Slashdot Mirror


Webmonkey Closes its Doors

An anonymous reader writes "According to Wired, Webmonkey is being closed by TerraLycos after 8 years of teaching practical web building skills and bucking more traditional outlets. They've written some good stuff over the years - in fact, I first understood the significance of XML after reading one of their articles."

113 of 162 comments (clear)

  1. old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    this is old news, the article even says Feb 17th
    mmm...

    1. Re:old news by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      OH NOES!!!11 T3h storie is ten days old! We are doomed!

      Pfft. Who cares? It's still news to us. People seem to care. What's the problem?

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
  2. First sign that web based content is unprofitable? by aldoman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It does seem than web based content (on adverts alone) is unprofitable. I think micropayments will solve this - maybe PayPal could easily expand into this area by dropping the 39c transaction fee for transactions under a dollar...

  3. Spanish company by jmerelo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It should be noted that, ultimately, HotWired belong to Terra-Lycos, a Spanish company closely tied to the old monopoly Telefonica.

    1. Re:Spanish company by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's more than closely tied, actually Terra Belongs to Telefonica. Telefonica
      Telefonica is not as big as AT&T, but they are as evil :)

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
  4. Wow! by GMontag · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I read them frequently about 5 years ago and learned a lot about web building. Not that I always followed their good advice or anything :)

    Was a great place to learn and find out that I was not really interested in going past the "hobby level" in that area. Like "one stop shopping" as it were. I suppose there are plenty of other places on the web now to find the same sort of thing.

    1. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      A site like that is no longer needed. With Microsoft products like Frontpage and IIS anybody can become a web genius. And from anywhere, allowing web development to be offshored to cheaper, better, faster countries.

    2. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      When webmonkey first came out --- their "wink wink see how easy this is" tutorials were like a breath of fresh air. The tone of their articles conveyed a warmth of being tutored by a fellow geek. Once I got my legs, tho, I stopped visiting. Their site was too disorganized to be a good reference site (contrast to sites like devguru.com).

    3. Re:Wow! by glass_window · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is there anything being done to retain this vast wealth of well presented knowledge for other's who have yet to benefit from webmonkey? When I first started getting into making a web page the first thing I realized is that there are a lot of people that have written quite a bit on the subjects, but none of them have done it in a way that a beginner would understand. Then I came across webmonkey and I was amazed. I used their website to get into html, stylesheets, dhtml, and there was quite a bit that I never managed to get into quite yet.

    4. Re:Wow! by gecko85 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "With Microsoft products like Frontpage and IIS anybody can become a web genius." God, I hope you were kidding. What a ridiculous statement! With products like Frontpage, anybody can churn out incomprehensible, invalid, bloated crap that only works (and barely at that) in one browser. Sure, anyone can make *something* with programs like Frontpage, but that doesn't mean it will be good, or even usable. How many sites have you seen with incomprehensible navigation (or no navigation to speak of), with such horrible design you can't even read the content, with....the list goes on. There's a hell of a lot more to becoming a web designer/developer than cobbbling together some html. There are UI considerations, information architecture, maintainability of code, and much more. Does picking up a copy of Quicken make one a CPA? If so, a lot of high-prices CFO's are out of a job!

    5. Re:Wow! by paganizer · · Score: 1

      It WAS a treasure trove of information. Sometimes I don't want to read the 39 chapter o'pedantic and assoc. book on the exact meaning of the word "dynamic", sometimes I just want a brief overview and a little example.
      Unfortunately, most sites of the type seem to have died, with webmonkey being one of the last.
      IMO, the web was destined for suckiness when C/net killed winfiles, this is just elaboration.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    6. Re:Wow! by DerekLyons · · Score: 3, Insightful
      How many sites have you seen with incomprehensible navigation (or no navigation to speak of), with such horrible design you can't even read the content, with....the list goes on.
      Many, and a large proportion of them *aren't* by Frontpage users but by web designers who really should know better. And frankly with the coming of CSS and XHTML, and all the other so called 'improvements', the number of bloated, slow, horrible sites is *increasing*. Too many web designers spend too much time on 'UI considerations, information architecture, maintainability of code, and much more' and very little time on making sure the damm thing works and that the content on the pages is actually acessible.
    7. Re:Wow! by gecko85 · · Score: 1

      2004. Actually, it was cleaning up some pages created with FP 2003. Removing tons on inline styles and putting them in an external style sheet (which is cached, thus improving performance and decresing file sizes), removing IE-only non-proprietary junk, fixing invalidly nested tags, and the list goes on. Sure, many of the tools have improved dramatically. Still, that doesn't mean you can forget about learning the how's and why's of web design.

    8. Re:Wow! by gecko85 · · Score: 1

      "Too many web designers spend too much time on 'UI considerations, information architecture, maintainability of code, and much more' and very little time on making sure the damm thing works and that the content on the pages is actually acessible." Hmmm...if a designer is spending time on UI considerations, information architechture, maintainability of code, etc...then their sites *should* work, and the content *should* be actually accessible. That's the whole point of taking the time to think about things like navigational structure, global navigation, breadcrumbs, etc. I guess I'm a bit confused as to how *not* taking these things into consideration would result in easier to use pages? Granted, there are thousands of self-professed web designers out there (and some working for large companies) that don't know the first thing about what they're doing. They may not be using Frontpage, but it's the "we have a tool to do that" mentality that leads to this mess of bloated web sites. As for the increasing number of "bloated, slow, horrible sites", I'd be willing to bet those in that category are *not* using CSS and XHTML to their advantage. Have a look at the source. You're sure to find deeply nested tables used for layout, a page littered with deprecated font tags, spacer gifs galore, and other telltale signs of bloat.

    9. Re:Wow! by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Hmmm...if a designer is spending time on UI considerations, information architechture, maintainability of code, etc...then their sites *should* work, and the content *should* be actually accessible.
      That's right, they *should*, but they frequently *aren't*.
      I guess I'm a bit confused as to how *not* taking these things into consideration would result in easier to use pages?
      It's not so much that not taking them into account makes pages more useable, it's that spending less time looking at the trees and more time looking at the forest make them more useable and accesible. Frequently all the lower level bits a jewels of the art, but no one has spent any time actually integrating them into a useable and acessible page.
      Granted, there are thousands of self-professed web designers out there (and some working for large companies) that don't know the first thing about what they're doing. They may not be using Frontpage, but it's the "we have a tool to do that" mentality that leads to this mess of bloated web sites.
      This attitude make me laugh so hard I can't hardly type. I suppose anyone who cannot paint like Michealangelo isn't a painter? One who cannot write music like Bach isn't a composer?

      The mark of a professional who is making products for the public is that they work and perform the function intended. Not that they slavishly adhere to the latest intellectual fad, not that that they follow whichever subset of standards the 'designer' community currently marks as acceptable, but that they work.
      As for the increasing number of "bloated, slow, horrible sites", I'd be willing to bet those in that category are *not* using CSS and XHTML to their advantage. Have a look at the source. You're sure to find deeply nested tables used for layout, a page littered with deprecated font tags, spacer gifs galore, and other telltale signs of bloat.
      Bloat can arise from using a dozen or more style sheets on a single page. Bloat can arise from trying to produce a page that is an academic and artistic masterpiece, instead of a page that simply works.
  5. nah by Bidet+Martini · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Webmonkey's tutorials treated you like a five year-old with learning disabilities. They tried to be cute and informative at the same time- and failed at both.

  6. Re:First sign that web based content is unprofitab by iocat · · Score: 3, Funny
    Don't tell this to IGN or GameSpot , which are finally raking money in hand over fist, for advertising, after years on the skids.

    Of course, those sites are so packed with ads they're functionally unusable, but still...

    --

    Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

  7. Content... by Ianoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There is quite a bit of good useful content on Webmonkey. Has anyone considered saving it all for future reference? I know it would probably be illegal to put them up for free access somewhere else on the web due to copyrights, but it seems a shame for it all to go to waste completely :(

    1. Re:Content... by texchanchan · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'd even pay for a CD archive.

      Lycos: You listening?

    2. Re:Content... by IANAAC · · Score: 5, Informative

      wget is your friend (for personal use, of course :-))

    3. Re:Content... by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "Has anyone considered saving it all for future reference?"

      Usual answer

    4. Re:Content... by ze_lee · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think Webmonkey will go dark, it's just that no new content will be added.

      Webmonkey has a big name, and Terra-Lycos can probably still make ad money off it enough to cover the costs of keeping a server or two running.

      At least, that's what I think (and hope)

    5. Re:Content... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Want an archive of it? How about....

      Internet Explorer --> Add to Favorites --> Properties of favorite --> Make available offline --> download tab --> follow links 6 pages deep (just to be safe) --> Synchronize.

      This will give you an offline archive of the entire site, as followed by links on the pages. 6 pages deep might be a little much, but you can also tell it to not go to pages off of this site (that's the default setting). What you get is a (mostly) complete archive of a great site. Now make your own CD. :-)

    6. Re:Content... by BigJimSlade · · Score: 4, Informative

      httrack is also your friend. I just found this tool (via the SpiderZilla front-end for Mozilla/Firefox). Did a good job of spidering a couple sites I was having trouble with using wget.

    7. Re:Content... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      someone mod this ac UP.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:Content... by ciroknight · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or you can use a product like Teleport, or you can use "wget -r -l 6 hotwired.lycos.com/webmonkey" for the same functionality, if you're not on a Windows machine. ;)

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    9. Re:Content... by Tassach · · Score: 1

      If you use cygwin, you can run wget (and many other nice unix-y tools) on Windows.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    10. Re:Content... by armb · · Score: 1

      > use wget ... if you're not on a Windows machine.

      Or even if you are:

      $ uname -a
      CYGWIN_NT-4.0 XXX 1.3.10(0.51/3/2) 2002-02-25 11:14 i686 unknown
      $ type wget
      wget is /usr/bin/wget

      --
      rant
    11. Re:Content... by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Um, I wget from all my windows machines, regularly. Even the ones without Cygwin installed. SSH and SFTP as well (thank you putty). And can even run Apache 1.3x/2.x for testing. Lots of unix utilities are ported to run on Windows, including wget.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  8. This is kind of depressing by BFedRec · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I learned a LOT of my HTML and related skills from webmonkey. They did good work, were always big advocates of standards, and a great resource no matter what your level of web work was. I personally am going to miss them greatly... makes me feel old (granted a LOT of things do that lately, but.. that's not the point now is it?).

    CharlesP

    1. Re:This is kind of depressing by Bobulusman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Think you're bummed? This is the first time I've heard of it. After reading a few things, I wish I had known if it back when I was first fiddling with html and php. Would have made things go much more smoothly.

      --
      Cogito ergo sum in Slashdot.
  9. Howabout an archive by Space+cowboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Webmonkey was pretty good - I remember referring to it now and then... I know we can use the wayback machine / google (at least for a short while) etc. but if they're closing the doors, are they doing anything about the content ? Seems a shame to throw it away... Nothing mentioned on the site :-(

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
  10. Salute! by use_compress · · Score: 4, Funny

    On behalf of all companies too cheap to by up-to-date reference books, I salute you WebMonkey. You've given me the information that has prevented me from robbing Barnes and Nobel countless times.

    1. Re:Salute! by InfiniteZero · · Score: 1
      ... that has prevented me from robbing Barnes and Nobel countless times.
      You mean "being robbed by"? Of course, you might live in Soviet Russia, so I could be wrong.
    2. Re:Salute! by use_compress · · Score: 1

      The joke was that the company wouldn't pay for an $80 book so I'd have to steal it from Barnes and Nobel. Maybe it was too big of a step.

  11. Re:First sign that web based content is unprofitab by MikeCapone · · Score: 4, Informative

    We'll always have Arhive.org, at least, although I'm not sure if they just mean that they are stopping adding new content or taking the place offline (yeah, RTFA, I know).

  12. At first I thougth they meant Primate Programming by nitehawk214 · · Score: 3, Funny

    They are not talking about this company.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  13. An Alternative to Webmonkey by snookerdoodle · · Score: 5, Informative

    FWIW, I've found "W3Schools" a decent source of Pretty Good Tutorials for most things 'web (xml, xsl, css, etc.).

    http://www.w3schools.com/

    Some stuff seems IE centric - i.e.: some examples only work with IE6 and alternatives aren't suggested.

    Mark

    1. Re:An Alternative to Webmonkey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      because you lock out users who may not be using MSIE? and perhaps because the WWW is developed on standards that everyone but Microsoft follows?

    2. Re:An Alternative to Webmonkey by chrisspurgeon · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just want to say that if you like/liked Webmonkey, you may also like A List Apart.

    3. Re:An Alternative to Webmonkey by DarkSarin · · Score: 3, Informative

      You beat me to it....

      I agree that w3schools.com is a great place..that's usually where I head to find a quick reference when I need it. There are a number of things I don't like about the site, namely the lack of acknowledging that Mozilla even exists! However, overall, I think that they are a great site.

      I also use codewalkers for things php related (aside from the reference chm from php.net, which is AWESOME--anyone have one like that for html/javascript? I would love that).

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    4. Re:An Alternative to Webmonkey by RoadkillBunny · · Score: 1

      W3Schools is a good source for quick reference. I quite lokie their reference sheets for JavaScript and CSS, it makes finding thinks out quick,

      --
      Cheers,
      RoadkillBunny
    5. Re:An Alternative to Webmonkey by Millennium · · Score: 4, Interesting

      IE actually makes a damn fine platform if you develop specifically for it, why is that so wrong?

      That is what makes it so wrong; you have to develop specifically for it in order to make it do anything half-decent.

    6. Re:An Alternative to Webmonkey by jupo · · Score: 1

      anyone have one like that for html/javascript? I would love that

      I believe there's a JScript (not Javascript, but almost the same) CHM available somewhere on the MSDN site.

      --
      Me I'm a maker, mostly of axioms.
    7. Re:An Alternative to Webmonkey by DarkSarin · · Score: 1

      cool, thanks. Unfortunately, I am not savvy enough to know what's different, so am likely to be baffled when my progs don't function since I am writing Jscript.

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    8. Re:An Alternative to Webmonkey by jupo · · Score: 1

      JScript is Microsoft's implementation of Javascript. To the best of my knowledge it's the same, although I wouldn't be surprised to find some proprietary extension within JScript.

      --
      Me I'm a maker, mostly of axioms.
    9. Re:An Alternative to Webmonkey by gavri · · Score: 1

      IE actually makes a damn fine platform if you develop specifically for it

      Is there an IE reference (if not a standard) i can use to prepare pages to IE? What the fuck are you talking about?

  14. Noo! by Nicholas+Evans · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Rest well, WebMonkey. You taugh us all so much. Someone should e-mail them and ask if they can mirror the papers, so the legacy of the WebMonkey may live on forever.

  15. Downloadable archive? by sdo1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It would be real slick to be able to buy a downloadable archive of articles. I'd gladly cough up some bucks for that. Certainly a lot better (not to mention more environmentally friendly) than bopping down to your favorite ink and paper store to buy some overpriced tome on how to make web pages.

    How about it guys?

    -S

    --
    --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    1. Re:Downloadable archive? by Clsid · · Score: 1

      I second this motion. Webmonkey has been a great resource. Regards,

    2. Re:Downloadable archive? by k8er · · Score: 1

      I would pay for an overpriced deadtree version of Webmonkey. And the CD, for easy searching. I guess I can make my own for free (free for me, not my employer, heh). It would save me a lot of trouble if they'd just publish it or leave the site up as is, for reference, indefinitely.

  16. Not Completely Lost... [karma whore warning] by cleetus · · Score: 4, Informative

    Thanks to the wayback machine: http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.webmonkey. com has, for the most part, working links to a great deal of content, not to mention a nice view of the evolution of the graphic design proclivities.

    Hopefully the terralycos lawyers won't ask the wayback to pull the content.

    As an aside, I wonder, but am doubtful, about whether alternate licensing could be arranged for the content, perhaps some form of the Creative Commons License??

    cleetus

  17. For great design tutorials by JoeBaldwin · · Score: 5, Informative

    Index DOT HTML

    Index DOT CSS

    And the Complete Idiots Guide to HTML 4. All three of those resources helped me a great deal, plus looking at other sites source code to see how they were made. Some of WMs articles were OK, but it wasn't exactly overly helpful to me.

    1. Re:For great design tutorials by superyooser · · Score: 2, Informative
      Also, HTMLHelp.com is GREAT.

      The CSS guide is good, and the JavaScript FAQ is VERY comprehensive.

  18. Man, this really pisses me off by Melvin+Daniels · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I learned a lot of shit from webmonkey. I'm going to go as far as to say that they're doing a grave injustice to those who are just learning things like PHP by closing their doors. Hell, they're doing an injustice to the internet itself. It's built on knowledge, so I only hope their reference materials will be available in other formats.

  19. Re:You are insane, and greedy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Let's take it to the next level! Have all websites charge a toll before you can even access them!! If you don't have a credit card or have bad credit, no Internet for you!

    What are you some kind of communist? The Internet is about making profit not some crazy hippie idea of freely exchanging knowledge for the benefit of mankind. Did you use the useless network of networks called the Internet before it began to be commercialized around 1993? I doubt it. There was nothing there except research papers and the occasional MUD or usenet article. Not until sites like Amazon or eBay came along did the Internet become truly useful.

  20. It's a jewel of rarity by HungWeiLo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I haven't been on Webmonkey for ages. However, when I did, I remember it as a resource that was unusual in the way that it was able to pander to both the inexperienced and the experienced alike. It provided a decent and friendly place for individuals to start learning about web design/programming, while also serving as a viable reference for experienced web designers.

    --
    There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
  21. Re:You are insane, and greedy by MikeCapone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What are you some kind of communist? The Internet is about making profit not some crazy hippie idea of freely exchanging knowledge for the benefit of mankind. Did you use the useless network of networks called the Internet before it began to be commercialized around 1993? I doubt it. There was nothing there except research papers and the occasional MUD or usenet article. Not until sites like Amazon or eBay came along did the Internet become truly useful.

    I can't tell if you are joking or not, which is scary.

    I know you probably are, but I've also known people who think exactly like that.

    Heh.

  22. And with the death of Web Techniques magazine... by cliveholloway · · Score: 5, Interesting
    .. (a year or so ago) and The Perl Journal, there goes the rest of the teachers from my early coding days.

    At least SysAdmin (even if pretty clueless sometimes as an entity) and Linux magazine are still worth reading. Both contain enough code to keep the old brain cells churning.

    And it was so sad that Web Techniques turned into a load of old wank aimed at PHBs - that, and TJP were the only ones I happily paid for.

    Anyone else got any (reasonably priced) recommendations for geek mags that still keep the ol' brain cells working?

    .02

    cLive ;-)

    --
    -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
  23. .edu by Dachannien · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Since this is educational content, wouldn't it make sense to give/sell-on-the-cheap the content to a university somewhere to make it publicly available on the tons of available bandwidth most universities have? Some CS department somewhere could probably find student volunteers to maintain the site and update it with externally-submitted articles.

    Or is TerraLycos going to sit on it for the next 95 years "just in case"?

  24. all-in-one web "schools" by nuffle · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Seems like a lot of these web "schools" that try to present all (or at least the common) facets of a subject are having trouble. Their product was access to content, and I think they've gone the way of most access providers.

    When webmonkey (and others such as builder.com) started out, the web was such that it could be difficult to find resources about some topics. Thus, to have all these references collected in one place was pretty handy. Now, however, it's pretty easy to find resources (through google if nothing else) for just about anything, and you can get the resources from experts who are deeply involved with the topic (which may or may not be the case from one of the "schools").

    So, like all other companies that make their money by providing access (e.g. ISPs, cable carriers), these schools must shift to instead offering a service. Granted, webmonkey did have somewhat of a service: Lots of n00b friendly articles all written in a similar format. But apparently that wasn't enough.

    1. Re:all-in-one web "schools" by Edward+Harrison+Bran · · Score: 1

      I agree, I think google killed the monkey.

  25. www.Archive.org by MikeCapone · · Score: 3, Informative

    Archive.org is your friend!

  26. "[karma whore warning]" by MisanthropicProggram · · Score: 1
    Yes, but, it's a victimless crime! Sorry, I had to say it.

    Anyway, thanks for the link! :-)

    --

    There is no spoon or sig.

    1. Re:"[karma whore warning]" by geekoid · · Score: 1

      why do you think it's victimless?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  27. Lycos, RIP by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It seems as if TerraLycos is cleaning house and pulling the plug on unprofitable operations. Furthermore, it seems as if the Lycos search engine itself is one of those elements being downplayed.

    The current Lycos Home Page still has the search box, but they're talking about the "new Lycos" which is all about the non-search sites that are part of the Lycos Network. It seems as if Lycos has fallen into an also-ran status.

    Another classic search engine met the same fate a few years ago. When Infoseek was bought up by Disney, it was supposed to be the anchor of the Go Network. When that didn't work out, the core part of the Go Network shut down, leading to a Go Network homepage that does nothing but link to stories on the surviving Disney-owned sites and provide a Google-powered search box.

    When we see Lycos Search powered by Google, we'll know that the layoff spree is complete...

    1. Re:Lycos, RIP by self+assembled+struc · · Score: 4, Informative

      actually, the lay off spree is mostly complete.

      i worked for tripod/angelfire for 4 years as their senior web developer (even wrote an article for webmonkey on PHP photo galleries) and at the time they closed webmonkey, lycos laid off most of it's employees who worked for "non-core" business parts now.

      pretty much they (terra) are focusing on the money-making aspects (proudly tripod/angelfire seems to be one of these) and cutting the rest of the crap.

  28. Put the website on GNU? or.. by MisanthropicProggram · · Score: 3, Insightful
    somewhere else for access?

    A couple of you posted some links for archives and also metioned something about lawyers and licenses - as in it may be illegal to archive the site?. It would be nice if the Webmonkey folks gave their content to someone like GNU - officially so that their work would live on.

    --

    There is no spoon or sig.

  29. It's on the Internet Wayback Machine by eggboard · · Score: 1, Redundant

    You can just call up old articles by going to archive.org and entering the webmonkey.com URL. It's not efficient, but it seems to be there.

    --
    Freelance tech journalist for the Economist, MIT Technology Review, Macworld, and others
  30. It's sad by w3weasel · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's sad to see em go, but I used to be a competitor of theirs until I cashed out my site (heh heh heh.

    While they produced good articles, many of their articles were poorly written, or written far above the heads of their intended audience.

    Back in the boom days, some of the WebMonkey employees got fed up with the corporate policies that valued ad placement over good content, often writing articles specifically tailored to woo the advertisers... a practice that clearly continued beyond the boom days. Those rebels started e-volt.. which still exists and is a vastly superior service.

    Slashdot is successful because they provide content that their readers want... instead of what the advertisers want. A simple thing to understand unless you are a marketing professional.

    The average marketing pro thinks that the average 'customer' doesn't know what to (think||read||buy) unless a marketeer tells them.

    --

    Just as irrigation is the lifeblood of the Southwest, lifeblood is the soup of cannibals. -- Jack Handy

    1. Re:It's sad by primetyme · · Score: 1
      Back in the boom days, some of the WebMonkey employees got fed up with the corporate policies that valued ad placement over good content, often writing articles specifically tailored to woo the advertisers... a practice that clearly continued beyond the boom days. Those rebels started e-volt.. which still exists and is a vastly superior service.

      Actually, evolt wasn't started by webmonkey employees, but by members of the monkeyjunkies mailing list which webmonkey sponsored.. Read the history of that stuff at evolt

  31. Dammit! by jhealy1024 · · Score: 1

    I would echo the sentiment of wanting a backup of all that content.

    I just finished a small tutorial site this week for students at my high school. I remembered Webmonkey being a good resource for beginners (they even have a "kids" section), so I was psyched to see that it was still alive and kicking.

    Now, two days after I posted a link to it at the top of my page of "useful links", Webmonkey goes under.

    Anyone know of a good replacement tutorial site for the non- to semi-experienced webmaster?

    1. Re:Dammit! by BlankTim · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've used Dave's Site in the past. Doesn't have all the indepth stuff web monkey has, but still a pretty good how to site anyway, I think

      http://www.davesite.com

      --
      Just once, I'd like it if someone called me "Sir".
      Without adding, "You're creating a scene."
    2. Re:Dammit! by jathos · · Score: 4, Informative

      I run a site called Help2Go -- it's all tutorials and help for newbies, including a lot of web stuff.
      Best of all, it's all Creative Commons licensed, so the articles won't disappear like Webmonkey's soon will.

      http://www.help2go.com/

    3. Re:Dammit! by itbwtcl · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link.

  32. sad they're closing by Sicnarf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Back when I was a n00b, webmonkey was the place I went to learn HTML. They've always been a neat and friendly place.

    I was kind of assuming they'd close. In recent years they've been lacking on 'new' technologies, that's my impression. They were fairly strong years ago, when the web technologies were still overseeable und basic: html, javascript, cgi... and then nowadays it's just too much to cover for webmonkey.
    Thanks WM for offering your *free* articles, they've been a great recource over the years.

  33. Monty Pythonesque by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Isn't the site already dead?"

    "No, I'm not."

  34. Re:First sign that web based content is unprofitab by beakerMeep · · Score: 5, Insightful

    IMHO, while they were great for beginners and I loved going there, it seemed they stoped making any significant additions to their content years ago -- and this was part of their downfall. The wired article even mentions how they often reshuffled old content to make it seem new.

    --
    meep
  35. anyone who still says "n00b"... by jeduthun · · Score: 1

    ... still is one.
    -- me

  36. Other Sources? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hello, Since webmonkey is going down, what are some others resources that you guys find equally well? I know of Arson Network. What about you guys?

    1. Re:Other Sources? by Ricardo+Dias+Marques · · Score: 2, Informative
      Anonymous Coward wrote:
      Hello, Since webmonkey is going down, what are some others resources that you guys find equally well? I know of Arson Network. What about you guys?

      Besides W3Schools which has been mentioned in this Slashdot discussion sometimes, I like Dev Shed - http://www.devshed.com/. It has lots of nice tutorials/articles about Perl, PHP, Java (including JSP), Python, XML, MySQL, Flash, etc...

      There was also a very nice discussion in Slashdot, around two years ago, about online resources for Developers:

      Slashdot | Best Websites for Developers?
      http://ask.slashdot.org/askslashdot/02/07/20/01242 43.shtml?tid=156
    2. Re:Other Sources? by mnewton32 · · Score: 1

      The only one I've used for a few years now: the WWW Consortium.
      Although I did use Webmonkey a few times back in the mid-90's, they haven't really kept up with the latest standards and practices.

  37. Flamebait by $exyNerdie · · Score: 3, Funny


    This might seem like a bad joke but people getting laid off from webmonkey team might make a use of this:

    Webmonkey Tips

  38. Re:You are insane, and greedy by asscroft · · Score: 1

    of course I did. There was internet porn pre-1993.

    --
    because I have been enjoined by this Holy Office to abandon the false opinion which maintains that the Sun is the centre
  39. And I submited another site link on 15th! by antdude · · Score: 1

    2004-02-15 00:09:41 Whole Webmonkey staff laid off... (articles,quickies) (rejected) :(

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  40. Re:First sign that web based content is unprofitab by k2dbk · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The problem is not that web-based content is unprofitable, but that web-based content that is no longer of interest is unprofitable. As many others here have said, I too used to visit webmonkey a lot. But, I learned enough so that I didn't have to visit any more. Newer folks, at least in some cases, are relying heavily on "do everything for you" tools, so the site is not (or less) needed.

    RIP, Webmonkey.

  41. Re:And with the death of Web Techniques magazine.. by Moeses · · Score: 2, Informative

    Dr. Dobbs.

    It mostly focuses on semi to non-trivial topics that would be found useful by those working in industry. At the same time the articles are usually well written and easier to digest than the academic papers on the same topics.

    It's not exactly web-centric though.

  42. Re:And with the death of Web Techniques magazine.. by cliveholloway · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah. I forgot about DDJ. I found it useful for grounding in prinicles, but not relevant enough to my everyday work to justify a subscription once my free year had run out.

    cLive ;-)

    --
    -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
  43. Style sheet reference by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Informative

    Mulder's Style Sheet Tutorial on Webmonkey is one of my favorite style-sheet references.

  44. Article full of historic revisionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is not about knocking the webmonkey people.

    I just want to point out as an ex-Wired employee from back in the day, that this article is full of lies and crap about what was going on inside at the time.

    First off, webmonkey wasn't even remotely close to profitable and certainly wasn't the only profitable website wired had if I'm wrong and there was some random day where they eeked out a penny. Hotbot was Wired's cash cow for years. It's the only service that made enough money to pay for the hardware, bandwidth and staff to run it. Webmonkey? Maybe if you don't charge against the site for equipment, staff, bandwidth, and power, then uhm, sure, ok, they made a penny.

    Second, the idea that the webmonkey people were these oppressed geeks who wrote content in their spare time for free is a complete fabrication. The webmonkey people would sometimes lower themselves from their prima dona perch and help out the rest of us little people here and there but they had very little interaction with the rest of the company. And they sure as hell didn't write for free on the side. Webmonkey staff did nothing but write a few articles and sit on the couch in the play room right off their quad playing Tekken4 all day. I guess sometimes they would go out for a long triple mocha latte break after coming in late so they'd have the energy to leave early.

    Webmonkey, I love you guys but you weren't what Wired was about. It was just as well Lycos came in and killed the company. It was DOA anyway.

    The article is all propaganda.

  45. Re:You are insane, and greedy by Penguinshit · · Score: 4, Funny


    Ahhh.. the days of alt.pics.binary...

    cat titties1.uue titties2.uue titties3.uue > titties.uue | uudecode -o titties.jpg

  46. I really don't understand Slashdot sometimes... by tweder · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    Here are your recent submissions to Slashdot, and their status within the system:

    2004-02-17 23:02:43 Webmonkey, RIP: 1996 - 2004 (articles,news) (rejected)

    Summary:

    rejected (1)

  47. Re:Not Completely Lost... [karma whore warning] by advocate_one · · Score: 1

    well I was going to use wget to pull down a local copy of one of their snapshots but they've got a robots.txt file up there and wget respects it...

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  48. Linked XML Article by PingXao · · Score: 1

    Ha. In the linked article on XML on page 4, in section "Recipe For Disaster", there's a link to Lark, Tim Bray's XML Parser. When I click that link I get...

    Internal Server Error
    The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.


    I know the story isn't about XML per se, but by sheer coincidence I've been checking out XML recently so I thought I'd have a look at Lark. LOL. I hope this experience isn't a precursor of what I'm about to get into!

  49. The Wired article was written by Paul Boutin ... by Ricardo+Dias+Marques · · Score: 1

    ... and Paul Boutin is writing about a subject that he knows about, because he has written several good articles in Webmonkey

    I will miss Webmonkey too. I have learned many things about web building in the "early days" from the articles that have been posted there.

  50. And so it proves... by stateofmind · · Score: 3, Funny

    A thousand monkeys, typing on a thousand typewriters cannot keep a site running.

    Josh

  51. You could always use HTTrack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    And make a mirror copy for your own personal edification.

    -CorProphet, too lazy to log in.

    1. Re:You could always use HTTrack by mustangsal66 · · Score: 1

      or wget -r http://hotwired.lycos.com/webmonkey/

      --
      Why worry? Each of us is wearing an unlicensed "nucular" accelerator on his back.
      Sig changed for readability by G.W.
  52. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  53. Pity... by gordgekko · · Score: 1

    I learned a lot back in the day from Webmonkey. Well, as long as they don't pull the plug on Cocktail.

    --
    You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
  54. I know this sounds like a troll, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Thank God! Hopefully this means that people at the level this site catered to have realized that they are not needed in the computer industry and have moved on.

    I see a lot of Java programming for idiots sites that seem to be in their final death throws too. Thank God!

    It seems like the problem with the boom is that it attracted and ecouraged a lot of people who have no business being within 10 feet of a computer.

  55. Will they release it Open Content? by SnappingTurtle · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Back when I had high hopes that The Idocs Guide to HTML would be my path to riches, I thought of WebMonkey as my chief competitor. There was no way I could produce the quantity of documentation they could, but I hoped that my narrow focus on client-side web pages features and high quality would win me followers. In fact, it did win me followers, but not enough to become profitable.

    Well, when I finally gave up that dream, I released the Guide as Open Content. Anybody who wants to can publish the content as they see fit. AFAIK, nobody's made a fortune off of my work (which, I admit, would bug the crap out of me), but some people have been helped, which is pretty cool. I wonder if WebMonkey will consider doing the same thing.

    --
    I've found that my posts don't format quite right w/o a sig.
  56. ENTIRE SITE ARCHIVE - Bittorrent by eaglebtc · · Score: 4, Informative
    For the benefit of posterity, I archived the entire site this morning, including audio and video content. It is now available for you to download as a Bittorrent release, containing a single RAR file. The site was archived using HTTrack 3.3 and set to crawl to infinitely many levels, excluding external sites. You may unpack to an empty folder and browse it as if you were on the live site.

    Total size is 450MB, compressed down to 130MB using WinRAR 3.3.

    View info and download the torrent here.

    --
    Homestarrunner.net -- It's Dot Com!
  57. I think what you meant to say was: (more flags) by arete · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think what you meant to say was:
    wget -k -p -nh -E -nc -r -l 6 \
    hotwired.lycos.com/webmonkey

    convert links
    get prerequisites
    don't dns everything
    add a .html extension for your viewing
    don't clobber (download only once)
    recursive
    levels 6
    slashdot wouldn't let my lines be long enough, so a \ : )

    --
    Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
    1. Re:I think what you meant to say was: (more flags) by wfberg · · Score: 1

      Is there an advantage to those flags over

      wget -m -np http://hotwired.lycos.com/webmonkey/

      ?

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    2. Re:I think what you meant to say was: (more flags) by ciroknight · · Score: 1

      lol.. much more thinking than i did when i posted, but yes, this is what i meant..

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    3. Re:I think what you meant to say was: (more flags) by oobar · · Score: 1

      Here's the one I used:

      wget -nv --limit-rate=30k -w 10s --random-wait -nH --cut-dirs=1 -U "WebmonkeyArchiver/1.0" --convert-links --backup-converted --mirror --page-requisites --no-parent http://hotwired.lycos.com/webmonkey/index.html

      This does about the same thing, except it's a little nicer to the server (pausing randomly between 0 and 20 seconds between each request and limiting the max rate to 30kB/s.) It also enables timestamping, so any static content will retain its proper date/timestamp. This one places the root of the mirror in the current directory. Remove --cut-dirs=1 and it will create it in a subdirectory named webmonkey. I change the user-agent on the off chance that anybody reads their logs, they will know that someone was interested in saving their site for posterity. (And yes, I know there are shorter versions of many of those command line parameters.)

  58. Sorry - registration-free link here by eaglebtc · · Score: 1

    click to download (no reg required; right click, save as)

    --
    Homestarrunner.net -- It's Dot Com!
  59. Re:First sign that web based content is unprofitab by ameoba · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The trick is to make the advertising the content. Considering how 'unbiased and objective' the average game review is, I'm suprised the reviewers aren't getting paid by the game companies...

    --
    my sig's at the bottom of the page.
  60. We're not killing the site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Thanks to all for their kind comments about Webmonkey.

    Despite what you've read here, we're not shutting down the site - it's just going into maintenance mode. That means no more updates, but all the old content will remain.

    - Anonymous (TerraLycos) Coward

  61. wget -m ; -r l 6 = 54 MB by arete · · Score: 1

    in my version of wget -m is equiv to -r -l inf -N -nr (nr is an ftp only option)

    Mainly I didn't use it because -r -l 6 was the example, and I was tired. But, I'll admit your kung fu was better than mine, at least about -m.

    I still think you want
    wget -m -k -E -nh -nc hotwired.lycos.com/webmonkey
    mirror
    convert links to work locally
    add an html extension
    don't dns everything
    download only once

    with the options I originally listed (l 6) it was 54 MB. Now I'll make it spider again (but not download everything) 'cause I was stupid.

    --
    Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
  62. oh, my correction needs a correction by arete · · Score: 2, Informative

    I guess maybe in my tiredness then I remembered something I forgot in my ultra tiredness now:
    you can't -nc (not clobber old files) and timestamp -N

    So you do have to
    wget -r -l inf -k -E -nh -nc \ hotwired.lycos.com/webmonkey

    if you want it to work and not clobber. (meaning, you can do it repeatedly, and it figures it out.)

    And, I think the AC was looking for -k

    --
    Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
  63. Re:You are insane, and greedy by rthille · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, you're planning on uudecoding the error output from 'cat'? Wow, that's some wierd fetish you've got there...

    --
    Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/