Slashdot Mirror


Introducing Linux to Joe Average

eco2geek writes "The local "alternative newspaper" is running a cover story titled 'The Rebel Alliance: An unlikely army of hacker hippies, geek visionaries, idealistic teachers and corporate giants is making Portland ground zero of a digital revolution.' I'm not sure I'd go so far as to call Portland 'ground zero' of anything, but the article does give the average reader a good introduction to what Linux is, why it's important, and some of the politics surrounding it. (The article also mentions 'the frenetic Slashdot.org.' :-)"

78 of 371 comments (clear)

  1. So many funny quotes by debilo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Check these out:

    Torvalds, now a 34-year-old tech superstar whom some see as the love child of Thomas Edison and Che Guevara,...

    "Linux wasn't started as any kind of rebellion against the 'evil Microsoft empire,'" Torvalds told The New York Times last year. "I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect."

    "In a school, it's public money. How should it be spent? Is it ethical to buy software instead of hiring an art teacher? Me, I want an art teacher--not the Microsoft help assistant dancing on every student's desktop.

    "Why spend billions," said one Amazon tech guru at the time, "when you can spend millions?"

    So funny. I'd post more quotes but I'm too lazy too read the rest of the article. :)

    1. Re:So many funny quotes by millette · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Google picked up about 700 pages with "that will just be a completely unintentional side effect"...

    2. Re:So many funny quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      News flash: the open source and priprietary software poles are not actually involved in a zero-sum game, for all the mouthpieces in the respective camps love the sound of their own voices.
      They serve different audiences, their goals sort in different orders, and they use different methods to achieve the same aim: getting the job done.
      Yes, the demagogues can be entertaining or alarming, depending on the moment. Yes, the legal and technical skirmishes can be quite entertaining. Yes, the market power of his Majesty Satanic may eventually be diminished.
      But no, the GPL worker's paradise will never be fully realized, and no, the GPL/BSD free-as-in-the-love-of-God software that continues to grow in usefullnes will not just go away, and no, you shan't be free of spam short of killing all your email boxes.
      It's, like, a market, or something, dude.
      Information Technology is a means to an end. What has occured is that too many view the means as an end unto itself, and expected to jump in and make ridiculous money for minimal effort. Guilty.
      The market forces eroding the IT economy are perfectly reasonable, and the pathetic attempts of Some Cretinous Orangutans are unsurpsing. My fear is that the chemotherapy required to purge the legal system of the cancer of monopoly will have catastropic effects on the legal system, which is brittle enough on its own.
      What a wandering rant.

    3. Re:So many funny quotes by gaijin99 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Torvalds, now a 34-year-old tech superstar whom some see as the love child of Thomas Edison and Che Guevara,...
      Ick. Why would anyone want to compare Linus to that looser Edison? I mean, he invented two bloody things in his entire life, the rest was invented by other people who had signed contracts that gave Edison all rights to their inventions and let him take the credit. I'd say Bill Gates is closer to Edison (remember, Bill didn't actually code anything for DOS or Windows, he hired it done). I suppose I should complain about the Linux/Che comparison too. I don't want this "Free Software == Communism" BS to spread either; but frankly the Edison comparison is more personally offensive to me.

      --
      "Mission Accomplished" -- George W. Bush May 1, 2003
    4. Re:So many funny quotes by nelsonal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But if they said Tesla and Che Guevara no one would have understood the reference.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  2. Wow! by Pingular · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm pretty impressed as it's only a 'local alternative newspaper' that it's not buckling under the Slashdot effect, in fact it hasn't even slowed down!
    Even stranger is the Netcraft 'what's that site running?' results, showing that the server was recently running MacOS!

    --

    When anger rises, think of the consequences.
    Confucius (551 BC - 479 BC)
    1. Re:Wow! by digitalunity · · Score: 3, Funny

      Have you ever seen those big maps showing the Internet's backbone providers? Look at Porland, OR.

      We have more bandwidth than god.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
  3. Farmers using Linux? by RinzeWind · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh, yes! Right here! The average Joe can handle Linux just as well as he can handle Windows. Teach a little boy Linux from the very first moment he touches a keyboard and he'll be just fine. The sad part is the national government is in bed with Microsoft. Let's hope that little project keeps going.

    1. Re:Farmers using Linux? by dcw3 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The sad part is the national government is in bed with Microsoft.

      Wow, you need to take off the tin-foil had buddy.

      I've been working for 26 years on govt. contracts using just about every flavor of *NIX you can think of. There's no great love for Richmond any more than there is for other large companies. Now if you're talking about lobbists being in bed with govt...that's an entirely different story.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    2. Re:Farmers using Linux? by nanowyatt · · Score: 3, Funny

      There's no great love for Richmond

      The Civil War is over, buddy. Jeff Davis, Robert E Lee, and good ol' Stonewall are all dead and buried. It's time to let Virginia back into our hearts.

      Even the Great Emancipator has stopped by to say hello.

      --
      Intellectuals! Liberals! Peacemongers! IDIOTS!!!
  4. Advertisements by PuffCammy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Frankly I see advertisements of Linux as a good thing, I mean more people should merely just know of Linux.

    --
    And the day came when the risk to remain closed in a bud, became more painful than the risk it took to blossom.
  5. If you want Joe Sixpack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you want Joe Sixpack to use linux, you just have to show him how fun it can be! Like this picture from a wild linux-party :)

    http://linuxforum.dk/2003/billeder/chlor/r001724 3. jpg

    Oh, they're a wild bunch!

  6. Open source: competing for new users? by Debian+Troll's+Best · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The story about Portland being a hotbed of Linux activism and getting a lot of new users into the community reminded me of a recent experience. I just built an Athlon XP PC for a friend who needed a cheap system just for the standard sort of computing tasks, you know, web, e-mail, some word processing and maybe a bit of light package management. Of course the finishing touch to a nice, budget Athlon XP was going to be Debian, with Mozilla for web/e-mail and OpenOffice.org to take care of office needs. But when it was time to break out the install CDs, my friend asked a very surprising question: "So are you going to install FreeBSD on my system?"

    It took a while for the words to sink in. I mean, my friend works in the publishing industry, and while she uses computers all day for word processing and presentations and stuff like that, I didn't expect her to know about FreeBSD. So I asked "Why FreeBSD? Have you been reading OSNews again?"

    She gave me a strange look and replied "No, because FreeBSD is free, and I've heard all sorts of things about Linux getting picked up by the big corporates. Those IBM ads are everywhere! I thought Linux was going to be expensive...more expensive than Windows!"

    I went ahead and install GNU/Debian for her, lecturing her solidly on the finer points of apt-get while we installed all 6 CD-ROMs from my laptop over a heavily degraded 802.11b link (I'd removed all the RF shielding from her PC's case to 'lap' the hard drive). But it got me thinking. Are Linux distros losing out to FreeBSD when it comes to new users simply because of their names? I mean, who's going to know that GNU/Debian Linux doesn't cost $699 per seat? FreeBSD says immediately that the product is free

    I'll put a question to the community...do people think that it might be worth re-naming Debian in some markets (like campus bookstores, for instance) to FreeDebian? I mean, Tux could even hold a pitchfork or something. Do people think that a 'marketing friendly' name is important? Would this get the Debian developers off-side with the FSF, or would they understand? Would the viral nature of the BSD license necessitate distribution changes because of the 'Free' in the name? I welcome comments from the GNU/Linux and FreeBSD communities equally!

    1. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by The+One+KEA · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Whoa - your friend just proved that despite the efforts of IBM, Red Hat and others to defend Linux against the FUD being spread by its competitors, that some of it is still getting through to the enduser. Her comment about Linux being swallowed by the corporations is a frightening one, and proves (at least to me) that we need to be much more proactive when it comes to explaining the philosophy and history of the Linux distribution, so that people don't continue to make this mistake in their thinking.

      --
      SCREW THE ADS! http://adblock.mozdev.org/ Proud user of teh Fox of Fire - Registered Linux User #289618
    2. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by no+longer+myself · · Score: 2, Funny
      Renaming any Linux distro is fine by me (Redhat -> Fedora), but it's like any other brand that thinks it can change its name to improve its image. There's always a backlash...

      So just tell ol' blondie that you're installing FreeDebian. It doesn't sound as cool as FreeFedora, but it just sounds much better than FreeMandrake.

    3. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by Pharmboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'll put a question to the community...do people think that it might be worth re-naming Debian in some markets (like campus bookstores, for instance) to FreeDebian?

      Ogg/Vorbis. Need I say more? Sounds "foreign", where "wav" files sound friendly, and its easy to guess what it stands for. This is like the Linux pronouncing debates 3 or 4 years ago (Lie-nux vs. LEE-nux vs Lin-ux) In the end, it doesn't matter because new users are going to pronounce it how it looks.

      One thing that OSS developers can learn from us "evil persons in the marketing world" is that a name DOES matter (Shakespeare be damned) and it is the name that creates the first impression. This is the whole reason Lindows fought for its right to use the name, because it tells what it is by the nature of the name.

      As Free Software begins to gain more and more acceptance, I think you will be seeing less obscure names, or other companies will simply take GPL software and rename it to a more reasonable term for public acceptance. This is sure to piss off more than a few authors, but otherwise, the programs won't get acceptance.

      PERL: Good name, easy to say, means something.
      SPAMASSASSIN: Ditto. The best possible name.
      GNOME: Bad name. A little evil dude, I dont want him in my computer, or my underwear drawer.

      OUTLOOK: Decent name, positive ring to it.
      FRONTPAGE: Good name, means what it is
      OFFICE: Good name, obviously.

      While I find recursive acronyms amusing, most people find them confusing, or more likely, they don't know what it is, even after you explain it. Its been a few years, but it confused me at first, and probably all of us. We need to be more reasonable if we want people to accept OSS on the desktop.

      Part of the problem is many authors don't care if the masses use their programs, and prefer it to be a leet few, which is why IBM et al will just repackage the programs with shiney new names and piss them off. Don't worry, we will be talking about "how wrong" it is to do this in a year or two.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    4. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by WWWWolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I recently posted on how I feel about the names like "FreeSomething" or "OpenAnything". Here are some of my further thoughts.

      I think this stuff is redundant. Freedom or Openness should be in the heart, not the name. I can understand if open source apps want to use unnecessary advertising of the parent project in form of "GNU Something" or "GNOME Anything", because that's just normal kind of titles (not too far from "Microsoft Whatever", which people will then casually call "Whatever".)

      But "Free" or "Open" in the title is an unnecessary wart. The "GNU" or whatever titles imply that they're part of a group of applications from a single vendor; there's nothing wrong with that. Yet, "Free" or "Open" implies different kind of relationship: This product vs. a specific product, or this product vs. the rest of the world.

      It carries a certain kind of connotation of competition: "This program is Free, the other program isn't, so use this program!" It can be a double-edged sword that's almost like free advertising for the proprietary competition: "Hey, this program is Free, but that other program costs money, so it has to be good!"

      Herein lies some duality: It is almost if this "free" program couldn't exist without the competition - We have "FreeBSD" and the "not-so-free UNIXes". We have "OpenOffice.org" and "StarOffice". Yin and Yang.

      "Free" or "Open" imply attitude. There's no place for attitude in software names.

      My original complaint was about the name "XFree86". It's a pun on "X386", which was what the project was known as over a decade ago. It might have been funny back in the day - "Ooh, it's like X, but it's free!" - but now it just looks silly. "Specification from 1986?" ...or "80386 code in my beautiful Macintosh? No way!"

    5. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by NixLuver · · Score: 2, Insightful
      As one who develops enterprise level data-center solutions for high end customers (hardware and infrastructure, not usually code) I'd have to say I'm just not buying this 'holier than thou' BSD tirade.

      While it's true that "Linux" is not the answer to every question, neither is *BSD, or Slowlaris, or AIX... etc.

      Yes, many people are "Linux Zealots". Many are "Windows Zealots". But, for my money, if not in numbers, certainly in snobbery quotient, *BSD zealots win... :)

      Face it, all of them, from AmigaDOS to ZeOS (wasn't there one called that?), there are zealots - that doesn't mean that everyone who uses Linux is a zealot, or incapable of seeing past the end of his/her floppy disk.

    6. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by madpierre · · Score: 2, Funny

      GIMP: Dont want no leather clad prevert gettin medeival on my ass.

      --
      siggy played guitar
    7. Re:Open source: competing for new users? by DarkVader · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, BSD strikes me as far more of a religion than Linux these days.

      Which is kind of sad. I'm typing this on a Mac, which is siting right beside a Fedora box.

      As far as I'm concerned, if your goal is ease of use and install on a *nix distribution, Mac OS X has it, and some of the Linux distros are getting there.

      FreeBSD proper, the last time I touched it, was not even close.

  7. Target Acquired by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm not sure I'd go so far as to call Portland 'ground zero' of anything. . .

    Rain?

    KFG

  8. Simplistic but well written. by Artega+VH · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sure there are small things (not a GNU/Linux in sight) which will probably be the cause of much criticism here but for an INTRODUCTION to Linux, and a brief update on the who SCO joke I thought it was rather well done.

    At least it didn't leave me thinking: "What idiots wrote this garbage..."

    Kudo's to a small newspaper standing up the /. effect too... :D

    --
    groklaw, wired and slashdot. The holy trinity of work based time wasting.
  9. Tux not copyrighted? by Guiri · · Score: 4, Interesting
    From the article:

    The Tux cartoon is not copyrighted--anyone can use it for free

    Does that mean that any company (SCO, M$) could copyright the Tux logo and we won't be able to use it anymore?

    1. Re:Tux not copyrighted? by ianezz · · Score: 2, Informative

      AFAIK, the copyright on Tux belongs to its author, Larry Lewing (he doesn't explicitly states that, but art works are copyrighted by default, right?), who then granted permission to everyone to use/modify it, provided he and The Gimp are acknowledged.

  10. Anything would be better than.... by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 5, Interesting



    Any effort to familliarize the public with Linux that doesn't involve a creepy-looking 9 year old with yellow hair has my support.

    That, and anything that doesn't involve Laverne talking about "chaos theory"..sheesh.

    What the hell would be so wrong about simply putting a few kernel/distrib contributors infront of a camera, and letting them talk for 30 seconds? "Hi, I'm Dave. I wrote the part of Linux that makes this camera work. I did it because it's fun....and because the manufacturer wouldn't." Sure, most of us are pretty damn ugly but there's gotta be a few photogenic nerds among us. With good stories, too.

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

    1. Re:Anything would be better than.... by darnok · · Score: 4, Funny

      > Sure, most of us are pretty damn ugly but there's
      > gotta be a few photogenic nerds among us. With
      > good stories, too.

      No, there aren't, at least not to Joe Average.

      When one of us sleeps with J Lo, then we've got a good story

    2. Re:Anything would be better than.... by JabberWokky · · Score: 3, Funny
      When one of us sleeps with J Lo, then we've got a good story

      Excellent. Now we just need a volunteer...

      --
      Evan "My SO and I had a long debate about photon/electron interaction tonight. I'm not giving that up for some overrated actress"

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    3. Re:Anything would be better than.... by m00nun1t · · Score: 2, Funny

      Then the BSD demon would need a new place to live - his home would be frozen over.

    4. Re:Anything would be better than.... by Xpilot · · Score: 3, Funny

      When one of us sleeps with J Lo, then we've got a good story

      It would be easier to have Ben Affleck learn how to write device drivers.

      --
      "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
  11. Luki by Elektroschock · · Score: 4, Informative

    Luki.org, a German organisation for the spread of the word of Linux in Christian Churches, created a very good "Uberzeugungsmappe", a convincement paper for Joe Enduser. It is slightly outdated and probably not available in English but you could try to tranlate it via Babelfish and correct the mistakes.

    Download the German paper in OpenOffice Format or as pdf. More about the Luki-Organisation in English

    It would be very helpful to get an English translation of this very good LUKI "Uberzeugungsmappe" paper

  12. Re:Real world vs. fanboy fantasies by bj8rn · · Score: 4, Funny
    These are hard numbers and 100% FACTS! There are several more where these came from

    Aye, I tried smashing them with a wooden hammer, but after a few hits, the sodden thing was in pieces! Then I tried a bigger one, but to no avail. Then I decided to test my brand new diamond-head drill, but it wouldn't even leave a mark on these numbers! "Bloody hell," I said. And threw the numbers into a furnace. And when I took them out, they were bloody hot (I almost lost my left thumb because of a number 5) and there were some weird markings to be seen on them -- I guess my diamond-head drill still did some damage ;7

    --
    Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
  13. The argument's wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It should be titled: Introducing Linux to Joe User.

    Linux is still a techies OS. Any headway made swinging it into the mainstream is by Linux bending towards what the user wants (Start Menus etc.), not by bending the public at large (i.e. not us) towards Linux.

    1. Re:The argument's wrong... by mwilliamson · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Linux is a techie OS because it works, and works well, and works with minimal fuss. These attributes, as well as a constantly-improving UI will push it into the mainstream. The fact that it is a techie OS should not deter Joe User.

      While linux is a strong techie's OS, it's also reached the point of being less of a pain in the arse to install and maintain than windows. Windows is such a pain in the arse to install that, if not for the fact it's usually pre-installed or supplied as a ghost image, most end users would have considerable difficulty installing.

      It is possible to have a fully operational Fedora box in as little as 15 - 30 minutes that will keep itself updated. Everything that needs configuration can be done right from the GUI nowadays, from partitioning to building your firewall. You can make a kickstart disk to carry your efforts in package selection to other machines. You need not face an interrogation every damned time you change a major piece of hardware, or a few pieces of minor hardware.

      While the techie community is capable of using operating systems that are difficult to install (openBSD, Darwin-i386 + Xfree86), the fact a good OS is easy to install/use/maintain will not drive them away.

  14. Overated ---- Rebellion ? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful



    I've heard so much about the so-called "Rebellion" whenever Linux is mentioned. Sometimes I gotta admit that I dunno what they are talking about.

    I use Linux not because I rebel against anyone, it's just that I got tired of the blue-screen-of-death cum you-gimme-more-$$$-and-we-still-won't-fix-the-bug thingy so I switched.

    No rebellion, just got tired with you-know-who.

    In other words, the "Rebellion" thingy may be overated.

    Just my thoughts, anyway.

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Overated ---- Rebellion ? by I+Be+Hatin' · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I've heard so much about the so-called "Rebellion" whenever Linux is mentioned. Sometimes I gotta admit that I dunno what they are talking about.

      A lot of Linux users think like you do... many also don't have anything particularly against Windows, they just like Linux better.

      However, Microsoft views this as a war, and is acting accordingly. Many Linux users realize this, and are fighting back, because sometimes non-violent resistance isn't the best strategy.

      --
      I know god exists. I read it on the internet, so it must be true.
    2. Re:Overated ---- Rebellion ? by kfg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      . . . sometimes non-violent resistance isn't the best strategy.

      There has been violence? I must have missed that. Perhaps you are making the sort of conceptual mistake that Gandhi warned about, mistaking nonviolence with passivity.

      Nonviolence as a technique is often based on direct confrontation, even to the extent of provoking it.

      KFG

    3. Re:Overated ---- Rebellion ? by HawkingMattress · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To me, there is a rebellion, but it's not about OSes, it's about freedom in the digital world.

      There really is a war going on between heavy capitalism, who tries to do all it can to restrict the use of everything digitally distribuable, and the people from the base, who have the skills to circumvent the rules, and organize hastily a counter attack to each offensives from the big boys.
      The point is, even Joe Sixpack, who doesn't care at all about the political or economical issues of modern technologies, is starting to understand when he sees he cannot play he's favorite mp3s in his xbox, or play the latests cds in his car stero and asks his tech savvy friends why this is.

      But that's nothing, what's important are the implications of such things in a world where everything will be digitalized.
      The technology, and the extensions we can try to forsee ten years from now can be the thing that will give the power back to the people, or the thing that will allow a control on us that even sci-fi books couldn't imagine.
      [ here fade in of terminator 1 music :)]

      And personnally, I first see Linux as a *nix system for x86, which allows me to play with UNIX on my laptop. But I also see it as a safe harbor where I can go when i'm fed up with corporate crap. Linux is people-centered, when you have a problem you just chat about it with some other users, or the developpers. Windows stinks corporatism everywhere, you know that the people on the other end want your money, not to help you, or to make things better. They'll lock you as soon as they can anyway. So in a sense to me linux is indeed a rebellion, a rebellion to fight the power of money, to circumvent the people I wish I could tell to go fsk themselves when I'm at work. If I can contribute to this little grain of sand in the wheel of capitalism, I'm all for it :)

    4. Re:Overated ---- Rebellion ? by Wellspring · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agreee. I think the counter-culture has been trying to adopt Linux as Member of the Movement. It's a little embarrassing.

      I have a friend who claims to be a geek. He can italicize and link in his livejournal. That's it. He put LimeWire proficiency on his resume to bulk out the "software" section. Yeah, yeah, I know in these enlightened times you can be a film geek, a music geek, a political geek, a goth club geek, or a football geek. In fact, virtually everyone has some kind of interest, so the word apparantly has no meaning anymore. Oh, and it used to be about the music. :)

      Bitter? Hell, yeah.

      Actually, political geeks are called policy wonks, and I'm one, and so I guess that puts me with the other hangers-on. But I'll brave that risk and say that any meaningful comparison of Linus to Che Guevara requires that Linus torture at least a dozen people to death.

      Failing that, Open Source is an economic, social and technological exercise. Political revolution is not on the menu, except maybe as a side project of some of our luminaries. Whose politics? (ESR? RMS? IBM?) Virtually any, apparantly.

      So I'd thank the drug-addled, media-obsessed non-programmers to stop trying to co-opt Linux into something that it isn't. I mean, seriously, go write a mission statement.

    5. Re:Overated ---- Rebellion ? by mysticgoat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I thought the Willy Week article was pretty neat, and I really liked the cover picture. But, like you, I think "rebellion" is the wrong word for this.

      It seems to me that calling this a "rebellion" is underrating what is going on. The increasing acceptance of Linux and OSS in general is the visible manifestation of a major revolution-- in thought and culture. The idea that a thousand eyes makes all bugs shallow-- cooperative development of new software wealth-- is as astounding and revolutionary as the idea of standardized parts that brought about the industrial revolution, or the idea of empiric, repeatable observation that brought about the scientific revolution, or perhaps even that idea our distant ancestors had that you could contain a small bit of fire, keep it fed, and actually benefit from it...

      This revolution is not a thing of competition. You who choose OSS simply because those apps make your life better than the alternatives are actually right in the middle of the front lines and don't even know it. Which is the way it should be.

      The revolution will not be televised. But if you know what to look for, you can see plenty evidence of it on slashdot.

  15. Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by questamor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Unfortunately for every good article there's another full of FUD about *ix systems. take this one

    "A new email virus called MyDoom is spreading rapidly across the Internet through UNIX mail servers, bringing with it a dangerous attachment that, when opened, can give attackers access to users' computers through an electronic backdoor."

    Amazing what they'll print these days? unix systems, one of the systems so amazingly resistant to worms like mydoom, and still we have the press implying they're to blame for the spread of windows viruses.

    1. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      spreading rapidly across the Internet through UNIX mail servers

      Well, of course. You can't expect exchange to be powerful enough to meet the email demand. You need a quality, robust unix server!

    2. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      unix systems, one of the systems so amazingly resistant to worms like mydoom, and still we have the press implying they're to blame for the spread of windows viruses.

      You know, the Windows fans are always the first to blame Sendmail if there happens to be a bug in it. (Typical *NIX fan reply is a gigantic yawn and something along the lines of "switch to Qmail or Postfix already, dammit, those things are already time-tested".)

      In this case, they're just jealous that most of the E-mail - including viruses - on the Internet is carried by Sendmail, and they can't blame it for this viral outbreak. The logic goes like this: "My operating system is vulnerable - but if those darn Sendmail servers didn't carry those E-mails to my inbox, I wouldn't have anything to worry!" Logical, huh?

    3. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by SiGiN · · Score: 2, Informative

      More articles of same author (Paul Thurrott):
      here

      And here is thurrott@winnetmag.com his addy, in case u wanna say "hello" ;-)

    4. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by HeghmoH · · Score: 4, Funny

      He does have a point.

      If every mail server on the internet ran Windows, e-mail would never work well enough to function as the vector for a worm.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    5. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's an old old old joke my father used to tell me when we were all out camping. It was a bonding time, between parent and child. You know those moments, when essential truths about the world are passed down. And he'd say to me:

      "How can you tell when Paul Thurrott is being a biased, lying windows Shill?"

      the punchline... oh and I used to wait for this one and laugh

      "His lips are moving!"

      and we'd cackle together around the fire, and eat another marshmallow.

    6. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Pretty dumb yes, but at the same time, it's not hard to build an email server with virus filtering built into it. It costs all of about $300 for a server license from most antivirus vendors, and there's free virus scanners available as well.

      As much as I think Windows blows goats, if you're putting an email server on the net I think it's the admin's responsability to ensure it doesn't propogate viruses. I put implementing virus scanning on the same level as making sure you're not running an open relay. It wasn't always like this but that's the climate we operate in now.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    7. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by Ann+Elk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Blaming the "UNIX mail servers" for spreading MyDoom is like blaming the USPS for spreading anthrax.

    8. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by SkArcher · · Score: 4, Informative

      Clam Antivirus is a GPL anti-virus scanner that can be set to scan all passing mail.

      Oh, and it was the first AV software to have a working definition of MyDoom (which they labeled "Worm.SCO.A") - faster than all of the commercial antivirus vendors.

      Chalk another one up for Open Software. Working together you can analyse virus code faster!

      Well shit, who would have thought it...

      --

      An infinite number of monkeys will eventually come up with the complete works of /.
    9. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by double-oh+three · · Score: 3, Funny

      /*Chalk another one up for Open Software. Working together you can analyse virus code faster! */

      No, you analyse it just as slow as the other vendors, it's just that one of the analysts wrote the damn thing. ;)

      --
      "For years, I struggled with reality... but I'm happy to say I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
    10. Re:Paul thurrott blames *ix for MyDoom! by kasperd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Think of back-scatter: when a virus hits a mail server, and the server bounces the message (to the forged sender address)

      For that exact reason I advice people to have the send an error message at once rather than first accept the email and then produce a bounce message. If your mailserver send an error message at the end of DATA, the error message is send directly to the worm. So no mail server will ever produce a bounce in that case.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
  16. How about "It's free. It works. Duh." by dpbsmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    (That would make a good slogan...)

  17. Re:death match! by tttonyyy · · Score: 3, Funny
    int main() {printf("Hello World");}

    Throw that sig in, and the fight would go like this:

    Linus: "Surely void main(void) since you've got no return, and you forgot to include your IO libraries for printf!"
    Bill: "Arrgghh - fire the secret weapon! #pragma align -0.5"

    (At this point Linus core dumps and Bill locks solid in the same position for 5 minutes until the referee resets him. Linus just gets on with it, but Bill returns to his corner to scandisk and blame the referee for not shutting him down properly).

    --
    biopowered.co.uk - catalytically cracking triglycerides for home automotive use since 2008. Just say no to big oil!
  18. Whole article on one page by shfted! · · Score: 5, Informative

    Using a little hack called page five of a four page story:

    http://www.willametteweek.com/story.php?story=4764 &page=5

    --
    He who laughs last is stuck in a time dilation bubble.
  19. Amusing quote by 3Daemon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "IBM's endorsement of Linux has added credibility and an illusion of support and accountability," Ballmer wrote.

    So, backing from a huge corporation only gives an illusion of support and accountability, by Ballmers own admission? Something to keep in mind next time "corporate backing" is flounted as a Windows highlight :)

  20. remove the "Duh" by real_smiff · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "It's free. It works."

    a better slogan i think :)

    --

    This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

  21. "the mark of cred" by eraserewind · · Score: 2, Funny
    "It's all about what a friend of mine calls 'the mark of cred,'" says Accardi, a Portland State grad who works as a Linux developer at Intel. "You either have it, or you don't."
    I think I probably don't have it, and I'm thinking that's a good thing too.

    Or maybe Bill Gates and Linus Torvalds will turn out to have been switched at birth, and will have to swap places, because it's discovered that the wrong one has "The Mark of Cred" (dun dun DUUUNNNNN!)
  22. Why People Don't Like Linux... by severoon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've talked to several non-linux users about why they don't use it, and I'm not talking about the die-hard MS supporters. I'm talking about people that have tried it at one time or another, ran it for a while, and just gave up on it.

    Why did they give up instead of switching over to it as their primary desktop? Answers ranged over several salient (if not because they're real, at least because they're perceived) problems.

    Die-hard linux people see variety as a good thing. That's true, and it's not true. Variety always has to be put in context, especially if there's a lot of it. Here's an example that even die-hard linux people can understand (assuming you're not chefs too). Let's say I'm making salsa and I send you to the store to pick up some heat. You don't know the first thing about peppers, and it just so happens I live next to a produce mart the likes of which you've never seen before. To choose from are: jalapenos, habaneros, anaheim, chipotle, ancho, pablano, thai, serrano, scotch bonnet, etc. What are you likely to do? That's right--grab the jalapenos, cuz that's what you've heard of before, even though they're probably not the best solution. Some die-hard linux people would argue, hey, if your goal is to help your buddy out, you'll head over to your favorite bookstore and read up, and then head back to the produce mart armed with this newfound knowledge. To these people I say, you are truly a die-hard fan of linux if you didn't get this point.

    This is the pressure novices feel at every turn with linux, not just from what OS to install, but what is the install process? (Depends on the distro you've chosen.) How do I install an application? (Ibid.) Which application do I install if I want, say, an email client? (Good luck wading through all of the available options.) Why is it that everytime I head over to my buddy's house, he always knows about all this crap that I've never heard of, and he's got this smokin' setup that I wouldn't have the first clue how to begin assembling? How does one even keep up with all the choice that's available?

    All frustrations that don't happen with Windows. You only rarely head over to a buddy's and see him running Mozilla instead of IE and think, hmm, I'd like that and didn't know about it. 99% of the time, you're both running the same media player, picture editor, etc, and if you're not, there's only a small handful of well-known choices to choose from.

    The next barrier to installing/using linux on a long-term basis with these folks is what I call the annoyance/showstopper problem. Eventually, usually sooner than later, these people run into something that's either really annoying (they can't get X to run at a desired resolution, for example), or a really serious problem that impedes their ability to move forward (they can't connect to the web). They also don't really know where to look for help, or even how to find out where they should start. I myself ran into a problem years ago with RedHat, I simply wanted to upgrade the asteroids game, but the web of library dependencies that had to also be updated made it hardly worthwhile. Eventually, I rolled up my sleeves and got to work--I finally got to the end of a long dependency chain and discovered that, no matter what I did to upgrade this particular library, it wouldn't go in because it was replacing a basic graphics library that is used by virtual terminals. Because it was always in use, it couldn't be replaced, even in single-user mode. So I know this frustration well...even I was asking, how great can this OS be if a simple game can't easily be upgraded, and then it turns out when you finally commit yourself to an afternoon of hunting, it simply can't be upgraded at all? The bigger issue here for most users is, why should I have to know about library dependencies to upgrade a game, why are virtual terminals relevant to the problem I'm having, and what is a virtual terminal anyway? (The point is, whatever it is, it's totally unrelated to what I was trying to do, and most people find t

    --
    but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    1. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by bangular · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Some of your points are valid, some are not.

      You mentioned installing Linux. How many average users do you know that installed their version of windows rather than bought it with it on there already? Most of those people wouldn't be able to install windows. The fact is, for so called "n00b" distro's, the installion process is in fact easier and quicker than windows. Some such as Lindows and Mandrake can be installed onto a new computer with just a couple of steps and nothing more than pressing next. PC's bundled with Linux and linux friendly hardware alieve this problem completely.

      RPM's are shitty and are the cause of more problems than they are worth. RPM's should have been done away with long ago. I remember as a noob, same problems. Could never install RPM's because of dependencys. I think distro's should adopt a portage style package system. Compiling from source takes longer, but it takes care of idiotic linking issues that RPM's create.

      I think most of Linux's entry level issues will be solved when OEM's start shipping it more included. The reason Linux on the desktop at the office is a great canidate is because it's installed for the workers and they've got someone to help them get past their entry level issues. Which are minor, but can be a big deal to new users.

    2. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by KermitJunior · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've run into five people in tha past two weeks and asked them, "Ever tried Linux?" Strangely they all said something like, "Yeah, but it doesn't do what I need." Me: "Oh really, when was it you tried it?" Them: "About five years ago."

      I think one major problem Linux faces is that Joe Average can't comprehend the speed that Linux has been changing with. Five years ago, you had Win98, which looked a felt a lot like Win95 which still strongly acts like WinXP in many areas.

      So if MS has been pretty much even in almost 10 years of OS, they assume Linux works like it did 5 years ago.

      --
      There is a Universal Life Value Check it
    3. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ok, I'll bite. :) I think you're overcomplicating the matter, although you made a lot of good points.

      You don't know the first thing about peppers, and it just so happens I live next to a produce mart the likes of which you've never seen before. To choose from are: jalapenos, habaneros, anaheim, chipotle, ancho, pablano, thai, serrano, scotch bonnet, etc. What are you likely to do? That's right--grab the jalapenos, cuz that's what you've heard of before, even though they're probably not the best solution. Some die-hard linux people would argue, hey, if your goal is to help your buddy out, you'll head over to your favorite bookstore and read up, and then head back to the produce mart armed with this newfound knowledge.

      Actually, not to split hairs or anything, but if you're having that much of a problem, you list the choices and go back to your buddy (or call him on your cell phone) and ask him which one he wants. Remember, the scenario you provided is your friend running an errand for me. The problem with using scenarios like this is that you can craft anything you want to make your point.

      Let's deal with real, hard facts here. The first time my wife sat down in front of a computer running Linux, she looked at all the foreign icons on her panel and correctly chose the web browser. Then she opened up a text editor to copy some stuff out of the browser into it. Then she saved it. Then she opened up her (mine, actually) home directory and started browsing the file system looking for it. She never once asked me "What is the d: drive?" because it never materialized to perplex her. Then she opened a mail client and realized she was logged into my account. Then she logged off and tried her old Windows username and password. Then she asked me why she couldn't login? I watched her this whole time because I was curious how she would react to it. She's a smart girl, but she's pretty sucky when it comes to computers. I was impressed, to tell you the truth. Linux isn't *that* hard to deal with.

      The thinking goes, in Windows, you learn about directory structures, a few commands to navigate around, a few basic apps for looking at files, opening programs, etc...at some point you hit a critical mass of knowledge where you just innately know how to move around and navigate new programs.

      This is a known problem and has been addressed by the major desktops. KDE has had a standard interface for years, and GNOME is finally tightening up on it as well. It is a problem that has mostly gone away. I suggest you take your Knoppix CD out to your dumbest friend's house with a windows box, pop it in, and watch him. See how he deals with it.

      How many linux users, even experts, can install an app they've never seen before (only know the basics of what it's for) in linux and start using it productively inside a few minutes without ever cracking any documentation?

      The answer is "all", because one of the main problems of free software is the lack of good documentation. So, since there isn't a manual to crack open, it is a requirement to be able to figure out how to use the software productively quickly without cracking open the non-existant manual. :)

      Ok, then, think about a piano. Anyone, even a child, can figure out the piano if given a chance to hit a couple of keys. That's Windows. They hand you the keys and you hit a couple and soon you're banging out simple tunes.

      Hmm, try again. Windows is a trumpet, with three valves that don't make any sense and a stupid slide. You have to either discover or have someone tell you to blow higher and tighten your embrosure just to get out of one stupid octave. Linux is the piano. :) Everything is exposed, you can look inside it and puzzle out how it works, and you can sit and use it productively within minutes of bootup. Personally, I prefer guitar.

      .there are a LOT of places where linux is worse than Wi

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    4. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by bangular · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The problem is, many OEM's _can't_ sell Linux preinstalled on desktops without the strong hand of MS slamming down upon them. It's all or nothing. You either sell all Window's PC's or you're paying retail for for each copy. No OEM discount. and if you have a contract, we will sue you for breech of contract.

      Not saying there's a huge demand, but if they offered it, people would buy it. Espically if it were the same PC but minus the cost of windows and office bundles they many times include. This would be very significant because for cheap PC's (some as low as a couple hundred bucks), shaving the price off of software could lower the price of a 300 dollar PC by as much as 50 dollars. So for many, the option of a PC that's around 20 percent less in price but is the same hardware, it would be a no brainer. Espically if OEM's started to give Linux a little nudge and put those PC's on the forefront.

      These are all dreams though because OEM's have signed long term contracts with MS and when it's re-negotation time, it's either you run an all MS shop or you pay retail.

    5. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by pben · · Score: 2, Insightful


      RPM's are shitty and are the cause of more problems than they are worth. RPM's should have been done away with long ago. I remember as a noob, same problems. Could never install RPM's because of dependencys. I think distro's should adopt a portage style package system. Compiling from source takes longer, but it takes care of idiotic linking issues that RPM's create.


      Oh yea, waiting 12 hours for KDE should really make a great impression on that new user! Ok if you install bins of KDE your Joe Average finds out about blender, gimp, or whatever, it will only take twenty or thirty minutes to compile!

      Portage and Gentoo should be kept far away from most users. If there ever was one group that should not use Portage it is new users. If the Debian team would spilt off the x86 platform from the reset so that they could keep the stable releases coming out every six months or so it would be ideal. That is the idea behind Fedora but when I tried it I found missing dependencies. Maybe the knock on rpm hell is based on that, maybe they can get their act together with core 2.

      Debian unstable is a pain to install but it is the most current and complete bin based distro. If you find a something missing or broked and file a bug report it is fixed within days. They are great. If they were not always waiting to fix up bugs in the lesser used platforms and was eaiser to install.

    6. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by bangular · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You missed the point. Binary packages as a base install are fine, but NOT for upgrading software from 3rd parties. If you installed your kde from the CD then it's fine as a binary, but when you grab an rpm from freshmeat that was compilied against gcc 2.95 and you are running 3.4, there are going to be problems. Problems that do not occour when compiling from source. RPM's have not standard on naming packages either. Sometimes the same package is split up into 5 parts. How are you supposed to resolve dependencies then? With almost every binary package system, the second you install software not supplied by the vendor or from source, you are almost guaranteed to break dependencies. The gnu build system does not suffer from this. I think portage is an acceptable wrapper for it.

    7. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by pben · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think that you missed my point! Waiting twenty minues for gimp or blender to install is that last thing that Joe Average want to do.

      Yes too many disros are bad but that is a call to improve the disto. If you are pulling random rpms off freshmeat you are asking for trouble. The distro should have the tools to install a tested version and all that it needs. Apt-get is probably the bet one out there, mainly because a lot of people work very hard to make it happen. That is the kind of effort that is going to be need to get linux onto the desktop.

      Make it easy for the user to get what he wants and he isn't going to downlaod random rpms off freshmeat. Then it will work correctly. Asking Joe Average to compile it from the source and waiting for minutes for it to install is the wrong way to go!

      No short cuts I am afraid, just a lot of work that just isn't being done by the current distros.

    8. Re:Why People Don't Like Linux... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...she was using one that had already been installed and set up with the sort of software she might use, with the right network and ISP settings, &c. (And I'm sure it didn't hurt having a comforting presence beside her, too.)

      Actually, while you're right that I had already installed it, it was RedHat 7.2, and it was easier to install than windows 2000. Windows 2000, as you might recall, has a stupid text-driven installer that you use for partitioning and crap and then it does work for awhile, then reboots and runs you through a stupid wizard, then works for awhile, reboots again, and I don't remember what it does after that. In any case, RedHat 7.2 installed on my system out of the box with everything working (except sound, a problem which doesn't exist anymore for me and current distributions) and using default options. She could've installed it, I'm certain, but she never has. As far as ISP settings, we're behind a NAT router on a cable connection, so it only needed to work with DHCP and the network card, a strength of Linux. I didn't discuss the installation because when I started in with RedHat 7.2, I quickly learned that installation wasn't an issue anymore.

      She also finds my presence intimidating when she's using a computer 'cause I always bitch "Why are you doing it the hard way?" "Shut up, Dave". :)

      Again, you're using knowledge that the uninitiated simply don't have. I've never used IRC, and I'm far from new to all this. How do you know where to look for help? How do you find all these helpful people?

      Instructions clearly posted on the GnuCash site led me to their IRC channel. The "uninitiated" have no problems surfing the web, as previously established. They only have to read the directions posted there to find help. I hadn't used IRC since the internet was telnet-driven, so while I did have the advantage of already knowing what IRC was, I don't think it served me in this case because finding it through the UI was completely different than I'm used to.

      There is at least one: M$ Office. I hate to say it, coz I know that other office packages have done a huge amount of work and are better in some ways, but I know many people who need to be able to read and write Office files, without worrying that obscure bits of formatting will be lost or that they won't be able to send files back. Rightly or wrongly, this is the main show-stopper, without which they simply won't consider anything else. If/when Linux is seen to provide a seamless, transparent, drop-in replacement for Office, it stands to gain a lot more users.

      That's just people being extremely picky. Before Microsoft had their monopoly, an Office suite wouldn't have been the deal-breaker like it is now. Personally, I find that KSpread and family are just as good, if not better, than MS Office. They just don't read MS Office files. I find that OpenOffice.org is an excellent office suite, but unreliable. It doesn't run well at all on my laptop, so it's a pain in the ass, but KOffice runs great. It really pisses me off that people focus on one thing, file formats, and refuse to go any further until that one thing is perfect to their satisfaction.

      Oh well. I suppose the serfs of our feudalistic ancestry didn't mind being beat up by the nobility as long as they had shelter.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  23. Uh... hello? OSDL? by BiOFH · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm not sure I'd go so far as to call Portland 'ground zero' of anything...

    Why not? The Open Source Development Lab (OSDL) is in Portland. I'd think that counts for _something_. Then there's Intel's first real [huge] Linux farm which was instrumental in designing and modelling the Pentium 4 (howdy DPG). Not to mention several Linux developers, coders and doc maintainers and that Randal guy (hey, Randal).

    Sign me,
    A BiOFH who will always call PDX home

    --
    - I am made of meat.
  24. World class in: Bookstores, Art dealers, Parks... by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 4, Informative


    Linus Torvalds can go anywhere. It's probably no accident that he and the The Open Source Development Lab are in Portland. (Beaverton is one of the towns that are part of the metropolitan area of 1.4 million people called Portland.)

    Portland has the largest bookstore in the world.

    Portland has one of the largest and most successful dealers in contemporary art in the world. The gallery has a funny name, but shows the work of over 1,100 artists.

    Portland has the largest park inside a city in the world. The park has over 74 miles of wilderness hiking trails.

    Portland is the home of Pink Martini, a band that writes multi-cultural songs. One of Pink Martini's songs was once one of the most popular songs in France. You can listen to the music video.

    It's a 55 minute drive from downtown Portland to the ski areas. "World Class Skiing in Your Own Backyard."

    The K-12 Linux Project, in Portland, is one of the more successful projects for giving Linux to average users, who in this case are students.

    Portland borders on the confluence of the Willamette River and the Columbia River, one of the largest rivers in the world. The Columbia River Gorge, on the eastern edge of Portland, is a world class wind-surfing area.

    On the other hand: Q. Why do hippies come to Portland? A. Because there are no jobs.

    Many people don't like the months of rain every year. They say Portland is the perfect place for slugs and ducks. (However, the rain cleans the air.)

  25. Joe Average by NixLuver · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Wonderful, amusing article

    I've been working with lots of 'Joe Average' types in the past couple of years, and there have been many abortive attempts to 'Linuxise' my offerings (to friends, family, and moonlighting clients). My wife was a ginea pig for me, switching from her blue-screen plagued windows install on a toshiba 8100 laptop to RedHat 8 + Ximian. She's never looked back. Encouraged by this success, I've brought several other family members and a couple of moonlight clients (barter system - including a veterinarian and a law firm) over to the 'free side'. Very few have experienced any real trouble.

    In short, right now, if a given person doesn't absolutely require windows-based apps (like custom applications or games, etc), Linux is ready for the desktop of Joe Average Computer User. The small business office or home user that's not a gamer can recieve significant value increase from Linux, and I have at least 22 happy customers right now.

  26. More good press from the BBC. by twitter · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Everyone's favorite "alternative" news source, the BBC is also running a nice summary of the impending Linux stampeed. The rebellion is on:

    If you spend a dollar with a local company working on Linux, that dollar stays in your economy," said Simon Phipps of Sun Microsystems.

    "When you spend a dollar with a multi-national corporation as a license fee for a piece of software, that dollar leaves your country."

    "It's about keeping the money in your local economy, developing skills and developing the local economy to be strong in its own right in a global context."

    Also quoted are Bruce Perens and Eric Raymond.

    Not mentioned, however, are The Free Software Foundation or the GNU Project.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  27. How to educate Joe User? by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The best way to stop these viruses is to get Joe computer user to be wary. How do you educate them? I do not know how many times I have repeated to the same folks over and over:"do not open attachments unless you know what it is", "keep your virus definitions up-to-date".

    I have not always been a geek, but even before my geek days I never caught a virus. The type of attachments and emails that these viruses come in is so blatantly obvious that any idiot can figure out which emails they should be wary of. If you do want to open up some little game that a freind sent you, at least update your definitions and scan the file first.

    Of course this is nothing in comparison to the ultimate peev which is folks giving out there passwords (or better yet, writing them down and taping it to the monitor). How damn ignorant do people have to be? Do they not realize that giving others your password completely defeats the purpose of having a password? I am not kidding when I tell you this: My girlfreind worked as an auditor at a public university. There were staff members whom had access to the database system that is used to keep track of student records including grades. They put the password for this system up on the computer and then, not only did they sit there clueless while watching student workers access this system, but this office had an open-door policy allowing any student to come in and use this computer.

    Gentlemen and ladies, this is the level of ignorance that we are dealing with.

  28. Standards by AdmV0rl0n · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Having spent some time on an LPI course, and delving a little deeper, I found some aspects of Linux still need attention (IMHO).

    Why is it not possible to have all configuration files with the .conf added on the end. Perhaps people who still roll the software with -conf are trying to be amusing.

    Daemons are another. Why the hell call your FTP log Xtransfer.log?

    There were so many examples of this idiocy that I ended up scratching my head. For an OS built on standards, there was a remarkable lack of reasonable standards when working with the OS, to the point of it being setup in some demented legacy ideals.

    Now, I know I can go and add my own aliases, and I can amend all my log files, and break open all the configuration and fix this myself. But if you take that view, JoeNewUser is going to face this everytime you crack open a new Linux on the guy.

    In the end, JoeNewUser will have to use the command lines and configuration, where he'll come up on the non standard, sometimes illogical, system confs and logs.

    One day maybe, just maybe, Linux and its distributions will agree on its boot configuration files being in a standard place, and the same leads on for conf files.

    Now, I suppose if you use the OS every day, you work around these things. You might adapt to the non logical names, non standard conf files, and ever changing locations of files.

    Anyway, just my tuppence..

    AdmV

    --
    We`re all equal .. Just some of us are less equal than others.
  29. Why do I care? by gsa700 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Way back when my brother was using windows 95 I thought it would be fun to try linux. What was cool about was that it was NOT like windows. In fact I had never seen anything so different from Windows. I bought a book with Red Hat 5.1 and it was good.

    Now I know that Linux is great for servers as I run my own site on it but even as the desktop becomes more usable, it is boring. It's nothing but a second rate clone of windows. And I doin't use anything second rate so I went back to windows when XP came out.

    Make Linux cool again. Make it different and BETTER than windows and you will win me back but as for now why bother?

    Thanks

    --
    "You do not support the root but the root supports you." - Romans 11:18
  30. I'm pumping Linux into the mix around here too. by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I recycle used computers, I have a contract with a *large* corporation to pick up their old PC's and other "goodies"..

    They wipe the drives in them, which is FINE with me, so I take them all and install Linux on them, clean them up like brand new and resell them at rock botton prices that EVERYONE can afford, with a 30 day warranty.

    I offer them only with Linux installed, take it or leave it. They are Internet appliances and they do a magnificent job of it, leaving the new owners to enjoy the computer without the headaches of using windows.

    I give them 15 minutes free instructions on using it, if they want FULL instructions then I set up an appointment and charge $20 an hour which is $15 an hour cheaper than anyone else in town charges.

    If they don't want Linux, that's tough. I don't offer any other options. They can install windows when they take it home but I won't help them if they have problems.

    Like it or not, people around here are getting introduced to Linux. They want a cheap computer, they get one but they are at least going to play with Linux a little before they wipe it out.
    But if they wipe out Linux and install anything else they void *my* 30 day warranty and they are own their own from them on..

    1. Re:I'm pumping Linux into the mix around here too. by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I put ads in the local papers that I pick up and recycle computer and electronic equipment.

      I offer my services free of charge. Everyone else charges money to pick up stuff. I do not. That THRILLS corporate customers to no end. They sign me up as their permanent "sucker" that they dump their old stuff on. And beleive me, I'm thrilled to get the stuff for free. It's almost always working equipment, just obsolete.

      So, I clean it up, service it, make it look like brand new, make it work like brand new and turn it around. Joe average can now get industrial grade equipment at garage sale prices. Work horse laser printers made in the USA that are designed to print 30,000 pages a month for $300 in brand new condition, where a Chinese made laserjet that is a POS and has a duty cycle of 1,000 pages a month and a 2 year life span for the same price.

      I just sold a PC with a 17" Compaq display, an HP color inkjet (US made!) speakers, etc, full package with Suse 9.0 installed for $300 to a guy that is thrilled to get a full system that cheap.
      And he's thrilled at the promise of a system that won't be plauged with the typical, never ending MS headaches. He's getting an internet appliance that is 100% reliable that will also handle his WP needs (Open Office 1.1)...

      This is just ONE example of a small time turn around. I have all sorts of goodies to suit any needs, I have a ROLM CBX II that I got for free, configured to handle 10,000 lines, a DG Calriion mini computer, two 18 wheeler loads of Compaq PC's, countless 21" monitors, even more countless numbers of 13-15-17" monitors, E size plotters, truckloads of laserjets, trailer loads of band printers, there's just no end to it. It's freaking insane. I have so much stuff that I can't walk around here. I have little tunnels to crawl through from room to room. I'm looking at getting a LARGE, climate controlled building to wharehouse this stuff as I process it and find new homes for it all. So far, very, very little of it has been broken, it all needs cleaning and minor service but it's all good stuff..

      So far, so good. I have the potential to turn this into a very good thing, if I don't fsck it up.

      Never in a million years would I have ever guessed that it would get like this. I just started doing this because I'm handicapped and un-employable otherwise. I wanted to do ANYTHING but get on SSI so I thought I would do a few PC's here and there to get by on. Damn! And the best thing is that this is something that I enjoy doing, I love working on stuff and I get to do it on my own terms..

      Fun, fun, fun!!

  31. Microsoft Will Bring This On Itself by rgainford · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I being a Microsoft croonie am sorry to say that I don't see this revolution of linux and freeBSD slowing down. I have always worked developing in microsofts products and their latest .Net platform is a pleasure to work with. That being said I also realize that the only reason Bill comes up with these development platforms is to increase his hold on the desktop market. Yet WHY then with the success of open-source software on the rise would they still be charging schools and university's for their products. This is where their user base is created from!! In addition this this fact( which bothers me immensly ) they have also come out with their latest aggravating anti-piracy tool "pain in the ass" activation. Now I can't even move my legal copy of XP from one computer to another without having to go through the activation process again. This is a big mistake in my opinion. I know there are already hacks for this feature but if they ever come out with a version of their operating system that can't be used illeagally I see them going down in FLAMES. If people in poor developing countries can't use their system to learn on along with the educational community in first world countries, there choke-hold on this industry will quickly be loosened.

  32. Don't shove it down people's throats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't want to hear any Windows using moron say that I should use Windows.
    I think that most Windows users feel the same way about Linux.

  33. I've been dreaming of that day for a while now by freeweed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    if they ever come out with a version of their operating system that can't be used illeagally(sic) I see them going down in FLAMES

    I went back to University a few years ago and am just finishing up once again. The level of software piracy around here absolutely astounds me. As a personal goal, I've spent the past couple of years trying to rid myself entirely of any software that isn't 100% legit (whether it's free "educational" MS product, or OSS, or whatever). The time I sometimes spend trying to get work done is frustrating (need to print something that isn't in a University-approved file format? ie: anything not a Word doc or PDF?), but the personal satisfaction is worth it.

    I rant almost daily about professors requiring us to hand in our work with MS-specific file formats, and my fellow classmates yawn and hand me a warezed copy of MS Office. OpenOffice is SO close, but still not 100% (as I learned after initially receiving a 0 on an assignment - thankfully the prof was understanding and let me re-submit it).

    I really, REALLY would like to see upcoming versions of Windows and Office be 100% unpiratable. Most students I know aren't going to be shelling out hundreds of dollars to keep up with software when there's a free alternative that does what they need just fine. Give it a few years, and we'd have an entire school generation almost entirely unexposed to Microsoft's software. Other than games (about 99% of which are also pirated, incidentally), I just can't see Joe Student *needing* Windows, to the tune of paying for software licenses for it.

    Hell, I've seen students fire up Visual Studio .NET to write and compile a 20-line console program using only standard C libraries. Apparently gcc is "too much typing" for them. I say, bring on working copy-protection for all commercial software, please! And yes, I do realize what a pipe dream this is :)

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  34. Portland schools have no money by jdictionary · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Don't get me wrong, I am definitely pro Linux and use it on a daily basis, but what this article fails to mention is that Portland public schools have no money. Portland has had to cancel all kinds of extracurricular programs, shorten the school year, layoff teachers, etc. Most of the sports programs require the players to purchase their own equipment (for example). The local economy is hurting big time. Portland and Oregon as a whole has had some of the highest unemployment in the nation in past months. So it makes me wonder if the big Linux push at some of the schools is really because they are so "anti Microsoft", etc. or it is out of desperation because they can't afford anything else. Don't forget, Microsoft is headquartered only 180 miles north of Portland and employs several thousand people. I have many friends that have moved up there to take jobs with them. A lot of the contract tech jobs you can find in Portland are for Microsoft. So I think this whole anti-Microsoft thing is blown way out of proportion by articles such as this. Just my two cents.