Slashdot Mirror


Heise Online Reveals Trojan / Spam Connection

yourruinreverse writes "Virus distributors have been caught red-handed selling IP addresses of trojan-infected machines by editors of the German IT magazine c't. Several individuals appear to have been arrested already after c't, revealing one of the virus writer's nationality as British, passed on the information to Scotland Yard. Check out the German article first, then its translation on Groklaw and maybe also same translation posted in the English section of the Heise website (in order of appearance)."

43 of 150 comments (clear)

  1. The future of law enforcement? by bc90021 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "With the help of c't, a student of computer science has tracked down the authors of a computer virus. The editorial staff were able to establish contact with the virus distributors and buy IP addresses of infected machines. Because one of the virus distributors has been located in Great Britain, c't has passed on all information to Scotland Yard. By now, individuals in several countries have been arrested."

    The Slashdot heading leaves out that it was a College Student who did this primarily. Will this continue to be a pattern in the future? I sure hope so, as law enforcement is typically behind the times, and overworked as it is. This way, order is still maintained without vigilante justice, since those in the know involved proper law enforcment.

    1. Re:The future of law enforcement? by null_session · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Will this continue to be a pattern in the future? I sure hope so

      I don't know that I wouild count on that. There are lots of CS students with lots of time on their hands. Some trade music files, some write virii, and some track down the people doing the first two (and ocassionally someone writes an OS). Anyone with adiquate knowlege and time can do any of the above, their choice is up to them.

      What choice will you make?

    2. Re:The future of law enforcement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
      What's wrong with vigilante justice? Care to give examples?

      In the US vigilante justice has a history that is associated with racism. Lynchings of whites by whites in the south, Bernie Goetz shooting black kids who tried to rob him, Chinese curfew laws in the west being enforced by white mobs, and so on.

      Vigilante justice is anti-democratic, it puts an unpopular minority at the mercy of the majority.

      I'm sure the cultural cultists protesting gay marriage in California would love to string up some of those lawbreaking fags getting married right now.

    3. Re:The future of law enforcement? by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I did not read the article online, but assume it is the same as was in the copy of C't which I read this morning.

      This is not really 'vigilante justice', especially in the racist sense which some ACs below saw there. It was someone who was affected (if only when cleaning up someone else's computer) and took the trouble to see what the trojan could do and where it came from. He then went to the only organisation he could think of (C't) which was technically able to understand the problem and had the legal knowledge necessary.

      Interesting was that companies like Symantec had also done the analytical work on the trojan(s) (and had posted the results) but had no interest in treating this problem at source (the ISS team). They make their money protecting computers from threats and not attacking those threats at source.

      What is going to happen to ISS now?

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    4. Re:The future of law enforcement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The post was in response to a question of what is wrong with vigilante action, as opposed to what the action taken by C't. Reporting someone to the police is not a vigilante action, deciding to take capture and punishment into your own hands is. Vigilante punishments are overly harsh, especially when undertaken by a majority that is angry and disgusted by the actions of the minority they wish to punish.

    5. Re:The future of law enforcement? by chimpo13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How did you get modded interesting? In the 1st sentence, in the 1st paragraph of the comment you replied is your answer: In the US vigilante justice has a history that is associated with racism.

      In this case, C't just did the police work for police too lazy/not knowledgable enough to figure out what to do. But just like the poster said, "In the US vigilante justice has a history that is associated with racism". And he gave some examples of that gay marriage being one of them.

  2. Re:PWN3D! by Aardpig · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hope they send them to a British pound-me-in-the-ass prison!

    In Britain, this happens in the private schools, not the prisons...

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  3. So, I suppose the next question is... by Xystance · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When will they post a website that has an engine that will allow us to submit IP addresses / MAC addresses to find out whether they are infected? I have the entire IP table of where I work... knowing what machines have been compromised through trojans would be helpful... Either way... Go Heise!

    1. Re:So, I suppose the next question is... by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Although not quite what you wanted dshield has a page where you can see if your machine has been reported as scanning others.
      They also has a banner you can add to your site that shows a warning if the viewers ip is in the list. But if fear that people will ignore that and mistake if for the "Warning, your machine is broadcasting an IP..." ad. that used to run.
      also check out mynetwatchman

    2. Re:So, I suppose the next question is... by 26199 · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's exactly what tools like nessus are for.

    3. Re:So, I suppose the next question is... by AhBeeDoi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am wondering how comprehensive dshield's database is and how they gather data about infected systems. Once on their database, always on it? If your server has been compromised and reported to dsheild will you bear the stigma forever?

    4. Re:So, I suppose the next question is... by null_session · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dangit, every business model that shows up on the internet, some nut starts doing it for free....

    5. Re:So, I suppose the next question is... by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, look at the site and see for yourself. :)

      People return logs from their routers, there are clients for most system where you send back the list of denied packets. And they do record when the attacks took place. Example..
      But the main focus for the single user is that it sends back daily reports of denied activity against your routers, such as port scanners.
      They do have a block list, which is rather short and only contains the worst current offenders over the last 3 days. They are not anal about it like SPEWS.

    6. Re:So, I suppose the next question is... by ogre57 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      nessus needs a server (nessusd) running on the machine that is being checked.

      Um, no, nessud runs on the machine that is doing the checking. Machine being checked doesn't need to be running anything special, just up and accessible.

      Re g*parent, seems a public site like that would be a great thing, for the spammers. User enters an IP to scan, say 1 in 1000 with a vuln they report as "none found", then use. Now, a non-public web interface equivalent to the nessus client program, for use on an internal-only server, for eg SOHO use .. hmm. I see potential problems, but might not be such a bad idea at that.

  4. A maturing industry... by erick99 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Maybe this isn't so surprising. Virus writers are becoming, as the gangsters in movies like to say, "a business man." Capitalism will grow in any sort of soil. I'm not supporting this by any means, but, sociologically, it sure makes a point about how any "industry" or endeavor will eventually start to emulate more legitimate enterprises.

    Keep Smiling!

    Erick

    --
    http://www.busyweather.com/
    1. Re:A maturing industry... by nomadic · · Score: 4, Funny

      In this country, you gotta get the IP addresses first first. Then when you get the IP addresses, you get the power. Then when you get the power, then you get the women.

      Actually, virus writers are still geeks so they don't get the women. Never mind.

  5. I new it! by megalogeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    OK, we all knew it, but maybe this will be enough incentive for the major news outlets to pick the story up. In an ideal world people would see this story, realize that much of the spam they get can be blamed on viruses and patch their systems.

    Too bad we don't live in a perfect world.

  6. Caught red-handed? by twoslice · · Score: 5, Funny
    The phrase "red-handed," meaning, as the Oxford English Dictionary puts it, "in the very act of crime, having the evidences of guilt still upon the person," A murderer caught "red-handed" still had the blood of his victim on his hands. We have, since the 18th century, also used "red-handed" to describe any criminal caught in the act or bearing irrefutable evidence of guilt.

    So did these guys have IP addresses hanging from their necks like bling blings?

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
    1. Re:Caught red-handed? by Curien · · Score: 2, Informative

      RTFA. c't ran a "sting" where the virus author sold them the IP addresses.

      --
      It's always a long day... 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
  7. Also with Linux Root Kit by rqqrtnb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hello!

    This article does not surprise at all. Thus I already read some months ago in the net of a root kit for Linux, which on the stricken computer installs itself and camouflages and then a special SMTP server starts, which from the outside refers always 1000 email addresses in the way of Client server communication and sends then the Spam. In the connection it sent back even still the Resultcodes to the server.

    In the case it was more difficult to pursue the author back because on the one hand the servers were located in several states and on the other hand the companies, to which the IPs/Domains belonged again mail box or dummy firms was.

    The problem is that here regular servers were stricken, which did not have dial up IP and thus also not over RBLs are recognized.

    Which one from it learns is probably clear: Safety updates bring in, mail content scaning (spamassassin), and feel safe never.

    Unfortunately did not know I meant articles any longer to find, otherwise I would have quoted him :(

    1. Re:Also with Linux Root Kit by krilli · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I say he's german, and that he's speaking through Google / Altavista. Quite remarkable, actually.

      --
      Jag pratar lite svenska.
    2. Re:Also with Linux Root Kit by Guylhem · · Score: 3, Funny

      Like yoda you speak.

  8. Hang 'em High by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...i'm sorry to say it, but goddamn, an example needs to be made of these fools.

    plain and simple: virus writing will get you in deep shit.

    1. Re:Hang 'em High by 26199 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, that statement would work a lot better if you gave an actual punishment rather than slang...

      e.g. virus writing will put you in jail

      Although personally I find it hard to justify jail for virus writers... maybe...

      virus writing will lose you your right to use computers for a while, along with a hefty sum of cash

  9. The outlawed triangle... by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think we've hit the point where three outlawed industries are now joining forces to support each other. P2P file sharing is an application consumers want but just isn't legal. Therefore, the writers of P2P applications just can't use legal means to collect money for it, they have to get paid under the table. Spyware and virus writers have the same goal, find any way possible to get their software onto your computer so they can get it to do their bidding. To them, how they get their payload isn't important How do they get paid? Well, who most needs distributed computing resorces with scattered IP addresses and bandwidth? Spammers. So, they'll gladly pay the creators of bot nets for their services, in a way no ethical buyer ever word. So there you have it, the connection between P2P and spam...

    1. Re:The outlawed triangle... by tiger99 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Sadly, it tends to be as you say, although P2P is not inherently illegal, it is only when you share someone else's property that it becomes so.

      I used a P2P network once, to get an unavailable piece of music. Had it been on sale in the shops I would have bought it.

      Lesson for the RIAA - keep everything available for ever, and find a sensible way of charging for odd copies of one track, then honest people would not need to do this. Of course that might need some understanding of technology, which no-one in your organisation apparently has any more, because you can't distinguish between someone who only wants to play the DVD he has paid for on his non-Microsoft PC and a gangster.

    2. Re:The outlawed triangle... by datadood · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Insightful? In what way is P2P filesharing 'illegal'? It might get used for copyright infringement, but that doesn't mean the tool itself is illegal. Think crowbar.

  10. This explains much by GeckoFood · · Score: 4, Informative

    A few weeks ago I noticed a HUGE spike in the number of trojan scans against my firewall. I found that the scans were coming from pretty much everywhere (world-wide), and seem to start up almost as quickly as I connect to the net. I have been wondering what was behind such a spike in trojan scan activity; I guess this is my answer.

    Fortunately, there are no known trojans on my system, the firewall and the virus checker are doing their jobs.

    --
    Be excellent to each other. And... PARTY ON, DUDES!
  11. Re:Theo article by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Uh. Why do you think zombie networks and selling access to them wasn't a problem earlier?

    Viruses are finally sophisticated enough to create botnets, and spammers have become more and more desperate for ways to pump their e-mail out.

  12. Excellent work by tiger99 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    It is about time that something like this happened, and I hope the courts deal with them severely.

    It would be very useful if the police forces had well-publicised points of contact for reporting computer and internet crime. At the moment, the local police station is unlikely to know anything at all, unless you are lucky to meet one of the few policemen who is really into computers, likely as a hobby. The expertise seems mainly to be in Scotland Yard, the department there could do with more funding, more staff, and more publicity, such as a simple means to contact them by email or web. My systems get beseiged by attacks from a handful of IP addresses, and if there was a central point for reporting all these easily, it would not be hard to spot the patterns and take appropriate action. For example, a warning letter from the police might be sufficient to get open mail relays closed, and cable modem users who have been trojaned might pay heed and take proper precautions. This could be largely automated, only where the parties concerned were deliberately committing criminal acts, or who failed to react to a warning, would the full powers of the Computer Misuse Act need to be applied.

    Not so long ago there was an idiot on the NTL cable network who was causing continual problems to others because his machine was running continually and had been trojaned, and was being used by hackers elsewhere. Something like that, after a few independent reports, should automatically trigger a "cease and desist" letter, together with some good advice on cleaning up the problem.

    It seems to me that it should be quite simple to gather and collate information from the public, which with the ISP's logs would enable the causes of problems to be located and dealt with. I for one don't mind my ISP's files being available automatically to a law-enforcement robot, I rather would get a warning letter or email if something was amiss.

    Of course the way to deal with the most recent round of severe problems is to simply ban Outlook. I wonder if the Convicted Monopolist could gain another conviction for deliberately producing software which facilitates contravening the Computer Misuse Act? BTW it would help if other countries enacted similar legislation instead of being misled by fascists like the RIAA into stupidly focussing on those who might want to play a DVD on their Linux computer, for example. In the UK, the CMA has real teeth, sadly it does not get exercised as often as it should, because it provides a means to outlaw certain vile practices. For example, if an installer deliberately cripples another application (we all know some that do, and most come from the Redmond area), that is a criminal offence, and rightly so, yet I have not seen any prosecutions. The wording of the Act would suggest that if installing Windoze as the second OS blows away the ability of Linux/BSD/OS-2 (or whatever) to boot, then an offence is committed. The only defence seems to be that it was done in ignorance. Can you imagine Bill standing in the dock in the Old Bailey, pathetically whining that he was not guilty, he was only ignorant? Justice would be admirably served by that admission.

    1. Re:Excellent work by sik+puppy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't crash the box, root it.

      Then use it to either send email or host a web page critical of the chinese government or praising the the Fulan Gong (sp?)

      Then wait for the news report of the chinese government executing these criminals for computer crimes.

      Is there a more cheerful thought than dead spammers?

      --
      The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers. Shakespeare, Henry VI, Part 2, Act 4, Scene 2
  13. Re:Theo article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    why I took so long to happen god knows

    Because there has always been an easier way to do it. Spammers used dial accounts, then spoofed dial accounts, then their own servers, then hijacked servers. As human beings became aware of each new spammer tactic that tactic would become unavailable.

    At some point humans will have to face the fact that spammers are not human and adopt a shoot on sight policy to end this terrible scourge.

  14. The factor neglected most often.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The machines infected with the trojans can be used as spam relays.. sure - but at the same time theyre also a gold mine for fraud, just think about all the data stored on the hard drives available for download - financial data, all kinds of private documents.. this worries me more than spam. I think data theft will become a hotter topic in the near future.

  15. And the network operaters still do nothing by cluge · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is no suprise for people involved in the anti-spam community. It has been discussed for some time in NANAE. What is REALLY sad is that some networks really don't seem to care, or don't have the time to police against this sort of thing. When I was Joe Jobbed by one of these spam gangs, using infected machines for webservers, I reported it to RR and comcast security. They were hosting their site all-oem.biz on several obviously compromised machines AND using my e-mail address in advertisements about their company. What did I get for my trouble? E-mail after e-mail that said - "To the best of our knowledge, the incident that was the basis of your complaint was neither posted by an individual using the Road Runner (Or Comcast) system, nor is it in any way related to the Road Runner (or Comcast) system or content maintained by Road Runner." What was funny is that if you did a dig on the domain being advertised it ALWAYS contained a road runner cable modem account.

    Lets try it again for a test shall we?
    # host www.all-oem.biz
    www.all-oem.biz is an alias for all-oem.biz.
    all-oem.biz has address 217.81.243.206
    all-oem.biz has address 24.98.35.54
    all-oem.biz has address 212.83.89.135
    all-oem.biz has address 213.33.0.67
    all-oem.biz has address 24.6.6.196

    And again, what do we have, 2 comcast cable modems working away trying to sell software that APPEARS to be pirated, and is advertised via spam with false headers.

    Lets check the DNS shall we, the dns servers for the domain are listed as follows

    Name Server:NS1.MOROZREG.BIZ
    Name Server:NS2.MOROZREG.BIZ
    Name Server:NS3.MOROZREG.BIZ
    Name Server:NS4.MOROZREG.BIZ
    Name Server:NS5.MOROZREG.BIZ

    Each of these name servers is also hosted on compromised machines, mostly broadband connections. Don't take my word for it, haul out nmap and take a look for yourself. The IP's for these name servers change pretty often. At this time no road runner accounts are showing up. I give it an hour before we get a few more.

    In short this is nothing new, and no one should be shocked. Spammers have shown themselves to be an unscrupulous lot. What IS good is that this is starting to get some press. Perhaps this will put pressure on providers to police their networks better. Otherwise more drastic action may be required to be taken by other networks to simply protect themselves.

    AngryPeopleRule

    --
    "Science is about ego as much as it is about discovery and truth " - I said it, so sue me.
    1. Re:And the network operaters still do nothing by kiolbasa · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'll bet dollars for doughnuts Comcast and Road Runner never see their own IPs when they do queries on that spammer's domain. I first learned of this trick from NANAE poster "Spamless," so you can look it up for a more thorough explanation (can't find it myself just now). The short story is that the spammer's DNS responds differently depending on the IP that makes the request. When the ISP checks those DNS records, they get something in South America, or China, or another ISP, anything other than them. The cable modem machine is just a proxy.

      It takes a little more effort to track down what is going on, and large broadband ISP's abuse desks are probably too swamped - which should be no excuse.

      --

      Beer wants to be free
  16. AMerican Media by MisanthropicProggram · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It is interesting that much of what is happening in the world isn't mentioned in the US news. East Timor anyone?
    I guess it has to do with ratings. It's unfortunate that editing the content of the news increases viewership. You see I, a US citizen, want to see ALL of the news, but unfortunately, our corporate news outlets censor a lot of what's going on to boost ratings! That's why I read foreign news sources as much as I can.

    --

    There is no spoon or sig.

    1. Re:AMerican Media by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes. More to the point, a number of foreign sources simply report events, which is how I want it. I'll form my own opinions in any event, but at least I don't have to filter out someone else's first. The U.S. media has way too much political and economic influence to really be trusted to report anything reliably anymore. I was talking to someone a few years ago who was in school to be a journalist, and she was told that it is the journalist's job to mold public opinion. Can you believe that? Not to report the facts honestly and completely, with one's own opinions delivered separately and clearly marked as such, but to tell the rest of us what to think. I guess the term "free press" now means that they are free to say anything they want and package it as "news."

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  17. Re:Theo article by tiger99 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Probably true, but most of it would be stopped if people stopped being stupid and got rid of Outlook, as well as taking all the other appropriate precautions. Theives take advantage of open doors, and Sir Bill has left so many openings..... Especially with new viruses, where it is going to take at best hours, more likely days, to get the countermeasures in place, the simple removal of Outlook and its malignant Express mutant gives far more benefit in terms of cost and time than any other single action. Yes, you do still need a stealth-mode firewall, even better a hardware firewall, and one or more virus scanners, but close the biggest hole first!

    I saw a book in the shop the other day called "Writing Secure Code" or something similar. When I saw the publisher, I did not even bother to pick it up for a look, as the company concerned (Guess who?) has a solidly demonstrated long-term track record of gross incompetence in that area.

  18. The reason for the UK term "public school" by smcv · · Score: 3, Informative

    The version I've always heard is that hundreds of years ago the only way to be educated was a private tutor. When they were introduced, "public schools" (schools where pupils' parents pay fees) were called that to differentiate between private tuition and a public school.

    The terminology is a bit unfortunate, now that private tuition doesn't happen and state schools are more public than "public schools", but that's how the English language works ;-)

    Schools entirely paid for by taxes are "state schools" (as in "separation of Church and State", not as in "Washington state").

  19. Re:Open Relays by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Most spammers don't use open relays these days. They use open proxies, which are different. (No logging in the Received lines of the email, and no store/forward--it's the spammer's machine doing the real work.)

    From some of the spam I've been getting, I think that some spammers are playing with zombie relay malware. That allows them to load up a whole spam run on a zombie machine and move on to the next one. I'll bet that their relay software is designed to not look like an open relay to anyone else. Why share the box with other spammers, and why set off open relay detectors?

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  20. RTFA. RTFA. RTFA. by MyHair · · Score: 4, Funny
    Check out the German article first, then its translation on Groklaw and maybe also same translation posted in the English section of the Heise website (in order of appearance).

    I'm supposed to RTFA 3 times?

    1: You're lucky if one out of every 3 read it once.

    2: Is this supposed to be a cascading Slashdotting? Next time just submit the story 3 times with a different link each time.

    :-)

  21. Does this surprise anyone? by olivercromwell · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This doesn't surprise me in the least. While it sickens me, I don't find this to be that startling. I, for one, have always thought the people who write malware are scum. They may try to justify their actions with lame claims of: 'Oh, i only did it to show how weak the system is', or 'I am only trying to learn more about the internal workings of the O/S'. But, let's face it, they are little more than little creeps with serious social behavioural problems. They know what they are doing is wrong, yest can find any manner of reason to justify their behaviour. In the end, they are criminals, scum, and a**es. That some are now selling harvestedd ip addresses to spammers should come as no surprise at all. I just wish I knew a way to punish them that would not only satisfy the gravity of their offence, but would also serve as a good deterrent. A pox on all of them.

  22. Illegal IP addresses? by sglines · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Selling infected IP addresses may be immoral but what is illegal about it?

    I run snort on a bunch of systems and have some very large lists of infected IP addresses. I suspect many others do too. Every time snort burps up a new IP address I inform the ISP that "owns" the IP address. The reality is that no one cares. I have been "hit" by 68.162.91.238 over 20 times in the last month by different viruses.

    These lists are easy to come by and even easier to generate. If someone is dumb enough to pay good money for a list of infected computers - let me know. I wonder what the going rate is.

    If these machines get abused enough maybe, just maybe they'll get fixed.