Slashdot Mirror


Webmonkey Closes its Doors

An anonymous reader writes "According to Wired, Webmonkey is being closed by TerraLycos after 8 years of teaching practical web building skills and bucking more traditional outlets. They've written some good stuff over the years - in fact, I first understood the significance of XML after reading one of their articles."

65 of 162 comments (clear)

  1. old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    this is old news, the article even says Feb 17th
    mmm...

  2. First sign that web based content is unprofitable? by aldoman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It does seem than web based content (on adverts alone) is unprofitable. I think micropayments will solve this - maybe PayPal could easily expand into this area by dropping the 39c transaction fee for transactions under a dollar...

  3. Spanish company by jmerelo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It should be noted that, ultimately, HotWired belong to Terra-Lycos, a Spanish company closely tied to the old monopoly Telefonica.

    1. Re:Spanish company by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's more than closely tied, actually Terra Belongs to Telefonica. Telefonica
      Telefonica is not as big as AT&T, but they are as evil :)

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
  4. Wow! by GMontag · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I read them frequently about 5 years ago and learned a lot about web building. Not that I always followed their good advice or anything :)

    Was a great place to learn and find out that I was not really interested in going past the "hobby level" in that area. Like "one stop shopping" as it were. I suppose there are plenty of other places on the web now to find the same sort of thing.

    1. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      A site like that is no longer needed. With Microsoft products like Frontpage and IIS anybody can become a web genius. And from anywhere, allowing web development to be offshored to cheaper, better, faster countries.

    2. Re:Wow! by glass_window · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is there anything being done to retain this vast wealth of well presented knowledge for other's who have yet to benefit from webmonkey? When I first started getting into making a web page the first thing I realized is that there are a lot of people that have written quite a bit on the subjects, but none of them have done it in a way that a beginner would understand. Then I came across webmonkey and I was amazed. I used their website to get into html, stylesheets, dhtml, and there was quite a bit that I never managed to get into quite yet.

    3. Re:Wow! by gecko85 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "With Microsoft products like Frontpage and IIS anybody can become a web genius." God, I hope you were kidding. What a ridiculous statement! With products like Frontpage, anybody can churn out incomprehensible, invalid, bloated crap that only works (and barely at that) in one browser. Sure, anyone can make *something* with programs like Frontpage, but that doesn't mean it will be good, or even usable. How many sites have you seen with incomprehensible navigation (or no navigation to speak of), with such horrible design you can't even read the content, with....the list goes on. There's a hell of a lot more to becoming a web designer/developer than cobbbling together some html. There are UI considerations, information architecture, maintainability of code, and much more. Does picking up a copy of Quicken make one a CPA? If so, a lot of high-prices CFO's are out of a job!

    4. Re:Wow! by DerekLyons · · Score: 3, Insightful
      How many sites have you seen with incomprehensible navigation (or no navigation to speak of), with such horrible design you can't even read the content, with....the list goes on.
      Many, and a large proportion of them *aren't* by Frontpage users but by web designers who really should know better. And frankly with the coming of CSS and XHTML, and all the other so called 'improvements', the number of bloated, slow, horrible sites is *increasing*. Too many web designers spend too much time on 'UI considerations, information architecture, maintainability of code, and much more' and very little time on making sure the damm thing works and that the content on the pages is actually acessible.
  5. nah by Bidet+Martini · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Webmonkey's tutorials treated you like a five year-old with learning disabilities. They tried to be cute and informative at the same time- and failed at both.

  6. Re:First sign that web based content is unprofitab by iocat · · Score: 3, Funny
    Don't tell this to IGN or GameSpot , which are finally raking money in hand over fist, for advertising, after years on the skids.

    Of course, those sites are so packed with ads they're functionally unusable, but still...

    --

    Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

  7. Content... by Ianoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There is quite a bit of good useful content on Webmonkey. Has anyone considered saving it all for future reference? I know it would probably be illegal to put them up for free access somewhere else on the web due to copyrights, but it seems a shame for it all to go to waste completely :(

    1. Re:Content... by texchanchan · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'd even pay for a CD archive.

      Lycos: You listening?

    2. Re:Content... by IANAAC · · Score: 5, Informative

      wget is your friend (for personal use, of course :-))

    3. Re:Content... by ze_lee · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think Webmonkey will go dark, it's just that no new content will be added.

      Webmonkey has a big name, and Terra-Lycos can probably still make ad money off it enough to cover the costs of keeping a server or two running.

      At least, that's what I think (and hope)

    4. Re:Content... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Want an archive of it? How about....

      Internet Explorer --> Add to Favorites --> Properties of favorite --> Make available offline --> download tab --> follow links 6 pages deep (just to be safe) --> Synchronize.

      This will give you an offline archive of the entire site, as followed by links on the pages. 6 pages deep might be a little much, but you can also tell it to not go to pages off of this site (that's the default setting). What you get is a (mostly) complete archive of a great site. Now make your own CD. :-)

    5. Re:Content... by BigJimSlade · · Score: 4, Informative

      httrack is also your friend. I just found this tool (via the SpiderZilla front-end for Mozilla/Firefox). Did a good job of spidering a couple sites I was having trouble with using wget.

    6. Re:Content... by ciroknight · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or you can use a product like Teleport, or you can use "wget -r -l 6 hotwired.lycos.com/webmonkey" for the same functionality, if you're not on a Windows machine. ;)

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
  8. This is kind of depressing by BFedRec · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I learned a LOT of my HTML and related skills from webmonkey. They did good work, were always big advocates of standards, and a great resource no matter what your level of web work was. I personally am going to miss them greatly... makes me feel old (granted a LOT of things do that lately, but.. that's not the point now is it?).

    CharlesP

    1. Re:This is kind of depressing by Bobulusman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Think you're bummed? This is the first time I've heard of it. After reading a few things, I wish I had known if it back when I was first fiddling with html and php. Would have made things go much more smoothly.

      --
      Cogito ergo sum in Slashdot.
  9. Howabout an archive by Space+cowboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Webmonkey was pretty good - I remember referring to it now and then... I know we can use the wayback machine / google (at least for a short while) etc. but if they're closing the doors, are they doing anything about the content ? Seems a shame to throw it away... Nothing mentioned on the site :-(

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
  10. Salute! by use_compress · · Score: 4, Funny

    On behalf of all companies too cheap to by up-to-date reference books, I salute you WebMonkey. You've given me the information that has prevented me from robbing Barnes and Nobel countless times.

  11. Re:First sign that web based content is unprofitab by MikeCapone · · Score: 4, Informative

    We'll always have Arhive.org, at least, although I'm not sure if they just mean that they are stopping adding new content or taking the place offline (yeah, RTFA, I know).

  12. At first I thougth they meant Primate Programming by nitehawk214 · · Score: 3, Funny

    They are not talking about this company.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  13. An Alternative to Webmonkey by snookerdoodle · · Score: 5, Informative

    FWIW, I've found "W3Schools" a decent source of Pretty Good Tutorials for most things 'web (xml, xsl, css, etc.).

    http://www.w3schools.com/

    Some stuff seems IE centric - i.e.: some examples only work with IE6 and alternatives aren't suggested.

    Mark

    1. Re:An Alternative to Webmonkey by chrisspurgeon · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just want to say that if you like/liked Webmonkey, you may also like A List Apart.

    2. Re:An Alternative to Webmonkey by DarkSarin · · Score: 3, Informative

      You beat me to it....

      I agree that w3schools.com is a great place..that's usually where I head to find a quick reference when I need it. There are a number of things I don't like about the site, namely the lack of acknowledging that Mozilla even exists! However, overall, I think that they are a great site.

      I also use codewalkers for things php related (aside from the reference chm from php.net, which is AWESOME--anyone have one like that for html/javascript? I would love that).

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    3. Re:An Alternative to Webmonkey by Millennium · · Score: 4, Interesting

      IE actually makes a damn fine platform if you develop specifically for it, why is that so wrong?

      That is what makes it so wrong; you have to develop specifically for it in order to make it do anything half-decent.

  14. Noo! by Nicholas+Evans · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Rest well, WebMonkey. You taugh us all so much. Someone should e-mail them and ask if they can mirror the papers, so the legacy of the WebMonkey may live on forever.

  15. Downloadable archive? by sdo1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It would be real slick to be able to buy a downloadable archive of articles. I'd gladly cough up some bucks for that. Certainly a lot better (not to mention more environmentally friendly) than bopping down to your favorite ink and paper store to buy some overpriced tome on how to make web pages.

    How about it guys?

    -S

    --
    --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
  16. Not Completely Lost... [karma whore warning] by cleetus · · Score: 4, Informative

    Thanks to the wayback machine: http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.webmonkey. com has, for the most part, working links to a great deal of content, not to mention a nice view of the evolution of the graphic design proclivities.

    Hopefully the terralycos lawyers won't ask the wayback to pull the content.

    As an aside, I wonder, but am doubtful, about whether alternate licensing could be arranged for the content, perhaps some form of the Creative Commons License??

    cleetus

  17. For great design tutorials by JoeBaldwin · · Score: 5, Informative

    Index DOT HTML

    Index DOT CSS

    And the Complete Idiots Guide to HTML 4. All three of those resources helped me a great deal, plus looking at other sites source code to see how they were made. Some of WMs articles were OK, but it wasn't exactly overly helpful to me.

    1. Re:For great design tutorials by superyooser · · Score: 2, Informative
      Also, HTMLHelp.com is GREAT.

      The CSS guide is good, and the JavaScript FAQ is VERY comprehensive.

  18. Man, this really pisses me off by Melvin+Daniels · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I learned a lot of shit from webmonkey. I'm going to go as far as to say that they're doing a grave injustice to those who are just learning things like PHP by closing their doors. Hell, they're doing an injustice to the internet itself. It's built on knowledge, so I only hope their reference materials will be available in other formats.

  19. Re:You are insane, and greedy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Let's take it to the next level! Have all websites charge a toll before you can even access them!! If you don't have a credit card or have bad credit, no Internet for you!

    What are you some kind of communist? The Internet is about making profit not some crazy hippie idea of freely exchanging knowledge for the benefit of mankind. Did you use the useless network of networks called the Internet before it began to be commercialized around 1993? I doubt it. There was nothing there except research papers and the occasional MUD or usenet article. Not until sites like Amazon or eBay came along did the Internet become truly useful.

  20. It's a jewel of rarity by HungWeiLo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I haven't been on Webmonkey for ages. However, when I did, I remember it as a resource that was unusual in the way that it was able to pander to both the inexperienced and the experienced alike. It provided a decent and friendly place for individuals to start learning about web design/programming, while also serving as a viable reference for experienced web designers.

    --
    There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
  21. Re:You are insane, and greedy by MikeCapone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What are you some kind of communist? The Internet is about making profit not some crazy hippie idea of freely exchanging knowledge for the benefit of mankind. Did you use the useless network of networks called the Internet before it began to be commercialized around 1993? I doubt it. There was nothing there except research papers and the occasional MUD or usenet article. Not until sites like Amazon or eBay came along did the Internet become truly useful.

    I can't tell if you are joking or not, which is scary.

    I know you probably are, but I've also known people who think exactly like that.

    Heh.

  22. And with the death of Web Techniques magazine... by cliveholloway · · Score: 5, Interesting
    .. (a year or so ago) and The Perl Journal, there goes the rest of the teachers from my early coding days.

    At least SysAdmin (even if pretty clueless sometimes as an entity) and Linux magazine are still worth reading. Both contain enough code to keep the old brain cells churning.

    And it was so sad that Web Techniques turned into a load of old wank aimed at PHBs - that, and TJP were the only ones I happily paid for.

    Anyone else got any (reasonably priced) recommendations for geek mags that still keep the ol' brain cells working?

    .02

    cLive ;-)

    --
    -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
  23. .edu by Dachannien · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Since this is educational content, wouldn't it make sense to give/sell-on-the-cheap the content to a university somewhere to make it publicly available on the tons of available bandwidth most universities have? Some CS department somewhere could probably find student volunteers to maintain the site and update it with externally-submitted articles.

    Or is TerraLycos going to sit on it for the next 95 years "just in case"?

  24. all-in-one web "schools" by nuffle · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Seems like a lot of these web "schools" that try to present all (or at least the common) facets of a subject are having trouble. Their product was access to content, and I think they've gone the way of most access providers.

    When webmonkey (and others such as builder.com) started out, the web was such that it could be difficult to find resources about some topics. Thus, to have all these references collected in one place was pretty handy. Now, however, it's pretty easy to find resources (through google if nothing else) for just about anything, and you can get the resources from experts who are deeply involved with the topic (which may or may not be the case from one of the "schools").

    So, like all other companies that make their money by providing access (e.g. ISPs, cable carriers), these schools must shift to instead offering a service. Granted, webmonkey did have somewhat of a service: Lots of n00b friendly articles all written in a similar format. But apparently that wasn't enough.

  25. www.Archive.org by MikeCapone · · Score: 3, Informative

    Archive.org is your friend!

  26. Lycos, RIP by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It seems as if TerraLycos is cleaning house and pulling the plug on unprofitable operations. Furthermore, it seems as if the Lycos search engine itself is one of those elements being downplayed.

    The current Lycos Home Page still has the search box, but they're talking about the "new Lycos" which is all about the non-search sites that are part of the Lycos Network. It seems as if Lycos has fallen into an also-ran status.

    Another classic search engine met the same fate a few years ago. When Infoseek was bought up by Disney, it was supposed to be the anchor of the Go Network. When that didn't work out, the core part of the Go Network shut down, leading to a Go Network homepage that does nothing but link to stories on the surviving Disney-owned sites and provide a Google-powered search box.

    When we see Lycos Search powered by Google, we'll know that the layoff spree is complete...

    1. Re:Lycos, RIP by self+assembled+struc · · Score: 4, Informative

      actually, the lay off spree is mostly complete.

      i worked for tripod/angelfire for 4 years as their senior web developer (even wrote an article for webmonkey on PHP photo galleries) and at the time they closed webmonkey, lycos laid off most of it's employees who worked for "non-core" business parts now.

      pretty much they (terra) are focusing on the money-making aspects (proudly tripod/angelfire seems to be one of these) and cutting the rest of the crap.

  27. Put the website on GNU? or.. by MisanthropicProggram · · Score: 3, Insightful
    somewhere else for access?

    A couple of you posted some links for archives and also metioned something about lawyers and licenses - as in it may be illegal to archive the site?. It would be nice if the Webmonkey folks gave their content to someone like GNU - officially so that their work would live on.

    --

    There is no spoon or sig.

  28. It's sad by w3weasel · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's sad to see em go, but I used to be a competitor of theirs until I cashed out my site (heh heh heh.

    While they produced good articles, many of their articles were poorly written, or written far above the heads of their intended audience.

    Back in the boom days, some of the WebMonkey employees got fed up with the corporate policies that valued ad placement over good content, often writing articles specifically tailored to woo the advertisers... a practice that clearly continued beyond the boom days. Those rebels started e-volt.. which still exists and is a vastly superior service.

    Slashdot is successful because they provide content that their readers want... instead of what the advertisers want. A simple thing to understand unless you are a marketing professional.

    The average marketing pro thinks that the average 'customer' doesn't know what to (think||read||buy) unless a marketeer tells them.

    --

    Just as irrigation is the lifeblood of the Southwest, lifeblood is the soup of cannibals. -- Jack Handy

  29. sad they're closing by Sicnarf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Back when I was a n00b, webmonkey was the place I went to learn HTML. They've always been a neat and friendly place.

    I was kind of assuming they'd close. In recent years they've been lacking on 'new' technologies, that's my impression. They were fairly strong years ago, when the web technologies were still overseeable und basic: html, javascript, cgi... and then nowadays it's just too much to cover for webmonkey.
    Thanks WM for offering your *free* articles, they've been a great recource over the years.

  30. Re:Dammit! by BlankTim · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've used Dave's Site in the past. Doesn't have all the indepth stuff web monkey has, but still a pretty good how to site anyway, I think

    http://www.davesite.com

    --
    Just once, I'd like it if someone called me "Sir".
    Without adding, "You're creating a scene."
  31. Re:First sign that web based content is unprofitab by beakerMeep · · Score: 5, Insightful

    IMHO, while they were great for beginners and I loved going there, it seemed they stoped making any significant additions to their content years ago -- and this was part of their downfall. The wired article even mentions how they often reshuffled old content to make it seem new.

    --
    meep
  32. Other Sources? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hello, Since webmonkey is going down, what are some others resources that you guys find equally well? I know of Arson Network. What about you guys?

    1. Re:Other Sources? by Ricardo+Dias+Marques · · Score: 2, Informative
      Anonymous Coward wrote:
      Hello, Since webmonkey is going down, what are some others resources that you guys find equally well? I know of Arson Network. What about you guys?

      Besides W3Schools which has been mentioned in this Slashdot discussion sometimes, I like Dev Shed - http://www.devshed.com/. It has lots of nice tutorials/articles about Perl, PHP, Java (including JSP), Python, XML, MySQL, Flash, etc...

      There was also a very nice discussion in Slashdot, around two years ago, about online resources for Developers:

      Slashdot | Best Websites for Developers?
      http://ask.slashdot.org/askslashdot/02/07/20/01242 43.shtml?tid=156
  33. Flamebait by $exyNerdie · · Score: 3, Funny


    This might seem like a bad joke but people getting laid off from webmonkey team might make a use of this:

    Webmonkey Tips

  34. Re:First sign that web based content is unprofitab by k2dbk · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The problem is not that web-based content is unprofitable, but that web-based content that is no longer of interest is unprofitable. As many others here have said, I too used to visit webmonkey a lot. But, I learned enough so that I didn't have to visit any more. Newer folks, at least in some cases, are relying heavily on "do everything for you" tools, so the site is not (or less) needed.

    RIP, Webmonkey.

  35. Re:And with the death of Web Techniques magazine.. by Moeses · · Score: 2, Informative

    Dr. Dobbs.

    It mostly focuses on semi to non-trivial topics that would be found useful by those working in industry. At the same time the articles are usually well written and easier to digest than the academic papers on the same topics.

    It's not exactly web-centric though.

  36. Style sheet reference by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Informative

    Mulder's Style Sheet Tutorial on Webmonkey is one of my favorite style-sheet references.

  37. Article full of historic revisionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is not about knocking the webmonkey people.

    I just want to point out as an ex-Wired employee from back in the day, that this article is full of lies and crap about what was going on inside at the time.

    First off, webmonkey wasn't even remotely close to profitable and certainly wasn't the only profitable website wired had if I'm wrong and there was some random day where they eeked out a penny. Hotbot was Wired's cash cow for years. It's the only service that made enough money to pay for the hardware, bandwidth and staff to run it. Webmonkey? Maybe if you don't charge against the site for equipment, staff, bandwidth, and power, then uhm, sure, ok, they made a penny.

    Second, the idea that the webmonkey people were these oppressed geeks who wrote content in their spare time for free is a complete fabrication. The webmonkey people would sometimes lower themselves from their prima dona perch and help out the rest of us little people here and there but they had very little interaction with the rest of the company. And they sure as hell didn't write for free on the side. Webmonkey staff did nothing but write a few articles and sit on the couch in the play room right off their quad playing Tekken4 all day. I guess sometimes they would go out for a long triple mocha latte break after coming in late so they'd have the energy to leave early.

    Webmonkey, I love you guys but you weren't what Wired was about. It was just as well Lycos came in and killed the company. It was DOA anyway.

    The article is all propaganda.

  38. Re:You are insane, and greedy by Penguinshit · · Score: 4, Funny


    Ahhh.. the days of alt.pics.binary...

    cat titties1.uue titties2.uue titties3.uue > titties.uue | uudecode -o titties.jpg

  39. And so it proves... by stateofmind · · Score: 3, Funny

    A thousand monkeys, typing on a thousand typewriters cannot keep a site running.

    Josh

  40. Will they release it Open Content? by SnappingTurtle · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Back when I had high hopes that The Idocs Guide to HTML would be my path to riches, I thought of WebMonkey as my chief competitor. There was no way I could produce the quantity of documentation they could, but I hoped that my narrow focus on client-side web pages features and high quality would win me followers. In fact, it did win me followers, but not enough to become profitable.

    Well, when I finally gave up that dream, I released the Guide as Open Content. Anybody who wants to can publish the content as they see fit. AFAIK, nobody's made a fortune off of my work (which, I admit, would bug the crap out of me), but some people have been helped, which is pretty cool. I wonder if WebMonkey will consider doing the same thing.

    --
    I've found that my posts don't format quite right w/o a sig.
  41. Re:Dammit! by jathos · · Score: 4, Informative

    I run a site called Help2Go -- it's all tutorials and help for newbies, including a lot of web stuff.
    Best of all, it's all Creative Commons licensed, so the articles won't disappear like Webmonkey's soon will.

    http://www.help2go.com/

  42. ENTIRE SITE ARCHIVE - Bittorrent by eaglebtc · · Score: 4, Informative
    For the benefit of posterity, I archived the entire site this morning, including audio and video content. It is now available for you to download as a Bittorrent release, containing a single RAR file. The site was archived using HTTrack 3.3 and set to crawl to infinitely many levels, excluding external sites. You may unpack to an empty folder and browse it as if you were on the live site.

    Total size is 450MB, compressed down to 130MB using WinRAR 3.3.

    View info and download the torrent here.

    --
    Homestarrunner.net -- It's Dot Com!
  43. I think what you meant to say was: (more flags) by arete · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think what you meant to say was:
    wget -k -p -nh -E -nc -r -l 6 \
    hotwired.lycos.com/webmonkey

    convert links
    get prerequisites
    don't dns everything
    add a .html extension for your viewing
    don't clobber (download only once)
    recursive
    levels 6
    slashdot wouldn't let my lines be long enough, so a \ : )

    --
    Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
  44. Re:First sign that web based content is unprofitab by ameoba · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The trick is to make the advertising the content. Considering how 'unbiased and objective' the average game review is, I'm suprised the reviewers aren't getting paid by the game companies...

    --
    my sig's at the bottom of the page.
  45. We're not killing the site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Thanks to all for their kind comments about Webmonkey.

    Despite what you've read here, we're not shutting down the site - it's just going into maintenance mode. That means no more updates, but all the old content will remain.

    - Anonymous (TerraLycos) Coward

  46. oh, my correction needs a correction by arete · · Score: 2, Informative

    I guess maybe in my tiredness then I remembered something I forgot in my ultra tiredness now:
    you can't -nc (not clobber old files) and timestamp -N

    So you do have to
    wget -r -l inf -k -E -nh -nc \ hotwired.lycos.com/webmonkey

    if you want it to work and not clobber. (meaning, you can do it repeatedly, and it figures it out.)

    And, I think the AC was looking for -k

    --
    Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
  47. Re:You are insane, and greedy by rthille · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, you're planning on uudecoding the error output from 'cat'? Wow, that's some wierd fetish you've got there...

    --
    Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/