Slashdot Mirror


Rochester Signs Napster Deal, Hosts P2P Panel

extra88 writes "Following in Penn State's footsteps, the University of Rochester has struck a deal to provide access to Napster's premium service for dormitory residents. From the press release: 'In addition, Napster and the University's prestigious Eastman School of Music will be developing ways in which Napster can begin to provide original content from Eastman students and faculty to service members across the entire Napster network.' What does this mean? Perhaps not coincidentally, the university is also hosting a panel discussion about P2P file sharing on Feb. 16. Cary Sherman from the RIAA, university administrators and others will be on the panel and there is to be a live audio stream of the event."

123 comments

  1. uh by SirSlud · · Score: 4, Insightful

    and tuitions are rising because what? its too expensive for students to buy music in the regular market so now its just included as a tax in their tuition???

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
    1. Re:uh by jangell · · Score: 1

      The music services that charge per song are never going to take off. Users simply do not want to pay $1 for every song they download. This is for several reasons.

      First off, You are downloading a digital file, It's not the same as going to the store and purchasing a CD in a case and getting something physical out of it.

      Any person would much rather go to the store, probably get a better price, and get a hard copy of it. Not some proprietary music format that you'll loose the next week because your sibling installed some virus from MSN Messenger.

      These services are just a way for teh RIAA to distract people. They know it won't take off, and so does everyone.

    2. Re:uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, raising tuition again, no raises for any workers, student or otherwise, cutting back on health care, everyone needs to make concessions, unions are going to have to accept re-negotiated contracts for less than was promised. Even after all the cost cutting there's still going to be a need to raise tuition to make up for the budget shortfall. But we're all sacrificing in these lean times and we'll get through it to see better days for our school. Meanwhile gotta increase spending on landscaping, install several new shrubbaries, maybe build a new football stadium, and the dean gets to live in a mansion for free and earns $300K plus... while the rest of us are sacrificing [btw, I don't go to any of the schools mentioned in this article].

      Sure I'll go in debt for a degree that won't get me hired. Fuck it. Friendly fascism. They can lead me along with a vice grip around my balls for the rest of my life. It's not like I ever had a choice, or freedom, or opportunity to be anything. As I was growing up I worked fast food and other shit jobs, and funny thing, there were people who earned their degrees working along next to me.

      Born poor, always poor. You can be anything you imagine is such a lie. If you're not a happy slave there's plenty of drugs we can prescribe that will make you happy, or otherwise indifferent. You're just another commodity, to be used, exploited and thrown away. Like anyone gives a fuck about you. Give me your money or get the fuck out of here. Culture is so important so got to feed that machine as well. People can keep debating. Whoopie. I suspect that for any meaningful change it will be necessary to use violence as a catalyst.

      Peace out y'all!

    3. Re:uh by danila · · Score: 1

      They are experimenting. If students do not like the service, this will be cancelled. You can't find out what is good without risking mistakes.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    4. Re:uh by ncr53c8xx · · Score: 1
      its too expensive for students to buy music in the regular market so now its just included as a tax in their tuition???

      The music industry is very good at taxing the citizens. They have taxes on blank CDs, hard drives (in Canada and Europe), and now in Internet streaming. I would suggest that people boycott solely on this tactic. This is should've been dealt with under the RICO statutes. Not to mention all the extra stuff you have to pay for in the electronics and computer goods you buy (DRM chips, signal degradation (Macrovision) etc.)

    5. Re:uh by tunah · · Score: 1
      The music services that charge per song are never going to take off.


      Um, I think you missed the boat on that one - iTunes has sold more than 30 million songs.

      --
      Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
    6. Re:uh by JustinMWard · · Score: 1

      Here's the problem, from the perspective of a recent UR graduate:

      College students are cheap. They are going to download free music off the net one way or another. For better or worse, it's been a fact since the day mp3 and broadband both became available. ftp, irc, usenet, napster, it doesn't matter.

      BUT.. The university will say "use this! it's free!" and the students will, instead of using Kazaa or DC or whatever else. New students come in every year and don't know square 1 about computers, but they see the kid down the hall get free music off Kazaa, and they learn. Except now, the university is going to mention napster, and they will use it, ignorant of the other choices.

      In other words, this service is about to gain market share against all the other P2P apps, in almost exactly the same way IE beat out Netscape. Of course in this case, it means trading an illegal and often spyware- and virus-ridden platform for a legal, responsible, and monitored platform.

      I still think this is a bad thing. The University should not be spending the money on this (believe me, I was there for four years, they have plenty of better things on which to spend money), and the students honestly don't care if it's legal. They never have and probably never will. They will, however, use it, simply because it's there.

    7. Re:uh by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

      >> The University should not be spending the
      >> money on this

      Have you looked at the big picture? Napster servers for these schools are located on campus and owned by Napster. When accessing the Napster service, students are not pulling songs over the net, they're pulling them from a local server saving oodles of bandwidth.

    8. Re:uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, I noticed that they are working on getting content from the students and faculty at the Eastman School of Music online. I suspect that was a major factor motivating this agreement. There's some great talent over there, and this is a way to bring their msuci to a wider audience.

    9. Re:uh by JustinMWard · · Score: 1

      The school has two T1 lines. They've had two T1 lines for ages, and haven't ever even thought about getting a third. The second isn't even turned on, it's just there for backup. That means that they aren't going to turn it off, either.

      500,000 songs, 4MB a song, that's... 2TB of storage? Are you sure that they're kept on a local server? I admit I haven't done my homework on this, but that sounds a little ridiculous to me.

      Not to mention the fact that newly released (or licensed) songs will have to be downloaded onto the Napster server. If it's effectively just a caching server, great. If it keeps a full catalog locally, well, that's a lot of music being downloaded that nobody will probably ever listen to. starting at 500,000 songs, with 3,700 students who have incredibly large overlap in their tastes. Think about it.

    10. Re:uh by CuriHP · · Score: 1

      Just two T1s. Wow. RIT is right next door and has orders of magnitude more bandwidth than that. Granted it's also a much larger school.

      --
      If it's not on fire, it's a software problem.
    11. Re:uh by MrDingusMcGee · · Score: 1

      The school has two T1 lines. They've had two T1 lines for ages, and haven't ever even thought about getting a third.

      Last I heard, UR has 2 oc-3 connections now and the backup line is a t3 that isn't on normally. So,that opens things up a bit for this whole idea of the Napster servers being on-site and downloading new content (maybe at like 6-8am when the fewest students are using their computers?). If there are 10 albums added every week, 15 songs per album, 4MB per song, that's still only 600MB/wk.

      I agree that UR can afford to spend money on much better things than this, but you know how the Satanic President Jackson likes to blow money on stupid shit.

      my $.02,
      "Evil Justin"
      --
      My Sig is Sauer.
    12. Re:uh by FlipmodePlaya · · Score: 1

      The Rochester Institute of TECHNOLOGY uses more bandwith than a, mainly, medical and engineering school? You don't say... I don't know how accurate the original figures were, but it wouldn't surprise me that RIT uses allot more bandwith than the U of R.

    13. Re:uh by Alinabi · · Score: 1

      They are free to experiment as much as they like, as long as they don't pass the cost of these experiments on to the students' parents, by raising the tuition fees. I am not too pleased with the idea of coughing up extra dough so that my son's roommate can download some crap he calls music.

      --
      "You can't allow somebody to commit the crime before you detain them." [Condoleezza Rice]
    14. Re:uh by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

      >> 500,000 songs, 4MB a song, that's... 2TB of
      >> storage? Are you sure that they're kept on a
      >> local server? I

      2TB isn't a huge number anymore for a server, my home gaming machine has 1TB. Remember these are the servers previously owned by MP3.com

      Regardless of how many T1 lines, the school also likely pays for traffic on those lines, additionl traffic = additional bandwidth costs.

      Also PenState has their own server on campus, for those users at the school they can connect to Napster and do a netstat/a to see the following connection:

      dloadx.napster.psu.edu

      Downloading from Napster doesn't count against the students internet bandwidth for this reason. This is a good thing since they get a measely 1.5gb a week.

    15. Re:uh by kevco46 · · Score: 1
      I'm a current student at the UR so I get first hand experience with this service. Or at least I would if I owned a PC. The software only works on a PC and not on my Mac. And since I graduate next May, I won't be around if they decide to support Mac users. So I get the joy of a tuition hike without any of the benefits of this hike! I love paying money for nothing.

      I like the idea of letting people from Eastman share their music, I would just like to be able to use a service that I am paying for.

    16. Re:uh by CuriHP · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Sigh, if only it was used for something useful. ITS claims that something ike 60-70% of traffic is just stupid P2P stuff.

      --
      If it's not on fire, it's a software problem.
  2. Political and practical... by Space+cowboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I suppose it makes sense for a school of music to embrace Napster, it's not as though they'll have nothing to offer. Presumably they're paying Napster here though, so perhaps they intend to make some of the money back via their "developed services".

    I reckon this is probably a move on two fronts though - first it prevents the College being sued because it's officially above-board. Second, it establishes the college as a "happening" place - it's not just teaching string quartet music, it's working with new media in new ways. All very attractive to potential students...

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Political and practical... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh...Napster sure as hell isn't "happening"

      Lame, desperate, ..., definitely not "happening"

    2. Re:Political and practical... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I suppose it makes sense for a school of music to embrace Napster, it's not as though they'll have nothing to offer."

      I disagree. I don't think the average student at schools that specializes in music would have any interest in the offerings of the majority of the download services (I'm a musician). These students aren't that interested in mainstream music. I certainly don't want my tuition going up because of services like this which offer nothing of interest to me. I'm attending school to receive an education, not to download music.

  3. A Hope Beyond a Hope by Fallout2man · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I seriously hope someone at this panel makes the RIAA look like the fools they are. Suing their user-base, charging ridiculous prices, forcing draconian DRM (in non US countries) on people, and stiffing the artist.

    And yet they wonder why they have such a piracy epidemic on their hands? Someone really needs to say/do something at the event to make a spectacle of the RIAA and how ridiculous what they're saying and doing is.

    1. Re:A Hope Beyond a Hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Piracy is a rather harsh word don't you think?

      Perhaps we should use the word "samizdat" to refer to unauthorized copying?

    2. Re:A Hope Beyond a Hope by Fallout2man · · Score: 1

      Probably, but I like going "D'yaaaaarrrr!" :p

    3. Re:A Hope Beyond a Hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you so much for spelling "ridiculous" correctly.

  4. Cool by macshune · · Score: 4, Funny

    So now they can get legit music if they can't find what they want on kazaa?:) It must be nice to get something with the ~$700/month dorm fees other than closet-sized room and a lumpy mattress.

    1. Re:Cool by cgranade · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, now even us nerds can get screwed!
      (Sorry for the tasteless joke, but c'mon... it was too good!)

      --

      #define DRM chmod 000

  5. RIAA by Dak_x · · Score: 1

    I think people will be willing to pay a resonable price for there music. Does this mean the RIAA is finally starting to get the message? Hopefully the future of technology and file swaping will bring us a future of direct music distribution without the RIAA... Heres hoping..

  6. Doesn't mean it's the most popular. by Basehart · · Score: 1

    I hear Penn State students are using iTunes predominantly, which makes sense seeing as it works with the iPod.

    1. Re:Doesn't mean it's the most popular. by cgranade · · Score: 1

      That makes RIAA twice as happy. They get paid for unused Napster accounts, and get paid for iTunes songs! What a deal. Way to stick it to The Man, eh?

      --

      #define DRM chmod 000

    2. Re:Doesn't mean it's the most popular. by jeffehobbs · · Score: 1


      iTunes 4 LAN music sharing ability basically puts all local music in one pot, for listening if not burning... and it's free. Apparently this feature is extremely popular on college campuses right now.

      Ah, I wish I was still in college, as I'd love to been able to peruse my classmate's music libraries. At the very least it would have made it way easier to differentiate between the cute girls, and the cute girls with really good taste in music.

      ~jeff

    3. Re:Doesn't mean it's the most popular. by hytmal · · Score: 1

      i currently go to penn state, and, though many people do use iTunes, less and less have been using it as of late, as evidenced by the number of shared libraries in iTunes. I believe this is due to the fact that napster provides free streaming music, which can only be listened at your computer. otherwise songs are $.99 per download (in .WMA format! YUCK!).

      Also, as a mac user on campus, i am still technically paying for the use of napster, despite the fact that i have no way of using it at all. This topic really angered a lot of my instructors last semester, particularly in the comp sci department, as we just got a new building. However there is no longer enough in the technology budget to stock all of the new computer labs in this building.

      This caused the school to beg microsoft for a donation, which means that it looks like we wont be using SunBlades in any of our new computer labs. I've got to be honest -- one of the big reasons i chose penn state is because they werent using windows machines in the intro programming classes, but now that is changing, even contrary to many professors desires.

      i hope i dont have to transfer to CMU -- cause im a poor college student!

      -- hytmal

    4. Re:Doesn't mean it's the most popular. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah hytmal. Right on.

  7. I wonder by Raul654 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    there is to be a live audio stream of the event

    You think they'll have to pay CARP?

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
    1. Re:I wonder by frs_rbl · · Score: 1

      ...there is to be a live audio stream of the event...

      You think they'll have to pay CARP?

      They should, at least the Business Establishment fee. It would be legally interesting if they didn't...

      --
      This is not my opinion. Actually, it's not even an opinion. And I'm nowhere to be seen near it
  8. uneccessary by facts · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's a shame that an educational institution has to make a deal with a corporation to sate the appetitie of the RIAA's lawyers. I'm guessing the cost of this will eventually be passed onto students if they approve the service. Why don't they just pay for all you can watch movies too?

    1. Re:uneccessary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should be the same price for either music-only or for music+movies.

      This is because the limit of music you can listen per day + movies you can watch per day is still 24h (and not 24h+24h = 48h, I hope they realize that).

  9. What does Napster have to do with P2P? by hanssprudel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why do people keep thinking that the new Napster has something to do with P2P?

    Yes, I know the answer: "Because that is what the DRM peddlers wanted them to think, which is why they bought the trademark. But at universities and especially here on Slashdot I think we can expect a little more.

    What the schools are doing when they sign deals with the new Napster is to drive their students into the acceptance of proprietary, Windows only, closed, locked, DMCA protected file formats that you better not even think about trying to port to your operating system of choice. What they are doing is welcoming into their campuses the future where the devices we use to communicate are not tools tools for freedom, but chains designed to control us. It is the equivalent of putting out a press release that all the dorms have now installed the new "Trusted door" technology, which will only let students out of their dorms when they have a valid reason to do it (I mean, you can't trust students - we know that - so why not have trusted doors instead???)

    Stop lauding this. Stop cheering it on. Fight it at every turn. Do not sign up. Do not give them your money. Shout as loudly as you can, at anyone involved, that you will start spending money on music again when it is sold to you, rather then given in some fucked up form of leasing where you own the computer, the law prevents you from figuring out how it works.

    Linux is dead in the DRM future. The open web is dead in the DRM future. Everything this site celebrates has no chance of survival when the Internet has become a centralized entity of information control. We have to draw the line HERE because we are the only ones who can. Every time we mention these serives in a positive light we are sowing the seeds of our destruction.

    I'll stop now. ARGGG.

    1. Re:What does Napster have to do with P2P? by ncr53c8xx · · Score: 1
      Do not give them your money.

      The fee will be added to your tuition. You don't really get a say in this.

      Linux is dead in the DRM future. The open web is dead in the DRM future.

      I don't think anyone would notice. If you see what people really want, you will undertand why a $40 billion dollar industry controls a $400 billion one.

    2. Re:What does Napster have to do with P2P? by imadork · · Score: 1
      It is the equivalent of putting out a press release that all the dorms have now installed the new "Trusted door" technology, which will only let students out of their dorms when they have a valid reason to do it (I mean, you can't trust students - we know that - so why not have trusted doors instead???)

      The parents who actually pay the tuition bills might think that Trusted Door Technology is a great idea: it guarantees that their child isn't getting into trouble, with no interacton on their part. (doesn't it? that's what the nice man at the school told me!)

      Yeah, I'm being sarcastic (a little) but there is a point buried in there. The Open Web is dead not because of DRM, but because the more powerful interests want it dead. They could care less about what we think, and anything that increases their profits and their control over us with less actual interaction with us is OK.

    3. Re:What does Napster have to do with P2P? by extra88 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      What does Napster have to do with P2P?

      Duh. It, like iTunes, BuyMusic, etc., is a legal service which is trying to supplant the illegal distribution of music via P2P protocols. It, like iTunes, BuyMusic, etc., does not use P2P protocols in its service. We all know this, you are not +1 Informative.

      I don't see anyone here "lauding" or "cheering this on." I certainly don't think these Napster deals at universities are a good idea.

    4. Re:What does Napster have to do with P2P? by hanssprudel · · Score: 1

      I don't see anyone here "lauding" or "cheering this on." I certainly don't think these Napster deals at universities are a good idea.

      If you haven't seen anybody here lauding and cheering on iTMS you have not been reading a lot comments.

    5. Re:What does Napster have to do with P2P? by extra88 · · Score: 1

      The article is about Napster, your own post is about Napster. You must have been wearing your tin foil hat when you wrote "this" and "it" but expected people to read your mind to know you were referring to all forms of DRM'd music.

  10. p2p "show will suck" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet all that is talked about is how evil Kazzzzza is and not about the cool things getting done like.... Waste, and the network changes to the org. GNUtella. Gnutella as a network protocal rocks now. The changes made allow scale vary well.

  11. Didn't think they beat us... by Xuranova · · Score: 2, Informative

    I attend, Rochester Institute of Tech(RIT), which happens to be 10-15 mins from U of R, and our faculty has just been "discussing" the idea of dealing with Napster. I didn't think U of R would come out of nowhere and beat us to the punch like that. First they cap our bandwidth, then we get upstaged by some liberal school to the west! :(

    --
    "There is no real right or wrong, just what the majority accepts at the time."
    1. Re:Didn't think they beat us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't feel too bad, they cap our upload bandwith to something ridiculous like 10 KB/s here at UR. At least your network is still useful.

    2. Re:Didn't think they beat us... by ovapositor · · Score: 1

      I went to Rochester. It is certianly not liberal in comarison to places like Emory. I agree that RIT is more blue collar and down to earth.

    3. Re:Didn't think they beat us... by extra88 · · Score: 2

      No they don't. I believe they do throttle uploads from P2P apps like Kazaa (which is an appropriate response to out-of-control bandwidth use) but they don't do it across the board. If you can't get better than 10KB/s ftp-ing a file to your mail account, complain to ResNet because they're something wrong with your connection.

    4. Re:Didn't think they beat us... by extra88 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Provost of the university has gotten involved at the national level in disussions of peer-to-peer file sharing. This draws attention from companies like Napster and indicates he's interested hearing about their service.

      Don't worry, UofR still doesn't have email aliases (the address you get is the address you get), single sign-on (like RIT's DCE), or university web servers that are actually useful to students doing anything beyond static HTML.

    5. Re:Didn't think they beat us... by CowboyMeal · · Score: 1

      um... when did they start capping our bandwidth? Last year, the outbound internet1 was constantly saturated (by about 10 students running FTP servers or whatever), so it may have seemed capped, but it wasn't technically. I could also download from RIT at 300K/sec from my cable modem in buffalo last year (probably more a limitation of the cable than RIT). If that's capped, then I'll take capped any day.

      (and technically, UofR is to the northeast)

      --
      Your credit card information wants to be free.
    6. Re:Didn't think they beat us... by LogicX · · Score: 1

      Yes. They Do -- 256Kbit/sec Internet1 Outgoing Cap.
      <a href="http://www.rit.edu/network/rrd/pub/inet.html ">Network Graphs</a> -- WTF, they just changed from MRTG to RRD-- like this week?

      --
      May this post be indexed by spiders, and archived for all to see as my Internet epitaph.
    7. Re:Didn't think they beat us... by LogicX · · Score: 1

      They bandwidth cap was tested Summer 2003, and put into full-effect fall-2003. 256Kbit/sec Internet1 Outgoing Cap.

      Network Graphs -- WTF, they just changed from MRTG to RRD-- like this week?

      --
      May this post be indexed by spiders, and archived for all to see as my Internet epitaph.
    8. Re:Didn't think they beat us... by mtnharo · · Score: 1
      UR did start capping uploads across the board, except for a few specific things. You can connect to internal campus services just fine, but any connection to something outside of campus is limited to 10KB/s unless the source of the connection is one of the UR servers.

      Case in point, when I was home on break, I would ssh into my machine to use it instead of the 6 year old win98 machine my parents have. If I connected directly to my machine, the connection was capped. If I first connected to either the mail or web servers, then forwarded the connection to my machine, I had all the bandwidth I could ask for.

      --UR student, currently on leave.

    9. Re:Didn't think they beat us... by technothrasher · · Score: 1
      Don't worry, UofR still doesn't have email aliases (the address you get is the address you get), single sign-on (like RIT's DCE), or university web servers that are actually useful to students doing anything beyond static HTML.


      Back in the early 90's when I attended UR, one of the nice things was that they had a very good computing resource/student ratio. They didn't have the best or most equipment, but I pretty quickly got access to pretty much anything and everything I wanted. Email aliases or anything else was not a problem, I had root access on a good number of the machines on the network.

      Maybe that's all changed now...

    10. Re:Didn't think they beat us... by Ex+Machina · · Score: 1

      You seem misinformed. The web servers have php.

    11. Re:Didn't think they beat us... by Ex+Machina · · Score: 1

      We also have actual females.

    12. Re:Didn't think they beat us... by extra88 · · Score: 1

      The AC claimed the cap was at UR, they weren't talking about RIT. I'm not sure how those graphs are supposed to prove your point anyway :)

      It looks like I was wrong anyway, sorry AC. Gee, silly me for thinking such a thing would be documented somewhere! I still haven't found any mention of rate limiting but I did find an article the campus newspaper from August 2003 saying there was a per-student/per-week outbound cap.

      ResNet limits student use of uploading bandwidth (reg. required)

      "ResNet is setting its per-week limit at 12 outbound gigabytes per student per week, which is comparable to about 17 CDs and three to four DVDs."

      Frankly, that's a lot of bandwidth and seems pretty resonable for a residential network. And that's just uploads, there's not cap on downloads, according to the article. But across-the-board rate limiting, especially as little as 10KB/sec, sucks. I experienced problems with something like this at my wife's college. I was trying to setup an rsync backup script to backup her laptop to my home computer and the transfers were crawling. After a lot of messing around with other things, I determined it was something the college was doing on their ResNet. Basicaly we hat do wait until she came home to do the initial sync then the nightly runs could complete because it just wasn't that much data.

    13. Re:Didn't think they beat us... by extra88 · · Score: 1

      Email aliases or anything else was not a problem, I had root access on a good number of the machines on the network.

      Maybe you're the reason the Unix group is so paranooid ;)

    14. Re:Didn't think they beat us... by extra88 · · Score: 1

      www.rochester.edu has PHP, mail.rochester.edu, the only university server students have accounts on, doesn't. At RIT, students have their home directories on www.rit.edu where they can use SSL, use their own CGIs, in addition to PHP. I'm not really a web guy so I don't know what else is there but it's pretty useful. I suppose the UR answer would be "use CIF," I don't know what it's like being on their server.

    15. Re:Didn't think they beat us... by technothrasher · · Score: 1
      Maybe you're the reason the Unix group is so paranooid ;)

      :-)

      That's the first move I made. I cozied up to the Unix group, and eventually became the student TA. It was definately a very different group back then though. But then again, the whole Internet was different back in those days. I remember lobbying them to switch Uhura to use to DNS instead of /etc/hosts.

    16. Re:Didn't think they beat us... by extra88 · · Score: 1

      I'll take your word for it because I'm not going to go over to a dorm with a laptop to try it out. It sure would be nice if these kinds of things were documented somewhere. I found out about the per-week cap from the Campus Times, it sure wasn't on a university site!

    17. Re:Didn't think they beat us... by technothrasher · · Score: 1
      I suppose the UR answer would be "use CIF".

      Well you can probably blame me for that. Back in '92 or so, the UCC (they're called something else now, ACS maybe?) were starting to lock down what users could do on the main campus servers. Since I was the CIF SysAdmin at the time, I worked a deal to get them to give us their just decommissioned Sun 3/260 in exchange for setting up accounts for the general student population to 'fool around' outside of their servers. They accepted, and after that point when anybody wanted to do something funky, they'd say "Use CIF".

    18. Re:Didn't think they beat us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm... I was the lead student consultant at Taylor in the early 90's.

      -Bruce
      bsaunder at hotmail.com (I get enough spam there already)

    19. Re:Didn't think they beat us... by BigDish · · Score: 1

      Cap it 512 Kbit/sec, not 256Kbit/sec

  12. Won't make a dent in Kazaa Usage by use_compress · · Score: 4, Informative

    On napster, you can only get semi commerical/commercial music. The average college student demands far more for a file sharing service. With high speed access, the tempation is still there to download movies/software/porn which can't be done on Napster. While the students are downloading movies/software/porn, what would stop them from picking up a few tunes along the way?

    1. Re:Won't make a dent in Kazaa Usage by LogicX · · Score: 1

      Hah -- UofR students don't use Kazaa --
      No Need -- they just friggin' leech at 100MB/sec all day long ;)

      --
      May this post be indexed by spiders, and archived for all to see as my Internet epitaph.
    2. Re:Won't make a dent in Kazaa Usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As Rob Limo once said after an "e-commerce" roundtable session, we can always go back to downloading from BBS's.

  13. Still $0.99 a Song for Them by the1brian · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Permanent downloads--to burn to CDs or transfer to any of 60 portable music devices--can be purchased for 99 cents each or $9.95 for an album."

    They will get access to the Streams (whoop dee doo), which are the equivalent of radio, or shoutcast. It does also say though that they can download locally an unlimitted amount of songs though, so maybe they just can't burn or transfer them, but there are ways around that.

    --

    ~Brian
    1. Re:Still $0.99 a Song for Them by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

      >>download locally an unlimitted amount of songs
      >>though, so maybe they just can't burn or
      >>transfer them, but there are ways around that.

      Correct, they can download an unlimited number of tracks but can't burn or transfer those tracks, these are identical to the songs that are paid for in terms of quality because they are the same files.

    2. Re:Still $0.99 a Song for Them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Napster radio feature is not like normal radio or shoutcast. When you select a radio station it puts a bunch of songs in your playlist. You can then just let them all play or you can pick and choose what you want to listen to.

      In addition to streaming much of their music library you can also download the songs locally so you can play them while offline. Another advantage to this is the downloaded version is usually higher quality but I have rarely noticed the difference.

      It's a fun service if you can afford it and like the music they offer.

  14. What's the deal with Napster? by kramer2718 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What kind of DRM do they employ?

    I ask for personally selfish reasons. I'm a graduate student at U of R (not Eastman). I don't live in the dorms, but I do have friends who do.

    I'm happy that I'll probably see benefit from this, but I'm not sure it's a good expenditure of University funds.

    On the other hand, it is a good idea for a community to pull together and bargain collectively with the music industry. That's really the only way to reach a reasonably fair deal.

    1. Re:What's the deal with Napster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft DRM

    2. Re:What's the deal with Napster? by kramer2718 · · Score: 1

      So how does it work? What does it allow you to do? Has it been cracked?

    3. Re:What's the deal with Napster? by senatorpjt · · Score: 1

      I'm going to graduate school at UR next semester. I had been using RIAA radar to make sure I wasn't giving the RIAA any money, but I guess that's pretty much pointless now, isn't it.

      Honestly, i'm pretty offended by having to pay for this. Same as having to pay for Windows and Office because my college had a site license. They don't give away free textbooks, and textbooks can cost as much or more than those, so let the people who want this crap pay for it.

      At least Windows/Office can be construed to have some academic purpose.

    4. Re:What's the deal with Napster? by mtnharo · · Score: 1

      So far it's only a trial run. They were debating about what service to try, even had machines in the big lab in the library with iTunes, Napster, Rhapsody etc installed so students could test them out. Supopsedly, they were going to pick one and offer some sort of free trial to the students, then if it caught on, the students would have to pay. Since it's a subscription charge for the basic service, I assume it's going to be thrown in with the ResLife charges, which sucks for anyone who doesn't want to use it. I have a feeling no one is going to drop P2P or Windows File Sharing over the network unless the ITS people actively start blocking that stuff.

  15. Meanwhile at Yale,... by nil5 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Skull & Bones members with insider connections to the RIAA have received copies of every commercial CD for Yale students at no charge.

    I smell a big fat commie-err-Yalie plot.

  16. What it means? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 3, Funny
    What it means? Well, I have two perspectives. First, there is the perspective that this shows how online music stores are growing rapidly in acceptance, when even universities are ready to sign up.

    The second perspective is that Napster 2 doesn't have anywhere near the negotiationing clout of Apple. I wonder how limited the song base is and whether or not the labels get control over what tracks are on Napster 2, because I'm SURE they weren't able to negotiate themselves out of that one. Is this simply labels gaining more control over what people listen to?

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  17. :-P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how much they'll charge to listen to the stream.

    1. Re::-P by Soskywalkr · · Score: 1

      PSU: Listening to streams are free - there is a server at PSU run by Napster to make them clearer. Downloading to computer also free. burning file to CD $0.99 per track or $9.95 per CD. Songs worth downloading? zero. http://napster.psu.edu (outside accessible?)

  18. It would benefit the students if... by jonatanw · · Score: 3, Interesting
    • Napster wasn't dead and noone uses it
    • It was free
    • You could download copyrighted material (as you can with all other p2p networks - would the students care about anything else than the latest R&B albums or the latest action movie?)
    Spreading your own works (music for instance) is a good thing to do over filesharing networks if someone downloads it.. However I assume that mp3.com (if it still existed) or similar would be a far better place as in the file sharing networks there is such a massive load of stuff available that you have to search specific things which i seldom beleive will be nothing but specific titles of copyrighted albums, movies, games etc.

    Anyone have experience with this? Is spreading your own unique creations really worth it over p2p networks? I would doubt that it is, but again, I wouldn't know..
    1. Re:It would benefit the students if... by OldSchoolNapster · · Score: 1

      I assume that mp3.com (if it still existed) or similar would be a far better place as in the file sharing networks there is such a massive load of stuff available that you have to search specific things which i seldom beleive will be nothing but specific titles of copyrighted albums, movies, games etc.

      One technique which I used to get alot of music was to search for for songs that I liked and browse the libraries of users that had it. As a result I downloaded alot of music I had never heard of and which may not have even been copyrighted. This was a fairly common practice on Napster, and many people would even go so far as to send you a message thanking you for sharing a good library. This was of course before the RIAA made such libraries too dangerous to be practical (at least in countries run by corporations, not people). Nowadays I don't even use a screename on fileshareing services and I only share my most recently downloaded files in the hopes of being less conspicuous. Its a shame that p2p has devolved into a mess of mislabeled files, RIAA pollution, and corporate intimidation.

  19. one-sided panel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Students will have an opportunity to... be kindly scolded about their habits and University administrators can rest easy knowing they have met the RIAA's educational propaganda needs.

    This is no panel... it's a sermon led by the RIAA.

    Where is the counter-part panel participant from the EFF or even Peter Gabriel or one of the many artists who want to bring money back to the artists instead of most of it going to the cartel?

  20. PSU Napster by Soskywalkr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So yeah. I'm a PSU student. They've just installed firewalls everywhere on campus to block out everything, but internet, napster, im.

    No IM file transfers. No incoming ssh connections. No Network games. No Kazaa. etc.

    PSU signed a deal with napster because one of the board members is on the RIAA commision. There is also some administrative link to Napster.

    The big problem is that what they've put in place basically says "We don't trust you. At all."

    We've had bandwidth restrictions for two years (1.5G up/ 1.5G down)

    1. Re:PSU Napster by finkployd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So yeah. I'm a PSU student. They've just installed firewalls everywhere on campus to block out everything, but internet, napster, im.

      Nope, just dorms. Still sucks I agree, but let's be factual.

      Also technically it blocks everything but port 80 and 443. Guess which ports Napster uses?

      PSU signed a deal with napster because one of the board members is on the RIAA commision. There is also some administrative link to Napster.

      You are refering to Berry Robinson, who is on PSU's Board of Trustees and is the Senior Counsel for the RIAA.

      Finkployd

    2. Re:PSU Napster by St.+Alfonso · · Score: 1
      Let's see, Penn State is a publicly funded University, UR I'm not sure but they probably take state tax dollars as well ... I wonder how the taxpayers of Pennsylvania and NY feel about subsidizing the RIAA, not to mention the cronyism angle.

      Are your parents or anyone you know alums? Write a nasty letter the next time they come asking for donations, explaining that you don't appreciate taxation w/o representation. Sometimes stepping on their air hose has a way of getting peoples attention.

    3. Re:PSU Napster by finkployd · · Score: 1

      All of the information about this PSU/Napster deal has been stating that it is completly funded by the student technology fee (a $160/semester fee). Now you can make the arguement that money would be spend from that fee is now (possibly) being spend by taxpayer money, but technically tax dollars are not going to Napster

      Also, PSU is a Land Grant institution, and state appropriation are much lower for us than actual State Schools.

      Finkployd

    4. Re:PSU Napster by Soskywalkr · · Score: 1

      From : Students will receive this service for free as part of their overall information technology-related services that are partially funded by the University's Information Technology fee. There will be no increase in the fee as a result of this service.

  21. Interesting Business Model by osewa77 · · Score: 1

    Since we all connect to the net through our ISPs what if music producers cooperated with Internet Access Providers to make music available inexpensively? What if free music download (a la Napster) was bundled into internet access fees? Such scale would allow the fees per user to be reduced even further. Cheap(er) music download is a worthy goal since nothing is really free.

    1. Re:Interesting Business Model by Newspimp · · Score: 1

      Problem with that, is that, I don't download music. I don't. I hardly listen to music, and when I do, provided I consider the album to be worthy of the heavily overinflated price the media companies want, so as to keep them in new Lear Jets yearly, then I buy it. I buy DVDs, if I consider what the DVD has to be worthy of the price.

      I don't download illegal music (not anymore; and not for legal reasons. Most music out there is pretty crappy now). Since I don't download music, I sure as hell don't think I should have to pay an additional fee so that I can *listen* to a bunch of crusty songs, with the occasional decent one, without the capability of listening to said song in the manner in which I choose. Now, if they offered the capability to burn CDs or backups without charge, then it wouldn't be a bad deal.

      But in no way related to charges or fees should a service be "opt-out". If the students want the service, on an individual basis, the university should set up a way to provide the students with legal access at a discounted rate. That way, the university absolves liability by providing the availability of legal services, and the students get to choose whether or not that service is worth their and their parent's hard earned money.

      And I'll be damned if I'm going to pay a "tax" on my internet service because Joe Bob Dumbass wants to feel good about downloading. He wants to feel "good" let him pay.

    2. Re:Interesting Business Model by osewa77 · · Score: 1

      A lot of business is based on the the understanding that not all users will make use of all the services provided all the time. But if its freely available you would find yourself downloading music too, once in a while. Most important thing is that the average cost is reduced because of the scale.

  22. Re:sometimes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just a thought, it was. thanks for the current 93 tip - i'll check them out. kind of like Einsturzende Neubauten maybe?

  23. Rental Music is lame by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

    This is a stupid idea. The university is going to pay for music to be streamed from Napster, but students won't be able to download, burn, or transfer this music. They're still going to rip it off.

    Moreover, giving students access to high quality streams of full songs is really really dumb. Come on, have we already forgotten our older bootlegging methods? If it makes noise, it can be recorded. One can either run a line out to a tape deck or find something like Audio Hijack to record system audio to the harddisk.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  24. ECN problems by evanbd · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's annoying. Apparently you can't access their web site with ECN turned on. In case it's causing problems for anyone else who turned on ECN in their kernel config, you can turn it off with 'echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn'. And yes, that does mean they are violating RFC 793. Anyway, if you're getting a connection refused error, and are using ECN, that's probably why. You can, as always, send complaints to webmaster@rochester.edu.

  25. Re:Meanwhile, at $ELITIST_COLLEGE by edgedmurasame · · Score: 1

    Well, it's not the first time for such to happen. Look at it, Orkut, a similar venture by another Ivy League college.
    Not something I'd want to associate myself with, given the prophecy of doom another one of these ventures
    shows with their photo of them "Leading the Way to Darwin". Fine, I'll be glad to welcome their demise...

    --
    "Forget the engineers." -Carly Fiorina, briber of MIT Technology Review.
  26. Re:sometimes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    current 93 is sorta like dark poetic folk music. i love it...soft black stars, is mostly just piano and lyrics. it's so simple, but captures me like so little music i've ever listened to. on the subject of poetic music, the legendary pink dots are also an all time favorite of mine. edward ka-spel is a great story teller. music that takes you to many strange and distant places. i've been listening to them for at least 12 years and i'll probably never get sick of it.

  27. Differs, but probably streaming only by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I believe in real life Napster offers a combination of most songs you can download and play on one computer, plus a portable - however they also offer streamed songs, and probably for the school to reduce costs I am imagining they are going to provide streaming service only so the students can't burn CD's.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Differs, but probably streaming only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a bunch fucking idiots.

      Time for them to get a fucking clue and go with the only service and player anyone cares about - iTunes and iPods.

      What a stupid waste of time.

  28. If you've got the Hammer, throw it already... by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    After reading the news release for this part of the discussion :

    If this didnt get a bit closer to advocating a police state under the rules of the RIAA as far as they care, then this
    is at least in my opinion quite fitting for the definition of a police state. You have the encouragment of turning people in,
    the monitoring of clear and non traffic for more than just the average security/quality/maintenance problems most universities
    have/had, and you're also a private university. The only shining points are with the initial funding of this, but if this sticks,
    the students not stuck with it are going to look elsewhere to colleges where they can concentrate on their studies
    of their choice versus RIAA indoctrination.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  29. Actually, Cary.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... is just in town to see his kid, Peter. They are going to go sing awful Kareoke at the Blue Room together.

    (and I'm not making it up, either)

  30. tuition by Phyz · · Score: 2, Informative

    for those curious as to how bloodthirsty UR really is, tuition this year was on the order of ~24,000 ,which is higher than Harvard (Harvard students pay higher room and board). I live off campus, but getting that "we have to raise tuition by x% this year to better serve you" letter just pisses me off. How about they use some of their $1x10^9 endowment and drop tuition next year? How's that for a novel idea?

    1. Re:tuition by 0xfc · · Score: 1

      They wont my friend. A business is a business. And modern universities are just a business whose main goal is to make money, keep the status quo around, and make sure the top employees get a fat retirement check. Please forgive me professors, who actually are there to teach AND learn.

  31. Ummmm... by qtp · · Score: 1

    Yup.

    It seems that there a lot of unelected people out there who have decided that they will decide who we will be giving our money to. Buy a PC, some of your money will go to Microsoft, attend a uni, some of that will go to the RIAA members.

    --
    Read, L
  32. DC Hub by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    U of R has a DC Hub. All the Internet 2 universities in the area use it. Its student run. I doubt any of the students are going to start using crapster 2.0 instead of DC++. If by some strange circumstance they manage to shut it down, RIT will just start another one.

  33. And afterward... by unix+guy · · Score: 1

    "and there is to be a live audio stream of the event."

    And the MP3 will be on Kazaa about 20 minutes after the event.

    --
    "Straddling the sword of technology..."
  34. Why didn't they tell me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a student of the Eastman School of Music, I'm hearing about this for the first time on Slashdot. ON SLASHDOT!!!!! Why did the school not bother to tell me? Are they going to sell my music without compensating me? Is this coming out of my tuition, even though I don't live in the dorm? Why is no one from Eastman on the panel? These and many other questions have been submitted to Mr. Undercofler (our dean) in an email. I hope the school has some answers. If they do, I'll try to post them so maybe the students who read slashdot will at least know what's going on.

    Oh and BTW, I work in the Technology and Music Production department, and our director also just found out about this today. Apparently, if this hadn't leaked to the media, we still wouldn't know.

    1. Re:Why didn't they tell me? by extra88 · · Score: 1

      I think it's good to ask Mr. Undercofler these questions because so far the information about "original content" has been extremely vague. You probably haven't signed a release which would allow the commercial distribution (which is what a deal with Napster would be) of any performance or composition by you so I doubt it's going to "just happen."

      The panel is about P2P file sharing and was scheduled before the Napster deal was made (or finalized at least). While having someone from Eastman on the panel might make sense they do have someone from the Yellowjackets to represent the "creatives." The Yellowjackets press and sell CDs which probably makes the topic more relevant to them than to most Eastman students (that's not meant as a value judgement at all).

      This wasn't leaked, the link is to a press release from the UofR and Roxio (owns Napster). It's also the top story in the current issue of the Campus Times. Previous issues of the Campus Times have had stories about the university investigating making this kind of deal (the Napster service part, not the "original content" part). You may find this Q&A page informative.

      At this point they're not specifically making the Napster service a part of tuition so in a sense, you may be paying for it. Of course the release says they plan on making the service available to non-dorm residents too. The university has a lot of revenue beyond tuition or room & board. They're also doing this deal to reduce the amount of bandwidth used, thus saving money. I doubt the money saved on bandwidth will cover the cost of the Napster deal but if a significant number of students stop using other means of getting music and switch to Napster, it'll make a real difference.

  35. Amen,,Brother!! by danknight · · Score: 1

    I wonder if there is a way for students to 'exempt' from paying the portion of thier tuition that goes to Napster. Like opting out of PRIG ?

    --
    wanted: one clever sig,apply within