Slashdot Mirror


Spammer Profile: Scott Richter

prostoalex writes "Westword.com published an article on Scott Richter, the owner of what is supposedly the nation's fastest-growing online marketing company, which mostly specialized in sending out those unsolicited electronic mail messages. Richter is the guy currently being sued by New York Attorney General and Microsoft Corporation for sending out nearly 9000 e-mails only to Hotmail accounts."

104 of 438 comments (clear)

  1. Spam time! by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 5, Funny

    WTF is HIS email address???

    1. Re:Spam time! by Pingular · · Score: 3, Funny

      scottrichter@hotmail.com

      --

      When anger rises, think of the consequences.
      Confucius (551 BC - 479 BC)
    2. Re:Spam time! by nocomment · · Score: 5, Informative

      According the Contact Us page, it's info@optinbig.com.
      Hey Andy! you take requests? http://www.optinbig.com/ unkay?

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    3. Re:Spam time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Email address?

      No, get him with USPS junk mail. That's a whole lot more fun. =) It's been done before with the guy who was #1 at the time (Alan Ralsky or something like that, I beLIEve...)

      Get his home address and have fun...

    4. Re:Spam time! by DrEldarion · · Score: 5, Funny

      ... and, for good measure, make sure you also do webmaster@optinbig.com, optinbig@optinbig.com, admin@optinbig.com, abuse@optinbig.com, scottrichter@optinbig.com, srichter@optinbig.com, and whatever else you can think of.

    5. Re:Spam time! by NixLuver · · Score: 2, Funny
      LOL... Yeah, fill out all catalog requests and the like with his addy? Nasty, nasty...

      In other news - fighting dead-tree spam: I like to take all of the "SASE" type of mail and swap the contents around, so that Credit1 gets the "free gift request" from OurHome.com, and the like. Sucks up their time and money sorting that stuff out.

    6. Re:Spam time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I send back pieces of toilet paper with "shit" on them. You know why? Because opening envelopes is a boring job and I want to make people's lives a little more fun.

    7. Re:Spam time! by zero_offset · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Sucks up their time and money sorting that stuff out.

      No, actually it doesn't. When I was a kid, I worked for a company which did direct-mail advertising. (I dislike it too, but I was 17 and hadn't really received junk mail in my name yet, and this was back when "online" meant a 300 baud connection to CompuServ and spam e-mail was just a glimmer in some evil asshole's eye.)

      Anyway, we had people who hated direct mail, and they waste their time doing all sorts of "clever" things, and frankly, it was only noticed by the office staff when somebody did something exceedingly disgusting, strange, or illegal.

      You'd waste more of their time by trying to come up with something *creative*. Shit, why not make it fun for the poor asshole opening your envelope? They're working for minimum wage hand-keying response cards; they sure as hell aren't making the big bucks off annual subscriptions or whatever.

      In any case, when you send a million direct-mail pieces, you fully expect to get a bunch of junk back (the other stupid one is putting metal washers in the return mail... the postage is PRE-PAID, you won't cost them a single cent in extra charges), and you have hordes of low-paid drones to sort that stuff for you.

      *shrug* What else can I say? I wish it worked, too.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

  2. Write your congress-critter! by Scott+Lockwood · · Score: 5, Funny

    Voice your support for the Death Penalty for spamers!

    --
    But this is slashdot. A slashdoter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber!
    1. Re:Write your congress-critter! by Tom · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why exactly was the parent modded as Funny?

      Now while we can argue about whether or not it's a bit excessive, I'm taking bets that the sudden and brutal death of, say, the top 20 US spammers would bring spam down to 1995 levels almost instantly.

      In addition to the 20 cretins that we are rid of, the next 20 might also realize just who will be filling the freed-up slots, and a good part of them will move into something that resembles honest work.

      Now for the "may be excessive" part:
      Wars have been fought and thousands been killed for less.
      Spammers commit a crime that is not very much realized in the modern world - they attack the common. They don't rob one guy a lot, they rob everyone a little. In other times, there would have been no hesitations to subject them to the most drastic penalties.

      In fact, the death penalty should be modified for spammers to make sure it's slow and painful. A literal death by a thousand needle pricks might be very appropriate to the crime. Just pinch them once for every spam they sent.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  3. Know what I hate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's bad enough that they're spamming me, but then they lie about me signing up for their list. I didn't sign up, I know I didn't sign up, they know I know I didn't sigh up, so why bother?

    1. Re:Know what I hate? by JuggleGeek · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I don't understand why they tell blatent "You signed up to our list" lies either. It isn't, as someone suggested, because it's illegal if you didn't sign up - it isn't (at least in the US.) The Can Spam law was very clear - they can legally spam you until you beg them to quit. Regardless, they were making that claim for a long, long time before any laws about spam were in place.

      Spammers have a different mindset from normal people.

      They are trying to sell a product, but they usually tell lies in the subject field and/or the From line. Most of us wouldn't think "Hey, I want to sell to people, so I'll start out by making it clear that I'm lying to them and can't be trusted." But spammers think that way. And some people are apparently dumb enough to buy from them.

    2. Re:Know what I hate? by Fr33z0r · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've had my (ISP) email address for the past 8 years or so, and when I first got that internet connection I was pretty naive, I'd use my real email address everywhere, it was on a popular site, it went unmunged on newsgroups and all was well. Not so long after getting it the spam started coming in, and it's increased over the entire 8 years without my involvement (I stopped using that address many years ago when I got my own domain)

      That address must be on every spam list/CD known to man, my ISP offers (free) filtering so I switched that on just to save my hard drive - I still get several hundred that make it through their filter every day, and they block tens of thousands each month - on the rare occasion when I go "oh, I signed up for an account on this site years ago, I wonder if my account still exists" - I go to the site, put that email address in the "remind me" box, fetch my new mail and literally have to do a search on that account's inbox - it's that bad that I can't even quickly find an email minutes after receiving it.

      So I've written off that account, I play around with anti-spam technologies from time to time and I use it as a throwaway account though, so I continue to let it exist and fetch my mail a few times a day - anyway... about 6 months ago I noticed I was getting dozens of the same email in a row from the same guys, for shits and giggles I clicked the unsubscribe link and did my usual "shauihfeuihgerisbuisrghsruighuisegr@hduiwehfeuiwh uighuierghruigher.com" - it came back with the "Thank you, you have now been removed from our list!" so I thought "ok, they're just building an unsubscribe list" - I put in my email address too (it's worthless now anyway, and I figured this way I covered my ass) and waited a couple of weeks - as I expected I just got spammed harder by them, to the point where I was receiving over a hundred of the exact same email every day. I looked up the contact details on the site that they were advertising, did a whois on the domain and got the contacts, whoised whatever was after the @ on each of the contacts and so on and so on and wrote my email.

      Essentially, I emailed the spammer and BCCd his ISP, the site he was advertising's webmaster, cust feedback, billing company, and anybody else I could find who had business dealings with the site or spammer that was responsible for spamming me so hard.

      I said "I unsubscribed from the list I didn't subscribe to, you were still sending hundreds of identical emails to me every day. As you are not honoring unsubscribe requests I don't know what else to do but go over your head.

      All, please ensure I am removed from this list, I don't care how, you are all responsible to an extent."

      for the next week I got about 10-20 of the same email daily, the week after I got
      It's a silly amount of hoops to jump through to get removed from one list (and futile, considering I get thousands of UCE from other sources), I did it largely to see if it would work, it did, draw your own conclusions :D

    3. Re:Know what I hate? by Moraelin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sadly, they're just doing what everyone else in the computer industry is doing. It's become not only acceptable, but _expected_ to lie your ass off.

      "Normal" people also wouldn't, for example, think "hey, I'm trying to sell stuff to these people, so let's first make sure I've annoyed the living crap out of them. Surely they'll express their hatred by buying lots of stuff."

      Yet all the pop-up and pop-under ad retards do just that. Not only that, but now they want to take over the browser and force you to watch half a megabyte of full screen movie before you can even get to see what the site offers. Yeah, that's gotta fly well with both the potential buyers _and_ the site owners. Not.

      Or see the RealNetworks retards. Yeah, buddy. Spamming the living hell out of me with popups, even when not using RealOne, surely will make me reach for the credit card and buy the premium player. Not.

      Speaking of which: "Normal" people would never think, "I'm trying sell people stuff over the 'Net, so let's install spyware on their computers until it crawls, hog their bandwidth, spam them with popups, etc. And generally make it hard to use the very medium over which I'm selling stuff."

      Gator, anyone? And a thousand others.

      "Normal" people would never think "I'm trying to build a loyal fan base, so let's sell them a clearly non-tested non-functional product."

      Yet, at least one game I've bought (Victoria from Paradox Entertainment, German version) threw up a script syntax error right on startup. FFS, not a crash, not a sound lockup, nothing even remotely blamable on my drivers or hardware. A script syntax error. Noone even started that game before selling it. Sad.

      Basically IMHO the spammers are just a symptom of the complete lack of accountability or responsibility in this industry. The whole "if you can make a buck with snake oil, lies and deceit, go for it" mentality. Spammers are just the brute force/low IQ version of what everyone else is doing.

      Until we stand up and say "no more!" to the whole snake oil deal, it will only get worse.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  4. I've got it! by swordboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    This guy must be Andy Richter's brother - the guy who wrote the MyDoom virus!

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
  5. New business? by monstroyer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just yesterday, Microsoft was devising a plan to invoice spammers, now they are suing a spammer. Who needs the operating system business when you got hotmail!

    9000 spam emails doesn't sound like that much. An acquaintance of mine is the developer of si20 and there's more spam than 9000 in a measly half a day of operations.

    Is this merely a symbolic legal pursuit? Or is this considered a lot of spam by the powers that be?

    1. Re:New business? by eln · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's not that it's a lot of spam, it's that this guy is easy to pursue. A lot of spammers are based in unfriendly countries and are very difficult to sue. This guy is easy to sue.

      The basic theory here is to pick the low hanging fruit, and hopefully the others will back down out of fear. Not likely to happen that way, but that's the idea.

    2. Re:New business? by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 3, Interesting

      RIAA has similar strategy.

    3. Re:New business? by whiteknight31 · · Score: 2, Informative

      What they could mean is 9,000 different peices of spam. Like 1 million that is selling Vi@agra and a half a million selling get rich quick scepems, ect. Just an idea.

    4. Re:New business? by spood · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you had RTFA, you would realize that the 9000 were collected by Hotmail's "spam traps", created for the sole purpose of collecting spam. Further, these 9000 were all part of the same campaign with fraudulent headers. The 9000 represent only a fraction of e-mail sent to Hotmail addresses as part of the campaign, but since the spam trap addresses could never have legitimately opted in, they are the smoking gun in the lawsuit against 'Snotty'.

      --
      ---- Just another spud server.
  6. Profile?? by nycsubway · · Score: 2, Funny

    He'll be about an eight inch tall, squashed under my shoe if I ever meet him.

  7. OptInRealBig's policy by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The policy from the guy's spam business site:

    It prohibits:

    "Unsolicited promotions, advertising or solicitations (commonly referred to as "spam"), including, without limitation, commercial advertising and informational announcements, except to those who have explicitly requested such e-mails."

    Hmmmm.....

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  8. Fatal allergies? by The+I+Shing · · Score: 4, Funny

    By any chance, does that article mention anything that he's fatally allergic to, say, something that could be purchased in bulk from a supermarket?

    Just wondering.

    --
    You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
    1. Re:Fatal allergies? by Brian+Boitano · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hear he's fatally allergic to those lead pills... you know, the ones that come in 7.62mm pacets?

      --
      What would Brian Boitano do?
  9. Booo! ... oh wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    He's a spammer! Burn him!

    Oh wait, he's spamming Microsoft Hotmail accounts? Oh hey man welcome back to the community!

  10. He's #4 by rossz · · Score: 5, Informative

    Spamhaus.org rates him as the nation's (world's?) #4 spammer.

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
    1. Re:He's #4 by kevcol · · Score: 2, Funny

      Then perhaps he should respond to some of those emails that promise he will "get bigger".

  11. Tired of the "fastest growing" statistic by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 4, Insightful
    If I got one hit on my website last month, and got fifty this month, I'd have, statistically, the fastest growing web site in the world.

    You see this in business news all the time. Brand X is the fastest growing company blah blah. Well, yeah. It's easy to see big growth numbers when you have three employees.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  12. Never fails to amaze.... by Epyn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am amazed that you can run an entire business of sending out emails that no one reads. I understand tha overhead = negligable thing, but still...How can he afford the trained monkies to write these things.

    1. Re:Never fails to amaze.... by Grrr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ... sending out emails that no one reads.

      Obviously false. That's the carrot at the end of the stick.

      <grrr>

    2. Re:Never fails to amaze.... by whiteknight31 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since if one idiot in 100,000 clicks on it he makes money.....

    3. Re:Never fails to amaze.... by sqlrob · · Score: 2, Informative

      You added a few zeros
      $12,500, but the same principle still applies - "free" money is still free money

      And Richter is making money by mailing for others as much (or more than) anything he owns. If nobody buys, you still make money on what you charged the customer to send 'em out.

    4. Re:Never fails to amaze.... by VX1984rr3 · · Score: 2

      People do read them... Microsoft and New York believe that $40M will bankrupt him... so that means someone is paying him big bucks to send the spam, and those people are getting results.

    5. Re:Never fails to amaze.... by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      the problem is that there's people out there who buy this stuff.. just read the bit about the iraq playing cards.

      his a classic example of an oppurtunist that just doesn't care, just as long as he makes money. had he been from a different neighbourhood he would be pimpin or selling crack. " At 32, Richter's already spent nearly two decades chasing the Next Big Thing -- and finding it, the past few years, in cyberspace."

      "The Pentagon had developed the cards as an intelligence tool, to be distributed to the troops. Richter saw them as the war souvenir the public had been waiting for. Within hours, his company was shooting out e-mails advertising the cards for sale -- more than 15 million e-mails, in fact. Richter moved 40,000 decks of the cards in a week, buying them for 89 cents each and selling them for $5.95. Yet at the time he started the blitz, he didn't have a single deck in stock. Nobody did.". find a product that's cool for stupid people and sell it through a medium that reaches the stupid people - kaching!

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  13. Will this last very long? by Srividya · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I am surprised that mass emailing is still profitable in America, with its restrictive new laws against spam. From India, cheaper connection costs and abundant IT expertise, in addition to laws which allow complete freedom of email, would seem to make India the much better choice for mass emailing business. How long till competition puts Mr. Richter out of business?

    1. Re:Will this last very long? by pyros · · Score: 5, Informative
      I am surprised that mass emailing is still profitable in America, with its restrictive new laws against spam.

      Your misconception is that the new federal law (which replaces all state laws, some of which had real teeth to them) is restrictive. The irony in the law being named CANSPAM, and it really is named CANSPAM, is not to be understated here. The law says that UCE must be labeled as such, but leaves it up to the sender to define how it is labeled.

  14. The best part is... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny


    ...that you'll die sooner or later, and then you won't get any more spam.

    Unless of course there's life after death, in which case you'll probably get spamned for all eternity.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  15. His policy is Rule #1 compliant. by Dimensio · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Rule #1: Spammers lie.

  16. Just Curious by Poligraf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is it possible to "SPAM back" someone by the means of /. effect?

    Imagine a couple hundred thousand /.-ers sending angry mail to some sites/accounts each day ...

    One thing though is to somehow avoid showing your own address in order not to get into SPAMmers databases.

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
    1. Re:Just Curious by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Is it possible to "SPAM back" someone by the means of /. effect?

      I suppose you'd also favor chopping off someone's hand when they steal something?

      An eye for an eye is not sound policy. We've got various laws against using your computer to create a nuisance for others, and they apply to us all, not just to spammers. I don't think I'd cry if any or all of the top ten spammers happened to be hit by a truck, but that doesn't mean I condone intentionally running them down.

      This guy is finally getting at least some of what he deserves, which is a trial potentially followed by punishment under the law. If you can contribute evidence to support the charges against him, or bring new charges, then go for it. Otherwise, leave it be.

    2. Re:Just Curious by Cyno01 · · Score: 2
      I suppose you'd also favor chopping off someone's hand when they steal something?
      No, but i wouldn't be opposed to a public flogging of a criminal in liu of jail time, certanly less costly for the american tax payer and more of a deterrent for crime. I think the 8th amendment needs some rework.
      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  17. This guy sounds like a real prize by LochNess · · Score: 5, Informative
    From the article:
    "And Richter now finds himself in a media spotlight at a time when he's coming off probation from a felony conviction arising from a fencing investigation two years ago -- a subject he's not at all eager to talk about.".
    1. Re:This guy sounds like a real prize by The+I+Shing · · Score: 2, Informative

      And here's a link to a newspaper article about Mr. Richter's other felonious activities:

      at the Rocky Mountain News

      If he didn't have so much money from spamming he'd probably be on his way to the big house right now.

      --
      You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
  18. Free Advertising by Squeebee · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sadly, all we are doing is giving this guy free advertising. Even bas publicity is good publicity. On a different note, a lot of these guys are not ashamed of what they do. I met one once at an Open Source conference and when you ask him what he does he very plainly states "I'm a spammer". The guy was a total pariah.

    1. Re:Free Advertising by djh101010 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I met one once at an Open Source conference and when you ask him what he does he very plainly states "I'm a spammer".

      I am a fairly mellow person, but boy, if I ran into one of these guys, I'd have a hard time not just taking a (physical) jab at them. I'm very sure I wouldn't (be able to | want to) stop myself from giving a very blunt verbal response.

      Long ago, there was a cracker in Milwaukee (early 1980's) who made it to the cover of Time Magazine. I ran into him a few years later, and the only question I could come up with was "Why aren't you in jail?"

      He wasn't amused. Onlookers were. I think that means I won that interaction, right?

  19. surprise by fuentes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "OptInRealBig sends out between 50 million and 250 million e-mails a day, generating close to $2 million a month in revenues."

    And people wonder why spammers do what they do. There are $2m worth of idiots connected to the internet.

    1. Re:surprise by dzym · · Score: 4, Funny

      Idiots are worth $2 apiece? :)

  20. I can't believe I am saying this.... by Rydian · · Score: 5, Funny

    Woohoo! Go Microsoft!

    I hope you win this one.

    --
    chown -R us. /base
  21. Who gave 'em that figure? by Dimensio · · Score: 2, Interesting

    $2mil/month? Riiiight. Someone should let the IRS know, as I highly suspect that they've not heard anything about this $2mil/month revenue.

  22. RealBigBaldSpot by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny

    For all his success, why doesn't he sport a William Shatner(tm) Rug on that shiny dome?

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  23. YahooMail, too by cethiesus · · Score: 2, Informative

    I get about 30 messages a day from this guy's "Allied Marketing Promotions Inc." on my Yahoo account. They usually arrive in chunks of 5-10 messages at a time, all peddling different "products", mostly the same spam fare such as mortgages and pills of one sort or another. It started about two weeks ago but Yahoo's spam filter still hasn't caught on...

    Definitely someone with an aluminum bat deficiency.

    --


    "Ford," he said, "you're turning into a penguin. Stop it."
    1. Re:YahooMail, too by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 2, Informative

      THOSE bastards????

      Well, thanks to his spamming operation suddenly bombarding me with piles of messages at my work address, I've gone to the effort of completely firewalling his netblock from my mailservers. Along with several other spamhaus-listed netblocks. So, to all of you OTHER spammers who can no longer get to the servers at work, you can blame "Allied Marketing Promotions" for getting you cut off completely.

      It was odd, over the last weekend I suddenly started getting about 20 "Allied Marketing Promotions" emails every day, and it annoyed me enough to just cut them off completely. (Having gone through the trouble of configuring my home server to use the Spamhaus blocklist, it already rejects them, thankfully.

  24. "The Internet Is Not Free" by the_mad_poster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Says asshat: What people don't understand is that the Internet isn't free.

    GOD I FUCKING HATE THESE PEOPLE!

    Since when does this dickhead own the Internet? Since when is it "not free" as in "you owe me money"?

    ARGH! I not only support the death penalty for these asshats, I think they need to deport this guy's goddamn family to central Cambodia.

    The absolute contempt that these people have for all other living beings outside their small inner circles is so mind-numbingly infuriating that I can't even come up with a suitable rant against this guy. The absolute level of FURY that these moronic losers can invoke through their childish, imbecilic, self-centered "give it all to me" outlooks on life could never BEGIN to compare to the narcissism displayed by everyone in Hollywood COMBINED. NEVER HAVE I SO DESIRED TO POP SOMEONE'S HEAD LIKE AN OVERINFLATED BALLOON!

    --
    Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    1. Re:"The Internet Is Not Free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      C'mon, man. Don't hold back. Tell us how you really feel.

    2. Re:"The Internet Is Not Free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      There needs to be a new moderation:

      "fucking pissed off, but right."

    3. Re:"The Internet Is Not Free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I think they need to deport this guy's goddamn family to central Cambodia."

      Hey I live in central Cambodia, you asshat.

    4. Re:"The Internet Is Not Free" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      H3b@l pr0z@k can help you with your rage problem.

    5. Re:"The Internet Is Not Free" by NineNine · · Score: 4, Funny

      Have you thought about maybe getting a hobby... like heavy drug use?

    6. Re:"The Internet Is Not Free" by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 3, Insightful
      What people don't understand is that the Internet isn't free. I make my money by signing you up at my Web site, getting your information, and using that information to figure out what you like.

      I quite agree. When I hear this type of confused smokescreen argument I think of everyone's favorite litigious bastards, the SCO Group. No such thing as a free lunch, so pay me right now.

      The argument is weak, and not very well thought out. The assertion he's making is that my e-mail can't be free because there's no such thing as a free lunch. But my e-mail is already non-free. I see ads when I check it. I pay something like $17 a year for POP3 access. In short, his crap e-mail doesn't justify my mailbox's existence. There is already an economic model behind it before a single spam lands in it.

      There is a special place in hell for people like Scott Richter, and we owe a lot of thanks to to the folks from Redmond and New York who are helping to escort him there.

  25. Jail... by Dieppe · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It's clear from the article that this joker should be in Prison for theft, and other crimes...

    But according to him he's raking in the big bucks! He used to be fat, but now he's 240lbs! Hey, I wonder if he has a large penis now as well?

    Point is, the article failed to mention the fact that he is still stealing resources from other ISP machines. While he claims that the Internet isn't free, and he's one of those good "internet marketer bulk emailers" and that all 40 million email addresses were opt-in, and that he's not one of those scummy "hard core spammers" and he honors all remove requests...

    Spammers ALWAYS LIE!

    He and Darl should get together sometime...

    ----

    I know, this is probably redundant and has probably already been said... but I do hate when thieveses like this joker just keep getting away with spamming.... so the question is asked. Who is giving him the money to continue his "business" and how can we (or anyone) stop it?

  26. I love these guys. by amarodeeps · · Score: 5, Interesting
    "I'm not going to argue that there isn't one person in forty million who didn't subscribe," Richter says. "But we document where the addresses come from, and when people complain, we remove them from our list. What people don't understand is that the Internet isn't free. I make my money by signing you up at my Web site, getting your information, and using that information to figure out what you like."

    Here we see a prime example of self-delusion and self-righteousness substituting for morality. Right, the Internet isn't free. But I didn't realize that I was paying Scott Richter to get online--I thought I was paying Verizon for DSL service.

    It is entertaining to see how much these people hate Steve Linford though.

    It's really simple folks: if what you are doing is legit, why do you have to forge your headers? Why do you have to hide behind false email addresses? If it is legit, why do you have such a hard time getting legitimate ISPs to sell you bandwidth? Figure it out.

  27. Contact Info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    From a PDF of the lawsuit:

    OptInRealBig, LLC is a limited liability corporation, with its principal place of business at 1333 W 120th Ave, Suite 101 Westminster, CO 80234.

    Wonder if he is getting enough mail at is office? I would expect that a few additional catalogs would do alot to spruce up the place.

    1. Re:Contact Info by darksoulz · · Score: 5, Informative

      Dont forget his home address. Being a resident of the Denver area, I've been tempted to drive by and let him know exactly what I think of his "marketing".

    2. Re:Contact Info by Chris+Brewer · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      Consultancy: If you're not part of the solution, there's money to be made in prolonging the problem
  28. spamming != marketing by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How the hell can you call spamming "online marketing". Although I'm, a techie, I have respect for skilled marketeers, analyzing markets and fitting producsts to customers.. Spammers just dump their shit indiscriminately. It's like calling the burger flipper at McDonalds a chef!

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  29. Another article on Snotty. by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Talbott: 'Spam king' didn't opt for this call

    Having been steadily bombarded with e-mail come-ons for "Vi@gra," breast enlargements and the secret to "ALL NIGHT sex," an average recipient would no doubt like to tell a spam king to back off.

    So when Scott Richter's phone number landed on my desk, I called. And, lo, he answered. I asked him if he'd mind my printing his number in the newspaper.

    His colorful response suggested that he wouldn't like it. On the other hand, millions of us don't particularly like being spammed. To print or not to print his number. That is the conundrum. [snip!]

    (And, yes, he did print the business phnoe number.)
    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  30. more information by cluge · · Score: 5, Informative
    This article misses a few key points that are summed up nicely here (requires a click to accept policy and then REFOLLOW the link) The SpamHaus information includes not only a brief description of his transgressions, but addresses from his domain registry etc. The one thing to remember about this person is that he has been dilligently obeying the first rule of spammers for years.

    Rule 1: Spammers lie Take a look at a few of his quotes here

    The article about him from the BBC is what scares me. "We are very excited [about the new CAN-SPAM law]," said Scott Richter, the president of OptInRealBig, an e-mail marketing firm in Westminster, Colo. "All of our clients had been worried about the California law. In the last two hours we have been booking a lot of orders for January."
    This guy is the kind of guy that would piss in your pool. Now that he's got the internet, he gets to piss on millions of people at a time.

    AngryPeopleRule

    --
    "Science is about ego as much as it is about discovery and truth " - I said it, so sue me.
  31. Look at any major spammer's past... by IANAAC · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They all have been in some sort of legal trouble.
    And it usually involves extortion, scam or theft. I wish the media would concentrate more on their criminal past. Maybe then people would get a clue and not do any business with them.

  32. getting worse by tloh · · Score: 2, Informative

    On a related note, I've noticed the spam filters of my yahoo account has consistantly failed in recent days to block stuff from one or two specific spamers. I think we're beginning to see the wide-spread deployment of those new ani-filtering techniques some have talked about. These annoying idiots are clogging up my mailbox to the point where I need to empty it out myself once or twice a day such that legitimate mail don't get bounced back.

    --
    Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    1. Re:getting worse by Steve+B · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I think we're beginning to see the wide-spread deployment of those new ani-filtering techniques some have talked about.

      What we need is a prosecutor looking to make a name for himself who is willing to do the homework to apply the existing anti-cracking laws (what is filter evasion, if not an attempt to circumvent computer security for the purpose of gaining prohibited access to other people's computer?)

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
  33. PHONE NUMBER!! SPAM TIME!! :D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I don't know his email address, but his PHONE NUMBER is

    (303) 464-8164

    N'joy!!

    ps- Don't forget to ask if his penis is larger!!

    1. Re:PHONE NUMBER!! SPAM TIME!! :D by Zone-MR · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Can someone please verify this?

      For all I know Mr. AC could have posted his 'friends' phone number, got modded up as informative, and exploited the slashdot crowd to arrange a personal vendetta against some random bloke.

    2. Re:PHONE NUMBER!! SPAM TIME!! :D by Coward,+Anonymous · · Score: 4, Informative

      Can someone please verify this?

      Verification

    3. Re:PHONE NUMBER!! SPAM TIME!! :D by GordoSlasher · · Score: 2, Informative

      A local newspaper reporter actually spoke with Richter and revealed two phone numbers: the one listed above, and another unpublished number he used to speak with him. Quite a potty-mouth Mr. Richter has. Here's the article.

  34. Slashdot Interview? by GeorgeH · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How about a Slashdot Interview with this guy (or another spammer)? I think it would be really interesting to see what (civilized) questions we could ask him and what his answers would be. He says that he puts himself in front of the media so it shouldn't be too hard to get in touch with him.

    How about it editors? (I tried suggesting an interview with a spammer before, but since I didn't have a name or contact information the editors didn't want to hear it. I wonder why I should do their job for them when they're the ones getting paid...)

    --
    Why can't I moderate something "Wrong" or at least "Grossly Misinformed"?
  35. The best line in the article is the last... by Frennzy · · Score: 5, Funny

    The sign on the window next to the entrance of OptInRealBig's offices in Westminster leaves no room for misunderstanding. Or irony.

    NO SOLICITING.

  36. Bizarre Quote from article by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 3, Interesting
    spamlord says: "What people don't understand is that the Internet isn't free".

    Thats right. Thanks to the spamlords its a cost-center for most firms transmitting and receiving this junk instead of a profit center.

  37. Judginging from your average spammer by Greyfox · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd say work. And raid roach spray.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  38. Size M@tters by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny
    He'll be about an eight inch tall, squashed under my shoe if I ever meet him.

    Yeah, but then he'll just take some herbal vi@gra and grow back to 6'1", because everyone knows it makes pricks get bigger.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  39. Bushy by pjh3000 · · Score: 2, Funny

    What I've always wondered is if the President gets spam, and if so, does he buy the penis enlargers (or did capturing Saddam do the trick). I'm sure the spammers would know.

    .

  40. Just out of interest by PatrickThomson · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have the international phone number for them right here, I'm in the UK and I just wasted 5 seconds of thier time going "um" and apologising. Perhaps someone with a stronger constitution can take out +1 303 464 8164

    Official source for this number, from the optinbig website.

    --
    I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
  41. Wrong. by schon · · Score: 5, Informative

    A lot of spammers are based in unfriendly countries and are very difficult to sue.

    Not true. The vast majority of spammers are based in the US.

  42. Re:How can I OptOutRealBig?? (nm) by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 2, Funny
    How can I OptOutRealBig??
    Remove your (cable)modem, mailbox, fax and telephone and burn them in your back yard.
  43. My favorite by jeffkjo1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My favorite quote from the article:

    "We made nothing," Richter recalls. "I thought all you had to do was put up a Web site and you'd be a millionaire. I didn't understand the Internet."
    Richter, on his first attempt at online marketing.

    He just summed up the entire tech bubble.

  44. 500,000 UNIQUE IMPRESSIONS! GUARANTEED! by hendridm · · Score: 2

    I'm guessing he doesn't get paid by the click. Companies probably come to him with mass-mailings they would like distributed. He charges his fee to distribute them. When the company realizes those mass mailings resulted in ZERO new business, they move on to another strategy. Next in line is another company who wants to do the same thing and make the same mistake. It's an industry of lies and one-time customers, me thinks.

    1. Re:500,000 UNIQUE IMPRESSIONS! GUARANTEED! by zelphior · · Score: 3, Funny

      The problem is that there is not ZERO new business. He sent out 15 million emails advertising Iraqi most wanted playing cards, and generated 40,000 orders. That's a sucess rate of around .26%. This may be low, but it is something, with a profit of $151,800. So next time he sends out the email to 60 million people, hoping to generate 120,000 responses. At $5.06 profit per order, that would generate him $607,200. And that was just over the course of a week. With really small return rates, the spammer's goal is to send out the message to more and more people. So until the percentage of people responding to spam reaches zero, there will always be people willing to invest in it. And the amount of spam will increase as it nears the end, rather than a slow decline, as spammers desperately try to keep up profits by spamming more and more people to get the diminishing returns on their marketing.

      I imagine them like loyd in Dumb and Dummer "What are the odds of me and you getting together?"
      "One in a million"
      "So you're saying there's a chance!"

      (sorry if I butchered the quote, it's been a few years since I saw the movie)

      --
      If you can read this then I forgot to check "Post Anonymously"
  45. Re:Fatal allergies? How about water? by Isochrome · · Score: 2, Funny

    Most people have a fatal reaction to water, taken in large enough doses.

    You can buy various brands. I like San Pellorino.

  46. Opt in? by RT+Alec · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I once complained to "dotregistrar.com" about one of their clients. I used their web form to file the complaint, since they do not have any operational phone numbers. An e-mail address is required, so I used "alec@dotregistrar.mydoman.com" (I have configured my mail server to allow me to create these types of addresses on-the-fly). I never heard back from them, but to date I have recieved over 100 spam to that very same address!

    Their AUP does state:

    DotRegistrar may disclose any Required Information, specified in paragraph 10, above, to third parties or to the public at large, for any purpose and at its discretion.
    There is no information about data collected as part of a complaint, so I guess I was supposed to assume that. Any other dotregistrar stories? Did I "opt-in"?
  47. Proof that spam works (sadly enough) by Nept · · Score: 4, Informative

    Read the article. Case in point was Iraq trading cards. He sent out 15 million emails, received 40,000 purchases. That's 1:375. Better than I would have thought. That's also $5.06 profit per transaction, which means he grossed $202,400, and I'll bet his net take wasn't much lower than the gross (what's the overhead for a spammer? Virtually nil, I would imagine.)

    --
    "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
    1. Re:Proof that spam works (sadly enough) by jfengel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know about the overhead, but I'm sure it's bigger than zero. Fifteen million emails at (say) 1K apiece (probably an overestimate, but it's a rough order of magnitude) is fifteen gigabytes.

      If you want to get that out in any sort of reasonable order, you're going to require a T1, at $1K per month. It's probably more than that; he probably requires a T3, for more money. Plus a bunch of servers and a small team of MSCEs to maintain them.

      Plus his own marketing department to find people willing to hire him to spam, and a sales department to actually fulfill all of those 40,000 transactions. And an office to put them in, and so on.

      Rough guess, it takes him $10K per month to stay in business. Now, that's still trivial compared to a $200K profit, but it's not "virtually nil". And I'd bet I'm low by as much as an order of magnitude; businesses have a way of being more expensive than you expect.

      The next trick is to raise his rents, as it were. Hit him with a fine when he sends illegal spam (as opposed to the legal stuff under the MAY SPAM law). Make service providers drop him for fear of being sued. And if he steps a toe out of line (like being behind MyDoom), send him to jail for a trillion years.

    2. Re:Proof that spam works (sadly enough) by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yeah, but the Iraq trading cards is the only non-dodgy thing ever advertised by spam. Compared to fake drugs, fake degrees and genital enhancers. The sort of things that wouldn't even get advertised on QVC.

      Heck, I wanted to buy a deck! I just didn't (even from a web search) because I thought if that sort of things was advertised by spam it must be a con of some sort. So the spammer polluted the idea of me buying it from other companies on the web.

  48. they are fast-growing - just like cancer by rbird76 · · Score: 2

    The problem is the association of "fast-growing" with "good". Yes, cancers that are fast-growing could be considered successful, but I don't think one would call them good. They are parasitic, and aggressively self-centered, to the point of destroying the organism within which they reside...just like spammers. "Fast-growing" isn't good if by doing so you kill what you rely on - it is unsustainable and can only end badly.

    Of course, this is a spammer here - he has operated in the criminal realm, taking what he did not earn and contributing nothing, kind of like a lamprey (and about as slimy). Forethought isn't a useful concept - in his mind, there will always be one more victim, one more fish to suck the life from. As long as he doesn't need to work, or create value, he's at home. If we're fortunate, that home will be a prison in NY, making license plates.

  49. OK by throbbingbrain.com · · Score: 3, Interesting


    You can usually reverse-resolve a phone number through google like this.

    ...or at least narrow it down to a location.

    1. Re:OK by gid13 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Following the daily camera link on that search yields an article that claims Mr. Richter himself answered this number: (303) 550-9828

      (article is at this URL):
      http://www.dailycamera.com/bdc/opinion_colu mnists/ article/0,1713,BDC_2490_2615380,00.html

  50. Obligatory bash.org quote... by Zone-MR · · Score: 4, Funny

    In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penisses, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship.

  51. I've blocked several hundred domains by KalvinB · · Score: 2, Insightful

    in my Mecury Mail rule file.

    That doesn't block the senders e-mail address but rather the links that spammers use. Spammers use countless IPs and countless forged e-mail addresses to send spams that all point to the same domain so it's a highly effective means to block large amounts of spam. You also can't obfuscate a link thanks to HTML standards. And since only spammers use those domains there's 0% collateral damage. Unless someone is foolish enough to buy one of the blocked domains that doesn't intend to use it for spam.

    The other benefit is that a new IP is free from the ISP or from that open proxy. Domains cost money. By filtering out those domains I've basically cost spammers a thousand bucks or so because all those domains are now useless to advertise to my e-mail accounts. The more domains they buy to try to spam me with the more money they waste.

    I also have a simple catch-all written in VB to bait spam with on my home connection which saves me money on bandwidth since I can preemptively filter domains on my real server.

    Ben

  52. Watch Scott the Spammer in action.. by Dynamoo · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Here's a very recent thread at Abestweb where Richter tries to con some affiliates into signing up to his program. It all starts to unravel when they begin to pick him apart. Look out for the Ukranian connection.

    Oh just for fun, one of Richter's outfits is CPAempire. Check out the parody site at SPAMempire. ;)

    --
    Never email donotemail@WeAreSpammers.com
  53. Article Text - What a Bastard by dave1212 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Article Text:

    From westword.com
    Originally published by Westword Jan 29, 2004
    (C)2004 New Times, Inc. All rights reserved.

    Mr. Spam Man
    Microsoft wants to shut him down. New York's attorney general wants to see him in court. But Scott Richter keeps thinking big.
    BY ALAN PRENDERGAST

    John Johnston

    Scott Richter

    Stephen Chernin/Getty Images

    Talking trash: Microsoft attorney Brad Smith (left) watches as New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer vows to delete Scott Richter's profits.

    Source: Brightmail Logistics and Operations Center

    FWD: SCOTT, DON'T SUFFER BETWEEN PAYCHECKS! THINK BIG!

    In Scott Richter's world, size matters.

    Richter knows that Americans like things big. Bigger penis, bigger breasts. Big savings. Big chance to win big. Think big about the bigness people crave, and big profits could be yours.

    Richter is a big fellow himself, 240 pounds or so packed on a 6' 1" frame. He used to be bigger, before he got into big-time weight loss. But these days, it's his business that'sreally big. His e-mail marketing company, OptInRealBig, controls a host of like-minded domain names, including SaveRealBig, RealBigCash, RealGreatGifts, RealBigHosting andLesbiansSizzle.com (lesbians, God knows, are big). At 32, Richter's already spent nearly two decades chasing the Next Big Thing -- and finding it, the past few years, in cyberspace.

    Last April, as American forces marched into Baghdad, Brigadier General Vincent Brooks showed a group of reporters a mock-up of playing cards featuring the faces of Iraqi leaders sought for questioning. Right away, Richter knew this was going to be big, big, big.

    The Pentagon had developed the cards as an intelligence tool, to be distributed to the troops. Richter saw them as the war souvenir the public had been waiting for. Within hours, his company was shooting out e-mails advertising the cards for sale -- more than 15 million e-mails, in fact. Richter moved 40,000 decks of the cards in a week, buying them for 89 cents each and selling them for $5.95. Yet at the time he started the blitz, he didn't have a single deck in stock. Nobody did.

    "We sold them before we ever owned them," he recalls. "Wal-Mart would've taken three weeks to get them in. We knew we could find them, so we went to work."

    Richter tells the story while bottle-feeding one of his five-month-old twin sons in the kitchen of his Westminster home. It's a clean, spacious, well-lit place, with a portrait of Marilyn Monroe in the foyer, three Rhodesian Ridgebacks cavorting on the back deck, and hockey trophies and a pair of giant flat-screen monitors towering over the desk in the den. It's the kind of house you'd expect a young, sober, hard-driving entrepreneur to inhabit with his young, budding family. It's also totally at odds with Richter's reputation among his enemies on the Internet, who regard him as one of the most notorious and "morally challenged" spammers in the world.

    If you have an e-mail account and have ever been careless about the kind of information you scatter about while surfing the Web, chances are good that you've received mail from Richter. OptInRealBig boasts of having a list of 45 million e-mail addresses at its disposal, many with additional demographic or consumer-preference information. The company also e-mails to millions of other addresses provided by clients, who use Richter's services to hawk everything from diet pills and porn sites to vacation packages and Christmas toys. OptInRealBig sends out between 50 million and 250 million e-mails a day, generating close to $2 million a month in revenues.

    According to the Spamhaus Project, a British-based organization dedicated to combating the expanding swamp of unsolicited e-mail, Richter's operation ranks as the third-largest source of spam on the Internet. "OptInRealBig.com and Richter's many aliases are 'block-on-sight' domains for most of the Internet's mail systems," states the group's profile of Richter. "Due to his

  54. he costs me money by mabu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am now getting somewhere in the area of 40,000 spams a day to one of my servers. This system handles e-commerce for a number of small and medium-sized companies. The volume of junk e-mail has gotten so out of hand that it's bogging down my mail processes sending/receiving clients order acknowledgements and critical communication.

    More than 80% of the mail my system handles is totally unsolicited. In fact, a substantive portion of it is random names @ random domains - there's no way it was ever solicited or welcome!

    Now I have to build an entirely new server because F'ing assholes like this guy waste my resources and I have to handle his shit or else I'll lose my legitimate business. To say I'm furious is an understatement to the Nth degree. Any money this asshole makes is at the expense of thousands of ISPs who have to spend money and time on bandwidth and system resources. THIS GUY NEEDS TO BE IN JAIL!!!

  55. Energy Source by pipingguy · · Score: 2, Funny

    One of the (non-computer) engineering types on my mailing list sent this in:

    SPAM as an energy source? Somebody hasn't thought this one out - Spam takes some amount of energy to create, so the reaction is basically endothermic. But, on the receiving end, we all know that it frequently takes considerable time and energy (expressable as watts) to get rid of it. So, at that point, it is again endothermic. So, this is following the rules of thermo, there is an unavoidable energy loss in the process. If we want to quantify the power input of a PC, divided by the amount of spam generated per unit time, we could get the energy input (input of energy in terms of creativity and potential information is taken as approaching zero). And on the output end, while it may cause increase in blood pressure and temperature, at best it is a catalyst, contributing nothing to the reaction.

    Conclusion, spam is adding to the entropy of the universe - WE HAVE FOUND ANOTHER SOURCE OF GLOBAL WARMING!

  56. While I understand your frustration with spammers by Kjella · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In fact, the death penalty should be modified for spammers to make sure it's slow and painful. A literal death by a thousand needle pricks might be very appropriate to the crime. Just pinch them once for every spam they sent.

    ...and I'm also sure that's why you're at +5, I'd like to hear your opinion on how someone raping, torturing and finally killing a child should be punished. Or Osama Bin Laden for that matter. Because then you either have some really morbid ideas, or you believe that sending a bunch of 0s and 1s over an Internet connection is the worst crime a human can commit.

    A single spammer would be a slight annoyance. A million spammers is a disaster. But let's take another of Slashdot's favorite subjects, mp3 trading. A single mp3 pirate would be a slight annoyance. A million pirates is a disaster. By the same logic that lets you judge spammers by the total damage caused by spam, the RIAA should also be allowed to judge pirates by the total damage caused by piracy. Wouldn't surprise me if they went for the death penalty too.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  57. Re:While I understand your frustration with spamme by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Insightful
    By the same logic that lets you judge spammers by the total damage caused by spam, the RIAA should also be allowed to judge pirates by the total damage caused by piracy.

    No, because as has been documented (including this FA) only a small number of Americans are responsible for most of the spam. With file trading, there are millions of us^H^H them, so dividing the damage by the number of perps does not lead to death penalties in this case.

  58. Re:While I understand your frustration with spamme by Moraelin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Kjella, those 1's and 0's are only as good or bad as they're used for. E.g., posting pics of child rape is also just 1's and 0's, but somehow that doesn't make it as harmless as hosting a human rights site.

    E.g., if you're into splitting things into bits and then debating those bits, a landmine is just nitrogen, oxygen, iron, carbon, and some other equally harmless elements. Nothing you wouldn't find in soil naturally, you know. So, by that kind of warped logic, surely noone should be punished for placing a few of them on a playground. Right?

    E.g., a bullet is only lead and a copper jacket. You probably get the analogy with "it's only 1's and 0's" by now.

    Basically what I'm saying is: it's safe to get off that high horse now ;)

    It's not the 1's and 0's we're debating, it's the way they're used.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  59. My long-standing spam theory by forkboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Instead of suing the customers, sue the guys who PAY the spammers to spam. Very few of these spamemrs are selling their own products...they're usually guns-for-hire for some website that wants to promote its product or service. So arrest the bastards.

    It's against the law to hire someone to conduct an illegal activity in yout stead, you're generally charged with the same crime that person commits. (i.e. hiring a hitman gets you a nice fat murder trial) So...since states are making spamming illegal, by that logic, hiring a spammer is also illegal. This also opens up foreign website owners who employ spammers to extradition from friendly countries.

    --
    This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.