Slashdot Mirror


Bell Labs Demos Cell Phone Location Software

mateub writes "AP via Yahoo reports that Bell Labs will soon announce cell phone software to reveal the owner's location to interested parties. To alleviate privacy concerns they say the software will 'let cell users be as picky as they choose about disclosing their whereabouts' but the article goes on to mention 'the ability for restaurants and other businesses to send a solicitation by text message to a cell phone when its owner wanders within range of those merchants.' Oh, wonderful, cellular popups..."

35 of 341 comments (clear)

  1. Hmm.... by SilentT · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sounds like a very good reason for me to remain cell-phone-free.

    1. Re:Hmm.... by JPriest · · Score: 3, Interesting

      An answer to 911 problem? I also read an article about cell phone companies in Japan having a "personals" system on the phone. e.g it gives you a list of "singles" next to you on sidewalk.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    2. Re:Hmm.... by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny
      Japan having a "personals" system on the phone. e.g it gives you a list of "singles" next to you on sidewalk.

      You are in Tokyo, standing next to a building, filled with 3,845 single women, would you like to list them?

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  2. Great for kids by ObviousGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While some adulterous adults may not want to have their whereabouts known, it is important for kids to be tracked.

    Child abduction is a major problem that affects thousands of families every year. This kind of cell phone tracking would go far to help find missing kids before they end up dead and in a ditch.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:Great for kids by a1ok · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Assuming for a moment that, unlike what another poster pointed out, there *are* kidnappers stupid enough to let some kid keep his cell. Why can't the parents just tell the police his cell number and get it tracked through E911 or other triangulation services that are currently available instead?

      This technology afaik just builds on the infrastructure that providers also have for E911 (in US) and tries to commercialize it for ad revenue et al. Right now they're talking about letting spouses and friends know about your location, but eventually there could be some provision that ad companies pay for sending the sms or mms (at bulk rates of course), and that would open the floodgates for much more targeted advertising. Especially since once its the sender who's paying for cell bandwidth, it becomes 'acceptable' like for telemarketing to land lines (of course the time you spend answering such calls is apparently worthless!).

    2. Re:Great for kids by Qzukk · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The way I see it, always-on tracking means using your receiver to find today's victim.

      Sure, having a phone that knows where it is is a good thing. Telling everyone in the world that 555-1212 has been standing at the bus stop for 15 minutes, and that all the other cell phones in the area have moved on to somewhere else is most certainly not good. Not even close. And if they're going to let the restaurant down the street know where 555-1212 is, they're most certainly not aiming at the privacy I'd want for MY kids whereabouts. (I suppose I could teach my kid to say "no" to the cell phone tracking message when it comes up for everyone but me, if they really do implement that feature of letting people choose)

      No, if I was going to give this to my kid, it would have to be on demand, with a password. I call 1800findkid, enter the cellphone number, enter my pin, and then it contacts the cellphone, some form of challenge authentication against the pin I had entered directly into the cellphone and the cellphone responds with its location.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  3. First, TV commercial ads, now text messaging ads.. by b0r0din · · Score: 3, Informative

    Where will it end? It just gets uglier. Location spam, how fun!

    I'm not a big fan of this, however it could be nice for people if it is like GPS. And I could see people at local bars using the features to locate other 'singles.' Lots of possibilities.

  4. Scary. by fuzzbot77 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It would be interesting if there were some software switch that could be triggered by the provider if they were forced to do so by eg FBI or some other form of law enforcment. If you have committed a crime flick of a swtich your position is lit up like a christmas tree. I would prefer telling people where I am rather than having the phone tell them my exact location. Some of the newer technology is interesting and good, But some will bring in a new era of Big Brother. Just my thought..

  5. No need to transmit at all, most of the time by HiKarma · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It's possible to produce compelling location-aware network applications without requiring the device to tell the outside world where it is. Instead, have the network provide information about the general area, and let the device decide what to do about it.


    Only in an emergency need you tell the outsiders where you are. You don't even want to always tell trusted people where you are. That's like being lojacked. Given the ability, how can you say to your wife, "Honey, I don't want you to see my location every minute of every day?"


    Unless she's a good, understanding privacy advocate.


    For an example of a nice location aware app that doesn't have to tell the network where you are, check out this blog entry about The Big Yellow Button

  6. Is it your cell phone???? by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 4, Insightful
    If you get a company cell phone, does the company have the right control the rules on who may locate you?


    Another thought, what about cell phone companies using the phone location service to send bill collectors?

  7. Enough by savagedome · · Score: 5, Insightful

    enabling users to specify what location information is shared, when, with whom, how and under what circumstances

    They told us that navigation system is for navigation. And then, its tracking the cars, speeding tickets.

    They told us cookies is just to make the stateless HTTP protocol have some states. And then, its Double Click and all the tracking.

    They told us at the grocery store that the card will be used to get discounts. And then, you start getting those annoying mail related to products you bought.

    Hello marketing fellas out there, PLEASE stop. Consumer is getting upset.

  8. Who pays for the message? by ptbarnett · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I'm charged 10 cents for every incoming or outgoing SMS (text) message. I can buy a bundle of messages every month for a cheaper unit price, but since I don't use my phone for that purpose, I don't see any point.

    If I get spammed by someone identifiable because I happen to be in their vicinity, I'll be demanding to see the manager and collect my dime refund, just to be a PITA. If enough people do it, that will be end of that kind of spam in the US.

  9. Yeah right by brunes69 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's the kind of excuse Bush and Ashcroft want to use to pull the woll over your eyes. You really think this would stop any kidnappers?

    Step 1: Kidnap Kid
    Step 2: Throw any phone they have in the dumpster

    Really, why the hell do you think any kidnappers are going to let a kid keep his PHONE on him? You think they're THAT stupid?

    1. Re:Yeah right by qw(name) · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Really, why the hell do you think any kidnappers are going to let a kid keep his PHONE on him? You think they're THAT stupid?

      Yes. Most criminals are very stupid.
    2. Re:Yeah right by AvitarX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well...

      Lets see the scenerios.

      first. 13 year old child is home alone (quite reasonable) after school for two hours and is absolutly not supposed to do anything else without contecting his/her parents.

      On the way home said child is abducted and phone left in a dumpster. Parents come home and flip. Child does not answer phone. They then use this service and find the phone in a dumpster. hmmm, seams like foul play.

      If the phone was not trackable it is going to be at least 8 hours before anyone who can do anything (athorities) care. They probably won't really do anything until the next morning.

      I somehow see the phone in the dumpster as a big clue that something is up.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    3. Re:Yeah right by Catbeller · · Score: 4, Interesting

      " somehow see the phone in the dumpster as a big clue that something is up."

      So would not phoning home from a friend's house, or not coming home at all.

      The cell phone in a dumpster is useless as an indicator, Q.E.D. So that "use" is a farce.

      So what is the real use?

      1. Selling ads.
      2. Tracking law abiding citizens.
      3. Locator service for the user. A selling point, but 1. and 2. are the winners here.

  10. Most /.ers Need Not Worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Since most of us are not presentable enough to enter restuarants which can afford this type of advertising.
    There really isn't much for most to worry about.

  11. Honing In by qw(name) · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the past, the only way to tell where a person was located while talking on the phone was to detect which cell tower they were connected to. Considering that coverage was several square miles, it wasn't a very good way of tracking someone. However, this method of location has been used by police to solve murders where a person said they were somewhere when they called home after they murdered their spouse.

  12. Dial 9-1-1 and it should, automagically, track you by khasim · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the article.

    "However, given the real-time requirements of transmitting information over a telephone network, it can be difficult to program a wide-range of options for individuals to personalize preferences such as when, where and with whom to share location information. One solution is to hard-code a network database with an "on-off" switch that activates or deactivates a service, for instance, during a window of time with set hours such as peak and off-peak."

    So, dial 9-1-1 and your phone should broadcast its location.

    Otherwise, just make it an option for the numbers you have stored on your phone and a simple check box for the rest (I want to receive tons of phone spam Y/N).

    #1. If I dial 9-1-1, my location is broadcast.

    #2. If I turn off the broadcast function, my location is not broadcast (unless #1).

    #3. For every phone number I have stored, I have the option to broadcast (or not) my location to that number, provided I have broadcast turned on (#2).

    #4. For everyone else, I can choose to receive massive amounts of phone spam (unless #2). Why anyone would choose this option is beyond me.

    Any problems with that? It seems simple to me. And it should be easily implemented in software. Of course, it will NOT provide the captive audience for phone spam that seems to be the focus of that article. But so what?

  13. cellular popups by Alien+Being · · Score: 5, Funny

    The day I have to take my phone out of pocket to discover that i've been "invited" into a nearby business establishment will be the day I chuck said phone thru the front window of said business establishment. Really, how often do you get the chance to kill two birds with one phone?

  14. And for for just $4.99 per month. by blanks · · Score: 5, Funny

    For for just $4.99 per month you can keep these popups from showing up on my cellphone.

    They make money one way or another.

  15. At first glance... by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This actually sounds reasonable: Advance the technology for intrusive advertising, but hand 100% detailed control to the user.

    There have been times when I've been wondering where the nearest {insert favorite exotic food} restaurant is. ....
    1. Grab Mobile
    2. set "restaurants only"=true
    3. turn on location announcing thingy
    4. wait 5
    5. turn off location announcing thingy
    6. read ads from local restaurants
    Wire them up with an electronic compass and it should even be able to give you (updated in realtime, even) directions from where you are.
    • Turn left
    • 2 blocks
    • 3 shops
    • there!
    --
    Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
  16. Can you see me now? by ir0b0t · · Score: 3, Funny

    No? Good.

    --
    I'm laughing at clouds.
  17. push vs. pull by Eric+Smith · · Score: 4, Interesting
    but the article goes on to mention 'the ability for restaurants and other businesses to send a solicitation by text message to a cell phone when its owner wanders within range of those merchants.' Oh, wonderful, cellular popups..."
    Yet another attempt to use a "push" media model where "pull" would be much better. Instead of having my phone contantly wanting my attention when it learns about restaurants, I would much prefer a feature where I could ask the phone "what restaurants are nearby".

    In particular, I don't want the restaurants (or other stores) to even know I'm nearby until I ask the phone to poll for that information.

  18. Popups by ksb · · Score: 5, Funny

    businesses to send a solicitation by text message to a cell phone when its owner wanders within range of those merchants.' Oh, wonderful, cellular popups..."

    Could be interesting when you pass that 'massage parlour' you never knew was there ;)

  19. Not so great for kids by HiKarma · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Many have pointed out how ineffective lojacking kids would be if the kidnappers (who 99% of the time are relatives, the press just makes a big deal when there is a stranger kidnapping) are aware of the technology.

    It can be worse, it can be used to mislead. Of course they can just turn the phone off (you going to trigger an alert on every dead battery or out of range cell phone?) but they can also plant it at the home or the home of some red herring.

    But here's the real question. Kids have rights. At what age will parents finally let their kids be free of the surveillance anklet we're calling a cell phone?

    I can tell you it will be later than it should be for almost all parents, that is their nature, and it's understandable.

    But I think if we are going to have readily available child-lojack, there may need to be a law to protect the children from their parents, and forbid doing it after the age of 12. The kids can still have a phone, can still call 911 and transmit their location, but no parent query.

    Otherwise we destroy the freedom of all kids to catch one stupid criminal out of 100,000 who doesn't know to turn off the phone. All the other times it will be used to say, "I told you not to associate with that Jimmy kid."

    1. Re:Not so great for kids by Valar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I just want to say that this is one of the better posts attached to this story. It is also, however, a wildly unpopular opinion in puritan america. Most people honestly believe that they should control every bit of their kid's life until the "child" graduates from college. The worst part is, they seem to block out the fact that they hated it when their parents did the same to them. Somehow, people who hated it when pops asked "Where are you going?" think that a TRACKING DEVICE is less envasive.

      I know many people who keep their fingers on the tuition-kill switch, so that if their kid steps "out of line" (get bf/gf the parental units don't like, listen to the wrong music, don't come home every weekend to mow the grass) the student gets to take out loans. Say what you will about parents paying tuition, but I think it should be one or the other, pay or don't, or at least tie it to academic performance, not lifestyle choices.

      The majority of small children don't have cellphones. Older highschool students and college students do. THAT is the parental potential of this device.

  20. Re:Regarding Popups... by bakes · · Score: 4, Informative

    When I was in Singapore about 18 months ago, they were starting to introduce location based services. They were tossing around ideas like an SMS 'discount voucher' being sent to you as you wandered near a store, but they also had practical stuff like I could call a particular number, and it would SMS me back with the location of ATMs for my bank nearest to my location. That was pretty handy.

    You are right though. The system will be abused.

    --
    Ho! Haha! Guard! Turn! Parry! Dodge! Spin! Ha! Thrust!
  21. Re:cells by geekoid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "...as it will undoubtedly
    improve children's safety."

    how so? Are you saying the kidnapper won't through the cell phone out the window?

    How about this, the kidnapper tosses the childs phone into a different vehical going in another direction?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  22. Don't Neglect the Useful Applications by thebiss · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just as cookies have useful applications, so will location-based messaging. Location-based traffic reports immediately come to mind.

    I'd love to get an SMS when I-684/I-95 are jammed, and I'd love it even more if the service was free, paid for by an ad for the local Dunkin Donuts. :-)

    --
    Beware: I believe all are created equal, and have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
  23. Actually, Yes, he is Right by Orne · · Score: 4, Informative

    Criminal uses cell phone to call in kidnapping ransom. Police trace phone, find criminal + kid. Summer 2003

    Kidnap victim memorizes rapists cellphone. Police check registry, find perp. Jun 2003

    Kidnapped woman had cellphone hidden on person. Cops trace it to car, catch perp in parking lot. Nov 2003

    And many more...

  24. yep - we launched all this in Sept 2000 by somewhere+in+AU · · Score: 3, Interesting

    .. using handset independent cell method in Australia using national Carrier.

    Our applications gave total control to user with global on/off and selective sharing of generated PIN with friends on list.

    Even now in 2004 network based positioning systems not precise enough to beep door-by-door for that available single right next to you so can stop worrying about that.

    Also here in Australia there must be a different assumption as to marketing and ads fears expressed - everyone from telco to providers to businesses here realise big time spamming will kill such services cold.

    We did 80 categories of content too and they were really popular to pull up relevant locations at any time, near you or somewhere else.

    Our latest generation services allows for free text searches as well so users are again in total control in roaming through our content with or without positioning.

    Alex.
    www.findmap.com.au

  25. Remember who this is for... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And it ain't "us".

    Repeat after me.
    "We are not the consumers. We are the product. Advertisers are the consumers."

  26. Cellular pop ups won't work by NTDaley · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Regular popups wouldn't work either if the advertiser was close enough to visit to "register disapproval".

    --
    bits and peace
    Nicholas Daley
  27. New business model. by ron_ivi · · Score: 4, Funny
    ... a courier service that will carry your phone to wherever you're supposed to be, while you leave the phone and go where you want to be....

    (At least I didn't say 3...profit)