Slashdot Mirror


Mitnick Calls for Hacker Stories

ram writes "Famed hacker and master social engineer Kevin Mitnick has been commissioned to write a new book following the success of his first text The Art of Deception. The new book, tentatively titled 'The Art of Intrusion' will tell the stories of real hacks, with the names of attackers obscured to protect them from the authorities and their victims. Mitnick has called on retired hackers to come forward with their stories, offering a $500 (283) prize for the best story that makes it into the book, and a $200 payment for all stories that make the final draft."

66 of 242 comments (clear)

  1. Why is Mitnick so famous? by Pingular · · Score: 3, Insightful

    He is a famous hacker because he got caught. There are thousands of hackers much better (if that's the right word), so why does he get all the attention?

    --

    When anger rises, think of the consequences.
    Confucius (551 BC - 479 BC)
    1. Re:Why is Mitnick so famous? by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 4, Insightful

      er, the 'attention' (most especially from the media) occured as a direct result of his being caught, or were you not paying attention at the time?

      Hiding under a particularly large rock?

      Or perhaps you were on your way here from (for example) Europa?

      --
      Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
    2. Re:Why is Mitnick so famous? by modpod · · Score: 5, Interesting

      because he was held without a trial for so long.... and eh, in the mid 90's people in the phreaking/hacking community decided to rally behind him. that part, i don't remember the specifics of. also, he was one of the first publicly discussed (newsmedia, websites) individuals banned from computer or electronic device use. funny sidenote, in highschool several years back, i was testing innoculate's latest patches for the school (without telling the network admin bumblehead), and i ended up being banned from touching all electronics at school nearly indefinitely! they wouldn't even let me troubleshoot a printer or a vcr... fools. it was funny though, and i was the first such case in the school district. go figure.

    3. Re:Why is Mitnick so famous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      He is a famous hacker because he got caught. There are thousands of hackers much better (if that's the right word), so why does he get all the attention?


      Because, he was considered a martyr. I remember 2600 was reporting that the original sentence (total amount of charges) could add up to 465 years in prison, or some astronomical number. He was extremely brazen in his ability, and it really isn't that interesting of a story. I prefer better stories. For example, when Wired reported about the LOD wars, Phiber Optik, etc.. I don't ever remember Mitnick being on the front cover, though.
    4. Re:Why is Mitnick so famous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Well you didn't say so explicitly, but I've heard, even from the mouth's of some of the best hackers, the notion that the best hackers never get caught, and only bad hackers do get caught. I don't really buy into this logic, I think anyone can get unlucky. I mean, being a good hacker and never getting caught is like getting an ace and a face card in black jack - but you can still have a winning hand without that.

      I also disagree there are thousands of hackers better than Mitnick. There are better hackers than Mitnick, maybe dozens, possibly even hundreds. But not thousands. He was pretty good on DEC Vax/VMS when that was big. He was a great social engineer. And he had UNIX and the Internet down pretty good. I do agree calling him the best ever, or one of the best ever might not be correct, but he definitely had skills, he was up there.

    5. Re:Why is Mitnick so famous? by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are thousands of hackers much better (if that's the right word), so why does he get all the attention?

      Because they aren't known? :-)

      I guess media has made Mitnick famous and that's why. But I'd be very interested in hearing of another hacker, whose hacks has been fairly well documented.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    6. Re:Why is Mitnick so famous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He is famous because he got caught and, perhaps more importantly, because the authorities either decided to make an "example" of him or were actually deluded by the exaggerated portrayals and feared him.

      Note that reading "The Art of Deception" is very enlightening as to what Kevin's skills and knowledge are really focused on. As someone with more than enough technical knowledge, but very limited social engineering skills (and no particular desire) to actually break into systems (I often find holes and create exploits, but only on my own systems, and I report them to the project or vendor), I can appreciate what his skills are, how they differ from mine, and how totally detached from reality the common perceptions about the danger of technical vs. social hacking skills are.

      I think that the reason Kevin got caught is because he wasn't acting rationally - he wasn't hacking for profit, with the appropriate caution to avoid getting caught, but because he was driven to it. He was probably far more active than cautious hackers. He probably misestimated the level of efforts that would be used to track him, because prior to his case, there weren't many high-profile cases.

      It doesn't necessarily imply anything, good or bad, about his skills. Perhaps about his judgement at the time.

    7. Re:Why is Mitnick so famous? by ReallyQuietGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      definitely had skills

      actually i am a little curious

      i remember reading about things he had done (e.g. "mitnick attack" (connection hijacking?) where IIRC you take down a genuine host by basically DoS-ing a legitimate machine and then impersonate that machine, made possible because the TCP increment value was predictable and not random)

      it definitely took an understanding of the way TCP etc. worked in order to come up with something like that (i guess it was really him who came up with it and not something he learned elsewhere?)

      but then, things have evolved in such a manner that these problems/holes/exploits are no longer possible - you can't hijack an SSH shell this way, for example (who nowadays still uses telnet on the open net?), TCP stacks have been rewritten, etc. - how many of the old-line "skillz" are still applicable nowadays?

      have the original hackers (i guess i should call them crackers instead) maintained their "lethality" in the face of progress, or is it always a new generation of people who just "understand" the current state of the tech who develop the knowledge/whatever to break into machines of that era, after which at some point they "lose" it and then no longer are able to follow evolution/development?

    8. Re:Why is Mitnick so famous? by true_majik · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It was unjust to have Mitnick held w/out bail/trial for years, that they were charging him for millions of dollars on behalf of companies who did not even report such losses in Annual Reports, asinine how they would not allow him/his lawyers to copy the HD of evidence they had of him (they wanted him to give them the pw to decrypt the info). ETc etc etc. However, Bernie S.'s story was more interesting to me than Mitnick's. He wasn't doing anything to defraud the phone company. He was simply selling something that Radio Shack was *also* selling at the time. Selective prsection if you ask me. Charging him for *potentially* having materials that could be used as explosives? That's crazy. And on top of that, the material they believed to be explosives turned out to be dentist's putty left behind by the previous tenant. Ehh, just read his story if you haven't already. http://www.2600.com/law/bernie.html

  2. I wonder if by dan+dan+the+dna+man · · Score: 5, Insightful

    he will take care to protect the identities of the targets too. I can see no end of trouble when "A Big Co." finds out they were completely rooted and had no idea..

    IANAL - lets say for the sake of argument I was an ex-hacker with a story to tell that ended up in print. Even with this much vaunted anonymity I would still be worried about publically confessing my misdeeds. Especially in the UK where hacking offences can be covered with anti-terrorist legislation these days.

    --
    I don't read your sig, why do you read mine?
  3. Wait a second... by JamesD_UK · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Sounds like a cheap and easy way to write a book if you ask me.

    1. Get others to produce the content of your book
    2. Publish
    3. ???
    4. Profit!

    1. Re:Wait a second... by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Books in one sense are very much like music.

      Anyone can write a book, can even get it published.

      However, of the thousands (hundreds of? or is it millions?) of books published every year, FAR too many of them SUCK for one reason or another.

      Having published one, and being comissioned for another based on the strength of the first, this is likely (though not guaranteed) to Not Suck.

      Even so, profit is by no means guaranteed.

      --
      Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
    2. Re:Wait a second... by Esteanil · · Score: 2, Funny

      1: Get advertised on /. 2: Thereby, get others to produce the content of said book 3: Give $200 to all making "the finals", thereby getting their personal info. (Where did you say I should send the money?) 4: Sell personal details & story to company in question 5: Profit, profit, profit

      --
      I'm a dreamer, the world is my playpen. But hey, I'm a serious person, I can't dream all the time.
    3. Re:Wait a second... by AllenChristopher · · Score: 2, Informative
      That's a good point. Why aren't the newspapers taking the time and money to stage the events they cover? Pretty lazy just waiting for something to happen before they write about it.

      Seriously, though, publishers do just what you've suggested:

      1. Commission someone to write a book for you.
      2. Publish.
      3. Give the author a tiny little bit of the money, and keep the rest.
      4. Profit!

      There's no ??? because it's a well-established model, but the the Profit! is optimistic... many books don't earn enough money to pay for the author's advance. It's the blockbusters that pay for the flops, and the flops that create enough volumes to convince customers that a bookstore is any good.

      Mitnick is following the journalistic model, though, because he isn't asking people to submit finalized text for him. He's going to write the book from the source material he's given.

    4. Re:Wait a second... by dipipanone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What, you think Mitnick actually *wrote* his first book himself?

      Perhaps he did, but given how modern publishing works, I'd be very surprised if that were true. These works are most likely ghostwritten attempts to cash in on his outlaw celebrity status (as told to A. Hack) and the follow-up is another attempt to capitalize on the Mitnick brand(tm) and its status in the burgeoning script kiddie market.

      You don't really think an editor commissioned this book because its likely to be a valuable contribution to culture, do you?

    5. Re:Wait a second... by gustgr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How can he totally trust on the histories he will receive ? Asking the history sender for details ? Do you guys think that a very imaginative mind can came up with a 'fantasy' history and got it published and no one (including Mitnik) note that it is fake ? Details and checking with the press publications doesn't asure that the content really happened. I would like to know how reliable are the histories.

    6. Re:Wait a second... by jsailor · · Score: 4, Informative

      AGREED. I published a book and paid out a much greater sum to contributors than what Mr. Mitnick is offering. Especially for the components that will make is book interesting to a wider audience. The key with publishing is to attract as large as an audience as possible - which the anecdotal stories will certainly help to do because they give the masses an insight into the hidden world.

      In general, royalties for U.S. sales are 5-10% of the sale price of the book from the publisher - usually 50-55% off of the cover price. Foreign sales often yield a fixed price per unit sold. Really geeky books have an audience of 5,000-10,000 readers. Mass market geek books 2-10 times that. The anecdotes will push this book well beyond that. I rant, but do the math and you'll see that $200 and $500 is very exploitive.

    7. Re:Wait a second... by ReallyQuietGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      it's not just "cheap" in this sense. think about it. miserable $200 if your contribution gets into that book? what kind of book advance would you think he got?

      $500 for the BEST story that gets in? you have got to be kidding.

      how many stories will he be able to include in the book? 10? 20? 30? so for an outlay of, say, $6000 or so he will be able to tack on to the cover a blurb about how the book is chock ful of real, exciting, etc. etc. stories "From the Dark Underside Of The Internet!!!!"

      is that worth more or less than $6000 in terms of sales?

  4. one thing for sure... by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 4, Funny

    IT people and security-concerned people will hopefully learn a lot from this book.

    good to see security improving as the time passess....

    --
    #
    #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
    #
  5. Confirmation by Tango42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How does he intend to confirm the stories are true? If he is trying to keep indentities quiet, he is going to have problems confirming them.

    1. Re:Confirmation by bruthasj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Easy. Just look up all the cracking activities that have occurred in the last five years via google or the library (newspaper articles). Then seek after the stories in a more specific way. Find out who did it. Interview them. Cover up their names and place their extremely detailed intrusion technique.

      The confirmation can be had by the sys admin saying, "Yep! That corresponds to the logs we had!" If someone really wanted to get that nitpicky.

      I'd even recommend that Kevin meet these people in a completely anonymous fashion so the authorities couldn't leverage him to get after his interviewees.

  6. nice gig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let's see...I'll give away a few hundred dollars for some stories of hacks, put them in a book and make thousands of dollars from it. I think he's still a damn good social engineer.

  7. '3' filled in for Crime; it does pay by Animaether · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1. Perform illicit activity (crime: 'hacking' or 'cracking' for those who prefer that term)
    2. Get away with it.
    3. Get paid for story publishing.
    4. Profit!!!

    Seriously though, as I'm sure many of these hackers/crackers will be heralded as (demi-)heroes by many visitors of Slashdot, and I understand that often the sentences for those caught are ridiculous, it should not be forgotten that they -did- commit a crime.

    Now, they were 'smart' enough to not get caught for that crime, too. Which means they can gloat about their hack/crack in private of with tight friends or do whatever the heck they want with it already.

    But now they're getting paid to talk about those hacks/cracks - and retain their anonimity ?

    There's something very wrong with that picture, in my humble opinion.

    1. Re:'3' filled in for Crime; it does pay by nathanh · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Seriously though, as I'm sure many of these hackers/crackers will be heralded as (demi-)heroes by many visitors of Slashdot

      Why would you think that? Whenever there's a Mitnick story on Slashdot the overwhelming majority of posts say "he got what he deserved" and "hackers are good, crackers are bad". I very rarely see anybody defend what Mitnick did; in fact, I don't think I've ever seen anybody defend what Mitnick did.

      If anything, I would say the "Slashdot meme" is strongly opposed to criminal acts with computers.

    2. Re:'3' filled in for Crime; it does pay by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 5, Informative
      My nephew recorded an MP3 (his digital voice recorder encodes to MP3 format) of himself singing me Happy Birthday, I downloaded it.
      Please tell me which law I broke, exactly?

      Copyright. The copyright on Happy Birthday is not expired. and it won't for another couple of decades (unless copyright laws change again).

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    3. Re:'3' filled in for Crime; it does pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Whenever there's a Mitnick story on Slashdot the overwhelming majority of posts say "he got what he deserved"


      He was arrested, convicted and sentenced in 1989 for doing something that at the time wasn't a crime; kept in solitary confinement for months on end; eventually released and was arrested again in 1992 for supposedly breaking parole conditions (he didn't); imprisoned for years without charge or trial and eventually has to incriminate himself to be released. Meanwhile he has to idly stand by why Shimomura and Markoff slander him repeatedly -- the most vicious slander incidentally being the accusation of the "crime" for which he was originally imprisoned (which Markoff more or less admits to spinning for "good-copy" at the end of "Freedom Downtime").

      Who deserves that?
  8. Interesting... by puddpunk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Personally, I could see this turn of events coming. Having read books such as Cyberpunk and Takedown and watched that doco "Freedom Downtime" I've drawn the conclusion that Kevin appears to be more "misguided" than dangerous and also more "attention seeking" than a model hacker for script kiddies to chase after.

    I must admit though, I would be _very_ interested to read this book when it hits the press :)

  9. Sure, offer me $200... by Pollux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...and I'll be happy to give to you some kinda fish story. Yea, there was that time back in '83 where some buddies and I were sitting 'round our dorm room and thought, "Hey, how long's it been since someone's busted into Langley's database?" And so, we all tossed five bucks in a pot for the first to break in and find the SS# of the Director of the CIA...

    Really, how are you gonna know that these stories are actually real?

  10. Cheap content by Andy+Smith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Even if the book includes as many as 100 stories, that's only $20,000. We can be sure that Mitnick will be making a lot more than that, and the publisher will be making much, much more.

    Don't most honest, law-abiding people nowadays disapprove of criminals profiting from their crimes? Well it sure seems like Mitnick is profiting from his crimes with this book because the publisher is using his name to sell it.

    Kinda cheap and sleazy if you ask me, which you didn't.

  11. Most funny story I heard by Krapangor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    was a typical social engineering story.
    Some hacker wanted to haxor some local republican servers. But these things turn out well secured, so he needed some physical access to the boxes. So he claimed to be a fundamentalist protestant (well, he didn't put it this way obviously) and asked the local repubs for some help for anti-abortion protests. He convinced the people to paint transparents in the server room. Ownage occured mysteriously. Well, not so mysteriously, 'cos the FBI got him in the end.
    To save his honour, it must be said that he indeed turned up at the anti-abortion protest, even throwing some tomatoes.
    Well, he was a crazy Nader follower. Quite funny , when you think about it - the hacker helped in the repubs due to the bad press in the end. And even Nader helped Bush by sucking votes away from Gore. These ecos can be very strange some times.

    --
    Owner of a Mensa membership card.
  12. Re:I got some to contribute. by harikiri · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's not just statute of limitations, but rather where they exist and if they exist.

    In my younger days I did some mischief along those lines, but considering the number of countries that I traversed in my electronic travels, I'd be a little concerned if any of them raised any flags.

    Especially since some of them that "old" folks like me used to traverse have less than pleasant human rights records.

    --
    Man watching 6 MSCE's around a sun box, looks alot like the opening scene's of 2001:space odyssey...
  13. Nuclear War with a Telephone ... Holy Cow. by leoaugust · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Four of his years inside were served before he was even tried, and he was forced to endure eight months in solitary confinement because "the government said I could start a nuclear war if I had access to a telephone," Mitnick says.

    Holy cow, is this serious ?

    But, just imagine if J. Reno could come up with the Nuclear War stuff for Mitnick, what a field day J. Ashcroft would have had if he had a chance ... Or maybe Ashcroft is already having a S&M ball. It is all so secretive nowadays.

    Lucky Mitnick...

    --
    To see a world in a grain of sand, and then to step back and see the beach where the sand lies ...
    1. Re:Nuclear War with a Telephone ... Holy Cow. by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 2, Informative

      For Serious: Another "wild one" often passed around whas that he could phreak the phone system by whistling into the handset.

      Yup! they seriously thought he could blow a consistent and exact 2600Hz (amongst other requisite frequencies) with just his mouth.

      As opposed to, for example, hypothetically, some cheap crappy plastic whistle from a box of Captain Crunch.

      --
      Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
    2. Re:Nuclear War with a Telephone ... Holy Cow. by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, I learned how to dial the telephone by whistling and vocalizing two different notes at the same time. I used to amaze my friends by dialing for pizza using only my voice and whistle. It's a wierd kind of whistle but with loads of practice and careful listening to and copying a standard touch tone telephone, I think anyone could do it.
      Never underestimate the power of a geek with no social life.
      And that's the ONLY thing I will admit to. Note non-anonymous post.

  14. And to his surprise .... by bain · · Score: 4, Funny

    An anonymous coward sends him detailed information about how his own computer was hacked and information sent to Tsutomu Shimomura, causing his capture.

    --
    Sanity is a majority vote.
  15. I've got a story by rf0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well d00d I got this l33t tool called t3ln3t. I connected to other people computers and got things like "SSH-1.99-OpenSSH_3.7.1p2". The 0th3r kidi33s were like. "D00D!!". I was like w0ah. I am so l33t

    Rus

  16. Re:I got some to contribute. by Texas+Rose+on+Lava+L · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You'd better hope that this troll doesn't know what he's talking about.

  17. Crazy Legal Question by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So, if someone breaks the law, and then tells you about it afterwards (but before they're brought to justice) doesn't that make you (in legal terms) an accessory after the fact?

    --
    Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
  18. You should read his existing book by anti-NAT · · Score: 3, Interesting

    including the missing chapter.

    Mitnick's 'Lost Chapter' Found

    While there are always two sides to a story, from what Kevin says, it sounds like Markoff and Shimomura exploited the situation for all the $$$ they could get.

    --
    The Internet's nature is peer to peer - 20050301_cs_profs.pdf
  19. Let them hack their way into the book by bain · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Setup a Machine and they can hack into it to submit their stories.

    This way if they are good enough not to be traced, the chances are good they actually did something real. It also removes most of the possible "script kiddies" submittions ;P

    --
    Sanity is a majority vote.
  20. Re:I got some to contribute. by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 5, Interesting
    While I do not personally have any to contribute, I have a friend who most likely could.

    Unfortunantly, he is rather busy at the moment.

    I would send him an email and tell him about it, but I don't think he's gonna be answering anything electronic for a little while.

    No, this is not a joke. Yes, this is a real friend of mine. And yes, I am probably a rat bastard for posting this on here. However, he did some of this from *home*!

    Jesus eppie, I thought you knew better than that!

    I guess the reason I am posting this is for all those of you who think that "thrill hacking" for fun, and not doing any real damage, will just get you a slap on the wrist if you are caught. Bet thats what eppie thought.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
  21. Mitnick is social engineering you! by SexyKellyOsbourne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We all know Mitnick is in quite a bit of trouble, but the fact that he's a good social engineer still persists. He was traumatized in jail, and most of what he was severely punished for was probably due to non-cooperation, in that "hacker" attitude, with very influential people. Most likely, he got out of such things by giving in and cutting deals.

    Before you send in any good stories, be they fact or fiction, think of this: what if FBI / Homeland Security agents are on the case working with Mitnick, reading those letters that will supposedly go into the book and tracing who sent them? They've been known to do similar things to get people to brag before, which is the easiest way to catch people, or at least make it seem that way. With John Ashcroft and Tom Ridge in the government, they will stoop to any low to put hackers, whom they view as terrorists, behind bars.

  22. best hack... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    use Social Engineering to get "hackers" to publicly brag about their illicit activities, in exchange for modest "prizes."

    collect reward money AND complete parole obligations.

    retire.

  23. im a paid hacker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm an active penetration tester, have been for some years. I can tell you now that from all the testing i've completed (including lots of clients in the financial sector and govt.) I wouldnt even be entertaining the idea of remotely telling anonymous tale stories. The risk is just too great. And for a measily $200?

    Give me a break.

    When you've proven to a client that millions could potentially be stolen, the last thing you'd want to do is discuss it in a book, anonymously or not.

  24. He is just covering his tracks !! by Pingo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think he needs the anonymous hacker contributions as a smokescreen for some of his old unknown hacks.

    This guy has probably done more than he is accused for and has got an urge to brag about all his hacks. Doing so might get him into more legal trouble and he needs some anonymous hackers as legal frontends. //Pingo

    --
    --- Linux or FreeBSD, it's like blondes or brunettes. I like both. ---
    1. Re:He is just covering his tracks !! by juuri · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Look this stuff is just crazy.

      I used to be very involved in the scene years ago under many names: juuri, syy, ^_, y, y-windoze and on and on. Mitnick was not this legendary figure people are making him out to be. Those who were around then know of others who did much more than him and got away with a fuckload more. Thinking he is using this as smokescreen is giving him some status as legendary.

      The truth of the matter is most hackers absolutely paled in comparison to stuff done by the phreaks of the 80s. Even before the rise of the script kids there was very little original stuff going on. One person would figure something out and use it for a few months before trading it to someone else and then it would enter the scene.

      You guys need to understand back then yp was everywhere and insecure, nfs was completely exploitable in many ways, telnet daemons were retarded (-fr00t anyone?), hosts abounded with +s in the hosts.equiv, firewalls didn't exist, source routing still worked and on and on. Even back then secured hosts were easily comprimised by finding a single account on a badly secured host, just like today.

      It always pains me on slashdot when these articles come up and people fall all over themselves to heap praise on people like Mitnick who were nothing more than petty opportunists with a good sense of trading. Mitnick getting caught also ended a lot of the fun for many of on networks; most people don't recall the extreme lockdown that went into effect on well.com and other community sites of the time.

      --
      --- I do not moderate.
  25. it's worked before by proradium · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.underground-book.com/ this style of book has been done before (in australia anyway) and with relative success. The best part about that book was how the author made it available for the public to d/l. an interesting read ...

  26. I knew it... by ayjay29 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...he's got a job with the FBI now.

    --
    Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
  27. Bold highwaymen by AllenChristopher · · Score: 4, Interesting
    There have been a couple of ideas put forward in response to your question... my feeling is that Mitnick isn't famous because he was caught, but because he dared to go for the big score, and because he ran.

    Running from the authorities using his advanced level of hacking skill, creating new IDs and such as he went, having stolen the data for the intellectual thrill of it, not for financial gain, then improperly held by a vengeful government... That's a classic tale. I don't know if it's a true story, but that was the popular perception at one point.

    In the 18th century, there was, in England, an absolute adoration of the highwayman. There were courteous highwaymen like Dick Turpin, whose victims had only this regret: that they could not have met him under other circumstances and been friends. There were brutal highwaymen, like Jack Sheppard, who was noted for his violence and for escaping Newgate with fetters on his limbs. There were gallant highwaymen, like Claude Duval, whose arrest was supposedly mourned by women across the country.

    Other countries and that and other times have had the same respect for any bold thief. John Dillinger is the best modern example.

    And as for getting caught, the populace believes that if you live bravely enough as a criminal, you WILL eventually get caught. That's really the basis of the admiration. If you could simply escape the government by being strong enough, as in the 1200s, you'd only be feared as a danger to all. It's the assurance of eventual capture that gives living on the edge its glamour. This, in particular, applies to Mitnick where it wouldn't to a mere modern carjacker, because we know the carjackers aren't caught. There are so many muggers and rapist and straight-up burglars who prey on the populace directly and succeed that we can't respect them. We fear them. A bank robber or a hacker can go after the big score, the wealth of the very rich, and leave us entertained participants.

    There are, of course, plenty of major criminal hackers who do get away with it, as with any other crime, hackers we never hear about because they stayed safe, played it smart all the way. Some of them may be reading this now. Hi boys... you're assumed to be mean of spirit, not to have aimed high enough to get caught, mere embezzling rats or at most a sort of criminal investment banker. How does that feel?

    Eventually the statute of limitations will start to run out on modern hackers who have done some pretty cool things, and we'll start to read the full stories of the ones who did go for the big score and get away with it in the Net age, just as we now revere some of the early phreakers who dared and won. Until then, the successful hacker will remain the province of fiction.

    It's also interesting to note that in the 19th century, it was felt that the effect of the poems and plays about thieves had the same deleterious effect that comic books, rock music and video games were later held to have.

    This post is reacher for 600 words, though, and beyond this I might as well write a properly-researched article, so I'll leave it here.

  28. I don't need to send a story in... by FyRE666 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... I can take money out of Kevin's bank account any time I like ;-)

  29. Re:Not heroes by proradium · · Score: 2, Informative

    hacker (from http://www.kernelthread.com/mac/apme/tools/)
    [originally, someone who makes furniture with an axe]
    1. A person who enjoys exploring the details of programmable systems and how to stretch their capabilities, as opposed to most users, who prefer to learn only the minimum necessary. RFC1392, the Internet Users' Glossary, usefully amplifies this as: A person who delights in having an intimate understanding of the internal workings of a system, computers and computer networks in particular.

    evil ??

  30. Money. by JVStalin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hackers would get more money writing for SysAdmin.

  31. One of my favorite books about hackers by dr_canak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I may have posted this link some time ago, but I think it's worth a repost. "Underground" by Suelette Dreyfus is, to me, a very interesting book looking at the hacking/cracking culture of the mid 1980's.

    It follows the stories of several hackers/crackers in Australia, Germany, and the United States. To me, it really reads more like an ethnographic anthropological study, than about hacks per se. But I found it very interesting. And best of all, the entire book is available for free:

    http://www.underground-book.com/

    in a download version.

    jeff

  32. Mitnick and editing by dysprosia · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wonder whether Mitnick will have to edit and typeset some of his work on a typewriter, since he can't touch a computer...

  33. Re:Wait a second.....or a comic strip. by eggoeater · · Score: 3, Informative

    That's the model that Scott Adams has been using for about 15 years with Dilbert. He ran out of ideas after the first two years but at that point he was popular enough that people sent him screwy stuff that was happening in cube-farms. Now I admit he is brilliant at putting them in a humorous context, but they're not necessarily all his ideas.

    This sig best viewed in a drunken stupor.

  34. Why these books are good by tarnin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For people like us (slashdotters) these books are mostly tales and overly obvious statements. Interesting and sometimes fun to read. That's about it.

    To people NOT like us (read: small/mid company admins and even some larger company admins) alot of this is actually an eye opener. Case in point: Some of you may know that I work for a smaller, privatly owned ISP. Because of this, we cater to a bunch of mid/small businesses. I have suggested his first book for them to read. I have gotten no less than 20 call backs after they read the book with statements like "Wow, I never even thought of that!" and "Thanks for the book tip! Helped me out alot and we have tightned up security with our staff." You're lucky to find a semi-competent admin in companies this small (or an admin at all) let alone one who understand or has even heard of social engineering or any type of specific attack out side of what the main stream media reports.

    Keep in mind that alot of admin in these companies have heard DoS and DDoS before, maybe even the names of a few well know worms but they don't even know what they stand for or what they do. They are nothing more than the catch phrase of the week. Books like this are pretty invaluable to them as they are not written from a tech stand point (Hardening Cisco comes to mind) and are eaisly understood and easy to put into practice by someone who is the admin because they know what HDD stands for or were hired on the lowest possible salary.

    Don't get me wrong here, these are not the end all be all security books but they are a great boon to the customers that I service.

  35. Slugging Average (offtopic) by IronicGrin · · Score: 2

    >Actually your batting average would be 1.000. 1 at bat >divided by 1 hit = 1 Totally offtopic. Bill James would slap you in the head. The original poster referred to "slugging" average, not "batting" average. If you were up once and hit a home run, your SLG would be 4.000 and your BA would be 1.000. Batting Average = H/AB Slugging Percentage/Average (SLG) = (H+2B+2*3B+3*HR)/AB Sports may be anathema to most Slashdotters, but sabermetrics oughta be geeky enough for anybody. [oddly, this is my first post ever...]

  36. This is cover for reporting HIS OWN exploits... by Curious__George · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People are getting all righteously indignant and aren't seeing the real purpose of this offer. By appearing to anonymously post OTHER'S stories, he will be free to publish HIS OWN stories under some cover. He will be able to use the journalist's right to conceal the names of his sources to protect himself - and yet still tell his stories. I'm sure he will still use a few others, but the only ones that he can know really happened for sure are those HE performed.

    Curious George

    --
    ***General Consultant to the Human Race*** My opinions are free. You get what you pay for.
  37. Ho hum by fw3 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    As somebody suggested above, the likely actual motivation for this is probably Mitnick's restriction from profiting on describing his own criminal activities.

    As I see it Mitnick remains of the same mindset as when he first showed off his cracking skills to a group of peers and was surprised when they turned him in.

    Among his various complaints about his treatment by the Feds are that he was held without bail (gee, can you say 'established flight-risk'?), and that they held onto all of his computers (gee, after he declined to provide the encryption keys needed to access them as evidence?).

    He's also clear about being bitter toward the author of 'Takedown' (advice, "never get in an argument with someone who buys ink by the barrel and paper by the train-car") and Shimomura(sp?) (Let's see, you break into lots of machines, eventually you come up against someone better'n you and now you complain that they exact some revenge?)

    His notoriety seemingly guarantees a certain audience for he and his publisher to profit.

    Personally I've got no desire to help this guy along. In the excerpts from his book he has the brass to include himself in the 'hacker' ethic of places like LCS, Berkeley, JPL. Sorry, that image doesn't pass.

    --
    Linux is Linux, if One need clarify their dist: <Dist>/GNU Linux
    bsds are of course just BSD
  38. The title? by LordK3nn3th · · Score: 2, Funny

    Chicken Soup for the Hacker's Soul.

    --

    ---
    Never criticize religion on Slashdot. You will be modded down for "Troll" no matter how factual it is.
  39. Hacker or Cracker? by radar2k2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    It sounds like this book is going to be about crackers and cracking and not hackers and hacking.

    Common usage tends to blur the meaning between the two concepts but I thought here on slashdot at least there was some instance that the two not get confused.

  40. From the article: "...could start a nuclear war" by Daniel+Baumgarten · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Fame found Kevin Mitnick when the US government made an example of him, incarcerating him for five years for computer based offences. Four of his years inside were served before he was even tried, and he was forced to endure eight months in solitary confinement because "the government said I could start a nuclear war if I had access to a telephone," Mitnick says.
    If it really is possible to start a nuclear war from a telephone, I must ask, who's the genius who attached our nuclear weapons systems to the phone grid?

    Seriously. There's no way somebody able to handle the task of organizing such a large force would be idiotic enough to give nukes phone lines. Then again, we are talking about the United States government...
    --
    "Screw slashdot." -- Linus Torvalds
  41. This one time ... by maelstrom · · Score: 2, Funny

    I haxx0red the GIBSON. Ph33r m3, I AM 31337.

    --
    The more you know, the less you understand.
  42. Re:Honeypot? by arose · · Score: 2, Funny

    Moderator needs more Simpsons.

    --
    Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  43. Re:I got some to contribute. by Glass+of+Water · · Score: 2, Insightful
    That's a very wierd article. First, the "Master Password" was a word from the dictionary??? Second, why would someone download tons of credit card data, and spend all that time doing it, and leave such an obvious trail, and not seek to profit from it? The article suggests that the prosecuting attorney believed that he did nothing further illegal with the info.

    These types af articles always seem to be a little strange. Would the "300 passwords" that he stole be a single password file, that maybe he brute forced the "Packers" password out of?

    And what's up with the bit about threatening the President? It's illegal to collect guns and bombs for use in harming the president. It's not illegal to say that you want to harm the president.

    More typical wierdness:

    Baas, 25, of Milford, admitted his hacking and theft of their customer information cost Acxiom -- of Little Rock, Ark., -- about $6 million. The tab included $2.4 million in Acxiom employee time and $1.3 million for security audits and encryptions upgrades for the company's computer system.
    He admitted what? How much employee time? At $40/hour, that's 480,000 hours. That's 240 full-time employees at $40/hr for a year. That's not including the audits and "encryptions upgrades".

    Too much nonsense in there.

    --
    There are no trolls. There are no trees out here.
  44. My personal Mitnick story by PopStar · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I know that I am coming into the discussion much too late for most people to see this comment, but when I saw this story I thought that I should share my personal Kevin Mitnick story.


    When I was going to school, I worked at Kinko's. I worked at the branch in Thousand Oaks/Westlake California, which happens to be a more upscale community. We used to get all sorts of notable people coming in to get copies. While most of my co-workers were always freaking out when the more mainstream celebrities would come in (Tom Selleck, Hulk Hogan, Heather Locklear, Will Smith, and Martin Lawrence are a few that spring in to mind), I was always more impressed by some of the more obscure personailities that would come in, including my personal favorite Bas Rutten - who, incendentally, is such a nice guy that none of my co-workers would believe me when I told them what he did for a living.


    However, the one "customer" that was the most interesting was Kevin Mitnick. For those of you who do not know, Kevin lives in Thousand Oaks. At the time, he lived about a quarter mile from Kinko's. He came in just about every day over a three month span. Myself and one of the graveyard guys were the only ones who even knew who Kevin Mitnick was. He used to come in, with a laptop, and set up over in one of the corners. He would never plug into our network, which was kind of odd, so everyone just assumed that he was coming in just to have a place to do some work.


    One night, our cleaning crew discovered an 802.11b wireless internet hub hidden under a table. It was plugged into our network. The next morning, we unplugged it (FWIW, I believe the graveyard guy ended up taking it home). That day, Kevin came in, went to his normal spot, and started up his laptop. He started looking around, real confused, and walked over to where we had found the hub. When he saw that it was gone, he started looking really panicked. He went and picked up his laptop and left, all the time holding a piece of paper up to hide his face from the cameras. That was the last time he ever came in.