Slashdot Mirror


Japanese Firms Create Home (Appliance) Network

JOstrow writes "The Japanese companies Toshiba, Mitsubishi, Sharp, and Sanyo are teaming up to create a standard for home appliances communicating over a network. Usage examples cited are ovens that download recipes and heating systems that can be adjusted remotely with a cell phone. The first products adhering to the standard, called iReady, are expected to be available by next year. The iReady adapter will be ready for use '...not only with commercialized Bluetooth and low powered wireless appliances but also wireless LAN and future transmission media.'"

175 comments

  1. Recipe Networks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Wow, soon I can cook meals controlled by my bluetooth enabled phone! Wow! How useful. The aspect of downloading recipes seems kind of interesting, however. Just make sure when you are downloading a recipe you don't get tricked into hitting the recipe link that is the equivilant of a goatse redirect *shudder*.

    Seriously though, perhaps we could use peer-to-peer networks to share recipes, with a rating system kind of like what Shareaza uses. I have a cookie recipe that I can share... It would be kind of interesting to join a network of like-minded recipe people and have recipes downloaded each day.

    1. Re:Recipe Networks? by Seft · · Score: 1

      Wow, soon I can cook meals controlled by my bluetooth enabled phone

      Slightly off topic, but has anyone seen the remote control car for the t610 on bluetooth? Makes me regret buying a t310 insteead...

    2. Re:Recipe Networks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use a dedicated server for that.

    3. Re:Recipe Networks? by Accipiter · · Score: 1

      Just make sure when you are downloading a recipe you don't get tricked into hitting the recipe link that is the equivilant of a goatse redirect *shudder*.

      Actually, that might make a good weight-loss plan. Would YOU want to eat after having seen that?

      Simmons, Atkins, and goatse. Oh MY.

      --

      -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
      (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

    4. Re:Recipe Networks? by cuban321 · · Score: 1

      I can't imagine it matters what brand of phone you have. Bluetooth should still be compatable.

  2. PDA remote controls? by adoll · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    So will this allow my Palm to replace my TV Remote control?

    -AD

    1. Re:PDA remote controls? by DarthWufei · · Score: 1

      Actually I'm pretty this is already possible, and I found something on google that already has a set up for it. Heard about it on TechTV today. http://www.pacificneotek.com/ It's interesting, but I have no clue about how well it works.

    2. Re:PDA remote controls? by adoll · · Score: 1

      That will work with the IR, but Bluetooth is still outside the realm of TV tech (to my knowledge). But I guess I could build an IR xmitter with a bluetooth connection so I can bluetooth the xmitter that IRs the TV.

      Hmm. Where is Rube Goldberg when you need him?

      -AD

    3. Re:PDA remote controls? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is probably only effective with an IR amplifier. works like: input IR, output higher powered IR with a bigger LED / more milliwatts

    4. Re:PDA remote controls? by Adam9 · · Score: 1

      I didn't read the link but I was using a program called Remote something around 3 or 4 years ago that you could use to train the PDA to send certain IR signals. It came with a nice UI for a tv/vcr/dvd/amplifier/etc. remote. Worked quite nicely. Free, too.

    5. Re:PDA remote controls? by filtersweep · · Score: 1

      It is. My Sony PDA does that right out of the box.

      --


      Those that suggest you "dance like no one is watching" really want to see you make a complete fool of yourself.
  3. cant wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I can't wait until my oven prints out emails.

  4. Ya' but by blurfus · · Score: 1

    will I be able to view my p0rn collection with it?

    --
    will work for Karma
    1. Re:Ya' but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what the previous poster (can I replace my remote with my PALM) was talking about.

  5. iReady? by R33MSpec · · Score: 3, Funny

    So, when you walk into a department story are you meant to ask if the appliance is 'iReady ready?"

    1. Re:iReady? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ummm no, you say 'do you have any iReadies'? who the hell walks into a store and says 'is dvd player ready?'... bro, your pathetic attempt at humor failed MISERABLY!

    2. Re:iReady? by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 1

      In the right places, and for a few years, yeah. I've never seen a standard like this stay around for more than a year or two. In 5 years there'll be a few japanese homes with appliances that have unusable features, having cost twice as much as normal ones, but now working no different.

      My prediction: this will be as useful as televisions with built in Beta tapes, CD players with built in organisers, and computers with a built in weather display on the front.

      I give it 18 months

    3. Re:iReady? by epiphani · · Score: 1

      yup.

      I really hope they dont fuck this up. Anything developed for this purpose *must* be based on ipv6. If I'm gonna work with any of these products after ipv6 accually kicks in, I'm gonna want it globally routable.

      --
      .
    4. Re:iReady? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you say "iready desu ka?"

    5. Re:iReady? by SkArcher · · Score: 1

      I have to question if having your cooker globally routable is necessary or even desirable.

      Still, it would be peotically satisfying to be able to route all spam mail to a honeypot in your fridge i suppose.

      Laugh. It's Funny.

      --

      An infinite number of monkeys will eventually come up with the complete works of /.
    6. Re:iReady? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * iReady compliant
      * iReady enabled
      * iReady product

  6. Good Thing by Phroggy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have difficulty imagining the usefulness of this, but I'm really glad they're working together to develop a common standard instead of each company doing their own thing. I suspect someone will find something really cool to do with this technology that nobody's thought of yet, now that the framework exists.

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    1. Re:Good Thing by serutan · · Score: 1

      I have difficulty imaging anything useful or cool about this. And apparently so does the otherwise gadget-happy Japanese public: "Net-linking home appliances without iReady are already available in Japan, though they have yet to catch on." Well, DUH, because the whole concept is pretty useless. I can't wait to stand in front of my refrigerator and surf the web.

    2. Re:Good Thing by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      How about a firdge that detects that you're getting low on milk, or beer, or whatever, and automatically adds it to your shopping list for you, or perhaps even places an order for more?

      Networked computers aren't just about surfing the web, you know.

    3. Re:Good Thing by Micro$will · · Score: 1

      How about I look in the fridge one in a while and check whether I'm low on milk/butter/beer whatever, instead of Hal 9000 figuring it out for me?

      What they need is a standard to unfuck the back of my entertainment system. I mean, really, why does there have to be over a dozen wires going to/from my home theater? It *should* be 6 speaker wires, and a couple USB/firewire connections. Is it that hard to produce?

    4. Re:Good Thing by jrumney · · Score: 1
      I have difficulty imagining the usefulness of this

      The example of controlling the heating from a cellphone seems geniuinely useful (but not via bluetooth, as you want the house warm before you get within bluetooth or even WiFi range), but all the crap about fridges and ovens that is the usual poster child for these systems is nothing more than gimmicky really.

    5. Re:Good Thing by Beardydog · · Score: 1

      I wanted to make chocolate chip cookies a few weeks ago, but I didn't have a recipe handy, so I looked up the Consumer Reports ultimate god-killing cookie recipe online.

      My printers aren't hooked up at the moment, and even if they were I probably wouldn't feel like printing a recipe up that I'd eventually jsut lose again in the cluter on my floor, so I trotted back and forth until I had the mix all ready.

      Sure, it isn't something that would make or break an appliance, but it would have been pretty handy for me to set the temp on the oven from my comp downstairsas soon as I found the recipe, beam the recipe to my fridge's screen to read while I prepared the dough, and gotten feedback on my comp from the oven about preheat status, or time left to cook.

      Hell, I'd even enjoy having a webcam involved so I could see if they're golden brown yet.

      Not to mention the times I've goe to all the trouble of finding a recipe, only to spend ten minutes routing through my fridge, and coming up short one ingredient. It'd be nice if I could drop a list into some kind of refridgerator widget that'll tell me if I've got anything, and what I'm missing.

      On the other hand, I'm the most ungodly lazy person on earth, and Ireally don't deserve anymore help from my kitchen...

    6. Re:Good Thing by RicktheBrick · · Score: 1

      Every device that allows flow of any type(gas,water or electricity) should communicatie its status to a computer. The computer should know if there is any flow and the reason why. The computer should be able to take corrective action if it determines there is not a good reason for the flow. Expensive devices should be able to be programmed so they work only when they can communicate with their owner's computer. When gps becomes cheaper I see the devices being able to broadcast their location so they can be located if anyone would be foolish enough to steal them. These would greatly enhance our safety and security in our homes.

    7. Re:Good Thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'd be nice if I could drop a list into some kind of refridgerator widget that'll tell me if I've got anything, and what I'm missing.

      Until you find that the fridge thinks that you having a milk carton is the same as having a pint of milk. Never forget that computers are very very stupid. Solution of course is to actually get the carton and see how much is in it... but quite what use the computer is being then is anyone's guess.

    8. Re:Good Thing by Beardydog · · Score: 1

      Hmm...maybe I can get one with little scales to set various items on... Me: This is the Milk scale. Computer: Oh? That feels like half a gallon...

    9. Re:Good Thing by GreggBert · · Score: 1
      I don't see the need for this in household applicances but something like this could be VERY usefull in medical equipment. I'm thinking about IV drips that communicate with pharmacies to let them know how much supply is left all over the hospital and heart and brain monitors that communicate with breathing apparatus and the like.

      I think the possibilities are endless for the medical application of this as long as you keep in mind that it should never replace or override a doctor's judgement. With nursing shortages and overworked doctor's in hospitals, medical machines talking to one another and downloading treatment plans might help out quite a bit in maintaining a certain level of care.

      --


      If you don't understand anything I post, please accept that I ate paste as a small boy...
    10. Re:Good Thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why have a home theater when standard speakers
      that are included with your tv work just fine?

      Why download books via the internet when you can walk / drive to the library?

      Why buy Cookies already made when you could just
      bake up a bunch?

      See its so easy to question the usefulness of
      anything; in the end its another minor convenience
      we will enjoy over time.

    11. Re:Good Thing by dollar70 · · Score: 1
      I don't really mean to sound cruel by this, but if you can't even find the time to set up your computer's printer, what makes you think you're ever going to manage to get your fridge online?

      And I know I probably won't make any friends with this next statement either, but if your cooking skills are limited to the equivelent of "paint by numbers", then maybe you ought to just buy pretty appliances that are only there for show and buy the foods you want down at the local deli.

      I just don't see how convergent technology inside of kitchen appliances is really going to be of any real benefit in the long run. If you're a lousy cook with basic kitchen utilities, you'll be a lousy cook with expensive high tech toys.

      Which house will you buy next? The one built by a master carpenter with over 10 years of homebuilding experience, or the one build by "Fred" who just bought a franchise, but don't worry, he's got the internet ready tools (e-Hammer(TM) and e-Saw(TM)) to show him how it's done!

      Again, I'm not trying to be mean about it, but if you've got enough cash to afford the infrastructure and maintenance of such merchandise, then you've got enough cash to pay someone else to prepare your food for you, and professionals are probably going to do a better job of it.

      Besides, no one is ever impressed with that "I made it myself" line when it comes to food anymore. They always kill the moment by asking far too many questions: "What's in it?", "Did you use Salt? I can't have salt. How much salt did you say?", "My doctor told me I can't have any carbs.", "Have you ever tried putting pecans in it instead of almonds?", "Oh my gosh! This contains nuts! Oh no! I'm Allergic to nuts!"

      Just flap out a box and let the brand name speak for itself: "Ooooooo! Krispy Kreme!", "Hey, check it out! It's Domino's!", "Cool! Doritos!", "Oh my! I just love Sarah Lee cheesecake!"

      If you're going to cook, learn to cook. If your going to impress, go to the professionals. If you want to look stupid and pretentious in one stroke, buy an e-Ready(TM) fridge.

    12. Re:Good Thing by LordMyren · · Score: 1

      except that framework was already invented and called universal plug and play.

      i havent seen any specs for developing iReady ready appliances. Universal plug and play actually is an open spec.

      Myren

    13. Re:Good Thing by LordMyren · · Score: 1

      medical systems require end after end of certification and approval. much like mil-spec gear.

      i'd be amazed if they'd gotten around to approving packet based networks yet. ;-] what with those collisions and what not.

      would you trust your life to a home automation standard called iReady? how about someone elses?

  7. E, I, O, U... Technology progression. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh, I understand the i-thing now. It shows the generation of neat, but possibly mostly useless or very successfull new personal technology.

    e-mail, emac, ecommernce, etc etc... for 1990's technology.

    imac, iRiver, iTones, iReady etc for 2000's technology.

    So next we have

    oMac, oMan, oRobit, oBeowolf/playstation3/cluster etc etc... for 2010,

    then

    uMac, uBrain, uBenevolentRobotMasters, uMars,
    for 2020's technology.

    The only question I have is what about "y" and sometimes even "w"?????

    1. Re:E, I, O, U... Technology progression. by mattjb0010 · · Score: 1

      There was a geek who had some toys, E I E I O

    2. Re:E, I, O, U... Technology progression. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yBother :-)

    3. Re:E, I, O, U... Technology progression. by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      and sometimes, they'll throw in a "y" as in "yMac"

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    4. Re:E, I, O, U... Technology progression. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yMac, yNot?

    5. Re:E, I, O, U... Technology progression. by gr8fulnded · · Score: 1

      oMac, oMan, oRobit, oBeowolf [...] Once again, the porn industry leads innovation. The oFace is already here: Houston porn doll

    6. Re:E, I, O, U... Technology progression. by gr8fulnded · · Score: 1

      Bah... one more time: oFace: Doll

    7. Re:E, I, O, U... Technology progression. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      e-mail, emac, ecommernce, etc etc... for 1990's technology.

      imac, iRiver, iTones, iReady etc for 2000's technology.


      The eMac came after the iMac. Time to start working on a new letter theory buddy.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    8. Re:E, I, O, U... Technology progression. by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      and email is not 1990s technology.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  8. iWife by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 4, Funny
    "The first products adhering to the standard, called iReady, are expected to be available by next year."

    Anybody know when they'll be releasing the iWife module?

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:iWife by physicsphairy · · Score: 1

      They already released it, but it was recalled because it was found to be trojaned with the iNlaw exploit.

    2. Re:iWife by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dunno about that, but iRobot will be out next July.

  9. I guess the simple book had no impact in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...may I propose SACP (the Simple Appliance Communications Protocol) + a generic per appliance MIB.

  10. just what I've been waiting for by wibs · · Score: 2

    As I understand it this essentially X10, except actually feasible.

    --
    If you get nervous, just remember that there are a few billion other people who don't really give a damn.
    1. Re:just what I've been waiting for by AmericanKleptocracy · · Score: 0

      And except also nothing like that at all.

    2. Re:just what I've been waiting for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great! Now the iStove can cook the iPopup iSpams.

  11. ILL GIVE YUO A HINT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    his name starts with the letter "M", and I don't mean "malda".
    wow this site sux0rs I'm gonna play w/ myself lolf kthx

  12. A/V network by myov · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think some form of A/V network would be more useful than linking appliances. Why can't I just link my TV, VCR, Digital Tuner, DVD, Receiver, etc with a single cable and let them figure themselves out?

    Play on DVD tunes the TV to the right input, sets the receiver surround mode, knows to control the receiver's volume instead of TV's, etc. Watching TV, press record and the VCR knows what to do. Let me walk over to the kitchen and continue watching my DVD there. Etc.

    A universal remote doesn't really make things that much simpler (constant mode switching, two different volume modes depending on where audio is routed, needing to know what plugs into what, etc). The alternative is an extremely complex/expensive crestron-type system.

    Of course, under the DMCA/etc, you'll probably see this as a "what we're allowing you to do" connection instead. :(

    --
    I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
    1. Re:A/V network by serutan · · Score: 1

      Now that's more like it. A/V devices have a REASON to be networked. Unless maybe... you could get the VCR could make toast. Oh wait, Vyvyan already did that.

    2. Re:A/V network by gum2me · · Score: 1

      Isnt InfiniBand coming out soon that will allow TVs, DVDs and the likes to connect to each other without wires?

      gum2me?

    3. Re:A/V network by jrumney · · Score: 1
      A universal remote doesn't really make things that much simpler

      I remember in the early 90's seeing a programmable remote, which could send multiple signals on a single button press. A single button to switch the receiver to DVD, turn on surround, turn the volume up, skip the copyright disclaimer and start the movie playing. Most TVs in Europe already switch channels so that signal is optional.

    4. Re:A/V network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      JVC already has a AV Link that does some of this with all their components. It is a TTL level of the remote signals connecting their components via a 3.5mm mono cable.

      I have my JVC TV hooked up to the receiver (RX-7030). When I select input from DVD (actually xbox), it would select the component+SPID input on the receiver and via the AV link the proper TV video mode. The receiver Off command would switch off all components connected.

      I uses the receiver, so there is no need to use the TV volume. My faithful 5-for-one remote maps the receiver volume instead of TV.

    5. Re:A/V network by myov · · Score: 1

      I have a programmable remote with a macro feature, but the problem is that my TV cycles through inputs with a single key. So, I have no way of knowing what input it's on in order to "press" the button the correct number of times.

      The digital tuner also adds to the confusion. I'm still trying to figure out how to wire the VCR. Would it have been that hard to have separate TV and VCR outputs? I'm now out of inputs on the TV, so either I chain things on to each other, or use an external switchbox. A single cable would eliminate this - the TV knows what it has attached.

      I agree with another post - Firewire would be perfect for this, since it's already in use for camcorders. The only problem I can see is for long cable runs (my TV and receiver have about a 40' run between them, because I couldn't go through the ceiling)

      --
      I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
    6. Re:A/V network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Been there, done that. Google 'mediawire avio'.

      Synchronous household/office network, many hdtv & cd channles, tcpip, x10, blah blah blah. We did a realtime OS in Smalltalk to drive it and provide the control device UI(s). Killed by M$.

    7. Re:A/V network by LordMyren · · Score: 1

      out little undergrad team developped a universal plug and play network device and is working on a software interface thereto. universal plug and play sounds a lot like what little we've heard of iReady from these sound bites, but its somewhat an "open standard" in that we can just go download specs and start making devices. we've spent a while thinking of how to really use our network, and besides lighting, av gear is the only legitimate solution we've dredged up for common use.

      with an open standard like universal plug and play, you can really work at uprooting the amx/crestron proprietary systems that cost and arm and a leg. you can install them yourselves and use your own choice of interfaces. a lot of choice you dont get with the proprietary systems.

      the problem with the one cable centralized content/control distribution is that standards such as these are far less important in that world because these systems are just computers. applicances need a way of being controlled over computer, computers typically have this advantage inherently built in.

      i believe Via just released one of their mini mobo's with component output. add GOOD sound output (Envy24?) and gigabit ethernet and a diskless linux boot and you're already nearing the apocalypse. Mobo + ram + power supply + case = one connector media box. + a metric f ton of linux legwork.

      although i said standards like this are less important for computers, they do implement a higher level of cross system functionality thats really very useful. universal plug and play can really help cross system integration. instead of custom scripting each cd rom drive across all the systems, you can start having each computer just be a device in your greater network, your home becomes the "central computer". its hard to describe, but behaviorally its much better than just samba sharing everything. inherently universal plug and play implements no privledge system across this, but software will begin cropping up to manage and orchestrate your network, thereby providing privledge systems.

      sites down right now, mobo shot, but we'll have our page back up at http://www.alienintels.com/spiffy/ if you're interested in our work. a PIC clone implementation of a UPnP device runs the hardware, and the software runs off a SQL database.

      Myren

    8. Re:A/V network by beguyld · · Score: 1

      Actually, there is a standard for an A/V network. It's called HAVi, and it based on Firewire. (In theory is should be able to use other media and protocols too, but the theory is very far from the reality, given the protocol design.) Main web site for the org is here .

      This was created by many of the same Japanese companies. I worked for one of their research labs on the project. When the economy hit the skids a couple years back, they basically abondoned it. They were not the only ones though. Lots of talk, some specs, but no company was actually wiling to be the first to spend the money to put the capabilities into real products. Last I heard it was dying a slow death, in spite of spiffy news updates on the HAVi site.

      Same old story of the difficulty of getting competitors to truly work together past the level of the standards committee. When it comes to putting dollars (or yen) on the line, it's a different story.

      Given that I was right in the middle of the HAVi thing, and watched it die in realtime, I don't have much faith in this latest great idea either. Especially since HAVi was actually useful.

  13. Essentially, this is something that MS failed at.. by Clinoti · · Score: 1

    but yet hails the future of technology in the homeplace. Smart networked appliances working together in unison with a 'master-of-the-household' system are what dreamers, and architect-dreamers have been thinking of something to do with for years now, but only to be foiled by incompatabilty and privacy issues. The only point of reference we have now in current age technology are the giant private corporation printers, and servers, that call back to a datacenter to report need of repair, need of future maintenance, or need of parts. But for the homestream....nothing. It's about time that companies started to herald this (old) breaking technology.

    --

    Let's keep in mind that patents are in place to keep lawyers employed and keep them litigating. -CatGrep

  14. If you want to buy connected appliaces today. . . by jhobbs · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Westinghouse has a new line of connected apliances available. They do such interesting things as, your alarm clock tells you if the coffee maker is not filled with water and coffee, when you go to bed. Or you can use the barcode wand on the microwave to scan your tv dinner, and the microwave will look up how to cook it on the internet. They are already available to purchase at Amazon. The appliances are about average for luxury appliances, but the "home hub" (an alarm clock + windows CE pda, the one require piece) is a bit pricy at $500 if you ask me.

  15. Oh, Brave New Crap. by servasius_jr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The future, as supplied by mega-corporations: More and more of what you need less and less.

    Do you really want your toaster to be twice as expensive, half as reliable, licenced instead of owned, and subject to planned obsolescence?

    1. Re:Oh, Brave New Crap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there some reason you will be forced to buy the iReady appliances rather than older model toasters?

      Oh, of course, the mega-corporations will conspire to bury knowledge of how to make a basic toaster and the black helicopters will come for anyone attempting to rediscover the process of toasting.

      Insightful, my ass.

    2. Re:Oh, Brave New Crap. by Agent+Green · · Score: 1

      Actually, if I could use that toaster with Power-Over-Ethernet, I might be impressed. :) Granted, if I miswired the thing my Cisco switch wouldn't be very happy. ;)

      The only useful thing that I really want is to be able to pull up a web browser and see how much time I have left on my laundry in the washer/dryer.

      This could be a HUGE hit any rental market (i.e. is someone else using the dryer downstairs before I lug all my crap down there?). I think some students at MIT did some project to show remaining time on the dryer in their dorm some time ago.

      --
      // Agent Green (Ian / IU7 / KB1JQO)
      // IEEE 802.3: All 10base Are Belong To Us
  16. great... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

    until a virus burns your house down, or turns the gas on the stove on and it doesn't light, then no one notices...

    Although it'd be worth if if the fridge has an auto-update :)

    1. Re:great... by Valar · · Score: 1

      until a virus burns your house down, or turns the gas on the stove on and it doesn't light, then no one notices...
      Or when a virus causes your phone to randomly dial people long distance. Or when a hacker takes control of the little computer in your car and makes you drive off a bridge...

      Or maybe this isn't as big a problem as everyone makes it seem...

    2. Re:great... by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      The little computer in your car isn't networked.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    3. Re:great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If somebody turns on all the appliances in a vulnerable section of the power grid, it would be easy to incite another big blackout - or at least waste a lot of power. Something that seems like a small security risk (the ability to turn on your toaster) could represent a real vulnerability if enough people adopt the technology.

    4. Re:great... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

      >> Or maybe this isn't as big a problem as
      >> everyone makes it seem...

      Looking back at the development of WI-FI, no one imaged it could have possibly been such a security risk and the security problems have seriously hurt adpation of this technology.

      Where there is potential for abuse in a technology product, it will be abused. Why not take a moment and think they 'hey, maybe there IS some potential for damage' here instead of just playing things by ear which didn't do well for WI-FI.

  17. ABC by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

    Another Bad Creation. Need I say more.

  18. As Always, Questionable Utility by Babbster · · Score: 5, Interesting
    To me, downloading recipes to a stove is just silly (assuming the presence of an Internet-connected PC) unless it has robot arms that prepare the meal to the recipe's suggestions. Automating and remote-controlling home-heating and air-conditioning systems has been going on for YEARS. Here's but one example using the X10 system (I refuse to link directly to X10 because of their evil internet advertising practices).

    Another use I've heard/read about is a "smart" refrigerator that can tell you, for example, when you need milk. Of course, most homes have solved this complicated problem with the extremely advanced pen/paper system (some VERY rich people substitute a dry erase system, but I've only read about homes so equipped in magazines) combined with opening the refrigerator door.

    I really wish manufacturers would come up with something truly useful and unique to do with these appliance-connectivity solutions. I love spending money on mostly unnecessary gadgets, but I need a LITTLE justification.

    1. Re:As Always, Questionable Utility by silentbozo · · Score: 1

      What I want to see is an apartment complex with a centralized food storage/delivery system. Instead of going to the supermarket, the supermarket sends a delivery truck to stock up the apartment's central store. When your fridge runs low on milk, it orders some from the central store, and it gets delivered via a pneumatic system (either that, or some delivery guy just does rounds inside the building.) No need to stock sodas (taking up valuable fridge room) - if you suddenly have a bunch of extra guests, just dial up a few six packs. Want a DVD for the evening? Just punch up your terminal (internet, telephone, cable, or otherwise) and see what's in stock locally.

      It boggles the mind that companies like Kozmo tried to do the pizza delivery thing (yes, we'll deliver a 90 cent pack of Junior Mints to your door... for free!), when they could have tried to partner with developers and supermarkets to implement this kind of system.

      Oh, and in case some punk tries to patent this (assuming it hasn't been patented already), I declare this idea to be published and in the public domain!

      Actually, it probably already has been patented, for use with hotel chains - they already have a hotel central store/kitchen, a delivery system (room service) and interactive controls (interactive cable, web console, or the good old menu and telephone.)

    2. Re:As Always, Questionable Utility by jellybear · · Score: 1

      would you pay for the real estate costs? The store could probably be rented out otherwise as apartments

    3. Re:As Always, Questionable Utility by Matthias+Wiesmann · · Score: 1
      To me, downloading recipes to a stove is just silly (assuming the presence of an Internet-connected PC) unless it has robot arms that prepare the meal to the recipe's suggestions
      I think it depends of the oven. If the only control of the oven is temperature, then it is, indeed, silly. Now if you have an oven that can control temperature, humidity, the strength of the blowing and is able to control the speed at which those variables changes, this are different. Being able to load "programs" that describe the changes of those variables over time instead of programming the oven makes a lot of sense.

      Obviously this makes no sense for heating deep-frozen pizzas, but for more complex cooking like delicate pasteries, fine control is needed. Professional ovens have this kind of controls (including the ability to control how fast temperature and humidity changes) and I suspect they could have even more but for the complexity of the interface.

      Remember that their target market is the japanese housewife, not the average slashdot reader, their cooking styles are, I suspect, a little bit different...

    4. Re:As Always, Questionable Utility by kisielk · · Score: 1

      As is mentioned in any article related to X10 home automation, the X10 in this case is *not* the same as those annoying camera advertisements we used to see all over the place. It's unfortunate that some shady advertisements gave a legitimate technology a bad name in that kind a of way.

    5. Re:As Always, Questionable Utility by shione · · Score: 1

      Mate, linking them on slashdot is what you do to sites you don't like.

    6. Re:As Always, Questionable Utility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah I thought everybody had heard about x10 way back in the day, even radio shack sold the stuff so u could turn on your lights or tv over the computer.

    7. Re:As Always, Questionable Utility by Babbster · · Score: 1

      Somehow, I never got that information. Consider my snide comment retracted with apologies.

  19. Re:Essentially, this is something that MS failed a by dnahelix · · Score: 1

    I think a crucial aspect here is the tendency of Japanese competitors to work together on advancing new technologies. Japanese companies also have a history of actually HELPING each other in diffucult times, especially companies with a similar business. Obviously, this is in direct contrast to Microsoft, which has the kill-all-competition mentality.

    --
    Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
    They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
    I Hate \.
  20. Those Crazy Japanese... by wedg · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Honey, the toaster's been hacked again." *sound of sirens in the background, getting louder* ... Can anyone else think of some appliances that could potentially be broken into and cause damage to someone's home? Hell, no system is perfectly secure. There's always a way in, and always someone willing to find it. So what if some happy-go-lucky hacker finds his way on to the net.appliances with a modified >appliance-of-choice and a laptop? Suddenly your oven's on while you're away being a Salaryman and the little ninjas leave their homework on deadly types of blowfish on the oven, and poof, someone's house goes up. Or an apartment complex.

    But maybe I'm just pessimistic.

    --
    Jake
    Dating: while( 1 ){ call_girl(); get_rejected(); drink_40(); } return 0;
    1. Re:Those Crazy Japanese... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just run Linux on it, security problems solved.

    2. Re:Those Crazy Japanese... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I envy your sheltered little world.

    3. Re:Those Crazy Japanese... by bonhomme_de_neige · · Score: 1

      Well, who's seen Ghost in the Shell? Now they are one step closer...

      --
      "Why are you watching the washing machine?"
      "I love entertainment, as long as it's clean"
  21. iReady by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's with putting 'i' in front of everything? can't four japanese mega-corporations working together come up with something original?

    iBullshit.

    1. Re:iReady by Ashtead · · Score: 1
      Looks to me like they have taken a page out of Intel's book. A number of Intel's trademarks begin with the lowercase "i", e.g. iPDX, iRMX, iCEL, iAPX and so on. I don't think Intel has a monopoly on acronyms or words starting with "i[A-Z]", but they've certainly got a lot of them.

      They are also quite well-known.

      So it might be a fashion thing, that "i-" this or that sounds like it would be with the times. As long as they don't bang into Intel's trademarks they would be OK.

      It does however look a little bit too 1985 to me...

      --
      SIGBUS @ NO-07.308
  22. Imagine the possibilities... by rohan_leader · · Score: 4, Funny

    BEFORE:

    RIAA or similar: You are hereby charged for downloading copyrighted content from this internet account.

    YOU: No no! The Virus did it!

    AFTER:

    RIAA or similar: You are hereby charged for downloading copyrighted content from this internet account.

    YOU: No no! The Oven did it!

    RIAA: Did you realize that the recipe for those cinnamon rolls was copyrighted?

    YOU: WTF! You can copyright a cinnamon roll recipe?

    etc etc etc.. ad infinitum.

    (and other possible encounters... too)

  23. Yet another standard among many? by akc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There already is a whole raft of standards for home interconnection, and then home to outside world.

    How does this new standard add to that?

    Look at OSGi, uPnP and LonWorks just to show a few of them

    1. Re:Yet another standard among many? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget Java/JINI/JAXTA

    2. Re:Yet another standard among many? by certsoft · · Score: 1
      The ECHONET communications protocol is designed to work over a variety of lower level interconnects. They show Power Line, Wireless, Extended HBS (whatever that is), IrDA, and LonTalk.

      There is a layer they call "Protocol Difference Absorption Processing Block" that then is supposed to make all these mediums look the same to the higher levels. We'll see :)

    3. Re:Yet another standard among many? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also xPL which covers IR, P&P and centralised configuration, messaging (eg caller ID, weather), integration with existing HA controller HomeVision. Never used it, just happened to be reading about it when I chanced on this thread. It's cross-platform and already has a couple of network MP3 players available using xPL.

      Phillip.

    4. Re:Yet another standard among many? by LordMyren · · Score: 1

      i'd like to point out UPnP is the only one that releases enough specs for you to build your own device without having to give your name or address to anyone, much less pay developer fees.

  24. hmmm where is the market? by dave1g · · Score: 1

    yes, eventually this will be cool, but a stove with a recipe is worthless if it cant fix the meal for you...

    But hey, let 'em at it, maybe something cool will come out of this.

    Atleast it is a standard!

  25. WLAN by rf0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Great instead of war driving there will be war cooking

    Rus

    1. Re:WLAN by Grey+Tomorrow · · Score: 1

      I can see it now: after putting a roast on and leaving it to cook, you smell something burning halfway through, go to check what it was, and see on the oven's digital clock display a scrolling message of "HaX0r's pwnt j00r dinar!!!!"

  26. This will add to already complex appliances by Qweezle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most new "modern" appliances with features that are anything near digital are already too difficult for the run-of-the-mill house caretaker, whether that be a woman or a man.

    People want something simple that WORKS....I doubt there will be a widespread acceptance of this until the technology generation, the kids of the 90s, grow old enough to have to use household appliances(and take care of a house/apartment), which won't be for another 10 to 15 years.

    Until then, therefore, I predict these things won't catch on too well. But you can never really predict consumer acceptance of a radical new idea, so I guess we'll have to wait and see.

    1. Re:This will add to already complex appliances by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 1

      You got that right. Appliances are supposed to be appliances: usable by anyone quickly with minimum fuss. I've been so peeved by those modern microwave ovens, with all their silly "pizza" and "bagel" buttons, since I'm an oven purist who thinks that [power dial] + [time dial] = [good enough for any heating job] ... but I admit the designers understand that things like "idiot buttons" make it more of an appliance. Programming your appliances is not the way to go.

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
  27. The Jetsons kitchen by IowaBoy · · Score: 1

    As far as networking kitchen appliances goes, this has the potential of being exceedingly silly, the bullshit net-ization of something just for the hell of it.

    The idea of remote-controlled ovens makes me nervous. These just aren't the kind of things you leave unattended. Automatic drip coffee makers, which have been around for a couple of decades, are acceptable because you're at home, and the device is really just heating and pumping water on a timer; little chance of burning a pyrex pot of Yuban. It's cool to think of leaving a frozen dinner in the oven in the morning and having the oven start cooking it at 6:00 pm for when you get home. But if I forget about it and go to Taco Bell, or if I'm late, the thing better call or e-mail me, and it better be able to reliably turn itself off. In the end, though, no labor is saved, and I have to plan the meal and program the oven.

    I don't know why we still don't have the most obvious network-enabled kitchen appliance: microwaves with bar-code scanners that set cooking times automatically. It's a ready-made metadata tagging schema, all it takes is an updated library of cooking times for a given SKU, pegged to the specific wattage of your unit and updated at night like a TiVo program guide. This is perfect for the kind of quick, unplanned meal that microwaves were made for. And how may times have you smelled burnt popcorn in the office because someone screwed up the cooking time? Hello, we went to the moon three decade ago! Bonus revenue stream: Agree to let the manufacturer track what you cook and eat, and you get some targeted marketing and coupons.

    Connecting my toaster oven to my home network shouldn't involve anything more than it alerting me that the Hungry Man is done without having to set an alarm. But you know where this is headed: Pop a DVD into your media PC, and a Microsoft wizard pops up and says "Looks like you're watching a movie. Would you like me to cook some popcorn?" Or if my wife has programmed it: "That's your third serving of hot wings this week you're about to cook. What about your diet?" And the f*&^&%$g thing calls her, too.

    1. Re:The Jetsons kitchen by filtersweep · · Score: 1

      If you are the sort who thinks you left your oven on while you are away on a trip, you could assuage your OCD checking behaviors if this were implemented in a secure manner.

      --


      Those that suggest you "dance like no one is watching" really want to see you make a complete fool of yourself.
    2. Re:The Jetsons kitchen by way2trivial · · Score: 1
      go to amazon
      search for Beyond WBYMW1

      Scanning wand programs microwave to cook foods with a swipe of the package UPC code
      Over 4000 UPC codes programmed at factory
      New UPC's added automatically via Beyond Information Network
      Clock time and day of week set automatically via HomeHub

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    3. Re:The Jetsons kitchen by craXORjack · · Score: 1
      all it takes is an updated library of cooking times for a given SKU, pegged to the specific wattage of your unit and updated at night like a TiVo program guide.

      I think the updating would not be necessary. It would be trivial to encode desired wattage, length of cycle, pauses, additional heating cycles into one barcode. The hardest part would be to get a referendum of microwave oven manufacturers to agree to the same system.

      --
      Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
    4. Re:The Jetsons kitchen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But you know where this is headed: Pop a DVD into your media PC, and a Microsoft wizard pops up and says "Looks like you're watching a movie. Would you like me to cook some popcorn?" Or if my wife has programmed it: "That's your third serving of hot wings this week you're about to cook. What about your diet?" And the f*&^&%$g thing calls her, too.

      The day it can move food from the cupboard into the oven and unwrap the package too it better be able to do this instead: "Looks like you're eyeing that 'Melinda Does Seattle' DVD again. Would you like me to feed you popcorn and massage you with the simu-vagina attachment?" And if your wife has programmed it you might get the simu-dong instead.

  28. ECHONET by AoT · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One part of this which is definitly novel is the talk of using appliance networks to minimize environmental impact. Not a bad idea. Thats the ECHONET they talk about in the standard.

    1. Re:ECHONET by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 1

      eh? Talk? What talk?

      I actually went to the echonet site. While they imply that echnoet will be good for the environment, there wasn't one single shred of information about anything to do with the relationship between "echonet" and "the environment".

      eg. nothing explaining in what way ECHONET will "sve the environment" or whatever.

      --
      Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
    2. Re:ECHONET by AoT · · Score: 1

      From what I could tell ECHONET was a unimplemented concept that could use the iReady(god that name sucks) standard as a means od implementation.

  29. Oh, I can hardly wait! by some+old+guy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let's see now, my garbage disposal locks up, causing a buffer overflow in my toilet. Meanwhile, my Smart Car fails to map my driveway and crashes.

    Welcome to the brave new world.

    --
    Scruting the inscrutable for over 50 years.
  30. I can see it now... by Bishop,+Martin · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Hacker burns down womans house with cell phone" "Malicious user ruins families turkey" "Woman not amused by recipe for 'Cooked lart'" "Top 10 ways to keep your refrigerator from BSODing"

    --
    Setec Astronomy
    1. Re:I can see it now... by mattjb0010 · · Score: 1

      Malicious user ruins families turkey

      Microwave corrects Slashdot reader's grammar.

  31. Those crafty Japs sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....make the biggest god damn miniature shit you've ever seen!

  32. HooBoy! by The+Mutant · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just hope these folks think a lot about security; I had to configure my Apple Base Station to use MAC address for all my wireless devices (two iMacs, a G4 PowerBook and two 5450 iPaqs) since the little bastards across the hall took to fucking with it whenever they could see it.

    For once I'm actually glad someone is just a PC user; if they were using Linux or OS X and knew about Kismet or KisMAC I'd have an ongoing problem.

    Why can't kids just do graffitti throw rocks through windows like I used to?

    1. Re:HooBoy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had to configure my Apple Base Station to use MAC address for all my wireless devices
      This is something that should be done BEFORE the 'little bastards across the hall' can have a chance to fuck with it. Also changing the default password, essid, enabling wep (not that it helps much), making it a closed or hidden network and whatever other small security measures your particular hardware may allow. Admittedly all these steps will do nothing to deter someone who is determined to get into your network, but at least they can keep you safe from accidental discovery and inquisitive kids. A network that is open is a nuisance. There are routers near me without all of the above done, and my computers would connect to their networks AUTOMATICLY until I changed the setup to only connect to a known essid. I have had similar problems at residential client installs, where someone would throw a $50 linksys wireless router into their apartment and not secure it at all, and then XP would pick up on the network and connect to it (since it is physically closer to this particular pc than the client's own router) and then the client wonders why they can not connect to the other machines on their network.
      A totally open wireless network is like a wired network with jacks running out to the street with a big neon sign saying 'Free access to my network'. Locking it down a bit at least makes the sign smaller or non-existent.
      It is harder to protect your glass windows from casual vandalism than it is to secure your network. You don't leave your door unlocked, why would you leave your wireless network open?

  33. Oh no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's great. As if people war-driving to screw up your computer wasn't bad enough. Now they're going to cut your heat up to 100 degrees and kill your fridge so you won't even have cold beer. Life sucks enough as it is. iGiveup.

    1. Re:Oh no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not THAT difficult secure a wireless network.

  34. "It's good for recipes!' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    History has shown that whenever the manufacturers of a new technology mention recipes, what they really mean is "we can't figure out what possible use this would be to the average person, but we still want to sell it."

  35. Possible uses by TheJorge · · Score: 2, Informative

    So of course this tech will wait until we find that one great use. But until, then there's plenty of druggery to be avoided:

    You finish the orange juice, and scan the SKU. OJ is added to your shopping list, which your spouse can sync to their palm at work and use at the market on the way home.

    Upon returning from shopping, you scan stuff as you put it away, or punch in produce codes (we all get jobskills as checkers as a side-effect). If you're like me, you buy some tomatoes, throw them in the crisper, and discover them three months later. A nice alert could be handy.

    You plan out a couple meals, and the ingredients are added to your shopping list and you're alerted when mealtime comes what you had planned. On some random morning, you ask what you can have for breakfast and based on a recipe list and your current stock, you're given a set of choice. Choosing one, your fridge tells you to take out the milk and four eggs, and the cabinet tells you to take out the bread. (I'm not a cook-- we're making french toast). The stove tells you to turn it on medium and put battered bread on a skillet.

    Obviously, for simple recipes this is useless and for complicated ones it doesn't save you anything more than looking back at a recipe, but if anything, we're a lazy population. More importanly, this could all be done with one standalone appliance with a barcode reader (kitchen pc, anyone?) But just because there's another way doesn't mean it can't catch on. People have powered toothbrushes and use the full-service pump at gas stations. We pay for others to wash our cars and change our oil, and buy lap dances rather than trying to pick up women and take them home. There may be a market for automating your grocery stock.

    1. Re:Possible uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You finish the orange juice, and scan the SKU. OJ is added to your shopping list, which your spouse can sync to their palm at work and use at the market on the way home.

      Upon returning from shopping, you scan stuff as you put it away, or punch in produce codes (we all get jobskills as checkers as a side-effect).


      I sort of like my household gadgets to save me work, not add to it. Some sort of RFID tags that get scanned automatically, maybe. Having to scan stuff manually or type in codes? Not going to happen.

    2. Re:Possible uses by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      no- you don't scan stuff when you get home, you download the data off of your usb key flash

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  36. Japanese proverb by Micro$will · · Score: 1

    "Business is War."

    Any mention of Japanese and fair in the same sentence is a invitation for laughter. Japanese companies have a recent history of helping each other due partly because of recent anti monopoly regulations from decades of monopoly abuses, and now competition from other asian markets. Microsoft may have helped develop "embrace and extend", but the Japanese developed "dump and pump". Flood the market with inexpensive products, and when the competition keels over, pump up the prices. Now they're in the same boat as we were in the 70s, and they're doing everything they can to survive.

  37. a wiser man than myself once said by understyled · · Score: 1

    i for one welcome our new eNetiConAppliance overlords.

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  38. Is this news ... by foobsr · · Score: 1

    ... hmm, definitely not. Even SIEMENS has a thingy called instabus .

    However, this reminds me of the hero in UBIK (the author was honored here) who always had difficulties with his appliances refusing to work as he was chronically out of credit.

    The door refused to open. It said, "Five cents, please." He searched his pockets. No more coins; nothing. "I'll pay you tomorrow," he told the door. Again he tried the knob. Again it remained locked. "What I pay you," he informed it, "is in the nature of a gratuity; I don't have to pay you." "I think otherwise," the door said. "Look in the purchase contract you signed when you bought this conapt." In his desk drawer he found the contract; since signing it he had found it necessary to refer to the document many times. Sure enough; payment to his door for opening and shutting constituted a mandatory fee. Not a tip. "You discover I'm right," the door said. It sounded smug. From the drawer beside the sink Joe Chip got a stainless steel knife; with it he began systematically to unscrew the bolt assembly of his apt's money-gulping door. "I'll sue you," the door said as the first screw fell out.

    Tough times to come.

    CC.

    --
    TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
  39. yay! Just what we all need by Piranhaa · · Score: 0

    So now that Microsoft has entered the car market, and already have lots of the computer market, what would stop them from entering the stove, or kitchen market... Seems kind of risky to me if you think about it...

    1. Re:yay! Just what we all need by phillymjs · · Score: 1

      Microsoft developed something like this years ago. IIRC they called the protocol "Homer"-- the jokes just kinda write themselves, don't they? I believe they dropped it because it wouldn't instantly make them a few billion dollars richer, so they went off to kill Netscape or something. (It's been a while since I read "Barbarians Led by Bill Gates*," which is the book that talks about Homer.)

      Personally, I hope this is one arena Microsoft stays the fuck out of. With other companies developing it, there's a chance the protocol will be an open standard and I'll be able to tie it into my exisiting Mac-based home automation setup. If Microsoft does it it will only run on Windows machines.

      ~Philly

      * This book also contains an excellent account of how Pen Windows was originally developed for no reason other than to kill Go Corp.

  40. Maximum Overdrive by primus_sucks · · Score: 1

    Hello people, anyone remember Maximum Overdrive.

  41. A whole new meaning for Video Toaster? by dilweed · · Score: 1

    And what happens to my Eggos when I have the pop-up killer running?

  42. Why would you need a $6K refrigerator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously. Some appliances may well be worth networking (the TV for instance), but most of them are not and this new trend will only make things more expensive.

    Although it would be nice if the department's coffee maker could advertise via IM or e-mail that the coffee is ready.

  43. Yay! for Japanese companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it works like their own TRON alliance more power to them. Frankly none of American companies ever cooperate (semiconductor companies like TI or Motorola) and hence it's up to the Japanese counterparts to bring in the ubiquitous world, which we were promised years ago.

  44. Funny thing is by quintessent · · Score: 1

    What was it, 4 years ago, Slashdot had an article just like this about a company making a home appliance network? IIRC, someone made this same joke.

    It's still funny, though.

    I think I first read about appliance networks being under development maybe 15 years ago. The example mentioned was that your stereo could turn itself down when the phone rang. Something like 7 years ago, Novell hired a CEO out of Sun who decided home appliance networks represented the future of the company. The networking medium was to be the electrical wiring in the home. (Yeah, for a while, they thought WordPerfect was their future too.)

    New year's resolution: Just laugh, and don't comment.

  45. Gotta love marketing by quintessent · · Score: 1

    Don't forget these bold, savvy offshoots: mLife and tMobile (or however they spell them).

    And I think it was the Wall Street Journal carried an article about X going into things to give them an edgy, exciting aura-- X-Files, X-Box, Windows XP, and many others.

    1. Re:Gotta love marketing by SkArcher · · Score: 1

      So X means overmarketed and annoying?

      You have a point I suppose...

      --

      An infinite number of monkeys will eventually come up with the complete works of /.
  46. Re:Imagine ... (you insensitive clod) by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 1

    I did.

    And my mind got bent out of shape trying to understand why the RIAA (Recording Industry Association of America) cares about recipes.

    --
    Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
  47. This would be quite useful in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most Japanese homes do not have central heating and so each room has a seperate space heater. Most appartments have just one heater that's left off when you are not home. With network enabled heater someone could call their heater in their appartment to tell it to heat the place up before you get home. I can't see this catching on for any other reason than that.

  48. The farmer's version by gringer · · Score: 1

    What about the following progression of 2 iterations of e, i, followed by o.

    e-mail -> iTones -> eNet -> iStation -> oRover

    --
    Ask me about repetitive DNA
  49. Re:If you want to buy connected appliaces today. . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    your alarm clock tells you if the coffee maker is not filled with water and coffee, when you go to bed

    Why would I want to leave my coffee to go stale overnight?

  50. Should they be in the same sentence? by gringer · · Score: 1

    From the ECHONET / iReady article :
    Download from the internet a recipe or washing machine instructions to ensure ideal operations.

    I hope these aren't meant to be downloaded to the same machine. Getting a washing machine and an oven mixed up could produce some strange results:

    "Okay, so I just put the clothes in the washing machine like this, and push this button to get the wash cycle."
    "Um... why is it adding a tablespoon of oil to the wash?"
    "Now it's heating the clothes without water... they're turning brown"
    "Okay, its put the water in (finally)"
    "And I guess it's sort of mixing them. I always imaginged a bit more effort needed to get stuff out of clothes"
    "Well, I must say those clothes look good enough to eat - shame about the dirt"

    Or alternatively :

    "I think I'll cook a roast today. Lets see, I push *this* button to get the recipe"
    "Hmm. Expected time: 2.5-4 hours. Sounds about right"
    "Okay, this looks about right. It's putting everything into the water, and soaking it, but no heat yet"
    [2 hours later]
    "Still no heat, and everything is getting rinsed in even more water"
    "Oh dear. I don't think hanging that out in the sun is going to cook the food very well"

    --
    Ask me about repetitive DNA
  51. argh by burntoutjoy · · Score: 2, Funny

    What a bloody awful name.

    STOP WITH THE i PREFIX, PEOPLE. IT'S NOT BIG OR CLEVER.

    Apple should have excusive rights to the i prefix so they can use it tastefully.

    1. Re:argh by WhatThe?? · · Score: 1

      Do you find it iAnnoying ?

      I smell a naming patent

      --
      Technology is only a vehicle. People are the ones that drive it.
  52. Re:A/V network - Firewire by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

    I beleive what your looking for is firewire it has the bandwith to move video and audio and can be used for control as well. The design allows things to be daisy chained for less clutter. Now you see them on the current DVHS decks and some TV's and receivers. Unfortunatly DVI is taking over that segment because firewire gasp dosent have any content protection and it's digital. DVI is substandard in it's control function and routing though it seems to be more common as a video out than firewire (would be strange to see a video card with firewire that supported it as an output device)

    As an asside somebody should have pulled there ability to call a tape with macrovision VHS compatable or NTSC it's realy not compliant with the specs of either. This is the technology that got the movie companies used to copy protection.

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
  53. A few great reasons... by John+Courtland · · Score: 1

    The computer senses that your stove is using a milliliter/second of natural gas yet the burners haven't been activated, disables the stove and warns you so you can fix it before any accumulates.

    The computer senses the coils in the refridgerator are getting too hot and warns you before the compressor dies so you have time to figure out what to do with your food.

    Remote monitoring of the status of your clothes in the dryer, the amount of hot water left in your hot water heater, the efficiency of your boiler/heat exchange device, the freon left in your air conditioner, the heat generated by your ceiling fan motor... I am looking forward to the day when I can just go to my web browser, type in http://stove and its current status is a nice webpage for me to view.

    --
    Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
  54. Old folks by presearch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One of the best things that this technology could do is
    to standardize on how devices talk to their control panels.
    This implies that the control panel is separate and distinct
    from the device it controls. A washing machine's panel
    for example isn't necessarily hard-coded and hard-wired
    to the washer itself. Now, it would be possible for grandma,
    who can hardly see, to have just three big buttons for the
    washer, with loud audio feedback. But the slashgeek could
    have the mega-LCARS interface that sets the washer based
    on the rfid tags on the clothes that are tossed in, along with
    woolen-color vs. cotton-whites incompatibility warnings.

    Big, simple interfaces for seniors is overlooked by most
    device makers these days. Lots of tiny, low contrast buttons
    with nested menu structures only confuse most non-geeks.

    Downside of this will be that you'll need a monthly subscription
    for -everything- and selecting interfaces will also be an additional
    charge, like cellphone ring tones.

  55. Re:Axioms of Christmas Linux Economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Derivation is based on "Linux is not free if your time is not worthless", which statement 1 does not imply. Take that class again buster.:-)

  56. System administration is the tricky part by Diomidis+Spinellis · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I built a home application network I termed an Information Furnace a couple of years ago based on machines running slightly customized versions of FreeBSD, Linux, and NetBSD. My system handles Internet access, the PBX, MP3 music distribution, an alarm system, and a door opener. It can receive commands from remote controls, DTMF, and the web.

    What I gained from connecting these systems under one roof was

    • a better user interface; e.g. no more cryptic PBX commands to change quick-dialing codes
    • enhanced functionality, as in globally distributed MP3 play lists
    • synergies; a single command turn on the answering machine and the alarm system
    • more efficient and elegant provisioning: most of the cable clutter is now concentrated in a single out-of-sight location

    The biggest difficulty in setting up the system was not technical, but administrative. Although I had to write a device driver and some custom software, these proved to be relatively stable once debugged. The problems were in correctly specifying our living requirements, translating them into specifications, and testing the result. The first friends to visit us after I installed the system rang the doorbell and were greeted by the answering machine message (oops!) Now the system is very stable, but I would never think of modifying its configuration less than a month before leaving for a vacation.

    Diomidis Spinellis - Code Reading: The Open Source Perspective
    #include "/dev/tty"

  57. grousing not permitted-this exists! it's for sale by way2trivial · · Score: 1
    White Westinghouse has made the beyond line now available at amazon.com

    submitted for a story by yours truly a few months ago

    go look for WBYCM1 wbyhh03 wbymw1 and wbybm1
    the microwave sounds neatest, scan a UPC and the microwave is ready to cook..

    they all interoperate, and you can access your appliances from the internet (i.e. slow em down if you are running late)
    'no privacy policy listed though

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  58. Oven downloading a recipe? by jmichaelg · · Score: 1

    Seems to me that this is a technology that not only doesn't fill a need, it complicates the problem it's allegedly solving. I'll bet Diebold is behind it!

  59. A NTP server by jhines · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A time server would be a really handy thing to have in a home network, imagine all the clocks in the appliances having the same, correct time all the time.

    Sure beats the blinking 12:00 syndrome.

  60. Possible uses by hey · · Score: 1

    I am very skeptical about this also.

    But one possible use would be for a single control by your door to put everything into power saving mode when you go away for a trip. Eg stove, turn off clock display, thermostat turn down.

    Notication from the fridge if there was a power outage (and how long) so you know food might be spoiled.

  61. Imagine the phone calls to customer service... by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 2, Funny

    Serivice Rep: "Hello, this is customer service."

    Guy: "Yeah, I uh, think my microwave is broken."

    Service Rep: "Yes sir. See it right here. It's broken."

    Guy: "What do I do to fix it?"

    Service Rep: "Buy a new one."

    Guy: "I just bought this a month ago."

    Service Rep: "Actually it was thirty eight days sir, according to this, and on September 25th you put something metal in there, and that is your problem that caused the failure according to the info it sent. The machine locked itself up automatically for "safety" purposes, it's a child lock feature, you know, litigation and all these days, oh, and it really is broken. If you would have read the manual like it told you to, which is under menu 72-d on you microwave's display, you would have noticed that you just voided the warranty, and your unconditional, money back guarantee just expired eight days ago... (Like a chipper jerk) anything else I can do for you?"

    Guy: "Uh, I, uh..."

    Service Rep: "Thank you for calling our service line." (Click)

  62. its amazing by t_parker16 · · Score: 1

    by pumping cash into the stock markets worldwide and reinflating the bubble, they've not only brought back the undead companies of the bubble year, but started a new race on things like chinese internet companies, and now ... the java toaster ...

    i dare these designers to name one reason why any of my kitchen appliances would need to communicate with each other. or why the heck my phone would make a better interface to any of these devices.

    stooopidity is racing ahead again ....

  63. Stop the madness by HangingChad · · Score: 1
    Okay, let's review. I have to shield my EZ-Pass and pretty soon my credit cards to keep from being tracked with those, install a fm tuner field dampener to keep people from checking which radio station I listen to in the car, carry around an RFID chip jammer to keep the chips in my clothes from ratting me out, turn my cell phone off so people can't track me with that. Pull the plug on my OnStar so the fibbies can't use that to listen in on my car conversations. And now have to have a Bluetooth jammer to keep my refrigerator from spying on me. And I'm probably leaving out some things.

    I miss the good 'ol days of being paranoid, when all a fellow needed was a tin foil hat and a good conspiracy theory and you were good to go.

    With all this electronic noise how am I supposed to hear instructions from the mothership?

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  64. I think this is cool! by KjetilK · · Score: 1
    Hey, /.ers! Why so negative?!?

    I think it's something quite cool! Really, I want a computer in my house to know exactly what food I've got in my fridge, and whereever I store that stuff. I want it to know what I need to buy, and what is about to get too old to be eaten. Why should I spend my time looking after these things, when it could be done well by a computerized system?

    OK, so on my way home from work, I tell my PDA-like gadget what I want for dinner. It connects to my home system, which contains the database of what I have in my house, and compares that with the recipe of my desired dinner, then decides what I need.

    Then it runs out on the web (or rather some future Semantic Web, it shouldn't be that hard to create, really), and collects today's prices, compares my position with the position of the shops, and reports back to me where I should go to get what I need for today's dinner.

    The machines did most of the job. I just told it what I wanted, and it, after checking it out, reported back what I needed to shop and where to get it at the best price. Who wouldn't want a system like that?

    So, the problem is: You don't want a bunch of big companies sneaking into your private life and know all your purchasing habits, as well as controlling the information flow in this process.

    If we leave this to a bunch of industry giants, guess what's going to happen? Joe Sixpack won't care anyway. But if we design it, base it on free software with full disclosure of how the data is used, we protect our privacy with cryptography and make sure we control our own data, then, this is no future I would fear.

    RFID tags would be a part of this, and it's a part of the same problem complex: If the data gained from RFID tags is mine, then I see little problems with it, but if I can't control it, then it's Bad[tm]. RFID-tags are not evil by default, it is what we make out of it.

    --
    Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
    1. Re:I think this is cool! by phillymjs · · Score: 1

      I want a computer in my house to know exactly what food I've got in my fridge, and whereever I store that stuff. I want it to know what I need to buy, and what is about to get too old to be eaten. Why should I spend my time looking after these things, when it could be done well by a computerized system?

      Hear, hear! This is something I could use as well, and right now it means building a system and having to remember to scan the UPC code of everything that enters or leaves a cabinet or the fridge.

      Currently I just write the purchase date on most groceries with a Sharpie as I put them away, and play it by ear. I'd love to be able to have my home automation server pop up a message telling me I should go out and buy milk because I won't have enough for my cereal in the morning if I don't. Or that it might be a good idea to use that [$food_item] because it is past expiration date in another few days. Or how about: These three items will soon go bad-- here's a recipe that will let you use them all up, you just need to pick up some butter to make it.

      Hell, this doesn't just need to be in the kitchen-- there are consumables all over the house. Soap, shaving cream, deodorant, razor blades, laundry detergent, toilet paper, batteries-- all kinds of stuff could be tracked, and as long as that data goes NOWHERE but to the in-home server to assemble your shopping list for you, I'd be happy to put such a beast in my home.

      What will probably happen, though, is that the device will be priced ridiculously high-- or only $49, if you submit to have your purchasing habits tracked and reported, or some shit like that. And since I pay cash and refuse the discount cards the supermarket keeps trying to push on me so The Man doesn't know my grocery buying habits, I'll just have to buy an extra box of Sharpies and keep doing it the old-fashioned way.

      ~Philly

  65. Why? by FreekyGeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Everytime someone gets excited about a "home appliance network" (which seems to be every year, like clockwork, for the past 20 years or so), I ask myself: "Why? What does my toaster have to say to my lamp? What does my microwave have to say to my toaster?"

    Other than a very few uses (your PC talking to your A/V components, for example) this is a technology in search of a problem.

    Do that many people really spend so much time using their appliances that they need to have their own network? And, of course, this is just one more thing to break - maybe it's a conspiracy by appliance manufacturers to reduce the reliability and "it-just-always-works" nature of most appliances.

    1. Re:Why? by phillymjs · · Score: 1

      Why? What does my toaster have to say to my lamp? What does my microwave have to say to my toaster?"

      Probably nothing. But in plenty of cases it would be nice for appliances and even some storage areas to be able to talk to a central server in your home.

      -I'd like my fridge to tell that server exactly what's in it and what I've used up and need to replace.
      -I'd like my medicine cabinet to tell that server that the box of DayQuil in it is expired, in case I don't notice the next time I get the sniffles and reach in there.
      -I'd like my bathroom closet to tell that server that I've only got 3 sticks of deodorant left so I might want to replenish the supply soon.*

      I can already control my lighting, A/V equipment, and thermostat from any web browser thanks to X10 and some clever programming. I'd love to let my server worry about even more stuff so I don't have to-- spit out a shopping list when I run out of enough stuff to justify the run to the market, and that'll be the extent of my involvement in maintaining the consumables inventory in the house.

      ~Philly

      * I hate shopping, so I buy unusually large quantities of non-perishable consumable items. If civilization ever falls, about four months afterward you'll be able to pick me out. I'll be the clean-smelling, clean-shaven guy with fresh breath.

  66. I have already trademarked "oFace"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...as the brand name for a line of sex toys.

  67. Just imagine... by psyconaut · · Score: 1

    Bob: "Damn...had to throw away the contents of my freezer again this morning...all my clothes ran in my washer as well...and now my TV is stuck on PBS..."
    Fred: "Script kiddies got into your home appliance network again?"
    Bob: "Yeah, li'll bastards..." ;-)

    -psy

  68. I'm sorry there's no dinner ... by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 1

    I spent all day trying to fix the oven, after some script kiddies cracked it.

    --
    in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
    Francis Smit
  69. Heater not working...maybe you got hacked? by ricochet81 · · Score: 0

    Its only a matter of time before SCO gets DDoS'd by 100,000 dishwashers

    --
    Error: Id10t detected
  70. Hrm... by Tuxedo+Jack · · Score: 1

    I'd swear that I saw a story about some people's toasters gaining intelligence and revolting against humanity when hooked up to a home network in a book a few years back.

    I don't remember the title, but the last line of the story was a refridgerator saying "WHERE HAVE ALL THE TOASTERS GONE?" when they were disconnected.

    --

    Striking fear in the authors of godawful fanfiction, I am here, appearing in darkness, Tuxedo Jack!
  71. Re:A/V network - Firewire by LordMyren · · Score: 1

    most av devices have a complex enough central processor to skip the foreplay and jump straight to GigE where you can start implementing higher levels of control (network level: tunneling, firewalling, routing, all that).

  72. Yeeeah just move ove- yeeaah, that's great. Peter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm gonna need you to go ahead and get me those TPS reports..

  73. Re:iReady - paranoid freaks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So skynet has another terminal to hide in?

  74. Re:A/V network - Firewire by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

    Actualy GigE would be rather hard to deal with at least with a stock MTU of 1500 bytes thats a lot of interupt handaling. You can run it as IP over firewire just as easily with a larger packet size and keep the cable simplicity along with nearly the speed of gigabit (800mbs half duplex vs 1000 full) I dont know enough about the CPUs in this sort of gear to make an educated assumption but with standard intel alpha and sun CPU's you need a lot of horsepower to go full datarate gigabit at a standard MTU.

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
  75. Re:A/V network - Firewire by LordMyren · · Score: 1

    Does firewire have any way to syncronize timing? Isosycronous scheduled packet which can be used for timing data or something?

    thats the biggest problem with AV. you can move the digital source wherever you want but as anyone who'se ever tried to setup even a shoutcast server which feeds a number of computers in one household, it is im-freaking-possible to get them all to play in anything resembling unison.

  76. Re:A/V network - Firewire by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

    Firewire can run isochronous data as well as async. I think your issues with shoutcast etc is more in the PC side thats not a real time envornment and loves to buffer data that is setting all the streams a bit askew from each other. Even the audio cards in PC's have different delays in them. For that application I use ethernet to audio converters (there are several on the web including build your own) look for ones that use a server in multicast mode there shouldent be any noticable delay that way (the difference between devices should stay under a few ms from switching delays)

    --
    No sir I dont like it.