Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Toshiba Develops 0.85'' Hard Disk

Posted by timothy on from the smaller-is-better dept.

onebuttonmouse writes "Toshiba have set a new record for the world's smallest hard disk at a tiny 0.85". Surely this will have some great applications in mobile devices, although the article does not mention power consumption. It'd be great if this made it into the iPod like the 1.5" Toshiba drive that resides in the current models."

71 of 283 comments (clear)

  1. pfft... by focitrixilous+P · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's not how big it is, it's how you use it...

    --
    SAILING MISHAP
    1. Re:pfft... by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 4, Funny

      An especially ironic statement, considering how much of it we use for porn :)

      --
      It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
    2. Re:pfft... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 3, Funny

      Is .85" how big it is when it's hard or when it's floppy?

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    3. Re:pfft... by innerlimit · · Score: 3, Funny

      Great, now i'll be getting emails saying

      'Inkreez ur HD size'

      --
      The Awful Truth
    4. Re:pfft... by Kingpin · · Score: 2, Funny


      That's what all the guys with little harddisks say..

      --
      Unable to read configuration file '/bigassraid/htdig//conf/14229.conf'
      Geocrawler error message.
  2. Why the iPod? Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It could benefit all hard drive based music players, not just the iPod.

    1. Re:Why the iPod? Seriously by grub · · Score: 5, Insightful


      2-3GB on a 0.85" drive isn't much compared to the 30GB+ on a 1.5" drive. That said I wish they'd put more money into developing high density solid state storage devices. 0.85" is cool but it's still a mechanical device with all the inherent problems.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:Why the iPod? Seriously by BitchKapoor · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Rio Karma plays MP3, WMA, Ogg and FLAC, but it includes a 20GB hard drive. It also has an ethernet port in its docking station.

    3. Re:Why the iPod? Seriously by Zeinfeld · · Score: 3, Insightful
      2-3GB on a 0.85" drive isn't much compared to the 30GB+ on a 1.5" drive.

      Try building an IPOD into a pair of headphones. The advantage of compact flash is you can now store enough data for almost any conceivable portable use. Like when did you last listen to 30Gb worth of MP3 without recharging your batteries?

      The role of an iPod formfactor device is to provide a portable repository from which to fill up the wearable media. No an ipod is too heavy to count as wearable.

      The big problem with these disk ideas is that they end up costing a lot - $500 to $200, there is no low end version like there is for flash rom. I typically buy whatever memory is $60 at costco these days, but then again for photography that is easily sufficient, I do not fill up 256K chips before I can reach my laptop.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  3. A drop on the factual side by NeoThermic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For those in the UK; 0.85 Inches is a nice small 2.159cm. Although I wonder at the capacity and the sheilding from magnetic interference its going to need to keep away from even small magnetic currents erasing the data...

    NeoThermic

    --
    Use my link above, or to view my server, NeoThermic.com
    1. Re:A drop on the factual side by Ingolfke · · Score: 2, Informative

      As the article stated:

      Despite the smaller size, Toshiba's HDD has a storage capacity of 2-3GB

  4. 1 gigabyte flash by morcheeba · · Score: 4, Informative

    I wonder how this will compete with Samsung's new one gigabyte (8 GBit) flash. With a storage capacity of only 2-3 GB, this drive is only 2 or 3 of these flash chips, so competing on size would be hard. Hopefully it's much cheaper.

    --
    HIV Crosses Species Barrier... into Muppets
    1. Re:1 gigabyte flash by HiThere · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ability to do rewrites to a sector could be significantly different, however. There are recommendations to not format flash to ext3 because of frequent rewrites to the same sectors, which could cause the flash cells to end-of-life pretty quickly, but hard disks don't generally have that problem. (OTOH, neither do vfat systems...not sure about ext2.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    2. Re:1 gigabyte flash by randyest · · Score: 3, Informative

      The company expects each drive to cost around 30,000 yen initially, but projects that mass production will push down the price to less than 10,000 yen within a few years.

      Yen30,000 is about 278.497 USD, Yen10,000 is about 92.8326 USD

      How much is that 1GB flash?

      --
      everything in moderation
    3. Re:1 gigabyte flash by pbox · · Score: 3, Insightful

      300 USD might buy you 3GB flash after some rebate crap. By the time this product comes out in 1-2 years, the final price will likely to be less and just below equivalent flash capacity. See what happened to IBM Microdrives vs. CompactFlash... It is not earth shattering invention, just normal evolution. Now 30 GB in that size, that would be somethin'.

      --
      Code poet, espresso fiend, starter upper.
    4. Re:1 gigabyte flash by BitchKapoor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most CompactFlash cards have built-in write conditioning in their controls, which is why it's not much of a problem to write whatever filesystem, including FAT, to them. SmartMedia (really StupidMedia), on the other hand, requires the host to do it.

    5. Re:1 gigabyte flash by Ion+Berkley · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is a concern. NAND flash which is generally the technology that leads the density curve needs special algorithms called 'wear leveling' in the device driver/file system to try to prevent 'hot spots' that cause bits to fail prematurely. the lower density NOR flash devices don't have the problem and tend to be used in application where this is expected to be a problem. That being said NAND flash has been used for many years in this type of application so I would describe it as an already solved problem. Given that there is no order of magnitude storage advantage for these miniturized HDD's over flash I can't imagine that flash would not still dominate in both the existing and new applciations it is touted for.
      I know I would think twice about have an HDD in a camera etc, I always treat my IPOD with extra care knowing what mechanical magic lurks within....

    6. Re:1 gigabyte flash by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think concerns about flash memory wearing out are usually overblown. I see flash cards advertised as having a minimum lifetime of 1,000,000 rewrite cycles. Suppose you formatted the card as ext3. Even if you wrote to the card once every minute around the clock, and it wrote to the same sectors each time, it would take more than two years to get up to a million writes. And who writes to their flash card every minute? Maybe you wouldn't want to use it as your permanent home directory for a knoppix install you used every day, but for any other use, I'd say that it's unlikely you'll get up to 1,000,000 writes anytime soon.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    7. Re:1 gigabyte flash by nathanh · · Score: 2, Interesting
      There are recommendations to not format flash to ext3 because of frequent rewrites to the same sectors, which could cause the flash cells to end-of-life pretty quickly, but hard disks don't generally have that problem. (OTOH, neither do vfat systems...not sure about ext2.)

      Your comment about ext3 (and ext2) is correct but VFAT is not immune to the frequent-rewrites problem. The FAT itself (basically a linked list stored as an array) will have frequent rewrites and there is no feature in VFAT to use alternate locations for the FAT. Also directory entries in VFAT will get frequent rewrites (especially the date fields). A flash-friendly filesystem needs to write to all "sectors" with equal frequency. VFAT does not do this.

      Not that I think any of this matters. USB keys become obsolete faster than you can wear them out. 16MB keys are already useless and 32MB ones are quickly going that way. I've never seen either size (16MB or 32MB) wear out before being junked. People are buying 512MB keys now for only a few $100. By the time the 512MB keys wear out I fully expect to be buying 10GB keys. I think the "only 10,000 writes" problem is theoretical; it's not a problem in practise.

      Though I suspect many USB keys rearrange their writes internally to prevent premature death. This probably means it doesn't matter what filesystem you use.

    8. Re:1 gigabyte flash by C10H14N2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It won't. Current pricing of compact flash memory in the 1GB range is about $300. At 10Y:1$, getting twice the space but on rapidly spinning disks on a handheld device prone to frequent bumps and drops is not going to be very attractive--especially as if you need that extra space, you can buy whatever sized CF Card suits you, so if you really only need 64MB, it'll cost you thirty bucks instead of three-hundred. In my digital photography experience, I found it MUCH more convenient to buy a couple 256 and 512MB CF cards and dump them to a 6GB hand-held drive when necessary, considering it would have cost about $4000 to get the necessary space in flash cards. That camera would accept the 1GB MicroDrive, but the power consumption was ridiculous and you had to be insanely careful handling it as an accidental pinch or abrupt bump would nuke it completely. I'd much rather see them throw a large-capacity CF card in the phones, since I could just pop it out of the phone and into any other device, or my pocket. Better yet, they could do like the higher quality cameras and PDAs and let you use CF/SM/SD media interchangeably.

      Regardless, with 100G hard drives going for roughly $100, this works out to over 30 times the price and on size, it's actually seven times larger physical displacement for equal capacity. Maybe when they get it to 4X the price for 1/4 the size at the same capacity, but not now. Really, would you pay $3,333 for 100G of space? Ok, maybe if it was Raid-5 Ultra-320 SCSI, but still.

      Perhaps this is just a vast conspiracy to get out of consumers in storage media the lost revenues on CD sales.

    9. Re:1 gigabyte flash by Cecil · · Score: 2, Informative

      For ext2, what you are saying is true. ext2 is a plain, boring, vanilla filesystem. ext3 is journalled. Which is why it is ext3 that is a concern.

      With default settings, ext3 syncs the journal every 5 seconds. Automatically, without stopping. The journal being located in the same place on the card, of course.

      For 1 million rewrites, this would kill your card in no less than 138.8 days. So, 4 months. I don't think that lifetime is still looking so great.

      --
      Random and weird software I've written.
    10. Re:1 gigabyte flash by Sloppy · · Score: 4, Interesting
      What occurs to me, when I read stuff like this, is that we still don't have a lot of diversity in filesystems. Ext3, Reiserfs, XFS, JFS.. all written for tradeoffs of reliability vs various different types of performance. But when was the last time you heard of a filesystem that was designed to not write to the same sector over and over?

      Me neither.

      There's still a frontier out there, and room to innovate and make one's mark.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    11. Re:1 gigabyte flash by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just because you haven't heard of it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. There are several linux filesystems suitable for embedded work, and they are designed for flash-card environments. There's cramfs which is a read-only compressed filesystem so you can cram as much stuff as possible into limited Flash space (to upgrade you just re-flash the entire filesystem with a new cramfs disk image, good for simple devices that can be upgraded with new ROMs). There's ramdisks or RAMFS to complement cramfs and make a usable Linux system where nothing at all is ever written to Flash. There's also JFFS which is a journaled filesystem made explicitly for Flash devices, which does try to adapt to Flash's weaknesses. It is used on iPAQs and other handhelds as the main filesystem.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
  5. So much porn... by scosol · · Score: 5, Funny

    in such a small place...

    God bless technology!

    --
    I browse at +5 Flamebait- moderation for all or moderation for none.
    1. Re:So much porn... by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 2, Funny


      I Like my women Like I like my hard drives, small and asian.

      --
      Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
  6. Microdrive by momerath2003 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If any of you were wondering about "The 1-inch HDD developed by the US affiliate of Hitachi Ltd," that is the same as (what was) the IBM MicroDrive. IBM's hard drive section was purchased by Hitachi.

    Also, it says that the Hitachi 1" hard drive was "released in November," but I know that the IBM MicroDrives have been around a lot longer than that. Maybe it's just that they shrunk a little and grew in capacity.

    --
    I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
  7. The thing I find interesting about this... by foxtrot · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...is that a Microdrive, which I believe is what they're referring to by "1 inch" hard disk drive is too large for cellphones, according to the article, but somehow, this .85 inch one isn't. That's not a huge difference in platter size. Is the associated electronic equipment in this one notably smaller? The article doesn't say, but that's the only thing I can think of-- .15 of an inch (that's shy of four millimeters for y'all metric folks) doesn't seem like it would be a deal-breaker.

    Not that it really matters to me. As long as my phone has a vibrate mode, I don't think I want a hard disk in it...

    1. Re:The thing I find interesting about this... by grub · · Score: 4, Interesting


      which I believe is what they're referring to by "1 inch" hard disk drive is too large for cellphones

      Whenever I read about hard disks in a cell phone I always wonder about the gyroscope effect making the phone hard to manage. Power up a standard hard drive and try turning it perpindicular to the spindle and see what I mean.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:The thing I find interesting about this... by DrInequality · · Score: 3, Informative
      You can be certain that this tiny little drive will have negligable gyroscopic effects.

      The angular momentum is (for a point)
      L = M x R^2 x omega

      So scales as the square of the disk radius. The radius of a standard 3.5" disk is probably about 1.7", the radius of this new disk is 0.425". The small disk will therefore have about 5% of the momentum of the larger disk (assuming all else is equal).

      Also, all else is not equal: the minature disk will spin slower for sure. 5400RPM or less.

      --
      DROS - Open-Source Robot Software
    3. Re:The thing I find interesting about this... by cperciva · · Score: 2, Informative

      Whenever I read about hard disks in a cell phone I always wonder about the gyroscope effect making the phone hard to manage.

      I imagine that, for power saving purposes, the hard drive would spin slowly, and be spun down most of the time anyway.

      This raises another question, however: When the mobile phone starts its hard drive, would the phone start to spin?

      --
      Tarsnap: Online backups for the truly paranoid
    4. Re:The thing I find interesting about this... by dhovis · · Score: 4, Informative
      Well,

      Remember that area goes as the square of the diamater, so this new hard drive is only 72% of the area of a 1 inch drive. They don't mention the thickness, but if it is thinner than the 1 inch drives, then there is better than 30% savings on volume. That is nothing to sneeze at.

      As long as my phone has a vibrate mode, I don't think I want a hard disk in it...
      One thing to remember is that the smaller the radius of the hard disk platter, the less sensitive it will be to vibrations anyway. That is why iPods are relatively robust (that and good caching, so the hard drive is rarely moving anyway).
      --

      --
      The internet is the greatest source of biased information in the history of mankind.

    5. Re:The thing I find interesting about this... by furiousgeorge · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >>Whenever I read about hard disks in a cell
      >>phone I always wonder about the gyroscope
      >>effect making the phone hard to manage.

      What....? Those millions of peoples with iPods seem to be able to power them up and turn them without falling over.

      Current implementations demonstrate the gyroscopic effects aren't a concern (except possible for the engineers designing them). Smaller disks will make it even less so.

  8. 0.85 by rkz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is great for seek times, high speed applications like watching hi-res movies from a hard drive this small could mean smooth tracking through the film without losing audio sync, a problem which affects larger drives (3.5").
    Forget the iPod, this sort of drive would do nicely in a handheld/pocket divx player.

    --
    There is no god
    1. Re:0.85 by imsabbel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ????
      Could you explain wtf this has to do with access time?
      If you can track to a film with audio sync or not is purely dependent on the container and the audio codec. Ogg or avi mit vbr mp3 can create problems, seek times dont (your blockindey is already in hd-cache, and if you dont jump into an i frame, decoding a lot of b/p frames (up to 11 in mpeg2 up to 100s in mpeg4) will take a lot longer than seek time.

      But even if seek time would be important for that stuff: Your 0.85" hd will have a lot worse seek time than any normal 3.5" drive. Because of the simple fact that you cant fit very powerfull magnets / coils in such a small package.
      If your reasoning would be true, we would have servers running of microdrive raids for years...

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  9. Re:Waiting. by Bahumat · · Score: 3, Funny

    Heh. Don't suppose there's a +1: Ironic, modifier there?

    --
    "To pass through the jungle; silence, courtesy, ferocity, as the occasion demands." -- Kamau, "Proper Passage"
  10. Usage by CrystalChronicles · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd love to see this used on a digital camera. Imagine 2 gig of sapce to space your 5 megapixel shots. mmmm Price might be prohibitive at first but what new technology isnt?

    1. Re:Usage by rgmoore · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's already available, at least for more expensive cameras. You can get an IBM microdrive in a Compact Flash Type II form factor, which is a bit thicker but otherwise dimensionally compatible with the regular Compact Flash cards. Less expensive cameras aren't designed to accept both Type I and Type II, but many of the high-end ones- including all of the Digital SLRs, AFAIK- are. The extra capacity is obviously really useful when dealing with a 6+ megapixel camera that may want to save pictures in raw (i.e. not compressed) format. The availablility of hard drive storage is one of the key things that keeps Compact Flash relevant; it's bigger and clunkier than other card types, but at the very high end it can hold way more than any of the others.

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    2. Re:Usage by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ack! no thanks....

      I'll take my pocket full of 256 meg CF cards.

      If I lose,smash,wash one, I lose 256Meg of storage and not much money or photos lost.

      The last thing I want is to spend my weekend in disneyworld taking photos of my kids pissing on mickey, screaming anti-disney slogans and getting dragged off by the goofy police and lose every one of them due to media failure.

      for holding divx files for me to watch on my Zaurus? yes! important things like digital photos? nope.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  11. Size Matters? by fmlug.org · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great so I can loose this sucker just like I keep loosing that tiny cell phone I had to buy. Or better yet they will prob combine the two and make the worlds smallest cell with a HD. So then I can loose both at the same time. How small do we need things, really. I thought women always say "size matters!" if so the geeks are going in the wrong direction.

  12. Wait, wait, wait... by BAM0027 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There have been a few press releases about significant reductions in form factor, but the storage capacity is also much less. Just hang out until they get as fast, as capacious, and as cheap.

    Of course, when they do,...

  13. Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    100 of these crammed together. They could hold about 200G and only be about 5 times the size of a normal drive!

  14. 4GB MIcrodrive by G4from128k · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When I RTFA, I noted a related story on the new Compact Flash 4GB Microdrive and found a randomly chosen supplier with more specs and claims that these are in stock now. Just think, a DVD worth of data on a single CF card. Now I can start taking all my digital pictures in RAW format.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:4GB MIcrodrive by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most movies take up that much space only when you add in all the alternate language tracks & video extras that are on the disc. You'd be suprised how small some of those movies can get when you just want one language track, and no extras. And then if you encode it in something like DivX or xvid, you can get them _really_ small.

  15. 0.85inch drives in iPods? by joekra · · Score: 3, Informative
    These drives are not to be introduced until 2005... so will not find their way into iPods anytime soon...

    that being said, there are circulating rumors of Smaller/Cheaper iPods.

  16. Imagine.... by Ibanez · · Score: 3, Funny

    a REALLY small beowulf cluster of...oh nevermind....

  17. RAID 5 em by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Funny

    You know, I think it would be kinda nifty to set up five or six of these micro drives in RAID 5 configuration. I mean, talk about a solid mini-application server for household use.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  18. Low power consumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It should have quite low power consumption.

    All else being equal, the power consumption of similar hard disks should be approximately proportional to the square of their radii.

    Of course, friction is a funny thing, and the engineering may need to be different for a small device, so YMMV. In general, smaller disks will use less power.

  19. Ooooh . . . GPS application by StefanJ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Imagine a handheld GPS locator with every city map!

    Or that you can set to record a timespace waypoint every five minutes.

    You could tie one of these to your outdoor cat and see how many owners he has . . .

    Stefan

  20. Re:2-3gb by Ingolfke · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, or maybe they'll finally realize that everyone wants RAID in their IPods! With smaller drives they can make it happen. How are you supposed to run a serious production IPod w/o some form of disk redundancy! I mean seriously now Apple, let's get w/ the program.

  21. Poor man's computer by King+Bo+Bo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is BIG news. It looks like cell phones will become the poor man's computer. How many billions of people live in China and India again? Over two billion.

    1. Re:Poor man's computer by RevAaron · · Score: 3, Informative

      Heh. haha. and heh again!

      I think you're confusing China and India with more affluent Asian nations. Yes, darn near everyone in Japan has a cell phone. But in China or India? What the hell are you thinking, man! Plenty of those people don't have electricity at all, let alone a really expensive cell-phone with a really expensive tiny hard drive.

      How cheap do you think these tiny drives will be? The same HD space in a bigger drive (esp if second hand) is a fraction of the cost. Seems to me that older technology would be for the "poor man's computer," rather than the newest and most expensive stuff.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    2. Re:Poor man's computer by phatsharpie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      China, despite having the world's largest mobile phone market (~250 million users), the growth is now mainly in the lower end of the market, so innovations like these will take a long time to penetrate.

      http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/en/doc/2003-11/10/c on tent_280187.htm

      However, I remember reading that most people in Japan have already using their mobiles to access the Internet by default. A lot of Japanese don't even have home Internet access, if I recall correctly, because mobile access has been so good.

      -B

    3. Re:Poor man's computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      250 million chinese have mobiles phones at present and this is expected to grow to 500M by 2007.

      Mobile phone penetration is much higher in the US. at 50% but whats 50% of 300M?

      hi-tech phones the chinese may not have but they do have mobiles.

    4. Re:Poor man's computer by Silvers · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you saw Shanghai these days you might be suprised.

  22. Amen by 4of12 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    high density solid state storage devices

    Having seen 2 GB USB memory keys starting to become available, I have to wonder what the great advantage is of the microdrive.

    I've heard the memory keys are limited by the number of erase/write cycles (to ~10,000) before they wear out, and also limited to data transfer speeds of about 1 MB/s (although I think USB 2.0 is supposed to be better).

    Unforunately, I didn't see any specifications about the read/write speed for this drive, but if it's going to plug into a USB port then it has no practical advantage over the solid state memory device.

    Is there any other reason you'd want a mechanical device like this over solid state memory?

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:Amen by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2, Interesting

      why not use magnetic memory? thy have prototypes for magnetic storage in memory modules for computers, why not use MDRAM for memory sticks? it is not limited by read/writes, and it has no moving parts.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    2. Re:Amen by RevAaron · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The IBM Microdrive hasn't had any advantages for a while. That is, as long as that's what you are talking about, rather than meaning the 1.5" PCMCIA drives, as found in the iPod. The PCMCIA drives still have plenty of advantages, price and size being among them- I bought a 2 GB PCMCIA Toshiba HD for $70 over a year ago; how much is that 2 GB key drive? That said, that is $35 per GB, whereas with the Microdrive it's hundreds. And you'd need two of them, which is about the size of the single PCMCIA card. :P

      Yes, there's a reason you'd want a mechanical device like this over solid state. Price. That's about it. Depending on the application there may be other factors- if you're doing *tons* of writes then a flash-based solution will pitter out after some time. Any flash will, but usually it's not a big deal, consider how most people use it. But if you were using the flash as swap (as some folks do with their Zauruses), or certain embedded applications, your flash chips could die right quick.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    3. Re:Amen by rgmoore · · Score: 2, Informative
      Having seen 2 GB USB memory keys starting to become available, I have to wonder what the great advantage is of the microdrive.

      Price. Pricewatch lists the cheapest 2GB USB memory key as going for $514 and the cheapest 2GB microdrive as going for $195. In 4 GB sizes I'd expect the microdrive to have an even bigger advantage, but there's no listing for 4 GB USB memory keys, probably because they're too expensive for anyone to think about them.

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

  23. some day by khuber · · Score: 5, Funny

    computers may be small enough to fit in a single room.

    1. Re:some day by freeweed · · Score: 2, Funny

      I know you're trying to be funny, but consider this:

      You're posting to a place where a sizable chunk of the readership probably has more than a roomfull of computers :)

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  24. I would so lost that by Unregistered · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the iPod gets an smaller, it ould be too easy to lost, imo. Unless they leave the device the same size and put the extra space to use for the battery. That would be pretty sweet

  25. Creative, Rio, RCA Already Using 1" 1.5GB Drives by meehawl · · Score: 3, Informative

    Why wait for Apple? Creative, Rio, and RCA are already using 1" 1.5GB Cornice drives in some tiny mp3 players that make the iPod seem oversized. Cornice says they will have a 5GB model around the middle of 2004...

    --

    Da Blog
  26. Power Consumption... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most of the power used by a hard drive I would presume is used to spin the platters. With a mass and diameter this low, spun at the same rpm as standard drives the power used would be:

    a) huge
    b) average
    c) miniscule
    d) I can't think for myself and must be explicitly told.

    Come on, at a tiny 0.85" it has to have really really low power consumption.

  27. One-dimensional storage?! by mriker · · Score: 2, Funny
    "Toshiba have set a new record for the world's smallest hard disk at a tiny 0.85".

    Wowsers, just 0.85"! One-dimensional storage is teh FUTARE!!!1

  28. Instead of smaller... by AvantLegion · · Score: 3, Insightful
    ... how about making them shock-proof?

    No matter how many people say they jog/run with their iPod fine, there's no denying that the sucker locks up for a whole lot of people.

    1. Re:Instead of smaller... by ItMustBeEsoteric · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The iPod only locks up on you if you jog for more than, say, 20 minutes. That is how long the buffer on it lasts. If you happen to be unlucky enough to be running while it starts to spin up, there's a good chance it's going to lock on you. I used to run long distance (just don't have the time anymore), and I've had an iPod lock. Now, my Archos AV120 has never locked on me. Sure, it's been moved while spinning, has actually skipped once. But not locked. I don't mind as skip once every 20 minutes so much as I mind a no-music-until-I-reset-the-iPod-at-home every 20 minutes.

  29. Picture here by News+for+nerds · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's the picture and report(Japanese).
    The small picture posted in the article will be more real-size for most people.

  30. Re:2-3gb by useosx · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not to mention wireless offsite backup and hourly automated optical backups in case of viruses, user error, or environmental disasters. Apple is really lagging, they're almost dead, flapping around like a salmon that missed the waterfall and ended up on dry land.

  31. Frontier Labs Nex IA - CF Slot MP3 Audio Handheld by meehawl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you want something like this then check out the Frontier Labs Nex IA. It's got that iPod white goods plastic look and takes Type I & II Compact Flash memory cards or MicroDrives (I think these go to 4GB now with the latest models). Built-in FM tuner and voice/FM recording. You can swap in and out media cards with music or data on them. All the no-skip benefit of static devices with some expandability. Runs on AA. Nice.

    1GB, $250
    512MB, $250
    256MB, $150
    Yes, I know the 1GB/512MB pricing is screwed. Go figure.

    --

    Da Blog
  32. Dimensions by JewFish · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just telling me one dimension, 0.85", is useless. We live in a n-dimensional world. I forget what that n is, but last time I heard a nuclear physicist speak it was over 7. So tell me its the Length, Width, Height, Diameter, Radius or something useful.

    I had to RTFA to find out it was diameter, what kind of /.'er does that make me? having to RTFA uck.

  33. Is that a toshiba hdd in your pocket..... by reality-bytes · · Score: 4, Funny


    ....or are you cold?

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.