Slashdot Mirror


Doomsday PC-Cooling With Dual-Cascade Coolers

An anonymous reader submits "Four (4) compressors cooling one PC! Yes, it's big, yes it's heavy, yes it's loud and yes it does get your CPU and GPU cold, very cold. Is -100C cold enough for you? Cascade cooling is yet another chapter in a Finnish overclocker's neverending quest for optimal PC performance. Those things go down to -80 to -100C and can maintain the temperature. See here for the whole article with the pictures of the project."

41 of 311 comments (clear)

  1. In Finland... by inteller · · Score: 5, Funny

    ....wouldn't they just put their computers outside to get this kind of cooling?

    1. Re:In Finland... by msmikkol · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But its the damn Gulf stream in the Atlantic that keeps (at least) southern Finland relatively warm, considering the geographic location...

      --
      The aim of science is not to open the door to infinite wisdom, but to set a limit to infinite error.
      -Bertolt Brecht
    2. Re:In Finland... by Soporific · · Score: 4, Funny

      I know that's what we do here in Minnesota. Of course we only can overclock for what seems like 11 months out of the year, but you do have to get out every now and then to soak up some vitamin D. ~S

    3. Re:In Finland... by Shut+the+fuck+up! · · Score: 5, Funny

      ....wouldn't they just put their computers outside to get this kind of cooling?

      No, you got it all wrong. He is overclocking to stay warm. All those compressors must generate a lot of heat.

    4. Re:In Finland... by apharov · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sorry to disappoint you with this, but it really doesn't work that way... While the temperatures would be quite about the same as in this refrigerator the terrible weather would kill any computer in a few seconds ;)

      Seriously though, often in winter when I have had to melt my freezer / refrigerator I've just put the foodstuffs in a box on the windowsill and opened the ventilation window. Everything stays frozen for at least long enough to to get the extra ice out of the freezer. I'm saying this as a Finn of course :)

    5. Re:In Finland... by Pieroxy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While putting the computer outside is a stupid idea, I can think of a very simple system over there. Just drill two 1-inch wide holes in the wall next to your computer, attach two tubes to it and link them at the CPU fan level. This way the fan will get fresh air from outside to the CPU, and then throw it out. After all, that's what the compressor is all about: Getting something cold. The air outside should do it.

      Of course, you need to drill holes in your house...

    6. Re:In Finland... by Zapper · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just make the holes a bit bigger and you may have an internal NIC for this guy.

      --
      So much to do, so little bandwidth.
      --
      Try Mozilla
    7. Re:In Finland... by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sort of like In Soviet Finland, refridgerators heat your house? Very amusing.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
  2. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  3. Not Quite by qewl · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's not cold enough unless it can offset global warming. AND refrigerate my beer.

    --

    (\_/)
    (O.o) This is Bunny. (> <)
    1. Re:Not Quite by viniosity · · Score: 5, Informative

      Impossible due to the first law of thermodynamics which states that energy can be neither created nor destroyed. Here's a good link to brush up on your thermo101:

      http://www.geog.ouc.bc.ca/physgeog/contents/6e.h tm l

    2. Re:Not Quite by notyou2 · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Lisa, in this house... --[fuck it, nevermind]--

  4. IMAGINE.... by TheDarkener · · Score: 5, Funny

    A Beowulf cluster of compressors on a Beowulf cluster of computers!

    Umm.....

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  5. Cold feet by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wouldn't your legs and feet get cold sitting next to that thing?

    --
    Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
    Africus aut Europaeus?
  6. Practical application? by Aviancer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Perhaps they should consider applying this research to their webserver, which appears to be having dififculties keeping up with requests ATM...

  7. Nice. by i_am_syco · · Score: 4, Funny

    Looks like Intel might license this for their new P4s at 4 GHz. After cooling it down, the chip is almost cool enough to run!

  8. neverending quest? by toddhunter · · Score: 4, Funny

    Keep playing around with stuff at -100 and the quest is going to end one way or another

  9. big and heavy? by civilengineer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, it's big, yes it's heavy, yes it's loud and yes it does get your CPU and GPU cold, very cold.
    You talking about my wife?

    --

    New year Resolution: Don't change sig this year
  10. absolute zero? by psoriac · · Score: 4, Funny

    How close to absolute zero would we have to cool a processor so that we could overclock it enough to handle a good slashdotting?

    --
    I browse Slashdot at +3, Funny
  11. Spending that kind of money on overclocking... by MikeCapone · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Doesn't it defeat the purpose of overclocking?

    I thought you did that to get more out of your CPU than what you paid for.

    If you are spending more on the cooling than on the computer, then why not get a faster one, or a second one (or dual, or whatever)?

    Heh, I guess there's the whole hobby "I do it because it's fun!" thing that explains it...

    1. Re:Spending that kind of money on overclocking... by Kris_J · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Extreme overclocking often takes the fastest available processor and then overclocks it as much as possible. The goal is not the most bang for your buck, but purely the most bang.

  12. Damaging to the machines? by Alphanos · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't know much about this kind of cooling, but if the compressors are being used to cool the air going through these machines, wouldn't they be worried about physically damaging the machines by cracking them? Keeping a computer cool is all well and good, but at a certain temperature the physical elements composing the hardware are bound to contract different amounts, causing damage. Maybe this only happens at -250 degrees, and not -100, but presumably there is a reason that hardware manufacturers state a minimum operating temperature for their components.

    --
    Alphanos
  13. The finnish ... by KRYnosemg33 · · Score: 5, Funny

    What's the finnish word for ... compensating?

  14. counterproductive by mkavanagh · · Score: 3, Funny

    looks like someone is ignoring the fact that overcooling your processor will lead to early failure.

  15. Why? by pla · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just that - Why?

    Hey, I can appreciate water cooling. Keep the chip at basically room temperature, it increases its life and the OC'ers can push it a bit. But -100? WHY??? What possible use can this serve?

    It doesn't even seem "cool" at this point (beyond the obvious pun). Wasting hundreds of watts, taking up way too much room (extra-large form-factor, anyone?), needing a fork-lift to move it... How does any of that benefit the PC or user?

    Some things have an upper limit to what still constitutes "bigger/better/faster/harder". This definitely crosses that line with regard to chip cooling techniques.

    1. Re:Why? by wackybrit · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Because the colder you make a processor, the further you can push it.

      If you can keep a chip at 0 celsius (as you can with many PC cooling units out there), you can get at least another 1GHz out of your chip, meaning your 3GHz PC is now a 4GHz power house.

      And so it goes with the lower you go. At -100C you could probably keep your 3GHz PC up at around the 14GHz area, which is way faster than anything on the market. Isn't it worth the money on cooling to experience a slice of tomorrow?

    2. Re:Why? by Idarubicin · · Score: 4, Informative
      And so it goes with the lower you go. At -100C you could probably keep your 3GHz PC up at around the 14GHz area, which is way faster than anything on the market. Isn't it worth the money on cooling to experience a slice of tomorrow?

      This works to a point...but there are physical limits to how fast a present-day chip can be overclocked. Aside from potential limits on how fast gates can switch inside the chips, you start running into concerns about things like the speed of light.

      At a hypothetical 15 GHz, light will travel 2 centimetres (about 0.8 inches) per clock cycle. The Pentium 4 die is about 1.7 cm on a side, with a 2.1 cm diagonal. If one corner of the chip needs to talk to the other corner of the chip, it will take a minimum of two clock cycles just for the signal to travel there and back--and that neglects the fact that electrons move slower than light. You can bet that Intel's designers didn't anticipate those kinds of timing issues.

      So you might be able to clock a 3 GHz chip to 4 or 4.5 GHz with this setup, and do so much more stably with less wear and tear on the chip--but you're not going to be able to scale the chip's speed to 10 or 15 GHz.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    3. Re:Why? by lafiel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The electrons won't move anymore?

      With all due respect (since your actual point is correct), you're certainly wrong in regards to electron 'movement'. Unless you're talking about absolute zero (which I doubt, considering the simpleness of your statement), the stage where extreme cooling creates a problem would be when we reach the superconductive state. At this critical temperature, the electrons exhibit the Cooper-Pair phenomenon and exhibit a total spin number of zero. Since they no longer have the same spin, they are exempt from most principles (Pauli's in particular) and so can all drop down to the 1s orbital.

      In short, the electrons don't stop moving. In fact, they drop to such a state where they can theoretically move with zero resistance (although drift velocity and the randomness of their wave equations would come into play here).

      What you should actually be pointing at is the design of the chip, which may not simply be able to do more, regardless of how much heat is dissipated due to consumption (generating lattice fluctuations and increasing resistance). As well, quantum tunneling becomes a major issue, but this isn't as important as the sheer limit of the architecture.

    4. Re:Why? by barawn · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can bet that Intel's designers didn't anticipate those kinds of timing issues.

      Actually, just to nitpick: they did.

      There are two (maybe three? I can't remember off the top of my head) pipeline stages in the P4 which are "drive" stages - stages where the pipeline does nothing except wait for data to travel from one side of the chip to another.

      It was part of Intel's design to allow the clockspeed of the chips to reach ~ 10 GHz.

      Now, that being said, that's the fundamental design, not the current design. Almost definitely a modern chip can't run even twice as fast as its rated clock speed. The chance of the margins being that large are just zero.

    5. Re:Why? by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And this limitation is why in the future, all computers will have multiple processors. Think about it- your computer ALREADY DOES! It has a CPU, several controllers and a Graphics processor. Your sound card has a microprocessor, and your various port controllers all do some work as well. Some of the work in the future will have to be subdivided. We'll have speech synthesis on our audio boards, and full raytracing on the video card. Maybe one processor will handle user input such as speech recognition. I don't think one single processor is going to get much faster than 8GHz anytime soon. They're already having serious trouble getting incremental speed increases to make a serious difference in useable processing.

  16. Re:minimum temperature by frdmfghtr · · Score: 5, Informative

    when you have an accident with liquid nitrogen you lose a finger. when you have an accident with liquid helium, you lose parts of the neighborhood.

    You're thinking of liquid hydrogen, not helium. Liquid helium is damn cold, yes, but it won't explode.

    --
    Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
  17. Why Not? by SkArcher · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lets face it, there are far more destructive ways to waste money than by attempting to make the fastest Home PC on the Planet.

    Why climb the mountain? Because it is there.

    Doing it just for the sake of having done it is enough, if that is what you want to do.

    --

    An infinite number of monkeys will eventually come up with the complete works of /.
  18. Forget cold feet... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 3, Informative

    Summary: Four (4) compressors cooling one PC! Yes its big, yes its heavy, yes its loud and YES IT DOES GET YOUR CPU AND GPU COLD - VERY COLD - EVEN DAMN COLD! Is -100C cold enough for you?

    Forget the cold feet, it's going deaf from the noise all that cooling generates that is your real problem. What's the point of having a PC that's so loud that you need to wear ear mufflers to be able to use it or else risk losing your hearing?

    Being able to hear yourself think while you work or hear the in-game audio while you play is a good thing.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  19. Re:minimum temperature by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Funny

    no, no, liquid plutonium is far deadlier

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  20. Re:minimum temperature by Zeinfeld · · Score: 4, Insightful
    with these loonys getting their temps down so low, i wonder what the limit is. i believe at around -200 the silicon seperates from the housing, destroying the chip.

    I can't remember how low we went with the Transputers but they ran damn fast dunked in liquid helium. The processors did not reach the level of the helium because it was constantly evaporating.

    The limit to overclocking is highly processor dependent. Some designs will simply end up in a race condition because some parts of the chip will work much faster than others and you end up missing the right edge of a pulse. Basically you give yourself a whole new region to discover timing errors in the design.

    I don't think that the physical process is going to be a fixed limit, clearly this will be very dependent on the physical packaging. Chips are sent into space to face some pretty unpleasant temperature ranges.

    Depending on your material there is a point when your band gap goes all wonky and things start breaking down. Most times what you are worried about is the effect in the high temperature region, but there are equally wierd things in the low temperature region.

    This is definitely not something that is recommended for most applications. There are a couple of oddball ones, like cryptanalysis where it is really hard to get a result but once you get one it is trivial to check. I would not be surprised if GCHQ has a swimingpool sized machine for brute force key cracking dunked in some type of cooling liquid. The NSA would just chuck money at the problem.

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  21. Re:Does this make it a: by Josh+Booth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    No, but with the right materials and time to develop a Pentium with superconducting transistors, they are only 13 K away from being able to use a "high temperature" superconductor. -100 C is 173 K, and according to my link, one of the highest temperature superconductor they have found works at 160 K. Not that I RTFA; it was /.ed at 50 posts.

  22. Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative


    Summary: Four (4) compressors cooling one PC! Yes its big, yes its heavy, yes its loud and YES IT DOES GET YOUR CPU AND GPU COLD - VERY COLD - EVEN DAMN COLD! Is -100C cold enough for you?

    Intro

    If you are an overclocker you know that keeping things cool is the key for big clockspeeds. The cooler that comes with the CPU ain't going to get you very far. It must be replaced with better cooling if you want to get really high clocks out of your hardware. But what is good enough? Even the biggest and baddest heatsinks won't get your temps much colder - in other words they wont give you much extra in terms of MHz. Watercooling is a nice option cos it has huge cooling capacity but does it really give you a big gain in CPU speed? Usually no because it can't get colder than the air cooling the water. So what can you do if you really need to get more speed out of your system??

    Vaporphase cooling is the answer here. Vaporphase cooling is what keeps your freezer and ice cream cold. Vaporphase cooling is what 'all the xtreme-overclockers' are using nowadays. Several people have noticed that going from +40C to -40C makes quite a difference in CPU overclocking potential (talking about 200-600MHz here). There are even commercial solutions that go all the way down to -40C and even a bit colder. If you feel that you must get one of these just go to nVentiv website, check who is your local reseller and get one

    But what if you are a real speedfreak and -40C ain't cold enough for you?? Well there is always dryice (-79C) or Liquid Nitrogen (-196C) or even liquid Helium (-268.6 C) for you but the problem is that its not really possible to get constant CPU cooling with these. LN2 and helium are actually too cold for your little CPU - it just wont operate properly at such low temps.

    But you know those low-temp freezers they use in labs? Those that go down to like -80..-100C and can maintain the temperature. Good temps for CPU cooling eh?
    These are cascade vaporphase coolers. They are called cascades because of multiple cooling stages (normally two). First stage uses 'normal' refrigerant like R404 or R507 and cools down to around -40C. The second stage uses a special low temp refrigerant like R23 or SUVA95 or R1150 and can get the temperature down to -100C level. The first stage evaporator is cooling down the condenser of the 2nd stage - this makes it possible to use a refrigerant with very low boiling point in the 2nd stage. Normal cascade design uses two compressors - one per stage. This also means that it is not a very compact cooler.

    Here is a picture of such a freezer (the door has been ripped off):

    Cascade cooling is yet another chapter in my neverending quest for optimal PC performance. I've tried quite a few cooling solutions already (waterchillers, peltiers, R404 vaporphase, dryice, ln2 etc.) but cascade vaporphase was something new to me.
    This time I was lucky enough to locate not only one but TWO cryofreezers - both were supposed to be broken - so I got them for free.
    The first one (the one in the picture on page 1) had problems with the system fan and because of that the owners decided to send it to the junkyard. True, there really was a problem with the fan. It didn't blow any air at all - but then again no power was coming to the fan powerconnector. I made external power input for the fan and it started to work nicely. With the freezer door closed it would get the inside temp down to -91C.
    Obviously it would do nothing for PC cooling in its original form so I had to convert it to a CPU cooler.

    Testing cascade stage 1 - its charged with R404 refrigerant and it went down to -40C.

    2nd stage parts installed - CPU cooler is ready for a test run.

    Its working! First test run got it down to almost -100C with no heatload. Pretty good with R23 refrigerant (boiling point @1bar = -82C).

    Here is a picture of the evaporator installed on P4 motherboard. I was using a 3GHz P4 CPU here and it would clock to around 3.6-3.7GHz with good heatsink. W

  23. Space/time/money by stienman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For all those wailing "Like, WTF?" and "This isn't worth it!" I'll say this once:

    Well duh. Do you think we don't understand the value of time, space, and money and can't do an investment/return calculation?

    This is cool because they can do it. It's on Slashdot because lots of us think it's nifty to turn a 2.2GHz processor into a 4+GHz processor.

    Yes, it does cost more, take more space, and more time to set up than two 3GHz machines, or even a dual processor 3GHz.

    But it's like my high school instructor telling me 10 years ago that making a microcontroller controlled light dimmer is non-trivial. I did it then, and it requires fewer than 25 lines of assembly code on a simple microcontoller. Was I geeked when I finished? You bet.

    People are constantly trying to break records, and this is no exception. The higher the record is set, the more effort and resources must be put in to beat it.

    -Adam

    Why is it becoming harder to post on slashdot? 4/5 of the time I get an incomplete page when I press submit or preview.

  24. Re:minimum temperature by McAddress · · Score: 4, Funny

    how about liquid mercury. oh never mind.

  25. Mirror by evn · · Score: 5, Informative
    The site is a little slow so I've mirrored the low resolution (~640x480) images and text right here

    Go easy on her, it's on my ISPs web space. Wait a minute, I'm still upset about not have truely unlimited access so on second thought: bag on it! ;)

  26. too complicated by fermion · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The first thing I thought is this is too complicated. A single LN2 compressor, some insulating tubes running into the box, and a heat exchange instead of a heat sink, you could easily chill that baby to 150K. The compressor would not even have to be in the same room. You would even have to charge it often if you kept the N2 clean.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black