Slashdot Mirror


Hitchhiker's Guide Film Reports

wakaranai writes "The BBC reports that the new "The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy" movie will star Martin Freeman (Tim from The Office) as Arthur Dent. According to the Internet Movie Database filming starts early 2004, and Marvin's voice will be Stephen Moore, reviving his role from the classic 1981 BBC TV version." If you haven't seen The Office, it takes the subject matter Dilbert has bored us with, and makes it utterly hysterical. This is a good bit of casting. I'm still available to play Zaphod.

92 of 518 comments (clear)

  1. So, Taco . . . by GnrlFajita · · Score: 4, Funny

    . . . are you saying that you're a two-headed alien, or just look like one?

    --
    When we remember we are all mad, the mysteries disappear and life stands explained.
    Mark Twain
    1. Re:So, Taco . . . by beacher · · Score: 3, Funny

      If cloning were as simple as posting, I'm sure there would be dupes of him floating around. It's just a matter of sewing on the other head.....
      B

    2. Re:So, Taco . . . by blowdart · · Score: 5, Funny

      No no, the second head is a dupe head, which appeared 3 days after the first head was posted.

  2. Word twisting by andyrut · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A film version of Hitchhiker's may be interesting, but I think it's safe to say that a film simply cannot pick up on the wordplay of Douglas Adams. Adams is simply a master of twisting words that can make the reader laugh out loud.

    Unless the director chooses to use lots of narration, which could ruin a film.

    1. Re:Word twisting by Threni · · Score: 5, Informative

      > A film version of Hitchhiker's may be interesting, but I think it's safe to say > that a film simply cannot pick up on the wordplay of Douglas Adams.

      Given that the original was a radio show, which contained one or two words....

    2. Re:Word twisting by ikoleverhate · · Score: 5, Informative

      The "voice of the guide" narration in the bbc TV series worked pretty well - when the audience was confused as to what was happening in the main story, a calm voice would start to explain... and leave you even more confused but in fits of laughter.

      "after disproving the existance of god, man goes on to prove 1=2, black=white, and gets run over on the next zebra crossing"

    3. Re:Word twisting by andyrut · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Given that the original was a radio show, which contained one or two words....

      With radio, the audience isn't shown what's going on, thus there has to be a certain degree of narration to give them some idea of what's going on.

      With a movie, the audience sees the action for themselves so narration wouldn't have to be used.

    4. Re:Word twisting by mirko · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With a movie, the audience sees the action for themselves so narration wouldn't have to be used.

      You may achieve excellent results using narration in a movie, one of my favourite situations is the one where Don Lockwood explains is idea of "Dignity".

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    5. Re:Word twisting by trellick · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Ah and don't forget the 'Blade Runner' narration - (the original - not the awful Director's Cut). Harrison Ford's voiceover added tremendously to the overall film.

      I just the original would be put on DVD.

      "Dear Mr Scott, please please please change your mind..."

    6. Re:Word twisting by Silverlock · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just a few days ago I found a DVD of the 1981 film version in a video store. Of course, I immediately grabbed it. The special effects and graphics are horrible but it's still Hitchhiker's.. I enjoyed it immensely.

      I bring this up because the original has a ton of narration (accompanied by bad graphics) but, hell, it could be a starfield screensaver with some guy reading the entire text in the background and I would still love it. I think it's too good of a book to be ruined by a change of medium. It's been a radio show, a book, a film, an Infocom text-adventure game, and who knows what else. There's a reason for that...

    7. Re:Word twisting by eln · · Score: 3, Funny

      You know, when I first read the book, when I was quite young, I came to the part about the zebra crossing and became very confused. I couldn't imagine any place in England where there was such an abundance of zebras hanging around that they would have to put in zebra crossings.

      Then of course, the idea of someone getting run over by a zebra, or perhaps a herd of stampeding zebras, made me laugh, so I thought maybe the author was just going for some kind of absurdist humor.

    8. Re:Word twisting by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Funny

      The "country" of "England" is absurdist humor.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    9. Re:Word twisting by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You know, when I first read the book, when I was quite young, I came to the part about the zebra crossing and became very confused.

      As would most Americans, when we call them "crosswalks". "Zebra" is an essential part of the humor there. Also, the "I'm in the car park" joke just doesn't have the same punch with "parking lot".

      But then we got the bit about the word Belgium inserted in our edition of the books to offset the sanitizing of the Rory for The Most Gratuitous Use of the Word "Fuck" in a Serious Screenplay. (Also "arsehole" was replaced with "kneebiter".)

      Still, everyone got revisions about probability of rescues and the name of the writer of the worst poetry in the Universe due to problems of people calling phone numbers and the writer actually being a former classmate of Adams who wasn't amused (though in exchange for changing the name, we did get the actual poetry about dead swans).

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    10. Re:Word twisting by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just a few days ago I found a DVD of the 1981 film version in a video store.

      That would be the TV series.

      There is also at least one comic book series.

      And the radio play is the original, though there came a point where multiple versions were being made simultaneously, then more radio episodes to finish out the book adaptions, and only now a movie.

      "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" has almost as many adaptions as has "The War of the Worlds". I wonder if they'll come out with an arcade game version next (Cinematronics did TWotW as an arcade game). Or pinball?

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    11. Re:Word twisting by Rallion · · Score: 2, Funny

      Come now. John Travolta isn't even up to Hollywood standards these days.

    12. Re:Word twisting by jandrese · · Score: 3, Informative

      I remember playing HHGTTG on my old Commodore 64. The box came with a bunch of extras (including Peril sensitive sunglasses--they were just black cardboard, a miniature invasion fleet in a baggie, some lint, and a few other things). It was one of those annoying "adventure" games where you have to try 6000 different bizarre things before you stumble across the one that lets you advance the story, because the programmers never bothered to account for the obvious solutions.

      For instance, instead of just cupping your robe in front of the Babel Fish vending machine (because they are too slippery to catch and the vending machine shoots them out at high speed for no particular reason), you have to hang your robe on a hook, put a towel over a drain, move a bag over a door, and pile mail on the bag to get the fish and advance the storyline. Garrgh!

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    13. Re:Word twisting by SamSim · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What I really don't want to see in this movie is an identical re-hash, opening in exactly the same way as the book, the TV series and the radio series, with exactly the same dialogue and jokes. There'd just be no point. The film should open on Ford Prefect waking up in the middle of the night and decoding the signal from the incoming Vogons, or Zaphod speeding across the oceans of Damogran towards Easter Island.

    14. Re:Word twisting by plugger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Theoretically required to stop? You are quite right that many vehicles don't stop, but if through inattention a driver badly injures or kills a pedestrian on a crossing, they will likely go to jail. The pedestrian has right of way once they have stepped onto the roadway, but I always stop for people who are waiting.

    15. Re:Word twisting by anotherone · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ok, you're going to laugh at me, but I hadn't realised that until just now. I also assumed that he meant that Man was run over by a zebra.

      --
      Username taken, please choose another one.
    16. Re:Word twisting by TomV · · Score: 2, Informative

      But then we got the bit about the word Belgium inserted in our edition of the books to offset the sanitizing of the Rory for The Most Gratuitous Use of the Word "Fuck" in a Serious Screenplay. (Also "arsehole" was replaced with "kneebiter".)

      'Belgium' (I'm so sorry!!!) was in the Radio Series, season 2, Fit The Tenth (In which our heroes have some close encounters with others and themselves), uttered, in total desperation, by Zaphod as he hangs from the lip of the Nutrimatic Cup, thirteen miles above the surface of Brontitall ("There's nothing out there Ford, like no Ground! Some cat's taken the ground away!") and tries to persuade Ford to rescue him instead of discussing the origins and applications of the phrase "Holy Zarquon's singing fish" ("I don't want to be interested, I don't want to be stimulated or have my horizons broadened. I just want to be rescued, Ford, I just want to be swutting well rescued").

      When Ford refuses, Zaphod utters the unmentionable imprecation; Ford relents and goes to fetch his towel.

      Frankly, the interactions of the series, the TV show, the stage plays and the books is one whole joojooflop situation already before we try and retcon a film into the mix.

  3. Sequel by stanmann · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What about the other 4 books in the trilogy???

    --
    Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    1. Re:Sequel by danidude · · Score: 2, Interesting
      the other 4 books

      Did you forget about "Young Zaphod Plays it Safe"?

      --
      - no sig.
    2. Re:Sequel by geoffspear · · Score: 2, Funny
      No, there are 5 books in the trilogy. He said "other 4".

      To be technical like you, however, since "tri" means 3 and "logos" means word, a trilogy can only have 3 words. Any longer works will need to find a new name. Now go away, kneebiter.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    3. Re:Sequel by TheXRayStyle · · Score: 2, Informative
      No, there are 5 books in the trilogy. He said "other 4". To be technical like you, however, since "tri" means 3 and "logos" means word, a trilogy can only have 3 words. Any longer works will need to find a new name. Now go away, kneebiter.
      Well, to really be technical (and increasingly more off-topic), that's not entirely true. The word logos (as used by Herodotus and Thucydides among several others) can mean a story or tale. It was used to differentiate a story both from mere fable (muthos, from which our word 'myth' comes from) and from a historical text (historia).

      That's not to say that it wasn't funny...it's just so hard not to be a pedantic bitch.

      Also, the HHGTTH is officially called a trilogy. It's funny. Ha ha.

  4. Stephen Moore by mccalli · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Stephen Moore's TV version was already a revival. Stephen Moore is the original voice from the radio series, which predates the books, TV series...anything. To my mind remains the best incarnation, though I'll accept an argument in favour of the books.

    He'll probably be quite pleased. Marvin, on the all.

    Cheers,
    Ian

    1. Re:Stephen Moore by corbettw · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, well, that sort of thing wouldn't happen if you had a brain the size of a planet. Not that you care.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  5. Hopes for Zaphod by dpille · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hope they'll spend some serious CGI money on Zaphod- I was always somewhat disappointed that on the TV series, the 2nd head mostly looked asleep or simply turned from side-to-side. I've always thought there are sections of dialogue in the books that make much less sense or are less funny if you can't imagine each head speaking its own mind.

    1. Re:Hopes for Zaphod by fruey · · Score: 5, Interesting
      They don't have to spend serious CGI. He just has to play the part twice, and then stitch them together, rather like in "Death Becomes Her" where the body and head parts were filmed separately, and the results were far more realistic than a completely CGI head like TPM or AotC. The plot of the film wasn't great, but it won the 1993 Oscar, BAFTA and Saturn awards for special effects.

      The key part is how to get a decent neck on him so that the two heads work. You could get twins or a pair of similar looking actors to play each part separately, then CGI them into one. Kinda like by tying them together before shooting and stuff. Way too many cool ways to do it, but don't make him 100% CGI!

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    2. Re:Hopes for Zaphod by eggoeater · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I never saw the TV series but from reading the book I've always had in my mind's eye what his two heads would be doing. The thing I like most about Zaphod is that he has two heads, two brains, but one "mind".
      In other words, were not subjected to the shtick of the two heads talking to one another as if there were two people sharing the same body. I like the idea of two faces showing the same emotion in slighly different ways. I also like the idea of only one head at a time talking unless he's screaming in which case he would use both. Another thing they could do is have him sing in harmony using both heads. Lots of possibilities! From an "acting" point of view, it adds a whole new dynamic.
      So my hope for Zaphod is that they take advantake of all that.

    3. Re:Hopes for Zaphod by fermion · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The second head was a thing that worked well for the book and radio, but was just a distraction on TV. It would just be better to take that bit out in rewrites. It won't be a big problem, since any fans knows that the main character is the Guide, not the people.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    4. Re:Hopes for Zaphod by cjpez · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bah. I hope they use as little CG as possible. HHGTTG isn't supposed to be some glitzy high-production thing; it's B-movie camp, and B-movie camp at its finest. Zaphod's plastic-head-attached-to-his-shoulder thing from the BBC TV series was outstanding. CG could ruin a good movie like this.

    5. Re:Hopes for Zaphod by belroth · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In the stage show they had two actors playing Zaphod, at the same time in the same costume.
      One actor was behind the other - the clothes went round both actors so 'zaphod' had two double thickness legs, one double thickness arm and two normal arms (and two heads of course). The shoes were two paris of normal shoes on plates fixed heel to toe. Obviously the actors need to be of the same height and twins would be ideal.
      The two actors on stage split the lines and did some nice business with both arms on the same side doing a task together,like feeding the 'opposite' head while the near head spoke. It was very effective.

      --
      I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
  6. Poor Synopsis by Afty0r · · Score: 5, Insightful
    If you haven't seen The Office, it takes the subject matter Dilbert has bored us with, and makes it utterly hysterical.
    That's an utterly terrible synopsis. Dilbert and The Office share only their setting (an office) and very little else. In contrast to Dilberts "engineers banging heads against the system" the office chooses to explore primarily the relationships and personalities of people in a small office and the lack of authority or system which allows an incompetent boss to reign supreme.
    1. Re:Poor Synopsis by pacman+on+prozac · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He was a standup comedian for years and is still going with it so he does do a few other things.

      It's meant to make you cringe, thats the point of it really. They deliberatly avoid obvious gags, its not that kind of show. I guess you could see it as one of those shows thats main point is to make you feel better about your own life because its not as bad as theirs, although I have worked in offices with worse bosses & atmospheres so I could be wrong on that.

      I'd say its a very individual thing as to whether you find it incredibly funny or just annoying as hell, and perhaps a very thin line. For years I just thought the former, now I'm hooked. My girlfriend hates it and cannot sit for more than 30 seconds with it on the tv.

      If you do appreciate their humour then it is hysterical, they are more down-to-earth than most other comedies on the TV so it seems a fair statement. It wouldn't have run for 2 series plus xmas special if nobody liked it either.

    2. Re:Poor Synopsis by TwistedSquare · · Score: 3, Informative
      Depends on what sort of humour you appreciate really. Tim's expressions while the crazy world happens around him are hilarious, Keith can even make exhaling funny, and Brent so perfectly picks out all the terrible boss characteristics that some find it amazing, and many find it too close to home...

      Also, not on a hysterical note, your sympathy for Brent grows more and more towards the end of the series (last 2 included), including the amazing scene where he is fired and then stands up to reveal his costume :)

  7. The Office is great... by SpaceRook · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...but don't expect laugh-a-minute jokes. It's incorrectly called a comedy, when it is really a satire. If you understand the type of humor in "Six Feet Under", you'll understand the type of humor in "The Office". The first season is available on Netflix.

  8. Movie go'ers who haven't read the book.... by eggoeater · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...will be pissed when they find out that the Ultimate question about life, the universe, and everything, is never revealed.
    I remember after the end of FOTR I overheard people saying "What happened to the ring?". Were these people living in a cave before going to the theater?? ....but hey...screw 'em.
    This is going to be great.

    1. Re:Movie go'ers who haven't read the book.... by corbettw · · Score: 3, Informative

      ...will be pissed when they find out that the Ultimate question about life, the universe, and everything, is never revealed.

      What are you talking about? The Ultimate Question to Life, the Universe, and Everything is "What is 6 times 9?"

      The answer, of course, is 42.

      (For the humor impaired, the joke is that 6*9 is not, actually, 42, implying there's something seriously wrong with the Universe when it can't even answer its own question correctly.)

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    2. Re:Movie go'ers who haven't read the book.... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Funny

      (For the humor impaired, the joke is that 6*9 is not, actually, 42, implying there's something seriously wrong with the Universe when it can't even answer its own question correctly.)

      Actually, the Earth matrix that was calculating the question got irrevocably screwed up by the arrival of all the telephone cleaners, hair dressers, and other useless beings from another planet. Thus, depending on how you interpret it, either the question of Life, the Universe and Everything is 7*6 or the question is simply lost forever.

    3. Re:Movie go'ers who haven't read the book.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, I suggest you go back and read the books and stop posting about HHGTTG on Slashdot, because it only makes you look a little silly.

      The mice built a computer to find The Answer, which is 42. They then built a much bigger computer to find The Question. That computer is the Earth.

      The Googlefrinchan B Ark crashlands on Earth, which essnentially causes a "bug" or "virus" in the Earth-program. Hence when Ford & Arthur attempt to find The Question by pulling Scrable letters from a bag at random, they get a question but it is the wrong; the greatest program ever to run was broken because of the Googlefrinchans.

      That is the joke. If you like you can look upon it as a commentary by Douglas Adams about the Earth being "wrong" or the awful consequences of introducing a foriegn species into an ecosystem. Whatever you like. But thats the joke at face value.

    4. Re:Movie go'ers who haven't read the book.... by Zak3056 · · Score: 2, Informative

      (For the humor impaired, the joke is that 6*9 is not, actually, 42, implying there's something seriously wrong with the Universe when it can't even answer its own question correctly.)

      I'm not quite certain this was the point of the "6x9" joke, given that the program of the computer called Earth was corrupted by the arrival of the Gulgafrincham. OTOH, I do agree about the premise that there is something seriously wrong with the Universe. :)

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    5. Re:Movie go'ers who haven't read the book.... by corbettw · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wish I had found this before posting my first reply:

      From wikipedia:
      "In the original radio series, this scene occurs at the end of the first series (Fit the Sixth). On discovering the question, Arthur Dent remarks "I always said there was something fundamentally wrong with the universe.". "

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    6. Re:Movie go'ers who haven't read the book.... by Sebastopol · · Score: 2, Funny

      According to Adams (paraphrasing):

      Yes, 6x9=42, in base 13, but no one writes jokes in base 13.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  9. I'd pick... by Xpilot · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sean Connery for Slartibartfast!

    --
    "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    1. Re:I'd pick... by Baby_with_a_nailgun · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sean Connery for Slartibartfast!

      Would that make him Shlartibartfasht?

  10. Adams was a jack-of-all-trades in life and writing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think it's safe to say that a film simply cannot pick up on the wordplay of Douglas Adams. Adams is simply a master of twisting words that can make the reader laugh out loud.

    I wouldn't say that's safe to say at all. The BBC radioplay version of "The Hitch-hiker's Guide to the Galaxy" precedes the novels - and is (at least in my worthless anonymous opinion) easily on par with the novels as far as humor goes.

  11. The Office by grandmofftarkin · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those of you who have never seen 'The Office' it is a BBC comedy filmed in a semi documentary format (though it is all fictional). On the BBC website linked above there is a clips section to give you a taste of what it is like. Though to really 'get it' you have to watch a couple of episodes. You can buy the complete first series online from PlayUSA.

    1. Re:The Office by Aardpig · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's always amusing to compare the people in American soap operas to the people in English ones like, say, EastEnders...

      That's because American soaps are aspirational, while English ones are cautionary. Dallas: you, too, can be a millionaire with hot chicks if you work hard. East Enders: if you don't work hard, you'll end up as one of these drunk, ugly, poor peasants.

      Australian soaps sit in the middle: the people are poor but beuatiful. Not sure what the message is, but it sure looks nice...

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    2. Re:The Office by lemsip · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Everything about the show is intended to look mundane and dull. Everything from the opening titles, showing shots of traffic driving about in dull commuter-belt town Slough, to the mundane way everyone in the office is sitting there looking ordinary and bored, adds to effect. Use models and good looking actors and it would destroy the effect the show is aiming for.

      Or maybe it's just that us Brits are less superficial than you Americans... :-)

    3. Re:The Office by Bertie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Erm, don't mean to sound patronising or anything, but working in an office is slow and boring. Maybe it's just culture shock. It's not in your face like most American sitcoms (though you could hardly say it's subtle). Stop watching it expecting punchlines, and try to see the humour inherent in the characters themselves.

      I mean, how can anybody watch Keith and not crease up?

      (Interestingly, I've learned since graduating from university that Keith was in my class - and I didn't notice him, which amuses me immensely)

    4. Re:The Office by Malfourmed · · Score: 3, Funny
      Australian soaps sit in the middle: the people are poor but beuatiful. Not sure what the message is...

      Everybody needs good neighbours.
  12. The Office by squirrelpants · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Office puts a more realistic spin on Dilbert. It really is one of the more original and best shows out there. They're still showing episodes on BBC America or you can pick up the first season on DVD. David Brent is truly a classic character.

  13. Picture by klocwerk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    here's a pic of him.
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/38281000/jpg/_3 8281639_office300.jpg

    looks like he could pull it off. never seen that movie though.


    --

    "You worthless post!"
    -Shakespeare, 2 Gentlemen of Verona, 1. 1. 147
  14. Anyone who liked Marvin the paranoid android.... by mgpeter · · Score: 5, Funny
  15. It's a joke! by shadowj · · Score: 5, Informative
    Trilogy relates to 3. Sorry, just being technical.

    I think the word you're looking for is "pedantic", not "technical".

    You obviously haven't read the books. The fourth and fifth books both have a blurb on the cover that says something like "fourth in the increasingly inaccurately named Hitchhiker's Guide trilogy". It's a joke, very much in keeping with the late author's sense of humor.

    --

    --Larry

    Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence

  16. It would be interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    To see how well this does here in the States.
    It might gain a crossover audience for special effects (they do go to many weird places, after all), but I don't think it'll get good critical reviews. The Hitchiker's Guide doesn't have a three-act movie structure, it bounces around from episode to episode. It's really more suited to be a TV series.
    It's also peculiarly British. Think about it: Arthur Dent's home is destroyed (twice) by bureaucrats. (Here it would have to be corporations.) They spend time looking for a cup of tea. The end of the universe comes, *and it's no big deal*: people go to a restaurant to watch it happen. (As they say, in England, death is imminent, in Canada, death is inevitable, and in California, death is optional.) The frat-boy Zaphod is a figure of fun and the hero is the mild-mannered Arthur Dent.
    I'm also disappointed that they're probably going to make Trillian into a bimbo again; she was supposed to be an astrophysicist. Nobody seems to like nerd women, except for Slashdot, Harvey Pekar, and Howard Dean ;)
    And I wonder how well the nerd community is going to rally around it: THHGTTG has been out for a while, and some younger nerds have never heard of it. Hey, I never knew about the Goon Show until I read they were part of the inspiration for Python (I'm 24).
    Oh well, I hope it's good...

    1. Re:It would be interesting... by siskbc · · Score: 3, Interesting
      It's also peculiarly British. Think about it: Arthur Dent's home is destroyed (twice) by bureaucrats. (Here it would have to be corporations.) They spend time looking for a cup of tea. The end of the universe comes, *and it's no big deal*: people go to a restaurant to watch it happen.

      Right, but all these lovely stereotypes are why we Americans love to poke fun at the British. Also, remember that the Hitchhiker series as as beloved by geeks on the left side of the pond as the right.

      I'm also disappointed that they're probably going to make Trillian into a bimbo again; she was supposed to be an astrophysicist. Nobody seems to like nerd women, except for Slashdot, Harvey Pekar, and Howard Dean ;)

      It would be a disappointment if she were *just* a bimbo...but she *is* a bimbo.

      And I wonder how well the nerd community is going to rally around it: THHGTTG has been out for a while, and some younger nerds have never heard of it.

      Who? Let me go kick their asses. I think the standards will be high, meaning it will either be reviled or loved by the geek community.

      --

      -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  17. Deep Thought by CelticWhisper · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe the Deep Thought supercomputer will be played by Virginia Tech's Power Mac G5 cluster! I'm sure Apple would state that if any computer can tell us the meaning of life, it's the G5. How's 'bout it, guys?

    --
    Help protect civil rights from abuse by the TSA - visit TSA News Blog.
    http://www.tsanewsblog.com
  18. Re:This will be interesting by mccalli · · Score: 2, Insightful
    specially if they pull a harry potter and begin using all 5 books of the trilogy to produce the movies in sequence.

    I hope they don't, to be honest. Specifically, I would like to consign the fifth book to the dustbin of history. The humour seemed to have gone, and the overall impression was one of bitterness rather than anything else. Fenchurch dismissed with a not especially good joke too, although to be fair that also happened to Trillian in the original radio series (The joke was funnier there though. Actually, damn near anything Peter Jones said could have been funny).

    Cheers,
    Ian

  19. Wouldn't Cmdr Taco make a better by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 4, Funny

    Vogon ??? :)

    --


    He tried to kill me with a forklift!
  20. It's the guy in the "high noon" graphic by c4miles · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you're getting the same image at the top of the article as I am, the guy in front of all the christmassy ladies is Bill Nighy, the actor lined up for Slartibartfast.

    On a related note, Slartibartfast was originally a working name for the character, which Adams chose just because he didn't like the typist the BBC had assigned for him whilst he was writing the scripts.

  21. Re:Come on... by Bertie · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's an absolutely ridiculous comparison to draw. Dilbert takes a sledgehammer approach to a load of heartbreakingly unfunny material about the minutiae of office life, and in my book it's usually rubbish. The Office has absolutely nothing in common with it other than that it's set in a boring office. It's about people, not procedures, and as a result it's touching as well as hilarious, and like so many other great comic characters (Fawlty, Rigsby, just about everybody in Porridge), David Brent is essentially a tragic figure.

  22. Re:Dilbert is funny, witty. by CaptainBaz · · Score: 5, Funny
    The Office is pretentious and boring. Is one of those things that only Brits get I guess.
    American huh?

    This may help.
  23. Re:the office stinks by Bertie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The beauty of The Office is in the fact that the people are barely acting at all. The humour is in the fact that these characters are only very slight exaggerations of the reality of office life. We all know somebody who's a bit like David Brent, or Gareth, or Finchy, or Keith. Especially Keith. Every office has a Keith. The humour's in a glance, or a facial expression, or a moment of dead silence, rather than some familiar character running onto the set and uttering their catchphrase for the three thousandth time like you get in most sitcoms.

  24. Re:I'd pick...Monty Python by eggoeater · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd like to see some of the Monty Python crew in this. I think John Cleese is a shoe-in for the role of the starship captain always in a bath tub that crashes into pre-historic Earth in RATEOTU.

  25. Noir it up, beeyatch. by fenix+down · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Blade Runner-style, g.

    Instead of a narrator, you just have the Guide chip in with an internal monologue every once and awhile. That's what Fight Club did to keep all their clever wordplay in. Admittedly, they had it easier since FC's first-person to start with, but most of the good stuff in H2G2 is cleverly-worded exposition, so it's no problem to just have the Guide say most of it.

  26. This has everything to be great by rcastro0 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I hope they have a good budget and don't spoil it. BTW, I don't know that actor, and haven't seen "The Office", but his puzzled face in the picture someone posted looks perfect. If this works perhaps more people will get to know where the names "DeepThought", "Trillian" and "BabelFish" first appeared.

    Anyway, Douglas Adams fans should know that his computer works are now abandonware, and available for free download:

    Last Chance to See -- The CD ROM, multimedia version of his book about endangered species

    The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy -- the text adventure game adaptation (by Infocom)

    Bureaucracy -- the original text adventure game (by Infocom)

    Cheers.

    --
    Quem a paca cara compra, paca cara pagará.
  27. Starring ???? as Zaphod by cryptochrome · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's the part Bruce Campbell was born to play!!!

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

  28. WHY is this being entrusted to a newbie director!? by vapid+transit · · Score: 3, Insightful

    WHY!? For the love of god. I've never heard of Garth Jennings. Its not like this guy's even worked his way up to director. IMDB does not have him listed as crew or writer for any major motion pictures. I hate to be negative but I'm truly anticipating disappointment from this film.

  29. Memories of Douglas Adams at Apachecon by gtrubetskoy · · Score: 2, Informative
    Those of us who were lucky enough to attend the 2000 ApacheCon in London saw a keyonote by Douglas Adams. Little did we know that he has less than a year to live. I remember he was excited about his recent move to California and talked about his daughter too. After the keynote we all got a copy of the authographed Hitchhiker Guide book.

    Anyway, I hope the movie is good.

  30. Re:My votes for casting... by cjpez · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Mike Myers? You've gotta be kidding me. And while I dig Owen Wilson in general, I think he'd make a lousy Ford.

    Zaphod should go to Bruce Campbell, and Jeff Goldblum would be great for Ford. And if Disaster Area makes it into the movies, they should do whatever it takes to get the Rolling Stones to play them.

  31. Re:WHY is this being entrusted to a newbie directo by dapulli · · Score: 2, Informative

    Probably because he is one of those MTV generation who get their directing knowledge from music videos.

    He works for Hammer and Tongs, who produce very innovating videos espically "Coffee and TV" for Blur and "Demons" for Fatboy Slim. The company as a whole does Badly Drawn Boy's videos, all of which are the right style and humour for a HHGTTG film.

    The company Hammer and Tongs

  32. Zaphod played by... by Popageorgio · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Clearly, Johnny Depp would make a kick-ass Zaphod. I'm thinking the same attitude he gave to Captain Jack Sparrow in "Pirates of the Caribbean" and Hunter S. Thompson in "Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas."

    All the film's creators should keep Oscar Wilde's words in mind: In an absurd play, no character can acknowledge the absurdity, or it all breaks down. Thus, the new screenplay should omit lines like the "these guys are ridiculous!" parts in the Shooty and Bang-Bang scene (where the heroes are trapped behind a computer bank on Magrathea).

    As for the bit parts, there are dozens of chances for cameos. For example, Bill Murray and Steve Martin should play Magikthies and Vroomfondel.

    1. Re:Zaphod played by... by Yewbert · · Score: 2, Interesting



      As for the bit parts, there are dozens of chances for cameos. For example, Bill Murray and Steve Martin should play Magikthies and Vroomfondel.

      Brilliant! These would be perfectly appropriate 'big names' to play tiny (literally) bit parts; in general, I hope they avoid big names for the main characters - way too distracting, and all too often chosen in order to bring in the viewers, and emphatically not because they're just right for the part. Will Farrell (sp?) as Ignatius J Reilly in the upcoming A Confederacy of Dunces? Puh-LEEZE!

      Ah, Douglas Adams, you left us too soon. I had the pleasure of seeing Douglas speak (along with Ray Bradbury) a couple/three years ago at Butler University in Indianapolis, IN. He talked about writing and various things, and read bits of H2G2, and was generally hilarious. Ray Bradbury - who has had at least one stroke, and whose voice was slightly shaky - just talked about writing and answered questions - and was inspiring, if a bit maudlin; it was wonderful to hear stories of his early days as a writer.

      Who ever would have thought that Bradbury would outlive Douglas Adams, some 30-ish years younger?

      (Douglas did a meet-and-autograph session afterwards, but Ray sent only his apologies for not having the energy to join in. Ever the geek, I had Douglas sign my (pretty rare, apparently) first American edition of The Meaning of Liff (not the more common The Deeper Meaning of Liff) - look this up if you appreciate peculiarly British humor and a long tolerance for pursuing a simple comic premise through a whole book's worth of punchlines.)

  33. Sounds Interesting by coastwalker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Back in the day when the radio series was first broadcast the most exciting aspect of the experience was the groundbreaking music and sound from the BBC Radiophonic Workshop.

    (I have it all on hissing cassette tape recorded off air, complete with fake links at the end of the show announcing availability of the guide from the Megadodo Corporation of Sirius Minor... )

    As a story with the premise that nothing is what it seems and that the unexpected should be expected the sound was correspondingly imaginative for the time.

    For example the noises used to show that the Hitch Hikers Guide book was being accessed have become part of our world - predating windows startup sound by a decade. Marvin the Paranoid Androids voice is a classic along with the squeaky mouse voices and the mournfull bleeps in the background when all seems lost.

    I expect a good sound track for the movie. In fact I now expect that pressing the lift buttons makes a windows startup sound before the talking Sirius Cybernetics corporation lift suggests the basement of the Hitch Hikers office as a good destination before the Frogstar fighter blasts them all into oblivion.

    --
    Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
  34. Re:My votes for casting... by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 2, Funny

    Donald Rumsfeld

    The Vogons aren't *that* bad.

    --

    --
    I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
  35. the lost script... by syle · · Score: 2, Funny

    CONNERY: I'll take MY GREAT THING for 600, Alex. HOST: "Uh, That's MAGRATHEAN, Mr. Slartibartfast." CONNERY: "But my thing is great! That's what your mother said last night!"

    --

    /syle

  36. Fitting, actually... by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It would be fitting to noir it up a bit, as it really is a very cynical work. When I read H2G2 back in the early 80's I thought it was a stitch. The last time I read it, about 1995, I realized it was cynical and very biting, though appears humorous and whimsical on the surface. What DNA was saying about things though his characters and story line is unfortunately true enough about Britain if not other parts of the world, the USA prominently included. Sirius Cybernetics == Microsoft? That would have been some foresight, but that SC would be some company or companies was inspired by something.

    Read the books again and look beyond the humor. It's probably only the humor which will appear on the screen, which could be a bit of a let down. Include some of that cynicism from the books and it could be better than just another light british comedy.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Fitting, actually... by Plugh · · Score: 2, Funny
      Blockquoth ackthpt:
      Sirius Cybernetics == Microsoft? That would have been some foresight

      You're right, Mr. Adams would indeed have to have had lots of foresight to see how Big and how Ugly Micro$soft would become.

      As it turns out, Douglas Adams did have that much foresight; see his anti-MS rants here, here, here, and... oh, shit, just Google for "Douglas Adams + Miscrosoft" and you'll see :-)

      (Disclaimer: I love everything about Douglas Adams, and work for a company famous for opposing Microsoft.)

  37. "bad graphics"??? by rpjs · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Bloody hell, I remember when that series was first shown on the Beeb, we were gobsmacked at the quality of the computer graphics!

    Of course it turned out that the computer graphics weren't computer generated at all 'cos the kit to do them didn't exist then (or if it did was way out of the Beeb's pricerange).

    Ah, those were the days.

  38. WARNING!! PARENT CONTAINS SPOILER FOR UNIVERSE!!!! by Omni-Cognate · · Score: 2, Funny

    That is so inconsiderate! You've gone and ruined the whole of creation for me.

    --

    "The Milliard Gargantubrain? A mere abacus - mention it not."

  39. Re:6 * 9 = "42" (base 13) by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 4, Informative
    Except the real Ultimate Question wasn't in that form at all. Marvin knew it. Eddie knew it. And both said it in the third book:
    "I gave a speech once," he said suddenly, and apparently unconnectedly. "You may not instantly see why I bring the subject up, but that is because my mind works so phenomenally fast, and I am at a rough estimate thirty billion times more intelligent than you. Let me give you an example. Think of a number, any number."

    "Er, five," said the mattress.

    "Wrong," said Marvin. "You see?"
    And again here, more blatently:
    "That's a pity," said Arthur. "I'd like to hear what he [Prak] had to say. Presumably he would know what the Ultimate Question to the Ultimate Answer is. It's always bothered me that we never found out."

    "Think of a number," said [Eddie] the computer, "any number."
    Now that's bloody Informative!
    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  40. What about Gareth? by Dani+Filth · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think he would make a much better Arthur....

  41. Trillian??? by advocate_one · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This young lady would be ideal for trillian...

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  42. Re:Come on... by arafel · · Score: 2

    I think how funny it is strongly depends on your point of view; personally, I can't stand it. The actor will probably make a good Arthur, though.

  43. Primary Argument Against Totally-CGI-Zaphod: by Schwartzboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Three words, my friends. Three words.

    The Incredible Hulk

    And therefore, if Chewbacca does not make sense, you must acquit. The defense rests. Good day to you.

    --
    "Linux doesn't exist. Everyone knows Linux is an unlicensed version of Unix"- Kieren O'Shaughnessy
  44. What it's really like... by halfsad · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...is a Christopher Guest phony documentary -- "Waiting for Guffman", "Mighty Wind", etc. They work on the Excruciating Awkwardness principle of comedy: Put your characters into situations so embarrassing, pathetic, and all-around squirmy your audience wants to scream. Then any joke gets a big relief laugh. Fortunately the jokes in the Office are pretty good, but what's really strong is it's minute observation of characters and cubicle life.

    The Office is hilarious but you'll need some time to get through it on DVD -- it's hard to watch more than one episode at a single sitting.

    I'm excited -- Martin Freeman's beleagured Tim bodes well for a great Arthur Dent.

  45. Re:WHY is this being entrusted to a newbie directo by yoz · · Score: 2, Informative

    My comment meant in the main any of the people whose directing range is limited to 180 seconds of eye candy.

    Short films have always been a good starting point for young filmmakers, and music videos are easily the most popular kind of short film. Besides, there are several ways of thinking about music vids; either, as you say, meaningless eye candy, or as a chance to squeeze some brilliantly original film-making into a meagre three minutes while managing often-pitiful budgets, release schedules and pop star divas. (To me, much of H&T's work falls in the latter category)

    I trust Garth Jennings, but that's mainly because <EGO ALERT>I was privileged to meet him (and Nick Goldsmith, his partner in H&T shortly after he got the HHG job and chat to him about it. He's a big fan from way back and he's not going to mindlessly Hollywoodise it. (If it helps reassure you, he's English) Sure, some of the casting decisions are going to raise eyebrows but you cannot please all of the fans at once, especially if you want to keep the studio (who are the ones writing the cheques, remember) happy as well.</EGO>

    A whole load of work has gone into this film project for many years now, much of it by Douglas himself (who turned out several new scripts just before he died), much of it by people who love his work, Garth and Nick among them. They're not just going to throw it all away.

  46. Re:WHY is this being entrusted to a newbie directo by halfsad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Some studio exec had the balls hand the Lord of the Rings to Peter Jackson on the strength of what exactly?

    A 30-second fantasy sequence in Heavenly Creatures?
    The flop that was The Frighteners? Bad Taste and Meet The Feebles?

    And it turned out great. I'd be more angry to see a Cultural Treasure such as Hitchhiker's in the hands of some big-name Hollywood chump. Maybe the newbie will turn the trick.

  47. Re:Adams was a jack-of-all-trades in life and writ by TomV · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The radio show *WAS* the Hitch Hiker's Guide. The books, TV series, LPs on Megadodo Records, superlarge towels, stage play, computer game and so forth were mere spin-offs.

    And there's no trouble incorporating the expositions, after all, it was always announced as "The Hitch Hiker's Guide To The Galaxy, By Douglas Adams, starring Peter Jones as The Book" (cue 'Journey Of The Sorcerer' by The Eagles).

    Never 'starring Simon Jones as Arthur Dent' or 'starring Geoffrey McGivern as Ford Prefect' or 'starring Mark Wing-Davey as Zaphod Beeblebrox'.

    Or, to quote Adams: "This is the story of the Hitch Hiker's Guide to The Galaxy, perhaps the most remarkable, certainly the most successful book ever to come out of the great publishing corporations of Ursa Minor".

    Exposition's not an issue.

  48. Re:6 * 9 = "42" (base 13) by Thedalek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Of course, in the radio series, it's entirely possible that the entire scrabble scene with the cavemen takes place in the artificial electronic universe in the Hitchhiker's offices.

    Consider: Arthur and Ford are trapped on prehistoric Earth. Zaphod finds himself at the Hitchhiker's offices, which proceed to get bombed by Frogstar Fighters, and Zaphod gets hauled off to the Frogstar to be plugged into the Total Perspective Vortex, supposedly lethal to all sentient life. He survives, but it is later revealed that he only did so by being inside the artificial universe at the Hitchhiker's offices, which isn't dismantled until much later in the series.

    Before the artificial universe is deactivated, Zaphod picks up Ford and Arthur from prehistoric Earth. They are quite definitely inside the artificial universe when it is deactivated, too. So, either Zaphod jumped out of the fake universe to get Ford and Arthur, and then back in to find Zarniwoop, or the whole business with the Gulgafrinchams happened in the artificial universe, in which case it could have been one of the minor differences between the fake and real universes.

    Now that's offtopic!

    --
    Happiness is relative, Based upon the way we live.
  49. Re:6 * 9 = "42" (base 13) by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yeah, but "think of a number" isn't a question - so that obviously isn't the right one.

    We're talking Douglas Adams here, not Alex Trebek. It would be perfect for him to have the Ultimate Question not even be in the form of a question.

    And it explains the answer: the answer itself is meaningless, a number pulled out to provide the initial seed value for the Universe.

    It also matches what he did in "Mostly Harmless" wrt Stavromula Beta: at the end of chapter 4, there's mention that Alpha was Stavro's original club in New York, now run by his brother Karl, and there being little love lost between Stavro and Karl Mueller, and if you were quick enough to figure it out on the first read, you thus knew then about Stavro Mueller's Beta.

    You notice more on the rereadings of the 5-book trilogy than on the first.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?