Slashdot Mirror


Rockstar Censors GTA After Haitian Outcry

Thanks to VE3D for carrying a statement from Take Two/Rockstar announcing the removal of alleged anti-Haitian content from future copies of Grand Theft Auto:Vice City, after a furore which started last month following a CBS TV segment on the game. The controversy, which even had New York's Mayor Bloomberg weighing in on the game's rival gang-related urgings to "Kill all the Haitians", has ended with Rockstar's press release indicating: "We believe that recent media coverage has taken certain statements made in the game out of context... nevertheless, we are aware of the hurt and anger in the Haitian community... we will remove the objectionable statements from future copies of Grand Theft Auto: Vice City."

171 comments

  1. Haitians??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    What about the Orcs? Nobody ever backs the Orcs. They get dissed in more games than anyone. How many other enemies explode on eye contact?

    1. Re:Haitians??? by Kurin · · Score: 1

      You do work FOR the Haitians in the game, too.

    2. Re:Haitians??? by CptChipJew · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not to mention you kill a number of Cubans in the game too.

      But you don't hear Castro getting a hard on.

      The Cubman-made anti-Hatian remarks are CLEARLY balanced out by the Hatian-made anti-Cuban remarks they make back!

      --
      Vonal Declosion
    3. Re:Haitians??? by david.given · · Score: 1
      What about the Orcs? Nobody ever backs the Orcs. They get dissed in more games than anyone. How many other enemies explode on eye contact?

      You need to read Mary Gentle's Grunts . Imagine Lord of the Rings written from an orc's point of view... by someone with a mind so twisted you could use them as a corkscrew.

    4. Re:Haitians??? by nadadogg · · Score: 1

      I've actually read that book, it was a damn interesting read.

      --
      i use linux and windows oh god how can i have an opinion
    5. Re:Haitians??? by Maserati · · Score: 1

      It's more twisted than 'corkscrew'. Funny book, interesting read.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    6. Re:Haitians??? by CaptMonkeyDLuffy · · Score: 1

      Well, fortunately the orcs are free from being the victims in the post-censoring version of Vice City. When Rockstar first decided to change the scene, the orcs were a strong first candidate. "Nobody would care if we changed the Haitians to Orcs, it's so simple!"

      However, upon second thought they realized that this didn't mesh well with the theme and placement of the game. Realizing that they'd exhausted most of the other stereotyped Florida residents(Cubans, Haitians, etc.), they were forced to play there one remaining trump.

      In the new reworked scene, the mission is changed from "Kill all Haitians" to "Kill all octogenarians." A crowd of elderly, wielding false teeth and walkers commence an assault upon the protagonist. It is rumored that a new vehicle, the electric wheelchair, has been added to the game.

  2. A moment, please... by ex_ottoyuhr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is getting just ludicrous. So not only is Manhunt not Adults Only, there's also no appreciable outcry about it, and the Rockstar game being censored is getting censored for a quote that sounds racist out of context, as opposed to being censored for, say, sodomizing a gang member with a crowbar. U.S. society is collectively insane. I'm not sure what variety of insanity (although I'd speculate a diagnosis of disorganized schizophrenia), but still... This is all getting disgusting.

    1. Re:A moment, please... by mrkslntbob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, it's surprising and disturbing that Rockstar backed down on this. They are the company that makes games like GTA and Manhunt in the first place, you think they'd be used to dealing with stupid-politically-correct-protester criticism. Why do people give in to such idiocy as taking a quote out of context from a video game and claiming to be deeply offended and upset by it.

    2. Re:A moment, please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      So not only is Manhunt not Adults Only, there's also no appreciable outcry about it
      Yeah, just 10,000 articles and reports on network news shows.
    3. Re:A moment, please... by KronicD · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know, its absolutely sickening the way this censoring of absolutely everything is going at the moment, what is the problem of a fictional script mentioning a certain group of people? There doesn't seem to be ANYTHING really offensive in the context that quote was in, and the context is definitely important.

      Our freedoms are constantly being crushed, and this isn't one of those "freedom of speech says that, i should be able to run a hate group" things.

      Next thing you know there will be a law confirming that if a member of a certain race is killed in a game/TV show/movie/audio recording or anything of that sort a equal number of people of other races must also be killed in the same manner.

      The creativity of people is being destroyed by this, no longer can we safely spawn anything as we envision it in our minds without facing the threat of legal action from simple minded people with very little base for legitimate complaint.

      Ok, for a moment if I were to take the same stand that these people are taking. I am of Anglo-Saxon origin, I find it offensive to see a white person killed or targeted in any segment of the media, I DEMAND that this sort of thing be stopped immediately.

      Why can't this sort of thing be applied to the Anglo-Saxon race?

      Don't people see that this sort of action is PROMOTING racism?

      End Rant.

      --
      "Those who would give up Essential Liberty, to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety"
    4. Re:A moment, please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, I'm sure there will be outcry about Manhunt when the people that whine finally notice in a year or two after everyone played it.

    5. Re:A moment, please... by seraph93 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Don't people see that this sort of action is PROMOTING racism?

      They don't. Most people take the opposite view: that enforcing artificial distinctions between ethnic groups will somehow bring these groups together instead of keeping them separated. It's okay to use this word to describe these people, but not to use this other word to describe these other people; it's okay to run over or gun down people in a video game, but not if they're of this background; this TV show should appeal to people of this ethnicity, whereas this other TV show is for the other folks; and don't you dare offer any fried chicken to that guy over there, he'll get offended!

      We don't have separate drinking fountains anymore, and only the handicapped and the elderly have seats reserved at the front of the bus. But we have separate television shows, separate music styles, separate styles of clothing, separate vocabularies, and now separate mission objectives in Grand Theft Auto. Segregation never went away; it just got sneakier. The rifts between the races have become more semantic and less physical, but that doesn't mean that they've not there. And now they're being pushed under the label of "Political Correctness".

      You better watch what you say, and especially who you say it to. Don't you dare look at someone else and think, "Oh, another human being." You'd better make sure you categorize that person properly first, and think of the differences between you, long before you think of the common heritage that we all share as human beings.

      After all, you wouldn't want to offend anyone.

      --
      Ph-nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn.
    6. Re:A moment, please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You ignore a crucial point! That is: The "segregation" you describe is self-imposed. People of different races are not likely going to "become one" anytime soon. That would be taking the archaic concept of "America's melting pot" a little too far. I prefer to think of America as a huge pot of nabemono: Everything goes together well and contributes to the flavor of the stock, but the ingredients are meant to enjoyed separately for what they are. "Vive la difference," if you prefer.

      And you cannot responsibly compare the segregation of America's past (basically, American apartheid) with black people wanting to be represented on TV in some sitcom, or listening to a rap radio station. The former was about the politically powerful racial majority using the law to oppress legally underrepresented minorities, in the areas of social status, employment, education, whatever you've got. The latter is about __everyone__ being free to express themselves. Nobody forces Jason Mraz's audiences to be almost 100% white, that's just how it turns out. :) And white people aren't stopped at the entrance to Snoop Dogg shows either.

      To extend this example, black entertainment exists because blacks enjoy it. Nobody is sitting up in some NBC office (well, especially not NBC....), thinking, "Let's make some black sitcoms because I don't want them watching white shows." That's nonsensical. Same thing applies to all forms of "ethnic" entertainment.

      Further, I take issue with your poor understanding of the concept of "Policital Correctness." PC is seen -- by those who have given the issue very little thought -- as a set of guidelines which is meant to shield people from "the truth," or as a means of suppressing what straight white males are allowed to say in public. That's bull. All that PC is really about is about treating people the same way you want to be treated. In other words, using common sense.

      So, what do I think of the Haitian group's qualms with Vice City? I think they should get over themselves. But because I'm not Haitian, I'm not qualified or informed enough to tell you whether I'd really be offended AS A HAITIAN by something like this. Common sense tells me, if they don't like it, there's no harm in not doing it. So Rockstar's decision sounds fair to me.

      BTW, if you think race is going to disappear as an instantaneous means of identifying someone, you are an idealist whose optimistic views will unfortunately not become reality any time soon. It is not politically incorrect to note that you are standing beside a black person on the train, or that the cashier at Macy's is a white woman. There is nothing offensive about such notions, nor is there anything wrong with noting the differences between yourself and others. Differences can be celebrated.

    7. Re:A moment, please... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      That was his point. The segregation isn't imposed by the majority, the segregation is imposed and enforced by the minorities themselves, because they don't really want to end racism and segregation either.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    8. Re:A moment, please... by Nohbi · · Score: 1

      It's not just U.S. society but a good portion of western society in general. We want labels put on games, and nearly everything else, so that people won't be offended. It's like the "Parental Advisory: Explict Lyrics" back in the 90s (Or was that 80s old memory, so fuzzy, too little sleep).

      That being said have game makers, especially the small independents, adopt the "Parental Advisory: Anything Goes" style logo.

    9. Re:A moment, please... by bl0nd13 · · Score: 1

      Clearly, the only solution is miscegenation; we just need to interbreed until we're all a creamy tan!

    10. Re:A moment, please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then, coming back to the topic of Haitians being offended by the content in Vice City, can we draw a parallel between what was suggested and what has happened here?

      If the Haitian group felt threatened by the content of that game, are they seeking to perpetuate their "otherness?" Or are they simply trying not to be singled out as a race against which it is okay to commit crimes?

      I'm the parent AC poster, so again, I think the Haitian group is taking the issue too seriously. But I doubt that it is out of the type of malice that some of the posters here describe that they sought to defend themselves. Their concerns are valid and real, if not altogether reasonable from the viewpoint of an uninvolved person.

    11. Re:A moment, please... by seraph93 · · Score: 1
      You make some very good points, but seem to have missed some parts of mine. So I'll try to clarify my position a bit.

      My complaint wasn't directed toward the natural distinctions between the various races, but rather toward the artificial ones. You say that these are self-imposed, but however they were imposed, and with whatever intentions, they serve more as barriers between the races than bridges. The artificial differences we impose cause us to tiptoe around the natural differences, trying our best to ignore them rather than to understand and embrace them.

      I can't argue too well about current television and music, as I don't watch TV or listen to much music (the PC term for someone like me is "Pop-culturally challenged" :), so I'll just concede most of those points to you. Entertainment is driven by the preferences of those entertained by it, and so that's probably a natural difference there. I will say this, however: Black television shows don't seem to be required to include a "token white guy" in their main cast.

      You say that political correctness is really about treating people the same way you want to be treated. This is true of its intent, but not of its effect. Sometimes common sense doesn't produce good solutions, especially when dealing with an issue as hideously complicated as racial relations. People want simple solutions, and making certain things taboo is simple enough in its implementation, but certainly not in its ramifications.

      My view of the Haitians' qualms with Vice City: It was immediately apparent to me that the game's shallow depiction of a gang of Haitian thugs could not possibly represent Haitian people and their culture as a whole, any more than the main character represents the whole of Italian American culture. In the mission in question, the main character was not killing Haitians in general, but cardboard representations of a tiny subset of the Haitian people. Not all Italians work for the Mafia, not all Hatians are gang members, and no one in a video game is real. I don't really see the reason in taking offense. Other people obviously don't see it that way.

      Race is always going to be an instantaneous means of identifying someone, I don't deny that. What I would like to see eradicated is all the negative baggage that goes along with that instantaneous identification. It's not wrong to note that the person next to me on the train is black, but the list of unacceptable behaviour that comes with noting that, and the tension and unease that it causes, is most certainly wrong. I agree with you completely, differences can (and should!) be celebrated, but it's hard to dance when you're too scared of stepping on someone's toes.

      --
      Ph-nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn.
    12. Re:A moment, please... by ex_ottoyuhr · · Score: 1

      I suspect that my post may have been poorly worded. :) To clarify: while I oppose the censorship of a game for out-of-context racism and so on, I do not by any means support Rockstar, and I do support the banning or at least censorship of gratuitously offensive works with little artistic value -- like, in this context, Manhunt.

      Censorship of, say, hostile political agendas is unjustifiable in all but the most unlikely cases, but the censorship of gratuitously offensive materials is a much better idea. There is a place for that sort of thing in the world, especially if an industry or medium cannot regulate itself.

    13. Re:A moment, please... by Zoshnell · · Score: 1

      What constitutes as "gratuitous" then? The majority of people? What about the rights of the non-majority who aren't offened by this or that? Would they be labelled as weirdos or psychopaths because they can stomache blood and guts better then a majority of people? Not that i include myself in that, I got squeemish looking at pics a truma nurse brought in about the aftermath of drinking and stupidity. I'm curious to your response.

      --
      "Do you suppose that's why God lives in the Heavens? Because he lives in fear of His creations?" - Steve Buscemi
    14. Re:A moment, please... by ex_ottoyuhr · · Score: 1

      Gratuitously offensive content is content which seems to exist only for itself, not to prove or establish some larger point. Pornography, for example, would be gratuitous sexual content, while a story which happened to include nudity -- or, for that matter, happened to include sexual intercourse; Clan of the Cave Bear comes to mind -- would not be. Similarly for violence: Vader cutting off Luke's hand is a qualitatively different matter from your character in Manhunt cutting off a gangster's head with a machete.

      Of course, I agree with you that it can be hard to determine when and if something is present for a reason other than just itself. Ultimately, I think that it has to be judged by a fellow-author, and one without strong feelings one way or the other regarding the content at hand. In short, some things (Manhunt) are clearly gratuitously violent -- including violence because it's fun, and not for the sake of the story, for social commentary, etc.; others (The Empire Strikes Back) are not... and then there's the huge grey area -- The Running Man and the like...

  3. What about BF1942?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    In Battlefield 1942 to advance to the next level sometimes you have to kill all the Germans (based on World War II). Frankly I have more German friends on IRC then I do any other nationality.

    1. Re:What about BF1942?! by Micro$will · · Score: 5, Funny

      With all the WW2 games out nowadays, I wouldn't be surprised if thats what they'll replace the Haitians with in the censored version. Hell, if they did that, I'd buy the game again just so I could hear German ghetto talk.

      Ja sind jene Weinerschnitzel die Bombe!

      Oh yeah, a Mercedes S class with hydraulics would be better than those slow Voodoos.

    2. Re:What about BF1942?! by fuzzybunny · · Score: 3, Funny


      There was an _awesome_ scene in Medal of Honor, in the level where you infiltrate the German submarine pen in Norway. Dressed as a kraut officer, you walk past two troopers having a chat in perfectly accented idiomatic German; something utterly hilarious, to the extent of "I don't know why the Norwegians are all so mad at us, we just want to bring their chicks back to Germany to breed the master race."

      I'm a native German speaker, and I think I would have noticed any trace of an accent there, so I can only assume that they used real Germans to record the voiceovers. Frankly, I can't imagine a German voice actor not pissing himself laughing when asked to read something like that out loud."

      The BF1942 clips are actually pretty funny--I like the Italians best--it all sounds romantic and beautiful (Va fa'in culo! I have a headwound! Mamma mia, I love you!)

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    3. Re:What about BF1942?! by Zoshnell · · Score: 1

      Its interesting, the only demographic that can get away with being consistantly placed as bad guys and we all love to gleefully torture and kill are Nazis(traditional and Neo). Not that I defend them in any way, but I find that interesting. And most importantly, fun.

      --
      "Do you suppose that's why God lives in the Heavens? Because he lives in fear of His creations?" - Steve Buscemi
  4. Remember kids.. by Stray7Xi · · Score: 5, Funny
    Don't kill haitians.. thats racist
    Kill cops.. thats politically correct

    /sarcasm off
    Wasn't the point of the game to be crude and offensive?? That's what makes it fun. If they're going to censor themselves they have a lot of work ahead of them

    1. Re:Remember kids.. by JFMulder · · Score: 1

      In fact, didn't some politician want to pass a law that said games which contained violence toward politicians or policemen would have to be identified as such?

  5. Unbelieveable... by este · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I would understand if Haitians were the only ethnic group singled out for mindless killing, but honestly....at a point in the game, you actually -work- for the Haitians, specifically for the purpose of killing the rival Cubans. At other points in the game, you kill Italians, French, Colombians, hell, I think I even killed some seagulls. If one took killing people out (and don't whine about ethnicity - in case it's not obvious, -everyone- is part of some ethnicity), you'd have.....nothing. And if you have a problem with killing in general........ DON'T BUY THE FSCKING GAME!!!!! I swear, we need to hold a telethon for these people......

    --
    [este]
    1. Re:Unbelieveable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be mistaken. You are under the impression that discrimination is something that can happen to everyone. It's not. Discrimination is something that only happens to non-caucasians. Discrimination against caucasians is called Affirmative Action and seems to be completely politically correct.

    2. Re:Unbelieveable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up, bitch.

    3. Re:Unbelieveable... by Gothic_Walrus · · Score: 2, Funny
      ...hell, I think I even killed some seagulls...

      So when is Take Two going to remove the alleged anti-seagull content from the game?

      Now THERE's a minority we don't want to piss off!

      *thinks of poo-splattered car* *shudders*

      --
      Goo goo g'joob.
    4. Re:Unbelieveable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I get it now. If you don't like something, don't participate! So if you don't like the Ku Klux Klan, just don't join! They'll go away on their own!

      Your logic is flawed pretty badly. The thing is that people don't have to play the game to be offended, although I completely disagree with this stupidity.

      This game isn't prejudiced in the sense that it offends everyone equally.

    5. Re:Unbelieveable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and uh, what makes those crackers free from racial slurs?

    6. Re:Unbelieveable... by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1
      This game isn't prejudiced in the sense that it offends everyone equally.

      Apparently not, since it offends Haitians and doesn't offend me.
      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    7. Re:Unbelieveable... by Crypt0pimP · · Score: 1

      I think it's your logic that's flawed skippy,

      Equating an ORGANIZATION of racists to a inanimate object (video game) in terms of their ability to inflict actual damage IS unbelieveable.

      I live in the south and I haven't seen an angry mob of GTA CD's hanging a "Negro" from a tree.

      Moron

      --
      Striving to achieve a lower state of conciousness
  6. in other news.. by TomSawyer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sales of Vice City spike up as the last few geeks who live under rocks crawl out to purchase a pre-censored copy.

    --
    If you disagree then it must be overrated, redundant or trolling.
    1. Re:in other news.. by MMaestro · · Score: 1
      Or for the hardcore geeks, the number of warezed copies of Vice City on the net have spiked.. again.

      On a more serious note, the fact that some warez servers (which I won't list for obvious reason) still hold and distribute the game while dropping more recent ones such as XIII and Max Payne 2 is quite notable. (I know some FTP servers that still distribute the older GTA3)

  7. They Shouldn't Have Caved In by illuminata · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't believe that they should sensor themselves just because certain people become offended. But, if Rockstar and Take Two truly believed that it is their right to keep a sense of realism in their game, then they shouldn't have removed the content at all. They're already getting enough bad press from the game, which has helped its popularity anyways.

    Most importantly, because Rockstar and Take Two are censoring themselves in this manner, they have severely hurt the argument that video games are an artform. It's going to be much harder to have video games gain the same amount of artistic respect that movies and music have to the general public. Special interest groups will have a much easier time getting other companies to follow suit and self-censor as well, because now they can say "Rockstar and Take Two did it, why won't you?"

    --


    Until Slashdot fixes the funny modifier, use insightful or interesting. The poster knows your intentions.
    1. Re:They Shouldn't Have Caved In by MachDelta · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Goddamnit, this sets a precedent that could screw over the whole Mature gaming industry. Way to go Rock*/T2 :(

    2. Re:They Shouldn't Have Caved In by kenthorvath · · Score: 1

      If you think that they sensored themselves out of any self-realization that they have created something immoral or indecent, think again. The only logic that motivates a corporation is sales and profit. The rationale behind censoring the game is to not lose sales to customers sensitive or sympathetic to the complaining group.

    3. Re:They Shouldn't Have Caved In by illuminata · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Let's not lump every corporation into being in it solely for sales and profit. Of course, sales and profit are considerations because the people running the company would like to stay in business and live comfortably. However, many companies make their money because they don't censor themselves and stay true to their artform. Governments and individuals also have good and bad motives. I challenge you or any other individual or group to make a game like GTA: Vice City without keeping sales and profit in mind.

      There's no need for a bleeding heart statement like the one that you made. There are companies out there that do what they do because they like it, not just for money.

      As for what you believe their rationale is, that could very well be the case. Yet, the Haitian population is fairly small in comparison to other groups. There could be a substantial amount of people who would sympathize if this issue gets enough attention. My guess is that their decision factored in loss of sales with bad publicity and the possibility of Mayor Bloomberg launching an investigation.

      They still shouldn't have censored the content, though.

      --


      Until Slashdot fixes the funny modifier, use insightful or interesting. The poster knows your intentions.
    4. Re:They Shouldn't Have Caved In by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to be a jackass, but the parent and grandparent made the same mistake. It's censored, not sensored.

      I'm glad you didn't put loose instead of lose. A lot of people seem to make that mistake nowadays. I don't understand why, though.

    5. Re:They Shouldn't Have Caved In by Spiffae · · Score: 1

      Contrary to what many on the internet seem to believe, the First Amendment states that Congress is not to abridge the freedom of speech, which has been interpreted to mean that the government is not allowed to regulate speech. This was NOT the case here. Private groups of concerned citizens used their free speech to voice their objections to something which appeared in a commercial product. Seeing that offending potential customers is not the best way to sell more product, the creators of the product firmly and intelligently stood behind the product as a whole but agreed to change a reletively miniscule part of the product to avoid offending people. This was not censorship, this was smart freedom of speech and smart business choices in action.

    6. Re:They Shouldn't Have Caved In by illuminata · · Score: 1

      I knew that it would be pointed out, I just knew it. I figured that I'd leave it alone, considering that I did use it correctly elsewhere in the post and that I didn't really feel like writing yet another disclaimer.

      Damn, that's two typos today, I made one before I took a nap, and another right after.

      --


      Until Slashdot fixes the funny modifier, use insightful or interesting. The poster knows your intentions.
    7. Re:They Shouldn't Have Caved In by illuminata · · Score: 1

      I never said this was a First Amendment issue, and I made it a point to mention that they self-censored. But, I'm not implying that you accused me of saying that it was. I just don't want anybody confused. Anyways, this would be a First Amendment issue if Mayor Bloomberg went through with an investigation.

      I'm not sure if the move was very smart, considering how much of this game's popularity came from controversy. This was indeed self-censorship. They pulled out the content despite feeling that the offended people misunderstood it. That's what I'm upset about the most, they made it seem like a video game was nothing more than a product when a video game truly is an artform.

      It's the same type of situation where they had the guns replaced with walkie talkies in E.T. when it was rereleased due to political correctness. Sure, it might have brought some more people to watch the movie, but it hurt the artistic integrity of the film and the filmmakers. It might have even costed them customers because of the move.

      In both cases, it was their work, and therefore they had every right to do what they wanted to with it. I just don't believe that either parties made the right decision.

      --


      Until Slashdot fixes the funny modifier, use insightful or interesting. The poster knows your intentions.
    8. Re:They Shouldn't Have Caved In by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come on now, the content of the game isn't being censored, just the text. Instead of "KILL HATIANS" the mission is just going to be "KILL ALL MEMBERS OF THE HATIAN GANG" or "KILL ALL RIVAL GANG MEMBERS" or something like that.

      It is actually fairly minor, and greater works of literature have suffered more.

    9. Re:They Shouldn't Have Caved In by Spiffae · · Score: 1

      guns for walkie talkies? that's awesome!

      did they fire their walkie talkies?

    10. Re:They Shouldn't Have Caved In by illuminata · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure. They might have tried to shoot Radio Waves of Doom (RWoDs for those in the know) at E.T. and the boy when they were flying in the bicycle.

      --


      Until Slashdot fixes the funny modifier, use insightful or interesting. The poster knows your intentions.
    11. Re:They Shouldn't Have Caved In by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Special interest groups will have a much easier time getting other companies to follow suit and self-censor as well, because now they can say "Rockstar and Take Two did it, why won't you?"

      They could just say that "Rockstar and Take Two" have no morals for caving in to special interest demands. We on the other hand stand up for the artistic first admendment right of producing entertainment forms that 5% will protest against but about 80% of the population own and enjoy. (O.k. maybe those percentages are reversed.)

    12. Re:They Shouldn't Have Caved In by bl0nd13 · · Score: 1

      I think it is deeply unfortunate that some people are so fucking twitchy that they wanted to get on Rockstar's case about a poor choice of phrasing. On the other hand, a few of the posts in this subthread have alleged that this is somehow a setback for videogames as art, or for "mature" games. I would just like to point out thatt GTA:VC is hardly mature because of it's content. In fact, what it makes so much goddamn fun is the sheer puerility of it all. The road to videogames that might be counted as art is not through more rampant idiocy with a flavor of the naughty, but through games that use the player's complicity (agency, even) in his or her actions as a tool for relfection and the asking of difficult question. Look to Deus Ex or Thief or even the infamous hallucination sequencee of Max Payne for evidence of this, and then tell if me GTA:VC stacks up. I'm as perturbed by this development as the next guy (okay, not nearly as much as some of the froting lunatics in here), but let's keep our issues straight.

    13. Re:They Shouldn't Have Caved In by bl0nd13 · · Score: 1

      sorry, typed too fast... "reflection" and "sequence," and "its," not "it's"...

    14. Re:They Shouldn't Have Caved In by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1
      going to be much harder to have video games gain the same amount of artistic respect that movies and music have to the general public

      Movies and music remove "offensive" things that would have been left in if art was the only consideration all the time. I think that this is especially true of movies which are often edited once they fail to get an R rating since being released as NC-17 or unrated really hurts your ability to distribute to theaters. Please don't interpret this as meaning that I approve of this practice though.
      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    15. Re:They Shouldn't Have Caved In by illuminata · · Score: 1

      Everything that you said was true, so don't think that I'm trying to argue with you on the points that you made. The video game industry is far behind as an artform in comparison to those industries. GTA: Vice City doesn't come close to what most R rated movies in terms of subject matter. The fact that companies like Rockstar and Take Two caved in over a statement that the Haitians took out of context gives the impression that games aren't much more than toys and that game companies are relatively easy to push over. These were two companies that took pride in having edgier content. And look how long it took for the edit to take place.

      In the movie world, look at what Quentin Tarantino or David Mamet can get away with. They get applauded for being great artists whereas currently a game couldn't even think of going as far as they do without having to be released independently and never making it into a store. Movies and music are edited as well, but they are not held down to the level games are at now.

      Still, I think that all of the industries need to change.

      --


      Until Slashdot fixes the funny modifier, use insightful or interesting. The poster knows your intentions.
  8. movie analogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    what if this were spray painted on a wall in a movie like Boyz N the Hood?

    How is this any different?

  9. Uh... what about the cops? by MBraynard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Cop killing has been one of the most criticized aspects of this game, but the Hatian comment is what gets the changes made? And really, it's not that out of context of a statement, as there is an unfortunate and very strong anti-Hatian sentiment in South Florida that I have personally witnessed as have many who live down there.

    1. Re:Uh... what about the cops? by MBraynard · · Score: 1

      I don't know why that second sentence showed up in bold, it wasn't done intentionally.

    2. Re:Uh... what about the cops? by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1
      And really, it's not that out of context of a statement, as there is an unfortunate and very strong anti-Hatian sentiment in South Florida that I have personally witnessed as have many who live down there.

      Rightly or wrongly, this is why people are offended by it. It's when things veer close to the truth that they offend people. The cop-killing seems a little more like pure fantasy. People aren't afraid that a typical gamer is going to go out and kill cops, but they are worried that they might harbor racist sentiments.
      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
  10. It's not ludicrous by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's valuable pre-christmas publicity!

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    1. Re:It's not ludicrous by Randolpho · · Score: 1

      Oh, had I mod points, you'd be +1 Fuckin' A.

      Folks, let's back down and see this for what it *really* is. Free publicity. Odds are that Rockstar dropped the "tip" about the racist comments in the first place.

      --
      "Times have not become more violent. They have just become more televised."
      -Marilyn Manson
    2. Re:It's not ludicrous by edwdig · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't forget, if you buy it after Christmas, odds are you're getting the censored version. So if you weren't quite sure before, you better buy it now or you'll be stuck with a crappy version if you change your mind later!

    3. Re:It's not ludicrous by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1

      +10^6 Insightful

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    4. Re:It's not ludicrous by Nohbi · · Score: 1

      Not only do you have a censored version but you'll have a buggy censored version. Having worked in testing for parts of the games industry even a small change like that is going to start giving bugs.

      Knowing how things often get censored though there will be a patch that uncensors it in a few days.

  11. Ah, remember the good old days... by Lithium_Golem · · Score: 2, Insightful
    when no one really complained about stuff like that? Remember the original GTA and running over the monks? Or the reference to "goomba" in Mario?

    Well it was different then than it is now. Today companies have to be more and more responsible because their customers are from all age groups and all walks of life. Rockstar Games isn't backing down from what they produced and they aren't silencing themselves. They are simply being socially responsible. A term that many angry gamers sometimes ignore.

    1. Re:Ah, remember the good old days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, being socially responsible is a good thing, but by backing down and giving in to all demands Rockstar has done a disservice to all gamers out there. I agree with illuminata above that this hurts the arguement that games are an art form. Also, they are opening not only their own products but other companies' products as well to a demand for censorship and sanitation by any group that cares to complain. Unfortunately people are not smart enough to realize that taking offense at something only shows that they are insecure with their own identity and feel any attack on an aspect of their identity will demean them. That is an arguement for another time, however. What really needs to be done is for a company to respectfully acknowledge any complaints but inform everyone that they are capable of making their own decisions.
      I guess to sum it up Rockstar has gone the way that I thought they never would. This all comes down to business, and Rockstar probably thinks they will get more sales of _Vice City_ with this move, either by people hurrying to buy pre-censored copies (as TomSawyer suggested) or by people who think this will make the game more socially acceptable. Good luck Rockstar. But know that you are only shooting yourself in the foot. What can you do now that people will not complain about?

    2. Re:Ah, remember the good old days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Shhh.... It's socially irresponsible to tell someone they're socially irresponsible. You'll hurt their feelings and make them feel bad.

    3. Re:Ah, remember the good old days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well then they should rename ALL the gangs to "Gang A", "Gang B", etc really...

    4. Re:Ah, remember the good old days... by metamatic · · Score: 1

      Rockstar, who just released "Manhunt", socially responsible?

      Thanks, I needed a good laugh.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    5. Re:Ah, remember the good old days... by Zoshnell · · Score: 1

      We should go back to the Pro Wrestling naming schema, i.e "The Strong Bads". I just fear the huge backlash from all Strong Bad afficidiandos(sic?).

      --
      "Do you suppose that's why God lives in the Heavens? Because he lives in fear of His creations?" - Steve Buscemi
  12. Boycott? by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Who wants to register boycottgta.com and get Rockstar to take a stand for their right to publish what they want to publish? This is complete garbage and I am amazed and sickened that they bowed to the pressure.

    Rockstar was getting pressure from mainstream groups who took the game out of context - are these the people who are driving sales of their game? No, it is the devoted gamer and they're bowing to pressure from the group that doesn't create their profits. It's time that Rockstar and Take Two remembered who butters their bread. All this will do is remove the heat from the censorship groups and replace it with heat from gamers offended by Rockstar's lack of a spine - and gamers getting angry hurts their bottom line.

    Big mistake, I think. I will not buy another Rockstar product unless they reverse their position.

    --
    I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
    1. Re:Boycott? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You really care this much about a meaningless word change in a game?

      If they had said "Kill all niggers" would you be so indignant?

      Stereotyping a nationality of people as 'gang members' is certainly protected by free speech, but anyone who makes millions of dollars by indirectly making these associations deserves no sympathy.

      No one is putting a gun to the heads of Rockstar games to make this change. I am surprised their lawyers missed this obvious of a slur.

      This gives me hope in our seemingly lost democracy: A large number of people were offended, complained to the company, and the company listened to the will of the community by making the requested changes.

      How isn't this a happy ending? We're not talking game redesign here, it is one word people, lighten up! If all developers were this responsive to the outcries of their users the software market would be awesome!

    2. Re:Boycott? by Jeff+Reed · · Score: 1

      Because there has been entirely too much of these changes in videogames lately. See this article, or the incident where Hitman 2 was changed for supposedly featuring a negative stereotype about another racial group. This is getting utterly ridiculous.

      Why is it okay to have games where the Russians, or the Nazis, or various assorted Middle Eastern types are the villians, but not Canadians or Haitians? Is it okay as long as you're not the same race as the villians? Is it acceptable as long as you're killing what is percieved to be an "evil" people?

      Rockstar should have stood up for themselves and told these groups where they can stick it. They don't need to be giving in to these groups and setting dangerous precidents. Oh, well. Too late now.

    3. Re:Boycott? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the thing though, a large number of people were not offended. That's what that special interest group would like you to think though. I bet you asked any normal Haitians, they'd either say, "what the hell are you talking about," or, "I don't give a fuck."

      Also, its not sterotyping a whole nationality of people to say Haitian gangs, its merely describing the type of gang. There are gangs that won't allow someone not of their nationality in, ya know. Those damned non-PC gangs, that is!

    4. Re:Boycott? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why is it okay to have games where the Russians, or the Nazis, or various assorted Middle Eastern types are the villians, but not Canadians or Haitians?

      Well, I'm not sure about the others, but the Nazis don't exactly have too many activist groups sticking up for their rights.

      By the way, Godwin Tag! You're "it" until someone else mentions the Nazis! :D

    5. Re:Boycott? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      If they had said "Kill all niggers" would you be so indignant?

      Why would it make any difference, other than "Haitian" not being a derogatory term.

      As someone with an Italian roots, I'd want Rockstar to defend their right to say "Kill all the fucking wop dagos!"

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    6. Re:Boycott? by SuperMo0 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure Rockstar cares very much about your "inability" to buy their games, and will cater to your every whim to fix the problem.

      For fuck's sake, they've been taking a beating over the game for close to a year now. They're going to have to cave in on something eventually.

      I mean, seriously, do you think this is anything BUT a publicity stunt, as mentioned earlier?

    7. Re:Boycott? by Firehawke · · Score: 1

      Heh. My roots are so muddied I can't say something of the sort, but I can say that it wouldn't matter to me what they said, so long as it was IN CHARACTER for the group portrayed.

      I think it's the authenticism that gives the game its flavor.

    8. Re:Boycott? by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1
      No one is putting a gun to the heads of Rockstar games to make this change

      Yes, that's the point. If they were having guns put to their heads and being forced to make this change (and would be put that passed the haitians, really?), then this would be acceptable.
      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    9. Re:Boycott? by Zoshnell · · Score: 1

      I find that more often then not, in games that utilize Russians as a) 1950 Stalin Communist with AKs pointing to the free world or b) Neo Communists who hold up Stalin as an ideal or such nonsense while middle eastern types are generally referred to as the zealot types. At least in the games I've played and can remember correctly(read: maybe 2. That i can remember correctly. I think.)

      --
      "Do you suppose that's why God lives in the Heavens? Because he lives in fear of His creations?" - Steve Buscemi
  13. Side Notes by illuminata · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Voodoo Extreme article stated that Mayor Bloomberg said Rockstar and Take Two would be investigated for human rights violations. The New York Post article stated that Bloomberg said they would be investigated if Take Two didn't comply in removing the phrase.

    Either way, what human right is being violated, other than the right to free speech?

    --


    Until Slashdot fixes the funny modifier, use insightful or interesting. The poster knows your intentions.
    1. Re:Side Notes by shadowcabbit · · Score: 1

      The Voodoo Extreme article stated that Mayor Bloomberg said Rockstar and Take Two would be investigated for human rights violations.

      Which would be really interesting to see, considering Rockstar North developed the game. In Scotland.

      --
      "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
  14. Contact Information for Take 2 Games by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 2, Informative

    Corporate Office
    Address Phone
    Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. 622 Broadway, New York, NY 10012 (646) 536-2842

    International Headquarters
    Address Phone
    Take Two UK Saxon House 4 Victoria Street, Windsor, Bershire SL4 1EN 01753 496 600

    Primary Subsidiaries
    Address
    Rockstar Games, Inc. 575 Broadway, New York, NY 10012
    Gotham Games, Inc. 622 Broadway, New York, NY 10012
    Gathering of Developers 9900 Franklin Square Drive, Suite A Baltimore, MD 21236

    Sales Department - (646) 536-2842

    Public Relations
    James Ankner - Take-Two (Investors & Media Relations) - (646) 536-3006
    Jeff Castaneda - Rockstar Games - (212) 334-6633 x217
    Anne Marie Sims - Gathering - (410) 933-9191 x108

    --
    I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
  15. surprised? by s0rbix · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why is everyone so surprised? This is America! You can kill as many people in as many ways as you want, just as long as you're PC about it.

    1. Re:surprised? by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 1
      I think everyone is surprised because Rockstar caved.

      You're right - no one should be surprised about the uproar over it. Of course, the uproar is a bit late since the game has been out for so long now but we'll just ignore that fact. Doing anything that isn't P.C. is a good way to get people upset but Rockstar really should have stood up for itself. People do not have the right to not be offended. If there is a group of Haitians who find the game offensive (out of context of course), they are free not to buy the game and quit their whining.

      --
      I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
    2. Re:surprised? by s0rbix · · Score: 5, Insightful

      not all liberals are PC fascists. i am very liberal and make un-pc jokes all the time... i dont care so much when people are stereotpyed, and it doesnt bother me when a small group of people are offended over an out of context comment from a video game.

    3. Re:surprised? by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 1

      My signature is separate from my comment. I said nothing about liberals being PC. I will expect an apology.

      --
      I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
    4. Re:surprised? by bitrott · · Score: 1

      I think you should expect a cap in your ignorant skull you redneck motherfucker. Get off your sister two seconds so we can explain to you the meaning of civility... at gunpoint.

  16. The PC Version... by Herkum01 · · Score: 3, Funny

    They can replace the Haitians with elves and the cubans with reindeer. The main character will be Santa Claus and he only scores with Mrs. Claus, who happens to wear a bikini. Merry Christmas indeed! Or was that not the effect these people were looking for?

  17. Haitians are Grade-A HYPOCRITES!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I mean, where was their outrage at the movie Bad Boys II(just got it today and watched it, great movie)? Will Smith and Martin Lawrence's characters have big gunfights with a chapter of the KKK, with a HAITIAN GANG, and with the Cuban Army. Oh, wait, I know why, is it because the main character of Vice City is white? If that's the Haitian groups' answer, then they're the ones being racist.

  18. Literature by Deanasc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Videogames are the next logical step beyond the Gutenberg Bible and Talkies. To censor them is to tell Falukner, Fitzgerald and Twain they can't make black people the servants in any novel. What's the point of writing if you can't tell the truth about the times you're writing about?

    --
    I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
    1. Re:Literature by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Its been a while, but I recall that some school board, a while back, wanted to censor Twain. Basically, they wanted to remove the word "nigger" from the book entirely. Now, I understand that it is a deragatory word, and for it to be commonly used in school might offend some people, but the use of the word in the context of a book about the South, during the days of slavery does help to provide a better view of how people lived and thought at the time.
      Also, I wish people would quit being so sensative about words. It's just a word, it's not inherently evil in and of itself. It's the racist bastard using the word that you should worry about. Yes, I'm whitey the wonderbread blue eyed devil, doesn't bother me, Its just words.
      Lastly, am I the only white guy who ever wanted to start the NAAWP (National Association for the Advancement of White People)? We've got groups representing every racial group, except white people (no, the KKK doesn't count, they're just a bunch of racist whackos). Of course, I'll probably be decried as being racist for such a thing.
      Remember, it's not racisim if it's done against white people, it's affimative action.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    2. Re:Literature by Christian+Claiborn · · Score: 1

      You're not the only person who wanted to start that group. The person who did start it is David Duke. Details here. That's good company you're in.

    3. Re:Literature by exick · · Score: 1

      Also, when you use a line from George Carlin, you might want to give credit.

    4. Re:Literature by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 1

      opps, I meant to, and forgot to. Yes, I stole a line from Carlin in the middle of my post there, didn't quote it, 'cause I'm sure I botched it.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
  19. Re:=O by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey there Mr Mike Hawk, if you are going to try and grab a first post, please take your head out of your ass long enough to turn on "AC".

  20. What about us white guys? by Ithaca_nz · · Score: 1

    I've never actually played Vice City, but I have played all the other GTA games. If they're anything to go by, you'll definitely kill far more mid-late 20's white guys than anybody else. But I suspect that if I, as one of the above got up there and said "Oi, I'm sick of being in the killable majority" I'd get shouted down as being insensitive to minorities. Sheesh. Maybe there's more of us out there to kill, and I'm not saying that (some of) us don't deserve - probably more as a group - but I'm always by this kind of double standard...

    1. Re:What about us white guys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for missing the point. The argument is not about killing Hatians, its about the phrase printed on the screen that says "KILL ALL HATIANS"

  21. Let's recap by Black+Hitler · · Score: 2, Funny

    So they've effectively shut up the critics by promising to remove the offending dialogue from all copies of the game produced at some unspecified point in the future after the ten trillion copies currently on store shelves have sold out. Pretty good move on their part if you ask me. Say, did Eidos ever get around to releasing the "censored" version of Hitman 2 without all the Sikh stuff?

    1. Re:Let's recap by metamatic · · Score: 1

      Sikh stuff? Some kind of "Sikh and Destroy" mission?

      I think I missed that news.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  22. Re: Or how about this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Consider this...

    You can refer to the British as Brits, and the Scottish as Scots, or even the Slovakians as Slovaks, and Canadians and Canucks, or Russians as Ruskies, and it's all OK. But the second you use the same sort of abbreviations for Japan, China, Pakistan, etc, suddenly it's racist.

    WHY?

  23. Sounds like a case for.. by u-238 · · Score: 0

    the Mothers Against Video game Addiction and Violence,
    a band of likeminded mothers with one main goal: to help purge the world's youth of Videogame Addiction and Violence and Underground Videogame Cultures

    1. Re:Sounds like a case for.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those mothers can go screw themselves on some dildo's ^_^

    2. Re:Sounds like a case for.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The women in that group probably wouldn't know what one looks like anyway. :)

      But you're right, they need a few gigolos, no matter how expensive.

  24. A Small "Victory"... by Monthenor · · Score: 3, Interesting
    ...but we still get to kill Cubans, right? Their lobby must not be as televised^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H powerful.

    Seriously, though, we should really be more concerned about the rampant genocide already present in gaming culture.

    One last thing: why is the "strike" tag not supported? I can't be the only one sick of seeing ^Hs.

    --
    Co-founder of GerbilMechs
    1. Re:A Small "Victory"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One last thing: why is the "strike" tag not supported? I can't be the only one sick of seeing ^Hs.

      Use ^W (delete previous word) instead, it's a lot more readable.

    2. Re:A Small "Victory"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I can't be the only one sick of seeing ^Hs.

      Anyone who used terminals knows you could more
      easily do ^W (or simply say what you mean), anyway.

    3. Re:A Small "Victory"... by mcb · · Score: 1

      so you're saying this guy is an idiot posing as a hardcore hacker because it makes himself feel special. that's what i always thought about people who use those chars.

    4. Re:A Small "Victory"... by EvilSporkMan · · Score: 1

      I used to have this box open for telnet access, and a friend and I discovered write and this ^H effect, but we found it could be avoided easily by doing
      cat - | write
      What'd I miss here?

      --
      -insert a witty something-
  25. PC or not PC by nwanua · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm surprised that nobody really seems to understand the context from the Hatian point of view:

    I think this form of censorship is along the same lines as a society censoring a public figure for making (even remotely) disparaging remarks about _any_ group. I'm sure we can recall an instance when some Mayor/Newscaster/Governor/Councilwoman/Banker/CEO made some (apparently) anti- (mexican/black/jewish/chinese/mexican/...) remarks and was taken to task to apologise.

    Now, one can argue about whether GTA is a "public figure" or not and whether this is covered under "Free Speech". But inasmuch as the "opinions" of the characters in the game reflect the thoughts of the game developers - which are now broadcast to all who are within earshot - one could consider them public.

    I think it's well within reason for individuals/groups/companies to seek censure against (perceived) defamatory remarks.

    Do we all remember the brouhaha about a certain singer's: "Kick me, Kike me" lyrics?

    I hope that, at the very least, this gives you pause to think about the feelings of individuals/groups who don't appreciate such "unpleasant" references to themselves.

    1. Re:PC or not PC by andyt · · Score: 1

      I'm sure we can recall an instance when some Mayor/Newscaster/Governor/Councilwoman/Banker/CEO made some (apparently) anti- (mexican/black/jewish/chinese/mexican/...) remarks and was taken to task to apologise.

      You mean like niggardly?

    2. Re:PC or not PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Video games are art. It's called Free Speech. Go fuck yourself.

    3. Re:PC or not PC by HCase · · Score: 1

      There is a big difference between a game company and a 'public figure.' The public figures that get called for making racially insensitive remarks are generally those in the government and are therefore making laws that, if biased, could damage the lives of the groups who the figure disliked. A game company doesn't have that kind of direct effect on people's lives and livelihoods and should be allowed to express more extreme views, whether they company believes those views, is simply trying to reach a certain demographic, or is trying to give people who are sick of always having to be PC a break is irrelevant.

    4. Re:PC or not PC by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 1

      1. Grow a skin.
      2. There is a bit of difference here. One that you, and these groups seem to have missed: context. If a public figure makes a racially dispariging remark, he probably means something by it. If a fictional character (who is probably supposed to be racist), makes a racially dispariging comment, it is nothing more than putting a bit of realism into a fictional game, it doesn't mean anything. Fact is, people aren't nice, many of them say and do things that are hurtful to other people, and when a game centers around such people, you should expect to see/hear such things. Get over it, its just a game, the remark was added to help drive the plot, and to make the characters more believeable. Do you really think a Cubian gang member is going to go to the trouble of saying, "Kill the members of the Haitian gang, but be sure you don't let this flow over into killing any Haitian you see, because that wouldn't be pollitically correct." Hell, no, most likely, he would say something along the lines of, "Kill all Haitians!" And if your violence spilled over to the Haitian community, at large, he would probably be happy about it.
      Its a game, and its going to have racist bastards in it, and they are going to say racist things, get over it. Like books and movies, these characters exist to drive the plot, without them, its a lot harder to deal with such subject matter.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    5. Re:PC or not PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure we can recall an instance when some Mayor/Newscaster/Governor/Councilwoman/Banker/CEO made some (apparently) anti- (mexican/black/jewish/chinese/mexican/...) remarks and was taken to task to apologise.

      Funny, George Bush (the first) has yet to apologize for saying Atheists should not be considered citizens or patriots of the US.

      (http://www.positiveatheism.org/writ/ghwbush.htm )

  26. Popular Media Topic by Galileo430 · · Score: 1

    It's a popular media topic of late. The story broke here in NY on CBS channel 2 news about a week and change ago. I figured it would boil over like the Doom stuff after the school shootings. On Monday I saw that Fox 5 was running a story on :: brace yourself :: Duke Nukem 3D! Just what I've come to expect from network news, timely, fair and balenced.

    I'm just worried that this sets a bad example.

    1. Re:Popular Media Topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      On Monday I saw that Fox 5 was running a story on :: brace yourself :: Duke Nukem 3D!

      Actually, that story was supposed to have been about Duke Nukem Forever, but Fox News got tired of watching the story gather dust while they waited for it to be relevant. So they made a small change and put it on the Monday news, just to fill some air time and clear up some shelf space.

    2. Re:Popular Media Topic by Tired_Blood · · Score: 1

      On Monday I saw that Fox 5 was running a story on :: brace yourself :: Duke Nukem 3D!

      I was laughing for about a minute when I saw the clips in the commercial previewing their 'news'.

      Since when is EIGHT YEARS OLD considered new?

      Also, if you look at the advisory label (about 2 screens down), it's rated 1 of 4 for "Nudity/Sex", an issue that Fox5 was pursuing (at least in the commercial I saw). At least use an example that's 2 or higher. Then again, the commercial wouldn't have been as funny.

      --
      This is not my sig.
  27. Re: Or how about this.. by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Brits call themselves brits, Scots call themselves Scots so those two are probably self explanatory.

    It probably doesn't help if you've been at war with someone in reasonably recent history as the abbreviated names tend to have retained their pejorative edge.

    It also has to be said that I don't think I've ever heard "nip", "chink" or "paki" said without a degree of ill-feeling behind it (GWB's "pakis" statement being the exception).

    It's not terribly unreasonable to accept that some shortened names have gathered a negative meaning while some haven't. Language evolves like that.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  28. It doesn't matter anymore... by Ceyan · · Score: 1

    Quit whining about Rockstar caving in. It doesn't matter anymore, GTA Vice City is out there, anyone who hasn't boughten the game by now will do so before the censored copies hit the shelves.

    Why should Rockstar fight in costly court battles when they could take 5 minutes and fix what people want to them to fix in a product which isn't likely to make them more money. Now that money that would have been invested into GTA Vice City can be invested into GTA Kill the Haitans.

  29. Re:=O by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't it be pwned?

  30. I don't quite understand which stance you've taken by HaloZero · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...if any. If none, I apologize.

    Frankly, I'm ready to write to them, and say thank you for making such a great game. It's rare you see a title where everyone has an equal opportunity to get shot in the face.

    --
    Informatus Technologicus
  31. Re:It's like the word nigger. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you ever called someone a pejorative name in an ironic sense that was really meant to show good will and brotherhood?

    Nigger, from a white man directed at a black man has a very negative connotation (historically and contemporarily) due to the long history of white slave owners and the black slaves.

    Nigger, from a black man to a black man shows a common struggle. Its like if I called fellow white people as "fucking rednecks" or fellow asian people as "rice pickers" or a fellow Jew as a "Christ Killer"

    Do you feel angry that you can't call black people niggers anymore? Do you want to whine and cry on daddy's shoulder? Did the scary black man take away your word?

    I wish the stupid liberals would stop brainwashing everyone into thinking that everyone is inheriently equal. People aren't (of course race plays no part in these differences, these differences are on an individual basis). We are all different, and thats what makes the US strong. Realizing and accepting differences forms greater bonds.

  32. Re:I don't quite understand which stance you've ta by understyled · · Score: 1

    It's rare you see a title where everyone has an equal opportunity to get shot in the face.

    how true. not since Carmageddon have i been so tickled by the so-indiscriminantly-violent-i-cant-help-but-laugh thing. i mean, seriously, had Rockstar put in Polish dudes into gta instead of Haitians or god knows who else, i would have bought this game even sooner. i would not have been offended in the least, Polish heritage and all.

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  33. I'm buying in Australia by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

    and it doesn't come out here till January 9th (god knows why) so I don't know whether it will be censored in this way or not. There's also rumours that the Australian edition might be censored in other ways in any case. For the most part I probably don't actually care though. As long as the game mechanics are the same I don't expect a bit of swearing/nudity/whatever here or there will alter my enjoyment much.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  34. Re: Or how about this.. by Haeleth · · Score: 1

    Brits call themselves brits...

    We do? First I've heard of it. To my ears the term sounds rather derogatory, although Americans use it so frequently, and so obviously without malice, that only an idiot would bother to be offended.

    I certainly don't object to anti-British sentiment in movies and video games, though, usually it just makes them funnier. Anyone remember the bartender's line from Privateer? "Man, I hate the British. I mean, who doesn't, right?" Did Origin take that line out before releasing it on this side of the Atlantic? Of course not!

  35. Re: Or how about this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brits call themselves brits, Scots call themselves Scots so those two are probably self explanatory.

    Blacks call themselves niggers, but I somehow don't think I, as a white man, could get away with it. Things aren't quite as simple as you make out.

  36. I am british too by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

    And I've heard it reasonably often. But I live outside Britain, Brits inside Britain might not talk about being British as often because it's normal rather than a distinguishing feature I guess.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  37. Re: Or how about this.. by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

    So then the real question is, do people from the UK realize how offended some people are at being called Yanks?

    --
    -PainKilleR-[CE]
  38. Demand that all Human content be removed from game by LordJezo · · Score: 2, Funny

    END THE HATE!

    Join my petition.. demand that humantiy be taken out of such a wretched game! Rockstar must not use humanity for greed!!!

    <LI>http://www.petitiononline.com/havc/petition. ht ml</LI>

    Let them know! Let our voices be heard!!

  39. End the hate.. by LordJezo · · Score: 1

    END THE HATE!

    Join my petition.. demand that humantiy be taken out of such a wretched game! Rockstar must not use humanity for greed!!!

    http://www.petitiononline.com/havc/petition.html

    Let them know! Let our voices be heard!!

  40. Re: Or how about this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah but if you look at the examples I listed, "coincidentally" all the abbreviations that are for peoples who are predominantly white, are also the ones that are considered inoffensive. As soon as you're referring to peoples that are predominantly non-white, all of a sudden the abbreviation is "racist". Little bit of a double standard, no?

    I blame it on PC pansies.

  41. Grand Day Out: Barney City by RobK · · Score: 1

    Screw them all... ... It's a FREAKING GAME!

    An ENTERTAINMENT EXPERIENCE.

    If you don't understand that you don't qualify to use the product - don't watch any movies either.

    Get a life!!

    No one would complain if it said "Kill Whitey!" - the f*ing liberals would say "We deserve it".

  42. Perhaps... by a+whoabot · · Score: 1

    Perhaps Rockstar will maintain artistic integrity. Maybe in the changed text they'll include some clever jab at the critics. We can only hope. It sounds like something they would do.

    1. Re:Perhaps... by JosefWells · · Score: 1

      Maybe they will change it to:

      "Kill all the DIRTY Haitians"

      That would rule.

  43. Re:It's like the word nigger. by nelsonal · · Score: 1

    Look at the difference between geeks calling each other geeks, and someone else using the term. One shows camaraderie the other derision. Or look at the uproar around here when someone in the media uses hacker instead of cracker.

    --
    Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  44. Yet somehow .. by dzeroo · · Score: 0

    I can't help but wonder about the demographic of this site.

    Anyone here ever been discriminated against?

    --
    == chicks are for fags ==
  45. Wow by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

    why is the "strike" tag not supported? I can't be the only one sick of seeing ^Hs.

    I was wondering what the "^H^H"s were. Now I'm happy. =)

    --
    "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    1. Re:Wow by exick · · Score: 2, Funny

      Beware this is Slashdot. You aren't supposed to wonder those kinds of things lest ye be mocked.

    2. Re:Wow by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

      That's okay, I've had plenty of practice being mocked in real life. =)

      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
  46. Re:I don't quite understand which stance you've ta by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 1

    I posted a bit prematurely BUT I think people should write to Rockstar and let them know that caving to special interest groups does not make the people who buy their games happy. I want the developers of GTA4 to have full reign and know that the company will back them up with whatever they produce. I don't want self-censorship to be going on.

    --
    I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
  47. ...I used to... by silicon1 · · Score: 1

    ...hate everyone equally; but now I hate haitians just a little bit more.

  48. Re:It's like the word nigger. by HCase · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Change "fucking rednecks" to rednecks and I hear non-white people say it all the time, and pretty much never hear anyone take offense. Of course, throw an adjective in front of it and it changes completely. I've also known a number of jews who were refered to as names simliar to christ killer and didn't care, generally he found them fairly amusing.(occasionally a local uber-christian would get mad, but not the jewish guy).

    Nigger is the only racial term I can think of at the moment that makes people mad only if a specific race uses it. I wouldn't mind much if people got mad when anyone used it, but personally it seems a bit racist for a single skin color of people to be completely singled out and not allowed to use it.

    As for the whining and crying on daddy's shoulder, seems like its not the white guys that whine and cry and get angry whenever a naughty word gets used.

    The long history of white slave owners and black slaves is over, lets let it pass and remember it as a bad time that is gone and must never be brought back.

  49. Re:It's like the word nigger. by TheLink · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well it's a bit like tickling/back-slapping.

    If a stranger tries to tickle you, that's harassment.

    That said lots of people are stuck where they are because they spend more time whining than doing something positive. Or they choose to adopt a self-destructive culture.

    --
  50. Anyone else here think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That this group will not accept minor word changes? I wouldn't be surprised if they try to get the whole game altered.

    If these groups got this far with little resistance from compaines like rockstar, why stop there? I really doubt that a minor word change will fix this problem. Plus with rockstar bending over for these groups, it makes easy for these groups to get their ways and their FUD look valid(even though it isn't).

    Even though the media is biassed, and takes this FUD as fact, the least rockstar could have done would have been to demonstrate the quote in context to the game. Although most would have ignored it, this way they have the proof to back up the claims they made in their announcement.

  51. Obligatory voodoo joke by Hackie_Chan · · Score: 1

    I could've done a voodoo joke here, but then it struck me that fighting racism with prejudice isn't funny.

    --

    What's so bad about being lazy? What if there was a war and nobody showed up?
  52. First post? by Mike+Hawk · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If I was going for first post I would remember. Though I see you still haven't figured out how to log in in the first place.

    Just goes to my point that the games section is too juvenile to properly utilize the moderation system.

  53. You are a dolt by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

    Language does not evolve to a standard. Negative aspects to some words exist because of their historical usage not "sudden" decisions on the part os "PC pansies" today.

    If anyone is being "politically correct" it is you as you are trying to wipe out the accepted, naturally acquired meaning of words in an effort to make things "even".

    The only "coincidence" is that you chose the examples you listed. There are no doubt counter examples, such as calling an Italian an Iti.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  54. What they should have done by Gamelore · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Kill all the Haitians!" flows. The creators used those words -- that is what they felt would compel the player the most in that situation. Changing a single thing due to censorship utterly destroys the creative flow of the work. And GTA:VC was another masterpiece, from what I've heard, so this is really bad news. What's next, telling them to remove black and mexican gang members form GTA3? I never thought Take Two would cave in this fast. Here's a list of easy things they could have said to protect their creation and creativity in the future: 1) They could say "It's rated M for Mature, deal." 2) They could say "It's called the first ammendment, deal" 3) They could say "It's just a game, deal" 4) They could say "We don't even make that game anymore, it's so last year." 5) They could say "Shut up, guys. Nobody cares. Quit being a bunch of sensative pussies." If somehow none of those things worked, they finally could have come to some kind of agreement by simply not selling the game in that city. If they said "Kill all the Finnish-German-Americans!" I would have laughed my ass off.. Like those Haitians should have too, not spoiled it.

  55. Re: Or how about this.. by TwistedSquare · · Score: 1

    Short answer: yes. But maybe in a different way to Americans.. to people from the UK I'd say it summons up the image of an arrogant (quite possibly stock-broker) American.

  56. Re: Or how about this.. by TwistedSquare · · Score: 1

    Ah come on, you know that no-one calls themselves British. You're either Scottish, Welsh, English or from Northern Ireland (do they have a short version?).

  57. Re: Or how about this.. by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

    heh, in the US, Yankees would most likely be those in the northern states, specifically referring to the US Civil War (North vs. South and all of that). To some people here in the south it is quite an offense to be called a Yankee. Then again, there're also those like myself that grew up outside of the area involved that just think the only reason someone would use such an antiquated term would be to use it in a derogatory sense.

    --
    -PainKilleR-[CE]
  58. Re: Or how about this.. by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

    When the British (and Irish) Lions tour they do :)

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  59. Re: Or how about this.. by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

    Yeah it is used derogatorily but probably not at the level of intended offensiveness as some people in the south might take it.

    It probably maintains currency in international usage because "Yank" sounds a fair bit like "wank(er)" which is more or less the sort of feeling that is often meant.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  60. one of an infinite number of typing monkeys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whats the matter Mike? You can dish it out but you cannot take it? Can you refute my claim that you were trying to get first post and forgot to turn on AC?

    No you cannot. If you find evidence please include links. I could link to your unimaginative first post but I assume that is unnecessary, and the whole hyperlinks thing is beyond my simple primate intelligence.

    Just goes to my point that the games section is too juvenile to properly utilize the moderation system.

    I don't know, someone got modded as funny for insulting you, seems to work to me. Just one other question: do you have the above quote in a text file that you can just cut and paste it or do you type it in by hand every time you want to use it as a snappy comeback?

    No I'm only kidding Mike you are great i love you. I wish you had 3 accounts so I could include you on my friends list 3 times. And if someone could provide a link to the login procedure for slashdot I would be very grateful.

    1. Re:one of an infinite number of typing monkeys by Mike+Hawk · · Score: 1

      Are you trying to draw me out so I lose karma? You've got to understand I don't care. You seem to however, and I find that interesting.

      Since you asked, "Owned" was the quickest, most to the point statement about what happened to Rockstar. They sold out not only themselves, but the entire case for games as art by not backing up their freedom of speech rights and caving to a small time politician and some micro special interest group. Of course, as usual you don't understand the issue at hand, and couldn't see how that simple statement summed it up perfectly with no wasted time or calories.

      Now, interestingly, +1 Funny doesn't go to karma, so either way that moderation does nothing but prove how the small group who routinely posts in the Games section has too much power. I bet you used your normal account to mod yourself Funny and then mod my reply down? Hey, good for you.

      And I thought you weren't going to read my tripe anymore. I told you a long time ago, I'm not going on a date with you and you can't come to my house anymore. You really should move on.

    2. Re:one of an infinite number of typing monkeys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, as usual you don't understand the issue at hand, and couldn't see how that simple statement summed it up perfectly with no wasted time or calories.

      Well let me use one word to describe what has happened to Mike Hawk here.

      here it is: owned

      Can you keep up or am I going too fast?

  61. Re:It's like the word nigger. by exick · · Score: 1

    The long history of white slave owners and black slaves is over, lets let it pass and remember it as a bad time that is gone and must never be brought back.

    Part of that "bad time" was the usage of the word by slave masters to refer to their African slaves. That's where the negativity comes from. If you want to let the long history of slavery pass, be my guest, but the word goes with it.

    And don't use one particular experience you had with a Jewish friend as an example of how the entire group feels. There are plenty of Jews who are extremely offended by the notion that they should endure persecution because the person who put Christ to death was Jewish. Just look at all the uproar over Mel Gibson's movie.

    Everything is about context. If my best friend is Jewish and I call him a dirty penny-pinching Yid, the ADL isn't going to hold a press conference and condemn me. But if I walk into a Vietnamese shop and call the clerk a gook, he's probably going to be pretty pissed. The word nigger isn't bothersome, but the way it's used (and has been used in recent history) is what causes it to have a negative connotation for black people.

  62. Re:It's like the word nigger. by nanojath · · Score: 1
    I wish someone would explain the logic of that to me.


    It's real simple. I can say what I want about my mother. If you say something about her we're going to have a problem. Blacks appropriated the term nigger and made it a neutral, "in" slang. In general what is objectional is the way it is being used. A white person is less likely to use nigger in a friendly, convivial way. If they try to do so, it is likely to seem like condecension or an clumsy attempt to emulate another culture.


    In fact, white people who are sufficiently "in" to a black scene can and do get away with the "friendly" use of nigger, if they want, depending on context. There are also plenty of black people (more common among older blacks) who do not like to hear it said at all no matter the context or who says it. To them it seems to reflect ignorance of the history of the word - as a perjorative term arising from slavery. Social norms don't necessarily make a lot of sense.


    Being the pasty honky cracker I am, and given that it has been traditionally used as a perjorative term of contempt, I don't use the term nigger casually although I might get away with it in certain contexts. Am I "politically correct?" No, I just try to be a polite and decent person.

    --

    It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries

  63. MOD PARENT DOWN -1 TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moderators? Parent is threatening physical violence - mod down.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN -1 TROLL by bitrott · · Score: 1

      BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAA. what's the sound of a thousand voices blithering in a vaccuuum? "moooooderator! mod down!"

  64. Re:It's like the word nigger. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your goal is to be a polite and decent person, then you are being politically correct.

    What makes everybody look at political correctness, as a term, with disdain? Oh, I know what it is. It's the opportunistic politically INcorrect rabblerousers who have misappropriated the term and co-opted it into meaning "STFU whiteboy."

  65. Re: Or how about this.. by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

    It probably maintains currency in international usage because "Yank" sounds a fair bit like "wank(er)" which is more or less the sort of feeling that is often meant.

    And interestingly enough, at least to some people in the US, yank or yanker has pretty much the same meaning as wank or wanker in the UK.

    --
    -PainKilleR-[CE]
  66. Re: Or how about this.. by ukmountie · · Score: 1
    Reminds me of a story about a friends husband who on visiting England and going on about how horrible it was said and "they kept calling me Yankie, and they knew I'm not American". Everyone else at the table got the Wanker reference.

    Now if you want real trouble call an Canadian, American.

  67. Haitian idiots still aren't happy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to a couple of other sites, The Haitian Ass-Clowns are now saying that it's not enough to remove the phrase, they now want the game banned.

    As a wrestling fan, is it just me, or does this remind you of the WWE's battle with the Parents Television Council, in which the PTC attacked WWE's advertisers with bogus claims that wrestling caused children's death(including the Lionel Tate case). These attacks caused several sponsors including Coca-Cola, Wrigley's, the U.S. Army, AT&T, and Wendy's to stop advertising on WWE programming, causing WWE to tone down their programming, yet the PTC continued to attack WWE because they wanted WWE Smackdown! off the air. In Nov. 2000, WWE sued the PTC, winning a $3.5 million settlement and a public apology from the PTC's founder Brent Bozell to Vince McMahon last July.

    It seems to me like the Haitian groups are only in it for publicity and money, considering that Vice City has sold close to 10 million copies(my estimate, remember that VC sold 4.5 million copies from the time of its release on Oct. 29, 2002 to the end of 2002). Take-Two can use WWE's lawsuit against the PTC as a blueprint for their own lawsuit against the Haitian-American Coalition. But then again, does the Haitian's actions really matter? Only if they succeed, which, in my opinion, they won't.

    1. Re:Haitian idiots still aren't happy by Zoshnell · · Score: 1

      That was teh funnay, that whole dog and pony show with the PTC. I'm glad it happened, brought out the RTC, which I felt really made use of second stringers like Stevie Richards and Ivory and putting them to use. Plus their characters got Chyna off my screen for a good long time. That was freakin awesome.

      --
      "Do you suppose that's why God lives in the Heavens? Because he lives in fear of His creations?" - Steve Buscemi