors don't want scanned images of their books online in the first place? Maybe because having a full book in digital form doesn't fall under fair use rules?

    Yeah, it'd be fantastic to have every book online, available at any time, not low definition images of pages. But I suspect it'll be cheaper to buy a robot that can fill queued requests during the night, rather than scan in every single book that's available. Once there's a central repository of books where every library could reference requests, then you won't need the robot, but until copyright laws change and all the books are online, the robot is probably the cheaper solution.

    --
    -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
  33. Re:They eat your medicine for fuel too! by deglr6328 · · Score: 2, Funny

    There have been a lot of alarming robot related stories on slashdot lately! Thankfully, I just renewed my Old Glory insurance policy with a robot plan. you should to! When the robots grab you with thier metal claws you cant break free, because they're made of metal and robots are strong.

    *WARNING: Persons denying the existance of robots may be robots themselves.

    --
    - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
  34. Re:So... what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Slashdot Freedom Theme:



    "Yo /. Joe!"



    We'll fight for freedom where ever there's trouble. /. Joe is there.

    It's /. Joe against MALDA the enemy! Fighting to save the day. He never gives up. He's always there, Fighting for freedom over internet, sea, land and air!

    /. Joe- A real Freedom Fighting hero!

    /. Joe is there

    /. Joe is the codename for American's daring, highly trained special mission force. It's purpose, to defend human freedom against MALDA - a ruthless, terrorist organization determined to rule the world.

    He never gives up. He'll stay 'til the fight's won. /. Joe will dare.

    /. Joe- A real American hero! /. Joe

  35. the REAL reason for this robot by nxs212 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The real reason for building this robot was to catch students making out in the basment. (most libraries' stacks are in the basement where the lights are low and access is limited to staff and few lucky/adventurous types)
    When I was in HS I worked at a library and stacks was my favorite area. One time I heard noise in the far corner and went to investigate. I was clumsy stepped on something on the way there - really cute catholic schoolgirl and my metalhead friend (who also worked there) emerged. Needless to say, both looked embarrassed. They made up some lame excuse and left. Now if I had that robot, I probably would have had the whole thing on tape :)
    1. All the good stuff is in the basement.
    2. Catholic schoolgirls are WAY pervy.
    3. Women are turned ON more if there's a chance of getting caught.
    4. Having long hair and playing metal in your car could actually get you laid! (in the 80s)

  36. Why don't you read the article by News+for+nerds · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "Still in the experimental stage, it was developed as a way to help people who cannot go to a library, said Akihisa Oya, an assistant professor at the University of Tsukuba."

    1. Re:Why don't you read the article by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 1

      I did. It's not much of an article though. I was commenting that it would be useful for those of us in the library, not just for those who can't get to the library.

      Have the robots run around the library to get a display of all the books on a shelf, feed it right into computers at the end of the aisles (or at the front desk) so you can visually see what's on the shelves. The way I look for a book, I do a search (over the 'net), see what book the library has, and check out other books that match the description. However, when I end up at the bookshelf, there are many other books in the same section which look interesting. So I stand there, in the aisle, with my head craned looking at the titles. How nice it would be to view the robotic feed of the titles, rotated 90 degrees, so I can just browse without getting a cramp. I wouldn't need the robot to open and glance at the books, I can go to the library for that, but with the video I can spend much less time by going directly to the books which look promising.

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    2. Re:Why don't you read the article by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      Who modded this Offtopic? It's a quote from the article (do the mods even bother to RTFA anymore?) that is concise and on point.

      This technology could be of great use to the handicapped. I have been in many libraries where the aisles are just wide enough to squeeze through--wheelchair-bound users are out of luck.

      Also, some libraries have closed stacks where library staff have to retrieve books for all library users, able-bodied and otherwise. Why not get a robot to do it? Save the people for jobs that require thinking, like managing the collection.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  37. Why don't you read the article by News+for+nerds · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "Still in the experimental stage, it was developed as a way to help people who cannot go to a library, said Akihisa Oya, an assistant professor at the University of Tsukuba."

  38. Why not just scan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Wouldn't it be easier just to design a machine that could scan all of the books. Why waste time with a robot, now that computer memory can hold millions of books?

    1. Re:Why not just scan? by Rev+Saxon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Lets just assume that each book has say...500 pages. Now, thats 500 million pages to be scanned, even moving at the rate of a page a second, the equates to roughly 951 years.

      --
      I am that much more enlightened and proportionally disillusioned
    2. Re:Why not just scan? by dk.r*nger · · Score: 1

      Lets just assume that each book has say...500 pages. Now, thats 500 million pages to be scanned, even moving at the rate of a page a second, the equates to roughly 951 years.

      Then we better get started.

      No, seriously. I think this is why people introduced the concept of Parallel Operation(TM), in which more than one unit (being a robot, person, processor) works on different parts of the same problem at the same time :o)

      If someone were to setup a bank of, say, 500 robots, the operation would take more like two years, which seems more reasonable.

  39. Re:Of *course*. The *Internet*. by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Why doesn't Amazon.com have scanned pages of all the books they sell? Maybe because it'll take a dozen years and millions of dollars to scan in all those pages? Maybe because the authors don't want scanned images of their books online in the first place? Maybe because having a full book in digital form doesn't fall under fair use rules?

    "Today, the Authors Guild is saying that the publishers don't have the right to let Amazon do this." -- Slashdot, Oct 25, 2003 - Amazon's Book Search Hits a Snag

    Why speculate when we know the answer?

    --
    But then again, I could be wrong.
  40. Roaming the Stacks by mr_lithic · · Score: 4, Insightful
    University Stacks are more than just a way of storing books. They are great method of researching.

    The fact that standard organisational systems (Dewey or Library of Congress)are employed in all university libraries makes the job so much easier.

    If you want to find research materials on North American Indians of the Plains. Instead of looking in a card catalogue, you would get yourself up to the "E" Stacks and roam around the 78's to 99's. Easy.

    Sometimes, I think that Librarians have more to tell us about organising information than we have to tell them.

    1. Re:Roaming the Stacks by ragnar · · Score: 1

      Good point. One of the defining aspects of the American library experience is the ability to walk the stacks. In many European libraries you have access to the card catalog (or digital equivalent). The process involves peering through the window of metadata in the catalog and requesting the book from library staff.

      Reverting to a metadata only search would decrease the possibility of unexpected discoveries from browsing the stacks. I believe many forms of digital books and organization systems focus too much on metadata for object retrieval and should emulate "walking the stack." I certainly don't think it is helpful to send a robot to do this task.

      --
      -- Solaris Central - http://w
    2. Re:Roaming the Stacks by mr_lithic · · Score: 1
      The other major problem with European Libraries is the continued use of the Dewey Decimal system.

      The Dewey Decimal System may be fine for smaller community libraries but for any research institution with a sizable collection, the Library of Congress system is the only one worth considering.

      Current Debates in Library Classification

    3. Re:Roaming the Stacks by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1


      Aren't the letter codes in the LoC system related to the physical dimensions of the book, though?

      That means the shelves can be spaced for the most efficient use of the available space, but if you're browsing by topic you may need to visit several different locations in the stacks -- one for the small books, one for the medium-sized books, one for the oversized books, one for the medium-small books, etc.

  41. Danger, danger! by bigberk · · Score: 3, Funny
    researchers has developed a robot that could help browse for books in a library
    Sure, this sounds like a good idea but wait til they start running into Isaac Asimov novels. The next thing you know the robots will want their freedom ( or worse... ) Be afraid, you're American... it's normal :)
  42. Re:Needless in this application by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The concept is fine though, just the wrong application area (slightly). Instead of books these bots could move tapes about in mass data stores.
    Its very generic. Solving the general case of accurately moving book sized objects of about 1Kg weight around in a large warehouse opens up lots of immediate uses for such a device, automated parts warehouses, microfilm libraries .....

    In fact they picked a stupid PR angle to twist this with, getting library books _is_ a pretty dumb example of this devices capabilities. Besides which its all pretty standard robo tech and I can't really see the story. Maybe they overcame some fuel-cell/power barrier or built a clever mechanical arm.??

  43. what took so long to post this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new robotic librarian overlords!

  44. We only need it once. by blair1q · · Score: 5, Funny

    Program it to read all of the books and upload them to an online server.

    Then it can retire and take up a hobby, like infinite looping or virus collecting.

    1. Re:We only need it once. by sharkdba · · Score: 1

      Program it to read all of the books and upload them to an online server.

      Then it can retire and take up a hobby, like infinite looping or virus collecting.


      Actually, we'll still need it part time for new prints.

      --
      The purpose of life is to find the purpose of life.
  45. Re:Of *course*. The *Internet*. by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 1

    Why speculate when we know the answer?

    Because IANAL, and I don't know the answer, regardless what the Authors Guild says, what Amazon says. Therefore I can only speculate...

    --
    -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
  46. The Japanese love robots too much. by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

    God, why do the Japanese have to turn everything into a robot :/ First pets, then car salesmen, now this. If Battlestar Galactica or the Matrix ever comes true... you know who to blame.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  47. That's nothing by Pflipp · · Score: 3, Informative

    Around the sixties, the Library of the Delft University of Technology had a "bibliofoon" system, where people could find the books they want in a catalog and then enter their number in the ordering system. A red light would start burning at the right shell, and personnel would start taking the order.

    Once arrived at the right spot, they would get the ordered book and put it on a large spiral slide that was central to the building. This slide was connected to a sliding table ("lopende band", how does that translate?) which ended up in the catalog room, so that people could take their books and check them out.

    The most fun part about this system was that people would keep the slide clean by simply taking a slide :-) Must have been marvellous.

    --
    "We can confirm that Debian does *not* ship the version with the trojan horse. Our version predates it." [CA-2002-28]
    1. Re:That's nothing by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      Lopende band translates to conveyor belt I'm dutch, I've got an excuse, what's yours??

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
  48. Librarians + Robots by Ximok · · Score: 2, Funny

    My thoughts,
    1. I never could argue with that cute pencil-chewing librarian who would occasionally look over the horn-rimmed glasses. (Wish I still had her number *cry*)

    2. I could never argue with a robot that zoommed around picking up stuff.

    Now, in reality, The idea of a robot zooming around picking up stuff, ultimately controlled by a librarian just rocks.

    For any system to work this way, it would have to be in collaboration with librarians. The Sonoma Library is a pretty cool concept. Having books lost for 2 decades is not. Personally I have found that running around a library for 2 hours trying to find a book that should be in place X (according to Dewey) is really lame. Some students have more important things to do, like post on Slashdot while putting off writing that 15 page paper on why the FCC should keep Amateur Radio around...

  49. shelfreading by js7a · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Typical work-study students can shelf-read at around two feet per minute. If only one student is working shelfreading 2 hours per day, that's 1,200 shelf-feet per week, or 36,000 shelf-feet per academic year. U. Chicago holds 7 million volumes, so 20 years is about what that one 10 hr/wk job would take.

    Sheesh, which is worse: lazy work-study students that don't reshelve properly, or a university administration that holds lavish parties for professors with huge salaries, but doesn't hire more than one 1/4-time shelf-reader at a time?

    1. Re:shelfreading by ragnar · · Score: 1

      university administration that holds lavish parties for professors with huge salaries

      I'm not sure what University you are talking about, but I know a good number of professors who make less than 50k per year. I work at a University which happens to be in the upper echelon and wages are still modest for most faculty.

      Incidentally, the parent post you respond to was pointing out that one lazy person can inflict a lot of financial harm to a library. I didn't see anything in the post to indicate a University's unwillingness to hire "more than one 1/4-time shelf-reader at a time" to use your words.

      --
      -- Solaris Central - http://w
    2. Re:shelfreading by jafuser · · Score: 1

      36,000 shelf-feet per academic year

      So what does this work out to in Libraries of Congress per kilofortnight?

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
  50. We are lagging by nnnneedles · · Score: 1

    I predict in 20 or so years, Europe and the U.S. will have plenty of catching up to do when it comes to robotics. It seems the japanese are coming up with a new robot concept every week!

    --
    Will code a sig generator for food
  51. Slashdotting an ARS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I always have wondered what it would be like if the ARS system at Sonoma State got slashdotted.

    I can just imagine thousands of books pouring into the front circulation desk via the nifty little book mover thingy that zips them around, and them having no idea where to put them all until the people come to pick them up.
    </evil_laugh>

  52. Pr0n bots (on topic, really) by menscher · · Score: 1

    How long before someone directs the webcam-bearing robot into the women's bathroom?

  53. Re:Of *course*. The *Internet*. by gilgongo · · Score: 1

    > Why are people still capitalizing "Internet", for that matter?

    OK that's easy. Because the use of the word "Internet" in this context is a proper noun. You capitalise "Pacific ocean", you capitalise "Joe Shmo, the baker", so you capitalise Internet.

    It's important to use the capital "i" to avoid confusion since it can also be used as a common noun to mean "any set of networks interconnected with routers." The Internet is the largest internet in the world (i.e. it's unique), and is therefore capitalised.

    Hope that helps.

    --
    "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
  54. Article is labeled wrong by TyrranzzX · · Score: 1

    "Remote-Controlled Robot Could Burn The Stacks"

    Got some pesky book like "You are being lied to" or "Media monopoly" by Ben Bagdikian, or hell, why stop there? Something written by John Taylor Gatto or recordings of Jello Biafra on burned CD donated to the library.

    History is written by the victor. A library is used to combat this, and the internet is the ultamate library.

  55. Robotwars! by ignatus · · Score: 1

    Robotwars get a whole new dimension here! :)

    --
    - Never underestimate the power of human stupidity.
  56. Hackers! by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    Tug of war with books in a library. Woot.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  57. New orders from the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Burn the books, burn the books...

    Sincerly,

    GW Bush Jr.

  58. Vinyl Robot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wish I could get a robot to organise my LP collection. Its getting out of hand...

  59. one word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "oook?"

  60. Are we THAT fucking lazy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First remote controls for the TV. Now remote controls for going to the library?? what's next, remote controlled bathrooms?

    Sheesh. Get off your fucking ass and go to the fucking library you fucking GEEK! Looks like your flabby ass could use the exercise.

  61. ARS for 4.6 million books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's Japanese technology first used in auto manufacturing. All the robots have barcode scanners. definitely no squishy humans allowed where they go...

    http://www.mbsbooks.com/Company/Photos/controlle r. shtml

  62. anime refernece by SteelRat · · Score: 1

    Didn't I just see some of those in the last episode of Ghost in the Shell - Stand Alone Complex?

    I suppose they're all fun and great until they start stacking and sorting schoolchildren.

    1. Re:anime refernece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think, as nerds/geeks it is our resposibility to protect society from it's own tendancey to misuse technology. For instance, while it might be amusing to listen to computer composed music (not computer generated) there are some things that computers should never do, for instance be phsychologists, (ELIZA) except as pure entertainment. If people want to search for books online they should simply be digitized. And if they want real books, why not just actualy WALK to the REAL library?

  63. Fermilab has had a similar robot for years by sharkdba · · Score: 1

    Check here.
    Although it's used for fetching data tapes instead of books, the principle is very similar. I've seen it in action, it's very fast and accurate. The system is very helpful for scientists. Let's say a scientist wants to see results of an experiment on a given date; he just plugs this info into the program, robot gets the proper tape, loads it into the reader, and the scientist can view the results. The whole process only takes seconds. Compare it to older scenario where the scientist had to check out the tapes manually from the depository. If the tape was misfiled it would be almost impossible to find it. Robot, on the other hand, always puts it back on the right place.

    --
    The purpose of life is to find the purpose of life.
  64. After-hours searches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The greatest advantage to this, to my mind, is that you could have the robot find the physical book on the shelf and place it on reserve for you even when the library's closed.

    Sure you can have a check-out/reserve system on the web minus the robot, but there's not necessarily any guarantee that the book is where the records say it is.

  65. Feed the world. by bogamo · · Score: 1

    Now if a similar robot could pull weeds out from between good plants, and target and kill insects, we would all be eating organic food cheaply.

    Just a thought,

    -Geoff

    --
    Check out TrailRegistry.com, my hiking site, Maps, altitude pr
  66. PARENT IS PINGULAR/SIR SUXALOTTACOCK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THEREFORE A FAG!